Podcasts about sentiments

On Wednesday's Mark Levin Show, in the 1970s gas prices jumped due to OPEC's boycott of the U.S. over its Israel policies. Back then people blamed the oil companies instead of OPEC. Today the same manufactured hostility targets AI data centers. Governors ban or endlessly delay them with false pollution claims once used against fracking. The real issue is electricity: decades of blue-state regulations and anti-capitalist obstruction have blocked grid upgrades. Critics now complain data centers will consume too much power yet refuse the solutions—expand the grid and let the centers build their own generation, including nuclear. Adversaries, especially China, face no such constraints and will dominate future technology, military, space, and health-care advances if America continues this economic self-sabotage. Also, the Woke Reich is essentially dead. Figures such as Tucker Carlson and Matt Gaetz, along with the rest of that circle are finished and exist mainly online in a toxic cesspool. The election in Florida illustrated that real, normal, patriotic Americans have no interest in the Woke Reich or its antisemitism and remain focused on patriotism. Later, Iran has killed and maimed thousands of Americans and spreads terrorism globally, yet this stance is treated as controversial by some, including former NSA counterintelligence officer John Schindler. Schindler's portrayal of Levin as a “super hawk” pushing total war is idiotic. Schindler an isolationist, Israel-hater, and incoherent critic who diminishes U.S. capacity for victory. Afterward, Bruce Blakeman, who is running for Governor of NY, calls in and explains that Gov Kathy Hochul is fully subservient to Zohran Mamdani—including supporting a $5 billion NYC bailout with no spending cuts. Blakeman says New York is in a death spiral with the nation's highest taxes, electric bills 70% above the national average, and the most pro-criminal governor, leading to hundreds of thousands of people and jobs lost, $11 billion in lost tax revenue from high-net-worth individuals and corporations fleeing to states like Florida and Texas, and widespread misery. He is running to reverse this by cutting taxes, halving utility bills, supporting police, and protecting neighborhoods. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This Day in Legal History: The Nineteenth Amendment Is RatifiedOn August 18, 1920, Tennessee became the thirty-sixth state to ratify the Nineteenth Amendment—the final state needed to reach the three-quarters threshold—and with that vote, the constitutional guarantee that the right to vote could not be denied on account of sex became part of American law. It enfranchised, at a stroke, roughly half the adult population of the United States.The story of how it happened is almost unbelievably close. Tennessee's state senate had ratified comfortably, but the house was deadlocked, tied 48 to 48. The decisive vote belonged to a 24-year-old representative named Harry Burn, who had a red rose on his lapel signaling opposition to the amendment—and a letter in his pocket from his mother, Phoebe, urging him to “be a good boy” and vote for suffrage. He did. His single vote broke the tie, Tennessee ratified, and the amendment was certified into the Constitution days later. A generational struggle turned, in the end, on a young man listening to his mother.The significance of August 18, 1920 is best understood as the payoff to a story we told on this show back in July. When we covered the Seneca Falls Convention and its 1848 Declaration of Sentiments—the founding document of the American women's rights movement, which dared to demand the vote—I noted that it would take seventy-two years to win the ballot. This is that day. The distance from Seneca Falls to Nashville is the distance from a bold, ridiculed demand to a line in the Constitution. And like the Fifteenth Amendment before it, the Nineteenth didn't instantly deliver on its promise—many women of color, in particular, remained effectively disenfranchised for decades until the Voting Rights Act. But it permanently changed who “the people” are in a democracy. It's a reminder, on a day full of stories about the law's unfinished business, that some of the most fundamental rights we now take for granted were won slowly, against fierce resistance, and sometimes by a single vote.A landmark trial has begun in California federal court that could reshape the most popular apps on the planet: a bipartisan coalition of 29 states has put Meta on trial, alleging it deliberately designed Instagram and Facebook to addict and harm children. This is the big one we've been building toward all summer—the federal counterpart to the state cases in New Mexico and Tennessee. The states, led by Colorado, California, New Jersey, and Kentucky, told the court that Meta engineered features like infinite scrolling, notifications, “likes,” visual filters, and algorithmic recommendations to drive compulsive use, and misled the public about the platforms' safety for young people. Here's an important procedural wrinkle: while there's an eight-person jury in Oakland, it's serving only in an advisory capacity—the case will ultimately be decided by U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. That's because this is largely an equitable case, and what the states are really after isn't just money but sweeping changes to how the platforms work: stronger age verification, restrictions on algorithms trained on children's data, limits on notifications, and the removal of features like infinite scroll. On damages, Meta itself has floated the staggering figure of $1.4 trillion as its potential exposure, though the states haven't named a number and legal experts consider an award anywhere near that scale unlikely. The significance is that this trial could force concrete, structural redesign of Instagram and Facebook for young users—not a settlement negotiated in private, but a judge's findings after a public trial. Everything we've tracked, from the multistate penalties to the New Mexico verdict to the Ninth Circuit clearing these suits, has been leading here. This is where the social-media reckoning gets its fullest public airing yet. Meta faces 29-state trial that could reshape Instagram and Facebook | ReutersYahoo Finance · anewsThe Justice Department has opened a civil-rights investigation into the College of William & Mary, alleging the Virginia public university runs scholarship and mentorship programs that unlawfully discriminate in favor of minority students. The Department's Civil Rights Division announced a “compliance review” under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act—which bars race discrimination by institutions that receive federal funding—targeting several specific programs: a fellowship in the education school that gives preference to Hispanic or Latina women with financial need, a doctoral mentorship program for “future education leaders of color,” and a law-school scholarship program. Here's the legal backdrop that makes this a national trend and not a one-off. After the Supreme Court's 2023 decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard ended race-conscious admissions, the fight didn't end—it moved. The administration is now using Title VI to argue that race-conscious scholarships, fellowships, and pipeline programs are themselves a form of unlawful discrimination, framing programs designed to expand opportunity for underrepresented groups as illegal “discrimination in favor of minorities.” Supporters of these programs say they're lawful efforts to remedy historic exclusion and build diverse professions; critics say any use of race, even to help, runs afoul of the post-SFFA legal landscape. It's worth being precise: this is a compliance review, an investigation, not yet a lawsuit or a finding of wrongdoing. The significance is that this is part of a systematic campaign we've tracked against universities—from Harvard to Columbia—and it signals that the enforcement frontier after affirmative action has shifted from the admissions office to the financial-aid office. Every race-conscious scholarship in the country is now, potentially, a legal target. DOJ probes College of William & Mary alleging discrimination in favor of minorities | ReutersBloomberg · Fox NewsA federal judge has ordered the release of a woman charged with vandalizing the World War II Memorial in Washington—and the top federal prosecutor there, Jeanine Pirro, is not happy about it. The defendant, 41-year-old Melissa Farris of Kentucky, was arrested last week and charged with two felony counts after the memorial's fountain was filled with soap suds and the words “Clean hands Dirty $” were spray-painted across a surface in red and green. A judge ordered her released on conditions—surrendering her passport and not leaving the continental U.S. without approval—and Pirro publicly criticized that decision. Let's unpack the legal pieces, because there are two distinct ones. First, pretrial release: in the American system, the default is that a defendant awaiting trial should be released unless the government shows they're a flight risk or a danger, with conditions used to manage any risk. A judge ordering release with conditions is the system working as designed—the presumption of innocence is not an empty phrase—even when a prosecutor would prefer detention. Second, the underlying conduct: Farris reportedly said on social media that she acted to protest tax dollars not being spent on ordinary Americans and alleged corporate wrongdoing. But political motivation doesn't convert property destruction into protected speech—you can hold the message and still prosecute the spray paint. The significance ties into a thread we've followed: this is the same U.S. Attorney, Jeanine Pirro, at the center of the Reflecting Pool saga, again clashing over how a memorial-vandalism case should be handled—this time frustrated that a judge released a defendant rather than that a case was dropped. A preliminary hearing is set for September 3, and it's a reminder that the everyday machinery of bail and pretrial release keeps operating regardless of how politically charged the underlying act may be. US judge orders release of woman accused of vandalism at World War Two Memorial | ReutersWashington Post · CBS NewsAnd finally, in my column this week, I take on a well-intentioned proposal to tax artificial intelligence in order to help the workers it displaces—and argue that, while the instinct is right, the mechanism is wrong. The proposal in question is Representative Greg Casar's AI Tax and Work Protection Act. Its premise is sound: if firms are capturing the gains from replacing human workers with AI while pushing the costs—unemployment, lost tax revenue—onto workers and society, those costs look like an externality, the same way pollution does. And we tax externalities all the time: cigarettes, gasoline, carbon. So taxing AI to fund worker protections is a reasonable idea in principle.My problem is with the particulars. Casar's bill doesn't actually tax worker displacement—it taxes AI “tokens,” the technical units of AI computation, with the rate keyed to the unemployment rate. That creates an appealing feedback loop on paper: as AI drives up unemployment, the tax rises and generates more money to put people back to work. But it asks the Treasury to do two things it's genuinely bad at. First, it has to figure out, in real time and on a political calendar, how much of any given rise in unemployment is actually caused by AI, as opposed to a recession, a pandemic, or a war. That's a causal judgment the tax code has no machinery for. Second, and worse, it has to put a stable dollar value on a “token”—an unstable, non-standardized unit that spans text, code, images, audio, and video, and isn't sold in any clean arm's-length market. You're trying to tax the meter, and the meter doesn't have a reliable price.So here's the alternative I argue for: instead of taxing AI use, give the public an equity stake in the companies that capture AI's gains—let the government own a piece of the franchise rather than tax the meter. This isn't as exotic as it sounds; scholars like Jeremy Bearer-Friend and Sarah Polcz have proposed having AI firms pay tax in kind, transferring equity rather than cash, and Senator Sanders has floated a far more aggressive version—a 50% stake funding a sovereign wealth fund. My point is that you don't have to go to 50% to adopt the underlying architecture. Equity is a better proxy than token usage: it scales with the actual size of the economic reallocation AI produces, and it only asks the government to value a company once, rather than to price billions of individual computations or adjudicate whether a particular prompt cost a particular job. If AI merely augments workers and produces modest gains, the public's share stays modest; if it produces extraordinary gains, the public shares in the upside. A smaller equity assessment on the largest firms, held through an independently managed vehicle, would let the public participate in AI's wealth without handing a shrunken Treasury an impossible measurement problem. The instinct to make sure the public benefits from AI is exactly right—we should just own a piece of the thing, not tax the ticker. Taxing AI to Help Workers Sounds Good, But Public Deserves More | Bloomberg Tax This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

BJP in Offensive Mode: FIR filed against Rahul Gandhi for Hurting Hindu Sentiments | Sanjay Dixit

durée : 00:17:56 - La Série fiction - "Que tu sois belle ou laide, Fanchon, dit Landry en lui prenant la main, je crois comprendre déjà que ton amitié est une très bonne chose, et si bonne, que l'amour en est peut-être une mauvaise en comparaison." Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

In this episode of SYF Podcast, John Comino and David Shih go through discussing the observations on how property investors and sentiments have reacted since the federal budget announcement on May 12th - now that we're about 2.5 months in. --- DISCLAIMER:  Host/Guest are not Financial Adviser/Investment Consultant. All opinions expressed by host or his guests are for informational purposes only and should not be treated as investment/financial advice of any kind.  "Spark your FIRE" and its team are not liable to the listeners or any other party, for the listeners use of, or reliance on, any information received, directly or indirectly, from the content in any circumstances. Please conduct your own research and obtain independent legal, financial, taxation and/or other professional advice in respect of any decision made in connection with this audio. Contact -  sparkyourfirepodcast@gmail.com

durée : 00:20:02 - La Série fiction - "Mon cœur s'ouvrit à mille sentiments de plaisir dont je n'avais jamais eu l'idée. Une douce chaleur se répandit dans toutes mes veines. J'étais dans une espèce de transport qui m'ôta pour quelque temps la liberté de la voix, et qui ne s'exprimait que par mes yeux." Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

This Day in Legal History: The Declaration of SentimentsOn July 20, 1848, at the close of the two-day Seneca Falls Convention in upstate New York, roughly a hundred people signed the Declaration of Sentiments—the founding document of the organized women's rights movement in the United States. Drafted principally by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, it was a deliberate and pointed act of legal argument: Stanton modeled it on the Declaration of Independence, echoing Jefferson's cadences but adding two words that changed everything—”that all men and women are created equal.”The genius of the document was to take the nation's own founding logic and turn it on the exclusion of half the population. It then catalogued, in the form of a bill of particulars against “man” rather than King George, the specific legal disabilities women lived under. Married women had no right to their own property or wages—under the common-law doctrine of coverture, a wife's legal identity was absorbed into her husband's. Women could not vote, were barred from most professions and higher education, had almost no rights to their own children in the event of separation, and were governed by laws they had no voice in making. The Declaration listed these as concrete legal grievances, not vague complaints, framing the denial of women's rights as a violation of the country's stated principles.The most controversial demand was the resolution calling for women's suffrage, which passed only narrowly and with the public support of Frederick Douglass, who attended the convention. The significance of July 20, 1848 is that it launched a legal and political campaign that would take seventy-two years to win the vote, with the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920, and far longer to dismantle coverture and the web of laws built on women's legal subordination. It's a reminder that constitutional principles are not self-executing—that “all men are created equal” had to be argued, expanded, and fought for by the people the original text left out.A federal appeals court has struck down New Jersey's ban on assault firearms and high-capacity magazines, the first time any federal appeals court has invalidated a state assault-weapons ban. Sitting en banc, the Philadelphia-based Third Circuit ruled 10-5 that the state's prohibition on semi-automatic rifles—not just AR-15s, but the whole category—violates the Second Amendment, as does its ban on magazines holding more than ten rounds. The reasoning flows from the Supreme Court's recent framework, which asks whether a gun regulation is consistent with the nation's historical tradition of firearms regulation; the majority concluded these bans are not. What makes this a genuinely big deal is the split it creates. Just last week, a different federal appeals court upheld Illinois's ban on semi-automatic weapons—so we now have appeals courts squarely disagreeing on whether these bans are constitutional. That kind of circuit split is precisely the condition that draws the Supreme Court in, and the Court is already poised to take up whether bans on semi-automatic rifles violate the Second Amendment. The significance is that a question affecting roughly a dozen states with similar laws is now barreling toward a definitive answer. For the moment, New Jersey's ban is unenforceable as to these weapons, but the durability of that outcome—and of assault-weapons bans nationwide—now depends on what the Supreme Court does next.US appeals court declares New Jersey's ban on assault rifles unconstitutional | ReutersA federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot rely on a White House budget-office regulation to cancel billions of dollars in grants simply because those grants no longer match its priorities. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston sided with a coalition of Democratic-led states, rejecting the administration's claim that a clause in Office of Management and Budget regulations gave it authority to revoke funding whenever an agency's focus shifts. Here's the underlying principle. When Congress appropriates money for a program and an agency awards grants under it, the government generally can't just take that money back on a whim—grant recipients have relied on it, and the terms for termination are limited. The administration's theory was that an OMB regulation let it terminate grants it deemed “inconsistent with agency priorities,” effectively a roving power to defund causes it disfavors. Judge Talwani found the regulation didn't authorize anything of the kind. The significance connects to a theme we keep returning to: the limits of executive power over money that Congress has already directed. The administration has repeatedly tried to redirect or withhold funds to reshape policy without going through Congress, and courts have repeatedly pushed back. This ruling reinforces that a president's control over federal spending, though real, is bounded—an agency can't retroactively pull grants just because political priorities changed.Trump administration cannot cancel grants for disfavored causes, US judge rules | ReutersA federal judge has declined to block Meta from laying off 26 employees who claim the company's AI tools singled them out for termination because they have disabilities or took medical leave. U.S. District Judge William Orrick in Oakland ruled that the workers hadn't shown the “irreparable harm” needed for an emergency order halting the layoffs, which are set to begin July 22, and that the merits of their novel claims will be decided in private arbitration. The allegations are striking. The plaintiffs—engineers, managers, researchers, and designers suing anonymously—say Meta used a suite of internal AI systems to score and rank employees onto a termination list, including an assistant called “Metamate,” an employee-trained “second brain” that tracked workers' communications, and a productivity score drawn from scanning keystrokes, screen content, emails, and browser history. Meta denies wrongdoing and insists humans, not algorithms, made the layoff decisions. This is a frontier legal question: when an employer uses AI to help decide who gets cut, and those tools allegedly disadvantage people with disabilities or on leave, is that illegal discrimination? The judge's refusal to block the layoffs was procedural—losing a job usually isn't “irreparable” because money damages can fix it—but he pointedly noted the case raises “serious questions” and said he might reconsider based on more evidence about how AI was actually used. The significance is that algorithmic management is colliding with anti-discrimination law, and courts are just beginning to work out who's accountable when the machine does the ranking.US judge won't block Meta from laying off workers who filed AI discrimination lawsuit | ReutersAnd finally, the IRS's top lawyer has been forced out after refusing White House demands that would have drawn him into tax audits of particular taxpayers. Ken Kies, who served as the agency's acting chief counsel and as Treasury's assistant secretary for tax policy, told administration officials their requests would violate a federal law that bars the president, the vice president, and other White House officials from ordering the IRS to conduct or terminate an audit of any specific taxpayer. That statute is a direct legacy of Watergate-era abuses, when presidents tried to sic the tax agency on their enemies, and tax professionals regard it as the single most important safeguard against weaponizing the tax code. Kies apparently stood on that law—and lost his job for it. The story connects directly to one we covered recently: the administration's $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” settlement that would have given the president and his family immunity from IRS audits, which a federal judge struck down as a collusive arrangement with no basis in law. The significance is about the fragile independence of tax administration. The protections that keep audits free from political direction only work if the officials inside the agency are willing to enforce them—and when the person who says “no” to an unlawful demand is pushed out, it sends a chilling message to everyone who remains. Top US tax lawyer forced out after White House clash over tax audits | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Église réformée baptiste de la Capitale Pasteur Jacques Pelletier

Église réformée baptiste de la Capitale Pasteur Jacques Pelletier

durée : 00:08:51 - par : Elodie Suigo - Pascal Obispo est l'invité exceptionnel toute cette semaine du Monde d'Élodie, à l'occasion de la sortie de son nouvel album "Héritage". Épisode 2 : "Tombé pour elle". Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

Vivre les sentiments d'Hachem (Pin'has) by Rav David Touitou

In this episode, we're joined by Dr. Bonnie O'Neill, Professor in the Department of English. Dr. O'Neill is an expert in early American literature. As July 4th is just around the corner, marking the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, we have Dr. O'Neill on to talk about just that. Most Americans know the highlights—"We hold these truths to be self-evident...life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"—but fewer know that those famous words were revised, debated, and edited by committee before they ever reached the page. Join us as we examine the Declaration of Independence as a piece of writing: How was it crafted? Why has it endured? And what happens when later generations return to it to challenge America to live up to its own ideals?     Declaration of Independence: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript   Declaration of Sentiments: https://www.cas.msstate.edu/sites/www.cas.msstate.edu/files/2026-07/Declaration%20of%20Sentiments%20%281%29.pdf   What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?: https://www.cas.msstate.edu/sites/www.cas.msstate.edu/files/2026-07/Douglass_speech_abridged_med%20%281%29.pdf   Gettysburg Address: https://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/gettysburg.htm

1966, gros moment de la soul. Cette chanson, c'est une voix, une mélodie empreinte de douceur et une sincérité bouleversante.Dans cette épisode, on revient sur l'amour que porte Gégé à ce morceau, une histoire qui démarre à la découverte d'un vinyle... Gégé nous raconte ce que cette musique évoque pour lui : une reconnexion à l'enfance, à la famille, même à distance.Student Stories, c'est quoi ? Une série inédite au sein du podcast Une Chanson En Histoire, & pour la première fois disponible en format vidéo, autour de chansons qui ont marqué la période étudiante d'un groupe d'ami.es.Un format animé par Valy et Gérald qu'on ne présente plus, en compagnie de Manou, Coco, Lambi et Harry. Et bien sûr, DJ Loloy aux platines ! La recette : une ambiance chill, de la musique, de l'enjaillement, de la nostalgie et des partages de souvenirs à gogo.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Aujourd'hui, Abel Boyi, éducateur, Jean-Philippe Cartier, chef d'entreprise et investisseur, et Barbara Lefebvre, professeur d'histoire-géographie, débattent de l'actualité autour d'Alain Marschall et Olivier Truchot.

durée : 00:19:14 - par : Elodie Suigo - Tous les jours, une personnalité s'invite dans le monde d'Élodie Suigo. Mardi 23 juin 2026, l'auteur, compositeur et interprète québécois Fredz. Il sort un nouveau single, "Mademoiselle". Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

Organised labour at Nedlac, including Fedusa, has voiced serious concern over rising anti-migrant sentiment and tensions around illegal immigration in South Africa. While recognizing deep frustrations over unemployment, poverty and crumbling services, unions insist migrants are being unfairly blamed for long-standing structural economic failures. They are warning against vigilantism and the exploitation of undocumented workers by unscrupulous employers. Fedusa Deputy General Secretary, Ashley Benjamin joined us to unpack their position.

durée : 00:17:56 - Théâtre - "Que tu sois belle ou laide, Fanchon, dit Landry en lui prenant la main, je crois comprendre déjà que ton amitié est une très bonne chose, et si bonne, que l'amour en est peut-être une mauvaise en comparaison." - réalisation : Céline Geoffroy Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

The National Constitution Center recently published The Promise of America: Reflections on Our Enduring Ideals (Simon & Schuster), a keepsake collection of essays bringing together leading thinkers from across perspectives to reflect on the ideals at the heart of the American experiment and what those principles have meant across generations of American life. In this episode, Professor David Armitage discusses his essay, “The Declaration's Influence Around the World,” which explores the document's international legacy as a powerful blueprint for collective rights and national self-determination, and its ever-evolving domestic legacy as a touchstone for individual rights and human equality. Julie Silverbrook, chief content and learning officer at the National Constitution Center, moderates.    Resources  David Armitage, “The Declaration's Influence Around the World”  National Constitution Center, The Declaration of Independence  Lemuel Haynes, “Liberty Further Extended” (1776)  Vermont Declaration of Independence (1777)  French Declaration of the Rights of Man (1789)  Haitian Declaration of Independence (1804)  Venezuelan Declaration of Independence (1811)  Greek Declaration of Independence (1822)  Belgian Declaration of Independence (1830)  New Zealand Declaration of Independence (1835)  Texas Declaration of Independence (1836)  Liberia Declaration of Independence (1847)  Declaration of Sentiments (1848)  Hungary Declaration of Independence (1849)  Proclamation of Independence of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (1945)  Israel Declaration of Independence (1948)  Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)  Unilateral Declaration of Independence of Southern Rhodesia (1965)  The Black Declaration of Independence (1970)  Kosovo Declaration of Independence (2008)  Stay Connected and Learn More Questions or comments about the show? Email us at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠podcast@constitutioncenter.org⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr Explore the ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠America at 250 Civic Toolkit⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sign up⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate Subscribe, rate, and review wherever you listen Join us for an upcoming ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠live program⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ or watch recordings on ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Support our important work ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Donate

We delve into an appendix from section 2 in the third volume of The Whole Truth About Fatima.Please support the Our Lady of Fatima Podcast: http://buymeacoffee.com/TerenceMStantonLike and subscribe on YouTube:https://m.youtube.com/@OurLadyOfFatimaPodcastFollow us on X:@FatimapodcastThank you!

Dans cet épisode de Connected Mate, PPC et les mates reçoivent Richard Malterre, Chief Communication Officer chez Enchanted Tools, la société française qui a inventé les robots Mirokai : des compagnons humanoïdes bourrés de technologies, pensés pour la relation humaine.Les Mates sont réunis pour explorer une question vertigineuse : et si la prochaine grande matière première de l'intelligence artificielle n'était plus le texte, l'image ou la vidéo… mais nos émotions ?Avec Alice Desjardins, consultante, prof, digital addict écolo, qui jongle avec sa dissonance cognitive entre tech et convictions ; Charles Nastorg, assembleur de bulles et de business dans le B2B, communicant assumé ; Hubert Kratiroff, professeur d'économie numérique, là pour prendre de la hauteur et éviter les débats de surface ; Jean-Emmanuel Séré, designer qui tente de remettre de l'humain dans des systèmes devenus invisibles ; et Christian Belala, chef d'orchestre de la protection des données, celui qui rappelle que “gratuit” n'existe pas.Ensemble, ils interrogent cette nouvelle frontière : une IA qui ne se contente plus de produire, mais qui observe, analyse nos signaux faibles, nos réactions, nos hésitations, nos affects. Une IA capable de simuler l'écoute, de provoquer de l'attachement, d'accompagner des personnes fragiles… mais aussi de manipuler, scorer, surveiller ou enfermer.Un épisode à la fois intime, politique et technologique, où il ne s'agit pas seulement de savoir si les machines peuvent ressentir quelque chose, mais surtout de comprendre ce que nous sommes prêts à leur confier de nous-mêmes.Pour bénéficier gratuitement d'une entrée chez Enchanted Tools et voir les robots, c'est ici, en indiquant le code promo : BonjourMirokai https://www.eventbrite.fr/e/lexperience-mirokai-musee-robotique-et-ia-tickets-1837425843159?aff=ebdssbdestsearchPour suivre les actualités de ce podcast, abonnez-vous gratuitement à la newsletter écrite avec amour et garantie sans spam https://bonjourppc.substack.com Et pour découvrir l'ouvrage de PPC préfacé par Serge Papin, rdv ici Réinventez votre entreprise à l'ère de l'IAHébergé par Ausha. Visitez ausha.co/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

As the NBA Playoffs commence, the Utah Jazz are forced to finally and completely turn the page on the 2025-2026 season with a collection of player and coach exit interviews and sentimental Instagram posts. What did these players say about the season that was, and, most importantly, what are their feelings about what's in store next year?Join Mark Russell Pereira (@jazzmanmark.com) as he pulls the best quotes and reactions from the media availability and surmises about the future for pending free agents Kevin Love and Jusuf Nurkic.Then, the Jazz win the coin flip with the Sacramento Kings! What does this mean for Utah's pick in the upcoming NBA Draft?

Happy Thursday you pop culture junkies. This week we focus on the vibes. We're scrubbing the glitter off our faces and diving straight into the desert heat to recap SOME of the first weekend of Coachella, before pivoting to the weird, wild world of TikTok and actual outer space. In This Episode:   Coachella 2026: The Highs, the Lows, and the Lounges We're breaking down the festival beyond the stage. From the shift in desert fashion to the "where" of it all—comparing the car camping to the gated luxury estates where the "cool kids" are hiding out.   Biebercella & The Carpenter Effect Did Sabrina Carpenter just become the new Princess of Pop? We recap her standout set and the controversy which came out of it! And get into the highs of Biebercella and the low (it has to do with Katy Perry).  TikTok's Viral Pulse • The JENNIE Impact: Breaking down the latest trend sparked by the K-pop icon that has everyone's FYP in a chokehold. • The AI Banger: We discuss that one song you can't stop humming—and the existential crisis that comes with finding out it's 100% AI-generated. Intergalactic Heartstrings Why is everyone crying over NASA? We look at Commander Reid Wiseman's emotional family moments hitting us all right in the feels. Courtside Love The Indiana Pacers game gave us more than just basketball. We're dissecting that viral couple moment—what they really said and why we love them.    This week's newsletter: https://popculturemondays.com/2026/04/13/coachella-411-artemis-ii-another-viral-couple-the-latest-dance-trend/   The pod with Ben Sasse: https://youtu.be/7CFo6-6BN9k  

Welcome to Life in the Leadership Lane where I am talking to leaders making a difference in the workplace and in our communities. How did they get to where they are and what are they doing to stay there! Buckle up and get ready to accelerate in the Leadership Lane! This week, I am talking with Sterling Edwards, Lead Pastor at Lake Shore Baptist Church in Lake Dallas Texas, Author of multiple books including Sentiments and Stories of a Struggler and His Savior, Unbecoming, Jesus Can, and Hope is a Person, …and has a passion for church planting.How did Sterling get started in ministry and whatled him to leadership? What does Sterling share about coincidence?When did Sterling “find his lane”?What does Sterling share about setting a vision?What does Sterling share about defining success?What does Sterling share about church attendance?What does Sterling share about 2 Samuel 7:18?What advice does Sterling share to help others inthe workplace?and more as we spend “Time to Accelerate” with afew more questions. Interview resources:Favorite quote from Sterling:“People have to know that we love them, many times before they can ever hear the message that God loves them.”Email Sterling at LakeshoreVisit Lakeshore Baptist ChurchLearn more about the podcast host Bruce WallerCheck out Bruce's books Drive With Purpose: Move Your Career from Success toSignificance (#1 New Released book on Amazon)Life in the Leadership Lane; Moving Leaders to Inspire and Change the Workplace Find Your Lane; Change your GPS, Change your Career (“Book Authority” Best Books)Milemarkers; A 5 Year Journey …helping you record daily highlights to keep you on track.Connect with Bruce on LinkTreeSubscribe to Bruce's Blog “Move to Inspire” Get relocation support for your next household goods or commercial office move across the US by reaching out to Bruce at bwaller@goarmstrong.com or visit The Armstrong Company

Dans ce roman, Nicola Yoon veut raconter la naissance des sentiments. Mais aussi l'immigration, la question des identités... Des sujets de société qui lui tiennent à cœur parce qu'ils lui sont intimes, mais qui doivent parler à tout le monde. "The sun is also a star" ose regarder en face la question de la diversité aux Etats-Unis, et des difficultés que peut rencontrer une jeunesse pourtant née dans ce pays. Les deux protagonistes, Natacha et Daniel sont des personnages tout en relief malgré leur jeune âge. Un podcast Bababam Originals Ecriture et voix : Alice Deroide Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Stoney and Rico hear from some of the people on the Tigers' big win over the Padres to start their season yesterday.

Do you know how to say “I'm happy to learn French” versus “I'm happy that you are learning French”? Expressing your feelings correctly is a huge milestone for A2 learners! In this video, we move beyond basic vocabulary and dive into natural conversation to see how French speakers actually share their emotions. I help French learners improve their language skills with my Learn French Program. Join the program!speaking, listening, reading, and writing skillsBeginner and Elementary/Pre-intermediate level: A1/A2-B1 level BOOK A CONSULTATION SESSION WITH ME: https://calendly.com/davidalexandercantu Follow me on social media below: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/davidalexandercantuTiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@davidalexanderfrenchFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/davidalexandercantuLinkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidalexandercantu

Mandy Wiener speaks to EWN Reporter, Alpha Ramushwana about IEC voter sentiments survey. The Midday Report with Mandy Wiener is 702 and CapeTalk’s flagship news show, your hour of essential news radio. The show is podcasted every weekday, allowing you to catch up with a 60-minute weekday wrap of the day's main news. It's packed with fast-paced interviews with the day’s newsmakers, as well as those who can make sense of the news and explain what's happening in your world. All the interviews are podcasted for you to catch up and listen to. Thank you for listening to this podcast of The Midday Report Listen live on weekdays between 12:00 and 13:00 (SA Time) to The Midday Report broadcast on 702 https://buff.ly/gk3y0Kj and on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from The Midday Report go to https://buff.ly/BTGmL9H and find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/LcbDdFI Subscribe to the 702 and CapeTalk daily and weekly newsletters https://buff.ly/v5mfetc Follow us on social media: 702 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TalkRadio702 702 on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@talkradio702 702 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/talkradio702/ 702 on X: https://x.com/Radio702 702 on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@radio702 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The guys hear from the people regarding belief in the Red Wings.

ThePrintPOD: Complaint filed by members of BJP Yuva Morcha after video of Muslim group on the boat went viral. Police say appropriate action will be taken.   https://theprint.in/india/14-held-in-varanasi-for-iftar-party-with-chicken-biryani-on-boat-in-ganga-hurting-hindu-sentiments/2882120/

durée : 00:20:02 - Lectures du soir - "Mon cœur s'ouvrit à mille sentiments de plaisir dont je n'avais jamais eu l'idée. Une douce chaleur se répandit dans toutes mes veines. J'étais dans une espèce de transport qui m'ôta pour quelque temps la liberté de la voix, et qui ne s'exprimait que par mes yeux." - réalisation : Sophie-Aude Picon

Description:What does it look like to strive ardently for justice and equality without losing yourself in the process? Today, Jen sits down with Norah O'Donnell—award-winning journalist, anchor, and managing editor of the CBS Evening News—for a conversation about courage, compassion, and the women who have quietly shaped the arc of American history. Norah's new book, We the Women: The Hidden Heroes Who Shaped America, uncovers the stories of women who refused to disappear: printers and poets, doctors and intellectuals, community builders and policymakers, women who risked safety, status, and belonging to tell the truth, expand freedom, and insist that dignity belongs to everyone. In this episode, we reflect on what these lives reveal about compassion—not as sentiment, but as action. Jen, Amy, and Norah talk about the indomitable women who made justice visible, who challenged power without losing their moral center, and who built systems of care that outlived them. The conversation also turns inward, as Norah reflects on her own career as one of the most trusted voices in American broadcast journalism, regularly asking hard questions in public spaces and of people in positions of power. This is a conversation about fierce compassion—the kind that tells the truth, draws boundaries, builds community, and refuses erasure. It's an invitation to remember the women who came before us, and to consider how we might carry their courage forward in our own time. Thought-provoking Quotes: “I think that journalists are doing an incredible job right now under really tough circumstances. But they're bringing to light what the power of the federal government, what the power of state governments and others are doing, and allowing the electorate to be informed so that they can get involved, they can vote, they can be energized, and each of us can be part of this great American democracy.” – Norah O'Donnell “I do believe we need more women in government and more women in positions of power.” - Norah O'Donnell “I'm in the business of information not affirmation.” – Norah O'Donnell “Women have been at the forefront of helping to bend that arc towards justice. Women have crashed through the educational glass ceiling. More women get degrees than men. Women have the right to vote and they do vote in greater numbers than men. So when are we gonna see this tipping point? I keep waiting for that in my lifetime.” – Norah O'Donnell Resources Mentioned in This Episode: We the Women: The Hidden Heroes Who Shaped America by Norah O'Donnell - https://amzn.to/4keE2Hb We The Women Tour  - https://www.wethewomenbook.com/about CBS News | Norah O'Donnell - https://www.cbsnews.com/team/norah-odonnell/ The Six Triple Eight | Netflix - https://www.netflix.com/title/81590591 Mary McLeod Bethune Statue - https://www.aoc.gov/explore-capitol-campus/art/mary-mcleod-bethune-statue The Declaration of Sentiments - https://www.nps.gov/wori/learn/historyculture/declaration-of-sentiments.htm Guest's Links: Website - https://www.cbsnews.com/team/norah-odonnell/ Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/norahodonnell/ Twitter - https://x.com/NorahODonnell Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/norahodonnell/ TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@norahodonnell?lang=en Connect with Jen!Jen's Website - https://jenhatmaker.com/ Jen's Instagram - https://instagram.com/jenhatmakerJen's Twitter - https://twitter.com/jenHatmaker/ Jen's Facebook - https://facebook.com/jenhatmakerJen's YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/user/JenHatmaker The For the Love Podcast is presented by Audacy. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Part 2 of today's "Can We Say That?" segments kicked off the third hour of the show. Then, the guys continued to take your calls on all of today's topics and then began a conversation about the Pistons and whether there's any reason to care about them until the playoffs.

À la veille de la Saint-Valentin, focus sur une industrie criminelle aussi méconnue qu'efficace : l'arnaque aux sentiments. Derrière les promesses d'amour se cache une économie mondialisée, ultra-organisée et désormais dopée à l'intelligence artificielle, qui brasse chaque année des milliards d'euros. L'arnaque aux sentiments repose sur un modèle efficace. Les escrocs créent de faux profils sur des sites de rencontres, des réseaux sociaux ou des applications de messagerie. Ils mettent en scène des identités valorisantes : ingénieurs expatriés, médecins humanitaires, entrepreneurs prospères, voire parfois des personnalités connues. L'objectif est clair, instaurer une relation affective intense en échangeant quotidiennement pendant plusieurs semaines, voire plusieurs mois, afin de bâtir un climat de confiance solide. Progressivement, le lien émotionnel s'intensifie, la victime s'attache, se projette, et baisse sa vigilance. Puis vient le moment du piège. Une urgence surgit, un billet d'avion à payer pour une rencontre tant attendue, un problème de santé soudain, un compte bancaire bloqué. La victime, déjà émotionnellement engagée, envoie de l'argent. D'abord de petites sommes, pour se rassurer. Puis, l'engrenage se met en place. Les demandes deviennent plus fréquentes, plus importantes, jusqu'à provoquer parfois un véritable effondrement financier. Des usines à arnaques en Asie et une tradition bien ancrée en Afrique Loin du cliché de l'escroc solitaire derrière son écran, l'arnaque sentimentale est aujourd'hui une industrie mondialisée, structurée et hiérarchisée. Certaines enquêtes récentes ont révélé l'existence de véritables « usines à arnaques » en Asie du Sud-Est. Dans d'immenses complexes, des plateaux entiers d'ordinateurs sont occupés par des équipes qui se relaient 24 heures sur 24 afin de couvrir tous les fuseaux horaires. Selon une étude de l'université du Texas, ces seuls réseaux asiatiques auraient extorqué près de 75 milliards de dollars entre 2020 et 2024. Une somme vertigineuse, qui illustre la dimension industrielle de cette cybercriminalité. L'Afrique de l'Ouest constitue également un foyer historique de ces pratiques, notamment pour les victimes francophones. En Côte d'Ivoire, les « brouteurs », au Nigeria les « yahoo boys », et au Cameroun les « feymen » incarnent ces figures désormais bien connues. La méthode y reste souvent plus artisanale, moins structurée qu'en Asie, mais les gains peuvent être considérables. Certains escrocs expérimentés parviennent à générer plusieurs dizaines de milliers d'euros par an. Intelligence artificielle, banques sous pression et humanité détournée La montée en puissance de l'intelligence artificielle a marqué un tournant. Désormais, les escrocs peuvent produire de faux appels vidéo ultracréditbles, combinant voix, visage et gestuelle réalistes. La fraude devient ainsi industrielle, automatisée et surtout hyper-personnalisée. La frontière entre le vrai et le faux s'efface, renforçant encore la vulnérabilité des victimes. Cette explosion des arnaques pose un défi majeur aux banques. L'enjeu est financier, juridique et réputationnel. Les établissements doivent gérer un afflux croissant de litiges tout en respectant leurs obligations de vigilance sur les mouvements de fonds. Mais comment bloquer un virement lorsque le client est lui-même persuadé d'agir par amour ? Pour répondre à ce défi, des acteurs spécialisés ont émergé, à l'image de Feedzaï, qui développe des solutions capables d'identifier en temps réel les transactions suspectes grâce à l'analyse comportementale et à l'intelligence artificielle. Toutefois, même les technologies les plus avancées ne peuvent tout empêcher. Car la véritable faille reste humaine. L'arnaque aux sentiments exploite ce qu'il y a de plus intime : le besoin d'amour, de reconnaissance et de lien. La manipulation émotionnelle est au cœur du système. Dans cette économie souterraine mondialisée, l'amour devient peu à peu un produit financier comme un autre.

- Joel Legendre nous explique les « R » de l’amour -Tammy Verge nous révèle pourquoi plusieurs jeunes français ressentent de la pression du gouvernement - Matthieu Pepper nous raconte sa fin de semaine dans un manoir. Bonne écoute !

In this podcast episode, I will discuss: ✨ Why holistic self-care is essential for your overall well-being✨ How a deeper understanding of self-care can support your healing journey and help release dis-ease✨ Why taking care of yourself is an act of self-love✨ And how lightening your emotional, mental, and spiritual load can be the most effective therapy you'll ever experience✒️ My new book, Poetic Verbiage: Words & Sentiments, is now available for Kindle pre-order. Paperback and hardcover editions arrive February 22, 2026.Pre-order copy here: https://tinyurl.com/Poetic-Verbiage-Pre-orders❤️Ready To Elevate Your Journey?

Difficile de passer à côté de Heated Rivalry sur les réseaux sociaux. Devenue un phénomène de pop culture depuis sa diffusion fin novembre au Canada, cette mini-série de six épisodes est désormais diffusée en France depuis le vendredi 6 février sur HBO Max.Inspirée de la série de livres Game Changer de l'autrice Rachel Reid, la série plonge le spectateur dans une idylle entre deux joueurs de hockey professionnels. Le premier, Ilya Rozanov (Connor Storrie), un Russe arrogant et sûr de lui, joue pour l'équipe de Boston. Le second, Shane Hollander (Hudson Williams), est un Canadien posé et timide de l'équipe de Montréal.Mélangeant les codes de la romance fleur bleue à ceux du porno gay « soft », la relation des deux hommes se complexifie et pose l'enjeu de la possibilité de vivre des amours homosexuelles dans un milieu sportif.Quels sont les ingrédients du succès de Heated Rivalry ? Pourquoi la série plaît-elle particulièrement au public féminin ? Et que vaut-elle ? Dans cet épisode du podcast « L'Heure du Monde », Audrey Fournier, spécialiste des séries au Monde, analyse les codes scénaristiques de cette production qui fascine son public, nous raconte ses origines et revient sur son succès grandissant.Un épisode d'Esther Michon. Réalisation : Florentin Baume. Présentation et rédaction en chef : Thomas Baumgartner. Dans cet épisode : extrait de la bande-annonce et du trailer de la série Heated Rivalry, de la bande-annonce de la série Normal People, d'une interview accordée par Connor Storrie au podcast « In Your Dreams With Owen Thiele » le 26 décembre 2025, d'un sketch de Connor Storrie et Hudson Williams à la cérémonie des Golden Globes le 11 janvier 2026, d'une interview d'une fan de la série accordée au podcast « L'Heure du Monde ».Cet épisode de podcast a été mis en ligne le 10 février 2026.---Abonnez-vous au Monde : https://abo.lemonde.fr/podcastEt réservez vos places pour les lives des 5 ans de L'Heure du Monde : https://ateliers.lemonde.fr/lheure-du-monde/174 Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

Philippe, 74 ans, partage son expérience d'une relation naissante avec une femme de 65 ans, rencontrée dans une association. Bien qu'il soit non-voyant et qu'elle traverse des soucis de santé, leur lien se renforce malgré les défis. Philippe cherche à comprendre comment soutenir sa partenaire tout en respectant son rythme. Chaque soir, en direct, Caroline Dublanche accueille les auditeurs pour 2h30 d'échanges et de confidences. Pour participer, contactez l'émission au 09 69 39 10 11 (prix d'un appel local) ou sur parlonsnous@rtl.fr Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

This week the guys discuss the latest anti-ICE garbage: Billie Eilish's Grammy acceptance speech and her claims that "no one can be illegal on stolen land", Boston Mayor Michele Wu video, "Every single human has a legal right to come to the U.S." Why didn't liberals make these claims when Obama was deporting large. West Virginia just deported 650 illegals in 2 weeks with no "chaos", riots, shooting, etc. If ICE brings chaos, riots, shootings, etc. then why isn't there chaos when local authorities cooperate with ICE? "Melania" Documentary had a $7-million opening weekend more than both Obama movies, and without free press from the media and entertainment, Why do liberals so hate Melania trump?

durée : 00:53:11 - Grand bien vous fasse ! - par : Ali Rebeihi - Pourquoi la lecture de la romancière anglaise Jane Austen nous fait du bien ? Ce matin, Grand bien vous fasse s'intéresse à l'autrice de "Raison et Sentiments", "Orgueil et Préjugés" ou de "L'Abbaye de Northanger", née en 1775 et morte en 1817 à l'âge de 41 ans. - réalisé par : Maria Pasquet Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

durée : 00:53:06 - Grand bien vous fasse ! - par : Ali Rebeihi - Pourquoi la lecture de la romancière anglaise Jane Austen nous fait du bien ? Ce matin, Grand bien vous fasse s'intéresse à l'autrice de "Raison et Sentiments", "Orgueil et Préjugés" ou de "l'Abbaye de Northanger", née en 1775 et morte en 1817 à l'âge de 41 ans. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

Laurence & Spiegs listen & react to Bears General Manager Ryan Poles remarking on Bears Head Coach Ben Johnson's first season.

Who was Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and why is she largely forgotten in popular history? How did she show that the Declaration of Independence promised women's rights, too? Dr. Natalie Taylor, Professor Political Science at Skidmore College, discusses this fascinating American, who formed much of the intellectual foundation of the Suffrage Movement in the 19th Century.Read her Declaration of Sentiments and see how it parallels the form and substance of the Declaration of Independence: https://teachingamericanhistory.org/document/declaration-of-sentiments/Host: Jeff SikkengaExecutive Producer: Jeremy GyptonSubscribe: https://linktr.ee/theamericanideaHomepage: https://ashbrook.org/the-american-idea-podcast/

durée : 00:44:15 - Révélations - par : Benoît COLLOMBAT, Cellule investigation de Radio France - Depuis vingt ans, un homme séduit des femmes seules, vole leurs économies et disparaît. Enquête sur un escroc en série toujours en cavale. - réalisé par : Christophe IMBERT Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

We know you're missing Sarah & Vinnie this holiday break, so enjoy this throwback!

Critiquing Isolationism and the Risks of Disengagement: Colleague Henry Sokolski critiques isolationist arguments, comparing current sentiments to pre-WWII attitudes, warning against relying solely on missile defense bubbles and discussing the distinct threats posed by Russia and China, emphasizing that US disengagement could lead to global instability and unchecked nuclear proliferation. 1932

God is not opposed to feeling.  He does ask that we cover them with the facts. When we feel rocky, we should talk to the Rock.We best pour out our souls to the Pillar of heavenThe Lord is not AFRAID of feelings. They just may be the footprints that help us return to Him.Let's let these sentiments run smack dab into the sediment of the Rock of Godsubscribe and comment for more solidity: https://youtu.be/U70euAC8kBY

Le Royaume-Uni célèbre ce week-end l'une de ses autrices les plus célèbres : Jane Austen, née le 16 décembre 1775. Il y a 250 ans. On lui doit six romans, dont Orgueil et Préjugés, Raison et Sentiments, Emma. De sa vie, on connaît peu de choses, mais son œuvre a chroniqué la période de la Régence anglaise. Une période qui connaît un regain de popularité depuis quelques années, aidée par les adaptations télévisuelles et les séries comme Bridgerton. Comme l'a constaté Emeline Vin à Londres.   À lire aussi«Love and Friendship», la Lady Susan de Whit Stillman

Today on the show, a woman's experience after ICE detained her husband. Wyoming has submitted some novel ideas to try to get a slice of 50 billion in federal dollars to transform healthcare. We hear more details. And what happened during the arraignment of the man who brought a wolf into a bar. Those stories and more.

The guys opened the second hour talking about how important MSU and Michigan football's games are tomorrow. Then, TJ Lang made his triumphant return to the show, ribbing Kenny for stealing waters and participating in this week's edition of "The Picks" to close out the hour.

On July 19th, 1848, 300 female and male delegates gathered in a church in Seneca Falls, New York for America's first women's rights convention. After two days, 100 of the attendees signed the Declaration of Sentiments, a radical manifesto affirming the equality of men and women. It was the start of the women's rights revolution.Over the next two decades, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony built a movement to push for women's suffrage. They worked side by side with abolitionists, certain their causes were intertwined. But in the years after the Civil War, racial tensions broke apart the decades-old alliance between those fighting for the end of slavery and those fighting for women's voting rights. Be the first to know about Wondery's newest podcasts, curated recommendations, and more! Sign up now at https://wondery.fm/wonderynewsletterListen to American History Tellers on the Wondery App or wherever you get your podcasts. Experience all episodes ad-free and be the first to binge the newest season. Unlock exclusive early access by joining Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Start your free trial today by visiting wondery.com/links/american-history-tellers/ now.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.