Podcasts about burps

Thanks For Listening - Say Something Nice about someone or something good going on in your life - Click the little mic on the iHeartRadio App and send us a talkback messageSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Friday briefing: Iran war poll; Maine Senate race; border wall construction; Camp Mystic; cow burps; and moreRead today's briefing.

Text us here! Hello Hersh, good to have you back to the trash-cast. We had a wonderful day of debacle-filled fun. I had a great intro all ready, and right during the intro music, I hit the wrong button a halted the music and sent the episode spiraling out of control and I don't know that we ever recovered. With that being typed, we covered some great topics today including: label-less water-bottles, fizzy burps, and a great dental breakthrough that I just experienced that likely saved me from losing a vital chopper! We used a great classic song from a missionary friend and Brooks even gave the audience a taste of what his Patreon show is like... or so he says he did. we have to trust that he was telling the truth because he couldn't produce the evidence during the recording which is another whole debacle... Enjoy! Support the showConnect with us at https://www.podnme.org/https://youtube.com/@devinbirdsongEmail devin@podnme.orgFollow us on Instagram @podn_mePersonalities on Pod'N MePastor: Devin BirdsongDeacon: Dustin WakleySongleader: Brad CottrellHershall: Jud IngramNews Anchor, Dink Burbank: Josh SmithGen Z Boy: Brooks Birdsong 

In this episode we talk about embarassing childhood stories, crazy coincidences, and our dream travel destinations.Rate us and leave us a review!

Chris!  What's the deal!?!  Why are you all sweaty and out of breath!!  Are you ok!?Tons of you have asked, and YES Chandler has an update about his new adopted kitten Lilly Belle!!!So… how's your March Madness bracket!?! Chris has an update…(which was recorded before Duke lost and destroyed about 80% of everyone's brackets)Why… WHY is it that when you eat Del Taco, you always burp Del Taco for days!!!!!  WHY!?!?!?What is your favorite gadget from your youth!?  We'll find out in the Chunga Poll Shout-outs!!Gregg has a new theme for his movie reviews!!  Now he's showcasing “strange and unusual” films he thinks you should watch!  AND!!!!!!  It's time for Your Really Stupid News!!!LISTEN NOW!!!It's on www.radioronin.com and everywhere you get your podcasts!!!

Chris!  What's the deal!?!  Why are you all sweaty and out of breath!!  Are you ok!?Tons of you have asked, and YES Chandler has an update about his new adopted kitten Lilly Belle!!!So… how's your March Madness bracket!?! Chris has an update…(which was recorded before Duke lost and destroyed about 80% of everyone's brackets)Why… WHY is it that when you eat Del Taco, you always burp Del Taco for days!!!!!  WHY!?!?!?What is your favorite gadget from your youth!?  We'll find out in the Chunga Poll Shout-outs!!Gregg has a new theme for his movie reviews!!  Now he's showcasing “strange and unusual” films he thinks you should watch!  AND!!!!!!  It's time for Your Really Stupid News!!!LISTEN NOW!!!It's on www.radioronin.com and everywhere you get your podcasts!!!

That's a THING?!?!See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

A very special edition of the good night podcast! Joanna Selvarajah always wanted to start a podcast so in this episode, she's taking over and asking Amer Rez questions! We talk about mean girls, conflict resolution, is Oumer Teyeb black and so many other things! Have a listen!

Aoife is at her wit’s end. Not only is she forced to tidy up after her one-year-old brother Lockie, but she’s also on pants and socks patrol for her messy Dad, Ben. Dad claims to be tidy but brother Baird drops some bombshell confessions. Meanwhile, Hazel brings Mum Caitlin to the court for a truly gas-tly offence: non-stop farting at the table, even on Christmas! Caitlin claims it’s natural as Judge Bex dives into the delicate etiquette of when and where to let it rip. Who will win: dinner manners or digestive freedom? Warning: This episode may cause giggles and a sudden urge to clean your room… Got a family disagreement of your own? Let us know at FunKidsLive.com/podcast/judgebexSupport the show: https://funkidslive.com/plusSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

(Spirit Rock Meditation Center)

(Spirit Rock Meditation Center)

(Spirit Rock Meditation Center)

On this episode of Ask Roz & Mocha, we're answering your wildest questions! What's something you think is totally overpriced but you still buy every single time? Did Roz ever get in trouble at ET Canada for not liking certain shows or actors? Plus, the great holiday debate: Incandescent vs. LED Christmas lights—what's your pick? We'll also talk public washroom etiquette (do you judge someone who skips the soap?), and for a laugh, would you rather fart like a trumpet or burp like a mooing cow? Finally, we wrap things up with the ultimate cozy question: What's your favorite Christmas scent?

Go tubeless with Omnipod 5 or Omnipod DASH * Dexcom G7 CONTOUR NextGen smart meter and CONTOUR DIABETES app Get your supplies from US MED  or call 888-721-1514 Tandem Mobi  twiist AID System Free Juicebox Community (non Facebook) Eversense CGM Medtronic Diabetes Drink AG1.com/Juicebox Touched By Type 1 Take the T1DExchange survey Type 1 Diabetes Pro Tips - THE PODCAST Use code JUICEBOX to save 40% at Cozy Earth  Apple Podcasts> Subscribe to the podcast today! The podcast is available on Spotify, Google Play, iHeartRadio, Radio Public, Amazon Music and all Android devices The Juicebox Podcast is a free show, but if you'd like to support the podcast directly, you can make a gift here or buy me a coffee. Thank you! * Omnipod Wilmot E, et al. Presented at: ATTD; March 19-22, 2025; Amsterdam, NL. A 13-week randomized, parallel-group clinical trial conducted among 188 participants (age 4-70) with type 1 diabetes in France, Belgium, and the U.K., comparing the safety and effectiveness of the Omnipod 5 System versus multiple daily injections with CGM. Among all paid Omnipod 5 G6G7 Pods Commercial and Medicare claims in 2024. Actual co-pay amount depends on patient's health plan and coverage, they may be higher or lower than the advertised amount. Source IQVIA OPC Library. Disclaimer - Nothing you hear on the Juicebox Podcast or read on Arden's Day is intended as medical advice. You should always consult a physician before making changes to your health plan.  If the podcast has helped you to live better with type 1 please tell someone else how to find it!  

Denmark is making history. Starting in 2030, livestock farmers will be taxed for the greenhouse gases produced by cows, pigs, and sheep—yes, that includes burps and flatulence. The country plans to charge 300 kroner ($43.58 USD) per ton of CO₂-equivalent emissions in 2030, rising to 750 kroner ($117.90 USD) by 2035. There's a 60% income tax deduction to ease the burden early on. The move is part of Denmark's goal to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030, and to become climate‑neutral by 2045. Tensions are high: farmers worry about rising costs and fairness. Environmental groups see it as a breakthrough. Whose side are YOU on?  This Week's Featured Hashtag#PutABodyPartInAMovieSend a text to The Ebone Zone! Support the showIf you have questions or comments email ebonezonepodcast@yahoo.com Follow the Ebone Zone on Twitter: https://twitter.com/OfficialEBZLike the Ebone Zone on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ebonezoneofficial/Visit www.ebonezone.com for more content!

10-09-25 - Remembering How Our Various Engineers Tackled Studio Problems - John Doubles Down On Mercury Bet Saying He'll Get Implants If They Win - People Taking Ozempic Are Reporting Surprise Pregnancies And Sulfur BurpsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

10-09-25 - Remembering How Our Various Engineers Tackled Studio Problems - John Doubles Down On Mercury Bet Saying He'll Get Implants If They Win - People Taking Ozempic Are Reporting Surprise Pregnancies And Sulfur BurpsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Today, we're meeting Sizzle, a tiny red dragon with a big problem…her fiery burps are turning trees to ash and threatening to get her kicked out of the magical Leora Academy! It's up to the Jupiter Twins, Lily and Jake, to find the one thing that can cure her burps: the golden fruit of the legendary Quenching Tree, found on a floating island in the sky. But with no magic allowed, can they get there and back in time before Sizzle flames out for good? Let's find out! Upgrade to Koala Kids Plus for full ad-free access to our collection of kids' shows, with bonus adventures and 8-hour episodes ⭐️ Subscribe via Apple Podcasts or visit https://koalashine.supercast.com/ Want to send in a note, joke, memo or monologue? Click here.

Are you ever embarrassed by your natural bodily functions? What if there's nothing wrong with you or your body? Join the Kanes in Being Here and have fun looking at your prudish nature.

In March 2024, a satellite built to detect the potent greenhouse gas methane launched into orbit – backed by New Zealand to a final total of $32 million. MethaneSAT aimed to pinpoint large leaks from oil and gas fields, since plugging these is considered an easy climate win. But an add-on mission was investigating whether the satellite could pick up the smaller, more diffuse methane emissions from agriculture. Our Changing World joined the New Zealand-based team testing this capability – before disaster struck. With MethaneSAT uncontactable and lost in space, what did the mission deliver? Sign up to the Our Changing World monthly newsletter for episode backstories, science analysis and more.In this episode:00:00 – 03:08: Introduction03:08 – 05:38: A methane-measuring device takes off from the airfield05:38 – 16:32: Ground-based methane measurements with the EM-2716:32 – 25:29: What went wrong, and what data MethaneSAT did collect…Go to this episode on rnz.co.nz for more details

Siblings Ashley Engle and Brandon Birdwell discuss life, birthday parties from the past, pirate themed restaurant pitches and Fran sings the hits!

Welcome to Troll Hole episode 80! Thanks for slipping into the tranquil waters of the spit pit and letting our hilarious conversation with Comedian Pearl Rose wash away your impurities. In this episode we talk: Mike's New Stand Up Special, Being on Time, ADHD, our Patreon members being single, Quiet Reading Rooms, Mike's Burps, Eating in the Car, Dmers criminal records, How Pearl wants to be a Husband, Phillies Karen, TMZ trolling comedian criminals and so much more. Reach in. Pull it out. Subscribe to the pod. Then give us a rating and leave a review while you're here. We're trying to feed our son, Producer Neil.#Phillies #selflove #selfcare #health #wellness #Trolling #trollholeWant bonus episodes and content? Check out the Troll Hole Patreon!:https://www.patreon.com/c/TrollHolePodcastFollow Pearl Rose on Instagram!: https://www.instagram.com/hipearlrose/Follow Troll Hole on Instagram!: https://www.instagram.com/trollholepodcastFollow Ben Katzner on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shaqkatznerCheck Ben out live!: https://shaqkatzner.komi.io/Follow Mike Lester on Instagram!: https://www.instagram.com/justmikelesterFollow Producer Neil! https://www.instagram.com/n3ilfaceListen to Neil's music here: https://songwhip.com/sevenswordsHas anyone said anything weird to you lately? Tell us about it and we might talk about it  on the pod! Send us screenshots or tell us your trolling story by dm'ing us or send it to us at Trollholepod@gmail.com

TJIF! Wrapping up the week with a show jam packed with games, nakedness and tales of the strange! Cass is passing on the trauma, Anthony saw him make a move in front of the husband and we salute the WNY great Chuck Mangione. Get ill with naked man on a boat, naked man in a pond and $700k in amputee money. We play CBC, Jeremy Jeremy Jeremy and much more! Support the show and follow us here Twitter, Insta, Apple, Amazon, Spotify and the Edge! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Thank you for starting your week off with us, La Plática fam!

This is one action packed radio break!

What do a rogue weatherman, a meat-induced burp, and a “blind taint test” have in common? They all collide in this absolutely unmissable episode of The Ben and Skin Show, where the Wayback Machine unearths some of the most hilariously bizarre moments in show history.“I Ate the Cobbler”, A local weatherman lets out a surprise burp on live TV and immediately confesses, “I ate the cobbler.” Skin's Legendary BBQ Burp: Flashback to 2018, when Jeff “Skin” Wade tried to talk Lonzo Ball and NBA free agency while battling a full-on meat tsunami. “So much meat, man.”The Infamous “Blind Taint Test”: What was supposed to be a whiskey tasting turns into one of the most unintentionally hilarious slip-ups in show history. “You line up all those taints…” Enough said.

FSA County Committee Elections Using Lasers to Measure Cow Burps Redwater Disease in Cattle   00:01:05 – FSA County Committee Elections: Kansas Farm Service Agency agricultural program specialist, Allison Womack, starts the show as she chats about county committee elections, the emergency conservation program, acreage reporting and other FSA programs. Farmers.gov   00:12:05 – Using Lasers to Measure Cow Burps: Continuing the show is Brian Washburn, physicist and project leader at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, discussing how he and a team are using lasers to measure cow burps.   00:23:05 – Redwater Disease in Cattle: Brad White, Bob Larson and Brian Herrin end the show as they talk about redwater disease and what it is on a recent Cattle Chat podcast from the Beef Cattle Institute.  BCI Cattle Chat Podcast Bovine Science with BCI Podcast Email BCI at bci@ksu.edu     Send comments, questions or requests for copies of past programs to ksrenews@ksu.edu.   Agriculture Today is a daily program featuring Kansas State University agricultural specialists and other experts examining ag issues facing Kansas and the nation. It is hosted by Shelby Varner and distributed to radio stations throughout Kansas and as a daily podcast.   K‑State Research and Extension is a short name for the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, a program designed to generate and distribute useful knowledge for the well‑being of Kansans. Supported by county, state, federal and private funds, the program has county Extension offices, experiment fields, area Extension offices and regional research centers statewide. Its headquarters is on the K‑State campus in Manhattan

Methane is often overlooked in the climate change discourse, as against carbon. Methane is over 80 times more potent at trapping heat in the atmosphere over a 20-year period. Released from sources like livestock, landfills, and leaky oil and gas infrastructure, methane is a tricky problem to solve. In this episode we understand what methane emissions are and how to plug them. Cutting methane emissions can be one the fastest ways to slow global warming.For this relevant issue, we talked with Hisham Mundol, Chief Advisor in India to the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Mundol is a seasoned development sector executive with experience in both government and private entities.Full transcript of the episode is available in EnglishPresented by 101ReportersHisham Mundol is on Twitter and LinkedInFollow TIEH podcast on Twitter, Linkedin & YouTubeOur hosts, Shreya Jai on Twitter, Linkedin & Dr. Sandeep Pai on Twitter, Linkedin

A Cher memory, curbing cow burps might save us all, "Sesame Street" gets Netflix lifeline, and what's with the Benson Boone hate?Rula patients typically pay $15 per session when using insurance. Connect with quality therapists and mental health experts who specialize in you at https://www.rula.com/ja! #rulapodSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The startup's enzymes modify a cow's microbiome using enzymes, slashing methane while boosting the nutrients available to the cow. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week… Andy was in town for the draft! He made his debut in the new Stu and introduced the fellas to a new buddy, Sweet Blake! Sweet Blake is a hater from Michagan, but was cool enough to call in so they could all take sh!t together. Before Sweet Blake called in, the fellas talked about the 2025 NFL draft being in Green Bay and discussed some prospects they hoped the Pack might draft. Andy got sweet Blake to call in and do a first round mock draft with the fellas and they didn't do too bad! They planned how they'll attack the three daft extravaganza and who they hoped they might see. Kärel was yelling and cussing, the fellas were in a good mode and the beers were going down easy. This was a fun one from start to finish. Burps, laughs, haters and so much more! But before any of the nonsense, they saved the best for first, with the Beer of the Week! During the BOW the fellas rate and review a new beer. They discuss the history of the brewery and examine what's in the beer they're drinking. Then, they break down the beer by its drinkability, the probability they'd drink it again, its chugability, and the can's attractability. Find out if Goose Island's IPA passed the HUA test.Beer of the Week: 09:54 - 01:09:032025 NFL Draft Preview: 01:16:40 - 02:06:002025 NFL Mock Draft: 02:07:45 - 03:27:002025 NFL Draft Talk/Planning: 03:27:08 - ENDBOW: Goose Island, IPACOW: 2025 NFL Draft PlanningHUA 185 Drinking game: whenever Kärel says the name “Blake,” drink! Good luck ;)Big shout out to the talented Adrian Pell! He created the intro and outro music for us. Check him out on IG: @AdrianPellMusicHold Us Accountable is on Patreon! Just search, ‘Hold Us Accountable.' We're just trying to earn us some beer money, nothing more nothing less! Join for just $1 a month! https://patreon.com/HoldUsAccountable920?utm_medium=unknown&utm_source=join_link&utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator&utm_content=copyLink If you're listening on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, rate and review the show, it helps us out a lot!Check out and subscribe to our YouTube Channel!⁠https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRVYu7zopmxja1RsmVpOucQ/featur⁠We're live on Twitch, check out our page!⁠https://www.twitch.tv/holdusaccountable⁠Find us on X:⁠https://twitter.com/hua_pod?s=11&t=DqKX0s9j1XzF2xFF3dBlDA⁠If you want to let us know what you think of the show, or have an idea for the show, you can DM us on Facebook or Instagram @HoldUsAccountable

Woman suing American Airlines after a passenger next to her was masturbating on her flight. Krystle shamed a couple for giving oral sex in a car. JLR burps in Krystle's face. People are upset that a player in the Masters tournament served time in jail for assaulting women. Rover is trying to be less selfish. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Charlie has lost a lot in the stock market. Jeffrey and his wife have been sleeping in the same bed and will never eat chicken wings with bones in them. At a restaurant in Thailand the skinnier you are the more of a discount you get off your bill. Tariffs increasing the cost of goods. B2 wants to go see Shane Gillis. Woman suing American Airlines after a passenger next to her was masturbating on her flight. Krystle shamed a couple for giving oral sex in a car. JLR burps in Krystle's face. People are upset that a player in the Masters tournament, Angel Cabrera, served time in jail for assaulting women. Rover is trying to be less selfish. Virginia Guiffre has been released from the hospital. The rectal realtor was seen pumping Jeffrey's gasoline. Groceries and new brakes. Snitzer went to Binghamton for a comedy show. A woman suffers from a stinky bottom after her BBL surgery went wrong. Jaylen Wells broke his wrist during a mid-air collision mid game. Stephen A. Smith wants to run for office. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Charlie has lost a lot in the stock market. Jeffrey and his wife have been sleeping in the same bed and will never eat chicken wings with bones in them. At a restaurant in Thailand the skinnier you are the more of a discount you get off your bill. Tariffs increasing the cost of goods. B2 wants to go see Shane Gillis. Woman suing American Airlines after a passenger next to her was masturbating on her flight. Krystle shamed a couple for giving oral sex in a car. JLR burps in Krystle's face. People are upset that a player in the Masters tournament, Angel Cabrera, served time in jail for assaulting women. Rover is trying to be less selfish. Virginia Guiffre has been released from the hospital. The rectal realtor was seen pumping Jeffrey's gasoline. Groceries and new brakes. Snitzer went to Binghamton for a comedy show. A woman suffers from a stinky bottom after her BBL surgery went wrong. Jaylen Wells broke his wrist during a mid-air collision mid game. Stephen A. Smith wants to run for office.

Woman suing American Airlines after a passenger next to her was masturbating on her flight. Krystle shamed a couple for giving oral sex in a car. JLR burps in Krystle's face. People are upset that a player in the Masters tournament served time in jail for assaulting women. Rover is trying to be less selfish.

Frasiacs, today I dive into the latest drama surrounding Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, and Justin Baldoni, particularly focusing on a TikToker's shocking claims about Lively's behavior on set, including her alleged flatulence and difficult demeanor. We also discuss the recent episode of "Sister Wives," where fans express frustration over the lack of updates regarding Coyote Pass and the ongoing dynamics between Christine Brown and her ex, Kody. Additionally, I explore theories about Ryan Reynolds' potential involvement in the lawsuit against Baldoni, sparked by Candace Owens' commentary, and highlight the strong support Baldoni has received from his family amidst the controversy. The episode is filled with engaging commentary, audience interaction, and plenty of juicy celebrity gossip.Timestamps:00:00:00 - Opening thoughts00:06:00 - Fans Coming For Christine Woolley Over Kody Comments00:18:00 - Blake Lively rips farts on set, actress says00:22:34 - Future predictions for lawsuit, gag order won't happenMY Go Big Podcasting Courses Are Here! Purchase Go Big Podcasting and learn to start, monetize, and grow your own podcast. USE CODE: Cyber10 for 10% OFF**SHOP my Amazon Marketplace - especially if you're looking to get geared-up to start your own Podcast!!!**https://www.amazon.com/shop/thesarahfrasershowShow is sponsored by:Head to acorns.com/tsfs or download the Acorns app to start saving and investing for your future today!Alomoves.com use code TSFS30 for only ninety-nine dollars with a thirty-day FREE trial. This is a limited time offer that ends January 31Honey Play Box adult toys for everyone! Use code TSFS for 20% OFF your order Horizonfibroids.com get rid of those nasty fibroidsNutrafol.com use code TSFS for FREE shipping and $10 off your subscriptionRula.com/TSFS to get started today. That's R-U-L-A dot com slash TSFS for convenient therapy that's covered by insurance Quince.com/tsfs for FREE shipping on your order and 365 day returnsFollow me on Instagram/Tiktok: @thesarahfrasershow  ***Visit our Sub-Reddit: reddit.com/r/thesarahfrasershow for ALL things The Sarah Fraser Show!!!***Advertise on The Sarah Fraser Show: thesarahfrasershow@gmail.comGot a juicy gossip TIP from your favorite TLC or Bravo show? Email: thesarahfrasershow@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoicesSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Frasiacs, today I dive into the latest drama surrounding Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, and Justin Baldoni, particularly focusing on a TikToker's shocking claims about Lively's behavior on set, including her alleged flatulence and difficult demeanor. We also discuss the recent episode of "Sister Wives," where fans express frustration over the lack of updates regarding Coyote Pass and the ongoing dynamics between Christine Brown and her ex, Kody. Additionally, I explore theories about Ryan Reynolds' potential involvement in the lawsuit against Baldoni, sparked by Candace Owens' commentary, and highlight the strong support Baldoni has received from his family amidst the controversy. The episode is filled with engaging commentary, audience interaction, and plenty of juicy celebrity gossip. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Opening thoughts 00:06:00 - Fans Coming For Christine Woolley Over Kody Comments 00:18:00 - Blake Lively rips farts on set, actress says 00:22:34 - Future predictions for lawsuit, gag order won't happen MY Go Big Podcasting Courses Are Here! Purchase Go Big Podcasting and learn to start, monetize, and grow your own podcast. USE CODE: Cyber10 for 10% OFF **SHOP my Amazon Marketplace - especially if you're looking to get geared-up to start your own Podcast!!!** https://www.amazon.com/shop/thesarahfrasershow Show is sponsored by: Head to acorns.com/tsfs or download the Acorns app to start saving and investing for your future today! Alomoves.com use code TSFS30 for only ninety-nine dollars with a thirty-day FREE trial. This is a limited time offer that ends January 31 Honey Play Box adult toys for everyone! Use code TSFS for 20% OFF your order  Horizonfibroids.com get rid of those nasty fibroids Nutrafol.com use code TSFS for FREE shipping and $10 off your subscription Rula.com/TSFS to get started today. That's R-U-L-A dot com slash TSFS for convenient therapy that's covered by insurance  Quince.com/tsfs for FREE shipping on your order and 365 day returns Follow me on Instagram/Tiktok: @thesarahfrasershow   ***Visit our Sub-Reddit: reddit.com/r/thesarahfrasershow for ALL things The Sarah Fraser Show!!!*** Advertise on The Sarah Fraser Show: thesarahfrasershow@gmail.com Got a juicy gossip TIP from your favorite TLC or Bravo show? Email: thesarahfrasershow@gmail.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Monica and Mike positive spin family vacations!

This is The Briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from a Christian worldview.Part I (00:13 - 05:26)Disorder Breeds Disorder and Civil Society Requires Order: Connecting Global HeadlinesA Power Vacuum in Gaza Could Empower Warlords and Gangs by The New York Times (Amanda Taub)Part II (05:26 - 10:18)Rule by Law or Rule by Criminal Gangs: The Stark Reality on the Ground in Troubled RegionsPart III (10:18 - 14:28)Crisis at the Federal Bureau of Investigation? President-Elect Trump Expresses Desire For Kash Patel to Become Director of the FBIPart IV (14:28 - 22:48)We Need Restored Confidence in the FBI: The Looming Issues Are Huge and the Stakes Are HighTaxing Farm Animals' Farts and Burps? Denmark Gives It a Try. by The New York Times (Somini Sengupta)Part V (22:48 - 27:11)Taxing Cow Burps and Flatulence? Climate Revolutionaries are Coming for Denmark's Livestock (And Yours)Sign up to receive The Briefing in your inbox every weekday morning.Follow Dr. Mohler:X | Instagram | Facebook | YouTubeFor more information on The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to sbts.edu.For more information on Boyce College, just go to BoyceCollege.com.To write Dr. Mohler or submit a question for The Mailbox, go here.

Jason and Laura talk about cancelling email subscriptions on Cyber Monday. Then on the DeRush-Hour: Denmark is taxing what?!

Washington's initial thinking about AI regulation has evolved from a knee-jerk fear response to a more nuanced appreciation of its capabilities and potential risks. Today on Faster, Please! — The Podcast, I talk with technology policy expert Neil Chilson about national competition, defense, and federal vs. state regulation in this brave new world of artificial intelligence.Chilson is the head of AI policy at the Abundance Institute. He is a lawyer, computer scientist, and former chief technologist at the Federal Trade Commission. He is also the author of “Getting Out of Control: Emergent Leadership in a Complex World.”In This Episode* The AI risk-benefit assessment (1:18)* AI under the new Trump Administration (6:31)* An AGI Manhattan Project (12:18)* State-level overregulation (15:17)* Potential impact on immigration (21:15)* AI companies as national champions (23:00)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. The AI risk-benefit assessment (1:18)Pethokoukis: We're going to talk a bit about AI regulation, the future of regulation, so let me start with this: Last summer, the Biden administration put out a big executive order on AI. I assume the Trump administration will repeal that and do their own thing. Any idea what that thing will be?We have a lead on the tech, we have the best companies in the world. I think a Trump administration is really going to amp up that rhetoric, and I would expect the executive order to reflect the need to keep the US and the lead on AI technology.Chilson: The Biden executive order, repealing it is actually part of the GOP platform, which does not say a lot about AI, but it does say that it's definitely going to get rid of the Biden executive order. I think that's the first order of business. The repeal and replace process . . . the previous Trump administration actually had a couple of executive orders on AI, and they were very big-picture. They were not nearly as pro-regulatory as the Biden executive order, and they saw a lot of the potential.I'd expect a shift back towards a vision of AI as a force for good, I'd expect to shift towards the international dynamics here, that we need to keep ahead of China in AI. We have a lead on the tech, we have the best companies in the world. I think a Trump administration is really going to amp up that rhetoric, and I would expect the executive order to reflect the need to keep the US and the lead on AI technology.That emphasis differs from the Biden emphasis in what way?The Biden emphasis, when you read the executive order, it has some nice language up top about how this is a great new technology, it's very powerful, but overwhelmingly the Biden executive order is directed at the risk of AI and, in particular, not existential risk, more the traditional risks that academics who have talked about the internet have had for a long time: these risks of bias, or risks to privacy, or risks to safety, or deepfakes. And to be honest, there are risks to all of these technologies, but the Biden executive order to really pounded that home, the emphasis was very much on what are the problems that this tech could cause and what do we as the federal government need to do to get in here and make sure it's safe for everybody?I would expect that would be a big change. I don't see, especially on the bias front, I don't see a Trump administration emphasizing that as a primary thing that the federal government needs to fix about AI. In fact, with people like Elon Musk having the ear of the president, I would expect maybe to go in the opposite direction, that these ideas around bias are inflated, that these risks aren't really real, and, to the extent that they are, that it's no business of the federal government to step in and tell companies how to bias or de-bias their products.One thing that sort of confuses me on the Elon Musk angle is that it seemed that he was — at least used to be — very concerned about these somewhat science-fictional existential risks to AI. I guess my concern is that we'll get that version of Musk again talking to the White House and maybe he says, “I'm not worried about bias, but I'm still worried about it killing us all.” Is there any concern there, that that theme, which I think seems to have faded a little bit from the public conversation (maybe I'm wrong) that that will reemerge.I agree with you that I think that theme has faded. The early Senate hearings were very much in that vein, they were about the existential risk, and some of that was the people who were up there talking. This is something that's been on the mind of some of the leaders of the cutting edge of the tech space, and it's part of the reason why they got into it. There's always been a tension there. There is some sort of dynamic here where they're like, “This stuff is super dangerous and super powerful, so I need to be the one creating it and controlling it.” I think Musk still kind of falls in that bucket, so I share a little bit of that concern, but I think you're right that Congress has said, “Oh, those things seem really farfetched. That's not how we're going to focus our time.” I would expect that to continue even with a Musk-influenced administration.I actually don't think that there is necessarily a big tension between that and a pushback against the sort of red-tape regulatory approach to AI that was kind of the more traditional pessimistic, precautionary approach to technology, generally. I think Musk is a guy who hates red tape. I think he's seen it in his own businesses, how it's slowed down launches of all sorts. I think you can hate red tape and be worried about this existential risk. It's not necessarily in intentioned, but it'll be interesting to see how those play out, how Musk influences the policy of the Trump administration on AI.AI under the new Trump Administration (6:31)One issue that seemed to be coming up over and over again is differing opinions among technologists, venture capitalists, about the open-source issue. How does that play out heading into a Trump administration? When I listen to the Andreessen Horowitz podcast, those guys seem very concerned.They're going to get this software. They're going to develop it themselves. We can't out-China China. We should lean into what we're really good at, and that is a dynamic software-development environment, of which open source is a key component.So there's a lot of disagreements about how open source plays out. Open source, it should be pointed out first, is a core technology across everything that people who develop software use. Most websites run on open source software. Most development tools have a huge open source component, and one of the best ways to develop and test technology is by sharing it with people and having people build on it.I do think it is a really important technology in the AI space. We've seen that already, people are building smaller models, doing new things in open source that it costs a lot of money to do in the first instance, maybe in a closed source.The concerns that people raise is that this, especially in the national security space or the national competition, that this sort of exposes our best research to other countries. I think there's a couple of responses to that.The first one is that closed source is no guarantee that those people don't have that technology as well. In fact, most of these models fit on the thumb drive. Most of these AI labs are not run like nuclear facilities, and it's much easier to smuggle a thumb drive out than it is to smuggle a gram of plutonium or something like that. They're going to get this software. They're going to develop it themselves. We can't out-China China. We should lean into what we're really good at, and that is a dynamic software-development environment, of which open source is a key component.It also offers, in many ways, an alternative to centralized sources of artificial intelligence models, which can offer a bunch of user interface-based benefits. They're just easier to use. It's much easier to log into OpenAI and use their ChatGPT than it is to download and build your own model, but it is really nice as a competitive gap filler to have thousands and thousands of other that might do something specific, or have a specific orientation, which you can train on your own. And those exist because of the open source ecosystem. So I think it solves a lot of problems, probably a lot more than it creates.So what would you expect — let's focus on the federal level — for this congress, for the Trump administration, to do other than broadly affirm that we love AI, we hope it continues? Will there be any sort of regulatory rule, any sort of guidance, that would in any way constrain or direct this technology? Maybe it's in the area of the frontier models, I don't know.I think we're likely to see a lot of action at the use level: What are the various uses of various applications and how does AI change that? So in transportation and healthcare . . . this is a general purpose technology, and so it's going to be deployed in lots of spaces, and a lot of these spaces already have a lot of regulatory frameworks in place, and so I think we'll see lots of agencies looking to see, “Hey, this new technology, does it really change anything about how we regulate medical devices? If it does, how do we need to accommodate that? What are the unique risks? What are the unique opportunities that maybe the current framework doesn't really allow for?”I think we'll see a lot of that. I think, once you get up to the abstract model level, it's much harder to figure out what problem both are we trying to solve at the model level and do we have the capability to solve at the model level. If we're worried about people developing bio weapons with this technology, is making sure the model doesn't allow that, is that useful? Is it even possible? Or should we focus those attentions maybe down on, people can't secure the components that they need to execute a biohazard? Would that be a more productive place? I don't see a lot of action, honestly, at the model level.Maybe there'll be some reporting requirements or training requirements. The executive order had those, although they used something called the Defense Production Act — I think probably unconstitutionally, how they use that. But that's going to go away. If that gets filled in by Congress, that there's some sort of reporting regime — maybe that's possible, but Congress doesn't seem to be able to get those types of really high-level tech regulations across the line. They haven't done it with privacy legislation for a long time and everybody seems to think that would be a good idea.I think we'll continue to see efforts at the agency level. One thing Congress might do is they might spend some money in this space, so maybe there will be some new investment or maybe the national laboratories will get some money to do additional AI research. That has its own challenges, but most of them are financial challenges, they're not so much whether or not it's going to impede the industry, so that's kind of how I think it'll likely play out at the federal level.An AGI Manhattan Project (12:18)A report just came out (yesterday, as we're recording this) from the outside advisory group on US-China relations that advises the government, and they're calling for a Manhattan Project to get to an artificial general intelligence, I assume before China or anybody else.Is that a good idea? Do you think we'll do that? What do you make of that recommendation, which caused quite a stir when it came out?For the most part, artificial general intelligence, I don't understand what the appeal of that is, frankly . . . Why not train something that could do something specific really well?Yeah, it's a really interesting report. If you read through the body of the report, it's pretty standard international competitiveness analysis that says, “What are the supply chains for chips? How does it look? How do we compare on talent development? How do we compare on the industry backing investment?” Things like that. And we compare very well, overall, the report says.But then, all of a sudden at the top level, the first recommendation talks about artificial general intelligence. This is the kind of AI that doesn't exist yet, but it's the kind that could basically do everything a human could do at the intellectual level that a human could do it. It's interesting because that recommendation, it doesn't seem to be founded on anything that's actually in the report. There's no other discussion in the report about artificial general intelligence, or how important it is strategically, or anything like that, and yet, they want to spend Manhattan Project-level amounts of money — I think in today's dollars, that'd be like $30 billion to create this artificial general intelligence. I don't know what to make of that, and, more than that, I think it's very unlikely to move the policy discussion. Maybe it moves the Overton window, so people are talking like, “Yeah, we need a Manhattan Project,” but I don't think that it's likely to do anything.For the most part, artificial general intelligence, I don't understand what the appeal of that is, frankly. It has a sort of theoretical appeal, that we could have a computer that could do all the things that a person could do, but in the modern economy, it's actually better to have things that are really good at doing a specific set of things rather than having a generalist that you can deploy lots of different places, especially if you're talking about software. Why not train something that could do something specific really well? I think that would slot into our economy better. I think it's much more likely to be the most productive value of the intense computation time and money that it takes to train these types of models. So it seems like a strange thing to emphasize in our federal spending, even if we're talking about the national security implications. It would seem like it'd be much better to train a model that's specifically built for some type of drone warfare or something rather than trying to make it good at everythi ng and then say, “Oh, now we're going to use you to fly drones.” That doesn't seem to make a ton of sense.State-level overregulation (15:17)We talked about the federal level. Certainly — and not that the states seem to need a nudge, but if they see the Washington doing less, I'm sure there'll be plenty of state governments saying, “Well then we need to do more. We need to fill up the gap with our state regulation.” That already seems to be happening. Will that continue to happen and can the Trump administration stop that?I think it will continue to happen, the question is what kind of gap is left by the Trump administration. I would say what the Biden administration left was a vision gap. They didn't really have an overarching vision for how the US was going to engage with this technology at the federal level, unlike the Clinton administration which set out a pretty clear vision for how the federal government planned to engage on the early version of the internet. What it said was, for some really good reasons, we're going to let the commercial sector lead on development here.I think sending a signal like that could have sort of bully-pulpit effect, especially in redder states. You'll still see states like California and New York, they're listening to Europe on how to do stuff in this space.Still? Are we still listening to . . . Who are the people out there who think, “They've got it figured out”? I understand that maybe that's your initial impulse when you have a new technology and you're like, “I don't know what to do, so who is doing something on it?” But we've had a little bit of time and I just don't get anybody who would default to be like, “Man, we're just going to look at a couple of EU white papers and off to the races here in our state.”I think we're starting to see . . . the shopping of bills that look a lot like the way privacy has worked across the states, and in some cases are being pushed by the same organizations that represent compliance companies saying, “Hey, yeah, we need to do all this algorithmic bias auditing, or safety auditing, and states should require it.”I think a lot of this is a hangover of the social media fights. AI, if you poll it just at that level, if you're like, “Hey, do you think AI is going to be good or bad for your job or for the economy?” Americans are somewhat skeptical. It's because they think of AI in the cultural context that includes Terminator, and automation, and so they think of it that way. They don't think about the thousands of applications on their phones that use artificial intelligence.So I think there's a political moment here around this. The Europeans jumped in on and said, “Hey, we're the first to regulate in this space comprehensively.” I think they're dialing that back since some of their member states are like, “Hey, this is killing our own homegrown AI industry.” But for some reason, you're right, California and New York seem to be embracing that, and I think they probably will continue to. At the very local level, at the state level, there's just weird incentives to do something and then you don't really pay a lot of consequences down the road.Having said that, there was a controversial bill that was very aggressively pushed, SB 1047, in California over the summer, and it got killed. It got canned by Gavin Newsom in the end. And I think that's a sort of a unique artifact of California's “go along to get along” legislature process where even people who don't support bills vote for them, kind of knowing that Gavin, or that the governor, will bring down the veto when it doesn't make political sense.All of this is to say, California's going to California. I think we're starting to see, and what concerns me is, we're starting to see the shopping of bills that look a lot like the way privacy has worked across the states, and in some cases are being pushed by the same organizations that represent compliance companies saying, “Hey, yeah, we need to do all this algorithmic bias auditing, or safety auditing, and states should require it.”There's a Texas draft bill that has been floated right now, and you wouldn't think that Texas would be on the frontier of banning differential effects in bias from AI. It doesn't really sound particularly red-state-y, but these things are getting shopped around and if it moves in Texas, it'll move other places too. I worry about that level of red tape coming at the state level, and that's just going to be ground warfare on the legislative front at the state level.So federal preemption, what is that and how would that work? And is that possible?It's really hard in this space because the technology is so general. Congress could, of course, write something that was very broad and preempted, certain types of regulation of models, and maybe that's a good idea, I've seen some draft language around that.On the other hand, I do believe in federalism and these aren't quite the same sort of network-based technologies that only make sense in a national sweep. So maybe there's an argument that we should let states suffer the consequences of their own regulatory approaches. That hurts my heart a little bit just to think about the future because there are a lot of talented people in those states who are going to find out it's the lawyers who are their main constraint. Those types of transaction costs, they will slow us down. I think if it looks like we're falling behind in the US because we can't get out of our own way regulatorily, I think there will be more impulse to fix things.There are some other creative solutions such as interstate compacts to try to get people to level up across multiple states about how they're going to treat AI and allow innovation to flourish, and so I think we'll see more of those experiments, but it is really hard at the federal level to preempt just because there's so many state-based interests who are going to push back against that sort of thing.Potential impact on immigration (21:15)As far as AI influencing what we do elsewhere — one thing you wrote about recently in a really great essay, which I've already drawn upon in some of these questions is — thinking about immigration and AI talent coming to the United States — what I think is now a widely accepted understanding, that this is an important technology and we certainly want to be the leader in this technology — does that change how we think about immigration, at least very high-skilled immigration?We should be wanting the most talented people to come here and stay here.I think it should. Frankly, we should have changed our minds about some of this stuff a long time ago. We should be wanting the most talented people to come here and stay here. The most talented people in the world already come here for school often. When I was in computer science grad school, it was full of people who really desperately wanted to stay in the US and build companies and build products, and some of them struggled really hard to figure out a way to do it legally.I think that making it easier for those people to stay is essential to keeping not just our lead in the world, I don't want to say it that way — I mean that's important, I think national competitiveness is sort of underrated, I think that is valuable — but those people are the most productive in the US system where they can get access to venture capital that's unlike any other part of the planet. They can get access to networks of talent that are unavailable on other parts of the planet. Keeping them here is good for the US, but I think it's good overall for technological development, and we should really, really, really focus on how to make that easier and more attractive.AI companies as national champions (23:00)This isn't necessarily a specific AI issue, but again, as you said earlier, it seems like a lot of the debate, initially, is really a holdover from the social media debates about moderation, and bias, and all that, and a lot of those sorts of people, in many cases, and frameworks just got globed onto AI.Another aspect is the antitrust, and now we're worried about these big companies owning these platforms, and they're biased.Do we begin to look at issues of how we look at our big companies who have been leading in AI, doing a lot of R&D — does the politics around Big Tech change if we begin to see them as our vanguard companies that will keep us ahead of China?. . . in contrast to the Biden sort of “big-is-bad” rhetoric that they sort of leaned into entirely, I think a Trump administration is going to bring more nuance to that in some ways. And I do think that there will be more of a look towards our innovative companies as being the vanguard of what we do in the US.I think it already has, honestly. You saw early on, the Senate hearings around AI were totally inflected with the language of social media and that network-effects type of ecosystem. AI does not work like that. It doesn't work the same way. In fact, the feedback loops are so much faster from these models, we saw things like Google Gemini that had ahistorical renderings of the founding fathers, and that got so much shouting on Twitter, and on X, and lots of other places that Google very quickly adjusted, tweaked its path. I think we're seeing the toning down of that rhetoric and the recognition that these companies are creating a lot of powerful, useful products, and that they are sort of national champions.Trump, on the campaign trail, when asked about breaking up Google for an ongoing antitrust litigation was like, “Hold on guys, breaking up these companies might not be in our best interest. There might be other ways we can solve these types of problems.” I think that that level of, in contrast to the Biden sort of “big-is-bad” rhetoric that they sort of leaned into entirely, I think a Trump administration is going to bring more nuance to that in some ways. And I do think that there will be more of a look towards our innovative companies as being the vanguard of what we do in the US.Now, having said that, obviously I think there's tons of AI development that is not inside of these largest companies in the open source space, and especially in the application layer, building on top of some of these foundation models, and so I think that ecosystem is also extremely important. Things that sort of preference the big companies over the small ones, I would have a lot of concerns about, and there have been regulatory regimes proposed that, even while opposed by some of the bigger companies, would certainly be possible for them to comply with in a way that small companies would struggle to comply with, and open-source developers just don't have any sort of nexus with which to comply, since there is no actual business model that's propping that type of approach up. So I'd want to keep it pretty neutral between the big companies, the small companies, and open source, while having the cultural recognition that big companies are extremely valuable to the US innovation ecosystem.If you had some time with, I don't know, somebody, the president, the vice president, the Secretary of Commerce, someone in an elevator going from the first to the 10th floor, and you had to quickly say, “Here's what you need to be keeping in mind about AI over the next two to four years,” what would you say?I think the number one thing I would say is that, at the state level, we're wrapping a lot of red tape around innovative companies and individuals, and that we need to find a way to clear that thicket or stop it from growing any further. That's the number one challenge that I see facing this.Secondary to that, I would say the US government needs to figure out how to take advantage of these tools. The federal government is slow to adopt new technologies, but this technology has a lot of applications to the types of government work that hundreds of thousands of federal employees do every day, and so finding ways to streamline using AI to do the job better I think is really valuable, and I think it would be worth some investment at the federal level to think about how to do that well.On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedMicro Reads▶ Economics* Productivity During and Since the Pandemic - San Francisco Fed* The Effect of COVID-19 Immigration Restrictions on Post-Pandemic Labor Market Tightness - St. Louis Fed* Trump Plans Tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico That Could Cripple Trade - NYT▶ Business* Nvidia's new AI audio model can synthesize sounds that have never existed - Ars* Europe's Mistral expands in Silicon Valley in hunt for AI staff - FT▶ Policy/Politics* Musk Wants $2 Trillion of Spending Cuts. Here's Why That's Hard. - WSJ* AI Governance: From Fears and Fearmongering to Risks and Rewards - AEI* Newsom says California to offer EV subsidies if Trump kills federal tax credit - Wapo▶ AI/Digital* A new golden age of discovery - AI Policy Perspectives* How Do You Get to Artificial General Intelligence? Think Lighter - Wired* Is Creativity Dead? - NYT Opinion* The way we measure progress in AI is terrible - MIT* AI's scientific path to trust - Axios* AI Dash Cams Give Wake-Up Calls to Drowsy Drivers - Spectrum▶ Biotech/Health* Combining AI and Crispr Will Be Transformational - Wired* Neuralink Plans to Test Whether Its Brain Implant Can Control a Robotic Arm - Wired* Scientists are learning why ultra-processed foods are bad for you - Economist▶ Clean Energy/Climate* Taxing Farm Animals' Farts and Burps? Denmark Gives It a Try. - NYT* These batteries could harness the wind and sun to replace coal and gas - Wapo▶ Robotics/AVs* On the Wings of War - NYT▶ Up Wing/Down Wing* ‘Genesis' Review: Rise of the New Machines - WSJ* The Myth of the Loneliness Epidemic - Asterisk▶ Substacks/Newsletters* The Middle Income Trap - Conversable Economist * America's Productivity Boom - Apricitas Economics* The Rise of Anthropic powered by AWS - AI Supremacy* Data to start your week - Exponential View* Trump's economic team is on a collision course with reality - Slow Boring* Five Unmanned SpaceX Starships to Mars in 2026 with Thousands of Teslabots - next BIG futureFaster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Jordan's sister Jamie returns to give her a crash course on setting boundaries. They talk about trauma, self love and what it's like when your mom is a god. Download the PrizePicks app and use code: "JORDAN" The RIPJJ Patreon is now live! Become a member HERE. Catch Jordan out on the road! Tickets @ https://punchup.live/jordanjensen The RIP Jordan Jensen Theme Song is "Superstition" by Music Band Follow Jordan on YouTube, Instagram & TikTok Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Siblings Ashley Engle and Brandon Birdwell discuss life, birthday parties from the past, pirate themed restaurant pitches and Fran sings the hits!

“The Sun, the hearth of affection and life, pours burning love on the delighted Earth.” ― Arthur Rimbaud *THIS IS A RE-EDITED RERELEASE OF SZN 2 EP 22* NEW UPLOAD DAY.. who dis? We are going to start posting our "Moments" episodes every Friday from now on! This is because we are adding a react/review segment on Wednesdays now. Listen to the episode for more details! This week is our Science Moment and we're discussing weather on THE SUN! This episode is a continuation to our Lightning & Auroras science episodes, so make sure you listen to those, too. J. Daae goes solo this episode and breaks down some basic facts about El Sol, tries his best to explain what plasma is, how the Sun's magnetic field gets all tangled up and how those tangles release large amounts of energy into space. There is a lot more I can say about the Sun and go in depth about but I tried to keep this very simple so that you can understand how events happening on the Sun affects the Earth's atmosphere.  On every episode J & Lesly feature something they're loving right now called a Double Feature. We call it our DOUBLE FEATURE because there's two of us and we wanna feature some sh*t ☺. Our Double Feature for this episode is the HILARIOUS, CUTE and TALENTED ⁠@AdamRayOkay! Follow his social meeds⁠ and the reservation ⁠app OpenTable⁠! Muve nezuva rakanaka !! —————————————————— Did we mention we made a ⁠Spotify Playlist? Check it out! ⁠New playlist every month! ⁠FOLLOW US on INSTAGRAM @HomoInTraining⁠ Find us on ⁠Facebook! LIKE & FOLLOW our page!⁠ EMAIL us some science facts you wanna know: ⁠HomoInTrainingPodcast@gmail.com⁠ —————————————————— Sun info Youtube Videos: ⁠National Geographic⁠: Sun 101, ⁠Astrium⁠: Are explosions on the Sun a threat to us?, ⁠JoJo's Science Show - Kid Science⁠: The Science of Plasma and how a Plasma ball works and ⁠Crashcourse⁠: The Sun: Crash Course Astronomy #10 —————————————————— Music Credit: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Jazzy Abstract Beat by Coma-Media⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ——————————————————

This week we are releasing one of our Patreon Live episodes! We had some last-minute hiccups so we weren't able to record. Bri tells you about some unfortunate ends to what should of been the "happiest day of their lives." Tragic bride to be's visiting the sweet here after at hotels people stay at every day. These stories will send chill up your spine. Amy shares a story about a scum of the earth who put a hit out on his perfect wife and mother of his 8 children. But no worries, the hitman really enjoyed her chicken casserole so it backfired on the husband.  Don't forget to send your SPOOKY SCARY SKELETON STORIES to wwtnpodcast@gmail.com Also instead of sharing ways you can help out the podcast we wanna share ways to help out Hurricane Helene victims... https://www.redcross.org/donate/dr/hurricane-helene.html/ https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/3A4N5MLYU4U1Z?ref_=wl_share&fbclid=IwY2xjawFuzNpleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHWrjymx7hUWTGOK2avqY41rTp9fpl4PBgyYbk6l6K6A36oqGeV1JUP0Y8g_aem_PTmvY0FA6znBrYFG9daaGAhttps://www.gofundme.com/c/act/hurricane-helene     

 It almost feels like we're reporting from the zoo on News Time today! I've got burping cows, comforting turtles and some lucky pups at a pet rescue lined up for you.Quiz Questions1.Can you name one of Selwyn's pet dogs?2.What's the thing, starting with M, that can be found in cow emissions?3.What did Dr. Louise name the turtle?4.Which state won the First Nations Tournament?5.What was Joel searching for when he spotted the crater?Bonus Tricky QuestionWhat was the score at the end of the final netball game of the tournament?Answers1.Mindy, Lindy, Rover and Buddy are all correct answers2.Methane3.Timmy4.Queensland5.A place to campBonus Tricky AnswerQueensland 37 - South Australia 35

The burps and farts of farm cows around the globe are a major contributor to methane pollution, with the average dairy cow producing about 98kg of methane annually. For decades, scientists have been working on a methane-reducing vaccine for cows with little success, until now. A prototype vaccine by US-based start-up Arkeabio is showing promise following a trial with 10 cows that saw emissions drop by nearly 13 percent. It targets the methane-producing bacteria that lives in the bovine digestive system. Arkeabio founder and CEO Colin South joins the show to discuss the vaccine and how it works.

Influencers are becoming really annoying. Also, Ripley and cat can't be in the same kennel. Animation, children's books, eating bugs and MORE, on this week's MONDAY Show! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.