Undisciplinary

Send us a textPart 2 of our conversation with philosopher Megan Dean. We explore the ethics of hosting and the tensions that arise when accommodating guests with dietary restrictions. We dive into her paper "The Worst Dinner Guest Ever" to understand why people with food allergies and gut issues often face skepticism and judgment when sharing their needs.• Megan was inspired by a blog post about accommodating guests with multiple dietary restrictions and the heated debate in its comment section• "Epistemic humility" means acknowledging people as authorities on their own bodies and experiences• Many food intolerances cause invisible or delayed symptoms, making them easy to dismiss but no less real• Hosting responsibilities include keeping guests safe and comfortable, which means taking dietary needs seriously• Cultural contexts create complex ethical situations where being a "good guest" might mean risking discomfort• "Healthism" flattens the rich experience of eating by assuming health should always be our primary consideration• The true "worst dinner guest" is the one who judges others' food choices rather than enjoying the shared experienceMegan A. Dean; The “Worst Dinner Guest Ever”: On “Gut Issues” and Epistemic Injustice at the Dinner Table. Gastronomica 1 August 2022; 22 (3): 59–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2022.22.3.59 Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a textPhilosopher Megan Dean joins us to explore the complex ethics of food restrictions, from hospital feeding tubes to revealing how deeply our identity and relationships are intertwined with what and how we eat.In this episode we discussCase of mushroom attempted mushroom poisoning - Ask Polly: My In-Laws are careless about my deadly food allergy! Smuggled Doughnuts and Forbidden Fried Chicken: Addressing Tensions around Family and Food Restrictions in Hospitals by Megan A. Dean, Laura Guidry-GrimesThe Culinary Mind - Center for the Philosophy of FoodUndisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a textChris and Jane kick off 2025 discussing their recent publication in the British Medical Bulletin titled "Obesity: Ethical Issues" and exploring how conversations about weight stigma have evolved in recent years.• Jane shares her experience appearing on ABC Radio National's "God Forbid" program where the topic shifted from "thinness and morality" to focusing entirely on obesity• Even as medical institutions acknowledge weight stigma is harmful, they continue to pathologize bodies outside narrow parameters• Public health messaging has evolved from fear-based "toxic fat" campaigns to more positive approaches focused on movement and wellbeing• Wonder drug narratives around Ozempic and other weight loss medications often ignore long-term risks including cardiac, gastrointestinal, and psychiatric impacts• Challenging the pathologization of diverse body types remains more difficult than addressing overt stigma• Chris teases an upcoming bioethics book project that will include interesting research tidbitsLet us know if you want us to discuss any particular topics - email us at undisciplinarypod@gmail.com or find us on Bluesky @undisciplinary.bsky.socialUndisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a text**Below is AI generated**This episode discusses weight stigma as a systemic issue deeply rooted in healthcare practices, often leading to misdiagnosis and mistreatment of individuals based on their body size. Dr. Patty Thille highlights the dangers of medicalization and pharmaceuticalization - especially the popularity of drugs like Ozempic - in addressing obesity and encourages a more holistic approach to health that considers broader societal contexts. • Weight stigma as both a personal and systemic issue • The impact of bias in healthcare settings • Personal experiences leading to critical perspectives on healthcare • Medicalization redefines societal problems into medical concerns • Pharmaceuticalization shifts focus to drug interventions • Ethical implications of funding in medical guidelines • The need for a broader understanding of well-being and health • Encouraging holistic, weight-neutral approaches to healthcareUndisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a textUndisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a text**Below is AI generated**Ever found yourself secretly despising a beloved Christmas classic or questioning the charm of a holiday favorite as you share it with the next generation? Join us as we navigate the highs and lows of 2024, starting with a comedic dissection of Christmas music and films. We take a cheeky swipe at Paul McCartney's "Wonderful Christmas Time," while debating the timelessness of "Christmas in New York" and "Carol of the Bells." Our scrutiny doesn't stop there; "Love Actually" gets a modern reevaluation, showing the inevitable cracks that appear when viewed through today's lens. Meanwhile, "Home Alone" brings a nostalgic warmth, offering a chance to bond over slapstick humor with our kids.As we wrap up, we shine a spotlight on some of the year's most compelling reads and cultural gems. "The Sunbird" by Sarah Haddad emerges as a must-read, a novel so exquisitely written that every word resonates deeply. It's a self-published triumph that's capturing hearts and getting the recognition it deserves. This episode balances the light-hearted and the thoughtful, providing both a trip down memory lane and a glimpse into the year's standout stories. Join us for a conversation that is as varied as 2024 itself, filled with humor, heart, and a little bit of holiday sarcasm.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a text**Below is AI generated**This episode explores the complexities of grief during festive seasons, focusing on the interplay between love, loss, and holiday traditions. Insights from bell hooks highlight the importance of love as an action, while discussions on technology's impact on mourning encourage listeners to consider their relationships with grief and community.• Discussing the emotional landscape of holiday traditions• The contrast of summer festivities in Australia with feelings of grief• Exploring the concept of death bots and digital mourning• bell hooks' perspective on love as a verb• The role of societal rituals in processing loss• Examining issues of empathy in global conflicts• Encouraging solidarity through small, actionable stepsUndisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a text**Below is AI generated**Is "cheeky" the most overused word in our everyday vocabulary? We kick things off with a humorous exploration of this label being slapped on everything from muesli bars to sports drinks. As we chuckle through language missteps, we also tackle an advertisement from the Victorian Cancer Council that boldly claims "one in two is too many." This prompts a serious reflection on the effectiveness of such messaging in cancer awareness and the potential for these tactics to oversimplify complex issues. Switching gears, we dive into the evolving landscape of breast cancer advocacy, spotlighting Andrea Smith's push for visibility for those living with long-term metastatic breast cancer. Our conversation then takes a critical turn as we dissect a controversial UK government proposal advocating weight loss injections to reduce obesity-related unemployment. By unpacking the assumptions and socio-economic factors tied into this initiative, we raise questions about the erosion of public trust in health policies. Join us for this lively mix of humor, skepticism, and truth-seeking.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a text**Below is AI generated**Is solidarity in healthcare a double-edged sword? That's the intriguing question we explore with our returning guest, Pete West-Oram. In this episode, we dissect how solidarity can both unite and divide, especially when misinformation—what Pete candidly refers to as "bullshit"—pervades public discourse. With a focus on healthcare ethics, we discuss the destabilizing power of dishonest communication and its impact on societal issues like the genocide in Gaza, where language is often wielded to distort reality.The conversation broadens to consider global solidarity in times of geopolitical conflict, spotlighting the contrasting international reactions to the Russian invasion of Ukraine versus the ongoing situation in Palestine. We question the biases in media narratives and political responses, illustrating how they can obscure true solidarity efforts. Despite media noise and leadership failures, Pete and I champion the grassroots movements and community solidarity that emerged during crises like COVID-19, urging for more substantial support from authorities to sustain these efforts.We then turn to the essential role of transparent communication in healthcare, drawing insights from Harry Frankfurt's "On Bullshit." With emphasis on the importance of clarity, we consider how misinformation and epistemic injustices, as discussed by Miranda Fricker, can lead to issues like vaccine hesitancy. By highlighting examples such as the UK's NHS and the impactful work of the Patient Information Forum, we stress the necessity of accessible health information. Whether it's through multilingual resources or straightforward language, the goal is to empower individuals with the knowledge needed to make informed health decisions, fostering trust and combating confusion.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a text**Below is AI Generated**What if the key to equitable healthcare lies in the power of solidarity? Join us as we explore this profound question with Dr. Peter West-Oram, a senior lecturer in bioethics, who offers a nuanced perspective on the intersections of history, ethics, and politics in healthcare. Through his expertise, we tackle the pressing issues of systemic racism laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic and examine the philosophical underpinnings of global health justice. Dr. West-Oram sheds light on the social determinants of health and the complex web of responsibilities shouldered by governments and corporations in combating systemic inequality.Embark on a reflective journey through Dr. West-Oram's academic career, from his early fascination with political and moral philosophy to his impactful work in bioethics. We revisit his 2017 paper on the ramifications of repealing Obamacare, where he argues for a healthcare system that enhances freedom through solidarity. Together, we ponder shared global challenges such as climate change and pandemics, urging collective action that champions our common humanity.Our conversation navigates the delicate balance between personal liberty and societal cooperation, questioning the narratives that often skew public perception against socialized healthcare. From the ethics of mandatory treatments to the emotive rhetoric surrounding healthcare reform, Dr. West-Oram challenges us to rethink the narratives that shape public opinion and underscores the importance of solidarity in achieving equitable healthcare outcomes. Tune in for a thought-provoking discussion that dares to challenge preconceived notions and advocate for a more just distribution of healthcare resources. SoundsCircus jingle loop by SergeyShred -- https://freesound.org/s/741150/ -- License: Attribution 4.0Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a text**Below is AI generated**What if the key to safer medicines lies in the blood of an ancient, alien-looking creature? Join us as we uncover the fascinating world of horseshoe crabs with our special guest, Richard Gorman. Rich's journey from human geography to animal ethics opens up a riveting discussion about the ethical implications of using animals in healthcare and the pivotal role horseshoe crabs play in pharmaceuticals. You'll be surprised to learn how these ancient creatures, often overlooked, are indispensable to the safety of vaccines and injectable medicines.We take a deep dive into the ethics surrounding the collection of horseshoe crab blood, comparing it to laboratory animal practices and fishery management. Rich helps us navigate the complexities of managing horseshoe crabs as a wild species and addresses the public's lack of awareness about animal-derived products in medicine. From their unique biology to the cultural perceptions that shape our interactions with them, we explore the many layers of horseshoe crabs' significance in global health.Finally, we examine the broader ethical and regulatory frameworks, discussing the "Three Rs" principle and the consequences of synthetic alternatives. Rich shares his insights on the hidden but crucial process of Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) tests and the challenges of balancing economic interests with conservation efforts. Reflecting on the importance of these incredible creatures, we encourage listeners to think more deeply about our reliance on them and the ethical dimensions involved. This episode promises to be both enlightening and thought-provoking, shedding light on the often-overlooked more-than-human world.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a Text Message.**The below is AI generated**What if bringing cake to work is as harmful as passive smoking? Join us for a thought-provoking exploration with our special guest, Sarah Attinger, as she shares her innovative approach to workplace treats. We dive deep into the public health implications of these sweet gestures and navigate a moral dilemma involving found cigarettes, debating the ethics of discarding them versus giving them to a smoker. Sarah, a research assistant at Sydney University and Macquarie, offers her unique perspective on these everyday ethical quandaries.Moving from the breakroom to the courtroom, we dissect the $56 million settlement involving Monash IVF and the fallout from inaccurate genetic testing. This gripping chapter uncovers allegations against Repromed, a Monash IVF subsidiary, accused of forging patient signatures and falsifying clinical trial results. Despite the settlement, Monash IVF did not admit liability. We discuss the wider implications of non-invasive pre-implantation genetic testing and consider the need for stricter regulations in the fertility industry, shedding light on the complexities and emotional toll of such cases.In our final discussion, we tackle the intricate world of reproductive medicine ethics, examining everything from procreative beneficence to the legal repercussions of the Monash IVF settlement. Sarah helps us understand the philosophical and commercial aspects of embryo selection, emphasizing the ethical tightrope healthcare providers must walk. We also delve into the contentious issue of league tables and how they impact embryo positioning and development. This episode promises to be a captivating journey through some of the most pressing issues in healthcare and public health today.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a Text Message.** Below is AI generated**What happens when religion, politics, and reproductive rights collide? Join us in this thought-provoking episode of Undisciplinary, featuring Risa Cromer, an Associate Professor in Anthropology at Purdue University. Risa takes us on her unique journey from a secular upbringing to studying the powerful intersections of religious politics and reproductive rights. Together, we explore the complex landscape of reproductive justice, revealing how reproductive capacities become battlegrounds for power and control.Ever wondered what sets embryo adoption apart from sperm or embryo donation? We break down its origins, deeply rooted in American evangelism, and the political forces driving its popularity. Risa illuminates the technicalities of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and the specific, often costly requirements for embryo adoption, including the crucial but under-discussed home study process. Through this lens, we also examine the commercialization and ethical issues tied to embryo adoption, highlighting the tension between its idealistic mission and the reality of "embryo shopping."Finally, we unravel the complex ties between embryo adoption, anti-abortion politics, and Christian nationalism. By connecting the dots between the promotion of a "culture of life" and broader authoritarian agendas, we reflect on the implications in a post-Roe v Wade landscape marked by varying state-level abortion restrictions. This episode offers a deep dive into how these reproductive politics resonate with themes of racial justice, gender, and the right to know one's biological heritage, inviting listeners to critically engage with these pressing issues.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Send us a Text Message.**Below was generated by AI and doesn't really have much to do with what we actually talked about!**Curious about how American English phrases like "it's been a minute" are shaping everyday language? Join us as we explore this playful debate and kick things off with an engaging discussion. We also introduce an exciting new feature that lets you send us anonymous text messages through Apple Podcasts and Spotify, making it easier than ever to share your thoughts. Plus, don't miss my shout-out to Pat McConville's new podcast, "Concept Art," and my experience of being featured on it, along with Jane's thrilling update on her new role as co-editor-in-chief of the Research Ethics Journal.We then pivot to the ethical nuances of using ChatGPT for qualitative data, reflecting on how it mirrors everyday opinions shaped by the internet. Diving into the role of research ethics committees, we question whether their primary function is to protect institutions or to facilitate meaningful research. Drawing from personal experiences, we highlight the diverse cultures of various ethics committees and discuss H. Tristam Engelhardt Jr.'s critique of market solutions in secular humanist bioethics. Finally, we tackle the unsettling practice of using AI to recreate deceased loved ones, inspired by the documentary "Eternal You," and explore its broader implications for cultural death rituals and commercial interests.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

**Below is AI-generated (with some editing) **Discover the commerical forces shaping our health as Dr. Mélissa Mialon describes the intricate web woven by large agri-food companies to influence health policies and sway public opinion. Our latest episode is a deep dive into the world where corporate interests meet public health, uncovering the stealthy methods these corporations use to assert their agenda. Dr. Mialon guides us through the labyrinth of systemic racism and the convolutions of the current healthcare system, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, while offering actionable strategies to dismantle these harmful influences.Grapple with the double-edged sword of corporate social responsibility; is it a genuine effort towards societal betterment or a smokescreen for deeper systemic issues? Dr. Mialon aids us in peeling back layers of corporate strategies to reveal the true motivations behind initiatives that often present themselves as benevolent. Our conversation takes a critical turn towards the interplay between capitalism and public welfare, stirring a debate on whether a capitalist system can ever truly align with the interests of public health over profit. We also address the imperative need for transparency in the corporate influence on public policy, highlighting global approaches to democracy that can either impede or foster progress.In conclusion, we reflect on the collective power of grassroots movements. The episode leaves listeners inspired by the influence that dedicated individuals and communities can exert on holding corporations accountable.  Join us for a conversation that not only challenges but also encourages each of us to actively participate in the movement towards a healthier, more equitable world.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

**The below is AI generated**Have you ever navigated the intricate dance of power and humility within the walls of a healthcare institution? Our latest episode features Dr. Supriya Subramani, shedding light on the ethical ballet between patients and doctors, infused with moral emotions and identity politics. As we weave through her interdisciplinary insights, Jane's battle with COVID offers a raw, firsthand perspective on these health research themes, grounding our discussion in the reality of patient experiences.Tackling the heavy lifting in academia, this episode isn't afraid to question the pillars of knowledge creation and the researcher's place within it. We cast a critical eye on reflexivity, dissecting how our backgrounds and biases shape our understanding. The creases of feminist scholarship and standpoint epistemology unfold in our dialogue, as we probe the intricate relationship between authority and the diverse voices that strive to be heard within scholarly circles.We round off our journey with a step into the quagmire of bioethics, informed consent, and the architecture of healthcare systems. Dr. Subramani's reflections from Indian hospitals pave the path for our exploration, examining how respect, privacy, and privilege are dispensed in medical care. As we tie up the threads of our conversation, we leave you with an invitation to continue these essential discussions, challenging the norms and shaping an informed, ethical landscape in health research and beyond.Audio excerpt of Helen Pluckrose from ABC RN  Grievance studies, thought and debateSubramani, S. (2019). Practising reflexivity: Ethics, methodology and theory construction. Methodological Innovations, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119863276 Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

**Below is AI Generated**Is clinging to "Happy New Year" wishes well into January a charming tradition or a sign of time slipping by? We dive into this seasonal conundrum before taking a hard look at the world of gym culture, where the quest for health often morphs into a pursuit of the perfect body. Our discussion unpacks an eye-opening critique of high-intensity interval training, challenging the notion that exercise should be a grueling endeavor rather than a source of joy. Join us as we unravel the complexities of fitness fads and refocus the lens on well-being and personal fulfillment.Meanwhile, the classroom becomes a battleground for morality as we dissect the effectiveness of mandatory ethics courses in higher education. With insights from our teaching experiences, we debate whether these courses spark true moral development or merely check a box. And as we navigate the intricate dance between public health and politics, we confront the tension between evidence-based messaging and the political landscape that shapes it, especially amidst crises. Listen in as we confront the ideals and the practical realities of public health, presenting an honest examination of its place in our society.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Join us for a thought-provoking conversation as we explore the intricate layers of the Israeli-Gaza conflict with the help of Tamara Kayali Browne and Zohar Lederman. Their unique insights as a Palestinian bioethicist and an Israeli emergency medicine physician with a bioethics background guide us through the turbulence of war, politics, and the ethics of healthcare under fire. The moral maze of warfare challenges us to confront harrowing bioethical dilemmas, from the deliberate targeting of medical facilities to the withholding of life-sustaining resources. The experiences of vulnerable populations, like pregnant women and healthcare workers, underscore the intersection of human rights and public health, demanding a critical look at our ethical responsibilities. Our dialogue traverses the potential biases in global conflict coverage, urging healthcare professionals and academics to rise above the fray and champion human rights in their spheres of influence.**the above was generated by AI with some editing from CM**Resources discussed:Washington post article on evacuation and babies left in ICUZohar's article "Together we lived, and alone you died: Loneliness and solidarity in Gaza" We also discussed an article by Zohar that is under-review. A link will be provided when it is published. Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

**The below is AI generated**Ever been cornered at a family feast by Aunt Marge, who can't help but comment on your third helping of pavlova? We've all been there. Join Chris and Jane as we stir up a candid conversation about the holidays and the unwanted side dish of fatphobia they bring. From the cultural anthems like Paul Kelly's "How to Make Gravy" that bind us, to the personal and societal pressures on body image that divide us, we're unpacking the complexities of festive food politics. We reflect on our nation's identity and how holiday cheer often comes with a side helping of guilt, especially when young, impressionable ears are at the table.Imagine sitting across from someone who, between bites of turkey, preaches about their latest diet. Awkward? Absolutely. That's why we're navigating the choppy waters of body and food judgments with care. Sharing tales from Southeast Asia, we tackle the cultural variances in body image perceptions and the art of respecting diverse dietary choices without imposing our own. Our discussion isn't just about the food on our plates, but also the deeper societal norms cooking in the background of our health and financial conversations. And yes, we're going to touch on those public health campaigns that often leave a sour taste during the sweet holiday season.Now, onto the myths that just won't go cold—like the idea that a shiver in an ice bath will shed the pounds. We're chilling out with Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz's enlightening thread debunking this frosty fallacy. And if that's not enough, we're slicing into the debate on office cake culture with the same scrutiny as a controversial Jerusalem Post article that – believe it or not – linked conflict to weight loss. By the end of our chat, you'll be seeing Christmas metaphors in a new light, peering beyond the festive facade to the sometimes harsh truths they obscure. So, grab your mug of mulled wine, and let's cut through the holiday hullabaloo together.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

**Below is AI Generated**Eager to explore the complex world of reproductive choices? Buckle up as we journey through this invigorating discussion with Elinor Pryce, a formidable scholar from the University of Adelaide. With her, we grapple with the nuances of pro-natalism and anti-natalist policies in Australia, and their intricate interplay with immigration and environmental concerns. Elinor's insights illuminate the need for a comprehensive approach that respects diversity, while also addressing population growth and sustainable development.Riding on the wave of our enriching dialogue with Elinor, we steer towards the ethical dimensions of eugenics and population control. The entanglement of pronatalism, antinatalism, and societal beliefs is unravelled, stimulating a profound reflection on our own values and ideologies. Philosophers are often the unsung heroes in this narrative, as they challenge detrimental ideologies and encourage a deeper examination of ingrained beliefs when proposing remedies. It's a fascinating discourse that breathes life into the conversations happening in conferences and bioethical circles.We then discuss the place of psychedelics in the workplace with Dr Cynthia Forlini (Deakin Health Ethics) and consider potential harms as well as general awkwardness of doing mind altering drugs with colleagues.Finally, we dissect reflexivity and standpoint theory in bioethics with Dr Supriya Subramani (Sydney Health Ethics), Prof Jonathan Ives (Bristol) and A/Prof Mikey Dunn (National University of Singapore). Our discussion traverses the tightrope between maintaining argumentation standards and adapting them to context, bringing to light the friction between social scientific and philosophical methodologies in bioethics. With an eye on the real-world impact, we stress the importance of reflexivity, where personal biases and prejudices come to the fore. We believe that the bioethical debates are enriched by this diversity of perspectives. So tune in for an episode that is sure to leave you contemplating long after it ends – a fascinating exploration of reproductive choices, eugenics, and bioethics like never before.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

**The below is AI generated**What would it feel like to constantly plan for something as life-changing as pregnancy, but feel ill-equipped to prepare for it? What if we told you that your health decisions pre-conception could impact not just your child, but generations to come? In today's episode, we're diving headfirst into the complexities of pregnancy planning and the repercussions of insufficient preparation. We're dissecting a recent study that found a shocking disparity between the women who plan their pregnancies and those who take active steps to prepare for them. The concept of 'Developmental Origins of Health and Disease' and its unique focus on women forms a critical part of our discussion. We particularly emphasize on the crucial yet often overlooked role of paternal health and the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to enhance overall reproductive health.As the conversation proceeds, we shift focus to explore the unique health challenges faced by overweight women preparing for pregnancy. It's no secret that societal discourse around women's bodies is riddled with negativity, but how does this impact a woman's ability to prepare for pregnancy? How do these biases and pressures complicate weight management during pregnancy? We delve into these dilemmas, shedding light on issues often swept under the rug. This episode is an earnest attempt to delve deeper into the societal pressures, health dilemmas, and the critical need for empathic and comprehensive healthcare for all women, regardless of their body size. So, brace yourself as we navigate this complex terrain in our latest episode.Here is the article Chris refers to:  Situating the Father: Strengthening Interdisciplinary Collaborations between Sociology, History and the Emerging POHaD ParadigmUndisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Ever grappled with the understanding of how your personal narrative could shape historical perspectives? This episode takes you on a journey through the untold stories of infertility, alongside Dr Sianan Healy, a historian at La Trobe University. She walks us through her personal experiences with infertility, which have been the bedrock of her research. She also highlights the importance of individual narratives in examining the complexities of infertility. The conversation goes deeper as we explore Sianan's ground-breaking research paper - 'Broken Bodies, Oral Histories of Infertility After Women's Liberation Movement.' Through her research, we understand the emotional depth of personal stories and the challenges of interpreting them. As we navigate the changing dynamics of women's agency in the IVF industry, we also examine the profound impacts of the IVF process on women's mental and physical health. We also scrutinize the silence around miscarriage and how it negatively affects women's health.Finally, this episode underscores the urgent need for improved women's health education. We discuss the societal devaluation of motherhood and the complexities of reproductive identity, and their lasting impacts on women's sense of self. Tune in to this poignant conversation as we unravel the complexities of infertility, miscarriage, and women's health. It's more than just a discussion; it's an invitation to contribute to the narrative that shapes our understanding of these crucial issues.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

We take a moment to honor the memory of two profound contributors to the bioethics community, the late Dr Henry Kilham and Professor Miles Little. Their significant impacts on the ethical and medical landscapes, particularly in Australia, have shaped the ways we navigate difficult conversations. We also mark that is has been a year since Courtney's death. In light of the ongoing humanitarian crisis in the Middle East, we consider the immense burdens borne by medical professionals in these conflict zones. With the Australian government's refusal to support a ceasefire, we discuss the implications this has on the ground. Here, the concept of 'grievable bodies' and 'grievable lives' comes to the fore.  Stay tuned for our next episode on infertility, releasing later this week.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Ready for an enlightening journey through the intricate world of 19th-century popular phrenology? Prepare to be captivated as we chat with historian, writer, and heritage consultant, Dr. Alexandra Roginski. Together, we unravel the mysteries of this once-beloved, now discredited science and the profound impact it had on our understanding of the human mind. Along the way, we'll unearth fascinating tales from Australia's phrenology scene, ethical quandaries of modern tech applications, and the puzzling case of Russian 'fat heads'.As we traverse the history of this intriguing science, we'll explore the complexities of medical pluralism and the gender challenges prevalent in 19th-century medical practices. From the peculiarities of skull shapes to the commodification of Aboriginal remains, Dr. Roginski guides us through a riveting narrative of early cerebral localization. Together, we discover how this now discredited, but once popular, science intersected with ethno-ethnography and anthropology, causing ripples that would change our view of the mind forever.In the final stretch of our journey, we discuss the rise and pitfalls of the wellness culture, the ethical implications surrounding the commercial use of AI and fMRI machines, and the power dynamics within wellness and spiritual practices. Uncover how wellness gurus pivot from one dodgy dealing to another, the sensationalism surrounding the 'fallen guru', and the dangers of misreading the situations we walk into. Listening to this episode promises to leave you with a newfound perspective, not just on the history of phrenology and wellness culture, but on the human mind itself. So, why wait? Tune in and let's embark on this mind-boggling journey together!**The above was produced via AI**Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

[FYI the below is an AI generated program description - lol]Wondering how industry funding could potentially sway the direction of research? Stroll with us into the labyrinth of the University of Sydney's new Centre of Excellence in Gambling Research, partly supported by companies from the world of wagering. Listen as we peel back the layers of this complex relationship, shining a light on the possible implications, bias, and the ambiguity of the "social license" that these companies might be seeking.Strap in as we pivot towards the stormy seas of research ethics and accountability. Our focus narrows on the intriguing case of Professor Smyth, weathering allegations of bullying and intimidation. We question the environments that incubate such conduct and the ripple effects on co-authors and fellow researchers when misconduct accusations surface. How does the return of grant funding fit into this turbulent picture, you ask? Join us, as we probe beneath the surface.Lastly, we steer towards the intriguing world of personalized healthcare and celebrity influence on health narratives. Ponder with us on the costs, risks, and potential for over-diagnosis of full-body scans, and the paradox of quality data access. Together, we'll examine the yawning gap between those who can afford such treatments and those who cannot. We'll also question the impact of celebrities as health influencers, and the potential fallout of their messages. So, buckle up and prepare for an absorbing discussion on these vital issues!Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

Prepare yourself for an enlightening exploration as we traverse the complex intersections of weight stigma, obesity, and the pharmaceutical industry with our distinguished guest, Dr. Patty Thille, an assistant professor in the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of Manitoba.  Dr. Thille shares her unique insights into the insidious presence of weight stigma in healthcare, offering a fascinating narrative that spans from her formative years in women's studies to her current research at the crossroads of healthcare and social sciences.We shine a light on the far-reaching implications of weight stigma in influential sectors such as healthcare, education, and legal systems. Uncover the disturbing realities of how this stigma can result in status loss, discrimination, and, at times, misdiagnoses within healthcare.We discuss medicalization and pharmaceuticalization of weight,  examine the historical perception of weight as a social problem, and dissect the rhetoric surrounding the modern 'obesity epidemic'. This paradigm shift has cleared the way for pharmaceuticals to position themselves as the magic bullet for weight issues. As we navigate this complex landscape, we reflect on the potential repercussions of this pharmaceutical-centric approach.In the last leg of our journey, we discuss Canadian and Australian obesity strategies, highlighting their shortcomings in addressing social factors while overemphasizing lifestyle changes. The role of financial conflicts of interest between pharmaceutical companies and medical professionals in shaping obesity guidelines is another area we delve into. Our conversations extend to the marketing strategies of weight loss drugs and their potential implications on public health. Prepare to have your perceptions challenged and your understanding deepened, as we unravel the intricate tapestry of weight stigma and obesity in healthcare with Dr. Patty Thille. Join us in this thought-provoking episode.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

What happens when a philosopher extraordinaire joins us to tackle controversial topics and ethical dilemmas? You get a captivating episode of Good Take, Bad Take, featuring our guest, Diego Silva, a senior lecturer in bioethics who brings unique perspectives to light! Join us as we explore the implications of anonymous submissions for the Journal of Controversial Ideas, reflect on how power is taken and consolidated, and analyze how we would handle a situation involving a child damaging property in a supermarket.But that's just the beginning! We're also diving into the controversy between the Saudi-backed Live golf tour and the PGA, discussing the potential dangers of government involvement in sports. Then, we'll shift gears to examine the ethics of public health vending machines in New York City and challenge the popular notion of taking 10,000 steps a day for health reasons. Don't miss this thought-provoking episode that will leave you questioning the world around you and reconsidering how you approach ethical dilemmas in everyday life.Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

In this episode Chris talks with Jacqueline Antonovich, Assistant Professor of History at Muhlenberg College. Jacki is a historian of health and medicine in the United States, with particular interests in how race, gender, and politics shape the medical field and access to health care. Her teaching interests include histories of public health, alternative medicine, disability, reproduction and childbirth, and epidemics. She also focus on the history of the American West, nineteenth-century America, and the Gilded and Progressive Eras.Her current writing projects include a book manuscript on women physicians and medical imperialism in the turn-of-the-century American West. She is also the co-founder and executive editor of Nursing Clio, a peer-reviewed blog project that ties historical scholarship to present-day issues related to gender, health, and medicine.Chris and Jacki discuss her recent paper "White Coats, White Hoods: The Medical Politics of the Ku Klux Klan in 1920s America".Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

In this episode of the recently renamed segment - Good Take/Bad Take - Chris and Jane tackle some thorny issues in pop culture (Bluey creators editing their recent episode "Exercise"), the boring and damaging use of war rhetoric in public health, and James Packer's recent $7 million donation to the University of New South Wales to fund research into mental health. Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

In this episode Jane and Chris talk with Associate Professor Seye Abimbola from the University of Sydney about their work on dignity in global health and the need for researchers and practitioners to have epistemic dignity as a precondition for health justice. When dignity meets evidence, The LancetUndisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

In this episode Chris and Jane discuss Jane's recently published paper on polarisation and public health expertise. Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

In this episode, Jane and Chris go to the movies to see The Whale. Warning - there will be spoilers. Undisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

In this new segment - Bad Public Health Takes - Jane and Chris dissect Prof Susan Jebb's suggestion that bringing cake to work is like passive smoking, and whether taking  weight-loss drugs is cheating. Intro music "Ticklish" by Quincas Moreira MusicSound Effect from PixabayUndisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

In this episode Jane and Chris talk with Dr Lisa Mitchell about ageism in clinical decision-making, societal prejudice against older people, and bio-tech attempts to reverse ageing. They also address ageist representation of older people in Bluey! Lisa is a doctor specialising in the care of older people, a clinical ethics consultant and researcher in ageism. Sarah Berry, "Scientists have tried to reverse ageing for decades. Have they finally cracked it?" Karen Hitchcock, "Dear Life: On caring for the elderly"  Bluey episode "Grannies" Every Age CountsWorld Health Organization on AgeismUndisciplinary - a podcast that talks across the boundaries of history, ethics, and the politics of health. Follow us on Twitter @undisciplinary_ or email questions for "mailbag episodes" undisciplinarypod@gmail.com

In this final episode for 2022 we reflect on the year, some conferences, and the best language learning apps. 

In this episode Chris and Jane wander through Robert Crawford's 1980 paper 'Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life'

In this episode Chris and Jane talk with Dr Michiel de Proost about his research on egg and sperm freezing, as well as feminist approaches to bioethics and reproductive justice. Michiel is a newly graduated PhD from the Vrije Universiteit  in Brussels, in the Research Centre for Gender, Diversity and Intersectionality. His work uses feminist ethics theories to explain conceptions of autonomy and emancipation in social egg freezing and, more recently, fertility apps that target men.  

In this episode Jane and Chris discuss the consequences of overturning Roe v Wade and its relevance to Australia or otherwise. Joining them in this conversion is Dr Rebekah McWhirter.Bek is a senior lecturer in health law and ethics in the School of Medicine at Deakin University. Her research interests include ethical and legal issues in health, Indigenous genetics, and empirical research methods in ethical and legal research. She has qualifications in law, public health and history.Resources discussed include:Abortion and Professional Secrecy A. V. M. Anderson; Medical Journal of Australia 1924 Vol. 2 Issue 19 Pages 495-498  https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1924.tb62321.xMedical abortion in Australia: a short history B. Baird, Reproductive Health Matters 2015 Vol. 23 Issue 46 Pages 169-176 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.10.002 Prof Theunis Roux  What does the US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs tell us about the virtues of Australia's approach to protecting fundamental rights?  God under Howard: The rise of the religious right in Australian politics M. Maddox Publisher: Allen & Unwin 2005 

In this episode Chris talks with Dr Caitlin Mahar about the history of euthanasia and how understanding the longer history of death and dying can help to understand contemporary debates over voluntary assisted dying legislation. Dr Caitlin Mahar is in Politics and History at Swinburne University. She is an historian whose research focuses on cultural and medical histories of dying and pain in Britain and Australia. She has a BA (Hons) degree in History and English from the University of Melbourne and a MA in Public History from Monash University. Her 2016 PhD thesis exploring the history of euthanasia won the University of Melbourne's Dennis-Wettenhall Prize for Australian History. Prior to joining Swinburne she taught literature in the Trinity College Foundation Studies program and worked as a researcher in the School of Historical and Philosophical Studies at the University of Melbourne.  Her book on this history of euthanasia will be published in 2023. 

In this episode Jane and Chris talk with Dr Alda Balthrop-Lewis about her book 'Thoreau's Religion: Walden Woods, Social Justice, and the Politics of Asceticism' and the myths and legacies of Thoreau.  Excerpt of Walden read by Gord McKenzie from LibriVox Music from Dan Bodan "City Plaza".Other interviews with Alda about her work include 'What is our life for? Henry David Thoreau's search for social justice' on ABC RN's Soul Search.Short pieces from Alda include 'What baking sourdough can teach us about the moral life'. 

In this episode Chris and Jane talk with Dr Yves Aquino about his work on the pathologization of ugliness, cosmetic surgery and race, and the norms of health and beauty. 

In the first episode for 2022, Chris and Jane talk with Peta Cook from UTAS about the ethical and social issues surrounding xenotransplantation. The discuss the recent developments surrounding the genetically modified pig heart that was transplanted into an American man, as well as historical precedence and debates. 

In the final episode for the year Jane and Chris discuss the ethics of doctors in Greece taking bribes to infect anti-vaxxers with fake vaccines, but instead injecting them with the real one. We also discuss a shift in the way COVID is being governed - a move away from state-led public health measures to rhetoric of individual choice and responsibility. We also talk about risk, uncertainty, favorite books from 2021 and what will 2022 hold. 

In this episode we are talking with Kiran Pienaar about the uncertainties and ambivalences produces via medical tests and diagnostics. We discuss some of her recent work with Prof Alan Petersen and the notion of bio-subjectivities. Plus leaf blowers. Sources discussed include:Searching for diagnostic certainty, governing risk: Patients' ambivalent experiences of medical testing Managing risks or generating uncertainties? Ambiguous ontologies of testing in Australian healthcareAudioMusic City Plaza - Dan Bodan

In this episode Jane and Chris are joined by Diego Silva from Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney to discuss his work on solidarity as a moral guide for global health. They also spend a lot of time talking about the aesthetics and political and ethical significance of sport, as well as whether academics (aka nerds) are allowed to enjoy sports. Sources discussed include:Mere rhetoric? Using solidarity as a moral guide for deliberations on border closures, border reopenings and travel restrictions in the age of COVID-19AudioMusic City Plaza - Dan BodanOutro Barry Bonds - Kanye West

In this episode Chris and Jane talk with Camilla Pickles from Durham University about her research on obstetric violence and the difficulties in drawing attention to the ethical and legal problems associated with childbirth, consent, and stereotypes regarding pain and capacity. Sources discussed include:Obstetric violence blogSounding the alarm: Government of the Republic of Namibia v LM and Women's Rights during Childbirth in South AfricaWomen's Birthing Bodies and the Law: Unauthorised Intimate Examinations, Power and Vulnerability AudioMusic City Plaza - Dan Bodan

In this episode we are talking about neuro-ethics and the good & bad of interdisciplinarity with Cynthia Forlini. 

In this episode we are discussing the obligations of the pharmaceutical industry during a global health emergency, plus the ethics of vaccine distribution and wearable tracking devices. We are talking with Assistant Professor Owen Schaefer from the Centre for Biomedical Ethics, National University Singapore. AudioPresident Trump praising Pfizer Music City Plaza - Dan Bodan

New Season, New Co-host!Jane Williams is joining the Undisciplinary team as a host and the first conversation is about Robert Veatch's paper on Generalized Expertise (1973) and we discuss how in the age of COVID everyone has become an expert about epidemiology, artificial intelligence, withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and everything else.