Podcasts about dream podcast

Inside the 12 Phases of Transition, Angelic Attendants, Past Lives & the Science of IntuitionPodcast Highlights~1) Who's really communicating with you from the unseen world2) The shocking truth about healing and death3) What actually happens in the afterlife—and who meets you there4) What Source says about fear (and why it controls so much)Julie Ryan is here; you'll discover how the invisible world around you—your angels, your past lives, your health, and even the loved ones you've lost—are communicating with you constantly. Stay with us, because what Julie reveals may change the way you understand healing, death, and your own soul's design. To learn more: ⁠https://askjulieryan.com/⁠Experience the adventure of a lifetime - a trip to Greece and Turkey in March 2026. Join Debbi aboard the Celebrity Cruise line for the Mystery School experience to acnient ruins, with presentation aboard the ship with the worl'd best speakers: ⁠https://mysteryschoolatsea.com⁠ (click on Debbi Dachinger under referral)Enter a world of channeling, ET's, metaphysics & multidimensional truth. Dare to Dream reveals what most shows won't touch — and what your soul's been asking for.Free Starseed Report: ⁠https://debbidachinger.com/starseed⁠IG: @⁠daretodreampodcast⁠ @⁠debbidachinger⁠Hosted by Debbi Dachinger, award-winning broadcaster, shamanic healer, & book launch mentor for authors ready to rise. ⁠https://debbidachinger.com⁠#JulieRyan #PsychicMedium #medicalintuitive #AngelicAttendants #afterlife #spiritualhealing #energymedicine #pastlives #soulcontracts #spiritcommunication #intuition #consciousness #healingjourney #daretodreampodcast #debbidachinger #death #dying #angels #animals #healingBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/dare-to-dream-with-debbi-dachinger--1980925/support.

Alignment always requires boldness—because when God speaks, He asks you to move.In this episode of Free to Dream Podcast, we have an honest conversation about what boldness is, and what it's not. Boldness isn't about personality, confidence, or volume. It's simply the willingness to respond. If you've been waiting to feel ready before you move, this conversation will challenge that mindset and help you see boldness through a biblical lens—where faith isn't passive and obedience builds momentum.Don't forget: Your alignment awaits! Click here to join me for the Arise & Align Experience: https://thejuliagentry.com/ariseandalignexperience/Or to learn more about How to Arise & Align like your life depends on it, click here: https://youtu.be/3rnPngwFmyUSubscribe to my podcast, Free to Dream Podcast, for more in-depth teachings that will make you laugh, cry, and not feel so alone: https://thejuliagentry.com/podcast/To learn even more about me: TheJuliaGentry.com To read the book that started this whole thing, DREAM - I Dare You: https://thejuliagentry.com/booksLove the show? Subscribe, rate, review, and share!Join the Free To Dream Community today:https://thejuliagentry.comInstagramFacebookYouTube

Billy Reveals the Fractal Code of Reality, Conscious Creation, and the Forgotten Science of the AncientsPodcast Highlights:• The shocking way ancient civilizations engineered manifestation using geometry and frequency• Why the universe behaves like a living, intelligent hologram • How sacred symbols were actually instruction manuals for reality creation• What modern humanity lost — and how to reclaim our cosmic creative power Join Billy and me at the L.A. Conscious Life Expo Feb 20-23, go to: ⁠https://debbidachinger.com/cle⁠What if the ancients didn't just worship the stars — they engineered reality through them? Billy Carson joins us to reveal how lost civilizations understood manifestation, consciousness, and the fractal code of the universe — and how that knowledge can radically change how you create your life right now. ⁠https://www.4biddenknowledge.com⁠Enter a world of channeling, ET's, metaphysics & multidimensional truth. Dare to Dream reveals what most shows won't touch — and what your soul's been asking for.Free Starseed Report: ⁠https://debbidachinger.com/starseed⁠IG: @daretodreampodcast @debbidachingerHosted by Debbi Dachinger, award-winning broadcaster, shamanic healer, & book launch mentor for authors ready to rise. #debbidachinger #daretodreampodcast #podcast #billycarson #4biddenknowledge #ancientcivilizations #manifestation #sacredgeometry #holographicuniverse #emeraldtablets #consciousness #StarKnowledge #realitycreation #cosmictruths #hiddenhistory #galacticwisdomBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/dare-to-dream-with-debbi-dachinger--1980925/support.

This episode is brought to you by B2B Better. We turned down SaaS clients and e-commerce brands to become the only video-first podcast agency for service-based B2B businesses. Specificity is the strategy.  If you've ever said "we can do that" to every client who walks in, this episode is your wake-up call. Host Jason Bradwell breaks down why niching down is the fastest path to becoming the obvious choice, and why being a bit of everything for everyone means you're actually nothing for nobody. Jason's core point is clear: when he set out to build B2B Better, he committed to being specific on two levels - who they serve and what they do. Not just B2B, because B2B is a hemisphere. They went one layer deeper: service-based businesses. Consulting firms, agencies, system integrators, compliance specialists. Companies that sell expertise, not products. People, not software. Trust and relationships, not features and pricing. That's what lends itself to their service: video-first podcasts that turn your point of view into pipeline. Nothing else. The same principle applies to podcasts. When a client says they want to launch a show, Jason's first question is: what's your superpower? Here's the formula. "This is a podcast about X, and unlike other podcasts about X, only we do Y." Most B2B podcasts fail this test. They say "we're a podcast about technology" or "leadership" or "AI." So are thousands of others. There's no "and." There's no reason to choose you. Add the "and" and everything changes. One show in the B2B Better portfolio is Data and Biotech: "a podcast about data science, and unlike other data science podcasts, only we explore it through the lens of biotech manufacturing." Suddenly if you're a data scientist in biotech, there's only one show for you. That specificity drives 75% to 80% episode completion rates, nearly double the industry average because every listener is exactly the right person. The fear of niching down is real. Every founder worries about leaving money on the table. But saying yes to everyone dilutes your positioning, creates operational inefficiency, and kills pricing power. What actually happens when you niche properly: the funnel gets narrower at first, but the people who raise their hand are perfect fits. They convert faster, pay more, stay longer, and refer others in the same niche. Year one it feels limiting. Year three it feels like leverage. Year five it feels like a moat. The framework to choose your niche: look at your best clients, not biggest. Validate the economics. Test your thesis before announcing publicly. Then commit hard and communicate clearly—change the website, the LinkedIn, the pitch deck. Say who you serve and who you don't. Resonance over reach. Always. Chapter Markers 00:00 - The "we can do anything" agency problem 01:00 - Why B2B isn't a niche, it's a hemisphere 02:00 - Choosing service-based businesses as the core niche 03:00 - Selling expertise, not products: why podcasts fit perfectly 04:00 - Video-first podcasts and the full service offering 05:00 - The superpower formula for podcast positioning 06:00 - Data and Biotech: the power of the "and" 07:00 - 75 to 80% completion rates and what resonance looks like 08:00 - Deeply engaged beats loosely interested every time 09:00 - Addressing the fear of leaving money on the table 10:00 - How niching compounds: pricing, referrals, close rates 11:00 - Four-step framework to choose your niche 12:00 - Specialists compound, generalists reset to zero 13:00 - Resonance is a revenue metric, reach is vanity 14:00 - Direct, systematic, results-driven: the B2B Better approach 15:00 - Write your "and" statement this week Useful Links Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Listen to Pipe Dream on Podbean Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

This episode is brought to you by B2B Better. Most owned media audits produce 50-page reports with vague recommendations and zero next steps. We give you four questions, 90 minutes, and a clear decision: kill, fix, or scale.  If your podcast has downloads but no pipeline, this episode shows you how to audit your entire owned media strategy in 90 minutes and walk away knowing what's broken and how to fix it. Host Jason Bradwell breaks down the Four R Framework — Reach, Resonance, Revenue, and Repeatability — plus a decision tree to kill, fix, or scale. Jason's core point is clear: most owned media audits are useless. They take weeks and produce reports filled with vanity metrics. Today you get four questions that reveal everything in 90 minutes. Reach is the least important. It can be bought. If you turn off ads tomorrow, what happens? That tells you whether you have real distribution or rented attention. Resonance is where it gets interesting. Jason would rather have 100 views at 85% consumption than 10,000 views at 20%. The 100 who watch the whole thing are deeply engaged. The 10,000 who clicked away were never going to buy. For video, 50% consumption is good, 70% is excellent. For podcasts, 50% is good, 75% is excellent. Revenue asks: is your strategy generating commercial results? The benchmark: 30 to 50% of closed deals should have at least one content touch. Content-influenced deals should close 20 to 30% faster. If attribution is weak, you have an activation problem, not a content problem. Repeatability determines if your strategy works long term. You should produce content four to six weeks in advance without overtime. If you're in hero mode with one person holding everything together, you need systems, not heroics. The decision tree is simple. High reach but low resonance? Fix the content. Low reach but high resonance? Scale distribution. Low everything? Kill it. High everything but low repeatability? Fix operations first. Chapter Markers 00:00 - Why most owned media audits are useless 01:00 - The Four R Framework and why reach matters least 02:00 - Resonance and consumption rate benchmarks 03:00 - 100 views at 85% beats 10,000 at 20% 04:00 - Revenue attribution and pipeline influence 05:00 - Direct vs influenced vs self-reported attribution 06:00 - Repeatability and sustainability benchmarks 07:00 - Hero mode vs documented processes 08:00 - The decision tree: kill, fix, or scale 09:00 - High reach but low resonance means fix content 10:00 - What to do on Monday morning based on your audit 11:00 - Fix activation by emailing sales directly 12:00 - Four questions, 90 minutes, one action 13:00 - Get the full audit template with benchmarks Useful Links Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Listen to Pipe Dream on Podbean Explore ABM reporting in HubSpot for tracking accounts touched Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

Who you are in Christ shapes how you live, decide, and show up every day.If you feel disconnected, unsure, or stuck striving, this message will bring clarity.Who you are in Christ is not just a theological idea—it's the foundation for identity, confidence, and spiritual growth in real life.In this episode of Free to Dream Podcast, we explore how the power of God works through identity, not performance. From Genesis to Ephesians, Scripture reveals that when identity is lost, people hide—but when identity is restored, God's power becomes active.In this episode, you'll discover:What the Bible really means by who you are in ChristWhy identity confusion leads to burnout, fear, and strivingHow the power of God operates through alignment, not effortWhat Ephesians teaches about being wrapped in ChristHow understanding your identity changes daily decisions and directionThis teaching is for anyone who wants faith that works in everyday life—not just on Sundays.When you know who you are in Christ, everything changes.

This episode is brought to you by B2B Better. Stop sending "just checking in" emails. We build owned media systems that give your sales team actual reasons to reach out, turning podcasts into sales enablement assets that move deals forward. If your sales reps send "just checking in" emails to prospects who've gone quiet, this episode explains why those fail and what to do instead. Host Jason Bradwell breaks down how to create milestone moments, legitimate, value-led reasons to reach out through long sales cycles without sounding desperate. Jason's core point is clear: most B2B sales cycles are brutally long, but sales teams don't know how to stay present without being annoying. The traditional approach fails. Discovery call, proposal sent, then "just checking in" emails with no response. Twelve months later, the prospect went with a competitor because "you didn't understand our business." After month two, you had nothing valuable to say. 95% of B2B Better's clients have sales cycles over six months. And 95% of your customers are out of market at any given time. Your job is to stay present so when they flip to being in market, they think of you first. Most owned media falls apart here. Marketing creates beautiful content. Sales sees it but has no idea how to use it in actual sales motion. Marketing measures downloads. Sales measures meetings. Different languages, different outcomes. Milestone moments fix this. Month one: send proposal plus a podcast clip addressing their exact challenge. Month three: benchmark report. Month four: webinar invite. Month five: customer story. Month six: check in with context. Months seven to twelve: new episodes create new reasons to reach out. Month eighteen: deal closes because you felt like a partner. B2B Better's sales enablement kits deliver three clips with email copy, key graphics, follow-up sequences, and tags showing which funnel stage each piece serves. One innovation: sales stitch videos where reps record 30-second reactions to clips. Personal brands beat company brands these generate thousands of views when originals get hundreds. This works with three things: marketing-sales alignment through quarterly planning, infrastructure for sales to contribute to production, and attribution through CRM tracking plus conversations about where content surfaces in deals. Chapter Markers 00:00 - The "just checking in" problem that kills deals 01:00 - Context on long sales cycles and 95% out-of-market buyers 02:00 - Why owned media strategies fall apart at sales activation 03:00 - Traditional approach: proposal to dead deal in 12 months 04:00 - Milestone moments approach: 18-month cycle done right 06:00 - What qualifies as a milestone moment 07:00 - Timing and sequencing content to the buyer journey 08:00 - Sales enablement kit components 09:00 - Tags and metadata for searchable, attributable content 10:00 - Sales stitch videos: personalising content at scale 11:00 - Why personal brands beat company brands in B2B 12:00 - Three requirements: alignment between teams 13:00 - Infrastructure for sales to contribute to production 14:00 - Attribution: quantitative and qualitative tracking 15:00 - The challenge: audit your last five gone-quiet emails Useful Links Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Read the Ehrenberg-Bass 95-5 rule research Explore HubSpot CRM for tracking content touches Check out Salesforce CRM Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

Most B2B companies struggle to turn marketing into measurable pipeline. At B2B Better, we build owned media systems that sales teams actually use to close deals, shortening cycles, improving reply rates, and directly influencing revenue. If you're tired of content that looks good on paper but doesn't move the business forward, visit the links in the show notes to learn how we do it differently. If your best clients won't sign case studies because legal says no, this episode shows you exactly how to flip that dynamic. Host Jason Bradwell shares how he cracked this problem working in broadcast media tech, where sports properties refused to give free logo rights to vendors they were already paying. Jason's core point: legal teams don't fear telling the story, they fear losing control over how it's told. Traditional case studies feel like monumental approval chains with multiple drafts and stakeholder reviews. It's easier to just say no. Jason worked for a tech company serving major sports media properties. The opportunity seemed obvious: tell stories about household name clients. But sports rights holders get paid millions for sponsorship rights. Why would they give a tech vendor free permission to use their name for marketing? Most teams try tactics that don't work: anonymous case studies nobody believes, paying for logo rights, using old logos without permission, or giving up entirely and competing on price. Here's what changed. When Jason's team sat down with legal teams, they learned it wasn't fear of the story—it was fear of losing control and bandwidth nightmares. So they launched a podcast with a different value exchange. Instead of "come talk about how great we are," the pitch was "come talk about your work and how you see the industry evolving." Questions submitted in advance. Full approval. Nothing goes live without sign-off. A VP of digital from a major sports league who'd said no to every promotional request for years agreed almost immediately. When Jason asked why, the answer was clear: "For years you've been asking me to do things for you. But this time you asked me to do something for me." The unlock is simple. Traditional case studies ask for public endorsement with high risk and zero personal upside. Editorial podcasts offer a platform to showcase expertise, professionally produced content they can use, and full control. The acceptance rate jumps from 5% for case studies to 70% for editorial podcasts. Sales can share clips without requiring testimonials, and the credibility is more authentic because it doesn't feel like marketing. Chapter Markers 00:00 - The legal blocker problem across every sector 01:00 - Working with sports media properties that wouldn't give logo rights 02:00 - Why GDPR and compliance make traditional case studies nearly impossible 03:00 - Four failed attempts most teams try 04:00 - What legal and compliance teams actually fear 05:00 - How podcasts flip the value exchange 06:00 - The breakthrough moment with the VP of digital 07:00 - Why "look how great they are" beats "look how great we are" 08:00 - Traditional case study vs editorial podcast value exchange 09:00 - The counterintuitive power of implied association 10:00 - The seven-step execution process 11:00 - Using content strategically in sales without testimonials 12:00 - Acceptance rates and ROI timeline 13:00 - Why this works even for clients who'd sign case studies 14:00 - The challenge: Email your top 10 blocked clients Useful Links Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Check out The Tim Ferriss Show and The Twenty Minute VC Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

If your podcast has 10,000 downloads and only two sales meetings, Jason's take is blunt: you're doing everything wrong. In this solo episode of Pipe Dream, host Jason Bradwell breaks down why most B2B podcasts become expensive therapy sessions for executives who like hearing themselves talk, and more importantly, how to fix it. Jason's core point is clear: downloads don't pay salaries, pipeline does. Most B2B podcasts fail commercially for four reasons. They borrow strategy from B2C entertainment instead of building revenue assets. They optimise for vanity metrics because that's what vendors sell. They exist in a silo with no connection to sales motion or funnel stages. And the generic interview format doesn't map to the buyer journey. The problem isn't production quality or download numbers. The problem is that marketing makes the show, sales doesn't know it exists, and when sales don't use it, it's just an expensive content theatre. One 45-minute conversation with a random influencer doesn't help a prospect at the consideration stage trying to figure out if you can actually deliver results, or help a champion sell your solution internally to their CFO. Instead of downloads, impressions, and social shares, here's what actually matters. Leading indicators like enterprise guests booked from your ABM lists, meetings created attributed to podcast touch, and accounts touched. Commercial outcomes like deal stage acceleration, rep usage in sequences and discovery calls, and pipeline influenced. That's the difference between vanity metrics and revenue metrics. One makes marketing feel busy, the other moves the business forward. Jason shares a real example. A B2B tech company ran a podcast for 18 months with 40 episodes, a few thousand downloads, and zero pipeline influence. They interviewed random influencers because "that's what podcasts do." Their sales team had never heard of the show. B2B Better killed the influencer strategy and started interviewing their own clients, CTOs and engineering leaders who'd worked with them but would never sign traditional case studies due to compliance constraints. They packaged content as battle cards and sales enablement artifacts, not social clips. Within 90 days, sales used clips in 60% of discovery calls, influenced £3 million in pipeline, and improved outbound reply rates by 34% when reps included a 92-second client clip in sequences. Same production effort, completely different outcome. The only difference was strategy. Here's the process. Audit your funnel gaps to find where deals actually stall. Map content to that stage. Design multi-segment episodes that serve different funnel stages, not one 45-minute interview that does nothing particularly well. Package for sales with battle cards, objection handlers, and committee packs. Measure commercial impact through meetings created, accounts touched, pipeline influenced, and deal velocity, not downloads. If you can't answer "which specific deals will this help us close," you're not ready for a podcast. You don't have a content problem, you have a strategy problem. Stop trying to be Joe Rogan. You're building a revenue asset, not an entertainment show. Chapter Markers 00:00 - Why downloads don't pay salaries, pipeline does 01:00 - The word podcast has become a red herring 02:00 - Four reasons B2B podcasts fail commercially 03:00 - No connection to sales motion equals content theatre 04:00 - Revenue metrics that actually matter 05:00 - Real example: Zero to £3 million pipeline influenced 06:00 - The process: Audit, map, design, package, measure 07:00 - Multi-segment episodes serving different funnel stages 08:00 - Most teams shouldn't have a podcast yet 09:00 - The activation test: Ask sales if they've used it Useful Links Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Listen to Pipe Dream Podcast on Podbean HubSpot ABM reporting guide for tracking accounts touched Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

If you're creating a dozen LinkedIn clips, X posts, blog articles, and email newsletters from every podcast episode because you can, this episode will change how you think about repurposing forever. In this solo episode of Pipe Dream, host Jason Bradwell breaks down why most B2B teams get content atomisation completely wrong and what to do instead. Jason's core point is clear: just because you can create 50 things from one piece of content doesn't mean you should. The real problem isn't lack of effort, it's creating a little bit of everything instead of focusing on the few assets that actually move prospects through the buyer journey. Most teams are building redundancy, not results. The appeal of content repurposing is obvious. You record one 60-minute podcast episode and suddenly you can create clips for LinkedIn, X, Instagram, blog posts, newsletters, listicles for SEO, and ads. At the end, you've got 50 things from one episode. Sounds amazing, right? But that mindset creates massive redundancy because you're not asking the critical question: should you actually create all of this? Can you create clips for X? Sure. But are your customers actually on X? Only three people subscribe to your newsletter, so why spend the time turning this into an email? What B2B Better does instead is map the content they create from one flagship piece against the buyer journey, specifically the stages of buyer awareness: unaware, problem aware, solution aware, and product aware. When you map these stages on a grid, you can identify how to plug each gap using different distribution channels. Take the unaware stage. There's a subset of your target audience that's unaware a massive problem is facing them. How do you reach them? B2B Better typically suggests running ads on platforms like LinkedIn or Google using content from your podcast that educates them about the problem. But you can't just hope that content naturally comes out of your recording. You need to script for it ahead of time. If you're running a guest-based podcast, ask questions that evoke answers and perspectives that educate unaware customers about the problem they're facing. Now flip to the product aware stage. These are people who know about the problem and solutions available, but don't have enough trust in your product to pull the trigger. For this stage, interview your existing customers and have them talk about their experiences using your product or service. Then turn that content into something your sales team can use to hit leads who have already demonstrated interest in your business. This is the tipping point that moves them from uncertainty to actually picking up the phone. This exercise of mapping different content types to different stages of buyer awareness is incredibly useful in evaluating not what content you could create, but what content you should create that's actually going to move people from podcast to pipeline. If this is an exercise you're interested in learning more about and you'd like B2B Better to run it with you, drop them an email or message using the details in the show notes. Chapter Markers 00:00 - Why B2B businesses get repurposing wrong 01:00 - Creating the wrong things instead of what matters 02:00 - Just because you can doesn't mean you should 03:00 - Mapping content to buyer awareness stages 04:00 - Targeting the unaware stage with strategic ads 05:00 - Building trust with product aware prospects 06:00 - Moving people from podcast to pipeline Useful Links Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Learn about Stages of Awareness framework Explore Content Atomization strategies for B2B Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

✨ Bashar on Open Contact, Human Choice, and the End of Harmful Secrecy

If "becoming a media company" feels like a vague buzzphrase inside your organisation, this episode gives you the real definition. In this solo episode of Pipe Dream, host Jason Bradwell breaks down what it actually means for B2B companies to adopt a media-first mindset and why it's not about chasing views or trying to be BuzzFeed. Jason's core point is clear: becoming a media company means setting yourself up to be a consistent source of trust for the right prospects, through regular cadence and a strong point of view. It's not about impressions or virality, it's about achieving resonance with your prospective customers. And if you don't move toward a media-first mindset, you'll stay stuck in campaign mode, keep starting from zero with cold outreach, paid ads, and SEO, and get increasingly commoditised. The resistance to this shift often comes from short-term thinking. Marketing teams want to see leads now, conversion yesterday. Building trust takes time, and when leadership can't draw an explicit line from content to revenue in the short term, these initiatives start to feel like distractions, especially in volatile economic environments. But companies that don't make this transition will face three fundamental problems. One: they'll be stuck in campaign mode forever. Two: they'll always be starting from zero; cold outreach, paid ads, SEO, all starting from scratch every time. Three: they'll be totally commoditised. Everything they do from a marketing standpoint can and will be replicated by competitors if it isn't already. So how do you navigate the shift into a media-first mindset? Jason offers three critical moves. First, stop thinking about campaigns and start thinking about systems. Build a workflow across your content production that allows you to consistently demonstrate a strong point of view without burning out your team. Second, stop renting attention on borrowed platforms and start focusing on the platforms that allow you to own that attention: your podcast, your newsletter, your website. Third, move away from a content calendar and move into an editorial strategy. This isn't about getting 100,000 people on your website tomorrow, it's about getting the 100 right people today. When B2B companies make this shift, several things start to happen. Outbound gets easier because people start recognising you when you land in their inbox. Sales cycles get shorter because people already trust you across the entire buying committee. Deals get less fragile because you've already demonstrated your value from the start of their buying journey. Inbound starts to balance outbound, content drives actual pipeline, and sales begin to use your marketing assets as intended. If you're ready to stop chasing impressions and start building consistent trust, this episode is your practical roadmap for making the media-first shift without burning out your team. Chapter Markers 00:00 - Introduction: What does becoming a media company actually mean? 01:00 - Defining a media company in B2B context  02:00 - Why B2B companies resist the media-first mindset  03:00 - The attribution gap and short-term thinking  04:00 - Three problems companies face without the shift  05:00 - How to navigate into a media-first mindset  06:00 - Editorial strategy over content calendars  07:00 - What happens when B2B companies make the shift  08:00 - How to get started with B2B Better Useful Links Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Check out the Pipe Dream Podcast on Podbean listing Learn about Owned media and Editorial mindset for B2B marketing Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik, Munaf Manji and SleepyJ talk NFL SBLX betting. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If your outbound is getting ignored, it's not your reps, it's the volume-over-value playbook. In this solo episode of Pipe Dream, host Jason Bradwell breaks down why traditional cold outreach is failing and how owned media can transform your outbound from extractive spam into contextual, value-first conversations that actually get responses. Jason's core point is blunt: AI has flooded inboxes, trust is at an all-time low, and "Can I grab 15 minutes?" reads as extractive instead of helpful. The numbers back this up. Most B2B buyers receive 20-50 outbound emails per day, and there's zero differentiation between them. Our sensors for AI-generated outreach are sharper than ever, which means prospects tune out before they even finish reading. The real cost to your business? SDR burnout, wasted resources, and eroded brand trust. When you're sending volume over value, pipeline becomes a numbers game instead of a game of generating quality, value-first relationships. And that "Can I grab 15 minutes?" CTA puts the burden on prospects to figure out if you're even relevant, it's extractive, not value-driven. The alternative is contextual outreach powered by owned media. Instead of leading with "we have a solution that we think is relevant to you," you lead with "we created a piece of content that we think is relevant to you because we know it's relevant to all the other prospects and personas we're interviewing on our podcast. Curious to know what you think." Here's how it works: build a piece of content IP (podcast, newsletter, YouTube series) with a clear point of view, co-designed with sales around real buyer challenges. Then lead outbound with relevant insights before you ever ask for time. That's the difference between cold and contextual outreach. Cold is a stranger asking for a prospect's time. Contextual is when you're perceived as an informed peer offering relevant insights to your target audience. Owned media used this way gives you credibility and gives value before the ask. And the results speak for themselves: traditional cold outbound rates hover around 2% on a good day. Contextual outreach using owned media can see outbound reply rates go as high as 10-15% and the replies are more substantive than "I'm not interested." They're often "thank you for showing me this content, let's stay in touch." Over 3-12 months, this approach creates a compounding effect: higher reply rates mean more at-bats, warm outreach converts better than cold, and prospects who don't reply now might reach out later because you started the relationship from a position of value rather than an ask. If your outbound program feels broken, this episode is a practical reset on how to use owned media to build credibility first and pipeline second and avoid the extractive playbook that's killing response rates. Chapter Markers 00:00 - Introduction: Why traditional cold outreach is dying 01:00 - The inbox overload problem (20-50 emails/day) 02:00 - What "Can I grab 15 minutes?" really says to prospects 03:00 - The owned media alternative: content IP that demonstrates POV 04:00 - How to align sales + marketing around contextual outreach 05:00 - Results you can expect: 2% vs 10-15% reply rates 06:00 - The compounding effect of value-first relationships Useful Links Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik, Munaf Manji and SleepyJ talk NFL SBLX betting. A roundtable of veteran bettors broke down Super Bowl 60 with a heavy focus on game flow, props, and market behavior, emphasizing patience and precision over headline wagers. The discussion centered on expectations of a slow start, defensive intensity, and a second half that could open up as nerves settle and adjustments take effect. Several participants highlighted how Super Bowls often begin conservatively, with early punts and limited first quarter scoring driven by caution from inexperienced quarterbacks and coaching staffs prioritizing mistake avoidance. That theme led to multiple angles tied to early unders and first quarter restraint, including expectations of punts and the likelihood that both teams would fail to score in the opening quarter. As the conversation shifted to broader game dynamics, there was consensus that second halves historically offer more value, particularly when teams are forced out of conservative scripts. The idea of more points after halftime was framed not just as a trend but as a structural outcome of playoff football, where deficits create urgency and open the door to turnovers, short fields, and higher variance scoring. Props tied to second half production were discussed as a way to avoid inflated first quarter pricing while still capturing offensive upside. Player specific angles focused on role clarity and matchup driven opportunity rather than star power alone. Attention was given to receivers positioned to benefit if defenses concentrate on taking away the opposing offense's primary threat, creating secondary targets with modest statistical thresholds. The group also debated MVP betting, noting that while quarterbacks dominate the award historically, price sensitivity and alternative paths, including defensive performances or uneven quarterback play in wins, complicate the decision. Market mechanics were a recurring theme, with warnings about public money driving overs and popular names higher as kickoff approaches. The panel stressed the importance of shopping numbers, monitoring late movement, and understanding that the sharpest prices often appear before recreational volume floods the market. Rather than chasing long shots, the approach advocated was selective, disciplined, and grounded in how sportsbooks manage risk during the Super Bowl. The overall message was clear, value is created by anticipating how the game is likely to unfold and how the betting market reacts, not by betting every available prop. In a game with massive liquidity and efficiency on sides and totals, the edge lies in timing, structure, and restraint. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

It is with heavy hearts that we bring you the last episode of The Dare to Dream Podcast, possibly ever. We started this podcast over 5 years ago and after 238 episodes, we are ready to close this chapter. This episode is a final reflection and celebration of the journey we embarked on and who we become along the way. Thank you so much for listening, supporting, and encouraging us over the last 5 years. We couldn't have done this without you all. Expect to learn:Why Vinny and Greg have decided to put The Dare to Dream Podcast into hibernationWhy we started the podcast in the first placeWhy Vinny is moving to New YorkWhy Greg's word for 2026 is "enjoyment"About the retreat Greg's hosting in SedonaAnd much more. Goodbye for now, but please know that this is just the beginning of what is coming next for both Vinny and Greg. For more Dare to Dream content find us on: Apple Podcasts:⁠ ⁠https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dare-to-dream-podcast/id1522983890⁠⁠ Spotify:⁠ ⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/599zlweDDcmXP5YhOX6TFw⁠⁠ Instagram:⁠ ⁠⁠⁠https://www.instagram.com/thedaretodreampodcast/⁠⁠Join Gregory's Newsletter - Live a Story Worth Telling:⁠ ⁠⁠https://liveastoryworthtelling.gregoryrussellbenedikt.com/laswt⁠ If you're ready to create your dream life, book a discovery call with Gregory:⁠ https://calendly.com/gregoryrussellbenedikt-1/discovery-call Join Vincent's Newsletter - Vinny's Field Notes:⁠ ⁠⁠⁠https://vincentvanpatten.substack.com/Vinny's book: https://www.amazon.com/When-Sky-Opens-Answers-Shimmer/dp/B0DSQ7MYRZ?ref_=ast_author_dp For Vincent's writing, travel photography, and more, check out:⁠ ⁠⁠⁠https://vincentvanpatten.com/⁠⁠

Munaf Manji and Steve Fezzik talk Super Bowl 60. RJ Bell joins on Friday for Part 2. Munaf Manji opened the episode by announcing a limited time promotional offer for listeners, providing a seven day all access pass at Pregame.com with an additional twenty dollar discount using the code SLASH20, bringing the price down to seventy nine dollars. He highlighted recent performance from Greg Shaker and Steve Fezzik before transitioning into a wide ranging discussion with Fezzik focused on Super Bowl betting, particularly the evolution and current state of proposition wagers. Fezzik explained how prop betting gained prominence during the 1985 Bears Super Bowl and later became a defining feature of the Imperial Palace sportsbook under Jay Kornegay, eventually carrying over to the Westgate where large scale prop menus became a signature offering. He noted that while Westgate historically led the market, other sportsbooks now release props earlier and with increasing sophistication, reducing edge opportunities. Fezzik described how early release timing, pricing discipline, and market copying have changed over the years, emphasizing that modern props are far more efficient and difficult to beat consistently. The discussion shifted to strategy, with Fezzik cautioning against chasing longshot novelty bets and instead favoring lower variance positions, particularly minus priced props that align with game flow. He explained the importance of volatility and market movement, arguing that early bets that move significantly create opportunities for scalps or middles later in the cycle. Using quarterback rushing and passing yard props as examples, he stressed that failure of popular overs to rise is often a signal the under is correct. Manji and Fezzik also discussed specific wagers they liked, including second half scoring props based on historical trends of higher second half and fourth quarter scoring in Super Bowls, as well as selective player props tied to usage and game state rather than narrative. Fezzik shared that he prefers betting structural advantages such as time of possession, first downs, or quarter specific scoring instead of attempting to perfectly script the outcome of the game. The conversation then turned to practical advice for bettors traveling to Las Vegas, with strong recommendations to use mobile apps to avoid long lines and to favor recreational sportsbooks for better late numbers. Fezzik suggested Westgate and South Point as affordable and well run viewing locations for the game, while cautioning against overpriced sportsbook seating elsewhere. He also noted that March Madness often provides a superior overall betting experience compared to the Super Bowl due to volume, weather, and sustained action. The episode concluded with best bets for the show, highlighted by Fezzik's recommendation of second half over twenty two and a half points, and a reminder that disciplined bankroll management is essential because the Super Bowl remains just one game despite the hype surrounding it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Munaf Manji and Steve Fezzik talk Super Bowl 60. RJ Bell joins on Friday for Part 2. Munaf Manji opened the episode by announcing a limited time promotional offer for listeners, providing a seven day all access pass at Pregame.com with an additional twenty dollar discount using the code SLASH20, bringing the price down to seventy nine dollars. He highlighted recent performance from Greg Shaker and Steve Fezzik before transitioning into a wide ranging discussion with Fezzik focused on Super Bowl betting, particularly the evolution and current state of proposition wagers. Fezzik explained how prop betting gained prominence during the 1985 Bears Super Bowl and later became a defining feature of the Imperial Palace sportsbook under Jay Kornegay, eventually carrying over to the Westgate where large scale prop menus became a signature offering. He noted that while Westgate historically led the market, other sportsbooks now release props earlier and with increasing sophistication, reducing edge opportunities. Fezzik described how early release timing, pricing discipline, and market copying have changed over the years, emphasizing that modern props are far more efficient and difficult to beat consistently. The discussion shifted to strategy, with Fezzik cautioning against chasing longshot novelty bets and instead favoring lower variance positions, particularly minus priced props that align with game flow. He explained the importance of volatility and market movement, arguing that early bets that move significantly create opportunities for scalps or middles later in the cycle. Using quarterback rushing and passing yard props as examples, he stressed that failure of popular overs to rise is often a signal the under is correct. Manji and Fezzik also discussed specific wagers they liked, including second half scoring props based on historical trends of higher second half and fourth quarter scoring in Super Bowls, as well as selective player props tied to usage and game state rather than narrative. Fezzik shared that he prefers betting structural advantages such as time of possession, first downs, or quarter specific scoring instead of attempting to perfectly script the outcome of the game. The conversation then turned to practical advice for bettors traveling to Las Vegas, with strong recommendations to use mobile apps to avoid long lines and to favor recreational sportsbooks for better late numbers. Fezzik suggested Westgate and South Point as affordable and well run viewing locations for the game, while cautioning against overpriced sportsbook seating elsewhere. He also noted that March Madness often provides a superior overall betting experience compared to the Super Bowl due to volume, weather, and sustained action. The episode concluded with best bets for the show, highlighted by Fezzik's recommendation of second half over twenty two and a half points, and a reminder that disciplined bankroll management is essential because the Super Bowl remains just one game despite the hype surrounding it. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Most B2B podcasts fail because they skip strategy and jump straight to recording. In this solo episode of Pipe Dream, host Jason Bradwell breaks down B2B Better's Podcast to Pipeline Framework, a six-step system designed to turn a podcast from a “nice content idea” into a revenue-generating GTM asset. Jason's core point is that marketing strategy matters more than microphones. The goal isn't to ship episodes, it's to create commercial momentum. That's why B2B Better positions itself as a podcast marketing agency, not just a production company: a podcast should drive pipeline, create revenue, and ultimately turn a profit. Anything else becomes a vanity project that dies after a handful of episodes. From there, he walks through the six phases: 1) Strategy development (the most skipped step). Instead of asking what gear to buy, brands should define what success looks like, who the audience is, and what messages matter. Jason runs strategy workshops with stakeholders across marketing, sales, product, and leadership to build a “show blueprint” that clarifies the what/why/who/how and prevents random feedback from derailing things later. 2) Funnel mapping. Most companies treat podcasts as top-of-funnel awareness only, but Jason argues podcasts can move buyers through awareness, consideration, evaluation, and conversion when you map content intentionally. He introduces B2B Better's distribution grid to align segments and content to different buyer awareness stages and distribution paths. 3) Pre-production. This is the setup work that makes recording smooth: scripting, guest booking and research, and establishing visual/audio treatments so the show feels consistent and intentional. 4) Creative treatment. Here Jason draws a key distinction: production is editing raw footage into a finished episode, while producing is editorial oversight and strategic control to ensure the episode hits the right messages. Many brands only buy production, but what they really need is a producer who can guide the conversation and keep the content aligned to the goal. 5) Integrated campaigns. Distribution and promotion shouldn't be “repurpose one episode into 100 assets.” Jason pushes back on that trend because it often creates redundant content that doesn't move the needle. Distribution has to match the objective: brand awareness might mean short clips plus paid spend; ABM might mean sales enablement and targeted account plays. 6) Reporting and optimisation. A show isn't static. Someone needs to review performance at the episode, channel, and show level with what's working, what isn't, and what market feedback is signaling and then feed that back into strategy (stay the course, pivot, or double down). If you're launching a B2B podcast or already have one that feels like it's going nowhere, Jason's framework is a practical way to treat podcasting like the GTM asset it should be, align every phase to commercial outcomes, and avoid the “six episodes then abandon it” trap. 00:00 - Introduction: From concept to commercial results 01:30 - Why B2B Better is a podcast marketing agency 03:00 - Phase 1: Strategy development and the show blueprint 06:00 - Phase 2: Funnel mapping and the distribution grid 09:00 - Phase 3: Pre-production essentials 11:00 - Phase 4: Creative treatment - producing vs production 14:00 - Phase 5: Integrated campaigns and smart distribution 17:00 - Phase 6: Reporting and optimisation 20:00 - How to get started with B2B Better Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Check out Jason's several tools in building guest lists: HubSpot CRM Clay Apollo Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

Want to book amazing podcast guests that actually match your ICP? In this solo episode of Pipe Dream, host Jason Bradwell shares his playbook for finding and booking ideal guests without turning the interview into a thinly veiled sales pitch. Jason starts with the elephant in the room: yes, you can invite guests who are also potential customers, but you cannot Trojan horse them. If you bring someone on the show and pitch them live, you create a bad experience for the guest, your audience, and your reputation. The rule is simple: content-first, always. Focus on a great conversation and a genuine value exchange, then let the relationship deepen naturally over time. Next, he breaks down where to find great guests. First: your immediate network. Start with executives, employees, customers, partners, and trusted connections, people who already know you and will say yes faster. Those first few episodes build credibility and social proof, which makes outreach to strangers dramatically easier. Second: your CRM. Jason recommends targeting lapsed prospects accounts you haven't engaged with in weeks or months and using the podcast as a re-engagement mechanism. If you run an ABM strategy, this is especially powerful: you can target high-fit accounts, invite the right people, and start meaningful conversations without a sales agenda. From there, Jason walks through prospecting tools. LinkedIn Sales Navigator helps with demographic and firmographic targeting, and tools like Apollo and Clay can help you build precise guest lists at scale. But the sleeper channels are Slack communities and conference speaker lists. In industry-specific Slack groups, people don't ignore direct notifications the way they do email or LinkedIn DMs. Jason notes content-first outreach can reach 60–70% response rates in the right communities. And conference speakers are already primed to share expertise, so their speaking topic becomes an easy hook to start the conversation. Once you've built your target list, Jason outlines a two-step outreach sequence. Message one is intentionally short: introduce the show, explain why you're reaching out to them, and ask if they'd like more details, no episode pitch, no long explanation. Message two comes after they've shown interest: reinforce why it's worth their time (downloads, guest lineup, maybe even payment) and share a personalised episode angle based on their experience, proving it's a real content opportunity, not random outreach. 00:00 - Introduction: Finding and booking dream guests 01:00 - The Trojan horse trap: content-first always 02:30 - Where to find guests: start with your network 04:00 - Mining your CRM for lapsed prospects 05:30 - Using LinkedIn, Apollo, and Clay for targeting 07:00 - Sleeper channels: Slack communities and speaker lists 09:00 - The two-message outreach sequence 11:30 - Message one: gauge interest only 12:30 - Message two: personalise and reinforce value 14:00 - How to get 60-70% response rates Connect with Jason Bradwell on LinkedIn Check out several tools in building guest lists: HubSpot CRM Clay Apollo Explore B2B Better website and the Pipe Dream podcast 

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Munaf Manji talk NFL Championship betting. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Munaf Manji talk NFL Championship betting. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Munaf Manji, Steve Fezzik and SleepyJ talk NFL betting for this weekend. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Munaf Manji, Steve Fezzik and SleepyJ talk NFL betting for this weekend. With RJ Bell sidelined by illness, the Dream Preview podcast shifted into capable hands as Munaf Manji stepped in to guide a detailed breakdown of the NFL divisional round alongside veteran bettor Steve Fezzik and longtime contributor SleepyJ. The discussion centered on how the betting landscape has evolved, with Fezzik emphasizing that traditional sides and totals no longer offer the same edge in an increasingly efficient market. Instead, he argued that player props, particularly live betting opportunities, now represent the most fertile ground for advantage, even if limits remain restrictive. As the group moved through the weekend slate, the focus consistently returned to game script, market efficiency, and situational factors rather than headline narratives. In the Bills Broncos matchup, Denver's pass rush and Buffalo's injury concerns framed the handicap, with attention paid to quarterback rushing props and a general lean toward a lower scoring game. The conversation highlighted how rest advantages from the bye week and short turnaround disadvantages for road teams shape expectations more than abstract notions of playoff rust. Seattle's matchup with San Francisco reinforced Fezzik's preference for teasers, particularly when market pricing around key numbers creates structural value. The Seahawks were viewed as the superior side, with the running game expected to carry the load and limit Sam Darnold's exposure, while Brock Purdy interception props and unders drew interest given game flow expectations. When the Texans traveled to New England, weather, travel fatigue, and spot dynamics dominated the analysis. The Patriots were favored not because of flashy metrics, but due to situational edges, defensive health, and the likelihood that Drake Maye could exploit Houston with both his arm and legs. The final game between the Rams and Bears underscored how environment can alter a matchup entirely. Cold, wind, and unfamiliar conditions were seen as significant obstacles for Los Angeles, while Chicago's recent offensive rhythm and turnover forcing defense made them an appealing home side. Throughout the episode, the hosts stressed disciplined bankroll management, selective aggression, and the importance of reduced vig markets, particularly in standalone playoff games. Rather than chasing every opinion, the emphasis remained on identifying where the market may still be vulnerable and acting only when price and situation align. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL Wild-Card betting. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL Wild-Card betting. RJ Bell opened the discussion by outlining a limited promotional offer tied to the weekend, noting that a DREAM30 coupon provided thirty dollars toward picks with no credit card required and could be used on higher tier packages by paying the difference. He emphasized recent form across the board, highlighting strong short term performance from AJ Hoffman, Steve Fezzik, and Goodfella, before shifting into Super Wild Card Weekend analysis alongside Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers. The conversation quickly centered on situational football and betting nuance rather than victory laps, with Bell framing playoff outcomes as heavily shaped by randomness, coaching decisions, and context rather than simple narratives. The group dissected Pittsburgh's recent win through the lens of field position, late game decision making, and the thin margins that can swing public perception of coaches, reinforcing the idea that playoff football amplifies variance rather than eliminating it. Fezzik detailed his contest results to underline that even elite long term performance includes extended cold streaks, arguing that bettors misinterpret variance as failure and ignore how binomial outcomes naturally produce extreme runs. Bell supported that view with broader commentary on how fans and online critics misread short term results, stressing that documented records and large sample sizes matter far more than recent noise. As the focus turned to Wild Card matchups, strength of schedule emerged as a central theme, with Fezzik explaining that teams battle tested against stronger opposition tend to outperform expectations in the opening playoff round. Carolina versus the Rams served as a prime example, with Bell noting the historical success of large home underdogs in the playoffs and arguing that Carolina's recent slate of strong opponents suggested resilience despite being heavily priced. The panel debated weather, rest, and rematch dynamics, ultimately leaning toward Carolina as undervalued while acknowledging the Rams' top end power. In Packers Bears, Green Bay's tougher schedule and historical dominance were weighed against Chicago's home environment and recent competitiveness, while Fezzik identified a tight end reception prop as mispriced due to shifting usage and injuries. Buffalo at Jacksonville drew sharper disagreement, with Fezzik pointing to kicking props and Buffalo's uncertainty at kicker, while Bell framed Jacksonville as underrated based on first half efficiency, recent form, and balanced improvement on both sides of the ball. Across games, the discussion consistently returned to early down performance, situational edges, and market bias, reinforcing the idea that playoff betting rewards structural analysis over headline driven reactions. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If you could map out your dream podcast tour for 2026, what would it look like?Instead of waiting for invitations or hoping opportunities line up, this episode is all about creating them intentionally. I'm walking you through exactly how I'd plan my dream podcast tour from scratch for 2026: the strategy, the energy, and the alignment behind showing up in the right rooms, not just more rooms.This isn't about chasing visibility everywhere, it's about visibility with a vision. Because when you know who you want to be known as and where your people are listening, every interview becomes a step toward the future version of your business.You'll hear:Why now is the perfect time to realign your visibility goals for 2026How to define who you want to be known as next yearMy process for choosing the right “rooms” — podcasts that truly fit your vibe and your audienceHow to create a repeatable speaking framework that makes guesting easy and effectiveThe visibility systems that keep your momentum flowing (no more energy leaks!)By the end, you'll have a clear vision for what your 2026 podcast tour could look like and the confidence to start building it now.

RJ Bell and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 17 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 17 As the NFL calendar turns to Week 17, the conversation centers on motivation, late season data, and targeted betting angles shaped by how teams actually perform across game segments. The discussion opens with a clear theme, late season handicapping requires a different lens, particularly as playoff incentives sharpen for some teams and vanish for others. With a large sample now available, quarter by quarter and half by half scoring trends are treated as actionable signals rather than noise. That approach drives the headline recommendation of the week, Baltimore versus Green Bay, where the data shows an extreme split between early and late scoring. The first half consistently underperforms expectations while the second half consistently exceeds them, leading to a primary position that the second half will outscore the first. Supporting angles include first quarter unders and first half unders, all pointing to the same structural imbalance rather than a simple total play. Motivation analysis also plays a central role. New England is highlighted as one of the league's strongest first half teams, paired against a Jets team perceived to be prioritizing draft position, making Patriots first half minus seven a featured recommendation. Tennessee's strong recent first quarter performance contrasts sharply with New Orleans' league worst first quarter results, producing a Titans first quarter position split between plus points and moneyline exposure to reduce vig. Game script considerations dominate several player and team prop discussions. Josh Allen's passing yardage under is framed not as a talent fade but as a run heavy Bills game plan when playing from ahead, leading to a correlated parlay pairing Buffalo to win with Allen under 194.5 passing yards. Defensive pressure metrics inform the Chargers team total under against Houston, with the expectation that sustained pressure limits Justin Herbert regardless of game outcome. Additional plays lean heavily on effort and incentive. The Raiders are positioned against a Giants team viewed as actively tanking, while Jacksonville versus Indianapolis is framed as a pure scoring environment with both teams capable of pushing the total over 48.5. Tony Pollard's rushing prop is supported by Tennessee's commitment to the ground game in competitive spots, and Chiefs Broncos under 36.5 reflects quarterback uncertainty and expected conservative game plans. Throughout the analysis, the emphasis remains consistent, late season edges come from understanding who needs the game, who is willing to empty the playbook, and how scoring actually unfolds by quarter rather than relying on full game narratives alone. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL Week 16 betting. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL Week 16 betting. RJ Bell hosts the NFL Week 16 Dream Preview with Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers, opening with a promotion for Pregame bulk dollars and highlighting recent hot streaks across college football, NBA, and other sports before diving into betting analysis. Fezzik is praised for an 11 2 best bet run with wide margins, leading into his first play Bears to score first versus the Packers based on scripting and coin flip leverage. Discussion centers on shortening time horizons with first score and first quarter bets, market overreactions, and the value of contrarian positions. Rivers' best bet backs Green Bay based on decades long dominance over Chicago, especially at Soldier Field, arguing motivation favors the Packers even in down seasons. Bell leans Chicago due to rest and altitude factors but passes officially. Bell's best bet is Patriots first half plus the points against Baltimore, citing New England's elite second quarter performance, Ravens poor first half ATS record, and coaching discipline under Vrabel. Fezzik supports the logic, noting strong game management signals. Additional plays include Colts first quarter plus a half on Monday night, Colts 49ers under based on limited passing upside and defensive matchups, Cowboys Chargers under due to offensive regression and Chargers line injuries, Saints Jets under due to lack of explosiveness and Jets quarterback play, and Raiders plus the points as a buy low embarrassment spot with motivational indicators despite public pessimism. Fezzik adds prop bets including Jacoby Brissett over pass attempts and Jaguars tight end Strange over receiving yards, citing usage trends and matchup weaknesses. The group discusses dream crusher scenarios like Kansas City after elimination, market overreactions to blowouts, teaser strategies, and situational angles tied to motivation and scheduling. The show closes with broader discussion on betting process, line movement discipline, and an extended AI segment exploring how large language models are transforming research, handicapping, content creation, and knowledge work, with Bell arguing AI progress may surpass historic technological shifts while leaving physical trades less disrupted in the near term. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 15. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 15. The podcast opens with RJ Bell describing the show structure and promoting a discounted full-year picks package before shifting into Week 15 NFL betting talk with Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers. They discuss recent results, handicapping philosophies, line-movement dynamics, weather effects, and bookmaker behavior, mixing in anecdotes about old betting practices, phonemen, and language quirks around point-spread terminology. Fezzik gives his “polar vortex prop of the year,” longest field goal under 49.5 in Browns-Bears, citing brutal weather, weak kickers, conservative coaching, and low-scoring game scripts; RJ adds correlation angles tied to Chicago leads. They debate EPA versus success rate, with Fezzik preferring EPA and RJ emphasizing variance and predictability concerns. Mackenzie delivers a Chargers team total under pick based on QB injuries, offensive struggles, Kansas City's defensive resilience, and adverse weather. RJ argues the Chiefs' motivational profile, dynasty fatigue, and market perception. They dive into league-wide context, historical dynasties, roster construction challenges, aging curves, and whether Kansas City's run is ending. They discuss tight end props in Bengals-Ravens, citing Cincinnati's chronic vulnerability to the position and prior matchup evidence, plus anytime-TD correlation. The show includes debate over bad beats, especially the Raiders-Broncos ending, contentious officiating, end-game decision logic, and media reactions. They analyze Saints-Panthers, emphasizing New Orleans' defensive improvement, Carolina's inability to win as a favorite, quarterback evaluation stakes, and correlated RB usage props on Hubbard and D'Onta Foreman/Dowdle-type roles. They examine scheduling spots, letdowns, weather-driven live-betting opportunities, and in-game market inefficiencies. There are extended side conversations on quarterback development, work ethic, coaching influence, the rarity of late-career improvements, comparisons to poker variance, and examples like Caleb Williams, Sam Darnold, Richardson, Leaf, Mahomes, and coaching trees. They explore NFL history, Jerry Rice's longevity, statistical dominance, and position-based greatness debates. Additional analysis covers Rams-Lions, revenge narratives, McVay/Campbell trend conflicts, and market sharpness revealing how highly the Rams are now rated. They break down Colts-Seahawks amid QB uncertainty, massive line moves, historical precedent for non-QB quarterbacks like Kendall Hinton, and franchise-level psychological impacts of late-season injuries. They also explore Jets-Jags, weather, totals, and line influences. Throughout, they mix strategic betting heuristics, seasonal pattern tracking, notes-keeping practices, and philosophical reflections on variance, coaching, and market expectations. The episode blends picks, trends, analytics, storytelling, and humorous riffs into a wide-ranging conversation driven by handicapping logic and market interpretation. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 14. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Sophia Grid, ascension timelines, and the cosmic architecture of Earth's future.Watch Now Highlights:1) Marilyn Gewacke & ZaZar: Building the 12th Golden Bridge2) Ancient light codes, new civilizations, comet activations, and the awakening of the New Human.3) The Sophia Grid, ascension timelines, and the cosmic architecture of Earth's future.4) The New Dawn of Earth.5) Galactic wisdom, unity templates, and the Golden Bridge to the next civilization.Enter a world of channeling, ET's, metaphysics & multidimensional truth. Dare to Dream reveals what most shows won't touch — and what your soul's been asking for.Marilyn Gewacke is here today carrying transmissions that could change how you understand your soul's mission, humanity's future, and the very architecture of reality. In the next moments, you'll discover why her connection with ZaZar — an omnidimensional cosmic intelligence — offers urgently-needed guidance for navigating the ascension, the new grids forming on Earth, and the Golden 12th Bridge now awakening across our planet. Stay with us, because what you're about to hear is not theory — it's a roadmap for the New Human, and a direct energetic upgrade for your consciousness. To learn more: ⁠https://www.TheShift.Rocks⁠Enjoy free access to a Starseed Video & Report to discover your galactic origins at DebbiDachinger.com/starseedIf you're ready for profound personal transformation, join the Dec 10, 2025 monthly shamanic healing session —90 mins of powerful clearing, activations, and soul alignment — sign up now at ⁠DebbiDachinger.com/healing⁠L.A. Conscious Life Expo: Marilyn and I will be speaking there Feb 20-23, 2026:⁠ https://debbidachinger.com/cle⁠New class starts January 6, 2026 - Shamanism Level One: ⁠https://debbidachinger.com/L1⁠IG: @daretodreampodcast @debbidachingerHosted by Debbi Dachinger, award-winning broadcaster, shamanic healer, & book launch mentor for authors ready to rise.#debbidachinger #MarilynGewacke #ZaZar #cosmiccontact #fifthdimension #ascensionjourney #12thGoldenBridge #newhuman #galacticwisdom #lightcodes #divinefemininerising #SophiaGrid #UnityTemplate #daretodreampodcast #channeling #elfin #omnidimensional #soul #EarthGrids #ascension #retreatBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/dare-to-dream-with-debbi-dachinger--1980925/support.

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 14. RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik, and Mackenzie Rivers break down NFL Week 14 betting, starting with RJ promoting a $50 seven-day all-access code WEEK50. Fezz's best bet is Colts to score first vs Jacksonville because of coin-toss tendencies and expected offensive advantage in a high-total game, with discussion about teams choosing to receive, scripting, first-drive props, and coin-flip-based derivative betting. RJ and Fezz debate optimal strategy, adjustments, and first-quarter dynamics. RJ describes analyzing first-drive receiver usage, highlighting Puka Nacua and Colts TE Alie-Cox/Woods/Warren (context mixed) as early-drive targets. They discuss deferring vs receiving, coaching tendencies, and how underdogs may benefit from taking the ball. They move into Fezz's prop focus shift and success. RJ and Fezz make a season-long sides/totals bet with RJ picking 30 games vs no-vig lines. Mackenzie reports RJ's recent streak (8–1 best bets, 10–2 likes). Conversation shifts to MVP odds, Stafford vs Drake Maye, injury risk, schedule strength, market pricing, and how voters behave. They also discuss Burrow's return, Bengals vs Bills line comparisons to past matchups, Cincinnati's weak defense, Buffalo's variance, McDermott's seat, and playoff stakes. Mackenzie's best bet is Bills –5.5 vs Bengals based on summer lines, defensive decline, and Buffalo urgency. RJ gives his best bet: Seahawks–Falcons under, citing Sam Darnold regression, Seattle protecting him, blitz issues vs Atlanta, scripted drives, Cousins limitations, motivation angles, and expectation of a 1995-style game. Fezz adds Chicago TE Loveland over yards due to increased targets and misleading prior stats. NBA segment: Thunder win projection, depth, injury savings, draft capital, and possible value on OKC to break the GS record; Knicks value to win the Atlantic. RJ provides more NFL picks: Packers team-total over, Bears team-total over based on Chicago offense improvement and defensive weakness; under in Chiefs–Texans due to Houston defensive surge, KC O-line issues, weather, and conservative game scripts; under first quarter Saints–Bucs because both offenses start slow and Tampa injuries limit explosiveness. They cover fire-and-ice weather mismatches, Fezz backing KC –3 vs Houston due to cold exposure issues, plus more rationale for the under. They discuss Pittsburgh–Baltimore history, third-quarter angle favoring the Ravens, Lamar's struggles outside the numbers, and prop opportunities for TEs/RBs. They note Indy's long losing streak at Jacksonville, Denver and Rams teaser options, Cleveland bad-weather unders, QB uncertainty for Washington and Chargers, and late-season bye effects. The show ends with general betting philosophy talk, variance, props, market holds, and closing banter. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Have you had a dream that stayed with you — one that felt larger than your own life?This is an invitation to join Jungian analysts Cécile Buckenmeyer and Jakob Lusensky in the experiment of shaping a holding space for collective dreams. A new podcast series devoted to those big dreams that C.G. Jung described as “the common property of mankind” (CW 10 §33), the deep streams of the delta that is the unconscious.By gathering these dreams, we may glimpse what our culture is dreaming beneath the surface, the myths that are forming us, and the ones asking to be born.Co-create our new podcast series by submitting your dream before December 31st.Credits:---Artwork: Iraq (Babylonia). Euphrates River, fisherman throwing net, sunset scene Music: It was just a dream by Rafael KruxLiterature: The Third Reich of Dreams by Charlotte Beradt

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 13. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 13. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 12. Best bets as always. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 12. Best bets as always. In this Week 12 NFL betting podcast, RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik, and Mackenzie Rivers break down matchups, trends, props, and power ratings while debating quarterback value, team motivation, weather effects, and market movement. RJ opens by promoting a 90-day all-access package and highlighting recent hot handicappers. Fezzik's best bet is Raiders team total over 19.5, citing Cleveland's historically poor road-defense scoring prevention and likely short-field opportunities created by rookie QB Sanders' turnover risk. RJ and Mackenzie evaluate low totals, weather, and historical under trends but agree the Raiders angle is stronger than the full-game over. RJ's best bet is Colts +3.5 vs Kansas City, arguing the teams are essentially equal in yards per play, success rate, and win-probability metrics, with KC overrated due to legacy bias and declining defensive performance. Fezzik adds Colts to score first at plus money due to coin-toss tendencies. Mackenzie's best bet is Lions -10 over the Giants, supported by Dan Campbell's elite ATS record off a loss, the Giants' league-worst run defense, and favorable matchups for Detroit's run game. Fezzik adds Lions team total over 30.5 and an SGP on Gibbs and Montgomery rushing overs. RJ also bets Falcons +2 vs the Saints, believing market overreacted to Kirk Cousins' injury perception and that Atlanta's roster, motivation, and power ratings remain stronger than New Orleans', which may be slipping into tank mode. Later, Fezzik plays Chase Brown under 60.5 rush yards due to expected shotgun-heavy Bengals offense with Burrow limited by turf toe and a strong Patriots run defense. The crew discusses Chicago-Pittsburgh, with RJ making his play contingent: if Rodgers starts, he likes the Bears; if Rudolph starts, he likes the over. They examine Jets-Ravens, Seahawks-Titans, Vikings-Packers, Jaguars-Cardinals, Raiders-Browns, Cowboys-Eagles, Rams-Buccaneers, and broader power-rating tiers, highlighting turnover luck, declining offenses, evolving defenses, team fatigue, coaching signals, and motivational windows. They close by summarizing all official picks and reinforcing that several favorites may be inflated while injured QBs, travel spots, and disguised regression points create value on selected dogs, overs, and player props. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode, we share a special interview featuring Sam Brake Guia on Podcast Growth Tools, hosted by Kylee Chandler.   You'll hear: -How to write a standout podcast pitch that actually gets a “yes” -Creative ways to use your podcast as a strategic networking tool -The connection between podcast guesting and lead generation -How to use your podcast as a networking machine (not just a content machine) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Love the show? We'd love a review! Leave us a review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen to podcasts.   ✅ Want to grow your visibility through podcast guesting? Check out how PodWritten can help: https://podwritten.com/services/ https://podwritten.com/  

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for week 11. RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers break down NFL Week 11 betting, starting with RJ promoting a discounted half-season package and highlighting hot handicappers before diving into matchups, market moves and derivative angles. They discuss Fezzik's strong college football season, best bets from previous weeks, and review wins on Jets spreads, Houston-Denver unders, Washington and Cincinnati games, plus Rams and London totals, noting a streak of strong “spot seven cover” results. McKenzie recounts past real-estate ventures as the trio jokes, then they shift into Week 11 analysis: Bengals second-half performance vs Pittsburgh, predictive metrics showing large first-half/second-half splits, and why Cincinnati +3.5 in the second half is RJ's best bet. They break down Green Bay's injuries, Philly line moves, wide-receiver depth concerns, and how market shifts through key numbers signal anti-Green Bay sentiment. They analyze Tampa Bay vs Buffalo, Baker Mayfield's lack of recent rushing, and whether injury or coaching changes explain performance dips. They touch on Tennessee improving after coaching changes, Kansas City's struggles, and how situational scheduling affects motivation. Fezzik gives his picks: Miami 1Q -130, Ravens-Browns under 39.5, and props including Brock Bowers and McBride overs, with McBride's volume spike under Jacoby Brissett emphasized. RJ questions line discrepancies in receiving props and discusses weather-driven total movement. The group debates quarterback traits, offensive limitations, and matchup-specific vulnerabilities, including Arizona's resilience and aggregate point-loss profile. They note 49ers scenarios, comeback histories, late-game aggression logic and how analytics or simulations contrast with intuitive coaching decisions. They close by previewing next week's recording schedule, recapping picks, and encouraging bettors to time wagers around market-expected weather drops, emphasizing second-half mismatches, injury context and evolving team profiles while keeping the tone humorous and conversational. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 10. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers dive into NFL Week 9 betting. RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers deliver an intense, fast-moving breakdown of NFL Week 9 betting, loaded with sharp insights, humor, and veteran perspective. (0:00–2:44 RJ) RJ opens with a limited-time $20 for $100 Pregame.com promo, setting a self-aware tone after a cold streak before pivoting to the “six-seven” inside joke. (2:45–9:38 RJ & Fezzik) They riff on culture and YouTube memes, then dig into Fezzik's documented record, the reality of variance, and public scrutiny—RJ publicly offers to bet $1K with anyone doubting Fezzik's winning ways. They stress long-term perspective, bankroll discipline, and Fezzik's 9-of-12 winning seasons. (9:39–15:14 Fezzik) Fezzik unveils his best bet: Atlanta Falcons +0.5 first quarter vs Patriots, citing motivation, coin-toss edges, and mismatch value. RJ challenges him on quarterback health and run-defense matchups, while McKenzie supports with EPA and DVOA metrics. (15:15–24:36) They debate totals, QB injuries, and the “grand salami” of leaguewide overs, revealing how context and psychology shape numbers. (24:37–35:06 RJ) RJ fires his best bet: Houston–Denver Under 40, explaining how both teams' offenses collapse under defensive pressure, why line moves misprice QB injuries, and how coaching style (Sean Payton's conservatism) locks games into “rock fight” mode. (35:07–38:25 Mackenzie) Mackenzie counters with Colts –3 vs Steelers, supported by data showing the Steichen offense outperforming Tomlin's blitz-heavy D; RJ and Fezzik debate side vs team-total angles and line value between –2.5 and –3. (38:26–44:46 Fezzik) Fezzik adds Saints +3.5 4Q vs Rams and Panthers +3.5 4Q vs Packers, explaining how blowouts, motivation, and end-game math make late-quarter dogs profitable. RJ dissects situational trends, home/road splits, and QB rotations, endorsing both plays. (44:47–59:15) They tangent hilariously into Shakespeare, “Back to School,” and North Texas–Navy live-betting logic, turning first-quarter tempo into a masterclass in betting time segments. (59:16–1:03:38 RJ) RJ's second best bet: Arizona Under 26.5 points at Dallas (MNF), citing Kyler Murray's road, primetime, and post-injury struggles; Fezzik cautions against underestimating Dallas's weak D. (1:07:14–1:10:22 Fezzik) Fezzik's player prop: Mahomes Over 4.5 rushes, Allen Over 7.5 rushes, backed by game-flow data and high-leverage situational running. (1:14:45–1:20:27 RJ) RJ leans Chiefs –2.5 vs Bills, defending KC's underrated defense and Mahomes's playoff-like motivation. (1:25:03–1:30:04) They hit Chargers –3 vs Titans, praising Harbaugh's 15-4 ATS record on East-coast trips, and (1:30:05–1:33:12) explore 49ers run game props vs Giants. (1:33:53–end) Final lightning round: Bears to score first vs Bengals, quick-hit leans, and closing banter on variance, sharp edges, and humility in handicapping. Featuring: RJ Bell (@RJinVegas) | Steve Fezzik (@FezzikSports) | Mackenzie Rivers (@mackinRivers)Topics: NFL Week 9 best bets, first-quarter/4Q angles, totals logic, QB prop edges, and how to read line value like a pro.

RJ bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for week 8. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL Week 7 betting and more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for Week 6. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL week 5 betting. Best bets as always. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

RJ Bell, Steve Fezzik and Mackenzie Rivers talk NFL betting for week 4. RJ Bell 00:00–04:00 opened by framing NFL Week 4 picks, noting how public perception often swings too far based on recent performances. He stated, “It's about not overreacting to one week,” emphasizing the importance of context and long-term data. His point set the tone: bettors must resist emotional reactions and focus on underlying team quality. Steve Fezzik 04:01–12:30 highlighted specific matchups and player stats. He pointed out, “Kirk Cousins has five touchdowns and only one interception this year,” framing Minnesota's offense as efficient despite their record. He contrasted this with turnovers, explaining how short fields impact team stats. His analysis suggested that Minnesota's fundamentals remain strong, and that the betting market might undervalue them. Scott Seidenberg 12:31–20:00 broke down trends. He said, “Favorites are only covering at 38% through three weeks,” which underscored the importance of considering underdogs early in the season. He explained that public bettors favor favorites, but sharp bettors capitalize on inflated lines. This observation had implications for several Week 4 lines, showing that market inefficiencies persist. RJ Bell 20:01–28:30 pivoted to broader team evaluations. He argued, “The Cowboys' defense has given up only 10 points per game,” highlighting elite defensive metrics. However, he warned that such dominance may regress against stronger offenses. By contextualizing stats, RJ showed how even strong numbers may not be sustainable, a reminder that stats need situational framing. Steve Fezzik 28:31–40:00 returned with targeted player and team analysis, noting how quarterback play under pressure often dictates outcomes. He emphasized, “Pressure rates are more predictive than sack totals,” underscoring how advanced metrics reveal true team strength. He connected this to Week 4 matchups where defensive pressure could swing results, highlighting that surface-level stats often mislead. Scott Seidenberg 40:01–50:00 focused on team situational spots. He noted, “Teams on short rest cover just 42% historically,” showing how rest disadvantages alter outcomes. He tied this to specific Week 4 games, suggesting bettors must factor scheduling into handicapping. His insight illuminated how off-field variables create hidden edges. RJ Bell 50:01–End closed by reiterating discipline. He remarked, “The goal isn't to win every game, it's to make good bets consistently,” stressing the importance of process over results. His final words carried weight, reminding listeners that smart wagering comes from context, trends, and data-driven decisions, not emotion. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices