Podcasts about Pigweed

Pigweed and Crowhill drink and review Cape May Brewing Company's Coastal Evacuation Double IPA and ask a deceptively simple question: When are we going to live on Mars?Elon Musk's SpaceX, Tesla, and even the Boring Company can all be understood as pieces of his larger vision of making humanity a multi-planetary species. And there's a compelling argument behind it: Earth is humanity's single point of failure.But getting to Mars may be the easy part. What happens when we arrive? The boys discuss radiation, low gravity, Martian dust, atmospheric pressure, growing food, human reproduction, terraforming, and the uncomfortable possibility that people born on Mars might never be physically capable of living on Earth.The problems are enormous. But perhaps that's precisely why we should try. Even if Musk's dream of a permanent Martian civilization never happens, attempting it could teach us things we would never learn otherwise.

On their recent trip to Mexico, Pigweed, Crowhill, and Longinus read Greene's novel set in Mexico -- a moral thriller about the relentless pursuit and persecution of a Catholic priest during the Mexican civil war. A paramilitary group has outlawed the Catholic Church and is executing the clergy. A humdrum, milquetoast, "whiskey priest" is on the run, and a determined officer is trying to hunt him down. He's stuck between duty and addiction, religion and survival.

What happens when people stop believing the justice system will deliver justice?Pigweed and Crowhill start with the banned movie Citizen Vigilante, but quickly move into a much bigger question: Why do vigilante stories become popular when people believe crime is out of control and the authorities aren't doing their job?From Charles Bronson and Falling Down to Batman, John Locke, the social contract, and the state's supposed monopoly on force, they explore the uneasy bargain at the heart of civilized society: We give up the right to take justice into our own hands because we expect the government to do it for us.But what happens when that bargain breaks down?Along the way, they discuss immigration and crime in Europe, censorship, the difficulty of talking honestly about politically sensitive problems, and why vigilante stories may be a warning sign that public confidence in institutions is collapsing.Plus: Alpaca Riot IPA, the Streisand effect, and a surprisingly serious theory about the size of Batman's ears.

Who was the greatest man who ever lived? Yeah, okay, Jesus. But who was called "the greatest man" by his enemies? That would be our first president, George Washington, who was declared the greatest man who ever lived by none other than his rival, King George. Why? Pigweed and Crowhill dive into that topic, and explore the amazing life and legacy of George Washington. But first, they drink an IPA inspired by ... Iron Maiden? What do they have to do with beer? This show is part of our America 250 series. We hope you appreciate our efforts to highlight important parts of American history as we celebrate 250 years of this strange experiment in the American Republic.

Pigweed, Crowhill, and Longinus are back from Mexico with stories to tell. The trip takes them from the beach town of Sayulita to the sprawling metropolis of Guadalajara and finally to Tequila—where the agave fields are endless, the distilleries are fascinating, and the tour bus gets considerably livelier on the way home.Along the way, they encounter mariachi bands, Mexican craft beer, cobblestone streets, scooters that would horrify an American safety inspector, mysterious walls topped with barbed wire, a spectacular rainstorm, and a culture that can feel simultaneously more relaxed and a little more dangerous than home. It leads to one of the recurring observations of the trip: part of Mexico's charm is the feeling that nobody is quite in charge—and that's both liberating and unsettling.Pour yourself a beer and join us for a conversation about what surprised us, what we loved, and what Mexico looks like when you get beyond the resort.

Why do some cultural fads disappear while others hang around long after everyone seems to have moved on?Pigweed and Crowhill drink and review a hazy IPA and ask, “Are we still doing this?” From pronouns in bios, COVID-era leftovers and land acknowledgments to climate alarmism, corporate virtue signaling, Pride Month, recycling and other remnants of the great cultural craziness of the past several years, they run through the ideas and practices they thought would have faded away by now.Every society gets swept up in bad ideas, moral panics and strange enthusiasms. The question is whether we can eventually admit it, laugh at ourselves, and move on. The good news? Pigweed and Crowhill think most of these things are finally trending in the right direction.

Finding a Bit of Consistency in Kansas Feedyards Webworms Eating on Pigweeds and Alfalfa Making Sure to Water Trees and Shrubs   00:01:05 – Finding a Bit of Consistency in Kansas Feedyards: Getting the show started is Justin Waggoner, K-State Extension beef cattle specialist, as he reviews the recent Focus on Feedlots report and what data points are starting to show consistency. Focus on Feedlots Reports Asi.K-State.edu KSUBeef.org   00:12:05 – Webworms Eating on Pigweeds and Alfalfa: Anthony Zukoff, K-State Extension entomologist, continues the show chatting about webworms and what their favorite food source is and what damage they can do to grower's fields. Webworms are Active in Pigweed and Alfalfa in Western Kansas   00:23:05 – Making Sure to Water Trees and Shrubs: K-State Extension horticulture expert, Matt McKernan, ends the show saying how providing adequate watering is one of the most important factors in determining the success or failure of a lot of young trees and shrubs.      Send comments, questions or requests for copies of past programs to ksrenews@ksu.edu.   Agriculture Today is a daily program featuring Kansas State University agricultural specialists and other experts examining ag issues facing Kansas and the nation. It is hosted by Shelby Varner and distributed to radio stations throughout Kansas and as a daily podcast.   K‑State Extension is a short name for the Kansas State University Cooperative Extension Service, a program designed to generate and distribute useful knowledge for the well‑being of Kansans. Supported by county, state, federal and private funds, the program has county Extension offices statewide. Its headquarters is on the K‑State campus in Manhattan. For more information, visit Extension.ksu.edu. K-State Extension is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Pigweed and Crowhill review two versions of the same old ale and tackle Helen Andrews' provocative argument that much of what we call “wokeness” can be understood as the feminization of our institutions.As women have become majorities in fields such as education, law, publishing, and human resources, Andrews argues that traditionally feminine priorities — empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition, and consensus over conflict — have increasingly shaped the rules by which institutions operate. Pigweed and Crowhill explore that idea through cancel culture, the workplace, the legal system, free speech, DEI, and the very different ways men and women tend to handle conflict.Is Andrews onto something? Probably. But is feminization really a unified theory of wokeness, or just one factor among many? As usual, the conversation wanders through history, politics, psychology, law, and culture — with beer close at hand.

Welcome to episode 450 of Growers Daily! We cover: today we are talking about pigweed living its best life (unfortunately), curing onions as a little in-the-field SESH and it's feedback friday. We are a Non-Profit! 

America needs more data centers to power AI -- but communities across the country are starting to say, "Not here."In this episode of Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill, we explore why counties and states are putting the brakes on new AI infrastructure. Data centers promise billions of dollars in investment, but they also consume enormous amounts of electricity, require vast tracts of land, generate noise, and create surprisingly few permanent jobs. Is the economic payoff worth the cost?We also tackle the bigger questions:* Why AI is driving an unprecedented demand for electricity* Whether America's power grid can keep up* The case for small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs)* Why local communities are increasingly resisting new data centers* Whether fears about AI are justified—or overblown* How the AI race with China changes the debate* Why this issue is becoming one of the country's newest political battlegroundsThe result is a genuine dilemma: America may need AI infrastructure to remain competitive, but the communities expected to host it are increasingly questioning whether they're getting a fair deal.Grab a beer and join us as we explore one of the most important—and least understood—technology controversies of our time.

Thomas Jefferson was far more than the author of the Declaration of Independence. He was a lawyer, architect, inventor, linguist, scientist, diplomat, president, and one of the most influential minds behind the American experiment.In this episode of Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill, we trace Jefferson's remarkable life—from writing the Declaration of Independence and championing religious liberty to the Louisiana Purchase, Lewis and Clark, the Barbary Wars, and even his surprising belief that woolly mammoths might still roam the American West.We also tackle the hardest question surrounding Jefferson: how do we reconcile his soaring ideals about liberty with the fact that he owned hundreds of slaves? Rather than reducing him to either hero or villain, we examine the historical, political, and personal contradictions that continue to shape the debate over his legacy today.Along the way, we discuss:* Why Jefferson was chosen to write the Declaration of Independence* The revolutionary ideas that transformed government forever* States' rights vs. federal power* The Louisiana Purchase and constitutional questions* Lewis and Clark's unexpected mission to search for mammoths* The First Barbary War* Jefferson's passion for science, education, and the University of Virginia* The enduring paradox at the heart of Jefferson's lifeGrab a beer and join us for a thoughtful conversation about one of America's most brilliant—and most complicated—Founding Fathers.

Foucault. Derrida. Lyotard. Three French philosophers walk into a cafe — and forty years later, American universities can't define what a woman is.In this episode, Pigweed and Crowhill dig into a viral French mea culpa: an apology, on behalf of France, for exporting postmodernism to the world. They trace the direct line from French theory's core claim — that truth is just a mask for power — through Judith Butler, Edward Said, and Kimberlé Crenshaw, and into today's language of oppressor/oppressed, meritocracy-as-racism, and "words are violence."Topics covered:* Why civilization rests on three pillars — truth, morality, and inherited tradition — and how French theory tried to dynamite all three* The difference between what Foucault et al. probably meant and what their disciples did with it* Why "everything is a power struggle" is really just Marxism with race swapped in for class* The philosophical case against relativism (and why no one actually lives like a true relativist)* Fragmentation, diversity, and the postmodern seduction of "there is no truth, only narrative"* Why a civilization that's only trained to deconstruct forgets how to buildPlus: a four-year-old bottle of Flying Dog Double Dog Triple IPA that's mellowed into something closer to a barleywine — tasting notes, aging thoughts, and whether it's worth the cellar space.#Postmodernism #Foucault #WesternCivilization #Philosophy #CraftBeer #IPA #BeerReview #PoliticalPhilosophy #CultureWar #Podcast

The 2026 World Cup brought millions of international visitors to the United States—and many of them experienced something they weren't expecting.For years they had been told America was dangerous, hostile, racist, politically unstable, and falling apart. Instead, many found friendly people, clean cities, incredible food, welcoming communities, freedom, abundance, and an atmosphere that challenged everything they thought they knew.In this episode of Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill, we examine the gap between America's international reputation and the experiences of the people who actually came here. Why has so much of the world developed such a dark view of the United States? What role do media, politics, and ideology play? And why were so many visitors saying, "I've been lied to my entire life"?Join us for a conversation about perception, propaganda, culture, and what the World Cup unexpectedly revealed about America.

As part of our America 250 series, Pigweed, Crowhill, and Longinus put each other to the test with a wide-ranging game of American trivia.How many people signed the Declaration of Independence? Which president served the shortest term? Why did George Washington's resignation astonish the world? Which four states meet at Four Corners? And could you answer the same questions that left some college students completely stumped?Along the way, we discuss fascinating stories from American history, including the Revolutionary War, the Constitution, Valley Forge, the Statue of Liberty, Fort McHenry, the American flag, and many of the remarkable coincidences and personalities that shaped the United States.Before the trivia begins, we also review a Baltimore Pilsner from Guilford Hall Brewery, comparing it to the classic pilsner style and debating whether it really fits the category.Whether you're a history buff or just enjoy learning something new, grab a beer and play along to see how much you know about America.In this episode:* Baltimore Pilsner from Guilford Hall Brewery* America 250 trivia challenge* The Founding Fathers and the Revolution* George Washington's remarkable legacy* American symbols and traditions* Surprising historical factsCan you beat Pigweed and Crowhill?Cheers—and happy birthday, America!

As America approaches its 250th birthday, we fire up a (mostly) reliable time machine and imagine what the Founding Fathers would think if they could see the United States today.Would George Washington be amazed by America's military power? Would Benjamin Franklin marvel at electricity, space travel, and modern technology? Would Thomas Jefferson recognize the federal government they created—or wonder what happened to the republic they envisioned?Over a German wheat beer, Pigweed and Crowhill explore questions the Founders might ask about:* The Constitution and the Bill of Rights* Free speech and religious liberty* The Second Amendment* Taxes and the growth of government* The Tenth Amendment and states' rights* Originalism vs. the "living Constitution"* The rise of the federal bureaucracy* Presidential power* Political parties (which many Founders distrusted)* Whether America has fulfilled—or departed from—the Founders' visionAlong the way, we also review a classic German Weissbier and finish with another round of "Satire or No Satire?" — where today's headlines are sometimes stranger than fiction.Whether you agree or disagree with our conclusions, we hope this conversation encourages you to think more deeply about America's constitutional heritage as we celebrate the America 250 anniversary.Cheers!#America250 #FoundingFathers #Constitution #BillOfRights #AmericanHistory #GeorgeWashington #ThomasJefferson #BenjaminFranklin #PoliticalPhilosophy #BeerAndConversation #PigweedAndCrowhill #Originalism #ConstitutionalLaw #HistoryPodcast

With special guest Longinus the boys review a Troegs Graffiti Highway Mosaic IPA and take a deep dive into Jack Kerouac's On the Road, one of the defining novels of the Beat Generation.We talk through the plot, the major characters like Sal Paradise and Dean Moriarty, and the larger ideas behind Kerouac's world: freedom, authenticity, rebellion, conformity, jazz, the open road, and the moral chaos that often comes with living for pure experience. Along the way, we explore the relationship between the Beat movement and the later hippie movement, Kerouac's writing style, the role of bebop jazz, the rise of the American highway culture, and whether On the Road is really a novel, a travelogue, or something in between.If you've ever wondered why On the Road became such an important American book—or what the Beat Generation was actually searching for—this conversation is for you.In this episode:* Troegs Graffiti Highway single-hop Mosaic IPA review* A summary and discussion of Jack Kerouac's On the Road* Who Dean Moriarty was and why he matters* The meaning of the Beat Generation* Kerouac, Allen Ginsberg, William S. Burroughs, and the Beat ethos* Freedom, spontaneity, authenticity, and the rejection of conformity* The connection between Beat culture, hippies, Ken Kesey, and the Merry Pranksters* Jazz, highways, postwar America, and the romance of the road* Why On the Road is both exhilarating and morally unsettlingIf you enjoy conversations about books, literature, culture, philosophy, religion, history, and beer, subscribe and join us for more episodes of Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill.#JackKerouac #OnTheRoad #BeatGeneration #BeerAndConversation #BookDiscussion #AmericanLiterature #Beatniks #AllenGinsberg #WilliamSBurroughs #KenKesey #LiteraryPodcast #BookTube #ClassicLiterature #PigweedAndCrowhill

Genuine racism is a bad thing. That's why the word "racist" used to carry real moral weight — because real racism is a serious wrong. But the word has been misused, abused, overused, and trampled on. After decades of overuse, misapplication, and outright abuse, the accusation of racism has jumped the shark. Today, voter ID is racist. Advanced math is racist. Showing up on time is racist. Flying your country's flag is racist. When everything is racist, nothing is. Pigweed and Crowhill dig into how the left turned a legitimate moral concept into a political weapon — and how that weapon is now misfiring badly. Plus: a review of honey Kölsch from Danville Ballad Brewing and a listener pushback on our Saul Alinsky episode.

Why does the aftermath of every revolution look like a disaster -- except ours?Pigweed and Crowhill walk through the big ones. * France's Reign of Terror killed tens of thousands and left the country in chaos for a century. * Haiti's slave revolt produced 111 changes of head of state and has never stopped bleeding. * Russia's communist revolution promised a people's paradise and delivered gulags and engineered famines. * China's Cultural Revolution had students beating their teachers to death and killed sparrows until the plague came. * Cuba took one of the wealthiest islands in the Caribbean and turned it into a museum.The common threads: destroy religion, abolish private property, eliminate the old institutions, and above all — try to create a new kind of man from scratch. It never works. It always ends in mass death and tyranny.What did America do differently? The founders weren't trying to remake human nature. They weren't starting from year zero. They were British citizens who already had self-government, local institutions, and a functioning legal tradition — and they simply wanted the king to stop interfering with it. Conservative in the truest sense of the word.Beer: Czech Style Pale Lager — Montgomery County, MD | 2025 Great American Beer Festival Gold#AmericanRevolution #History #FrenchRevolution #Communism #ColdWarHistory #CraftBeer #Politics

Benjamin Franklin was a printer, publisher, inventor, scientist, diplomat, entrepreneur, author, and Founding Father. He helped secure American independence, invented practical technologies still used today, built civic institutions, and retired wealthy at age 42.He may well have been the most impressive American -- maybe even the most impressive man -- who ever lived. In this installment of our America 250 series, Pigweed and Crowhill explore the remarkable life of the man some have called "the first American."Plus: a review of Monument City's American Brown Ale.#America250 #BenjaminFranklin #FoundingFathers #AmericanHistory #USHistory

Has Pride Month reached its peak?Pigweed and Crowhill discuss the origins of Pride Month, the Stonewall riots, the changing meaning of the word "pride," and why June feels different than it did just a few years ago. Along the way they explore corporate virtue signaling, rainbow branding, LGBTQ activism, transgender controversies, compelled speech in sports, and whether the movement has expanded so far that it is beginning to generate its own backlash.The conversation also touches on biblical views of pride, the difference between accomplishment and identity, and why some activists, corporations, athletes, and even members of the LGBTQ community appear less enthusiastic than they once were.Plus: a Southern Maryland IPA from Calvert Brewing Company.#PrideMonth #Stonewall #CultureWar #LGBTQ #Politics #CurrentEvents #BeerAndConversation #PigweedAndCrowhill

Is the insanity defense a get-out-of-jail-free card — or does "not knowing right from wrong" actually make you more dangerous? Pigweed and Crowhill dig into one of law's most misunderstood doctrines: what the insanity defense actually requires, why it succeeds in only about 25% of the cases where it's even attempted, and why the guys think the standard argument runs backwards. From the Son of Sam's killer dog (mostly a myth) to the McNaughton Rule, the Garfield assassination, James Holmes, and a Florida State student who believed he was half dog — the case studies are wild, but the underlying question is serious: when someone genuinely can't distinguish right from wrong, is that a reason for leniency, or a reason they should never be released?Also: a blood orange blonde ale from Molly's down in Prince Frederick. It actually tastes like orange. High praise.#InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #LegalHistory #Podcast #CriminalJustice

For the inaugural episode of Conspiracy Corner, Pigweed and Crowhill investigate the claim that birds are actually government surveillance drones. The theory is completely fake—and that's the point.Created as a parody of conspiracy culture, Birds Aren't Real became a social experiment that exposed how easily movements can gain momentum and how quickly people can mistake satire for sincerity. Along the way, the hosts discuss fake whistleblowers, media reactions, group identity, persecution narratives, and the enduring appeal of hidden truths. Plus, they settle an important question: Have you ever seen a baby pigeon?

The boys drink and review Sierra Nevada's Torpedo Extra IPA, then move on to political strategy and methods. Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals remains one of the most influential—and controversial—books on political organizing ever written. In this episode, Pigweed and Crowhill dive into the life and ideas of the Chicago community organizer whose methods have shaped activist movements for generations. From "pick the target" and "keep the pressure on" to the strategic use of ridicule, disruption, and media attention, they unpack Alinsky's famous tactics and examine why they continue to be effective decades after they were first developed.But the conversation goes beyond a simple review of organizing techniques. Are these tactics merely practical tools that can be used by anyone seeking political change, or do they encourage a permanent culture of conflict? Why do modern movements always seem to be searching for the next crisis, the next injustice, or the next cause? Pigweed and Crowhill explore whether activism has become less about solving problems and more about sustaining a mindset of perpetual agitation.Along the way, they discuss Barack Obama's background as a community organizer, Hillary Clinton's connection to Alinsky, Ben Shapiro's surprising praise for some of Alinsky's methods, and the broader question of how political narratives are created, amplified, and maintained. Whether you see Alinsky as a champion of the powerless, a master strategist, or something more troubling, his influence on modern politics is impossible to ignore.

Is the government secretly poisoning us through airplane exhaust? Pigweed and Crowhill drink a couple of stouts and dig into the chemtrails conspiracy — one of the most persistent theories in the skies today.They break down the real historical cases that give the theory its legs: Operation Sea Spray, Operation Large Area Coverage, MKUltra, and other documented government experiments conducted without public consent. Then they weigh the actual claims — population control, weather modification, compliance drugs, corporate cover-ups — against the far simpler scientific explanation for contrails.Along the way, the conversation drifts into cloud seeding (which is real and uncontroversial), the ethics of weather manipulation, trolley-problem-style moral dilemmas, and whether a slow chemical buildup could gradually make us all more compliant voters.Their verdict? Totally false. But the kind of totally false that makes you understand exactly why people believe it.Conspiracy Corner examines the plausible, the ridiculous, and the occasionally true — one theory at a time.#chemtrails, #conspiracytheories, #cloudseeding, #MKUltra, #OperationSeaSpray

Human moral judgment emerges from emotion, empathy, lived experience, social development, and our embodied understanding of the world. AI has none of those things. So, can artificial intelligence be taught right from wrong?If we're going to rely on AI (the way the tech bros want us to), we're going to need to trust it, which means we're going to need to believe it has a trustworthy moral sense. Is that reasonable? Or even possible? Pigweed and Crowhill recall Google's Gemini image-generation fiasco (where "give me an image of a pope" created anything but an image of a pope), which resulted from a ham-handed attempted to paste moral rules on top of AI. It was comically stupid, but entirely predictable. Many people assume morality is simply a matter of following a set of rules, but no set of rules can create a proper moral sense. The boys discuss hallucinated legal citations, content moderation, reinforcement learning, the limits of rule-based ethics, Isaac Asimov's famous Three Laws of Robotics, and Pope Leo's recent call for AI guardrails. The conversation also explores autonomous weapons, the global AI arms race, and the uncomfortable reality that even the engineers building these systems do not always understand how they arrive at their conclusions.Their conclusion is both simple and unsettling: AI may become useful, powerful, and even trustworthy in certain contexts, but that is not the same thing as being moral. Machines may imitate moral reasoning, yet human beings must remain skeptical, vigilant, and ultimately responsible for the decisions AI helps make.Can a machine have a conscience? Or are we fooling ourselves when we talk about "moral AI" at all?

The Southern Poverty Law Center began as a respected civil rights organization that targeted the Ku Klux Klan and other extremist groups. Decades later, however, critics argue that the SPLC has drifted far from its original mission, expanding its definition of "hate" to include mainstream religious, political, and advocacy organizations that simply disagree with progressive orthodoxy.In this episode, Pigweed and Crowhill examine the controversy surrounding the SPLC, recent allegations that have damaged its reputation, and the growing number of corporations and institutions that are distancing themselves from the organization's judgments. They also explore a larger question that extends well beyond the SPLC: what happens when an organization is funded by the existence of the very problem it claims to solve?From racism and hate groups to environmental activism and public-interest nonprofits, organizations often face a difficult incentive structure. If they succeed, they become less necessary. If they fail, they can continue raising money, attracting attention, and expanding their influence. Is mission creep inevitable? Does every cause eventually become a business model? And when does a watchdog become an advocate for its own survival?Along the way, Pigweed and Crowhill review a Manor Hill brown ale and discuss the complicated relationship between good intentions, institutional incentives, and the temptation to keep a crisis alive long after its original purpose has been served.

Welcome back to Conspiracy Corner, where Pigweed and Crowhill examine theories that range from ridiculous to surprisingly plausible. This episode tackles one of the internet's newest suspicions: genetically engineered ticks.Lyme disease is rising. Alpha-gal syndrome is spreading. Tick populations seem to be exploding. The government studies ticks. Universities study ticks. Billionaires fund research on insects. And somewhere in the background, people are talking about reducing meat consumption.Is somebody deliberately releasing bioengineered ticks? Or is this just a perfect storm of coincidence, fear, and institutional distrust?Pigweed and Crowhill sort through the facts, the rumors, the helicopter stories, the mysterious boxes, and the reasons this conspiracy theory has gained traction—even if the evidence doesn't quite get it across the finish line.

Were there always teenagers, or did modern society invent them?Pigweed and Crowhill explore the surprising history of adolescence and the emergence of the modern teenager. For most of human history, young people moved directly from childhood into adult responsibilities. They worked on farms, served on ships, fought in wars, and contributed to family life from an early age. So what changed?The conversation traces the rise of the teenager as a distinct social category in the 20th century, examining the effects of compulsory education, child labor laws, postwar prosperity, automobiles, rock and roll, advertising, and mass marketing. Along the way, they discuss powder monkeys in the age of sail, Shakespeare's view of life's stages, James Dean, Elvis Presley, the generation gap, and the creation of a youth culture unlike anything that had existed before.Pigweed and Crowhill also consider the unintended consequences of teen culture: peer groups replacing families as primary influences, prolonged adolescence, changing expectations about responsibility, and the modern tendency to celebrate youth rather than maturity. Was the rise of the teenager an inevitable result of prosperity and social change, or did we accidentally create a cultural phenomenon that now shapes society far more than we realize?As always, the discussion begins with a beer review—this time featuring an Imperial Pilsner from Heavy Seas—and ends with a few reasons for cautious optimism about the next generation.Topics discussed:* The history of adolescence* Child labor and compulsory education* Teen culture in the 1950s* Rock and roll and youth identity* Marketing to teenagers* Responsibility and maturity* Generational change* Modern youth culture* Family vs. peer influence* The future of young adulthood#BeerAndConversation #PigweedAndCrowhill #Teenagers #History #Culture #Parenting #Education #RockAndRoll #GenerationalChange #Society

Crowhill and Pigweed drink and review a Sweet Baby Jesus chocolate peanut butter porter and discuss a question that's challenged churches and society for centuries. Should religion and politics mix?Using a collection of social issue position papers published by the United Methodist Church as a starting point, the conversation explores the history of Methodism, from John Wesley's "heart strangely warmed" experience and the Holy Club at Oxford to the circuit riders who helped spread the movement across the American frontier. Along the way, they examine how Methodism became deeply associated with social reform, including efforts against slavery, drunkenness, and other social ills.The discussion then turns to modern political issues, including immigration, worker justice, climate change, the death penalty, abortion, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Crowhill and Pigweed consider how churches apply biblical principles to contemporary policy debates, where the line between moral teaching and political advocacy should be drawn, and whether clergy are always equipped to speak authoritatively on complex public issues.A recurring theme is the idea that movements formed in crisis often institutionalize a crisis mentality. If a religious movement was born by confronting genuine social problems, does it eventually develop a habit of searching for the next great cause? And does that tendency sometimes lead churches to exaggerate modern problems by comparing them to historic struggles such as slavery, Jim Crow, or the civil rights movement?It's a wide-ranging conversation about faith, public life, church authority, social reform, and the challenges of living out religious convictions in a deeply political age. Plus, as always, there's a beer review to get things started.

Welcome to Conspiracy Corner — where Pigweed and Crowhill examine the plausible, the ridiculous, and the occasionally true theories about what's really going on.In this episode, the guys dive into one of the internet's strangest modern conspiracy theories: “Birds Aren't Real.” Are pigeons actually government surveillance drones? Are birds recharging on power lines? Is bird poop really a tracking system? And why don't you ever see baby pigeons?Along the way, Pigweed and Crowhill unpack the surprising origins of the “Birds Aren't Real” movement, which began as an elaborate satire of conspiracy culture itself. What started as a joke eventually became a fascinating social commentary on internet tribalism, media gullibility, trolling, and the psychological appeal of secret knowledge.The conversation explores:How fake conspiracies can spread like real onesWhy people are drawn to “hidden truth”The role of belonging and identity in conspiracy communitiesMedia reactions to absurd claimsThe strange overlap between irony, satire, and beliefWhy persecution can actually strengthen conspiracy thinkingPlus: fake CIA whistleblowers, QAnon comparisons, and the immortal question: Have you ever seen a baby pigeon?Send your favorite conspiracy theories to: pigweedshow@gmail.com#ConspiracyCorner #BirdsArentReal #ConspiracyTheories #Podcast #PigweedAndCrowhill #ComedyPodcast #Satire #InternetCulture

Pigweed, Crowhill, and Longinus crack open a high-octane Voodoo Ranger “GeForce” IPA and head west into one of the greatest adventures in American history: the Lewis and Clark expedition. What begins as a discussion of America's upcoming 250th anniversary quickly turns into a deep dive into the astonishing story of how a small band of explorers crossed an almost completely unknown continent armed with little more than maps, muskets, determination, and an absurd amount of practical skill.The conversation covers the Louisiana Purchase, Thomas Jefferson's constitutional concerns about buying so much land, and the widespread belief that America had just purchased a giant worthless desert. The guys discuss Jefferson's ambitious goals for the expedition — mapping rivers, collecting scientific samples, establishing diplomatic relations with Native tribes, searching for trade opportunities, and hopefully finding a navigable water route to the Pacific Ocean.Along the way, they explore the personalities of Meriwether Lewis and William Clark, the remarkable role of Sacagawea and her infant son Jean-Baptiste, encounters with Native American tribes, brutal winters, grizzly bears, starvation in the Rockies, and the staggering amount of improvisation required just to survive. They also marvel at the sheer competence of frontier-era men who could build forts, construct canoes, map terrain, hunt, trap, waterproof boats with animal hides, and keep detailed scientific journals — all while trying not to die.The episode also touches on the strange emotional aftermath of the expedition, especially the tragic decline of Meriwether Lewis after returning home from one of the greatest journeys in American history. The result is part history lesson, part meditation on exploration and resilience, and part appreciation for the rugged, multi-talented people who helped shape early America.Also discussed: woolly mammoth rumors, whale blubber, drunken bargain malt liquor IPAs, and why showing up with a woman and a baby might be the greatest diplomatic strategy ever devised.

In this episode of Beer and Conversation, Crowhill, Pigweed, and Longinus crack open a West Coast pilsner and dive into the world of Louis L'Amour.The boys review three L'Amour stories:* Mistakes Can Kill You* The Man from Battle Flat* The Rider of the Ruby HillsAlong the way, they discuss frontier justice, cattle rustling, gunslingers, hidden competence, classic Western themes, and whether L'Amour deserves more literary respect than critics usually give him. They also explore the appeal of “formulaic” storytelling, memorable cowboy language, and how L'Amour's deep historical research gave authenticity to his Westerns.Topics include:* Why Louis L'Amour became the defining Western writer of the 20th century* The difference between “great literature” and great storytelling* Western archetypes and the hero journey* Real Old West terminology and ranch culture* Why audiences often love familiar story structuresPlus: beer review, cowboy slang, and a surprising discussion about opium smuggling in a Western novella.If you enjoy Western fiction, classic storytelling, or authors like Stephen King and Jack London, this one's for you.

What if the modern world was shaped by people wanting better-tasting food?In this episode of Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill, we dive into the surprisingly wild history of the spice trade — from pepper worth its weight in silver to the Dutch East India Company, piracy, colonialism, the Columbian Exchange, and the discovery of chocolate, chili peppers, coffee, tea, and sugar.Along the way, we explore:* Why spices were once luxury items for kings* How the search for cinnamon and pepper helped launch the Age of Exploration* Why Columbus accidentally found the Americas* How the Dutch created one of the world's first mega-corporations* The dark side of the spice trade: war, slavery, and empire* Why your kitchen spice cabinet is a tiny museum of world historyPlus: Crowhill experiments with a homemade Manhattan variation called “The Dutch Indian.”History, economics, food, exploration, trade, empire, and cocktails — all in one conversation.

In this episode of Beer & Conversation with Pigweed & Crowhill, the guys crack open a homebrewed IPA and dive into one of the most controversial ideas in modern culture: “suicidal empathy,” a term popularized by evolutionary psychologist Gad Saad.The conversation explores:* The difference between empathy and sympathy* Why empathy evolved in human societies* How compassion can become self-destructive* The “weaponization of empathy” in politics and culture* Immigration, tribal loyalty, and social cohesion* The balance between compassion and judgment* Whether modern Western culture has lost that balanceAlong the way, Pigweed and Crowhill discuss evolutionary psychology, virtue signaling, theory of mind, and why even good virtues can become dangerous when pushed to extremes.If you enjoy long-form conversations about culture, philosophy, politics, psychology, religion, and the strange state of the modern world, subscribe and join the discussion.

In this episode of Beer and Conversation, Pigweed and Crowhill take on a recent United Nations resolution addressing the history of slavery and the call for reparative justice. Beginning with the obvious — slavery is a moral evil — they quickly move past the headline and dig into the deeper question: which history is being told, and why?The discussion explores the broader global context of slavery, including the transatlantic trade, intra-African slavery, and the often-overlooked Arab slave trade that spanned centuries and affected millions. Along the way, they challenge the common narrative that frames slavery primarily as a Western phenomenon and examine how economic realities, geography, and historical conditions shaped the “supply chain” of slavery across different regions. They also unpack the political dimensions of the UN resolution—why certain countries supported it, why others abstained or opposed it, and what role modern ideologies play in shaping how history is interpreted. The conversation raises uncomfortable questions about reparations, historical accountability, and whether it's possible—or even meaningful—to apply modern legal and moral frameworks to actions that were once widely accepted.From there, Pigweed and Crowhill zoom out to consider a broader pattern: the tendency to simplify complex historical realities into morally satisfying narratives. They discuss how this dynamic shows up not just in conversations about slavery, but in how nations remember (or ignore) other forms of conquest, exploitation, and violence—from the Mongol Empire to the Aztecs to European colonial powers.As always, the episode blends historical commentary with candid opinion, a bit of humor, and a willingness to question prevailing assumptions. And, true to form, it all begins with a beer—this time, Dale's American Light Lager.

In this episode of Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill, we start with a light IPA, but quickly get into a heavy topic: how devices like Ring cameras are quietly reshaping everyday surveillance. What begins as a helpful feature — like Ring's “Search Party” for finding lost pets — raises bigger questions. If cameras can identify your dog, what else are they tracking? And who ultimately has access to that data? We explore the tradeoffs between convenience and privacy, including:* How networked cameras could allow real-time tracking of people and vehicles* The growing normalization of constant recording in public (and even private) spaces* The risks of data collection happening *before* you opt in or out* Why the question “What do you have to hide?” might be the wrong one* How surveillance tools—originally built for safety—can be misused by individuals, corporations, or governmentsAlong the way, we connect Ring cameras to broader trends: dash cams, license plate scanners, facial recognition, and even government surveillance programs. The result? A world where everything is recorded—and the real question is not *if* it will be used, but *how*. Is this just the cost of modern convenience, or are we drifting toward something much bigger?Grab a drink and join the conversation.

How did New York City elect Zohran Mamdani—and what does it mean for the future of America's most important city?In this episode of *Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill*, we review a citrusy blonde ale while unpacking the rise of NYC's new mayor and the ideas driving his agenda: socialism, wealth redistribution, and an expansive vision of government power. We dig into:* Mamdani's background and rapid political rise* The appeal of socialism among younger NYC voters* Policies like free buses, government-run grocery stores, and rent control* The real-world consequences of taxing the rich and expanding government* Tensions between progressive politics, religion, and modern cultural movementsAlong the way, we ask a deeper question: is this just another political cycle, or a sign of something more fundamental changing in New York and the West?If you're interested in NYC politics, socialism, or the future of major cities, this is a conversation you won't want to miss.Grab a beer and join us.

With special guest Longinus, the boys drink and review Noir, a black IPA from DuClaw, then discuss slang. In this episode of Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill, we dive into a wide-ranging (and occasionally grumpy) discussion on slang — what it is, where it comes from, and why so much of it drives us up the wall. From Valley Girl “like” to “literally” meaning its opposite, from “no worries” to “full stop,” we go through the phrases we love, the ones we tolerate, and the ones we refuse to say under any circumstances.Along the way, we explore:* Why slang spreads (and why it spreads faster now than ever)* The role of influencers, media, and subcultures in shaping language* How words become clever… and then unbearable* Whether language is evolving faster—or just differently* Why you'd be exposed instantly as a time traveler just by the way you talkWe also get into newer phrases like “based,” “not on my bingo card,” and “living rent free in my head,” and ask the deeper question: what does the way we speak reveal about who we are?Bottom line: language is fun… until everyone starts saying the same thing.Cheers.

In this episode of Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill, we crack open a Steady Eddie IPA and take on a big cultural question: why are people who hate Star Trek directing, producing, and writing the show?From the optimism of Star Trek: The Original Series and the (somewhat) moral clarity of Star Trek: The Next Generation to the confusion of modern efforts like Star Trek: Discovery, something clearly changed.We explore:* Why classic Star Trek worked as a moral framework without preaching* The shift from storytelling to ideology* How strong characters like Picard gave way to “feelings-first” writing* The difference between a future where humanity improves… and one where standards disappear* Why newer shows feel more like social commentary than science fictionAlong the way, we revisit favorite series, debate underrated entries like Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, and ask whether anything in modern Trek—like Star Trek: Strange New Worlds—still captures the original spirit.This isn't just about Star Trek. It's about storytelling, culture, and what happens when a compelling vision of the future gets replaced by something else entirely.And yes, there's a beer review and a few Star Trek trivia detours along the way.

Pigweed and Crowhill drink and review Lindemans Pecheresse, a Belgian Fruit Lambic, then discuss the show's uncanny ability to predict the future. In this episode we update past topics and predictions. An earlier show discussed kill switches and cameras in cars. There have been some developments to that story. On the show where we questioned whether psychiatry is science (mostly it isn't), the boys asked if it was time to bring back involuntary commitment. We also discussed the over-prescription of psychiatric drugs and the interesting correlation between mental health and going to church. Pigweed called attention to the problem of cousin marriage, and what do you know? -- Britain is experiencing a huge rise in birth defects as a result of cousin marriage from Pakistani immigrants. At peak trans madness, the boys predicted a time when the monsters who are promoting this barbarity were fined and jailed. We're starting to see it happen. Recently, some of these ghoulish doctors were fined millions of dollars for performing a double mastectomy on a child. The boys did a show calling out gerrymandering foolishness, but Maryland is still going full speed ahead. To "protect democracy," of course. Another show on Persia predicted the bombs would start dropping within ten days. That prediction was exactly right. They also predicted that the regime will fall in two months. That prediction is still outstanding. The boys discuss the ongoing Iran war. Re: the infrastructure show we update the "sewage in the Potomac" story and wonder again why the "mainstream press" is so uninterested. We recap the Julian Assange and Edward Snowden situation. Trump is now considering pardoning them and then bringing them in to help expose corruption inside the intelligence system. That would be interesting. The show ends with a letter from long-time listener and contributor JR about whether Social Security is a Ponzi scheme.

The boys drink and review Finest Kind IPA from Smuttynose, then talk about efforts to make Alberta an independent nation. Pigweed's news feed has been full of talk about this burgeoning movement in Canada. Alberta is an energy rich province that sends a lot of money to Ottawa, but doesn't get much in return. Albertans hate being under the thumb of a government thousands of miles away with completely different values. The story seemed so exciting and right up Pigweed's alley ... until he realized his feed was exaggerating the popularity of the movement. It's at about 30 percent. But would Canada allow Alberta to leave even if Albertans voted for it? P&C have their doubts. Would Canada peacefully allow their cash cow to leave?

The boys drink and review a cream ale from Jailbreak Brewery, then discuss the dramatic decline in trust in our institutions. Trust in institutions used to be the default. Today, it's the exception.From corruption and abuse of power to ideological capture and growing economic inequality, many people feel that the institutions that once anchored society — government, media, academia, and public health — have become distant, opaque, and unaccountable. When ordinary citizens see elites displaying obscene wealth, when justice appears unevenly applied, or when powerful organizations seem staffed by insiders and relatives, skepticism becomes inevitable.But there's a deeper problem: institutions are not people.When trust breaks between individuals, you can repair it through conversation and accountability. With large bureaucracies that kind of repair is much harder.The discussion also examines how ideological conflict fuels distrust. Some argue that skepticism toward institutions reflects a rejection of facts. Others counter that trust was damaged when institutions themselves misled the public on major issues — from shifting COVID narratives to the media's failure to understand the political forces that produced Donald Trump's rise in 2016.So what happens when institutions lose credibility? Can trust be rebuilt—or are we entering a new era where citizens simply stop believing the organizations that once guided public life?Pigweed and Crowhill dig into the causes, the consequences, and the uncomfortable questions we can't ignore.

The boys drink and review Dogfish Head's Sixty-One, which is an IPA brewed with Pinot Noir grapes, then discuss the idea that AI will make us all wealthy while Pigweed's cat prances around the studio. Elon Musk recently said that AI + robotics will eliminate scarcity to the point that there's no real point in saving for retirement. We'll have "universal high income." It's like the Star Trek vision of the future where all your needs are provided for. Does that make any sense? Can an economy function like that? Will "AI abundance" arrive simultaneously for every human need? Who will pay the taxes? What does "lack of scarcity" really mean? There can be an abundance of food, or healthcare. AI isn't going to make more beachfront. How do we get from here to there? What happens to property rights? Will the people who own the AI share their wealth with everybody else? Why? Who will make them do it? When people start losing jobs (by the millions), how will they live? The idea that we'll tax AI to pay the people who are laid off doesn't make sense. If you tax the AI to pay the displaced workers, what have you gained? The internal contradictions in the optimistic view of an AI-driven future are mind-boggling. The boys try to parse through it all.

P&C drink and review Pigweed's homebrewed porter then discuss squatter's rights. Can somebody just take over your house when you're on vacation? There's a famous case in Maryland where some "activist" has moved in to a $2.3 million house that had been foreclosed on. Can she do that? Who's to stop her, and how? "Adverse possession" is the technical word for squatter's rights. But it only applies in narrow situations. Not just somebody moving in. Social media has made this worse. People share the location of unused houses and help people take possession of these homes. Sometimes they then rent the property out to others. This is a daily occurrence in Baltimore. The boys also reply to letters on recent topics we've covered, including psychology, consciousness and AI, and mental illnesses. Pigweed also notices that other podcasts and shows are picking up our topics without giving us any credit. The boys end the show with a reprise of the Potomac River problem.

Pigweed and Crowhill drink and review a Copper Legend, an Oktoberfest from Jack's Abbey brewing. The topic for today: Has the development of AI changed our perspective on whether or not we're living in a simulation? Starting with Nick Bostrom's famous essay, the boys discuss the issues and why we might not be as "real" as we think we are. The development of AI has made Bostrom's essay even more significant. The idea that simulated minds might soon outnumber "real" minds is no longer an abstract science fiction question. On top of all this, we have stories about discussion groups just for AI -- where the bots talk to the bots. Another approach to the issue is to question what "real" means anyway. Our concept of the real, the physical, seems less and less likely as we discover that the hard substances around us are mostly empty space. It might be all empty space, with no "things" there at all. It's no longer a question for college freshmen in a late-night dorm chat. We have to ask ourselves what we're going to do when AI starts to claim that it's sentient. Finally, how does all this affect the way we live our lives? How does it affect questions of meaning and purpose? What about theological questions?

With special guest Longinus, Pigweed and Crowhill review Nugget Nectar from Troegs and then turn to Death in Venice, a short but unsettling story about beauty, obsession, and moral collapse.Longinus provides a brief biography of Thomas Mann, and then the boys walk through the story while unpacking its major themes.This is a controversial book, and they don't shy away from it's ugly side. Mann explores hidden desires and forbidden obsession, along with the danger of aesthetic fascination untethered from moral restraint.Ultimately, the discussion centers on a larger question: Does beauty have a special philosophical or theological weight — and what happens when beauty replaces wisdom, when form is severed from moral truth, and when a man mistakes aesthetic experience for spiritual insight?Along the way, the conversation draws on Nietzsche's The Birth of Tragedy, parallels from the book of Proverbs, and the underlying struggle of an Apollonian man confronted by Dionysian temptation.

The boys drink and review Brother Joseph's Belgian-style Double Ale from Straight To Ale then discuss the war on beauty. Pigweed wonders why everything is so ugly. Older buildings -- even sewage plants -- were beautiful. They were built to lift the human spirit. Modern buildings are built to be hideous. Why? It's so cheap to make things beautiful these days. Why don't we? It's almost as if we're choosing ugliness. Even churches are ugly. What about a banana taped to the wall as "art"? That's not an aesthetic statement, it's a statement about standards and meaning. That is, that there is no meaning. The boys discuss the present reality of omnipresent ugliness and review its possible historical origins. Join us for a deep dive into this fascinating topic.

10 13 25 Pigweed Control by Ag PhD

The boys drink and review Pigweed's homebrewed Black IPA, then discuss cancel culture in the light of the Charlie Kirk story. Defenders of so-called cancel culture object to the term. They say it's just "consequence culture." Traditionally, conservatives have been against cancel culture -- because it's usually a weapon deployed by liberals against conservatives. But now, when liberals like Jimmy Kimmel are canceled for lying about Charlie Kirk, conservatives seem to have changed their tune. But have they? Not quite. There's a huge difference between what liberals have been doing -- trying to get someone fired for having a different political opinion -- and what conservatives are celebrating, which is when people promote or celebrate political violence. The boys work through the issues and make the necessary distinctions.

P&C drink and review a dopplebock from Troegs then ask whether there's a difference between a liberal and a leftist. Pigweed reflects on his youth and his admiration for the free spirit attitude of the hippies, and that while he hasn't moved, the Overton Window has moved around him, shifting him from left to right. The normal politics of a 1995 Democrat turn the left's hair on fire. Even recent quotes from Clinton, Obama, Schumer, and other Democrats are completely out of step with the modern left. On crime, the border, gay marriage, trans issues, and a host of other issues, an orthodox Democrat from 1995 would be unwelcome in the modern Democratic Party. "Liberal" used to mean ... * Personal autonomy * Individual rights * Economic freedom * Constitutional limited government * Free speech The modern left has flipped all these things on their head. More at ... https://www.pigweedandcrowhill.com/https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYAjUk6LttQyUk_fV9F46R06OQgH39exQ#Liberalism #leftism #politicalviolence #culturewar