Podcasts about la trama

* On the 150th Anniversary of the Proclamation, the Surprising Truth: With yesterday (January 1st, 2023) being the 160th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, we are going back to a broadcast classic where Bob Enyart and guest Jamie Schofield analyze the meaning and actual intent of that sad document. For this was no abolitionist policy (as a contemporaneous report in the Rocky Mountain News makes clear), but an example of moral compromise that ended in failure. Today's Resource: The Plot | Second Edition!The Bible Gets Easier to Understand: Apparent contradictions plague many Bible students. The Plot demonstrates how hundreds of such contradictions disappear when the reader applies the big picture of the Bible to its details. Tunnel vision focuses so narrowly on a problem that the solution often lies just out of view. As the pastor of Denver Bible Church, Bob Enyart teaches Christians how to use the whole counsel of God to understand the plot of the Bible and solve biblical mysteries. (Missionaries in Costa Rica effectively use the Spanish translation, La Trama.) Available as either book or PDF download. The Plot: 2nd Edition Just before his passing, Bob finished the second edition of his manuscript, The Plot. While sadly he didn't live long enough to see the work published, He did get it out just in time. His second edition includes ten years worth of updates, revisions, additional sections and updated graphics. Now, a year after his passing, it has been made available to the public! Get your copy now... The Proclamation was actually comprised of two announcements, not just one.  The first half – the preliminary proclamation – set the policy and gave a deadline of 100 days.  It was addressed not to the common citizens of the nation or to the Union military, but rather to the states in rebellion at that time.  What was Lincoln's declared policy on slavery at that time?  He made that very clear in a letter to Horace Greeley on Aug. 22, 1862, just days before the issuance of the preliminary proclamation: If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. . . . I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men everywhere could be free. Lincoln's goal was not the abolition of slavery but rather the preservation of the Union, and if that meant keeping slaves in bondage everywhere, he would support and practice exactly that.  And this non-abolitionist stance is reflected in the text of the Emancipation Proclamation.The Preliminary Proclamation, September, 1862 In short, the stated intent and purpose of this policy was to offer the Confederate states the opportunity to keep their slaves if they would choose to stop rebelling within a 100-day deadline.  Essentially, it said that if your state ceases its rebellion against the union, you may keep your slaves. I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy thereof, do hereby proclaim and declare that hereafter, as heretofore, the war will be prosecuted for the object of practically restoring the constitutional relation between the United States... That on the first day of January in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; Any state still in rebellion against the Union on Jan. 1 would be subject to the Proclamation, which would declare any current slaves in those areas to be free.  The stated goal was not to free any slaves, but rather to preserve the Union.  Was it a success?  Before hearing the answer, Bob predicted that such a policy would bear no fruit, and he was right.  In fact, not a single state took Lincoln up on his offer.  By its own standard, the Proclamation was an abject failure!  In fact, all the proclamation did in that regard was to infuriate the Confederate states more than ever, deepening their resolve to reject the Union. Perhaps even worse, the preliminary proclamation also explicitly ordered slaves to be returned to their slave owners in specific circumstances, thus actually ordering the enforcement of keeping such men in bondage: Sec.10. And be it further enacted, That no slave escaping into any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia, from any other State, shall be delivered up, or in any way impeded or hindered of his liberty, except for crime, or some offence against the laws, unless the person claiming said fugitive shall first make oath that the person to whom the labor or service of such fugitive is alleged to be due is his lawful owner, and has not borne arms against the United States in the present rebellion, nor in any way given aid and comfort thereto; In other words, if a slave escaped to an area controlled by the Union, all a Southern slave owner had to do was show up, give an oath (no evidence required) that he was the lawful owner of that slave, and swear that he had never taken up arms against the Union, and then “here's your slave back.” The Emancipation Proclamation, January 1, 1863 This document was the culmination of the policy already given 100 days earlier.  Not a single Confederate state had taken Lincoln's offer to cease rebellion and keep their slaves.  Therefore, this document declared (largely symbolically) the slaves in those non-Union-controlled areas to be free.  But, at the same time, and as one should expect in such a compromised and non-abolitionist policy, it also explicitly listed all of the areas in the U.S. where slaves would be kept in bondage.  Thus, this policy actually authorized the continuing wicked enslavement of innocent men, women and children, for example in many counties in Louisiana, especially around New Orleans, as well as in the newly-forming West Virginia. Many abolitionists of the day decried the Emancipation Proclamation, rightly pointing out its moral compromise.  Lincoln's own secretary of state, William Seward, commented that "We show our sympathy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free."  Unlike Lincoln, Seward knew the atrocities of slavery firsthand, having been raised by a slave-owning family.  "I early came to the conclusion that something was wrong... and [that] determined me to be an abolitionist." On the other hand, in their coverage of the Proclamation, the now-defunct Rocky Mountain News here in Colorado celebrated on their front page the fact that this policy was not abolitionist, and mocked abolitionists who disagreed with it, praising Lincoln for going against the “radical” abolitionists.  The newspaper wrote: “The last mail... brought scores of Eastern and Western papers with similar recommendations.  The voice of the press is almost unanimous in its approval.  That is a pretty correct index of popular opinion, and we may therefore set down that almost the entire loyal States endorse the action of the President.  It must be expected that the ultra Abolitionists will kick against it, as too conservative [not going far enough] for their radical views.  Let them squirm!  ‘Honest Abe' has shown that he will be no tool of theirs.” How were slaves freed and slavery abolished, then? It's important to note that the Emancipation Proclamation didn't outlaw slavery anywhere.  It declared current slaves in those areas to be free, in areas where the Union had no control.  It essentially “freed” them in word only, and was largely a symbolic gesture.  As the Union military moved through the Confederate states in rebellion, they did free slaves they encountered.  In truth, they could have done this with or without the Proclamation.  The Proclamation was simply used as an excuse to do it, but they would have been right to do it, regardless.  Lincoln gave orders to the Union Army to free those slaves, apart from the Proclamation, which wasn't addressed to the Union Army, but to the Confederate States themselves.  He could have ordered the Union Army to do this without such a proclamation.  And even if Lincoln hadn't issued that order, it would have still been right for Union forces moving through the South to free those slaves, anyway.  If you are a military unit and have taken over an area from the enemy, and you find men who have been kidnapped and brutalized by the people there, the right thing to do would be to free those victims.  The Proclamation didn't free anyone, although it did serve as a political excuse to do so. What of the abolition of slavery, then?  That was accomplished later, in some areas at the state level, and in the rest of the nation through federal action.  Unlike in the Emancipation Proclamation, in all of these cases it was a principled, no-compromise, abolitionist policy that required the complete abolition of slavery in each state.  For example, West Virginia (which had ironically seceded from Virginia while the latter was seceding from the Union) wasn't allowed to join the Union as a new state unless their constitution abolished slavery without exception.  In Maryland, Arkansas and Louisiana in 1864, they abolished slavery at the state level as their citizens ratified new state constitutions.  In Missouri in January of 1865, that governor abolished slavery via executive order.  In all other Southern states, slavery was ultimately abolished through the ratification of the 13th amendment to the U.S. Constitution, in December of 1865. In all of these cases, it was a no-compromise policy that we would describe today as “pro-personhood.”  Slavery was ultimately abolished despite the pro-slavery policy of the Emancipation Proclamation, not because of it.

* On the 150th Anniversary of the Proclamation, the Surprising Truth: With yesterday (January 1st, 2023) being the 160th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, we are going back to a broadcast classic where Bob Enyart and guest Jamie Schofield analyze the meaning and actual intent of that sad document. For this was no abolitionist policy (as a contemporaneous report in the Rocky Mountain News makes clear), but an example of moral compromise that ended in failure. Today's Resource: The Plot | Second Edition!The Bible Gets Easier to Understand: Apparent contradictions plague many Bible students. The Plot demonstrates how hundreds of such contradictions disappear when the reader applies the big picture of the Bible to its details. Tunnel vision focuses so narrowly on a problem that the solution often lies just out of view. As the pastor of Denver Bible Church, Bob Enyart teaches Christians how to use the whole counsel of God to understand the plot of the Bible and solve biblical mysteries. (Missionaries in Costa Rica effectively use the Spanish translation, La Trama.) Available as either book or PDF download. The Plot: 2nd Edition Just before his passing, Bob finished the second edition of his manuscript, The Plot. While sadly he didn't live long enough to see the work published, He did get it out just in time. His second edition includes ten years worth of updates, revisions, additional sections and updated graphics. Now, a year after his passing, it has been made available to the public! Get your copy now... The Proclamation was actually comprised of two announcements, not just one.  The first half – the preliminary proclamation – set the policy and gave a deadline of 100 days.  It was addressed not to the common citizens of the nation or to the Union military, but rather to the states in rebellion at that time.  What was Lincoln's declared policy on slavery at that time?  He made that very clear in a letter to Horace Greeley on Aug. 22, 1862, just days before the issuance of the preliminary proclamation: If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. . . . I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men everywhere could be free. Lincoln's goal was not the abolition of slavery but rather the preservation of the Union, and if that meant keeping slaves in bondage everywhere, he would support and practice exactly that.  And this non-abolitionist stance is reflected in the text of the Emancipation Proclamation.The Preliminary Proclamation, September, 1862 In short, the stated intent and purpose of this policy was to offer the Confederate states the opportunity to keep their slaves if they would choose to stop rebelling within a 100-day deadline.  Essentially, it said that if your state ceases its rebellion against the union, you may keep your slaves. I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy thereof, do hereby proclaim and declare that hereafter, as heretofore, the war will be prosecuted for the object of practically restoring the constitutional relation between the United States... That on the first day of January in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; Any state still in rebellion against the Union on Jan. 1 would be subject to the Proclamation, which would declare any current slaves in those areas to be free.  The stated goal was not to free any slaves, but rather to preserve the Union.  Was it a success?  Before hearing the answer, Bob predicted that such a policy would bear no fruit, and he was right.  In fact, not a single state took Lincoln up on his offer.  By its own standard, the Proclamation was an abject failure!  In fact, all the proclamation did in that regard was to infuriate the Confederate states more than ever, deepening their resolve to reject the Union. Perhaps even worse, the preliminary proclamation also explicitly ordered slaves to be returned to their slave owners in specific circumstances, thus actually ordering the enforcement of keeping such men in bondage: Sec.10. And be it further enacted, That no slave escaping into any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia, from any other State, shall be delivered up, or in any way impeded or hindered of his liberty, except for crime, or some offence against the laws, unless the person claiming said fugitive shall first make oath that the person to whom the labor or service of such fugitive is alleged to be due is his lawful owner, and has not borne arms against the United States in the present rebellion, nor in any way given aid and comfort thereto; In other words, if a slave escaped to an area controlled by the Union, all a Southern slave owner had to do was show up, give an oath (no evidence required) that he was the lawful owner of that slave, and swear that he had never taken up arms against the Union, and then “here's your slave back.” The Emancipation Proclamation, January 1, 1863 This document was the culmination of the policy already given 100 days earlier.  Not a single Confederate state had taken Lincoln's offer to cease rebellion and keep their slaves.  Therefore, this document declared (largely symbolically) the slaves in those non-Union-controlled areas to be free.  But, at the same time, and as one should expect in such a compromised and non-abolitionist policy, it also explicitly listed all of the areas in the U.S. where slaves would be kept in bondage.  Thus, this policy actually authorized the continuing wicked enslavement of innocent men, women and children, for example in many counties in Louisiana, especially around New Orleans, as well as in the newly-forming West Virginia. Many abolitionists of the day decried the Emancipation Proclamation, rightly pointing out its moral compromise.  Lincoln's own secretary of state, William Seward, commented that "We show our sympathy with slavery by emancipating slaves where we cannot reach them and holding them in bondage where we can set them free."  Unlike Lincoln, Seward knew the atrocities of slavery firsthand, having been raised by a slave-owning family.  "I early came to the conclusion that something was wrong... and [that] determined me to be an abolitionist." On the other hand, in their coverage of the Proclamation, the now-defunct Rocky Mountain News here in Colorado celebrated on their front page the fact that this policy was not abolitionist, and mocked abolitionists who disagreed with it, praising Lincoln for going against the “radical” abolitionists.  The newspaper wrote: “The last mail... brought scores of Eastern and Western papers with similar recommendations.  The voice of the press is almost unanimous in its approval.  That is a pretty correct index of popular opinion, and we may therefore set down that almost the entire loyal States endorse the action of the President.  It must be expected that the ultra Abolitionists will kick against it, as too conservative [not going far enough] for their radical views.  Let them squirm!  ‘Honest Abe' has shown that he will be no tool of theirs.” How were slaves freed and slavery abolished, then? It's important to note that the Emancipation Proclamation didn't outlaw slavery anywhere.  It declared current slaves in those areas to be free, in areas where the Union had no control.  It essentially “freed” them in word only, and was largely a symbolic gesture.  As the Union military moved through the Confederate states in rebellion, they did free slaves they encountered.  In truth, they could have done this with or without the Proclamation.  The Proclamation was simply used as an excuse to do it, but they would have been right to do it, regardless.  Lincoln gave orders to the Union Army to free those slaves, apart from the Proclamation, which wasn't addressed to the Union Army, but to the Confederate States themselves.  He could have ordered the Union Army to do this without such a proclamation.  And even if Lincoln hadn't issued that order, it would have still been right for Union forces moving through the South to free those slaves, anyway.  If you are a military unit and have taken over an area from the enemy, and you find men who have been kidnapped and brutalized by the people there, the right thing to do would be to free those victims.  The Proclamation didn't free anyone, although it did serve as a political excuse to do so. What of the abolition of slavery, then?  That was accomplished later, in some areas at the state level, and in the rest of the nation through federal action.  Unlike in the Emancipation Proclamation, in all of these cases it was a principled, no-compromise, abolitionist policy that required the complete abolition of slavery in each state.  For example, West Virginia (which had ironically seceded from Virginia while the latter was seceding from the Union) wasn't allowed to join the Union as a new state unless their constitution abolished slavery without exception.  In Maryland, Arkansas and Louisiana in 1864, they abolished slavery at the state level as their citizens ratified new state constitutions.  In Missouri in January of 1865, that governor abolished slavery via executive order.  In all other Southern states, slavery was ultimately abolished through the ratification of the 13th amendment to the U.S. Constitution, in December of 1865. In all of these cases, it was a no-compromise policy that we would describe today as “pro-personhood.”  Slavery was ultimately abolished despite the pro-slavery policy of the Emancipation Proclamation, not because of it.

01 16-12-25 LHDW Toda la crispación y declive de España llegó con Zapatero. Es el verdadero número 1 de la trama PSOE, vinculaciones con Venezuela y China

01 16-12-25 LHDW Toda la crispación y declive de España llegó con Zapatero. Es el verdadero número 1 de la trama PSOE, vinculaciones con Venezuela y China

La UCO afirma que la trama de hidrocarburos destinó un millón de euros en sobornos para lograr licencias, incluyendo 585.000 euros que Claudio Rivas invirtió en un chalet para Ábalos —que luego retiró al no obtenerse las licencias—, además de 292.000 euros pagados a Víctor de Aldama y 7.000 a Koldo García. Paralelamente, se investiga si los 53 millones con los que el Gobierno rescató a la aerolínea Plus Ultra en 2021 se usaron para blanquear fondos venezolanos. La Guardia Civil ha detenido al dueño y el consejero delegado . También ha sido arrestado Antxón Alonso, en el caso que mantiene a la “fontanera de Ferraz”, Leire Díez, y el expresidente del SEPI, Vicente Fernández, en el calabozo. 

Programa desde el pazo de Fonseca en Santiago con el análisis de Antón Losada, Estefanía Molina y José María Lassalle. El nuevo informe de la UCO sobre el caso hidrocarburos aparece sostiene que la trama dedicó un millón de euros para intentar comprar a políticos como José Luis Ábalos, para quien adquirieron un chalé de casi 600.000 euros. El PP exige la dimisión del Gobierno por los casos de corrupción en el entorno del PSOE, y por las denuncias de acoso sexual contra dirigentes. Anoche un miembro de la Ejecutiva Federal de Ferraz dimitió de sus cargos, el partido lo enmarca en los cosas de acoso sexual a mujeres. En medio de estas crisis, el Gobierno perdió ayer por segunda vez en el Congreso la votación de la senda del déficit. El paso previo para poder presentar los presupuestos. El ejecutivo, sin embargo, saca pecho porque sí salió adelante la subida del sueldo de los funcionarios y otros acuerdos con Junts.

Programa desde el pazo de Fonseca en Santiago con el análisis de Antón Losada, Estefanía Molina y José María Lassalle. El nuevo informe de la UCO sobre el caso hidrocarburos aparece sostiene que la trama dedicó un millón de euros para intentar comprar a políticos como José Luis Ábalos, para quien adquirieron un chalé de casi 600.000 euros. El PP exige la dimisión del Gobierno por los casos de corrupción en el entorno del PSOE, y por las denuncias de acoso sexual contra dirigentes. Anoche un miembro de la Ejecutiva Federal de Ferraz dimitió de sus cargos, el partido lo enmarca en los cosas de acoso sexual a mujeres. En medio de estas crisis, el Gobierno perdió ayer por segunda vez en el Congreso la votación de la senda del déficit. El paso previo para poder presentar los presupuestos. El ejecutivo, sin embargo, saca pecho porque sí salió adelante la subida del sueldo de los funcionarios y otros acuerdos con Junts.

La UCO afirma que la trama de hidrocarburos destinó un millón de euros en sobornos para lograr licencias, incluyendo 585.000 euros que Claudio Rivas invirtió en un chalet para Ábalos —que luego retiró al no obtenerse las licencias—, además de 292.000 euros pagados a Víctor de Aldama y 7.000 a Koldo García. Paralelamente, se investiga si los 53 millones con los que el Gobierno rescató a la aerolínea Plus Ultra en 2021 se usaron para blanquear fondos venezolanos. La Guardia Civil ha detenido al dueño y el consejero delegado . También ha sido arrestado Antxón Alonso, en el caso que mantiene a la “fontanera de Ferraz”, Leire Díez, y el expresidente del SEPI, Vicente Fernández, en el calabozo. 

En ESTO NO TIENE NOMBRE, analizamos la querella presentada por el Equipo de Recuperación del Patrimonio Público (ERPP) con constitución en actor civil por el fraude masivo en Senasa. El ERPP actuará de manera pro bono para recuperar los fondos sustraídos y luchar contra lo que califican como un "atentado directo contra la vida y la salud" de los dominicanos. Hablamos de la lucha contra la corrupción y el nuevo modelo de integridad pública de la DIGEIG.

Las noticias que debes conocer esta tarde, con Aimar Bretos.

Tertulia y análisis desde el Museo Guggenheim de Bilbao con Ángeles Caballero, Juanma Marqués, Luz Rodríguez y Mariano Alonso. 

Valentina Rinforzi ha intervistato, durante la terza giornata di Più Libri Più Liberi 2025, il prof. Arturo Gallia e il dott. Mirko Castaldi che ci hanno parlato di "La trama del paesaggio Racconti e immagini del Grand Tour tra geografia, storia e progetto territoriale", Viella, 2025.

Carlos Cuesta comenta cómo la trama corrupta en torno a Pedro Sánchez empieza a tirar de la manta.

Sobre las redes del cuestionado conservador Sergio Yáber en la Trama Bielorrusa y el baneo de redes sociales a adolescentes en Australia, Iván Valenzuela conversó con Paula Comandari y Fernanda Paúl en una nueva edición del Rat Pack de Mesa Central.

En una nueva edición de Página 13, Iván Valenzuela y Kike Mujica conversaron con los columnistas Carlos Gajardo y Cristián Stewart sobre la reunión entre el ex Presidente Eduardo Frei y el candidato republicano José Antonio Kast que remeció la campaña. Además, comentaron la nueva capa del Caso “Muñeca Bielorrusa” que se abrió en el Congreso.

Sobre la presión del candidato José Antonio Kast para nombrar a su jefe de la billetera fiscal, en caso de llegar a La Moneda; y el impacto del caso "Muñeca bielorrusa" en el Parlamento, donde dos congresistas se ven envueltos en transferencias de dinero del conservador Sergio Yáber.

En una nueva edición de Página 13, Kike Mujica conversó con las columnistas Andrea Vial y Paula Comandari sobre cómo abordar el desangramiento del Poder Judicial, a partir del impacto de la “Muñeca Bielorrusa”. Además, se preguntaron cómo enfrenta Chile el tema de la obesidad.

Santos Cerdán ha salido de la cárcel, pero su panorama judicial sigue complicándose. Estos días la Guardia Civil ha hecho público un segundo informe y le asigna un papel clave a la hora de cobrar comisiones por adjudicación de obras públicas. El ex secretario de Organización del PSOE actuó de enlace entre las constructoras y el ministerio. Y entre él y su familia gastaron decenas de miles de euros en pisos, viajes y restaurantes. CRÉDITOS: Realizan: Víctor Rojo y Ana Fuentes Presenta: Ana Fuentes Con información de: Irene Dorta y JJ Gálvez Edición: Ana Ribera Coordinación: Jose Juan Morales Dirección: Ana Alonso Dirección Hoy en El País: Silvia Cruz Lapeña Diseño de sonido: Nacho Taboada Sintonía: Jorge Magaz Si tienes quejas, dudas o sugerencias, escribe a defensora@elpais.es o manda un audio a +34 649362138 (no atiende llamadas).

Exponemos la nueva trama de corrupción que golpea al PSOE, centrada en las investigaciones de la UCO que revelan comisiones ilegales, contratos a dedo y el papel de figuras clave como Santos Cerdán, Ábalos y su entorno. Analizamos cómo operaban las constructoras beneficiadas, el uso de empresas pantalla, la diferencia de trato mediático entre el PSOE y la derecha, y el silencio sobre el poder real del Ibex en la política española. Mas vídeos de Pandemia Digital: https://www.youtube.com/c/PandemiaDigital1 Si quieres comprar buen aceite de primera prensada, sin intermediarios y ayudar de esa forma a los agricultores con salarios justos tenemos un código de promoción para ti: https://12coop.com/cupon/pandemiadigital/ Este video puede contener temas sensibles, así como discursos de odi*, ac*so, o discr*minación. El objetivo de abordar estos temas es exclusivamente informativo y busca concienciar a la audiencia sobre estos acontecimientos, y denunciar y señalar el origen de los mismos para crear consciencia y evitar su propagación. Si consideras que el contenido puede afectarte, te recomendamos proceder con precaución o evitar su visualización. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Únete a nuestra comunidad de YouTube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFOwGZY-NTnctghtlHkj8BA/join Se mecenas de Patreon https://www.patreon.com/PandemiaDigital ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Súmate a la comunidad en Twitch - En vivo de Lunes a Jueves: https://www.twitch.tv/pandemiadigital Sigue nuestro Canal de Telegram: https://t.me/PandemiaDigital Suscríbete en nuestra web: https://PandemiaDigital.net Sigue nuestras redes: Twitter: https://twitter.com/PandemiaDigitaI Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PandemiaDigitalObservatorio Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/pandemia_digital_twitch TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@pandemiadigital #PandemiaDigital

Daniel Muñoz analiza el nuevo informe de la UCO que aporta nuevos datos sobre la trama de Ábalos y Cerdán con actuaciones internacionales.

Desgranamos todo lo que contiene el informe de la UCO que ha colocado a Santos Cerdán en una posición todavía más comprometida. Según la Guardia Civil, Cerdán empezó a construir la trama antes incluso de ser secretario de organización del PSOE y siguió después, cobrando comisiones del 2% a Acciona a cambio del amaño de contratos de obra pública para que se los llevara la constructora.

El informe de la UCO apuntala las sospechas en torno al ex secretario de Organización del PSOE por el cobro de comisiones ilegales. Acaba el plazo para que Juanfran Pérez Llorca se convierta en sucesor de Mazón con el apoyo necesario de Vox. Y Trump justifica como "cosas que pasan" el asesinato de Jamal Khashoggi, sentado junto al príncipe saudí que lo encargó.

L'assassinat d'Encarnita Polo i final del judici per la trama de narcotràfic al Port

Luis Herrero analiza el nuevo registro de la Unidad Central Operativa de la Guardia Civil.

El fiscal general del Estado defiende su inocencia y niega haber filtrado el correo de la pareja de Ayuso por lo que le juzga el Supremo. El Congreso vota hoy la últimas leyes propuestas por el Gobierno que contarán con el apoyo de Junts, cuya portavoz tilda de "cínico" a Sánchez. Y Trump acusa a los demócratas de utilizar los correos de Epstein para tapar sus "fracasos".

Sobre la última semana previo a la elección presidencial y parlamentaria de este domingo, en cuatro momentos clave; y el perfil, trayectoria y redes de la exministra de la Corte Suprema Ángela Vivanco, y su vínculo con el caso "Muñeca bielorrusa", Iván Valenzuela conversó con las editoras Angélica Bulnes y Andrea Vial en un nuevo Rat Pack de Mesa Central.

Sobre la trama oculta tras el crimen que ha conmocionado al país; y el rol de Chile en la cumbre climática internacional que tiene lugar Brasil y con la presencia del Presidente Boric, Iván Valenzuela conversó con las editoras Paula Comandari y Paula Escobar en un nuevo Rat Pack de Mesa Central.

Viernes 07 de noviembre: Hoy es la formalización de los tres detenidos en el caso de la Muñeca Bielorrusa. Se supone que la fiscalía entregará los antecedentes del caso, aunque los que ya se han conocido en la orden de detención y en la querella de capítulos contra Ángela Vivanco, son llamativos.

Daniel Muñoz comenta el nuevo informe de la UCO que implica al ministro en su etapa como presidente de Canarias en la trama de las mascarillas.

La periodista hace un repaso de la nueva investigacion que se ha publicado parcialmente en la que se incluyen conversaciones de WhatsApp entre el ministro y Koldo para acelerar los pagos de mascarillas de la empresa de Aldama.

La periodista hace un repaso de la nueva investigacion que se ha publicado parcialmente en la que se incluyen conversaciones de WhatsApp entre el ministro y Koldo para acelerar los pagos de mascarillas de la empresa de Aldama.

Luis Herrero analiza junto a Cristina de la Hoz, Marisol Hernández y Raúl Vilas el último informe de la UCO.

Marta Garcia Aller destacada las novedades en el caso de la 'fontanera del PSOE' a la que la Fiscalia atribuye un "plan delictivo" para desacreditar a la propia Fiscalia Anticorrupcion y a la UCO.

La periodista Isabel Vega desgrana en 'El Banquillo' de Hora 25 cómo se han robado millones de euros a través del negocio del fuel

Maria Daban, Antonio Casado, Javier Caraballo, Marta Garcia Aller y Ruben Amon comentan la actualidad politica.

El expresidente francés Nicolas Sarkozy se encuentra al borde de la cárcel luego de ser condenado a cinco años de cárcel por la presunta financiación de su campaña electoral de 2007 con dinero del régimen del dictador libio Muamar al Gadafi. Sarkozy ya tenía dos condenas previas, pero había logrado evitar la prisión. ¿Tiene alguna posibilidad de esquivarla otra vez? Es el tema de El Debate.

Ander Iturralde da la bienvenida a Óscar Portugal y Lorenzo Manchado para analizar los dos primeros días de la primera jornada de la Champions League 2025-2026...Empezando por la victoria del Arsenal en San Mamés sobre un siempre esquirridizo Athletic Club de Bilbao; pero no fue la única esa, victoria, de un equipo del Norte de Londres sobre un equipo español y es que el Tottenham logró replicar extracción de tres puntos contra el Villarreal; cosa que también logró llevar a cabo el Liverpool en su recibimiento del Atlético de Madrid y cómo cinco años más tarde sí que hubo locura desatada local y no sólo vírica, como en aquel entonces; lo cual, entonces, nos dejó al Chelsea como el principal y único perdedor inglés hasta el momento al sucumbir ante el Bayern de Munich en el Allianz Arena; el Real Madrid se hizo con su obligada victoria ante el infinitamente atrevido Olympique de Marsella; en lo demás, la Juventus y el Borussia Dortmund se emparon en goles; el Inter ganó al Ajax; el PSV perdió contra el Union St. Gilloise; el PSG despedazó a la Atalanta; el Olympiakos y el Pafos empataron; como también el Slavia Praga y el Bodo/Glimt; pero no así un Benfica que sufrió una apocalíptica remontada a manos del Qarabag para caer ellos en manos de José Mourinho; y mucho más.Escucha la versión completa de este episodio PREMIUM de 1:23:18 de duración, apoya a que Alineación Indebida pueda prosperar, accede a todo nuestro contenido premium y a nuestro server de Discord suscribiéndote por tan sólo 5.50$/5.50€ en: https://www.patreon.com/posts/139156708Además... Ahora, al suscribirte en nuestra página de Patreon, puedes escuchar todo nuestro contenido de Alineación Indebida Premium a través del siguiente link de Spotify. Sólo tienes que vincular la cuenta que abras en Patreon y, a partir de ahí, tendrás desbloqueado todo el contenido premium que producimos: https://open.spotify.com/show/6WeulpfbWFjVtLlpovTmPv¡Volvemos el Lunes! (o quizás antes)Sigue a Ander: https://x.com/andershoffmanSigue a Óscar: https://x.com/OscarP107Sigue a Loren: https://x.com/LAManchadoSigue al programa en Twitter: https://twitter.com/PodcastIndebidoSigue al programa en Instagram: instagram.com/podcastindebidoContacto: anderpodcast@gmail.com // alineacionindebidapodcast@gmail.com Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Escuche esta y más noticias de LA PATRIA Radio de lunes a viernes por los 1540 AM de Radio Cóndor en Manizales y en www.lapatria.com, encuentre videos de las transmisiones en nuestro Facebook Live: www.facebook.com/lapatria.manizales/videos

En este episodio del podcast literario ‘La Trama’ David Uclés, el autor de La península de las casas vacías, uno de los mejores libros de 2024, conversa con Irene Lozano sobre por qué los escritores, casi 90 años después, siguen volviendo a la Guerra Civil. Una reflexión también sobre qué nos queda por saber, por aprender, por imaginar de aquella guerra. *** Suscríbete gratis a 'La Trama' en tu plataforma de audio favorita: Spotify Apple Podcast Ivoox Podimo RSS *** Envíanos una nota de voz por Whatsapp contándonos alguna historia que conozcas o algún sonido que tengas cerca y que te llame la atención. Lo importante es que sea algo que tenga que ver contigo. Guárdanos en la agenda como “Un tema Al día”. El número es el 699 518 743See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Esmeralda Ruiz entrevista a Cristina Ibarrola, portavoz del UPN en Pamplona.

La Fiscalía de Brasil señala al expresidente brasileño, el ultraderechista Jair Bolsonaro, como "líder de la organización criminal" detrás del intento de golpe de Estado perpetrado en enero de 2023 tras la victoria del izquierdista Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva en las elecciones presidenciales y pide que sea condenado por cinco delitos junto a otros siete acusados en la trama.

Un juez de Tarragona ha imputado al exministro de Hacienda con el Partido Popular Cristóbal Montoro y a su equipo por usar a Hacienda para traficar con leyes y reglamentos a cambio de beneficios económicos. La Fiscalía ha pedido este miércoles tres años y nueve meses de cárcel para el empresario Alberto González Amador, pareja de la presidenta de la Comunidad de Madrid, Isabel Díaz Ayuso, por dos delitos de fraude fiscal. Feijóo ha defendido el endurecimiento de la política migratoria de los populares a la vez que asume los marcos de la ultraderecha. 

Dieter Brandau comenta lo que reflejan las informaciones sobre cómo se va estrechando el cerco judicial en torno al núcleo duro de Pedro Sánchez.

- Emma Frost: The White Queen #1 - Amy Chu, Andrea Di Vito- Aliens vs. Avengers #4 - Jonathan Hickman, Esad Ribić- The Amazing Spider-Man #6 - Joe Kelly, John Romita Jr.- Epitaphs from the Abyss #12 - Michael Conrad, Alison Sampson- Los Monstruos #2 - James Robinson, Jesús Merino- Superman Unlimited #2 - Dan Slott, Rafael Albuquerque - Krypto: The Last Dog of Krypton #1 - Ryan North, Mike Norton

Corruptores al descubierto: la izquierda exige actuar contra quienes pagan. La presión sobre el gobierno tras estallar el escándalo por los audios

Rosana Laviada analiza las nuevas revelaciones del caso Koldo que incluyen comunicaciones que implicarían a Santos Cerdán.

Marta García Aller reflexiona sobre la comparecencia de Leire Díez y de la aparición de Aldama. 

Luis Herrero analiza con Juanma González, Dani Palacios y Jesús Fernández Úbeda los estrenos de la semana.