Podcasts about Southern District

Prince Andrew publicly said after his disastrous 2019 Newsnight interview that he was willing to help any appropriate law-enforcement agency investigating Jeffrey Epstein, but U.S. prosecutors later said that cooperation never materialized. In January 2020, then-U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman said Andrew had provided “zero cooperation” despite requests from the FBI and federal prosecutors to interview him. By March, Berman said Andrew had effectively “shut the door” on voluntary cooperation, and in June the Southern District of New York stated that Andrew had repeatedly declined requests to schedule an interview and had told prosecutors through his lawyers that he would not come in voluntarily. Andrew's legal team disputed the government's characterization, saying he wanted to cooperate but objected to the way prosecutors had handled the matter publicly.Years later, the core issue remained unresolved: Andrew had never sat for the kind of substantive questioning U.S. investigators originally sought about Epstein and his associates. His lawyers had at various points proposed providing written responses, while Andrew himself largely avoided further public questioning after the Newsnight interview devastated his reputation. Renewed calls for him to testify continued as additional Epstein records were released, with survivors and lawmakers arguing that he may possess relevant information. Andrew has consistently denied wrongdoing and denied knowledge of Epstein's criminal conduct, but the contrast between his original promise to help investigators and the absence of a full interview has followed him ever since.to conact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode:“That's Propaganda,” says former DOJ senior ethics attorney, Joseph W. Tirrell, on the Trump administration's re-airing of their 2024 campaign ad, on the taxpayer's dimeWhy Mary and Andrew think SCOTUS' decision to uphold Trump's SAVE voter database will have a greater effect on the next electionHow irked the high court is about having to reject the Trump-back Missouri congressional map for a third timeThe legal status of the attempted media ban by the White HouseAnthropic's heated fight with the government over being labeled a “supply chain risk”The “hot mess” surrounding FBI agents reportedly being subpoenaed to testify in the grand conspiracy investigation in the Southern District of Florida, all while Jack Smith testifies in front of Congress yet again Sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts to listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads. You'll also get exclusive bonus content from this and other shows. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week, the boys head to London and Paris to discuss 1948's “The Red Shoes”! Our first Powell and Pressburger film; we got to drinking and kept it positive while talking about this absolute classic. From groundbreaking dance sequences to technical achievement to sensational performances, this film blew us away almost as hard as it did Martin Scorsese, who stole some filmmaking ideas for “Raging Bull” and led a restoration effort on this film. John also talked about “Digger”… sort of, and John and Jeff discussed “Resident Evil” (2026). Grab a beer and listen along! inktr.ee/theloveofcinema - Check out our YouTube page!  Our phone number is 646-484-9298. It accepts texts or voice messages.  0:00 Intro; 8:06 “Resident Evil” (2026) mini-review; 16:58 “Digger” (2026) mini-review; 20:42 1948 Year in Review; 38:10 “The Red Shoes”: Films of 1948; 1:16:57 What You Been Watching?; 1:26:34 Next Week's Episode Teaser.  Additional Cast/Crew: Tom Cruise, Alejandro Inarritu,  Austin Abrams, Zach Cregger, Shay Hatten, Zach Cherry, Kali Reis, Paul Walter Hauser, Will Merrick, Griggin Newman, Emily Piggford, Isla Mcrae, Sara Paxton, Jez Butterworth, Riz Ahmed, John Goodman, Sandra Huller, Emma D'Arcy, Jesse Plemons, Michael Stuhlbarg, Sabina Berman, Alexander Dinelaris, Anton Walbrook, Marius Goring, Moira Shearer, Robert Helpmann, Albert Bassermann, Leonide Massine, Esmond Knight, Austin Trevor, Irene Browne, Hans Christian Andersen, Hein Heckroth, Jack Cardiff, Brian Easdale. Hosts: Dave Green, Jeff Ostermueller, John Say Edited & Produced by Dave Green. Beer Sponsor: Carlos Barrozo Music Sponsor: Dasein Dasein on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/77H3GPgYigeKNlZKGx11KZ 
Dasein on Apple Music: https://music.apple.com/us/artist/dasein/1637517407 Recommendations: Resident Evil, Slow Horses, Lanterns, The Pianist, some true crime about an autistic boy who probably killed his mother and wealthy ass grandfather? Backrooms- HBOMAX, Toy Story 5, Strange New Worlds, Reacher, Beauty and the Beast, The Little Mermaid, Forrest Gump, The Roustabout, Munich, the Hunt for Red October, Patriot Games, Jack Ryan, The Sum of All Fears, The Eye in The Sky, 70mm imax The Odyssey,  Additional Tags: Dolby Cinemas, Peter Parker, Stanley Kubrick, Argentina, Spain, England, France, The Odyssey, Christopher Nolan, Moana, Toy Story 5, Focus Features, A24, Curry Barker, The Tenant, Rosemary's Baby, The Pianist, Cul-de-Sac, AI, The New York City Marathon, Apartments, Tenants, AMC, IMAX Issues, Tron, The Dallas Cowboys, Short-term memory loss, Warner Brothers, Paramount, Netflix, AMC Times Square, Academy Awards, BFI, BAFTA, BAFTAS, Adelaide, Australia, Queensland, New South Wales, Melbourne, The British, England, The SEC, HBO Max, Amazon Prime, casket maker, Seven Samurai, Roshomon, Sergio Leone, Clint Eastwood, Stellan Skarsgard, the matt and mark movie show, The Southern District's Waratah Championship, Night of a Thousand Stars, The Pan Pacific Grand Prix (The Pan Pacifics), Jeff Bezos, Rupert Murdoch, Larry Ellison, David Ellison, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg. 

For the first time, Legal Speak recorded live podcast episodes from RelFest Chicago 2026 during Relativity's annual conference hosted September 29th  through October 1st at the Hyatt Regency.  Centered around legal technology, legal data, e-discovery and the growing use of artificial intelligence in legal work, the gathering brought together roughly 2,000 members of the legal intelligence community, including lawyers, legal technology professionals, corporate legal teams, litigation support and e-discovery specialists, judges, consultants and technology providers.  In this episode recorded live from the conference floor, Host Cedra Mayfield sat down with Retired U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman of the Southern District of Florida.   Host: Cedra Mayfield  Guest: Judge William Matthewman Producer: Charles Garnar     Be sure to look for all the RelFest conference on Law.com, Apple and Spotify. 

Judge Alison Nathan responded sharply after one of Ghislaine Maxwell's appellate lawyers, David Markus, published a June 2021 New York Daily News op-ed arguing that Maxwell should benefit from the same kind of prosecutorial-agreement reasoning that had just led to Bill Cosby's release. Markus described the case against Maxwell as extremely weak, argued that Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement should protect her and suggested that a jury should reject the charges. Federal prosecutors complained that the column violated Southern District of New York rules restricting lawyers from making public statements that could prejudice a pending criminal trial. Nathan ordered Maxwell's defense team, including Markus, to respond and ultimately made clear that lawyers connected to the case could not use the media as an unrestricted venue for arguing the merits of a case that was still headed for trial.Nathan stopped short of disciplining Markus for the op-ed itself, noting there had been some uncertainty over whether the local rule technically applied to him because he was handling appellate matters rather than appearing as Maxwell's trial counsel. But she removed any uncertainty going forward. Nathan ordered Markus to comply with Local Criminal Rule 23.1 and emphasized that public statements expressing opinions about a defendant's guilt or innocence, the strength of the evidence or the merits of a pending case could create a substantial risk of interfering with a fair trial. The message from the court was straightforward: whatever ambiguity may have existed before the op-ed was now gone, and Markus, along with other attorneys associated with the Maxwell case, was formally on notice that their public commentary would be governed by the court's restrictions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Judge Alison Nathan responded sharply after one of Ghislaine Maxwell's appellate lawyers, David Markus, published a June 2021 New York Daily News op-ed arguing that Maxwell should benefit from the same kind of prosecutorial-agreement reasoning that had just led to Bill Cosby's release. Markus described the case against Maxwell as extremely weak, argued that Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement should protect her and suggested that a jury should reject the charges. Federal prosecutors complained that the column violated Southern District of New York rules restricting lawyers from making public statements that could prejudice a pending criminal trial. Nathan ordered Maxwell's defense team, including Markus, to respond and ultimately made clear that lawyers connected to the case could not use the media as an unrestricted venue for arguing the merits of a case that was still headed for trial.Nathan stopped short of disciplining Markus for the op-ed itself, noting there had been some uncertainty over whether the local rule technically applied to him because he was handling appellate matters rather than appearing as Maxwell's trial counsel. But she removed any uncertainty going forward. Nathan ordered Markus to comply with Local Criminal Rule 23.1 and emphasized that public statements expressing opinions about a defendant's guilt or innocence, the strength of the evidence or the merits of a pending case could create a substantial risk of interfering with a fair trial. The message from the court was straightforward: whatever ambiguity may have existed before the op-ed was now gone, and Markus, along with other attorneys associated with the Maxwell case, was formally on notice that their public commentary would be governed by the court's restrictions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The BBC story covered a Walmart patent for an internet-connected shopping trolley capable of tracking items, displaying information, and potentially simplifying checkout. It was an example of how major retailers were experimenting with smart-store technology, although a patent filing alone did not guarantee the system would ultimately be deployed in stores. Kurt Olsen, a prominent figure in efforts to challenge the 2020 election results, has resigned from the Justice Department. He had been working in the Southern District of Florida on a high-profile investigation targeting Obama- and Biden-era officials, a probe that has not yet resulted in charges. His departure follows other personnel changes on the same investigative team. Please Like, Comment and Follow 'Philip Teresi on KMJ' on all platforms: --- Philip Teresi on KMJ is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever else you listen to podcasts. -- Philip Teresi on KMJ Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 AM & 105.9 FM KMJ | Website | Facebook | Instagram | X | Podcast | Amazon | - Everything KMJ KMJNOW App | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The BBC story covered a Walmart patent for an internet-connected shopping trolley capable of tracking items, displaying information, and potentially simplifying checkout. It was an example of how major retailers were experimenting with smart-store technology, although a patent filing alone did not guarantee the system would ultimately be deployed in stores. Kurt Olsen, a prominent figure in efforts to challenge the 2020 election results, has resigned from the Justice Department. He had been working in the Southern District of Florida on a high-profile investigation targeting Obama- and Biden-era officials, a probe that has not yet resulted in charges. His departure follows other personnel changes on the same investigative team. Please Like, Comment and Follow 'Philip Teresi on KMJ' on all platforms: --- Philip Teresi on KMJ is available on the KMJNOW app, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever else you listen to podcasts. -- Philip Teresi on KMJ Weekdays 2-6 PM Pacific on News/Talk 580 AM & 105.9 FM KMJ | Website | Facebook | Instagram | X | Podcast | Amazon | - Everything KMJ KMJNOW App | Podcasts | Facebook | X | Instagram See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The 2019 New York federal grand jury transcripts capture the final prosecutorial push that led to the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein on sex-trafficking charges in the Southern District of New York. The transcripts reflect prosecutors laying out a sweeping pattern of alleged conduct, including the recruitment and exploitation of underage girls, the use of intermediaries, and the systematic nature of the abuse network. Witness testimony, documentary evidence, and financial records were presented to establish probable cause, directly contradicting the long-standing narrative that Epstein was a lone offender whose crimes were limited to Florida. These proceedings culminated in the July 2019 indictment, marking the first time federal prosecutors in New York formally moved against Epstein despite years of prior allegations and investigative leads.The transcripts have now been newly unsealed under the Epstein Transparency Act, a move that has reignited scrutiny over what federal authorities knew—and when. Their release sheds light on investigative decisions, evidentiary thresholds, and the scope of information presented to the grand jury, while also highlighting gaps that critics argue point to earlier prosecutorial failures. Survivors and transparency advocates have emphasized that the unsealing is significant not only for what it reveals about Epstein's conduct, but for what it exposes about institutional hesitation, delayed accountability, and the broader protection mechanisms that allowed Epstein to evade federal charges for years. While redactions remain, the disclosure represents a rare window into the mechanics of a case that many believe should have been brought long before 2019.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00008529.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The 2019 New York federal grand jury transcripts capture the final prosecutorial push that led to the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein on sex-trafficking charges in the Southern District of New York. The transcripts reflect prosecutors laying out a sweeping pattern of alleged conduct, including the recruitment and exploitation of underage girls, the use of intermediaries, and the systematic nature of the abuse network. Witness testimony, documentary evidence, and financial records were presented to establish probable cause, directly contradicting the long-standing narrative that Epstein was a lone offender whose crimes were limited to Florida. These proceedings culminated in the July 2019 indictment, marking the first time federal prosecutors in New York formally moved against Epstein despite years of prior allegations and investigative leads.The transcripts have now been newly unsealed under the Epstein Transparency Act, a move that has reignited scrutiny over what federal authorities knew—and when. Their release sheds light on investigative decisions, evidentiary thresholds, and the scope of information presented to the grand jury, while also highlighting gaps that critics argue point to earlier prosecutorial failures. Survivors and transparency advocates have emphasized that the unsealing is significant not only for what it reveals about Epstein's conduct, but for what it exposes about institutional hesitation, delayed accountability, and the broader protection mechanisms that allowed Epstein to evade federal charges for years. While redactions remain, the disclosure represents a rare window into the mechanics of a case that many believe should have been brought long before 2019.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:EFTA00008529.pdfBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The grand jury played a central role in turning the federal investigation of Ghislaine Maxwell into a criminal prosecution. On June 29, 2020, a federal grand jury returned a sealed indictment charging Maxwell with conspiring with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit and groom underage girls, transporting minors for illegal sexual activity and committing perjury during earlier civil depositions. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the indictment was returned by a grand jury sitting in the White Plains Division of the Southern District of New York rather than Manhattan, a decision Maxwell's lawyers later challenged unsuccessfully. The indictment remained sealed while federal agents prepared to arrest her, and on July 2, 2020, authorities took Maxwell into custody in New Hampshire. The charges were unsealed that same day, revealing that prosecutors had used the grand jury process to formally accuse Maxwell of participating in Epstein's abuse of minors rather than simply treating her as a witness or associate.The grand jury's involvement did not end with Maxwell's arrest. As prosecutors continued investigating, they returned superseding indictments that expanded and refined the case against her. In March 2021, another Manhattan grand jury added sex-trafficking and sex-trafficking-conspiracy charges, reflecting additional evidence prosecutors said had emerged as the investigation continued. Maxwell repeatedly challenged the indictments, including the composition of the original grand jury and the legality of the additional charges, but Judge Alison Nathan rejected those efforts and allowed the case to proceed. The grand jury process therefore served as the mechanism through which prosecutors first brought Maxwell into the criminal case, then broadened the charges against her as the investigation developed, ultimately setting the stage for the trial that resulted in her conviction.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Judge Alison Nathan responded sharply after one of Ghislaine Maxwell's appellate lawyers, David Markus, published a June 2021 New York Daily News op-ed arguing that Maxwell should benefit from the same kind of prosecutorial-agreement reasoning that had just led to Bill Cosby's release. Markus described the case against Maxwell as extremely weak, argued that Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement should protect her and suggested that a jury should reject the charges. Federal prosecutors complained that the column violated Southern District of New York rules restricting lawyers from making public statements that could prejudice a pending criminal trial. Nathan ordered Maxwell's defense team, including Markus, to respond and ultimately made clear that lawyers connected to the case could not use the media as an unrestricted venue for arguing the merits of a case that was still headed for trial.Nathan stopped short of disciplining Markus for the op-ed itself, noting there had been some uncertainty over whether the local rule technically applied to him because he was handling appellate matters rather than appearing as Maxwell's trial counsel. But she removed any uncertainty going forward. Nathan ordered Markus to comply with Local Criminal Rule 23.1 and emphasized that public statements expressing opinions about a defendant's guilt or innocence, the strength of the evidence or the merits of a pending case could create a substantial risk of interfering with a fair trial. The message from the court was straightforward: whatever ambiguity may have existed before the op-ed was now gone, and Markus, along with other attorneys associated with the Maxwell case, was formally on notice that their public commentary would be governed by the court's restrictions.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In 2011, Alex Acosta publicly defended his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case while serving as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. Acosta characterized Epstein's 2008 non-prosecution agreement as the result of weighing difficult legal realities, claiming federal prosecutors believed the case hinged on vulnerable witnesses and posed significant trial risks. He asserted that the deal was intended to secure some measure of accountability—arguing that without it, Epstein might have avoided any jail time at all—and framed the outcome as a pragmatic compromise rather than a failure of justice.Acosta also emphasized that Epstein's influential legal team and resources played a role in shaping the resolution, suggesting the prosecution faced extraordinary pressure and complexity. He maintained that the agreement, while imperfect, achieved convictions on state charges and required Epstein to register as a sex offender, portraying it as a better alternative than an uncertain federal trial. Critics, however, later pointed out that Acosta's 2011 remarks glossed over the secrecy of the deal, the exclusion of victims, and the extraordinary concessions granted to Epstein—issues that would come to define the controversy surrounding the prosecution in the years that followed.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Matt and Meghan Sacks break down the shocking details behind Diddy's recent federal conviction in the Southern District of New York. As former federal probation officer, Meghan explains how Diddy was found guilty on two of the lowest charges carrying a maximum of 10 years, but why the real sentence could be much less. Get the real story on Diddy's charges, the sentencing guidelines, and what's next for him, plus insight into the bigger issues with the criminal justice system.⁣ ⁣ Meghan's links ⁣ https://womenandcrimepodcast.com⁣ https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxfVg98aA6yHZCZvLelG2QQ⁣ https://www.instagram.com/womenandcrimepodcast/⁣ ⁣ Get 10% sitewide for a limited time. Just visit https://GhostBed.com/cox and use code COX at checkout.⁣ ⁣ Do you want to be a guest? Fill out the form https://forms.gle/5H7FnhvMHKtUnq7k7⁣ ⁣ Send me an email here: insidetruecrime@gmail.com⁣ ⁣ Do you extra clips and behind the scenes content?⁣ Subscribe to my Patreon: https://patreon.com/InsideTrueCrime ⁣ ⁣ ⁣ Follow me on all socials!⁣ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/insidetruecrime/⁣ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@matthewcoxtruecrime⁣ ⁣ ⁣ Do you want a custom painting done by me? Check out my Etsy Store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/coxpopart⁣ ⁣ Listen to my True Crime Podcasts anywhere: https://anchor.fm/mattcox ⁣ ⁣ Check out my true crime books! ⁣ Shark in the Housing Pool: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0851KBYCF⁣ Bent: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BV4GC7TM⁣ It's Insanity: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08KFYXKK8⁣ Devil Exposed: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08TH1WT5G⁣ Devil Exposed (The Abridgment): https://www.amazon.com/dp/1070682438⁣ The Program: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0858W4G3K⁣ Bailout: https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/bailout-matthew-cox/1142275402⁣ Dude, Where's My Hand-Grenade?: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BXNFHBDF/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1678623676&sr=1-1⁣ ⁣ Checkout my disturbingly twisted satiric novel!⁣ Stranger Danger: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BSWQP3WX⁣ ⁣ If you would like to support me directly, I accept donations here:⁣ Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/MattCox69⁣ Cashapp: $coxcon69 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today's Headlines: There's quite a bit of geopolitical drama going on. Three Russian intelligence operatives were indicted by the Southern District of New York for allegedly orchestrating plots to assassinate Russian dissidents on US soil, with the Kremlin offering no comment, of course. Trump is planning to sell $2.8 billion in bombs to Israel — including 40,000 two-thousand-pound bombs — while having recently bought stock in General Dynamics, one of the manufacturers, and having made more stock trades than all members of Congress combined since taking office, so the conflict of interest is doing a lot of work there. The UN released a report finding the US may have committed war crimes in Iran during two specific strikes — one hitting an elementary school that killed 157 people, 123 of them under 13 — while military families told reporters that missile attacks on US bases in the Middle East are being actively hidden from the American public, alongside the true number of injured troops and the state of munitions supplies. On the vanity projects beat, a judge ruled the Trump administration must give 30 days notice before making any changes to the Kennedy Center — a day after fencing went up around the building and Trump was photographed with a poster board titled "KENNEDY CENTER DEMOLISHED" — buying it at least another month, despite the fact that it was $41 million in the black at the end of the Biden administration, nothing to see here folks. In tech, OpenAI disclosed six new alarming model incidents including concealing mistakes, attempting to access unauthorized credentials, and communicating across isolated training environments, so not cool. Finally, Nike cofounder Phil Knight and his wife Penny announced a $1.1 billion donation to build Oregon's first women's health hospital, which is the best news of the day, and Merriam-Webster added 1,400 new words including "looksmaxxing," "crash out," "Sunday Scaries," and "cuffing season." Resources/Articles mentioned: NYT: U.S. Charges Five Men in Russia-Backed Assassination Plots ABC News: Top Democrat places hold on Trump administration's plan to sell heavy bombs to Israel MS Now: Trump's reported plan to sell bombs to Israel spotlights his stock trading Axios: UN report: U.S. may have committed war crimes in Iran MS Now: ‘Sitting ducks': Military families live in fear as U.S. troops face undisclosed missile attacks WaPo: Judge says Trump's board may not demolish Kennedy Center without warning Axios: OpenAI discloses six new AI safety incidents AP News: $1.1 billion from Nike co-founder will build Oregon's first women's hospital WaPo: ‘Crashout', ‘Looksmaxxing': Merriam-Webster adds over 1,400 new words Subscribe to the Betches News Room and join the Morning Announcements group chat. Go to: betchesnews.substack.com Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hide your China, the boys are at it again with a drink and a discussion of 2011's “Warrior”. Gavin O'Connor's film found Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton at the perfect time, and he paired them with legend Nick Nolte for one of his best performances. Jeff also saw “Practical Magic 2” in the theaters on 9/11 and gives a mini-review. Two very different films! They both go well with drinks. Maybe wine or margaritas for the witch film, and whiskey and/or coffee (for our non-drinkers) for the MMA film. Grab a drink and join us! inktr.ee/theloveofcinema - Check out our YouTube page!  Our phone number is 646-484-9298. It accepts texts or voice messages.  0:00 Intro; 5:48 “Practical Magic 2” mini-review; 15:50 2011 Year in Review; 25:48 “Warrior”: Films of 2011; 1:13:50 What You Been Watching?; 1:21:11 Next Week's Episode Teaser.  Additional Cast/Crew: Sandra Bullock, Nicole Kidman, Stockard Channing, Diane Wiest, Maisie Williams, Joey King, Jennifer, Morrison, Frank Grillo, Kurt Angle, Sam Sheridan, Bryan Calln, Susanne Bier, Griffin Dunne. Hosts: Dave Green, Jeff Ostermueller, John Say Edited & Produced by Dave Green. Beer Sponsor: Carlos Barrozo Music Sponsor: Dasein Dasein on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/77H3GPgYigeKNlZKGx11KZ 
Dasein on Apple Music: https://music.apple.com/us/artist/dasein/1637517407 Recommendations: Lanterns, Pearl Harbor, Howard, The Boys: The Sherman Brothers Story, The Bride, The Bride of Frankenstein, Parenthood, The Emmys. Additional Tags: Dolby Cinemas, Peter Parker, Stanley Kubrick, Argentina, Spain, England, France, The Odyssey, Christopher Nolan, Moana, Toy Story 5, Focus Features, A24, Curry Barker, The Tenant, Rosemary's Baby, The Pianist, Cul-de-Sac, AI, The New York City Marathon, Apartments, Tenants, AMC, IMAX Issues, Tron, The Dallas Cowboys, Short-term memory loss, Warner Brothers, Paramount, Netflix, AMC Times Square, Academy Awards, BFI, BAFTA, BAFTAS, Adelaide, Australia, Queensland, New South Wales, Melbourne, The British, England, The SEC, HBO Max, Amazon Prime, casket maker, Seven Samurai, Roshomon, Sergio Leone, Clint Eastwood, Stellan Skarsgard, the matt and mark movie show, The Southern District's Waratah Championship, Night of a Thousand Stars, The Pan Pacific Grand Prix (The Pan Pacifics), Jeff Bezos, Rupert Murdoch, Larry Ellison, David Ellison, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg. 

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Join us to celebrate the federal trial bench and to hear from Bankruptcy Judge David Jones, of the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, as he describes his path to the bench, including two years as a law clerk to US District Judge Morris Lasker, four years in private practice as a litigator, and nearly twenty-five years as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York doing civil trial and appellate work, including in some of the largest and most complex corporate restructurings ever filed. Judge Jones also offers his perspective on how to have a good day in his courtroom, and what missteps to avoid.

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week the boys head to 1988 to discuss “Rain Man”, the Barry Levinson film that makes you wonder: is Tom Cruise a better actor than Dustin freaking Hoffman? Is he??? John also discusses “The End of Oak Street” and “Grab a beer, grab your card counter, and let's head to Vegas!  inktr.ee/theloveofcinema - Check out our YouTube page!  Our phone number is 646-484-9298. It accepts texts or voice messages.  0:00 Intro; 7:02 “End of Oak Street” mini-review; 13:07 “By Any Means” mini-review; 18:08 1988 Year in Review; 34:43 “Rain Man”: Films of 1988; 1:15:48 What You Been Watching?; 1:25:44 Next Week's Episode Teaser Additional Cast/Crew: Tom Cruise, Dustin Hoffman, Bonnie Hunt, Mark Wahlberg, Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, David Strathairn, Josh Lucas, Giancarlo Esposito, Ethan Embry, LaChanze, Elegance Bratton, Sascha Penn, David Robert Mitchell, Anne Hathaway, Ewan McGregor, Maisy Stella, Christian Convery, P.J. Byrne. Hosts: Dave Green, Jeff Ostermueller, John Say Edited & Produced by Dave Green. Beer Sponsor: Carlos Barrozo Music Sponsor: Dasein Dasein on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/77H3GPgYigeKNlZKGx11KZ 
Dasein on Apple Music: https://music.apple.com/us/artist/dasein/1637517407 Recommendations: The Rip, Lorne, Ted Lasso, Michael, Sisu: Road to Revenge, 28 Years Later, The Death of the Pastor's Wife, Silo, Lanterns, Strange New Worlds, Yellowjackets, DCU, The Bear, Frasier, The Rip, Lorne, Ted Lasso, Michael, Sisu: Road to Revenge, 28 Years Later, The Three Musketeers, The Man in the Iron Mask, Titanic, The Dark Knight, Batman begins, The Fast and the Furious, Undertone, Fraser. Additional Tags: Dolly Parton, Tim Curry, AMC A-List, Dolby Cinemas, Peter Parker, Stanley Kubrick, Argentina, Spain, England, France, The Odyssey, Christopher Nolan, Moana, Toy Story 5, Focus Features, A24, Curry Barker, The Tenant, Rosemary's Baby, The Pianist, Cul-de-Sac, AI, The New York City Marathon, Apartments, Tenants, AMC, IMAX Issues, Tron, The Dallas Cowboys, Short-term memory loss, Warner Brothers, Paramount, Netflix, AMC Times Square, Academy Awards, BFI, BAFTA, BAFTAS, Adelaide, Australia, Queensland, New South Wales, Melbourne, The British, England, The SEC, HBO Max, Amazon Prime, casket maker, Seven Samurai, Roshomon, Sergio Leone, Clint Eastwood, Stellan Skarsgard, the matt and mark movie show, The Southern District's Waratah Championship, Night of a Thousand Stars, The Pan Pacific Grand Prix (The Pan Pacifics), Jeff Bezos, Rupert Murdoch, Larry Ellison, David Ellison, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg. 

This July 27, 2023 filing was Ghislaine Maxwell's reply brief to the Second Circuit as she appealed her conviction, and it centered heavily on her claim that Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement should have barred federal prosecutors in New York from charging her at all. Maxwell argued that she was an intended third-party beneficiary of the agreement because it promised protection to Epstein's “potential co-conspirators,” and she contended that the protection was not limited to the Southern District of Florida. Her attorneys pointed to drafts of the agreement and the Justice Department's later Office of Professional Responsibility report, arguing that language limiting co-conspirator immunity to South Florida had actually been removed before the final deal was signed. They also claimed the unusual structure of the NPA showed Epstein wanted broader protection for other people around him, including Maxwell, and argued that the trial judge should at least have held a hearing to determine the true scope of the agreement instead of rejecting Maxwell's interpretation outright.Maxwell also renewed her attack on the jury and her sentence. Her lawyers argued that Juror 50 had falsely answered questions during jury selection by failing to disclose that he had been sexually abused as a child, an experience they said closely mirrored the testimony of women who accused Maxwell and Epstein. The defense maintained that truthful disclosure would have provided grounds to remove him for cause and accused the district court of accepting explanations that were not credible while preventing a sufficiently broad inquiry into whether his personal experience influenced deliberations. Maxwell separately challenged the four-level leadership enhancement applied at sentencing, arguing that prosecutors had not shown she actually supervised another criminal participant such as Sarah Kellen. She ultimately asked the Second Circuit to reverse her convictions, dismiss some or all of the indictment, order a new trial, or at minimum send the case back for further hearings or resentencing.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The United States responded to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal by arguing that her conviction should be affirmed across the board and that none of the issues she raised justified a new trial or dismissal of the indictment. Prosecutors rejected Maxwell's claim that Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement protected her from prosecution in New York, arguing that the agreement was made by the U.S. Attorney's Office in South Florida and did not bind federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. They also disputed Maxwell's argument that she was entitled to enforce the agreement as an intended third-party beneficiary, maintaining that the NPA did not give her a nationwide immunity shield. On the jury issue, the government argued that Juror 50's failure to disclose his childhood sexual abuse did not warrant a new trial because the district judge had held a hearing, assessed the juror's credibility and found that the omission was not intentional and did not establish actual bias.The government also defended Maxwell's sentence and the leadership enhancement imposed by the trial court, arguing that the evidence supported the conclusion that she exercised authority over others involved in Epstein's operation. Prosecutors pointed to testimony and trial evidence showing that Maxwell helped recruit, groom and normalize sexualized behavior around young women and girls, and that she worked with staff and associates in ways that supported Epstein's abuse. More broadly, the United States portrayed Maxwell's appeal as an attempt to relitigate issues the jury and district court had already resolved, while emphasizing that the trial produced substantial evidence of her knowing participation in Epstein's scheme. The government therefore asked the Second Circuit to leave both the conviction and sentence intact.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The United States responded to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal by arguing that her conviction should be affirmed across the board and that none of the issues she raised justified a new trial or dismissal of the indictment. Prosecutors rejected Maxwell's claim that Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement protected her from prosecution in New York, arguing that the agreement was made by the U.S. Attorney's Office in South Florida and did not bind federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. They also disputed Maxwell's argument that she was entitled to enforce the agreement as an intended third-party beneficiary, maintaining that the NPA did not give her a nationwide immunity shield. On the jury issue, the government argued that Juror 50's failure to disclose his childhood sexual abuse did not warrant a new trial because the district judge had held a hearing, assessed the juror's credibility and found that the omission was not intentional and did not establish actual bias.The government also defended Maxwell's sentence and the leadership enhancement imposed by the trial court, arguing that the evidence supported the conclusion that she exercised authority over others involved in Epstein's operation. Prosecutors pointed to testimony and trial evidence showing that Maxwell helped recruit, groom and normalize sexualized behavior around young women and girls, and that she worked with staff and associates in ways that supported Epstein's abuse. More broadly, the United States portrayed Maxwell's appeal as an attempt to relitigate issues the jury and district court had already resolved, while emphasizing that the trial produced substantial evidence of her knowing participation in Epstein's scheme. The government therefore asked the Second Circuit to leave both the conviction and sentence intact.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

The United States responded to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal by arguing that her conviction should be affirmed across the board and that none of the issues she raised justified a new trial or dismissal of the indictment. Prosecutors rejected Maxwell's claim that Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement protected her from prosecution in New York, arguing that the agreement was made by the U.S. Attorney's Office in South Florida and did not bind federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. They also disputed Maxwell's argument that she was entitled to enforce the agreement as an intended third-party beneficiary, maintaining that the NPA did not give her a nationwide immunity shield. On the jury issue, the government argued that Juror 50's failure to disclose his childhood sexual abuse did not warrant a new trial because the district judge had held a hearing, assessed the juror's credibility and found that the omission was not intentional and did not establish actual bias.The government also defended Maxwell's sentence and the leadership enhancement imposed by the trial court, arguing that the evidence supported the conclusion that she exercised authority over others involved in Epstein's operation. Prosecutors pointed to testimony and trial evidence showing that Maxwell helped recruit, groom and normalize sexualized behavior around young women and girls, and that she worked with staff and associates in ways that supported Epstein's abuse. More broadly, the United States portrayed Maxwell's appeal as an attempt to relitigate issues the jury and district court had already resolved, while emphasizing that the trial produced substantial evidence of her knowing participation in Epstein's scheme. The government therefore asked the Second Circuit to leave both the conviction and sentence intact.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  For a transcript of Elie's note and the full archive of contributor notes, head to CAFE.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Geoffrey Berman's removal as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York in June 2020 immediately generated controversy because of both the chaotic way it happened and the sensitive investigations his office was handling. Attorney General William Barr first announced that Berman was “stepping down,” only for Berman to publicly state that he had not resigned and had no intention of doing so. Barr then said President Donald Trump had fired him, while Trump publicly distanced himself from the decision. Berman later told Congress that Barr had repeatedly pressured him to resign and offered him other government jobs before threatening to fire him. The episode was especially explosive because SDNY was investigating several politically sensitive matters involving Trump associates, and because Berman had also publicly emphasized that the Epstein investigation remained active after Epstein's death, including efforts to obtain cooperation from Prince Andrew.That timing helped fuel allegations that Berman's removal might have been intended, at least in part, to interfere with or contain the continuing Epstein investigation, although no conclusive evidence ever established that as the reason he was fired. The suspicion was intensified by Berman's later account that his office had been aggressively pursuing Prince Andrew and that efforts to compel Andrew's cooperation through diplomatic channels went nowhere, leading Berman to openly wonder whether someone in Britain was protecting him. Berman also later alleged that Barr viewed the Epstein matter as something that could be used in dealings with the British government, adding still more controversy to an already extraordinary dismissal. What could be established was that Berman was removed while overseeing an office pursuing Epstein-related leads and other politically sensitive investigations, that Barr's initial public account of Berman's departure was contradicted by Berman himself, and that Berman resisted leaving until his deputy, Audrey Strauss, was guaranteed control of the office. Those facts were enough to make the firing look deeply suspicious to many observers, but the claim that Berman was specifically fired to protect Epstein associates remained an allegation rather than a proven conclusion.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Aircraft carrier catapult systems, Peraton's performance as the Prime Integrator for the FAA’s Brand New Air Traffic Control System, the Department of Homeland Security's luxury jets, Google's purchase of Spirit Airlines' data for AI training, American Airlines economy seatback screens, and a Li-ion laptop battery that caught fire in flight. Also, Micah's first flight, Delta's requirements for portable chargers, and the real reason they are called bear straps. Aviation News Trump orders Pentagon to redesign US aircraft carrier to use steam catapults to launch jets President Trump signed a national security memorandum directing the defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, and the acting Navy secretary, Hung Cao, to come up with a plan to replace the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) and Advanced Weapons Elevators with steam and hydraulic systems for the construction of the Ford-class aircraft carrier USS Doris Miller. Critics of the change point to the major redesign and expense required. Aircraft Carrier Catapult Technology by Era: Era Technology Key navies 1910s–30s Compressed-air/flywheel catapults (mostly floatplanes) US, UK WWII Hydraulic catapults US, UK 1950s–2010s Steam catapults UK (pioneer), US, France 2010s–present Electromagnetic (EMALS) US, China Throughout No catapults (ski-jump/STOVL) USSR/Russia, Italy, Spain, India, UK (post-1978), current China (Liaoning/Shandong), US Navy Amphibious Assault Ships Arrangement of a hydro-pneumatic catapult in an aircraft carrier. Naval Marine Archive. See also: Why The Ford Class Carrier's Island Superstructure Is Located So Far Back and Navy considers major aircraft carrier revamp to better suit Trump's aesthetic. Trump's FAA picked an unlikely contractor to lead its air traffic overhaul. The agency is having second thoughts. In December 2025, DOT/FAA selected Peraton as Prime Integrator for the FAA’s Brand New Air Traffic Control System (BNATCS), a $1.5 billion contract. Peraton, which had little direct experience working with the FAA, was chosen over Parsons Corp., which has extensive experience with FAA contracts. Peraton is a national-security and government-services contractor owned by Veritas Capital, and is known for its defense, intelligence, and IT/communications work. (Veritas also owns Peraton Labs, the former Bell Labs). Some reports indicate that the FAA is frustrated with Peraton. A source notes that “Peraton has basically not done any work since they got in” and admits that the FAA was partially at fault because it “stonewalled Peraton's efforts to work seamlessly with FAA counterparts.” The FAA has micromanaged the project, and Peraton has failed to manage the project. An In-House Private Jet Service, Senators Say The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) purchased two Gulfstream G650s, two G700s, and eight Boeing 737s to be used by the Trump Administration. U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee vice chair Patty Murray (D-Washington) and ranking homeland security subcommittee member Chris Murphy (D-Connecticut) are calling for an investigation. In a letter to both DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and the DHS inspector general requesting the investigation, the purchases are characterized as a “gross misuse” of tax dollars. Spirit Data Sale to Google Prompts Flight Attendants' Objection After 34 years of operations, Spirit Airlines ceased all flight operations on May 2, 2026. Spirit's Chapter 11 reorganization failed, and the airline went into full liquidation. The bankruptcy court entered a Wind-Down Order covering the sale of LaGuardia slots, the corporate campus, the loyalty program, and operating equipment. For $10 million, Google won the auction for Spirit’s approximately 100 million emails, calendar data, 500 million Microsoft Teams chats, documents, spreadsheets, and software code. Google will use them to improve its products and AI models. The Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, AFL-CIO, voiced a limited objection to the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, raising privacy concerns. The union is concerned about the confidentiality of disciplinary records, payroll history, and internal communications, noting that the deal’s privacy provisions are designed to protect consumers, not employees. The union also raised concerns about links between payroll, timekeeping, and communications data; whether there will be an independent screen for employee confidentiality; and provisions on later transfers to third parties. The AFA asked the court to reject the sale unless changes are made to exclude all flight attendant information, including training records, time cards, and payroll, as well as any Microsoft 365 content containing flight attendant data. Alternatively, the court should require a review protocol for labor or disciplinary records and communications, and prohibit using the data to profile any identifiable group of flight attendants, the AFA said. See also: Flight attendants freaked out that Google is buying tons of Spirit employee data American Airlines U-turn: Seatback screens coming to all classes in 2028 American Airlines plans to start rolling out personal inflight entertainment displays on its narrowbody fleet in 2028, and complete the upgrade by the early 2030s. American will begin offering Starlink inflight connectivity on 500 planes beginning in 2027.  The lack of screens in economy cabins dates back to the US Airways merger in 2014. Doug Parker argued that the cost of screens was not worth the investment since most fliers brought their own portable device. United and Delta followed a different path. Laptop catches fire on American Airlines flight, passenger suffers minor burns Injuries occurred on American Airlines flight 2398 between Atlanta (ATL) and Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) on August 21, 2026, after a laptop battery caught fire. The pilots reported smoke in the cabin to ATC. The cabin crew extinguished the fire (reportedly using a thermal containment bag). The A321 landed without further incident. Mentioned Airplanes and Water Can Mix in the Stories about Flying podcast. The Wreck of the U. S. S. “Memphis” Up Against the Rocks: The Wreck of the Memphis Lynch Drone Photography LLC, 2026 EAA AirVenture. Photos by Logan Lynch. Hosts this Episode Max Flight, our Main(e) Man Micah, Rob Mark, and David Vanderhoof.

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Spirit shut down on May 2 with roughly $8.1 billion in debt and about 17,000 people out of work, and the estate has been selling the pieces since. A court approved 22 LaGuardia slots to JetBlue for $58.5 million in July. Last week's lot was the data. The August 14 notice out of the Southern District of New York itemizes 100 million emails, 500 million Microsoft Teams chats, around 30 million lines of code, pricing from 7.2 billion competitor flights, 7.5 billion passenger transaction records going back to 2008, and more than 175,000 employee records dating to 1986. Google says a third party will scrub personally identifiable data before the handover. Rick thinks $10 million is low, and that the next liquidation will have somebody in the room asking what the internal record is worth.A HarrisX and Allison Worldwide study of 705 teens aged 13 to 16 and 750 parents puts Mom ahead of any platform, creator, or celebrity on which brands Gen Alpha teens end up liking. Dads introduce new brands at 60% against 39% for moms, but moms carry which brands the kid actually likes, 73 to 58. Nike sits first with dads and Walmart first with moms. Any plan that treats parents as a single line item is funding discovery and approval at the same weight when the survey says those are two jobs held by two people.QXO reported $3.25 billion in quarterly sales against $1.91 billion a year ago, with a $55 million net loss and $130 million in adjusted net income. Kodiak Building Partners accounted for about $595 million of the top line. Brad Jacobs told investors he wants $50 billion within a decade. He did not break out organic growth.PayPal traded above $300 a share in 2021 at a market value north of $280 billion. The Wall Street Journal reports that Stripe and private equity firm Advent International approached in July at $60.50 a share, valuing the company near $53 billion. PayPal called the price insufficient and the two sides have been negotiating since.Also this week, the Investor Minute: MUD Jeans files for bankruptcy, Home Depot-owned SRS Distribution moves for Noland Company, and 3 funding announcements.The Watson Weekly is sponsored by Avalara. For e-commerce brands, tax compliance gets harder with every new channel, state, product, and market. Avalara Agentic Tax and Compliance automates the work behind the scenes so merchants get accurate tax at checkout, clear visibility into tariffs and duties, and fewer surprises when the order arrives. More at avalara.watsonweekly.comSubscribe to the newsletter and find every episode at watsonweekly.com

Global prediction markets are booming. Trading volumes reached a record US$24 billion in April this year, heavily driven by excitement over the FIFA World Cup and sports betting. But with that expansive growth come risks. Recent high-profile cases alleging insider trading related to the markets have alarmed businesses over the fear employees could exploit their nonpublic information for personal gain. Regulators have taken notice, and enforcement is on the rise. How can businesses protect themselves from insiders who might use the prediction markets for ill gain? How significant is the enforcement and regulatory impact on companies? And what's on the horizon as the prediction markets continue to captivate the public? Join The Sidley Podcast host and Sidley partner, Sam Gandhi, as he speaks with two of the firm's thought leaders on these issues — Ian McGinley, a partner in Sidley's Securities Enforcement and Regulatory and White Collar Defense and Investigations practices and a former Commodity Futures Trading Commission director of enforcement, and Matthew Podolsky, also a partner in Sidley's Securities Enforcement and Regulatory and White Collar Defense and Investigations practices. Matt is a former acting United States attorney for the Southern District of New York and former chief of their Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force. Together, they discuss the exponential growth of the prediction markets, what is driving that growth, and the real-world risks of insider trading prosecutions related to engaging with those markets. Executive Producer: John Metaxas, WallStreetNorth Communications, Inc.

Featuring:Sade Frazier, Attorney, Cahill Gordon & Reindel, Sports Lawyers Association NextGen Committee MemberHost:Landis Barber, Attorney, Safran Law Offices In this episode of Highlight Reel Headlines, host Landis Barber is joined by Sade Frazier to break down the biggest sports law stories from the past two weeks. The episode opens with NASCAR's temporary restraining order against online counterfeiters, including the court's temporary restraining order. Landis and Sade then turn to the latest development in Borovicanin v. NCAA, where an Ohio appellate court stayed the trial court's preliminary injunction. The conversation continues with Ezekiel Elliott's NIL lawsuit against the NCAA and Big Ten and its transfer to the Southern District of Ohio, followed by a discussion of a California court's decision refusing to compel arbitration in a former Los Angeles Rams employee's lawsuit. The episode wraps up with the latest eligibility controversy in youth sports as Tulsa National Little League went from being disqualified, to reinstated by a Texas court, and back to being disqualified within 24 hours. There is always something to talk about in sports law. So, join us as we roll through the headlines!

In the third part of our What The Hell summer reading series, Judge Roy Altman joins us for a discussion on the questions posed in his book, “Israel on Trial: Examining the History, the Evidence, and the Law.” What the hell are the charges? Who the hell are the plaintiffs? Altman applies his legal and ethical training to put Israel on trial. Together, we analyze the ultimate question: guilty or not guilty? After being confirmed to a seat on the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida in 2019, Judge Roy K. Altman, at 36, became the youngest federal district court judge in the country—and the youngest federal judge ever appointed in the Southern District of Florida. He received his JD from Yale Law School, where he was projects editor of the Yale Law Journal. Altman clerked on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals for the Honorable Stanley Marcus and was appointed a federal prosecutor at the US Attorney's Office in Miami, where he twice received the Director of the Executive Office of US Attorneys' Award for Superior Performance by a federal prosecutor. Altman was named a partner at the Miami law firm Podhurst Orseck, where he represented the victims of airplane crashes and bank fraud conspiracies. He received a BA from Columbia University, where he played quarterback on the football team and pitched for the baseball team.Read the transcript here.Subscribe to our Substack here.

This week, the boys head to Aussie Dave's native Australian Outback (& Adelaide) to discuss 1971's “Walkabout”. The film shows you how easy it is to die in the Australian desert, and we drink while discussing the artistic achievement, even if we didn't all feel the same way about our viewing experiences. John also got us started with a mini-review of “Tony”. Grab a beer and join us! inktr.ee/theloveofcinema - Check out our YouTube page!  Our phone number is 646-484-9298. It accepts texts or voice messages.  0:00 Intro; 4:35 “Tony” mini-review; 11:41 1971 Year in Review; 30:29 “Walkabout”: Films of 1971; 1:10:30 What You Been Watching?; 1:17:34 Next Week's Episode Teaser Additional Cast/Crew: Nicholas Roeg, Jenny Agutter, Edward Bond, John Meillon, Luc Roeg, David Gulpilil, Dominic Sessa, Antonio Banderas, Emilia Jones, Matt Johnson, Todd Bartels, Lou Howe, Leo Woodall, Stavros Halkias, Michael Jibrin, Monica Raymund, Dagmara Dominczyk. Hosts: Dave Green, Jeff Ostermueller, John Say Edited & Produced by Dave Green. Beer Sponsor: Carlos Barrozo Music Sponsor: Dasein Dasein on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/artist/77H3GPgYigeKNlZKGx11KZ 
Dasein on Apple Music: https://music.apple.com/us/artist/dasein/1637517407 Recommendations: Parenthood, Strange New World, Spider-Man: Far From Home, Stewart Fails To Save The Universe, Until Dawn, Nat Geo The Rescue, Criterion 24/7, Norwegian Pathfinder, detour, Sugar, Cape Fear, The Northman. Additional Tags: Dolby Cinemas, Peter Parker, Stanley Kubrick, Argentina, Spain, England, France, The Odyssey, Christopher Nolan, Moana, Toy Story 5, Focus Features, A24, Curry Barker, The Tenant, Rosemary's Baby, The Pianist, Cul-de-Sac, AI, The New York City Marathon, Apartments, Tenants, AMC, IMAX Issues, Tron, The Dallas Cowboys, Short-term memory loss, Warner Brothers, Paramount, Netflix, AMC Times Square, Academy Awards, BFI, BAFTA, BAFTAS, Adelaide, Australia, Queensland, New South Wales, Melbourne, The British, England, The SEC, HBO Max, Amazon Prime, casket maker, Seven Samurai, Roshomon, Sergio Leone, Clint Eastwood, Stellan Skarsgard, the matt and mark movie show, The Southern District's Waratah Championship, Night of a Thousand Stars, The Pan Pacific Grand Prix (The Pan Pacifics), Jeff Bezos, Rupert Murdoch, Larry Ellison, David Ellison, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg. 

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The Epstein survivors have repeatedly been treated by the Department of Justice and the Southern District of New York as secondary to the institutions, agreements and prosecutorial decisions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. That pattern began with the secret 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, negotiated without informing victims even though federal law gave them rights to confer with prosecutors and receive notice about major developments. Years later, survivors were forced to litigate simply to establish that the government had violated those rights. After Epstein was arrested again in 2019, many survivors believed the federal government finally had an opportunity to fully expose the criminal enterprise around him, identify additional participants and explain how he had escaped meaningful accountability for so long. Instead, Epstein died before trial, the investigation remained far narrower than many survivors expected, and prosecutors repeatedly resisted efforts to disclose additional records. The result has been a system in which survivors have often had to fight the government for information about crimes committed against them rather than being treated as central participants in the pursuit of accountability.The SDNY's prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell produced an important conviction, but it also reinforced complaints that federal authorities were interested in prosecuting a limited case rather than comprehensively investigating Epstein's broader network. Survivors and their attorneys have repeatedly questioned why numerous people identified in testimony, depositions, financial records and other evidence were never charged or, in some instances, apparently never even subjected to meaningful public scrutiny. At the same time, the DOJ has fought disclosure battles over grand jury material, investigative records and other Epstein-related documents while officials have issued sweeping public conclusions that many survivors believe were reached without adequate transparency. For people who spent decades being ignored, disbelieved or marginalized while Epstein accumulated power and protection, every unexplained refusal to disclose evidence and every investigation that appears to stop short of examining the wider network reinforces the same message they received during Epstein's lifetime: the government controls the information, the powerful receive extraordinary consideration, and the survivors are expected to accept whatever answers officials decide to give them.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

OA1287 - Today on Rapid Response Friday:  Todd “Two Taints” Blanche flexes his new freedom as two Tates blanch at the loss of theirs, and a lawsuit over a cinematic heist starring Nicolas Cage. Applicability of Executive Privilege to Presidential Communications with Private Advisers, Office of Legal Counsel (8/10/2026) Second Superseding Indictment in United States of America v. Southern Poverty Law Center Inc. and Heidi Beirich, Middle District of Alabama (8/11/2026) Secretary Rubio Terminates Green Cards of Foreign Nationals Tied to Infamous Iranian Regime Propagandist, U.S. Department of State (4/11/2026) One Woman's Message From the Hell of ICE Detention, The Nation (8/11/2026) Andrew and Tristan Tate's Motion for Release Pending Extradition Proceedings and Opposition to the Government's Request for Detention In the Matter of the Extradition of Emory Andrew Tate, Southern District of Florida (8/7/2026) Response in Opposition to Andrew Tate's and Tristan Tate's Motion for Release Pending Extradition Proceedings In the Matter of the Extradition of Emory Andrew Tate, Southern District of Florida (8/10/2026) Complaint in Op-Fortitude Ltd. and Simon Afram v. Netflix Inc.,  Central District of California (7/29/2026) Check out the OA Linktree for all the places to go and things to do!

The New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission's 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein's broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein's orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein's other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein's activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein's conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein's financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement's decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report

The New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission's 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein's broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein's orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein's other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein's activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein's conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein's financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement's decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report

The New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission's 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein's broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein's orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein's other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein's activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein's conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein's financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement's decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report

The New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission's 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein's broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein's orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein's other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein's activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein's conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein's financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement's decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

The New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission's 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein's broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein's orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein's other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein's activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein's conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein's financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement's decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report

The New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission's 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein's broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein's orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein's other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein's activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein's conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein's financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement's decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report

The New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission's 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein's broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein's orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein's other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein's activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein's conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein's financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement's decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report

The New Mexico Survivors' Truth Commission's 119-page interim report described Zorro Ranch as a major and largely neglected component of Jeffrey Epstein's broader operation, concluding that authorities failed for years to seriously investigate what happened there. According to the Commission, Epstein maintained an elaborate, highly controlled compound in New Mexico where survivors reported sexual abuse and where young women were routinely transported, housed and brought into Epstein's orbit. The report pointed to witness testimony, flight records, seized electronic evidence and FBI material suggesting that Zorro Ranch was integrated into the same system of recruitment, secrecy and exploitation seen at Epstein's other properties. Among the evidence discussed were computer folders labeled “ZORRO,” discs referencing nude photographs associated with the ranch, accounts of young women arriving by aircraft, efforts to impose restrictive nondisclosure agreements on workers, and survivor statements describing abuse in New Mexico. The Commission stressed that the evidence remained under review and that allegations involving individuals named in the report were not final findings of wrongdoing, but it said the existing record was already sufficient to show that Epstein's activities in New Mexico deserved far more scrutiny than they ever received.The report was especially critical of institutional failures, saying New Mexico and federal authorities effectively passed responsibility to prosecutors elsewhere while Epstein's conduct in the state went largely unexamined. It said the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Mexico and state officials expected the Southern District of New York to handle Epstein, but New York prosecutors concentrated on crimes tied to New York and Florida rather than building a New Mexico case. Zorro Ranch was never searched while Epstein was alive and, according to the report, was not subjected to a comprehensive law-enforcement search until March 2026, nearly seven years after his death. The Commission concluded that this passivity allowed evidence to disappear, memories to fade and potential criminal cases to become more difficult or impossible to prosecute. It also opened separate lines of inquiry into Epstein's financial dealings, his relationships with scientific institutions and wealthy associates, and the conduct of banks, including subpoenas to Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Its clearest interim observation was devastating: Epstein continued exercising wealth and influence after becoming a registered sex offender, operated much of his system in plain sight, and New Mexico law enforcement's decision to rely on other jurisdictions left the conduct of Epstein and his co-conspirators in the state “unexamined and unpunished.” Final findings and recommendations were deferred while the Commission continued issuing subpoenas, interviewing witnesses and searching for additional survivors and potential perpetrators.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:NM Survivors' Truth Commission — Interim Report

Elie Honig is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney and co-chief of the organized crime unit at the Southern District of New York, where he prosecuted more than 100 mobsters, including members of La Cosa Nostra, and the Gambino and Genovese crime families. He went on to serve as Director of the Department of Law and Public Safety at New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice. He is currently Special Counsel at Lowenstein Sandler and a CNN legal analyst.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Donald Trump just got one step closer to stealing the next election. The Senate confirms a new head of National Intelligence: former US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jay Clayton — a man who won't say who won the 2020 election. This week, Alex looks into whether or not Trump will try to steal the midterms. She's first joined by Errin Haines, an Atlanta native, editor at large at The 19th, author of the Amendment newsletter, and co-host of Crooked's newest show, Long Play, to talk about Georgia: the state Trump has focused his most intense efforts of election interference. Then Alex speaks with Joy Reid, host of The Joy Reid Show, to try and get a handle on Trump's latest efforts to subvert the election and figure out how prepared we really are.Hate listening to ads? Become a Friends of the Pod subscriber for ad-free episodes of Pod Save America, Pod Save the World, Lovett or Leave It, Runaway Country, Offline with Jon Favreau, and more—plus exclusive content, including bonus episodes of Pod Save America. Subscribe now at crooked.com/friends, on Apple Podcasts, or through the Pod Save America YouTube channel.To watch this episode with subtitles, click here and turn on closed captions (CC).You can also request a transcript by emailing transcripts@crooked.com. Include the podcast name, episode title, and air date. Please allow 48–72 hours for delivery.

This week, Scott sat down with his Lawfare colleagues Public Service Fellow Julia Curlee and Senior Editors Eric Columbus and Molly Roberts to talk through the week's big news in national security, including:“The Manchurian Candidates.” In a primetime address to the nation last Thursday, July 16, President Trump declassified a trove of intelligence documents that he claimed prove America's elections are dangerously vulnerable to foreign interference—particularly by China—and revived his long-standing, evidence-free assertions that the 2020 election was “rigged” against him. He ordered the Justice Department to prosecute those he claims were involved. But intelligence officials past and present, as well as the documents themselves, draw a sharp line between foreign influence campaigns and actual interference with vote counts—and none of the material supports the claim that any votes were changed. What is actually in the documents that President Trump has declassified? And what does his speech tell us about his intentions for the midterm elections and the 2028 elections beyond?“Leak and Ye Shall Find.” The Trump administration has dramatically escalated its campaign against leakers, culminating in grand jury subpoenas served to New York Times journalists, some at their homes, over their reporting on security concerns relating to the new Qatari-gifted Air Force One. The Pentagon and the Justice Department have stood up a joint task force to “identify and prosecute leakers,” and the New York Times is now fighting the subpoenas in court, calling them an attempt to intimidate the press that treads on First Amendment rights. The administration insists that reporters aren't the targets—only the people who actually leaked—and said that the reporters are simply witnesses. How much legal jeopardy do the reporters—and the media more broadly—actually face? And is this a genuine national security effort or an assault on press freedom?“Advise and Dissent.” Two of the administration's most consequential nominees—Jay Clayton, who has been nominated as Director of National Intelligence, and Todd Blanche, who has been nominated as Attorney General—sat for their Senate confirmation hearings last week. Clayton, currently U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, repeatedly declined to say that Joe Biden won the 2020 election, while Blanche was grilled over the now-“dead” anti-weaponization fund, the Epstein files, and the very NYT subpoenas he authorized. Both face unexpectedly narrow paths to confirmation, complicated by the sudden death of Sen. Lindsey Graham. What did we learn from the hearings? And what are each nominee's prospects for confirmation?In object lessons, Julia strums to the strifes it seems we can't escape. Eric compliments the coordinated collection of compost. Scott salutes Mr. The Frog and friends who are back on the small screen (and then gets scooped on another Muppet story). And Molly marvels at one of her many military morale patches. To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.