POPULARITY
Categories
Autism rates are rising all over the world, and lots of people are wondering: why? In the U.S., HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has said the cause is an "environmental toxin" and has vowed to get to the bottom of it. But we already have lots of science on this — so what does that research tell us? We talk with epidemiologist Professor Brian Lee, Associate Professor Karen Heffler, clinical psychologist Professor Catherine Lord, epidemiologist Professor Maureen Durkin, and Senior Science Researcher Dena Gassner. We want to hear your ideas for new episodes of Science Vs! Tell us via: Instagram at science_vs Bluesky at sciencevs X at @sciencevs Email at sciencevsteam@gmail.com Voicemail at +1(774) 481-1238 Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsAutism In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Rates of autism are going up (03:33) The hunt for the cause of the ‘autism epidemic' (13:43) Could screen time be causing autism? (20:10) The changing definition of autism (27:48) Could this explain the rise in autism? This episode was produced by Meryl Horn, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Ekedi Fausther-Keeys, Michelle Dang, and Rose Rimler. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking, research assistance, and consulting by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Emma Munger, So Wylie, Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka and Bobby Lord. A special thanks to the researchers we reached out to, including Professor Karen Pierce, Professor David Mandell, Professor Deborah Bilder, Professor Frédérique Bonnet-Brilhault, Dr. Helen Tager-Flusburg, Dr. Isabella de la Lara, Katherine Byrne, Professor Sven Bölte, and Dr. Whitney Worsham. Special thanks also to Lynn Keeys and Mbella Beseka, Chris Suter, Elise and Dylan, Jack Weinstein and Hunter, and Joseph Lavelle Wilson and the Zukerman Family. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Fluoride and its presence in public water has become a hot-button issue in the United States. More and more communities and government officials are rethinking whether the benefits fluoride provides our teeth outweigh its potential health risks. But history shows fluoride is no stranger to controversy or conspiracy theories. Over the years, the naturally-occurring mineral compound has been blamed for turning women into nymphomaniacs, populations into “moronic, atheistic slaves”, and perhaps most popularly, it's been accused of being a weapon in a vast communist plot to overthrow democracy. What's true and what's not? The needle is moving. ***Keep up with us on Instagram @theconspiracypod! Listen to Science Vs. explore the science, including recent studies on whether fluoride affects IQ. Listen to The Journal discuss how the politics of fluoride in drinking water are playing out across the country. To check fluoride levels in your local water, visit the CDC's My Water's Fluoride page. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
A lot of influencers are going on all-meat diets, saying that all this meat is clearing up inflammation, healing their guts, and sharpening their focus. But others say, hold up — this diet is sure to lead to heart disease, cancer, and even scurvy. So we're asking: Is it possible to live on meat alone? Is there any benefit to the carnivore diet? And what are the risks? We talk to nutritionist Prof. Caryn Zinn and internist Dr. Adrian Soto-Mota. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsCarnivore In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Carnivores Bring the Meat (04:28) They're Gonna Get Scurvy, Right? (13:09) Fiber? Cholesterol? Heart Disease? Cancer? (20:11) A Miracle Diet? (22:31) Are Plants the Enemy? (25:57) Is it Just Keto? (27:50) Weight Loss (28:50) Should You Go Carnivore? This episode was produced by Rose Rimler, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Ekedi Fausther-Keeys, Michelle Dang, and Meryl Horn. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Emma Munger, So Wylie, Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka and Bobby Lord. A special thanks to the researchers we reached out to including Dr. Lawrence David, Dr. Andrija Karačić and others. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In this episode of Mormonism Live, Radio Free Mormon (Bill is on vacation) dives headfirst into the growing tension between scientific discovery and Mormon doctrine. When it comes to mormonism in the modern world, science keeps raising its hand with uncomfortable questions. The LDS Church, meanwhile, continues to insist it has the answers… or at… Read More »Science vs. Mormonism [Mormonism Live 234]
In this episode of Mormonism Live, Radio Free Mormon (Bill is on vacation) dives headfirst into the growing tension between scientific discovery and Mormon doctrine. When it comes to mormonism in the modern world, science keeps raising its hand with uncomfortable questions. The LDS Church, meanwhile, continues to insist it has the answers… or at… Read More »Science vs. Mormonism [Mormonism Live 234] The post Science vs. Mormonism [Mormonism Live 234] appeared first on Mormon Discussions Podcasts - Full Lineup.
Send us a textThe age-old debate of plant-based versus omnivorous diets takes center stage in this riveting conversation between host Anthony Amen and guest Tyler, creator of the "Full Vegan Belly" program. What begins as a friendly discussion quickly evolves into a fascinating exploration of nutritional science, evolutionary biology, and the psychology behind sustainable dietary habits.Tyler shares his unexpected journey from frustrated meat-eater to vegan advocate after experiencing remarkable changes just days into his plant-based experiment. His program promises 97% complete nutrition through carefully selected whole foods condensed into a simple, accessible meal plan requiring minimal cooking skills. The comprehensive approach focuses on nutrient density rather than restriction, offering a refreshing departure from more complicated vegan regimens.Anthony brings critical counterpoints to the conversation, challenging veganism's nutritional completeness by highlighting vitamin B12 deficiency concerns and the complexity of obtaining complete proteins from plant sources. His provocative "survival guide diet" perspective – explaining why 90% of plants are potentially dangerous while 90% of animals are safe to eat – adds a compelling evolutionary dimension that even has Tyler reconsidering certain assumptions.What emerges isn't a clear "winner" in the dietary debate, but rather a thoughtful exploration of balance. Both agree that processed foods (including many commercial vegan products) undermine health regardless of dietary philosophy. They find common ground in advocating for whole foods, simple preparation methods, and the 80-20 approach to sustainability – being disciplined most of the time while allowing flexibility to enjoy life.Whether you're a committed omnivore, curious about plant-based eating, or somewhere in between, this episode delivers valuable insights without dogma. You'll walk away with practical nutrition knowledge, a deeper understanding of different dietary perspectives, and perhaps most importantly, permission to find your own balanced path to better health without the pressure of perfection.Ready to challenge your assumptions about diet and nutrition? Listen now and discover how small, consistent changes might be more powerful than radical transformations in your journey toward optimal health.Support the showLearn More at: www.Redefine-Fitness.com
Fitness buffs online can't stop raving about creatine. They say it is THE supplement to get you shredded in no time — and that it can even boost your brain and memory too. Are they right? We dive into the science of creatine and talk to anatomy Professor Darryn Willoughby, physicist Dr. Ali Gordji-Nejad, and psychology researcher Julia Fabienne Sandkühler. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsCreatine In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The hype around creatine (02:40) How creatine builds muscle (08:41) Are the gains all muscle? (17:23) Does creatine help with sleep deprivation? (22:10) Does creatine boost cognition? (27:05) Is creatine safe? This episode was produced by Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Marlowe Starling. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Emma Munger, So Wylie, Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka and Bobby Lord. A special thanks to the researchers we reached out to, including Dr. Imtiaz Desai and Prof. Phil Chilibeck. Thanks to Larry Lee and Lee Physical Therapy & Wellness. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Science vs. Spin The Defense Pushes Conspiracy, But the Timeline Doesn't Lie On Day 22 of the Karen Read trial, the defense launched what looked more like a desperate PR offensive than a credible legal cross-examination. Their target? Crash reconstruction expert Judson Welcher—the man who clearly laid out how Read's Lexus SUV, in reverse at 74% throttle and 23.9 mph, aligned perfectly with the injuries found on John O'Keefe's body. The defense didn't challenge the data. They couldn't. Instead, they went after Welcher's paycheck—suggesting his $325,000 compensation somehow invalidated the scientific conclusions. But forensic experts cost money—especially when they laser-scan the scene, replicate impact scenarios, and map injuries to vehicle geometry with precision. Welcher testified that O'Keefe's wounds—on his arm, hip, and head—were consistent with being struck by an SUV and falling to the frozen ground. The defense, meanwhile, continues to float its baseless conspiracy theory that O'Keefe was beaten inside the house, dumped in the snow, and that the entire Canton police and Massachusetts State Police are complicit in framing Karen Read. Even Judge Cannone saw through the smoke. She allowed Welcher to state that the damage to the SUV and the injuries were consistent with a collision—but reminded the jury that only they can decide what happened. Which is exactly what prosecutors want: let the facts speak louder than the fiction. The real question isn't whether the defense can poke at Welcher's resume. It's whether they can explain why everything—timeline, data, injuries, and forensic logic—points to one person: Karen Read. #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #ForensicTruth #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #DefenseDesperation #TrueCrimeUpdate #HiddenKillersPod #ProsecutionCase #KarenReadFacts Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Science vs. Spin The Defense Pushes Conspiracy, But the Timeline Doesn't Lie On Day 22 of the Karen Read trial, the defense launched what looked more like a desperate PR offensive than a credible legal cross-examination. Their target? Crash reconstruction expert Judson Welcher—the man who clearly laid out how Read's Lexus SUV, in reverse at 74% throttle and 23.9 mph, aligned perfectly with the injuries found on John O'Keefe's body. The defense didn't challenge the data. They couldn't. Instead, they went after Welcher's paycheck—suggesting his $325,000 compensation somehow invalidated the scientific conclusions. But forensic experts cost money—especially when they laser-scan the scene, replicate impact scenarios, and map injuries to vehicle geometry with precision. Welcher testified that O'Keefe's wounds—on his arm, hip, and head—were consistent with being struck by an SUV and falling to the frozen ground. The defense, meanwhile, continues to float its baseless conspiracy theory that O'Keefe was beaten inside the house, dumped in the snow, and that the entire Canton police and Massachusetts State Police are complicit in framing Karen Read. Even Judge Cannone saw through the smoke. She allowed Welcher to state that the damage to the SUV and the injuries were consistent with a collision—but reminded the jury that only they can decide what happened. Which is exactly what prosecutors want: let the facts speak louder than the fiction. The real question isn't whether the defense can poke at Welcher's resume. It's whether they can explain why everything—timeline, data, injuries, and forensic logic—points to one person: Karen Read. #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #ForensicTruth #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #DefenseDesperation #TrueCrimeUpdate #HiddenKillersPod #ProsecutionCase #KarenReadFacts Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Science vs. Spin The Defense Pushes Conspiracy, But the Timeline Doesn't Lie On Day 22 of the Karen Read trial, the defense launched what looked more like a desperate PR offensive than a credible legal cross-examination. Their target? Crash reconstruction expert Judson Welcher—the man who clearly laid out how Read's Lexus SUV, in reverse at 74% throttle and 23.9 mph, aligned perfectly with the injuries found on John O'Keefe's body. The defense didn't challenge the data. They couldn't. Instead, they went after Welcher's paycheck—suggesting his $325,000 compensation somehow invalidated the scientific conclusions. But forensic experts cost money—especially when they laser-scan the scene, replicate impact scenarios, and map injuries to vehicle geometry with precision. Welcher testified that O'Keefe's wounds—on his arm, hip, and head—were consistent with being struck by an SUV and falling to the frozen ground. The defense, meanwhile, continues to float its baseless conspiracy theory that O'Keefe was beaten inside the house, dumped in the snow, and that the entire Canton police and Massachusetts State Police are complicit in framing Karen Read. Even Judge Cannone saw through the smoke. She allowed Welcher to state that the damage to the SUV and the injuries were consistent with a collision—but reminded the jury that only they can decide what happened. Which is exactly what prosecutors want: let the facts speak louder than the fiction. The real question isn't whether the defense can poke at Welcher's resume. It's whether they can explain why everything—timeline, data, injuries, and forensic logic—points to one person: Karen Read. #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #ForensicTruth #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #DefenseDesperation #TrueCrimeUpdate #HiddenKillersPod #ProsecutionCase #KarenReadFacts Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Science vs. Spin The Defense Pushes Conspiracy, But the Timeline Doesn't Lie On Day 22 of the Karen Read trial, the defense launched what looked more like a desperate PR offensive than a credible legal cross-examination. Their target? Crash reconstruction expert Judson Welcher—the man who clearly laid out how Read's Lexus SUV, in reverse at 74% throttle and 23.9 mph, aligned perfectly with the injuries found on John O'Keefe's body. The defense didn't challenge the data. They couldn't. Instead, they went after Welcher's paycheck—suggesting his $325,000 compensation somehow invalidated the scientific conclusions. But forensic experts cost money—especially when they laser-scan the scene, replicate impact scenarios, and map injuries to vehicle geometry with precision. Welcher testified that O'Keefe's wounds—on his arm, hip, and head—were consistent with being struck by an SUV and falling to the frozen ground. The defense, meanwhile, continues to float its baseless conspiracy theory that O'Keefe was beaten inside the house, dumped in the snow, and that the entire Canton police and Massachusetts State Police are complicit in framing Karen Read. Even Judge Cannone saw through the smoke. She allowed Welcher to state that the damage to the SUV and the injuries were consistent with a collision—but reminded the jury that only they can decide what happened. Which is exactly what prosecutors want: let the facts speak louder than the fiction. The real question isn't whether the defense can poke at Welcher's resume. It's whether they can explain why everything—timeline, data, injuries, and forensic logic—points to one person: Karen Read. #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #ForensicTruth #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #DefenseDesperation #TrueCrimeUpdate #HiddenKillersPod #ProsecutionCase #KarenReadFacts Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
Methamphetamine is best known as one of the most addictive and dangerous drugs out there. But it's also an FDA-approved drug that can be used to treat ADHD in children. In this special feed drop of the Spotify podcast Science Vs, scientists and meth users weigh in on what meth does to your brain. This episode was produced and hosted by Wendy Zukerman, with production from Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, Michelle Dang and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys. It was edited by Blythe Terrell, fact checked by Erica Akiko Howard, mixed by Bobby Lord, with music by Bobby Lord, Bumi Hidaka, So Wylie, Emma Munger and Peter Leonard. You can find and follow Science Vs here: https://open.spotify.com/show/5lY4b5PGOvMuOYOjOVEcb9?si=273dc5f470ba476d Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Send us a textI had a great conversation with Dr Lauren Colenso-Semple today as we discussed what the science says, versus what the trends are saying! Listen in! Dr. Lauren Colenso-Semple discusses evidence-based fitness, emphasizing the importance of basics like strength training, balanced nutrition, and understanding hormone impacts without falling for misleading trends.00:00 Lauren's mission to simplify fitness and nutrition 07:07 Basic principles of health and fitness 14:15 Strength Training -heavy or light?21:24 Physical activity 28:27 Current protein recomendations35:38 Supplements42:44 Cortisol49:51 HormonesFollow Dr Lauren Colenso-Semple: https://www.instagram.com/drlaurencs1/Lauren's MASS Research Review: https://massresearchreview.com/Move Daily Membership: https://movedailyca.mykajabi.com/offers/rzB5Fqiw/checkoutFOLLOW ALONG!Follow on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/movedailyfitness/Follow on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/movedailyfitness/Follow on Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.ca/tracysteen/Indemnity** All information provided by Move Daily Fitness and Tracy Steen is of a general nature and is furnished for educational/entertainment purposes only. No information is to be taken as medical or other health advice pertaining to any individual's specific health conditions. Move Daily is not engaged in rendering any medical services. Move Daily makes no guarantee regarding the accuracy, timeliness or relevance of any text, video or audio content. Any content provided is not a diagnosis, treatment plan or recommendation for a particular course of action regarding your health and it is not intended to provide specific medical advice. Do not delay in seeking the advice and diagnosis of a medical professional because of anything you may have read or interpreted from Move Daily Fitness content. Consult your health care professional before participating in or acting on any recommendations found on Move Daily Fitness. You agree, at your exposure, to indemnify and hold Move Daily Fitness and Tracy Steen harmless from any and all losses, liabilities and injuries, or damages resulting from and all claims, cause of action, suits, proceedings and demands against Move Daily Fitness and Tracy Steen, arising from or related to decisions or recommendations you make using Move Daily Fitness content. You agree that use of this information is at your own riskShop Legion Supplements and use discount code: MoveDailyThis is an affiliate link. The Move Daily Membership is a paid monthly subscription for women, which gives you access to a huge amount of resources to help support you in reaching your health goals. Whether you're looking to lose fat, gain lean muscle, focus on your nutrition, give time to wellness or simply wish to dial in your overall health, we can support you in achieving your objectives. Join today!Support the showThanks for moving daily with us in your fitness, wellness and nutrition! Be sure to follow us here:YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TracySteenMoveDailyInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/movedailyfitness/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tracy.steen1TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tracysteenSubscribe to my podcast! https://www.buzzsprout.com/2375873/support
In this episode of the Absolute Strength Podcast, Derek and I dive into science vs. bro science. More specifically, should you always follow what science says is optimal, or focus on what works for you? We explain why bro science sometimes delivers real results, how evidence-based training can fall short in the real world, and why a blend of both is probably best. If you've ever wondered whether you're overthinking your training—or not thinking enough—this one's for you. Sit back, relax, and enjoy! Sign up for the newsletter: https://kylehuntfitness.beehiiv.com/subscribe Hire Kyle as your coach: http://www.kylehuntfitness.com/services/ Connect with Kyle: KyleHuntFitness@gmail.com http://www.kylehuntfitness.com/ Connect with Derek: @DerekCharlebois https://www.prbreaker.com/ Programs: Powerbuilding: Absolute Progress 2.0 Powerlifting: Absolute Strength 3.0 Bodybuilding: Absolute Muscle Get 10% OFF PR Breaker Supplements: DISCOUNT CODE: "HUNT" at https://www.prbreaker.com/discount/HUNT
Bird flu has been in the headlines for ages, with scientists warning that we could be headed for a pandemic. But we've been hearing about this H5N1 virus for so long that it's kind of starting to feel like the boy who cried wolf. So — what's really going on with H5N1 bird flu? How scary is it, and how likely is it that we're going to end up in a bird flu pandemic? We talk to virologists Dr. Seema Lakdawala and Dr. Richard Webby. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsBirdFlu (00:00) Tons of people are freaked out about H5N1 bird flu (03:38) Why H5N1 bird flu is scary (05:01) Birds are falling out of the sky dead (07:32) Things get weird when bird flu gets into mammals (18:34) What happens when humans start getting this bird flu (23:26) Is bird flu mutating? (29:11) Should I worry about bird flu? (30:50) Do we have anything to fight bird flu? (32:14) We have had some silent cases of bird flu already This episode was produced by Blythe Terrell, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Michelle Dang, Rose Rimler, Meryl Horn and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys. We're edited by Blythe Terrell with help from Wendy Zukerman. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord and Sam Bair. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Music written by Bumi Hidaka, Peter Leonard, Emma Munger, So Wylie, and Bobby Lord. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke to for this episode, including Dr. Louise Moncla, Dr. Ted Elsasser, Dr. John Korslund, Victoria Rosado and Lindsey Adams. Thanks to Jeff DelViscio. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Wendy Zukerman, host and executive producer of the Science Vs podcast on Spotify, joined Philip Clark on Nightlife to look at the latest news in science.
We've all heard health tips that sound convincing, especially when they're passed around in casual conversation or shared in social media reels. Things like, “Cut out sugar and you'll starve cancer,” or “Superfoods can cure disease.” These kinds of statements might sound reassuring, but are they backed by science? After teaching my 6 Pillars of Health and Wellness at a local school, I found myself fielding lots of interesting questions from teachers, especially around cancer and lifestyle habits. Can you really shrink cancer by cutting out sugar? Is cancer contagious? Are superfoods the magical cure we've all been waiting for? In this episode, I unpack some of the most frequently asked (and misunderstood) questions about cancer and lifestyle habits, inspired by my recent wellness sessions with school staff. About Your Host Hosted by Dr. Deepa Grandon, MD MBA, triple board-certified physician with over 23 years of experience working as a Physician Consultant for influential organizations worldwide. Dr. Grandon is the founder of Transformational Life Consulting (TLC) and an outspoken faith-based leader in evidenced-based lifestyle medicine. TLC is presenting this podcast as a form of information sharing only. It is not medical advice or intended to replace the judgment of a licensed physician. TLC is not responsible for any claims related to procedures, professionals, products, or methods discussed in the podcast, and it does not approve or endorse any products, professionals, services, or methods that might be referenced. Check out this episode on our website, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify, and don't forget to leave a review if you like what you heard. Your review feeds the algorithm so our show reaches more people. Thank you!
Are you tired of being bombarded with promises of miraculous anti-aging solutions? Join us as we separate fact from fiction, exploring the science behind aging and exposing the marketing tricks that prey on your desire to look and feel younger. We'll reveal what truly works and what's just a clever scam, helping you make informed choices about your health and beauty.Dr. Bob and Dr. Brockman take calls and emails from listenersHealth Alternative of the WeekHealth Outrage of the WeekProduct Recall of the WeekHealth Mystery of the Week
Methamphetamine has a scary reputation as one of the most addictive and dangerous drugs out there. But at the same time, it's an FDA-approved drug — and can even be used to treat ADHD in children. So just how dangerous and addictive is meth? And what's going on in your brain when you use it? We hear from Science Vs listeners who've used it — and the scientists who study it, including neuroscientists Professor Martin Paulus and Dr. Jennifer Hsieh, as well as Dr. Kate O'Malley and Dr. Krista Siefried. Find drug use resources here: spotify.com/resources Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsMeth In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Methamphetamine: The Scariest Drug (03:44) Super Meth? (04:35) What it feels like to take Meth (05:57) What meth does in the brain (09:20) Can Meth break your brain? (21:51) Meth Mouth: Is it real? (25:55) How Meth Breaks your Heart (26:52) How addictive is Meth? (36:42) New research to help people with Meth Dependence (38:08) Meth: The Most Misunderstood Drug This episode was produced by me Wendy Zukerman, with help from Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, Michelle Dang and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Bumi Hidaka, So Wylie, Emma Munger and Peter Leonard. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including, Dr Heather Barkholtz, Professor Nadine Ezard, Dr Nicole Lee, Dr Samantha Brooks, Dr Steph Kershaw, Professor Steven Shoptaw, Dr Susan Calcaterra, Professor Harriet de Wit, and Professor Edyth London. Also thanks to the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Hey toots! Happy Day! We're almost to the end of April. How are you feeling? This week, we talk about the science of mediumship, ghosts vs. spirits, energy you "work" with, spirit caught on video, a message from the other side & gut feelings in your daily life. We hope you have a great day! Register for free for Reiki Energy / Prayer Circle: May Reiki Energy / Prayer Circle
Is science political? Yes, and that's not an inherently a bad thing. In this episode I try to unpack my thinking on why science is political and more specifically where and why political influences enter the picture. From here I explore how an understanding of these influences can improve scientific research and also ruminate on how this affects science communication aimed at two important audiences: politicians and we the people. Science is a human endeavor and is subject to all the foibles of human behavior. It's also an amazing example of what humans are capable of. By understanding how it works and why we should care we can maximize the good it does. Scientists are building giant ‘evidence banks' to create policies that actually workWhy we need a body to oversee how science is used by governmentsAdvising governments about science is essential but difficult. So train people to do itScience-policy advisers shape programmes that solve real-world problemsTrust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries | Nature Human BehaviourSocietal Preparedness Insights - Global Listening ProjectVetting Scientific Sources - The Open NotebookScience could solve some of the world's biggest problems. Why aren't governments using it?Science's big problem is a loss of influence, not a loss of trust This is the only link you need to subscirbe and never miss an episode of Two Brad For You. Please do rate and review it really helps us out.If you'd like to support the show with currency click here. We are grateful for that too. Finally, you can check out the website here.Many thanks to Freak Motif for the music and Sebastian Abboud for the logo.
Measles is spreading in the U.S., with hundreds of cases across more than 20 states. And tons of people online are arguing over how we should feel about it. Some say this is bad because measles is SO contagious — and not enough people get the vaccine. But others say that measles isn't such a big deal, so why are we freaking out?? Didn't basically everyone get this virus back in the day and live to tell the tale? So we'll find out — what is measles doing to our body (and our brain)? And how can we stop this outbreak ... and possibly rid the world of measles. We hear from New Scientist reporter Grace Wade, Prof. Peter Kasson, Dr. Meru Sheel and Dr. Katherine Gibney. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsMeasles In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Measles cases are popping off in the U.S. (04:04) How measles messes with our immune system (10:13) How measles can kill (14:54) How contagious is measles - really? (18:46) How good is the measles vaccine? (25:11) What are the risks of the measles vaccine? (28:34) What it will take to stop this measles outbreak This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Eva Dasher. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Emma Munger, So Wiley, Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka and Bobby Lord. A special thanks to the researchers we reached out to including Professor Rik de Swart, and a big thanks to Joseph Lavelle Wilson and the Zukerman family. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Should kids just “get the disease” instead of being vaccinated? Can vaccines really overwhelm a child's immune system? Who decides what vaccines we get—and why? If you're a new parent with questions about vaccines, you're not alone. In this 2-part episode of Science in 5, WHO's Dr. Kate O'Brien breaks down the science behind childhood vaccinations, the importance of the schedule, and the truth behind common concerns.
A popular podcast called The Telepathy Tapes claims that telepathy is real — and tons of people are convinced. So we open our minds to the possibility of mind-reading and ask: Could this be real?? And if not — what might be going on here? We dive into the science (yes — there is science!) with Dr. Katharine Beals, Prof. Jim Todd, and Prof. Chris French. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTelepathy In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Extraordinary Claims of Telepathy (08:28) What Could Be Going On Here? (32:27) 50 Years of Science on Telepathy?! This episode was produced by Rose Rimler, with help from Wendy Zukerman, along with Ekedi Fausther-Keeys, Meryl Horn, and Michelle Dang. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Music written by Peter Leonard, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka, and Bobby Lord. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to for this episode, including Dr. Zoltan Kekecs, Prof. Stefan Schmidt, and Janyce Boynton. Special thanks to Enrique Perez. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The battle over whether we should be putting fluoride in our water has reached fever pitch. We've got U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and anti-fluoride activists saying it's a neurotoxin that's lowering our IQs. But supporters say that fluoride is a safe and effective way to protect our teeth from cavities, and that stopping water fluoridation would lead to a spike in tooth decay. To find out who's right, we talk to epidemiologist Dr. Ashley Malin and community health scientist Professor Lindsay McLaren. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsFluoride In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Chapter 1: Why did we start water fluoridation? (07:00) Chapter 2: What can fluoride do at really high levels? (11:18) Chapter 3: Can low doses of fluoride affect the brain? (20:41) Chapter 4: Anything else to worry about? (24:53) Chapter 5: Does fluoride in the water protect our teeth? This episode was produced by Meryl Horn, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Rose Rimler, Michelle Dang, and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Music written by Bumi Hidaka, Peter Leonard, Emma Munger, So Wylie, and Bobby Lord. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to for this episode, including Professor Christine Till, Professor Jonathan Broadbent, Dr. John Morris, Professor Bruce Lanphear, Professor Loc Do, Dr. Maria Kipper, Professor Philippe Hujoel, Professor Stephen Peckham, Dr. Tommaso Filippini, and Professor Steven Levy. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Depending on who you ask, running is either really good for you, or it's something you should avoid to protect your knees, joints, or overall health. Some people swear by it as the ultimate form of exercise, while others are convinced it does more harm than good. So what's the truth? Let's set the record straight. When it comes to running, there are a few of the myths that keep circulating, myths that keep people from lacing up their shoes and reaping the rewards. The science behind running tells a different story—one that shows running can benefit not just your body but your mind, no matter your age. In this episode, I'm going to clear up some common myths about running and why you might just want to add it to your exercise routine. About Your Host Hosted by Dr. Deepa Grandon, MD MBA, triple board-certified physician with over 23 years of experience working as a Physician Consultant for influential organizations worldwide. Dr. Grandon is the founder of Transformational Life Consulting (TLC) and an outspoken faith-based leader in evidenced-based lifestyle medicine. Resources Feeling stuck and want guidance on how to transform your spiritual, mental and physical well being? Get access to Dr Deepa's 6 Pillars of Health video! Visit drdeepa-tlc.org to subscribe and watch the video for free. Work with Me Ready to explore a personalized wellness journey with Dr. Deepa? Visit drdeepa-tlc.org and click on “Work with Me” to schedule a free intake call. Together, we'll see if this exclusive program aligns with your needs! Want to receive a devotional every week From Dr. Deepa? Devotionals are dedicated to providing you with a moment of reflection, inspiration, and spiritual growth each week, delivered right to your inbox. Visit https://www.drdeepa-tlc.org/devotional-opt-in to subscribe for free. Ready to deepen your understanding of trauma and kick start your healing journey? Explore a range of online and onsite courses designed to equip you with practical and affordable tools. From counselors, ministry leaders, and educators to couples, parents and individuals seeking help for themselves, there's a powerful course for everyone. Browse all the courses now to start your journey. Disclaimer TLC is presenting this podcast as a form of information sharing only. It is not medical advice or intended to replace the judgment of a licensed physician. TLC is not responsible for any claims related to procedures, professionals, products, or methods discussed in the podcast, and it does not approve or endorse any products, professionals, services, or methods that might be referenced. Check out this episode on our website, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify, and don't forget to leave a review if you like what you heard. Your review feeds the algorithm so our show reaches more people. Thank you!
Is science at odds with faith? It's a question your daughter may face for the first time in a classroom, an online debate, or even among friends. How can you equip her to stand firm in her faith while engaging with science confidently and thoughtfully? In this episode of the Raising Godly Girls Podcast, co-hosts Melissa and Natalie dive into the “Faith vs. Science” debate and the common misconceptions that fuel this tension. They'll unpack why faith and science aren't actually in opposition—and how understanding God as the author of science can help your daughter navigate tough conversations with wisdom, grace, and boldness. You'll hear practical insights on helping your girl process scientific claims through a Biblical Worldview, boost her confidence in defending her beliefs (1 Peter 3:15), and embrace science as a tool for discovering God's incredible design. Plus, you won't want to miss AHG's unique approach to fostering a love of science in girls—through hands-on learning and a foundation of faith. Don't let your daughter feel unprepared when she encounters the “Faith vs. Science” challenge for the first time. Tune in for a conversation that will equip you both to tackle this topic with truth and confidence! Find an American Heritage Girls Troop near you, visit americanheritagegirls.org Add even more Biblical wisdom to your parenting quiver, visit raisinggodlygirls.com
Join us for the Vet Vault's own conference in the snow: Vets On Tour Wānaka, New Zealand, 10-15 August 2025!Have you ever felt pressured, as a vet, to do more 'stuff' - diagnostics, procedures, and sell more, even when you can't quite see the clinical justification for it? In this episode we welcome Dr. Brennen McKenzie-veterinarian, researcher, creator of the SkeptVet blog, author of Placebos for Pets? The Truth About Alternative Medicine in Animals, and all-round lover of science-based thinking. And who better to help us draw the line between solid science and revenue-driven decision making than someone who is known for their scepticism? Dr. McKenzie brings real-world wisdom and refreshing honesty to the debate. Together we explore the often-unspoken pressures of profit-driven care, commission-based pay, and what happens when business incentives conflict with good science. Brennen shares lessons from two decades in practice on how to use Spectrum of care reasoning to make clinical decisions that respect science, client resources, and the needs of your employer. A must-listen for any vet who's ever questioned the system—and their place in it.Find out more about Brennen's current work in longevity at loyal.com.Join our community of Vet Vault Nerds to lift your clinical game and get your groove back with our up-to-date, easy-to-consume clinical episodes at vvn.supercast.com.Get help with your tricky cases in our Specialist Support Space.Visit thevetvault.com for show notes and resources related to this episode.Subscribe to our weekly newsletter here for Hubert's favourite clinical and non-clinical learnings from the week.Episode Topics and Timestamps08:11 The Shift to Profit Driven Veterinary Practice09:46 A Guide to Evidence-Based Decision Making12:00 Client Communication and Financial Constraints17:31 Spectrum of Care: A New Approach32:15 Overdiagnosis and Screening: A Critical Look39:09 Cognitive Psychology in Veterinary Decision Making42:45 The Power of Checklists in Medical Practice43:18 Balancing Autonomy and Systematic Decision Making45:52 Clinical Audits: Improving Practice Through Data48:36 Intuitive vs. Algorithmic Thinking in Veterinary Medicine51:37 The Pitfalls of Anecdotal Evidence in Veterinary Practice01:07:40 Communicating with Clients About Unproven Therapies01:18:17 Pass Along Question and The One Bit of Advice
040425 1st HR Dean Sessions Settled Science VS Truth Science by Kate Dalley
040425 1st HR Dean Sessions -Settled Science VS Truth Science Universal Model by Kate Dalley
ADHD is all over the internet, with people saying that it's way different than we thought it was — and that tons of us might have it without even knowing it. Influencers are telling us that ADHD can cause all sorts of things, like hyperfocused states, serious emotional dysregulation, even something called rejection sensitivity dysphoria. So — is all this true? Plus, when you do have ADHD — what's going on inside your brain? And what are the best ways to cope with it? We talk to Prof. Maggie Sibley, Prof. Philip Shaw, and Dr. J. Russell Ramsay. This episode does mention depression. Here are some crisis hotlines: United States: US National Suicide Prevention Lifeline Dial 988 (Online chat available); US Crisis Text Line Text “HOME” to 741741 Australia: Lifeline 13 11 14 (Online chat available) Canada: Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention (See link for phone numbers listed by province) United Kingdom: Samaritans 116 123 (UK and ROI) Full list of international hotlines here Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsADHD Chapters: In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Is ADHD everywhere?? (02:45) How do you really know if you have ADHD? (09:05) Is hyperfocus legit? (12:50) What's up with ADHD and emotional issues? (18:05) ADHD in women and people who menstruate (20:07) So do is ADHD really everywhere? (21:34) ADHD in the brain (26:21) Meds, Therapy, Body Doubling?! This episode was produced by Rose Rimler, with help from Wendy Zukerman, along with Meryl Horn, Michelle Dang, and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard and Marlowe Starling. Music written by Peter Leonard, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka, and Bobby Lord.Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to for this episode, including Dr. Robert Rosenthal, Dr. Miguel Garcia Pimenta, Prof. Michelle Martel, Dr. Maedbhe King, Dr. Edward Modestino, Prof. Edmund Sonuga-Barke, and Dr. Ashley Halkett. Again, big special thanks to all the listeners who called in and told us about their ADHD experiences! Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
This conversation delves into the Shroud of Turin, exploring its historical significance, scientific investigations, and the controversies surrounding its authenticity. The hosts discuss the various theories, findings from forensic studies, and the implications of radiocarbon dating, ultimately reflecting on the beliefs and meanings attributed to this enigmatic artifact.
We live in an era where misinformation spreads faster than ever—shaping our beliefs, fueling our anxieties, and making it nearly impossible to separate fact from fiction. Why are our brains so susceptible to false narratives even when we know better? How do we resist falling for this stuff? And also, where is the line separating misinformation from harmless ~lore~ anyway? In this special episode, host Amanda Montell (@amanda_montell) reads an exclusive excerpt from her new book, The Age of Magical Overthinking, diving into the psychology behind misinformation, revealing some mistakes of her own, and exploring the linguistic tricks that make debunking a falsehood so much harder than believing it in the first place. Listen to the full audiobook here: https://bit.ly/48mnRkG Audio excerpt courtesy of Simon & Schuster Audio from THE AGE OF MAGICAL OVERTHINKING by Amanda Montell, read by the author. Copyright © 2024 by Amanda Montell. Used with permission of Simon & Schuster, Inc. For more, follow @simon.audio on IG and @SimonAudio on FB/X! Overthinker Corrections: From our episode on toxins, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has faced controversy over the years, with critics arguing that it overstates chemical risks, relies on flawed methodologies, and promotes an organic marketing agenda. Despite these concerns, EWG defends its work as being rooted in a mission to protect public health and empower consumers to make safer choices. For those seeking alternative resources to the EWG, consider exploring Consumer Reports for independent product testing and safety insights, and Made Safe for certified non-toxic product recommendations. A couple of points made in our fertility interview—namely, the study about birth control pills disrupting pheromones and the implication that hormonal IUDs and birth control pills can cause the same side effects—are debated. Listen to Science Vs the Pill to learn more. Thanks for your listenership and thoughtful engagement! Overall, we hope this episode inspires more critical conversation and self-advocacy, and less shame, about the thought spiral-inducing subject of fertility - Join the "Magical Overthinkers Club" by following the pod on Instagram @magicaloverthinkers. - To access early, ad-free episodes and more, subscribe to the Magical Overthinkers Substack. - Pick up a hard copy of Amanda's book The Age of Magical Overthinking: Notes on Modern Irrationality, or listen to the audiobook. Thanks to Our Sponsors: No matter how you say it, don't overpay for it. Shop plans at https://MINTMOBILE.com/magical Stop putting off those doctors appointments and go to https://Zocdoc.com/MAGICAL to find and instantly book a top-rated doctor today Check out the Fits Everybody Collection at https://www.skims.com/magical #skimspartner Cannot use any other commissionable clothing links including, but not limited to, LTK, MagicLinks, Amazon Storefront, ShopMy, etc. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Wendy Zuckerman, host and executive producer of the Science Vs podcast on Spotify, joined Philip Clark on Nightlife to look at the latest news in science.
To start off the new season we're getting into the science of one of the most controversial and taboo sex topics around. Squirting! For some people, it's a major sex goal — but for others, it's a source of major embarrassment. And it turns out that people have been writing or talking about squirting and female ejaculation for CENTURIES. So in this episode, we're going to find out: what IS squirting (like, what is this fluid??), how common is it, and if you want to start doing it … how can you? We'll hear from Sex Educator and World Record Holder, Lola Jean. As well as Professor Caroline Pukall, Dr. Nan Wise, Professor Helen O'Connell, and Dr. Samuel Salama. Find our transcript here: bit.ly/4iIVQcc In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Welcome to Cirque du Squirt (08:26) History of female ejaculation (13:18) Suspect 1: Vaginal lubrication (15:55) Suspect 2: Pee (24:41) Suspect 3: Chemical X? (29:47) Female prostate (36:00) Why does it feel like that? (39:26) What about penises? (42:03) Can you learn to squirt? Credits: This episode was produced by Ekedi Fausther-Keeys, with help from Blythe Terrell, Wendy Zukerman, Meryl Horn, Michelle Dang, and Rose Rimler. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Video editing, audio mix and graphics by Bobby Lord. Graphics help from Michelle Dang. Illustrations by Scarlette Baccini. Fact checking by Eva Dasher. Music by Bobby Lord, Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, and So Wylie. Interpreting by Kana Hatakeyama, translation help from Ben Milam. Thanks also to Dr. Devon Hensel, and Dr. Leslie Rickey. Recording and logistics help from Michelle Kitchen, Spencer Howard and Nick Johnson. Recording help from Abi McNeil. Special thanks to Roland Campos. Thanks to Cameron Silzle and Arsonhouse Entertainment. Thanks to Lola Jean and everyone who spoke to us at Cirque du Squirt. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
We can say we value science over religion, but the truth is that we have simply replaced one religious system of beliefs with another. The way God made us, we cannot escape the requirement to put our faith in something. I choose God and the Bible. How about you?
Have you been missing your weekly dose of science?? Well, we've got good news: Science Vs is BACK next week, and we'll be tackling ADHD, squirting, creatine, the carnivore diet, bird flu, fluoride, meth, memory and much more. New episodes start March 27. Fact ya soon! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
The Myth of Brand Loyalty Herd, Habit, Hassle: The Science Behind Consumer Behavior Episode 248 (Ethan is based in Boulder, Colorado) ----- In this conversation we explore: The science behind consumer behavior and brand growth. Why brand loyalty is often misunderstood and overrated. How frequency of purchase correlates directly with customer numbers. Three core factors driving purchasing decisions: Herd, Habit, and Hassle. The critical role of hassle reduction in customer retention. The importance of consistency in advertising for brand recognition. How humor enhances advertising effectiveness by improving memorability. The difference between visual branding ('little b') and overall brand perception ('big B'). Why marketers should rely on universal marketing principles rather than frequently changing tactics. Practical strategies for creating memorable, "sticky" ads. ----- About our guest, Ethan Decker: Ethan is a brand strategist and marketing expert who has spent 20 year creating award-winning brand strategy, advertising and marketing research for some of the world's biggest brands. A scientist by training and a marketer by trade, he's the missing link between science and creativity. ---- Key Learning Points from Ethan Decker: Brand loyalty is overrated. Real growth comes from increasing your customer base rather than deepening loyalty. Three forces drive customer behavior: Herd (social influence), Habit (routine buying), and Hassle (avoiding inconvenience). Frequency of purchase correlates directly with how many customers you have, not how loyal they are. Sticky advertising—ads that are memorable and clearly linked to your brand—significantly boosts customer recall. Humor can make ads memorable, but it must be used thoughtfully to avoid alienating customers. Consistency in branding builds recognition and customer trust more effectively than frequent changes. Customer buying decisions are influenced primarily by ease, familiarity, and social proof—not brand love. Great marketing combines art and science—science provides structure; creativity makes it memorable. Marketers have limited control over influencing how often customers buy; external factors play a bigger role. Successful brands balance ‘little b' branding (visual elements) with overall reputation and perception (Big B brand). ----- ----more---- Your Intended Message is the podcast about how you can boost your career and business success by honing your communication skills. We'll examine the aspects of how we communicate one-to-one, one to few and one to many – plus that important conversation, one to self. In these interviews we will explore presentation skills, public speaking, conversation, persuasion, negotiation, sales conversations, marketing, team meetings, social media, branding, self talk and more. Your host is George Torok George is a specialist in communication skills. Especially presentation. He's fascinated by the links between communication and influencing behaviors. He delivers training and coaching programs to help leaders and promising professionals deliver the intended message for greater success. Connect with George www.SpeechCoachforExecutives.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/georgetorokpresentations/ https://www.youtube.com/user/presentationskills https://www.instagram.com/georgetorok/
Fan Favorite: This episode originally aired on April 11, 2017. Vishen Lakhiani discovered that if he was going to stay true to his inner identity he was going to have to break some “brules.” The CEO and Founder of the revolutionary global empire Mindvalley Academy, best-selling author, and philosopher discusses changing your culturescape and moving toward your end goals in this episode of Impact Theory with Tom Bilyeu. SHOW NOTES Vishen defines the culturescape and “brules.” [2:58] Vishen talks about why goal setting is rubbish. [7:31] Vishen shares the three most important questions to identify your end goal. [11:18] Tom and Vishen discuss parenting and creating positive meaning making machines. [15:42] Vishen shares his philosophy on parental discipline and fundamental beliefs. [20:40] Vishen describes the diffusion of sympathy and natural evolution. [22:46] Vishen describes how he defines himself and his true self-identity. [25:35] Tom and Vishen discuss the difference between business and true entrepreneurs. [29:02] Vishen talks about the expectancy effect and the power of the mind. [33:47] Vishen shares the powerful mission purpose of the Mindvalley Academy [36:41] Tom and Vishen discuss why 4-year colleges are no longer relevant. [39:52] Vishen defines the impact that he wants to have on the world. [44:08] FOLLOW VISHEN: WEBSITE: http://bit.ly/2nWmjGZ INSTAGRAM: http://bit.ly/2pn6OZt TWITTER: http://bit.ly/2okogAa FACEBOOK: http://bit.ly/2okDCmG FOLLOW MINDVALLEY WEBSITE: http://bit.ly/2nTo6wo INSTAGRAM: http://bit.ly/2osqDl4 TWITTER: http://bit.ly/2o1leyn FACEBOOK: http://bit.ly/2nyKksd FOLLOW A FEST WEBSITE: http://bit.ly/1Tt0E1G TWITTER: http://bit.ly/2okwlDn FACEBOOK: http://bit.ly/2o1fynR FOLLOW MINDVALLEY ACADEMY WEBSITE: http://bit.ly/2ohGvGt TWITTER: http://bit.ly/2o1cNDg CHECK OUT OUR SPONSORS Range Rover: Range Rover: Explore the Range Rover Sport at https://rangerover.com/us/sport Audible: Sign up for a free 30 day trial at https://audible.com/IMPACTTHEORY Vital Proteins: Get 20% off by going to https://www.vitalproteins.com and entering promo code IMPACT at check out Thive Market: Go to https:thrivemarket.com/impact for 30% off your first order, plus a FREE $60 gift! ITU: Ready to breakthrough your biggest business bottleneck? Apply to work with me 1:1 - https://impacttheory.co/SCALE Kettle & Fire: Get 20% off your first order at https://kettleandfire.com/impact with code IMPACT Netsuite: Download the CFO's Guide to AI and Machine Learning at https://NetSuite.com/THEORY Found: Try Found for FREE at https://found.com/impact ********************************************************************** Do you need my help? STARTING a business: Join me inside ZERO TO FOUNDER here SCALING a business: Click here to see if you qualify Get my battle-tested strategies and insights delivered weekly to your inbox: sign up here. ********************************************************************** If you're serious about leveling up your life, I urge you to check out my new podcast, Tom Bilyeu's Mindset Playbook —a goldmine of my most impactful episodes on mindset, business, and health. Trust me, your future self will thank you. ********************************************************************** Join me live on my Twitch stream. I'm live daily from 6:30 to 8:30 am PT at www.twitch.tv/tombilyeu ********************************************************************** LISTEN TO IMPACT THEORY AD FREE + BONUS EPISODES on APPLE PODCASTS: apple.co/impacttheory ********************************************************************** FOLLOW TOM: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tombilyeu/ Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tombilyeu?lang=en Twitter: https://twitter.com/tombilyeu YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TomBilyeu Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Join Pastor Jack and special guest Ken Ham for an exciting conversation that covers topics from gender, evolution, abortion, creationism, and the government. Ken Ham is the Founder CEO of Answers in Genesis and its two popular attractions: the acclaimed Creation Museum and the internationally known Ark Encounter, which features a life-size 510-foot-long Noah’s Ark—sometimes described as the “8th Wonder of the Modern World.” Each year, the two attractions host over 1.5 million guests. Ken Ham is also an in-demand Christian speaker and interview guest and has authored over 30 books. Ham became well known throughout America for his 2014 evolution/creation debate with Bill Nye, TV’s “The Science Guy.” Ken Ham hosts the daily radio program Answers on over 1,000 stations. He’s also the founder of the award-winning Answers magazine. In 2020, Ham launched Answers TV, an ambitious streaming service. His website, AnswersInGenesis.org, has twice won the top award from the National Religious Broadcasters for Best Website. (00:00) Biblical Views on Gender and Mutations(11:13) Worldview Clash and Environmental Worship(16:47) Godly Stewardship and Cultural Shift(28:35) God's Call to the Church(41:53) Genesis 3(53:28) Science, God's Word, and Human Bias(01:01:04) Impact of Creation Museum and Ark(01:10:48) Supporting Answers in Genesis OutreachANSWERS IN GENESIS: https://answersingenesis.org/ ARK ENCOUNTER: https://arkencounter.com/CREATION MUSEUM: https://creationmuseum.org/ CONNECT WITH PASTOR JACK Get Updates via Text: https://text.whisp.io/jack-hibbs-podcastWebsite: https://jackhibbs.com/ Instagram: http://bit.ly/2FCyXpO Facebook: https://bit.ly/2WZBWV0 YouTube: https://bit.ly/437xMHn DAZE OF DECEPTION BOOK:https://jackhibbs.com/daze-of-deception/ Did you know we have a Real Life Network? Sign up for free for more exclusive content:https://bit.ly/3CIP3M99
U.S. science is in turmoil. Amid agency firings and confusion over federal funding, researchers are freaking out. Many can't do their work, and they have no idea what the future holds. Plus, we're hearing that all of this could jeopardize medical treatments for people in the U.S. and all over the world. So, what exactly is going on? And how bad is it? We speak with Nature reporter Max Kozlov and Science magazine reporter Jocelyn Kaiser. Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsWarOnScience In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Scientists are freaked out (02:40) The chaos on government science websites (11:28) Firings and research funding freezes (18:09) Flagging words like women, Black and Latinx in grants (22:20) USAID cuts and vaccine concerns (27:04) What could be the motivation for all this? This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, Michelle Dang and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Emma Munger, Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Thanks to Lauren Silverman and Nimra Azmi. And thanks so much to all the scientists who shared their stories with us. We appreciate you. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
In this episode, Dr. Diane Reidy-Lagunes speaks with Dr. Jun Mao, Chief of MSK’s Integrative Medicine Service, and Jason Hou, herbalist and acupuncturist at MSK, to break down the facts about alternative medicine—an approach that combines conventional cancer treatments like surgery, radiation, chemo, immunotherapy and targeted treatments, with holistic therapies like acupuncture, mindfulness, natural herbs and supplements. They tackle common misconceptions about alternative medicine, explaining what the science says, what’s safe, and what to avoid. Offering guidance on how these natural therapies can complement other cancer treatments – and how to recognize misleading claims – this episode empowers patients and caregivers with the knowledge they need to make informed choices about their cancer care and the use of alternative therapies. Resources:MSK's "About Herbs" DatabaseMSK's Meditation LibraryMSK's Integrative Medicine at Home Program Episode Chapters:2:05 - Integrative vs. Alternative medicine3:14 - Which integrative therapies are right for me?6:29 - Do these therapies actually treat/kill cancer?7:59 - The very real benefits of human connection9:36 - Ivermectin10:18 - Cannabis oil and Castor oil11:55 - Vitamin C13:53 - Turmeric14:30 - Medicinal mushrooms14:59 - Ashwagandha15:42 - Traditional Chinese medicine18:25 - The dangers of "Why not try?"21:49 - Resources: herbs, meditation, yoga, music, etc.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Who will get sample from Mars first? Who controls the James Webb Space Telescope? Does space radiation rule out panspermia? Answering all these questions and more in this Q&A show.
Who will get sample from Mars first? Who controls the James Webb Space Telescope? Does space radiation rule out panspermia? Answering all these questions and more in this Q&A show.
***JOIN THE NEXT MASTER YOUR FASTING CHALLENGE THAT STARTS Jan 29th, 2025!*** We'll GUIDE you how to FAST to LOSE FAT for good, and use 'fast cycling' to achieve uncommon results! REGISTER HERE! Click the Link for DATES, DETAILS, and FAQs! In this comprehensive episode, Dr. Scott Watier and Tommy Welling dive deep into the science and practicality of long-term water fasts, addressing common misconceptions and examining recent research about their effectiveness. They provide crucial context around different fasting durations, from 24-hour fasts to extended 5-10 day protocols, while explaining how fasting needs differ between lean and overweight individuals. The hosts share valuable insights into gender-specific fasting considerations, including optimal timing for women based on their menstrual cycle, and outline practical strategies for successful extended fasting, from exercise modification to stress management. This episode delivers essential knowledge for anyone considering longer fasting protocols, while emphasizing the importance of personalization and strategic implementation. Take the NEW FASTING PERSONA QUIZ! - The Key to Unlocking Sustainable Weight Loss With Fasting! Resources and Downloads: SIGN UP FOR THE DROP OF THE ULTIMATE GUIDE TO BLOOD SUGAR CONTROL GRAB THE OPTIMAL RANGES FOR LAB WORK HERE! - NEW RESOURCE! - December 2024 FREE RESOURCE - DOWNLOAD THE NEW BLUEPRINT TO FASTING FOR FAT LOSS! SLEEP GUIDE DIRECT DOWNLOAD DOWNLOAD THE FASTING TRANSFORMATION JOURNAL HERE! Partner Links: Get your FREE BOX OF LMNT hydration support for the perfect electrolyte balance for your fasting lifestyle with your first purchase here! Get 30% off a Keto-Mojo blood glucose and ketone monitor (discount shown at checkout)! Click here! Our Community: Let's continue the conversation. Click the link below to JOIN the Fasting For Life Community, a group of like-minded, new, and experienced fasters! The first two rules of fasting need not apply! If you enjoy the podcast, would you please tap on the stars below and consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts/iTunes? It takes less than 60 seconds, and it helps bring you the best original content each week. We also enjoy reading them! Article Links: https://today.uic.edu/water-fasts-can-help-you-lose-weight-but-you-might-gain-it-back-quickly/
The internet tells us that narcissists are everywhere — and that the problem is only getting worse. It's like narcissism is oozing out of our celebrities, politicians, partners, parents, maybe even ourselves?? So today, we're taking a long look in the mirror to find out: are we all a bunch of narcissists? And what should we do if we think someone in our life is a narcissist? We find out by talking to a real narcissist, Lee Hammock of the social media platform “The Self Aware Narcissist” as well as psychologists Prof. W. Keith Campbell, Prof. Kali Trzesniewski, and Dr. Craig Malkin. We want to hear your ideas for new episodes of Science Vs! Tell us via: Instagram at science_vs X at @sciencevs Bluesky at sciencevs Email at sciencevsteam@gmail.com Voicemail at +1(774) 481-1238 This episode does mention depression. Here are some crisis hotlines: United States: US National Suicide Prevention Lifeline Dial 988 (Online chat available); US Crisis Text Line Text “HOME” to 741741 Australia: Lifeline 13 11 14 (Online chat available) Canada: Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention (See link for phone numbers listed by province) United Kingdom: Samaritans 116 123 (UK and ROI) Full list of international hotlines here Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsNarcissism In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Lee's Ratatouille Moment (07:06) The Narcissism Test (15:53) Are We In a Narcissism Epidemic? (25:41) It Kind of Sucks to be a Narcissist (31:55) Narcissists in Therapy (35:11) How to Deal With a Narcissist in Your Life This episode was produced by Rose Rimler, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Michelle Dang, Meryl Horn, and Ekedi Fausther-Keeys. We're edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Sam Bair. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Music written by Peter Leonard, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka, and Bobby Lord.Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to for this episode, including Dr. Igor Weinberg, Dr. April Ilkmen, Dr. Jennifer Gerlach, Dr. Betsy Edershile, Prof. Brad Bushman, Prof. Brent Donnellan, Prof. Chris Barry, Dr. Glenn Geher, and Winkie Ma. Special thanks to Rachel Humphries for editing help. And big thanks to everyone who helped us this season! Jack Weinstein, Hunter, Chris Suter, Oscar, Elise, Dylan, the Zukerman family and Joseph Lavelle Willson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Happy holidays, listeners! We're starting off our winter break by bringing you an episode from our colleagues at Science Vs about how a notorious murder case was solved with help from an unlikely source: a nuclear weapons lab. It's the 1990s at a medical center in California, and patients are dying. At first, this doesn't seem strange — it's a hospital, and deaths happen. But then rumors start to circulate about a particular health care worker: difficult or needy patients in his care are ending up dead. The cops get involved, but there's a huge problem: there's no hard evidence. Until the so-called “Lab of Last Resort” steps in. Crime Junkie host Ashley Flowers joins us as we speak to analytical chemist Armando Alcaraz, former Detective Sergeant John McKillop, and Dr. Ian Musgrave. Keep up with us on Instagram @serialkillerspodcast! Have a story to share? Email us at serialkillerstories@spotify.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
When he rounded them up, he had a 100.A few months ago, Wendy Zuckerman invited our own Latif Nasser to come on her show, and, of course, he jumped at the chance. Laughter ensued, as they set off to find the "The Funniest Joke in the World." When you just Google something like that, the internet might serve you, "What has many keys but can't open a single lock??” (Answer: A piano). So they had to dig deeper. According to science. And for this quest they interviewed a bunch of amazing comics including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Dr Jason Leong, Loni Love, and, of course, some scientists: Neuroscientist Professor Sophie Scott and Psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman. Which Joke Will Win???Special thanks to Wendy Zuckerman and the entire team over at Science VsWe have some exciting news! In the “Zoozve” episode, Radiolab named its first-ever quasi-moon, and now it's your turn! Radiolab has teamed up with The International Astronomical Union to launch a global naming contest for one of Earth's quasi-moons. This is your chance to make your mark on the heavens. Vote on your favorites soon, check here for details: https://radiolab.org/moonSupport Radiolab by becoming a member of The Lab today.Signup for our newsletter. It includes short essays, recommendations, and details about other ways to interact with the show. Sign up (https://radiolab.org/newsletter)!Radiolab is supported by listeners like you. Support Radiolab by becoming a member of The Lab (https://members.radiolab.org/) today.Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @radiolab, and share your thoughts with us by emailing radiolab@wnyc.org.Leadership support for Radiolab's science programming is provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Science Sandbox, a Simons Foundation Initiative, and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.