Government by oppressive authority
POPULARITY
Episode 179: Guests: John Quincy Adams; John Adams; John TaylorThe rallying cry of evil and darkness throughout history - What is the will of the people - Disaster, brought to you by the will of the people - Rags to riches stories that warm the heart and get people killed- Will of the people vs God's Will - Weird Story - ____________Support the show
Jeffrey Tucker is founder and president of Brownstone Institute and Senior Economics Columnist at Epoch Times. He is the author of 15 books, most recently Life After Lockdowns. Senator Rand Paul says, “In Life after Lockdown, “ Jeffrey Tucker paints a picture of the living hell that was the government lockdown and outlines a roadmap for never again allowing such a police state to occur.” Please take the time to visit the Brownstone Institute's excellent website and its stable of fine writers
Learn more about the podcast hereLearn more about Give Him Fifteen hereSupport the show
On Filipino politics and geopolitics. Renowned public intellectual Walden Bello talks to Alex and contributing editor Lee Jones about his recently published memoirs, former president Rodrigo Duterte's arrest, warring political dynasties and more. What's behind Duterte's arrest? Is it lawfare? How did the Philippines comes to be an ‘anarchy of families'? What are the barriers to doing left-wing political work in the Philippines? How has Walden been involved with the social-democratic party Akbayan? What does China's rise mean for developing countries and the global South? What are Walden's key lessons for the ‘end of the End of History'? Links: GLOBAL BATTLEFIELDS: Memoir of a Legendary Public Intellectual from the Global South, Walden Bello, Clarity Duterte Is Right to End the U.S.-Philippine Military Exercises, Walden Bello, NYT /52/ Duterte's Despotism ft. Nicole Curato /351/ Eating the Left's Lunch? ft. Cecilia Lero & Tamás Gerőcs
Learn more about Give Him Fifteen here:Website: https://www.givehim15.comSupport the show
Tajikistan has been acknowledged by Freedom House as one of the worst human rights violators for years, but 2025 has seen Tajik authorities take repression to new levels. Eight former government officials and political opposition figures were convicted at a closed-door trial of plotting a coup and given lengthy prison sentences. In addition, a journalist was convicted of treason for reporting on Tajik citizens' opinions on Chinese influence in their country, and the OSCE said it would not observe Tajikistan's March 2 parliamentary elections because Tajik authorities failed to give assurances of accreditation. Joining host Bruce Pannier to discuss events in Tajikistan in early 2025 are guests Muhamadjon Kabirov, editor at Azda.tv, a media outlet run by exile Tajik journalists; Edward Lemon, the president of the Washington-based Oxus Society for Central Asian Affairs; and Steve Swerdlow, a rights lawyer who is currently an associate professor at the University of Southern California.
Episode in which I discuss the recently detailed revelations of how taxpayer money has been laundered through USAID.
PREVIEW: Author Brenda Shaffer, "Iran is More Than Persia," explains the falsehoods used by the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1979 to convince the numerous ethnic minorities to join the revolution - that became despotism. 1925 Persia
Welcome Back to the Ba'al Busters Community. M-F 8am - 10am Pacific on FTJMedia.com, Rumble and Twitter as @DisguiseLimits. Thanks For Joining Us!If you watch Live, Please use the Rumble Rants ($) icon to support the effort in the chat. ThanksGo To: https://www.moneytreepublishing.com/shop USE code: BAAL for 10% OFF your entire order.Today, 10.30.2024 -Author DONALD JEFFRIES is here today to discuss the state of the Union and his books Hidden History and Crimes and Cover-Ups in American Politics.https://substack.com/@djeffriesJOIN this Site below!DR PETER GLIDDEN, ND Health Recovery Site:https://leavebigpharmabehind.com/?via=pgndhealthUse Code baalbusters for 50% OFF - LIMITED TIME Just For UsFor the 90 Essential Nutrients, Contact Brenda here: 888 618 1796 ext. 101 Mention the Show!YOU ARE the CHANGE. You ARE the Sponsors.Support the Show Here: https://GiveSendGo.com/BaalBustersEuropean Viewers You can support here: https://www.tipeeestream.com/baalbusters/GET COMMERCIAL FREE VIDEOS/PODCASTS and Exclusive Content: Become a Patron. https://Patreon.com/DisguisetheLimitsMy Clean Source Creatine-HCL Use Coupon Code FANFAVORITE for 5% Offhttps://www.semperfryllc.com/store/p126/CreatineHCL.htmlGo to https://SemperFryLLC.com to get all the AWESOME stuff I make plus use code Victory for 11% OFF just for BB viewers! Quick Links to Dr Monzo and Dr Glidden are found on my website.Have you tired TRY BLUE? https://tryblue.refr.cc/baalbusters for 17% Off!Want to send me something?Baal Busters Broadcast#1029101 W 16th Street STE AYuma, AZ 85364BE ADVISED: If you are compelled to mail a check for show support, it must be written out to Semper Fry, LLC.Thanks!Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/ba-al-busters-broadcast--5100262/support.
From April 10, 2023: On March 23, 2023, an Indian court found Prime Minister Narendra Modi's principal opposition leader, Rahul Gandhi, guilty of defaming the Prime Minister and the Modi surname. He was sentenced to two years in prison and expelled from Parliament in what journalists and pro-democracy groups view as yet another inflection point of democratic decline under Modi's leadership. To understand the challenges facing Indian society and the current deterioration of India's democracy, Lawfare Legal Fellow Saraphin Dhanani sat down with Debasish Roy Chowdhury, an Indian journalist based in Hong Kong and Calcutta, who has written extensively on Indian politics, society, and geopolitics. He co-authored a book titled “To Kill a Democracy: India's Passage to Despotism,” which paints a chilling history and reality of the state of Indian democracy. They discussed the Rahul Gandhi case, the spillover of Hindu nationalism into mainstream politics under Modi's leadership, and the future of India's democracy. To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/c/trumptrials.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Let's examine the raw, pulsating heart of today's governance crises. Populist movements, those so-called 'disruptors' of the status quo, aren't just random eruptions of public discontent; they are the inevitable backlash against a political system that has blatantly failed to deliver. These movements, feeding off fear and division, highlight not just a crack but a chasm in public trust—a gap so wide that it beckons the question: Is this chaos orchestrated or merely the clumsy stumble toward a new oligarchy dressed in technocratic garb?Consider this: as democracy flounders, gasping for relevance, are we not witnessing the stage being set for a technocratic takeover? Imagine a future where your 'vote' is as impactful as a 'like' on a corporate executive's latest policy tweet. Here, industry titans and seasoned politicians merge into a hybrid beast, promising efficiency but at the cost of what? Your voice, your choice, your democracy.Technocracy, cloaked in the allure of expertise and efficiency, promises to solve problems with the precision of a surgeon. But let's not be naive. This isn't about solving problems; it's about control. If you appreciate my articles, please consider giving them a like. It's a simple gesture that doesn't cost you anything, but it goes a long way in promoting this post, combating censorship, and fighting the issues that you are apparently not a big fan of.When the U.S. flirted with the idea through its Manufacturing Jobs Initiative, it wasn't just about gaining insights; it was a test run for a governance model where decisions are made in boardrooms, not ballot boxes. Here, the 'scientific method' becomes a pretext for autocracy, where decisions are as sterile and devoid of human touch as an algorithm.The technocratic ethos assumes that those at the top, these so-called experts, will act in the public's interest. But history scoffs at this notion. Look at the Chinese Communist Party, a prime specimen of technocratic rule. Efficient? Undoubtedly. But at what cost? Freedom, dissent, and individuality are squashed under the guise of unity and progress. Here's where the cynicism kicks in: if efficiency is the measure of success, then perhaps we should all aspire to be as 'successful' as drones in a hive.And then there's Singapore, often paraded as the poster child of technocracy. Yes, it's clean, it's rich, it's advanced. But peel back the layers, and what do you find? A society where the richness of public debate is supplanted by the sterility of imposed consensus. Here, the government acts more like a corporate entity, where public opinion is a mere formality, not a foundation.A Lily Bit is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Here we are, in the shadow of the Great Depression's echoes, where the idea of technocracy first found fertile ground. Fast forward to today, and we're not just flirting with technocracy; we're on the brink of marrying it, driven by the same disillusionment with political ineptitude. But let's not be romantics about this union.The historical allure of technocracy, this notion of replacing bumbling politicians with the crisp efficiency of scientists and engineers, always surges back like a bad habit during times of crisis. But think about it: are we genuinely considering handing over the reins of power to the Zuckerbergs and Musks of the world because our current leaders can't pass legislation without turning it into a circus?Let's dissect this with a critical eye. The Kochs and Zuckerbergs of our era, through their opaque LLCs and boundless funds, are not just whispering in the ears of politicians; they're practically writing the script. This isn't just influence; it's a soft coup by the technocratic elite, bypassing the democratic process under the guise of 'efficiency' and 'problem-solving'.Now, consider the implications: when we turn to the private sector, to these titans of industry, for governance, what are we really asking for? Efficiency, yes, but at what cost? Democracy thrives on debate, diversity, and sometimes, delightful chaos. Technocracy, on the other hand, operates on algorithms and bottom lines. When Elon Musk proposes a solution, it's brilliant, it's sleek, but politics isn't just about solutions; it's about consensus, about navigating the human messiness that no AI or algorithm can fully comprehend or manage.Here's where the economic theory bites back: in a technocracy, decisions are economic, not political. They're about optimizing resources, not optimizing human welfare. When industry leaders step into governance, their solutions might look great on a profit and loss statement but could very well ignore the nuanced needs of a diverse populace.And let's inject some cynicism here: these technocrats, with their tech empires and billion-dollar initiatives, aren't just playing at policy-making; they're potentially crafting a world where their economic dominance translates into political power. Are we ready to live in a society where the boardroom decisions of a few dictate the daily lives of the many?Technocracy is a fundamentally different beast, one that could very well chew up the principles of representation and spit out a streamlined, but soulless, corporate governance model. Are we prepared to make this trade, or should we fight to fix the democratic flaws that make technocracy seem like an appealing escape route?The skepticism towards technocracy isn't just about fearing change but about recognizing patterns that could lead to an unprecedented consolidation of power. The idea that technocracy could strip away private property under the guise of efficiency or economic management isn't just a theoretical fear; it's rooted in historical examples where central control over economic resources led to significant curtailment of individual freedoms. The Trilateral Commission, with its focus on policy integration across continents, does indeed present a facade of enhancing democratic governance, yet its approach to 'managing' democracy by suggesting a reduction in its excess can be seen as a move towards more autocratic control.Let's delve into the implications of this technocratic shift:* Economic Control: If technocrats decide the distribution of resources, what happens to entrepreneurship, innovation, or even personal ambition? The notion of universal basic income, while on the surface provides security, could also be viewed as a tool for control. When your basic needs are met by the system, how freely can you oppose it?* Surveillance and Data: The scenario where companies like Google or Amazon become integral to daily life isn't just about convenience; it's about surveillance. The data they collect could theoretically be used to predict, influence, and control behavior. Here, technocracy doesn't just govern; it monitors, predicts, and potentially manipulates.* Political Puppetry: The notion that politicians might already be "useful idiots" in a technocratic system where decisions are made by unelected experts or corporate entities challenges the very core of representative democracy. If true, then elections become mere formalities, not expressions of public will but validations of pre-selected choices by technocratic elites.This creeping technocracy, where technology companies and unelected bodies potentially hold more sway over daily life than elected officials, does paint a picture of a new world order. It's a world where efficiency and technological advancement might come at the cost of privacy, freedom, and democratic participation.Thanks for reading A Lily Bit! This post is public so feel free to share it.The critical question then becomes: Are we, as a society, willing to trade the messiness of democracy for the streamlined, yet potentially soulless, efficiency of technocracy? Or can we find a balance where technology serves humanity without governing it, where innovation thrives alongside privacy and individual rights? This debate isn't just for conspiracy theorists but for anyone concerned with the future trajectory of global governance.How you can support my writing:* Restack, like and share this post via email, text, and social media* Tip me a bug-free meal with Ko-Fi* Buy a discount subscriptionThank you; your support keeps me writing and helps me pay the bills.
Donald Trump is a despot, ramping up his authoritarian language as he fears losing to Kamala Harris. Join this channel for exclusive access and bonus content: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkbwLFZhawBqK2b9gW08z3g/join Five Minute News with Anthony Davis is an Evergreen Podcast, covering politics, inequality, health and climate - delivering independent, unbiased and essential news for the US and across the world. Visit us online at http://www.fiveminute.news Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/fiveminnews Follow us on Instagram http://instagram.com/fiveminnews Support us on Patreon http://www.patreon.com/fiveminutenews You can subscribe to Five Minute News with your preferred podcast app, ask your smart speaker, or enable Five Minute News as your Amazon Alexa Flash Briefing skill. Please subscribe HERE https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkbwLFZhawBqK2b9gW08z3g?sub_confirmation=1 CONTENT DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed on this channel are those of the guests and authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Anthony Davis or Five Minute News LLC. Any content provided by our guests or authors are of their opinion and are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual or anyone or anything. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
3438 – July 31, 2024 – Win Everlasting Independence Refute Despotism – WEIRD = “Basket of Deplorables” We think the left has a lot of gall calling J.D. Vance “weird.” Have they not looked in the mirror lately? J.D. is a red-blooded American man who bravely served his country in the USMC in Iraq. Weird is Pete Buttigieg strapping on ... The post Win Everlasting Independence Refute Despotism appeared first on CSC Talk Radio.
I have actually asked many people this question and I am always amazed at how many answer with an emphatic, NO. The entire history of the world is made of stories of men who want to be free and other men that want to rule over free men. There is no shortage of tyrants in the world and it requires constant vigilance to keep them powerless. Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America" addressed this very subject but from the perspective of 'tyranny of the majority'. In America today we are losing liberty for all the reasons de Tocqueville pointed out way back in 1830. Thomas International Center - Alexis de Tocqueville https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2djyr_92OM Joe Rogan - Soft Men...Hard Times https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9r0jp_z20rs --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/seth-martin0/message
On this episode of The Hillsdale College Online Courses Podcast, Jeremiah and Juan introduce the course "The American Left: From Liberalism to Despotism". American politics have drastically transformed over the last few decades as a ruling elite has emerged that, despite being from different parties, largely shares radical ideologies centered around identity politics. The change is not simply the natural conclusion of progressivism, but rather a series of radical movements that have provided new ideas and shifted the Left from the liberalism of Franklin Roosevelt to the Great Awokening of Barack Obama's second term. Progressive ideas rejected the Founding belief that the purpose of government was to protect natural rights. This has opened the way for a new understanding of politics that seeks power to redefine nature itself.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
On this episode of The Hillsdale College Online Courses Podcast, Jeremiah and Juan introduce the course "The American Left: From Liberalism to Despotism". American politics have drastically transformed over the last few decades as a ruling elite has emerged that, despite being from different parties, largely shares radical ideologies centered around identity politics. The change is not simply the natural conclusion of progressivism, but rather a series of radical movements that have provided new ideas and shifted the Left from the liberalism of Franklin Roosevelt to the Great Awokening of Barack Obama's second term. Progressive ideas rejected the Founding belief that the purpose of government was to protect natural rights. This has opened the way for a new understanding of politics that seeks power to redefine nature itself.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Today on The Prather Point LIVE at 2 pm ET / 11 am PT on RUMBLEhttps://rumble.com/v4r598t-ai-outs-almighty-for-digital-despotism.htmlFDA MODERIZATION = FISA 2.0!JESSICA LYNCH: WHEN WE RESCUED OUR TROOPS!STRANDED US SOLDIERS IN NIGER NEXT BENGHAZI?DEMOCIDE MASKED AS MEDICAL COUNTERMEASURES
This week on The Learning Curve, guest co-hosts Charlie Chieppo and Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Barry Anderson interview UCLA's classical historian, Prof. Ronald Mellor. Dr. Mellor delves into the enduring influence of Tacitus, the great Roman historian, on both America's Founding Fathers and contemporary understanding of politics and government. He discusses Tacitus’s insights on the early Roman emperors, unchecked authority, moral judgment of leadership, and the decline of the Roman Republic, as well […]
This week on The Learning Curve, guest co-hosts Charlie Chieppo and Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Barry Anderson interview UCLA’s classical historian, Prof. Ronald Mellor. Dr. Mellor delves into the enduring influence of Tacitus, the great Roman historian, on both America’s Founding Fathers and contemporary understanding of politics and government. He discusses Tacitus’s insights on the early... Source
This week on The Learning Curve, guest co-hosts Charlie Chieppo and Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Barry Anderson interview UCLA's classical historian, Prof. Ronald Mellor. Dr. Mellor delves into the enduring influence of Tacitus, the great Roman historian, on both America's Founding Fathers and contemporary understanding of politics and government. He discusses Tacitus's insights on the early Roman emperors, unchecked authority, moral judgment of leadership, and the decline of the Roman Republic, as well as ancient lessons for modern governance. Prof. Mellor closes with a reading from his book, Tacitus.
Protect Your Retirement W/ a Gold and/or Silver IRA: https://www.sgtreportgold.com/ or CALL( 877) 646-5347 - Noble Gold is Who I Trust Canadian patriot, researcher and activist Christopher James returns to SGT Report so discuss pre-crime and thought crime legislation in Castro-Trudeau's KanaDUH and the absolute dspotism we're seeing in the USA as well. Oh, and the stupid wretched pathetic infighting. We talk about that too. Thanks for tuning in. GET MasterPeace to GET THE GRAPHENE & nanotech OUT of your body!! https://masterpeacebyhcs.com/?ref=4094 https://www.bitchute.com/video/2qJYMAp5r50D/
As promised, at the beginning of each month in 2024, we return to the topic of “Election Year Zen,” with my “DharmaByte” column (DB) for the Silent Thunder Order monthly newsletter, followed by my first subsequent “UnMind” podcast (UM) of the month. To review the underlying rationale for this approach to a topic most practitioners would prefer to avoid, please refer to last month's DB and UM if you have not already done so. In an earlier DB from June of 2023, I had broached this subject gingerly, and I touch upon it in my second major book, “The Razorblade of Zen.” In the newsletter column, I make the point that partisan politics in general is not a topic we would recommend bringing up in the context of the meditation hall — in Japanese called the “zendo” — a sensitive point which had come up in dialog with one of our affiliated Zen centers (quoting myself again): In a recent meeting with one of our affiliate centers, the focus was on “The Platform Sutra of Huineng,” in which he admonishes all to not find fault with others. One of the members who helps organize these events sent me some questions she wanted me to address, including the dilemma of how we are supposed to not find fault with people who are waging war on others, and committing atrocities such as bombing cities, civilians, and children. She was concerned that raising these issues might be too personal, in the context of a Zen community, where the underlying premise might be to provide some shelter and sanctuary from the insanity of the world. But I assured her that, no, these very events are apt examples of the very ignorance, and resultant unnecessary suffering, that are pointed to in the foundational teachings of Buddha. And that she is right to raise such questions in the context of Zen practice in modern life. It is my understanding that in the monasteries, and perhaps the smaller temples in cities and villages of the countries of origin of Zen Buddhism, the custom is to have little or no speaking in the zendo itself. As I learned in 1989, when visiting Eiheiji, the training monastery established by Master Dogen in the 13th century, ceremonial services are typically conducted in an entirely separate building, as are formal talks and other forms of dharma study. This tradition has carried over into the American Zen community, where we are encouraged to leave the zendo quietly after the meditation and gather in another chamber before engaging in dialog. So the idea that we preserve the sanctity of the zendo, and the sanity of its attendees, has some legs. There are good reasons for the specific designs of the protocols we have inherited from Zen's storied past. However, in most smaller temples and training centers, having multiple rooms, let alone separate buildings, in which to conduct various activities is a luxury that many cannot afford. This is the reason both the main altar (J. butsudan) and the smaller zendo altar dedicated to Manjusri are often in the same room, separated by space, or located on different walls of the meditation hall. So we compromise, and hold competing sessions at different times. The meditation hall becomes the dharma hall, then reverts back, when sitting in zazen. Silent, upright seated meditation is the hallmark of Zen, taking precedence over all other activities, fostered by instruction periods for newcomers. However, Zen is not unconnected from reality outside the temple, and the zendo does function as a kind of social sanctuary, as does zazen itself, in the personal sphere. We can manage to accommodate both personal practice and social service functions in the same space, by scheduling them at different times. This does not mean, however, that everyone has to participate, just as everyone need not attend all newcomer instruction sessions. Which is why instructions are not given with every session in the zendo. Members who do not want to discuss buddhadharma on any other than the personal plane are welcome to avoid attending dharma dialogs that have a social slant. But if we prohibit such discussions, we are sidestepping our civic responsibility, which, if you study the Buddhist canon, from Buddha on down to the present day, you will see that the ancient sages and their modern counterparts have not shied away from the subject. When it comes to indiscriminate bombing of civilians and children, we are no longer in the realm of politics. If we are silent, we become complicit. Buddha, I believe, would have spoken out against this betrayal of compassion and wisdom. As did Matsuoka Roshi, concerning the corrupt regime in Vietnam, and other atrocities of his time. We can look to the teachings and meditation practice of Zen Buddhism to find a degree of solace and sanctuary from these insults to humanity, but we cannot run, and we cannot hide from them, ultimately. But we do not have to join the partisan divide, either. To provide some historical context for this discussion, we refer to the foundational documents of the founding fathers of this nation, the oldest surviving democratic republic. In the prior installment on this matter, we quoted the famous first paragraph of the Declaration of Independence. Let us continue with the second section: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. Aye, there's the rub: if “all men” — which phrase we now define to include all women and all children, of all races, ethnic backgrounds, and countries of origin — are indeed created equal, and endowed with “unalienable rights,” then there is no rationale, no excuse, for waging war in which innocents are slaughtered as “collateral damage.” — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. If the very purpose of government is to secure such rights as to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, then the institutions of government — including first and foremost the military — must be prohibited from depriving citizens of any country of these rights, with or without the concept of a “Creator.” They go on to define the remedy: — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. So here is the ostensible rationale for the recent attempts to overthrow the present government, though the events of January sixth clearly appear to have partisan roots. At the time of this writing, of course, this ultimate right was claimed in the context of Great Britain's “crazy” King George, and his autocratic grip on the colonies. The history of protests of the original tea party and privileged Tories — loyalists and royalists, or “King's men” — illustrates that the times were probably as divisive, or even more so, than our present partisan divide. Anticipating that this passage might be construed to lend support to purely partisan motives, the framers optimistically hang the hope of future jurisprudence on the dictates of prudence itself: Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Leaving aside for now the determination as to which causes should be eschewed as “light and transient,” this suggests that this call to arms is based on the degree of oppression the hoi polloi are willing to bear. This returns to the theme of the last segments of UnMind, with their emphasis on the intersection of design thinking and Zen, where in both arenas, one of the central questions bearing on happiness and suffering is, How much is enough? If the majority of people are fat and happy, and “kitchen table” issues — the price of eggs, bread and butter — are relatively bearable, little attention will be devoted to overthrowing the government, no matter how corrupt. “Let them eat cake” works, if there is fairly widespread access to cake. The division of the citizens into haves and have-nots, with those at the top of the game, the “one-percenters,” raking in wealth that is unimaginable, and inaccessible, to the rest, may be much more exaggerated today, as well as more obvious and available to scrutiny, owing to the ubiquitous availability of 24/7 real-time news media. A recent newspaper column revealed the staggering increases in incomes of the country's top three or four wealthiest individuals, compared to their more meager incomes of only a few years ago, alongside the minimum wage, which has remained static in the same time period, This disparity of incomes has national and international implications as an impetus to immigration, to make matters more complicated. You may argue that these captains of industry deserve the income they earn, but that stretches the concept of earning to the breaking point. You cannot “earn” this level of income in any rational sense of the word. Corporate income comes from “owning,” not earning. We are not going to solve these problems in this analysis, but we can at least compare and contrast the current cultural norms and memes that attempt to justify them, with the teachings of Buddhism, such as encouraging us to engage compassion in dealing with our fellow travelers in the dusty realm of Samsara, the everyday world of patience. So we have to practice patience with a situation that seems to have no justification whatever, or very little from this perspective. While the case can be made that not all people are created equal, it can be argued that to the degree reasonable, the playing field should be leveled. A child born with a silver spoon in their mouth, whether currently or 2500 years ago, is no more deserving than a child born into a family that doesn't even own a spoon. To argue that those parents should not have children who cannot afford to have children ignores the reproductive drive of the species, which pays little regard to the material circumstances of its sperm donors and receivers. Once a child is born, it has the same potential for realizing its buddha nature as any other child, regardless of the causes and conditions into which it is born. And we cannot misuse the Buddhist take on karma and karmic consequences to dismiss these disparities, nor the social injustices that often accompany them, out of hand. The teachings of Buddhism were never intended to be held up to others as a criticism or justification for inaction, but to be reflected back upon our own follies, foibles and failings. This is the “mirror of Zen,” which reflects the good, bad, and the ugly without discrimination. We come to see ourselves in this mirror, along with all others, in our extended dharma family. Buddha was said to have come to see everyone as his “children,” and not in a condescending way. To close this segment, I will lean on Master Dogen's admonition to “thoroughly examine this in practice.” Let us return to our cushions, but not turn our back on those who have not even been exposed to this excellent method. Our mission is clear. We need to wake up on every possible level. Compassion and wisdom — like charity — begin at home.* * * Elliston Roshi is guiding teacher of the Atlanta Soto Zen Center and abbot of the Silent Thunder Order. He is also a gallery-represented fine artist expressing his Zen through visual poetry, or “music to the eyes.”UnMind is a production of the Atlanta Soto Zen Center in Atlanta, Georgia and the Silent Thunder Order. You can support these teachings by PayPal to donate@STorder.org. Gassho.Producer: Shinjin Larry Little
In her widely-read and influential anti-federalist essay, Mercy Otis Warren warned that the Constitution would abandon the principles of the American Revolution and facilitate consolidation of the states under a powerful national government. In other words, it would lead to unlimited centralized power – similar to the system the colonists had fought to leave. The post Uncontrolled Despotism: Mercy Otis Warren on the Constitution first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
Out of the crooked timber of man, no straight thing was ever made. -Immanuel Kant A Welsh slave was once given a direct order by his captor and notorious butcher of men, sultan Moulay Ismail of Morocco. He refused it and lived. This is the problem of despotism. It's why despotism, or even just authoritarianism, is all-powerful and brittle at the same time. Despotism creates the circumstances of its own undermining. The information gets worse. The sycophants get greater in number. The corrective mechanisms become fewer. And the mistakes become much more consequential. –Stephen Kotkin If the history of slavery ought to teach us anything, it is that human beings cannot be trusted with unbridled power over other human beings - no matter what color or creed any of them are. –Thomas Sowell
We discuss Chapter 10 – The Despotism of Subsumption – and get deeper into the impersonal domination of capital and why the concepts of formal subsumption and real subsumption are necessary for a critical analysis of the socio-technical conditions of capitalism. Plus – we build all this into a discussion of the Apple Vision Pro. ••• Mute Compulsion: A Marxist Theory of the Economic Power of Capital – Søren Mau https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/products/2759-mute-compulsion Subscribe to hear more analysis and commentary in our premium episodes every week! https://www.patreon.com/thismachinekills Hosted by Jathan Sadowski (www.twitter.com/jathansadowski) and Edward Ongweso Jr. (www.twitter.com/bigblackjacobin). Production / Music by Jereme Brown (www.twitter.com/braunestahl)
Become a Patron. GET COMMERCIAL FREE PODCASTS and Exclusive Content: https://Patreon.com/DisguisetheLimitsSamuel Morse, creator of the Telegraph, and Morse Code (should have saw that one coming) enlightens us on the Infiltrators destroying America and the the world from his 1835 worldview.Priestcraft: Beyond Babylon is getting Great Feedback! 8.5x11 Paperback, Hardcover, & Kindle: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CNGX53L7/Barnes & Noble: Priestcraft: Beyond Babylon 416 pages, and ebook: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/book/1144402176KOBO: https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/priestcraft-beyond-babylonAdd to the Kristos Family Apocalypse Fund: https://GiveSendGo.com/BaalBustersBecome a Patron. All the Cool Kids are doing it! https://Patreon.com/DisguisetheLimitsDR MONZO Products: https://drmonzo.kartra.com/page/shopDR MONZO ATB BOOK: https://drmonzo.kartra.com/page/ATBBookUSE CODE: BaalBusters15 for 15% OFF Dr. MONZO's store itemsGet Healthy with DR PETER GLIDDEN, ND https://leavebigpharmabehind.com/?via=pgndhealthGet KRATOM HERE: https://klaritykratom.com/?ref=BaalBustersSubmit Questions: https://buymeacoffee.com/BaalBusters or just Call-in!Have you tired TRY BLUE? https://tryblue.refr.cc/baalbusters for 17% Off!SHIRTS & MERCH https://my-store-c960b1.creator-spring.com/THIS CHANNEL IS INDEPENDENT and has no sponsors but YOUJOIN Locals by Clicking the JOIN Button Beneath the video.AWESOME Hot Sauce: https://SemperFryLLC.com Use Code at site for 11% Off qualified purchasesBa'al Busters channel: https://rumble.com/c/BaalBustersTwitter: https://twitter.com/DisguiseLimitsInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/baalbusters/Telegram: https://t.me/BaalBustersStudiosJoshWhoTV channel: https://BaalBuster.JoshWhoTV.comSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3N7fqqG6MX84vKbANtxrWS
"Join Wall Street. Save the world," The Washington Post urged in 2013. "How to Know Your Donations Are Doing the Most Good," The New York Times proclaimed in 2015. "I give 10 percent of my income to charity. You should, too," Vox advised last November. Each of these headlines tops a piece that extols the virtues of Effective Altruism, a philanthropic philosophy, for lack of a better term, ostensibly dedicated to the pursuit of the best ways to address large-scale, global ills like pandemics and factory farming, informed by “evidence and reason.” The school of thought, popularized by figures like the academic and author Peter Singer and disgraced FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, has been widely embraced – or at least uncritically boosted – in mainline media for years. Superficially, this makes sense. Effective Altruism seems unimpeachably virtuous: It's great if people want to solve the world's problems, and so much the better if they've done their research. But beneath this surface lies a deeply reactionary movement, predicated on an age-old desire to characterize the wealthy as the solution to, rather than the cause of, the very problems they purport to want to solve. On this episode, we parse the rise, motives, and influence of Effective Altruism. We look at how the doctrine gamifies wealth distribution, falsely portrays the rich as uniquely qualified to make decisions about public welfare, often provides cover for eugenics and racism, and masquerades as a groundbreaking ethos of data-driven compassion while it merely regurgitates a 100-year-old rich person ideology of supposedly benevolent control over the masses. Our guest is Dr. Linsey McGoey.
An interview with Udi Raz from Jewish Voice for Peace in the Middle East on how the Holocaust impacted the societies and politics of both Germany and Israel January 27 is Holocaust Remembrance Day, a date of enormous symbolic importance in Europe, marking one of the darkest chapters in human history. It's a day of particular significance in Germany, of course. The so-called remembrance culture, Germany's reckoning with the legacy of the Nazi periods, and the industrial scale genocides perpetrated by the Nazi regime, have been much lauded internationally. But today, parts of this culture are increasingly coming into question by many, with charges of antisemitism being used by German institutions to silence voices speaking up for the rights of Palestinians in particular. The targets of these charges are, disproportionately, the Palestinians themselves, Arabs, more broadly, and Jews. On the international stage, meanwhile, Germany's long steadfast support for the State of Israel, which remains unshaken even as the civilian toll in Gaza continues to climb to ever more obscene numbers, has raised the ire of many. The support, of course, is again justified by the legacy of the Holocaust and the German state's resulting sense of responsibility towards the security of the Jewish state. What about Israel itself? How has the memory of the Holocaust shaped Israeli society and how does it influence the Israeli government's words and actions? To discuss all this, DiEM25 Communications Director Lucas Febraro sat down with Udi Raz, a doctoral fellow at the Berlin Graduate School for Muslim Cultures and Societies and a board member of Jewish Voice for Peace in the Middle East, in Germany.
Dan returns from Christmas break and destroys the Wisconsin Supreme Court's rejection of the state's electoral maps. Plus, Congressman Bryan Steil live from the southern border and the resignation of Harvard president Claudine Gay.
In this episode of the Nèg Mawon Podcast, we delve deep into the roots of Haiti's complex political landscape with Dr. Robert Fatton. From its foundation, Haiti has grappled with a social, economic, and political apartheid system that has marginalized the majority of its population. Dr. Fatton discusses how this system, rooted in divisions of color, class, and colonial hierarchy, has led to exclusionary practices in education and culture.Our guest emphasizes the economic basis of this system, calling for a more democratic and egalitarian society that meets the basic needs of all Haitians. He critiques the simplistic savior narrative often applied to Haiti and explores the historical context of the country's authoritarian tradition, advocating for a revolutionary transformation of both politics and the economy.Join us as we explore the persisting issue of authoritarian governance in Haiti, the challenges faced after the revolution, and the potential for a more inclusive and accountable society. This thought-provoking discussion sheds light on the structural forces shaping Haiti's past and present, offering crucial insights into the complexities of its history and the path to a more inclusive future. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/negmawonpodcast/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/negmawonpodcast/support
On the radical right in the global periphery. [This was originally a Patreon Exclusive] Erdogan, Modi, Orban, Bolsonaro, Duterte. Though the latter two are gone, the first three are still going strong, in government for a decade or more. What unites these figures? They're all right wing and authoritarian, but also popular and anti-establishment. How similar are these politicians to their analogues in the core of global capitalism? Might they even be seen to be forerunners of developments in the rich world? And to what extent are they able to resolve the crises of the end of the end of history? In this episode, we talk to two of the editors of a new book, The Radical Right: Politics of Hate on the Margins of Global Capital. Previous episodes on this theme: Turkey /339/ Erdogone? People vs Nation in Turkey ft. Alp Kayserilioglu Brazil: /299/ Micropower & Transcendence in Brazil (Bungazão 2022) ft. Miguel Lago Brazil: /292/ Bungazão 2022: Unrealistic Pragmatism, ft. Unbridled Possibility Collective India: /198/ Universal India ft. Achin Vanaik Hungary: /33/ Hungary's Illiberal Democracy ft. Tamas Gerocs Philippines: /52/ Duterte's Despotism ft. Nicole Curato
On this episode of Radio Rothbard, Ryan McMaken and Tho Bishop look at the domestic costs of 9/11 and its continuing impact on Americans. The two discuss articles they wrote this week about how the events sowed the seeds of the current regime, how it reversed the trajectory of rising government skepticism in the 90s, and the need for accountability still to this day. Recommended Reading "Three Reasons Why Military Recruitment Is in Crisis" by Ryan McMaken: Mises.org/RR_151_A "America Since 9/11: 22 Years of Lies and Despotism" by Ryan McMaken: Mises.org/RR_151_B "Lew Rockwell's Prophetic Warning About 9/11" by Tho Bishop: Mises.org/RR_151_C Get your free book at Mises.org/RothPodFree Be sure to follow Radio Rothbard at Mises.org/RadioRothbard. New Radio Rothbard mugs are now available at the Mises Store. Get yours at Mises.org/RothMug PROMO CODE: RothPod for 20% off
On this episode of Radio Rothbard, Ryan McMaken and Tho Bishop look at the domestic costs of 9/11 and its continuing impact on Americans. The two discuss articles they wrote this week about how the events sowed the seeds of the current regime, how it reversed the trajectory of rising government skepticism in the 90s, and the need for accountability still to this day. Recommended Reading "Three Reasons Why Military Recruitment Is in Crisis" by Ryan McMaken: Mises.org/RR_151_A "America Since 9/11: 22 Years of Lies and Despotism" by Ryan McMaken: Mises.org/RR_151_B "Lew Rockwell's Prophetic Warning About 9/11" by Tho Bishop: Mises.org/RR_151_C Get your free book at Mises.org/RothPodFree Be sure to follow Radio Rothbard at Mises.org/RadioRothbard. New Radio Rothbard mugs are now available at the Mises Store. Get yours at Mises.org/RothMug PROMO CODE: RothPod for 20% off
On this episode of Radio Rothbard, Ryan McMaken and Tho Bishop look at the domestic costs of 9/11 and its continuing impact on Americans. The two discuss articles they wrote this week about how the events sowed the seeds of the current regime, how it reversed the trajectory of rising government skepticism in the 90s, and the need for accountability still to this day. Recommended Reading "Three Reasons Why Military Recruitment Is in Crisis" by Ryan McMaken: Mises.org/RR_151_A "America Since 9/11: 22 Years of Lies and Despotism" by Ryan McMaken: Mises.org/RR_151_B "Lew Rockwell's Prophetic Warning About 9/11" by Tho Bishop: Mises.org/RR_151_C Get your free book at Mises.org/RothPodFree Be sure to follow Radio Rothbard at Mises.org/RadioRothbard. New Radio Rothbard mugs are now available at the Mises Store. Get yours at Mises.org/RothMug PROMO CODE: RothPod for 20% off
In a more reasonable world, people like Cheney, Rice, Bolton, et al., would all be forgotten, shamed, and disgraced for overseeing multiple disastrous wars abroad and the creation of a police state at home. Unfortunately, we don't live in a more reasonable world. Original Article: "America Since 9/11: 22 Years of Lies and Despotism"
In a more reasonable world, people like Cheney, Rice, Bolton, et al., would all be forgotten, shamed, and disgraced for overseeing multiple disastrous wars abroad and the creation of a police state at home. Unfortunately, we don't live in a more reasonable world. Original Article: "America Since 9/11: 22 Years of Lies and Despotism"
In a more reasonable world, people like Cheney, Rice, Bolton, et al., would all be forgotten, shamed, and disgraced for overseeing multiple disastrous wars abroad and the creation of a police state at home. Unfortunately, we don't live in a more reasonable world. Original Article: "America Since 9/11: 22 Years of Lies and Despotism"
Ignorance of liberty, of the constitution, of the powers delegated to the government - and so much more - are just what tyrants absolutely love. And we're literally surrounded by people who are willfully ignorant of it all. The post Ignorance is the “Footstool of Despotism” first appeared on Tenth Amendment Center.
Absolute Despotism | Ep. 625- Daily Dose Kirk Elliott Gold and Silver www.getgoldtoday.com www.redpills.tv/mypillow My Patriot Supply Be Prepared When Disaster Strikes redpills.tv/patriot The Redpill Project.. Find Us and Subscribe! Web https://redpills.tv Telegram http://t.me/RedpillsTV Rumble https://rumble.com/c/RedpillProject CloutHub https://clouthub.com/redpills GETTR https://gettr.com/user/redpill TikTok https://tiktok.com/@realjoshreid Foxhole App: https://pilled.net/#/profile/127862 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/redpillproject DLive: https://dlive.tv/RedpillProject
Daniel Klein is professor of economics and JIN Chair at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, where he leads a program on Adam Smith. He is the author of Smithian Morals and Central Notions of Smithian Liberalism. I admired his widely-read 2023 essay “Misinformation Is a Word We Use to Shut You Up,” which has been posted by Brownstone Institute, Independent Institute, Zero Hedge, and other websites. The KunstlerCast theme music is the beautiful Two Rivers Waltz written and performed by Larry Unger.
On the radical right in the global periphery. [Patreon Exclusive] Erdogan, Modi, Orban, Bolsonaro, Duterte. Though the latter two are gone, the first three are still going strong, in government for a decade or more. What unites these figures? They're all right wing and authoritarian, but also popular and anti-establishment. How similar are these politicians to their analogues in the core of global capitalism? Might they even be seen to be forerunners of developments in the rich world? And to what extent are they able to resolve the crises of the end of the end of history? In this episode, we talk to two of the editors of a new book, The Radical Right: Politics of Hate on the Margins of Global Capital. Previous episodes on the theme: Turkey /339/ Erdogone? People vs Nation in Turkey ft. Alp Kayserilioglu Brazil: /299/ Micropower & Transcendence in Brazil (Bungazão 2022) ft. Miguel Lago Brazil: /292/ Bungazão 2022: Unrealistic Pragmatism, ft. Unbridled Possibility Collective India: /198/ Universal India ft. Achin Vanaik Hungary: /33/ Hungary's Illiberal Democracy ft. Tamas Gerocs Philippines: /52/ Duterte's Despotism ft. Nicole Curato
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
#PrayerFriday #Heal #WalkWithJesus My Patriot Supply PREPAREWITHBARDS.COM : Click here BIRCH GOLD Infokit: >>>Text BARDS to 989898 iTargetPro promo code BARDS: https://itargetpro.com MYPillow promo code: BARDS Go to https://www.mypillow.com/bards and use the promo code BARDS or... Call 1-800-975-2939. Use promo code BARDS. EMPShield protect your vehicles and home. Promo code BARDS: Click here Field of Greens organic superfood whole body supplement. Promo code BARDS: click here Founders Bible 20% discount code: BARDS >>> https://thefoundersbible.com/#ordernow Treadlite Broadforks...best garden tool EVER. Promo code BARDS: Click here MYCoffee promo code BARDS: https://mystore.com/mycoffee BardsFM Flags: https://bardsfm.com/shop/black-flag/ DONATE: https://bardsfm.com/donate/#donate-content Address: Xpedition Cafe, LLC 780 NW Garden Valley Blvd. #64 Box 133 Roseburg, OR 97471
On March 23, 2023, an Indian court found Prime Minister Narendra Modi's principal opposition leader, Rahul Gandhi, guilty of defaming the Prime Minister and the Modi surname. He was sentenced to two years in prison and expelled from Parliament in what journalists and pro-democracy groups view as yet another inflection point of democratic decline under Modi's leadership. To understand the challenges facing Indian society and the current deterioration of India's democracy, Lawfare Legal Fellow Saraphin Dhanani sat down with Debasish Roy Chowdhury an Indian journalist based in Hong Kong and Calcutta, who has written extensively on Indian politics, society, and geopolitics. He co-authored a book titled “To Kill a Democracy: India's Passage to Despotism,” which paints a chilling history and reality of the state of Indian democracy. They discussed the Rahul Gandhi case, the spillover of Hindu nationalism into mainstream politics under Modi's leadership, and the future of India's democracy. Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Guests: Kevin Slack, Karol Markowicz, & Brent Cline Host Scot Bertram talks with Kevin Slack, Associate Professor of Politics at Hillsdale College, about his new book War on the American Republic: How Liberalism Became Despotism. New York Post columnist Karol Markowicz takes us inside her recent book, co-authored with Bethany Mandel, Stolen Youth: How Radicals […]
#StandAndFight #SpeakTruth #DefyTyranny BIRCH GOLD Infokit: >>>Text BARDS to 989898 My Patriot Supply get 20% off by going to: PrepareWithBards.com iTargetPro promo code BARDS: https://itargetpro.com MYPillow promo code: BARDS Go to https://www.mypillow.com/bards and use the promo code BARDS or... Call 1-800-975-2939. Use promo code BARDS. MYCoffee promo code BARDS: https://mystore.com/mycoffee Xpedition Coffee: A coffee for whole body health. >>> https://xpeditioncoffee.com BardsFM Flags: https://bardsfm.com/shop/black-flag/ Founders Bible 20% discount code: BARDS >>> https://thefoundersbible.com/#ordernow DONATE: https://bardsfm.com/donate/#donate-content Address: Xpedition Cafe, LLC 780 NW Garden Valley Blvd. #64 Box 133 Roseburg, OR 97471