Podcast appearances and mentions of blaine amendments

Send us a textDoes our legislative process truly reflect Christian values, or have we strayed from the path? In an eye-opening conversation, Amanda Hovis, director of the Spartanburg Christian Action Network, illuminates the often unseen challenges faced by Christians aiming to influence legislation. Amanda passionately argues that our job doesn't end at the ballot box and stresses the necessity for ongoing engagement to ensure our values are manifested in lawmaking. Her insights reveal the complex schemes within government that can even sway well-intentioned leaders, calling for a renewed commitment to informed advocacy.We then navigate the fraught waters of school voucher legislation in South Carolina, a battleground where the Blaine Amendment looms large. With Amanda, we unravel the intricate dance between public funds and private education, focusing on the potential overreach that could threaten the independence of private schools. Concerns around transparency, admissions, and government control are laid bare, urging vigilant community involvement to safeguard educational autonomy. This chapter isn't just a discussion; it's a call to action to protect the sanctity and choices in our children's education.Finally, we tackle the overarching theme of personal freedoms affected by state regulations and taxes, casting a spotlight on education and healthcare. From direct tax credits to medical informed consent bills, Amanda and I explore legislative pathways that can bolster individual autonomy. We analyze the restructuring of health departments and the critical need to resist employer mandates on vaccinations, emphasizing how informed and vocal citizens can drive meaningful change. As the episode wraps up, I extend heartfelt gratitude to Amanda for her dedication and urge listeners to stay connected through our platforms for the latest updates and resources.https://www.jacksonfamilyministry.comhttps://bobslone.com/home/podcast-production/

In this episode of The Learning Curve, co-hosts U-Arkansas Prof. Albert Cheng and Alisha Searcy interview Nicole Stelle Garnett, Associate Dean and John P. Murphy Foundation Professor of Law at Notre Dame Law School, and a national expert in education law and school choice. Dean Garnett discusses the vital role Catholic education plays in fostering faith, community, and the pursuit of “the true, the good, and the beautiful.” She explores the challenges posed by the decline of Catholic schools in urban areas, as outlined in her book Lost Classroom, Lost Community: Catholic Schools' Importance in Urban America, and highlights policy solutions such as expanding educational choice options to support Catholic school families. She delves into recent landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions, including Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue and Carson v. Makin, which undermined the legal barriers to school choice, like Blaine Amendments, while strengthening religious liberty in K-12 schooling. Dean Garnett also examines the growth of private school choice programs, education savings accounts, and education tax credits across the U.S., and offers insights into upcoming legal challenges as the opponents of school choice and religious education strategize to push back.

This week on The Learning Curve, co-hosts Alisha Searcy of DFER and U-Arkansas Prof. Albert Cheng interview Eric Rassbach, Vice President and Senior Counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. Mr. Rassbach discusses the Loffman v. California Department of Education case, where Becket successfully secured a unanimous Ninth Circuit decision ensuring equal access to special education funding for religious school students. He explores how California's restrictive interpretation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) denied federal funds to students at private religious schools, in contrast to secular ones. He delves into the broader context of religious liberty in K-12 education, highlighting landmark SCOTUS rulings, including Trinity Lutheran, Espinoza, and Carson's impact on the evolving legal battles reshaping states' Blaine Amendments and school choice policies. Rassbach also examines how religious schooling and school choice initiatives can enhance student achievement. He foresees increased litigation and legislative action bolstering educational freedom nationwide.

Join us for a webinar featuring Manhattan Institute fellow Tim Rosenberger, who will delve into the landmark case of Hile v. Michigan. On November 6th, 2023, the Sixth Circuit upheld Michigan’s Blaine Amendment, which bars public financial support for parochial and other nonpublic schools, raising significant questions about religious discrimination and equal protection under the […]

Join us for a webinar featuring Manhattan Institute fellow Tim Rosenberger, who will delve into the landmark case of Hile v. Michigan. On November 6th, 2023, the Sixth Circuit upheld Michigan's Blaine Amendment, which bars public financial support for parochial and other nonpublic schools, raising significant questions about religious discrimination and equal protection under the law. The plaintiffs filed a petition of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that these so-called "neutral" amendments often mask deep-seated biases, as evidenced by Michigan's historical animosity towards Catholic schools.Learn about the broader implications for religious freedom, the precedent set by recent Supreme Court decisions, and the potential ripple effects across other states with similar provisions. Don’t miss this opportunity to understand the constitutional arguments and engage in a pivotal discussion on the future of educational rights and religious liberties in America.Featuring:Tim Rosenberger, Fellow, Manhattan Institute

The Idaho legislature has a new school choice proposal this year that would give out tax credits to parents who enroll their kids in private school. Some say this creates a conflict with Idaho's constitution, specifically the Blaine Amendment, which says the state cannot use public funds for religious schools.

In this week's episode, reaping what you sow is anti-Catholic persecution, the NFL sets up a really dumb script with a small market team as the protagonist, and Tom and Cecil will be back with all the vulgarity you missed last week. --- To make a per episode donation at Patreon.com, click here: http://www.patreon.com/ScathingAtheist To buy our book, click here: https://www.amazon.com/Outbreak-Crisis-Religion-Ruined-Pandemic/dp/B08L2HSVS8/ If you see a news story you think we might be interested in, you can send it here: scathingnews@gmail.com To check out our sister show, The Skepticrat, click here: https://audioboom.com/channel/the-skepticrat To check out our sister show's hot friend, God Awful Movies, click here: https://audioboom.com/channel/god-awful-movies To check out our half-sister show, Citation Needed, click here: http://citationpod.com/ To check out our sister show's sister show, D and D minus, click here: https://danddminus.libsyn.com/ To hear more from our intrepid audio engineer Morgan Clarke, click here: https://www.morganclarkemusic.com/ --- Guest Links: Check out more from Tom and Cecil on Cognitive Dissonance: https://dissonancepod.com/ --- Headlines: The headlines Noah mentioned in the diatribe: https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/religious-people-coped-better-with-covid-19-pandemic-research-suggests and https://religionnews.com/2024/02/02/study-spirituality-boosts-mental-health-during-isolation-and-despair/ Threat of Satanic school halts repeal of Idaho's Blaine Amendment: https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/a-proposed-satanic-school-helped Conservatives lose their minds over Jesus as a scantily clad white twink on a poster: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/02/conservatives-lose-their-minds-over-jesus-as-a-scantily-clad-white-twink-on-a-poster/ Abortion protestors convicted of doing what they were doing  The Catholic version: Six Pro-Life Activists Convicted of Federal FACE Act Charges, Face Over a Decade in Prison| National Catholic Register (ncregister.com) The DOJ version: Office of Public Affairs | Six Defendants Convicted of Federal Civil Rights Conspiracy and Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act Offenses for Obstructing Access to Reproductive Health Services in Tennessee | United States Department of Justice Arizona bill would ban Satanic displays on public property: https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/arizona-bill-would-ban-satanic-displays Mom banned from christian school parking lot because of onlyfans decal: https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/central-florida-mom-banned-from-dropping-off-kids-at-school-because-of-onlyfans-decal/ Christian Right conspiracy theories about Taylor Swift reach new heights ahead of Super Bowl: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/01/31/taylor-swift-conspiracy-theories-gop-00138817 https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/taylor-swift-far-right-maga-relationship-timeline-1234957784/ --- This Week in Misogyny: Misogyny ensues on Orthodox radio show: https://religionnews.com/2024/02/05/orthodox-christian-radio-hosted-a-broadcast-on-deaconesses-then-misogyny-poured-in/ Glitter Unicorns: https://www.facebook.com/sowalball/posts/pfbid02x8Rbha6tXxJgzEQm3DBEYYEewMdNQyA3Eg9WV1eS7EfDeVH7c8msYRSyGwJ1BBFRl

Patreon supporters who give $5 a month will get an ad-free version of the show! Join our private Facebook group and Discord server! Jessica and I spoke about several stories from the past week involving religion and politics. — Oregon lawmaker tries to walk back comment that atheists are unfit for public office. (0:42) — A proposed Satanic school helped derail a vote to repeal Idaho's Blaine Amendment. (21:29) — Christian radio host punished after advising grandma to attend transgender wedding. (33:45) — An Oklahoma GOP lawmaker wants to ban single people from sexting each other. (53:20) — Did a public school in Texas figure out how to legally hoist a Christian flag? (1:10:40) SPONSOR: Sign up today at butcherbox.com/friendly and use code friendly to choose your free offer and get $20 off. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Patreon supporters who give $5 a month will get an ad-free version of the show!Join our private Facebook group and Discord server!Jessica and I spoke about several stories from the past week involving religion and politics.— Oregon lawmaker tries to walk back comment that atheists are unfit for public office. (0:42)— A proposed Satanic school helped derail a vote to repeal Idaho's Blaine Amendment. (21:29)— Christian radio host punished after advising grandma to attend transgender wedding. (33:45)— An Oklahoma GOP lawmaker wants to ban single people from sexting each other. (53:20)— Did a public school in Texas figure out how to legally hoist a Christian flag? (1:10:40)SPONSOR: Sign up today at butcherbox.com/friendly and use code friendly to choose your free offer and get $20 off. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

SELECTED LINKS FROM THE EPISODETeach Your Kids: LinkedIn | Website | X | Instagram | Substack | Facebook | TikTokManisha: LinkedIn | X | Instagram | FacebookJoe Connor: LinkedIn | Website | XJoin our premium community with expert support and adviceOdyssey - helping parents easily and securely access funding for K–12 educationTeach Your Kids Podcast EpisodesThe Future of Educational Choice: Kerry McDonald Unpacks it AllTeach Your Kids Blog PostsHow to afford homeschooling - Teach Your KidsBooks and ArticlesCottageClass: A Microschool Hub That Connects Families With Small-Scale Teachers — & Takes Care of the Business Side – The 74Education Savings Accounts, Explained — Education WeekWhat is a Tax-Credit Scholarship? — EdChoiceRelated ResourcesEdChoiceOdyssey + Idaho = Empowering ParentsWhat Are You Learning?Empires of the Steppes: A History of the Nomadic Tribes Who Shaped Civilization - Kenneth W. Harl This site contains product affiliate links. We may receive a commission if you make a purchase after clicking on one of these links. Time Codes00:00:20 — Introduction: Manisha welcomes Joe Connor and his revolutionary educational platform00:02:00 — Odyssey's Mission: Empowering parent consumers00:04:00 — Utilizing Funds: The practical uses of Odyssey's resources00:04:50 — Program Types: Breakdown of micro grants vs. ESAs00:08:00 — ESA Insights: Joe expounds on the nuances of ESAs00:10:20 — Future Forecast: Predictions on ESA funding's trajectory00:12:40 — Tax Credit Scholarships: An alternative funding route00:16:25 — Curriculum Concerns: Manisha probes into curriculum vetting00:17:40 — Outreach Strategies: Engaging low-income families00:23:33 — Bipartisan Nature: School choice crossing political lines00:31:40 — Trust in Parents: Advocating for parental decision-making power00:35:40 — Separation of Powers: Discussing church, state, and education00:42:12 — Regulation vs. Innovation: The impact on educational growth00:45:20 — Odyssey's Role: Enhancing education accessibility00:54:17 — School Choice Advocacy: Joe Connor advises on lobbying and resources01:03:22 — Looking Forward: Anticipating Odyssey's future impactThis podcast is made possible through a generous grant from the Vela Education FundVELA Education Fund is catalyzing a vibrant alternative education ecosystem. VELA provides trust-based funding to entrepreneurs, fosters community-building and knowledge-sharing, and increases visibility through storytelling that promotes cultural awareness and acceptance of the out-of-system space. Today, VELA serves the largest community of out-of-system education entrepreneurs in the country, with over 2,000 community members. About half of VELA's community members operate small learning environments, and the other half are ecosystem and community builders offering direct services and support across the out-of-system space. Learn more at velaedfund.org.

Mike Hoey, former director of the Missouri Catholic Conference, explains the history of the Blaine Amendment in Missouri and how its anti-Catholic language kick-started the MCC's role in defending Catholic education at the capitol. 

Liv Finne of the Washington Policy Center explains how ‘now that the baleful influence of this mean-spirited provision has ended, Washington lawmakers are free to join other states in offering families access to popular education choice programs.' https://loom.ly/gvls54c #Opinion #Columns #Commentary #LivFinne #WashingtonPolicyCenter #USSupremeCourt #WashingtonsBlaineAmendment #WashingtonLawmakers #Families #EducationChoicePrograms #VancouverWa #ClarkCountyWa #ClarkCountyNews #ClarkCountyToday

The Supreme Court's decision in Carson v. Makin comes at the end of a long line of cases relating to state-level discrimination against schools and other institutions of a religious nature. Neal McCluskey discusses the case and its implications. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Today's Topics: 1) Gospel - Jn 8:21-30 - “When you lift up the Son of Man, then you will realize that I AM, and that I do nothing on my own, but I say only what the Father taught me. The one who sent me is with me. He has not left me alone, because I always do what is pleasing to him.” Saint Vincent Ferrer, pray for us  Bishop Sheen quote of the day  2) Did you know that there are 37 states with blatantly anti-Catholic amendments called “Blaine Amendments,” which prohibit many forms of educational funding from going to Catholic schools? There's a new Supreme Court case that might finally rule that those discriminatory laws are unconstitutional. Learn more from Andrea Picciotti-Bayer  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euqEgV4AOUE&ab_channel=EDIFY  3) Mom says goodbye to Disney because they are now a propaganda machine  https://www.theblaze.com/news/moms-goodbye-message-to-disney-propaganda-machine-grooms-children?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20220401Trending-MomDisneyGoodbye&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News  4) Have we lost our hunger for the Bread of Life?  https://www.crisismagazine.com/2022/have-we-lost-our-hunger-for-the-bread-of-life

Today's Topics: 1)  The Code of Canon Law states "Catholic parents have the duty and right of choosing those means and institutions through which they can provide more suitably for the Catholic education of their children."  In St. Paul's second letter to Timothy he tells how learning scripture is useful for teaching, Catholic Schools certainly follow this guidance 2)  Dr. Alex Lessard joins the show to speak about the history of Catholic education in the United States.  It developed as a result of anti-Catholicism in America.  This mirrors the reason for the establishment of the Knights of Columbus in 1882 3)  Dr. Lessard discusses the important role that religious sisters played in the American Catholic educational system.  The Blaine Amendment was used to restrict taxpayer funding of parochial education during the time of President Ulysses Grant, the effect of which remains in 32 U.S. states to this day 4)  The California School Choice Initiative is an attempt to give parents and guardians of students the ability to choose the schools they desire to educate their children.  As Catholics, we must take up the battle to safeguard our children's education.  We have until March 31, 2022, to gain one million signatures to get this initiative on the California state ballot in November 2022.  Please follow the link to download and print the petition - Print Your Own Petition  Information and directions can be found on the following link -  www.californiaschoolchoice.org Theme: "Salve Regina" performed by Floriani. All rights reserved. Used with permission. For more information please visit Floriani.org

Can our government facilitate the funding of students instead of systems? If you get a tax cut does that money still belong to the government? Will I get put in jail for feeding the birds? The answer to these questions and plenty of metaphors in the DREW WORLD ORDER.

The Managing Attorney at the Liberty Justice Center, Daniel Suhr, joins Paul E. Peterson to discuss the Bishop of Charleston v. Adams case, which challenges South Carolina state officials from using the Blaine Amendment to block Covid-19 funds from going to non-public schools and historically black colleges and universities.

Ben DeGrow on how the COVID-19 pandemic might change education policy

This week on “The Learning Curve,” co-hosts Cara Candal and Gerard Robinson talk with Michael Bindas, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice (IJ). They discuss IJ's 2020 landmark U.S. Supreme Court win in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, and its implications for state Blaine Amendments, bigoted legal barriers that have blocked religious liberty and school choice for over a... Source

This week on “The Learning Curve,” co-hosts Cara Candal and Gerard Robinson talk with Michael Bindas, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice (IJ). They discuss IJ's 2020 landmark U.S. Supreme Court win in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, and its implications for state Blaine Amendments, bigoted legal barriers that have blocked religious liberty and school choice for over a […]

On EWTN News Nightly tonight: On Capitol Hill, conservatives are saying that since the confirmation of Xavier Becerra to Health and Human Services Secretary, the Biden administration has made it clear they do not want to maintain Hyde Amendment protections, and want to prioritize funding for abortion instead of actual healthcare. Meanwhile, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy is calling sanctions against Democratic Representative Maxine Waters of California, for what he says was an incitement of violence during a protest over the weekend in Minnesota. Editorial Director at the Daily Caller, Vince Coglianese, shares his thoughts on Representative Waters' actions and what she said. President Joe Biden met Monday with lawmakers from both political parties in the Oval Office, as he continues working to convince them and the American public his infrastructure bill is needed. Over the weekend, Ukrainian and Russian forces appeared to be gearing up for attacks. Pope Francis says he has been following the grave situation and appealed for an end to the violence. The Diocese of Charleston has filed a lawsuit against the state of South Carolina, challenging an amendment which prohibits public funds from going to private schools. Jeff Jennings, attorney for the Liberty Justice Center, joins to talk about the Blaine Amendment, the history of it and how it pertains to this case. Don't miss out on the latest news and analysis from a Catholic perspective. Get EWTN News Nightly delivered to your email: https://ewtn.com/enn

What are the Blaine Amendments, how does the Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue Supreme Court Case affect school choice in the states and is your state impacted? Listen in on this episode featuring Education Choice Attorney at the Institute for Justice David Hodges, ALEC Director of the Education and Workforce Development Task Force Scott Kaufman and host Dan Reynolds to find out more. Educational Choice at Institute for Justice: https://ij.org/issues/school-choice/ Institute for Justice on the Blaine Amendments: https://ij.org/issues/school-choice/blaine-amendments/ Institute for Justice’s Educational Choice Legislative Resources: https://ij.org/issues/school-choice/school-choice-legislative-resources/

The one where your humble host doesn't say much about the recent SCOTUS decision regarding the Blaine Amendment and taxpayer funding of Christian or religious schools.

In today’s episode we’re talking about school choice, anti-Catholic Blaine Amendments, and the recent Supreme Court ruling that allows for religious schools to participate in government programs that are open to everyone. We are joined by Ray Domanico, a senior fellow and director of education policy at the Manhattan Institute. Domanico began his career in research positions in the New York City school system, and he has taught graduate-level courses in educational research and policy analysis. Domanico holds an MPP (Master of Public Policy) from the University of California, Berkeley. In our mailbag segment we’re covering a question about the Paycheck Protection Program and why churches are able to access this COVID relief funding. And stick around for the bricklayer segment when we’ll be discussing the upcoming anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For more information: https://www.manhattan-institute.org/,

Peter Stravinskas joins contributing editor Mark Bauerlein to discuss school choice and the Supreme Court’s decision in “Espinoza v. Montana.”

There have been several recent Supreme Court decisions that involve the Catholic faith and our religious institutions. Some were good news and some were bad news. We covered two of those decisions on the June 24th episode, but this week Bishop breaks down the rest. ….the decisions covered abortion, contraception coverage offered by employers, Catholic schools, and Blaine Amendments. The show wraps up with Bishop answering questions submitted from listeners on giving our time, talent, and treasure plus a Catholic response to anxiety, whether or not we should capitalize pronouns for God, and more. Listener-submitted questions: As I think about how to best give my time, talent, and treasure, I wonder whether it’s best to give a little to a lot of people...where your investment may not make much of a meaningful/lifelong impact, but you make small positive impacts on lots of people....or instead, perhaps invest more into a single person, perhaps as a long term mentor, where you could make a meaningful and eternal impact.I realize it’s probably another example of not “either or,” but “both and” but would appreciate your thoughts and comments on this.We appreciate you and all you do for our Diocese! When I use pronouns for God like he or him or his I capitalize the "H." But I noticed my Bible does not capitalize pronouns for God. What should I do? Is there a Catholic response to worry and anxiety? Are there degrees or programs you would recommend for those in a professional evangelization role? What is your favorite beach? —— Truth in Charity is brought to you in part by Notre Dame Federal Credit Union. —— Live: www.redeemerradio.com Follow us on social media: www.Facebook.com/RedeemerRadio www.Twitter.com/RedeemerRadio www.Instagram.com/Instagram Submit your question(s): Call / Text (Holy Cross College text line) – 260-436-9598 Online – www.RedeemerRadio.com/AskBishop E-mail – AskBishop@RedeemerRadio.com Subscribe to the Podcast: iTunes | Google Play | SoundCloud | RSS

On this episode, Chris Motz is joined by Erica Smith, one of the lead attorneys in Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue, a recent major decision of the Supreme Court. Erica and Chris discuss the anti-Catholic history of Blaine Amendments, and what the case means for education policy and the free exercise of religion.

On this episode, Chris Motz is joined by Erica Smith, one of the lead attorneys in Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue, a recent major decision of the Supreme Court. Erica and Chris discuss the anti-Catholic history of Blaine Amendments, and what the case means for education policy and the Read more…

07/18/20 Episode 216: SCOTUS Rules Montana Blaine Amendments Unconstitutional - Interview with Attorney Anthony Sanders See omnystudio.com/policies/listener for privacy information.

On June 15th of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, ruling that the prohibition of sex discrimination in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act extends to sexual orientation and gender identity as well. LGBT rights groups hailed the decision as a major victory, but churches and other faith-based organizations worried that it would impinge on their religious freedom. In three cases since Bostock, however, the Supreme Court has vindicated religious freedom. Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue struck down that state’s (and by extension every other state’s) “Blaine Amendment.” Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania upheld an exemption from the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate based on religious or moral reasons. And Our Lady of Guadalupe v. Morrisey-Berru (in which the Assemblies of God was joined a friend-of-the-court brief) expanded the scope of the “ministerial exception.” Given the divergent outcomes of these four cases—Bostock pulling one way, the three other cases pulling the other—many people are asking: Where is the Supreme Court heading with religious freedom? That’s the question Eric Kniffin and I will discuss in this episode of the Influence Podcast. I’m George P. Wood, executive editor of Influence magazine and your host. Eric Kniffin is a partner in the law firm of Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie, where he works in the Religious Institutions Practice Group. Before joining the firm, he worked as a trial attorney for the United States Department of ‎Justice, practicing in the Civil Rights Division. He also served as legal counsel for Becket Law, a leading religious freedom litigator.

Montana’s school choice advocates didn’t pick this fight (Senate Bill 410 – the Tax Credit Scholarship Bill) to knock out the Blaine Amendments, but in the end that’s the high ground that was won in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Montana law that allowed a tax credit for…

Tues. July 7th. Bishop Richard Stika (Dicoese of Knoxville, TN) on peace in our country, churches targeted, the Blaine Amendment. Fr. Rocky on St. Maria Goretti, Praying the Rosary and new Relevant Radio en Espanol stations. All show notes at Hour 3-Fr. Rocky on St. Maria Goretti, Bishop Stika on Peace and the Blaine Amendment - This podcast produced by Relevant Radio

Mon. July 6th. Dr. Barbara Golder gives an update about coronavirus and the steps we should take. Sr. Dale McDonald on the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Blaine Amendment and how that benefits religious schools Homily Highlights-Bishop Michael Burbidge, Cardinal Blaise Cupich, Fr. Samuel Morehead, Fr. Marcel Taillon All show notes at Hour 2-Coronavirus Update, Supreme Court & Religious Schools, Homily Highlights - This podcast produced by Relevant Radio

Melanie Collette from Project 21 on the ruling's impact on the poor communities.

Thanks for listening to the Bob Harden Show, celebrating over eight years of bringing you news and commentary on line! This Independence Day weekend we celebrate our founding and the principles or personal freedom, individual responsibility, free markets, limited government, and the rule of law. On Friday's show, we visit with Research Fellow with the Cato Institute, William Yeatman, about the resolution of the Michael Flynn case, and we discuss the meaning and importance of the Declaration of Independence and the rule of law. We visit with our State Representative and candidate for Congress in District 19, Byron Donalds, about the Supreme Court's decision to strike down the “Blaine Amendment” used in several states to limit “school choice.” We also discuss the proposed $1billion reduction in police force funding in New York City, which will lead to more crime and less safety for citizens – especially the poor. We visit with local dining, entertainment, and travel columnist Sharon Kenny about the big changes we will see over this weekend because of Covid-19. We also discuss our economic recovery and unemployment compensation policy as well as the need for opening public schools during Covid-19 with the President of American Commitment, Phil Kerpen. Please join us on Monday when we visit with terrific special guests including the Founder and Publisher of HistoryCentral.com Marc Schulman, President Emeritus of the Foundation for Economic Education Larry Reed, and author and former Barron's Washington Bureau Chief Jim McTague. Please join us live at 7 a.m. on my website, or you can access the show anytime on podcast platforms (iTunes, TuneIn, Spotify, and Stitcher) or in “show archives” on my website, www.bobharden.com.

In this special Supreme Court edition of the podcast, CNA editors JD Flynn and Ed Condon discuss the week’s news, including several recent and highly consequential Supreme Court decisions. They also talk about the abuses against the Uighur people in China, chat for a couple of minutes about baseball, and, for fun, take the United States Citizenship Test. (8:57) Supreme Court decision on Blaine Amendments and school choice: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/supreme-court-rejects-montana-blaine-amendment-in-religious-schools-case-34984 https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/soft-despotism-of-anti-catholicism-on-the-rise-catholic-bishops-religious-liberty-chair-warns-90987 (33:01) Supreme Court declines to hear the appeals of four federal death row inmates: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/us-bishops-ask-trump-administration-to-reconsider-federal-executions-35027 (38:28) Supreme Court rejects pro-life Louisiana law: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/supreme-court-strikes-down-louisiana-law-on-abortion-clinics-41500 https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/katrina-jackson-denounces-supreme-court-decision-on-louisiana-abortion-law-99510 https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/us-catholic-bishops-louisiana-abortion-ruling-a-cruel-precedent-60601 https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/how-the-scotus-abortion-ruling-could-affect-upcoming-senate-races-97187 https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/whats-next-for-the-supreme-court-and-abortion-70342 (1:00:12) Game: United States Citizenship Test. Happy July 4th!

Tuesday, June 30, 2020; Episode No. 742:  Tonight we'll discuss the SCOTUS ruling that struck down states' bans on taxpayer funding for religious schools, known as “Blaine Amendments,” with American Federation for Children Vice-President Tommy Shultz.Please join us live via affiliate FM/AM stations, satellite, or streaming live each and every weeknight beginning at 9 pm Eastern, or on-demand at your convenience. You can also access the show via various podcast platforms (iHeartRadio, iTunes, TuneIn, and Spreaker) or on our website, www.keithhansonshow.com.

As the Supreme Court closed out it 2019-2020 term, it handed down its decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. With a 5-4 majority, the Court ruled that states could not use their so-called “Blaine Amendments” in order to deny religious schools funding that is generally available to other private schools. It was a momentous decision, with implications for school choice programs and religious liberty across the nation. Earlier this year, soon after the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case, we had a discussion with Professor Michael Avi Helfand about the legal ins and outs of Espinoza. In this podcast, Jonathan Silver sits down with EdChoice Director of Policy Jason Bedrick to discuss the Court’s ultimate decision, what it means for school choice and religious pluralism, and what the decision means for the Jewish community. Bedrick and Silver also talk about school choice programs more broadly, the ongoing debate about government oversight of haredi educational institutions in the U.S., and the recent expansion of educational choice in Florida. Musical selections in this podcast are drawn from the Quintet for Clarinet and Strings, op. 31a, composed by Paul Ben-Haim and performed by the ARC Ensemble.

By Kathryn Hickock The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue that states' school choice laws may not discriminate against religiously affiliated schools. Montana's tax credit scholarship program, passed in 2015, enabled families to send their children to the private schools of their choice. The program was ruled unconstitutional by the Montana Supreme Court because some participating students wanted to apply their scholarships to religious schools, which the Department of Revenue argued violated the state's Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice (IJ) appealed this decision on behalf of parents, arguing that the Court's decision violated the Free Exercise, Equal Protection, and Establishment Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court decided in favor of the Montana parents, stating that “[a] State need not subsidize private education. But once a State decides to do so, it cannot disqualify some private schools solely because they are religious.” Reacting to the Court's ruling, IJ's president and general counsel Scott Bullock commented: The Montana high court claimed, as [educational] choice opponents have for decades, that allowing parents like Kendra [Espinoza] to [use a tax credit scholarship at a religious school] violated the state constitution's Blaine Amendment—which forbids state funding of so-called sectarian institutions. The U.S. Supreme Court made clear in its ruling today that it was wrong. As Chief Justice Roberts wrote in the majority opinion, “Drawing on ‘enduring American tradition,'” the Court has long recognized the rights of parents to direct the upbringing of their children. Back in 1926, another private school controversy made it all the way to the Supreme Court. With the goal of preventing students from choosing a Catholic education, the state of Oregon had outlawed all private schools. In the landmark ruling Pierce v. Society of Sisters, the Supreme Court wrote that “[t]he fundamental theory of liberty…excludes any general power of the State to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only.” Parents have a right to direct the education of their children—they did in 1926 and they still do today. The Supreme Court's ruling in Espinoza v. Montana upholds parental choice in education by ensuring that state-run school choice programs don't discriminate on the basis of religion. Learn more at info@cascadepolicy.org or at cascadepolicy.org. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/coffeewithcascade/message

In this episode, we are joined by Montse Alvarado, the Vice President and Executive Director of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. In addition to her work at the Becket Fund, Alvarado is also a lay consultant to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) Religious Liberty Committee. We discuss the need and importance of religious liberty for all, as well as the work of the Becket Fund. Becket has helped secure religious liberty victories against the contraceptive mandate, protect the rights of churches to choose their leaders, and safeguard the free speech of crisis pregnancy centers and religious groups on campus. In the mailbag segment, we discuss a question around defining the term “systemic racism”. Finally, in our brick layer segment, it's Religious Freedom week. We discuss where you can learn more about current Supreme Court cases regarding religious liberty. These cases include the Little Sisters of the Poor and their fight against the contraceptive mandate, as well as the Supreme Court’s Blaine Amendment case and its impact on Catholic Education. Additional resources mentioned in the episode: https://www.becketlaw.org/ , http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/religious-liberty/index.cfm

This SCOTUScast addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The question, in this case, is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case. To discuss the case, we have Erica Smith, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice.

This SCOTUScast addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The question, in this case, is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case. To discuss the case, we have Erica Smith, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Justice.

David and Sarah discuss the end of Rep. Justin Amash's short-lived presidential bid, preview a number of upcoming Supreme Court decisions from Little Sisters of the Poor to the Blaine Amendment case, and the New York Times column taking a closer look at Ronan Farrow.Show Notes:-The agonizing story of Tara Reade-A Guide To the 10 Biggest Supreme Court Cases of This Term-A Glossary of Important SCOTUS Terminology-Not Everyone Is Happy With the Supreme Court’s Live Broadcasts-Is Ronan Farrow Too Good to Be True?-ProPublica: Disaster in the Pacific

Despite long standing amendments like the Blaine Amendment, religious organizations should be just as deserving of participating in public programs as anyone else. Learn more at FirstLiberty.org/Briefing. We have discussed the history of anti-Catholic Blaine Amendments on this program before.  If you recall, it was Senator James Blaine who, in the mid-1800’s, proposed language ultimately adopted within state constitutions that prevents government dollars flowing to religious institutions, even to this day. It’s a curious thing that, in 2020 two organizations, one of whom is charitably motivated because of its secularity and the other by its religious convictions, yet only the secular organization may qualify for participation in public programs. Government officials need not rely upon the overall ability, educational or professional qualifications, financial stability, or facilities of a religious organization to decide whether it may participate. Rather, they may exclude religious organizations because they are religious organizations. Their religion may be the sole criterion for exclusion. In January of 2020, the Supreme Court once again heard arguments over the constitutionality of Blaine Amendments in Espinoza v. Montana.  In a friend of the court brief, First Liberty Institute argued that religious organizations are as deserving of participation in public programs as anybody else. The promise of the First Amendment is — at the very least — that government will be neutral towards religion, welcoming religious organizations to compete in the public square on equal footing with other organizations. If they are to be denied, let it be for legitimate reasons having not the whiff of religious discrimination. Government should never tolerate the codification of religious bigotry. To learn how First Liberty is protecting religious liberty for all Americans, visit FirstLiberty.org.

This week on “The Learning Curve,” Cara and Gerard continue coverage of COVID-19's impact on K-12 education, joined by Tim Keller, Senior Attorney with the Institute for Justice, which has been defending school choice from legal challenges, largely from state Blaine Amendments, for 30 years. Tim describes IJ's work on behalf of the plaintiffs in the high-profile Espinoza v. Source

Kendra Espinoza is a low-income single mother from Montana who applied for a tax-credit scholarship program—created by the state legislature in 2015—that would allow her to keep her daughters enrolled in a private Christian school. But soon after implementing the program, the state banned any of the scholarship funds from going to religious schools, thus excluding Espinoza and her family from receiving support. The ensuing legal battle made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue last month. The case implicates the religion clauses of the First Amendment, the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, and the notorious “Blaine Amendments” adopted by many states during the heyday of anti-Catholic bigotry in America. In this episode, Professor Michael Avi Helfand of Pepperdine University joins special guest host and Tikvah Senior Director Harry Ballan for a discussion of this important religious-liberty case. You’ll hear these two brilliant lawyers examine the knotty legal doctrines at issue, how the current’s justices are likely to rule, and why Espinoza should matter to every American citizen. Musical selections in this podcast are drawn from the Quintet for Clarinet and Strings, op. 31a, composed by Paul Ben-Haim and performed by the ARC Ensemble as well as "Ulterior" by Swan Production.

02/15/20 Episode 194: Montana, SCOTUS and the Unconstitutional Blaine Amendments - Interview with Attorney Anthony Sanders

02/08/20 Episode 193: Montana, SCOTUS and the Unconstitutional Blaine Amendments-Interview with Attorney Anthony Sanders

Late last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. Montana Dep’t of Revenue, a case on the constitutionality of a Montana school-choice program that allows parents to direct state-funded scholarships to religiously affiliated schools. The Montana Supreme Court ruled that the program violated the state constitution’s “Blaine Amendment,” which prohibits the appropriation […] The post Legal Spirits Episode 019: Oral Argument in the Blaine Amendments Case appeared first on LAW AND RELIGION FORUM.

Erin Hawley joins the podcast to preview Espinoza v. Montana, the highly anticipated landmark education case before the Supreme Court. The ruling could settle the on-going battle over the use of public funding for religious schools and may also declare the Blaine Amendment unconstitutional. Erin Hawley is a Senior Legal Fellow for the Independent Women’s Legal Center and a Senior Fellow at the Kinder Institute for Constitutional Democracy. Erin’s research interests include the separation of powers, federal courts, agricultural law, and administrative law. Her work has been published in numerous top law journals, and she is a frequent national commentator on legal issues. Erin is a former clerk to Chief Justice John Roberts and has litigated extensively before the United States Supreme Court. Erin and her husband U.S. Senator Josh Hawley have two active boys, a dog, and a horse. She Thinks is a podcast for women (and men) who are sick of the spin in today’s news cycle and are seeking the truth. Once a week, every week, She Thinks host Beverly Hallberg is joined by guests who cut through the clutter and bring you the facts. You don’t have to keep up with policy and politics to understand how issues will impact you and the people you care about most. You just have to keep up with us. We make sure you have the information you need to come to your own conclusions. Because, let’s face it, you’re in control of your own life and can think for yourself. You can listen to the latest She Thinks episode(s) here or wherever you get your podcasts. Then subscribe, rate, and share with your friends. If you are already caught up and want more, join our online community. Sign up for our emails here: iwf.org/sign-up Independent Women’s Forum (IWF) believes all issues are women’s issues. IWF promotes policies that aren’t just well-intended, but actually enhance people’s freedoms, opportunities, and choices. IWF doesn’t just talk about problems. We identify solutions and take them straight to the playmakers and policy creators. And, as a 501(c)3, IWF educates the public about the most important topics of the day. Check out the Independent Women’s Forum website for more information on how policies impact you, your loved ones, and your community: www.iwf.org. Be sure to subscribe to our emails to ensure you’re equipped with the facts on the issues you care about most: iwf.org/sign-up. Subscribe to IWF’s YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/IWF06. Follow IWF on social media: - twitter.com/iwf on Twitter - www.facebook.com/independentwomensforum on Facebook - instagram.com/independentwomensforum on Instagram #IWF #SheThinks #AllIssuesAreWomensIssues

Back in 2015, the state legislature of Montana created a dollar-for-dollar tax credit for individuals who donate to organizations that provide scholarships to private school students. In response, the Montana Department of Revenue ruled that such a tax credit would violate the state's version of the “Blaine Amendment,” which prohibits state funding of religious education. So, the state terminated the program altogether. Kendra Espinoza, a single mom who works extra jobs in order to send her kids to a Christian school in Kalispell, challenged the Department of Revenue's ruling in court. The case is currently on the Supreme Court's docket for this term. During oral arguments, conservative justices like Alito and Kavanaugh brought up the Court's decision in Trinity Lutheran v. Comer, which held that forcing a church school to choose between “[participating] in an otherwise available benefit program or [remaining] a religious institution” violated the Free Exercise clause. Unsurprisingly, the liberal justices disagreed. What was surprising is that the editorial board of the Washington Post came out on the side of Espinoza. Using scholarships at private, religious schools was not only a parent's right, the editorial board wrote, but using them didn't “undermine” or “harm” public education or the state, “contrary to many of the tropes advanced by those opposed to school choice.” The Post also called out the hypocrisy of upper-middle class opponents to these kinds of programs by noting that, “People with means take for granted the ability to choose their child's school by paying tuition or moving to communities with quality schools.”  So why begrudge people like Kendra Espinoza the same opportunity? It's not often I find myself in complete agreement with the editorial board of the Washington Post! I'm old enough to remember when the very existence of Christian educational alternatives was threatened by government entities. Oh yeah, we all are old enough…such threats are still very much a reality, especially in California. The truth is, government-imposed ideologies, especially so-called SOGI (sexual orientation and gender identity) legislation, very much threaten the future of Christian educational institutions. Still, I hold a great hope for their futures, and not only because this crucial Montana case is being heard in our recently remade Supreme Court. It's because Christians are currently bringing an incredible amount of innovation and creativity to the realm of education. In a Christianity Today article last August, Louis Markos described a home-schooling co-op in Kentucky that not only is “steeped in the Great Books,” but whose purpose is to glorify God, free “the mind(s) of students from the marketplace of idols,” and shape them into “virtuous, morally self-regulating citizens.” Across the country, innovative classical schools like this one are exploding, some in the form of homeschool co-ops, others in the form of private and charter schools. Many private Christian schools today are thriving, some who have made the difficult but sound transition from only existing to keep kids sheltered from culture to effectively preparing them to engage the culture. Also, excellent para-educational options abound, from the outstanding conferences for high-shoolers and college students offered by Summit Ministries, Worldview Academy, and Impact 360 to graduate and post-graduate training such as the John Jay Institute and ADF's Blackstone Legal Fellowship. All of these point to a real rejuvenation in Christian education, and we are seeing their fruit. Time and again, I meet Christian secondary students who are running their own businesses, digging much-needed wells for communities in Africa, or fighting to save preborn lives or victims of sex trafficking. I recently talked to a Christian school administrator who is actively seeking innovative ways to make sure that single moms, like Kendra Espinoza, can afford private Christian education for their children. These believers are joining Christianity's historic role in advancing education and taking the lead in solving our nation's educational problems. Historically, Christians have seen education as a gift we can best offer, not only to our own, but to the world, as a vehicle to knowing God and to promoting human flourishing. I'm not certain how the Court will decide the Montana case, but I do see reasons for optimism no matter what the justices decide. How refreshing. These days, that kind of optimism can be as rare as agreeing with the Washington Post.

On this episode of “The Learning Curve,” Bob & Cara are joined by Dick Komer, Senior Attorney with the Institute for Justice. Komer led the oral argument this week before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the plaintiffs in the high-profile school choice case, Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. They review the details of the Montana case and the nativist history of the Blaine amendments... Source

Louis Avallone and Stephen Parr talk about the Supreme Court hearing a case out of Montana where donations to scholarships are tax deductible as long as it does not go to a religious based scholarship. Stephen explains this is based upon the Blaine Amendment which was proposed to the US Constitution and failed to pass in 1875. It currently is impacting many states and their various voucher programs.

This teleforum addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The question in this case is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case.Featuring: -- Erica Smith, Senior Attorney, Institute for Justice

This teleforum addresses the January 22 Supreme Court argument in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. The question in this case is whether it violates the Free Exercise Clause for a state supreme court to invalidate a school choice program, merely because that program includes religious options, pursuant to that state’s Blaine Amendment. The Institute for Justice represents the Plaintiffs in the case.Featuring: -- Erica Smith, Senior Attorney, Institute for Justice

Louis Avallone and Stephen Parr talk about the Supreme Court hearing a case out of Montana where donations to scholarships are tax deductible as long as it does not go to a religious based scholarship. Stephen explains this is based upon the Blaine Amendment which was proposed to the US Constitution and failed to pass in 1875. It currently is impacting many states and their various voucher programs.

On January 22, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue. At issue is a Montana school choice program that allowed families to send their children to private schools, including religious ones. The Montana Supreme Court said the program violated the state's Blaine Amendment, a relic of 19th-century anti-Catholic hysteria that lives on today in 37 states constitutions, and struck the program down in 2018. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, will consider whether discriminating against religious options violates the First Amendment. On this podcast, we take a look at the history of Blaine Amendments, school choice, and one-size-fits-all schooling. Click here for transcript. Click here for Google Podcasts, iTunes, Spotify, TuneIn, and Stitcher.

On January 22, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue. At issue is a Montana school choice program that allowed families to send their children to private schools, including religious ones. The Montana Supreme Court said the program violated the state's Blaine Amendment, a relic of 19th-century anti-Catholic hysteria that lives on today in 37 states constitutions, and struck the program down in 2018. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, will consider whether discriminating against religious options violates the First Amendment. On this podcast, we take a look at the history of Blaine Amendments, school choice, and one-size-fits-all schooling. Click here for Google Podcasts, iTunes, Spotify, TuneIn, and Stitcher.

On January 22, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue. At issue is a Montana school choice program that allowed families to send their children to private schools, including religious ones. The Montana Supreme Court said the program violated the state’s Blaine Amendment, a relic of 19th-century anti-Catholic hysteria that lives on today in 37 states constitutions, and struck the program down in 2018. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, will consider whether discriminating against religious options violates the First Amendment. On this podcast, we take a look at the history of Blaine Amendments, school choice, and one-size-fits-all schooling. https://ij.org/case/montana-school-choice/

On January 22, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue. At issue is a Montana school choice program that allowed families to send their children to private schools, including religious ones. The Montana Supreme Court said the program violated the state’s Blaine Amendment, a relic of 19th-century anti-Catholic hysteria that lives on today in 37 states constitutions, and struck the program down in 2018. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, will consider whether discriminating against religious options violates the First Amendment. On this podcast, we take a look at the history of Blaine Amendments, school choice, and one-size-fits-all schooling. https://ij.org/case/montana-school-choice/

Get ready for the most important education related Supreme Court case in 50 years by tuning into Jeanne’s interview with Kendra Espinoza, lead plaintiff in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, to be heard by the nation's highest court on January 22, 2020. A win for Espinoza would strike down the bigoted Blaine Amendments that currently exist in 37 states' constitutions and deny kids attending private schools equal access to state education funds. Also joining Jeanne and co-host Michael Musante is Erica Smith of the Institute for Justice. Kendra Espinoza was a single mother of two young girls when fate – and the Montana Supreme Court – propelled her into this legal fight to strike down religious exceptions to equal access to state education funds Montana’s kids. You will be impressed, and maybe a little awed by this story of determination and courage. Don’t miss this inside look at history in the making.

Erica Smith, an attorney with the Institute for Justice, joins Paul E. Peterson to discuss Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, a case that takes a deep look at school choice and which could declare the so-called Blaine Amendments unconstitutional in 38 states. Prof. Peterson previously spoke to Richard Komer on this issue, and in the Fall 2019 issue of Education Next, Joshua Dunn analyzed the Espinoza case in “Answered Prayer? Montana case could prompt last judgment for Blaine Amendments.” https://www.educationnext.org/education-exchange-school-choice-blaine-amendments-montana-supreme-court-espinoza/

Ray Domanico joins senior editor Mark Bauerlein to discuss the history of the Blaine Amendments, a recent challenge to Montana’s school choice program, and the future of religious schools in America.

Richard Komer, a former Senior Litigation Attorney at the Institute for Justice, joins Paul E. Peterson to discuss Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue, a case which could declare the Blaine Amendments in 38 state constitutions unconstitutional. Komer is defending plaintiffs, including Kendra Espinoza, who received a tax credit scholarship to attend a religious school. In the Fall 2019 issue of Education Next, Joshua Dunn analyzed the Espinoza case in "Answered Prayer? Montana case could prompt last judgment for Blaine Amendments." https://www.educationnext.org/answered-prayer-montana-case-prompt-last-judgement-blaine-amendments/

Ray Domanico joins senior editor Mark Bauerlein to discuss the history of the Blaine Amendments, a recent challenge to Montana’s school choice program, and the future of religious schools in America.

The first Monday of October marks the start of the U.S. Supreme Court’s session. Among the cases being heard this session is Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. This case examines the question of whether it violates the religion clauses or the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution to invalidate a generally available and religiously neutral student-aid program simply because the program affords students the choice of attending religious schools. To discuss this case we speak with senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, Michael Bindas. He litigates in courts nationwide to protect freedom of speech, economic liberty, educational choice, and other individual liberties. In our mailbag segment, we discuss what the word "dignity" actually means. And, we round out the show with the bricklayer segment in which we discuss the concept of "no bill before its time".

Attorney Paul Clement, former clerk to the late Justice Antonin Scalia and U.S. Solicitor General brings his expertise to Episode 73 of Reality Check to discuss the Blaine Amendment and parental rights, the subject of an upcoming U.S. Supreme Court case. Clement breaks down what you need to know to be informed about the most important education case in over a generation.

Never heard the term “Blaine Amendments” before? The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear IJ's educational choice case Ezpinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue is […] The post Previewing IJ's Next Case at the United States Supreme Court appeared first on Institute for Justice.

Never heard the term “Blaine Amendments” before? The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hear IJ’s educational choice case Ezpinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue is likely to change that. In today’s Deep Dive IJ Senior Attorney Tim Keller and IJ Attorney Erica Smith describe what Blaine Amendments are, why they matter to parents who simply… The post Previewing IJ’s Next Case at the United States Supreme Court appeared first on Institute for Justice.

A Supreme Court challenge implicating state-level Blaine Amendments and Democrats' revival of school busing as an issue could force a real conversation about educational freedom. Neal McCluskey comments. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

James Gillespie Blaine proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would, prevent any government aid to “sectarian schools,” especially Catholic schools.  Learn what Justice Clarence Thomas said about the amendment at FirstLiberty.org/Briefing. James Gillespie Blaine had an interesting life. He served as Speaker of the House of Congress and in the United States Senate.  Twice he served as Secretary of State, holding the position under three separate presidents.  He even sought the presidency, losing to Grover Cleveland. Blaine’s most notorious legacy, however, is an amendment that bears his name.  Blaine got his idea from a fiery speech delivered by President Grant at the height of a national controversy over the nation’s public schools, and whether religion had any place within them.  In 1875, President Grant declared, “Leave the matter of religion to the family altar, the Church, and the private school, supported entirely by private contributions.  Keep the Church and State forever separate.” Days later, Blaine introduced a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would, prevent any government aid to “sectarian schools,” especially Catholic schools.  His amendment failed, but various states borrowed his proposal and their constitutions were amended instead.  Today, almost 40 states have a constitutional provision that prevents government aid to religious institutions.  These amendments have empowered states to legally discriminate against religious organizations when they perform the same work secular institutions do. That prejudice led Justice Thomas to write of Blaine Amendments in the 1999 decision of Mitchell v. Helms, “This doctrine, born of bigotry, should be buried now.” To learn how First Liberty is protecting religious liberty for all Americans, visit FirstLiberty.org.

FR 18 - 34RR - What's A Blaine Amendment? - Amireh Al Haddad - Rel Date 08 - 25 - 18 by Church State Council

FR 18 - 18 - What's A Blaine Amendment? - Amireh Al Haddad - Rel Date 05 - 05 - 18 by Church State Council

Timothy Keller and I talk about his work as the managing attorney for the Institute of Justice's Arizona Office and how he has promoted educational choice programs throughout his career. We go behind the scenes of the 2011 Supreme Court Case Arizona Christian School v. Winn, a case fighting for educational choice programs, which Timothy helped lead to victory. Throughout our discussion, we explore some of the arguments for and against school choice programs—which include vouchers, tax credits, scholarships, or Educational Savings Accounts. We also discuss how state "Blaine Amendments" are tremendous barriers to educational choice programs around the country. Stay tuned for a truly thought-provoking discussion. … More Ep. 19: Timothy Keller, Managing Attorney of the Institute for Justice’s Arizona Office

Timothy Keller and I talk about his work as the managing attorney for the Institute of Justice's Arizona Office and how he has promoted educational choice programs throughout his career. We go behind the scenes of the 2011 Supreme Court Case Arizona Christian School v. Winn, a case fighting for educational choice programs, which Timothy helped lead to victory. Throughout our discussion, we explore some of the arguments for and against school choice programs—which include vouchers, tax credits, scholarships, or Educational Savings Accounts. We also discuss how state "Blaine Amendments" are tremendous barriers to educational choice programs around the country. Stay tuned for a truly thought-provoking discussion. … More Ep. 19: Timothy Keller, Managing Attorney of the Institute for Justice’s Arizona Office The post Ep. 19: Timothy Keller, Managing Attorney of the Institute for Justice’s Arizona Office appeared first on The Edge of Ideas.

The conclusion of Josh's discussion with Dave Roland, the Director of Litigation and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri about the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer. Dave and Josh talk about the possible practical implications of the decision, including what we might expect in future litigation. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="150"] Dave Roland, Executive Director and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri[/caption] See also Supreme Court Remands School Aid Cases For Reconsideration In Light of Trinity Lutheran Decision Trinity Lutheran Church, Inc. v. Comer, No. 15-577 (U.S. June 26, 2017)  Coverage of Trinity Lutheran Church decision  1719 Background on Trinity Lutheran v. Comer  1720 Trinity Lutheran oral argument  1721 What is a Blaine Amendment?  1722 The Freedom Center of Missouri 1730 Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer decision 1731 Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer dissent 1733 Cases remanded after Trinity Lutheran Subscribe to the Law Meets Gospel Podcast Apple Podcasts Google Play RSS Support the Law Meets Gospel Podcast Patreon.com Sign up to contribute an amount you choose for each episode the Law Meets Gospel Podcast publishes.

The third part of Josh's discussion with Dave Roland, the Director of Litigation and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri about the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer. Dave and Josh talk about two cases remanded by the Supreme Court. One involves a voucher program in Colorado. The other involves a textbook-renting program in New Mexico. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="150"] Dave Roland, Executive Director and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri[/caption] See also Supreme Court Remands School Aid Cases For Reconsideration In Light of Trinity Lutheran Decision Trinity Lutheran Church, Inc. v. Comer, No. 15-577 (U.S. June 26, 2017)  Coverage of Trinity Lutheran Church decision  1719 Background on Trinity Lutheran v. Comer  1720 Trinity Lutheran oral argument  1721 What is a Blaine Amendment?  1722 The Freedom Center of Missouri 1730 Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer decision 1731 Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer dissent Subscribe to the Law Meets Gospel Podcast iTunes Google Play RSS Support the Law Meets Gospel Podcast Patreon.com Sign up to contribute an amount you choose for each episode the Law Meets Gospel Podcast publishes.

The second part of Josh's discussion with Dave Roland, the Director of Litigation and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri about the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer. Dave and Josh talk about the separate opinions by Justice Stephen Breyer, who concurred only in the judgment favoring the church, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="150"] Dave Roland, Executive Director and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri[/caption] See also Trinity Lutheran Church, Inc. v. Comer, No. 15-577 (U.S. June 26, 2017) Coverage of Trinity Lutheran Church decision  1719 Background on Trinity Lutheran v. Comer  1720 Trinity Lutheran oral argument  1721 What is a Blaine Amendment?  1722 The Freedom Center of Missouri 1730 Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer decision Subscribe to the Law Meets Gospel Podcast iTunes Google Play RSS Support the Law Meets Gospel Podcast Patreon.com Sign up to contribute an amount you choose for each episode the Law Meets Gospel Podcast publishes.

Josh talks with Dave Roland, the Director of Litigation and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri about the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="150"] Dave Roland, Executive Director and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri[/caption] See also Trinity Lutheran Church, Inc. v. Comer, No. 15-577 (U.S. June 26, 2017) Coverage of Trinity Lutheran Church decision  1719 Background on Trinity Lutheran v. Comer  1720 Trinity Lutheran oral argument  1721 What is a Blaine Amendment?  1722 The Freedom Center of Missouri Subscribe to the Law Meets Gospel Podcast iTunes Google Play RSS Support the Law Meets Gospel Podcast Patreon.com Sign up to contribute an amount you choose for each episode the Law Meets Gospel Podcast publishes.

[caption id="" align="alignright" width="170"] James G. Blaine in the 1870s[/caption] The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer on April 19, 2017. The church is challenging Missouri’s exclusion of religious groups from the state’s grant program for playground surfaces, which is based on the state's constitution. The relevant amendment is one of many often referred to as "Blaine Amendments." Josh interviews Dave Roland, the Director of Litigation and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri about the history behind these amendments and their ramifications for modern American law. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="150"] Dave Roland, Executive Director and cofounder of the Freedom Center of Missouri[/caption] Subscribe to the Law Meets Gospel Podcast iTunes Google Play RSS Support the Law Meets Gospel Podcast Patreon.com Sign up to contribute an amount you choose for each episode the Law Meets Gospel Podcast publishes.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear oral arguments in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Pauley. The case questions whether the exclusion of churches from an otherwise neutral and secular aid program violates the First Amendment’s guarantee of Free Exercise of Religion and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. Debaters will address this case along with the Blaine Amendment implications. -- This panel was part of the 2017 Annual Western Chapters Conference at The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, CA on January 28, 2017. -- Debate—State Blaine Amendments -- David A. Cortman, Senior Counsel and Vice President of U.S. Litigation, Alliance Defending Freedom and Prof. Steven Green, Fred H. Paulus Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Religion, Law & Democracy, Willamette University College of Law. Moderator: Hon. Carlos Bea, U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit. Introduction: Lisa Ezell, Vice President & Director of Lawyers Chapters, The Federalist Society.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Pauley. The case focuses on religious liberties and the Establishment Clause, and whether the First Amendment allows states to disfavor religious institutions. The Missouri Constitution has a clause against the use of public funds for religious entities, reading “that no money shall ever be taken from the public treasury, directly or indirectly, in aid of any church, sect or denomination of religion…” In this case, The Department of Natural Resources turned down a request by a church-run preschool for a grant for new rubber ground in their playground. Does the exclusion of churches from an otherwise neutral and secular aid program violate the constitution? Our experts join us today to discuss the upcoming case and to give some background on the relevant precedent in this area of law. -- Featuring: Prof. Thomas C. Berg, James L. Oberstar Professor of Law and Public Policy, University of Saint Thomas School of Law; Prof. Martin S. Lederman, Associate Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center and Prof. Christopher C. Lund, Associate Professor of Law, Wayne State University.

So-called Blaine Amendments were created to keep states from sending public funds to support Catholic education. And today, those laws foil many efforts at giving parents more choice in education. Following the premiere of the Cato Institute film, Live Free and Learn: Scholarship Tax Credits in New Hampshire, Dick Komer, a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, described the history and trouble with Blaine Amendments. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.