Podcast appearances and mentions of jay treaty

This week on APTN News InFocus, host Cierra Bettens examines the impact of the looming trade war between Canada and the U.S. and what it means for Indigenous businesses. As U.S. President Donald Trump plans to move ahead with 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian exports, companies across the country are scrambling to adapt. But for Indigenous businesses, many of which already face barriers, the economic uncertainty is especially challenging. Shane Prevost, vice president of Bison Modular, is looking to a centuries-old agreement for solutions. The Jay Treaty, signed in 1794, grants Indigenous Peoples the right to trade and travel freely across the Canada-U.S. border. Could this be a game-changer for Indigenous businesses caught in the crossfire of a trade war? Join us as we put Indigenous trade InFocus. • • • APTN National News, our stories told our way. Visit our website for more: https://aptnnews.ca Hear more APTN News podcasts: https://www.aptnnews.ca/podcasts/

The Gulf of Maine is warming faster than 99% of the ocean.  In this episode of In Hot Water, Maine, we meet with Plansowes Dana, a member of the Passamaquoddy Tribe and the Indigenous Communities Partnership Manager at the Gulf of Maine Research Institute. Her goal is to build relationships between the Wabanaki communities and GMRI to incorporate Indigenous knowledge with Western science. There's no quick fix for seafood harvesters in the Gulf, but climate solutions do exist. From encouraging species diversification to actively involving frontline communities, changemakers are leading a new path for seafood in Maine Produced by Seafood and Gender Equality (SAGE) and Seaworthy, the “In Hot Water” podcast explores SEAFOOD and CLIMATE JUSTICE in distinct regions. Episode Guide :00 Intro to In Hot Water, Maine Edition 01:57 Meet Plansowes Dana, a member of the Peskotomuhkati Tribe and Indigenous Partnerships Manager at the Gulf of Maine Research Institute 03:07 As a child, Plansowes would seek out storytellers who would share stories about the changing landscape  07:04 The Jay Treaty and what it means for the Wabanaki people 08:04 Plansowes' passions—food sovereignty and food security—and what they mean for the Passamaquoddy 11:52 The incredible story of Plansowes' uncle,a POW in the Korean War 13:24 The Passamaquoddy have fished with weirs for generations but a changing climate is making it more and more difficult 17:46 Coastal erosion is happening on a large scale in the Passamaquoddy Bay 20:36 Plansowes' advice about how to adapt to a changing climate 22:43 The community does not have access to clean drinking water and the pandemic put this situation in the spotlight The Emerald ash borer, an invasive insect that's wreaking havoc on the trees 31:02 “Moving at the speed of trust”—building partnerships with Wabanaki communities takes time 33:18 Plansowes' hope for the future in a changing climate 33:47 Discussion: Colonialism is a driver of environmental exploitation and degradation.To build a future capable of withstanding the immense challenges posed by the climate crisis, we must first acknowledge and address our colonial, genocidal, white supremacist, and patriarchal past and present. 36:17 What Plansowes loves about living in the area Resources Recommend this series to anyone who enjoys seafood and is curious about how climate change is affecting our seafood-producing regions.  

This Day in Legal History: Jay Treaty SignedOn November 19, 1794, the United States and Great Britain signed the Jay Treaty, formally titled the “Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation.” Negotiated by U.S. Chief Justice John Jay and British Foreign Secretary Lord Grenville, the treaty sought to resolve lingering tensions between the two nations following the American Revolutionary War. At its core, the agreement facilitated the withdrawal of British troops from forts in the Northwest Territory, a region that was still contested despite American sovereignty being recognized in the Treaty of Paris (1783).The treaty also addressed contentious issues such as British seizure of American ships and the debts owed by American citizens to British creditors. While the agreement provided for limited American trade rights in the British West Indies and a framework for resolving disputes over the U.S.-Canada border, it failed to stop British impressment of American sailors or guarantee broader trading rights. Domestically, the treaty sparked fierce political debate, with Federalists supporting it as a means of preserving peace and economic stability, while Jeffersonian Republicans decried it as overly conciliatory to British interests.The Jay Treaty is historically significant for establishing a precedent for diplomatic negotiation and emphasizing the importance of peaceful dispute resolution. While controversial at the time, it ultimately helped avert war with Britain and allowed the young United States to stabilize its economy and focus on internal growth. Its ratification in 1795 marked an important step in shaping U.S. foreign policy during its formative years. The treaty's mixed reception underscored the deepening political divisions in the United States, foreshadowing the partisan struggles that would define early American governance.Big Law firms are poised to see significant lobbying revenue gains under anticipated Republican control of the White House and Congress, as the GOP aims to advance a pro-business, “America First” agenda. Key areas of focus for lobbyists include revisiting elements of the 2017 tax law, reversing restrictions on fossil fuel development imposed by the Biden administration, and assisting with the confirmation of cabinet nominees. The Supreme Court's recent Loper Bright decision, which limits federal agencies' ability to interpret vague laws, adds another layer of legislative complexity, increasing demand for legal expertise in technical drafting.The potential uptick in lobbying activity echoes patterns seen in prior shifts of political power. Lobbying revenue rose sharply in 2017 and 2021 during transitions to unified party control. Firms like Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Akin Gump, Squire Patton Boggs, and K&L Gates are particularly well-positioned, with some deriving significant portions of their income from federal lobbying efforts. Brownstein Hyatt leads the pack, earning $50.9 million in lobbying revenue through the first three quarters of 2024.Major firms are already representing high-profile clients. For instance, Brownstein Hyatt has advocated for Apollo Global Management on portfolio-related issues, while Squire Patton Boggs has worked on food regulation for Mars Inc. Energy-related lobbying, such as advocating for liquefied natural gas export permits, is also expected to surge as Republicans aim to repeal Biden-era restrictions. Appropriations negotiations may further boost lobbying opportunities, as delayed bills give the GOP more leverage.Big Law Lobbyists See GOP Trifecta Haul Including Tax, EnergyThe State Bar of California has approved a proposal to expunge attorney discipline records from public view after eight years, provided the attorney has not faced subsequent disciplinary action during that time. This measure, which excludes cases of disbarment, aims to address racial disparities in the attorney discipline system. A 2019 study revealed that Black male attorneys in California were over three times more likely than their white counterparts to face probation, prompting a 2023 review committee to recommend changes to the system. The proposal now awaits approval from the California Supreme Court.The expungement policy is intended to balance accountability, transparency, and redemption opportunities, aligning California's attorney discipline practices with those in other states and professions like medicine and real estate. Critics, however, argue it could undermine transparency and public trust, with 74% of public comments opposing the plan. In contrast, a majority of attorney comments—69%—supported the change, noting it incentivizes maintaining clean records. If implemented, an estimated 2,353 attorneys would be immediately eligible for expungement. California, the second-largest state bar by membership, projects that this policy will reduce the long-term stigma attached to past disciplinary actions.California Bar aims to expunge attorney discipline records after 8 years | ReutersThe losing bidder for Alex Jones' bankrupt Infowars empire is challenging The Onion's winning bid, arguing it offered less cash and relied on questionable claim waivers. First United American Companies LLC (FUAC), which bid $3.5 million in cash, claims its offer was superior to The Onion parent company Global Tetrahedron LLC's $1.75 million bid. FUAC accuses The Onion of colluding with Sandy Hook families who supported the bid by waiving part of their claims against Jones.The bankruptcy trustee overseeing the sale, Christopher Murray, defended the auction as transparent and noted that the Sandy Hook families' waiver improved the overall value of The Onion's bid. The waiver was key in positioning The Onion's bid as the best-value offer, despite its lower cash amount. FUAC countered that these waivers are speculative and provide no real value to the bankruptcy estate, calling them akin to “monopoly” money.Judge Christopher M. Lopez, who previously raised concerns about the auction's transparency, is now considering the motion to disqualify The Onion's bid. The sale is part of an effort to liquidate Jones' estate and pay down the $1.5 billion in defamation judgments against him for spreading false claims about the Sandy Hook shooting. The trustee dismissed FUAC's accusations as baseless and an attempt to mislead the court.In case you haven't figured it out already, FUAC is a company affiliated with Alex Jones' snake oil sales. Obviously, Jones has an interest in seeing his assets purchased by a friendly company rather than The Onion which … is not friendly to Jones' interests. Infowars Bidder Moves to Disqualify The Onion's Winning OfferThe 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals appeared likely to dismiss appeals by Amazon and SpaceX challenging the structure of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), arguing the companies acted prematurely. Both companies sought to block NLRB cases alleging labor violations, with Amazon opposing a unionization case and SpaceX contesting claims of retaliatory firings. However, the appeals panel suggested that Amazon and SpaceX did not give lower court judges enough time to rule before filing their appeals.  Amazon's case, initially in Texas, was transferred to Washington, D.C., and SpaceX's to California, though these transfers are on hold pending appeals. The judges questioned whether the delays cited by Amazon and SpaceX constituted "effective denials," a standard necessary for appeals. Judge James Graves noted Amazon's unrealistic deadline demands, while Judge Irma Ramirez questioned SpaceX's assertion of deliberate judicial delay.  The NLRB argued that the companies imposed arbitrary deadlines to expedite decisions and delayed proceedings by resisting case transfers. Both companies face significant underlying NLRB cases, with Amazon fighting unionization at a New York warehouse and SpaceX denying allegations of retaliatory firings. If the appeals are dismissed, the companies could request a review by the full 5th Circuit, known for its conservative leanings.Amazon, SpaceX challenges to NLRB may be thrown out of appeals court | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

This week on "Off the Cuff," Sarah and Hugh discuss 2024-25 changes in documentation requirements related to Jay Treaty students and dig into the background of this guidance within the FSA Handbook. From there, Sarah debriefs listeners on several resources both NASFAA and the Department of Education (ED) have for institutions that were impacted by recent natural disasters. Sarah then explains some timely electronic announcements and Dear Colleague Letters that can help students and schools affected by these recent disasters.  

This Day in Legal History: John Jay Commissioned as first Chief JusticeOn September 26, 1789, John Jay was commissioned as the first Chief Justice of the United States, marking a pivotal moment in American legal history. Nominated by President George Washington and confirmed by the Senate, Jay's appointment came just months after the Judiciary Act of 1789 established the framework for the federal judiciary. As the leader of the newly formed Supreme Court, Jay faced the monumental task of defining the role of the judiciary in the young republic. He served from 1789 to 1795, during which time the Court heard few cases but laid foundational principles for its future authority.Jay's influence extended beyond the bench. He played a key role in shaping foreign policy, including negotiating the 1794 Jay Treaty with Great Britain. His tenure helped establish the Supreme Court as an independent branch of government, though the Court's full power would only be realized in later decades. Jay resigned from the Court in 1795 to become Governor of New York, but his legacy as the first Chief Justice remains integral to the evolution of the U.S. judiciary. His commission set a precedent for the development of a robust and coequal judiciary, a cornerstone of the American system of checks and balances.New York City Mayor Eric Adams has been indicted following a federal corruption probe, raising questions about his political future. The investigation, which began after an FBI raid on a campaign fundraiser's home, has expanded in recent months. Key members of Adams' administration, including his chief counsel and police commissioner, have resigned amid the scrutiny. The charges remain unclear, as the indictment is sealed. Investigations reportedly involve allegations that Adams' campaign accepted illegal donations tied to the Turkish government and pressured officials to approve permits despite safety concerns. Federal agents recently searched the mayor's official residence, Gracie Mansion.Adams, who has denied any wrongdoing, vows to remain in office and fight the charges. Calls for his resignation are growing, including from prominent figures like U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and mayoral challengers. The probes come as Adams seeks re-election and amid challenges like rising crime rates, absenteeism in schools, and the ongoing migrant crisis in New York City.NYC Mayor Eric Adams Indicted After Federal Corruption ProbeNew York Mayor Adams faces criminal indictment, vows to fight charges | ReutersDonald Trump's legal team is appealing a nearly $500 million civil fraud judgment related to his real estate dealings. The case, brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, resulted in a February 2024 ruling by Judge Arthur Engoron, who found Trump guilty of inflating his net worth to secure better loan terms. Trump was ordered to pay $454.2 million, which has since increased to $478.3 million due to interest. His lawyers argue that the financial statements submitted to banks understated his wealth and claim the case is politically motivated.James' office countered that the lawsuit's goal was to maintain the integrity of New York's commercial markets, and proof of financial losses by the banks was not required under the law. The judgment threatens Trump's business empire and includes a ban on him leading New York companies or seeking loans from state-registered banks. Trump has denied wrongdoing and posted a $175 million bond to prevent asset seizures while his appeal is pending. This case is one of several legal challenges he faces as he campaigns for the 2024 presidential election.Trump to ask New York appeals court to toss nearly $500 mln civil fraud judgment | ReutersCalifornia has filed a landmark lawsuit against ExxonMobil, accusing the company of misleading the public by promoting plastics as recyclable when few are. Filed on September 23, 2024, the case argues that ExxonMobil's actions fueled increased consumption of single-use plastics, worsening the global plastic pollution crisis. This case stands out by targeting the root of the problem—plastic producers—rather than downstream companies. It seeks a multibillion-dollar abatement fund for recycling education and other penalties. The lawsuit is part of a broader push for "extended producer responsibility," which holds manufacturers accountable for the environmental impacts of their products.Experts suggest the false advertising and unfair competition claims in the case have strong backing, but public nuisance claims could be tougher to prove. ExxonMobil is expected to argue that it didn't mislead consumers and that California's own recycling policies are at fault. This lawsuit may inspire other states, such as New York and Massachusetts, to file similar cases, depending on how California's case progresses. The case reflects a growing trend of states using the courts to address environmental concerns amid weakening federal regulations.California's ExxonMobil Suit Marks New Front in Plastics FightA federal court has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must take action to address the risk that fluoride in drinking water poses to children's IQ. The case, decided by Judge Edward M. Chen in the Northern District of California, found that adding fluoride to water at the currently recommended level of 0.7 milligrams per liter (mg/L) could lower children's IQ, creating an "unreasonable risk" that requires a regulatory response. While the court did not conclude definitively that fluoridated water is harmful, it mandated that the EPA assess the risk and determine appropriate measures under the 2016 Toxic Substances Control Act amendments.The ruling follows a lawsuit from groups like Food & Water Watch and the Fluoride Action Network, who argued that fluoride's neurotoxic effects pose a public health danger. Scientific studies have shown a significant association between higher fluoride levels and decreased IQ in children. Judge Chen noted that the population exposed to fluoride in the U.S. is vast, including two million pregnant women and 300,000 formula-fed infants. Despite past recommendations to lower the maximum contaminant limit, the EPA has not yet revised its standards.The court's decision, which bypasses the EPA's earlier denials of citizen petitions, marks a historic moment in the long-standing debate over water fluoridation.EPA Must Reduce Fluoride's IQ Risks to Children, Court Says (1) This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

In 1794, the United States was on the brink of war. But the British weren't the only ones on the offensive. An incendiary printer with a famous grandfather would soon accuse Washington of treason, tyranny, even murder. In this episode, Joseph Adelman and Lindsay Chervinsky discuss the backlash surrounding the Jay Treaty and the controversial newspaper run by Benjamin Franklin Bache. For bibliographies, suggested readings, and lesson plans, go to www.GeorgeWashingtonPodcast.com.Inventing the Presidency is a production of the Mount Vernon Ladies' Association and CD Squared Productions. This episode was written and directed by Dr. Anne Fertig. This episode was narrated by Tom Plott.

Joel wanted to cast a wider net for roles and try to get work in the United States. But first, he needed to get a social security number. Follow Joel's journey over the border to get his SSN! The Jay Treaty allows Indigenous Peoples in Canada to travel freely across the border to work, live, or study. The idea sounds easy but it was pretty challenging to find the right information and get the right documents. Hopefully Joel's experience will help you navigate the system if you're an Indigenous actor in the same boat! This information is not legal advice. What Joel needed:Signed letter from his bandLong form birth certificate Treaty cardOther ID (driver's license or passport)More info:USCIS Green Card for an American Indian Born in Canada (you don't need a green card to get an SSN but some useful information)Canadian-born Native Americans: Work or Green Card?Border Crossing Rights Under the Jay Treaty (this is an old post but still useful)Actors and Ancestors is created, hosted, and produced by Joel D. Montgrand. Audio editing and production support by Daniella Barreto. Music Credit at 01:41Track: "Endless Summers"Music provided by https://slip.streamDownload / Stream: https://get.slip.stream/K665Z0 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Jay Treaty, named after John Jay, the chief negotiator on behalf of the United States, sought to resolve several key disputes in the aftermath of the American Revolutionary War and the subsequent Treaty of Paris in ...

This Day in Legal History: Jay Treaty SignedOn this day in legal history, February 29, 1796, the Jay Treaty, also known as the Treaty of London, was formally proclaimed, marking a significant moment in the post-Revolutionary War era between the United States and Great Britain. Negotiated by John Jay, the U.S. Chief Justice at the time, the treaty aimed to resolve lingering tensions and disputes that had persisted since the end of the war, particularly regarding territorial claims, trade relations, and maritime rights. The agreement facilitated the withdrawal of British forces from frontier forts in the Northwest Territory, which they had continued to occupy, in violation of the Treaty of Paris of 1783.The treaty also addressed American grievances related to British seizures of American ships and cargo, which had been a major source of conflict between the two nations. In return, the United States offered most-favored-nation trading status to Great Britain, an important economic concession that allowed for British goods to enter the U.S. market under favorable terms. Additionally, the treaty established a commission to resolve outstanding border disputes along the Canada–United States border and agreed to compensate American merchants for losses due to British ship seizures.Despite its diplomatic successes, the Jay Treaty faced significant opposition within the United States, particularly from supporters of Thomas Jefferson who viewed it as too conciliatory to British interests and a betrayal of France, America's ally during the Revolutionary War. The treaty's ratification in the Senate and subsequent implementation, however, played a crucial role in averting a potential war with Great Britain, solidifying the United States' sovereignty, and enhancing its economic independence. Thus, the Jay Treaty stands as a pivotal agreement that helped define the early foreign policy of the United States, ensuring peace with Great Britain while establishing a framework for handling international disputes through diplomacy rather than conflict.A federal judge in Texas has ruled against a new Texas law, SB 4, which allowed for the arrest and removal of migrants entering the U.S. without proper documentation, declaring it infringes on the federal government's exclusive authority over immigration. This decision, a victory for the Biden administration, comes from Senior US District Judge David Ezra, who also issued a preliminary injunction to prevent the law from taking effect as scheduled. Judge Ezra highlighted that permitting Texas to enact its own immigration policies would effectively nullify federal law, emphasizing the problems with allowing states to have their own disparate immigration laws. The ruling, subject to appeal by Texas to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, underscores a significant clash between state and federal visions of immigration enforcement. Governor Greg Abbott of Texas has been a vocal advocate for state-level enforcement, citing high numbers of border crossings as justification. However, the law has faced criticism for potentially leading to a fragmented approach to immigration, similar to previous legal challenges against similar laws in other states.Texas Immigration Law Struck Down by Judge in Win for BidenA California state judge has made a tentative ruling that allows nearly 6,000 Black workers at Tesla's Fremont factory to sue the electric vehicle manufacturer collectively over allegations of widespread racial discrimination and harassment. This decision by Judge Noel Wise centers on the accusation that Tesla was cognizant of the misconduct but failed to address it. The lawsuit, initiated by former assembly line worker Marcus Vaughn in 2017, claims that Black employees were subjected to racial slurs, graffiti, and nooses at their workstations. Tesla has yet to respond to the ruling but has previously stated its zero tolerance for workplace harassment, asserting that it has terminated employees found guilty of racial harassment. The ruling, which Tesla has an opportunity to contest, sets the stage for a potential multimillion-dollar judgment against the company and schedules a trial for October. This case is part of a broader legal challenge Tesla faces regarding racial bias, including a separate lawsuit by a California state civil rights agency and federal court claims by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Additionally, Tesla is appealing a $3.2 million jury verdict awarded to another Black former employee in a related racial harassment case.Tesla must face race bias class action by 6,000 Black US workers | ReutersA novel legal technology venture, Bench IQ, founded by legal tech entrepreneur Jimoh Ovbiagele and former Kirkland & Ellis partner Jeffrey Gettleman, aims to revolutionize how lawyers prepare for court by using artificial intelligence to analyze and predict judges' decision-making patterns. This Toronto-based startup has successfully secured $2.1 million in pre-seed funding from a mix of law firms and venture capital firms. Bench IQ's technology promises to provide comprehensive insights into judges' rulings, not limited to their written opinions, by employing large language model-based AI. Although specifics about the technology and data are under wraps due to pending patents, the company has already attracted 12 large law firms as pilot customers. Bench IQ offers flexible pricing models tailored to the needs of different law firms. The venture is entering a competitive market of AI-based legal services but distinguishes itself by focusing on explaining judges' legal reasoning rather than just describing it. This initiative represents a significant step forward in legal research, offering a tool that could potentially change the standard approach to legal arguments and courtroom strategy.New legal AI venture promises to show how judges think | ReutersThe U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case regarding Donald Trump's claim of immunity from criminal prosecution related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. This decision puts a temporary hold on the criminal case led by Special Counsel Jack Smith and will examine the extent of presidential immunity for actions taken while in office. The Court of Appeals previously ruled against Trump's claim, emphasizing the limits of executive power and the importance of election integrity. Scheduled for oral arguments in April, this case is significant as Trump, a leading Republican candidate for the upcoming election, faces multiple criminal charges. These include accusations of conspiring to defraud the United States and obstructing the congressional certification of Joe Biden's victory. Trump argues that presidential immunity is crucial for a president's effective functioning and to prevent post-office prosecutions, which he views as politically motivated. The Supreme Court's involvement in this and related cases highlights its central role in addressing issues surrounding the 2020 election and its aftermath, including a case that could affect Trump's charges directly.US Supreme Court to decide Trump criminal immunity claim in 2020 election case | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

What happens when some groups are pushed outside of their traditional territory and divided into separate countries? Mainstreet's Sis'moqon spoke to Aaron Dana -- a Passamaquoddy Tribal Representative in the Maine Senate -- about the issues surrounding the Jay Treaty and its history in Canada.

Modern representative democracy was born in darkness. Transparency in representative bodies can spur unintended consequences for freedom, while secrecy in those bodies can lead to optimal outcomes for the public.These are uncomfortable truths that emerge from the history of the US and French revolutionary experiences. Many of our governance challenges today, from malign misinformation to persistent leaks to skepticism toward authority, derive in part from the fact that fundamental issues about how to manage openness in a representative deomcracy remain unresolved.David Priess chatted with Katlyn Carter, assistant professor of history at Notre Dame and author of the new book Democracy in Darkness: Secrecy and Transparency in the Age of Revolutions, about the concepts of reflective representation and insulated representation, how to understand and research the will of the people, the Continental Congress's secrecy, the closed-door policy of the Constitutional Convention, the consequences of its secrecy for the doctrine of originalism, the crucial cases of the Jay Treaty and the Alien and Sedition Acts, James Madison's evolving views about representation and openness, the difficult realization that open dialogue and debate do not always lead to truth, and Thomas Jefferson's complicated legacy.Chatter is a production of Lawfare and Goat Rodeo. This episode was produced and edited by Cara Shillenn of Goat Rodeo. Podcast theme by David Priess, featuring music created using Groovepad.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Modern representative democracy was born in darkness. Transparency in representative bodies can spur unintended consequences for freedom, while secrecy in those bodies can lead to optimal outcomes for the public.These are uncomfortable truths that emerge from the history of the US and French revolutionary experiences. Many of our governance challenges today, from malign misinformation to persistent leaks to skepticism toward authority, derive in part from the fact that fundamental issues about how to manage openness in a representative deomcracy remain unresolved.David Priess chatted with Katlyn Carter, assistant professor of history at Notre Dame and author of the new book Democracy in Darkness: Secrecy and Transparency in the Age of Revolutions, about the concepts of reflective representation and insulated representation, how to understand and research the will of the people, the Continental Congress's secrecy, the closed-door policy of the Constitutional Convention, the consequences of its secrecy for the doctrine of originalism, the crucial cases of the Jay Treaty and the Alien and Sedition Acts, James Madison's evolving views about representation and openness, the difficult realization that open dialogue and debate do not always lead to truth, and Thomas Jefferson's complicated legacy.Chatter is a production of Lawfare and Goat Rodeo. This episode was produced and edited by Cara Shillenn of Goat Rodeo. Podcast theme by David Priess, featuring music created using Groovepad. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This Day in Legal History: John Jay BornOn this day in legal history, December 12th, we celebrate the birth of John Jay, a pivotal figure in the early judicial and political history of the United States. Born in 1745 in New York City, Jay would grow to be a foundational character in the formation of the United States. He was a statesman, patriot, diplomat, and, most notably, the first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, appointed by President George Washington in 1789.Jay's legal career was marked by significant contributions, including his co-authorship of "The Federalist Papers," a series of essays advocating for the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. His essays underscored the necessity of a strong, unified federal government, a principle that would shape American governance for centuries to come.As Chief Justice, Jay set the groundwork for the Supreme Court's authority, although he served in this role for only six years. During his tenure, the Supreme Court heard few cases, and none of Jay's decisions were particularly landmark. However, his leadership established the early functioning and dignity of the Court.Jay was also a leading diplomat, negotiating the Jay Treaty with Britain in 1794, which averted war and facilitated ten years of peaceful trade between the U.S. and Britain. This treaty, though controversial, was pivotal in stabilizing the young nation's international standing and economy.Beyond his public service in federal roles, John Jay was a staunch abolitionist. As governor of New York, he signed a law in 1799 that would eventually lead to the emancipation of all enslaved people in the state.Jay's legacy as a legal and political luminary is often overshadowed by his contemporaries like Washington and Hamilton. However, his contributions were fundamental to the establishment of the U.S. legal system and the function of the Supreme Court. His efforts in shaping the early foreign policy of the United States and his commitment to abolitionism are testaments to his broad impact on the nation.On December 12th, we remember John Jay not just as the first Chief Justice, but as a multifaceted leader whose vision and dedication played a crucial role in laying the foundations of American law and government.The US Labor Department's proposal to impose stricter fiduciary advice standards on financial professionals is set for its first public hearing. This move by the Biden administration could impact broker-dealers and insurance agents who earn commissions from selling investment products to 401(k) participants. The proposal aims to prevent advisers with conflicts of interest from directing retirement assets into risky investments for personal gain. Critics, however, argue that this fee-only fiduciary advice model could exclude low- and moderate-income savers.The proposed rule seeks to update a nearly 50-year-old fiduciary investment advice regulation. It focuses on whether advice is part of a trusted relationship and in the best interests of the investor. Witnesses from various organizations, including AARP, major banks, and Wall Street lobbying firms, will testify at the hearings.Adopting fiduciary status would bring tougher reporting and disclosure requirements and potential legal risks for companies. The proposal is seen as a potential reshaper of financial markets and echoes a similar Obama-era regulation that was vacated in 2018.The rule particularly targets rollovers from workplace retirement plans to bank or insurance products, which can be crucial financial decisions for individuals. President Biden has criticized rollovers that benefit brokers over clients as "junk fees."EBSA aims to finalize the fiduciary rule quickly, potentially before the upcoming election, to avoid congressional or administrative revocation. Critics argue that the proposal could make fiduciary investment advice more costly for consumers and blur the line between salesmanship and financial advice, hindering financial inclusion and retirement options.Wall Street Set to Fight 401(k) Advice Rule in Public HearingsEpic Games has won a significant antitrust trial against Google regarding its Play app store, alleging it operated as an illegal monopoly. The jury found in favor of Epic on all counts, after a month-long trial, accusing Google of stifling competitors and imposing high fees on app developers. This ruling, if sustained, could transform the app store economy, giving developers more control over app distribution and profits.Google plans to appeal, emphasizing its commitment to the Android ecosystem. Epic's CEO publicly hailed the verdict, denouncing the "Google Play monopoly." The allegations included Google's tying of its Play store and billing service, forcing developers to use both for app inclusion.While the Play store is a smaller part of Google's revenue compared to its search business, it holds symbolic importance as a gateway to billions of mobile devices. The verdict could lead Google to permit more app stores on Android devices, potentially reducing its revenue from in-app purchases. Epic criticized Google's practices as illegal, accusing them of stifling competition and innovation.Sensationally, Epic also accused Google of deleting internal messages to hide anticompetitive actions. Google, however, denied wrongdoing, arguing it competes fiercely with Apple's App Store. The outcome of this case follows Epic's similar, less successful lawsuit against Apple, with Epic continuing to challenge Apple at the U.S. Supreme Court.Epic Games wins antitrust case against Google over Play app store | ReutersThe Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is expected to vote on a new rule that could significantly increase lawsuits against various businesses, including lenders, insurers, and law firms, over unwanted texts and calls. This rule aims to reduce the number of sales calls received by consumers and will likely pass. It introduces strict regulations on lead generators, who collect and sell consumer contact information to businesses seeking new customers. The rule opens up a broader pathway for claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which allows individuals to sue over unwanted communications, including robocalls.An FCC spokesperson noted this move aligns with the agency's ongoing efforts to reduce robocalls. Attorneys representing both consumers and companies foresee a surge in TCPA litigation if the rule is enacted, potentially leading to double or triple the current number of lawsuits. Lead generation, traditionally used in various industries, has expanded to include personal injury attorneys and mass litigation lawyers.Under the proposed rule, lead generators would be restricted to offering customer information to only one business unless explicit consent is obtained for more. This change requires businesses using leads to ensure compliance with the new law, as non-compliance could lead to legal repercussions. Defense attorney Eric Troutman predicts non-compliance among some lead generators, and attorney Andrew Perrong, experienced in filing lawsuits over unwanted calls, warns against using fraudulently generated leads. Perrong emphasizes that non-compliance with the new rule could lead to significant legal challenges for businesses.New FCC rule on lead generation expected to spur wave of lawsuits | ReutersMy column this week discusses the potential impact of Moore v. United States on wealth taxation, arguing for reforming the estate tax as a more viable alternative to address wealth inequality. The Moore case centers on the constitutionality of taxing unrealized gains, crucial to the feasibility of a wealth tax. If the Moores win, it could challenge the validity of a wealth tax and impact other tax code elements. In my column I suggest that the estate tax, weakened by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, could be a practical tool for tackling wealth disparity. It proposes lowering the estate tax exemption, adjusting rates, and eliminating the step-up basis to make the tax system more equitable. Additionally, I explore Lily Batchelder's idea of a true inheritance tax, taxing inherited wealth at the heir's income tax rate plus 15%. This approach would incentivize the wealthy to distribute their estates in a way that avoids high tax brackets for beneficiaries. My column, in sum, concludes that while a wealth tax is appealing, the estate tax offers a more legally sound and pragmatic solution for addressing wealth concentration.Reforming Estate Tax Would Pave Way for Equitable Tax Landscape Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

First Nations officials will hold a ceremony on the Ambassador Bridge this morning to mark the Jay Treaty, Conagra Brands is celebrating 75 years of tomato processing in Chatham-Kent, and one of the key organizers of last winter's convoy protest in Ottawa has been arrested again.

What do the Jay Treaty, the Logan Act, Fries' Rebellion, and the Alien and Sedition Acts have to do with this time? Are they all connected? We are taking a short break from our series on Charles I this week. Instead we will be discussing the XYZ Affair. The 1790s in America were almost as messy as the 1640s in England. There was trouble with both France and England. The United States had treaties with both nations, and those treaties conflicted. When the French Revolution wiped the Monarchy away, war with England was inevitable. The combination of the conflicting treaties and the expectation for the United States allegiance further divided American politics. When the French minister, Genet, tried to use the United States as a staging area for France to attack both England and Spain, there was resentment. When the French minister Talleyrand attempted to bribe the United States, there were calls for war... and there actually was a two year Quasi War fought from 1798-1800. President John Adams made a lot of mistakes during these tense years, but in the end, he may have saved the country. There are a lot of lessons here for our day. Audio Production by Podsworth Media.

Discover what the mood was like for Indian Nations from New York to Mississippi River as Revolutionary War came to an end. Learn how agents & troops in British Indian Department went about improving relations amongst Indian Tribes from Upper Mississippi to Lake Superior. Learn about the strife brought on by land speculation and what Congress did to curtail the issue. Find out exactly just how many people lived in Northwest Territory including number of Indians. Discover what Congress enacted to help enforce treaties between US Government & Indian Tribes. Learn briefly about who John Jay is and why the Jay Treaty of 1794 is important. Find out if many traders were living at La Baye & Prairie Du Chien come beginning of 19th Century. Learn which section of Northwest Territory became an official act of Congress starting July 4, 1800. Learn which Virginian became Governor to Indiana Territory including various duties. Discover why 1802 is important for Prairie Du Chien. Learn how America is still vulnerable as 18th Century closes & 19th Century begins. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/kirk-monroe/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/kirk-monroe/support

With special guest Dr. David Gary.  Rufus King is one of the most obscure of the also-rans, but he was an active part of countless key moments in early American political history: he fought in the Revolution, helped frame the U.S. Constitution, implemented the Jay Treaty, helped figure out the Northwest Ordinance, and was one of the first prominent anti-slavery American politicians. He was also the final presidential candidate fielded by the dying Federalist Party. With help from our guest, we'll explore how King's career mirrors the rise and fall of one of America's first political parties. 

1795. April. May. June. Three months in which the French make peace with Prussia and Holland… A British attempt to stoke up trouble in Brittany appears to get off to a good start… And John Jay's deal with an old enemy divides opinion in the United States. This is episode 14 of the Napoleonic Quarterly – covering three months which sees the collapse of the First Coalition against the French and their Revolution… [14:25] – Jordan R Hayworth, Assistant Professor of Military and Security Studies at the US Air Command and Staff College, on the peace treaties with Prussia and Holland which effectively ended the First Coalition [33:44] – Mary Robinson, Associate Professor of History at the University of Lourdes, on an improbable attempt by British-backed French emigres to raise the Breton chouanerie against the Revolution [50:36] – Josh Provan of @LandOfHistory on the Jay Treaty and the outcry it provoked in US domestic politics Plus throughout Charles Esdaile and Alexander Mikaberidze offer their thoughts – and from [04:40] in particular lock horns about whether or not the Revolution really offered “nothing” to ordinary French people…

IVPodcast Ep. 34 | Land Border & Disinfectant Blues Souta and Melissa discuss what it's like to cross the canadian/united states border using the Jay Treaty to border agents who usually don't have a clue, developing hyper-cleanliness, isolation, and safe spaces to heal. Let us sponsor your self-defense classes! Submit this request form if you or someone you know is in need of a self-defense class sponsorship at a gym near you! Once submitted, IV will work with you and the nearest gym to provide limited classes: www.indigenousvision.org/mmiwarriors/…cmJJzxpOVFDQ Learn about here: www.indigenousvision.org/ Follow Souta: @lastwarcry on TikTok Indigenous Vision on IG: @helloivmusic The IV Podcast is hosted by Indigenous Vision's Executive Director Souta Calling Last (Blackfoot) and produced by co-host Melissa Spence (Anishinaabe).

How we remember the past shapes our future. In this episode Joel Sherlock shares some of his experience as the manager of Genealogical and Archival Research at Indigenous Services Canada. What does research in an archives look like? Who goes to such an archives, and why? This interview offers a glimpse of these topics as well as the enduring legacy of the Canadian government's treatment of First Nations peoples. [Editor's note, the Jay Treaty was signed in 1794, not 1793] This episode is part of a collaboration showcasing how research methods are practiced and applied in various settings. These episodes are developed in collaboration with Dr. Melissa Adler and the Faculty of Information and Media Studies at Western University in support of the Media, Information and Technoculture Research Methods coursework. Episode transcript available online: sowhat.fims.uwo.ca/2-1-genealogical-and-archival-research Episode producer: Alex Mayhew

The most forgotten "War" in American history is also one of its first. Tensions boil over with France after the US starts getting buddy-buddy with England again with the Jay Treaty. A war most people don't know we ever really had is a large factor why we have the modern territory of the United States. Enjoy.

In this lecture, Dr. Totten argues George Washington's administration set many important precedents that continue in the United States to this day. Washington new he needed experts around him and established the cabinet to help him govern the new nation. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson enunciated two rival visions for the future of the country, with Hamilton enacting numerous policies to stabilize the nation's economy. The battle between Hamilton and Jefferson led to the creation of the proto-political parties, the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, also called Jeffersonian Republicans. These parties were further solidified as Americans disagreed over foreign policy, as France and Great Britain were locked in battle over the French Revolution. Washington's administration attempted to negotiate the Jay Treaty with Great Britain, which did not solve the immediate problems of impressment that ultimately led to the War of 1812. While Americans were fearful that the Haitian Revolution might spread to America, Washington illustrated one more weakness of his character, when he attempted to recapture an escaped slave, Ona Judge, who had escaped to freedom. In the end, Washington continued his proclivity for giving up power when he could have been president for life. Thus, Washington is a flawed founder who provided a stable foundation for the Early American Republic.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/history-of-the-american-people-to-1877/donations

Richard Lummis and Tom Fox conclude our four-part series on leadership lessons from George Washington. We will look at lessons from Washington’s colonial and frontier period, focusing on the French and Indian War, leadership lessons from Washington’s generalship of the Continental Army, his leadership in both the Continental Congress and Constitutional Convention and we will end with leadership lessons from both terms of Washington’s presidency. In this fourth and concluding episode, we consider the leadership lessons demonstrated by Washington during his two terms as the first President of the United States.  Highlights of this podcast include: 1.     Introduction into Washington’s two terms as President. 2.     A team of rivals? How did he manage them?  3.     Leading by example, yet in a measured and nuanced manner-the Whiskey Rebellion. 4.     Foreign Affairs-Citizen Genet and Jay Treaty with Britain.  5.     Farewell Address-how did this encapsulate Washington’s leadership?  6.     Final thoughts on leadership lessons still relevant today from George Washington.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Volley.FM - Click here for more great shows!

Episode 84: The Republicans flip out over the Jay Treaty and divide the country further while Thomas Pinckney negotiates a favorable treaty in the south that will begin to set the stage for the Louisiana Purchase.   --------- Please be sure to subscribe and tell your friends! Leave us a review on iTunes and reach out to us on social media! Twitter: @ateachershist Facebook: A Teacher's History of the United States Podcast: https://www.facebook.com/ateachershist/ Website: www.ateachershistory.com Artwork by Brad Ziegler

On Friday's Mark Levin show, the way that Roger Stone was treated as he was arrested today was unusually aggressive and wrong! We see some aspects of our history repeating itself, just as critical pamphleteers strongly opposed the president during the conflict between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson prior to the Jay Treaty in 1795 "In the ideology of the new republic no danger was greater than the corruption of foreign influence." At the time it was believed that British interests were involved in treaty negotiations. Despite all of Robert Mueller’s interviews and arrests, for unrelated process crimes, he still has no proof of collusion or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.  The goal of Trump's opposition has always been to destroy him, his policies, and his presidency.  Also, CNN's "nose for news" smells more like a leak than muckraking. The DOJ needs to initiate a leak investigation into why CNN was at Stone's house before the FBI even arrived because their explanation is weak and nonsensical. Then, Fox News Chief Intelligence Correspondent Catherine Herridge  calls in to discuss how the Stone arrest was handled and how rarely congressional testimony has been used as the basis for a grand jury indictment and other irregularities. Later, President Trump's problem with the border wall is that Republicans in the Senate are falling off the Trump Train. If his own team won’t stand with him in this fight it’s going to be tough. We need to stand with the President and give him three more weeks and see what they come up with - we’re not done yet. But we must stand against amnesty, otherwise we’re out! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On Friday's Mark Levin show, the way that Roger Stone was treated as he was arrested today was unusually aggressive and wrong! We see some aspects of our history repeating itself, just as critical pamphleteers strongly opposed the president during the conflict between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson prior to the Jay Treaty in 1795 "In the ideology of the new republic no danger was greater than the corruption of foreign influence." At the time it was believed that British interests were involved in treaty negotiations. Despite all of Robert Mueller’s interviews and arrests, for unrelated process crimes, he still has no proof of collusion or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.  The goal of Trump's opposition has always been to destroy him, his policies, and his presidency.  Also, CNN's "nose for news" smells more like a leak than muckraking. The DOJ needs to initiate a leak investigation into why CNN was at Stone's house before the FBI even arrived because their explanation is weak and nonsensical. Then, Fox News Chief Intelligence Correspondent Catherine Herridge  calls in to discuss how the Stone arrest was handled and how rarely congressional testimony has been used as the basis for a grand jury indictment and other irregularities. Later, President Trump's problem with the border wall is that Republicans in the Senate are falling off the Trump Train. If his own team won’t stand with him in this fight it’s going to be tough. We need to stand with the President and give him three more weeks and see what they come up with - we’re not done yet. But we must stand against amnesty, otherwise we’re out! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In the wake of Russia-gate, I take a look at the reaction to George Washington's lowest moment as president: The Jay Treaty. 

Year(s) Discussed: 1790-1796 Relations between the US and France deteriorate after the Jay Treaty goes into effect while Washington gets involved in the campaign to secure Lafayette’s release from his imprisonment in the Habsburg Monarchy, the administration takes care of business as the end of Washington’s second term draws closer, and the parties position themselves … Continue reading 1.33 – Race to the Finish Line →

Year(s) Discussed: 1795-1796 Though finally managing to resolve his personnel issues, Washington and his Cabinet find themselves faced with a host of new problems including a new round of debate over the Jay Treaty and political maneuverings by the Democratic-Republicans as the next presidential election draws ever closer. Source information for this episode can be … Continue reading 1.32 – Samsons and Solomons →

Year(s) Discussed: 1789-1799 While the construction of the nation’s new capital proceeds, the public battle against the Jay Treaty begins in earnest upon its publication by Benjamin Franklin Bache. Demonstrations and meetings go on up and down the Eastern seaboard, and even Alexander Hamilton has difficulty determining how to respond. Meanwhile, Washington has to fill … Continue reading 1.27 – The Light of Burning Effigies →

Year(s) Discussed: 1794-1795 The Jay Treaty finally arrives in Philadelphia, but it turns out to be more of a curse than the blessing for which Washington and his administration were hoping. As Washington and Randolph scramble to figure out what to do with the treaty, the opposition makes preparations for a full-on attack on this … Continue reading 1.26 – A Monument of Folly and Venality →

The last Documents in Detail webinar for the 16-17 school year took place on Wednesday, 17 May, and focused on George Washington's Farewell Address. A good question that kicked off the discussion was simply why? That is, why is Washington's Farewell Address so popular, so often read, and considered by so many over the last 200+ years to be so important. What's so special about it? Scholars brought up the point that Washington, while very popular at the outset of his first term, experienced the first presidential controversies - the Jay Treaty, the problems within his own cabinet between Jefferson and Hamilton, to name but two - and many Americans questioned his decisions and leadership by 1796. Also discussed were the various drafts of Washington's address, the first of which was written mostly by James Madison at the end of Washington's first term, when he seriously considered stepping down; and the one written by Alexander Hamilton in 1796. Both were based solidly on Washington's ideas, however. Additional suggested reading is from Ellis's Founding Brothers, specifically chapter 4, "The Farewell." Access the full archives, with documents links, here. iTunes podcast

We recorded an audiobook! It’s about the letters between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr before their fateful duel. Get it for free with a 30 day Audible trial at ElectionCollege.com/DuelingLetters or get it for only $3.99 with your Audible subscription! _____________________________ If you’re going to talk about the First Party System, you definitely have to talk about the Jay Treaty. So that’s what we’re going to do!   Did it ever occur to you that not everything was all wrapped up nicely with a bow after the Battle of Yorktown? Well it wasn’t! There’s still lots of stuff to be taken care of.   In this episode we talk all about the origins of the Two Party System and the Jay Treaty. ______________________________ Check out Jason's other show - Online Marketing Guys! ______________________________ Support the show! Use this link to do your shopping on Amazon. It won't cost you a penny more and it will help us out!  ElectionCollege.com/Amazon ________________________ Be sure to subscribe to the show! Leave us a review on iTunes - It really helps us out! Facebook  |  Twitter  | Instagram ________________________ Get a free month of Audible and a free audiobook to keep at ElectionCollege.com/Audible ________________________ Music from: http://www.bensound.com/royalty-free-music ________________________ Some links in these show notes are affiliate links that could monetarily benefit Election College, but cost you nothing extra.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Jay treaty gets everyone all riled up. The obvious solution? FIGHT! Join us as we discuss... the Jay Treaty,Washington's retirement,a spat between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams,and more!For more information, check out the following resources... The Quartet: Orchestrating the Second American Revolution, 1783-1789John AdamsThe First Presidential Contest: 1796 and the Founding of American Democracy________________________  Be sure to subscribe to the show! Leave us a review on iTunes - It really helps us out! Facebook  |  Twitter  | Instagram Election College is recorded using Audacity and produced with help from the BossJock for iPad App. ________________________ Get a free month of Audible and a free audiobook to keep here. ________________________ Get $10 free from Canva using this link! ________________________  Music from: http://www.bensound.com/royalty-free-music ________________________   Some links in these show notes are affiliate links that could monetarily benefit Election College, but cost you nothing extra. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices