Podcasts about stigchel

In the ‘information age' it's easy to find any number of resources and strong opinions. This makes it more crucial than ever that we're able to filter out the noise and access evidence and information that's of a high standard and digestible.As heated debates around tech continue – including its impact on attention spans and social media ‘addiction' – what does the research actually say, and how can we best access it?In this episode, Vicki is joined by researcher, popular science author and Professor of Cognitive Psychology at Utrecht University, Stefan Van der Stigchel to help answer these questions. They'll also be discussing why robust, accessible science can help minimise easy answers, flimsy claims and viewing things through a binary lens.  Talking points:What do we really mean when we talk of ‘attention' and ‘concentration' and just how do they differ?Why is the ‘Like' button – among other features – so problematic, and how could insights from cognitive psychology guide positive design choices?How should consumers go about separating the good popular science from the not-so-good popular science?Tech Shock is a Parent Zone production. Follow Parent Zone on social media for all the latest on our work on helping families to thrive in the digital age. Presented by Vicki Shotbolt. Tech Shock is produced and edited by Tim Malster.wwwTwitterFacebookInstagram

Links:#118: Hoe krijg je meer flow, productiviteit & werkgeluk? - Hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie Stefan van der Stigchel#168: Meer werkgeluk? Tips voor meer productiviteit en focus - Ondernemer en productiviteitsexpert Tim Metz#235: Hoe saboteer jij je eigen geluk? - Ernst-Jan PfauthSocials:

How to concentrate on your studies?I'm going to be talking to one of the world's leading authorities on how to manage your attention, and focus on what really matters to you, Professor Stefan van der Stigchel.We'll be walking through an entire day of concentration to show you step-by-step what you can do to help maximise your focus, including:“Attention rituals” – learning from Darwin and BeethovenHow to take effective breaksDesigning your environment for maximum concentrationIs it OK to listen to music?Stefan leads the AttentionLab at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, and is a regular face on national television and radio in the Netherlands, as well as speaking on prestigious conference stages around the world.Originally broadcast as Episode 60.You can find out more about Stefan's work at his personal website: https://www.stefanvanderstigchel.nl/ For a highly practical guide to maximising concentration, I highly recommend his book “Concentration: Staying Focused in Times Of Distraction”, available at https://geni.us/concentration*“How Attention Works”, a guide to the psychology of attention, is available at https://geni.us/attention** * *Hosted by William Wadsworth, memory psychologist, independent researcher and study skills coach. I help ambitious students to study smarter, not harder, so they can ace their exams with less work and less stress.Book 1:1 Coaching and let me help you find the shortcut to success in your exams this year: https://examstudyexpert.com/workwithme/[free] Download the Exam Success Cheat Sheet at https://examstudyexpert.com/freetips*As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchasesPodcast Edited by Benoît André.Questions? Comments? Requests? Or just want to say "thanks" - send me a text message (I read them all!).

Seg 1: Can daydreaming be productive? Guest: Dr. Stegan Van der Stigchel, Professor of Cognitive Psychology at Utrecht University and the Author of “Concentration: Staying Focused in Times of Distraction” Seg 2: Scotts Thoughts: Let Kids be Kids! Or don't says one kindergarten teacher Guest: Scott Shantz, CKNW Contributor Seg 3: View From Victoria: The Conservative line-up! We get a local look at the top political stories with the help of Vancouver Sun columnist Vaughn Palmer. Seg 4: How would a cyberattack impact Canada's agriculture sector? Guest: David Shipley, CEO of Beauceron Security Seg 5: How will new Temporary Foreign Worker Regulations affect employers?  Guest: Christopher Worswick, Economics Professor at Carleton University Seg 6: How funding cuts are leaving Surrey's unhoused population in limbo Guest: Jack O'Halloran, CEO of Surrey Urban Mission Seg 7: How are international student caps impacting universities? Guest: Gabriel Miller, President and CEO of Universities Canada Seg 8: How will BC's cellphone bans impact students' mental health? Guest: Jeff Hancock, Founding Director of the Stanford Social Media Lab and Author of the National Association of Science's Report on Social Media, Adolescence, and Well-Being Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Can daydreaming be productive? Guest: Dr. Stegan Van der Stigchel, Professor of Cognitive Psychology at Utrecht University and the Author of “Concentration: Staying Focused in Times of Distraction” Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In deze aflevering van de Tijdwinst Podcast neemt Björn Deusings je mee in een boeiend gesprek met professor dr. Stefan van der Stigchel, een expert op het gebied van aandacht en concentratie. Stefan deelt verrassend positief nieuws: ondanks de vele prikkels van onze moderne wereld, is ons brein nog steeds in staat om zich net zo goed te concentreren als 20 of 30 jaar geleden. Hij legt uit hoe evolutie een traag proces is en dat ons brein nog steeds dezelfde kracht heeft, mits we onze omgeving slim inrichten.Een van de hoogtepunten van deze aflevering is het inzicht dat we, door bewuste keuzes te maken over onze omgeving en gewoontes, onze aandacht en focus kunnen verbeteren. Stefan bespreekt ook hoe belangrijk het is om momenten van rust en dagdromen in te bouwen in je dagelijkse routine om je concentratievermogen te behouden.Wil je weten hoe je beter om kunt gaan met afleidingen zoals smartphones en wat je kunt doen om je concentratie te verbeteren? Dan is deze aflevering een must-listen! Laat je inspireren door Stefans praktische tips en zijn wetenschappelijk onderbouwde kijk op hoe we onze aandacht kunnen sturen in een wereld vol afleiding. Mis deze waardevolle inzichten niet!

'Het vliegtuig was altijd een goede plek om je brein rust te geven', dat zei cognitief psycholoog Stefan van der Stigchel tegen RTL Nieuws in een interview over de virale meme waarbij men op een lange vlucht geen enkele vorm van afleiding gebruikt; 'rawdogging'. Maar is een vliegtuig wel een plek waar je brein tot rust komt? En hoe goed is verveling voor je?

Nu de eindexamenscholieren gebogen ploeteren achter hun eenzame tafeltjes, vragen wij ons af: heeft TikTok onze spanningsboog werkelijk teruggebracht naar acht seconden? Hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie prof. dr. Stefan van der Stigchel ontkracht concentratiemythes. We kunnen ons nog nét zo goed concentreren als 30 jaar geleden. Maar alle tips zijn natuurlijk welkom.

Dit is de gehele uitzending van dr Kelder en Co met deze week Marloes Lemsom, politiek verslaggever van EenVandaag aan het roer. Jort Kelder is er volgende week weer.  In deze uitzending bellen we met Kamerlid Joost Sneller (D66) en besteden we nog meer aandacht aan Den Haag en wel de communicatie rondom de formatie met dr. Bert Bakker. Welk nut hebben al die tweets van Wilders en formatiecollega's? De jonge dr. Valérie van Hezik-Wester heeft de kosten/baten analyse onderzocht van de hulphond bij epilepsiepatiënten en tot slot legt prof. dr. Stefan van der Stigchel ons uit hoe we ons beter kunnen concentreren. 

'Beter leren kijken' is de titel van een nieuw populair wetenschappelijk boek over aandacht, van hoogleraar Stefan van der Stigchel. Een boek waar we in deze tijden ons voordeel mee kunnen doen. Zoals met het geven van ontregelende complimentjes aan je opponent, met mindfullness, met het trainen van aandacht, en met afstand naar je eigen gedachten kijken. Bekijk eens drie schilderijen in een tentoonstelling. Duizend woorden zeggen meer dan één plaatje. Aandacht maakt alles mooier, maar vergeet niet: het gaat uiteindelijk allemaal om de liefde. Veel plezier met de aflevering!ShownotesBeter leren kijken - Stefan van der StigchelFotostrip over podcastluisterenThe Shallows - Nicholas CarrCamerabeeldspecialisten van de politie winnen prijs (2021)Drugsinfo over paddo's en truffelsDe Fotodetective - columns van Hans Aarsman in De VolkskrantNitsEeuw van de Amateur hitplaylist op SpotifyZie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Er zijn elke dag wel momenten waar we ons moeten concentreren, maar toch lukt het niet altijd even goed. Wat is concentratie? Hoe kan je het langer vasthouden? En helpt het om naar muziek te luisteren of niet? Stefan van der Stigchel, gedragspsycholoog, vertelt deze aflevering wat ervoor zorgt dat je zo snel uit je concentratie bent, en geeft hierbij handige tips om het de volgende keer te voorkomen. 

Lukt het jou om stil te zijn? Durf je echt stil te zijn? Het is lastig, stilte in onze tijd. Altijd prikkels, altijd activiteit, steeds weer nieuwe informatie. Dit terwijl regelmatig stil zijn ons echt veel kan brengen. Maar wat dan? En hoe doe je dat dan? Over deze vragen gaat Joram deze aflevering in gesprek met hoogleraar psychologie Stefan van de Stigchel. Hij heeft veel geschreven over aandacht en concentratie. Volg Life Rules op Instagram (https://instagram.com/liferuleseo?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=) Doe mee met Life Rules in de Telegram-community (https://t.me/+PQkc-bkv2Yk2NWQ0)

Je hoort het steeds vaker om je heen: mensen die zeggen overprikkeld te zijn. Op sommige universiteiten worden zelfs al prikkelvrije ruimtes ingericht, op scholen gaat de mobiele telefoon in de ban en zitten kinderen soms met geluidsdempers op hun oren. Kunnen we al die moderne prikkels niet meer aan? En hoe vinden we de rust en controle terug? Met hoogleraar en concentratie-expert Stefan van der Stigchel en Volkskrant-journalist Anna van den Breemer.  Presentatie: Tonie MuddeMontage: Julia van AlemEindredactie: Corinne van Duin Onze journalistiek steunen? Dat kan het beste met een (digitaal) abonnement op de Volkskrant, daarvoor ga je naar  www.volkskrant.nl/podcastactieSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

De telefoon. Een voorwerp waar we in het dagelijks leven bijna niet zonder kunnen: je werk, mooie berichten, nieuws, je vrienden, alles zit in dat kleine apparaatje. Maar het is vooral ook een bron vol met afleidingen. De apps en meldingen zorgen er keer op keer voor dat we uit onze concentratie worden gehaald en er dan een hele tijd uit zijn. Hoe ga je om met de mentale jeuk van berichtjes? Hoe zorg je ervoor dat je niet steeds ongewild een uur op je telefoon zit? En wat doet dat scrollen eigenlijk met je brein? Stefan van der Stigchel, gedragspsycholoog, vertelt in deze aflevering hoe je met die telefoon vol prikkels kunt omgaan. Ben je al lid van Arie's wekelijkse nieuwsbrief? Abonneer je hier! Bestel je eigen AG1 en ontvang een jaarvoorraad vitamine D en 5 reisverpakkingen AG1. Wil je adverteren in deze podcast? Mail dan naar adverteren@de-stroom.nl

Gaat de tijd sneller als je ouder wordt? En hoe maak je het wachten in de wachtkamer van de tandarts een leuke bezigheid? Pieter en Floris buigen zich deze aflevering over hoe tijdsbesef en aandacht wordt geregeld in de hersenen. Dat doen ze in een gesprek met niemand minder dan prof. dr. Hedderik van Rijn en prof. dr. Stefan van der Stigchel.  Hedderik onderzoekt de invloed van tijd op informatieverwerking in de hersenen aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Stefan is professor en hoofdonderzoeker aan de Universiteit Utrecht, en is auteur van onder andere ‘Zo werkt aandacht' en ‘Concentratie'.

Stefan Van der Stigchel discusses how we filter out what is irrelevant so we can focus on what we need to know. We are surrounded by a world rich with visual information, but we pay attention to very little of it, filtering out what is irrelevant so we can focus on what we think we need to know. Advertisers, web designers, and other "attention architects" try hard to get our attention, promoting products with videos on huge outdoor screens, adding flashing banners to websites, and developing computer programs with blinking icons that tempt us to click. Often they succeed in distracting us from what we are supposed to be doing. In How Attention Works, Stefan Van der Stigchel explains the process of attention and what the implications are for our everyday lives. The visual attention system is efficient, Van der Stigchel writes, because it doesn't waste energy processing every scrap of visual data it receives; it gathers only relevant information. We focus on one snippet of information and assume that everything else is stable and consistent with past experience; that's why most people miss even the most glaring continuity errors in films. If an object doesn't meet our expectations, chances are we won't see it. Van der Stigchel makes his case with examples from real life, explaining, among other things, the limitations of color perception (and why fire trucks shouldn't be red); the importance of location (security guards and radiologists, for example, have to know where to look); the attention-getting properties of faces and spiders; what we can learn from someone else's eye movements; why we see what we expect to see (magicians take advantage of this); and visual neglect and unattended information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/communications

Stefan Van der Stigchel discusses how we filter out what is irrelevant so we can focus on what we need to know. We are surrounded by a world rich with visual information, but we pay attention to very little of it, filtering out what is irrelevant so we can focus on what we think we need to know. Advertisers, web designers, and other "attention architects" try hard to get our attention, promoting products with videos on huge outdoor screens, adding flashing banners to websites, and developing computer programs with blinking icons that tempt us to click. Often they succeed in distracting us from what we are supposed to be doing. In How Attention Works, Stefan Van der Stigchel explains the process of attention and what the implications are for our everyday lives. The visual attention system is efficient, Van der Stigchel writes, because it doesn't waste energy processing every scrap of visual data it receives; it gathers only relevant information. We focus on one snippet of information and assume that everything else is stable and consistent with past experience; that's why most people miss even the most glaring continuity errors in films. If an object doesn't meet our expectations, chances are we won't see it. Van der Stigchel makes his case with examples from real life, explaining, among other things, the limitations of color perception (and why fire trucks shouldn't be red); the importance of location (security guards and radiologists, for example, have to know where to look); the attention-getting properties of faces and spiders; what we can learn from someone else's eye movements; why we see what we expect to see (magicians take advantage of this); and visual neglect and unattended information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/science-technology-and-society

Stefan Van der Stigchel discusses how we filter out what is irrelevant so we can focus on what we need to know. We are surrounded by a world rich with visual information, but we pay attention to very little of it, filtering out what is irrelevant so we can focus on what we think we need to know. Advertisers, web designers, and other "attention architects" try hard to get our attention, promoting products with videos on huge outdoor screens, adding flashing banners to websites, and developing computer programs with blinking icons that tempt us to click. Often they succeed in distracting us from what we are supposed to be doing. In How Attention Works, Stefan Van der Stigchel explains the process of attention and what the implications are for our everyday lives. The visual attention system is efficient, Van der Stigchel writes, because it doesn't waste energy processing every scrap of visual data it receives; it gathers only relevant information. We focus on one snippet of information and assume that everything else is stable and consistent with past experience; that's why most people miss even the most glaring continuity errors in films. If an object doesn't meet our expectations, chances are we won't see it. Van der Stigchel makes his case with examples from real life, explaining, among other things, the limitations of color perception (and why fire trucks shouldn't be red); the importance of location (security guards and radiologists, for example, have to know where to look); the attention-getting properties of faces and spiders; what we can learn from someone else's eye movements; why we see what we expect to see (magicians take advantage of this); and visual neglect and unattended information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/psychology

Vuurtjes opstoken en brandjes blussen, de politiek lijkt er gericht op en de pers rolt gretig mee. Dat trekt nu eenmaal de aandacht. Terwijl er een bubbel-oorlog woedt, vragen wij ons af: piept en kraakt de democratie? Dr Kelder presenteert: de nazit van de uitzending van 18 maart, met politicoloog dr. Josje den Ridder en psycholoog prof. dr. Stefan van der Stigchel.

In een wereld die steeds digitaler wordt, groeit zowel de economische áls de maatschappelijke positie van Big Techbedrijven gestaag door. Hoe kijkt een bedrijf als Google zelf naar hun rol in de maatschappij en de verantwoordelijkheden die daarbij komen kijken? Te gast is Martijn Bertisen, directeur van Google Nederland. Luister om 10:00 LIVE naar BNR's Big Five Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Macht van het scherm - Felienne Hermans, hoogleraar didactiek van de informatica aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Hans Schnitz­ler, filosoof en schrijver - Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht - Kees Verhoeven, voormalig D66-Kamerlid en oprichter van Bureau Digitale Zaken - Martijn Bertisen, directeur Google NederlandSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Kunt u zich nog concentreren voor langer dan anderhalve minuut? Dan graag héél even uw onverdeelde aandacht voor prof. dr. Stefan van der Stigchel. Het mocht dan Boekenweek zijn, het laatste bastion van het geschreven woord, velen zullen er geen letter méér op gelezen hebben. Het is veel gevraagd van een spanningsboog die met de komst van TikTok niets meer gewend is. Maar er is hoop: dr Kelder schrijft u het recept (en enkele boeken) graag voor.

De politiek ontspoort, grote techbedrijven hebben te veel macht en de overheid moet de data van burgers beter beschermen. Digitalisering doet de democratie geweld aan, vindt voormalig Tweede Kamerlid Kees Verhoeven. Hoe is het tij te keren? Luister om 10:00 LIVE naar BNR's Big Five Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Macht van het scherm - Felienne Hermans, hoogleraar didactiek van de informatica aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Hans Schnitz­ler, filosoof en schrijver - Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht - Kees Verhoeven, voormalig D66-Kamerlid en oprichter van Bureau Digitale Zaken - Martijn Bertisen, directeur Google NederlandSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hoeveel macht heeft het scherm nou écht over onze aandacht? En wat zijn de gevolgen van al die digitale impressies voor ons concentratievermogen? Te gast is Stefan van der Stigchel, Hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht  Luister om 10:00 LIVE naar BNR's Big Five Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Macht van het scherm - Felienne Hermans, hoogleraar didactiek van de informatica aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Hans Schnitz­ler, filosoof en schrijver - Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht - Kees Verhoeven, voormalig D66-Kamerlid en oprichter van Bureau Digitale Zaken - Martijn Bertisen, directeur Google NederlandSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

De EU probeert de macht van grote techbedrijven in te dammen en ook wij moeten zelf heel hard aan de slag met data-minimalisatie. Dat zegt techfilosoof en schrijver Hans Schnitzler. Luister om 10:00 LIVE naar BNR's Big Five Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Macht van het scherm - Felienne Hermans, hoogleraar didactiek van de informatica aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Hans Schnitz­ler, filosoof en schrijver - Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht - Kees Verhoeven, voormalig D66-Kamerlid en oprichter van Bureau Digitale Zaken - Martijn Bertisen, directeur Google NederlandSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Vijftien jaar geleden zag iedereen dezelfde websites. Inmiddels klik je één keer op een link en krijg je een specifieke versie van het internet te zien. Hoe is dat zo gekomen? Te gast is Felienne Hermans, hoogleraar didactiek van de informatica aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Luister om 10:00 LIVE naar BNR's Big Five Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Macht van het scherm - Felienne Hermans, hoogleraar didactiek van de informatica aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - Hans Schnitz­ler, Filosoof en schrijver - Stefan van der Stigchel, Hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht - Kees Verhoeven, voormalig D66-Kamerlid en oprichter van Bureau Digitale Zaken - Martijn Bertisen, Directeur Google Nederland  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Wat valt er te proteststemmen in een land waar kinderen armoede van hun ouders kunnen ontstijgen en dat het goed doet in de gelukslijstje? Dr. Josje den Ridder geeft antwoord. En eindelijk een goed verhaal over concentratie, van dr. Stefan van der Stigchel. Over dopamineklets en onze immer slinkende spanningsbogen. Dr. Suzanne van der Meulen onderzocht in haar proefschrift de publieke waterkwaliteit en weet of u een duik in de grachtengordel kunt nemen.

Wat valt er te proteststemmen in een land waar kinderen armoede van hun ouders kunnen ontstijgen en dat het goed doet in de gelukslijstje? Dr. Josje den Ridder geeft antwoord. En eindelijk een goed verhaal over concentratie, van dr. Stefan van der Stigchel. Over dopamineklets en onze immer slinkende spanningsbogen. Dr. Suzanne van der Meulen onderzocht in haar proefschrift de publieke waterkwaliteit en weet of u een duik in de grachtengordel kunt nemen.

Oscar Trimboli: The sophisticated and paradoxical power of deciding if and when to listen. G'day, It's Oscar, and today we have a question from a Deep Listening Ambassador in Japan. Shaney: Hi Oscar. This is Shaney from Tsukuba Ibaraki, Japan, and my question is about listening as a leader. Do you have any suggestions about how to continue to listen deeply as a leader when you tend to receive comments, suggestions, and ideas from so many people all day every day. It can be quite surprising for people who are new to leadership positions to realize just how much time leaders spend listening to people and how tiring it can be when the fourth or the eighth person in a day asks you if you have a minute and then launches into a rant or a criticism or a suggestion of how to improve something. Listening is so very important to leadership, but it can also be really, really hard to listen to comments and suggestions all day long, especially because you feel a personal obligation to fix the problems that people bring to you.   Oscar Trimboli: Thanks, Shaney. This is a wonderful paradoxical and universal question independent of organization, culture, location, or country. My favorite kind of question, if you like Shaney, have a question about listening in the workplace, email  podcast@oscartrimboli.com This question, it's a question about choice and timing. It could be about when to listen and when NOT to listen. It's also a question about attention and your listening batteries. When it comes to your listening batteries throughout the day, you need to check and notice what's your battery level right now is a green, yellow, red. You need to check what color your listening battery is before you start listening. Something I learned from James Clear in episode 67, advice is often context dependent. Shaney, I'm going to avoid giving you advice here as James points out questions can help you navigate beyond the context. Let's listen to how James explained it.   James Clear: And one of the women that as a reader of mine and I talked to as I was working on the book, she lost a lot of weight, and she had this really great question that she carried around with her. Questions are often more useful than advice in the sense that advice is very context dependent. It's like, "Oh, it works in this situation, but what if you find yourself in a different situation now it doesn't apply as much." And the question that she carried around with her was what would a healthy person do? And so she could go from context to context and sort of have that question to reinforce the identity. That's actually in many ways, more useful than having a good workout program or a good diet plan because that you can only do once. But no matter where you're at, you can ask what would a healthy person do?   Oscar Trimboli: Shaney, I'll share with you four types of questions, four categories of questions for groups of questions that have helped my other clients. It's important to understand that the question you are asked is very, very common and it's amplified when you're in a leadership role. The categories of the four questions are what, when, how, and who. Let's start with WHAT. What would make this a good conversation? What would make this a great conversation? What would make this an effective conversation? What do you want from this conversation? In the book, how to listen, we cover off the use of this question throughout the book, creating a listening compass for you and the other participants. It's a great way to hack the conversation to make it much shorter for you and for them. The reason we want to ask a WHAT question right up front is you want to understand the context for them and for you, because shortly I'm going to invite you to make a choice about when you should think about answering this question, Shaney. So let's move to WHEN Here's a group of questions to think about. When is the best time to discuss this with you? When is the best time for us to discuss it? And finally, although I'd love to discuss it right now and listen to you, I don't think I can effectively listen to what you want to achieve in this conversation. Can we discuss this at another time? Professor Cal Newport is very particular about the value he places on his time. And rather than dealing with each individual and their specific question, request feedback experiment, he encourages each of his students or peers to attend a regular weekly meeting. In that meeting, everybody can bring their request or their question along. He does this for three very specific reasons. 1. he has a defined time and more importantly, a defined process for dealing with these random rants, as you call them, Shaney, or the feedback or any of the other issues he's dealing with. He's placing them in space, time, and context where he can arrive with his listening batteries fully charged. 2. he creates the environment where others can participate. Others can listen to the range of questions that Professor Newport is asked, as well as listening to the way he thinks about answering these questions. 3. he thinks about his time being multiplied in a group context with many of the participants either self-solving when hearing others' answers, resolving their question with other participants, helping them in doing so. Newport is building a culture of mutual support. He's making himself independent of the process, and ultimately Newport explains how he would approach thinking about the issue rather than his recommendation to the other person or group about how to solve the issue. Shaney, one of the things I invite you to think about is if you feel like you need to fix, give them a simple framework to think it through rather than giving them an answer. In adopting this approach, Newport creates a sustainable listening process ensuring his listening batteries are fully charged before arriving at this regular meeting, whether it's face to face or virtual. Shaney, back in episode 61, when I discussed this issue with Professor Stefan Van der Stigchel from Utrecht University, he's written multiple books on the importance of attention. He reflected on his more direct approach when students or peers approached him with a question.   Stefan Van der Stigchel: People come into my room when I'm on my work quite often to ask me questions or to talk about a certain experiment. And of course, when you're in your working environment, they're things are not always positive, right? What I've tried to learn is that communicate to, if people enter my room to say, this is not the right moment. I cannot listen to you. My mind is not open, my working memory is full, I'm worrying about something. And I've started to realize that people actually appreciate that if you say it in the past, there are too many occasions in which I was claiming to be listening and they ask me questions and I just noticed my mind is somewhere else. My mind wandering about the meeting before, and then I simply have to admit that I have no idea what they're talking about. And that's quite embarrassing and it's frustrating what I've learned from my peers that there are people who can acknowledge that they can acknowledge if somebody walks into the room, ask them a scientific question, please, not now. It's good to have a culture and in a work environment when you can admit that although I might be looking at you right now, I am honestly not listening. And this is not due to you. You're very interesting and you're probably a very interesting question. But what's happening to me right now is that my mind is wandering, and I'm not ready to receive your information. Again, my environment, people have to learn that's a possibility and that they can come back at a later time, but it's not something personal. Previously what happened to me is that I was sort of almost afraid to tell the other person because I was afraid that they were going to take it personally, right? That you are not interesting to me. And I try to make sure that it's not about them, but it's simply that the current situation is for some reason not appropriate.   Oscar Trimboli: Shaney, when thinking about the WHEN of listening, the most generous thing, the most sustainable outcome for you, and the person asking the question, the rant, the person wanting to bounce something off you. The most generous thing I think you can do is NOT listen. When you're listening, batteries are drained when they're moving from yellow to red or from red to black. It doesn't help them, you or the organization you lead by listening, transactionally, listening superficially, bouncing between level one and maybe level two, listening for symptoms rather than moving between level two, three and four and listening for systemic implications. Listening is a skill, it's a practice, it's a process and ultimately a way to impact systemic change in a sustainable way for the organization you'd lead. As I mentioned earlier on, Shaney, the question you pose is a universal leadership issue. It's a common question my clients ask me. This is an interview with Katie Burke, who is the leader of people and culture at HubSpot, an organization where she's responsible for 6,000 employees globally. In this interview with Shane Metcalf, Chief People Officer for 15Five an employee engagement software company from June 21, it was called Reviving the Art of Listening with HubSpot's Katie Burke. Listen carefully as Katie describes how she manages her energy to make a bigger impact with her listening. Notice how she conserves her listening batteries and shares the difficult and draining parts of listening with other leaders and members of her team.   Katie Burke: In my own journey on this front, I think a few things that have really worked for me, I got some really tough feedback my first few years as CPO that I was distracted and I was, and it was because I was trying to be everywhere at once and be all things to all people. And so the biggest tack for listening that I know is I say NO to almost everything, including I don't get a ton of energy from doing one-on-one coffee chats with people. I've just learned over the years. I feel like I'm saying the same thing over and over again. And also just I got emotionally worn down. It was just tiring. And so I don't do our new hire welcome as a group anymore because it just felt a little tiring. And then I don't do a ton of coffee chats both internally and externally. And the reason I don't do that is not because I don't enjoy doing that occasionally, it was because it was starting to really interfere with my ability to listen and be a great leader for my team. Great listening actually starts with being intentional around what you say no to. So you can be present for the people in your org and be the best leader possible when you're there.   Shane Metcalf: It's so interesting around our own energy management, our own state is going to dictate are we able to listen? Especially HR is often the punching bag in an organization because HR people, we are the recipient of so much feedback, positive and negative, humans get flooded with emotion. When we're in a fight or flight state, there's a physiological change that happens in our ears and we actually stop listening. What I'm hearing from you is you needed to set boundaries and create the experience for you to do work that energizes you so that you could actually listen.   Katie Burke: I personally think there should be much more discussion for CHROs, for HR business partners, for anyone who bears the emotional breadth of an organization, of talking about how I think people talk a lot about self-care and break and rest. Those are all great, but don't get to the core fix. And I think what I had to learn is I have to actually just be really disciplined around my schedule because it creates space for me to do the things that I know make me a better listener. And for me, that's getting outside once a day, getting my run in the morning. I'm a much better person, leader, manager, you name it. If I get outside and get a workout in. And then the other thing is just being intentional around what gives you energy and being honest about that. I grew up very much a people pleaser. It was a really hard habit for me to break, and I don't think people love that. It's my habit. I've had to get really comfortable with the fact that it is the only thing that allows me to keep listening, to HubSpotters and being a good leader for my team.   Shane Metcalf: It's a worthwhile process for all of us to check in. Am I actually in a state where I can listen? Because I've gone through this, I've gone through periods where I'm like, I don't want to hear any more feedback. I'm sick of it. People just complain. We're never going to make people happy. I'm in the pretty negative state and then I have no receptivity to actually listen to what my people are saying and anything they say will probably be viewed through that lens of I don't want to hear it.   Katie Burke: Agreed. I've also just had to say no. There are times when I think taking a meeting does you want to listen to someone. If you're not, there is actually a bad use of both of your time. And so one of the things I've said to some people is. Hey, I'm actually not in a great spot to really have the conversation I think we need to have, and so I need to wait until tomorrow. I need to wait until I'm in a better spot or I think someone on my team is better suited to have this conversation given that they can really understand and empathize where you are because I think when people are in an acute state, they need someone to listen to them a 100%. I need to be honest if you're not there. The other thing is just that's where I come back to you're not going to make everyone happy. I used to hold myself to a really high bar. I wanted to think that everyone who, if we had a tough meeting to listen to people that everyone would leave saying like, "Wow, our people operations team is great." What I've started doing is now leaving those meetings where the goal is just to make people feel heard, not to make them feel better, just to make them feel heard. That takes some of the pressure off because the other thing is I'm a bias for action person. I tend to lean into how do we solve things? It takes the pressure off to solve it because my only job there is to be present to what they're feeling.   Oscar Trimboli: Shaney, the most impactful, sustainable, and generous listening could be when you choose NOT to listen in that moment, reacting and trying to fight the urge to fix, kind of showing up like the shrewd listening villa from our listening quiz, becoming conscious that your ego wants to fix, solve, and answer. It's great in the moment, but it doesn't drive systemic change. Create a phrase that works for you. The four A's at this point, ask, acknowledge, assess, and agree. Ask what would make this a good conversation or outcome? Acknowledge their point and issue or even question, or problem Assess when is the most effective time for a sustainable, impactful discussion? Agree, when or who to meet with to progress it. Shaney, we've covered the what and when. I just want to quickly talk to you about how and who. These additional categories of questions are really useful when the conversation happens. First, let's talk about HOW. How would you like to discuss it? How will we allocate our time exploring the past and the future? How long have you been thinking about this? How will we know if we've made progress? Let's move on to the WHO Who else noticed this issue originally? Who else does it impact? and Who needs to be involved in discussing or resolving it? Shaney, to make this very practical, very pragmatic, and actionable for you. My go-to question for the random rant, the curious question, or the feisty feedback, What would make this a good conversation for you? They will either tell you they want to have a rant with no outcome, or they may request you to be their thinking partner, or more likely than not, they'll try and put the problem-solving monkey back on your back. At this point, Shaney, notice the pattern in their questions three or more of the same kinds of questions. You're probably dealing with a systemic issue, and I speculate you probably can't solve it alone, or at least in the pair that are discussing the problem. Define an allocated time on a regular basis for you to triage all of these kinds of discussions into one context where your listening batteries are fully charged. As Katie mentioned, sometimes people just want you to hear them out rather than fix, especially when you don't have the listening batteries available to listen and fix in the moment. Finally, every conversation doesn't and can't be a process of deep listening. You can't always deeply listen. You need to be flexible and adjust accordingly in the situation. Sometimes just being present and allowing them to be heard will be enough. This makes your listening light and easy and it doesn't drain your listening batteries. A quick reminder, your role as a listener is not to comprehend everything the speaker says. It's your role to help the speaker better understand what and how they're thinking about an issue and ultimately help them to understand what they mean and where they want to progress. Shaney, thanks for the brilliant question. G'day. It's Oscar. This podcast episode is an experiment in a few parts and one of the things that's happened in between the time Shaney sent me the question, I recorded the responses that I sent it back to her in draft format to ask her for a few reflections. I gave her four questions to ponder. Shaney listened to what I sent her and shared it with her team, and I've asked her to reflect on four questions. Also, in between that time I have been completely flat on my back with a virus for seven days, so my voice is probably sounding a little different. What you'll hear next is Shaney reflecting back on the questions I posed to her. Let me know what was most helpful in what I've explored.   Shaney: I don't need to fix, solve, or answer anything when I'm listening to people. I just need to make sure that people are heard. When I played it for my team, they really reacted positively to the concept of a listening battery and also to the idea that not every conversation can or should be a process of deep listening.   Oscar Trimboli: Which one of these will you experiment with? Which one will be easy for you to implement? and What will be sustainable in the context in which you leave?   Shaney: I will definitely be trying to remember not to go into conversations with the intent to solve anything. This will be very hard for me as I have a lifetime habit of doing just that. I think that this is very important and as a leader, I really need to try to help the people that I'm talking to find ways to solve their own problems instead of trying to solve them for them. People take more ownership of decisions and outcomes when they come to their own conclusions, so I'd like to learn more about how I can suppress my urge to fix things. I need to do a better job of listening to ensure that my colleagues are heard and that they're supported in finding solutions that work for themselves in their own context rather than just me giving advice to them that may or may not work because I may or may not have fully accounted for the context that they're working in. In my team, we talked about how saying no can be quite difficult in our context as one of our goals is to be approachable and available to the students, parents, and staff members at our school. We talked about how we can conserve our batteries by acknowledging the person and their query and actively deciding whether or not this is the best time to have the conversation. We think that can work well with students and parents, but we're still not sure how to say no in a compassionate way that doesn't make our colleagues feel like they're being ignored or rebuffed when they approach us to talk about something that may be, for example, personal or professional. The when is difficult for us. It's pretty difficult for some of my colleagues to have control over when their conversations happen with their colleagues. They can set appointments for students and parents, but conversations with colleagues happen all the time. Two of the colleagues that were in the meeting with me have an office that is in a rather public area, so people walk by and talk to them all the time, and that can be really tiring and they can often get involved in conversations about both professional topics and personal topics, and they mentioned that it can be tiring to switch back and forth between the professional and the personal conversations. We decided as a team that we might experiment with having a set time in our meetings where our colleagues can bring up the professional issues that have come up through the week. This could be one way to say, not now kindly, at least when the issue is professional, by acknowledging the issue and saying, let's talk about it at the next meeting. What would be easy to implement? It would be relatively easy to implement the idea of having a pre-conversation with the person we're speaking with to determine what would make the conversation a success. It could even happen during or after the conversation, or it could be something that we try to remember to ask ourselves as we enter into various conversations throughout the day, And finally, what would be sustainable in the context that we lead? In my context, it's sustainable for me to become more conscious of how my ego is reacting to whatever is being said and to remember to have an awareness of both the state of my listening batteries and that I can choose not to listen deeply at that moment if that is the more considerate and humane response because my batteries are particularly low at that moment. Oscar, I can't believe you made an entire podcast for me and my question. I loved every second of it. I sincerely feel that all of it was useful and productive. You really listened to my question. You heard it and you understood the heart behind the words.   Oscar Trimboli: If you like Shaney, have a question about listening in the workplace or you'd like me to pose a few questions or reflections or framework rather than just answering your question, podcast@oscartrimboli.com. And if you don't have a question yet, you learn something from the question Shaney posed today and possibly hers or her team's reflection, email me podcast@oscartrimboli.com Let me know what was useful in this episode, the format, the interaction, the questions rather than the answers, and what possibly is transferable and useful into your workplace. I'm Oscar Trimboli and along with the Deep Listening Ambassadors, we're on a quest to create a 100 million Deep Listeners in the workplace and you've given us the greatest gift of all. You've listened to us. Thanks for listening. Shaney : Hi Oscar, it's taken a while, but over the past couple of days, I've been able to catch myself in conversations and work on directing my listening The first step -- self-awareness is so hard, but so crucial as you can't take any other steps until you're actually aware that you're in a situation where you need to test out your new conscious listening paradigm. In at least three conversations over the past two days, I've been able to get to that level of self-awareness that allows me to pause and remind myself not to try to solve any problems for anyone else, and instead try to ask myself what would make this conversation a success. This is revolutionary, the whole flavor of conversations changes. I'm able to relax and actually listen to the person if I don't have to feel the pressure of solving anything. Conversations are also shorter because people feel heard more quickly and are okay with moving on, so I'm ever so grateful to you and your podcast for opening up my eyes to this whole new world.

Als jij internet gebruikt, wordt er data over jou verzameld door tech-bedrijven. Dat weten we intussen wel. Waar die data heen gaan of wat er mee gebeurt, weten we vaak niet. Wat moet je doen om je geheimen niet met de grote tech-bedrijven te delen? Hoe verspreid je zo min mogelijk data over jezelf? Moet je dan digitaal geheelonthouder worden? Hoe doe je dat in een digitaal tijdperk? En wat doet het met je?   Verslaggever Rick Uilenbroek spreekt met wetenschappers Ina Koning en Stefan van der Stigchel en ging zelf een week lang offline.   Presentatie: Petra Grijzen, redactie en montage: Rick Uilenbroek, eindredactie: Gerda Bosman

Het was de afgelopen jaren dé hype in de kantoortuin: de flexplek. Maar heeft het wel een positieve invloed op ons werk? Voor een antwoord belden we met Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar Cognitieve Pyschologie aan de Universiteit van Utrecht.

Link to bioRxiv paper: http://biorxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.09.01.506184v1?rss=1 Authors: Chota, S., Gayet, S., Kenemans, J. L., Olivers, C. N. L., Van der Stigchel, S. Abstract: Our visual environment is relatively stable over time and an optimized visual system ought to capitalize on this by not devoting any representational resources to objects that are still present. Subjective experience, however, suggests that externally available (i.e., perceived) information is more strongly represented in neural signals than memorized information. To distinguish between these possibilities, we use EEG multivariate pattern analysis to quantify the strength of representation of task-relevant features (color or spatial frequency) in anticipation of a change-detection task. Perceptual availability was manipulated between experimental blocks by either keeping the stimulus on the screen during a two second delay period (perception) or removing it shortly after its initial presentation for the same time period (memory). We find that task-relevant (i.e., attended) memorized features are more strongly represented than irrelevant features. More importantly, we find significantly weaker representations for available (perceived and attended) features than for unavailable (memorized and attended) features. Contrary to what subjective experience suggests, our findings demonstrate that vividly perceived and attended stimuli elicit weaker neural representations (in terms of detectable multivariate information) than stimuli maintained in visual working memory. We hypothesize that an efficient visual system spends little of its limited resources on the internal representation of information that is externally available anyway. Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info Podcast created by PaperPlayer

In deze aflevering onderzoeken we samen met Stefan van der Stigchel waarom we zo snel afgeleid zijn. Wat is de invloed van alle informatiebronnen om ons heen en kunnen we eigenlijk wel multitasken?Zie het privacybeleid op https://art19.com/privacy en de privacyverklaring van Californië op https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Hoe verhoog je de productiviteit, focus en flow? Wat zijn de beste tips en tricks? We vragen dit aan onderzoeker Stefan van der Stigchel. Stefan is hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie aan de afdeling Experimentele Psychologie van de Universiteit Utrecht. Ook is hij hoofdonderzoeker van de onderzoeksgroep AttentionLab en schrijver van meerdere boeken over productiviteit en aandacht. 

Door pushberichten, emails en appjes worden we continu afgeleid. Hoe houd je nou echt goed je aandacht bij je werk? En: hoe ziet een concentratievriendelijk kantoor eruit? Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie, vertelt het in BNR's Big Five van de nieuwe werkomgeving. Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Nieuwe werkomgeving - Coen van Oostrom, founder en CEO Edge Technologies - Eduard Schaepman, founder en CEO Tribes - Willem van Rhenen, hoogleraar Engagement & Productivity aan Nyenrode Business Universiteit - Wendy van Ierschot, founder en CEO van VIE People - Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar Cognitieve PsychologieSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

De SER en het kabinet stellen dat werknemers meer zeggenschap moeten hebben over thuiswerken. Dat is mooi, maar een wettelijke basis ontbreekt. Hoe zou die eruit moeten zien? Dat bespreken we met Wendy van Ierschot, oprichter van VIE People. Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Nieuwe werkomgeving - Coen van Oostrom, founder en CEO Edge Technologies - Eduard Schaepman, founder en CEO Tribes - Willem van Rhenen, hoogleraar Engagement & Productivity aan Nyenrode Business Universiteit - Wendy van Ierschot, founder en CEO van VIE People - Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar Cognitieve PsychologieSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bedrijven moeten hun verantwoordelijkheid nemen en zorgen dat hybride werken goed is geregeld voor werknemers. Dat zegt Willem van Rhenen, hoogleraar Engagement & Productivity aan Nyenrode Business University en bestuurder bij de Arbo-Unie, in BNR's Big Five van de nieuwe werkomgeving. Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Nieuwe werkomgeving - Coen van Oostrom, founder en CEO Edge Technologies - Eduard Schaepman, founder en CEO Tribes - Willem van Rhenen, hoogleraar Engagement & Productivity aan Nyenrode Business Universiteit - Wendy van Ierschot, founder en CEO van VIE People - Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar Cognitieve PsychologieSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Is het flexibele werken wel echt het werken van de toekomst? En op welke manier richten we dit goed in zodat we elkaar niet volledig uit het oog verliezen? En is flexibel werken wel geschikt voor alle generaties? In de Big Five van de nieuwe werkomgeving spreekt presentator DIana Matroos hierover met CEO en founder van Tribes: Eduard Schaepman. Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Nieuwe werkomgeving - Coen van Oostrom, founder en CEO Edge Technologies - Eduard Schaepman, founder en CEO Tribes - Willem van Rhenen, hoogleraar Engagement & Productivity aan Nyenrode Business Universiteit - Wendy van Ierschot, founder en CEO van VIE People - Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar Cognitieve PsychologieSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Thuis werken of juist op kantoor? De meeste bedrijven zijn een mengvorm blijven gebruiken sinds de coronacrisis. Maar is het hybride werken wel de heilige graal? Hoe ziet een werkomgeving er eigenlijk idealiter uit? Te gast is Coen van Oostrom.  Gasten in BNR's Big Five van de Nieuwe werkomgeving: - Coen van Oostrom, founder en CEO Edge Technologies - Eduard Schaepman, founder en CEO Tribes - Willem van Rhenen, hoogleraar Engagement & Productivity aan Nyenrode Business Universiteit - Wendy van Ierschot, founder en CEO van VIE People - Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar Cognitieve Psychologie  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Deze week leert Arie alles over aandacht en concentratie van hoogleraar Cognitieve Psychologie Stefan van der Stigchel. Wat zijn de handigheidjes om fijn en geconcentreerd thuis te kunnen werken? Hoe ga je om met uitstelgedrag? Een gesprek over lijstjes maken, flow, online prikkels en hoe je gefocust blijft in tijden van afleiding. Besproken boeken: Stefan van der Stigchel - Concentratie Stefan van der Stigchel - Grip op je aandacht Stefan van der Stigchel - Zo werkt aandacht De soundtrack van Over Routines is gemaakt door Sticks en Sim Fane.

How to concentrate on your studies?I'm going to be talking to one of the world's leading authorities on how to manage your attention, and focus on what really matters to you, Professor Stefan van der Stigchel.We'll be walking through an entire day of concentration to show you step-by-step what you can do to help maximise your focus, including:“Attention rituals” – learning from Darwin and BeethovenHow to take effective breaksDesigning your environment for maximum concentrationIs it OK to listen to music?Stefan leads the AttentionLab at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, and is a regular face on national television and radio in the Netherlands, as well as speaking on prestigious conference stages around the world.You can find out more about Stefan's work at his personal website: https://www.stefanvanderstigchel.nl/ For a highly practical guide to maximising concentration, I highly recommend his book “Concentration: Staying Focused in Times Of Distraction”, available at https://geni.us/concentration*“How Attention Works”, a guide to the psychology of attention, is available at https://geni.us/attention**Hosted by William Wadsworth, memory psychologist, independent researcher and study skills coach. I help ambitious students to study smarter, not harder, so they can ace their exams with less work and less stress.Book 1:1 Coaching and let me help you find the shortcut to success in your exams this year: https://examstudyexpert.com/workwithme/[free] Download the Exam Success Cheat Sheet at https://examstudyexpert.com/freetips*As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchasesPodcast Edited by Benoît André.

Mede mogelijk gemaakt door: DDAUItdager van deze uitzending van Slimme Koppen Prof. dr. hoogleraar Cognitieve Psychologie van de Universiteit Utrecht: Stafen van der Stigchel vraagt zich in de uitzending af of we eigenlijk nog wel terug willen naar de situatie van voor de lockdown. Hij geeft dan ook aan: Ik hoop dat de positieve dingen die we meenemen uit de lockdown we ook implementeren in de heropende samenleving. Slimme Koppen De Slimme Koppen van deze uitzending zijn founder van Megg Ella Vogel en IT-ondernemer, CCO bij Triple en oud-topschaatser en panellid van ons Slimme Koppen-panel Ben van der Burg. Zij hebben concrete innovatieve ideeën hoe we ook in een heropende samenleving onze rust kunnen pakken zodat we niet overprikkeld raken. Weten welke oplossingen zij bieden? Luister dan de podcast! Abonneren In het programma BNR Slimme Koppen gaat Diana Matroos op zoek naar innovatieve oplossingen voor deze belangrijke themas. Abonneren kan via www.bnr.nl/slimmekoppen.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Twee weken voordat ze beviel van haar eerste dochter, stond ondernemer en YouTuber ‘Sanny zoekt geluk' nog op naaldhakken voor 500 man te presenteren. Nog even cashen, want hierna stop ik, dacht ze. Maar Sanny's ambitie is er sinds haar moederschap niet minder op geworden. Wel haar aantal werkuren. Zijn kinderen slecht voor je carrière? Kun je een goede ouder én een goede collega zijn? En zit daar een verschil tussen moeders en vaders? Dat onderzoekt Arie Boomsma in deze aflevering van Goed Werk, de podcast van de EO en het Nederlands Dagblad. Daarbij schuift ook hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie Stefan van der Stigchel aan, die eveneens vader van kinderen is. Volg Goed Werk op LinkedIn en praat mee!

Twee weken voordat ze beviel van haar eerste dochter, stond ondernemer en YouTuber ‘Sanny zoekt geluk’ nog op naaldhakken voor 500 man te presenteren. Nog even cashen, want hierna stop ik, dacht ze. Maar Sanny’s ambitie is er sinds haar moederschap niet minder op geworden. Wel haar aantal werkuren. Zijn kinderen slecht voor je carrière? Kun je een goede ouder én een goede collega zijn? En zit daar een verschil tussen moeders en vaders? Dat onderzoekt Arie Boomsma in deze aflevering van Goed Werk, de podcast van de EO en het Nederlands Dagblad. Daarbij schuift ook hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie Stefan van der Stigchel aan, die eveneens vader van kinderen is. Volg Goed Werk op LinkedIn en praat mee!

Met Stefan van der Stigchel hebben we het over koektrommels voor je telefoon, studeren met Japanse Youtube-meisjes en de vergeten brief in je tas. Hij legt uit waarom een kattenfilmpje hetzelfde effect heeft als de dreiging van een chittah, dat mindwandering goed voor je is, net als schermtijdbattles, Morning Pages en in slaap vallen met Friends.De fotograaf die een gratis portret van je maakt als je je telefoon drie dagen inlevert, heet Brenda de Vries en is te vinden via Facebook.De Japanse studeermeisjes op Youtube (met of zonder Pomodori-timing) kun je vinden via Study With Me.Als je meer wilt weten over Morning Pages, lees het boek The Artis Way van Julia Cameron. En de nieuwste editie van het boek van Stefan van der Stighel, die overigens hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht is, heet: Grip op je aandacht, 50 tips voor meer concentratie en focus. Inclusief thuiswerktips!

Wat haalt jou uit je concentratie? Zijn het kattenfilmpjes op Instagram, een continue stroom e-mails of misschien juist jouw eigen hersenspinsels over hoe ijshoorntjes worden gemaakt (zo dus)? Wat jouw aandachtsvreters ook zijn, ze hinderen je in je focus op die éne werktaak of lastige tentamenstof. Hoe komt het dat je soms bent afgeleid? En wat is het eigenlijk, concentratie? We bespreken het met Stefan van der Stigchel, die onder meer het boek ‘Grip op je aandacht’ schreef. We hebben het over multitasken (en of dat eigenlijk wel bestaat), hoe je dagdromen nuttig kunt inzetten én op welke manier je de controle over jouw aandacht terug pakt. Juist nu werk en privé meer dan ooit door elkaar lijken te lopen. De Podcast Psycholoog is een productie van Marissa van der Sluis en Leonie van Dijk. Tips, reacties of vragen? Mail ons! info@depodcastpsycholoog.nl.Voor meer informatie over ons: www.depodcastpsycholoog.nl Help ons door een goede review achter te laten op iTunes en abonneer je via je favoriete podcast app. Doneer via Petje.af/depodcastpsycholoog.Shownotes:Gast: Stefan van der Stigchel Muziek: Frank Kloos Voice-over intro: Bart Slim Artwork: Joeri Worm Website: Eduardo Guzmán Support the show (https://petje.af/depodcastpsycholoog/)

Ungkapan yang menyatakan bahwa ‘mata adalah jendela jiwa, ternyata sesuai dengan sebuah hasil penelitian. Setidaknya jika kita merujuk pada sebuah artikel yang diterbitkan oleh Current Directions in Psychological Science. Dalam artikel tersebut, psikolog Sebastiaan Mathôt dan Stefan Van der Stigchel berpendapat, bahwa fungsi pupil bukan hanya sebagai pengatur cahaya yang masuk ke mata. Tapi lebih dari itu, ukuran pupil adalah cerminan emosi dan niat dari pemiliknya. Salam Rodjali

Het is misschien wel de grootste revolutie in ons werk sinds de komst van de computer. Ineens werken we massaal thuis. Maar hoe doe je dat. Hoe kom je op gang en belangrijker nog: hoe stop je op tijd. En wat betekent thuiswerken voor de verhouding met je baas? Ben je nu meer eigen baas? In de eerste aflevering van de podcast ‘Goed Werk’ zoekt Arie Boomsma het antwoord op al je thuiswerkvragen met NRC-columnist Japke-d. Bouma en hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie Stefan van der Stigchel. Abonneer je op deze podcast van de EO, het Nederlands Dagblad en NPO Radio1. Sluit je aan bij de commuity op Linked In via www.eo.nl/goedwerk en volg de artikelenserie in het ND via https://www.nd.nl/goed-werk

In an age of digital devices and near constant distractions, many of us feel like our attention spans are shrinking. So this week on Spark, a handbook on how to concentrate in a distracting world. Stefan Van der Stigchel is a cognitive psychologist and author of Concentration: Staying Focused in Times of Distraction. He believes that concentration is like a muscle you have to work to maintain. As we age we find it more difficult to concentrate. Tarek Amer and fellow researchers found a possible upside: being scattered may help in creative thought. Tarek is also researching whether we can use older folks' distractibility as a way to deliver helpful reminders. Michael Shammas, a lawyer in New York who decided to unplug his headphones for a week. After spending years tethered to his phone while working at a corporate law firm, Michael decided he needed to shake things up. So he abandoned the comfort of his audio bubble, to see what he could learn by reconnecting with his inner monologue. This episode originally aired March 15, 2020.

In de 24e aflevering van de Business Books Podcast bespreken Thijs Peters (hoofdredacteur GoodHabitz) en Remy Gieling (hoofdredacteur MT/Sprout)de lessen uit: >> Samsung Rising van Geoffrey Cain >> Jouw baan gaat verdwijnen en dit is de oplossing van Andrew Yang >> Grip op aandacht van Stefan van der Stigchel en Lotte Elbrink + een interview met Steven Levy die meer dan 300 mensen bij Facebook sprak, waaronder Mark Zuckerberg en Sheryl Sandberg.

Stefan van der Stigchel, Professor of Cognitive Psychology at Utrecht University and author of How Attention Works and Concentration (MIT Press) joins Paul Ashcroft and Garrick Jones, co-authors of The Curious Advantage to talk about Curiosity and Focus. What is the relationship between curiosity and the way the brain works? How do we sample the environment around us and what is the role of attention and concentration in exploring these?    Are you curious? Subscribe today! #Curiousadvantagepodcast #curiosity #attention #concentration #focus #curiousadvantage   Join the conversation and connect with the authors #CuriousAdvantage. About the Curious Advantage Podcast Series The Curious Advantage Podcast series is brought to you by the authors of the book The Curious Advantage, Paul Ashcroft, Simon Brown & Garrick Jones and it is about how individuals and organisations use the power of curiosity to drive success in their lives and organisations, especially in the context of our new digital reality. It brings to life the latest understanding from neuroscience, anthropology, history and behaviourism about curiosity and makes these useful for everyone. Produced by Aliki Paolinelis, edited by John McGinty & Jill Damatac-Futter. #Curiousadvantage #Curiousadvantagepodcast About The Curious Advantage Book The Curious Advantage is an exploration of the idea of Curiosity and its increasing importance for thriving in the digital age. Taking the widest possible exploration of things Curious – historical, contemporary, neuro-scientific, anthropological, behavioural, semantic and business-focused. At the heart of the book is our model of Curiosity, called 'Sailing the 7 C's of Curiosity'. This model provides individuals with a practical framework for how to be successfully Curious and use Curiosity as a power skill to unlock their own potential. To find out more visit: curiousadvantage.com   Get your copy on Amazon!  Contact: pr@curiousadvantage.com   

Why is it so hard to concentrate? How can we do it better? Dutch psychologist Stefan van der Stigchel has some suggestions... Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Thuis werken of telewerken dringt nu door als het nieuwe normaal. Ook voor de crisis werd het al als zaligmakende oplossing naar voren geschoven. Geen enerverende files meer. Lekker in makkelijke kleding werken. Veel meer baas over eigen tijd. Er zou zelfs winst zijn voor de werkgever want hij kan ruimte besparen met flexdesks en we zouden allemaal productiever zijn.Is dat echter zo? Professor Godderis gaf in een eerdere podcast al aan dat thuiswerken voor meer stress kan zorgen. In ons gesprek met Stefan van der Stigchel, hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie en gespecialiseerd in aandacht en concentratie aan de universiteit van Utrecht, hebben we het uiteraard uitgebreid over die concentratie.Support the show (https://doorbraak.be/steun/)

Today we are joined by Stefan van der Stigchel, Professor of Cognitive Psychology at Utrecht University and author of How Attention Works: Finding Your Way in a World of Distraction and Concentration: Staying Focused in Times of Distraction. We discuss the varying scientific definitions of attention, the psychology of how our attention actually works, and ways that we can improve our attentional capacity. For more information on Prof. van der Stigchel's books, click here. www.attentiontodetailpod.com

Stefan van der Stigchel -hoogleraar psychologie- weet alles over aandacht. Hij legt uit waarom iedereen de wereld anders ziet, hoe beperkt onze aandacht eigenlijk is én hoe je op een verstandige manier gebruik maakt van je aandacht.

In an age of digital devices and near constant distractions, many of us feel like our attention spans are shrinking. The good news is: we can get our power of concentration back. So this week on Spark, a handbook on how to concentrate in a distracting world. + Stefan Van der Stigchel is a cognitive psychologist and author of Concentration: Staying Focused in Times of Distraction. He says that there's no reason to believe our ability to concentrate is being permanently eroded by digital distraction, but concentration is like a muscle you have to work to maintain. + As we age we find it more difficult to concentrate. Tarek Amer and fellow researchers found a possible upside: being scattered may help in creative thought. Tarek is also researching whether we can use older folks' distractibility as a way to deliver helpful reminders.Tarek is a Canadian Postdoctoral Research Fellow in the Department of Psychology at Columbia University. + Michael Shammas, a lawyer in New York who decided to unplug his headphones for a week. After spending years tethered to his phone while working at a corporate law firm, Michael decided he needed to shake things up. So he abandoned the comfort of his audio bubble, to see what he could learn by reconnecting with his inner monologue.

How good is your multi-tasking? Is it a skill you try to work on?  On this episode of Deep Listening, Prof. Stefan van der Stigchel explains what happens when you multi-task, and why it might not actually exist at all. An expert in attention, Stefan shares how to write notes to best retain information and continue listening. He explains what your working memory is, and how distraction cuts your performance in half. Learn how to really pay attention when listening, and how to prepare your environment to minimise distraction.

In de 15e aflevering van de Business Books Podcast bespreken Thijs Peters (business journalist & hoofdredacteur GoodHabitz) en Remy Ludo Gieling (hoofdredacteur MT & Sprout) de lessen uit: >> It doesn't have to be crazy at work van Jason Fried hoe softwarebedrijf Basecamp hyperwinstgevend is zonder strategie >> Spreken we met bestsellerauteur Tony Crabbe over zijn boek Nooit meer te druk >> Ontrafelen we mythes over productiviteit met het boek Concentratie van hoogleraar Stefan van der Stigchel >> Groeit jouw bedrijf dankzij toptalent door middel van het boek Hard gaan met de beste mensen (18 dagen op #1 bij Managementboek) van de redactie van Sprout. Meer luisteren of de boeken bestellen? Dat kan via www.businessbookspodcast.nl

Stefan Van der Stigchel discusses how we filter out what is irrelevant so we can focus on what we need to know.

Aandacht, hoe werkt dat? Wat trekt onze aandacht en hoe nemen we de wereld om ons heen waar? Hebben we minder aandacht dan vroeger en waardoor komt dat? Met  Stefan van der Stigchel praat ik over hoe aandacht precies werkt, het verschil tussen aandacht en concentratie, fabels en misvattingen, waarom je eigenlijk kijkt met je brein, multitasken, verveling, meditatie en natuurlijk de smartphone. Stefan van der Stigchel is hoogleraar Cognitieve Psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht,  hoofd van de onderzoeksgroep AttentionLab en auteur van de boeken 'Zo werkt aandacht' en 'Concentratie'. In de Dingen Duiden podcast bespreek ik iedere aflevering een onderwerp op het gebied van wetenschap, technologie, de toekomst, filosofie, zingeving en nog veel meer. Alles om de wereld een beetje beter te begrijpen. De shownotes van deze aflevering vind je op susandullink.nl/aandacht.

Een kijkje in ons hoofd nemen, dat doen we tegenwoordig maar al te graag met sensoren en scanners. Maar slaan we op die manier niet te veel het complexe gedrag achter die hersensignalen over? Hoogleraar cognitieve psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht Stefan van der Stigchel waarschuwt van wel. Zelf doet hij onderzoek naar onze waarneming en de verdeling van onze aandacht. Daarbij zijn metingen interessant, maar het begint volgens hem altijd bij gedragsonderzoek. Hij meent dat we - hoe ver de techniek ook lijkt te zijn - nog lang niet alleen kunnen vertrouwen op grafieken en cijfertjes. 'Het lijken misschien objectieve metingen, maar van wat precies?'

We Lezen in het Donker met aandachtsexpert en cognitief psycholoog Stefan van der Stigchel. In zijn nieuwe boek Concentratie maakt hij duidelijk hoe we ons werkgeheugen soms verkeerd gebruiken en geeft hij technieken waarmee je je concentratie langer vast kunt houden.

Graag uw aandacht voor het volgende. Prof. dr. Stefan van der Stigchel, cognitief psycholoog, legt uit hoe onze hersenen omgaan met de vracht aan prikkels waaraan we dagelijks worden blootgesteld en hoe concentratie werkt. Wat blijkt? Aandacht is als een kaasplankje.

Stefan van der Stigchel is universitair hoofddocent experimentele psychologie aan de Universiteit Utrecht. Hij focust in zijn onderzoek op hoe wij onze aandacht verdelen en hoe dingen onze aandacht trekken. Hij staat aan het hoofd van de onderzoeksgroep AttentionLab die bekijkt hoe aandacht en visueel bewustzijn samen ons beeld van de wereld vormen. Schrijf je […]