Podcasts about Hanne

Every animal is telling you something. The real question is whether you're paying attention. I sit down with animal behavior expert Hanne Grice to explore what our pets reveal about trust, stress, communication, and even ourselves. Drawing on nearly 20 years of experience, Hanne explains why behavior is never random, why outdated dominance theories continue to harm animals, and how curiosity leads to better relationships with both pets and people. We also discuss guide dogs, emotional regulation, grief, parenting with dogs, and the science behind building trust through predictability and choice. I believe you'll find this conversation valuable whether you share your life with animals or simply want to become a better leader, communicator, and observer of those around you Highlights: 05:47 – The biggest breakthrough in animal behavior starts with changing the human. 09:35 – A common belief about dog dominance is challenged by modern science. 20:34 – Jane Goodall's work transformed how we understand animal emotions and personalities. 31:02 – Hidden medical issues often explain behaviors owners mistake for disobedience. 45:14 – Giving animals more choice can reduce stress and strengthen trust. 58:21 – Remarkable stories show how animals have influenced history in unexpected ways. About the Guest: Hanne Grice is a UK Clinical Animal Behaviourist, Certified Trainer, and award-winning educator who specialises in the science of human–animal relationships. She founded Hanne Grice Pet Training and Behaviour in 2006 and has supported thousands of families across dogs, cats, and small companion animals. Her work centres on evidence informed welfare, behaviour change, and practical strategies that help people and their animals nurture stable, healthy relationships. Alongside clinical practice, Hanne lectures at the postgraduate level in applied animal behaviour, human–animal interactions, and the psychology that shapes how people understand and interact with their pets. She previously served on the Board of the UK's Animal Behaviour and Training Council. When her tenure concluded in July 2025, she was appointed an Honorary Individual Member in recognition of her outstanding contribution to the charity's mission to raise and protect professional standards. Hanne is known for making science accessible. Her “How Does…” series explores everyday behaviour across species, and her “Animals in History” films examine the remarkable roles animals have played across cultures and time. She is the author of Playing with Your Dog (2010), a practical guide to enriching the lives of companion animals through evidence-informed play. Her research includes studies on dog–owner relationships during pregnancy and early parenthood, as well as ongoing work on behaviour change techniques for animal professionals. She continues to develop tools that bring together behavioural science, practical welfare, and effective communication, helping owners and practitioners create environments where animals feel safe, understood, and able to thrive. Ways to connect with Hanne**:** Hanne Grice YouTube: Hanne Grice Pet Training & Behaviour - YouTube Facebook: Hanne Grice Pet Training and Behaviour Instagram: Hanne Grice on Instagram LinkedIn: Hanne Grice | LinkedIn TikTok: Hanne Grice (@hannegrice) | TikTok https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOf6YEUpLhiktobqDFUSrjuXKBQUW_xyz&si=T9593esdANzVVYoM https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOf6YEUpLhik4U80OJWUMHd5JwbDNZbwd&si=atOLyb_foY_7AVjs   https://learn.hannegrice.com/ https://shophannegrice.com/ https://amzn.to/4pxuzfv  About the Host: Michael Hingson is a New York Times best-selling author, international lecturer, and Chief Vision Officer for accessiBe. Michael, blind since birth, survived the 9/11 attacks with the help of his guide dog Roselle. This story is the subject of his best-selling book, Thunder Dog. Michael gives over 100 presentations around the world each year speaking to influential groups such as Exxon Mobile, AT&T, Federal Express, Scripps College, Rutgers University, Children's Hospital, and the American Red Cross just to name a few. He is Ambassador for the National Braille Literacy Campaign for the National Federation of the Blind and also serves as Ambassador for the American Humane Association's 2012 Hero Dog Awards. https://michaelhingson.com https://www.facebook.com/michael.hingson.author.speaker/ https://twitter.com/mhingson https://www.youtube.com/user/mhingson https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelhingson/ Thanks for listening! Thanks so much for listening to our podcast! If you enjoyed this episode and think that others could benefit from listening, please share it using the social media buttons on this page. Do you have some feedback or questions about this episode? Leave a comment in the section below! Subscribe to the podcast If you would like to get automatic updates of new podcast episodes, you can subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts or Stitcher. You can subscribe in your favorite podcast app. You can also support our podcast through our tip jar https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/unstoppable-mindset . Leave us an Apple Podcasts review Ratings and reviews from our listeners are extremely valuable to us and greatly appreciated. They help our podcast rank higher on Apple Podcasts, which exposes our show to more awesome listeners like you. If you have a minute, please leave an honest review on Apple Podcasts. Transcription Notes: Michael Hingson  00:03 One of the biggest things holding you back isn't what's in front of you, but rather what you believe. Welcome to Unstoppable Mindset, where inclusion, diversity, and the unexpected meet. I'm your host, Michael Hingson, speaker, author, and advocate for inclusion and possibilities. This podcast explores how the beliefs we carry shape the way we live, lead, and connect with others. Each week, I talk with people who challenge assumptions, face adversity head on, and show what's possible when we choose curiosity over fear. Together we focus on mindset, resilience, and the small shifts that lead to meaningful change. Let's get started. Hi everyone, I am Mike Hingson, or you can call me Michael Hingson, just to make sure you get the Hingson part right. I am the host of Unstoppable Mindset, and today we get to chat with Hanne Grice from over in the well, across the pond, shall we say. So it's later in the evening there, and she was just telling me that her children celebrate Christmas tomorrow because they also have another Christmas to celebrate on Thursday, so I might be jealous. It is being recorded by the way two days before Christmas in 2025 and we're looking forward to it. Hannah is an animal behavior, she's an expert in all of that. She's done a program called How Does, which I'm interested to learn more about. She is also founded other organizations dealing with training, I think, probably more humans than pets, but all about pet training and developing relationships. Just before we came on, we were talking about a couple of our kiddies, and I should tell you, Hanne, I had a guide dog, my second guide dog, Holland, who was a golden retriever, lived 15 years, so he lived a long time, and was actually three weeks from retirement when he collapsed, and I think had a stroke and a heart attack, and the vet said we could bring him back, but he wouldn't have a good quality of life, so, but we were only without a guide dog for three weeks, but anyway, with all that aside, Welcome to Unstoppable Mindset. We're glad you're here. Hanne Grice  02:34 Thank you so much for having me. It's an honor, and I'm sorry to hear about Holland. So, thank you for sharing that. Michael Hingson  02:42 Well, here's a wonderful puppy dog, and now we have Alamo, who will be 10 years old on the 14th of May, and he will have been a guide dog for me for eight years on the 24th of February, and that's especially interesting because the 24th of February is my birthday, so I regard Alamo as a wonderful birthday present, which is kind of cool. Speaker 1  03:17 That is cool. And how long, Michael, would you typically have a guide dog for when do they typically retire. Michael Hingson  03:24 Typically it's an average thing. It really is all a question of how the guide dog is doing, and so on, because it's a very stressful job, but it's also up to me to keep the stress as low as possible. But typically it's, it's six to eight years, and I expect Alamo to work and be around for quite a while, yet he's just doing really well and isn't showing much age, and I'm happy with that. And then Stitch is going to be 16 in January, so we guess we rescued her back in 2015 and and so she's she's been around, and the two get along pretty well together. They don't chase each other or anything like that, but, but they do communicate, and they talk, and they touch noses, and all that. And every so often, Stitch steals Alamos bed, and poor Alamo doesn't know what to do about it, because Stitch has claws, and he knows it. So he just goes and finds another place to collapse until she leaves. Speaker 1  04:20 Yeah, cats and dogs, they find a way, but two of the species that I work very closely with, so yeah, and a testament to the quality and type of relationship that you have with them, that they're aging so well. So that's great to hear. Michael Hingson  04:36 One of the things that I insist on when I'm having to get a new guide dog, which I don't anticipate doing for a long time yet, but one of the things that I insist is that any guide dog I get has to have been raised around cats and get along with cats. I've seen a couple of guide dogs that are cat haters, and I would never want that kind of thing, especially when it's such an. Easy distraction when that happens. Speaker 1  05:02 Yeah, yeah, I can't imagine what it'd be like if suddenly you're finding yourself careering down the street, right? My dog was chasing the neighbor's cat, not good, not good for any of the animals or human involved. So, yeah, Michael Hingson  05:15 my fourth guide dog, Lynn, loved to chase rabbits, now not out of any kind of meanness or anything like that. She just wanted friends, and she loved to visit my first guide dog, Squire, when we were in Boy Scouts, and went to a camp one on a camping trip one weekend. Actually, caught a road runner, and we discovered that the road runner had a broken leg, but we fixed it, and the road runner took off, but again he just wanted to talk. He never hated any animal, and you know, none of my guide dogs have ever done anything, except they've never known a stranger. Everyone is a friend to them, people in and animals, which is great, Speaker 1  05:58 and that's what I love about my job, Michael, because I am, and you said at the start I'm working with animals, but predominantly it's the humans that engage my services, it's the humans that are looking for help and support with their animals, and so when any of my students or young and aspiring clinical behaviorists or trainers say to me, "Oh, I want to do this job because I love animals. I don't like people. I always say, well, you're going to be in the wrong job. You have to like humans as well, because they're the ones that really you're working with to help change their animals' behavior, and they pay the bills. Michael Hingson  06:36 Well, since you do work a lot with training animals and so on. Have you had any success at training politicians? I mean, there's an animal for you. Speaker 1  06:44 I have had all sorts of clients on my books, from the rich and famous to sportsmen and politicians, so I can't disclose names. However, what I will say is I have successfully used my effective consulting skills on humans to reframe, because actually, if we think about when they engage my services, usually it's because there's a fractured pet owner relationship. For example, you might have a dog that's lunging at other dogs, or you know, the cat that's attacking another cat in the household, and by the time they come to me, they're really frustrated. They're labeling their animals as naughty, and actually, my role is to take an investigative approach, look at all the evidence, and help the clients understand, you know, why the animals are doing what they're doing, what's the function, and usually we start to see that human mindset shift when they have that understanding, and that's incredibly powerful, because you know once we get that human understanding, the behavior change in animals then follows, so it really does begin with the insight in the humans. Michael Hingson  08:04 Really good point. I've seen a lot of people interacting with guide dogs, and some of them get very nervous, especially when they get lost or something isn't going exactly the way they want. When the reality is that nervousness translates to the dog, and the fact is that the dog gets stressed out because their person is stressed out, and I think there's a lot of truth to what the dog whisperer, Caesar Milano, says, is that it's that the dogs are looking for a pack leader, they want the humans to do it, but when some of these people get so nervous, they stress out the dogs, and that has a significant effect on the lifespan. A guiding is is very stressful, and the dogs take it very seriously and want to do a good job, and they want to know that they're doing a good job, and if you get stressed, Michael Hingson  08:59 it's a problem. Speaker 1  09:00 Absolutely, what I would say is it's more scientific in the sense that when we look at the evidence out there in terms of how our animals influence us and vice versa, it tends to be much more subtle. Michael Hingson  09:18 Yeah, Speaker 1  09:19 for example, animals do act as a stress buffering mechanism, for example, if we're feeling worried about something or unsettled, if we see our dog lying, you know, calmly by our feet, we're going to pick up on those cues, and that will help us settle, and there's a good amount of evidence, as you'll be aware, Michael, of, you know, how animals can lower our heart rates, our breathing rates, they can reduce our stress hormone levels, but what's interesting is that doesn't happen in isolation, and over time humans and their animals do fall into these shared rhythms, like you're talking about. So essentially, we are synchronizing things like our routine, our movement. Our emotional states, and so that synchrony does work both ways, and when to your point, as our stress levels rise or our routines become unstable, absolutely our animals will often reflect that, and it's not about leadership at all, it's actually about emotional, our emotional regulation, or inability to regulate that, exactly Michael Hingson  10:23 right, Speaker 1  10:24 or have stable routines, and you know, certainly we saw the impact animals had for us during the pandemic, you know, lots of people lost that social contact, they lost their structure, and so their animals became anchors for routine and emotional stability, so this also helps explain why researchers, as well as our lived experiences, show that attachment to our pets can rival or even exceed some of those that we form with people, and that also explains why when we look at grief, when we lose a pet, and you talked about your gorgeous Holland, and you know your previous guide dogs, you know that that loss of a pet can be as intense as you know when we lose a close friend and a partner. So, back to what you were saying, yes, there's lots of evidence to show heart variability synchronizes, you know, cortisol blood cortisol levels will synchronize, you know, but it's, it's more than sort of some of the popular culture would have us believe in terms of alpha and leader, and I think if there's one thing I could burst a bubble on, it would be around that notion about that the dog is trying to dominate us or take control, and the reason being is because it all comes down to some outdated and flawed research from the 1940s that was then attempted to replicate in the 70s, and as I said, the research design was deeply flawed. It was mixing captive balls from different groups together, so, of course, there's going to be fighting, and so I guess for anyone listening, I would like them to just be really aware that dominance isn't a personality trait, it simply describes a relationship between individuals in a specific context, so when your dog is sat next to you at home, they're not plotting to take over the household, they're not like, you know, Dr. Evil in Austin Powers, they're not trying to take over the world, they're when we see the behaviors like the chasing after the road runner, or the lead pulling after the neighbor's cat, or the growling when they're being touched for grooming, or when they're guarding objects, those behaviors are usually linked to fear or frustration, learning history, even pain, and so when we look through things with a dominance lens, that alpha lens, it attempts to explain animal behavior without actually helping the animal. Do you know what I mean? So, yeah, so when we fish shift, I should say our focus to understanding what's actually driving that behavior, how is that environment, or how's the handling from that individual contributing or compounding the issues that people are coming to me to get help with? You know, what does the animal need to learn instead? Then we get actually better welfare outcomes and much more reliable behavior change done in a science-led, ethical, humane way. Michael Hingson  13:45 Well, I was talking about Squire chasing the Roadrunner. It is my, and it's always been my opinion that Squire was the first one to see that that that bird was injured, and I am absolutely certain that he would never have been able to catch the road runner if that road runner had been able to go at full speed, but the, but the bird had a broken leg, and we fixed it, you know, we taped it, we split it, and then the bird ran away, and Squire didn't, didn't follow it, but I think that there was a sense, and I'm still convinced to this day that that was the case, and I don't want my dogs to be afraid. My previous guide dog to Alamo, actually not even Africa, but going back to Roselle, who was with me in the World Trade Center, Roselle was afraid of thunder. Now she didn't start out being afraid of thunder, but we really didn't know how to deal with it, probably correctly, and she developed this phobia, so that she could even sense when a storm was coming before it got to us, and we worked to calm her down as much as we could, but she was our early warning system for. Storms, and you know, but that was also one of the reasons that I knew on september 11 that we were going, you know, that we didn't have to just rush out of the office like crazy people, because she wasn't reacting after the building was struck, she wasn't reacting with any kind of fear evidence at Speaker 2  15:24 all. Michael Hingson  15:24 Mostly she was yawning and going, "Who woke me up? You know, and, and the bottom line is that she didn't sense anything, and I wasn't smelling any smoke, and I knew that whatever was going on wasn't such an imminent emergency that we couldn't try to evacuate in an orderly way, and, and that's what happened, but I, you know, I have a question for you. How did all this start for you? So, tell us a little bit about the early Hanne growing up, and how did you get into the whole idea of dealing with animals and starting this whole process? Speaker 1  15:56 Well, partly stories like yours, fascinating, absolutely fascinating. Um, so as a child I, there's a big age gap between my brother and my sister and I. So I was the youngest, and I was always fascinated with human animal interactions anyway, but because I think my siblings, where they were so much older, my animals were really my constant companions, and so that's where the deep love of a range of species started, and I was very lucky in that I think because there was such an age gap and my brother and sister weren't around, my parents were sort of, yeah, you can have another rabbit, you can have a stick insect, and it was kind of just keep it quiet, and then I'd be busy with my animals, and then as I sort of grew up, became more aware, as you do, into your sort of preteens and then teens, was really interested in watching how people behaved around their pets, which comes back to some of the stuff you were saying earlier, doesn't it, and I became really curious as to why someone could describe themselves as an animal lover, yet use methods or make choices that clearly compromised the animal's welfare, so that really fascinated me, and I can't pinpoint it to a single defining moment, but certainly I wasn't fortunate to, unlike my students nowadays, because I also lecture, they can do what I do as a degree. When I was growing up, it was vet or very nursing, so it took a while before I could viably get onto the degrees and masters to specialize, but I think for me what continues to motivate, and I'll be 20 years in practice in 2026 is the, the impact, positive impact my role can have on the human animal relationship, in the sense that you know they can, they can come to me, and they're at the brink of despair, the clients, because they've maybe looked at the internet, they've asked well-meaning friends, they may have gone to other professionals, and nothing seems to be working. And actually, you know, it takes further exploration. I can detect stuff that might not be picked up before, because I'm taking like a detective approach, looking at medical history, looking at the owner reporting, asking questions, observing the animal, and all of that information can then lead me to determine, okay, what's going on, and how we approach it, and so when done robustly and systematically that shift in the relationship starts to improve, because they better understand one another, and when an animal starts to go, "Hey, you're listening to me, you're getting what I mean when I kind of do x, y, or z in terms of behavior. That's when the shift happens, and for me, the magic and what really motivates me doing this job day in day out is improving the human animal relationship. Michael Hingson  19:06 Was there any defining moment that caused you to say, yeah, this is exactly what I want to do with the rest of my life, or was it just sort of a gradual thing? Speaker 1  19:17 Oh golly, I mean that for me it's it's a bit like, you know, if you ask something, somebody like an artist to do a painting, at the end of it, there's the finished picture, and for me, I liken it, it's like lots of little building blocks to get to that end picture. For me, the magic really is, is seeing a fractured relationship repair and be better than it was, and so there's been many, many moments over 20 years in my career where that's happened, and those glimmers, as I call them, of what I celebrate, and it's very easy for us all, isn't it, to have those negative ninny moments, those imposter sounds. Syndrome moments, and I hold on to all the reviews, or the little texts that I get when my clients go, "Hey, I walked past another dog, and my dog kept his call, you know, yay, you know, they're the things that drive me and motivate me to keep going, because some of the cases I work with are really heavy, you know, take quite a lot of emotional toll, and I guess that's the stuff that you know the every person doesn't see with clinical behaviorists, is that we do lay in bed at night worrying about other people and their animals. Michael Hingson  20:30 Yeah, I know what you're saying. Coincidentally, just this morning I was reading an article about people we lost in 2025 and of course, one of the people mentioned one of the trailblazers, as the New York Times put it, was Jane Goodall. Have did you ever meet her? Have you had any interactions with her? Because one of the things that they talked about was that she took a completely different approach to interacting with chimpanzees and truly developed a personal relationship. She named them, and she became accepted by them. That really was.. I don't want to say amazing, because I don't think that kind of thing is amazing, but that really just told me how much she obviously understood. Did you ever meet her, or get to deal with her at all? Speaker 1  21:20 I really wish that would have been amazing. Jane Goodall is one of the most inspiring people, you know, in my opinion, and I'm really glad you mentioned her, Michael, because she, her work really paved the way for us to understand back in the 70s, really, that animals have personalities. Michael Hingson  21:45 Yeah, Speaker 1  21:46 because it was, it was months and years of taking things really slowly, being really unintrusive, observing. It took many years for her to be accepted around the truth, because they can be really dangerous animals, and so, and that was a really good example, you know. I was saying earlier about taking things slowly and systematically, and she recognized that chimpanzees were individuals, they had different emotions, just like us, they had different personality types that didn't really change as they grew, and it was through her work, particularly with one called David Graybeard, that led to her sort of gaining more public awareness, and she had her critics, you know, at the time they thought she, oh Michael Hingson  22:35 sure, Speaker 1  22:36 she was a bit like Diane Posse, they thought she was some sort of crazy lady who was terribly anthropomorphic, and that wasn't the case at all. No, so you know it's it's real leaders in, in the field, like Jane Goodall and the Diane Fosses, that that has paved the way for the likes of me to then go, yes, our animals have emotions. It wasn't, you know, Darwin led the way in the 1800s with the first idea of this, but you know it's not that long ago that really we thought animals were just unthinking, you know, blobs that you know were incapable of feeling pain, and sadly even today in social media we see some awful advice given out to cat or dog owners about how you deal with problems in order to have a quick fix, you know, and that's not the case at all. So, yeah, I'm really happy you brought her up, because, yeah, amazing lady. Michael Hingson  23:35 Well, I don't remember exactly when it occurred, it was sometime when I was 10 or 11, sometime in the very early 60s. She came and lectured in the area where I grew up, in the Antelope Valley, and my parents and I did go to see her. I don't remember anything about the lecture, but it was.. I know it was.. it was interesting, and I wish I could remember more of it, but that was the only time that we were ever close to her, but it was, it was fascinating, and of course, knowing about her life and the things that she did, I absolutely understand and agree with you. When I worked, which I did for Guide Dogs for the Blind for six and a half years, we lived in Northern California, about seven miles from Guide Dogs for the Blind, and literally just down the street from the Marin Humane Society, which is one of the more famous and well-known organizations of its type in the United States, and talking to some of their people, they, they said, How so often it's not really training the animals that is what we're dealing with here, it's training the humans, and it is because it's the humans that really need to get a clue and understand that these animals have as much of a personality and as much knowledge to share. As we do, and are born with more instincts, and we could learn to listen to our own instincts, if we would observe these dogs a whole lot more, and these animals a whole lot more than we do. Now, I don't know about cats, but you know that's another story. Speaker 1  25:13 Yeah, yeah, we often like to label. Yeah, that's fascinating. That's super cool that you got to see her in the 60s, even if you can't remember what she said, that's really impressive. I remember Michael Hingson  25:28 doing it, but that was about that's about it, actually. Speaker 2  25:32 Yeah, wow, that's Michael Hingson  25:33 kind of fun. Yeah, if Speaker 3  25:38 you enjoy Unstoppable Mindset and would like to help us continue bringing these conversations to you each week. We've created a way for you to support the show. Your contribution helps us cover production costs and continue sharing stories, insights, and ideas that inspire people to live with purpose and possibility. If supporting the podcast feels right for you. You'll find the link in the show notes. Thank you for being part of the Unstoppable Mindset community, Michael Hingson  26:11 but you know the fact is that animals really can contribute a whole lot more to our lives than we think, and we just need to be the ones to take the initiative and develop the relationships. I talk to people all the time about dogs, and I say that dogs, and I firmly believe, do love unconditionally, unless there's some horrible thing that happened to them that that affects their, their views, but dogs love unconditionally, but they don't trust unconditionally. The difference, though, between dogs and people is that dogs are more open to trust, and they want to develop that trusting relationship. And if we would learn to do that as well, it would be such a wonderful thing. Now it can be that you will like with human to human trust, you might find that somebody doesn't earn your trust. That's okay. Then you move on, but we need to learn to be more open to trust than we than we tend to be. Speaker 1  27:14 Yeah, absolutely. Really well said. And you know, in terms of how do we develop secure, healthy bonds between us and our animals. It's built on several things, and that includes predictability, responsiveness, and emotional safety. That's your trust bed, isn't it? And so one of the clearest findings that we have from attachment research is that animals cope better when they can predict how their humans going to respond. Michael Hingson  27:46 Yes, Speaker 1  27:47 and when their attempts at communication are noticed and make sense to the animals. So, for example, in everyday life, you know, this might look like your dog pausing or turning their head when we're reaching out to stroke them, or it might be the cat choosing to leave a stroke as you're attempting to reach out to their cheek, and how we recognize this as the human would be to go, "Oh, okay, I'm going to ease off, because clearly you know you're turning your head, you're lip licking, that's telling me you'd rather I stop trying to reach out to pet your head or the cat walking way, I'm going to allow you to do that pussy cat rather than follow you and try and pick you up and give you a cuddle. So when handlers respond in those ways to their animals responses, the animals learn very quickly, hey, my communication works, and then that understanding strengthens the animal owner relationship, and another thing that plays into that, which is what I'm always talking to clients about, is processing time plays an important role in building healthy, secure relations, because often animals need much longer to take in information or decide how to respond, particularly if they're feeling emotionally aroused, unsafe, or trying to learn something new. And when we rush them, and a real good example of this is some my clients will ask the dog to sit, and if the dog doesn't do it within a split second, they're going sit, sit, they're repeating the cue over and over again, and that unintentionally puts pressure rather than giving clarity to the dog, and it can then often lead to confusion and even frustration, and that's going to show up behaviorally, so for example, we may end up with the dog, then jumping up at the owner or grabbing the lead and ragging it. So, I always say, look, if we slow down, if we allow space for the animal to process what we're asking them to do, if we respond calmly and consistently to their subtle cues that they communicate through body language. And so on, animals begin to expect safety rather than threat from us, and that expectation therefore reduces things like stress. It supports learning, it makes behavior much more resilient, because the relationship itself is secure, and these are the same principles that sit at the heart of child-parent attachment, where there's predictability, there's responsive caregiving, and that helps the child feel safe enough to explore and learn. Michael Hingson  30:32 It's also just as relevant for any kind of teaming relationship, even within companies, and the true leaders of companies who catch on to these kinds of things and learn how to communicate and process to determine whether somebody is truly understanding what they're communicating or not is an extremely important thing, because the fact of the matter is none of this is overly magical, whether it is between human and animal or human and human, but we do need to recognize the values and what it really is is meaning when, for example, we don't react to someone not doing instantly what we say, which isn't the way to do it. Speaker 1  31:17 Absolutely, yeah, really good example using principles that we see in leadership, HR, you know, and that's why when they're recruiting, they spend so much time typically looking at personality types, how that's going to match with the team, you know, so yeah, really good point there, Michael, about leadership and the importance of that people centric approach, which I think, with you know, sadly, you know, not to go too political, we're seeing real crazy times Speaker 2  31:47 at the moment, Speaker 1  31:48 and a lack of true leadership with that empathetic, human-centric approach, whatever side of the political spectrum you sit on. Michael Hingson  31:57 Yeah, and it is, it's all over. I hope something will come and break that pattern and get people to recognize what really should work and what really does work well in your case, even when you walk into a home, what is it that you observe, or how do you determine how an animal feels for the first time when you come in and see them before you really even get a chance to talk with their people. Speaker 1  32:25 Yeah, that's a good question. Animals, you were talking about Brazil and thunder, and she pick up on, you know, atmospheric changes. We know that biometric changes are picked off on by many, many non-human animals, so because they communicate using a combination of sensory information, be it sense, sound, visual signaling. I can walk into a client's house and immediately pick up on something. So, I'll give you some real examples. I recently had a case with Dusty Gorgeous Cocker Spaniel, and I was called in because she had developed severe resource guarding, so she'd get really growly and snappy, and sometimes bite the owner when she'd taken something of theirs, and they were trying to take it off them. As soon as I walked into Dusty's home, I could smell her, I could smell her ears, and that led me to suspect straight away there's some sort of likely infection going on here, and so working collaboratively with the vet, as clinical animal behaviorists do, that was confirmed, and the level of pain she'd been experiencing turned out to be a significant, significant contributory factor in her case for guarding, because guarding of the items provided some form of emotional regulation, whereas you know from an outsider's perspective she might have just been labeled naughty and disobedient, which isn't the case at all. Another example is I'm always watching how an animal moves, or how the owner interacts with them. How the animal, therefore, responds in return. And I touched on, you know, predictability a moment ago. And many stress signs that our animals will give us are really subtle and often misinterpreted. So let's take zoomies, you know, when the dog goes crazy around the lounge, and they may be jumping all over the sofas, etc. or humping the visitor, you know, the leg when the person comes in. Frequently, that's labeled as over excitement, or even dominance. When in reality, these are really often indicators of stress or discomfort, and small details also matter, so for example, the holding of breath or an increased blink rate, turning away from an outstretched hand. You know, these are really kind of brief moments that can be missed, and yet they tell us a huge amount of information. About how that animal was feeling about that interaction at that moment in time, and more recently I had a couple of cats, different cat cases, but urinating around the home, you know, up toasters on beds and sofas and things like that, and when, because I work with clients all around the world, as well as the UK, I can't always physically be there in person, so I'm reviewing the footage, and they managed to capture video of the cats moving around their environment, and then also urinating in their litter tray, and straight away I could spot the position of the whiskers, the eye shape, the ear position, the tension in the muzzle, the posture, and when they're moving around, and these were consistently scoring high on something called the cat groom miss scale, and that's a validated pain assessment Michael Hingson  35:54 tool. Speaker 1  35:54 So all of that information provided further investigation for the bet, and again, medical conditions are identified, and clearly you've got learning occurring anyway. So, there's always the behavior modification side, but these are just with dusty in the cat examples showing how there's often some other stuff like medical bits and bobs that are compounding the issues as well. Often I might be in a situation where you know the dog is belching or they're gnawing at their paws or their franks. Now that in itself can indicate perhaps gustatory issues or skin problems, but also context is critical because that's if that's happening when I'm there it could also be a stress sign, yeah, because an unfamiliar person, me, is present, so I'm looking at patterns, and does that happen when visitors aren't there, and and so on, and so on. So I come back to what I said earlier, really, it's like a detective, you're looking at all the evidence and piecing that together, and that then helps us understand what function is that undesirable behavior serving, whether that's the cat, you know, urinating against the toaster, or the rabbit scratching or biting the human. Michael Hingson  37:14 Well, so I've mentioned Roselle, one of the things that I was told when I first met Roselle, was she likes to steal socks, and, and I found that to be true. She loved to steal them and hide them, and that was it. She never chewed them up, but it, it really was a game, and we, we found socks in very strange places, and she actually, a couple times, stole my wife's slippers, but again, she stole them, and she hid them, and it was, she, she was very proud of herself. She thought it was a fun game, and you know, we never reacted negatively to it, because clearly it wasn't a bad thing. She didn't ever chew them up, so we knew it wasn't a bad thing, and we just accepted it as a game. Speaker 1  38:06 Yeah, yeah, and you know, partly if you think about, you know, her breed and species, partly that could be cashing, you know, partly it's fulfilling an entertainment function, as you said, a game, so yeah, and that will come down to her learning history before she came to you, and so on. So, yeah, really lovely example. She sounds like a complete poppet. Oh, Michael Hingson  38:28 I've always described her as a pixie by any standard, but, but yeah, she was, she was a wonderful dog, and the bottom line was it was also how we reacted to her, because if we had started to react in a negative way, that would have introduced stress, and that wouldn't have been a good thing either. Speaker 1  38:50 Yeah, absolutely. And you know, your story is is remarkable, and you talked about her and fireworks, yet she was so steady on that day, so I wonder, yeah, and I was just wondering, Michael, if, if I can ask you, you know, what do you think helped Friselle remain so steady in those conditions where many humans were being overwhelmed, understandably, on that day in 911 Michael Hingson  39:19 Well, I, I'm sure this won't totally surprise you, but I spent a lot of time before september 11 learning all I could about the World Trade Center, including what to do in the case of an emergency, and so I think that probably the most significant thing was probably Roselle was was looking at me and how I reacted and recognizing the fact that we do work and did work well as a team, so I wasn't panicking, and that helped her focus as well. Speaker 1  39:55 Yeah, and you know that's a really good example where you talked about. Up getting to know the environment, and kind of practicing, you know, going through those drills of what to do in an emergency, because I'm always saying to clients, repetition, consistency is the mother of success, you know. So, my goodness, did that pay off dividends, and you keeping your cool head, and both of you helping each other, amazing. Michael Hingson  40:21 Yeah, you've spent a lot of time studying kind of the transitions that that people go through, parenthood, children, pregnancy, and so on. How do dogs react to that? What are.. what are you.. what do you observe, or.. and what would you advise about that? Speaker 1  40:41 It's really interesting, Michael, because actually there's very little research out there in terms of what happens when a new baby arrives, you know, what happens to the family dog, and that's why I've explored it, and what stood out with my research, which looked at expectant parents and the other group with the postpartum parents, is that once baby arrives, and this won't be a surprise to anyone with children, but you know parents are spending understandably all their time focused on the baby, so what immediately happens is there's less time interacting with dogs, and so the biggest drop tends to be in the quality and type of interactions that are occurring, for example, walking durations, walking frequency, and also play, and the ones that stay in terms of the interactions that remain the same are the low effort ones, the quick ones, which is like stroking the dog or giving them a treat, and also my research found that many parents describe having huge levels of guilt once the baby arrived, because you know they are aware that now their dog, which may have been their fur baby, you know, the kind of surrogate child before the real one arrived, now was sort of come down a peg or two, and also what came out of my research is there's often because new parents are knackered, let's be honest, broken sleep is that they can easily become frustrated and sometimes the dog becomes the one that the frustration is directed at, and then layered on to that, we also have physiological stress synchrony. We were talking about synchrony between ourselves and our dogs, and an example is that research has found that when a baby cries, our blood cortisol level rises in the parents, but it also rises in the family dogs. Blood cortisol levels also rise. So, what that shows is, oh my goodness, you know, there's a significant impact on the new baby that has on the dog's day-to-day life, and it might not be obvious, because the dog may just kind of plod to the bed and rest, but there's all this other stuff going on that might not be obvious. So, the key takeaway from my research is that, you know, if you're having a baby and you have a dog, you know absolutely baby prep your dog for that change that's going to come, you know, especially if your dog has any problem behaviors, you know, be it pulling on the lead, they don't like visitors, you know, build support systems, so in less qualified humane, ethical trainers and behaviorists, dog walkers, so we've got some sort of routine, or in less family support or friends to help out, so there's some predictability, there's some quality one to one time for the dog once baby comes, and all of that, along with really good management of the home environment through dog ate safe zones, etc. for the dog and the baby, that's going to protect the pet's welfare, but it's also going to reduce the risk of behavior problems escalating. Michael Hingson  44:05 The other kind of thing that I can imagine will happen, hopefully more than not, is that the dog will bond or work to develop a bond with the new baby in the family. Speaker 1  44:18 Absolutely, and that's one of the most important things about baby prepping is that if we create some sort of understanding. Okay, I'm being exposed, let's say gently to baby sounds whilst I'm licking on this long-lasting chew, and this is quite nice, hearing this baby cry, you know. This recording, or I have, I joke, I have like a lending library with fake babies, you know, and my clients may think I'm mad to start, and very quickly they're realizing actually it's really good to train my dog to go and station on their mat while I'm carrying a baby or pretending to change the nappy on this fake baby, and the dog's learning I can, I can go to my mat and sit and settle while you know my own is doing this. Yes, and you know, so if we create that sort of learning, it's, it's not then such a shock to the dog, and I even get my clients practicing walking with a pram and the dog, because the dog's got to learn to walk nicely with the pram, you know, and inevitably, you know, the owners are accidentally running over the dog's paws to start, or just simple things, like, oh my gosh, I hadn't even thought about how do I get out the house with the baby, the dog, and the pram. So, sometimes just, just practicing, like you said, about getting to know the environment at the Twin Towers, it's really important to practice these things for real world, Michael Hingson  45:36 and the reality is, even a dog with a big long tongue isn't going to drown a baby, Speaker 1  45:42 of course. You know, and we know, and we absolutely know that those little ones that grow up with animals, particularly dogs, have really strong guts, micro, you know, flora, and so it's, it's helpful, you know, if they're sort of around the animals. So clearly we just got to be sensible in terms of managing the interactions, but absolutely I'm a huge fan of nurturing those dog baby buns, and do you know what one of the best things is when the baby throws some of that food onto the floor from the highchair when they're weeding, that's that's a sure far way for that dog to learn to love that baby, Michael Hingson  46:20 yeah, you know, there's nothing wrong with a little bribe every so often. Speaker 1  46:24 Pennies from heaven, I call it. Michael Hingson  46:27 That's right. What is the one behavior that you wish that people would just get rid of and not not have anymore? Speaker 1  46:37 Well, I talked about earlier in terms of myth busting and the busting, the myth about our dogs wanting to take over the world, and us needing to be sort of leaders, and that's not the case at all. I think, for me, it's the importance about agency and understanding what do we, what do we mean by giving our animals agency, so for example, you know, if our animal has some sort of influence over what happens to them, rather than just being passive receivers of what we're telling them what to do, if we give them choice, behavioral science and lived experience shows that absolutely that reduces uncertainty, and we know that uncertainty is a major driver of stress, so if we look at zoological settings, there's a Copenhagen Zoo, for example, give their guinea pigs choice whether to be petted or not, and how they do that is they bring out a carrier and the guinea pigs know that if they hop in the carrot carrier, it means they're going to go and see the kids, sit on the kids' laps, and they'll be petted, and so you'll have guinea pigs that rush into the carrier, and then you've got other guinea pigs who go, "Heck, not today, and those ones that choose not to go in the carrier are simply not handled, and then I've got peers of mine who work with dolphins, and they will show the dolphin picture of two of the trainers, and they'll let the dolphin decide who do they want to work with in that session. So that's an example of giving a dog adult dolphin and guinea pigs agency. Another one is in the states, so in the Smithsonian National Zoo and Toledo Zoo, they've specifically designed exhibits where orangutans can, by choice, spray the visitors with water. So, basically, the orangutans push a button, and that button causes a shower to go all over the visitors on the other side of the enclosure, so that acts as a form of enrichment, and it also provides a really neat way for the visitors to feel like they're directly connecting with the animals, so in all of those examples stress-related behaviors actually drop because the animals have choice, and so if we apply that principle to our pets at home, you know, agency would look like allowing the family dog to choose which way to walk occasionally, or allowing them the time to stop and sniff, or offering choice between resting places, or letting our cat decide when they want the interaction to end, or I don't know, offering up a choice of different toys or different food stuffs, and seeing which way does your pet go, you know, what do they find motivating, which toy or which food stuff in that moment in time do they want, so these small choices tell animals that they have some sort of control over their environment, and so why that's so important, and why I'd love everyone to be aware of that, is behaviorally this really matters, because when animals are feeling sort of overridden or trapped, Michael Hingson  49:59 yeah. Speaker 1  50:00 They're much more likely to rely on coping strategies that include avoidance or shutdown or even escalating behaviors like grounding and biting, and conversely, when they experience agency, their learning improves, their emotional regulation becomes easier, and their behavior becomes more stable, so agency isn't about letting our animals run the household. It means it means we as humans are deliberately designing interactions so that the animals feel safe and they have appropriate choices, and that balance supports welfare and leads to much more reliable behavior change over time. Michael Hingson  50:43 I think that all too often we are the greatest contributors to stress in our pets' environments, like dogs, and so on. And I know one of the things that is emphasized when we get new guide dogs is guiding itself is extremely stressful. The dogs have been brought up to respect the job, to like to do the job, and they're absolutely committed to doing it as well as they can. Now, to keep that attitude up is our job, and one of the things that I've learned over the years, you know, people will come up, "Well, I want to pet your dog, and my response is, "No, don't pet the dog. Now, if there's time, however, I will stop, and I'll take the harness off and say, "Now you can pet the dog, because the harness is the indicator that the dog is working, but dogs need to relax too, and so I know Alamo, especially, just loves it when the harness comes off, and he'd love to cheat more and visit with people, even when the harness is on, but he does understand the difference, and so I do work to try to make sure that when people want to pet the dog, if I have any time at all, I will stop and I'll take the harness off and say, "Now you can pet the dog. You need to understand why we're doing this, and that gives me the opportunity to explain it. Now, the only difference, the only time that's there's an exception to that, is if a child comes up and wants to pet the dog. I will always stop and take the harness off, because it doesn't matter. I want kids to grow up being comfortable around these dogs, and sometimes the parents will go, "Oh, that dog might bite, and all that, and I'll say, "No, the dog won't, and I'll always take the harness off for children. I may not always have the time to do it for adults, but I'll take the time for kids, because I want them to really understand that these dogs are not mean, and that they have a job to do, and so it gives me the opportunity to talk about that. Speaker 1  52:52 Yeah, that's great that you are promoting those fantastic child dog interactions, and you know what you're talking about is exactly what we've been discussing, in terms of that predictability, that consistency. You know, when the harness is off, you know that that gives the dog a clear signal. So, that's fantastic. Michael Hingson  53:13 Yeah, that's also part of it, that they know that when the harness is on, time to work, at least you're supposed to be serious anyway, no. Now, what? What's one thing that you wish dog owners would understand about cats and small animals that they tend not to pay attention to? Speaker 1  53:31 Yeah, you made me smile earlier, Michael, when you mentioned cats, because I was thinking about this. So, I guess you know, often cats and small animals are characterized as independent or aloof. Yeah, when in fact their communication styles are just maybe less obvious than the dog that's wackling the body, and you know, the tail, etc. And you know, looking really happy when the owner returns home, whereas the cat may sort of slink past, and we think, oh, okay, they're not that fast, but you know, their behavior is shaped by very different evolutionary pressures, and that's particularly around safety and conflict avoidance. So, when cats, for example, you know, act aloof or appear distant, it's much more about de-escalation, so research into feline social behavior shows that cats rely heavily on subtle signals like slow being blinking or head turns or ear position, choosing elevated resting spots to manage sort of social distance and reduce tension, and those behaviors are affiliative or calming, yet they're often missed by our ourselves or misinterpreted, and again, what seems like they're independent or aloof or distant is in reality them simply working hard to regulate proximity in ways that feel safe to them and. So you know, never feel offended if your cat moves away from you in the sofa to perch on a higher spot, because they're just managing their own comfort and control, and similarly, with rabbits or guinea pigs, they're a prey species, so their behavior is organized again differently, and they're neurologically wired to prioritize things like visibility or escape routes or control of space, so research consistently shows that when prey animals feel exposed or they're unable to run away, obviously stress responses are going to escalate quickly, and what people will therefore label as a rabbit, skittish, for example, is in fact a really logical response to feeling unsafe. Michael Hingson  55:47 Yeah, Speaker 1  55:47 so when we, when we stop looking at behavior through our human lens, which is what Jane Goodall and others have, you know, tried to help people understand, when we stop looking at it through human lens and consider what safety looks like for the animal. You know, welfare improves, owner animal relationships tend to strengthen. Michael Hingson  56:10 I don't know how Stitch figures out how to deal with a blind person, because all that link, blinking, and all that goes way over my head, of course. But even so, she's obviously figured it out, because we do have a good relationship, and she, as I've explained earlier, comes and yells at me when she wants to eat, and she'll come up and rub against me, and so on, but I think that overall she's figured out enough that, well, maybe he's a little bit different than some of the people I'm used to, so we figure it out, and we make it work, Speaker 1  56:42 absolutely. And do you know what cats are very clever in that, over the 1000s upon 1000s of years we've been around them, they've developed these unique vocalizations that really, that they don't do to other cats, but they do only to humans, which taps into our sort of caregiving responsibilities to feed them or be attentive, so yeah, brilliant example, when, when she's crying at you to have some sort of interaction or food, Michael Hingson  57:12 yeah. Tell me about your, your program. How does.. Speaker 1  57:17 oh gosh, so basically I'm drawn to sort of questions that people may have the answers to, but can't articulate, or everyday behaviors that we may take for granted. And an example of that might be, you know, why does it take so long for a dog to find the perfect spot to poo? You know, why they twirling around, and that's to do with the Earth's magnetic field. So, the how does series, I deliberately choose questions that sit at the intersection of curiosity and science. Some of the topics are more serious than others, but I do intentionally use some questions or look at some areas that are silly, for example, how does a dog fart, and why does some linger, and that might sound silly, but it's a brilliant entry point into physiology, digestion, dog behavior, and it kind of hooks people in, particularly the younger audiences, as you can imagine, and once they're engaged, then you can start to introduce real, real science without it feeling heavy, and another deciding factor, when I'm looking at subject matters, will be, you know, what's the science behind it? Is there robust research that can explain the science accurately without stripping it of nuance, and then you know, I might look at a different angle, like with my animals and history series, which is another one that I do, where it's still grounded in human animal interactions, but it's about historical moments involving animals, and what do those stories reveal about humans, and how we understood them, how we valued them or misunderstood them, and so on. So those two series, how does is the kind of science behind what animals do, and so on. And the animals in history is still approaching curiosity, but from a different angle. Michael Hingson  59:17 Is there one animal in history that really has changed how you think about animals that you maybe have talked about in your animal history series. Speaker 1  59:26 Gosh, I, at the last look, I think I've done about 67 so far of the animals in history, and there are some that really stick with me, and if I am allowed to have more than one, is that all right, Michael? Michael Hingson  59:43 Oh, sure. Speaker 1  59:44 Okay, so there's ones like Operation Acoustic Kitty, which is completely inhumane and unethical by today's standards, but back during the Cold War, they basically, the US researchers. Tried to create cat spies, and basically fitted them with microphones and listening devices within their bodies, and it was a bit barbaric, to say the least, but that experiment was scrapped. It wasn't very successful in the real world. The cats, when they were experimenting with them out on the street inevitably got run over or distracted. There's other experiments like attaching incendiary devices to bats in an attempt to help with the Second World War effort, which was unsuccessful because the bats didn't always do what the researchers hoped they would do, and then there's Project Pigeon, which is fascinating, and that's where researchers trained pigeons to guide missiles through pecking the screen, and that was scrapped because then Oppenheimer's bomb took over from that project, but you know these are some of the examples about how animals are drawn into human conflict strategy, even technical ambition. And then there's there's fascinating ones like Snowball, who was a Canadian cat, and her DNA was used to solve a crime in a murder case in 19 419 94 and basically it was the first time ever that animal forensics had been used in that way. So fundamentally it changed how we think about animals as part of our human environments, not just emotionally but evidentially, and then there's quirkier stories as well, but you know the stories that stand out include yours, Michael and Roselle. On that day, as I've said to you before, when we first met and chatted, you know that, that to me is just, I mean, it just gets me, your story, so yeah. Michael Hingson  1:02:04 So, what's next for you? Speaker 1  1:02:07 Golly, so there's always many plates spinning. Let's say I'm working on putting the Animals in History series into a book, so my plan is to produce a version of the video series into a form that would be of interest to young kids and adults who are interested in in the quirky and the curious, and then always stay curious, I guess. You know, I think curiosity matters. It's what drives my how does series. It's what interests me with the animals in history, and my articles that are right, my podcasts, etc. So, whether we're talking about humans, whether we're talking about non-human animals, it makes far more sense to pause and ask what might that individual individual be experiencing rather than rushing to explain or correct it, and I think if we're patient, if we're responsive, if we allow animals the time and humans that they need to cope in a world that's often crazy, and for animals largely designed by us, I think will be much better advocates for our animals and each other. So, I always think, stay curious. So, that's what I will stay as my mantra going forward. Michael Hingson  1:03:34 And it doesn't get better than that. And I hope that you stay curious. And I think curiosity is such a wonderful thing that that we should do a whole lot more than we do. Well, I want to thank you for being here with us. This has been fun. Can you believe we've been doing this over an hour? Oh gosh, I can all hold Speaker 1  1:03:53 on forever. So, oh, I'm not Michael Hingson  1:03:55 complaining, I'm not complaining. We'll have to do this again. Speaker 1  1:03:58 Yeah, thank you so much for having me. Well, Michael Hingson  1:04:00 this has been fun, and I want to thank all of you for watching and listening. Love to hear from you and hear what you think, but Hannah, for you, if people want to reach out to you, how do they do that? Speaker 2  1:04:09 It's just my name, Hanne grice.com is my H A Michael Hingson  1:04:14 N N E, not A, Speaker 1  1:04:16 yeah, Danish way, so H A double N E, G G R I C e.com So I'm on the website. You can just Google my name, follow me on socials. If you have any questions, you have any ideas for the how does, or want me to explore a story for the animals in history, always open to suggestions as well as feedback. Michael Hingson  1:04:36 Cool. Well, and I hope all of you will give us some feedback. I'd love to hear from you, feel free to email me at Michael H I M I C H A E L H I at Accessi B A C C E S S I B e.com Please give us a five star rating wherever you're observing our podcast, but more important than a rating, give us a great review. We love reviews, and people who are interested in listening to the podcast. Just really appreciate people who have already heard the podcast reviewing it, so please give us a review, and whatever you do, if you know anyone who ought to be a guest on Unstoppable Mindset, including you, Hannah, we'd love introductions to anyone that you think ought to be a guest on the podcast, and with that, again, I want to thank you, Hannah, for being here. This has been absolutely wonderful. Speaker 1  1:05:24 Thank you again, and take care, everyone listening. Michael Hingson  1:05:30 Thank you for being here with me on Unstoppable Mindset. I hope today's conversation left you with a fresh perspective, a new insight, or at least something worth thinking about. If you're ready to go deeper into the ideas that shape how we see ourselves and others, I have a free gift for you. Head over to Michael hingson.com and download my free ebook, Blinded by Fear. It explores the invisible beliefs that hold us back and shows you how to reframe them, so you can move forward with clarity and confidence. Be sure to subscribe to our podcast, leave a review, and share this show with someone who can use a reminder that growth starts with mindset. When people think differently, we all move forward together. Thanks again for listening. Keep learning, keep questioning, and keep choosing to live with an unstoppable mindset. Thank.

Vi har scoret i Dallas! Markus Slettholm, Ask Hansen og Hanne Østli Jakobsen diskuterer gårsdagens røde eksplosjon i gatene og teknologien som har inntatt VM til det verre.Under hele VM blir podkasten Maktutredningen til VM-utredningen, hvor Markus Slettholm og Snorre Valen med venner analyserer den norske fotballpsykosen fra innsiden. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

I mange år har psykisk helse først og fremst handlet om hjernen: tanker, følelser, traumer og kjemiske signalstoffer. Men hva om det bare er en del av historien? Hva om psykiske plager også henger tett sammen med kroppens energiomsetning, immunforsvar, tarmhelse og cellefunksjon?Dagens gjester er Øyvind Torp, spesialist i allmennmedisin, og Hanne Eriksen Torp, spesialist i psykiatri. Sammen har de skrevet boken Selvforsvar mot psykisk sykdom, hvor de utforsker det nye fagfeltet metabolsk psykiatri.Vi snakker blant annet om:Hva metabolsk psykiatri er, og hvorfor feltet utfordrer dagens forståelse av psykisk sykdomHvordan insulinresistens, inflammasjon og oksidativt stress kan påvirke hjernenHvorfor hjernen er avhengig av stabil energi for å fungere optimaltSammenhengen mellom tarmhelse, mikrobiom og psykisk helseHvordan ultraprosessert mat, sukker og næringsmangler kan påvirke humør og mental helseHvordan livsstil kan redusere risikoen for depresjon, bipolar lidelse og andre psykiske lidelserKetogent kosthold for psykisk helse, og hva forskningen viser så langtNæringsstoffer og kosttilskuddDe viktigste grepene du kan ta for å styrke egen psykisk helseDette er en episode som utforsker hva som kan ligge under overflaten når vi strever psykisk – og hvordan kroppen og hjernen henger sammen.For mer fra Øyvind og Hanne.Boken: Selvforsvar mot psykisk sykdomØnsker deg en nydelig uke!AnnetteFølg meg gjerne på:Instagram.com/dr.annettedraglandFacebook.com/drannettedraglandhttps://youtube.com/@drannetteDisclaimer: Innholdet i podcasten og på denne nettsiden er ikke ment å utgjøre eller være en erstatning for profesjonell medisinsk rådgivning, diagnose eller behandling. Søk alltid råd fra legen din eller annet kvalifisert helsepersonell hvis du har spørsmål angående en medisinsk tilstand. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hvilket forhold har vi til frelsen? Og hvis man lever 'frelst', hvem kan så frelse? Når vi lader Gud om ansvaret for frelsen, kan livet blive lidt friere og rigere – også for vores næste. I dette afsnit af Prædiken på vej taler Hanne Lundsgaard, Toreby Sogn med Anders Martin Lauritsen, Væggerløse – begge Lolland-Falsters Stift.Prædiken på vej er præster, der taler med andre præster og teologer om den kommende prædikentekst - til faglig inspiration og almindelig opbyggelse, til forberedelse for den, der skal prædike på søndag, og til glæde for alle, der vil lytte til en fri og teologisk kvalificeret samtale om de tekster, der skal prædikes over. Podcastserien blev lanceret i 2020 og er siden blevet produceret i skiftende samarbejde med folkekirkens stifter. Der er over 300 afsnit i serien, og der kommer hver uge et nyt til. Prædiken på vej bliver fra palmesøndag 2026 og det kommende år til i et samarbejde mellem Aarhus Stift og Folkekirkens Uddannelses- og Videnscenter.

L'islam des Lumières est une expression récente. Elle désigne, depuis vingt ans, une approche ouverte sur la philosophie et les sciences, compatible avec la République et dont l'esprit est profondément humaniste. Cette forme d'islam peut cependant s'appliquer à des courants de pensée et des réalités qui, contrairement aux idées reçues, existent dès le VIIe siècle : des érudits à l'intelligence libre, des savants armés d'outils scientifiques, des hommes et des femmes qui cultivent le goût de l'altérité et des mystères divins.Olivier Hanne fait revivre cette histoire en mettant en évidence les mouvements d'ouverture et de repli, de tolérance et de raidisse ment qui traversent l'islam des origines à nos jours.L'auteur, Olivier Hanne est notre invité en studio - Elle est en vidéo sur Youtube : https://youtu.be/M5D0GOK7_RY Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

I denne episoden anbefaler vi nok en gang de «hemmeligste» bøkene i bibliotekets samling, altså bøker vi mener burde lånes og leses mer. Litteraturformidler Ine snakker om sin store leseopplevelse med romanen «Jeg går og lever» av svenske Mirja Unge, formidler Hanne presenterer sakprosaperlen «Stygt og pent» av Ragnhild Brochmann, og Litteraturvitenskap-praktikant Anna Bjørn gir oss en innføring i «Mørk vår» av tyske Unica Zürn.

Reflection on 2 Corinthians 12:1–10 by Hanne.

Das Versprechen der ewigen Jugend und Schönheit lasse sie kalt, dachte «Input»-Autorin Julia Lüscher lange. Bis sich, mit knapp vierzig, ein Gedanke in ihren Kopf schlich: «So eine Botoxspritze, was kostet die eigentlich?» Selbstbestimmt älter werden mitten im Beauty-Boom – wie gelingt das? «Ich kann nicht glauben, dass ich das gerade mache», sagt Hanne mit 36, als sie sich zum ersten Mal botoxen lässt. «Sich dagegen zu wehren ist schwierig», findet auch Ärztin Marlies Baertsch, die seit zwei Jahren in ihrer Praxis Botoxbehandlungen anbietet. Die Forschung zum Mittleren Alter zeigt: Ab vierzig erleben viele Menschen eine Phase der Unsicherheit und Neuorientierung. «Der perfekte Nährboden für die profitorientierte Beauty-Industrie, die ewige Jugend verspricht», sagt die Politologin und Aktivistin Emilia Roig. Ein «Input» von Julia Lüscher über den Drahtseilakt im eigenen Gesicht. ___________________ Habt ihr Feedback, Fragen oder Wünsche? Wir freuen uns auf eure Nachrichten an input@srf.ch – und wenn ihr euren Freund:innen und Kolleg:innen von uns erzählt. ____________________ 00:00 - 01:50 Intro 02:00 - 08:00 Besprechung in der Arztpraxis 08:00- 09:40 Botox-Boom, Unseriosität und Tabu 09:40 - 11:40 Eitelkeit, Scham und Zweifel: Hanne im Botox-Dilemma 11:42 - 16:19 Strenge gesetzliche Regulierung und milliardenschweres Geschäft 16:50 - 19:10 Hanne wagt den Schritt 19:20 - 21:25 Dana und die fehlende Reaktion im Gesicht nach Botox 21:50 - 26:30 Unsicherheit und Beauty-Industrie: Politologin Emilia Roig zum Älterwerden 26:30 - 30:10 Forschung zum Älterwerden und neue Freiheiten ab vierzig 30:11 - 34:58 Selbstbestimmt älter werden - wie ist das möglich? 35:00 - 36:38 Fazit ____________________ In dieser Episode zu hören - Hanne, Dana, Ranja, Solenne - Marlies Bärtsch, Gynäkologin - Emilia Roig, Politolgin und Autorin - Christina Röcke, UZH, Healthy Longevity Center ____________________ - Autorin: Julia Lüscher - Publizistische Leitung: Anita Richner ____________________ Das ist «Input»: Dem Leben in der Schweiz auf der Spur – mit all seinen Widersprüchen und Fragen. Der Podcast «Input» liefert jede Woche eine Reportage zu den Themen, die euch bewegen. ____________________ Diese Folge wurde zum ersten Mal am 21.01.2026 ausgestrahlt.

Regjeringen går inn for 16 års aldersgrense på sosiale medier. Er det så lurt? Og burde vi også ha aldersgrense på tilgangen til chatboter? Hør Bernhard Ellefsen, Hanne Østli Jakobsen og Martin Gedde-Dahl i Ubehaget i Kulturen. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Zu Gast in der BuchWerkstatt ist die Autorin Hanne Röhlinger. Wir sprechen über das Leben und das Schreiben. Hanne gibt uns Einblicke in die Zeit des Krieges und die damit verbundenen Entbehrungen. Den Blick für die positiven Dinge hat sie nie verloren. Hanne Röhlinger ist eine Frau, die etwas zu erzählen hat. Viel Freude beim Zuhören!Mehr zu Hannes Röhlinger findest Du hier:https://www.instagram.com/hannerohlinger/https://www.facebook.com/hanne.rohlingerMehr zur BuchWerkstatt findest Du hier: https://www.instagram.com/reginalehrkind/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/reginalehrkind/https://reginalehrkind.de https://www.youtube.com/@BuchWerkstattMail: info@reginalehrkind.de

Hur väljer man ut och tränar framtidens kirurger? I det här avsnittet möter vi Hanne Pedersen, forskare vid Lunds universitet och ST-läkare i internmedicin vid sjukhuset i Ängelholm.Hennes forskning handlar om kirurgisk utbildning, rekrytering och tidiga erfarenheter under ST. Vi pratar om vad som gör någon lämplig – eller olämplig – som kirurg, varför teknisk skicklighet bara är en del av yrket, och hur kommunikation, personlighet och feedbackkultur påverkar både utbildning och patientsäkerhet.Vi diskuterar också simulatorträning, myten om att gamers blir bättre kirurger, skillnader mellan Sveriges och Irlands sätt att rekrytera kirurger – och varför en mer strukturerad och evidensbaserad utbildning kan hjälpa både läkare, arbetsgivare och patienter.Här finns Hanne Pedersens avhandling: https://portal.research.lu.se/sv/publications/surgical-education-evaluating-selection-methods-and-early-trainin/Podden Fatta forskning är finansierad med stöd från Stig och Ragna Gorthons stiftelse. Programledare är Matti Palm. Jingel av Erik Ahl. Omslagsbild Sanja Matonickin. Skriv gärna till podden på Instagram:⁠⁠ @forskningochutbildninghbg⁠

Hva er det med kjernekraftdebatten? Blir den så opphetet fordi vi er på desperat leting etter nye løsninger på klima- og energikrisen? Eller er det heller identitetspolitikk det egentlig handler om? Dette er tema i denne ukens utgave av Maktutredningen. I studio sitter Maria Berg Reinertsen og jeg Aslak Bonde, og så har vi fått med oss vår egen kjernekraftmedarbeider, Hanne Østli Jakobsen. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Kasper Kvello hadde aldri planer om å bli influenser. Målet var å bli fotballspiller, og han satset i flere år, helt til han måtte erkjenne at nivået ikke holdt, og at drømmen ikke kom til å bli virkelighet.I dag forteller han åpent om det å gi slipp på en livsdrøm, hvordan det føltes å ikke lykkes, og hvilke konsekvenser det fikk både for ham selv og for de nærmeste, inkludert kjæresten Hanne.Til slutt tok han valget om å gi opp, noe han i dag beskriver som den beste avgjørelsen han har tatt. Nå lever han av sin egen merkevare, og Helle er nysgjerrig på både inntekten hans og planene framover.Obs! Grunnet problemer med strømmen i studio er lydkvaliteten på denne episoden noe redusert. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Nora Brockstedt, Hanne Krogh og Anita Skorgan - Alle tre for lengst skrevet inn i MGP-historien med gullskrift. Og har i tiår etter tiår fortsatt å skjenke oss fantastiske og uforglemmelige kulturopplevelser både i form av både låtskriver-teft og enestående formidlingsevne. Og nå er de nok en gang aktuelle, på det kommende albumet til CLMD – «På Diskoteket». Martin Danielle også kjent som CLMD er ingen hvem som helst. Låtene hans har blitt strømmet over én milliard ganger. Han har delt scene med Madonna, Remixet Bruno Mars, DJ'et på Ultra Music Festival i Miami og headlinet noen av de største klubbene på Ibiza. Men «På Diskoteket» – som slippes 24. april – er kanskje det mest personlige og unike han har gjort.Låtene er langt ifra tilfeldig valgt basert på listeplasseringer eller et resultat av å en uinspirert nattlig samtale med chatbot om "norske gromlåter" som det hadde vært helt krem å slengt no' beats under.De ni sporene på skiva er belønningen etter er nitidig "skattejakt" i norsk musikkhistorie, plate for plate, låt for låt for å finne det norske disco-gullet.Blant funnene er Gro Anita Schønns «På Ringerike Trenger'u Ikke Penger» som for lengst er ansett som et mesterverk som helt åpenbart skal med på et prosjekt som dette til den langt mer obskure «Instamatik» fra Jahn Teigens . Begge artistene har for lengst inntatt himmelens dansegulv – men tekstene deres? De er mer treffende i dag enn noen gang når priser på alt fra sjokolade til bensin som skyter i været fra den ene dagen til den andre og skillet mellom menneske og maskin som Teigen sang om i 1982 er for lengst hvisket ut.For Martin har arbeidet med sangskattene bydd på både ærefrykt, gåsehud og et genuint ønske om at disse sangene kanskje kan få en ny vår og bli oppdaget av en ny generasjon med musikkelskere. Og de som fremførte sangene den gang da har merket seg prosjektet med stor iver. Da Dagsrevyen spurte Hanne Krogh hva hun syntes om Martins versjon av hennes gjennombruddslåt «Lykken er», svarte hun at det var «frekt gjort» – før hun la til «og jeg elsker frekt» med et glimt i øyet du kun finner hos Hanne. Anita Skorgan hyller også tolkningen av sin udødelige klassiker «Oliver», låten som dessuten har æren av å være startskuddet på hele prosjektet.Norges aller første Eurovision-bidrag, Nora Brockstedts «Voi Voi», har også fått seg en skikkelig revitalisering – og OnklP, som trolig er landets fremste rapper, sier seg nok enig i at det er vrient å finne en kulere dame å ha bidratt på låta til enn ikonet Nora Brockstedt.I denne bonusepisoden snakker Ronny med Martin om hvordan arbeidet med det som må kunne anses å være norsk kulturarv fungerte som en solid vitamininnsprøytning som sendte både kreativiteten og energien i taket. «På Diskoteket» – slippes 24. aprilDans Med Oliver – CLMD, Anita Skorgan (MGP -vinner 1979)Diskopenger På Ringerike – CLMD, Gro Anita SchønnVoi Voi – CLMD, OnklP, Nora Brockstedt (MGP-vinner 1960)Valentino – CLMD, Olav StedjeTeddyen min, Pt. 2 – CLMD, Todd Halvor, Grethe KauslandHjem Til Hans – CLMD, Atle LauveInstamatik – CLMD, Jahn TeigenLykken er.. – CLMD, Hanne Krogh (MGP-vinner 1971)Midt På Natta – CLMD, Åse KlevlandLitt dølt med førsteklasses disco house servert gjennom earpods sier du? Opplev musikken bokstavelig talt PÅ DISKOTEKET når CLMD lørdag 2. mai gjør sitt første liveshow på 1,5 år på Vulkan Arena i Oslo. Sikre deg billetter her: https://www.ticketmaster.no/event/936537523

Join 4-time Grand Slam Champion Kim Clijsters and tennis reporter Blair Henley for a deep dive into the rapid rise of Belgium's newest star, Hanne Vandewinkel. Fresh off a Billie Jean King Cup Qualifier weekend where Belgium stunned the United States, Hanne opens up about her first Top 20 victory over Iva Jovic, the emotional impact of a surprise video message from cycling legend Wout van Aert, and what it really feels like to balance the WTA tour with her life as a medical student.  The episode also covers the biggest stories on tour, including Jannik Sinner's historic dominance as the new World No. 1 following his Monte Carlo victory, and the "bestie" vibes between him and Carlos Alcaraz. The duo also discusses Mirra Andreeva's clinical performance in Linz, and a special guest question from Zizou Bergs. Welcome to Love All! If you want to hang out with us behind the scenes follow us on all of our socials: https://www.instagram.com/loveallpodcast/ https://www.tiktok.com/@loveallpodcast  https://x.com/loveallpodcast  ⏰ TIMESTAMPS:  0:00 Welcome to Love All 4:04 Hanne Vandewinkel Joins The Show 5:50 The Impact of Kirsten Flipkens  8:15 Tactical Play & Managing Match Nerves  12:12 Cycling Passion & Wout van Aert Motivation  15:02 Reaching the Top 100 & Future Tournament Goals  17:41 Learning in the Grand Slam Environment  19:10 Mental Growth & Believe on Court  22:27 The Art of the Slice: Early Development  25:03 Balancing Professional Tennis with Medical School  29:06 Eye Training & Focus Techniques  31:56 Quick Questions: Phone Apps, Hobbies, & Best Advice  36:38 Personality Traits & Positive Outlook  40:23 Henley's Headlines: Linze & Monte Carlo Results  43:18 Sinner vs. Alcaraz: Rivalry & Respect  51:10 Kim-formation: The Rise of Valentin Vacherot  54:03 Support Systems & The Power of Inner Belief  56:15 Guest Question: Zizou Bergs on Humility vs. Success  1:00:57 Learning to Say No & Avoiding Distractions  1:03:01 Mindset in a Grand Slam Final  1:06:12 Closing thoughts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

COMMENTAIRE DE L'EVANGILE DU JOUR Jean 18, 1 – 19, 42L. En ce temps-là, après le repas, Jésus sortit avec ses disciples et traversa le torrent du Cédron ; il y avait là un jardin, dans lequel il entra avec ses disciples. Judas, qui le livrait, connaissait l'endroit, lui aussi, car Jésus et ses disciples s'y étaient souvent réunis. Judas, avec un détachement de soldats ainsi que des gardes envoyés par les grands prêtres et les pharisiens, arrive à cet endroit. Ils avaient des lanternes, des torches et des armes. Alors Jésus, sachant tout ce qui allait lui arriver, s'avança et leur dit : † « Qui cherchez-vous? » L. Ils lui répondirent : F. « Jésus le Nazaréen. » L. Il leur dit : † « C'est moi, je le suis. » L. Judas, qui le livrait, se tenait avec eux. Quand Jésus leur répondit : « C'est moi, je le suis », ils reculèrent, et ils tombèrent à terre. Il leur demanda de nouveau : † « Qui cherchez-vous? » L. Ils dirent : F. « Jésus le Nazaréen. » L. Jésus répondit : † « Je vous l'ai dit : c'est moi, je le suis. Si c'est bien moi que vous cherchez, ceux-là, laissez-les partir. » L. Ainsi s'accomplissait la parole qu'il avait dite : « Je n'ai perdu aucun de ceux que tu m'as donnés. » Or Simon-Pierre avait une épée ; il la tira, frappa le serviteur du grand prêtre et lui coupa l'oreille droite. Le nom de ce serviteur était Malcus. Jésus dit à Pierre : † « Remets ton épée au fourreau. La coupe que m'a donnée le Père, vais-je refuser de la boire ? » L. Alors la troupe, le commandant et les gardes juifs se saisirent de Jésus et le ligotèrent. Ils l'emmenèrent d'abord chez Hanne, beau-père de Caïphe, qui était grand prêtre cette année-là. Caïphe était celui qui avait donné aux Juifs ce conseil : « Il vaut mieux qu'un seul homme meure pour le peuple. » Or Simon-Pierre, ainsi qu'un autre disciple, suivait Jésus. Comme ce disciple était connu du grand prêtre, il entra avec Jésus dans le palais du grand prêtre. Pierre se tenait près de la porte, dehors. Alors l'autre disciple – celui qui était connu du grand prêtre – sortit, dit un mot à la servante qui gardait la porte, et fit entrer Pierre. Cette jeune servante dit alors à Pierre : A. « N'es-tu pas, toi aussi, l'un des disciples de cet homme ? » L. Il répondit : D. « Non, je ne le suis pas ! » L. Les serviteurs et les gardes se tenaient là ; comme il faisait froid, ils avaient fait un feu de braise pour se réchauffer. Pierre était avec eux, en train de se chauffer. Le grand prêtre interrogea Jésus sur ses disciples et sur son enseignement. Jésus lui répondit : † « Moi, j'ai parlé au monde ouvertement. J'ai toujours enseigné à la synagogue et dans le Temple, là où tous les Juifs se réunissent, et je n'ai jamais parlé en cachette. Pourquoi m'interroges-tu ? Ce que je leur ai dit, demande-le à ceux qui m'ont entendu. Eux savent ce que j'ai dit. » L. À ces mots, un des gardes, qui était à côté de Jésus, lui donna une gifle en disant : A. « C'est ainsi que tu réponds au grand prêtre ! » L. Jésus lui répliqua : † « Si j'ai mal parlé, montre ce que j'ai dit de mal. Mais si j'ai bien parlé, pourquoi me frappes-tu ? » L. Hanne l'envoya, toujours ligoté, au grand prêtre Caïphe. Simon-Pierre était donc en train de se chauffer. On lui dit : A. « N'es-tu pas, toi aussi, l'un de ses disciples ? » L. Pierre le nia et dit : D. « Non, je ne le suis pas ! » L. Un des serviteurs du grand prêtre, parent de celui à qui Pierre avait coupé l'oreille, insista : A. « Est-ce que moi, je ne t'ai pas vu dans le jardin avec lui ? » L. Encore une fois, Pierre le nia. Et aussitôt un coq chanta. Alors on emmène Jésus de chez Caïphe au Prétoire. C'était le matin. Ceux qui l'avaient amené n'entrèrent pas dans le Prétoire, pour éviter une souillure et pouvoir manger l'agneau pascal. Pilate sortit donc à leur rencontre et demanda : A. « Quelle accusation portez-vous contre cet homme ? » L. Ils lui répondirent : F. « S'il n'était pas un malfaiteur, nous ne t'aurions pas livré cet homme. » L. Pilate leur dit : A. « Prenez-le vous-mêmes et jugez-le suivant votre loi. » L. Les Juifs lui dirent : F. « Nous n'avons pas le droit de mettre quelqu'un à mort. » L. Ainsi s'accomplissait la parole que Jésus avait dite pour signifier de quel genre de mort il allait mourir. Alors Pilate rentra dans le Prétoire ; il appela Jésus et lui dit : A. « Es-tu le roi des Juifs ? » L. Jésus lui demanda : † « Dis-tu cela de toi-même, Ou bien d'autres te l'ont dit à mon sujet ? » L. Pilate répondit : A. « Est-ce que je suis juif, moi ? Ta nation et les grands prêtres t'ont livré à moi : qu'as-tu donc fait ? » L. Jésus déclara : † « Ma royauté n'est pas de ce monde ; si ma royauté était de ce monde, j'aurais des gardes qui se seraient battus pour que je ne sois pas livré aux Juifs. En fait, ma royauté n'est pas d'ici. » L. Pilate lui dit : A. « Alors, tu es roi ? » L. Jésus répondit : † « C'est toi-même qui dis que je suis roi. Moi, je suis né, je suis venu dans le monde pour ceci : rendre témoignage à la vérité. Quiconque appartient à la vérité écoute ma voix. » L. Pilate lui dit : A. « Qu'est-ce que la vérité ? » L. Ayant dit cela, il sortit de nouveau à la rencontre des Juifs, et il leur déclara : A. « Moi, je ne trouve en lui aucun motif de condamnation. Mais, chez vous, c'est la coutume que je vous relâche quelqu'un pour la Pâque : voulez-vous donc que je vous relâche le roi des Juifs ? » L. Alors ils répliquèrent en criant : F. « Pas lui ! Mais Barabbas ! » L. Or ce Barabbas était un bandit. Alors Pilate fit saisir Jésus pour qu'il soit flagellé. Les soldats tressèrent avec des épines une couronne qu'ils lui posèrent sur la tête ; puis ils le revêtirent d'un manteau pourpre. Ils s'avançaient vers lui et ils disaient : F. « Salut à toi, roi des Juifs ! » L. Et ils le giflaient. Pilate, de nouveau, sortit dehors et leur dit : A. « Voyez, je vous l'amène dehors pour que vous sachiez que je ne trouve en lui aucun motif de condamnation. » L. Jésus donc sortit dehors, portant la couronne d'épines et le manteau pourpre. Et Pilate leur déclara : A. « Voici l'homme. » L. Quand ils le virent, les grands prêtres et les gardes se mirent à crier : F. « Crucifie-le! Crucifie-le! » L. Pilate leur dit : A. « Prenez-le vous-mêmes, et crucifiez-le ; moi, je ne trouve en lui aucun motif de condamnation. » L. Ils lui répondirent : F. « Nous avons une Loi, et suivant la Loi il doit mourir, parce qu'il s'est fait Fils de Dieu. » L. Quand Pilate entendit ces paroles, il redoubla de crainte. Il rentra dans le Prétoire, et dit à Jésus : A. « D'où es-tu? » L. Jésus ne lui fit aucune réponse. Pilate lui dit alors : A. « Tu refuses de me parler, à moi ? Ne sais-tu pas que j'ai pouvoir de te relâcher, et pouvoir de te crucifier ? » L. Jésus répondit : † « Tu n'aurais aucun pouvoir sur moi si tu ne l'avais reçu d'en haut ; c'est pourquoi celui qui m'a livré à toi porte un péché plus grand. » L. Dès lors, Pilate cherchait à le relâcher ; mais des Juifs se mirent à crier : F. « Si tu le relâches, tu n'es pas un ami de l'empereur. Quiconque se fait roi s'oppose à l'empereur. » L. En entendant ces paroles, Pilate amena Jésus au-dehors; il le fit asseoir sur une estrade au lieu dit le Dallage – en hébreu : Gabbatha. C'était le jour de la Préparation de la Pâque, vers la sixième heure, environ midi. Pilate dit aux Juifs : A. « Voici votre roi. » L. Alors ils crièrent : F. « À mort ! À mort ! Crucifie-le ! » L. Pilate leur dit : A. « Vais-je crucifier votre roi ? » L. Les grands prêtres répondirent : F. « Nous n'avons pas d'autre roi que l'empereur. » L. Alors, il leur livra Jésus pour qu'il soit crucifié. Ils se saisirent de Jésus. Et lui-même, portant sa croix, sortit en direction du lieu dit Le Crâne (ou Calvaire), qui se dit en hébreu Golgotha. C'est là qu'ils le crucifièrent, et deux autres avec lui, un de chaque côté, et Jésus au milieu. Pilate avait rédigé un écriteau qu'il fit placer sur la croix ; il était écrit : « Jésus le Nazaréen, roi des Juifs. » Beaucoup de Juifs lurent cet écriteau, parce que l'endroit où l'on avait crucifié Jésus était proche de la ville, et que c'était écrit en hébreu, en latin et en grec. Alors les grands prêtres des Juifs dirent à Pilate : F. « N'écris pas : “Roi des Juifs” ; mais : “Cet homme a dit : Je suis le roi des Juifs.” » L. Pilate répondit : A. « Ce que j'ai écrit, je l'ai écrit. » L. Quand les soldats eurent crucifié Jésus, ils prirent ses habits ; ils en firent quatre parts, une pour chaque soldat. Ils prirent aussi la tunique ; c'était une tunique sans couture, tissée tout d'une pièce de haut en bas. Alors ils se dirent entre eux : A. « Ne la déchirons pas, désignons par le sort celui qui l'aura. » L. Ainsi s'accomplissait la parole de l'Écriture : Ils se sont partagé mes habits ; ils ont tiré au sort mon vêtement. C'est bien ce que firent les soldats. Or, près de la croix de Jésus se tenaient sa mère et la sœur de sa mère, Marie, femme de Cléophas, et Marie Madeleine. Jésus, voyant sa mère, et près d'elle le disciple qu'il aimait, dit à sa mère : † « Femme, voici ton fils. » L. Puis il dit au disciple : † « Voici ta mère. » L. Et à partir de cette heure-là, le disciple la prit chez lui. Après cela, sachant que tout, désormais, était achevé pour que l'Écriture s'accomplisse jusqu'au bout, Jésus dit : † « J'ai soif. » L. Il y avait là un récipient plein d'une boisson vinaigrée. On fixa donc une éponge remplie de ce vinaigre à une branche d'hysope, et on l'approcha de sa bouche. Quand il eut pris le vinaigre, Jésus dit : † « Tout est accompli. » L. Puis, inclinant la tête, il remit l'esprit. (Ici on fléchit le genou, et on s'arrête un instant.) Comme c'était le jour de la Préparation (c'est-à-dire le vendredi), il ne fallait pas laisser les corps en croix durant le sabbat, d'autant plus que ce sabbat était le grand jour de la Pâque. Aussi les Juifs demandèrent à Pilate qu'on enlève les corps après leur avoir brisé les jambes. Les soldats allèrent donc briser les jambes du premier, puis de l'autre homme crucifié avec Jésus. Quand ils arrivèrent à Jésus, voyant qu'il était déjà mort, ils ne lui brisèrent pas les jambes, mais un des soldats avec sa lance lui perça le côté ; et aussitôt, il en sortit du sang et de l'eau. Celui qui a vu rend témoignage, et son témoignage est véridique ; et celui-là sait qu'il dit vrai afin que vous aussi, vous croyiez. Cela, en effet, arriva pour que s'accomplisse l'Écriture : Aucun de ses os ne sera brisé. Un autre passage de l'Écriture dit encore : Ils lèveront les yeux vers celui qu'ils ont transpercé. Après cela, Joseph d'Arimathie, qui était disciple de Jésus, mais en secret par crainte des Juifs, demanda à Pilate de pouvoir enlever le corps de Jésus. Et Pilate le permit. Joseph vint donc enlever le corps de Jésus. Nicodème – celui qui, au début, était venu trouver Jésus pendant la nuit – vint lui aussi ; il apportait un mélange de myrrhe et d'aloès pesant environ cent livres. Ils prirent donc le corps de Jésus, qu'ils lièrent de linges, en employant les aromates selon la coutume juive d'ensevelir les morts. À l'endroit où Jésus avait été crucifié, il y avait un jardin et, dans ce jardin, un tombeau neuf dans lequel on n'avait encore déposé personne. À cause de la Préparation de la Pâque juive, et comme ce tombeau était proche, c'est là qu'ils déposèrent Jésus.

Wat maakt een ondernemer écht succesvol? Is het blind knallen, of durf je juist opnieuw te kiezen wanneer je voelt dat het niet meer klopt? In deze Boostways-aflevering duiken we in het verhaal van Hanne, founder van Hashtack, die haar marketingbedrijf opnieuw vormgaf om het vuur brandend te houden. Haar reis is er eentje van durven loslaten, herpositioneren én kiezen voor plezier.Bedankt voor te luisteren! Elke donderdag een nieuwe aflevering online! Nog meer gratis content, handige tips én coaching on the spot? Dat kan in onze GRATIS Facebook Private Community, een besloten Facebook-groep waarin jij nog meer content van Boostways kan ontdekken. Helemaal gratis! Kom jij erbij?Nog meer tips en tricks om jouw bedrijf een boost te geven? Volg ons dan op social media: Instagram @boostways.be Facebook LinkedInTiktokOf bezoek onze website: www.boostways.be 

Voici l'Évangile du vendredi 3 avril 2026 :Passion de notre Seigneur Jésus Christ (Jn 18, 1 – 19, 42)Indications pour la lecture dialoguée : les sigles désignant les divers interlocuteurs sont les suivants : X = Jésus ; L = Lecteur ; D = Disciples et amis ; F = Foule ; A = Autres personnages.L. En ce temps-là, après le repas, Jésus sortit avec ses disciples et traversa le torrent du Cédron ; il y avait là un jardin, dans lequel il entra avec ses disciples. Judas, qui le livrait, connaissait l'endroit, lui aussi, car Jésus et ses disciples s'y étaient souvent réunis. Judas, avec un détachement de soldats ainsi que des gardes envoyés par les grands prêtres et les pharisiens, arrive à cet endroit. Ils avaient des lanternes, des torches et des armes. Alors Jésus, sachant tout ce qui allait lui arriver, s'avança et leur dit : X « Qui cherchez-vous? » L. Ils lui répondirent : F. « Jésus le Nazaréen. » L. Il leur dit : X « C'est moi, je le suis. » L. Judas, qui le livrait, se tenait avec eux. Quand Jésus leur répondit : « C'est moi, je le suis », ils reculèrent, et ils tombèrent à terre. Il leur demanda de nouveau : X « Qui cherchez-vous? » L. Ils dirent : F. « Jésus le Nazaréen. » L. Jésus répondit : X « Je vous l'ai dit : c'est moi, je le suis. Si c'est bien moi que vous cherchez, ceux-là, laissez-les partir. » L. Ainsi s'accomplissait la parole qu'il avait dite : « Je n'ai perdu aucun de ceux que tu m'as donnés. » Or Simon-Pierre avait une épée ; il la tira, frappa le serviteur du grand prêtre et lui coupa l'oreille droite. Le nom de ce serviteur était Malcus. Jésus dit à Pierre : X « Remets ton épée au fourreau. La coupe que m'a donnée le Père, vais-je refuser de la boire ? » L. Alors la troupe, le commandant et les gardes juifs se saisirent de Jésus et le ligotèrent. Ils l'emmenèrent d'abord chez Hanne, beau-père de Caïphe, qui était grand prêtre cette année-là. Caïphe était celui qui avait donné aux Juifs ce conseil : « Il vaut mieux qu'un seul homme meure pour le peuple. » Or Simon-Pierre, ainsi qu'un autre disciple, suivait Jésus. Comme ce disciple était connu du grand prêtre, il entra avec Jésus dans le palais du grand prêtre. Pierre se tenait près de la porte, dehors. Alors l'autre disciple – celui qui était connu du grand prêtre – sortit, dit un mot à la servante qui gardait la porte, et fit entrer Pierre. Cette jeune servante dit alors à Pierre : A. « N'es-tu pas, toi aussi, l'un des disciples de cet homme ? » L. Il répondit : D. « Non, je ne le suis pas ! » L. Les serviteurs et les gardes se tenaient là ; comme il faisait froid, ils avaient fait un feu de braise pour se réchauffer. Pierre était avec eux, en train de se chauffer. Le grand prêtre interrogea Jésus sur ses disciples et sur son enseignement. Jésus lui répondit : X « Moi, j'ai parlé au monde ouvertement. J'ai toujours enseigné à la synagogue et dans le Temple, là où tous les Juifs se réunissent, et je n'ai jamais parlé en cachette. Pourquoi m'interroges-tu ? Ce que je leur ai dit, demande-le à ceux qui m'ont entendu. Eux savent ce que j'ai dit. » L. À ces mots, un des gardes, qui était à côté de Jésus, lui donna une gifle en disant : A. « C'est ainsi que tu réponds au grand prêtre ! » L. Jésus lui répliqua : X « Si j'ai mal parlé, montre ce que j'ai dit de mal. Mais si j'ai bien parlé, pourquoi me frappes-tu ? » L. Hanne l'envoya, toujours ligoté, au grand prêtre Caïphe. Simon-Pierre était donc en train de se chauffer. On lui dit : A. « N'es-tu pas, toi aussi, l'un de ses disciples ? » L. Pierre le nia et dit : D. « Non, je ne le suis pas ! » L. Un des serviteurs du grand prêtre, parent de celui à qui Pierre avait coupé l'oreille, insista : A. « Est-ce que moi, je ne t'ai pas vu dans le jardin avec lui ? » L. Encore une fois, Pierre le nia. Et aussitôt un coq chanta. Alors on emmène Jésus de chez Caïphe au Prétoire. C'était le matin. Ceux qui l'avaient amené n'entrèrent pas dans le Prétoire, pour éviter une souillure et pouvoir manger l'agneau pascal. Pilate sortit donc à leur rencontre et demanda : A. « Quelle accusation portez-vous contre cet homme ? » L. Ils lui répondirent : F. « S'il n'était pas un malfaiteur, nous ne t'aurions pas livré cet homme. » L. Pilate leur dit : A. « Prenez-le vous-mêmes et jugez-le suivant votre loi. » L. Les Juifs lui dirent : F. « Nous n'avons pas le droit de mettre quelqu'un à mort. » L. Ainsi s'accomplissait la parole que Jésus avait dite pour signifier de quel genre de mort il allait mourir. Alors Pilate rentra dans le Prétoire ; il appela Jésus et lui dit : A. « Es-tu le roi des Juifs ? » L. Jésus lui demanda : X « Dis-tu cela de toi-même, Ou bien d'autres te l'ont dit à mon sujet ? » L. Pilate répondit : A. « Est-ce que je suis juif, moi ? Ta nation et les grands prêtres t'ont livré à moi : qu'as-tu donc fait ? » L. Jésus déclara : X « Ma royauté n'est pas de ce monde ; si ma royauté était de ce monde, j'aurais des gardes qui se seraient battus pour que je ne sois pas livré aux Juifs. En fait, ma royauté n'est pas d'ici. » L. Pilate lui dit : A. « Alors, tu es roi ? » L. Jésus répondit : X « C'est toi-même qui dis que je suis roi. Moi, je suis né, je suis venu dans le monde pour ceci : rendre témoignage à la vérité. Quiconque appartient à la vérité écoute ma voix. » L. Pilate lui dit : A. « Qu'est-ce que la vérité ? » L. Ayant dit cela, il sortit de nouveau à la rencontre des Juifs, et il leur déclara : A. « Moi, je ne trouve en lui aucun motif de condamnation. Mais, chez vous, c'est la coutume que je vous relâche quelqu'un pour la Pâque : voulez-vous donc que je vous relâche le roi des Juifs ? » L. Alors ils répliquèrent en criant : F. « Pas lui ! Mais Barabbas ! » L. Or ce Barabbas était un bandit. Alors Pilate fit saisir Jésus pour qu'il soit flagellé. Les soldats tressèrent avec des épines une couronne qu'ils lui posèrent sur la tête ; puis ils le revêtirent d'un manteau pourpre. Ils s'avançaient vers lui et ils disaient : F. « Salut à toi, roi des Juifs ! » L. Et ils le giflaient. Pilate, de nouveau, sortit dehors et leur dit : A. « Voyez, je vous l'amène dehors pour que vous sachiez que je ne trouve en lui aucun motif de condamnation. » L. Jésus donc sortit dehors, portant la couronne d'épines et le manteau pourpre. Et Pilate leur déclara : A. « Voici l'homme. » L. Quand ils le virent, les grands prêtres et les gardes se mirent à crier : F. « Crucifie-le! Crucifie-le! » L. Pilate leur dit : A. « Prenez-le vous-mêmes, et crucifiez-le ; moi, je ne trouve en lui aucun motif de condamnation. » L. Ils lui répondirent : F. « Nous avons une Loi, et suivant la Loi il doit mourir, parce qu'il s'est fait Fils de Dieu. » L. Quand Pilate entendit ces paroles, il redoubla de crainte. Il rentra dans le Prétoire, et dit à Jésus : A. « D'où es-tu? » L. Jésus ne lui fit aucune réponse. Pilate lui dit alors : A. « Tu refuses de me parler, à moi ? Ne sais-tu pas que j'ai pouvoir de te relâcher, et pouvoir de te crucifier ? » L. Jésus répondit : X « Tu n'aurais aucun pouvoir sur moi si tu ne l'avais reçu d'en haut ; c'est pourquoi celui qui m'a livré à toi porte un péché plus grand. » L. Dès lors, Pilate cherchait à le relâcher ; mais des Juifs se mirent à crier : F. « Si tu le relâches, tu n'es pas un ami de l'empereur. Quiconque se fait roi s'oppose à l'empereur. » L. En entendant ces paroles, Pilate amena Jésus au-dehors; il le fit asseoir sur une estrade au lieu dit le Dallage – en hébreu : Gabbatha. C'était le jour de la Préparation de la Pâque, vers la sixième heure, environ midi. Pilate dit aux Juifs : A. « Voici votre roi. » L. Alors ils crièrent : F. « À mort ! À mort ! Crucifie-le ! » L. Pilate leur dit : A. « Vais-je crucifier votre roi ? » L. Les grands prêtres répondirent : F. « Nous n'avons pas d'autre roi que l'empereur. » L. Alors, il leur livra Jésus pour qu'il soit crucifié. Ils se saisirent de Jésus. Et lui-même, portant sa croix, sortit en direction du lieu dit Le Crâne (ou Calvaire), qui se dit en hébreu Golgotha. C'est là qu'ils le crucifièrent, et deux autres avec lui, un de chaque côté, et Jésus au milieu. Pilate avait rédigé un écriteau qu'il fit placer sur la croix ; il était écrit : « Jésus le Nazaréen, roi des Juifs. » Beaucoup de Juifs lurent cet écriteau, parce que l'endroit où l'on avait crucifié Jésus était proche de la ville, et que c'était écrit en hébreu, en latin et en grec. Alors les grands prêtres des Juifs dirent à Pilate : F. « N'écris pas : “Roi des Juifs” ; mais : “Cet homme a dit : Je suis le roi des Juifs.” » L. Pilate répondit : A. « Ce que j'ai écrit, je l'ai écrit. » L. Quand les soldats eurent crucifié Jésus, ils prirent ses habits ; ils en firent quatre parts, une pour chaque soldat. Ils prirent aussi la tunique ; c'était une tunique sans couture, tissée tout d'une pièce de haut en bas. Alors ils se dirent entre eux : A. « Ne la déchirons pas, désignons par le sort celui qui l'aura. » L. Ainsi s'accomplissait la parole de l'Écriture : Ils se sont partagé mes habits ; ils ont tiré au sort mon vêtement. C'est bien ce que firent les soldats. Or, près de la croix de Jésus se tenaient sa mère et la sœur de sa mère, Marie, femme de Cléophas, et Marie Madeleine. Jésus, voyant sa mère, et près d'elle le disciple qu'il aimait, dit à sa mère : X « Femme, voici ton fils. » L. Puis il dit au disciple : X « Voici ta mère. » L. Et à partir de cette heure-là, le disciple la prit chez lui. Après cela, sachant que tout, désormais, était achevé pour que l'Écriture s'accomplisse jusqu'au bout, Jésus dit : X « J'ai soif. » L. Il y avait là un récipient plein d'une boisson vinaigrée. On fixa donc une éponge remplie de ce vinaigre à une branche d'hysope, et on l'approcha de sa bouche. Quand il eut pris le vinaigre, Jésus dit : X « Tout est accompli. » L. Puis, inclinant la tête, il remit l'esprit. (Ici on fléchit le genou, et on s'arrête un instant.) Comme c'était le jour de la Préparation (c'est-à-dire le vendredi), il ne fallait pas laisser les corps en croix durant le sabbat, d'autant plus que ce sabbat était le grand jour de la Pâque. Aussi les Juifs demandèrent à Pilate qu'on enlève les corps après leur avoir brisé les jambes. Les soldats allèrent donc briser les jambes du premier, puis de l'autre homme crucifié avec Jésus. Quand ils arrivèrent à Jésus, voyant qu'il était déjà mort, ils ne lui brisèrent pas les jambes, mais un des soldats avec sa lance lui perça le côté ; et aussitôt, il en sortit du sang et de l'eau. Celui qui a vu rend témoignage, et son témoignage est véridique ; et celui-là sait qu'il dit vrai afin que vous aussi, vous croyiez. Cela, en effet, arriva pour que s'accomplisse l'Écriture : Aucun de ses os ne sera brisé. Un autre passage de l'Écriture dit encore : Ils lèveront les yeux vers celui qu'ils ont transpercé. Après cela, Joseph d'Arimathie, qui était disciple de Jésus, mais en secret par crainte des Juifs, demanda à Pilate de pouvoir enlever le corps de Jésus. Et Pilate le permit. Joseph vint donc enlever le corps de Jésus. Nicodème – celui qui, au début, était venu trouver Jésus pendant la nuit – vint lui aussi ; il apportait un mélange de myrrhe et d'aloès pesant environ cent livres. Ils prirent donc le corps de Jésus, qu'ils lièrent de linges, en employant les aromates selon la coutume juive d'ensevelir les morts. À l'endroit où Jésus avait été crucifié, il y avait un jardin et, dans ce jardin, un tombeau neuf dans lequel on n'avait encore déposé personne. À cause de la Préparation de la Pâque juive, et comme ce tombeau était proche, c'est là qu'ils déposèrent Jésus. Cet enregistrement est proposé bénévolement pour répandre la Parole de Dieu

En start 11-er med Arsenal-spillere er enten skadet eller har reist hjem fra landslagsoppdrag. Står vi ovenfor et skademareritt, eller er dette bare taktisk spill fra Arteta? Vi får også høre hvordan Arsenal Norway-leder Hanne Furuheim opplevde Wembley. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hvorfor har mat blitt et tema gjør så mange foreldre usikre? I denne episoden snakker Thea med matanalytiker, influencer og forfatter Hanne-Lene Dahlgren om mat, tillit, usikkerhet og hvorfor det har blitt så vanskelig å navigere i alle rådene som møter oss. Vi snakker om Hanne-Lenes «to om gangen»-metode, om hvorfor sunn mat ikke nødvendigvis trenger å være så dyrt, og om hvordan vi kan senke skuldrene litt i møte med barn og mat.Vi er også innom hvor lett det er å bli overveldet av kostholdsråd, hva det betyr å formidle forskningsbasert kunnskap uten å være ernæringsfysiolog. Hvorfor får ytterpunktene mest oppmerksomhet i sosiale medier? Hvor går skillet mellom hjelpsomme råd og stress? Og hva gjør du når feeden din gjør at du får vondt i magen? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

De siste årene har debatten om ultraprossesert mat rast i alle flater. Hanne-Lene Dahlgren mener at debatten er fryktbasert og unyansert. Hva mener hun med det? Og hvorfor er hun tilhenger av de norske kostrådene som stadig flere har begynt å kritisere? Frida er dritt lei hele temaet og ber om Hanne-Lenes velsignelse til å spise ultraprossesert iskrem.Har du noen spørsmål om kvinnehelse som du trenger svar på? Send det til Frida på epost: hei@fridamarie.noDet er helt nydelig om du spiller det inn som et lydklipp, så vi kan ta det med i podden!Ønsker du å samarbeide med denne podcasten? Ta kontakt med kristin@snakk.asKvinnehelse-merch kan du alltid kjøpe her: https://fridagrande.no/collections/kvinnehelse Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hva betyr egentlig lydighet? Og hvordan henger det sammen med etterfølgelse?  Denne talen handler om å ha tillit til Gud, også når vi ikke forstår alt, når vi ikke får alt til, når livet ikke er perfekt og når vi ikke ser resultatene av det vi gjør. Bibelreferanser: Hebreerne 11,1-16 og 32-60, Hebreeerne 12,1-2

SK Beveren keert na zes jaar terug naar de eerste klasse. Wat is de sleutel tot succes in dit verhaal? We vragen het aan CEO Bart Foubert. Thibaut Courtois is een record rijker. Hij wordt recordhouder bij de doelmannen in de Champions League met drie assists. Keeperstrainer bij de Rode Duivels Guy Martens snapt niet dat z'n poulain nog twijfels oproept. En we bellen met Hanne Desmet over het aankomende WK in Montreal. Misschien wel haar laatste reddingboei voor een ontgoochelend seizoen?

Fluent Fiction - Norwegian: From Lenses to Legacy: Sindre's Journey to Belonging Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/no/episode/2026-03-09-22-34-01-no Story Transcript:No: På et hjørne av hovedgaten, gjennom store vinduer, strømmet vårens tidlige sollys inn i den lille, koselige kaféen.En: On the corner of the main street, through large windows, the early spring sunlight streamed into the small, cozy café.No: Lukten av nytraktet kaffe fylte luften, og de rustikke trebjelkene og koselige båser ga stedet en varm atmosfære.En: The smell of freshly brewed coffee filled the air, and the rustic wooden beams and cozy booths gave the place a warm atmosphere.No: Midt i dette trakk Sindre et dypt pust og kjente på roen.En: In the midst of this, Sindre took a deep breath and felt at peace.No: Som frilansfotograf elsket han friheten, men kjente også en tomhet.En: As a freelance photographer, he loved the freedom but also felt an emptiness.No: Da han kikket rundt i kaféen, oppdaget han Hanne og Åsmund, det eldre paret han kjente fra byen.En: As he looked around the café, he noticed Hanne and Åsmund, the older couple he knew from town.No: Han husket dem med et smil – Hanne med sitt smittende latter og Åsmund med sitt stille smil.En: He remembered them with a smile – Hanne with her contagious laughter and Åsmund with his quiet smile.No: Paret så ut til å være i dyp samtale, men Hanne vinket ham over med en gang hun så ham.En: The couple seemed to be in deep conversation, but Hanne waved him over the moment she saw him.No: "Sindre," sa Hanne med varm stemme.En: "Sindre," said Hanne with a warm voice.No: "Kom og sett deg ned.En: "Come and sit down.No: Vi trenger en hjelpende hånd.En: We need a helping hand."No: "Sindre, alltid klar til å hjelpe, satte seg.En: Sindre, always ready to help, sat down.No: "Hvordan kan jeg hjelpe dere?En: "How can I help you?"No: " spurte han.En: he asked.No: Hanne begynte å forklare at de forberedte byens årlige vårfestival, men hadde støtt på noen problemer.En: Hanne began to explain that they were preparing the town's annual spring festival but had run into some problems.No: Det manglet dekorasjoner, og Åsmund hadde vondt i ryggen, noe som gjorde arbeidet tungt.En: They lacked decorations, and Åsmund had a sore back, making the work difficult.No: Sindre følte nøling innvendig.En: Sindre felt hesitation inside.No: Å involvere seg betydde engasjement – noe han vanligvis unngikk.En: Getting involved meant commitment – something he usually avoided.No: Men denne gangen følte han en trang til å si ja.En: But this time, he felt an urge to say yes.No: Det var noe med Hanne og Åsmunds vennlighet som var vanskelig å motstå.En: There was something about Hanne and Åsmund's kindness that was hard to resist.No: "Jeg hjelper gjerne til," svarte han til slutt.En: "I'd be happy to help," he finally replied.No: "Hva trenger dere å få gjort?En: "What do you need to get done?"No: "De neste ukene tilbrakte Sindre mye tid med Hanne og Åsmund.En: In the following weeks, Sindre spent a lot of time with Hanne and Åsmund.No: Hanne lærte ham hemmelighetene bak sine berømte kaker, mens Åsmund delte historier fra sitt liv som snekker.En: Hanne taught him the secrets behind her famous cakes, while Åsmund shared stories from his life as a carpenter.No: Sakte, men sikkert, begynte Sindre å åpne seg opp, både for arbeidet og vennskapene som dannet seg.En: Slowly but surely, Sindre began to open up, both to the work and the friendships that were forming.No: Så, dagen før festivalen, oppstod krisen.En: Then, the day before the festival, a crisis arose.No: Leverandøren av blomster til dekorasjonene hadde avlyst i siste liten.En: The supplier of flowers for the decorations had canceled at the last minute.No: Hanne var fortvilet.En: Hanne was distraught.No: Byen hadde sett frem til denne festivalen i måneder.En: The town had been looking forward to this festival for months.No: Sindre kunne ikke bare la det skje.En: Sindre couldn't just let it happen.No: Han tok initiativet, og med kameraet sitt i hånden, fanget han bilder av naturen som omkranset byen – den friske, grønne spiringen av våren, glitrende bekker og blomstrende trær.En: He took the initiative, and with his camera in hand, captured images of the nature surrounding the town – the fresh, green sprouting of spring, sparkling streams, and blooming trees.No: Bildene ble blåst opp og brukt som bakgrunnsdekorasjoner for festivalen.En: The photos were enlarged and used as background decorations for the festival.No: På festivaldagen var stemningen magisk.En: On the day of the festival, the atmosphere was magical.No: Folkene i byen samlet seg, og dekorasjonene med Sindres bilder fikk mange komplimenter.En: The townspeople gathered, and the decorations with Sindre's pictures received many compliments.No: Hanne og Åsmund var takknemlige, og Sindre følte en varme i hjertet han hadde savnet lenge.En: Hanne and Åsmund were grateful, and Sindre felt a warmth in his heart he had long missed.No: Han innså at ved å bidra, hadde han funnet en del av seg selv.En: He realized that by contributing, he had found a part of himself.No: Festivalen var en stor suksess.En: The festival was a great success.No: Byen strålte, og både små og store koste seg.En: The town shone, and both young and old enjoyed themselves.No: I det hele sto Sindre tilfreds.En: Overall, Sindre stood satisfied.No: Han hadde funnet en mening i å være en del av noe større.En: He had found meaning in being part of something greater.No: Utsikten over kaffekoppen hans en uke senere, mens vårens sol igjen varmet kaféen, bestemte han seg: Han ville bli værende i den lille byen.En: Staring at his coffee cup one week later, as the spring sun again warmed the café, he decided: He would stay in the little town.No: Her hadde han funnet et nytt hjem.En: Here, he had found a new home.No: Og på den måten ble Sindre en del av byens fellesskap, rikere på både minner og vennskap, klar til å møte nye eventyr med åpent hjerte.En: And in this way, Sindre became part of the town's community, richer in both memories and friendships, ready to face new adventures with an open heart. Vocabulary Words:corner: hjørnestreamed: strømmetcozy: koseligerustic: rustikkebeams: trebjelkenefreelance: frilansemptiness: tomhetwaves: vinketconversation: samtaledecorations: dekorasjonercommitment: engasjementurge: trangcarpenter: snekkercrisis: krisesupplier: leverandørendistraught: fortviletinitiative: initiativetenlarged: blåst oppcompliments: komplimentergrateful: takknemligemeaning: meningcommunity: fellesskapmemories: minnerfriendships: vennskapadventures: eventyrspouting: spiringengathered: samlet segpeeked: kikketencircled: omkransetblooming: blomstrende

Go to rushhourwithdave.com for tickets to my upcoming Asheville NC, Stamford CT and Boston shows! Consider donating to Hanne's gofundme here: https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-hanne-recover-and-seek-justice  

Op de Olympische Winterspelen is de 1000 meter shorttrack op een nachtmerrie uitgedraaid voor Hanne Desmet. Ze geraakte door een val niet in de finale. Dan ging het voor Dorian Marchant een stuk beter in de slalom. Hij eindigde na een knappe race vijfde. Straf, zeker als je weet welke weg hij moest afleggen om op de Spelen te staan. En het curling is in de ban van valsspelers. Hoe dat juist zit, vragen we aan Tom Goethals, een Belgische curling-speler.

Dischingthun var bare én av mange fra Norge som deltok ti den transatlantiske slavehandelen og det dansk-norske koloniveldet. Med i studio for å diskutere Danmark-Norge som kolonimakt er Hanne Østhus, førsteamanuensis i historie ved Universitetet i Oslo. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Das Versprechen der ewigen Jugend und Schönheit lasse sie kalt, dachte «Input»-Autorin Julia Lüscher lange. Bis sich, mit knapp vierzig, ein Gedanke in ihren Kopf schlich: «So eine Botoxspritze, was kostet die eigentlich?» Selbstbestimmt älter werden mitten im Beauty-Boom – wie gelingt das? «Ich kann nicht glauben, dass ich das gerade mache», sagt Hanne mit 36, als sie sich zum ersten Mal botoxen lässt. «Sich dagegen zu wehren ist schwierig», findet auch Ärztin Marlies Baertsch, die seit zwei Jahren in ihrer Praxis Botoxbehandlungen anbietet. Die Forschung zum Mittleren Alter zeigt: Ab vierzig erleben viele Menschen eine Phase der Unsicherheit und Neuorientierung. «Der perfekte Nährboden für die profitorientierte Beauty-Industrie, die ewige Jugend verspricht», sagt die Politologin und Aktivistin Emilia Roig. Ein «Input» von Julia Lüscher über den Drahtseilakt im eigenen Gesicht. ___________________ Habt ihr Feedback, Fragen oder Wünsche? Wir freuen uns auf eure Nachrichten an input@srf.ch – und wenn ihr euren Freund:innen und Kolleg:innen von uns erzählt. ____________________ 00:00 - 01:50 Intro 02:00 - 08:00 Besprechung in der Arztpraxis 08:00- 09:40 Botox-Boom, Unseriosität und Tabu 09:40 - 11:40 Eitelkeit, Scham und Zweifel: Hanne im Botox-Dilemma 11:42 - 16:19 Strenge gesetzliche Regulierung und milliardenschweres Geschäft 16:50 - 19:10 Hanne wagt den Schritt 19:20 - 21:25 Dana und die fehlende Reaktion im Gesicht nach Botox 21:50 - 26:30 Unsicherheit und Beauty-Industrie: Politologin Emilia Roig zum Älterwerden 26:30 - 30:10 Forschung zum Älterwerden und neue Freiheiten ab vierzig 30:11 - 34:58 Selbstbestimmt älter werden - wie ist das möglich? 35:00 - 36:38 Fazit ____________________ In dieser Episode zu hören - Hanne, Dana, Ranja, Solenne - Marlies Bärtsch, Gynäkologin - Emilia Roig, Politolgin und Autorin - Christina Röcke, UZH, Healthy Longevity Center ____________________ - Autorin: Julia Lüscher - Publizistische Leitung: Anita Richner ____________________ Das ist «Input»: Dem Leben in der Schweiz auf der Spur – mit all seinen Widersprüchen und Fragen. Der Podcast «Input» liefert jede Woche eine Reportage zu den Themen, die euch bewegen.

Hva er vold i nære relasjoner? Hva gjør det med et menneske å leve i konstant frykt? Og hvordan setter traumer seg i både kropp og hjerne – lenge etter at volden har stoppet?I denne episoden snakker jeg med psykologspesialist Hanne Netland Simonsen, som i over 20 år har jobbet med mennesker utsatt for vold, seksuelle overgrep og komplekse traumer.I samtalen utforsker vi blant annet:Hva vold i nære relasjoner faktisk er, og hvorfor mye vold forblir usett og uadressert.Hvordan det å leve i frykt påvirker nervesystemet og former hjernens måte å tolke verden på.Hvorfor noen frakobler seg egne følelser for å overleve, og hvilken funksjon dissosiasjon egentlig har.Hvordan kroppen lagrer traumer, og hvorfor heling ofte må starte med kroppen, ikke tankene.Hva ACE-studien lærer oss om sammenhengen mellom barndomstraumer, psykisk og fysisk helse og livslengde.Hvordan både voldsofre og de som har utøvd vold kan få hjelp, og hva som faktisk skal til for endring.Enkle reguleringsteknikker som kan hjelpe voldsutsatte, voldsutøvere og behandlerne som hjelper dem.For mer fra Hanne:Psykologforeningen: Å være offer for vold i nære relasjonerHolberpsykologene: Hanne Netland SimonsenKontakt Vold- og overgrepslinjen på telefon 116 006 eller chat på volinjen.no. Helt gratis og anonymt.Ønsker deg en nydelig uke!AnnetteFølg meg gjerne på:Instagram.com/dr.annettedraglandFacebook.com/drannettedraglandhttps://youtube.com/@drannetteDisclaimer: Innholdet i podcasten og på denne nettsiden er ikke ment å utgjøre eller være en erstatning for profesjonell medisinsk rådgivning, diagnose eller behandling. Søk alltid råd fra legen din eller annet kvalifisert helsepersonell hvis du har spørsmål angående en medisinsk tilstand. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Knep, husmorstips eller lifehacks vi vill lära oss nya grejer! Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radios app. Ett nyfiket och underhållande aktualitetsprogram med lyssnaren i fokus.Hanne tipsar om hur man städar ur mikron, Magnus har ett lifehack som innebär att han slipper använda påsklämmor och Anna använder gummiband i julkulorna för att enklare trä dem på grannen. Dessutom ringer vi upp influencern och författaren Kevin Florström som driver kontot Kevins kvadratmeter, där han tipsar om bland annat städknep.I extramaterialet pratar vi om fler tips och trix för att lösa situationer i vardagen!

Marianne får skrubb. Hanne har seg en byge. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

I denne episoden snakker vi om hvordan teknologiverdenen ble så dritt. Men enda viktigere, hvordan vi kan velge alternativer som gjør det digitale livet fantastisk igjen. For det finnes en sti som leder deg ut fra tekovervåkningen, dommedagsscrollingen og tekmonopolenes Internett. Hør Bernhard Ellefsen og Hanne Østli Jakbosen i denne ukens Ubehaget i kulturen.Les Jakobsens tips til konkrete programmer og systemer du kan bruker for å frigjøre deg digitalt. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Fluent Fiction - Norwegian: Surviving Jotunheimen: A Tale of Strength and Resilience Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/no/episode/2025-11-11-23-34-02-no Story Transcript:No: Det var en kjølig høstmorgen i Jotunheimen.En: It was a cool autumn morning in Jotunheimen.No: Bladene på trærne skiftet fra grønt til gull og rød.En: The leaves on the trees were changing from green to gold and red.No: Det var en perfekt dag for en fjelltur.En: It was a perfect day for a mountain hike.No: Mikkel, en erfaren fjellvandrer, ledet an med et våkent blikk på stien foran seg.En: Mikkel, an experienced hiker, led the way with a watchful eye on the path ahead.No: Ved hans side gikk hans yngre søster, Sigrid, full av eventyrlyst.En: Beside him walked his younger sister, Sigrid, full of a sense of adventure.No: Bak dem fulgte Hanne, Mikkels trofaste venninne som alltid var forberedt på det uventede.En: Behind them followed Hanne, Mikkel's loyal friend who was always prepared for the unexpected.No: De tre vennene hadde planlagt denne turen i ukevis.En: The three friends had planned this trip for weeks.No: For Sigrid, som ikke hadde vært her før, var det en mulighet til å oppleve naturens storhet.En: For Sigrid, who had not been here before, it was an opportunity to experience the grandeur of nature.No: De enorme fjellene reiste seg majestetisk rundt dem, og den klare lufta fortalte om den kommende vinteren.En: The enormous mountains rose majestically around them, and the clear air hinted at the coming winter.No: Mens de klatret oppover, skled Sigrid på en løs stein og falt.En: As they climbed upwards, Sigrid slipped on a loose stone and fell.No: Hun skrek ut i smerte.En: She cried out in pain.No: Mikkel var rask til å hjelpe henne opp.En: Mikkel was quick to help her up.No: "Jeg tror jeg har forstuet ankelen," sa Sigrid med tårer i øynene.En: "I think I've sprained my ankle," said Sigrid with tears in her eyes.No: Mikkel kjente en bekymring gripe tak i ham.En: Mikkel felt a worry grip him.No: De var dypt inne i skogen, og været ble raskt verre med mørke skyer som trakk inn fra horisonten.En: They were deep in the forest, and the weather was quickly worsening with dark clouds pulling in from the horizon.No: Etter å ha undersøkt skaden visste Mikkel hva de måtte gjøre.En: After examining the injury, Mikkel knew what they had to do.No: Han samlet noen greiner og nøklet dem sammen til en improvisert skinne.En: He collected some branches and lashed them together into an improvised splint.No: Hanne hjalp til med å binde den fast med det de hadde tilgjengelig.En: Hanne helped to secure it with what they had available.No: "Vi må tilbake før det blir verre," sa Mikkel bestemt.En: "We must get back before it gets worse," said Mikkel firmly.No: Da de startet på returen, begynte regnet å falle.En: As they started on their return, the rain began to fall.No: Snart møtte de på en elv som bruste voldsomt, uten noen bru i sikte.En: Soon they encountered a river roaring fiercely, with no bridge in sight.No: Mikkel visste at dette var et kritisk øyeblikk.En: Mikkel knew this was a critical moment.No: Han så seg omkring og fant en smalere del av elven hvor steiner stakk opp fra vannet.En: He looked around and found a narrower part of the river where stones jutted up from the water.No: "Vi må denne veien," ropte han over lyden av elva.En: "We have to go this way," he shouted over the sound of the river.No: Forsiktig førte han Sigrid over steinene, steg for steg, mens Hanne støttet dem begge.En: Carefully, he led Sigrid over the stones, step by step, while Hanne supported them both.No: Det krevde all hans styrke og fokus, men de kom seg over til den andre siden.En: It required all his strength and focus, but they made it to the other side.No: Etter mange timers strev, med Sigrid støttet mellom dem, så de endelig skogkanten åpne seg.En: After many hours of struggle, with Sigrid supported between them, they finally saw the edge of the forest open up.No: Der ventet parkvaktene, som hadde blitt varslet om gruppens forsinkelse.En: There waited the park rangers, who had been alerted about the group's delay.No: De var alle utslitte, men lettet.En: They were all exhausted, but relieved.No: Mikkel følte en bølge av stolthet skylle over seg.En: Mikkel felt a wave of pride wash over him.No: De hadde klart det.En: They had made it.No: Sigrid kastet et siste blikk på fjellene bak dem, og forsto hvor viktig det var å være forberedt og ydmyk overfor naturen.En: Sigrid cast one last look at the mountains behind them and understood how important it was to be prepared and humble in the face of nature.No: Dog utmattet, innså Mikkel at han hadde oppdaget en ny styrke i seg selv, en lederskapsevne han ikke visste han hadde.En: Though exhausted, Mikkel realized he had discovered a new strength in himself, a leadership ability he didn't know he had.No: De returnerte hjem, trøtte men fylt av lærdom fra fjellene i Jotunheimen.En: They returned home, tired but filled with lessons from the mountains in Jotunheimen. Vocabulary Words:cool: kjøligautumn: høstexperienced: erfarensense: følelseadventure: eventyrlystunexpected: uventedegrandeur: storhetmajestically: majestetiskclear: klarslipped: skledloose: løsankle: ankelworry: bekymringgrip: gripeweather: værhorizon: horisontexamining: undersøktinjury: skadeimprovised: improvisertsplint: skinnesecure: bindereturn: returencountered: møtteroaring: brustefiercely: voldsomtbridge: brunarrower: smalererequired: krevdesupported: støttetexhausted: utmattet

Marianne var oppe i 12 mg. Hanne er skeptisk til å svelge. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dette er vårt skift i kirkehistorien, det er vi som er bakkemannskapet. Hva betyr det for oss å være våkne og lene oss inn i det som Gud gjør NÅ? Hva betyr det å følge etter Jesus nå?Bibelreferanser: Ordspråkene 8, 34-35, Matteus 28:18-20, Matteus 9, 35-38 

This is message 12 in The Names of God Series Deuteronomy 7:6-9 God is faithful and always keeps His Word. His love is not based on our worthiness but on His promise, and what He begins, He finishes. He keeps His covenant of salvation, sustains us through temptation and trial, and never abandons His people. We can trust Him completely because HIs faithfulness never fails. Don't forget to download our app for more from the Riverview Baptist Church. http://onelink.to/rbcapp Find more at https://riverviewbc.com/ Donate through Pushpay https://pushpay.com/pay/riverviewbc

In deze aflevering van De Donkere Kamer praat ik met fotografe Hanne Lamon, die al meer dan twintig jaar haar leven vastlegt in verstilde, intieme beelden. Ze vertelt over haar nieuwste project en boek “VULVA Obscura”, waarin ze via het oeroude principe van de camera obscura het vrouwelijk lichaam onderzoekt — niet als object, maar als bron van kracht, diversiteit en herkenning.Wat begon bij een moeder-dochtermoment groeide uit tot een artistiek én persoonlijk statement over schaamte, identiteit en vrouwelijke zichtbaarheid. Een gesprek over moed, intimiteit en het belang van blijven kijken, ook als het spannend wordt.Wil jij als fotograaf ook dieper graven in je werk, je visie aanscherpen en met meer zelfvertrouwen zichtbaar worden?Dan is mijn 1-op-1 mentorshiptraject iets voor jou. Zes maanden lang werken we intensief aan jouw groei — artistiek én ondernemend.Ontdek alle info via donkerekamer.com/mentor of stuur me een DM op insta. Samen brengen we jouw fotografie verder.

Originally released July 23, 2024. New Kindred episodes will drop starting in October 2025.In this week's episode, we travel to Denmark and speak with author and long time marine biologist Hanne Strager about the incredible and dynamic predator the killer whale, or orca if you prefer.Hanne specializes in marine wildlife, specifically killer whales, and has recently published her new book titled, The Killer Whale Journals: Our Love and Fear of Orcas. We wanted to speak with Hanne because we are keenly interested in the relationship humans have with predators and why killer whales have long been persecuted, misunderstood, and even demonised by humans, like MANY predators whether that be on land or sea. We think they are dynamic, highly intelligent, gorgeous, and captivating animals and Hanne tells us why!What an absolute honor to speak with Hanne. We steeped in her knowledge and experience and mostly her poignant insights on not only killer whales but also her view of the relationship we have with animals like killer whales and other powerful and intelligent predators. Also, take a listen to this week's introduction to the episode and weigh in on whether my “joke” about killer whales is actually a joke, a riddle, or just a question! Jenn is most definitely unsure! Lols. Lots of Love.Episode Timestamps: Introduction: 00:52 Interview: 5:35 TA: 51:48Show Notes:https://hannestrager.com/https://www.instagram.com/hannestrager/https://www.thewhale.no/enArticles:https://www.raincoast.org/2024/05/southern-residents-salmon-science/https://www.afar.com/magazine/the-whale-museum-to-open-in-norway-in-2022https://dortemandrup.dk/work/whale-norwayAmazing video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhmJkIUH_qw

Met boeken als "Saus is de beste saus" en "Oost west saus best" mag het duidelijk zijn waar onze gast van deze week voor staat. Hanne Lemmens is niet alleen auteur, maar ook een ambassadeur voor een culinair leven met saus. En ook al hoefde ze ons niet van van die levensfilosofie te overtuigen, ze bracht buiten haar boeken toch genoeg klaargemaakte gerechten mee om er een heel fijne en gezellige aflevering van te maken. Vandaag dus niet alleen tips voor in de keuken maar ook tips om het leven net iets vrolijker te maken. "Saus is de beste saus" en "Oost west saus best" zijn uit bij uitgeverij PelckmansSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hanne Hagenaars is curator en auteur. Ze is initiatiefnemer van het tijdschrift ‘The Dummy Speaks', een tijdschrift voor jongeren over beeldende kunst en van het (online) kunst magazine ‘Mister Motley', waarvan ze ook negen jaar hoofdredacteur is geweest.  Ondertussen publiceerde ze in 2006 haar eerste boek ‘Geen wolk, hoe kunst mijn leven redde'. Later maakte ze meerdere tentoonstellingen, waaronder ‘Be Calm' in het CBK.  In 2023 scheef ze haar tweede boek ‘Missen als een ronde vorm' en nu presenteert het Stedelijk Museum Schiedam een tentoonstelling ‘Missen als een ronde vorm. De kunst van het doorleven', geïnspireerd op Hagenaars boek. Er zijn werken van meer dan 30 internationale kunstenaars te zien, die gaan over verlies, gemis en hoe je je dierbaren dicht bij je houdt. 

Hanne de Vries was jarenlang een bekende aanbiddingsleider met een eigen band en stichting. Drie jaar geleden koos hij er bewust voor om te stoppen. Waarom? In deze RAUW TALK gaat hij in gesprek met David de Vos over twijfel, eerlijkheid en de moed om een stap terug te doen. Hij deelt openhartig hoe hij worstelde met vragen over geloof, kerk en zichzelf. Een rauw, kwetsbaar en hoopvol gesprek. Nu te beluisteren als podcast!

Fluent Fiction - Danish: Adventures in Thy Park: One Boot, Endless Laughter Find the full episode transcript, vocabulary words, and more:fluentfiction.com/da/episode/2025-09-21-22-34-02-da Story Transcript:Da: Under de gyldne træer i Thy National Park, stod en hyggelig lille hytte.En: Under the golden trees of Thy National Park, stood a cozy little cabin.Da: Luften var kølig, og den duftede af efterår.En: The air was cool, and it smelled of autumn.Da: Lars, Hanne og Jens var klar til en dag med eventyr.En: Lars, Hanne and Jens were ready for a day of adventure.Da: Lars, som altid var klar på et nyt påfund, havde planlagt en vandretur.En: Lars, who was always up for something new, had planned a hike.Da: Men netop da de skulle afsted, opdagede Lars noget uheldigt.En: But just when they were about to leave, Lars discovered something unfortunate.Da: Han havde kun én gummistøvle med.En: He only had one rubber boot.Da: Lars stoppede op.En: Lars stopped.Da: Han så ned på sine fødder og derefter på sine venner.En: He looked down at his feet and then at his friends.Da: Jens slog en latter op, og Hanne fniste.En: Jens burst out laughing, and Hanne giggled.Da: Lars lo også.En: Lars laughed too.Da: "Jeg må gøre noget ved det her," sagde han, stadig med et skævt smil.En: "I need to do something about this," he said, still with a crooked smile.Da: Han ville ikke aflyse turen.En: He didn't want to cancel the hike.Da: Han ville imponere sine venner med sin viden om parken.En: He wanted to impress his friends with his knowledge of the park.Da: Til alles overraskelse begyndte Lars at samle blade og grene.En: To everyone's surprise, Lars began to gather leaves and branches.Da: "Hvis jeg ikke kan have to støvler, så må jeg lave én selv," sagde han.En: "If I can't have two boots, then I'll have to make one myself," he said.Da: Med omhyggelige fingre begyndte han at binde grene og blade sammen.En: With careful fingers, he began tying branches and leaves together.Da: Jens og Hanne så til, fascinerede af hans kreativitet.En: Jens and Hanne watched, fascinated by his creativity.Da: Mens Lars arbejdede, gik solen på sin rejse over himlen.En: As Lars worked, the sun made its journey across the sky.Da: Snart var hans nye "støvle" klar.En: Soon, his new "boot" was ready.Da: Den så sjov ud, men den sad tæt.En: It looked funny, but it fit snugly.Da: Lars rettede sig op og sagde, "Så er vi klar."En: Lars straightened up and said, "Now we're ready."Da: Turen gik gennem lysninger og stier fyldt med rustne blade.En: The hike went through clearings and paths filled with rusty leaves.Da: Lars fortalte ivrigt om de forskellige træer og dyr.En: Lars eagerly told about the different trees and animals.Da: Hans én-gummistøvle-én-bladstøvle blev centrum for mange grin og kommentarer, men det gjorde kun turen sjovere.En: His one-rubber-boot-one-leaf-boot became the center of many laughs and comments, but it only made the hike more fun.Da: Pludselig trak skyerne sig sammen, og regnen begyndte at falde tæt.En: Suddenly, the clouds gathered, and the rain began to fall heavily.Da: Bladstøvlen blev gennemblødt og mere skrøbelig.En: The leaf boot got soaked and more fragile.Da: Lars haltede lidt, men han gav ikke op.En: Lars limped a little, but he didn't give up.Da: Med våde ansigter og latteren rungende, fortsatte de sammen.En: With wet faces and laughter echoing, they continued together.Da: Da de endelig nåede tilbage til hytten, var de gennemblødte.En: When they finally reached the cabin, they were drenched.Da: Men gløden i deres øjne var ikke til at tage fejl af.En: But the glow in their eyes was unmistakable.Da: Lars lo højt, "Næste gang husker jeg begge støvler!"En: Lars laughed out loud, "Next time I'll remember both boots!"Da: Han havde lært noget vigtigt den dag.En: He had learned something important that day.Da: Selv når alt går anderledes end forventet, kan humor og tilpasningsevne gøre en situation uforglemmelig og sjov.En: Even when everything goes differently than expected, humor and adaptability can make a situation unforgettable and fun.Da: Hanne og Jens tog hver sin kop varm kakao, mens Lars satte sig ved kaminen.En: Hanne and Jens each took a cup of hot cocoa, while Lars sat by the fireplace.Da: De tre venner så ud gennem vinduet.En: The three friends looked out the window.Da: Regndråberne strømmede ned ad ruderne, men indeni var der varmt og fyldt med latter og venskab.En: Raindrops streamed down the panes, but inside it was warm and filled with laughter and friendship. Vocabulary Words:cozy: hyggeligcabin: hytteadventure: eventyrunfortunate: uheldigtrubber boot: gummistøvlecrooked: skævtcancel: aflyseimpress: imponereknowledge: vidensurprise: overraskelsegather: samlebranches: grenecreativity: kreativitetjourney: rejsesnugly: tætstraighten: retteclearing: lysningrusty: rustnecenter: centrumcomment: kommentarerfragile: skrøbeliglimped: haltededrenched: gennemblødteunmistakable: ikke til at tage fejl afglow: glødadaptability: tilpasningsevneunforgettable: uforglemmeligfireplace: kaminraindrops: regndråberpanes: ruder

Fuhrig, Dirk www.deutschlandfunk.de, Büchermarkt

EVEN MORE about this episode!Can a mother's love endure the unimaginable—facing a rare cancer diagnosis, a failing medical system, and even the loss of custody of her child? In this powerful episode, Hanne Hansen shares her deeply personal journey as her teenage son battled alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. From the shock of diagnosis to the heartbreak of navigating dismissive doctors and legal battles, her story is one of resilience and unshakable devotion.Hanne also opens up about her path to healing after loss, revealing how mediumship, forgiveness, and spiritual connection brought her comfort and strength. With raw honesty, she sheds light on the hidden challenges families face in medical and legal crises while offering hope and guidance to those walking a similar path. This moving conversation is a testament to the enduring power of love and the ways spirit continues to connect us beyond this world.Guest Biography:Hanne Hansen is a Shining Light parent and ordained minister specializing in counseling, grief support, and sound healing. After the passing of her beloved son, Meikel, in 2012, Hanne dedicated her life to guiding others through loss, healing, and transformation. She is also a certified grief counselor and massage therapist who integrates energy work and sound healing into her practice. Deeply grateful for the support she received from Helping Parents Heal and the Melonhead Foundation, Hanne now walks alongside others on their healing journeys, offering compassion, wisdom, and hope.Episode Chapters:(0:00:01) - The Trauma of Childhood Cancer Treatment(0:12:14) - Custody Battle Over Child's Treatment(0:22:53) - Navigating Medical Decisions and Treatment(0:31:44) - Healing and Forgiveness After Loss(0:44:19) - Nurturing Connections With the Spirit Realm(0:55:54) - Navigating Grief and Finding Support➡️Subscribe to Ask Julie Ryan YouTube➡️Subscribe to Ask Julie Ryan Español YouTube➡️Subscribe to Ask Julie Ryan Português YouTube➡️Subscribe to Ask Julie Ryan Deutsch YouTube➡️Subscribe to Ask Julie Ryan Français YouTube✏️Ask Julie a Question!

I dag har vi besøk av Hanne-Lene Dahlgren som er en prisvinnende kokebokforfatter, samfunnsdebattant og en av Norges tydeligste stemmer innen helse og kosthold. Hun deler sine beste mat-hacks, avklarer myter om vegetarkosthold og forklarer hvordan man kan få i seg nok proteiner med mindre kjøtt. Vi snakker også om klima, dyrevelferd og hvorfor Helsedirektoratets kostråd er viktige for både helsa vår og planeten. En episode full av tips, kunnskap og inspirasjon for deg som vil spise grønnere og ta gode valg i matveien. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hanne Kjöller är författare, kolumnist och debattör samt aktuell med “Polis – så funkar det! (inte)”. Boken granskar nätet av byråkrati och styrningsdokument hos en polis som klarar upp allt färre brott. Hanne är ledarskribent på SvD och har tidigare skrivit för bl.a. DN. OBS. Hela avsnittet är 2 tim 26 min. Vill du få tillgång till alla hela avsnitt? Bli medlem på Sista Måltiden. Som medlem får du tillgång till alla nya och gamla avsnitt i sin helhet och utan reklam. Lyssna i valfri podcast-app, inklusive Spotify. Enkelt att komma igång. Ingen bindningstid. Tryck här för att bli medlem eller gå in på https://sistamaltiden.se. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

We're back for another round of Women in Translation Month! Each August, readers around the world celebrate books written by women and translated into English, spotlighting voices the too often go unheard. In this episode, we each pick five WIT titles we're planning to read this month. We promise our goal is not to derail your carefully curated TBR list, but this is an event where we'll happily take responsibility for your reading detours!What WIT books are you reading to celebrate?We've got some fantastic author-focused episodes lined up for the foreseeable future, and we want to give you plenty of time to dive in if you'd like to read along with us. These episodes come around every ten episodes, and with our bi-weekly release schedule, you'll have a few months to get ready for each. Here's what we have in store:* Episode 115: Kazuo Ishiguro* Episode 125: Flannery O'Connor* Episode 135: William Faulkner* Episode 145: Elizabeth Taylor* Episode 155: Naguib MahfouzThere's no rush—take your time, and grab a book (or two, or three) so you're prepared for these as they come!Join the Mookse and the Gripes on DiscordWant to share your thoughts on these upcoming authors or anything else we're discussing? Join us over on Discord! It's the perfect place to dive deeper into the conversation—whether you're reading along with our author-focused episodes or just want to chat about the books that are on your mind.We're also just now in our second novella book club, where we're reading Giovanni's Room by James Baldwin. It's a fantastic book, and we'd love to have you join the discussion. It's a great space to engage with fellow listeners, share your insights, and discover new perspectives on the books you're reading.ShownotesBooks* The Adventures of China Iron, by Gabriela Cabezón Cámara, translated by Fiona Mackintosh and Iona Macintyre* We Are Green and Trembling, by Gabriela Cabezón Cámara, translated by Robin Myers* The Ghost Writer, by Philip Roth* Love in a Cold Climate, by Nancy Mitford* The Sun King, by Nancy Mitford* The Pursuit of Love, by Nancy Mitford* Don't Tell Alfred, by Nancy Mitford* Voltaire in Love, by Nancy Mitford* The Faces, by Tove Ditlevsen, translated by Tiina Nunnally* The Trouble with Happiness, by Tove Ditlevsen, translated by Michael Favala Goldman* Killing Stella, by Marlen Haushofer, translated by Shaun Whiteside* The Wall, by Marlen Haushofer, translated by Shaun Whiteside* Overstaying, by Ariane Koch, translated by Damion Searls* In Farthest Seas, by Lalla Romano, translated by Brian Robert Moore* A Silence Shared, by Lalla Romano, translated by Brian Robert Moore* Frontier, by Can Xue, translated by Karen Gernant and Chen Zeping* The Last Lover, by Can Xue, translated by Annelise Finegan* The Blue Room, by Hanne Ørstavik, translated by Deborah Dawkins* The Taiga Syndrome, by Cristina Rivera Garza, translated by Suzanne Jill Levine and Aviva Kana* New and Selected Stories, by Cristina Rivera Garza, translated by Sarah Booker with additional translations by Lisa Dillman, Francisca González Arias, and Alex Ross* Ultramarine, by Mariette Navarro, translated by Eve Hill Agnus* Voices in the Evening, by Natalia Ginzburg, translated by D.M. Low* The Dry Heart, by Natalia Ginzburg, translated by Frances Frenaye* Family Lexicon, by Natalia Ginzburg, translated by Jenny McPhee* Traces of Enayat, by Iman Mersal, translated by Robin Moger* Motherhood and Its Ghosts, by Iman Mersal, translated by Robin Moger* Animal Stories, by Kate Zambreno* Migratory Birds, by Mariana Oliver, translated by Julia SanchesOther* PEN/America: Women in Translation Month Reading Series 2025* Women in Translation Month websiteThe Mookse and the Gripes Podcast is a bookish conversation hosted by Paul and Trevor. Every other week, we explore a bookish topic and celebrate our love of reading. We're glad you're here, and we hope you'll continue to join us on this literary journey!A huge thank you to those who help make this podcast possible! If you'd like to support us, you can do so via Substack or Patreon. Subscribers receive access to periodic bonus episodes and early access to all new episodes. Plus, each supporter gets their own dedicated feed, allowing them to download episodes a few days before they're released to the public. We'd love for you to check it out! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit mookse.substack.com/subscribe

Home, 11min., Belgium Directed by Hanne Schillemans, Ralph Timmermans Home is a short film about the fragility of life and the virtue of solitude. A faceless figure attempting not to resist the endless waves of pointlessness. Get to know the filmmaker: What motivated you to make this film? Home grew out of a shared fascination with the fragile, often uncomfortable terrain of solitude. We were both navigating a kind of existential tension: the absurdity of life, and the strange peace that can arise when one stops resisting it. The idea that everything is ultimately out of one's control and perhaps even pointless and the realization that this, paradoxically, can be liberating. That thought, oddly enough, gave us comfort. The film became a way to give form to that feeling. From the idea to the finished product, how long did it take for you to make this film? It's hard to say exactly when the idea began. We think Home found us during a hike through desolate nature, when we unexpectedly came upon an empty house. It felt like stumbling into the middle of a concept. We didn't plan it, we just recognized it. From that moment to the final cut, the process took about 18 months. Much of that time was spent letting the idea unfold, allowing it to simmer before taking shape. Subscribe to the podcast: https://twitter.com/wildsoundpod https://www.instagram.com/wildsoundpod/ https://www.facebook.com/wildsoundpod

Grace Hanne, an Innovation Principal Analyst for Johnson County, KS joined the podcast to discuss the County's Sparks Pilot Program, which is an effort to encourage collaboration and innovation across the organization. The program brings together employees from different areas of the County to work on transformative projects. She detailed what benefits the County and its employees gained from the program and the reasons why local governments should focus and invest in the intersectional and interdisciplinary exchange of ideas in local government. Host: Meredith Reynolds