Podcasts about grassroot institute

Hawaii leads the nation in high housing prices. Experts Ted Kefalas and Jonathan Helton from Grassroot Institute explain the regulatory obstacles to building sufficient housing for Hawaiians, and regulatory reform efforts that could increase the housing supply. It has been over 18 months since the fires that nearly destroyed the town of Lahaina in Maui County, Hawaii. Since that time, thousands of commercial and residential properties have been destroyed or damaged, and only 6 houses have been rebuilt. In this segment, Kefalas and Helton discuss the legal and regulatory hurdles that have prevented Hawaiians to rebuild their destroyed homes and businesses, and proposals that could help facilitate rebuilding. In the final segment, the experts discuss what lessons California could learn from Hawaii's experience to ensure that Angelinos do not experience the same slow rebuild after the Pacific Palisades Fire.

This week, Joe Kent of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii joins us to share lessons learned from the Aloha State's experience in rebuilding after the devastating Maui wildfires from a few years ago.  It's a conversation everyone who has been affected by the wildfires should listen to, especially as leaders from Gavin Newsom on down are exploring ways to “reimagine” the Palisades after the fires.  Plus, Tim and Matt Fleming discuss the Super Bowl and the constitutional questions surrounding President Trump's efforts to reform the federal government and eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending.

Randal O'Toole, an American policy analyst, discusses his maverick career, non consensus views on urban planning, transportation, and housing in this interview. O'Toole runs the Thoreau Institute as well as the popular policy blog, The Antiplanner. He has written several books and hundreds of policy papers from a free market perspective on urban planning, government policy, housing, rail and other related land use topics. We explore his belief that urban planners often impose their preferences on the public, such as imposing restrictive land use planning codes to “force” people to live in apartments and use public transit, even though most people prefer single-family homes and driving. O'Toole also shares the impact of the pandemic on urban planning, reinforcing existing trends such as people moving to the suburbs and working from home. We discuss the potential of autonomous vehicles in replacing public transit in the future as well as his views on cycling. In this interview, O'Toole critiques the idea of planning itself and promotes the repeal of federal and state planning laws and the closure of state and local planning departments. He explores in detail why planning fails, through documentation of planning disasters, while giving context of his perspective on land use issues in Hawaii such as cycling, light rail, affording housing, and agricultural lands as well as providing solutions for environmental protection and stewardship.Topics / Time Stamps* (2:08) On Biking in Oahu* (12:33) Educational Background and Current Work* (16:05) Economics vs Planning* (20:31) The Iconoclastic Mindset* (24:25) Buses vs Light Rail* (26:55) Criticism of the Honolulu Light Rail System* (33:47) On New Urbanism* (43:45) Urban Planning and the Pandemic* (46:16) Solutions to non utilized urban cores / skyscrapers * (49:06) The Iron Triangle* (51:30) Autonomous vehicles as an alternative* (54:07) Houston as Model* (59:18) Incentive-based conservation* (1:04) The Grassroot Institute* (1:06) Hawaii Land Use Reforms Recommendations* (1:12) Vacancy Taxes as Symptom * (1:15) On Optimism* (1:17) Policy Briefs The Antiplanner: https://ti.org/antiplanner/Policy Briefs: https://ti.org/antiplanner/?page_id=16274The Education of an Iconoclast: https://ti.org/antiplanner/?page_id=16272Leafbox:Today I had the pleasure of speaking and learning from Randal O'Toole. He's an American policy analyst. He's written several books, hundreds of policy papers, and he provides solutions from a free market perspective to various problems. He runs a popular blog called The Antiplanner, and he's featured in several debates on urbanism, environmentalism, government policy. But today I was curious about exploring his biography and discussing his memoir, the Education of an Iconoclast. We discussed his shift from forestry to economics, his 50 year career, his thoughts on light rail and other transportation, housing solutions, bus, Hawaii, top down urban planning, Houston as a model for development and other topics. I hope you enjoy. Thanks for listening.Leafbox:Hi, good afternoon, Randal.Randal O'Toole:Can you hear me?Leafbox:Now I can. Perfect. Thank you for your punctuality and for rearranging the meeting. I know you're a busy man.Randal O'Toole:Great.Leafbox:Well, Randal, I just thank you so much for your time. I've been reading your blog on and off for years and this morning I was biking. I live in Oahu, so I think that's important visual wise.Randal O'Toole:Oh, I hate biking in Oahu. It is so awful.Leafbox:I bike every day about 10, 12 miles to drop off my daughter back and forth. I was listening to some of your debates you've had with people, mainly James Kunstler and obviously I love biking. I wanted to start with biking. There are many debates you have online about the pros and cons of government planning and light rail, but I really wanted to start with your relationship with cycling and how that influenced your political evolution because I read most of your excellent biography and memoirs and I just wanted to understand how that cycling framework has influenced your analysis of cities and urban planning and design and everything.Randal O'Toole:Well, it's funny. One of the very first transportation issues I got involved in, it wasn't the first, but it was early. It was about 1975. I was invited to attend meetings of the bicycle advisory committee for the city of Portland. And I was an ardent cyclist. I didn't even have a driver's license at the time and I worked in downtown Portland and I lived in the east side, which if you know Portland means you have to cross the river. And Portland has, I think 11 bridges now. Only nine of them are open to vehicles and only seven of them are open to bicycles. And the lanes tended to be pretty narrow and there was a lot of on and off ramps on some of those bridges. So I went to the advisory committee and I said, you need to put some curb cuts to make it easy for bicycles to use the sidewalks so that they aren't blocking your narrow lanes.A couple of the bridges, the lanes were only like 12 feet wide and there was no ability to pass because there were structures on both sides of the lanes. And so if you were bicycling, it was kind of scary to have cars pass you in this narrow lane if you were in the lane. Now there was a sidewalk, but you couldn't get up to the sidewalk without stopping and getting off your bike and lifting the bike onto the sidewalk and so on. So I said, put in curb cuts. And the city said, oh, we can't do that. It would be too dangerous when the bicycles come off, the cars wouldn't expect it. And they'd hit the bicyclists and two years later they put in all the curb cuts and all the places I recommended. So I stopped going to those advisory committee meetings, but they ended up doing what I recommended.Now it wasn't because I had recommended it, it was because that was the logical place to put it. Since then, I occasionally participated in bicycle proposals, but today what I'm seeing is that the bicycle community has been captured by the anti automobile community. Even though at the time I didn't have a driver's license, I wasn't anti automobile, I was a follower of John Forrester. John Forrester wrote a book called, what was it called? Anyway, he argued that bicycles were vehicles by law, they were treated as vehicles and so they should act like vehicles. They should assert themselves when they were in very narrow lanes and make sure that cars knew they were there, occupy the whole lane if necessary, but usually they should try to be a part of the flow of traffic and not expect any special lanes or anything like that. In fact, he argued that bicycle lanes actually made traffic more dangerous.What's happened since then is that we've had movements, pro bicycle movements that have made bicycle list feel like they are superior to other vehicles in traffic. There was a movement called critical mass where hundreds or thousands of bicyclists would go at rush hour one day a week and occupy some entire streets that were vital streets for people getting home and disrupt traffic as much as possible. And the bicyclists who were attending these critical mass events were told You were superior, cars are inferior, you should have the right of way over cars at all times. And what we saw happen was bicyclists then would go away from these critical mass meetings and be convinced that they were superior and they would insist on occupying right away and asserting right away when they didn't actually have it and they would get hit more frequently. And we've seen an increase in bicycle fatalities in recent years.And I think that's partly because critical mass has warped the perspective of bicyclists. And so we've had cities adopt plans that they claim are to make streets safer. They call them vision zero plan. And these vision zero plans often call for taking a four lane street, in other words, a major collector street that's moving a lot of traffic and take away one of the lanes from the automobiles and make it into bike lanes. So you'd have a 12 foot lane turned into two six foot lanes, one for bicyclists going one way and one for bicyclists going the other way. That leaves three lanes. One of the lanes would be used for left turns and the other two lanes would be for traffic in two different directions. Now that kind of project is designed to safeguard bicyclists from being hit from behind by cars. Well, on average, about 3% of bicycle fatalities consist of people being hit from behind by cars.Now I'm a cyclist. I know you're always nervous about getting hit from behind, but the cars see you, they know you're there, and so they watch out. They don't want to hit you any more than you want to be hit by them. So only 3% of fatalities are being hit by cars from behind. Half of all fatalities take place at intersections where the bike lanes disappear. So we're safeguarding against a very rare event and not doing anything about the kind of event that is responsible for half of all bicycle fatalities by putting in the bike lanes, we're sending a message to bicyclists that it's safe to ride on this busy street. So we get an increase in bicyclists riding on these busy streets, which means you're get an increase in bicyclists crossing busy intersections and getting hit. So we're making bicycling more dangerous by creating an illusion of bicycle safety that isn't real.I would've done something completely different. I would've taken local streets that are parallel to those busy streets and turned them into bicycle boulevards, which means you remove as many stop signs as you can so that you can have through bicycle traffic with minimal stops, but put in a few little concrete barriers to discourage cars from using those streets as through street. So you now have streets that are open to cars for local traffic and open to bicycles for through traffic. And I've used bicycle boulevards in Berkeley and Portland and other streets and they feel a lot safer. They are a lot safer and they don't cause the imposition on cars. It happens when you take lanes away from cars. So that's my attitudes towards cycling, which is that bicycles are vehicles, cars are vehicles. One should not be superior to the other. In certain situations, cars have the right of way and other situations, bicycles have the right of way. The safest thing we can do is separate them when we can by putting bicycles on bicycle boulevards instead of by asserting that bicycles are safe, by putting them into bike lanes when actually we're making it more dangerous.Leafbox:So Randal, you mentioned that you don't like biking in Oahu. What specifically do you not like about biking here?Randal O'Toole:Well, you've got a lot of busy streets. Their lanes are narrow. There's often not bike lanes where you do have bike lanes. They have strangely put two-way traffic in one bike lane. And so you have a risk of hitting other bicyclists, but you also have the risk that not only do you have bicyclists going with the flow of traffic, you have bicyclists going in the opposite flow from traffic. And so you're compounding the risk of not just having the risk of getting hit from behind, but having the risk of a head on collision. And I don't see that as particularly safe. I've bicycled, the last time I got hit by a truck was when I was bicycling in Maui on a bike lane and the truck was turning left into a driveway. I was bicycling at about 20 miles an hour. There was a lot of traffic and the truck didn't see me before it turned and I didn't see it until the last second and got hit by this truck. So again, it's another situation where bike lanes do not increase safety. It would've been better if there had been a local bicycle boulevard and I think you could probably put some bicycle boulevards in Oahu, but they haven't done that. Instead. Mostly bicycles are then for themselves and there are those few bike lanes downtown, which I didn't find particularly well designed.Leafbox:Randal, I should have asked first, but for people who aren't familiar with your work, I'm a fan of Antiplanner, but how do you describe yourself? What's a quick summary of your actual work and education and framework?Randal O'Toole:Well, the funny thing is my training is as a forester and I spent the first 20 years of my career as a forest policy analyst. I was analyzing government plans, Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management plans for mainly public lands, but also in some cases for private lands. That analysis carried over. I discovered that, well, what happened was is I was challenging the federal timber sale levels. They were selling a lot of timber, losing money at most of it, doing a lot of environmental damage. And in a nutshell:, we won federal timber sale levels declined by 85% between 1990 and 2000, and it was a great deal of that was due to my work. Part of it was due to the spotted owl, which I didn't really work on, but most of it was due to my work, which persuaded the forest service, that they were cutting too much timber and that they shouldn't be doing so much.And so now having won that battle, I looked around for other battles to fight and came across battles that were going on with land use and transportation in the city I lived in, which was the Portland urban area. And extended that to found out that I was dealing with a movement that was a national movement that was trying to force people to stop driving, trying to force more people to live in apartments instead of single family homes. And since 98% of the travel we do in cities is driving, and since 80% of Americans want to live in single family homes, it seems to me that even though I was a bicyclist, I have to realize that most people don't bicycle. Most people drive. And even though I have lived in apartments, I have to realize that most people want to live in single family homes.So I shouldn't be imposing my preferences on other people through some kind of planning process. So I began to challenge city plans, urban area plans, state plans, transportation plans, land use plans, and I discovered that there's a lot of similarities between forest planning and urban planning. Basically, forest planners think that there's these inanimate objects out in forest that they can make, do whatever they want. I actually found a forest plan that proposed they were going to grow trees to be 650 feet tall when the tallest trees in the world are less than 400 feet tall. Forest planners just thought they could imagine anything they want and it would happen. And urban planners think that there's these inanimate objects in cities that they can make, do whatever they want. And those inanimate objects are people and they think that, well, they can just force more people to live in apartments. They can just force more people to take transit or to bicycle instead of drive. And to me, those are very unappealing ideas and whether you're libertarian or not, you don't really like to think that somebody is trying to manipulate you to force you to use a much more expensive way of transportation or to live in a much less desirable home. That also happens to be more expensive than the single family home you might be living in. Now,Leafbox:When did that shift, I think in your memoirs, you started taking economics classes or was it when you were learning first computer modeling, when did that shift come in understanding reality versus imposed reality?Randal O'Toole:The funny thing was that when I was working on forest issues, I was making quite a name for myself. One Forest Service official told a reporter that Randal O'Toole has had more impact on the forest service than all the environmental groups combined. And so I would get speaking invitations and a professor at the University of Oregon Department of Urban Planning asked me to come and speak to his class, and I did at the time, I had a bachelor's degree in forestry and he said, you should go to graduate school, you should go to graduate school in our urban and regional planning department. And I said, well, I'm not really interested in urban planning. I'm interested in forest issues. He said, well, we also do regional planning, so they offered me funding support and things like that. So I said, okay, so I took the first terms worth of courses in urban planning and I looked around and I said, I shouldn't just take courses in one field.I should also learn some other fields. And there was a course in urban economics, it was also a graduate course, and what I discovered was the urban economists didn't make any assumptions about cities. Instead, they looked at the data and then they tried to build for how the city works, they compared the model against the data and if the model didn't produce the data that they knew was real, they modified the model and then they compared that against the data and they kept modifying it until they got a model that came out pretty close to how the cities actually were working. So then they were able to ask questions of the model like what happens if you draw an urban growth boundary around the city and force the density of the city to get higher force higher densities, force more people to live in apartments instead of single family homes?Will that result in more congestion or less? Well, the model clearly showed that although some people would respond to density by taking transit, most people would keep driving and the congestion would just get worse. Because you have more people driving per square mile of land because you'd have higher population densities? Well, in the urban planning courses, they asked the same question, and instead of building a model or looking at any data at all, they just said, well, I think if they were higher density people would ride transit more and so there'd be less congestion. And everybody in the class agreed. There were two urban planning professors in this class and they agreed and I said, no, the actual economic data show that the congestion would get worse. We went back and forth and finally one of the professors said, well, everybody's entitled to their opinion.And that was the day I knew I wasn't going to become a planner, I was going to become an economist. So I stopped taking urban planning courses and I started taking economics courses and took a whole slew of those courses and still spent most of my time working on forest issues. And so I ended up not earning any degrees, but I think more like an economist than a planner. In fact, I think more like an economist than a forester. Foresters have a way of thinking. Geographers have a way of thinking. Landscape architects have a way of thinking. Economists and planners have ways of thinking, and I think like an economist. And so sometimes I'll call myself an economist even though I don't have a degree in economics. Sometimes I call myself a policy analyst even though I don't have a degree in policy analysis. My degree is in forestry. All of these things are alike in the sense that these planners and basically what I've spent my career doing is critiquing government plans. These planners think that they can impose things on the land or impose things on people that people don't want to have imposed on them.Leafbox:Going back to where does that iconoclastic mindset emerge from? I'm curious and how do you keep defending it? Why don't you go with the flow of the consensus?Randal O'Toole:Well, it's funny, I've always been an iconoclast. I grew my hair down well below my shoulders when I was in high school, which made the high schools vice principals hate me. I would leave school to go to anti-Vietnam protest marches or civil rights protest marches. I would skip school to go to environmental events and eventually started an environmental group in my high school when Earth Day came along that persuaded me that I should work on environmental issues. So I went to a forestry school where they taught people how to grow trees so they could cut them down and cut them up into forest products. And here I was not being real obvious about it, but being somewhat obvious because I was spending my summers doing internships, working on how to stop the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management and other agencies from cutting down trees.And so I was always out of step and that seems to have continued throughout my career. One interesting example lately has been bus rapid transit. I spent a lot of the last 30 years of my career critiquing urban transit systems and we'd see cities like Portland and Seattle spending billions of dollars on rail transit and Honolulu now spending billions of dollars on rail transit and I'd say, wait a minute, bus rapid transit can move more people faster, faster to more destinations than rail transit. So instead of rail transit, we should be looking at bus rapid transit, and now we're seeing cities say, okay, we'll do bus rapid transit, but we won't do the kind of bus rapid transit Randal O'Toole was talking about, which was running buses on ordinary city streets. But the buses only stop once per mile like a rail line, and so they're faster.They don't have to stop as frequently and they'll be more attractive to passengers both because they're faster and they're more frequent. Instead of just doing that, we're going to build special lanes for the buses. We're going to build fancy stops for all the buses, fancy stations for all the buses to stop at. And so instead of spending a million dollars a mile on bus rapid transit, we're going to spend $50 million a mile or a hundred million dollars a mile on bus rapid transit. We're going to make bus rapid transit as expensive as building rail transit. Well, I've lost interest in that, and so I'm now no longer enthusiastic behind bus rapid transit. Instead, the kind of transit I've been advocating is express buses, nonstop buses throughout urban areas that will take people from lots of origins to lots of different destinations with intervening 20 miles an hour, which is the average speed for bus rapid transit or 11 miles an hour, which is the average speed for local buses. They'll go at 50 miles or 55 miles an hour because they'll be going on freeways for most of their routes. Nobody else in the transit industry is thinking about this. So I guess I'm ahead of my time. I was talking about bus rapid transit before they were, and now I'm talking about express buses before anybody else. We'll see if they follow.Leafbox:Randal. These are like the buses, the Bolt bus in Los Angeles or San Francisco or the Chinatown buses in New York to Boston or DC or those type of private industry buses.Randal O'Toole:Those are intercity buses. And the interesting thing about the intercity bus industry is it used to be tied down by bus stations. You'd have these expensive bus stations in every city and they'd have baggage clerks and they'd have ticket salesmen and stuff like that. And the kind of buses you're mentioning, they've abandoned all that. They go from curbside to curbside, which means they don't have to pay for a station. They let the passengers load their own luggage, which means they don't have to pay for baggage handlers. You buy your tickets on the internet, which means they don't have to pay for ticket agents.And that led to a huge resurgence in inter city buses. intercity buses buses were on the decline for about 1960 to 2005, and you started seeing these infrastructure light buses, megabus and bolt bus and so on, and suddenly bus ridership, intercity buses bus ridership is increasing. So we look at the transit industry and instead of saying, let's see, we've got this great infrastructure out there, it's called roads and streets. Let's run our transit on roads and streets. Instead of saying that, they're saying, let's build a lot of infrastructure that's dedicated solely to urban transit, and it's going to be really expensive infrastructure. We can build a lane mile of road for half a million dollars, but we're going to spend a hundred million dollars building a mile of rail or $200 million. There are some rail projects now that are costing $500 million per mile of rail.That's a billion dollars a route mile because we have a mile of rail going in each direction. So we're spending phenomenal amounts of money for something that's only going to be used by a few transit riders because transit only carries half a percent of all passenger travel in this country. Before the pandemic, it was 1%, but now it's down to about a half a percent. Maybe it'll get us way back up to three-fourths of a percent. We're spending billions and billions of dollars on this tiny percentage of travelers with buses. We could attract the same number of people, move the same number of people, probably more people for a lot less money because the buses can go faster. Even New York City subways average less than 30 miles an hour, and buses on freeways can average 60 miles an hour.Leafbox:So Randal here in Hawaii about the new HART (Light Rail), I'd love to just a quick summary of your critiques of that system and why you think it was built.Randal O'Toole:Well, of course, when they first planned it, they said it was going to cost less than 3 billion. And in fact, the original proponents said that fares were going to pay not only all the operating costs, but they were going to pay part if not all of the capital costs. Well, the costs have exploded to well over $9 billion. The Federal Transit Administration thinks that by the time they're done, it's going to be $12 billion and they've run out of money. So they're saying we're not going to be able to finish it all the way immediately. Eventually we might get enough money to be able to finish it, but not right away. And the ridership numbers they were projecting were probably way too high. Certainly they're not getting anything close to what they were expecting with the part that's opened. That's partly because it's not finished and you look at it and all it really is a bus route.They could have done exactly the same thing with buses. They could have gone just as fast if not faster with buses. They persuaded people to go for it. They said it's going to relieve congestion. Well, it's not going to relieve congestion. In fact, their own data show the congestion is going to increase near the transit stops because people were going to be slowing down and stopping there to pick up and drop off rail riders instead of people walking to the rail stations that were going to drive to the rail stations and have somebody drive them and drop them off. So their own data showed it was going to increase congestion, but they convinced people it was going to reduce congestion. And the onion had a great story many years ago saying 98% of American commuters want other people to ride transit so that they can drive in less congested traffic.So transit agencies in Honolulu, in Los Angeles and San Diego and cities all over the country had convinced people to go for these extremely expensive transit projects by claiming that it was going to reduce congestion when in fact, on almost every case, it made congestion worse. And we made these critiques of the Honolulu Rail project before they began, before it began, the city council ignored us. They were heavily pressured by the unions that wanted jobs for constructing it. When the construction is done, there aren't going to be any jobs. The transit is automated, there aren't going to be jobs for drivers, there's going to be some maintenance jobs. There's going to be a tiny fraction, the jobs that they're getting for building. And so it was just basically unions and contractors wanted to build it. They threw money into the right campaign funds, and so politicians supported it.So we end up seeing, and we're seeing us all over the country, we're seeing it for high speed rail, we're seeing it for Amtrak. We're seeing this what's called the iron triangle, which is people who make money from tax dollars in one corner of the triangle, the bureaucracy that another corner of the triangle and the politicians at a third corner of the triangle, the politicians appropriate money to the bureaucracy, which then give it out to the contractors who spend it and then who then take some of that money and use it for campaign contributions to the politicians. Very hard to break that triangle. We have found that if a measure goes on the ballot and we can spend 10% as much money as a proponent spend, we can usually reach enough voters to convince 'em to vote it down. But if we only reach five, only spend 5% as much as the proponent spend, it usually passes because they drown us out with their claims that it's going to relieve congestion and is education.It's convincing people to be skeptical of government. We've got this huge movement now that's skeptical of capitalism and they don't realize that a lot of government is really crony capitalism where people take money from government to build up their companies. You've got companies that exclusively live off of government spending, and you see this in transportation. We've got all these engineering and consulting firms like Parsons Brinkerhoff, which has now got a new name WSR and HDR and a bunch of other companies, and they overtly lie. HDR has made a specialty of going to cities and saying, if you build rail transit, you're going to get billions of dollars of economic development. Look what happened in Portland. They built a light rail line and they got a billion dollars of economic development. They don't mention the fact that Portland got zero economic development after it built the light rail.So 10 years after it opened the line, it threw a billion dollars in subsidies to developers along the light rail line, and those developers then put in new developments and they said, look, we built the light rail line. We've got all this new development. Well, you didn't mention the billion dollars in subsidies: where you didn't put in the subsidies, you got no new development, or you did put in the subsidies and you didn't have light rail, you got new development. It was the subsidies, not the light rail that got new development. HDR lies to people and claims it's the rail transit that got the new development. They even hired a city counselor in Portland, the person who had originally proposed these subsidies, and he traveled around the country telling cities that they put in the rail lines and they got all this development. He never mentioned the subsidies that he himself had initiated on the Portland City Council.So you need to educate people and we need a skeptical public. We need people in the public who aren't going to automatically assume that government is good and that private operations, private companies are automatically bad. Private corporations aren't necessarily purely good, but given a choice between a public agency and a private corporation, I would rather have the private corporation because I can at least decide not to patronize that company if I don't like their products or what they do. Whereas when the government does something, I'm stuck with having to pay taxes for it whether I like it or not.Leafbox:What are your thoughts on New Urbanism? I think you've had debates with James Kunstler and have any of your thoughts changed or evolved orRandal O'Toole:Yes, they've evolved. I originally didn't like it and now I hate it. I originally thought new urbanism was a little misguided. Now I think they're delusional. Totally delusional. New urbanism is the idea that people will be happier if they live within walking distance of shops, of coffee shops, of stores of transit stops, maybe even within walking distance of work that people will be healthier if they're within walking distance. The way to do that is to build a lot more apartments because that's the way to get the density you need to get people living within walking distance. And so new urbanism effectively supported the urban planners who are trying to have urban growth boundaries around cities and densify the cities and increase the apartments. And if you look at the history of new urbanism, it basically came in the 1990s from a group of architects and planners who read a book that was published in about 1960 called The Death and Life of Great American Cities.The book was written by an architecture critic at the time named Jane Jacobs. She lived in Greenwich Village, New York City at the time, the urban planning profession believed that high density apartments were bad. Most of the big cities like New York and Chicago and Boston had a bunch of apartments that had been built before the turn of the 20th century. They were like four and five and six stories tall. They didn't have any elevators. You had to climb up all these staircases if you lived on an upper floor to get to your apartment. At the time they were built, elevators had just been invented or they hadn't even been invented yet. High speed electric elevators dated to 1891. So a lot of these were built before the elevators. They were built for people who couldn't afford to ride a street car to work. And so you had blocks of apartments that had like 5,000 people living per block, and they were within walking distance of blocks of factories that had like 3000, 4,000 people per block of factories.So people would walk, from the apartment for the factory. Well, after the turn of the 20th century, we got Henry Ford developed the moving assembly line for automobiles, and he made automobiles so cheap that everybody who was living in those apartments could afford to buy them. And the moving assembly line required so much land that all the factories moved out of downtowns into the suburbs. So the jobs moved to the suburbs, the people who bought cars that a lot of them moved to the suburbs, they could live in single family home instead of apartments. And after World War ii, we could see those apartments were not very desirable. And so in 1949, Congress passed a law that gave the cities money for urban renewal that was to be used to clear these apartments out and replaced them with something else. Well, the cities didn't want to replace 'em with single family homes because they didn't think they'd get as much tax revenue for the single family homes.So for the most part, the cities were replacing them with high rise apartments with elevators. In the 1930s, there was a crazy architect from Switzerland who called himself Le Corbusier , which I think means the crow, and he thought that everybody should live in high rise apartment. I don't know why he thought that, because he himself never lived in a high rise apartment. He lived in low-rise, but he thought cities should build highrise apartments. So the urban planning fad of the 1950s was to build high-rise apartments, not just in American cities, but all over the world. You go to South Korea and the cities, all of them have high rise apartments. You go to Japan, you go to China, you go to Russia, you go to Paris, you go to cities everywhere you find all these high-rise apartments. They were all inspired by this kooky architect named Lake Buer who thought people should live in a way that he himself didn't want to live.So here comes Jane Jacobs. They want to tear down her apartment building and put in a high-rise, and she says, urban planners don't understand how cities work. Well, she was right about that. Urban planners don't understand how cities, but then she went on to say something that was totally wrong, which was that she, Jane Jacobs understood how cities work, and the way she described an ideal city was you had five story apartment building and with all this density, the ground floor would be shops and people would entertain their guests out on the street. She didn't say this apartments were so small, there was no room for entertaining guests. So you'd entertain the guests out on the streets, so you'd have people playing out on the streets, they'd be barbecuing out on the streets, they'd be shopping out on the streets because the shops are out on the streets, so there wouldn't be any crime because everybody would be able to see everything that was going on because they'd all be down on the streets all the time.You'd have these lively streets, it'd be so exciting to live in them. It'd be a wonderful place to live. And that's what a real city was like. She didn't understand that what she was describing was an artifact from the 1880s that people were moving out of as rapidly as they could and that, despite her claims, they did have high crime rate. The people didn't want to live in buildings, so they had to climb up to five stories, four, four or five stories on stairs to get to their apartments that they're moving out. She herself didn't live in a five story building. She lived in a three story building. I don't know if she lived on the second floor or the third floor. I suspect her apartment was probably on both floors because she was welted due. Her husband had a good job, she got a good job.They lived in this three story building. There was a shop on the ground floor and they had to walk up, I think one floor to get to the main part of their apartment. So she didn't understand what it was like having to walk up three, four, and five flights of stairs to get to apartments on the fourth, fifth, and sixth floors. Doubly ironic, in 1968, her son decides to dodge the draft because he didn't believe in the war in Vietnam. So he moved to Canada. She decided to move to Canada with him, and she made so much money selling her book, the Death and Life of Great American Cities that she bought a single family home in Canada. She didn't live in a mid-rise apartment, and she moved to a single family home. And yet the urban planners who were young in the 1960s and becoming dominant in the 1990s who had read her book said, yes, we were wrong to try to force people to live in high rise apartments.We should instead try to force people to live in five story apartments like the apartments that she described in the Death and Life of Great American Cities, like the apartments in Greenwich Village. So instead of saying, alright, let's build some of these five story apartments in the inner cities in Portland and Denver and Seattle, they said, let's build these five story apartments everywhere. Let's build them in the suburbs. Let's build them in rural areas. Let's build 'em everywhere. All urbanites should live in these five story apartment buildings. And so we're seeing them spring up all over the place. Most of them are subsidized because as I say, 80% of Americans want to live in single family homes, not in apartments. We even had an urban planner write a paper that was very popular in the urban planning profession that said by the year 2025, and he wrote this in about 2002 or something. By the year 2025, people aren't going to want to live in single family homes anymore, and we're going to have a surplus of 22 million single family homes in the suburbs. The suburbs are going to turn into slums because everybody living in those suburbs are going to have moved into apartments in downtown. And so what urban planners should do today is get ahead of the situation by getting their cities to build more apartments, building more apartments in the suburbs, replace these icky single family homes that people won't want to live in so that we won't have a shortage of apartments when people want them. Well, of course, we're two years away from 2025. We have people moving away from cities as fast as they can before the pandemic where there were polls that showed that 40% of people who were living in dense cities wanted to move to suburbs or rural areas. And we had the same polls showed that more people wanted to live in suburbs that actually lived in them, and that was in 2018. And then the pandemic comes along and people just flee these dense cities, the populations of San Francisco and New York and others, Portland and Seattle, they're all declining and the populations of their suburbs, some cases are growing the populations of small towns. Boise, Idaho is the fastest growing city in the country.The guy was just totally wrong. And yet we have suffered for two decades under urban planners who have tried to force these ideas on cities by subsidizing, by taxing people, and then subsidizing these high density apartments that people don't really want to live in.Leafbox:Randal, talking about the pandemic, how has that changed or affected your outlook on urban planning or on where people want to live? Or do you have the same critiques of the subsidies of suburban living orRandal O'Toole:All the pandemic has done is reinforced the ideas I already had. A pandemic doesn't really change things. What it does is it reinforces trends that are already happening. We already had a trend where people were buying cars and stopping the use of transit. Transit ridership declined every year from 2014 to 2018. It recovered slightly in 2019, but not much. Most cities still declined. About 45% of our transit takes place in New York City. And what happened was it grew in New York City in 2019. It's still declined almost everywhere else, but the growth in New York City overcame the decline everywhere else, but basically people were still buying cars. Gas prices dropped in 2014 and that just killed transit everywhere except New York City.And then we have the trend to living in suburbs. We have the trend of wanting to live in single family homes as soon as people could afford to do so. They would buy a car and then they could live out in the suburbs where they didn't have to be in a lot of congestion or they didn't have to deal with crime or they didn't have to deal with pollution and things like that. And all the pandemic did is it reinforced all those things before the pandemic. You might've thought everybody who wanted to move to the suburbs had already done, but no, it turns out a lot more people wanted to move to the suburbs, but by the pandemic allowed more people to work at home and that led more people to say, okay, now I can move to the suburbs. Or before I couldn't because I was required to work in an office that was too far away from the place I wanted to live in the suburbs. So we now have people who maybe work in an office one day a week, but live a hundred miles away from that office and instead of driving 20 miles five days a week, they're driving a hundred miles one day a week each way and living far, far away from the density that urban planners had made for them.The pandemic didn't change my views, it just reinforced them.Leafbox:What is your solution for the urban cores that are the skyscrapers of New York and the developers that built up that infrastructure? What are they supposed to do with these remote work is a challenge for 'em?Randal O'Toole:I think the government shouldn't do anything. I think the developers are going to have to figure it out for themselves. The owners are going to have to figure out for themselves what to do with those offices. Solution number one is to find lower valued tenants. They have what they call Class A offices and class B offices and class A offices attract companies like Chase Manhattan and Wells Fargo and Class B attracts lower rung companies. Then you have Class C that attracts nonprofit groups and flea markets and antique stores and things like that. So the owners of these office buildings are going to have to accept a lower class of tenants. Now you hear proposals to convert office buildings to apartments, and I think the Biden administration just approved a bill that's going to offer money to developers to convert office buildings to apartments. The problem is you look at the way plumbing is set up in an apartment building, every single apartment has to have plumbing for kitchen and bathrooms.And you look at the way plumbing is set up in an office building, they put the plumbing in this core of the building where the restrooms are and the outer reach of the building have no plumbing at all. So it's going to be very expensive to change office buildings into apartment buildings. And really it's cheaper to build single family homes than it is to build apartments, and it's probably cheaper to build single family homes than it is to convert offices to apartment buildings. If you didn't have urban growth boundaries around cities, you're not going to convert offices to apartments because people aren't going to be willing to pay that extra cost of living in an apartment. If you live in a place that does have urban growth boundaries, you've driven up the cost of single family homes to be two to five times greater than it ought to be, then maybe you'll be able to justify converting offices to apartments economically justify. But that's only because you've distorted the housing market totally rid of those distortions.Leafbox:Like you said, it's still the triangle, the iron triangle, because the developers are getting subsidies for their losses instead of just taking the loss and finding Class C tenants.Randal O'Toole:Well, that's going to happen in some places, but even with the subsidies, I don't think you're going to see a lot of apartment conversions in Houston or Dallas or Atlanta or Omaha or Raleigh, places where you don't have urban growth boundaries. And so housing is still pretty affordable. Single family housing is still pretty affordable. The new urbanists like to ask people, would you rather live in an apartment where you're within walking distance of coffee shops and grocery stores and your work? Or would you rather live in a single family home or you have to drive everywhere you go? Everywhere you go. And a lot of people will say the apartment, but if you ask a question honestly, you'd say, would you rather live in a 1000 square foot apartment that costs $400,000 that's within walking distance of a limited selection, high priced grocery store and a coffee shop?Or would you rather live in a 2000 square foot single family home on a large lot that's with an easy driving distance of multiple grocery stores that are competing hard for your business, both on and on having a wide selection of goods to sell you. And there's not much congestion because you live in a low density area. Well, you asked a question that way. You mentioned that your 2000 square foot house only costs $200,000, whereas to 1000 square foot apartment costs $400,000, even without the cost, you're going to find a lot more people saying they want the single family home. And when you add in the cost, the preference for single family homes just zoomed upward. So in Houston, you're not going to see a lot of conversions. You'll probably see a bunch of conversions in San Francisco, but do people really want to live that way? I think people are being forced to live that way, and I don't like the fact that planners are getting away with forcing people to live in ways they don't want to live. WhatLeafbox:Are your thoughts? I think you're a proponent of autonomous vehicles as an alternative to public infrastructure and public transport. Could you expand on that?Randal O'Toole:Well, I'm not so much a proponent, as I see that's the wave of the future. So we see cities like Seattle spending gobs of money. I mean, Seattle's got spending like 90 billion on light rail when autonomous vehicles, once they're applied to Seattle are going to be just destroy light rail as a mode of transportation. Who's going to want to ride light rail when you're going to be susceptible to diseases that you can catch from other people on the train? There's going to be crime on the train, and it only goes when the rail is scheduled, not when you want to go, and it only goes where that we've spent billions of dollars building the rail lines and not where you want to go. Whereas you could call up an autonomous vehicle, have it come to your door, take you to your door, and it's going to cost you probably not much more, maybe even less than when you count all the subsidies.It's certainly going to cost less than the light rail. So it's going to happen. I mean, it's happened in San Francisco. Waymo has just announced that they're serving the entire Phoenix metropolitan area now just 550 square miles. Cruise is shut down in San Francisco temporarily in response to calls because there was one accident. But the data show that even as primitive as it is today, we've the autonomous vehicles that have traveled millions and millions of miles have only had about one fifth as many accidents per million miles. They travel as human-driven vehicles. The pressure is coming from the taxi drivers, the truck drivers, the people whose jobs are going to be lost when they're replaced by autonomous vehicle, and they're the ones who are putting pressure in California to try kill autonomous vehicles in San Francisco. But it's going to happen. And since it is going to happen, we shouldn't be spending money on these 19th century forms of rail transportation that are slow and expensive and don't go where people want to go.Leafbox:Talking about international frameworks, you travel, you went to Switzerland and you're going to Canada and you're a fan of rail. Where can Americans learn? Who's doing planning, right? Who's letting, is it Singapore, is it Tokyo? Where's the most ideal framework for development in your opinion, meeting the needs of this civilian, the government, and just where do you find that balance?Randal O'Toole:Houston. Houston is the closest I can come to the ideal. Houston has no zoning. Texas counties are not allowed to zone. And so Houston is surrounded by lots, some suburban cities that are incorporated. The biggest one is Pasadena. They don't have any zoning. Other Incorporated cities around Houston do have zoning, but what happens is the developments take place in unincorporated areas. The developers build houses that people want. They build homes for the market. They do build some multifamily, but they build mostly single family. And then these developed areas then get annexed into the suburbs and the suburbs then sometimes apply zoning. Sugar land is one example of that. Almost all of sugar land was built in unincorporated areas and then annexed into the city. Even the city hall was built when it was unincorporated, and then they annexed it into the incorporated area. So the zoning only came after it was built.And so the developers were able to build the kind of houses that people wanted. And one of the things that developers found is that if you're going to buy a single family home, you want to have some assurance that nobody's going to put in a gravel pit or a meat packing factory or a brick factory or something like that right next door to you. And so the developers did something that was like zoning. They put protective covenants on the properties. They said All the homes in this neighborhood have to be a certain size. All the homes in this neighborhood have to be a certain size or whatever, and the lots have to be a certain size and so on. And what happens is when you do that, if you're a developer, you don't get more money from your lots, but they sell a lot faster.It doesn't increase the cost. There's no cost of putting these covenants on, but they sell a lot faster. These covenants are actually developed decades before zoning, and they were so successful that zoning was invented by cities to apply to existing single family neighborhoods to increase home ownership. Home ownership rates went from about 15% in cities in 1890 to over 50% by 1960, because people had the assurance that if they bought a home, it wasn't going to be degraded in use because the next door neighbor decided to put in something that was incompatible, whether it was zoning or protective covenants. So Houston has protective covenants in all these suburban developments, and these covenants are flexible. If a developer says, look, your neighborhood has these covenants in and they're incompatible with the development I want to put in, but I think my development will sell really well, I'll pay you to change your covenants.And some neighborhoods have agreed to do that so that the developers can put in something that they think is more marketable than the kind of housing that's in that neighborhood and people's taste change. So these kinds of things do happen over time. Now, another thing that's happened is that some of the suburban counties around Houston have toll road authorities, and they are funded exclusively out of their tolls. They build roads rather economically. They build freeways that are cost about $5 million a lane mile, and they build these freeways to get from the suburban communities that are being built by developers who are using protective covenants to get from these suburban neighborhoods to downtown Houston. So Fort Bend County, for example, has several freeways that is built exclusively with toll roads that are paid for solely out of tolls. They don't get any gas taxes, they don't get any tax dollars, and I consider these to be very successful.Now nobody is perfect. Houston. After voting down light rail a couple of times, they managed to persuade them that voters that if they built light rail, it would relieve congestion. And so they ended up building some light rail lines That to me, have been total disasters. Transit ridership in Houston was growing before they started building a light rail is now lower than it was in the last couple of years before light rail opened. Because they spent so much money on the light rail, they ended up cutting back on their bus service and you lost more bus riders than you gained rail riders. That's a pattern we've seen in Los Angeles and St. Louis and Sacramento and cities all over the country that you build rail and you lose riders because you end up having fewer bus riders than you gain rail riders. But overall, despite that quirk, the light rail problem in Houston, I say Houston is the place you should go to if you want to find out how cities could work without a lot of government plansLeafbox:As an environmentalist, you have a model called Incentive-based conservation. Could you just summarize that for people and how you think market reactions can help secure environmental rights and whatnot?Randal O'Toole:Well, I developed those ideas back when I was working on forest issues and the Forest Service and other agencies were doing a lot of clearcutting that clear cutting damaged wildlife habitat. It reduced recreation values because recreationists to the most valuable recreation was recreation in areas that were wild and where you had some solitude from other people and from big cities and from roads and things like that. And so the forest service is eagerly building roads, cutting down trees, damaging watersheds, damaging fisheries, damaging wildlife habitats. The best fisheries in Oregon, for example, are an area that have no roads, that have had no logging, the best salmon fisheries. So I looked at after years of looking at Forest service data, something hit me one day, and that was that the reason why the Forest Service was doing this is because Congress had inadvertently designed their budget to reward the Forest Service for losing money on environmentally destructive activities and to literally penalize the forest Service for either making money or doing environmentally benign activities, activities that were not bad for the environment.And certainly they didn't reward them for doing environmentally good activities. And so the Forest Service was merely following its incentive. I wrote a whole book about this. It was called Reforming the Forest Service. It came out in 1988. In 1989, the Forest Service sold 11 billion Ford feet of timber started declining in 1990. By 2001, it had fallen to one and a half billion board feet of timber. It had fallen by 85%. And people in the Forest Service came to me and said, we read your book and we thought you were accusing us of being corrupt. And then this guy said, the guy told me, I suddenly realized last week I had signed off on a timber sale so I could get a bigger budget. And they stopped doing that. They stopped saying, they said, we don't want to be motivated by our budget to do these bad things anymore.And so they stop these environmentally destructive timber sale. I didn't think that was going to happen. I thought we would have to change their incentives. So I talked about incentive-based conservation. I said, we should charge recreation fees. We should charge fees, bigger fees for fishing and hunting. Right now, when you fish and hunt, technically under federal law or under US law, the animals you fish and hunt are owned by the states. But if you, on national forest, the land you're hunting on is owned by the federal government. So right now you pay a hunting fee to the state, but you don't pay anything to the federal government. I said, you should also have to pay a fee to the federal government to hunt on federal land or fish on federal land. If you did that, I pointed out then private landowners would also be able to charge fees, and you'd see both federal and private landowners modifying their activities so that they would enhance wildlife habitat, enhance fisheries, and enhance recreation opportunities.We'd have more recreation, not less if we were willing to pay fees. And so my solution to the forest problems was to charge recreation fees to balance the fees from timber cutting and grazing and mining. And the forest services own numbers showed that recreation was worth more than all the other activities combined. So they would make a pretty good balance. I got quite a few environmentalists supporting this. But then in the mid 1990s, the environmental movement kind of got taken over by people who believed in top down planning, they believed that the president should make all the decisions for every single timber sale. And if a timber sale didn't meet their approval, they literally went to the president of the United States and got him to call up the district, not him, but one of his age, to call up the district ranger and say, don't do that timber sale. It drove the Forest Service bureaucracy nuts because these people in the administration in the White House were overruling 'em. And so incentive-based conservation didn't get very far. Now we're seeing some people in the environmental movement going back and recognizing that this top down planning doesn't work very well, and they're beginning to look at these ideas again.Leafbox:Randal, as you had that interview with the Grassroots Initiative here in Hawaii discussing housing policy, what's your relationship with them? And my other question is, do you have an opinion on vacancy taxes for Hawaii or other places?Randal O'Toole:Alright, well, you're talking about the Grassroot Institute, not plural, but Grassroot Institute, and they're a state-based think tank in Hawaii. And I work with state-based think tanks all over the country. Recently, I've done work for state-based think tanks in North Carolina, Arizona, Oregon, Colorado, a lot of different states and Hawaii. And some of them have hired me to do some work. Some of them just asked me to comment in Zoom meetings or in podcasts or radio interviews or whatever. But the Grassroots Institute is one of a great network state-based think tanks that I'm happy to be working with and for as much as I can. Even when I worked for the Cato Institute, which is a national think tank in Washington dc, I really saw my job as being a liaison from Cato to these state-based think tanks because most people in Cato working on national or international issues, I was one of the few in Cato who was working on local issues like housing or transportation issues. And so I've always had a good relationship with the Grassroot Institute. The director and their staff are great people and they do good work on housing and a lot of other issues in Hawaii.Leafbox:And then what are your thoughts? I mean, you advocated for a voucher model, just to summarize that for meeting affordable housing and then if you have any thoughts on vacancy taxes. Many people want to apply vacancy tax in Hawaii for empty units or empty second homes or I'm just curious if you've studied that at all.Randal O'Toole:Well, Hawaii was the first state in the country to try to restrict the development of single family homes. And it's such an irony because in the 1950s, most of the land in Hawaii was owned by the five companies, Dole and so on, and the bishop estate. And if you wanted to own your own home in Hawaii, often you couldn't find land to own it on something like 99% of the land was owned by one of these six entities. So you would have to lease land from one of these entities and build your home on it. And the five companies were agricultural companies and they weren't interested in leasing land for homes. They wanted to grow pineapple and sugarcane and other crops on their land. And so you had this huge housing crisis in Hawaii in the late 1950s. And at the time, in the early 1950s, Hawaii's legislature, territorial legislature was run by Republicans and they were very sympathetic to the five companies, and they weren't sympathetic to the people who needed housing.Well, the late 1950s, the Democrats took over and they took over on a promise of land reform. They promised that they would force the five companies and the bishop estate perhaps to sell some of their land to use for housing so that people could find affordable housing. Well, the Democrats won and in 1961 they passed their land reform cap package and it did exactly the opposite of what they promised. Instead of requiring the companies to sell the land, they declared all the rural land in the state, most of which was owned by these five companies. They declared that land off limits to developments. They said the only land you could develop was urban land. This story is told by a great book called Land and Power in Hawaii. I recommended to all your listeners if they're from Hawaii. And what the Democrats discovered was that as legislators, they could make exceptions for themselves.And so if you're a developer and you wanted to develop some land, you went to a state legislator and you made that legislator a partner in your development, the partner would then get the state to override the rules that had been passed by the state in response to the law you passed so that you could have your land developed or your developer partners land development developed and you'd make all this money. And so it became quite a corrupt system, and that's a system that governs Hawaii. To this day, only about 14% of the land in Hawaii has been developed. There's lots of land even in Oahu. Most of the land is still undeveloped. It's rural land that could be developed. And the real irony is supposedly the 1961 law that reserved all these rural areas where supposed to protect the agricultural industry, and yet the farm industry has practically died in Hawaii.Why? Because the farmers can't afford to hire farm laborers and pay them enough money for those laborers to find housing and still produce pineapple and sugarcane and other produce that's competitive with farms in Costa Rica and Fuji and other places that haven't restricted housing. And so we've destroyed more than 80% of the farm industry in Hawaii just since 1982. It's been 80%. So since 1961, it's been more than 80%. In order to preserve the farmlands, we had to destroy the farms. That to me is a very sad commentary on what's happened in housing. Now, since housing has gotten expensive, we've come up with all these wacko ideas to make housing that's affordable. One wacko idea is build high density housing, build more apartments. Well, it turns out apartments cost twice as much per square foot to build as single family homes, maybe more than twice as much if it's really tall, partly because you have to put in elevators.If you're building taller than two or three stores, you have to put in elevators. They're really expensive, more steel, more concrete. It just makes housing a lot more expensive. So you're not building affordable housing when you build apartments. And yet we have all these subsidies that we're throwing at developers that are inefficiently building expensive housing, but it's subsidized housing. And so then they can rent it at lower rates. Then we come up with crazy ideas like, oh, Airbnb is using up all the housing. Well, if we didn't have these restrictions on housing, we could build more housing. There'd be enough housing for Airbnb, there'd be enough housing for vacation homes, and there'd be enough housing for year-round residents. It's only because of the land use law that restrict housing, restrict new development that's made housing expensive. So the number one priority of anybody who cares about affordable housing should be to abolish the state land use laws, not just modify them to increase the amount of urban land, but totally abolish them. We'd see a lot more development on Oahu. We'd see a tiny bit more development on the other islands. Not much. Most of the land that's rural and the other islands would stay rural. At least half the land on Oahu that's rural would stay rural. Probably half of Oahu would stay rural, but there'd be a lot more development and housing would get to be a lot more important.Leafbox:A

New law breaks down barriers for local hemp farmers; Grassroot Institute of Hawaiʻi concerned over high cost of rail; HPR's Cassie Ordonio highlights printmaking artform and its ties to activism; Shakespeare hits the stage in upcoming festival

A Vacancy Tax Would Not Fix the Problem. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Jensen Ahokovi. Some state and county lawmakers in Hawai'i have proposed taxing so-called empty homes as a way to address Hawaii's housing crisis. However, a new study from the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii found no meaningful relationship between home vacancy rates and high home prices — in Hawai'i or anywhere else in the U.S. — which means that the 'empty homes' theory is just another time-wasting distraction from addressing the real cause of Hawaii's housing shortage, which is too many regulations that hinder new homebuilding.The Institute's new policy brief is titled The ‘empty homes' theory of Hawaii's housing crisis,' and was written by Institute staffers Jensen Ahokovi and Mark Coleman.On today's episode of 'Hawaii Together,' host Keli'i Akina speaks with Ahokovi about the report — and why an empty homes tax would be unlikely to lower Hawai'i home prices or increase housing supply.The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_XPlease visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

In his first term as California's governor, Jerry Brown famously said back in 1975, “There is no free lunch. This is an era of limits and we all had better get used to it. Small is beautiful.” Was Brown right? These days, it seems that establishment thinking and most of the content on mainstream media believes it is so. Threats from climate change, overpopulation, and environmental degradation, we are told, now force us to reduce consumption and limit growth in order to save the planet and ourselves. Wesley's guest in this edition of Humanize takes a radically different and far more optimistic view. Gale L. Pooley has co-authored a book entitled Super Abundance in which he and co-author Marian L. Tupy argue that contrary to the roaring pessimism about the human future so often espoused these days, our earthly resources are actually unlimited and indeed, that population increases and innovation are the keys to growing our prosperity and extending our freedoms. Gale L. Pooley is an associate professor of business management at Brigham Young University-Hawaii. He has taught economics and statistics at AL Faisal University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Brigham Young University-Idaho, Boise State University, and the College of Idaho. Dr. Pooley earned his BBA in Economics at Boise State University and completed his PhD at the University of Idaho. He has published articles in National Review, Human Progress, The American Spectator, the Utah Bar Journal, the Appraisal Journal, Quillette, and RealClearMarkets.  Dr. Pooley is a Senior Fellow with the Discovery Institute's Center on Wealth and Poverty and serves on the board of HumanProgress.org. He also serves on the Foundation for Economic Education Faculty Network and is a Scholar with Hawaii’s Grassroot Institute. His major research activity has been the Simon Abundance Index, which he co-authored with Dr. Marian Tupy. Economics | Discovery Institute (wealthandpoverty.center) Superabundance: The Story of Population Growth, Innovation, and Human Flourishing on an Infinitely Bountiful Planet: Tupy, Marian L., Pooley, Gale L., Gilder, George: 9781952223587: Amazon.com: Books Review of “Superabundance,” by Marian L. Tupy & Gale L. Pooley (city-journal.org) After 96 Years, TV Abundance Continues to Flourish | Economics (wealthandpoverty.center)

A Review of State and County Strategies. The host for this show is Joe Kent. The guest is Lance Owens. In 2017, Hawai'i adopted a law requiring that all of the state's 88,000 cesspools be converted to septic, sewer or another wastewater disposal system by the year 2050. But cesspool conversation can be prohibitively expensive — ranging up to $40,000 for some homeowners. As a result, the state and counties are reviewing numerous strategies to achieve that 2050 goal. On today's episode of Hawaii Together, Lance Owens, a Hawai'i island REALTOR and co-operator of the real estate company Kona Home Team, talks about these strategies and especially how Hawai'i island, which is home to more than half of the state's cesspools, is planning to deal with them. He joins host Joe Kent, executive vice president of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, to discuss the costs, benefits and feasibility of the cesspool-conversion mandate.The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_XPlease visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Proposed Law Could Harm Farmers, Economy. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Joshua Montgomery. Short-term rentals are controversial across the country. It's no different in Hawaii County. Some members of the Hawaii County Council are proposing tighter regulations on hosted short-term rentals in the hopes that doing so will add to the county's housing stock and reduce complaints. Hawaii island resident Josh Montgomery isn't so sure these new regulations are a good idea. Montgomery operates the Guard Well Farm in Holualoa and coordinates the Ohana Aina Association, which promotes homestays, farmstays and short-term rentals. Montgomery says many Hawaii island residents rent out rooms in their homes to vacationers to help make ends meet. On today's episode of 'Hawaii Together,' Keli'i Akina, president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute, talks with Montgomery about this issue. The pair discuss the reasoning behind the proposed law, how it might affect Hawaii isle residents, and how concerned citizens can make their voices heard. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Could a Lower Tax Burden Help. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Scott Grosskreutz. It's no secret that Hawaii has a healthcare crisis. The state has a shortage of more than 700 physicians and more than 3,000 healthcare staff. Meanwhile, many patients report running into significant delays in finding the care they need. For residents of the neighbor islands, these delays can prove fatal. Dr. Scott Grosskreutz, who practices radiology on Hawaii Island and is an active member of the Hawaii Physician Shortage Crisis Task Force, joins host Keli'i Akina, president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute, to discuss what state lawmakers can do to address these dire concerns. On today's episode of 'Hawaii Together,' Akina and Grosskreutz discuss the state's healthcare staff shortage, its general excise tax and medical licensing laws and what lawmakers can do to make Hawaii a safer and healthier place to live. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

High Home Values Prompt Calls for Relief. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Natalie Iwasa. Driven by rising land and home values, Hawaii's property taxes are soaring. Each county has reaped significant revenues from property taxes in the past several years. But with inflation and a housing crisis, is it time for counties to reevaluate how they levy this tax? Natalie Iwasa, CPA, CFE and community advocate joins host Keli'i Akina, president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute, to answer this question. On today's episode of Hawaii Together, Akina and Iwasa discuss the history of property taxes in Hawaii, how assessments are conducted and what reforms the counties should consider. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Reform Could Boost Freedom, Create Jobs. The host for this show is Joe Kent. The guest is Jessica Poitras. What do barbers, plumbers and athletic trainers all have in common? In Hawaii, they all need an occupational license to practice their trade. Unfortunately, these mandatory licenses often do far more harm than good. Jessica Poitas, legislative counsel for the Institute for Justice — a public interest law firm based in Arlington, Virginia — explains why. Using data from the Institute for Justice's new report, License to Work 3, Poitras argues that occupational licensing makes it harder for people to work in a given profession, which limits options and raises prices for consumers. On today's episode of 'Hawaii Together,' host Keli'i Akina, president of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, speaks with Poitras about the history of licensing laws, where Hawaii ranks compared to other states and how to change licensing for the better. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Could Regulatory Sandboxes Help. The host for this show is Jonathan Helton. The guest is Rees Empey. Hawaii is one of the most difficult states in which to start a business, according to a recent survey by CNBC. But Rees Empey, director of state government affairs at the Utah-based Libertas Institute, says one way Hawaii lawmakers could make it easier is to establish more regulatory 'sandboxes,' such as the one it already has for cryptocurrencies. On today's episode of Hawaii Together, host Jonathan Helton, Research Associate from the Grassroot Institute, talks with Empey about what regulatory sandboxes are and how Hawaii could deploy them to foster innovation. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Judge Upholds Property Rights. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Gregory Kugle. Honolulu's new ordinance limiting short-term rentals to a minimum of 90 days has been blocked by US District Court Judge Derrick Watson, who issued a preliminary injunction on Oct. 13. Gregory Kugle, an attorney with Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert, who represents the Hawaii Legal Short-term Rental Alliance, talks about the case on Hawaii Together with host Keli‘i Akina, who also is president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii. Part of the discussion covers a warning letter Kugle sent Oct. 21 to Honolulu officials about how they should be cautious that their publicized intent to 'aggressively' enforce the law doesn't violate the judge's order. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Government Watchdogs Look the Other Way. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Randy Roth. Too many government watchdog entities appear to have been willfully ignoring, or even tacitly approving, some of Hawaii's most egregious corruption scandals, according to Randy Roth, law professor emeritus at the University of Hawaii William S. Richardson School of Law. Those include Honolulu Police Commission, the state and county ethics commissions, the state commissions of judicial conduct and judicial selection, and the state Office of Disciplinary Counsel. On today's episode of Hawaii Together, host Keli‘i Akina, president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, talks with Roth about why such watchdogs have been paper tigers in the face of corruption all around them. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Debunking the Remote Buyer Myth. The hosts for this show are Jay Fidell and Tom Yamachika. The guests are Malia Hill and Jensen Ahokovi. Hawaii is renowned for high housing prices. Lawmakers have blamed them on wealthy out-of-state buyers with little more than anecdotal evidence. As a result, lawmakers have proposed punishing new taxes such as an empty homes tax and steep hikes in the state conveyance tax. But a study from the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii analyzes the evidence and debunks this theory. We hear from the people who did the research and looked at the data, and we come to different conclusions about the cause of the problem and more effective ways to address it. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6lmEllOKP493URXssFT4N7G Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Why Maui Needs to Relax Housing Barriers. The host for this show is Ted Kefalas. The guest is Todd Apo. Todd Apo, vice president of community partnerships and public affairs of the Hawaii Community Foundation, will discuss the foundation's 'House Maui' initiative, which aims to clear away roadblocks to more housing on Maui. Host Ted Kefalas, executive vice president at the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, will discuss policy options that could help ease the housing shortage. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Data Shows Minimum Wage is Bad Medicine. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is David Neumark. The research is in: The minimum wage mostly hurts the people it is intended to help. That's the finding of David Neumark, economist and co-director of the Center for Population, Inequality, and Policy at the University of California, Irvine, and author of “Minimum Wages,” published by The MIT Press. Program host Keli'i Akina, president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, interviews Neumark about his comprehensive review of evidence on the effect of minimum wages on employment, skills, wage and income distributions, and longer-term labor market outcomes, and his conclusion that, ultimately, minimum-wage laws are not a good policy tool. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Russian Oil Sanctions and the Jones Act. The host for this show is Joe Kent. The guest is Colin Grabow. Colin Grabow, Grassroot Scholar and policy analyst at the Cato Institute, discusses President Joe Biden's ban on Russian oil imports and why Hawaii needs a Jones Act waiver to ensure its energy security. Currently Hawaii is almost wholly reliant on foreign fuel sources, due to Jones Act restrictions on shipping goods between U.S. ports that make it too expensive to buy U.S. oil. Also, in the event of an emergency, there also are too few Jones Act oil tankers available to ship fuel to Hawaii from the U.S. mainland. Joe Kent, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii executive vice president, is the program host. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

This week's episode is hosted by Cardinal Institute's Development Director, Jessi Troyan. Jessi is joined by Keliʻi Akina, President and CEO of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii. The Grassroot Institute is a nonprofit policy research organization focusing on the values of individual liberty, economic freedom, and accountable government. In this episode, Jessi and Keliʻi discuss the Jones Act, how pandemic lockdowns affected Hawaii's economy, and creating practical change and a better society in the spirit of “E hana kākou” (Let's work together).   Grassroot Institute of Hawaii https://grassrootinstitute.org/ Grassroot Institute video primer on the Jones Act, here. Watch Keli'i Akina at the West Maui Taxpayers Association annual meeting discuss to create a more robust healthcare system on Maui, here.    Support: Patreon: patreon.com/cardinalinstitute Donate: cardinalinstitute.com/donate Newsletter: cardinalinstitute.com/newsletter Follow: YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram

Why the Push to Increase Hawaii Taxes. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Tom Yamachika. “Why the push to increase Hawaii taxes?” Hawaii legislators are aiming to increase taxes on fuels, property and capital gains, but that might be more trouble than it's worth, according to Tom Yamachika, president of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii. Host Keli‘i Akina, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii president and CEO, discusses with Yamachika why lawmakers should keep focus on other issues. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Bills Would Limit Executive Power. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Malia Blom Hill. Hawaii legislators have introduced several bills that would limit the governor's potentially endless emergency powers. According to Malia Blom Hill, Grassroot Institute of Hawaii policy director, the goal is to bring a much-needed end to the state's economic and social lockdowns and restore the government's constitutional checks and balances. The host is Keli‘i Akina, institute president and CEO. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X Please visit our ThinkTech website at https://thinktechhawaii.com and see our Think Tech Advisories at https://thinktechadvisories.blogspot.com.

Grassroot Institute Opposes TAT Surcharge. The host for this show is Jay Fidell. The guest is Joe Kent. Grassroot Institute warns that Hawaii's economy is in no condition to sustain a tax increase on visitors to the islands. The Institute opposes a 3% transient accommodations tax for the City and County of Honolulu, the proceeds of which would be divided between the county's general fund, a special account to "mitigate the impact of visitors on public facilities” and the county's transit fund for the rail project. Joe Kent, the Institute executive vice president of the Institute, said that with the elimination of the county's share of the state's 10.25% TAT, it is understandable that Honolulu would want to establish its own TAT, but he urged the Council to carefully consider the state of the economy before proceeding with yet another tax increase. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6mAjbhHpq-LyAm9pcuN3zJ

How Red Tape Threatens the Individual. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Jensen Ahokovi. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii's newest research associate, Jensen Ahokovi, quoted founder Dick Rowland's quip, “The bigger government gets, the smaller you get,” in a recent commentary in Honolulu Civil Beat. Ahokovi wrote about Hawaii's stunningly large government bureaucracy and how too often it serves itself instead of the public. Program host Keli‘i Akina, president and CEO of the institute, talks with Ahokovi about why a limited government is a better way to ensure respect for the individual, as well as facilitate better economic outcomes, such as for healthcare and housing. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X

How COVID Rules Affect Maui Businesses. The host for this show is Keli'i Akina. The guest is Pamela Tumpap. Pamela Tumpap, president of the Maui Chamber of Commerce, talks with host Keli‘i Akina, president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, about Mayor Mike Victorino's executive orders mandating customers of restaurants and other establishments be vaccinated or tested against COVID-19. Questions include whether the mandates are practical, whether they are supported by data, and whether they are narrowly tailored to achieve a specific goal without violating the freedoms of Maui residents generally. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X

The hosts for this episode are Joe Kent and Joe Kent. The guests for this episode are Shawn Luis and Kristin Coccaro. The hosts for this episode are Joe Kent and Joe Kent. The guests for this episode are Shawn Luis and Kristen Coccaro. The hosts for this episode are Keli'i Akina and Keli'i Akina. The guests for this episode are Shawn Luis and Kristen Coccaro. Governor's Vaccine Mandate Challenged. The host for this episode is Keli'i Akina. The guest for this episode is Shawn Luis. The host for this episode is Keli'i Akina. 2,000 first responders and city workers have filed a lawsuit against the governor and Honolulu and Maui counties because they feel a vaccine requirement at work violates their constitutional rights. Private attorneys Shawn Luiz and Kristin Cocarro shares details about the case with host Keli'i Akina, president and CEO of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii. The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X The ThinkTech YouTube Playlist for this show is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQpkwcNJny6nA87XBgqRzAmCFmG39Wg_X

The host for this episode is Keli'i Akina. The guests for this episode are Melissa Newsham and Malia Hill. Hear What Lawmakers Had to Say. The host for this episode is Keli'i Akina. The guest for this episode is Melissa Newsham. As Hawaii's 2021 legislative session came to a close on April 29, many Hawaii residents were disappointed by the failure of the Legislature to approve HB103, which would have placed limits on the governor's emergency powers. In this episode of Keli‘i Akina's “Hawaii Together” program, Melissa Newsham of the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii shares the results of her research into why the bill failed at the last minute to make it to the governor's desk, despite widespread support from individuals and public interest groups worried about our civil liberties and accountable government. In addition, Malia Hill, institute policy director Malia Hill, discusses specifically how the defeated measure would have helped rein in the governor's unchecked executive power, which he invoked in March 2020, has included severe economic and social lockdown measures, and so far has no official end in sight.

Keli'i Akina interviews economist De Rugy. The host for this episode is Keli'i Akina. The guest for this episode is Veronique de Rugy. Hawaii’s unemployment insurance system is in crisis, with stalled payments, rampant fraud, and massive debt leading to higher taxes. Is there a better way to help the unemployed? International economist Veronique de Rugy says yes based on her study of best practices across the nation and the world. In this episode, Grassroot Institute president Keli’i Akina and De Rugy discuss possible solutions for Hawaii‘s unemployment insurance needs.

Q and Gumbo talk to Joe Kent, the Executive Vice President of Grassroot Institute of Hawaii about the destructive Jones Act Law, COVID-19 and economic recovery. https://www.grassrootinstitute.org/ Don't forget to listen to the FRAT House shows (https://twitter.com/FRAT_HOUSE_1704): Burning Boots (https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/derek-4/burning-boots) Dissecting Liberty (https://dissectingliberty.com/) Erase the State (https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/matt-kimball/erase-the-state) Insurrection Inc (https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/insurrection-inc/e/67055518) Laurel and Hardy Across the Pond (https://anchor.fm/laurel-and-hardy-across-the-pond) No Real Libertarian (https://anchor.fm/bullshido) Punk Rock Libertarians (https://prlpodcast.com/) Sean v Planet (https://seanvplanet.podbean.com/) The Gaslight Hour (https://thegaslighthour.libsyn.com/) Trent Must Talk (https://anchor.fm/trents) Two Fats and a Black (https://open.spotify.com/show/4IT4fvpgY1iQkeXkTr3Mvs) --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/unshackledliberty/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/unshackledliberty/support

Randal O’Toole is a land-use and transportation policy analyst who works with a variety of think tanks including Colorado’s Independence Institute, Hawaii’s Grassroot Institute, and Oregon’s Cascade Policy Institute. He has written several books on the follies of government planning including American Nightmare: How Government Undermines the Dream of Homeownership. He has also taught environmental economics at Yale, UC Berkeley, and Utah State University.

Like what you see? Please give generously. http://www.thinktechhawaii.com Out with The Old & In with The New?. As Hawaii’s leading independent think tank, the Grassroot Institute tackled a number of issues affecting individual liberty and free markets in 2019. Will we see the same issues arise in 2020 or will there be new ones? The host for this episode is Keli'i Akina. The guest for this episode is Malia Hill.

Keli’i Akina is the president of the Grassroot Institute, a non-partisan think tank based in Hawaii. Besides sunshine and palm trees, California and Hawaii have something in common – one-party rule. As Dr, Akina says in the interview, Hawaii is as blue as the ocean that surrounds it. We discuss the common issues of the Golden State and the Aloha State – affordable housing, high poverty, a pension crisis, and the high cost of living.

Humor is one of the best ways to convey ideas and change minds. David Swann knows this from his career as a cartoonist for newspapers on the mainland and Hawaii. Now he works for the Grassroot Institute, using his art to get people to think! The host for this episode is Keli'i Akina. The guest for this episode is David Swann. The host for this episode is Keli'i Akina. The guests for this episode are David Swann, David Swann and Joe Kent.

Matt is joined by Joshua Mason and Joe Kent, two members of the team at Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, a creative local think tank dedicated to providing the intellectual foundation for the many public policy debates on topics seriously affecting our everyday lives in Hawaii. https://www.grassrootinstitute.org

Like what you see? Please give generously. http://www.thinktechhawaii.com On Hawaii Together. There was good news and bad news for Hawaii's taxpayers during this past legislative session. Policy experts at the Grassroot Institute discuss some of the bills that will impact our lives and economy The host for this episode is Keli'i Akina.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli’i Akina, we talk with: - Senate Candidate John Carroll - Jared Meyer, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute - Andrew Walden, publisher of Hawaii Free Press - Grassroot researcher Aaron Lief - Alan Yim, Uber driver The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli’i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui’s premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui’s only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli’i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli’i Akina, we talk with: - Caleb McMahan, former fishery observer - Colin Moore, Political Science professor at UH - Andrew Walden, publisher of Hawaii Free Press - Joe Kent, VP of Research and Development - Tom Yamachika, president of the Tax Foundation The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli’i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui’s premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui’s only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli’i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli’i Akina, we talk with: - Joe Kent, Grassroot's Vice President of Research and Development, shares what he's learned about Maui's water meter list and bus system - Grassroot researcher Aaron Lief talks about Education Savings Accounts - Andrew Walden, publisher of Hawaii Free Press, joins Dr. Akina for a weekly update - Grassroot researcher Andy Slaven brings us the latest on Hawaii's catch limits - Tom Yamachika explains the dangers of an illegal law passed by Hawaii's legislature - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist, brings us another chapter from his book "Jonathan Gullible" The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli’i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui’s premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui’s only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli’i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Joe Kent, Grassroot's Vice President of Research and Development, shares what he's learned about Maui's water meter list and bus system - Grassroot researcher Aaron Lief talks about Education Savings Accounts - Andrew Walden, publisher of Hawaii Free Press, joins Dr. Akina for a weekly update - Senate candidate Makani Christensen chats with Dr. Akina - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist, brings us another chapter from his book "Jonathan Gullible" The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Grassroot researcher Andy Slaven discusses catch limits - Andrew Walden, publisher of Hawaii Free Press, joins Dr. Akina for a weekly update - Grassroot researcher Hirem Ruiz talks about Hawaii's budget - Joe Kent, Grassroot's Vice President of Research and Development, brings us both sides of the ride sharing debate - Grassroot researcher Andy Slaven talks about budget discrepencies on Maui - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist, brings us another chapter from his book "Jonathan Gullible" The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Joe Kent and Dr. Akina discuss the privatization of Maui's Hospital - Mililani Trask, Attorney - Grassroot analysts Aaron Lief and Matthew Reade on "Cool the Schools" - Neil Mellen, researcher - Oliver Porter, founder of town Sandy Springs - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Joe Kent and Dr. Akina discuss Maui Hospital - Grassroot Analyst Aaron Lief on Education Savings Accounts - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Grassroot analysts Aaron Lief and Matthew Reade on "Cool the Schools" - Hajime Alabanza, executive assistant of Hawaii Solar Energy Association - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Tom Yamachika, president of the Tax Foundation - Dr. Phil Eskew, founder of DPC Frontier - Sen. Maile Shimabakura, - Thomas Rubin, mass transit consultant - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Harvey Gerwig, president of Hawaii Rifle Association - Dr. Phil Eskew, founder of DPC Frontier - Marc Kilmer, analyst at Advance Arkansas Institute - Thomas Rubin, mass transit consultant - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government. mauioahufreemarketbusinessuberlyftcabhawaiiride-sharing

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Jose Torra, head of Movimiento Libertario de Mexico - Brian Hughes, General Manager of Uber - David Jung, owner of Ecocab - Jim Nielson, founder of the California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

David Jung, owner of Ecocab, speaks with Grassroot Institute analyst Hirem Ruiz about the effects of ride-sharing companies such as Uber and Lyft on the taxi market of Hawaii.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Candidate Keith Regan - Candidate Joe Blackburn - Karen Gray from the Nevada Policy Research Institute - Jared Meyer from the Manhattan Institute - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

Grassroot Institute researcher Jason Hirose shares his findings on overtime abuse within the Maui County police force.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Tom Yamachika, Tax Foundation - Baylen Linnekin, Attorney - Maile Shimabukuro, Senator - Jason Hirose, Grassroot researcher - Andrew Walden of Hawaii Free Press - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Simon Russell, Maui agriculture representative - Deidre Tegarden, candidate - Thomas Ruben, mass transit consultant - Robert Graham, AZ GOP chairman - Andrew Walden of Hawaii Free Press - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Keith Regan, candidate - Joe Blackburn, candidate - Alex Haller, candidate - Steve Petranik, Hawaii Business Magazine - Kaloa Robinson and Chay Shioi, local entrepreneurs - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Simon Russell, small farmer - Andrew Walden, Hawaii Free Press - Danny Pekus, candidate - Steve Petranik, Hawaii Business Magazine - Malia Blom, Grassroot Institute policy expert - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Liang Shi, Engineer - Jonathon Williams, Rich State Poor State Report - Andrew Walden, Hawaii Free Press - Steve Petranik, Hawaii Business Magazine - Steven Chiang, GoFarm Hawaii - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

Baylen Linnekin is a leading Food Law & Policy author, attorney, and scholar. He was interviewed on the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, a radio show on KAOI 1110AM and KKNE 940AM.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Hideo Simon, owner of Square Barrels - Keep Laie Cool - Brian Hughes, General Manager of Uber - Chun James, whistleblower - David Blair of the Leadership Institute - Andrew Walden of the Hawaii Free Press - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Chun James, a private citizen who's land is being seized - Mayor Alan Arakawa and Councilwoman Elle Cochran on the Future of Farming on Maui - Andrew Walden of the Hawaii Free Press - Colin Moore, Director of Political Science at UH, and Neil Milner a columnist at Civil Beat, - Ken Schoolland, author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Joni Kamiya, Hawaii's Farmer's Daughter - Andrew Walden, publisher of Hawaii Free Press – Leonard Gilroy of the Reason Foundation – Jiva Jive, Maui Dancing Advocates – Judge Ted Abrum –Randal O'Toole, Grassroot Scholar – Ken Schoolland, author and economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: – Don Couch, Maui Councilman – Randal O'Toole, Economist and Grassroot Institute Scholar – Steve Petranik, editor at Hawaii Business Magazine –Paul Harleman, Senate Minority Budget Director – Andrew Walden, publisher of HawaiiFreePress.com – Ken Schoolland, author and economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Andrew Walden, publisher of HawaiiFreePress.com - Robert Baumann, economist - Colin Moore, University of Hawaii Public Policy Center - Dick Rowland, Chairman and Founder of the Grassroot Institute - Jonathan Williams, ALEC - Ken Schoolland, author and economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

Jared Meyer, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, sat down with Joe Kent to discuss the positive impacts of Airbnb as part of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, a radio show on KAOI and KAKU on Maui, and KKNE on Oahu.

Dick Rowland, founder of the Grassroot Institute, spoke with Dr. Keli'i Akina, as part of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, a radio show on KAOI and KAKU on Maui, and KKNE on Oahu.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Andrew Walden, publisher of HawaiiFreePress.com - Randy Cabral, President of the Hawaii Farm Bureau - Colin Moore, University of Hawaii Public Policy Center - David Friedman, economist and author - Pathways for Native Hawaiian Advancement Panel - Ken Schoolland, author and economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Andrew Walden, publisher of HawaiiFreePress.com - Susan Halas, reporter for Maui Watch, about the 300% tax hike on Maui farmers - Erin McLaughlin, local business owner, about the monopolistic ocean activity system on Maui - Tom Blackburn-Rodgriguez of GoMaui, about water rights - Panos Prevedorous about rail, and other issues in Honolulu - Ken Schoolland, author and economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

Susan Halas, a reporter for MauiWatch.com shares the inside scoop on a tax hike that would have decimated agriculture on Maui. The interview was recorded on The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, a weekly radio show on KAOI 1110 AM and KAKU 88.5FM Maui, and on KKNE 940 AM Oahu.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Kathryn Henski about homelessness in Hawaii - Dr. Kyle Varner about Hawaii's doctor shortage - Josh Archambault from the Foundation for Government Accountability about food stamps in Hawaii - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Tom Yamachika, President of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii - Dan Mitchell, Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute - Ken Schoolland, author and economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - John Tilman, CEO of Illinois Policy Institute - Stanford Carr, founder of StanfordCarr development - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Kurt Altman, lawyer at the Goldwater Institute - Al Gonzalez, writer at ourfuturehawaii.com The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Joe Pluta, West Maui Taxpayers Association - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Gene Zarro, Kihei Charter Schools - James M. Taylor, Forbes, Heartland Institute - Ken Schoolland, Author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Tom Yamachika, of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Bill Bergman, director of research at Truth in Accounting - Paul Harleman, Senate Minority Budget Director - Meg Garvin, executive director at the National Crime Victim Law Institute - Ken Schoolland, Author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

Tom Blackburn-Rodriguez, a consultant for GoMaui, talks with Joe Kent about water rights on Maui. This was part of an episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Tom Blackburn-Rodriguez, a consultant for GoMaui about water rights. - Andrew Walden, publisher of Hawaii Free Press - Jonathan Williams, Vice President for the Center for Fiscal Reform at the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) - Sean Mitsui, President of Young Americans for Liberty at UH Manoa - Ken Schoolland, Author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Alan Lloyd, a researcher to talk about climate change - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Kaloa Robinson of Standford Carr Development - James M. Taylor of the Heartland Institute - Kurt Altman of the Goldwater Institute - Ken Schoolland, Author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

Jonathan Williams, Vice President for the Center for State Fiscal Reform at the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) talks to Joe Kent at the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina about Hawaii's fiscal forecast.

Sean Mitsui of the Young Americans for Liberty joins Joe Kent on the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina to talk about the movement to divest from fossil fuels.

Scott Roberts of the Washington Freedom Foundation talks with the Grassroot Institute about how to opt-out of the union.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Wes Machida, State Budget Director, and former Director of the Employee Retirement System - Jan Yamane, Acting State Auditor - Paul Harleman, Senate Minority Budget Director - Maria Pauley, Principal of Lanakila Baptist School - Tom Galley, Gun Advocate - Dan Clegg, Monsanto The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This Week: January 11, 2016 This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Dave Deleon, Government Affairs Director for the Realtors Association of Maui - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Jason Hirose, researcher at the Grassroot Institute - Scott Roberts of the Freedom Foundation of Washington State - Robert Thomas, Land and Appellate Lawyer in Hawaii - Ken Schoolland, Author and Economist The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

Susan Halas visits with the Grassroot Institute to talk about the top stories of 2015.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Michael Lilly, former attorney general for Hawaii about the Native Hawaiian Election – Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Jared Meyere of the Manhattan Institute to talk about AirBNB on Maui - Lenie Lawrence about the new Federal Registration Rules on drones - Phil Heath, an Uber driver on Maui about Honolulu County's new proposed rules to regulate ridesharing – Ken Schoolland, economist and author of The Adventures of Jonathan Gullible: a Free Market Odyssey The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This Week: January 11, 2016 This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Susan Halas of Maui Watch about the top stories of 2015 - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Gene Zarro, Co-founder of Kihei Public Charter Schools - Erin McLaughlin about monopolies on Maui - Jason Hirose, Grassroot Institute Researcher about Police Overtime on Maui - Michael Hansen, President of the Hawaii Shipper's Council about the Jones Act The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: – Joni Kamiya, Hawaii Farmers Daughter – Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Jennifer Suzuki, a teacher at Maui Waena Intermediate School about the KeikiCo Contest - Victor Geminiani, Executive Director of the Hawaii Appleseed Center for Law and Economic Justice – Ken Schoolland, economist and author of The Adventures of Jonathan Gullible: a Free Market Odyssey The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: – Charlie Jencks, Owners Representative for Honua'ula Partners and Manager for Pacific Rim Land – Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press about the TMT decision's affect on Maui - Sean Mitsui and Clarke Velasco, President and Secretary of the Young Americans for Liberty at UH Manoa - Dr. Steven Dollar, Coastal Resources Specialist at the University of Hawaii at Manoa about bleaching on Maui's reefs - Charlotte Igo, Managing Business Partner for Complete Hospice of Hawaii about the certificate of need process on Maui – Ken Schoolland, economist and author of The Adventures of Jonathan Gullible: a Free Market Odyssey

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Former Liutenant Governor Duke Aiona about Grassroot Institute's work in a Supreme Court Victory to preserve the Aloha Spirit. - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Senator Sam Slom about hidden Taxes in Hawaii - Erik Root, Grassroot Institute Scholar about Certificate of Need laws in Hawaii - Joe Henchman, Vice President at the National Tax Foundation about Hawaii's Tax Ranking - Ken Schoolland, economist and author of The Adventures of Jonathan Gullible: a Free Market Odyssey The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government. Grassroot Institute

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Pedro Gaperao, a Native Hawaiian concerned about the race-based election in Hawaii. - Andrew Walden, publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Joe Pluta, President of the West Maui Improvement Foundation - Pat Brock, a small business owner - Valerie Sisneros, a small business owner - Ken Schoolland, economist and author of The Adventures of Jonathan Gullible: a Free Market Odyssey The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Angus McKelvey, State Representative for West Maui - Tom Yamachika of the Tax Foundation of Hawaii - The West Maui Taxpayers Association's Panel on Homelessness - Pamela Tumpap, President of the Maui Chamber of Commerce - Phil Health, an Uber Driver on Maui The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Joni Kamiya, Hawaii Farmers Daughter - Andrew Walden, Publisher of the Hawaii Free Press talks about police body cameras, and cane burning on Maui. - Reg Baker about Small Business on Maui - Nancy Cook Lauer about Corruption in Hawaii - Sam Slom about the Jones Act - Ken Schoolland, Economist and Grassroot Institute Scholar talks about price supports, as demonstrated in his book, The Adventures of Jonathan Gullible. The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Oliver Porter talks about Sandy Springs Georgia, the town that privatized almost everything. - Andrew Walden, Publisher of the Hawaii Free Press talks about police body cameras, and cane burning on Maui. - Joe Pluta of the West Maui Taxpayers Association talks about Maui's homelessness problem. - Matt Clayton of the Acton Academy talks about teaching kids to think like entrepreneurs. - Ken Schoolland, Economist and Grassroot Institute Scholar talks about protectionism, as demonstrated in his book, The Adventures of Jonathan Gullible. The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

This episode of the Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina, we talk with: - Joni Kamiya of Hawaii Farmer's Daughter - Andrew Walden, Publisher of the Hawaii Free Press - Leonard Gilroy, Director of Government Reform at the Reason Foundation - Jiva Jive of Maui Dance Advocates - Judge Ted Abram, Executive Director of the American Institute for Full Employment - Ken Schoolland, Economist and Grassroot Institute Scholar The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.

The Grassroot Institute with Dr. Keli'i Akina is a radio show on Maui 1110 AM 96.7 FM KAOI, Maui's premiere talk radio station. The show is Maui's only free market radio talk show, hosted locally by the President of the Grassroot Institute, Dr. Keli'i Akina, and produced by Joe Kent. The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii is a 501c3 non-profit independent think tank working to advance individual liberty, the free market, and limited, accountable government.