Podcasts about Welcher

Wed, 16 Jul 2025 03:45:00 +0000 https://jungeanleger.podigee.io/2416-borsepeople-im-podcast-s19-23-sonja-schromm 8b675f14f39a40d13c3fc6d1bc6b07c5 Sonja Schromm ist Vorstand der ÖVAEG, der Austria United Arab Emirates Society, die im Jahr 2003 gegründet wurde, um die bilateralen Beziehungen zwischen Österreich und den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten zu stärken. Sonja, gebürtige Kärntnerin, startete in der Politik und war vor dem Emirate-Job u.a. auch für exxpress.at und zbcom tätig. Unsere Podcast-Reise ist ein lupenreiner One Take und bietet breite Vielfalt: Es geht um Rocco Schamoni, die Schönheit von Primzahlen trotz 42, die Null, um Linksausleger, Rainer Nowak, Beate Meinl-Reisinger, Hans Niessl, Eva Schütz, Alex Schütz, Bernhard Krumpel, mehrere Minister aus den Emiraten und eine Mindestgrösse bei Männern. Hat riesig Spass gemacht. https://www.oevaeg.at Podcasts mit Bernhard Krumpel: https://audio-cd.at/search/krumpel%20&%20me Börsepeople Alex Schütz: https://audio-cd.at/page/podcast/7515 Börsepeople Beate Meinl-Reisinger: https://audio-cd.at/page/podcast/5816 About: Die Serie Börsepeople des Podcasters Christian Drastil, der im Q4/24 in Frankfurt als "Finfluencer & Finanznetworker #1 Austria" ausgezeichnet wurde, findet im Rahmen von http://www.audio-cd.at und dem Podcast "Audio-CD.at Indie Podcasts" statt. Es handelt sich dabei um typische Personality- und Werdegang-Gespräche. Die Season 19 umfasst unter dem Motto „25 Börsepeople“ 25 Talks. Presenter der Season 19 ist die Volksbank https://www.volksbank.at. Welcher der meistgehörte Börsepeople Podcast ist, sieht man unter http://www.audio-cd.at/people. Der Zwischenstand des laufenden Rankings ist tagesaktuell um 12 Uhr aktualisiert. Bewertungen bei Apple (oder auch Spotify) machen mir Freude: http://www.audio-cd.at/spotify , http://www.audio-cd.at/apple . 2416 full no Christian Drastil Comm. 1784

In dieser Folge spricht Host Samuel Stötzner mit dem dotSource Commerce Experten Martin Heidenreich über das neue Shopsystem von Adobe. Dabei geht es nicht nur um die Vorteile von »Adobe Commerce as a Cloud Service«, sondern auch um die Frage, wie es mit den On-Premises-Systemen weitergeht. Welcher strategische Kurswechsel steckt hinter dem dem neuen Produkt? Für wen ist und bleibt Adobe als Shopsystem interessant? Und wann zieht Adobe dem Monolithen endgültig den Stecker?

Mon, 14 Jul 2025 03:45:00 +0000 https://jungeanleger.podigee.io/2410-borsepeople-im-podcast-s19-22-lars-brandau 7d964593a512c90c25f76abfc8eaed1e Lars Brandau ist langjähriger n-tv--Moderator/Anchorman und ebenso langjähriges Gesicht des Zertifikate Award Austria, er ist mein persönlicher Moderations-Hero. Lars studierte Politik und Germanistik, von 1992 bis 2007 arbeitete er als Redakteur, Reporter, Chef vom Dienst und Chefmoderator beim Nachrichtensender n-tv in Berlin und Köln, moderierte die Bundestagswahl 1998, die Wahl des deutschen Bundespräsidenten 1999 und die Präsidentschaftswahl in den Vereinigten Staaten 2000. Von 2001 bis 2003 präsentierte er die Wirtschaftssendung „Telebörse“ und war seit Oktober 2003 Nachrichtenmoderator. Wir kennen uns von den Zertifikate Awards Austria, die Lars als früherer DDV-GF jahrelange moderierte. Und so machen wir auch einen Deep Dive in eine Branche, die immer selbstbewusster wurde, sprechen über Hoppalas bei früheren Awards bzw. Namensgebungen, über unsere Smalltalks, die nicht selten Sport als Thema hatten. Heute ist Lars im Wealth Management tätig, auch da werden Zertifikate eingesetzt. Warum ich selbst als Privatperson vollkommen uninteressant bin, wird in dieser Folge ebenfalls aufgelöst. Lars Brandau bei den Zertifikate Awards Austria: https://photaq.com/search/lars%20brandau Sondernummer Zertifikate Award Austria 2025: https://boerse-social.com/pdf/fachheft64 Börsepeople Carola Ferstl (startete mit Lars 1992 bei n-tv): https://audio-cd.at/page/podcast/6618 About: Die Serie Börsepeople des Podcasters Christian Drastil, der im Q4/24 in Frankfurt als "Finfluencer & Finanznetworker #1 Austria" ausgezeichnet wurde, findet im Rahmen von http://www.audio-cd.at und dem Podcast "Audio-CD.at Indie Podcasts" statt. Es handelt sich dabei um typische Personality- und Werdegang-Gespräche. Die Season 19 umfasst unter dem Motto „25 Börsepeople“ 25 Talks. Presenter der Season 19 ist die Volksbank https://www.volksbank.at. Welcher der meistgehörte Börsepeople Podcast ist, sieht man unter http://www.audio-cd.at/people. Der Zwischenstand des laufenden Rankings ist tagesaktuell um 12 Uhr aktualisiert. Bewertungen bei Apple (oder auch Spotify) machen mir Freude: http://www.audio-cd.at/spotify , http://www.audio-cd.at/apple . 2410 full no Christian Drastil Comm. 1658

Fri, 11 Jul 2025 03:45:00 +0000 https://jungeanleger.podigee.io/2404-borsepeople-im-podcast-s19-21-brigitta-schwarzer 784d08382ca53b6bc4178a8bd2fdb92c Brigitta Schwarzer ist Geschäftsführende Gesellschafterin von Inara, sie ist Expertin für Governance, Compliance und D&O-Versicherungen. Ich spreche mit der Juristin über spannende Jahre bei Semperit, Kapsch, Immofinanz und Wienerberger, 2015 hat sie dann Inara übernommen. In Summe eine der bestgelaunten Folgen mit vielen Facetten: Wilhelm Rasinger, der IVA und der Börsen-Kurier, Georg Kapsch, Karl Petrikovics, Wolfgang Reithofer, Viktoria Kickinger, Christine Domforth, Manfred Kainz, Alexander van der Bellen, die Panzerknacker, Finlex, der gute Namen Sechskrügelgasse und eine arge Elon Musk-Geschichte rund um Wienerberger (die ich nicht kannte). Ich darf in dieser Folge auch selbst Freude über den IVA-David sowie drei persönliche No Gos positionieren. Und die D&O? Die schützt Privatvermögen vor den finanziellen Folgen schuldhafter Pflichtverletzungen im Rahmen vonr Organfunktion(en). https://www.inara.at About: Die Serie Börsepeople des Podcasters Christian Drastil, der im Q4/24 in Frankfurt als "Finfluencer & Finanznetworker #1 Austria" ausgezeichnet wurde, findet im Rahmen von http://www.audio-cd.at und dem Podcast "Audio-CD.at Indie Podcasts" statt. Es handelt sich dabei um typische Personality- und Werdegang-Gespräche. Die Season 19 umfasst unter dem Motto „25 Börsepeople“ 25 Talks. Presenter der Season 19 ist die Volksbank https://www.volksbank.at. Welcher der meistgehörte Börsepeople Podcast ist, sieht man unter http://www.audio-cd.at/people. Der Zwischenstand des laufenden Rankings ist tagesaktuell um 12 Uhr aktualisiert. Bewertungen bei Apple (oder auch Spotify) machen mir Freude: http://www.audio-cd.at/spotify , http://www.audio-cd.at/apple . 2404 full no Christian Drastil Comm. 2112

Mehrere Diakone örtlicher Seemannsmissionen in Schleswig-Holstein berichten, dass die Bundespolizei (BP) in den letzten Monaten zahlreichen russischen Seemännern den eigentlich völkerrechtlich verbrieften Landgang verwehrt hat. Dieses Vorgehen treffe ausschließlich russische Seemänner, unabhängig davon, unter welcher Flagge das jeweilige Schiff fährt, und auch bei national buntgemischten Besatzungen. Die NachDenkSeiten wollten vor diesem Hintergrund wissen, wie dasWeiterlesen

Beruhigend bei negativen Gefühlen: Sie gehen vorbei. Ängste werden bereits kleiner, wenn man nicht mehr gegen sie ankämpft. Unangenehme Gefühle auszuhalten, gehört zu einer gesunden Entwicklung dazu – auch für Erwachsene. «Wenn ich sie akzeptieren kann, das ist paradox, werden die Gefühle automatisch kleiner oder verschwinden wieder,» sagt Christina Stadler, Leiterin des tagesklinischen Bereich für Kinder an den UPK Basel. Wer das kennt, nachts wach zu liegen mit Gedankenkreisen oder von einem Gefühl wie gelähmt zu sein, dem rät die Psychotherapeutin, bewusst Abstand zu nehmen von den negativen Gedanken, da sie nicht die Realität widerspiegeln. In die Distanz gehen und sich dann fragen: «Welcher andere Gedanke ist hilfreich, um das zu erreichen, was dir wichtig ist,» sagt Christina Stadler. Denn eins sollten Gefühle auf keinen Fall: Verhindern, dass man die eigenen Wünsche und Ziele erreicht. Deswegen sei es wichtig, Emotionen zu regulieren – sozusagen auf der Welle der Emotionen das Surfen zu lernen.

Wed, 09 Jul 2025 03:45:00 +0000 https://jungeanleger.podigee.io/2398-borsepeople-im-podcast-s19-20-manuel-kurz 8324025ef3a601ce26095eb4782576b5 Manuel Kurz ist Deputy Head of Member Sales & Business Development bei der Wiener Börse und parallel Prokurist bei der CCPA, die ja 50-Prozent-Tochter der Börse ist. Ganz bewusst habe ich ihn für Sendetermin "9.Juli 2025, der 18. Jahrestag des All-time-Highs im ATX" eingeladen. Wir sprechen über einen frühen Touchpoint zur Börse, weiters über familiären Bezug zur Börse, über spannende erste Jobs bei der UniCredit Bank Austria und der RLB NÖ Wien / RSC, dann vor 13 Jahren den Wechsel zur Wiener Börse. Es geht auch um FATCA, CIIA/CEFA/CPM, wichtige Wegbegleiter:innen, die Bindeglied-Rolle zur CCPA sowie Indexrekorde. Finally auch um die Running Bulls mit Aktiv-Member Manuel. http://www.wienerborse.at https://www.ccpa.at Börsepeople Iris Schatzl Wiener Börse: https://audio-cd.at/page/podcast/5430 Börsepeople Thomas Rainer Wiener Börse: https://audio-cd.at/page/podcast/4910 Börsepeople Wolfgang Aubrunner CCPA: https://audio-cd.at/page/playlist/6697 Börsepeople Kalina Jarova Müller CCPA: https://audio-cd.at/page/playlist/6701 About: Die Serie Börsepeople des Podcasters Christian Drastil, der im Q4/24 in Frankfurt als "Finfluencer & Finanznetworker #1 Austria" ausgezeichnet wurde, findet im Rahmen von http://www.audio-cd.at und dem Podcast "Audio-CD.at Indie Podcasts" statt. Es handelt sich dabei um typische Personality- und Werdegang-Gespräche. Die Season 19 umfasst unter dem Motto „25 Börsepeople“ 25 Talks. Presenter der Season 19 ist die Volksbank https://www.volksbank.at. Welcher der meistgehörte Börsepeople Podcast ist, sieht man unter http://www.audio-cd.at/people. Der Zwischenstand des laufenden Rankings ist tagesaktuell um 12 Uhr aktualisiert. Bewertungen bei Apple (oder auch Spotify) machen mir Freude: http://www.audio-cd.at/spotify , http://www.audio-cd.at/apple . 2398 full no Christian Drastil Comm. 2003

4 Feedback-Fallen, mit denen du dein Team in Sekunden lahmlegst Als Unternehmer:in kennst du die Szene: Du willst „nur schnell“ korrigieren – und plötzlich herrscht Grabesstille. Warum? Weil verschiedene Mitarbeiter dein wohlmeinendes Feedback völlig unterschiedlich deuten. Triffst du den Ton nicht, gehen A-Player in den Fluchtmodus, B-Player in die Rechtfertigung und C-Player in die Endlosschleife. Ergebnis: Energie weg, Umsatz bremst, Fluktuation steigt. Hör rein in meine neue Folge „Welcher Charismatyp welches Feedback verträgt“, welche Feedback-Strategie zu welchem Charismatyp passt – und behalte deine Top-Leute, statt sie versehentlich zu vergraulen. Trau dich du zu sein, deine Silke & ein Lächeln. In Podcastfolge #321 „Welcher Charismatyp welches Feedback verträgt“, erfährst du unter anderem: ✨ Wie ein einziger Nebensatz vom positiven Impuls zur stillen Kündigung kippt. ✨ Warum der analytische Profi andere Worte als der kreative Freigeist hört. ✨ Woran du in 30 Sekunden erkennst, ob vor dir ein A-, B- oder C-Player sitzt. ✨ Welche Kontrollfrage dich davor schützt, Feedback nur fürs eigene Ego abzuladen. ✨

„Endlich Anfragen übers Netz generieren“ steht wahrscheinlich auch auf Deiner Wunschliste weit oben.Im Marketing gibt es dazu einen Dreh- und Angelpunkt. Einen Kern. Einen Motor. Etwas, das sitzen sollte bevor auch nur ein Cent in Werbung investiert wird. Welcher das ist, warum dieser je nach Ziel anders aufgebaut sein sollte, wie Du diesen für Dich nutzt und, wie Du die richtigen Engpässe identifizierst, wenn es derzeit (oder später einmal) hapert..…das und mehr erfährst Du in dieser Folge. Du willst einmal mit mir direkt sprechen und Deine Webpräsenz von mir strategisch analysieren lassen? Dann trag' Dich hier für ein unverbindliches Strategie-Gespräch ein und erfahre: 

Die meisten Menschen sind verkopft. Viele folgen einem Weg im Beruf oder in der Beziehung, der fremdbestimmt ist. Sei es das Umfeld, das ihnen einredet, was gut für sie ist oder sie selbst. Dabei ist der einzige Weg, der glücklich macht, der selbstbestimmte Weg. Welcher ist das? Wie findest du denn vom Kopf ins Herz und weißt, dass es der richtige Weg für dich ist. Die Volljuristin Mandy hat sich diese Frage schon seit längerem gestellt und hat sich dafür entschieden, etwas dafür zu TUN, um die Antwort zu finden. UND: Sie hat sie gefunden. Höre dir diesen spannenden Podcast an! DIE COMMUNITY IST ONLINE - SEI EIN WERTVOLLES MITGLIED VON UNS:

Mon, 07 Jul 2025 03:45:00 +0000 https://jungeanleger.podigee.io/2392-borsepeople-im-podcast-s19-19-kurt-kerschbaum ea126da64316f3c93e16af726af8f0bd Kurt Kerschbaum ist Direktor der OeKB CSD, die unlängst ihren 10. Geburtstag feierte. Wir sprechen über lange Jahre bei der UniCredit, wo Kurt nach und nach in Führungspositionen aufstieg und dann - kurz nach der Gründung der OeKB CSD - den Wechsel eben dorthin. Und es wird tief eingetaucht, es geht um die Integrität der Urkunden, knapp 20.000 verwahrte Wertpapierkategorien (ISINs), 1.644.470 abgewickelte Transaktionen 2024, rund 850 Mrd. Euro Verwahrwert Anleihen, Aktien & Fonds und die Novelle des Depotgesetzes, die die rein elektronische Begebung von Wertpapieren ermöglichte, was zu Kurts Steckenpferd wurde. Auch da haben wir viele Zahlen. Wir sprechen aber auch über Dividenden, die Zusammenarbeit mit der CCPA, Shortpositionen, FMA und OeNB, Settlementfails sowie einen typischen Tagesablauf. Und Schach. https://www.oekb-csd.at Erklärvideo zur CSD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U10TkkHgwRE About: Die Serie Börsepeople des Podcasters Christian Drastil, der im Q4/24 in Frankfurt als "Finfluencer & Finanznetworker #1 Austria" ausgezeichnet wurde, findet im Rahmen von http://www.audio-cd.at und dem Podcast "Audio-CD.at Indie Podcasts" statt. Es handelt sich dabei um typische Personality- und Werdegang-Gespräche. Die Season 19 umfasst unter dem Motto „25 Börsepeople“ 25 Talks. Presenter der Season 19 ist die Volksbank https://www.volksbank.at. Welcher der meistgehörte Börsepeople Podcast ist, sieht man unter http://www.audio-cd.at/people. Der Zwischenstand des laufenden Rankings ist tagesaktuell um 12 Uhr aktualisiert. Bewertungen bei Apple (oder auch Spotify) machen mir Freude: http://www.audio-cd.at/spotify , http://www.audio-cd.at/apple . 2392 full no Christian Drastil Comm. 2101

„Warum halte ich beim Abnehmen einfach nicht durch?“ Du hast doch nicht wirklich geglaubt, dass "einmal geschafft" gleich "für immer geschafft" heißt, oder?

Fri, 04 Jul 2025 03:45:00 +0000 https://jungeanleger.podigee.io/2385-borsepeople-im-podcast-s19-18-edith-holzer da6cc802d34f26e1b9b83c5163776841 Edith Holzer ist selbstständige Kommunikationsberaterin, Tänzerin und Hofnärrin. Wir kennen uns über Ediths Bank- und Zertifikate Forum Austria-Arbeit, zudem gibt es Höfnärrin/Hofnarr-Parallelen. Und so wurde es ein Talk über Lektoratstätigkeit in mehreren Sprachen, die Zeitschrift Profil, die UniCredit Bank Austria samt Leasing, eben über das ZFA, die Selbstständigkeit und das "Worum es wirklich geht". Aber auch über das Tanzen, die Tour de France, das Dehnen bei Pressekonferenzen und den Verzicht auf eine eigene Homepage. Beim Process Communication Model sind wir voll d'accord, beim Radfahren innerhalb des Wiener Gürtels wohl nicht so ganz. Aber das schadet der spassigen Diskussion überhaupt nicht. So soll es sein. https://www.linkedin.com/in/edith-holzer-5029a325/ About: Die Serie Börsepeople des Podcasters Christian Drastil, der im Q4/24 in Frankfurt als "Finfluencer & Finanznetworker #1 Austria" ausgezeichnet wurde, findet im Rahmen von http://www.audio-cd.at und dem Podcast "Audio-CD.at Indie Podcasts" statt. Es handelt sich dabei um typische Personality- und Werdegang-Gespräche. Die Season 19 umfasst unter dem Motto „25 Börsepeople“ 25 Talks. Presenter der Season 19 ist die Volksbank https://www.volksbank.at. Welcher der meistgehörte Börsepeople Podcast ist, sieht man unter http://www.audio-cd.at/people. Der Zwischenstand des laufenden Rankings ist tagesaktuell um 12 Uhr aktualisiert. Bewertungen bei Apple (oder auch Spotify) machen mir Freude: http://www.audio-cd.at/spotify , http://www.audio-cd.at/apple . 2385 full no Christian Drastil Comm. 2172

Kyle Welcher joins BTL to talk about technology parallels between tournament poker and professional bass fishing.  Mark Jeffreys also jumps in mid-show.  

Kyle Welcher, Mikey Balzz and Wes Logan join host Thom Abraham on this episode of Bassmaster Radio.

Braun, Hilde www.deutschlandfunk.de, Verbrauchertipp

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/9W-28UtY1lYDay 31 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on June 11, 2025. Neither Karen Read nor Former Trooper Proctor will be called to testify. A charging conference, where jury instructions will be discussed, is scheduled for tomorrow. The Defense is requesting instructions regarding "missing witnesses" and the hoodie, but not a "third-party culprit" instruction.Dr. Rentschler's testimony focused on the paint transfer test and concluded that the injuries were inconsistent with the Commonwealth's theory, stating that the abrasions on O'Keefe's arm do not correspond to how an arm would interact with the vehicle if struck at a right angle. The Defense effectively used visuals from his Power Point to support Dr. Rentschler's testimony.During cross-examination, Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, largely avoided questions about Dr. Rentschler's testing, instead focusing on his independence and expenses. Rentschler maintained his opinions were unchanged by these factors. Brennan's cross-examination strategy undermined the Commonwealth's position, especially given the high payment to their own experts.A significant development is that the Commonwealth will not call any rebuttal witnesses once the defense rests, a surprising move given their prior legal battles over testimony. The introduction of X-rays by the defense, which many believed didn't exist due to Dr. Welcher's testimony, may have influenced this decision.With the evidence phase concluding, the next steps are the charging conference, where jury instructions and lesser-included crimes will be debated, and then closing arguments on Friday. The jury will then deliberate, with the complexity of Count Two (involuntary manslaughter) expected to be a key focus, as it was in the previous trial. RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Der kleine Bruder des Golds, Silber, ist gerade nach oben ausgebrochen, das digitale Gold Bitcoin steht kurz vor einem Allzeithoch. Die beiden Wirtschaftsjournalisten Dietmar Deffner und Holger Zschäpitz debattieren darüber, welche Anlage bis zum Jahresende das größere Potenzial hat und überbieten sich mit spannenden Kurszielen. Weitere Themen: - Spannende Chip-Übernahme – warum Qualcomm eine neue Perspektive liefert - Trendwende bei Carbios? – was für einen Durchbruch beim Recycling-Tech-Unternehmen spricht - Cloud, Online, Tech – wo Deffner zuletzt eingestiegen ist - Altersvorsorge nur mit Versicherungen? – was für und gegen Versicherungsprodukte zum Kapitalaufbau spricht - Labernder Finfluencer – warum Zschäpitz von einer YouTube-Werbung megagenervt ist Produktion: Dieter Webel DEFFNER & ZSCHÄPITZ sind wie das wahre Leben. Wie Optimist und Pessimist. Im wöchentlichen WELT-Podcast diskutieren und streiten die Journalisten Dietmar Deffner und Holger Zschäpitz über die wichtigen Wirtschaftsthemen des Alltags. Schreiben Sie uns an: wirtschaftspodcast@welt.de Impressum: https://www.welt.de/services/article7893735/Impressum.html Datenschutzerklärung: https://www.welt.de/services/article157550705/Datenschutzerklaerung-WELT-DIGITAL.html

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/fyEtt02zOn8Day 28 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on June 6, 2025. Karen Read spoke to the media and suggested the case might go to the jury the following week. The judge denied the motion to have police procedure expert Michael Easter testify.Today we were all day with Dr. Daniel Wolfe, Direct of Accident Reconstruction at ARCCA. He tests conducted using a pressurized air cannon to fire a drinking glass at a car's tail light to simulate damage. ARCCA also purchased an "exemplar vehicle," a 2021 LX 570, to test damage to the tail light. ARCCA conducted tests to rebut Dr. Welcher's testimony. They tested to see if damage from a thrown rocks glass matched the damage to Karen Read's tail light, and compared that to damage from collisions with a test dummy arm and Resource Randy, a full body dummy. Tests were conducted using a crash test dummy with a hoodie similar to John O'Keefe's, and none of the tests damaged the hoodie. The most helpful part of Dr. Wolf's testimony was explaining the inner and outer plastic layers of the tail light, which helped understand the depth of the damage.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Direct Examination Part 2 Description: Part 2 of Judson Welcher's direct examination continues to unpack the forensic reconstruction of the alleged vehicle strike. Using detailed animation models and vehicle dynamics data, Welcher walks the jury deeper into the timing and mechanical behavior of Read's Lexus SUV. The testimony focuses on acceleration patterns and reverse speed — elements that could determine whether this was an accident or something much darker. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #ApertureForensics #CrashExpert #JudsonWelcher #JohnOKeefe #ReverseImpact #VehicleData #TrueCrimeCourt #TrialAnalysis #ExpertTestimony Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 1 Description: In this critical segment of the trial, the defense begins its cross-examination of Judson Welcher. Attempting to poke holes in Aperture's crash analysis and methodology, Read's attorneys challenge assumptions, question visibility models, and raise issues of expert bias. This is the first round of a highly technical — and tactical — courtroom exchange. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CrossExamination #DefenseStrategy #TrueCrimeCourtroom #ApertureAnalysis #CrashDataDebate #TrialFootage #KarenReadDefense #JohnOKeefeCase Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 2 Description: As cross-examination continues, the defense zeroes in on the reliability of the data and simulation models used by Judson Welcher and Aperture. Welcher is pressed on assumptions, thresholds, and visual representation of impact scenarios — in an attempt to raise doubt about the prosecution's timeline and theory of the case. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #CrossExamination #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcherTestimony #TrueCrimeVideo #VehicleForensics #JohnOKeefe #CourtroomDebate #ForensicScience #TrialDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination & Re-Direct Description: The cross-examination wraps, and the prosecution follows with re-direct to re-establish Judson Welcher's credibility and reinforce his key conclusions. This segment showcases the tug-of-war over expert interpretation and how precise data — or its presentation — can shape a jury's perception in a high-stakes case. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CourtroomDrama #ReDirect #ForensicBattle #CrashAnalysis #ExpertWitnessTestimony #ApertureForensics #TrueCrimeTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Direct Examination Part 1 Description: In this courtroom clip, Judson Welcher, a crash reconstruction expert from Aperture, takes the stand in the Karen Read trial. In Part 1 of his direct examination, Welcher begins to walk the jury through forensic vehicle data, reverse throttle evidence, and scene analysis from the night of John O'Keefe's death. With a technical but powerful breakdown of the movements of Karen Read's SUV, this testimony sets the stage for a battle of expert interpretations in a case centered around timing, trajectory, and intent. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #ApertureAnalysis #TrueCrimeTrial #JohnOKeefe #CrashReconstruction #CourtroomTestimony #ExpertWitness #ForensicEvidence #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 2 Description: As cross-examination continues, the defense zeroes in on the reliability of the data and simulation models used by Judson Welcher and Aperture. Welcher is pressed on assumptions, thresholds, and visual representation of impact scenarios — in an attempt to raise doubt about the prosecution's timeline and theory of the case. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #CrossExamination #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcherTestimony #TrueCrimeVideo #VehicleForensics #JohnOKeefe #CourtroomDebate #ForensicScience #TrialDrama Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination & Re-Direct Description: The cross-examination wraps, and the prosecution follows with re-direct to re-establish Judson Welcher's credibility and reinforce his key conclusions. This segment showcases the tug-of-war over expert interpretation and how precise data — or its presentation — can shape a jury's perception in a high-stakes case. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CourtroomDrama #ReDirect #ForensicBattle #CrashAnalysis #ExpertWitnessTestimony #ApertureForensics #TrueCrimeTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Cross Examination Part 1 Description: In this critical segment of the trial, the defense begins its cross-examination of Judson Welcher. Attempting to poke holes in Aperture's crash analysis and methodology, Read's attorneys challenge assumptions, question visibility models, and raise issues of expert bias. This is the first round of a highly technical — and tactical — courtroom exchange. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #CrossExamination #DefenseStrategy #TrueCrimeCourtroom #ApertureAnalysis #CrashDataDebate #TrialFootage #KarenReadDefense #JohnOKeefeCase Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Direct Examination Part 2 Description: Part 2 of Judson Welcher's direct examination continues to unpack the forensic reconstruction of the alleged vehicle strike. Using detailed animation models and vehicle dynamics data, Welcher walks the jury deeper into the timing and mechanical behavior of Read's Lexus SUV. The testimony focuses on acceleration patterns and reverse speed — elements that could determine whether this was an accident or something much darker. Hashtags: #KarenReadTrial #ApertureForensics #CrashExpert #JudsonWelcher #JohnOKeefe #ReverseImpact #VehicleData #TrueCrimeCourt #TrialAnalysis #ExpertTestimony Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial - Judson Welcher From Aperture Direct Examination Part 1 Description: In this courtroom clip, Judson Welcher, a crash reconstruction expert from Aperture, takes the stand in the Karen Read trial. In Part 1 of his direct examination, Welcher begins to walk the jury through forensic vehicle data, reverse throttle evidence, and scene analysis from the night of John O'Keefe's death. With a technical but powerful breakdown of the movements of Karen Read's SUV, this testimony sets the stage for a battle of expert interpretations in a case centered around timing, trajectory, and intent. Hashtags: #KarenRead #JudsonWelcher #ApertureAnalysis #TrueCrimeTrial #JohnOKeefe #CrashReconstruction #CourtroomTestimony #ExpertWitness #ForensicEvidence #HiddenKillers Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Send us a textWhat a week in Norfolk County,Massachusetts! The prosecution concluded their case in chief. What exactly did they prove. It appears that the Commonwealth has NOT proven the intent factor in the second degree homicide charge. The forensic case against Karen Read is shaky at best. Dr Welcher, an accident re-constructionist  was the last witness called by the Commonwealth, was simply not what they needed. He came off as every engineer at a house party, Know it all, dismissive and insistent. He was forced to admit that he could not determine, on what body part John was first struck, where on the street John was standing, where John O'Keefe's final resting place was. This case remains an incoherent mess for the Commonwealth. Please Share this episode! Law and Crime-https://bit.ly/43PX6EaThe Emily Show-https://bit.ly/3T4dzzmX-bcpbeantown Email-barry@bostonconfidential.net

Big Breakdown: Karen Read BOMBSHELL Week As Forensic Expert Destroys Her Defense In this video, we break down one of the most crucial turning points in the Karen Read murder trial: the forensic testimony of crash reconstruction and biomechanics expert Dr. Judson Welcher. This wasn't just dry data—it was a methodical unraveling of the defense's entire alternate timeline, backed by engineering certainty, 3D laser scans, and vehicle telemetry that left little room for doubt. Welcher took the stand and presented detailed vehicle data showing Karen Read's Lexus accelerated in reverse at 74% throttle, hitting nearly 24 miles per hour, at the exact moment John O'Keefe's phone stopped registering activity. That moment—12:32:14 a.m.—was cross-validated by cell phone experts and aligned with the SUV's event data recorder. This wasn't speculation. It was math, physics, and digital forensics doing the talking. He went further. Using an identical Lexus RX350, blue tail light paint, and comparative biomechanics, Welcher demonstrated exactly how O'Keefe sustained arm injuries that defense experts claimed could not have come from a car. The match was precise—even down to bruising and laceration alignment. He explained how the trajectory of injuries to O'Keefe's hip and head also matched a glancing, accelerated reverse impact. In response, the defense tried to downplay the data, even mocking the idea that a Lexus could “launch into space.” But Welcher didn't flinch. He stayed focused, clarified the science, and held the courtroom with calm authority. Every attempt to rattle him fell flat—and that's what made his testimony so devastatingly effective. This is the video you need to watch if you're still on the fence about Karen Read's guilt. The Lexus doesn't lie. Neither does the data. And Karen's own post-arrest words—“What if I clipped him?”—only tighten the noose. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #CrashReconstruction #ForensicEvidence #JudsonWelcher #TrueCrimeAnalysis #HiddenKillers #Biomechanics #DigitalForensics #TrialBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Big Breakdown: Karen Read BOMBSHELL Week As Forensic Expert Destroys Her Defense In this video, we break down one of the most crucial turning points in the Karen Read murder trial: the forensic testimony of crash reconstruction and biomechanics expert Dr. Judson Welcher. This wasn't just dry data—it was a methodical unraveling of the defense's entire alternate timeline, backed by engineering certainty, 3D laser scans, and vehicle telemetry that left little room for doubt. Welcher took the stand and presented detailed vehicle data showing Karen Read's Lexus accelerated in reverse at 74% throttle, hitting nearly 24 miles per hour, at the exact moment John O'Keefe's phone stopped registering activity. That moment—12:32:14 a.m.—was cross-validated by cell phone experts and aligned with the SUV's event data recorder. This wasn't speculation. It was math, physics, and digital forensics doing the talking. He went further. Using an identical Lexus RX350, blue tail light paint, and comparative biomechanics, Welcher demonstrated exactly how O'Keefe sustained arm injuries that defense experts claimed could not have come from a car. The match was precise—even down to bruising and laceration alignment. He explained how the trajectory of injuries to O'Keefe's hip and head also matched a glancing, accelerated reverse impact. In response, the defense tried to downplay the data, even mocking the idea that a Lexus could “launch into space.” But Welcher didn't flinch. He stayed focused, clarified the science, and held the courtroom with calm authority. Every attempt to rattle him fell flat—and that's what made his testimony so devastatingly effective. This is the video you need to watch if you're still on the fence about Karen Read's guilt. The Lexus doesn't lie. Neither does the data. And Karen's own post-arrest words—“What if I clipped him?”—only tighten the noose. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #CrashReconstruction #ForensicEvidence #JudsonWelcher #TrueCrimeAnalysis #HiddenKillers #Biomechanics #DigitalForensics #TrialBreakdown Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/NqdL0Oq7uMADay 23 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 29, 2025. Judge Cannone ruled against allowing the defense to question Dr. Welcher further about Trooper Paul and Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello. The definition of "rely" and its implications in questioning witnesses were discussed. Dr. Welcher remained on the stand for the duration of the half-day session. The defense was allowed to cross-examine the Commonwealth's new accident reconstruction expert about what they relied on from the previous expert, but not necessarily all of their opinions. The defense would have to call Trooper Paul themselves.Dr. Welcher was questioned about the suspension system and height variance of the Lexus were discussed, the 3D modeling process, and about the glass on the bumper that the expert's assumptions was that it was inclusive. Cross-examination concluded after the morning break.The Commonwealth rested its case, and the Defense will argue their motion to dismiss on Day 24 and call their first witness, their tech expert, Matthew DiSogra.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/IduAs7XWVEUDay 22 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 28, 2025. After a brief Direct Examination by Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, of their Accident Reconstructionist, Dr. Welcher, Cross Examination took up the whole day and will continue on Day 23. Defense Attorney, Robert Alessi, ross-examination was rigorous and focused on challenging the credibility, methodology, and conclusions of the Commonwealth's expert witness. Dr. Welcher was repeatedly admonished by the court for looking at his computer and searching for information during the cross-examination, rather than answering directly from memory.Alessi questioned Dr. Welchre about the significant amount his firm, Aperture, was being paid by the Norfolk County District Attorney's Office ($325,000), and the details surrounding the purchase and sale of a Lexus exemplar for testing. The defense sought to highlight potential bias due to financial incentives.Alessi challenged inconsistencies in Dr. Welchre's testimony, such as the distance the Lexus traveled in reverse during a test (initially said to be 53 feet, then 87 feet), and the explanation of the 8 mph threshold for tail light breakage.Alessi delved into Dr. Welcher's use of data and images from Trooper Paul's report, questioning the extent to which Dr. Welcher relied on that information in his analysis. There was a dispute about a drone image and other diagrams, leading to a "Voir dire" (examination outside the presence of the jury) to clarify the sources of these materials.The voir dire aimed to clarify the sources of Dr. Welcher's materials and to determine the extent to which he relied on Trooper Paul's report or other evidence. It highlighted the defense's effort to question the independence of Dr. Welcher's analysis and the Commonwealth's attempt to defend it. The voir dire concluded with plans to continue the cross-examination the following day, with the understanding that time was limited due to a juror's scheduling issue.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Karen Read Trial Day 22 Full Recap: Defense vs. Physics: A Masterclass in Desperation In this in-depth breakdown of the May 28, 2025 courtroom testimony, we dissect forensic crash expert Judson Welcher's compelling appearance in the Karen Read trial—where science met high-stakes cross-examination. With a forensic eye on biomechanics, vehicle telemetry, and injury patterns, Welcher walked the jury through data from Karen Read's Lexus SUV, including an alarming reverse acceleration at 24 mph with 74% throttle at exactly 12:32:14 a.m.—the same second John O'Keefe's phone went dark. This video explores the physical and digital evidence presented by Welcher, including the now-viral paint transfer experiment showing how blue dye from a Lexus taillight landed exactly where O'Keefe had injuries on his forearm. We also unpack his calm dismantling of the “no broken bones, no collision” myth—citing real-world fatalities from glancing blows that left bones intact but caused fatal head trauma. But it wasn't just about evidence—it was about courtroom tension. The defense tried to undercut Welcher with a sarcastic jab about his remark that “a car could shoot into space”—twisting a scientific metaphor into a courtroom punchline. Welcher stood his ground. No theatrics. Just facts. We'll also take a closer look at the $325K paid to his firm, Aperture LLC, and whether that undermines or enhances the credibility of an expert who went as far as purchasing a Lexus RX350 to recreate the conditions of the alleged strike. If you're following the Karen Read trial for the forensic truth, legal strategy, or psychological breakdown of the arguments, this is the analysis you can't miss. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #Forensics #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #CourtroomDrama #LexusRX350 #InjuryAnalysis #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

On May 29, 2025, the prosecution rested its case against Karen Read — and not with a whimper, but with a sledgehammer. After weeks of building forensic, digital, and testimonial evidence linking Read to the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, the Commonwealth ended with a one-two punch: a bulletproof expert and Read's own words. Defense attorney Robert Alessi attempted to dismantle the testimony of crash reconstructionist Dr. Judson Welcher — and failed spectacularly. Welcher, who detailed how Read's Lexus reversed at 74% throttle and left taillight fragments and DNA near O'Keefe's body, stood unshaken as Alessi tried (and floundered) to poke holes in the data. Alessi's aggressive tone did nothing but irritate the court and highlight his lack of traction. His cross-examination was littered with grasping hypotheticals and unsupported accusations. He tried to cast doubt on the tech data, the 3D scans, and even camera angles — only to be reminded that science doesn't bend to bad theater. Then, the prosecution dropped the final blow: a 50-second clip of Karen Read herself, questioning aloud if she hit O'Keefe. “What if I clipped him in the knee?” she asks. “Then you'd have some culpability,” her lawyer reportedly told her. The courtroom fell silent. The jury stared at the screen long after it went black. This video covers the top 10 moments from Day 23 — and why May 29 may go down as the day this case turned for good. With expert testimony that held firm and the defendant's own voice suggesting guilt, the prosecution ended on a note that may echo all the way into deliberations. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #JusticeForJohn #ForensicEvidence #CrashReconstruction #DefenseFail #ProsecutionRested #ExpertWitness #CourtroomDrama

Day 23 of the Karen Read trial may go down as a defining moment. After weeks of forensic testimony, digital data, and a parade of witnesses, the prosecution rested its case—but not before leaving the jury with a gut-punch final act: a 50-second clip of Karen Read herself, captured in 2024, questioning whether she may have accidentally hit Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. “What if I clipped him in the knee?” she asked, describing a conversation with her lawyer, who allegedly responded, “Then you'd have some culpability.” The courtroom didn't erupt—but the silence said everything. Jurors reportedly remained fixated on the blank screen long after the video ended. But that moment wasn't the only blow to the defense. Before that, defense attorney Robert Alessi attempted a full-scale takedown of the prosecution's final expert witness, Dr. Judson Welcher, a crash reconstructionist hired by the state. What followed was a long, tense, and ultimately unconvincing cross-examination. Alessi challenged Welcher on the reverse throttle data (74% acceleration, 23.9 mph), questioned the accuracy of surveillance video reconstructions, and grilled him on the origins of glass fragments. Welcher held his ground. Calm, consistent, and data-driven, he even pushed back with a line that will likely echo: “Are you calling pieces of taillight found around the body circumstantial?” The defense also tried to cast Welcher as a “hired gun,” noting the $369,000 his firm had been paid. But he calmly stated that he began his analysis under the assumption that Read hadn't hit O'Keefe—and changed his conclusion only when the evidence demanded it. This video breaks down the 10 most critical moments from the day the prosecution closed strong, the defense stumbled, and the jury was left with Karen Read's own words ringing in their ears. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #CrashReconstruction #CourtroomDrama #ExpertWitness #ReverseThrottle #ForensicAnalysis #JusticeForJohn #HiddenKillers

Science vs. Spin The Defense Pushes Conspiracy, But the Timeline Doesn't Lie On Day 22 of the Karen Read trial, the defense launched what looked more like a desperate PR offensive than a credible legal cross-examination. Their target? Crash reconstruction expert Judson Welcher—the man who clearly laid out how Read's Lexus SUV, in reverse at 74% throttle and 23.9 mph, aligned perfectly with the injuries found on John O'Keefe's body. The defense didn't challenge the data. They couldn't. Instead, they went after Welcher's paycheck—suggesting his $325,000 compensation somehow invalidated the scientific conclusions. But forensic experts cost money—especially when they laser-scan the scene, replicate impact scenarios, and map injuries to vehicle geometry with precision. Welcher testified that O'Keefe's wounds—on his arm, hip, and head—were consistent with being struck by an SUV and falling to the frozen ground. The defense, meanwhile, continues to float its baseless conspiracy theory that O'Keefe was beaten inside the house, dumped in the snow, and that the entire Canton police and Massachusetts State Police are complicit in framing Karen Read. Even Judge Cannone saw through the smoke. She allowed Welcher to state that the damage to the SUV and the injuries were consistent with a collision—but reminded the jury that only they can decide what happened. Which is exactly what prosecutors want: let the facts speak louder than the fiction. The real question isn't whether the defense can poke at Welcher's resume. It's whether they can explain why everything—timeline, data, injuries, and forensic logic—points to one person: Karen Read. #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #ForensicTruth #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #DefenseDesperation #TrueCrimeUpdate #HiddenKillersPod #ProsecutionCase #KarenReadFacts Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial Day 22 Full Recap: Defense vs. Physics: A Masterclass in Desperation In this in-depth breakdown of the May 28, 2025 courtroom testimony, we dissect forensic crash expert Judson Welcher's compelling appearance in the Karen Read trial—where science met high-stakes cross-examination. With a forensic eye on biomechanics, vehicle telemetry, and injury patterns, Welcher walked the jury through data from Karen Read's Lexus SUV, including an alarming reverse acceleration at 24 mph with 74% throttle at exactly 12:32:14 a.m.—the same second John O'Keefe's phone went dark. This video explores the physical and digital evidence presented by Welcher, including the now-viral paint transfer experiment showing how blue dye from a Lexus taillight landed exactly where O'Keefe had injuries on his forearm. We also unpack his calm dismantling of the “no broken bones, no collision” myth—citing real-world fatalities from glancing blows that left bones intact but caused fatal head trauma. But it wasn't just about evidence—it was about courtroom tension. The defense tried to undercut Welcher with a sarcastic jab about his remark that “a car could shoot into space”—twisting a scientific metaphor into a courtroom punchline. Welcher stood his ground. No theatrics. Just facts. We'll also take a closer look at the $325K paid to his firm, Aperture LLC, and whether that undermines or enhances the credibility of an expert who went as far as purchasing a Lexus RX350 to recreate the conditions of the alleged strike. If you're following the Karen Read trial for the forensic truth, legal strategy, or psychological breakdown of the arguments, this is the analysis you can't miss. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #Forensics #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #CourtroomDrama #LexusRX350 #InjuryAnalysis #HiddenKillersPodcast Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?  Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Science vs. Spin The Defense Pushes Conspiracy, But the Timeline Doesn't Lie On Day 22 of the Karen Read trial, the defense launched what looked more like a desperate PR offensive than a credible legal cross-examination. Their target? Crash reconstruction expert Judson Welcher—the man who clearly laid out how Read's Lexus SUV, in reverse at 74% throttle and 23.9 mph, aligned perfectly with the injuries found on John O'Keefe's body. The defense didn't challenge the data. They couldn't. Instead, they went after Welcher's paycheck—suggesting his $325,000 compensation somehow invalidated the scientific conclusions. But forensic experts cost money—especially when they laser-scan the scene, replicate impact scenarios, and map injuries to vehicle geometry with precision. Welcher testified that O'Keefe's wounds—on his arm, hip, and head—were consistent with being struck by an SUV and falling to the frozen ground. The defense, meanwhile, continues to float its baseless conspiracy theory that O'Keefe was beaten inside the house, dumped in the snow, and that the entire Canton police and Massachusetts State Police are complicit in framing Karen Read. Even Judge Cannone saw through the smoke. She allowed Welcher to state that the damage to the SUV and the injuries were consistent with a collision—but reminded the jury that only they can decide what happened. Which is exactly what prosecutors want: let the facts speak louder than the fiction. The real question isn't whether the defense can poke at Welcher's resume. It's whether they can explain why everything—timeline, data, injuries, and forensic logic—points to one person: Karen Read. #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #ForensicTruth #CrashReconstruction #JudsonWelcher #DefenseDesperation #TrueCrimeUpdate #HiddenKillersPod #ProsecutionCase #KarenReadFacts Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

On May 29, 2025, the prosecution rested its case against Karen Read — and not with a whimper, but with a sledgehammer. After weeks of building forensic, digital, and testimonial evidence linking Read to the death of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, the Commonwealth ended with a one-two punch: a bulletproof expert and Read's own words. Defense attorney Robert Alessi attempted to dismantle the testimony of crash reconstructionist Dr. Judson Welcher — and failed spectacularly. Welcher, who detailed how Read's Lexus reversed at 74% throttle and left taillight fragments and DNA near O'Keefe's body, stood unshaken as Alessi tried (and floundered) to poke holes in the data. Alessi's aggressive tone did nothing but irritate the court and highlight his lack of traction. His cross-examination was littered with grasping hypotheticals and unsupported accusations. He tried to cast doubt on the tech data, the 3D scans, and even camera angles — only to be reminded that science doesn't bend to bad theater. Then, the prosecution dropped the final blow: a 50-second clip of Karen Read herself, questioning aloud if she hit O'Keefe. “What if I clipped him in the knee?” she asks. “Then you'd have some culpability,” her lawyer reportedly told her. The courtroom fell silent. The jury stared at the screen long after it went black. This video covers the top 10 moments from Day 23 — and why May 29 may go down as the day this case turned for good. With expert testimony that held firm and the defendant's own voice suggesting guilt, the prosecution ended on a note that may echo all the way into deliberations. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #JusticeForJohn #ForensicEvidence #CrashReconstruction #DefenseFail #ProsecutionRested #ExpertWitness #CourtroomDrama

Day 23 of the Karen Read trial may go down as a defining moment. After weeks of forensic testimony, digital data, and a parade of witnesses, the prosecution rested its case—but not before leaving the jury with a gut-punch final act: a 50-second clip of Karen Read herself, captured in 2024, questioning whether she may have accidentally hit Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. “What if I clipped him in the knee?” she asked, describing a conversation with her lawyer, who allegedly responded, “Then you'd have some culpability.” The courtroom didn't erupt—but the silence said everything. Jurors reportedly remained fixated on the blank screen long after the video ended. But that moment wasn't the only blow to the defense. Before that, defense attorney Robert Alessi attempted a full-scale takedown of the prosecution's final expert witness, Dr. Judson Welcher, a crash reconstructionist hired by the state. What followed was a long, tense, and ultimately unconvincing cross-examination. Alessi challenged Welcher on the reverse throttle data (74% acceleration, 23.9 mph), questioned the accuracy of surveillance video reconstructions, and grilled him on the origins of glass fragments. Welcher held his ground. Calm, consistent, and data-driven, he even pushed back with a line that will likely echo: “Are you calling pieces of taillight found around the body circumstantial?” The defense also tried to cast Welcher as a “hired gun,” noting the $369,000 his firm had been paid. But he calmly stated that he began his analysis under the assumption that Read hadn't hit O'Keefe—and changed his conclusion only when the evidence demanded it. This video breaks down the 10 most critical moments from the day the prosecution closed strong, the defense stumbled, and the jury was left with Karen Read's own words ringing in their ears. #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #CrashReconstruction #CourtroomDrama #ExpertWitness #ReverseThrottle #ForensicAnalysis #JusticeForJohn #HiddenKillers

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/3DAtOqbCSh0Day 21 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 27, 2025. Week six of evidence included a voir dire of Dr. Welcher, the Commonwealth's accident reconstructionist. Concerns were raised about updated slides and changes to the presentation at the direction of Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, without informing the defense. Dr. Welcher also mentioned being "inundated" with emails about issues with Burgess' CV but he was told by the court not to read or discuss them.The accident reconstructionist focused on the "trigger event," during a three point turn and its connection to Ian Whiffin's last point of contact. There was also discussion of variance, the three-point turn of the Lexus, and the backing event. Dr. Welcher analyzed the Lexus's tech stream data, which records data before and after a trigger event, such as reversing and accelerating. The data showed the backing event occurred about 8 minutes after the three-point turn. There are discrepancies and confusing aspects of Dr. Welcher's testimony and PowerPoint slides.He also revealed that the Lexus's tires were spinning and slipping during the backing event, and the car traveled a total of 87 feet. Dr. Welcher ultimately concluded that the Lexus struck John O'Keefe, which led to objections and a sidebar discussion. Dr. Dr. Welcher struggled to provide exact details, such as the point of impact or speed, and that many of his findings showed “results that were all over the map”. He also mentions he is only certain that damage to Karen Read's tail light didn't come from John O'Keefe's Chevy. Though this expert's testimony was tedious and disorganized, it did provided many areas doubt which is a win for the defense. Direct Examination will continue on Day 22.RESOURCESWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy

Aperture Reconstruction Witness Judson Welcher was on direct exam the entire day - let's recap the main points!10% off all merch with code Sherlock10 at checkout Donate: (Thank you for your support! Couldn't do what I love without all y'all) PayPal - paypal.com/paypalme/prettyliesandalibisVenmo - @prettyliesalibisBuy Me A Coffee - https://www.buymeacoffee.com/prettyliesrCash App- PrettyliesandalibisAll links: https://linktr.ee/prettyliesandalibisMerch: prettyliesandalibis.myshopify.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/PrettyLiesAndAlibis(Weekly lives and private message board)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/pretty-lies-and-alibis--4447192/support.

Karen Read Trial Day 21 - Reasonable Doubt Is Gone, Data Shows Karen's SUV Struck John O'Keefe In today's explosive courtroom session in the Karen Read trial, we dive deep into the forensic testimony of Dr. Judson Welcher—an accident reconstruction expert whose analysis may be the most critical evidence presented so far. At the center of it all: vehicle data showing Karen Read's Lexus SUV hitting 74% throttle in reverse, accelerating backward at nearly 24 mph outside 34 Fairview Road—the exact time prosecutors allege she struck Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe and left him to die in the snow. Welcher didn't just analyze the black box data—he recreated the scenario. Wearing similar clothing and holding a glass like the one O'Keefe had that night, he demonstrated how red paint from a Lexus taillight transferred exactly to the spot where O'Keefe had a deep arm laceration. He matched that with hip and head injuries, dismantling theories of a dog attack or indoor altercation. His conclusion? The SUV's motion and O'Keefe's injuries aligned with a sideswipe-style impact. But the day didn't stop at science. The defense launched a counterattack, filing new witnesses to authenticate hostile texts from former lead investigator Michael Proctor—texts like “hopefully she kills herself.” They argued this shows investigative bias. Meanwhile, they fought to keep Welcher from stating outright that a collision occurred, calling it jury overreach. Judge Cannone deferred a ruling. This video breaks down the full day of courtroom drama, forensic testimony, legal chess, and how this moment could turn the entire trial. #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #LexusSUV #AccidentReconstruction #TrooperProctor #CrimeScene #LegalDrama #PoliceCoverUp Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

EXPERT: Body Position, Time Markers & Damage Prove Karen Read's SUV Hit John O'Keefe In this critical episode, we unpack the most damning forensic testimony yet in the Karen Read trial—straight from the prosecution's final witness, Dr. Judson Welcher, a biomechanical engineer and accident reconstructionist. Welcher testified that John O'Keefe's injuries were “consistent with being struck and dragged” by Karen Read's SUV, based on an exhaustive analysis of vehicle event data, scene evidence, and physical injury patterns. Using a matching Lexus RX350 and crash test dummies, Welcher simulated the scene and determined that Read's SUV reversed 53 feet at 74% throttle—without braking. His conclusion? The SUV's reverse path “lines up with fatal contact,” and the injuries “match a collision with a human body,” specifically one standing near the right rear corner of the car. He also cited damage to the vehicle and the pattern of blood and debris as “highly consistent” with a reverse impact. This video dives deep into: The reenactments Welcher performed His use of data from the car's event recorder His breakdown of how and where O'Keefe was likely hit What this means for the jury's understanding of Karen Read's actions With the defense now forced to confront this expert forensic narrative, viewers are left asking: Was this the moment Karen Read's case collapsed? #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DrWelcher #ForensicTestimony #CrimeSceneAnalysis #AccidentReconstruction #TrialUpdate #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForJohn Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Karen Read Trial Day 21 - Reasonable Doubt Is Gone, Data Shows Karen's SUV Struck John O'Keefe In today's explosive courtroom session in the Karen Read trial, we dive deep into the forensic testimony of Dr. Judson Welcher—an accident reconstruction expert whose analysis may be the most critical evidence presented so far. At the center of it all: vehicle data showing Karen Read's Lexus SUV hitting 74% throttle in reverse, accelerating backward at nearly 24 mph outside 34 Fairview Road—the exact time prosecutors allege she struck Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe and left him to die in the snow. Welcher didn't just analyze the black box data—he recreated the scenario. Wearing similar clothing and holding a glass like the one O'Keefe had that night, he demonstrated how red paint from a Lexus taillight transferred exactly to the spot where O'Keefe had a deep arm laceration. He matched that with hip and head injuries, dismantling theories of a dog attack or indoor altercation. His conclusion? The SUV's motion and O'Keefe's injuries aligned with a sideswipe-style impact. But the day didn't stop at science. The defense launched a counterattack, filing new witnesses to authenticate hostile texts from former lead investigator Michael Proctor—texts like “hopefully she kills herself.” They argued this shows investigative bias. Meanwhile, they fought to keep Welcher from stating outright that a collision occurred, calling it jury overreach. Judge Cannone deferred a ruling. This video breaks down the full day of courtroom drama, forensic testimony, legal chess, and how this moment could turn the entire trial. #KarenReadTrial #JohnOKeefe #TrueCrime #ForensicEvidence #LexusSUV #AccidentReconstruction #TrooperProctor #CrimeScene #LegalDrama #PoliceCoverUp Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

EXPERT: Body Position, Time Markers & Damage Prove Karen Read's SUV Hit John O'Keefe In this critical episode, we unpack the most damning forensic testimony yet in the Karen Read trial—straight from the prosecution's final witness, Dr. Judson Welcher, a biomechanical engineer and accident reconstructionist. Welcher testified that John O'Keefe's injuries were “consistent with being struck and dragged” by Karen Read's SUV, based on an exhaustive analysis of vehicle event data, scene evidence, and physical injury patterns. Using a matching Lexus RX350 and crash test dummies, Welcher simulated the scene and determined that Read's SUV reversed 53 feet at 74% throttle—without braking. His conclusion? The SUV's reverse path “lines up with fatal contact,” and the injuries “match a collision with a human body,” specifically one standing near the right rear corner of the car. He also cited damage to the vehicle and the pattern of blood and debris as “highly consistent” with a reverse impact. This video dives deep into: The reenactments Welcher performed His use of data from the car's event recorder His breakdown of how and where O'Keefe was likely hit What this means for the jury's understanding of Karen Read's actions With the defense now forced to confront this expert forensic narrative, viewers are left asking: Was this the moment Karen Read's case collapsed? #KarenRead #JohnOKeefe #DrWelcher #ForensicTestimony #CrimeSceneAnalysis #AccidentReconstruction #TrialUpdate #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForJohn Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

Andrew, Branson, and Charles tell a bedtime story about the legend of Skunk Welcher and the four treasures. Full episode on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/posts/e2-87-legend-of-129927887

Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/IJgD247smlQDay 19 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 20, 2025. Defense Attorney, Robert Alessi, continued cross examining Shanon Burgess. Questions arose regarding the accuracy of dates and timeline in the expert's analysis, with errors of 24 hours. Burgess kept saying that the event happened the night of January 29-30th when in reality is it was January 28-29th. Shanon's analysis of call logs, text streams, and vehicle data was scrutinized. There were concerns about the use of approximate times and potential confirmation bias. The expert did not have the raw data for the techstream information, he instead got it from Welcher's report. During redirect examination, Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, attempted to clarify Burgess' credentials and data interpretation. Pointing out that he didn't need that degree to perform his job and that work life balance made it a challenge to complete his degree.On Re-Cross Examination, Alessi pointed out that in a federal court filing in Texas, Burgess' resume stated he was anticipating a BGS - Bachelor of General Science in 2024. There is no Bachelor of General Science degree in Alabama and he has been pursuing this degree since 2008. The use of the Commonwealths presenting video and audio clips, especially the voicemail, appears to be related to establishing a timeline of Karen Read's movements and actions around the time of John O'Keefe's death. The defense may use it to show her actions were consistent, while the prosecution may use it to point out inconsistencies. The 12:25/12:30 timeframe she gives for John's passing may be challenged given her audio from the voicemail at 12:41AM.Later in the day, Christina Hanley, a trace analyst expert witness from the lab testified about a mechanical match on glass. The court adjourned early after sidebar discussions. We'll get back to her on Day 20.RESOURCESRetrial Day 10 - Voicemails - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2vEF0vxG2wWhat You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTSThis podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy