Podcasts about terminations

Sista Tells Women "GETTING MARRIED FOR LOVE IS DUMB | Banned After 13 Terminations by Greg Adams

Since the Super Bowl is mere days away, we're going back to the Sh*t vault to hear Nikki and Steve issue a ceremonious personal foul upon the consort of a gridiron idol who venerates the NFL with near-liturgical devotion! Get out that jersey, order some wings, and let's here Nikki and Steve drop some relationship knowledge on y'all. Enjoy! Nikki is now an ambassador for Club WPT Gold! Check out: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://clubwptgold.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and use code NIKKI to sign up! Follow the podcast on Insta: @shttheydonttellyou Follow Nikki on Insta: @NikkiLimo Follow Steve on Insta: @SteveGreeneComedy To visit our Patreon: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.patreon.com/stikki⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To watch the podcast on YouTube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/STDTYPodYouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast for free wherever you're listening, or by using this link: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/ShtTheyDontTellYou⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you want to support the show, and get all our episodes ad-free go to: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://stdty.supercast.tech/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you like the show, telling a friend about it would be amazing! You can text, email, Tweet, or send this link to a friend: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/ShtTheyDontTellYou⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To submit your questions/feedback, email us at: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠podcast@nikki.limo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To call in with questions/feedback, leave us a voicemail at: (765) 734-0840 To watch more Nikki & Steve on YouTube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.youtube.com/nikkilimo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To watch more of Nikki talking about Poker: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.twitch.tv/trickniks⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To check out Nikki's Jewelry Line: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://kittensandcoffee.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Terminations in therapy should be expected, but they often catch us – patients and providers – off-guard. What is the best way to talk about termination? What if it's unexpected? Is “termination” even the right word? This episode finds your hosts inspired by two listeners, one of whom asked us to muse on the topic of ending the therapy relationship. And what better way to terminate 2025 than by exploring this topic? Thanks, Jane!Resources mentioned in this episode: CDP's consultation services: https://deploymentpsych.org/resources/consultation-servicesCalls-to-action: Make use of consultation when facing a challenging terminationConsider using a psychotherapy plan to articulate the treatment and termination process from the beginningIncorporate ongoing assessment throughout to inform treatment and terminationSubscribe to the Practical for Your Practice PodcastSubmit your comments or questions on our social media pages or via SpeakpipeSubscribe to The Center for Deployment Psychology Monthly Email

In this episode of PRIM&R's podcast, "Research Ethics Reimagined," we explore the unprecedented wave of federally funded research terminations affecting tens of thousands of study participants. Brandon Brown, MPH, PhD, is a Professor of Medicine at UC Riverside School of Medicine's Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health and a Hastings Center Fellow. Dr. Brown discusses the ethical and practical challenges researchers and IRBs face when studies end suddenly due to funding cuts. He examines how IRBs and researchers can collaborate to develop guidance to ensure communication and transparency for impacted researchers and participants.

Send us a textIn this episode, Tyler and Jimmy discuss upcoming events for the final month of 2025, they talk through the recent news of the contract termination of several pros. They go through their predictions for the final tournament in 2025 in Daytona and then they end with a Q+A from the fans - Let us know what we should cover on the pod in future episodes, thanks for following along!—————————Website: https://www.tylerloong.com/ pickleballcentral.com/?oid=9&affid=7919954 click here for Huge Savings at Pickleball Central: https://pickleballcentral.com/ Use Code "KOTC" for $100 Savings on C&D Pickleball Nets: https://bestpickleballnets.com/ Use Code "KOTC" to save 10% on Modballs:https://modballs.4com/products/modballs Use Code "KOTC" for Big Savings on Vulcan Gear: https://vulcansportinggoods.com/pagesNEW KOTC DISCORD https://discord.com/invite/kNR65mBemfNEW KOTC CAMEOhttps://www.cameo.com/morekotcInstagram: Tyler's IG - @tyler.loong  Jimmy's IG - @jimmymiller_pbKOTC IG - @morekingofthecourt  Facebook: / tyler.loong   --0:00 Introduction 3:49 The Picklr 4:14 Cameo 5:24 Code for Tournament discount 7:34 Hawaii Trip 8:54 Contract Terminations19:24 Pickleball in Asia 24:28 C&D Pickleball Nets 25:24 Will Howells coming to the PPA 26:35 Merch Website 32:11 Selkirk X Tesla 37:30 PPA Daytona Preview47:23 Vulcan Pickleball 49:05 Q+ASupport the show

Why Every Electrical Contractor Needs a Thermal Imaging Camera — And How It Will Transform Your Service Business. Learn more about our certification program at https://thermalelectrician.comWelcome back to another powerful episode of the Master The NEC Podcast, the show that helps electricians, contractors, inspectors, and professionals stay sharp, stay informed, and stay ahead of the curve. I'm your host, Paul Abernathy, your Electrical Guru, and today we're diving into a topic that is transforming the electrical service industry: Why every electrical contractor — yes, EVERY ONE — needs a thermal imaging camera on every service call, not as an add-on.Not as “something we do sometimes.”But as a standard part of your professional toolkit. And we're going to go deep into:NFPA 70B requirementsHow to create proper loading conditionsResidential and commercial applicationsI²R heating and hidden failuresHow thermal diagnostics increase profitabilityAnd why mastering this skill is essential for modern electriciansAnd of course, how all of this ties directly into becoming a Certified Thermal Electrician™ with Electrical Code Academy, Inc. Let's get into it.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/electrify-electrician-podcast--4131858/support.

In this episode, Paul talks about a massive announcement and industry-leading partnership between one of the largest manufacturers of thermal imaging products and Electrical Code Academy, Inc.We are poised to actually bring a change to the Thermography World with the only Electrician Specific thermal imaging course, and how to use it in your daily world, and for special conditions. This will be the biggest partnership of our CEO's career, and it is within 7 days of being a reality. Visit https://ThermalElectrician.com to learn more and get started.Listen as Paul Abernathy, CEO and Founder of Electrical Code Academy, Inc., the leading electrical educator in the country, discusses electrical code, electrical trade, and electrical business-related topics to help electricians maximize their knowledge and industry investment.If you are looking to learn more about the National Electrical Code, for electrical exam preparation, or to better your knowledge of the NEC, then visit https://fasttraxsystem.com for all the electrical code training you will ever need by the leading electrical educator in the country with the best NEC learning program on the planet.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/ask-paul-national-electrical-code--4971115/support.

In this episode, Paul talks about a massive announcement and industry-leading partnership between one of the largest manufacturers of thermal imaging products and Electrical Code Academy, Inc.We are poised to actually bring a change to the Thermography World with the only Electrician Specific thermal imaging course, and how to use it in your daily world, and for special conditions. This will be the biggest partnership of our CEO's career, and it is within 7 days of being a reality. Visit https://ThermalElectrician.com to learn more and get started.Listen as Paul Abernathy, CEO and Founder of Electrical Code Academy, Inc., the leading electrical educator in the country, discusses electrical code, electrical trade, and electrical business-related topics to help electricians maximize their knowledge and industry investment.If you are looking to learn more about the National Electrical Code, for electrical exam preparation, or to better your knowledge of the NEC, then visit https://fasttraxsystem.com for all the electrical code training you will ever need by the leading electrical educator in the country with the best NEC learning program on the planet.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/ask-paul-national-electrical-code--4971115/support.

I'm always asking questions.  The fun begins when you start researching for answers. Such as…   With so many major corporations downsizing their workforce, how does it sit with decisionmakers who set employees free?  Plus…what can a former employee do in these modern AI times to keep their head above water?   I'm Arroe…  I am a daily writer.  A silent wolf.  I stand on the sidelines and do nothing but watch, listen study then activate.  I call it The Daily Mess.  A chronological walk through an everyday world.  Yes, it's my morning writing.  As a receiver of thoughts and ideas, we as people tend to throw it to the side and deal with it later.  When a subject arrives, I dig in.  It's still keeping a journal!  By doing the research the picture becomes clearer.  This is the Daily Mess…  Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/arroe-collins-unplugged-totally-uncut--994165/support.

I'm always asking questions.  The fun begins when you start researching for answers. Such as…   With so many major corporations downsizing their workforce, how does it sit with decisionmakers who set employees free?  Plus…what can a former employee do in these modern AI times to keep their head above water?   I'm Arroe…  I am a daily writer.  A silent wolf.  I stand on the sidelines and do nothing but watch, listen study then activate.  I call it The Daily Mess.  A chronological walk through an everyday world.  Yes, it's my morning writing.  As a receiver of thoughts and ideas, we as people tend to throw it to the side and deal with it later.  When a subject arrives, I dig in.  It's still keeping a journal!  By doing the research the picture becomes clearer.  This is the Daily Mess…  Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/arroe-collins-like-it-s-live--4113802/support.

"The termination of SML contracts is purely political. These contracts were signed under the NPP, and canceling them harms businesses in Ghana. We need to stop this back-and-forth between the NPP and NDC," - Rev. Charles Owusu, Former Head of Forestry Commission Monitoring Unit

The Trump administration's sweeping cuts to federal grants are triggering a wave of legal challenges, especially from nonprofits and research institutions. And more cases are landing in the Court of Federal Claims. Here to explain why, and what funding recipients need to know before they sue is partner at Jenner & Block, David Robbins.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In today's episode, Bob ‘n Joyce welcome Steve Jaffe, author of The Layoff Journey: From Dismissal to Discovery, for a powerful conversation about turning job loss into personal growth. Steve shares lessons from his 22-year journey through multiple layoffs—how his early struggles gave way to resilience and insight over time. His book guides readers through the stages of grief that often follow a layoff and offers practical tools for navigating job searches and interviews with renewed confidence. Together, we explore how layoffs reveal the true values and culture of an organization—a theme we've revisited often (most recently in Episode 189, Letting Employees Go – Do It Right or Pay the Price). Come on in. Grab a snack. Let's talk about how to handle one of the toughest transitions in work and life—with honesty, compassion, and purpose. About Steve Jaffe Steve Jaffe brings 25 years of advertising and marketing expertise and deep experience with career transitions into his consulting practice. As the author of The Layoff Journey and a seasoned executive who worked on the iconic “What Happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas” campaign, Steve offers unique insights into professional perseverance, rebuilding after sudden change, and authentic leadership. Connect with Steve:

This week, Nikki and Steve issue a ceremonious personal foul upon the consort of a gridiron idol who venerates the NFL with near-liturgical devotion, conduct a gleeful post-mortem on a heartbreakingly theatrical airport parting, and deliver a merciless roasting to the undisputed sovereign of gift gaffes: an intrepid bungler who alchemized the simplest of instructions into an opulent fiasco of gift-giving misadventure. Nikki is now an ambassador for Club WPT Gold! Check out: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://clubwptgold.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ and use code NIKKI to sign up!  Follow the podcast on Insta: @shttheydonttellyou Follow Nikki on Insta: @NikkiLimo Follow Steve on Insta: @SteveGreeneComedy To visit our Patreon: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.patreon.com/stikki⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To watch the podcast on YouTube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/STDTYPodYouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast for free wherever you're listening, or by using this link: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/ShtTheyDontTellYou⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you want to support the show, and get all our episodes ad-free go to: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://stdty.supercast.tech/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you like the show, telling a friend about it would be amazing! You can text, email, Tweet, or send this link to a friend: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://bit.ly/ShtTheyDontTellYou⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To submit your questions/feedback, email us at: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠podcast@nikki.limo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To call in with questions/feedback, leave us a voicemail at: (765) 734-0840 To watch more Nikki & Steve on YouTube: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.youtube.com/nikkilimo⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To watch more of Nikki talking about Poker: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.twitch.tv/trickniks⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ To check out Nikki's Jewelry Line: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://kittensandcoffee.com⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Terminations! Do you know how to do them correctly? | Down Payment the Podcast for Used Car Dealers S4 E59They are never easy, but they should be quick. Terminations. Do you know how to handle letting an employee go? Leave us your thoughts on terminations in the comments! Don't miss an episode! Subscribe to Down Payment now! Visit all our sites at:YouTube - @DownPaymentPodcastYouTube - @cardealeru5061X - @DownPaymentPodInstagram - @DownPaymentPodcastDon't forget to like and subscribe! #carsales #usedcar #usedcarsforsale ##autosales #automobile #auto #cardealer #cardealership #preownedcar #secondhandcar #buyherepayhere #managmenttraining #manager #managertraining #denver #termination #fired #letgo #employment #humanresources

In this episode, Chip and Gini discuss how to manage situations where clients want to terminate contracts early. Gini emphasizes the importance of having a strong contract with clear termination clauses, which can serve as leverage in negotiations. They share experiences and strategies for recovering outstanding invoices, including offering concessions and being flexible with payment arrangements. The duo also cautions against aggressive tactics like public shaming for non-payment and stresses the importance of maintaining professionalism to avoid burning bridges. They conclude with practical advice on managing accounts receivable and resolving disputes amicably. Key takeaways Chip Griffin: “If you look at a contract as a tool rather than a rigid roadmap, I think that’s the most helpful way to think of legal agreements in the agency client context.” Gini Dietrich: “Overall, you don’t want to burn the bridge with clients.” Chip Griffin: “What you really have to do is figure out how can you get the best possible outcome at this point?” Gini Dietrich: “Keep in mind that these are people who are going to refer business to you.” Related Getting agency-client contracts done right How to protect yourself from an unexpected client breakup How to do client collections right and get paid faster 6 reasons why your agency needs client contracts The basics of agency-client contracts from a business perspective View Transcript The following is a computer-generated transcript. Please listen to the audio to confirm accuracy. Chip Griffin: Hello and welcome to the Agency Leadership Podcast. I’m Chip Griffin. Gini Dietrich: And I’m Gini Dietrich. Chip Griffin: And Gini, we have one of your favorite topics today, but it’s one that, that we haven’t visited in a while, so it’s, it’s probably worth revisiting. Okay. And, and, and that is, how do you handle it when you have a client who wants to end their contract early? Gini Dietrich: Well. As we all know, I am a stickler for the details when it comes to this, and we have very specific language in our contracts. Our attorney helped me create something beautiful that is a 90 day termination clause. Almost never does somebody sign 90 days. They use, it’s usually a negotiation point, right? It’s, we get it to 30 or 60, whatever. I use it for negotiation. Sometimes the client signs the full 90 day contract. I have had a situation where a client called me at the end of the month and said, we are terminating the contract as of today. And I said, great. There are two outstanding invoices, and by the way, you have a 90 day termination clause. And they came back and said, and I said, but if you’ll pay the the outstanding invoices by the 15th of the month, then I will happily waive the 90 day termination clause because I know you’re, it’s cashflow and I know you’re having a tough time right now. They came back and said, no, that I’m not being a good partner. Chip Griffin: So to clarify, they don’t want to pay for services already rendered? Gini Dietrich: Correct. Chip Griffin: That seems unreasonable under any circumstances. Gini Dietrich: I agree. Chip Griffin: So I think that from my observations of having had these conversations with you now for what, seven or eight years now on this show, you’re being particularly reasonable. Especially for me. Yes. That’s what I’m saying. You, you personally are being particularly reasonable Uhhuh, because usually you are much more hardcore than I am Gini Dietrich: Yes. Chip Griffin: On these things. Yes. I think that’s fair to say it is. But what you’ve described is. Is something that I would typically offer to a client. Settle your debts and we can just part ways amicably. Gini Dietrich: Yes. Chip Griffin: And you are also, I think, the only agency owner I know of who has ever sued a client. I’m sure there are others out there, but I don’t know them personally. Gini Dietrich: It’s the principal. Chip Griffin: Yeah. Yes. We, we know that you, that you thrive on making the point. Gini Dietrich: I do. Chip Griffin: So, so it’s Gini Dietrich: Fair is fair. Chip Griffin: So you’re clearly. Going soft. Gini Dietrich: I’m, I’ve, I’m getting older. I’m, I’m getting older, and I understand that this is not worth pursuing. I would like our past due invoices to be paid, and I will happily waive the 90 day clause. If, however, you don’t pay us by the middle of the month, then I’m not waiving the clause on the contract you signed. Chip Griffin: Right. So let’s, I mean, let’s extrapolate or not extrapolate, let’s, let’s step back and look at this at a higher level rather than your particular individual case. We can use that as an example. Sure. But I think that, that there are a few key points that come out of this that could help other owners. And, and I think the first one is the way that you are using the contract as a tool to get leverage to get a solution that you’re happy with, right? It’s not that you’re abiding by the contract. Right down to the last crossed T and the last dotted I, you are willing to make concessions, right? But by having a strong contract, it gives you the leverage in that negotiation to be able to trade something, the unpaid invoices for the lengthy notification period. Or not lengthy, but the the 90 day notification period. Gini Dietrich: Right, right. Yeah. I think that’s right. And I think having that leverage helps And you, you have, you have to find ways to be able to have that leverage. Like, you know, web forms won’t deliver a website until you’ve paid their last invoice. Same thing. Like what do some things, if a client’s not gonna give you any notice and they did not give us any notice, they called us on the last day of the month. If they’re not going to give you any notice, then what is your leverage to be able to get the invoices paid, in a timely manner? And you know, if they’re saying, well, we can’t pay for 60 or 90 days, or they’re saying We’re not gonna pay it all. There’s things that you need to have. So I think your point about having a contract that has that language in it that they have signed and agreed to, gives you some of that leverage. Withholding work product gives you some leverage. So there are some things that you can do, but you have to have that all set up. You know, you always talk about sort of the prenup. What happens if you get divorced from a client, right? What are the things that are gonna protect you in that, that situation? Chip Griffin: Yeah. And, and I think if you, if you look at a contract as a tool rather than a rigid roadmap, I, I think that’s, that’s the most helpful way to think of, of legal agreements, at least in the agency client context. There are obviously other places where it is that rigid roadmap and Sure. And you’re not gonna do anything about it. I mean, you try having a negotiation with, I don’t know, your car lender, you know, it’s probably not gonna happen. They’re probably just gonna sit there and say, you know, you signed the 27 page agreement. Gini Dietrich: Right. Chip Griffin: Pay up. Gini Dietrich: Yes. Chip Griffin: So, so you know, but in, in an agency client relationship, the, the contract is that tool to help resolve the challenge in some sort of a reasonable way. And I, and I do think that it is particularly unreasonable when clients call at the end of, of a time period and say, we’re ending immediately. I mean, that’s just – Regardless of what your contract says, that’s just it. It’s bad behavior. Yep. And, and I don’t appreciate seeing it. And it tells me a lot about either the individual or the organization or sometimes both. Yep. And, and so certainly not something you ever wanna see. Having a contract can help you find a resolution to that. Although, I will say at the same time, when you have people who engage in that kind of behavior, it sometimes ends up being a lost cause candidly. Because if, if someone is willing to do that, then they may have no issue at all just leaving invoices unpaid, and then your only recourse is to sue, which you can do. Sure. You’ve proved that. Yes. And, and yet most of the time it will cost you more time and money than you actually recover. Gini Dietrich: Yeah, for sure. Yes, I have. I have learned, I have grown. I have, and sometimes there are situations where I’m okay spending the money to prove my point. Chip Griffin: Well, and, and sometimes, and there are other options. You can sometimes turn, turn these over to collections groups who will take a percentage of whatever they are able to recover, you know, that. And they, they just turn into the obnoxious collections agent and just Yep, keep calling. You know, that’s not something I’ve ever pursued, but I know some, some owners who have gone down that route, with mixed success. So. You know that there are things that you can do, but generally speaking, your best bet in my experience is to try to work something out in as Gini Dietrich: Yeah. Chip Griffin: As friendly a way as possible. Yeah. Gini Dietrich: Yeah. Chip Griffin: But it’s, it’s also a good reminder to, to stay on top of your accounts receivable. In your case, two months is, is not terrible. There are plenty of cases where I’ve worked with agencies who have much larger debts owed to them by clients. Yes. And, and what I always tell folks is, you know, whatever you have for outstanding invoices, you have to assume you’ll never get paid. Because there’s just, you know, particularly once they cancel, now you’ve got no leverage left, right? Because what are you gonna, the only thing you have at that point is a lawsuit. Gini Dietrich: Yep. Chip Griffin: That’s not particularly helpful Gini Dietrich: right Chip Griffin: Now I have seen a lot of suggestions in places like candidly, the Spin Sucks community, where people have suggested. Some creative, Gini Dietrich: very creative, Chip Griffin: but I think very impudent Gini Dietrich: correct Chip Griffin: ideas. Gini Dietrich: Yes. Chip Griffin: For how you deal with deadbeat clients. Gini Dietrich: Yes, yes. Chip Griffin: For example, I think one suggestion I saw, I forget whether this was Spin Sucks or somewhere else, was basically taking out a billboard in a community attacking a company for not paying. Others have suggested putting them on blast and just posting all over social media like you see people do when they’re upset about some treatment by the airline or something like that. Gini Dietrich: Yes, yes. Chip Griffin: These are bad ideas folks. Gini Dietrich: They’re bad ideas. Actually, I just saw somebody put a company on, on blast on social media because they weren’t paying their bills, and I was like, well, that’s one approach. Chip Griffin: I, I mean, the thing is you have to look at this through the lens of the recipient. I mean, you’re, you’re escalating dramatically with them once you go public, right? With something like that. And so now you know, you think you’re putting pressure on them, but the exact opposite may be true. You may be stiffening their spine to say, You know, I didn’t like working with these people anyway, and if they’re gonna behave like this, right? Because keep in mind we sit there and, and, and we look at a client who is canceling with little or no notice, not paying bills. We look at them as the bad guy. But oftentimes if you talk to them, that’s not how they see it. Sure. And, and so, and they may think in their mind, well, geez, this agency didn’t live up to their promises. They didn’t do what they could, or they don’t understand and appreciate our financial troubles that, you know, and, and we just, we don’t have it. We can’t pay it. It is what it is. And, and so, so they don’t think that, and so you going on the, the attack publicly right now just makes them think. Even better of themselves and worse of you and, and takes you further away from resolution rather than closer. I mean, certainly in some cases it might work, but I, but I would argue more often than not, it’s probably not going to. But the other thing you have to think of is how are other people perceiving this? Right. Prospective clients. Yeah. Who might be inclined to work with you. Yeah. If they’re looking at this, they’re saying, geez, you know, if it doesn’t go right with them, this is how they treat their clients? Yeah. I don’t, I don’t know that I wanna work with them. Yeah. So, so you gotta be really careful with these kinds of, of tactics because scorched earth usually burns both sides. Gini Dietrich: Absolutely. And I, I mean, there’s something to be said for not burning a bridge, you know, and sure, certainly there, there may be instances here and there over the years that you, it’s okay to burn the bridge, but overall you don’t wanna burn the bridge. And, you know, I, I think that that’s the case. As I’ve grown and matured, that’s one of the things that I’ve learned is, yeah, could I prove, could I sue them and prove my point? Sure, absolutely. Is it worth it? Probably not. Chip Griffin: No. And, and so, so what you really have to do is figure out, you know, how, how can you get the best possible outcome at this point? And so, you know, in your case, trying to trade the outstanding invoices, you know, for waiving the notice period is, you know, probably the, the first and most obvious thing that you can do. But I would also say in these cases, try to collect as much as you can, however you can. Yeah. So, so sometimes what you might do is you might say, well if, if you can pay one of the invoices by this date and the other by a later date, you know, that will then, so ’cause that sometimes can encourage that first payment to come in or break it up. Mm-hmm. You know, break it up into four monthly installments even though it’s two months worth of there. There’s a lot of different creative things that you can do so that you are mitigating your exposure and, and collecting at least some of it. And I think one of the mistakes that, that I’ve seen people make in circumstances like these is it becomes all or nothing. Yeah. And so the, the focus is purely on getting the total amount owed. And, and I would strongly encourage you to try to, if, if you certainly start there, but if you can’t get that right away, then try to figure out how can you, you know, start carving out at least some of that past debt for two reasons. One is it does reduce how much you’re out at the end of the day. But the second is it starts to, to build the expectation in the client that they will continue to pay up, right? And so, so getting that first payment across often will help you get to the later ones. Maybe not to all of them, but at least to subsequent ones. And so, you know, you want to think creatively about this and, and not cut off your nose to spite your face because you just, you wanted it all. Gini Dietrich: Yeah. And I, I would say to that end too, that many of us have, interest clauses in our contracts. I never hold clients to that either. Like if I, if I can split it up into four payments or, you know, five payments, whatever it happens to be and get and not charge interest for them being late, like, but I get the money eventually. I that, I’m fine with that. Chip Griffin: Yeah, I mean the, to me, the interest clause is, is really just another lever for you to use. I certainly know agencies who do charge the interest. In some cases I know them, that they, they’ll start it like on day one of being late. I, you know that that’s not. My approach to it. I, I think that, that you, you can lead to clients feeling like they’re being nickled and dimed for things like that. Sure. Yeah. But the other thing frankly is that there is, a fair bit of, of research out there that suggests that things like interest in late fees and all of that actually encourages late payment. Sure. Yeah. Before the be, you know, there was a, I remember there was one particular study of a daycare. And the, the daycare was frustrated that parents kept, you know, showing up after five o’clock or whatever to pick up their kids. I remember the staff had to wait around and so they started instituting a late fee, and rather than fixing it, it actually made it worse. Yes. Because then people started saying, well, okay, I’ll pay the extra 50 bucks. Right. You know, so that I don’t have to show up until like seven. Yes. Yes. And, and so what they, because, so sometimes those kinds of, of penalties actually serve as permission to engage in bad behavior. So, so something to, to keep in mind when you’re using things like that is that, that you may not have the expected consequence of things like that. So you, you wanna think those things through, but I, I encourage you to have the interest fee provision in there because it is something that you can say, it does give you that leverage. You gets paid in 10 days, then we’ll waive it or something like that. Yep. And so you, you, you always want to try to appear, even with the most difficult client, it is in your best interest, no pun intended, to, to appear to be as accommodating and as helpful as possible. Because your goal, when you think about it, is to extract yourself from this relationship with as little damage to your business as possible. That’s right. And generally escalating, and, you know, you know, putting up your fists and sparring is not the way to get there. Gini Dietrich: No, absolutely not. And like I said, if you, if, if you can avoid burning a bridge because you’re right. These cl, these, these are people who are going to refer business to you. And I always say, I always say this about employees. You always remember an employee by the way they left, not with by all the great work that they did while they worked with you. Yep, sure. And if they behave, if they left badly, that’s how you remember them. And it’s the same thing with clients. If you leave the relationship poorly or you leave with a bad taste in their mouth, or you put them on blasts publicly. They’re not going to refer business to you, and they’re going to remember that you treated them badly from their perspective when you left. So I think those are the kinds of things that we have to think about as we, as we deal with clients who don’t follow their agreement that they made with you. Chip Griffin: Right. And, and I, and I do think that it is important to try to, to end relationships in such a way that you leave the door open to future possibilities. Sure. At the same time as you’re seeking to resolve these kinds of issues. I wouldn’t put too much stock in that because the vast majority of clients who have ever left any of my businesses over the years, will say things like, oh, well, we’ll be back when, you know, and, and that may be time certain, it may be when their business turns around, it may be, you know, whatever. The vast majority never come back, and I don’t believe that’s because, you know, my businesses are all lousy and they were just, you know, making stuff up to make me feel good. I, I think in the moment most people actually believe this, but… Things change for them. Life moves on. Sure. And, and yes. And so maybe it just doesn’t feel like a fit later on. Right. And there’s nothing wrong with that. Right. And I don’t blame them for that, but I do, I do encourage owners not to say, well, they said they’ll come back in three or six months, so you know, I’m gonna cut ’em a real sweetheart deal. You wanna be careful about that. Make a decision that assumes that you would still be okay with it if they never come back. I mean, I, I always think that most business decisions. If you, if you look at them through the, the worst case possibility, you’ll make better decisions. And that’s true of, you know, whether it’s resolving something with a client. Pitching new business to a client, selling your agency at some point down the road, always assume that you only get the bare minimum out of it. Yeah. And ask yourself if you are okay with the bare minimum. If you’re only happy with it because there’s some icing on the cake that you think is coming later, then you probably shouldn’t go down that path. Gini Dietrich: No, totally agree with you. It’s, you know, counting your chickens before their hatch. Don’t do that. Don’t ever, ever do that. Chip Griffin: Nope. Nope. Kill a chicken and eat it. Sorry, PETA. Gini Dietrich: On that note, Chip Griffin: I think, I think probably on that note before we go farther off the rails, we will draw this episode of the Agency Leadership Podcast to a close. I’m Chip Griffin. Gini Dietrich: I’m Gini Dietrich, Chip Griffin: and it depends.

In this episode, Chip and Gini discuss how to manage situations where clients want to terminate contracts early.

For information anytime, please call 1-855-821-5900 or visit pocketemploymentlawyer.ca

What happens when crew speak up—and get fired for it? In part two of this three-part legal series on UNCENSORED, maritime lawyer and former U.S. Navy Reserve officer Adria Notari returns to confront one of the most taboo issues in yachting: retaliation against crew who report abuse, assault, or safety violations. From unlawful termination and unenforceable NDAs to what crew can do without a written contract, this is a masterclass in real-world maritime law that crew at every level need to hear.

This Episode Aired Previously. For information anytime, please call 1-855-821-5900 or visit pocketemploymentlawyer.ca

Trump 2.0 is causing mass anxiety throughout “Indian Country” and across Turtle Island so far in 2025. As of mid-June 2025, the Trump Administration's proposed Fiscal 2026 federal budget calls for nearly $1 billion in cuts to the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and other federal Native American programs. In addition, President Trump signed “Birthright Citizenship” Executive Order 14160 on January 20th, 2025, where the Trump Administration believes it could denaturalize Native American U.S. citizenship, especially if the U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v. CASA, Inc. agrees with the Trump Administration. But Native America nations have an extra-constitutional relationship with the United States government, and this extra-constitutional relationship is the result of more than 380 signed and ratified treaties between Native American nations and the U.S. government – an approximate similar number of treaties were signed but never ratified. The U.S. government, however, must legally and adhere to its “Trust” responsibilities its treaty obligations. Enduring questions are guest addresses: Do the Trump Administration's proposed budget cuts along with the DOGE cuts to federal programs violate the Treaties between Native American nations and the Trust Doctrine? In addition, does President Donald Trump's Birthright Citizenship executive order place Native Americans in real threat of losing their U.S. citizenship contrary to the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924? Lastly, does the combined actions of the Trump Administration plausibly suggest the possibility of new “Terminations” reminiscent of the 1950s? Today on American Indian Airwaves, our guest for the hour provides an in-depth description and analysis on the Trump 2.0 Administrations actions within the context of the understanding the legalities and constitutionality of the treaties between the Native American nations and the U.S. federal government. Today's interview was conducted prior to the four recent SCOTUS and lower court decisions on the Birthright Citizenship executive order. Guest: David E. Wilkins, a citizen of the Lumbee Nation, is a political scientist specializing in federal Indian policy and law. He is the E. Claiborne Robins Distinguished Professor in Leadership Studies in the University of Richmond's Jepson School of Leadership Studies and professor emeritus of the University of Minnesota. He studies Indigenous politics, governance, and legal systems, with a particular focus on Native American sovereignty, self-determination, and diplomacy. Professor Wilkins is the author of numerous books including, but not limited to: Indigenous Governance: Clans, Constitutions, and Consent (2024), Of Living Stone: Perspectives on Continuous Knowledge and the Work of Vine Deloria, Jr. (2024), Documents of Native American Political Development, 1933 to Present (2019), Red Prophet: The Punishing Intellectualism of Vine Deloria, Jr.(2018), Dismembered: Native Disenrollment and the Battle for Human Rights (2017), American Indian Politics and the American Political System, second edition, 2017, Hollow Justice: A History of Indigenous Claims in the United States (2013), The Hank Adams Reader (2011), The Legal Universe: Observations of the Foundations of American Law (2011), Documents of Native American Political Development, 1500 to 1933 (2009), On the Drafting of Tribal Constitutions - Felix S. Cohen (2006), Native Voices: American Indian Identity and Resistance (2003), Uneven Ground: American Indian Sovereignty and Federal Law (2002), and Tribes, Treaties, and Constitutional Tribulations (2000). Archived programs can be heard on Soundcloud at: https://soundcloud.com/burntswamp American Indian Airwaves streams on over ten podcasting platforms such as Amazon Music, Apple Podcast, Audible, Backtracks.fm, Gaana, Google Podcast, Fyyd, iHeart Media, Mixcloud, Player.fm, Podbay.fm, Podcast Republic, SoundCloud, Spotify, Tunein, YouTube, and more.

Today's episode of the Consumer Finance Monitor podcast offers an in-depth analysis of the unitary executive theory and its implications for terminations by President Trump of the Democratic members/commissioners of several so-called independent Federal agencies.  The episode features Lev Menand, an associate professor of law at Columbia Law School, who provides expert insights into financial institutions and administrative law and the validity of the Trump terminations. Professor Menand discusses the theory that President Trump may exercise complete control over independent federal agencies (which includes such terminations), despite statutes which permit terminations only for cause and a 1935 Supreme Court opinion in Humphries Executor which upheld the constitutionality of the “for cause” limitation on such terminations.  Professor Menand also discusses (i) the stay orders issued by the Supreme Court which have frozen preliminary injunctions issued by lower courts in litigation initiated by the terminated individuals which required the reinstatement of Democratic members of two agencies who had been fired by Trump and (ii) the dictum in such stay orders saying that the reasoning behind the stay orders  does not apply to the members of the Federal Reserve Board. This episode builds on another podcast released by Consumer Finance Monitor on July 10 featuring Patrick Sobkowski of Marquette University. Consumer Finance Monitor is hosted by Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel at Ballard Spahr, and the founder and former chair of the firm's Consumer Financial Services Group. We encourage listeners to subscribe to the podcast on their preferred platform for weekly insights into developments in the consumer finance industry.

The NIH is facing growing backlash over canceled research grants, internal pushback, and sweeping policy changes under the Trump administration. Just last week, the administration asked the Supreme Court to block a federal order that would force the agency to reinstate grants it cut over conflicts with its stance on diversity, equity, and inclusion. With billions in funding at stake, NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya joins us to break down what it all means for researchers, institutions, and the patients who rely on them.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

American farms are facing an unprecedented workforce crisis as Temporary Protected Status (TPS) programs for multiple countries terminate this August, threatening to remove an estimated 76,000 agricultural workers from the labor force. But what does this mean for food security, rural economies, and the future of legal farm labor?Immigration Nerds Host, Lauren Clarke, is joined by immigration attorney LJ D'Arrigo to reveal how farms following the law through H-2A visa programs face greater penalties than those operating in gray areas, creating a dangerous compliance paradox.D'Arrigo breaks down the "August 5th cliff" – the simultaneous termination of TPS designations for Nepal, Cameroon, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Haiti – and explains why states like Florida (357,000 TPS holders) and Texas (124,000) will be hit hardest. While the Department of Labor signals potential H-2A streamlining efforts, the reality is stark: many longtime farm workers with decades of loyalty to their employers face impossible choices between self-deportation or living in the shadows.From the human cost of breaking up farm families to the economic impact of losing trained workers, this episode explores practical solutions farms can implement now, the enforcement climate creating fear even among legal workers, and why seasonal agricultural visas may be the one area where immigration reform is actually possible. Essential listening for anyone navigating the intersection of immigration policy and America's food supply.GUEST: Leonard J D'Arrigo (LJ), Harris Beach Murtha PartnerHOST: Lauren Clarke, EIG Senior Managing AttorneyPRODUCER: Adam Belmar

For information anytime, please call 1-855-821-5900 or visit pocketemploymentlawyer.ca

The DOGE grant termination effort that began in USAID has now topped 19 billion dollars government-wide. This affects research universities, foreign aid providers, and local social services in every corner of the country. But because DOGE also took over the government's grants management system, it takes a major effort to track down all of the data and document exactly what we've lost. Ryan Alcorn, co-founder of GrantExec, and Zoe Kendall, GrantExec's Chief Product and Data Officer, have made that effort and they're here to tell us what they've learned.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

We continue our lease accounting miniseries with an episode focused on modifications and terminations. From determining whether a change results in a new lease to navigating remeasurement requirements, we share practical insights and key reminders for applying the guidance.In this episode, we discuss:1:12 – How to determine if a lease modification should be treated as a new lease or a remeasurement of the existing lease10:31 – Key accounting steps in a lease modification and remeasurement17:49 – Differentiating a lease termination from a modification20:59 – Example of a lease modification for downsizing leased space24:07 – Modifications to combined versus separate lease contractsFor more information, see chapter 5 of our Leases guide. You can also listen to the first episode in this series, Lease accounting reset - Presentation and disclosure. Be sure to follow this podcast on your favorite podcast app and subscribe to our weekly newsletter to for the latest thought leadership.About our guestsMarc Jerusalem is a managing director in PwC's National Office specializing in leasing. Marc consults with clients on complex lease accounting issues and is a frequent contributor to many related PwC National Office publications.Suzanne Stephani is a director in PwC's National Office specializing in the statement of cash flows as well as the application and interpretation of the accounting guidance related to financing and leasing transactions.About our hostHeather Horn is the PwC National Office Sustainability and Thought Leader, responsible for developing our communications strategy and conveying firm positions on accounting, financial reporting, and sustainability matters. In addition, she is part of PwC's global sustainability leadership team, developing interpretive guidance and consulting with companies as they transition from voluntary to mandatory sustainability reporting. She is also the engaging host of PwC's accounting and reporting weekly podcast and quarterly webcast series.Transcripts available upon request for individuals who may need a disability-related accommodation. Please send requests to us_podcast@pwc.comDid you enjoy this episode? Text us your thoughts and be sure to include the episode name.

Welcome to The Bond and Ground Podcast—On this episode Paul Abernathy discusses the misunderstanding of how to connect equipment grounding conductors, also known as EGC's in a box when you have multiple sizes and what happens when you have a metal box interposed in a PVC raceway system and visa versa for PVC boxes in metal raceway systems. On this podcast the National Electrical Code® becomes personal, practical, and powerfully clear. Hosted by Paul Abernathy, a respected voice on Code Making Panel 5 (CMP-5) and industry-leading expert on grounding and bonding, this show delivers deep insights into Article 250 and beyond. Each episode breaks down real-world applications of grounding and bonding rules, dispels myths, and explores the Code's intent—so you're not just following the rules, you're understanding them. Whether you're a licensed electrician, inspector, engineer, or serious Code student, The Bond and Ground Podcast equips you with the grounded knowledge you need to wire with confidence and stay compliant.

There's hope there can be a turnaround in unruly Kāinga Ora tenants. A Government crackdown has resulted in 63 tenancy terminations in the past 10 months - up from 11 in the year before. Formal warnings have gone up 600%. Litigation Lawyer Adina Thorn told Mike Hosking the figures are encouraging. She says it looks like under this government, there's been a big step up and a moderate to good response to the behaviour that has been going on in some KO homes across New Zealand. LISTEN ABOVE See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

For information anytime, please call 1-855-821-5900 or visit pocketemploymentlawyer.ca

Jonna D. Eimer is a health law and corporate attorney and shareholder at Roetzel & Andress in Chicago, Illinois. She represents numerous concierge medicine practices and has extensive experience with other innovative practice models. She also advises her clients – including physicians and physician groups, dentists, behavioral health clinicians, and other health care providers – in forming new practices, selling established practices, and negotiating employment and shareholder agreements, as well as guiding them with respect to regulatory matters. In addition, she counsels clients in forming management services organizations (MSOs) and navigating these sales to private equity. She can be reached at jeimer@ralaw.com.   By Jonna D. Eimer, Roetzel & Andress   Concierge medicine is on the rise, especially in the “snowbird” states like Florida, as practices and hospitals from Chicago and elsewhere have opened concierge practices to serve their patient populations in these warm locations. As these concierge style medicine practices continue to grow all over the country in primary care, pediatrics, women's health and other specialties, practices need to be particularly mindful of the different legal considerations that affect these new practice models. Because patient membership fees are often paid in advance and the patient agreement usually contemplates a personal relationship with increased access to a certain physician, there are different legal challenges and practice issues that should be addressed at the outset of these practices.   Access the Full Interview (iTunes): LISTEN TO THE FULL INTERVIEW WITH JONNA D. EIMER, Roetzel & Andress (Updated May 2025) Connect with Jonna directly: Jonna D. Eimer is a health law and corporate attorney and shareholder at Roetzel & Andress in Chicago, Illinois. Watch Webinar Version (YouTube): Watch the Full Interview (YouTube) ...   Transitions, Terminations and Retirement   Jonna D. Eimer is a health law and corporate attorney and shareholder at Roetzel & Andress in Chicago, Illinois. © 2024 Roetzel & Andress. Photo Used With Permission.   The concierge model generally relies on increased access and time for patients because physicians have typically accepted fewer patients. Because of this, it can be very difficult to figure out the fairest way to negotiate a partner's exit and how these patients and fees paid would transfer in the event of such departure. Does the partner get paid only in a buy-out of the whole practice or will the practice buy-out the individual partner upon his or her termination? Would this be handled differently in the case of a retirement? Would the practice consider a buy-out only if another physician can be substituted and take over the patient panel? How then is the new provider paid if fees have already been collected for a given year? It is possible the patients reject the substitute physician regardless of the departing physician's recommendation.   Oftentimes, the agreements governing the practice's operations include long notice provisions prior to any termination or retirement because it is not easy to substitute another concierge doctor if one leaves. Also, the patients have paid for the personal relationship and membership with their own doctor, so they do not always feel that this relationship transfers to another doctor. Another thing to consider is if a doctor terminates or unexpectedly dies or becomes disabled and a new doctor cannot cover their patients, what happens to patient fees that have already been collected? The practice needs to consider whether these fees are returned to patients and then whether a new membership agreement is entered into with the new physician. All these considerations need to be addressed in the initial stages of the company's operations.   Cost Sharing/Expenses   Another issue confronting concierge practices is cost sharing and how to divide expenses in this type of practice models. Practices must decide if they are allocating costs based on each physician's patient panel size or based on their respective ownership percentages of the practice. Once you allow for different panel sizes, these differences can become quite problematic, and physicians can end up disagreeing on the fair allocation of these costs. Confronting these differences early in the formation of the practice and providing for them in the practice's operating documents can help avoid difficult and costly conflicts later for the partners.   Sales to Third Parties   Physician owners in a concierge practice also need to consider at the formation of a practice how the profits of the practice will be divided in the case of a sale to a third party. Will profits be divided based on a physician's ownership in the practice or based on an individual physician's production and fee generation? If a practice has providers with vastly different production and patient panel sizes, then this is important to consider because the higher producing partner may want a sale to a third party to take into account these differences. Another partner may feel strongly that profits should be divided based on ownership percentages in the practice entity, which may be equal even if the providers have different numbers of patients. Frequently, the potential buyer has their own considerations for valuing the practices and may ascribe different values to each physician's practice. The buyer may base its valuation of the practice on patient panel size and fees generated by each individual physician.   Regulatory Considerations   Concierge practices typically charge a fee for membership in their practice, which generally allows patients increased access to the physicians and their services. If the practice is accepting Medicare and/or commercial insurance, the fee cannot be charged for any service already covered by Medicare or insurance. Additionally, if the practice accepts commercial insurance, the fee must be scrutinized to be sure it is allowed under any agreement with a commercial payor of the practice. Some payor agreements may specifically prohibit any patient fee for membership in a practice. Some practices have reached out to their commercial payors directly when converting to a concierge practice and have had these commercial payors review and approve their patient agreements and membership fees.   Coverage and Licensing Concerns   Because of the unique access provided to concierge patients, some practices have added special coverage when these patients are out of state or on vacation. In light of their patients who winter in warmer climates, like Florida, California and Arizona, some practices have partnered with other concierge practices in these states to offer services to their “snowbird” patients. Health systems are taking advantage of these practice models also. For instance, Chicago-based Northwestern Medicine opened a concierge medicine office in Naples, Florida, and Ohio-based Cleveland Clinic also has opened concierge medicine practices in multiple Florida locations. Doctors, however, need to be aware that they need to be licensed in the state where the patient resides. Due to these licensing considerations, some concierge physicians are also obtaining licenses in other states to cover patients that often spend their winters in these warmer states.   Final Thoughts   The above issues are just some of the unique considerations facing concierge practices from Chicago to Florida and other states as well. Because each concierge practice has unique patient fee agreements to consider, there is not a “one size fits all” approach to advising these practices. Concierge practices should not overlook the unique legal and practice issues facing them, from patient fee issues to physician departures. These models have a variety of legal challenges that should be addressed at the early stages of the practice, so they do not lead to partner and patient discord later on.   Connect with Jonna D. Eimer at Roetzel & Andress in Chicago, Illinois.   Jonna D. Eimer is a health law and corporate attorney and shareholder at Roetzel & Andress in Chicago, Illinois. She represents numerous concierge medicine practices and has extensive experience with other innovative practice models. She also advises her clients – including physicians and physician groups, dentists, behavioral health clinicians, and other health care providers – in forming new practices, selling established practices, and negotiating employment and shareholder agreements, as well as guiding them with respect to regulatory matters. In addition, she counsels clients in forming management services organizations (MSOs) and navigating these sales to private equity. She can be reached at jeimer@ralaw.com.   Disclaimer: This site does not constitute medical, financial, legal or other professional advice. Please do your due diligence. © 2025 Concierge Medicine Today, LLC. All rights reserved. This site is not without error or omissions. Concierge Medicine Today is the industry's trade publication, est. 2007. 

Cat Clark, campaigns manager, Threshold and Pat Davitt, Institute of Professional Auctioneers and Valuers

Recapping Season 8 Episodes 1 & 2 The girls kick off Season 8 and it's hard to believe there's only two more seasons left of this life-changing show. They talk about the good, bad, and ugly of firing people at work. Amanda reveals her celebrity doppelganger, according to the internet of course. They discuss the etiquette of snooping in medicine cabinets when you're at someone's house for a party. They both agree on the right approach but Maggie reveals what she thinks you'll find in a bathroom drawer. How does she even know this??? And the girls are both separately on the hunt for unaccounted for money and really hope Tony delivers soon!  For all things OSF, visit onlysuitsfans.com  And tune in to Youtube on Sunday, May 18th at 9:30p CST for the Series Finale :( of SUITS LA! 

On Day 21 of our 5-week journey to systemize your office, Dr. Killeen tackles one of the toughest parts of leadership — letting a team member go. It's never fun, but it's crucial for protecting your culture and keeping your practice strong. In today's episode, learn how to approach terminations with professionalism and compassion, plus a quick checklist to make sure you're prepared when the time comes. Done right, it's a natural next step — not a surprise.

Immigration attorney Rekha Sharma-Crawford filed a federal lawsuit against the sudden termination of five international students status terminations — and has successfully temporarily blocked the terminations. She argues that the terminations were cruel, opaque, and have significantly harmed the students' wellbeing.

Confused about F-1 visa revocations or SEVIS terminations? In this episode, we break down what it means to "fail to maintain status" and what students and schools should do. Stay informed and protected.Need help? Contact NPZ Law Group:

The federal government revoked visas or terminated records of more than 100 college students in Massachusetts and thousands nationwide. For international students, studying in America now feels different.

When the government terminates a contract for convenience, the contractor has rights and responsibilities. To find out how contractors can prepare in the current environment, Federal News Network's Terry Gerton spoke with Contract Attorney with Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, Stephen Bacon. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

When the government terminates a contract for convenience, the contractor has rights and responsibilities. To find out how contractors can prepare in the current environment, Federal News Network's Terry Gerton spoke with Contract Attorney with Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, Stephen Bacon. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Student visas are terminated for some international students at California colleges. Also, Sac State President Luke Wood talks about football's Spring Game. Finally, the Sierra Poetry Festival. Student Visa Terminations

You clicked “I Agree” — but did you read the fine print? In this unnerving installment of Scary Stories Told in the Dark, hosts Otis Jiry and Malcolm Blackwood invite you to explore a chilling future where convenience comes with a cost, and compliance is no longer optional. Five tales unravel the hidden dangers lurking in the systems we trust — from biotech miracles and wearable upgrades to invisible bureaucracies and rogue algorithms. This is horror for the modern age — surgical, seamless, and all too plausible. The next time your phone vibrates… you might want to think twice before answering. To watch the podcast on YouTube: http://bit.ly/ChillingEntertainmentYT Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast for free wherever you're listening or by using this link! http://bit.ly/ScaryStoriesPodcast If you like the show, telling a friend about it would be amazing! You can text, email, Tweet, or send this link to a friend: http://bit.ly/ScaryStoriesPodcast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Tens of thousands of federal employees who were fired during their probationary periods have their jobs back on paper anyway. In a court filing last night, the Trump administration detailed the process agencies have gone through to reinstate those fired workers in the aftermath of a judge's ruling that found the terminations were illegal. But the administration also made clear it's not happy about having to process those reinstatements, and it's still fighting in federal appeals court. Federal News Network's Jared Serbu is here with more on the legal process and the details on which agencies are undoing those terminations. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Tens of thousands of federal employees who were fired during their probationary periodshave their jobs back on paper anyway. In a court filing last night, the Trump administrationdetailed the process agencies have gone through to reinstate those fired workers in the aftermath of a judge's ruling that found the terminations were illegal. But the administration also made clear it's not happy about having to process those reinstatements, and it's still fighting in federal appeals court. Federal News Network's Jared Serbu is here with more on the legal process and the details on which agencies are undoing those terminations. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Both sides of the abortion debate  find some common ground on a bill legally protecting doctors when treating medically-complex pregnancies, a measure that would undo the current ban on conversion therapy in the state sparks intense discussion during a hearing, and reaction to the death of former University of Louisville basketball star, Ulysses "Junior" Bridgeman.  

LISTEN: On the March 6 edition of Georgia Today: Today is Crossover Day, an important deadline for Georgia's 2025 legislative session; Also, Employees at Atlanta's Center for Disease Control and Prevention are told to report back to work; And a lawsuit filed by 17 states seeks to remove gender dysphoria protections from a federal act related to schools.

Join the conversation with C4 & Bryan Nehman.  C4 & Bryan kicked off today's show discussing Moore's tax relief package.  A halt on future terminations via DOGE.  An update to the investigation into the deaths of actor Gene Hackman & his wife.  State Senator & Minority Whip Justin Ready joined the show discussing Moore's budget package & taxes.  Zelensky is set to meet with President Trump later this afternoon.  40% of Americans say that it isn't so great to live in the US anymore.  Listen to C4 & Bryan Nehman live weekdays from 5:30 to 10am on WBAL News Radio 1090, FM 101.5 & the WBAL

Terminations have hit all of the major federal energy and environmental agencies in recent days as part of the Trump administration's ongoing efforts to shrink the federal workforce. POLITICO's Alex Guillén breaks down which agencies have been affected, how the firings represent the most aggressive action against bureaucracy in modern Washington history, and the reaction from lawmakers. Plus, a top federal prosecutor in Washington resigned on Tuesday after refusing an order from Justice Department leaders to direct a bank to freeze accounts holding $20 billion in climate change money allocated during the Biden administration. Alex Guillén is an energy reporter for POLITICO Pro.  Nirmal Mulaikal is a POLITICO audio host-producer. Annie Rees is the managing producer for audio at POLITICO. Gloria Gonzalez is the deputy energy editor for POLITICO.  Matt Daily is the energy editor for POLITICO. For more news on energy and the environment, subscribe to Power Switch, our free evening newsletter: https://www.politico.com/power-switch And for even deeper coverage and analysis, read our Morning Energy newsletter by subscribing to POLITICO Pro: https://subscriber.politicopro.com/newsletter-archive/morning-energy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Read beyond the headlines! Support Local Journalism https://www.spokesman.com/podcastoffer

Terminations are now underway at the Department of Education and the Small Business Administration. Presidents Trump and Putin discuss ending the war in Ukraine. Hamas now says it will release hostages as planned this weekend. Senators start voting on the nation's health and human services secretary in about an hour.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

AP Washington correspondent Sagar Meghani reports on fired federal watchdogs suing the Trump administration.