POPULARITY
3 episodes with pardon power
2 episodes with pardon power
2 episodes with pardon power
2 episodes with pardon power
3 episodes with pardon power
Who deserves a second chance and who gets left behind?In this episode of Pardon Who?, we unpack the politics, privilege, and power behind forgiveness. Whether it's a presidential pardon, a public comeback, or personal redemption, we ask the hard questions: Who gets a clean slate? And more importantly why?
Media coverage over the economic impact of President Trump's tariffs has been robust,but not a ton of attention has been paid to the actual legality of them. So that's where Andrew and Mary begin, after two court decisions in the last week questioned the merits and where jurisdiction lies. Then they turn to the president's significant use of the pardon power to commute sentences and override convictions of some friends and allies, and what it says about maintaining a belief in blind justice. And after some great reporting from the New York Times, Mary and Adnrew detail some changes happening within Director Kash Patel's FBI, as bureau leaders are taken down a peg and emphasis on public corruption is dialed back.Further reading: Here is the New York Times reporting concerning the FBI: Unease at F.B.I. Intensifies as Patel Ousts Top OfficialsWant to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts.
First: Donald Trump is aggressively using the power of the pardon to let loyalists off the hook, especially conservatives he claims - baselessly - were pursued by the Biden Justice Department for political reasons. The latest example: a reality TV couple convicted in a $30 million fraud scheme. Plus: Trump is clearly getting fed up with Vladimir Putin's seeming unwillingness to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. But will the president actually punish Russia? And: John King talks with Trump supporters in Allentown, Pennsylvania to get their take on the president's trade war. Do these voters really think the president will bring manufacturing back as he's promising? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Brian Kalt of Michigan State College of Law and Jeffrey Toobin, author of The Pardon: The Politics of Presidential Mercy, join Jeffrey Rosen to explore the founders' vision for the pardon power and the use of the presidential pardon throughout American history—from Thomas Jefferson's pardons to those issued by Presidents Biden and Trump. This conversation was originally streamed live as part of the NCC's America's Town Hall series on March 27, 2025. Resources Jeffrey Toobin, The Pardon: The Politics of Presidential Mercy (2025) Brian Kalt, Constitutional Cliffhangers (2012) Nixon Pardon (Gerald Ford Presidential Library) Trump v. United States (2024) Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 74, New York Packet (March 28, 1788) Abraham Lincoln, “Proclamation 124—Offering Pardon to Deserters” (March 11, 1865) United States v. Klein (1871) Ex parte Garland (1866) Andrew Glass, “Bush pardons Iran-Contra felons, Dec. 24, 1992,” Politico (Dec. 24, 2018) Presidential Records Act Donald Trump, “Granting Pardons and Commutation of Sentences for Certain Offenses Relating to the Events at or Near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021,” (Jan. 20. 2025) Jimmy Carter, “Proclamation 4483—Granting pardon for violations of the Selective Service Act, August 4, 1964, to March 28, 1973,” (Jan. 21, 1973) Pardons granted by President Barack Obama Pardons granted by President Joe Biden Pardons granted by President Bill Clinton Pardons granted by President Donald Trump Stay Connected and Learn More Questions or comments about the show? Email us at podcast@constitutioncenter.org Continue the conversation by following us on social media @ConstitutionCtr. Sign up to receive Constitution Weekly, our email roundup of constitutional news and debate. Follow, rate, and review wherever you listen. Join us for an upcoming live program or watch recordings on YouTube. Support our important work. Donate
The power of the President to pardon convicted criminals is enshrined in the Constitution, but many experts have criticized the recent use of pardons and calls for reform have grown louder. Governors Bredesen and Haslam are joined by Mike Nelson, professor of political science at Rhodes College and Steve Vladeck, professor of law at Georgetown University (and returning YMBR guest), to discuss this power, what the Framers of the Constitution intended, and how it could be reformed.
What are the legal implications of the unprecedented mass pardoning of the January 6th rioters? What does it say about American rule of law? President Biden's DOJ prosecuted nearly 1,600 of the January 6, 2021, rioters—many for acts of shocking violence against police and government offices. On January 20, newly sworn-in President Trump, in one of his first official acts, issued a sweeping grant of clemency to all of the rioters charged in connection with the attack on the Capitol attack. He pardoned most defendants and commuted the sentences of 14 members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers militia, most of whom had been convicted of seditious conspiracy. The response from some of these violent rioters since the pardons has been alarming.“The people who did this, they need to feel the heat. We need to find and put them behind bars for what they did,” said Enrique Tarrio, the former national Proud Boys leader, sentenced to a 22-year sentence on seditious conspiracy charges, on Alex Jones' podcast soon after his pardon. Our guests today are Stanford Law Professor Shirin Sinnar and former DOJ prosecutor Brendan Ballou.Sinnar's scholarship, including a recent study of hate groups, focuses on the legal treatment of political violence, the procedural dimensions of civil rights litigation, and the role of institutions in protecting individual rights and democratic values in the national security contextBallou was a lawyer at the Department of Justice for five years. He resigned on January 23 soon after President Trump's pardons. In a New York Times opinion essay, he wrote: “For while some convicted rioters seem genuinely remorseful, and others appear simply ready to put politics behind them, many others are emboldened by the termination of what they see as unjust prosecutions. Freed by the president, they have never been more dangerous.” He graduated from Stanford Law in 2016.Links:Shirin Sinnar >>> Stanford Law pageNew York Times piece by Brendan Ballou >>> I Prosecuted the Capitol Rioters. They Have Never Been More Dangerous.Connect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>> Twitter/XPam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School PageStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/X(00:00:00) The January 6th Prosecutions and the Pardon Power(00:06:26) Rewriting History and the Threat of Political Violence (00:11:56) The Future of Political Violence in the U.S. (17:24) Addressing Militia Violence and Legal Gaps(21:37) State-Level Prosecutions and Risks of Expanding Criminal Laws(25:27) Pardons, Political Violence, and Historical Parallels
The presidential pardon is the most sweeping and unchallengeable of a president’s powers, and it seems that each time someone leaves the White House, pardons generate at least some level of controversy. Why did the Founders include this power? How was its use originally envisioned, and how has it evolved over time? Historian Jonathan White […]
The presidential pardon is the most sweeping and unchallengeable of a president's powers, and it seems that each time someone leaves the White House, pardons generate at least some level of controversy. Why did the Founders include this power? How was its use originally envisioned, and how has it evolved over time? Historian Jonathan White joins Cara Rogers Stevens to discuss the issue, using Abraham Lincoln as a vehicle to better understand this significant, yet poorly-understood presidential power. Host: Jeff Sikkenga Executive Producer: Jeremy Gypton Subscribe: https://linktr.ee/theamericanidea
Pardons seem to be trending lately, especially in politics. However, don't they undermine the entire justice system? In this episode we will discuss the 4 purposes of the justice system and corrections - starting way back with some biblical history. Then we will dive into presidential pardon powers, the pros and cons, as well as my personal views. As always, we will wrap up with ways you can help to make the justice system better. Also, if you are wondering what happened over the break, there will be a catch-up at the end as well.Support The Shakedown at: https://www.patreon.com/TheShakedown Find Shakedown merch and support us at: https://wayword.pressThe Shakedown on IG, Threads, FB, BlueSky, or TikTok: @gettheshakedownRainforest on IG: @lorax4lifeREFERENCESThe History of the Pardon Power, White House History https://www.whitehousehistory.org/the-history-of-the-pardon-powerThe Four Purposes of Correctionshttps://cap-press.com/files/PPTwebsamples-DO%20NOT%20REMOVE/DelCastilloImpactofRegCrimLaw2eSampleSlides/DelCastilloImpactRegCrimLaw2eSampleSlides.pptx?srsltid=AfmBOorgozafe-3qdfPZWokXIkbHrjVlc24oXyvHiavuaTYqFzCSSbZbNumbers Chapter 35
In this episode of Consider the Constitution, we explore the presidential pardon power with Professor Kim Whele from the University of Baltimore Law School. The discussion covers the historical origins of pardons from British common law, its incorporation into the U.S. Constitution, and how this power has evolved through American history through the recent pardons by both President Biden and President Trump in 2024-2025.
Elcox Law Founder Edwina Elcox discusses the latest in the Bryan Kohberger case. Stanford Law Professor Bernadette Meyler and St. John's University School of Law Professor John Barrett join Legal Face-Off to discuss the use of pardons by Biden and Trump. Oakland Community Health Network Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Compliance Officer Bernard Hooper discusses […]
Pardons have been in the news lately as both Presidents Biden and Trump have used the power extensively. What is the power? Where does it come from? And what, if any, are its limits? Article I mentioned on culture and pardons. Check out our new True Crime Substack the True Crime Times at: https://t.co/26TIoM14Tg Get Prosecutors Podcast Merch: https://www.bonfire.com/store/prosecutors-podcast/ Join the Gallery on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/share/g/4oHFF4agcAvBhm3o/ Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ProsecutorsPod Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/prosecutorspod/ Check out our website for case resources: https://prosecutorspodcast.com/ Hang out with us on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@prosecutorspod https://thefederalist.com/2024/12/05/there-is-no-historical-precedent-for-hunter-bidens-pardon/
Tonight's rundown: Hey BillOReilly.com Premium and Concierge Members, welcome to the No Spin News for Thursday, January 23, 2025. Stand Up for Your Country. Talking Points Memo: Bill outlines what the Constitution says about presidential pardons and how Biden and Trump have exercised this power. Brandon Straka, founder of the #WalkAway Campaign, talks about his charges and plea deal related to January 6, and his pardon from Donald Trump. The House passes the Laken Riley Act, sending the bill to Trump's desk. Congressman James Comer joins the No Spin News to discuss the ongoing Biden family investigation and whether Trump will push charges against Joe Biden. Smart Life: Kathy Hochul proposes a full phone ban in NY schools, but how much will it cost taxpayers? This Day in History: The Carpenters “Please Mr. Postman” hits number one on the Billboard Hot 100 chart. Final Thought: Why DEI is wrong. In Case You Missed It: Read Bill's latest column, He's Back For a limited time, get Bill O'Reilly's bestselling The United States of Trump and a No Spin Mug for only $39.95. Get Bill's latest book, CONFRONTING THE PRESIDENTS, out NOW! Now's the time to get a Premium or Concierge Membership to BillOReilly.com, the only place for honest news analysis. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Golden Age Of America. The Crazy Bishop AKA- Bishop Star Trek! The Pardon Power. How The Went Nuts In 2020.....Not Now! Can We Put Some Members Of The Media in Executive Detention?
#POTUS: Biden and the Pardon Power. @AndrewCMcCarthy @NRO @ThadMcCotter @theamgreatness 1937 SCOTUS with Charles Evan Hughes
"PREVIEW: Colleague Andrew McCarthy outlines the Founders' intention for the Pardon Power and examines how President Biden has used this authority. More tonight 1776 Pulling down King George
US Presidents past and present have abused the constitutional pardon power, but the abuses of that power in just the last week by Presidents Biden and Trump should get special scrutiny. Clark Neily explains. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should presidents have pardon power? Listen here to Michael's take, then vote at Smerconish.com, and please leave a rating and review of this podcast! The Daily Poll Question is a thought-provoking query each day at Smerconish.com on a political, social, or other human interest issue. Entirely non-scientific, it always begins a great conversation. Michael talks about it in this podcast each weekday.
SUPPORT MY WORK:SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/The Dershow staring Alan Dershowitz* APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99_________________________________________________________FOLLOW ME:TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDershRUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_saysLOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz________Youtube: @thedershowwithalendershowitz
In this bonus episode, we feature an in-store event held the day after the 2024 Presidential election with professors Kim Wehle and Jessica Henry, who discussed Kim's book Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works–and Why. Kim Wehle is a constitutional scholar and tenured professor of law at the University of Baltimore School of Law. She was formerly an assistant United States Attorney and an associate counsel in the Whitewater investigation. Professor Wehle is also a legal expert for ABC News, a contributor for BBC World News, and a regular guest on NPR's Morning Edition. She also writes for The Atlantic, Politico, The Hill, and The Bulwark. The author of four books including, Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works–and Why, she lives in Chevy Chase, Maryland with her children.Jessica Henry is an author, professor, legal commentator, blogger, and social justice advocate. She served as a public defender in New York City for nearly a decade and has written numerous articles for academic and mainstream publications. Her research interests include wrongful convictions, severe sentences (including the death penalty and life without parole), and hate crimes. She frequently appears as a commentator on national and local television and radio, and in 2020 she published Smoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never Happened. She is the creator and host of the podcast, Just Justice.Resources:U.S. ConstitutionPardon Power: How the Pardon System Works–and WhyHow to Read the Constitution--and WhyHow to Think Like a Lawyer--and WhyWhat You Need to Know About Voting--and WhySmoke But No Fire: Convicting the Innocent of Crimes that Never HappenedBooks:A full list of the books and authors mentioned in this episode is available here. Register for Upcoming Events.The Watchung Booksellers Podcast is produced by Kathryn Counsell and Marni Jessup and is recorded at Silver Stream Studio in Montclair, NJ. The show is edited by Kathryn Counsell and Bree Testa. Special thanks to Timmy Kellenyi and Derek Mattheiss. Original music is composed and performed by Violet Mujica. Art & design and social media by Evelyn Moulton. Research and show notes by Caroline Shurtleff. Thanks to all the staff at Watchung Booksellers and The Kids' Room! If you liked our episode please like, follow, and share! Stay in touch!Email: wbpodcast@watchungbooksellers.comSocial: @watchungbooksellersSign up for our newsletter to get the latest on our shows, events, and book recommendations!
#SCOTUS: Ex Parte Garland 1866, and the Pardon Power. Richard Epstein, Civitas Institute, @CiviitasOutlook 1888 SCOTUS
It's January 2025, and we're in the final days of the Biden administration. He has had a busy last month or so issuing pardons and commutations. This unfettered power is rightly scrutinized but often misunderstood. The bigger problem is, the whole damn process appears to be broken. And although Pres. Biden has done some good things with his power, it still represents a small fraction of those languishing in prison who deserve action. Margeret Love was the head of the US Pardon office from 1990-97, she had a front row seat to the pardon process, and continues to represent clients seeking pardons. Mark Allenbaugh needs no introduction. His stats help us put many of these decisions into the proper perspective. Both of them join us on the first episode of the new year to lend their unique perspective to this very timely issue! IN THIS EPISODE The Hunter Biden Pardon The 1500 commutations of those who BOP had released to home confinement during Covid; The difference between pardons and clemency; When did things really start to go off the rails in the US Pardon office? (spoiler alert, it was the Clinton years); Is it true that when you accept a pardon it is an admission of guilt? Trumps promise to pardon the January 6th defendants; Can a president pardon himself? Why the pardon essentially makes the president the "DOJ's Janitor"; How the pardon power should be managed going forward; Michael Conahan commutation (the judge embroiled in “cash for kids” scandal); Rita Crundwell (Dixon, IL Comptroller fraud) commutation. LINKS: For more info on the Rita Crundwell Case, there's a great documentary produced by Prof. Kelly Richmond Pope called "All the Queens Horses" currently available on Amazon Prime (https://www.amazon.com/All-Queens-Horses-Gene-Biggerstaff/dp/B07BPNGP85). She also writes about it in her book, "Fool Me Once" https://a.co/d/hQzJFUY I had Dr. Pope on the podcast to talk about this case a while back As for the "Kids for Cash" judge who just had his sentence commuted, here's his wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Conahan Here's our two previous episodes on Hunter Biden. The first talks in detail about the political nature of his prosecution and his original plea bargain falling apart and the next happened live after he pled guilty in California: Ep. 64: Too Cute by Half: Why Hunter's Plea Went South: https://youtu.be/sWEzwKLQCoo?si=rK3qRURAJVQtXXk5 Ep. 92: Livestream Bonus: Hunter Biden Edition: https://www.youtube.com/live/B3VL-cJlXSo?si=r1zAdBS6C2s_STTO(make sure you forward through the first two minutes of tech disaster) And we talk in depth about the concept of "lawfare".
The president spares 37 of the 40 inmates facing the federal death penalty, commuting their sentences to life in prison. Is this an appropriate use of the pardon power, issuing mass clemency based on policy disagreements with the law? Will this action in Biden's last days in office, so soon after he pardoned his son Hunter, add to the arguments for a constitutional amendment? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
After a quick review of the Georgia Court of Appeals decision disqualifying Fani Willis from Donald Trump's criminal case based on an appearance of impropriety, MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord are joined by NYU Law professor and Dean Emeritus, Trevor Morrison. The discussion revolves around the limits and scope of the presidential pardon power, the legal precedence of a blanket pardon for crimes not yet adjudicated, and whether a president can in fact, pardon himself. Want to listen to this show without ads? Sign up for MSNBC Premium on Apple Podcasts.
Kim Wehle joins The Great Battlefield podcast to talk about her career as a law professor and her recent book "Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works and Why".
In this episode of Badlands Daily, hosted by CannCon and GhostofBPH, we dive deep into the latest shocking headlines. First, we cover the tragic shooting at a Madison, Wisconsin, Christian school, exploring the circumstances surrounding the shooter and the ongoing conversation about mental health and gun control. We also discuss the mysterious drone activity over New Jersey and Bedminster, with experts raising questions about its origins and potential implications. Finally, we touch on Donald Trump's statements about pardoning New York City Mayor Eric Adams, and his comments on the U.S. border crisis and the situation with the border wall. Join us for a critical look at today's top news.
#POTUS: Absolute Pardon power and the Bidens..Richard Epstein, Civitas Institute, UT. 1926 Treasury Department
PREVIEW: POTUS: PARDONS: Colleague Richard Epstein of Civitas Institute at the University of Texas Austin comments on the pardon power and the Biden Administration at limits of law. More tonight. 1911 SCOTUS
#Markets: POTUS Pardon Power and the Bidens.Liz Peek The Hill. Fox News and Fox Business 1870 NYC
The Ultimate Preppers Christmas Catalog https://bit.ly/3Zn2iOt
JoJo and Kim Wehle discuss why Biden was completely within his authority to pardon his son Hunter.
We pick up with the Pardon Power in the Constitution and consider the term "Christian Nationalism" from a Christianity as Ethnicity perspective. NB: Ethnicity is not race or color/appearance in this usage of the term. Ethnos, the Greek word used in Matthew 28's "Great Commission," contemplates ethnicity as its used here, as "nation" or people bound together by kinship, heritage, tradition, no matter what they look like, for adoption is very old in the Judeo-Christian tradition (think of for example Ruth, or the language of adoption in the New Testament). Application to American Politics and Public Law are sprinkled throughout. This is a Christmas season series on The Republican Professor podcast.
Presidential pardons are in the headlines again after President Joe Biden's pardon of his son Hunter. But the vast majority of presidents have used this awesome power, which was enshrined in the Constitution at the founding of the country and dates back to 7th Century English monarchs. What are the issues at play with modern presidential pardons? What does history tell us about this practice? Our guest this week is Stanford Law Professor Bernie Meyler, a scholar of British and American constitutional law and of law and the humanities and author of the book Theaters of Pardoning. She joins Pam and Rich for a discussion of high-profile pardons like Hunter Biden and Donald Trump's allies to broader issues of mercy, justice reform, the implications of pardons in polarized politics, their historical roots, and ideas for reform. Connect:Episode Transcripts >>> Stanford Legal Podcast WebsiteStanford Legal Podcast >>> LinkedIn PageRich Ford >>> Twitter/XPam Karlan >>> Stanford Law School PageStanford Law School >>> Twitter/XStanford Lawyer Magazine >>> Twitter/XLinks:Bernadette Meyler >>> Stanford Law page(00:00:00) Chapter 1: The Origins and Evolution of the Pardoning PowerHosts Pam Karlan and Rich Ford welcome guest Bernie Meyler. The discussion opens with a look at the historical roots of the pardoning power, tracing its lineage from the divine rights of kings in England to its adaptation in American democracy. Key examples include early English judicial pardons, debates at the U.S. Constitutional Convention, and George Washington's use during the Whiskey Rebellion. The chapter closes with insights into President Trump's controversial approach to pardons, likened to monarchical practices of wielding power above the law.(00:05:04) Chapter 2: Legal Boundaries and Contemporary Issues in PardoningThis chapter examines the legal limits of the president's pardoning power, such as the inability to pardon state crimes, and the various forms pardons can take. The conversation pivots to notable recent pardons, including Hunter Biden's, sparking a discussion about blanket pardons versus specific ones and their implications on guilt and historical accountability.(00:14:24) Chapter 3: Pardons, Polarization, and Public Perception The discussion shifts to the broader context of pardons, their declining use, and the influence of public opinion. The hosts analyze the risks of granting pardons and compare historical uses of the power, such as Washington's Whiskey Rebellion pardons, to modern examples like January 6th.(00:21:02) Chapter 4: Reforming the Pardon Process in a Divided Society The group explores potential reforms to the pardon process, suggesting ways to make it more democratic and transparent. Meyler discusses citizen panels and their role in ensuring fairness, while reflecting on the challenges of polarized politics.
By Amy Goodman & Denis Moynihan With the simple stroke of a pen, President Biden saved his son from a terrible ordeal. Before he leaves office, he should extend the same compassion to thousands of people in federal prison, victims of the so-called war on drugs.
We take a look at two provisions of "the Supreme Law of the Land," as well as Federalist 74 written by Hamilton, and I reflect briefly on Lincoln's Lyceum Address.
This week: we welcome Harry Dunn as the new co-host! He is qualified and loyal to the Constitution unlike Trump's pick to head the FBI – Kash Patel.President Biden pardoned Hunter Biden and we will not be clutching our pearls about it.We have an update on the Michigan phony electors case; background on Bannon's upcoming fraud trial in state court; and Rudy news. Allison Gillhttps://muellershewrote.substack.com/https://bsky.app/profile/muellershewrote.bsky.socialhttps://twitter.com/MuellerSheWroteHarry Dunnhttps://harrydunn.substack.com/https://bsky.app/profile/libradunn1.bsky.socialPete Strzokhttps://twitter.com/petestrzokThe Podcasthttps://twitter.com/aisle45podWant to support this podcast and get it ad-free and early?Go to: https://www.patreon.com/aisle45podTell us about yourself and what you like about the show - http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=short
The absolute power of the presidential pardon has once again proven to be at odds with a system of government that depends on checks and balances. What's the history of the pardon? We hear from Mark Osler. He's the Robert & Marion Short Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of St. Thomas in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
12/3/24: Atty John Pucci: Hunter Biden & the pardon power. Sci-tech Café: MHC Prof, Kerstin Nordstrom & UMass Prof Alissa Nolden: not impossible burgers. Sen Paul Mark: Trump v. Massachusetts? Amherst Media's Vira Douangmany & Yanna Ok w/ Jacqueline Wallace, Amherst Area Gospel Choir – a cappella in studio!
Before we begin, don't forget to check out Lawrence Eppard's new book, The Poisoning of the American Mind, and to read the newest piece in the Connors Journal on single parenthood in the U.S. Now on to the podcast. . . Kimberly Wehle, a constitutional law expert at the University of Baltimore's School of Law, joins the Utterly Moderate Podcast to discuss her new book, Pardon Power: How the Pardon Power System Works—and Why. Wehle and host Lawrence Eppard discuss a variety of topics, including: How the pardon power looms large in the current presidential election. Why Wehle believes the pardon power is necessary to retain. The constitutional limits of and possible reforms to the pardon. Both good and bad historical examples of the pardon's use. Whether it might be used (appropriately or inappropriately) to help the Jan. 6 rioters, Hunter Biden, or to self-pardon Donald Trump (and whether a self-pardon is even constitutional). Enjoy the conversation and please consider JOINING OUR MAILING LIST! ------------- ------------- Episode Audio: "Air Background Corporate" by REDCVT (Free Music Archive) "Please Listen Carefully" by Jahzzar (Free Music Archive) "Last Dance" by Jahzzar (Free Music Archive) “Happy Trails (To You)” by the Riders in the Sky (used with artist’s permission)
Former assistant U.S. attorney and law professor Kim Wehle looked at how the pardon system works in the United States. She was interviewed by University of Michigan emeritus professor of law and sociology Richard Lempert. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Former assistant U.S. attorney and law professor Kim Wehle looked at how the pardon system works in the United States. She was interviewed by University of Michigan emeritus professor of law and sociology Richard Lempert. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Stand Up is a daily podcast. I book,host,edit, post and promote new episodes with brilliant guests every day. Please subscribe now for as little as 5$ and gain access to a community of over 700 awesome, curious, kind, funny, brilliant, generous souls Kimberly Wehle is an expert in constitutional law and the separation of powers, with particular emphasis on presidential power and administrative agencies. She is a tenured law professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, where she teaches Constitutional Law, Civil Procedure, Administrative law, and Federal Courts. She is also a legal contributor for ABC News and regularly writes for Politico, The Atlantic, and The Bulwark. Winner of the University of Maryland System Board of Regents Award for excellence in scholarship, she also writes and comments on the Supreme Court, election law and voting rights. She was an Assistant United States Attorney in the Washington D.C. office and Associate Independent Counsel in the Whitewater Investigation. She is author of the books, What You Need to Know about Voting—and Why, How to Read The Constitution—and Why, and How to Think Like a Lawyer—and Why: A Common-Sense Guide to Everyday Dilemmas. Her forthcoming book, Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works—and Why, is due out in September of 2. Kim is also the recipient of a 2024-2025 Fulbright US Scholar Award for the University of Leiden, The Netherlands. Follow Kim on Twitter and Instagram, where she hosts an IGTV series called #SimplePolitics, in which she breaks down complex subjects on various legal and political issues in easily understandable language. A sought-out public speaker, Kim also served as an on-air legal analyst with CBS News during the first impeachment of former President Trump and has appeared regularly on numerous other networks, including CNN, NBC, BBC, Fox News, MSNBC, C-SPAN, NPR, PBS and Al Jazeera, and has written for The Guardian and the LA Times, among other publications. Pete on Threads Pete on Tik Tok Pete on YouTube Pete on Twitter Pete On Instagram Pete Personal FB page Stand Up with Pete FB page All things Jon Carroll Follow and Support Pete Coe Buy Ava's Art Hire DJ Monzyk to build your website or help you with Marketing
On today's episode of Hear Me Out: pardon interruption. What's the purpose of the presidential pardon? Well, depends on who you ask — hypothetically, it's meant for course-correction and honoring restorative justice. But presidents on both ends of the spectrum have used it for purposes that are distinctly not that. So do we need the pardon or do we need to get rid of it… and either way, what's next? Kim Wehle joins us once again to talk about her new book, Pardon Power. Hear Me Out ends next week. So, before then, please feel free to email the show: hearmeout@slate.com Podcast production by Maura Currie. Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/hearmeoutplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On today's episode of Hear Me Out: pardon interruption. What's the purpose of the presidential pardon? Well, depends on who you ask — hypothetically, it's meant for course-correction and honoring restorative justice. But presidents on both ends of the spectrum have used it for purposes that are distinctly not that. So do we need the pardon or do we need to get rid of it… and either way, what's next? Kim Wehle joins us once again to talk about her new book, Pardon Power. Hear Me Out ends next week. So, before then, please feel free to email the show: hearmeout@slate.com Podcast production by Maura Currie. Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/hearmeoutplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On today's episode of Hear Me Out: pardon interruption. What's the purpose of the presidential pardon? Well, depends on who you ask — hypothetically, it's meant for course-correction and honoring restorative justice. But presidents on both ends of the spectrum have used it for purposes that are distinctly not that. So do we need the pardon or do we need to get rid of it… and either way, what's next? Kim Wehle joins us once again to talk about her new book, Pardon Power. Hear Me Out ends next week. So, before then, please feel free to email the show: hearmeout@slate.com Podcast production by Maura Currie. Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/hearmeoutplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On today's episode of Hear Me Out: pardon interruption. What's the purpose of the presidential pardon? Well, depends on who you ask — hypothetically, it's meant for course-correction and honoring restorative justice. But presidents on both ends of the spectrum have used it for purposes that are distinctly not that. So do we need the pardon or do we need to get rid of it… and either way, what's next? Kim Wehle joins us once again to talk about her new book, Pardon Power. Hear Me Out ends next week. So, before then, please feel free to email the show: hearmeout@slate.com Podcast production by Maura Currie. Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/hearmeoutplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On today's episode of Hear Me Out: pardon interruption. What's the purpose of the presidential pardon? Well, depends on who you ask — hypothetically, it's meant for course-correction and honoring restorative justice. But presidents on both ends of the spectrum have used it for purposes that are distinctly not that. So do we need the pardon or do we need to get rid of it… and either way, what's next? Kim Wehle joins us once again to talk about her new book, Pardon Power. Hear Me Out ends next week. So, before then, please feel free to email the show: hearmeout@slate.com Podcast production by Maura Currie. Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/hearmeoutplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On today's episode of Hear Me Out: pardon interruption. What's the purpose of the presidential pardon? Well, depends on who you ask — hypothetically, it's meant for course-correction and honoring restorative justice. But presidents on both ends of the spectrum have used it for purposes that are distinctly not that. So do we need the pardon or do we need to get rid of it… and either way, what's next? Kim Wehle joins us once again to talk about her new book, Pardon Power. Hear Me Out ends next week. So, before then, please feel free to email the show: hearmeout@slate.com Podcast production by Maura Currie. Want more Hear Me Out? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/hearmeoutplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
What if a president could pardon crimes that hadn't even been committed yet? Join us as we uncover the intricate workings of the presidential pardon system with Kimberly Wehle, a tenured law professor and ABC News legal contributor. Kimberly shares insights from her upcoming book, "Pardon Power: How the Pardon System Works and Why," shedding light on the president's ability to pardon past actions and the historical context of this profound power.In an exclusive discussion, we dive into the complex legal labyrinth surrounding the cases against Donald Trump, including the controversial handling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Kimberly deciphers Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6E and its implications for national security, while also addressing the unprecedented notion of criminal immunity for a president. We analyze how these legal challenges impact the Department of Justice and the broader implications for our democracy.Our conversation then pivots to the critical differences between democracy and monarchy, using current political scenarios to illustrate the dangers of autocratic shifts. From the implications of the Supreme Court's decisions on Roe v. Wade to the potential misuse of presidential pardon power, we underscore the perils of unchecked authority. We also highlight the essential role of informed voting and the necessity of legal consequences to maintain the rule of law. Tune in for a thought-provoking episode that emphasizes the importance of checks and balances in preserving democratic integrity.Support the Show.
Stigall's monologue today focuses on an news report surrounding the idea behind an app for single liberals to connect. Suffice it to say, Stigall has his share of thoughts on why it will fail miserably. Are you following the fight between Matt Gaetz of Florida and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy? We try to unpack it a bit, mindful even the audience is split. Steve Moore our chief economist weighs in on the funding side of the fight as well as an alarming new poll on the housing market. Plus, Trump in a Manhattan court room yesterday with a clown judge mugging for the camera. What's the likely outcome? Michael O'Neill of Landmark Legal explains and previews some coming SCOTUS cases this term. -For more info visit the official website: https://chrisstigall.comInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/chrisstigallshow/Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChrisStigallFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/chris.stigall/Listen on Spotify: https://tinyurl.com/StigallPodListen on Apple Podcasts: https://bit.ly/StigallShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
This episode is brought to you by Mauve and Mocha. Visit mauveandmocha.com for modern and elegant fashion accessories made by co-host of the show, Siyana J. Topics in this episode: Widows Peak, Mauve and Mocha, Pardon Power, Flower Girl, Ayman is fake, Islam and Hijab, Pretty Boy, Crimson Chin, and more Find out more at https://table-moments.pinecast.co
Don't forget to subscribe. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/beau-of-the-fifth-column/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/beau-of-the-fifth-column/support
Join us for this week’s episode as we discuss a Candle Fire, a Car Thief, a Disturbed Housekeeper, Pardon Power, and so much more. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/the-amazing-world-of-talkinu2019-shiz/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/the-amazing-world-of-talkinu2019-shiz/support
Tonight: How America gave itself the chance to end its long, national nightmare. Then, Trump's last days, and what's next for the party that enabled him. Plus, Jordan Klepper of the Daily Show on the Americans still under the spell of Donald Trump.
Tonight: How America gave itself the chance to end its long, national nightmare. Then, Trump's last days, and what's next for the party that enabled him. Plus, Jordan Klepper of the Daily Show on the Americans still under the spell of Donald Trump.
We recorded this episode on Jan 12, just six days since a mob, whipped up by the president, breached the capitol. The first such breach since the war of 1812. So we’ve had to restart the clock, so to speak.It’s the insurrection equivalent of a workplace injuries counter: “6 days without a breach!”So we recorded six days after a mob stormed the capitol and one day before the House voted to impeach for a second time. Nancy Pelosi wore the same dress for both impeachments, which is just cool, if you ask me. A sartorial power move.My guests are Connor Ewing and Jeffrey Tulis, two political scientists. I didn’t get to ask them about Pelosi’s dress, but I did get to ask them about impeachment, the pardon power, presidential power generally, and more. Be warned that we might get into the weeds a bit, but there are some interesting things that emerge from the conversation. I point out a few in the intro to the podcast...
President Trump in December sparked controversy when he granted pardons to numerous political cronies, including convicted felons Paul Manafort and Roger Stone. The presidential pardon is a time-honored tradition for outgoing presidents, but critics argue these pardons are a clear reward for previous loyalty.
President Trump in December sparked controversy when he granted pardons to numerous political cronies, including convicted felons Paul Manafort and Roger Stone. The presidential pardon is a time-honored tradition for outgoing presidents, but critics argue these pardons are a clear reward for previous loyalty.
We’re looking back at an episode that sheds light on President Trump’s actions as his term ends. Reporter Toluse Olorunippa explores the principles and controversy around presidential pardons after Trump’s clemencies. Original air date: February 20, 2020.
Support this podcast
I never promised you a Rose Garden, but I can give you a short primer on the how, what, and why of pardons before delving into the murky waters of what Trump does and does not have the power to do for himself and his felonious hangers-on. Can he pardon himself? Can he pardon people for crimes they haven't even been charged with yet? Why does the pardon power exist at all? 10 minutes of your time will answer all. I value your support on Patreon.
This episode is simultaneously political and holiday-themed. With the Presidential power of pardoning under scrutiny, I look at the history of its use and misuse as I speculate about how our current lame duck may abuse it and consider whether it should be reformed. Donate at paypal.me/NathanLeviLloyd or support the show by signing up for a 2-week trial of The Great Courses Plus or a 30-day trial of Audible. Background music, including "Remedy for Melancholy," "Run," "Plague," "November," "Laburnum," "Modum," and "July" are by Kai Engel, licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0). Additional music: Mesmerize by Kevin MacLeod Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/4994-mesmerize License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Guy Benson Show - 11-25-2020 [00:00:00] 3:06 pm - Guy Benson Show [00:16:00] 3:27 pm - Guy Benson Show [00:18:17] 3:35 pm - Guy Benson Show [00:33:53] 3:55 pm - Guy Benson Show [00:36:33] 4:06 pm - Guy Benson Show [00:51:28] 4:26 pm - Guy Benson Show [00:54:49] 4:35 pm - Guy Benson Show [01:11:05] 4:55 pm - Guy Benson Show [01:13:06] 5:06 pm - Guy Benson Show [01:27:02] 5:25 pm - Guy Benson Show [01:31:25] 5:35 pm - Guy Benson Show [01:47:31] 5:55 pm - Guy Benson Show
The post Time for Cooper to used pardon power as COVID rages on appeared first on NC Policy Watch.
The post Time for Cooper to used pardon power as COVID rages on appeared first on NC Policy Watch.
Should the president have the right to pardon people? Sources: The Origins of the Pardon https://people.howstuffworks.com/presidential-pardon6.htm Senator Jack Reed on Pardons https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVkBW7gqyt0 The Power of the Pardon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WeUEDOVpMZ8 Trump and the Rules of Presidential Pardons https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LG1fVn_7tI0 Democracy Now https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8PncNxkpVA --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/andanotherthingwithdave/message
Lawfare’s Jack Goldsmith discusses his new book, After Trump. The group then tackles the Supreme Court and Trump’s threat to election integrity. Special Guests: Bill Galston, Damon Linker, Jack Goldsmith, and Linda Chavez.
We break down news from the week. Support the show: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=Q2PZ6NSMG7X7N&source=url See omnystudio.com/policies/listener for privacy information.
The tRUMP could pardon himself before leaving office. Speaker Pelosi could cut this off by starting dozens of impeachment inquiries. Anything under impeachment cannot be pardoned. Period. See trumptalesblog.wordpress.com --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app
President Donald Trump announced a spree of pardons and sentence commutations that continued his track record of using his clemency powers on controversial figures. A president's clemency power is sweeping — he or she can decide to legally forgive or free anyone convicted of federal crimes, removing any remaining punishments and restoring their rights. Commutations, on the other hand, merely reduce a prisoner's sentence. What's the relationship between marijuana, race, and presidential pardons? You have to watch this video to find out.
Only a few presidential powers are very clearly outlined in the U.S. Constitution. One of those is the president’s power to pardon.We’ve seen President Trump exercise his pardon power at several moments during his tenure in office - sometimes to much controversy.Tuesday, the president continued this trend. He pardoned or commuted the sentences of several convicted white-collar criminals at the center of federal anti-corruption and tax fraud cases.Trump’s choice to grant clemency to this group, combined with a reported desire from the administration to issue more pardons in the coming months, raises questions about who else Trump might pardon. Among them is his longtime adviser and friend Roger Stone, who was sentenced Thursday to serve three years four months for impeding a congressional investigation of 2016 Russian election interference.Trump left this door open when he said at an event in Las Vegas Thursday that while he wasn’t going to grant clemency to Stone right now, Stone “has a very good chance of exoneration.”What do a president’s decisions about who to pardon say about his agenda? How unusual is it really for a president to pardon those close to him? And how much power does the Justice Department have to push back on a president who seeks to pardon for political gain?On this episode, White House reporter Toluse Olorunnipa helps us boil our questions down to this: If a president has sweeping pardon powers — are there really consequences to using them? And … should there be?Related episodesTrump’s view of a unilaterally powerful president goes unchallenged'The Framers would not recognize the modern presidency.'
Today's episode takes a deep dive into the history and contemporary use of the Presidential pardon power in light of President Trump's decision to pardon and/or commute the sentences of 11 various and sundry monsters. We figure out exactly what the power was supposed to mean and what it means today. We start off with some pre-show teasers. After that, our "A" segment looks at the basics of the Nevada caucus, including the results you can expect the day after this show drops! What weird changes are taking place in Nevada? Listen and find out! As a teaser, we talk about today's sentencing by Judge Amy Berman Jackson of Trump loyalist and Nixon afficionado Roger Stone. What does it mean, and does it portend a pardon for Stone? Listen and find out! Then, it's time for our deep dive into Presidential pardons and commutations. We begin with the language in the Constitution (Art. 2, Sec. 2, Cl. 1) and Federalist 74. From there, we move on to the 19th and 20th century uses of pardons, looking at the literature and the relatively recent (and controversial -- deservedly so) pardons by Bill Clinton on the very last day of his presidency. We end the segment, of course, by discussing the assorted and sundry monsters pardoned by Trump, including some names you literally won't believe. Appearances None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com. Show Notes & Links Check out Federalist 74 on pardons. In terms of contemporary pardon literature, we recommend Margaret Colgate Love's "The Twilight of the Pardon Power" (2010) and Gregory C. Sisk's 2002 article "Suspending the Pardon Power During the Twilight of a Presidential Term." -Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law -Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs -Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community! -For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki -And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!
On Tuesday President Trump pardoned Edward DeBartolo Jr., a former owner of the San Francisco 49ers. In a major sports history scandal of the time, DeBartolo was convicted in 1998 of gambling fraud. We discuss the DeBartolo pardon, how the recent spate of presidential pardons fits into the history of pardons, and why the pardon exists.
Donald Trump is not the first president to abuse the power of the pardon, but with his latest acts of clemency, our wannabe dictator has crossed lines our nation’s founders never imagined and no prior president ever dared to go — and with good reason. This week, Stu and AJ discuss the good and the bad of presidential clemency, the most ironic pardon in U.S. history, and why Trump’s actions are SO MUCH more dangerous than any of his predecessors. PLUS! We get ready to show Congress, the nation, and the watching world that we are ready to impeach and remove Trump by registering for the historic nationwide mobilization on the eve of Trump's impeachment vote at impeach.org. Moment of Uplift: Baldwin, Florida — one of America’s most conservative towns — needed a place to buy groceries, so the mayor set up a government-run store. Unlike almost everything Republicans give the label to, this IS socialism. The residents love it and so do we! This is your country for the week of December 2, 2019.
What are the values and purposes behind the pardon power? How has President Trump used this executive power in his first term and how might he use it in the future? Harry talks with an expert panel including Robert Bauer, former White House counsel and professor, Margaret Love, former pardon attorney, and Rachel Barkow, professor of Law at New York University and a former member of the United States Sentencing Commission.
Trump vows not to work with Democrats until investigations end, proving once again he likes the trappings of the presidency but not the actual work, plus SE explains why impeachment could be his best-case scenario at this point; Trump, Kellyanne Conway, Pelosi, and sexist smears; Elizabeth Warren gains some traction in the polls, which makes her our Candidate of the Week; Is electability & favorability still a thing in a post-Trump world?; Trump is considering pardoning war criminals; A new study shows women are more productive when the office temperature is warmer
Chad Roach Preaches a message about the Grace of God that gives us Pardon, Power, and Promise. The post Grace-Pardon, Power, and Promise appeared first on Easley Church of God.
Legally Insane Highlight Reel - Episode 50 Today Matt and Tony celebrate their 50th episode by brining you highlights of some of their favorite past shows. Statistically most podcasts get to only 3 episodes before throwing in the towel. The guys will be back next week with a new episode, but for now kick back, relax and enjoy some of the funnier moments of past episodes. Highlights: [07:00] – Hulk Hogan [10:20] – Clarence Thomas [11:56] – John McCain [14:36] – McDonalds [17:44] – Animal Cruelty [20:32] – The Blacksox [22:47] – Tribal Law [24:23] – Revenge Porn [26:26] – Divorce Law [28:35] – Pardon Power [30:45] – Eminent Domain [33:28] – Monument Laws The Takeaway – Cheers to our 50th Episode. Hollywood Improv Ticket Link: https://www.ticketweb.com/event/legally-insane-with-matt-ritter-hollywood-improv-the-lab-tickets/8716345?pl=hollyimprov&REFID=hollywoodimprov&_ga=2.229160988.1613415035.1536793988-696882873.1536793988 Twitter: @mattritter1 @toekneesam Website: www.cascademedia.com
On this episode of The Critical Hour, Dr. Wilmer Leon is joined by Dr. Gerald Horne, a professor of history at the University of Houston and author of Blows Against the Empire: U.S. Imperialism in Crisis. Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort was found guilty of tax fraud, bank fraud and all kinds of fraud; according to Rudy Giuliani, Trump considered pardoning Manafort. A lone holdout on the jury kept the prosecution from going 18 for 18 against Manafort. Over the past two days, we've been discussing that America's prisoners are on strike. Yesterday, several members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, all of whom have been jailed by Israel for their participation in the struggle for national independence, released a statement in solidarity with the national US prisoners strike, which began yesterday. The statement expressed the group's “mourning for George Jackson, the imprisoned revolutionary and martyr of the Black Liberation struggle. The strike is beginning on the 47th anniversary of his martyrdom, an event that was recognized in Palestine and around the world at the time as an assassination of a true voice of struggle by the US ruling class.” This is an example of the unity that oppressors fear because they can't control it.Another incorrect tweet from President Trump cited false information about widespread attacks on White farmers in South Africa. He waded into South Africa's proposal to seize land from white farmers, saying in a post on Twitter late Wednesday that he had asked Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to “closely study” the “the large scale killing of farmers” - a claim disputed by official figures and the country's biggest farmers' group. Remember, land reclamation is what turned the tide against former President of Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe. So, it sounds to me as though there are a few different groups who are trying to turn public opinion against South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and label him “a racist” as they did with former Zimbabwean President Mugabe. Well, that's fake news from the lying fake “newser” in chief. The tweet gives prominence to a false narrative pushed by some right-wing groups in South Africa that there have been numerous seizures of white-owned land and widespread killings of white farmers. Some of those groups have brought their claims to the United States on lobbying trips. Mr. Trump's tweet is likely to inflame the divisive landownership debate. Lauren von Bernuth, Co-Founder of Citizen Truth, has been following the truth, lies and money trail behind the Syrian White Helmets. While the group is gaining momentum, many still don't know who they are, who funds them and what their mission truly is about. GUESTS: Gerald Horne - Professor of history at the University of Houston and author of many books, including Blows Against the Empire: U.S. Imperialism in Crisis Obi Egbuna - Activist and US representative for the Zimbabwean newspaper The HeraldLauren von Bernuth - Co-Founder of Citizen Truth
Larry P. Arnn and Hugh Hewitt discuss the Pardon Power and Treaty Power from Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, including President Trump's recent pardon of Dinesh D'Souza.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Larry P. Arnn and Hugh Hewitt discuss the Pardon Power and Treaty Power from Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, including President Trump's recent pardon of Dinesh D'Souza.
Richard Epstein explains what the Constitution says about President Trump's ability to pardon himself, grapples with the constitutional standards for impeachment, and warns about the political excesses being engendered by the Mueller investigation.
Help support the show! - http://www.patreon.com/dailyinternet Merchandise! - https://teespring.com/stores/the-ireadit-emporium #5 - Endangered mountain gorilla population recovers to over 1,000 #4 - Trump: 'I have the absolute right to pardon myself' #3 - 'You don't look like a legislator': Security stops black, female lawmaker going to work in Ohio #2 - After 4 years, Indiana embraces text-to-911 in emergencies #1 - Mexico: Three More Female Politicians Murdered In 24 Hours Nathan - Supreme Court rules in favor of Colorado baker who refused to make wedding cake for gay couple for religious reasons Schwahn - Amazon's $1 Billion 'Lord of the Rings' Series Will Run 5 Seasons Connect with us: Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/dailyinternet Website: http://mjolnir.media/ireadit Subreddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/ireaditcast Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/ireadit YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCZXcQHg5RGMinTm5_yLOGVg Instagram: https://instagram.com/ireaditcast Twitter: http://twitter.com/ireaditcast E-mail: feedback.ireadit@gmail.com Voicemail: (508)-738-2278 Michael Schwahn: @schwahnmichael Nathan Wood: @bimmenstein
Michael Goodwin
Learn what Presidential Pardon Power is and how it works. Learn the purpose of granting pardon. The Recap On this week’s episode, Matt and Tony deep dive into some of the craziest and darkest parts of the legal history of the United States. Matt is a recovering Big Law attorney-turned-comedian with a passion for legal history, while Tony has no legal background whatsoever - except for a few minor brushes with the law. Ultimately, it’s Tony’s absurd and funny point of view on laws that will rub Matt the hilarious way. Expect tons of crazy antics from the duo as they bring their insights about the use and misuse of the Pardon Power. Check out these episode highlights 01:00 – History of Pardon Power 10:10 – How the President’s Pardon Power works 11:27 – The Whiskey Rebellion of 1974 19:30 – Brigham Young and the Utah War of 1858 20:20 – Socialist politician Eugene Debs’ sedition case in 1920 21:48 – Richard Nixon and the Watergate Scandal of 1974 25:48 –Patty Hearst and Symbionese Liberation Army in 2002 26:01 –Bill Clinton pardoned FBI’s top fugitive, Mark Rich 36:43 – Obama pardoned 5% of all the pardon requests during his term 46:28 – Matt and Sam take on the use and abuse of Pardon Power and clemency grants
Legally Insane is a deep dive into some of the craziest and dark parts of the legal history of this great country. Our hosts Matt Ritter and Tony Sam come at the topic in a very unique way. Matt is a recovering Ivy league Biglaw attorney turned comedian with a passion for legal history. Tony has no legal background whatsoever, expect for a few minor brushes with the law. However, he is one of the top comedians in the world and was recently named a "Comic to Watch" by LA WEEKLY. He has no idea what Matt is about to discuss before each podcast so he follows along with our listener, and it ends up being a hilarious half hour filled with education and laughs. Covering a wide range of topics like: Eminent Domain, Blue Laws, Stand Your Ground, the Pardon Power and more, listening to this podcast will make you a great dinner party guest.
According to Article II, Section 2, of the United States Constitution, the president "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” With the recent investigation into President Trump’s possible collusion with Russia by special counsel Robert Mueller, talk of presidential pardon power has surfaced. So the question remains: if President Trump were to be ever found guilty of a federal crime, could he pardon himself? On Lawyer 2 Lawyer, host Bob Ambrogi joins guests Brian C. Kalt, professor of law and the Harold Norris Faculty Scholar at Michigan State University College of Law, and Robert L. Deitz, professor of Public Policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University, as they take an inside look at presidential pardon power. They discuss limits, take a look back at history, look ahead to see how this all will unfold, and get a deeper look into a possible presidential self-pardon and repercussions. Brian C. Kalt is professor of law and the Harold Norris Faculty Scholar at Michigan State University College of Law. Robert L. Deitz is professor of Public Policy at the Schar School of Policy and Government at George Mason University. Special thanks to our sponsors, Clio and Litera.
In episode 110 of The More Perfect Union podcast series, the gang ruminates about presidential pardons, newly released intel about Jeff Session's previously undisclosed talks with the Russian ambassador, and the co-hosts own Russian connections that the MPU podcast feels compelled to reveal.
There are reports that the Trump administration is being investigated for obstruction of justice. This has led a lot of people to wonder if the Constitution's presidential pardon power could be used to absolve members of his administration, or even himself, from criminal charges. And what does the Constitution say about how a pardon has to be presented? Can Trump pardon someone with a tweet?
There are reports that the Trump administration is being investigated for obstruction of justice. This has led a lot of people to wonder if the Constitution’s presidential pardon power could be used to absolve members of his administration, or even himself, from criminal charges. And what does the Constitution say about how a pardon has to be presented? Can Trump pardon someone with a tweet?
Former Governor Haley Barbour of Mississippi is only the latest in a long line of chief executives to issue a heapin' helpin' of pardons just before leaving office -- Richard Nixon, anyone? Anyone? -- How could he do such a thing? How have U.S. Presidents, from George Washington to Barack Obama, exercised the remarkable Pardon Power?
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
