Podcasts about despite donald trump

Despite Donald Trump-induced volatility in global markets, Ian Anderson, head of listed property and portfolio manager at Merchant West Investments, is confident SA Reits will weather the storm, saying the sector is ‘better placed' than during the Covid-19 pandemic fallout. Podcast series on Moneyweb

Elias Makos is joined by Paul Gott, Lead singer and guitarist for Montreal Punk Rock band the Ripcordz and a journalism professor at Concordia, and Caroline Codsi, Founder & Chief Equity Officer, Women in Governance. Quebec and Canada are mostly exempt from the latest US tariffs announced by Donald Trump, but a 25% tariff on some Canadian auto products takes effect at midnight, with steel and aluminum tariffs remaining Despite Donald Trump’s promise of rapid job growth and investment from his new tariffs, the National Association of Manufacturers warns that high tariffs could hurt investment and competitiveness Earlier in the week, a controversial nine-second clip of one of Pierre Poilievre’s campaign stops made the rounds on social media The former leader of the Reform Party of Canada has a warning: “Mark Carney poses a threat to national unity.”

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive and contentious policy initiative, it becomes clear that this is more than just a set of recommendations – it's a blueprint for a radical transformation of the American government. Crafted by over 400 scholars and experts, predominantly from the Heritage Foundation, this 900-page document outlines a vision for a conservative administration that is both ambitious and alarming.At its core, Project 2025 aims to reshape the federal government in a way that consolidates executive power and aligns it with right-wing ideologies. One of the most striking aspects is the proposal to replace merit-based federal civil service workers with individuals loyal to the president, a move that critics argue would undermine the impartiality of the civil service system. This plan includes taking partisan control of key government agencies such as the Department of Justice, Department of Commerce, and Federal Trade Commission, while dismantling or abolishing others like the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Education[1][2][4].The project's vision for education is particularly telling. It advocates for a significant reduction in the federal government's role in education, promoting school choice and parental rights over federal oversight. This would involve closing the Department of Education and transferring its responsibilities to the states. Programs under the Individuals with Disabilities' Education Act (IDEA) would be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services, and federal enforcement of civil rights in schools would be curtailed. The project blames federal overreach for schools prioritizing "racial parity in school discipline indicators" over student safety, reflecting a broader theme of reducing federal involvement in what it sees as local issues[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes significant changes, including cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and the promotion of private health insurance options like Medicare Advantage. It also aims to restrict access to medication abortion and defund stem cell research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), aligning with conservative principles on healthcare and research[1][5].The economic policies outlined in Project 2025 are equally far-reaching. The plan calls for reducing taxes on corporations and capital gains, instituting a flat income tax, and rolling back environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels. It also proposes eliminating funding for key public transportation projects and restricting safety nets for farmers, measures that could disproportionately impact low-income farmers and communities reliant on public transportation[1][5].Technology and media policies are another critical area of focus. Project 2025 recommends increasing agency accountability at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) while decreasing what it deems as wasteful spending. It also suggests promoting national security and economic prosperity by expanding 5G connectivity and satellite services like StarLink. The plan criticizes current media ownership regulations as outdated and stifling competition, while advocating for Big Tech companies to contribute to the Universal Service Fund[2].One of the most contentious aspects of Project 2025 is its stance on social issues. The project proposes criminalizing pornography, removing legal protections against anti-LGBT discrimination, and ending diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across the federal government. It also calls for the prosecution of what it terms "anti-white racism" and the mass deportation of illegal immigrants, with the U.S. Armed Forces potentially deployed for domestic law enforcement[1].The implications of these policies are profound. Critics argue that Project 2025's recommendations would undermine democratic institutions, dismantle civil liberties, and concentrate presidential power in ways that are authoritarian and autocratic. Legal experts warn that these changes would erode the rule of law, the separation of powers, and the separation of church and state[1][2][4].Despite Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, many of his recent policies align closely with its proposals. For instance, Trump's executive order ending all DEI programs within the federal government and his suggestions to dismantle FEMA and leave disaster response to the states mirror key recommendations in Project 2025[3][4].The reaction from Democrats has been vehement. They see Project 2025 as a blueprint for a second Trump administration's most draconian policies, and have launched campaigns to tie Trump directly to the project. As James Singer, a spokesperson for the Biden campaign, put it, "248 years ago tomorrow America declared independence from a tyrannical king, and now Donald Trump and his allies want to make him one at our expense"[4].As we look ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's policies will depend on several key milestones. With Trump's second term underway, the nomination of several architects and supporters of the plan to positions in his administration suggests a strong likelihood that many of these proposals will be pursued. The upcoming legislative sessions and potential Supreme Court rulings will be crucial in determining the extent to which these radical changes can be enacted.In conclusion, Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in the way the federal government could operate, with far-reaching implications for American governance, civil liberties, and social policies. As the country navigates these proposed changes, it is imperative to engage in a nuanced and informed discussion about the future of American democracy and the values it upholds. The next few years will be pivotal in shaping whether these ambitious – and often contentious – policies become the new norm.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sense of unease settles in, not just because of the radical nature of its proposals, but also due to the incremental and strategic ways these policies are being implemented. This 900-page blueprint, crafted by the Heritage Foundation and a cohort of conservative scholars, is more than just a distant vision; it is a meticulously laid out plan to reshape the very fabric of American governance.At its core, Project 2025 aims to centralize power in the executive branch, a move that critics argue would erode the system of checks and balances that has been a cornerstone of American democracy. One of the most alarming aspects of this plan is the proposed reinstatement of Schedule F, an executive order that former President Trump issued in October 2020. This order would strip career government employees of their employment protections, allowing the president to fire and replace them with loyalists and ideologues at will[3].The implications of Schedule F are far-reaching. It would politicize the civil service, enabling the president to dismiss dedicated civil servants who have spent years serving the nation, regardless of their performance. This move would not only undermine the continuity and integrity of government operations but also pave the way for an authoritarian takeover. As the Kettering Foundation explains, "Understanding the Schedule F threat is critical to stopping it," because it fundamentally changes the character of the federal government, advancing the US toward authoritarianism[3].Project 2025's vision for federal agencies is equally troubling. The plan calls for dismantling or abolishing key agencies such as the Department of Education and the Department of Homeland Security, while significantly altering the roles of others like the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The DOJ, for instance, would be thoroughly reformed to combat what Project 2025 terms "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," a move that would involve prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs[2].The impact on public education is particularly devastating. Project 2025 proposes eliminating Title I funding, which has provided critical financial support to high-poverty schools since 1965. Instead, states would receive no-strings-attached block grants with zero regulations or oversight. This change would strain already tight education budgets, undermine academic outcomes for millions of vulnerable students, and exacerbate teacher shortages in low-income communities. As Will Ragland from the Center for American Progress notes, "Removing Title I funding would mean losing thousands of teachers and ultimately limiting children's access to quality instruction"[4].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025's proposals are starkly at odds with the needs of many Americans. The plan includes slashing Medicare and Medicaid, stripping away healthcare coverage for pre-existing conditions, and criminalizing the sending and receiving of abortion and birth control medications. These measures would have far-reaching consequences, particularly for women facing severe health risks during pregnancy, who may be denied life-saving care if abortion is not considered healthcare[1].The project's stance on immigration is equally draconian. It recommends transferring custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), prioritizing enforcement over welfare. This move would expand detention centers and worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children. Additionally, the plan proposes mass deportation of illegal immigrants and the deployment of the U.S. Armed Forces for domestic law enforcement[1][2].In the realm of media and technology, Project 2025's policies are designed to align with a conservative agenda. The plan includes reducing agency accountability and decreasing wasteful spending, while promoting national security and economic prosperity. For instance, it suggests that Big Tech companies should contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills. The project also advocates for increasing transparency in media ownership to ensure national security and reducing regulations on media ownership to stimulate competition[5].The broader theme here is one of control and centralization. Project 2025 seeks to place the entire executive branch under direct presidential control, eliminating the independence of agencies like the DOJ, the FBI, and the Federal Communications Commission. This expansive interpretation of presidential power, rooted in the unitary executive theory, aims to centralize greater control over the government in the White House. As Kevin Roberts, a proponent of Project 2025, puts it, all federal employees should answer directly to the president[2].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this is not just a policy agenda but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's architects see it as "the next conservative President's last opportunity to save our republic," but critics, including Vice-President Kamala Harris, describe it as a plan to "return America to a dark past"[4].The latest developments are equally concerning. Despite Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from the plan, many of his allies and former administration officials have been involved in its creation. Since his re-election in 2024, Trump has nominated several of the plan's architects and supporters to key positions in his administration. Analysis by *Time* found that nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions mirror or partially mirror proposals from Project 2025[2].As we move forward, the implications of Project 2025 will become increasingly evident. The upcoming months will be crucial as these policies are implemented and tested. The American public, already largely opposed to the plan, will be watching closely. Polls indicate that the more people learn about Project 2025, the more they dislike it, with 53% opposing the plan and only 12% supporting it[4].In conclusion, Project 2025 represents a substantial threat not only to individual rights but also to the very foundation of American democracy. Its incremental steps, already being taken in states and through legal challenges, foreshadow a future where the rights of marginalized groups are further compromised. As we navigate this critical period, it is essential to remain vigilant and informed, ensuring that the democratic principles that have defined America are not eroded by the radical ambitions of Project 2025.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and alarm. This sprawling, 900-page policy blueprint, crafted by the Heritage Foundation and a coalition of over 100 conservative groups, is more than just a set of recommendations; it's a comprehensive roadmap for a radical transformation of the American government.At its core, Project 2025 aims to reshape the federal government in a way that consolidates executive power, particularly in favor of a conservative agenda. The project's architects envision a government where key agencies, such as the Department of Justice, the Department of Commerce, and the Federal Trade Commission, are brought under direct presidential control, eliminating their independence[1][3][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to replace merit-based federal civil service workers with loyalists to the president. This is achieved through a mechanism known as Schedule F, which allows for the transfer of civil service employees into a category where they lose their protections against political overreach and abuse of power. This move would grant the president and his loyalists unparalleled control over the executive branch, raising serious concerns about the erosion of democratic institutions and civil liberties[2][3][4].The project's scope is vast and far-reaching. For instance, it proposes the dismantling or abolition of several federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Education. The Department of State is also targeted, with plans to dismiss its leadership and replace them with acting roles that do not require Senate confirmation. Kiron Skinner, who wrote the State Department chapter, believes most State Department employees are too left-wing and need to be replaced by those more aligned with conservative values[1][2][4].Project 2025's policy objectives are equally ambitious. It advocates for significant tax cuts on corporations and capital gains, the implementation of a flat income tax, and reductions in Medicare and Medicaid. Environmental regulations would be rolled back to favor fossil fuels, and the National Institutes of Health would see its independence diminished, with a halt to its stem cell research funding. The project also proposes criminalizing pornography, removing legal protections against anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination, and ending diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. Instead, the Department of Justice would focus on prosecuting what the project terms "anti-white racism"[1][2][4].The plan's stance on immigration is particularly draconian, calling for the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants, as well as the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement. It also suggests enacting laws supported by the Christian right, including criminalizing the sending and receiving of abortion and birth control medications and eliminating coverage of emergency contraception[1].In the realm of media and technology, Project 2025's proposals are equally radical. It recommends defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports PBS and NPR, and revoking NPR stations' noncommercial status. This could force these stations to relocate on the FM dial, making way for religious programming. The project also advocates for more media consolidation, allowing local news programs to be converted into national ones. Social media companies would be required to not remove "core political viewpoints" from their platforms, and TikTok would be banned. Furthermore, the Federal Elections Commission would be prevented from countering misinformation or disinformation about election integrity[1][3].The implications of these proposals are profound. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, endangering democratic institutions and civil liberties. The project's emphasis on centralizing power in the White House, based on a controversial interpretation of the unitary executive theory, raises concerns about the potential for abuse of power and the undermining of independent agencies like the FBI and the Federal Communications Commission[1][3][4].Despite Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from Project 2025, the overlap between his policies and the project's recommendations is undeniable. Trump's recent actions, such as reviewing FEMA's role in disaster response and withdrawing from the World Health Organization, align closely with Project 2025's proposals. The project's authors and contributors, many of whom worked in Trump's last administration or on his election campaign, see their goals as closely aligned with Trump's Agenda 47 program[1][4][5].As we move forward, the potential implementation of Project 2025's policies looms large. With Trump's second term underway, the stage is set for a significant reshaping of American governance. The next few months will be crucial, as the administration begins to enact its policies and face the inevitable pushback from opponents.In the words of Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation, "We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." This statement, made on a conservative podcast, underscores the high stakes and the deep divisions that Project 2025 embodies[4].As I reflect on Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy document but a vision for a fundamentally different America. Whether this vision will come to fruition remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: the journey ahead will be marked by intense political battles and profound implications for the future of American democracy.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a blueprint crafted by conservative extremists and political operatives, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of this radical plan. Released by the Heritage Foundation in April 2023, Project 2025 is more than just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive roadmap for a sweeping overhaul of the federal government, designed to be implemented in the event of a Republican victory in the 2024 presidential election.At its core, Project 2025 is a 927-page manifesto divided into 30 chapters, each targeting a specific federal department. The authors, many of whom are former Trump administration officials, envision a future where the federal government is radically reshaped to align with far-right ideologies. This vision is encapsulated in the project's stated goal to "destroy the Administrative State" and replace it with a system where political loyalists hold key positions of power[3].One of the most alarming aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to centralize executive power, effectively undermining the independence of various federal agencies. The plan advocates for the elimination of civil service protections, allowing the president to hire unlimited political appointees without expiration dates. This scheme, known as Schedule F, would transfer apolitical civil service employees into a category where they would be vulnerable to political overreach and abuse of power. As Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation, put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president," reflecting a unitary executive theory that seeks to consolidate greater control over the government in the White House[2][3].The implications of such a shift are profound. For instance, Project 2025 proposes dismantling or abolishing several key agencies, including the Department of Education and the Department of Homeland Security. In their place, the plan suggests installing senior leaders in "acting" roles that do not require Senate confirmation. This move would ensure that these agencies are run by individuals loyal to a conservative president, rather than by career civil servants who might resist partisan manipulation[2].The Department of Justice (DOJ) is another target, with Project 2025 aiming to eliminate its independence. The plan recommends that the DOJ prosecute anti-white racism instead of protecting against anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination, a stark reversal of current civil rights priorities. This aligns with the broader theme of Project 2025: to prioritize enforcement over welfare and exclusion over inclusion. As seen in the proposal to transfer custody of immigrant children from Health and Human Services (HHS) to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), this approach would likely worsen the safety and psychological well-being of vulnerable immigrant children[1][2].Healthcare is another critical area where Project 2025's policies could have devastating consequences. The plan includes proposals to cut Medicare and Medicaid, strip away healthcare coverage for pre-existing conditions, and criminalize the sending and receiving of abortion and birth control medications. These measures would not only undermine reproductive rights but also leave millions of Americans without essential healthcare services. As Vice-President Kamala Harris warned, "Project 2025 is a plan to return America to a dark past"[4].The impact on public education is equally dire. Project 2025 plans to gut federal education funding, eliminate Title I funding for high-poverty schools, and introduce federal voucher laws that would benefit private schools at the expense of public education. This would exacerbate existing teacher shortages and destabilize local school budgets, ultimately limiting children's access to quality instruction. Jessica Levin of the Education Law Center aptly described the Arizona voucher program, which Project 2025 aims to model, as "Exhibit A" of the disastrous implications for students and public schools[4].In addition to these domestic policy changes, Project 2025 also outlines a series of controversial measures related to media and information control. The plan proposes defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, revoking NPR stations' noncommercial status, and forcing them to relocate to less favorable positions on the FM dial. This would pave the way for religious programming to dominate public airwaves. Furthermore, the project suggests banning TikTok and preventing social media companies from removing "core political viewpoints" from their platforms, which could lead to the unchecked spread of misinformation[2].Despite Donald Trump's public disavowal of Project 2025, the connections between the former president and the initiative are undeniable. Many of the plan's architects and contributors are former Trump administration officials, and Trump has nominated several of these individuals to positions in his administration following his 2024 election victory. As CBS News noted, nearly two-thirds of Trump's executive actions in his second term "mirror or partially mirror" proposals from Project 2025[5].The public's reaction to Project 2025 has been overwhelmingly negative. Polls indicate that a significant majority of Americans, including a substantial portion of non-MAGA Republicans, oppose the plan. The more people learn about Project 2025, the more they dislike it, with concerns ranging from the firing of civil service employees to the stripping of healthcare coverage for pre-existing conditions[4].As we look ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's policies will be a critical test of American governance. The plan's proponents are gearing up for a rapid rollout of their agenda, with a 180-day playbook outlining specific steps for the new administration. This includes a prepared stack of executive orders ready to be signed on the first day in office. The coming months will reveal whether these radical changes can be enacted without significant resistance from Congress, the judiciary, and the American public.In the words of Kevin Roberts, "the nation is in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be." However, for many, Project 2025 represents not a revolution but a regression—a return to a past marked by inequality, exclusion, and the erosion of democratic principles. As the nation navigates this tumultuous period, one thing is clear: the future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the choices made now will have far-reaching consequences for generations to come.

Despite Donald Trump being accommodating to staffers whose views on race would be disqualifying in most administrations, a member of Elon Musk's team has reportedly resigned after the discovery of his past racist online statements. Rachel Maddow looks at new details that are coming to light about some of the other members of Musk's crew that will make people already uncomfortable with Musk's overreach feel even worse.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a federal policy agenda crafted by former Trump administration officials in collaboration with The Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this initiative is more than just a set of policy proposals – it's a blueprint for a radical restructuring of the American government.Project 2025, encapsulated in the 900-page manual "Mandate For Leadership," is a comprehensive plan to reorganize the entire federal government, agency by agency, to align with a conservative agenda. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank known for its opposition to abortion and reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, immigrants' rights, and racial equity, is at the helm of this project. Despite Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself, the connections run deep; at least 140 people involved in Project 2025 previously worked in Trump's administration, and Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, who was part of Trump's transition team in 2016, has described the project as "institutionalizing Trumpism"[1][2][3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its sweeping overhaul of federal agencies. For instance, the project proposes merging the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Census Bureau, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics into a single entity, aligning its mission with conservative principles. This includes maximizing the hiring of political appointees in statistical analysis positions, a move that could significantly politicize data collection and analysis[3].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 outlines a future where the Department of Energy focuses on fundamental research rather than energy technology development and climate change programs. The report suggests eliminating many DOE offices and programs, arguing they act as subsidies to the private sector. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would also face significant changes, with proposals to prevent the agency from using certain climate change impact projections and to require clear congressional authorization for any science activity. Mandy Gunasekara, former chief of staff at the EPA during the Trump administration, authored the EPA chapter, reflecting the deep ties between Project 2025 and Trump's previous policies[2].The project's vision for the executive branch is perhaps its most contentious aspect. It seeks to place the entire executive branch under direct presidential control, eliminating the independence of agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This is based on an expansive interpretation of the unitary executive theory, which aims to centralize greater control in the White House. As Kevin Roberts put it, "all federal employees should answer to the president"[3].Project 2025 also delves into personnel changes, proposing the reclassification of tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees. This would allow for the replacement of current employees with Trump loyalists, using a questionnaire to screen potential recruits for their adherence to the project's agenda. This approach is reminiscent of Trump's previous efforts to remove employees he deemed disloyal, regardless of their ideological convictions[3].The impact on social and economic policies is equally profound. Project 2025 recommends work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which issues food stamps, and suggests legislation to pay Americans more for working on Sundays, citing the biblical ordinance of the Sabbath. It also proposes cutting overtime protections for 4.3 million workers, limiting access to food assistance for over 40 million people, and denying students in 25 states and Washington, D.C. access to student loans if their schools provide in-state tuition to undocumented immigrants[5].In the area of civil rights, Project 2025 is particularly draconian. It recommends rolling back civil rights protections, cutting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, and targeting LGBTQ+ rights in healthcare, education, and workplaces. The DOJ's Civil Rights Division would be reformed to combat what the project calls "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism," a stance that former Trump DOJ official Gene Hamilton argues is necessary to prevent the advancement of certain segments of society at the expense of others[3].The project's approach to law enforcement is also noteworthy. It suggests that the DOJ has become a "bloated bureaucracy" infatuated with a "radical liberal agenda" and must be thoroughly reformed and closely overseen by the White House. The director of the FBI would be made personally accountable to the president, and legal settlements between the DOJ and local police departments would be curtailed[3].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it's clear that this initiative represents a fundamental shift in how the federal government operates. It centralizes power, politicizes agencies, and rolls back protections for various segments of the population. The project's authors and supporters see it as a necessary correction to what they perceive as a liberal bias in the current system, but critics argue it erodes democracy and promotes inequality.Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals will depend on several factors, including the outcome of future elections and the willingness of Congress to support these radical changes. As the 2025 timeline approaches, the country will be watching closely to see how these plans unfold. Will Project 2025 succeed in reshaping the federal government, or will it face significant resistance? The answer will have profound implications for American governance and the lives of millions of Americans.

Despite Donald Trump announcing that the U.S. will withdraw from the Paris Agreement, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has reaffirmed his party's commitment to the accord. Gary Hardgrave said on 4BC Drive, "I just have to tell you, Peter, because I'm a mate of yours. I want to tell you this straight. This is not what people want to hear." "Particularly, given everything that's happened in the last 36 hours in the United States, changes are coming in the world and we want it to happen here in Australia," he continued. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Supreme Court has upheld Congress's law banning TikTok, but there's more developing on the app's future practically every hour. Despite Donald Trump signing an executive order to ban TikTok during his first term, on the first day of his second term, he floated a "50% joint venture" between TikTok and the U.S. government. Congress has no idea how to feel about the national security concerns on both sides of the aisle. Luckily, Dave Ball is just learning the app exists.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I was struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2023, outlines a radical transformation of American governance, touching on virtually every aspect of federal policy, from education and healthcare to technology and environmental regulation.At its core, Project 2025 is a manifesto for a conservative revolution, envisioning a federal government reshaped in the image of a strong, centralized executive branch. The project's architects argue that the current system of independent federal agencies undermines the democratic republic, and they propose placing the entire executive branch under direct presidential control. As Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts puts it, "The notion of independent federal agencies or federal employees who don't answer to the president violates the very foundation of our democratic republic."[1]One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its plan to dismantle and reconfigure several key federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. Education would be left to the states, with federal funding for low-income students, such as Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, allowed to expire. Instead, public funds would be channeled into school vouchers, even for private or religious schools, reflecting the project's belief that education is a private rather than a public good[1].The Department of Homeland Security would also face significant changes, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This move is part of a broader strategy to reshape national security and immigration policies, including the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants and the deployment of the military for domestic law enforcement[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 proposes drastic cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and it urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The plan also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. This stance is part of a broader agenda to roll back reproductive rights and impose conservative moral values on healthcare policy[1].The project's vision for science and research is equally transformative. It prioritizes fundamental research over applied research, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. Climate change research would be significantly curtailed, with the U.S. Global Change and Research Program facing critical analysis and potential rejection of its assessments prepared under the Biden administration. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be restricted from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts, and its science activities would require clear congressional authorization[4].Project 2025 also targets the tech and media landscape, proposing significant reforms to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The plan includes increasing agency accountability, reducing wasteful spending, and promoting national security and economic prosperity. It suggests that Big Tech companies should contribute to the Universal Service Fund, currently funded through telephone bills, to support the expansion of 5G and satellite connectivity. Additionally, the project advocates for revising Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, limiting social media's ability to moderate content and ban individuals from their platforms[3].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked intense debate. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, undermining the system of checks and balances that is foundational to American democracy. As one analysis notes, "Project 2025 would destroy the U.S. system of checks and balances and create an imperial presidency," giving the president almost unlimited power to implement policies without significant oversight[5].The project's stance on civil rights is particularly contentious. It rejects diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives as "managerialist left-wing race and gender ideology" and proposes banning funding for critical race theory. The Department of Justice and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission would be used to undermine protections for LGBTQ employees and to prosecute private employers that support DEIA in their workplaces[2].As I navigated the complex web of policies outlined in Project 2025, it became clear that this initiative is not just a collection of policy proposals but a coherent vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's backers see it as a necessary corrective to what they perceive as the "totalitarian cult" of the "Great Awokening," a term they use to describe the cultural and political shifts of recent years[3].Despite Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, many of its authors have close ties to his administration. The connection is evident in the overlap between Project 2025's recommendations and Trump's own policy agenda. For example, Trump has called for NPR funding to be rescinded, echoing Project 2025's criticism of public broadcasting as a "liberal disinformation machine"[3].As the 2025 presidential transition approaches, the potential implementation of Project 2025's policies looms large. The project's authors envision an "army of aligned, vetted, trained, and prepared" personnel ready to execute these reforms swiftly. If realized, these changes would mark a seismic shift in American governance, one that could redefine the balance of power between the executive branch and other institutions of government.In the coming months, as the political landscape continues to evolve, the fate of Project 2025 will remain a critical point of contention. Whether its proposals are adopted in whole or in part, one thing is certain: the initiative has already sparked a national conversation about the future of American democracy and the role of the federal government in shaping that future. As we move forward, it will be essential to closely monitor these developments and consider the profound implications they hold for the country's governance, civil rights, and societal values.

As host Tim Boyum continues to look at the results of the 2024 election, longtime Republican Jim Blaine joins him to offer his perspective on why President-elect Donald Trump won. Despite Donald Trump's more than 3-percentage point victory in North Carolina, Democrats celebrated Election Day victories in races for governor, attorney general and the legislature. With the 2026 and 2028 elections in sight, both parties are already maneuvering for position. Blaine breaks down those moving pieces.

COLUMBUS DAY / INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' DAY / CLASSIC EPISODE FROM SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 -- On the Show: -- Doctor Steven Hassan, world-renowned cult expert and author of "The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control," joins David to discuss his understanding of the MAGA movement through a cult lens. Get the book: https://amzn.to/4dTBM4q -- Allan Lichtman, top longtime election predictor, predicts that Kamala Harris will defeat Donald Trump in the November presidential election -- A new poll finds that Kamala Harris leads Donald Trump among Latino voters by 27 points, but this is actually a smaller lead than that which previous Democrats have held over Republicans -- A number of pro-Trump influencers, including Dave Rubin, Tim Pool, Benny Johnson, and Lauren Chen, have been named in an indictment related to Russian influence campaigns --Despite Donald Trump calling New York City a crime-ridden hellscape, and despite New York University being a "woke" institution, Barron Trump will be attending NYU in New York City -- Donald Trump appears to forget who he is running against in a disastrous Fox News town hall hosted by Sean Hannity -- Kamala Harris announces a major tax proposal and Donald Trump absolutely loses it -- Voicemail caller asks how to get the free goodies with David's forthcoming book, The Echo Machine. Get the book: https://davidpakman.com/echo -- On the Bonus Show: Republican Liz Cheney says she's voting for Kamala Harris, Ken Paxton threatens to block Democrats from registering to vote, Trump media stock crashing, much more... -- Become a Member: https://www.davidpakman.com/membership -- Become a Patron: https://www.patreon.com/davidpakmanshow -- TDPS Subreddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpakmanshow -- Pakman Discord: https://www.davidpakman.com/discord -- David on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/davidpakmanshow -- Leave a Voicemail: (219)-2DAVIDP

In this episode of Hollywood Live, Tanya Hart dives into Taylor Swift's surging popularity following her endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris. Despite Donald Trump's prediction that Swift would “pay a price” for the endorsement, the opposite has happened. Taylor has seen a spike in followers, gaining 1 million on Spotify and increasing her Instagram count by 260,000, bringing her to 280.3 million followers. It seems Kamala Harris is good for business, which might be why Bruce Springsteen has also voiced his support for the Vice President. Tanya also explores the controversy surrounding Beyoncé's country album, Cowboy Carter, which recently made history on Billboard's Top Country Album Charts but was snubbed by the Country Music Awards. Despite praise from fans and country artists like Luke Bryan and even Dolly Parton, the album failed to receive a single nomination. Tanya points out that while the country world may feel the need to honor its long-standing members, Beyoncé has been in the music game her entire life. For these stories and more, follow Tanya on social media and check out AURN's YouTube channel for exclusive interviews with stars like Debbie Allen and Fat Joe. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

-- On the Show: -- Doctor Steven Hassan, world-renowned cult expert and author of "The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control," joins David to discuss his understanding of the MAGA movement through a cult lens. Get the book: https://amzn.to/4dTBM4q -- Allan Lichtman, top longtime election predictor, predicts that Kamala Harris will defeat Donald Trump in the November presidential election -- A new poll finds that Kamala Harris leads Donald Trump among Latino voters by 27 points, but this is actually a smaller lead than that which previous Democrats have held over Republicans -- A number of pro-Trump influencers, including Dave Rubin, Tim Pool, Benny Johnson, and Lauren Chen, have been named in an indictment related to Russian influence campaigns --Despite Donald Trump calling New York City a crime-ridden hellscape, and despite New York University being a "woke" institution, Barron Trump will be attending NYU in New York City -- Donald Trump appears to forget who he is running against in a disastrous Fox News town hall hosted by Sean Hannity -- Kamala Harris announces a major tax proposal and Donald Trump absolutely loses it -- Voicemail caller asks how to get the free goodies with David's forthcoming book, The Echo Machine. Get the book: https://davidpakman.com/echo -- On the Bonus Show: Republican Liz Cheney says she's voting for Kamala Harris, Ken Paxton threatens to block Democrats from registering to vote, Trump media stock crashing, much more...

Despite Donald Trump's efforts, there will be a significant cost for his continued defamation of E. Jean Carroll (And it's $83.3 million!!). For much of the proceedings he sat behind Carroll muttering under his breath and posting three-dozen times on Truth Social in one night about the unfairness of the judge and the court. But zoom out, and Trump's actions at the trial and toward women generally have far bigger implications than the size of the check he'll have to write. This week, Vanity Fair's Molly Jong-Fast joins Dahlia Lithwick to explain how Trump has fanned the flames of GOP misogyny playing out in every aspect of our politics, from the GOP primary to the leadership in the House of Representatives to women who have been raped in states with no access to abortion. And she asks what it ultimately says about our justice system that 80-year-old E. Jean Carroll is the one prepared to take the stand against the man who assaulted her. In this week's Amicus Plus segment, Slate's Mark Joseph Stern discusses the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision that kinda sorta resolved the battle between federal immigration authorities and Texas Governor Greg Abbott, and the horrifying turn the conservative turn has taken on capital punishment this week. Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Despite Donald Trump's efforts, there will be a significant cost for his continued defamation of E. Jean Carroll (And it's $83.3 million!!). For much of the proceedings he sat behind Carroll muttering under his breath and posting three-dozen times on Truth Social in one night about the unfairness of the judge and the court. But zoom out, and Trump's actions at the trial and toward women generally have far bigger implications than the size of the check he'll have to write. This week, Vanity Fair's Molly Jong-Fast joins Dahlia Lithwick to explain how Trump has fanned the flames of GOP misogyny playing out in every aspect of our politics, from the GOP primary to the leadership in the House of Representatives to women who have been raped in states with no access to abortion. And she asks what it ultimately says about our justice system that 80-year-old E. Jean Carroll is the one prepared to take the stand against the man who assaulted her. In this week's Amicus Plus segment, Slate's Mark Joseph Stern discusses the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision that kinda sorta resolved the battle between federal immigration authorities and Texas Governor Greg Abbott, and the horrifying turn the conservative turn has taken on capital punishment this week. Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Despite Donald Trump's efforts, there will be a significant cost for his continued defamation of E. Jean Carroll (And it's $83.3 million!!). For much of the proceedings he sat behind Carroll muttering under his breath and posting three-dozen times on Truth Social in one night about the unfairness of the judge and the court. But zoom out, and Trump's actions at the trial and toward women generally have far bigger implications than the size of the check he'll have to write. This week, Vanity Fair's Molly Jong-Fast joins Dahlia Lithwick to explain how Trump has fanned the flames of GOP misogyny playing out in every aspect of our politics, from the GOP primary to the leadership in the House of Representatives to women who have been raped in states with no access to abortion. And she asks what it ultimately says about our justice system that 80-year-old E. Jean Carroll is the one prepared to take the stand against the man who assaulted her. In this week's Amicus Plus segment, Slate's Mark Joseph Stern discusses the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision that kinda sorta resolved the battle between federal immigration authorities and Texas Governor Greg Abbott, and the horrifying turn the conservative turn has taken on capital punishment this week. Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Despite Donald Trump's efforts, there will be a significant cost for his continued defamation of E. Jean Carroll (And it's $83.3 million!!). For much of the proceedings he sat behind Carroll muttering under his breath and posting three-dozen times on Truth Social in one night about the unfairness of the judge and the court. But zoom out, and Trump's actions at the trial and toward women generally have far bigger implications than the size of the check he'll have to write. This week, Vanity Fair's Molly Jong-Fast joins Dahlia Lithwick to explain how Trump has fanned the flames of GOP misogyny playing out in every aspect of our politics, from the GOP primary to the leadership in the House of Representatives to women who have been raped in states with no access to abortion. And she asks what it ultimately says about our justice system that 80-year-old E. Jean Carroll is the one prepared to take the stand against the man who assaulted her. In this week's Amicus Plus segment, Slate's Mark Joseph Stern discusses the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision that kinda sorta resolved the battle between federal immigration authorities and Texas Governor Greg Abbott, and the horrifying turn the conservative turn has taken on capital punishment this week. Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Despite Donald Trump leading in the polls, victory in the GOP presidential primaries isn't certain. Ahead of the Iowa caucuses, Trump hopes to extinguish his opponents. But history has shown that not every winner in Iowa goes on to become the nominee. Read more:Donald Trump has consistently led his opponents in polling for the Republican nomination, often by a wide margin. But victory isn't certain. In Iowa, the first state in the Republican primaries, Trump wants to fully knock out his competitors, but that may be easier said than done. Support for former U.N ambassador Nikki Haley appears to be growing, and even if Haley loses in Iowa, a strong performance could give her campaign enough momentum to win in New Hampshire later this month. Meryl Kornfield, Michael Scherer and Hannah Knowles join us from the campaign trail to explain everything ahead of the caucuses in Iowa on Monday.

Despite Donald Trump's absence, the first GOP debate had plenty of fireworks. Who emerged as a winner/loser? Tucker Carlson interviews Trump on X. Fauci warns COVID is due for a comeback.

Despite Donald Trump being charged with conspiring to overturn the US election result in 2020, he is currently ahead of candidates for the Republican nomination for president. On Thursday, former US President Donald Trump pleaded not guilty in a Washington DC court to conspiring to overturn his 2020 election defeat. But, in the latest nationwide poll, he was on level pegging with Joe Biden. He could win the presidential election. Can anti-Trump Republicans turn this around? Today's Justin Webb heard from John Fredericks, a radio talk show host whose show is syndicated nationally across America, and speaks to Scott Jennings, a former Republican special assistant to President George W. Bush and to Will Hurd, former Texas GOP Congressman & Republican candidate for the presidential nomination. Photo credit: REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg

Despite Donald Trump's objections, Mike Pence testified before the Jan. 6th grand jury for several hours last week. But if you strip away the insurrection and the attempt to overturn the election, did Trump also try to solicit a crime of violence against Pence himself? MSNBC legal analysts Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord get into that and what it could all mean for Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation.

Despite Donald Trump claiming there would be massive protest and "potential death & destruction" if he were to be indicted, only a small number of Trump supporters showed up to Mar-a-Lago to protest the Manhattan District Attorney's decision, RadarOnline.com has learned.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

On today's podcast show, we talk about the Leftist who are having a Nuclear meltdown and a temper tantrum over Donald Trump returning to Twitter. Despite Donald Trump having his own social medial platform called Truth Social.  Source: Donald trump Back on Twitter. https://nypost.com/2022/11/19/trump-to-be-reinstated-on-twitter-after-elon-musk-posts-poll/ Leftist are having a nuclear Meltdown over Trump. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/liberals-twitter-fume-musk-reinstates-trump-platform-god-help-us   How to get a hold of Nicky; Connect with Nicky: https://allmylinks.com/kamodo Support my affiliates Try Shibari Study. https://shibaristudy.com/?referral_code=ieeHaHHDeFgF Get the Gift of Amazon prime. https://amzn.to/3ygNOls

Willy welcomes Dr. Larry Sabato. He is a political scientist, political analyst, and the Robert Kent Gooch Professor of Politics at the University of Virginia. He is the founder and director of the university's Center for Politics, which publishes Sabato's Ball, his online newsletter where he writes electoral predictions and analysis. Dr. Larry Sabato begins by discussing remaining nonpartisan in an increasingly divisive environment. He is only interested in picking the winners and claims to have a good idea of where the upcoming results are going. He aims to get people involved and excited about politics. Research done by the Center of Politics interviewed 1,000 Donald Trump supporters and 1,000 Joe Biden supporters, which resulted in 51% of Trump supporters believing that Democratic states should secede from the union, and 42% of Biden supporters wish the same for Republican states. Nowadays, people feel strongly about their campaigns that even some Americans don't believe that Biden was legitimately elected despite zero evidence of fraud. People think they're entitled to facts and opinions in a no-facts era. Dr. Sabato calls for returning to basics and the civic education of young people. Although existing systems work, Dr. Sabato recommends voting on paper to eliminate questioning. Having computers with the Internet creates doubts and is at risk of hacking. It's difficult for a third party to emerge even though it can change political dynamics. The two major parties comprise most of Congress and wouldn't want a smaller slice of the pie. Gerrymandering is a big issue, with Democrats in Virginia making decisions that, in the end, favored Republicans. Dr. Sabato talks about open primaries where people vote for four candidates in order, and each candidate receives a certain number of votes based on how high they are ranked. This system can produce centrist results, and Dr. Sabato is open to this reform. Despite Donald Trump receiving a larger turnout than usual, Dr. Sabato still hopes more people will be voting this year. Moving on to the gubernatorial elections, he describes how "hypocrisy is the lifeblood of politics." He predicts Brian Kemp winning even without a runoff. He explains how split-ticket results are rare, as their parties determine 90% of voters. He says we shouldn't believe the Gallup polls, and split ticketing mainly happened in the 70s. An entirely Republican sweep isn't possible, one of the reasons being the overturning of Roe v. Wade. He foresees Republicans winning Oregon, Wisconsin, and Kansas. Although Massachusetts and Maryland are Republican, Dr. Sabato thinks they will lose in a landslide. He believes that Sonny Perdue leaning heavily in Trump's direction was a mistake that ended his career. He explains how the Republican party is divided into two halves: one is entirely dedicated to Trump, and the other is much more conservative than Larry Hogan. He predicts Jared Polis is not running against Biden, but reruns are possible. It's also expected that Kevin McCarthy will win as a speaker. He describes how every president will experience one or both Houses of Congress controlled by the other party, but veto power will be exercised to counter it.

What does the future of the Dissident Right look like? Patrick Casey, of Restoring Order, talks about the growth of the Dissident Right and the many challenges it faces in the present and future. Despite Donald Trump's loss in 2020, right-wing nationalism is alive and well in America. Moreover, identity issues reign supreme despite what Conservatism Inc. says.Tune in to this episode of El Nino Speaks to learn why the Dissident Right is not going away anytime soon. Buy My Book "The 10 Myths of Gun Control" TodayIf you're serious about changing the gun control status quo we live in, this book is a must.After reading this text, you will be able to hold your own in any debate with your anti-gun friends, family, or associates. No questions asked.And heck, you will have a solid foundation in championing issues like gun rights should you take your activism to the next level.Knowledge is power and the foundation for any worthwhile endeavor. With this next-level information at your fingertips, the sky is the limit.So make today the day you say NO to the gun control status quo by taking action NOW.The full retail price for The 10 Myths of Gun Control is $6.Get Your Copy TodayBookmark my Website For Direct ContactIn the era of Big Tech censorship, we can't rely on just one or two platforms to keep us connected. Bookmark my website today so you always know where to get the true, unfiltered information about the news and views that matter to you.Subscribe to my Premium Newsletter TodayThe Niño FileIf you're serious about changing the authoritarian status quo we live in, make sure to join the Niño File on Patreon for as little as $5 a month. This is the premier source for dedicated and passionate leaders who want to not just “move the needle”, but actually win and change the landscape ahead of us.The Niño File is bringing you the necessary and concise ways to help you identify and train strong candidates, kill bad legislation while actively passing good bills, keeping incumbents accountable and knowing how to replace them when push comes to shove. Those are just the tip of the iceberg, the only way to get so much more is to join today!Don't Forget to Follow me on Twitter @JoseAlNino This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit josbcf.substack.com/subscribe

The Democratic party is in the throes of a rude awakening. Despite Donald Trump remaining at its head, the Republican Party is widely expected to make significant gains in the upcoming mid-term elections. Working class and Hispanic voters seem to be turning away from the Democrats. In some liberal cities, voters are in open revolt against progressive policies. How did the party lose touch with its voters? And does a flurry of recent dealmaking suggest it can moderate in time to avoid electoral disaster?Pramila Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, makes the case for progressive success beyond the mid-terms. We ask Elaine Kamarck, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and author of “The New Politics of Evasion”, how the central myths of the Democratic party have changed. And Ro Khanna, a Democratic congressman from Silicon Valley, argues for how to reframe the Democratic narrative.John Prideaux hosts with Idrees Kahloon and Charlotte HowardYou can now find every episode of Checks and Balance in one place and sign up to our weekly newsletter. For full access to print, digital and audio editions, as well as exclusive live events, subscribe to The Economist at economist.com/uspod"Triplicity, or Donkey, Moose or Elephant", by L. Mae Felker and H.S. Gillett, performed Harry Style See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The Democratic party is in the throes of a rude awakening. Despite Donald Trump remaining at its head, the Republican Party is widely expected to make significant gains in the upcoming mid-term elections. Working class and Hispanic voters seem to be turning away from the Democrats. In some liberal cities, voters are in open revolt against progressive policies. How did the party lose touch with its voters? And does a flurry of recent dealmaking suggest it can moderate in time to avoid electoral disaster?Pramila Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, makes the case for progressive success beyond the mid-terms. We ask Elaine Kamarck, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and author of “The New Politics of Evasion”, how the central myths of the Democratic party have changed. And Ro Khanna, a Democratic congressman from Silicon Valley, argues for how to reframe the Democratic narrative.John Prideaux hosts with Idrees Kahloon and Charlotte HowardYou can now find every episode of Checks and Balance in one place and sign up to our weekly newsletter. For full access to print, digital and audio editions, as well as exclusive live events, subscribe to The Economist at economist.com/uspod"Triplicity, or Donkey, Moose or Elephant", by L. Mae Felker and H.S. Gillett, performed Harry Style See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

--On the Show: --Dr. Baland Jalal, researcher at Harvard University and Cambridge University and expert on sleep and sleep paralysis joins David to discuss dreams, sleep, and more --Russian troops recently withdrawn from Chernobyl are suffering radiation poisoning --There is indeed an investigation into Hunter Biden, but it has nothing to do with his supposed laptop --Notable discussions from the David Pakman Show subreddit, including about a no-fly zone in Ukraine, sexism, and massive audio problems recently plaguing live streams --Donald Trump's social media app Truth Social is quickly collapsing, with new signups down 93% --Despite Donald Trump claiming he has no idea what burner phones are, his former National Security Adviser John Bolton appears on CNN to say that Trump used the term regularly --The new cultural battle for the right wing media is that Disney wants to make children gay --Voicemail caller explains that he knows more about medicine than his doctors --On the Bonus Show: Biden face squeeze on defense spending, Tennessee trying to find loophole to ban same-sex marriage, Alex Jones avoids jail for now, much more...

The voting crowd is even dumber than we thought. Despite Donald Trump's constant praise of Vladimir Putin, Trump remains as popular as he's ever been. Thanks to Supreme Lending for sponsoring this podcast! https://get.johnmcclellan.com/austin-mortgage-1/ Thanks to Aura for sponsoring this episode! aura.com/jeff Thanks to Spec's Wines, Spirits and Finer Foods for sponsoring this podcast! https://specsonline.com/  Jeff Ward's experience, insight, and unique perspective on football is always in demand. The audience starves for his fearless, agenda-free, and irreverent take on the teams and storylines that matter most. Now, fans can get a steady diet of his football knowledge with regular segments titled “Six Minutes of Football." Follow The Jeff Ward Show on social media: Twitter Instagram Facebook   Jeff Ward is a highly decorated former NCAA football player with extensive ties to the University of Texas. He's been nominated as an Outstanding Young Texas Ex, and while a student at The University of Texas, he was a four-year Letterman in football, a football team captain, a member of the Athletics Director's Academic Honor Roll, a three-time all-conference football player, and a two-time All-American football player. He's among the top five all-time leading scorers at The University of Texas, and he's the NCAA record holder for game-winning field goals. He was selected in the 1988 NFL Draft to play football professionally. The podcast market is oversaturated with NCAA and NFL football content but with Jeff, you get the educated perspective of someone who's lived it.    Jeff has been appearing on both national news and local (Texas-based) news platforms to discuss sports, politics and economics for over 20 years. Jeff's time at The University of Texas provided him with knowledge of worldwide economics, marketing strategies and the economics of sports, particularly with NCAA Football. With the NCAA always finding itself involved in hot-button issues, Jeff Ward explains what's going on behind the scenes.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The voting crowd is even dumber than we thought. Despite Donald Trump's constant praise of Vladimir Putin, Trump remains as popular as he's ever been. Thanks to Supreme Lending for sponsoring this podcast! https://get.johnmcclellan.com/austin-mortgage-1/ Thanks to Aura for sponsoring this episode! aura.com/jeff Thanks to Spec's Wines, Spirits and Finer Foods for sponsoring this podcast! https://specsonline.com/  Jeff Ward's experience, insight, and unique perspective on football is always in demand. The audience starves for his fearless, agenda-free, and irreverent take on the teams and storylines that matter most. Now, fans can get a steady diet of his football knowledge with regular segments titled “Six Minutes of Football." Follow The Jeff Ward Show on social media: Twitter Instagram Facebook   Jeff Ward is a highly decorated former NCAA football player with extensive ties to the University of Texas. He's been nominated as an Outstanding Young Texas Ex, and while a student at The University of Texas, he was a four-year Letterman in football, a football team captain, a member of the Athletics Director's Academic Honor Roll, a three-time all-conference football player, and a two-time All-American football player. He's among the top five all-time leading scorers at The University of Texas, and he's the NCAA record holder for game-winning field goals. He was selected in the 1988 NFL Draft to play football professionally. The podcast market is oversaturated with NCAA and NFL football content but with Jeff, you get the educated perspective of someone who's lived it.    Jeff has been appearing on both national news and local (Texas-based) news platforms to discuss sports, politics and economics for over 20 years. Jeff's time at The University of Texas provided him with knowledge of worldwide economics, marketing strategies and the economics of sports, particularly with NCAA Football. With the NCAA always finding itself involved in hot-button issues, Jeff Ward explains what's going on behind the scenes.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Today on Sojourner Truth, our weekly roundtable. Our panelists are Laura Carlsen, Jackie Goldberg and Dr. Gerald Horne. Donald Trump is desperately trying to stay in power and prevent President-elect Joe Biden from taking office. In what many are now describing as a slow-motion coup, Trump is using a combination of methods to undermine the results of the 2020 election. Not only is he pushing state legislators to visit him at the Oval Office in an attempt to overturn the Democrats victory. He is also personally calling local election officials who are trying to rescind their certification votes in Michigan, according to the Associated Press. Also, during a press conference hosted by Rudy Giuliani, Trumps personal lawyer, he claimed that the election had been rigged by a company owned by affiliates of former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and current President Nicolas Maduro. Also, a few days after winning the electoral votes needed to win the presidency, Joe Biden appointed adviser and lawyer Ron Klain as his Chief of Staff. He has also tapped former campaign manager Jen O'Malley Dillon as his deputy chief of staff. She is the first woman to lead a winning Democratic presidential campaign. On Tuesday, November 17, Biden officially appointed three Latinos to be part of his White House senior staff. They include Julie Chvez Rodriguez, Director of Office of Intergovernmental Affairs, Julissa Reynoso Pantaleon, Chief of Staff for the First Lady, and Anthony Bernal, Senior Adviser to the First Lady. Biden also picked Cedric Richmond, a Black man, to serve as Director of the Office of Public Engagement. At the moment, only ten people have been selected, seven of which are women and people of color. However, many in the peace movement are worried about his major candidates for security and defense. Despite Donald Trump refusing to concede defeat, President-elect Joe Biden is already tackling major world events that will impact his administration upon taking office. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo laid the capstone this week on the Trump administrations four-year ideological project in Israel. Pompeo made a controversial visit to settlements located in the West Bank and the Golan Heights, marking the first time a U.S. secretary of state has appeared at such sites, which much of the world views as illegal. Although an overwhelming majority of people across the United States voted for Joe Biden instead of Donald Trump, it is not smooth sailing for the President-elect. The progressive and grassroots movement that helped elect Biden into power is now reminding him that he must live up to his promises. This includes the LGBTQ movement, the environmental movement and the progressive anti-war movement.

Today on Sojourner Truth, our weekly roundtable. Our panelists are Laura Carlsen, Jackie Goldberg and Dr. Gerald Horne. Donald Trump is desperately trying to stay in power and prevent President-elect Joe Biden from taking office. In what many are now describing as a slow-motion coup, Trump is using a combination of methods to undermine the results of the 2020 election. Not only is he pushing state legislators to visit him at the Oval Office in an attempt to overturn the Democrats victory. He is also personally calling local election officials who are trying to rescind their certification votes in Michigan, according to the Associated Press. Also, during a press conference hosted by Rudy Giuliani, Trumps personal lawyer, he claimed that the election had been rigged by a company owned by affiliates of former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and current President Nicolas Maduro. Also, a few days after winning the electoral votes needed to win the presidency, Joe Biden appointed adviser and lawyer Ron Klain as his Chief of Staff. He has also tapped former campaign manager Jen O'Malley Dillon as his deputy chief of staff. She is the first woman to lead a winning Democratic presidential campaign. On Tuesday, November 17, Biden officially appointed three Latinos to be part of his White House senior staff. They include Julie Chvez Rodriguez, Director of Office of Intergovernmental Affairs, Julissa Reynoso Pantaleon, Chief of Staff for the First Lady, and Anthony Bernal, Senior Adviser to the First Lady. Biden also picked Cedric Richmond, a Black man, to serve as Director of the Office of Public Engagement. At the moment, only ten people have been selected, seven of which are women and people of color. However, many in the peace movement are worried about his major candidates for security and defense. Despite Donald Trump refusing to concede defeat, President-elect Joe Biden is already tackling major world events that will impact his administration upon taking office. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo laid the capstone this week on the Trump administrations four-year ideological project in Israel. Pompeo made a controversial visit to settlements located in the West Bank and the Golan Heights, marking the first time a U.S. secretary of state has appeared at such sites, which much of the world views as illegal. Although an overwhelming majority of people across the United States voted for Joe Biden instead of Donald Trump, it is not smooth sailing for the President-elect. The progressive and grassroots movement that helped elect Biden into power is now reminding him that he must live up to his promises. This includes the LGBTQ movement, the environmental movement and the progressive anti-war movement.

Despite Donald Trump's 2016 campaign promises to “bring back jobs,” trade-related job losses have continued under the Trump administration. Under the Labor Department's narrow Trade Adjustment Assistance program alone, 176,982 workers have been certified as losing jobs to trade since 2017. Trade-related job losses have been especially high in California, Michigan, Ohio, Michigan, Virginia, and Washington state. On this episode we break down these figures and discuss Public Citizen's Trade Adjustment Assistance Database, the online portal where you can search by zip code, state, company name and more for trade-related job losses across the United States. Learn more at rethinktrade.org. Music: Groove Grove by Kevin MacLeod Link: https://incompetech.filmmusic.io/song/3831-groove-groveLicense: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Despite Donald Trump's invective, the spread of Covid-19 has made the expansion of absentee voting expansion critical.

On this episode of Fault Lines, hosts Garland Nixon and Lee Stranahan discuss how the mainstream media pivots from one story to the next and reframes events to push specific narratives. How does this method of operation impact how the public views the news & world events, and what impact does social media have on the modern flow of information? Guests:Patrick Henningsen - Journalist & Founder of 21stCenturyWire.com | Julian Assange and Attacks on Independent JournalismPhil Giraldi - Former CIA Case Officer and Army Intelligence Officer | Are the DC Foreign Policy Hawks Pushing President Trump Towards War?Ryan Cristián - Founder and Editor of The Last American Vagabond | The Yellow Vests in France & The Crackdown on Social Media and Alternative Media SourcesMuch of the mainstream media has reported on Julian Assange and WikiLeaks in a negative light for many years and continues to do so following Assange's recent arrest. Journalist Patrick Henningsen joins today's show to discuss why the majority of the media takes this stance regarding Assange, how the mainstream media reframes and spins stories, and the threat independent journalism presents to the legacy media and political establishment.Despite Donald Trump's anti-interventionist rhetoric as a Presidential candidate, his administration has taken a far more aggressive approach to foreign policy during his time in the White House. Former CIA Case Officer and Army Intelligence Officer Phil Giraldi returns to the program to talk about why he views the current US foreign policy establishment as itching for a fight, how labeling organizations as terrorist groups sets the stage for a potential military incident that could escalate into a major war, and why Congress appears to be on-board with this approach to modern geopolitics.For the final two segments, Garland and Lee are joined by Ryan Cristián, geopolitical analyst & Founder of 'The Last American Vagabond', for a conversation about both the ongoing "Yellow Vests" protest movement in France and the increasing crackdown on non-mainstream media sources/dissenting points of view on social media. Does the massive sum of money that has poured in to help rebuild the damaged Notre Dame Cathedral prove the point of the "Yellow Vests" that the French elites care about their own interests but not those of the working class? Additionally, what conclusions can be drawn about the media crackdown in Sri Lanka following its recent terrorist attack and how it parallels with increasing online censorship in the United States?

Despite Donald Trump's campaign rhetoric the U.S. must avoid positions that could trigger trade wars with China or upset the military balance in Asia say experts. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

-- On the Show:-- Republicans are in shambles as the predicted "disaster" at the border hasn't happened after Titles 42 restrictions expired-- The supposed bombshell Republican "informant" about the alleged "crimes" of Joe Biden has now gone "missing"-- A House Republican report finds no evidence of wrongdoing by President Joe Biden-- Could James Buchanan, not Donald Trump, be the worst President in American history?-- Despite Donald Trump's rally in Iowa being cancelled, the dangerous and deranged Trump cult showed up at full strength-- Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis appears to be trying to fix his personality, but so far is failing-- MyPillow CEO and Founder Mike Lindell has now blown $40 million pursuing his election lies-- Failed former President Donald Trump explodes in a deranged Mother's Day rant on Truth Social, attacking CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins, Ron DeSantis, and many others-- White supremacists march on Washington DC while wearings masks-- Voicemail caller says that we need to stop calling internet searches "research" since they certainly are not research-- On the Bonus Show: George Santos agrees to settle lawsuit in Brazil, NC Governor vetoes 12-week abortion ban, SCOTUS outlawed split juries yet hundreds remain in prison, much more...