Podcasts about Squire Patton Boggs

Send us a textExiting Contracts and Handling Suppliers in DistressIn this final episode, Nicola Smith, Simon Jones, Victoria Callicott and Ollie Ward-Jones, from global law firm Squire Patton Boggs, cover strategies for exiting contracts and dealing with supplier insolvency. The hosts discuss termination clauses, risks of incorrect termination, due diligence, contingency plans and red flags for supplier distress. Practical tips and real-life examples are provided to help businesses navigate these challenging situations.

Send us a textNavigating Regulatory Compliance Issues: A Case Study of Products Contaminated With PeanutsThis episode focuses on handling regulatory compliance issues, using a case study of peanut contamination in products. Partner Nicola Smith, leads the discussion with Simon Jones, Victoria Callicott and Ollie Ward-Jones, from global law firm Squire Patton Boggs on immediate actions, communication with stakeholders, legal obligations, corrective actions and potential claims for compensation. The importance of legal privilege and practical steps to manage contamination issues are highlighted. 

Send us a textNavigating Daily Challenges in Supply AgreementsHost Nicola Smith and guests Simon Jones, Victoria Callicott and Ollie Ward-Jones, from global law firm Squire Patton Boggs, delve into common day-to-day issues in supply agreements, such as delivery delays, quality discrepancies and communication breakdowns, as well as how these issues should be handled. They emphasise proactive approaches, clear communication channels, detailed contracts and contingency plans to manage these challenges effectively.

Send us a textThe Recipe for Perfect ContractsHost Nicola Smith and guests Simon Jones, Victoria Callicott and Ollie Ward-Jones, from global law firm Squire Patton Boggs, discuss the importance of well-crafted contracts for supply chain risk management in the food and drink industry. They cover key elements such as key contractual terms to agree, the importance of audit rights, termination clauses, force majeure and limits of liability to avoid disputes and ensure smooth operations, as well as how a business can best protect its position in the event of a regulatory or insolvency situation.

This week I had the pleasure of speaking with Karyn Schmidt, now a principal at Squire Patton Boggs in its Public Policy practice, after spending 25 years at the American Chemistry Council (ACC). For the many members in the chemical community who know Karyn, her deep understanding of chemical law and policy will serve the firm's clients well. We discuss Karyn's transition to private practice, her work at ACC, and Karyn's thoughts on what is in store for chemical stakeholders now and the foreseeable future. ALL MATERIALS IN THIS PODCAST ARE PROVIDED SOLELY FOR INFORMATIONAL  AND ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES. THE MATERIALS ARE NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE OR THE PROVISION OF LEGAL SERVICES. ALL LEGAL QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ANSWERED DIRECTLY BY A LICENSED ATTORNEY PRACTICING IN THE APPLICABLE AREA OF LAW. ©2025 Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.  All Rights Reserved

The new European Commission talks the talk on rescuing chemicals but has not yet turned words into action as deindustrialisation gathers pace.-          Change of tone from new Commission-          New strategic dialogue with chemicals on competitiveness-          Well intentioned, but not enough detail on action plan-          Conflict between competitiveness and Green Deal objectives -          Watering down or delaying existing legislation moves the goalposts, adds legal uncertainty-          US has a patchwork of state-level and federal regulation-          EU-US regulatory alignment is moving towards divergenceThis podcast was recorded on 26 March. ICIS journalist Will Beacham interviews Thomas Delille and Peter Sellar of UK-US based law firm Squire Patton Boggs.

This Day in Legal History: Jay Treaty SignedOn November 19, 1794, the United States and Great Britain signed the Jay Treaty, formally titled the “Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation.” Negotiated by U.S. Chief Justice John Jay and British Foreign Secretary Lord Grenville, the treaty sought to resolve lingering tensions between the two nations following the American Revolutionary War. At its core, the agreement facilitated the withdrawal of British troops from forts in the Northwest Territory, a region that was still contested despite American sovereignty being recognized in the Treaty of Paris (1783).The treaty also addressed contentious issues such as British seizure of American ships and the debts owed by American citizens to British creditors. While the agreement provided for limited American trade rights in the British West Indies and a framework for resolving disputes over the U.S.-Canada border, it failed to stop British impressment of American sailors or guarantee broader trading rights. Domestically, the treaty sparked fierce political debate, with Federalists supporting it as a means of preserving peace and economic stability, while Jeffersonian Republicans decried it as overly conciliatory to British interests.The Jay Treaty is historically significant for establishing a precedent for diplomatic negotiation and emphasizing the importance of peaceful dispute resolution. While controversial at the time, it ultimately helped avert war with Britain and allowed the young United States to stabilize its economy and focus on internal growth. Its ratification in 1795 marked an important step in shaping U.S. foreign policy during its formative years. The treaty's mixed reception underscored the deepening political divisions in the United States, foreshadowing the partisan struggles that would define early American governance.Big Law firms are poised to see significant lobbying revenue gains under anticipated Republican control of the White House and Congress, as the GOP aims to advance a pro-business, “America First” agenda. Key areas of focus for lobbyists include revisiting elements of the 2017 tax law, reversing restrictions on fossil fuel development imposed by the Biden administration, and assisting with the confirmation of cabinet nominees. The Supreme Court's recent Loper Bright decision, which limits federal agencies' ability to interpret vague laws, adds another layer of legislative complexity, increasing demand for legal expertise in technical drafting.The potential uptick in lobbying activity echoes patterns seen in prior shifts of political power. Lobbying revenue rose sharply in 2017 and 2021 during transitions to unified party control. Firms like Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, Akin Gump, Squire Patton Boggs, and K&L Gates are particularly well-positioned, with some deriving significant portions of their income from federal lobbying efforts. Brownstein Hyatt leads the pack, earning $50.9 million in lobbying revenue through the first three quarters of 2024.Major firms are already representing high-profile clients. For instance, Brownstein Hyatt has advocated for Apollo Global Management on portfolio-related issues, while Squire Patton Boggs has worked on food regulation for Mars Inc. Energy-related lobbying, such as advocating for liquefied natural gas export permits, is also expected to surge as Republicans aim to repeal Biden-era restrictions. Appropriations negotiations may further boost lobbying opportunities, as delayed bills give the GOP more leverage.Big Law Lobbyists See GOP Trifecta Haul Including Tax, EnergyThe State Bar of California has approved a proposal to expunge attorney discipline records from public view after eight years, provided the attorney has not faced subsequent disciplinary action during that time. This measure, which excludes cases of disbarment, aims to address racial disparities in the attorney discipline system. A 2019 study revealed that Black male attorneys in California were over three times more likely than their white counterparts to face probation, prompting a 2023 review committee to recommend changes to the system. The proposal now awaits approval from the California Supreme Court.The expungement policy is intended to balance accountability, transparency, and redemption opportunities, aligning California's attorney discipline practices with those in other states and professions like medicine and real estate. Critics, however, argue it could undermine transparency and public trust, with 74% of public comments opposing the plan. In contrast, a majority of attorney comments—69%—supported the change, noting it incentivizes maintaining clean records. If implemented, an estimated 2,353 attorneys would be immediately eligible for expungement. California, the second-largest state bar by membership, projects that this policy will reduce the long-term stigma attached to past disciplinary actions.California Bar aims to expunge attorney discipline records after 8 years | ReutersThe losing bidder for Alex Jones' bankrupt Infowars empire is challenging The Onion's winning bid, arguing it offered less cash and relied on questionable claim waivers. First United American Companies LLC (FUAC), which bid $3.5 million in cash, claims its offer was superior to The Onion parent company Global Tetrahedron LLC's $1.75 million bid. FUAC accuses The Onion of colluding with Sandy Hook families who supported the bid by waiving part of their claims against Jones.The bankruptcy trustee overseeing the sale, Christopher Murray, defended the auction as transparent and noted that the Sandy Hook families' waiver improved the overall value of The Onion's bid. The waiver was key in positioning The Onion's bid as the best-value offer, despite its lower cash amount. FUAC countered that these waivers are speculative and provide no real value to the bankruptcy estate, calling them akin to “monopoly” money.Judge Christopher M. Lopez, who previously raised concerns about the auction's transparency, is now considering the motion to disqualify The Onion's bid. The sale is part of an effort to liquidate Jones' estate and pay down the $1.5 billion in defamation judgments against him for spreading false claims about the Sandy Hook shooting. The trustee dismissed FUAC's accusations as baseless and an attempt to mislead the court.In case you haven't figured it out already, FUAC is a company affiliated with Alex Jones' snake oil sales. Obviously, Jones has an interest in seeing his assets purchased by a friendly company rather than The Onion which … is not friendly to Jones' interests. Infowars Bidder Moves to Disqualify The Onion's Winning OfferThe 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals appeared likely to dismiss appeals by Amazon and SpaceX challenging the structure of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), arguing the companies acted prematurely. Both companies sought to block NLRB cases alleging labor violations, with Amazon opposing a unionization case and SpaceX contesting claims of retaliatory firings. However, the appeals panel suggested that Amazon and SpaceX did not give lower court judges enough time to rule before filing their appeals.  Amazon's case, initially in Texas, was transferred to Washington, D.C., and SpaceX's to California, though these transfers are on hold pending appeals. The judges questioned whether the delays cited by Amazon and SpaceX constituted "effective denials," a standard necessary for appeals. Judge James Graves noted Amazon's unrealistic deadline demands, while Judge Irma Ramirez questioned SpaceX's assertion of deliberate judicial delay.  The NLRB argued that the companies imposed arbitrary deadlines to expedite decisions and delayed proceedings by resisting case transfers. Both companies face significant underlying NLRB cases, with Amazon fighting unionization at a New York warehouse and SpaceX denying allegations of retaliatory firings. If the appeals are dismissed, the companies could request a review by the full 5th Circuit, known for its conservative leanings.Amazon, SpaceX challenges to NLRB may be thrown out of appeals court | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Alan L. Friel is Chair of Squire Patton Boggs' Data Privacy, Cybersecurity & Digital Assets Practice. He is tier-1 ranked by Chambers, and BTI Consulting Group has named Alan a Client Service All-Star, recognizing lawyers who stand above all others in delivering exceptional client service. In this episode… Evolving privacy regulations like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) are reshaping the way companies approach data management and compliance. CCPA's proposed draft regulations would require certain businesses to conduct cybersecurity audits, privacy risk assessments, and implement governance surrounding automated decision-making and AI technologies. While these frameworks help protect consumer data, they also introduce operational challenges and increased expenses for companies. How can companies prepare for compliance while effectively managing data and reducing costs? Privacy compliance is more than a legal requirement — it's a vital part of sound business strategy. Navigating compliance obligations requires companies to adopt a proactive approach to data governance. Businesses need to implement good data hygiene practices and conduct privacy risk assessments to identify and mitigate risks. These processes help businesses maintain their data inventory, respond to consumer privacy rights requests, and manage information assets. However, the legal landscape remains complicated, with questions about whether some regulatory requirements may conflict with First Amendment protections. In this episode of She Said Privacy/He Said Security, Jodi and Justin Daniels speak with Alan Friel, Chair of the Data Privacy, Cybersecurity & Digital Assets Practice at Squire Patton Boggs, about the costs, benefits, and legal implications of regulatory compliance. Alan explains why businesses should adopt privacy risk assessments as a best practice, regardless of ongoing legal uncertainties, and discusses the intersection of privacy regulations with free speech rights under the First Amendment. He emphasizes the importance of proactive data management practices and governance to navigate compliance challenges and position businesses for long-term success in a shifting regulatory environment.

For over 10 years, Charmain was at Drew & Napier working as a director, Throughout her career, she has been a privacy protector. Charmain now works at Squire, Her career journey is really something to admire!

Analizamos el conflicto en Oriente Medio con Vicente Palacio, director de Política Exterior de la Fundación Alternativas. Tertulia con Eduardo Aguilar, técnico comercial y economista del Estado; Francisco Navarro, profesor del Instituto de Empresa; y Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs.

This Day in Legal History: Lord Haw-Haw Sentenced to HangOn September 19, 1945, William Joyce, infamously known as "Lord Haw-Haw," was sentenced to death by a British court for treason. Joyce, an American-born British subject, became notorious for his English-language radio broadcasts during World War II, where he spread Nazi propaganda designed to demoralize Allied forces and sway public opinion. His broadcasts, aired from Germany, ridiculed Britain and encouraged defeatism, earning him the mocking nickname "Lord Haw-Haw" due to his affected, sneering tone.Interestingly, before aligning with Nazi Germany, Joyce had served as an informant for the British government on Irish Republican Army (IRA) activities. In the 1920s, Joyce had strong anti-communist and anti-Irish Republican sentiments, and his knowledge of far-right politics in the U.K. led him to assist British authorities in monitoring IRA movements. However, his extreme right-wing views eventually drew him to fascism, and by the late 1930s, he joined Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists before fleeing to Germany at the onset of World War II.The nickname "Lord Haw-Haw" was coined by British journalist Jonah Barrington in reference to the exaggerated aristocratic accent of an anonymous broadcaster. Though it initially referred to another German propagandist, the label stuck to Joyce, who became the most infamous voice behind Nazi broadcasts. His broadcasts, filled with mockery of the British government and predictions of their downfall, made him a household name in Britain, and the face of enemy propaganda. Despite his American birth, Joyce's use of a British passport for his travels was enough for the court to convict him of treason. His execution in January 1946 marked the end of one of the most infamous figures of wartime propaganda.The Compton Courthouse in Los Angeles suffered two major floods in January 2024, caused by burst water valves, resulting in closures and significant disruptions to court operations. Nearly 5,000 cases were impacted, and emergency repairs cost California almost $2.6 million. This courthouse, along with many others in L.A. County, is deteriorating due to a "run to failure" maintenance approach, where repairs are made only after systems break. Budget constraints have forced the California Judicial Council to prioritize only critical repairs, leaving many courthouses vulnerable to failure. Compton is a "medium priority" for repairs, raising concerns about more urgent locations, such as the Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center, which has also faced severe plumbing and hazardous material issues.Los Angeles has 36 courthouses, many of which are well past their 50-year lifespans, and costly maintenance bills continue to rise. The challenges are compounded by seismic safety risks, as many of these buildings are not built to withstand earthquakes, presenting a significant danger to the public. Renovation and replacement of courthouses are progressing slowly, with only a few new facilities funded each year. Experts suggest modernizing courthouse designs and incorporating technology to reduce the need for large, outdated structures. However, without substantial investment, L.A.'s court infrastructure remains vulnerable to both natural disasters and everyday wear and tear.L.A. Courthouses Crumble With ‘Run to Failure' MaintenanceSecond indoor flood causes Compton Courthouse to close until further noticeCOMPTON COURTHOUSE CLOSED FOR THE NEXT SEVERAL DAYS DUE TO ADDITIONAL FLOODING ISSUES AFFECTING ELEVATORS AND LOBBAlso in California legal news, a judge has denied a request to reopen Golden Gate University's law school, which closed after 123 years of operation. California Superior Court Judge Richard Ulmer ruled against the plaintiffs, a group of former students and alumni, who had sought an injunction to reinstate the school. The plaintiffs had sued for breach of contract, claiming the university kept students in the dark about its financial struggles before announcing the closure.Golden Gate University cited declining enrollment, poor bar exam pass rates, and a weak job market as reasons for shutting down its law program. While most of the affected students have transferred to other American Bar Association-accredited schools, such as the University of San Francisco School of Law and Mitchell Hamline School of Law, the plaintiffs argue that the school failed to provide adequate transfer options.Although the school will not reopen, the plaintiffs can still pursue monetary damages for claims such as breach of contract and false advertising. A hearing is scheduled for October 22 to determine whether their case will proceed. Golden Gate Law is the latest in a series of law schools nationwide facing closures due to similar challenges.California judge rejects bid to reopen 123-year-old law school | ReutersMark Esper, former U.S. Secretary of Defense, joined Squire Patton Boggs as a part-time senior adviser, where he will focus on advising clients on national security and foreign policy. Although Esper has extensive experience in government and previously worked for defense contractor Raytheon, he will not lobby for the firm's clients in Congress or executive branch agencies. His role will leverage his public policy expertise from over 30 years in high-level government positions.Esper's move comes after his public break with Donald Trump in 2020, particularly over disagreements about invoking the Insurrection Act during protests following George Floyd's murder. He has since emerged as a critic of Trump, calling him a “threat to democracy” while also critiquing President Biden. While at Squire Patton Boggs, Esper will continue his work with venture capital firm Red Cell Partners and European think tank GLOBSEC.The firm views Esper's hire as a key step toward becoming a leader in national security advisory services. His work is expected to focus more on helping multinational corporations navigate the intersection of economic policy and national security rather than direct governmental advocacy.Trump Defense Secretary Esper Joins Squire Patton BoggsEx-Trump defense secretary Esper joins law firm Squire Patton Boggs | ReutersSenate Democrats are working to strike a deal with Republicans to confirm a backlog of President Biden's judicial nominees before the end of the year. Senate Judiciary Chair Dick Durbin is hopeful that Republicans will agree to a package of nominees, a practice that was more common in less partisan times. With the Senate's slim Democratic majority, confirmations have been challenging, particularly for nominees like Rebecca Pennell and Mustafa Kasubhai, whose votes were delayed due to attendance issues and GOP opposition.Some nominees, such as Charnelle Bjelkengren, faced significant hurdles, with Bjelkengren withdrawing earlier this year due to a failed confirmation hearing. Kasubhai, who is still awaiting a vote, has been scrutinized by Republicans over his stance on diversity and past writings. Additionally, Democrats have faced internal opposition, with key senators refusing to support Adeel Mangi's nomination due to allegations of affiliations with controversial groups. The Senate faces a tight deadline, with a limited five-week "lame duck" session following the upcoming election recess, during which they must juggle these nominations alongside other legislative priorities.Democrats Look to Strike Deal With Republicans on Judicial PicksEU antitrust regulators have initiated proceedings to ensure Apple complies with the Digital Markets Act (DMA), which requires the company to open its closed ecosystem to rivals. The European Commission aims to clarify what Apple must do to meet its obligations, focusing on iOS interoperability for devices like smartwatches, headphones, and VR headsets, as well as how Apple handles third-party and developer requests for connectivity. The Commission expects to finalize the guidelines within six months, with Apple at risk of fines up to 10% of its annual global turnover if it fails to comply. Apple has expressed willingness to cooperate but warned that opening its systems could expose users to security risks.EU antitrust regulators tell Apple how to comply with tech rules | ReutersAnd something of a double-dip in the Apple news bowl, in a piece I wrote for Forbes I spoke about the European Union's recent win in a legal battle requiring Ireland to collect €13 billion in unpaid taxes from Apple–a significant victory in the fight against multinational tax avoidance. Although the EU's highest court upheld the decision, Ireland remains reluctant to claim the windfall, as doing so could threaten its status as a low-tax haven that attracts large corporations. Ireland had argued, alongside Apple, that the taxes were not owed, reflecting its desire to maintain control over its tax policies.This case highlights the tension between national tax sovereignty and EU regulations aimed at curbing unfair competition through favorable tax deals. While the EU can force Ireland to reclaim the unpaid taxes, it cannot dictate how the country spends the money, leaving the Irish government with a difficult decision. Ireland's low corporate tax rate has been key to its economic growth, but the Apple ruling could have global ramifications as more countries adopt minimum tax frameworks to address tax avoidance by multinational corporations.The case underscores broader issues in international tax law, as countries like Luxembourg and the Netherlands, also known for favorable tax policies, may face similar pressures. While Ireland is legally obligated to collect the money, its cautious approach reflects a concern about maintaining its attractiveness to global businesses. The funds remain in escrow, and Ireland has yet to reveal how it plans to utilize the money, which is equivalent to 2.43% of its GDP.You Can Give Ireland Tax Revenue—But Can You Make Ireland Spend It? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Welcome back to the tour IPxSUMMER 2024 around the world!Today we fly to China with Paolo Beconcini, Head of China IP Practice at Squire Patton Boggs law firm and we will find out more on trade secrets' protection and violation there.So, fasten your seat belts and enjoy the IP tour!

Traci Martinez is the Office Managing Partner of the Columbus, Ohio, office and an experienced civil litigation and labor and employment lawyer. She has a unique and broad practice that focuses on the business objectives of her clients, whether through counseling, litigation or transactional matters. Traci is also a demonstrated leader in the Central Ohio …

In this episode we're with Candice Kwok, partner at Squire Patton Boggs law firm, and we will talk about Branding of pharmaceuticals in the US.

For today's discussion we were pleased to host Jim Matheson, CEO of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA). Jim's distinguished background includes roles in both the public and private sectors. Prior to joining the NRECA in 2016, he served in the public policy practice at Squire Patton Boggs based in Washington, D.C. Jim was elected as a U.S. Representative for Utah from 2001 to 2015 and has significant experience in the energy industry. The NRECA is a vital national service organization representing over 900 consumer-owned electric cooperatives, collectively serving 42 million people across 48 states in the US. We were excited to visit with Jim and gain valuable insights into the cooperative landscape. Jim first provides background on the unique structure of electric cooperatives, how they are owned by the members they serve, and focus on consumer interest rather than shareholder interests (a detailed overview of US electric co-ops is linked here). We explore how electric co-ops approach decision making regarding power systems to balance cost, reliability, and emissions reduction, the evolving generation mix, the shrinking margin of error in meeting peak demand and the increasing risk of outages, and the US's struggle to keep up with building new power plants while also shutting down existing ones prematurely. Jim shares his perspective on the need for increased resiliency in the electric grid, particularly through the expansion of transmission infrastructure, and concerns with the feasibility and economic impact of recent EPA regulations targeting emissions reduction from coal and natural gas plants (details linked here). We discuss potential bipartisan efforts to revise permitting and streamline processes, growing awareness among the public on power issues, election year dynamics, the benefits of natural gas as a fuel source for electricity generation, the need for continued vigilance around cybersecurity measures in the electricity sector, the possibility of bipartisan efforts to prioritize energy security and reliability, and more. We greatly appreciate the work Jim and the team at NRECA are doing. Mike Bradley kicked us off by highlighting that markets have been choppy this past week but managed to get by with modest gains. The 10-year bond yield has plunged to ~4.45%, down from ~4.7%, just one week ago. Bond yields dropped despite the FOMC leaving interest rates unchanged, mostly because Chairman Powell signaled the next rate move would likely not be a rate hike. WTI price this past week had collapsed ~5/bbl due to a large increase in US crude oil inventories, less concern over Mideast chaos, and WTI trading through important technical trading levels. Crude oil traders seem to firmly believe that OPEC will not announce they're putting barrels back into the market at their June 1st meeting, especially at sub-~80/bbl. Natural gas is trading at its highest level since early January, mostly due to the monthly futures contract roll. The US natural gas storage surplus is still high, but lower 48 natural gas production is falling faster than expected and recently averaged less than 99bcfd. Most S&P companies have reported Q1 results, and so broader markets will need to look elsewhere for direction. Broader markets have rallied recently as they're less worried today about higher interest rates and higher commodity prices. He further noted that broader markets recently have had a nice bounce because they were technically oversold, and volatility had spiked but are now moving towards overbought territory again. He ended by flagging most energy companies have reported Q1 results and this week will be a heavy dose of SMID-cap E&Ps, Global Oil Majors

The domestic and global appetite to consume sports and entertainment keeps growing. As such, legal work – in its myriad forms – will continue to expand alongside it, says a global firm partner. In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, host Jerome Doraisamy welcomes back Squire Patton Boggs partner Tony Chong to discuss what's happening in sports and entertainment law, the issues and challenges being faced on the ground by practitioners, the need for legal teams to continually anticipate evolutions in the sporting and entertainment realms, and staying on top of the social, cultural and even political zeitgeist in understanding how the environment will evolve. Chong also details the need to immerse one's self in the industry, engaging with other practice groups, the potential need to be a jack-of-all-trades, taking a case-by-case approach, how legal work in these spaces will continue to grow, and why it is so exciting to be at the forefront of such change. If you like this episode, show your support by rating us or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts (The Lawyers Weekly Show) and by following Lawyers Weekly on social media: Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. If you have any questions about what you heard today, any topics of interest you have in mind, or if you'd like to lend your voice to the show, email editor@lawyersweekly.com.au for more insights!

Analizamos la economía china con Alicia García-Herrero, economista jefe de Asia-Pacífico en NATIXIS. En la tertulia han intervenido Celia Ferrero, vicepresidenta ejecutiva de ATA; Juan Carlos Lozano, periodista especializado en información económica del Grupo Prensa Ibérica; y Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs.

The banking agencies and the Justice Department are shifting how they assess and review bank mergers and acquisitions. On the latest episode of the ABA Banking Journal Podcast — presented by Alkami — ABA SVP Hu Benton discusses what bankers need to know about potential deals and offers amid the wave of policy changes. Among other topics, Benton explores: The Justice Department's review of bank merger guidelines The FDIC's newly released policy statement on mergers. How the OCC is evaluating mergers among national banks and federal thrifts. How bank mergers fit into the Biden administration and executive agencies' broader approach to antitrust considerations. A new resource from ABA and Squire Patton Boggs to help banks assess their readiness for a transaction.   Access “Bank Mergers & Acquisitions: A Self-Assessment Guide“ This episode is presented by Alkami.

Las claves de la Ley sobre IA que ha aprobado el Europarlamento con Ibán García del Blanco, eurodiputado socialista. Tertulia con Miguel Yagüe, profesor de Economía en la Universidad Complutense, IE y Cunef; Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; y Jesús Varela, presidente de Lenguluka.

Analizamos el comportamiento de los mercados con José Luis Cava, analista independiente. Tertulia con Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; Juan José Rubio, catedrático de Hacienda Pública y exdirector del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales; y Rafael Ramiro, Profesor de Icade Business School -Universidad Pontificia Comillas.

Two authors of the groundbreaking U.S. Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA) join the podcast to discuss one of the most sweeping and consequential anti-corruption laws of the last four decades. Tom Firestone, a partner at Squire Patton Boggs, and Scott Greytak, Director of Advocacy at the U.S. chapter of Transparency International (TI), discuss the importance of FEPA. The law makes it a crime for a foreign official to demand or accept a bribe from a company with a U.S. nexus, including those listed on a U.S. stock exchange. The guests join Frank Brown, Director of CIPE's Anti-Corruption & Governance Center, to discuss who the law covers, the steps needed to enforce it, and what it means for other countries seeking to adopt similar legislation. This podcast is brought to you by CIPE's Anti-Corruption & Governance Center.   

Analizamos la situación de la PAC con Clara Aguilera, eurodiputada socialista y miembro de la Comisión de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Tertulia con Rafael Moreno, coordinador de comunicación de defensa de TEDAE y dircom de Santa Bárbara Sistemas; Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; y Miguel Córdoba, profesor de economía financiera.

Hablamos del ritmo de ejecución de los fondos europeos con Paloma Baena, Directora Senior European Affairs y Next Generation EU en LLYC. Tertulia con Carmen Morales, profesora del IE Business School; Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; y José Ignacio Gutiérrez, presidente de la Federación de Servicios Financieros de la Confederación de Cuadros.

Hablamos de economía y de los resultados de la entidad con Juan Carlos Ureta, presidente de Renta 4 Banco. Tertulia con Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; Loreto Gómez, Directora Asociada Marketing y Estrategia Digital; y Miguel Córdoba, profesor de economía financiera.

In this week's episode, we start with key takeaways from our recent networking event in collaboration with Squire Patton Boggs, where market experts gathered to share an overview of the hydrogen industry's current landscape, highlighting the challenges and opportunities in technology, finance, and regulatory aspects.Our news team presents an exclusive story on H2 Green Steel's groundbreaking €4.5bn financing package for its hydrogen-powered facility in Sweden.  We also bring you the latest on Field's acquisition of Scottish BESS projects, TotalEnergies and European Energy's Nordic offshore wind partnership, CIP's launch of Copenhagen Energy Islands, and Pantheon's Infrastructure Fund final close.In our analysis section, we explore the UK's relationship with hydrogen heating, find out how disruption in the Red Sea is having a knock-on effect on supply chains for EV manufacturers, and ask why traditional nuclear projects are still falling behind.Finally, we bring you a first look at January's editorial,  focusing on significant industry consolidations such as BlackRock's acquisition of GIP, Commerzbank's purchase of Aquila Capital, and the intriguing partnership between Societe Generale and Brookfield.Hosted by:Oliver Carr - Lead AnalystViola Caon - Head of Content Zachary Skidmore - Senior Reporter Reach out to us at: podcasts@inspiratia.comFind all of our latest news and analysis by subscribing to inspiratiaListen to all our episodes on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and other providers. Music credit: NDA/Show You instrumental/Tribe of Noise©2024 inspiratia. All rights reserved.This content is protected by copyright. Please respect the author's rights and do not copy or reproduce it without permission.

Tom Firestone, a partner with Squire Patton Boggs in Washington, discusses the new US Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA).  Tom's perspective is especially interesting as he previously served as the Legal Adviser at the US Embassy in Moscow dealing with financial crime there and, in 2018, he wrote an article on what was needed to tackle the demand side of bribery.

Analizamos la situación de las ventas de España al exterior con Antonio Bonet, presidente del Club de Exportadores. Tertulia con Julián Salcedo, Doctor en Economía, presidente del Foro de Economistas Inmobiliarios; Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; e Isabel Aguilera consultora empresarial.

Analizamos las medidas económicas del gobierno argentino con Rogelio Núñez, investigador senior asociado del Real Instituto Elcano. Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; Rubén García-Quismondo, Socio Director de Quabbala, Abogados y Economistas; y Carmen Morales, profesora del IE Business School.

ABI's Business Reorganization Committee is proud to launch "Unordinary Course," a podcast series that aims to unpack current events and emerging trends in the restructuring industry. The inaugural episode features host Lee Pacchia of ICR talking with Karol Denniston of Squire Patton Boggs about trends and issues surrounding industrial policy, and why practitioners should take note.

Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs, cree que la comunicación de la SEPI es poco reflexionada

Analizamos el conflicto entre Israel y Hamás con Ignacio ÁLVAREZ-OSSORIO, Profesor de Estudios Árabes de la Universidad de Alicante. Tertulia con Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; Rubén García-Quismondo, Socio Director de Quabbala, Abogados y Economistas; y Juan Carlos Lozano, periodista especializado en información económica del Grupo Prensa Ibérica.

In this episode of Cannabis Unlocked, Mara Sheldon (Principal at Squire Patton Boggs) sits down with Tiby Erdely (Founding Partner at KEY Investment Partners) to discuss the recent U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recommendation to the Department of Justice to reschedule cannabis from a Schedule 1 drug to Schedule 3. The conversation begins with Mara's thoughts on HHS' recommendation and what rescheduling could mean for the cannabis industry.  From there, the conversation shifts to the positive and negative implications of a schedule 3 reclassification and the political pressure this recommendation creates. Please enjoy!

Analizamos los retos de la presidencia de turno de la UE con Raquel García, investigadora del Real Instituto Elcano. Tertulia con Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; María José Villanueva, consultora de Salud y farma, dietista-Nutricionista y cofundadora de la asociación española de ejecutivas y consejeras EJECON; y Julián Salcedo, presidente del Foro de Economistas Inmobiliarios y socio director de CEFRE.

Hear Patricia Woo and I talk about why she integrates her spiritual gifts with evidence-based knowledge into her legal sessions with clients. This conversation is all about marrying the tangible side of life with the intangible and how they must go together in order to create one's desired future.  

The federal government has ended COVID-19 border restrictions known as Title 42, which blocked many migrants at the border with Mexico. These restrictions have been replaced with a new asylum regulation aimed at deterring illegal crossings. However, legal challenges have been filed against the new asylum bars, with advocates arguing that they violate U.S. laws and international agreements. The new regulation implemented by President Joe Biden is seen by some as resembling the restrictions imposed by former President Donald Trump. Chaotic scenes have unfolded at the border as migrants rushed to enter the country before the new rule took effect. The new regulation presumes that most migrants are ineligible for asylum if they did not seek protection in other nations first or failed to use legal pathways for entry. Thousands of migrants have attempted to enter the U.S. by crossing rivers, climbing walls, and scrambling up embankments. The Biden administration has defended the regulation, stating that it seeks to incentivize migrants to use lawful pathways for entry. Title 42 was first implemented by Trump in 2020 to curb the spread of COVID-19 in detention facilities and allowed for the quick expulsion of migrants. Biden kept Title 42 in place and expanded it. Republicans have criticized Biden's immigration policies, while Biden has blamed Congress for not passing comprehensive immigration reform. The Biden administration has been trying to send a message that illegal crossers will face consequences, deploying additional personnel to the border. Despite the end of Title 42 and the COVID public health emergency, the U.S. has been dealing with record numbers of migrants at the border, straining authorities and border cities.Legal challenges threaten Biden's border plan as Title 42 ends | ReutersA federal judge in Virginia has ruled that federal laws prohibiting the sale of handguns to individuals under the age of 21 violate their constitutional rights to possess firearms. The ruling, which is expected to be challenged by the Justice Department, will not take effect until the judge, Robert Payne, issues his final order in the coming weeks. The ruling will not impact the 19 states that already have their own laws prohibiting handgun sales to those under 21. The judge referenced the Supreme Court's recent expansion of gun rights in his decision. Gun rights are a contentious issue in the United States, with high levels of firearm violence and mass shootings. There have been at least 210 mass shootings in 2023 so far, according to the Gun Violence Archive. The decision was welcomed by the attorney representing the plaintiffs, who expressed optimism that the ruling would be affirmed.US judge strikes down federal law barring handgun sales to those under 21 | ReutersGoldman Sachs has reached a $215 million settlement in one of the largest sex discrimination cases on Wall Street, which has the potential to bring about greater gender equality in the financial industry. The settlement is a victory for more than 2,800 female associates and vice-presidents who accused the bank of paying women less than their male counterparts and denying them opportunities for advancement. But a settlement isn't without its downsides – by avoiding a trial, Goldman Sachs prevents damaging information about its employee evaluation and promotion processes from being revealed in court. As part of the settlement, an independent expert will investigate the bank's practices and conduct a pay-equity review for the next three years. The settlement could have a ripple effect on Wall Street, where gender discrimination and inequality have persisted for decades. Advocates hope that this landmark settlement signals a willingness by the industry to address gender inequality more effectively. However, the case has been a hard-fought battle, lasting nearly 13 years and requiring significant resources. The use of mandatory arbitration agreements in workplace disputes, which limit workers' ability to seek justice collectively, has also drawn criticism. Further legislative action is needed to curtail the use of arbitration agreements in other work-related disputes. The Goldman Sachs case highlights the importance for employers to regularly review their compensation, evaluation, and promotion practices to ensure they do not have a discriminatory impact on protected classes of workers.Goldman's Sex-Bias Deal Is ‘Milestone' for Women on Wall StreetGerman foundation Wau Holland has hired Squire Patton Boggs, a global law and public policy firm, to lobby the US Department of Justice (DOJ) on behalf of WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange. The foundation has paid Squire at least $1.2 million since October 2022 to advocate for journalists' rights to publish classified information. The firm aims to discuss the compatibility of Assange's espionage charges with Attorney General Merrick Garland's policy to protect journalists from enforcement actions. Although there is no evidence of progress in arranging a meeting with DOJ officials, this lobbying effort represents Squire's most lucrative federally-disclosed work in the past six months. Advocates for press freedom and civil liberties, major news outlets, and progressive members of the House have raised concerns about extraditing Assange to the US and putting him on trial, citing potential threats to First Amendment rights. Squire Patton Boggs declined to comment on the matter, while the DOJ and Wau Holland Foundation also did not provide comments.Assange Allies Turn to Squire Patton Boggs to Help Lobby DOJCrypto lender BlockFi has received court approval to return $297 million to customers with non-interest-bearing accounts. The ruling by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan stated that customers owned their deposits in BlockFi's Wallet program, which kept customer deposits separate from the company's other funds and did not pay interest. However, customers with interest-bearing accounts did not own their deposits, which were considered part of BlockFi's lending business and were subject to being pooled with other assets in bankruptcy proceedings. BlockFi, which filed for Chapter 11 protection in November, froze accounts shortly before the filing, creating confusion among customers. Despite receiving confirmation that their transfers were complete, customers who attempted to move $375 million from interest-bearing accounts to Wallet accounts will not have their funds returned. BlockFi's terms of service allowed it to block transfer requests during the shutdown. The decision aims to protect the recovery for Wallet customers and ensure the return of customer funds from a fixed pool of assets.BlockFi gets court permission to return $297 million to Wallet customers | ReutersMicrosoft is set to defend its planned $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard in a private antitrust lawsuit filed by video gamers who argue that the deal will harm industry competition. The hearing, taking place in San Francisco federal court, will determine whether a preliminary injunction should be issued to block the acquisition. Microsoft's lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs' request is unprecedented and have asked the court to deny the injunction. The deal, announced in January 2022, is also facing regulatory scrutiny from various competition law enforcers, including the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and Britain's antitrust regulator, which has already stated its intention to block the acquisition. The plaintiffs' lawyers are urging the court to block the deal to allow a trial on the merits of the acquisition to proceed. The case is being closely watched as it raises significant questions about competition in the gaming industry.Microsoft to defend Activision deal in gamers' lawsuit in US court | Reuters Get full access to Minimum Competence - Daily Legal News Podcast at www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

I've had fun and fluid exchanges of ideas with Stephen Goldstein of Squire Patton Boggs for over 20 years. In our chat today we cover the velocity of change in the legal market,  perceived next-GEN killers of revenue, accelerators of innovation and the legal workforce / workplace of the future.

In this special edition episode of GREAT POWER PODCAST, host Michael Sobolik turns the conversation over to AFPC President Herman Pirchner and AFPC Advisory Board Member Manisha Singh for a discussion on the past year of warfare in Ukraine, what the coming months could look like, and what it means for the United States and global security. Guest biographies Herman Pirchner, Jr. is the founding President of AFPC. Under his leadership, AFPC has hosted Washington events for hundreds of foreign officials ranging from the Prime Minister of Malta to the Prime Minister of Russia; conducted hundreds of briefings for Members of Congress and their staffs and, organized dozens of fact-finding missions abroad for current and former senior American officials. Former Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge, Former Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld, Former Speaker of the House of Representatives Newt Gingrich, former Director of Central Intelligence R. James Woolsey, as well as the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dick Myers are among those who have participated in this program. Pirchner's travels have taken him to most areas of the world, including more than 65 trips to the former Soviet Union since 1989, and more than 30 trips to China since 1994. He is an engaging speaker with a compelling grasp of the dynamics of world affairs. AFPC's publication program includes sponsorship of articles, monographs, books and Congressional testimony. AFPC authors have appeared in numerous newspapers and magazines including the Washington Post, New York Times, International Herald Tribune, Jane's Defense Weekly, Washington Times, Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, and National Review. In addition to his duties at AFPC, Mr. Pirchner directed the national security team advising the 2012 Presidential campaign of Newt Gingrich. Among his many publications is Pirchner's very prescient 2004 monograph, Reviving Greater Russia: The Future of Russia's Borders with Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Moldova, and Ukraine. He is also the author of Post Putin: Succession, Stability, and Russia's Future (Rowman and Littlefield, May 2019), which is also available in Ukrainian and Russian editions. Before founding AFPC, Mr. Pirchner served in the U.S. Senate as Director of Legislation for Senator Roger Jepsen (R-IA) and Legislative Assistant to Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA). She is an American attorney and government official who served as Assistant Secretary of State for Economic and Business Affairs in the Trump administration until January 20, 2021. She previously also served as Acting Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment. Previously, Singh worked as a lawyer at Reed Smith and Squire Patton Boggs. She also served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs during the Bush administration. Resources from the conversation Read Herman's book, Post Putin Read Herman's Washington Times op-ed about U.S. assistance to Ukraine

In this episode of Cannabis Unlocked, Mara Sheldon (Principal at Squire Patton Boggs) sits down with Pete Karabas (Founding Partner at KEY Investment Partners) to discuss the current and past hurdles of cannabis reform, the impact different types of reform have on the cannabis industry, and what the future could hold as another presidential election cycle kicks into gear. The conversation begins with Mara's thoughts on the complicated journey the SAFE Banking bill has taken and what 2023 could bring for cannabis reform. From there, Mara speaks to the potential outcomes associated with rescheduling or de-scheduling cannabis, the odds of this happening in the near future and what this shift means for 280E. This episode concludes with Mara's perspectives on the timeline for cannabis reform and what could be expected going into the next presidential election. Please enjoy!

Allen Morrison is a Professor at Thunderbird School of Global Management at Arizona State University and Stewart Black is the Global Chief Leadership & Strategy Officer at Squire Patton Boggs an international law firm and also Adjunct Professor at INSEAD. They are the co-authors of Enterprise China which is the result of decades of experience and research as to the dominance and continuing impact of China on the global economy. This episode is relevant to all leaders and all businesses, large or small. You may be thinking about operating in China, leaving China or simply curious as to the global impact of Enterprise China and why you should even care!This is a fascinating episode that outlines that leaders must understand that they are dealing with Enterprise China not Chinese Enterprises as we examine the often-misunderstood interconnectedness of the Chinese state and Chinese businesses, demonstrating that individual firms and companies are often just the tip of the iceberg.China is the largest simple market and for many years has been considered the 'Factory of the World.' My guests outline the three elements of the Chinese Commercial Strategy as 1. Ending reliance on the West 2. Dominating domestic markets 3. To win internationally and facilitating the West to become highly dependant on China. Both guests outline real case studies of companies strategising for commercial success, outlining pitfalls and clear strategic and leadership implications that must  be considered. www.enterprisechina.com

Analizamos la propuesta de subida del SMI con Sara de la Rica, Directora de la Fundación ISEAK . Catedrática de Economía de la Universidad del País Vasco. Tertulia con Carlos Blanco, socio del departamento mercantil de Squire Patton Boggs; Juan Carlos Lozano, periodista especializado en información económica del Grupo Prensa Ibérica; y Hermenegildo Altozano, abogado de Bird&Bird.

In this episode of Cannabis Unlocked, Mara Sheldon (Senior Policy Advisor at Squire Patton Boggs) sits down with Tiby Erdely (Founding Partner at KEY Investment Partners) to discuss political hurdles and opportunities facing the cannabis space in light of recent political wins. This conversation begins with Mara's background and her perspectives on the current state of cannabis policy following Biden's recent announcements including the potential rescheduling of cannabis and the pardoning of thousands of low level federal cannabis convictions. From there, Mara speaks to the various levels of federal drug scheduling, and how 280E, a tax law that only applies to federally illicit businesses like cannabis, could change after the rescheduling of cannabis. The talk continues as the pair discuss opportunities that the Safe Banking and CLIMB acts open up for the cannabis industry, and how this could fuel rapid growth for the industry by dropping the cost of capital. This episode concludes with Mara's predictions on the future of cannabis and steps ahead that could lead to eventual federal legalization. Please enjoy!

Mimi Dane is the CEO of the Belford Family Charitable Fund and former CEO of Flying Horse Farms. Mimi completed her undergraduate degree at St. Norbert College and graduated with a Master's in English at Western Michigan University. After graduating from Ohio State University - Moritz College of Law, Mimi served as a law clerk for the Honorable Louis Pollak. She then began a 21-year career with Squire Patton Boggs, where she eventually became a partner. At Squire Patton Boggs, Mimi handled the legal strategy for the case of Butch Reynolds, an athlete. He was suspended after the International Association of Athletics Federation wrongly accused him of drug use. After over two decades of practicing law, Mimi entered the nonprofit world and joined the board of Flying Horse Farms, a nonprofit camp in Ohio. Mimi eventually served Flying Horse Farms as its CEO until 2018, when she became Chief Executive of the Belford Family Charitable Fund. Today, you'll hear Mimi share her journey and work as a lawyer. She describes her early life and upbringing and explains why she stopped working on her Ph.D. in English at Western Michigan University to pursue a law degree. She discusses the Butch Reynolds vs. IAAF case, her role in the legal work, and what the results of the case meant for future athletes' rights to arbitration from independent bodies. We also discuss her work in the nonprofit world and get advice on changing course in your career or life. “Law teaches you a way to think, to analyze, to look at risks. A lawyer is a problem solver, whether it's going into the legislature or helping someone with a contract.” - Mimi Dane This week on Kathy Sullivan Explores: Mimi's early life, upbringing, and love of learning Her education at St. Norbert College and Western Michigan University and why she stopped pursuing her Ph.D. in English to go to law school How Mimi realized that the path to scholarship and academia wasn't for her What made Mimi interested in pursuing a law degree The job description of a commercial litigator The career pathways of law degrees and why Mimi chose to be a commercial litigator Mimi's advice to people considering pursuing a law degree Mimi's role in the Butch Reynolds case that went to the Supreme Court What it takes to get admitted to the US Supreme Court Bar The impact of law and what the Butch Reynolds case meant for future athletes Mimi's work in the nonprofit world and how she became the CEO of Flying Horse Farms Her thoughts and advice on changing careers Our Favorite Quotes: “Cases, whether they go to trial or not, are about writing, research, and explaining something complex to the jury, a group of people who may have an eight grade level of education to advanced degree.” - Mimi Dane “There's not one pathway with a law degree. You can be the CEO of a nonprofit and your law degree is still going to be invaluable.” - Mimi Dane Connect with Mimi Dane: Mimi Dane on LinkedIn Spaceship Not Required I'm Kathy Sullivan, the only person to have walked in space and gone to the deepest point in the ocean. I'm an explorer, and that doesn't always have to involve going to some remote or exotic place. It simply requires a commitment to put curiosity into action. In this podcast, you can explore, reflecting on lessons learned from life so far and from my brilliant and ever-inquisitive guests. We explore together in this very moment from right where you are--spaceship not required. Welcome to Kathy Sullivan Explores. Visit my website at kathysullivanexplores.com to sign up for seven astronaut tips to improving your life on earth and be the first to discover future episodes and learn about more exciting adventures ahead! Don't forget to leave a rating and review wherever you get your podcasts! Spotify I Stitcher I Apple Podcasts I iHeart Radio I TuneIn I Google I Amazon Music.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Data privacy rules continue to expand, and even if you are well informed on GDPR, you may not know why you need to know about the WISP. A Written Information Security Program (WISP) is a set of documents that details an organization's security controls, processes as well as policies. In many states in North America, a WISP is a legally required document, to show the organization's IT security and data protection status. It takes into account the policies and processes that should be in place to ensure that any organization, which processes, controls, manages, licenses and/or retain personal information about citizens, and has implemented the required level of data protection and cyber security. If these do not currently exist, a WISP can help identify the gaps in any security plan. Join host KiKi L'Italien as she interviews David Clarke, Chief Technology Officer, The Trust Bridge, and Malcolm Dowden, Partner, Data Privacy, Cybersecurity and Digital Assets, Squire Patton Boggs, to discuss this important issue. As data breaches and cyber security attacks increase, having the correct WISP documentation in place can demonstrate to clients and suppliers, customers and members, as well as the regulatory authorities and employees that your organization takes Data Protection and Cyber Security seriously, and has implemented the necessary safeguards.

Brandi, Hann-Legal Admin Hot Topic Open MicLegal Administrator roles have grown over the years to becoming the business managers of their Law Firms.HR, Finance, Technology, Security Operations and more have been welcomed additions to the already important responsibilities of the Legal Admin.In many situations, legal admins have become C-Levels for their firms.This week we welcome our guest, Brandi Hann a 15-year Legal Admin veteran of Squire Patton Boggs.It's Open Mic so all topics important to the Legal Admin and Law Firm Management is fair game.Some of the topics for sure to be on tap include Return to the Office strategies, “Hoteling”, Flex Schedules, Hiring tips.Connect with Brandi-https://www.linkedin.com/in/brandihann/Watch our past shows: https://youtube.com/NoLawFirmLeftBehind/Listen to our Podcast: https://www.splice.net/podcasts/Need a new Tech or Cybersecurity strategy for your Law Firm- https://www.splice.net/2-hours-free/ 

Since 2020, many law firms have incorporated new racial justice efforts into their pro bono programs. Some have hired pro bono professional staff whose primary focus is to expand the firm's racial justice work. Others have expanded the roles and responsibilities of their pro bono professionals to include racial justice. In this episode, hear from pro bono professional staff focused on racial justice: Diane Lucas, Pro Bono Counsel for Racial Justice Initiative at Davis Polk, Quinncy McNeal, Pro Bono Counsel at Husch Blackwell, and Corrine Irish, heading pro bono as a Partner at Squire Patton Boggs. Learn how the establishment of these pro bono professional roles has incorporated racial justice and pro bono to contribute to the firm's long-term racial justice commitment.

For this Legalweek 2022 day two mixtape, I was fortunate to speak with Ryan Anderson of Filevine, Dan Berlin of TABS3, Ian Campbell of iCONECT, Debbie Foster of Affinity Consulting, Steve Goldstein of Squire Patton Boggs, Eric Gonzales of Epiq, Anil Kona of Ligl, Matt Mahon at Trustpoint.One, Soumya Nettimi of Paradigm, Memme Onwudiwe of Evisort, Steve Schley of ContractPodAi, Joey Seeber of Level Legal, Danny Thankachan of Blank Rome, and Nick Whitehouse of Onit.

For this Legalweek 2022 day two mixtape, I was fortunate to speak with Ryan Anderson of Filevine, Dan Berlin of TABS3, Ian Campbell of iCONECT, Debbie Foster of Affinity Consulting, Steve Goldstein of Squire Patton Boggs, Eric Gonzales of Epiq, Anil Kona of Ligl, Matt Mahon at Trustpoint.One, Soumya Nettimi of Paradigm, Memme Onwudiwe of Evisort, Steve Schley of ContractPodAi, Joey Seeber of Level Legal, Danny Thankachan of Blank Rome, and Nick Whitehouse of Onit.

Work looks a lot different today than it did three years ago. So, too, does mentoring. Traci Martinez, managing partner at Squire Patton Boggs' Columbus office, shared her thoughts on the evolving nature of mentoring relationships during our recent Mentoring Monday event. She also talked about her own unusual path to a legal career, taking on a new role amid an unprecedented global crisis, and how the law firm has supported working mothers through the challenges wrought by that crisis. Check out the full conversation, recorded live during the virtual event, to hear more from Traci.

Joe Crowley was a district party leader at 23, in the New York State Assembly at 26, and in the US House at 37...a political prodigy by any measure. He talks the early lessons learned in Queens politics, his time around Governor Mario Cuomo, his rise through the Assembly and Congress, his 2018 primary against AOC, and memorable moments and valuable insights from 20 years in the House. IN THIS EPISODE…The Crowley family lore that intersects with the Titanic…Congressman Crowley's early political memories growing up in Queens…The family connection between the Crowleys and the Cuomos…The story behind a 26-year-old Joe Crowley elected to the state legislature…The enduring mystery behind his candidacy for Queens College president…Memories of the “totalitarian” nature of the New York State Legislature…He remembers the “magnetic” personality of Mario Cuomo, plus how close he came to a Cuomo Presidential bid…He talks how Mario Cuomo and Geraldine Ferraro opened the door for pro-choice Catholics in New York politics…The unusual story behind his surprising 1998 candidacy for Congress…His first impressions of Congress…The Joe Crowley 101 of what new members should know…Congressman Crowley “expends some political muscle” to advance marriage equality…How Congressman Crowley climbed the leadership ladder to become Democratic Caucus Chair…Congressman Crowley's perspective on the Pelosi-Hoyer relationship…A glimpse into the intensity surrounding the ACA legislative process…How he views the 2018 primary against AOC with a few years hindsight…How he's approached his post-congressional career…The Broadway musical Congressman Crowley is helping produce…His thoughts on running for mayor or running statewide…Advice for those in government relations…Congressman Crowley's relationship with both Presidents Obama and Biden…Who's the hardest working person in Washington?Congressman Crowley's early instincts toward Donald Trump…Congressman Crowley's 2022 advice for Congressional Democrats…AND…9/11, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Bella Abzug, John Adams, John Boehner, boiler engineers, Dick Cain, Steve Chabot, civility in discourse, County Armagh, the DCCC, Geraldine Ferraro, the Five Points, Frontline Democrats, Ben Gillman, Thomas Jefferson, John Kennedy, Ed Koch, John Larson, Barbara Lee, Donald Manes, a members' member, Cathy Nolan, Tom Manton, the New Dem Coalition, Dave Obey, Paradise Square, Nancy Pelosi, Powell Memorial High, Paul Ryan, John Sabini, St. Mary's Catholic Church, Chuck Schumer, shoe leather, Bud Shuster, Squire Patton Boggs, Tammany Hall, Walter McCaffery, Watergate babies, & more!

I spoke with Bonnie Beuth, the Information Systems Trainer for Ford Harrison, and Rachel Baiden, the Global Technology Training Manager at Squire Patton Boggs, who are two of the founding members of the Legal Technology Core Competency Certification Coalition – LTC4, which is a non-profit consortium of law firms, corporate legal departments, law schools, and attorneys from around the world that have established industry-standard core competencies for legal technology. We discussed how the LTC4 has evolved over the past decade, what distinguishes its learning plan format, lawyer technological competency requirements, and how the LTC4 distinguishes its certification.