Podcast appearances and mentions of rob roos

We begin with the HHS announcement that Covid shots will no longer be recommended to healthy children and pregnant women. What does healthy mean? And what are the conditions that provide release from liability for vaccine makers? Then, a discussion of kinds of immunity, and how vaccines are best delivered depending on how disease is transmitted. We compare what was claimed about the shots (they stop transmission!), and what Pfizer later admitted (that they did not know if the shots stopped transmission—but they had to move at the “speed of science”!). Also, a discussion of how to kill your pathogens by crossing ecological borders…and how to get rid of a botfly with a steak, or with ivermectin. Then: why are young male capuchin monkeys abducting baby howler monkeys on an island off the coast of Panama? Finally: a discussion of transhumanism, our future, our embodied selves, how we live on, what we owe our children, what our beloved dead would make of now, and how we, and the LLMs, could know.*****Our sponsors:Brain.fm: intense music that boosts productivity. Unlock your brain's full potential free for 30 days by going to http://brain.fm/DARKHORSEPique's Nandaka: delicious mushroom, tea, and chocolate drink that provides all day energy. Get 20% off plus free frother+beaker at http://www.Piquelife.com/DARKHORSEJolie: Beautiful showerheads that filter out the garbage without reducing water pressure. Go to http://jolieskinco.com/DarkHorse to get free shipping; free returns within 60 days.*****Join us on Locals! Get access to our Discord server, exclusive live streams, live chats for all streams, and early access to many podcasts: https://darkhorse.locals.comHeather's newsletter, Natural Selections (subscribe to get free weekly essays in your inbox): https://naturalselections.substack.comOur book, A Hunter-Gatherer's Guide to the 21st Century, is available everywhere books are sold, including from Amazon: https://amzn.to/3AGANGg (commission earned)Check out our store! Epic tabby, digital book burning, saddle up the dire wolves, and more: https://darkhorsestore.org*****Mentioned in this episode:Kennedy, Bhattacharya and Makary on changing vax recommendations: https://x.com/SecKennedy/status/1927368440811008138Dr. Lon Jones on mucosal immunity (on DHP): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w99CQVaOK0ERob Roos forcing truth from Pfizer: https://x.com/Rob_Roos/status/1579759795225198593Heather on killing your pathogens: https://open.substack.com/pub/naturalselections/p/kill-your-pathogensForrest Maready on polio (on DHP): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7wYUnQUESUGoldsborough et al 2025. Rise and spread of a social tradition of interspecies abduction. Current Biology 35(10): R375-R376: https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(25)00372-0Bret on transhumanism: https://x.com/BretWeinstein/status/1927043640813138102Support the show

Chris en Tink. Over hoe het allemaal misging met Rob Roos. Met hele aardige woorden over Kirsten Verdel en over Jerry Affriye.En voor de fans van deze show is er een nagesprek in een podcast die te beluisteren is op www.petjeaf.com/hoehetallemaalmisging - Deze week over TINKEBELL.'s toetreding tot de Akademie van Kunsten. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

De volledige uitzending van blckbx today #375, woensdag 26 februari 2025, is te bekijken via:  https://www.blckbx.tv/livestreams/blckbx-today-2025-2-26Woensdag 26 februari- Conservatief Amerika komt bijeen op CPAC 2025- De opmars van de AfD- Trumps handelsoorlog tegen de EUDesk: Lex Hoogduin, emeritus hoogleraar monetaire economie, columnist Sietske Bergsma en voormalig Europarlementariër Rob Roos.Presentatie: Gerry van der LaanSupport the showWaardeer je deze video('s)? Like deze video, abonneer je op ons kanaal en steun de onafhankelijke journalistiek van blckbx met een donatieWil je op de hoogte blijven?Telegram - https://t.me/blckbxtvTwitter - / blckbxnews Facebook - / blckbx.tv Instagram - ...

De 31e aflevering van Ongehoord Nieuws seizoen 6. Presentatie: Tom de Nooijer en Raisa Blommestijn. Gasten: Paul Cliteur, Sietske Bergsma, Rob Roos, Joost Niemöller, Jonathan Krispijn, Machiel de Graaf, Arlette Adriani en Flavio Pasquino

De 28e aflevering van Ongehoord Nieuws seizoen 6. Presentatie: Tom de Nooijer. Gasten: Sietske Bergsma, Rob Roos en Ab Flipse

GUEST HOST: Peter Mcilvenna filling in for James Freeman.

Show Notes and Transcript Rob Roos, a Dutch politician and member of the European Parliament joins Hearts of Oak to discuss his non-traditional journey into politics and his focus of representing the people over personal gain.  He advocates for free speech, energy security, and national sovereignty while addressing issues like immigration and digital identity.  Rob highlights the complexity of politics, emphasizing compromise and unity among diverse political groups.  He stresses the importance of collaboration to tackle challenges like immigration and the changing European political landscape.  Rob also shares his views on international relations, promoting peaceful resolutions and maintaining dialogue.  As we look ahead, Rob remains dedicated to serving his country and advocating for critical issues, cementing his position as a notable voice in European politics. Rob Roos (1966) has been a Member of the European Parliament since 2 July 2019, until December 2020 this was on behalf of the Forum for Democracy (FVD) and then until August 2023 on behalf of JA21. Mr Roos was a member of the Provincial Council of South Holland for several months in 2019 and chairman of the political group until July 2019. He is an entrepreneur in the ICT sector and worked in business and is the Vice President of the group of European Conservatives and Reformists. Connect with Rob... X/TWITTER         x.com/Rob_Roos WEBSITE             ecrgroup.eu/ecr/mep/rob_roos INSTAGRAM        www.instagram.com/robroos.mep Interview recorded  14.6.24 Connect with Hearts of Oak... X/TWITTER        x.com/HeartsofOakUK WEBSITE            heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  heartsofoak.org/connect/ SHOP                  heartsofoak.org/shop/ Transcript (Hearts of Oak) I'm delighted to be joined by Rob Roos today, a Dutch politician, was a member of the European Parliament for five years. Rob, it's wonderful to have you with us. Thank you for giving us your time today. (Rob Roos MEP) Yeah, it's wonderful to be here and I try to explain the things that are happening in the European Parliament and in the Netherlands. And I'm honoured to have me in the show. Thank you. Great to have an eye of, as have many, I think, English speakers certainly enjoyed your fantastic short videos on a range of issues and it is, I guess, to see a member of the European Parliament speak sense and speak specifically, I just say what they think, love it. But you obviously were a member of the European Parliament for five years. I'm still am. Still am, yeah. Yes, yes, till July 16. Okay, till July 16 and you were vice chairman of the the ECR group, and we'll get into the groupings, the European Conservatives and Reformist Party. But your background, you were in telecoms, and it made me smile because I know I worked with Gerard Batten, who was MEP for UKIP, UKIP leader, and his background was telecoms as well before he got into politics. Maybe I can ask you just how you ended up being involved in politics. It was an accident. It always is. No, I was never a member of a political party. My background is I'm actually an electrical engineer. But I'm an entrepreneur. I have my own businesses. I had an engineering company in energy. That's what I'm doing for 32 years now. But after a while I started to invest in my own fibre optic networks across the country so, I founded my own telecom company. It started with the infrastructure but after a while I also had I had my own ISP and we did everything, but in 2016 I sold my engineering company. And because I wanted to move on with my telecom company, it was a huge success. But then there was a private equity from London who wanted to buy my shares. And so I did the negotiations for two years in 2018. They bought my shares also of that company. I still have one telecom company. I still own a fantastic gym. I'm also a boxing trainer. But then in 2016, we had a new movement in the Netherlands. It was called Forum for Democracy. Thierry Baudet was very good at that time. And, well, I funded his political movement so he can run for our national parliament. But I didn't become a member at the time. But after a while, they called me. Rob, can you please help us? You live close to Rotterdam. Can you do the campaign over there? I was never involved in politics. I was always interested in politics since I was a child. So I said, okay, let's do it. I'm an entrepreneur. Let's roll up the sleeves and just do it. But it was a success. And from one thing came another. And, well, before I knew it, I was in the office in Amsterdam. To them and yeah, building this organization because that is my background I founded nine companies, our board companies, our merged companies, and so I know how to build organizations. Yeah, from there they said well can you record a video about entrepreneurship and it was so difficult because I was never in front of the cameras really it was maybe 50 takes or something like that it was terrible, but okay, I didn't have that experience, but finally this video was successful and then Rob you should also be on the list and I said absolutely not. I want to help but I'm not going to be on this, but in the end to make a long story short, in the end I was on the list and I was elected as a member of of the European Parliament. And, well, yeah, I did it with love and passion, and I loved what I did. I'm not really a politician. I'm a representative of the people. I think that's a big difference. Most people who go into politics have very good intentions, but once chosen, they make a career of it. And, yeah, I didn't do that. I'm really there for the people. It's sometimes tough, you know. They call you names. But I don't care, you know, it's the right for people to call me names. That's freedom of speech. I don't block anyone on social media. But yeah, I did it with love and passion. And to be honest, I think I'm going to miss it. But there will probably be something else in the future. I keep on fighting for my country, absolutely. And also for Europe. Well I want to get on to what kind of your passions and what you wanted to to bring to that role but let me for our UK and half of our viewers are American and I don't know if we'll be able to explain all of the intricacies and little details in in the politics but obviously I watched Thierry Baudet start his movement and you've got all different letters in Dutch politics. So, that's the Forum for Democratie, the FVD. And then there was, I think, a disagreement. So things were said, as happens, and then you had broken away with some others and started a new group, the J21. And then you had represented that and then as an independent. And I guess there are always difficulties with a new movement or a new group or new party that starts, because it doesn't have the history of what it actually believes and it's evolving and that can lead to clashes I guess. Yeah, that's true you know, but it's always in politics. I was in Bangkok two weeks ago. I was speaking there about food security. I spoke with the the audience that were all kinds of ministers and and members of parliament of all kinds of Asian countries from Kazakhstan to South Korea, Japan, China, everywhere. And it's everywhere the same. You know, politics is just a dirty game. But the point is for new political parties, if someone is, let's say, difficult to handle, there is no job somewhere else. The establishment, if someone is not very favourable anymore in the party, they give them a decent job as a mayor or something else. And this is not possible with a new political party. So, yeah, that is the problem. But there are more problems. Politics also attracts strange people. I agree. It's incredible. And I'm just a simple human being. The only thing that counts for me, I want results. I'm a businessman. man you know and I my my job is to solve problems and to to go straight to the result and I don't want to play all these games, and I don't do it, so it's, I stay, I stick to my principles and then that's why I fight for and if people said you should not speak about this, you shouldn't speak about that, and I said sorry I'm here to represent the people that's why they have chosen me and I will fight for them. For me the party, a political party is just a tool. It cannot be the goal and that is often the thing that they make the political party more important than our country and the people and yeah for me the people and the country is that that's the most important thing that's the highest goal there is. Tell us about you as an MEP you as vice chair of the ECR one of the kind of three groupings on the right and people obviously will know Georgia Maloney her party part of that I think the Law and Justice Party and also I think the Czech Civic Democratic Party are part of that. Tell us what that was, because obviously you were there for five years. So you don't have a track record of being in the European Parliament. That's not your life. Your life, as you say, is service and serving the people. Vice-Chairman of the ECR, that is a key position. How did that come about? And how did you find your time, I guess, working with the groupings in the European Parliament? Oh, I love that. I love to do that. I can be tough on subjects, but I think I'm a very reasonable person and I can bring people together. Even I cooperate a lot of times with, for example, the Greens. I disagree. On 100% on their climate policy, but I was a member of the industry and energy committee and we were responsible, for example, for the digital identity, etc. And in the greens you have these pirates, you know, they are very hard on privacy. So, I made my coalitions with them to create a majority on things. So, there was also a very left liberal lady in the Renew, and she said, Rob, you are such a nice person, but you have such strange people around you. And then I said, you have exactly the same. So you can disagree on subjects, but you can respect each other as human beings. And this is how I work. And that is also that I did it in the ECR. I think, yeah, it's so strange because in my political party, they said, they told me, you should not speak about this and you should not speak about that. And they really disagree with me on the things. And they made my life very tough to survive in that party. But the strange thing is that I can go along with all the people in the group. Even we have, of course, you have a bandwidth and you have the people. We are the conservative, but you have people who are on the left side of this conservative movement and also the hardliners. But I can get along with them very well. And I try to bring people together, because in the end, we have to do it together. Together, you are strong. And of course, you can disagree with each other, but you have to find a compromise on things so that you can show your strength. And being united is very important to achieve the goals. I was in Bucharest, I think it's now four or five weeks ago, I was the keynote speaker there at Make Europe Great Again. Oh, yes. And that was exactly the speech that I gave. We have the elections coming up and we should be united on the right. And I hope there are now negotiations going on to create this. Conservative supergroup. They try it every time we have new elections. But this time I really hope it will work because. We are bigger, if we are united, we are bigger than the socialists in the European Parliament. And then we are the second largest group right after the European People's Party. And then we are strong. We have the best positions. You have the best, yeah, as a rapporteur, you can change things. You have the chairman of all the committees, et cetera. And so, yeah, I think we should respect each other as a human being and be tough on the subject, but we should find compromises and work together. The elections have thrown up some interesting and exciting results. Obviously, Marine Le Pen doing well. I remember meeting Marine 12 years ago in London, the only time I've met her. But Gerrit Fielder is obviously doing very well in Holland, and I've met him a number of times. And you've got two high-profile individuals that really make the left extremely angry. And to me, that's kind of the part that I like, but also you need to come together. But then you've got all these, obviously, where Giorgio Maloney fits in. And then you've got all the conversation about the AFD and the FPO. And it's an interesting mix. And you said politics brings together estranged people. It also brings together people who are extremely ambitious. And sometimes that doesn't work with groupings. But what are your thoughts looking across the landscape at what this election has produced? And how do you see it moving forward with some of those conversations? If we look at the numbers, then EPP is still the biggest group in the European Parliament. But let's say the conservatives, if you count the numbers, then we almost have the same numbers. If I count the numbers, EPP can be around 190. But also the conservatives, the right-wing conservatives, they have also 190 seats if we can merge. And Renew lost a lot, especially in France. It's a chaos over there. But also the Greens in Germany, the Socialists in Germany, they did a terrible job. It was the worst elections for them ever on the European Parliament level. So, this is a very strong signal from the people in Europe that they are fed up with all this climate communist nonsense. All this gender nonsense, because this is what it is. It was so horrible the last five years. Every legislation that we passed was full of gender ideology, climate ideology, and it was absurd, you know. I was in energy for 32 years. I really know what energy is about and how to do it. You cannot do this energy transition with wind turbines and solar panels. So, there is an alternative, and that is nuclear energy. And I was advocating for that for a very long time. I'm not against phasing out Fossil. Partly, you cannot do it completely, but partly you can phase out fossil fuel. But then you need something stable. And nuclear energy is such a wonderful form of energy. It's really a gift from the stars. If you have this uranium, but also the new... New reactors. New reactors, the fourth generation reactors with thorium and other things. There is so much energy in this tiny particle form. And this is really a solution. But this is the problem. They don't want that. So, to come back to the question, the Greens they lost, the Liberals they lost. And, well, it's time to have a real democracy. These people are upset. It was also in the Netherlands, exactly the same when Wilders won the election. These people are upset, but it's their democracy, it's not the democracy, it's their democracy. They have a view of how the world should look like, and this is how everyone should behave. But if it's real democracy, they should start listening to the people. The people gave a very clear signal. We don't want this anymore. We want change. We want a normal life. Of course, we want to take care of the planet, but we don't want to have this absurd laws where we are losing our freedom, where we are paying so much for just normal energy while it's not necessary. Our food security is in danger because of the policy on the farmers. And people start seeing it. And now they want to go back to normal. Well, of course, the farm demonstration, they started in your part of the world, in the Netherlands, and then really, really spread out. But this idea of wanting your own industries, not necessarily relying on the global, of not wanting to, not seeing renewables as the full-on solution may be a part of it, but it can't be. This is where we put everything into. And the gender ideology debate, the mass immigration that Europe has faced. I mean, but which one has it just been those coming together to give the push to to Gerd Willers, to Marine Le Pen, to Maloney, the Swedish Democrats, the FPO coming top and then even the Vox and Chega doing well in Portugal and Spain. I mean, it's across the board where all these parties have come first or second or one or two end up third. But it does seem a change of the guard. I'm wondering which issue is it that actually is concerning Europeans the most? I think it's immigration. You know, we are flooded with people from the Middle East and Africa. And even in my small village here, very close to Rotterdam, it's changing. Our children don't have houses anymore the culture is changing. Well I've seen the videos from London this is not Europe anymore and if these people want the Sharia, if they like to live by the Sharia there are lots of places in the world where you can do that. We should not allow that they are changing our society. I didn't ask for it. Most of the people didn't ask for it. So why is this happening? You know, it's not the will of the people. So, I think immigration is something that is the most important issue at the moment. But the rest, the Green Deal, all this climate policy, the gender policy, changing our identities, taking away our freedom, Yeah, I think we are heading, when I was in Warsaw, I said we are heading to a new kind of communism. And I really think that is the case. You know, if you look at communism, it's all central plant economy. Now, that is exactly what the Green Deal is. As an entrepreneur, I want to make my own decisions. And if we have new legislation and say, OK, we have to improve the environment, etc. Etc. Okay, make your goals. And let me, let the market find out what the best solution is. But they are not only telling you what to do, they are also telling you how to do it. Like the civil servants in Brussels, sitting on the chair of the entrepreneurs and of the chair of the businesses, if they really think they can do a better job, it's so stupid, you know, that's not the case. So, immigration is the most important thing. We feel that everywhere. We see the bomb attacks, we see the violence. You should not speak about it, then you are a racist, of course, they call your names again, but also the women in our cities are not safe anymore. It's just happening. It started, this started in Sweden, but now we have the same problem here in Rotterdam. And that doesn't mean that all the people who coming in are are evil, but it is changing our society and if you have too much of it and you cannot integrate in the society there are people here that live really 30 years in the Netherlands and they don't speak our language that is absurd, you know, that you then you are not a part of the society. I don't believe in a multicultural cultural society, we should have a monocultural society with maybe multicultural people from other countries but multicultural society really means a parallel society you have so but yeah, I think this is this is something that we have to solve and I think the key is now, With Giorgio Maloney. Fratelli d'Italia. I really understand their position. They are my colleagues. They are very good colleagues. I love them very much. But Italy has problems, you know, with their debt. So, they depend on what is happening in the financial market. The financial market can break or they can break the government within months, I think. But also the Commission, because they have this money where they can bribe the member states. They did it with Poland, they do it with Hungary, but they can also bribe Italy, because Italy, I think they still have to receive 85 billion Euros from this next generation EU. EU, so that is serious money. But it should not be the case that the government of Italy, of Giorgio Meloni, that they can hostage our whole group. We in Europe, we have to move on. So, I understand their position, but still I hope there will be a solution also for this big group, including... Fratelli d'Italia. I really hope that. We're talking about Giorgio Maloni and you've seen, I guess, Orban with Fidets in Hungary and the Law and Justice Party in Poland really taking a very hard line against the EU and you posted, I think, on Twitter a day ago or so, Hungary getting fined every day. Giorgio Maloney has taken a softer approach. I think people have seen that as weakness but maybe she just realizes this is a game you need to play and you don't win everything on day one is that a fair assessment because, I would be talking to some people about my frustration with Giorgio Meloni not going all the way and they said patience this this takes time. Is that a kind of a fair assessment that she knows how the game has to be played and to get to your goal It takes a number of steps. Yes, absolutely. If you are in government, you have to take responsibility. You have to make compromises. As long as you have no 51% of the seats, then you have to make compromises. But also, she has to deal with the European Commission. She has to deal with the financial markets. So that is the case. And even we have these elections in France at the end of the month. And I really hope there will be, let's say, a common sense politics, because that is what it is, with conservatives, political parties. But even then, they will lower down the vote. It's always easier to be in the opposition and to raise your voice. But if you have the responsibility and you have to solve the problems, yeah, you have to deal with many problems at the same time. And of course, you have to make compromises, but it is possible. Yeah, but I hope it's not too much and that there will be a solution to create this supergroup. It is really necessary to change things. I'm so happy that we have more and more prime ministers with a conservative background in the European Council, because that's probably the most important thing. To have this blocking minority over there, maybe even if we look further in time, there will be a majority and we can really change things. But I hope Maloney and Orban and Le Pen, they can find a solution because they are the most important, yeah, these are the biggest countries, you know, Italy, France, and Hungary. So, you know, well, I think Orban is at this moment the only Western prime minister with a long-term strategy of the West. No matter what people are saying of him, I agree on a lot of things with him. And I hope he can achieve this super group. Because Orban's sitting, I think, as an independent with Fidets at the moment in the European Parliament. So to me, if he moved one way, if he said, no, I'm going to join Giorgio Maloney and encourage Marine to do the same, him or I'm going to join ID and encourage or if there's coming together he seems to be the figure that is so well respected and because he has led Hungary forever it seems like for me but you've kind of got individuals like that and is he kind of the the kingmaker the one that can bring them together or does it depend on Marine whether she wins the French elections end of this month. And is there enough commonality, because obviously the issue with Russian Ukraine is a split with some people there, but there does seem to be enough commonality between everything else that is happening to actually come together. Yeah, I think if you read the media let's say the mainstream media they blame Orban like Kiefer Hofstad is every day doing of supporting Russia, but that's absolutely not the case. Orban, he wants peace, and I also agree with him on that, because Ukraine cannot win this war. It's just as simple as that. If you look at the numbers, Russia has all the resources to go on with this war, and they have also much more people than Ukraine. That's just facts. Should we reward Russia for the invasion in a sovereign country? Of course not. There are ways to punish him. And I think that's right. So, I'm not saying that we should reward Putin. Absolutely not. It's disgustful what happened. But we have to find a solution. You know, we cannot escalating more and more and more weapons fighting yet. OK, you can use them across the border. It's going on and on and on. And last week I spoke someone from NATO. Then I stay a little bit at this one and I come back to your question. I spoke someone from NATO and they are also becoming very nervous of some politicians who are, for example, Macron. Let me put it this way. Macron, of course, he knows he is, before the election, he knew he was very unpopular. And then he tried to make himself bigger as he was at that moment by saying all these crazy things about the war. We should bring boots on the ground over there. Really incredible, you know. This guy is, he has no roots, you know. He has no children. And then I think my son is 22. He is not going to fight, because Macron wants to set himself in a position as a big leader. Let Macron put on his own boots and go there and fight. Pick up a gun and do your job, you know. But this is, we should, well, this is Ukraine and people are divided. But I think Orban is right. The rest is, of course, supporting Ukraine. I'm also supporting Ukraine. Let there be no misunderstandings about that. But I think also the people in Ukraine want peace. You're never going to get back to Donbass. You're never going to get back to the Crimea. That is now what it is. And I hope that the rest of Ukraine can be part of NATO and that we put sanctions on Russia as long as these parts of the Ukraine is in Russian hands. But let's let's work on peace let's get people to the negotiation table because a war never ended on the battlefield it always ended on the negotiation table and I think the other conservatives also in it like this and they support Ukraine, but I think there can be a solution for that. I think the kingmaker, that's your question, is Orbán the kingmaker. I think Giorgia Maloni is the kingmaker in this. It's her decision and I really know that she has a difficult position because of the financial problems and the market with Italy, but she She has to make the decision. I think the rest will this. Orban, Le Pen, Moranjewski, Kaczynski. They are really ready to create a supergroup. Because it's, I mean, Europe seems to be marching towards greater and greater confrontation with Russia. And I think part of that's Boris Johnson's fault, because he was involved in rejecting the original peace deal. But Europe seemed to have no money left, and yet they're sending it all to Ukraine. And then the talk about conscription, which you mentioned. In Britain, we're talking about conscription. In Britain, it's rumoured that we will be at war with Russia by the end of the year, and that's why the election was called, and Macron calling for conscription. And it is a very frightening situation for Europe. Whenever the battle is not ours, it is to other countries that are neighboring countries. But Europe and partly the US, actually Biden pushing us, we seem to be being sucked further and further into this, which could be a war. Is these elections, are they enough to kind of break away and change that conversation? Because the outcome could be extremely destructive for Europe, for all of us. Yes, I think this is also what the leaders of this country should realize now, that we should unite. We have the problems we discussed already with the migration, with the Green Deal, with the gender policy, etc. But the war in Ukraine is also a big issue. And that's why I hope President Trump will win the election. I think he will choose a different approach than Biden. Of course, we should help Ukraine, but we should not make the weapon industry that should not. Booming weapon industry should not be the goal. And I think this is what's going on right now. It's all about money. And there are people making a lot of money. No, yeah, it can make a difference. And even if we have this big group, and it's so strange, the left, and they were always the one who wanted peace, you know, the symbol, and they wanted to make peace, not war, make love, not war. And now those are the ones who are the warmongers. And the world has changed so much. I really, I really, that's maybe also they try to, yeah, how do I say that? No, let's hope Trump will win the election. I think they make people very afraid of Trump winning the election because they tell the people he's crazy. He is maybe a little bit rude in his conversation, but I think he's done a wonderful job in the time he was the president. He was the only one who didn't start a war. I even recommended him for the Nobel Peace Prize in the European Parliament. Of course, it was rejected. I made a resolution to give him, because of this Abraham Accords. It was a wonderful job and what did the media said? Oh, this is a very bad thing for the Palestinians. No, it was peace. It was peace. It was very good. But yeah, let's hope that How does that, because I've had the privilege of seeing him speak it at three different rallies actually over in the states and there's nothing like a trump rally and for my all my years in UKIP. I've never seen anything like that, but how does it change because in most of your time in the European parliament it's been Biden in charge and with the rise of common sense parties more in the right it could be a different relationship with Europe and Trump. I'm wondering how you see that because you want bloc countries to actually have commonality and work together and not have disagreements. And the Trump derangement syndrome, the hatred of Trump, we've seen in many European governments. That could change now with these elections. How do you see that kind of, is there a better relationship that can be had with the Trump administration and with European Union groupings more on the right? Yeah, I think that relation is very good. Of course, Trump is always saying America first, and that is his job. You know, if he is the president of that country, he should put his country on the first place. That is also what every leader of a country should do. But for example, Orban and Trump, they can work very close. Trump Jr. was yesterday in Hungary also. But Trump was also speaking on the rally of Fratelli d'Italia. So, this relationship is also good. I think, let's say the Republicans and the conservatives here in Europe, they have a very good relation. I have very good relations also in the United States, we can get along very well and it should be something that it is a global fight. You know, this this this globalism is a left wing socialist agenda and we should fight it together. Not we see the problems everywhere in the UK, in Australia, New Zealand. South America and Europe, Canada. We have all this woke ism and there's more warmongers. And so we should unite and and also fight back together and I think this is something, that is happened that happened in the last uh years with for example CPAC and it started in the United States we have CPAC Hungary, we have CPAC in Mexico, in Brazil, in Israel, so yeah. We have a movement and we know how to find each other. And if Trump will be elected, I think there will be a very good relationship with Europe and the United States. Can I just end with you personally, because you will not be an MP soon, but you've used your position as a member of the European Parliament to speak truth and connect with the public. And you touched on energy as being something that you were intrigued about. And I always was confused why Germany would rely through the Nord Stream pipeline on one country. It doesn't matter who the country is to rely on one country. But what are the other issues that you've tried to champion? We've touched a number of them, but your kind of areas of passion and what issues did you want to bring during your five years in the European Parliament? Well, I think most of all is defending free speech. I think this is the most important thing and it's also, I was, I did the negotiations on the digital services act to. To bring some common sense over there also the digital services act is something to control, the the big big tech companies but but actually now the European commission has so much power, because they can fight disinformation and misinformation and then I try to have a definition of that. I try to also have a definition of hate speech and harmful speech. But of course, they didn't make it because you cannot, it's impossible to say this is harmful speech, so this is disinformation. These people who are advocating for this, they say to us that men can have babies and for me that is disinformation, for them, it's the truth. So it's a very dangerous development. We've seen the law in Scotland when you cannot discuss anymore the gender thing about the difference between men and women it's a hate crime. In Canada, we have the same and Europe, the European Union is moving in that same direction. Von der Leyen, two weeks ago, said we have to not debunk misinformation, we have to pre-bank this information. This is really the synonym of censorship and that is what's going on. So free Free speech is also a main topic for me. I think it's the cornerstone of having a healthy democracy, that we can disagree with each other in a decent way. And, yeah, of course, people have different opinions, but that is what politics is about. And this is also the beautiful thing that we have, and it's very precious. It's not in most parts of the world. We don't have this luxury to speak out. But they are taking it away, and that's why I called it also a new kind of communism. Because... Yeah, if you cannot speak out anymore, then we have a real problem. We have seen that during COVID, it was real censorship. It was a horrible time. People were locked up. If you disagreed, then you... So this should never happen again. Digital identity is also a very difficult thing for me. I did the negotiations on that too. I was able to delay that for two years, but finally it was adopted. It's not as bad as it was at the beginning, but still it is there. Central bank, digital currency, all kinds of tools to control people. You know, no one asked for this. No one. It's a top-down approach and it has nothing to do with democracy. There is no problem. Everyone can pay with their debit card or their credit card. It's not an added value. It's a dangerous development because you can control people. These are also very important topics to me. Freedom, freedom of speech, having reliable and affordable energy. Our food security, and, of course, stopping this illegal immigration and the sovereignty of our nations. This is very important. And just to end off, the future for you, when you finish as an MEP, I hope you're not going to disappear and become quiet. What does the future hold for you? I have no idea. Not yet. Not yet. But, you know, when I was an entrepreneur, I started to sell my first cluster of companies in 2016, and I sold a cluster of companies in 2018. It sounds strange, but I really had the idea. I've played that game. I've seen it all and I've done it all. That game is over. I thought I have enough money. That's also very strange if I see Bezos, you know, buying another super yacht. Does that make you happy? I don't think so. I have enough money, so I don't need to do, I don't need to work anymore, so I can use my time to, service my country, to fight for the future of my children, and they're the generation. So, this is what I wanted to do, but I don't have any idea what I'm going to do. But I keep on fighting. My wife, she hates politics. So, I have to convince her. But still, she also recognized that it's very necessary. There are not many voices like me who really speak the truth. Because politicians make a career of it. And yeah, let's see what's going to happen, what the universe wants to do with me. Not many speak to it, but also not many who can do it in English. And I often have struggles talking to the French groupings and saying, could I have someone not speak English? And it's like, no. Rob, I really appreciate you coming on. John, I thoroughly enjoyed your many videos going out and speaking truth in the European Parliament and looking forward to seeing what is the next step for you. But thank you so much for joining us today. Yeah, it was a pleasure. And if I have news, when I know what I'm going to do, Id love to come back. You're welcome anytime. I keep on speaking, I promise. Thank you, Rob. Thank you.

In de nieuwste aflevering van Op z'n Kop! gaan Marianne Zwagerman en Rick van Velthuysen in gesprek met Europarlementariër Rob Roos. Het is cruciaal dat Roos ons nog eens goed informeert over het belang van Brussel voor de Nederlandse politiek, voordat hij op 16 juli zijn functie neerlegt. Volgens Roos lijkt het alsof we denken dat Europa er niet toe doet, wat deels de schuld is van zowel de media als de Nederlandse politieke partijen. Zijn we sinds de verkiezingen een stap dichter bij een rechtser Europa gekomen, of niet?

De 37e aflevering van Ongehoord Nieuws seizoen 5. Presentatie: Tom de Nooijer. Gasten: Harm Beertema, Paul Cliteur, Rob Roos en Kinga Pajak.

In this interview with The New American, Rob Roos, the Member of the European Parliament (MEP) from the Netherlands, discusses the pandemic documents currently negotiated by the World Health Organization (WHO)—amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and the Pandemic Agreement. The documents would be legally binding and provide the WHO with unlimited power to declare ... The post MEP Rob Roos: Stopping WHO’s Powergrab appeared first on The New American.

In de nieuwste aflevering van Op z'n Kop! worden twee onderwerpen besproken door Marianne Zwagerman en Rick van Velthuysen. Ten eerste wordt er een gesprek gevoerd met Rob Roos, wiens aanwezigheid binnen een conferentie van Europees 'radicaal-rechts' in Brussel abrupt werd beëindigd door een bevel van de burgemeester. Ten tweede wordt er gesproken met Jan van de Beek, die was uitgenodigd door informateurs Elbert Dijkgraaf en Richard van Zwol om als migratiedeskundige te spreken samen met de vier partijen die betrokken zijn bij de formatie. Van de Beek deelt zijn inzichten over de kwestie van migratie.

Show notes and Transcript James Roguski has been calling out lies and propaganda for decades. He believes it is every person's responsibility to question their most cherished beliefs, challenge claims of authority and disobey unjust laws and that is how we grow while remaining free and maintaining our integrity. In February 2022 the company that had hosted James's websites for over a decade deleted his account and tens of thousands of hours of his work.  They gave no reason other than the content violated their “Terms of Service.” They may of deleted many of James's websites, but they ignited his passion to burn even brighter. If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then this interview and James's Substack are the places to be. Connect with James... Substack             jamesroguski.substack.com Website               exitthewho.org X                          twitter.com/jamesroguski Interview recorded  29.3.24 Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  heartsofoak.org/connect/ SHOP                  heartsofoak.org/shop/ TRANSCRIPT (Hearts of Oak) And I'm delighted to be joined by James Roguski today. James, thank you so much for your time today. (James Roguski) Oh, any time. I'm honoured that you'll have me share this information with you and your audience. And so thank you very much for having me. Well, we're going to delve into all things WHO. And people obviously can find you @JamesRoguski on, that is your Twitter handle. And obviously Substack, it is again the same, just .substack.com. On the end of your name all the links are in the description and I know that our audience will be interested and hungry for that information so you're an awesome source of information and thanks to Noor for actually connecting us when she said I know someone who knows all things WHO you need to have them on so although I don't really know Noor yet the answer is yes and then I delved into and found out, she was completely accurate. So thank you to Noor for the introduction and connection. But James, before we get into the topic WHO, can I just ask you to take a moment and introduce yourself to our guests? Well, you know, you mentioned my Twitter handle, and I don't honestly really spend a lot of time on Twitter. But if anybody goes to my Twitter account, you'll see that right at the top, I have my phone number and I encourage everybody to give me a phone call. 310-619-3055. I'm in California. So, you know, wherever you may be, I'm that serious about what's going on with the WHO that if anybody out there, you know, wants to have a conversation, happy to do so, you know, reach out on telegram or signal or WhatsApp or phone call or text message or whatever it might be. You know, we got connected through Noor, but I'm readily available because this is complicated. It's confusing. And what I have observed is that almost everybody gets a little tiny piece of information that's been mangled. You know, the game of telephone, right? You know, you tell somebody who tells somebody who tells somebody who tells somebody. I just want people to get the facts. Don't believe anything I say. All I've been doing is pointing to the WHO's documents and their video recordings of their meetings and going, hey, did you see that? Did you see what they said? Now, I obviously have opinions and happy to share my opinions with you. But what I encourage everybody to do is to go to the source. Read the darn documents don't listen to hear, you know hearsay, it's funny I hear I have a lot of people reach out to me and they go, oh did you hear what so-and-so said I'm like okay that might be a clue but by definition that is hearsay if you hear somebody say something interesting and you dig in and you find the source, man, 99 times out of 100 the source is a little bit different than what what you heard somebody say about the source. So don't trust me, right? I think I'm trustworthy, but don't trust me. Don't take my word for it. The problem that we're dealing with is people hear something, they accept it, and then when they're greeted with the actual source, factual documents, it conflicts with the confusing thing they heard somebody say, and they don't wanna let go of their initial understanding, one of the hardest things in the world to do is to unlearn something that you thought you knew but maybe where you got that information was a little bit mangled. So be careful out there I agree too often our feelings are to accept things and to assume things and I always whenever I see someone posting something I, with so many memes you kind of think think, okay, is that accurate? And delve into it. And you're right. Then you find out whether it's true and you're not repeating hearsay, which can be extremely dangerous. But James, WHO, how did you, before we get into kind of what it is, and I do want to give that kind of overview to the audience, because I think it's important to put together the piece of the jigsaw. And I know you delve deeply into many different parts of it on your Substack, but how on earth did the WHO come on your radar and how did you decide that I tell you what I think I want to delve into this and make this a large part of my life to understand it and expose it? I'll have to thank some invisible sensor out in the world. I have been talking about natural health for 30 years and written a number of books and you know had many many many many websites. And in 2022, I learned that the FDA on, if my memory is correct, I believe it was January 21st, 2022, that the FDA approved outpatient injections for infants to receive Remdesivir. And my head exploded. And I wrote a couple of articles on websites that I had. And a couple of days later, I got an email from my website hosting provider that I had been with for like a decade and everything was gone. And I was like, Oh, must've been right over the target with that one. Okay. And I, I have to say, I was a little bit happy with myself because I was like, Oh, all right. I guess this is one of those midlife crisis change of, you know, direction things that the universe is trying to tell me something. And so, I ended up, I had many, many websites and they were all gone and rather than rebuild them, I'm like, okay, fine. What should I be doing? And I ended up on Substack. So jamesrugoski.substack.com. And I started writing on Substack and I got to give credit where credit is due. I bumped into an article by Shabnam Palaisa Muhammad, who's connected to many, many things, but she's also with World Council for Health. And she had started started talking about something that had happened really on December 1st, 2021. So this was February 2022. And I ended up doing about a month's worth of research. And on March 24th, so slightly more than a year, two years ago, I published a big article about what was going on with the proposed pandemic treaty. And I thought I was done with it. And four days later, would have been two years ago yesterday, I woke up at four in the morning and I was compelled to go searching for something. And I found a website that had a document and it said, we've obtained this document. And the document was hyperlinked. So I clicked on it and I went down the rabbit hole and I started reading the document and I just got a massive shiver down my spine. I'm like, wait a minute, what is this? It wasn't anything to do with the treaty. It was amendments to another existing document called the International Health Regulations. It had been submitted to the WHO more than two months prior in January. And it was to be discussed in May, which was, a month and pretty much two months away. And I'm like, nobody's talking about this. What the heck is this? And it was the Biden administration trying to do many things. They had a number of different amendments, but what they were mainly trying to do was shorten the time period through which any future amendments might be put into effect. Currently that's two years, they wanted to shorten it to six months. And I'm like, okay, what does that mean? what's coming? And down the rabbit hole I went and I haven't gotten out of the WHO rabbit hole since. I've got a slogan for myself. I want to get out of the WHO and on with the new, but we've got two months to flatten the WHO they're shooting to, they're hoping to adopt amendments to the international health regulations and a new pandemic treaty, two separate things. And it's really important to keep those things separate. May 27th to June 1st is their yearly world health assembly. And so for the next two months, just trying to raise everyone's awareness of what it is they're trying to do. Well we'll get on to the pandemic treaty and a lot has been made out of it, I think it was the World Council for Health had that petition in the UK and we'll maybe touch on some of that but we, I mean you've got this organization, a massive power grab and I don't think many people will have had any idea of this and the role this played, I mean it's 75 year history probably most people don't even know it's a UN organization and the power it had I think maybe the WEF is higher on people's radar where the WHO seems to have been much under it and I mean just give us a little bit of a snapshot and I know you've looked into the the current proposals. But there's 75 years of history of this organization, but it seems to be having a massive power grab, certainly COVID time. But what about the organization itself? Because we're told it's just a benign organization, but it doesn't seem so. I don't know if anything in life is benign. It all depends on what is going on with it. So you've really got to go back almost to the Civil War in the United States and the 1800s where –, If you think about living in a world where you ride a horse, okay, and you don't have a toilet that goes into a wastewater sewage treatment system, okay, you know, manure everywhere. People who lived in cities would have a chamber pot, maybe throw it out the window in the gutter. I can only imagine, I've heard stories about the stench, you know, of the River Seine in Paris. Getting control in large cities of everyone's excrement is what really cleaned up a lot of infectious disease. Okay. And so from the 1800s, early 1900s, all the way through World War II, after World War II, when the WHO was brought into being, and in 1951, they sort of organized the sanitary regulations. We kind of take a lot of things for granted right now, but the pathogens found in excrement from animals and humans are a problem. Well, we don't really deal with that so much anymore. And the fallacy of all of the many childhood diseases that just plummeted in the 1800s, 1900s, you know, after World War II, they were primarily gone. And then started jabbing people and they gave credit to the jabs for what sanitation actually did. And so fast forward to 1969, I don't know how old you are, so I'll have a little fun with you. Where were you and what were you doing when the moon landing happened in July of 1969? I was just a thought somewhere. I wasn't around. 77 is my birthday. Okay. I was a nine-year-old boy. I was born in 1960. And I was watching, you know, black and white feed from maybe it was the moon, maybe it was the Hollywood soundstage, whatever. At that same time in July of 1969, the 22nd World Health Assembly was going on in Boston. And five days after the moon shot, or the moon landing, they agreed to the international health regulations. That was sort of an update on the sanitary regulations. Nobody was paying attention. Nobody read them. Nobody ever ratified them. What they put in there, all of the diplomats who met said, okay, you know, we've agreed to all of this. And if nobody objects, it'll be international law. So it wasn't the case that the UK parliament or the Senate of the United States or any other body around the world considered it and voted to, you know. What they put in there was, we'll give everybody nine months to object to it. And if nobody objects, then we're good. So on the first day of January 1971, it went into legally binding effect. Everybody's kind of default, ignored it, and it was now international law. Fast forward to 2005, after 9-11, after the anthrax scare, after SARS-1, they made a whole bunch of changes in 2005. And that went into effect in 2007. So for 17 years or so, we've been under the international health regulations. Raise your hand, everybody, if you've read them. Okay. Why would you, who, you know, two and a half years ago, I had no idea. Okay. So I can, understand why that's just mysterious. Well, the idea behind the 2005 regulations was they wanted nations to feel comfortable, not just seeing if someone who was traveling at the border was bringing in leprosy or smallpox or whatever, checking ships to see if they're infested with with rats or, you know, other vectors that might bring some kind of disease. They also wanted nations to set up an office in their nation to surveil their health system. To say, you know, if something's going on, you know, I've talked to many people in the UK and where all the mussel beds and oyster shells and all the many seafood areas around the coast, with the sewage not being as well processed as it might be, you get E. Coli infections and things like that. So they want the nations to immediately notify the WHO if something is going on, not just at a border crossing, but inside the country. And on one level, you go, you know, that's just, okay, we got a problem. As a good member of the international community, you tell the WHO, if it's deemed to be a public health emergency of international concern, P-H-E-I-C, or fake, the director general can alert the world that you've got a problem. On a certain level, much of that makes sense. And we've been operating under that rule, those rules since 2007. When COVID hit, it all went out the window. Everybody panicked, right? Oh, you know, something's going on in China. And everybody went nuts. They threw their plans out the window. They started making rules out of thin air to do lockdowns and social distancing. Just an absolute mess. Okay. And so there was a call to strengthen the international health regulations because everybody ignored them. Right. And the, one of the biggest issues that triggered these negotiations, it didn't trigger it necessarily, but it certainly is embedded deeply into it. If you can recall when South Africa and Botswana said that they had found a very different variant called Omicron, and they publicly quickly said, hey, look what we found. And Europe, and I think the UK, I'm not 100% sure about the UK, but European Union, you know, travel lockdowns. Oh, you know, no more travel to South Africa. Well, that's what the international health regulations were supposed to prevent. Don't punish nations for being honest. But that's what happened. And then the real kick in the balls, quite frankly, from their point of view, was Pfizer and Moderna put that into the boosters and made a couple of billions of dollars. And so what we're dealing with here is not what people think it is. What we're dealing with here is a trade dispute. We're dealing with an understanding that, wait a minute, the international health regulations are supposed to encourage transparency. Hey, we got a problem. But what's being negotiated is not, how do you deal with that problem? How do you give someone good early treatment? How do you let doctors be doctors and deal with the patient in front of them? You know, there's all these many, many issues. And so the confusion has been enormous because there's, on one hand, amendments to the international health regulations. But on the other hand, there's a whole new agreement that they would like to have passed, two separate related but separate tracks. And almost everybody's getting them all co-mingled and confused. And so I'll stop right there for that. That's the setup, right? The reason why these negotiations are happening is because the relatively poor nations like South Africa and Botswana said, hey, we identified something. We turned it over to you. You put travel restrictions to hurt our economy and then you took that information and made billions of dollars off of it. Oh, hell no. That ain't happening again. Okay. That is what these negotiations are really all about. And then it gets worse from there. It's not about your health or, you know, what you should do to maintain or optimize or regain your health. This is a business deal and it's an evil, evil business deal. Well, I can, I want to get to the session they've just had and you have titled it, the spirit of Geneva, which I know is a reference used many times in it, and that's on your latest sub-stack. But looking at the WHO, it seems to be, I think we've learned a lot, the relationship the governments have with Big Pharma, with the mass lobby power of Big Pharma, I think has been exposed to many people during the COVID tyranny. And I'm guessing the WHO is no different and very much part of that collusion with Big Pharma to assist in making money. Because in the West, obviously, this is the opposite of your thinking, your background. The thinking we're told now is you've got a problem. Don't worry, there are drugs to treat it manufactured by a mass company that will make a ton of money from you. No conversation about health, style, lifestyle, diet, anything like that. So it does seem as if the WHO are very much part of that big pharma global entity. I have dubbed what's going on with this negotiations for the new treaty, and maybe we'll talk about that first, as the new OPEC. OPEC currently stands for the oil producing and exporting countries, Saudi Arabia and so forth. Well, the new OPEC, in my view, is the Organization of Pandemic Emergency Corporations. If you think about this from a business perspective, if you were doing some sort of thesis or something at a business school, or I don't know if people in your audience are familiar with United States television program called Shark Tank, where entrepreneurs pitch their business idea, right? If 10 years ago you said, hey, I got this business idea, we'll put a bunch of letters in a data file, and we'll say that that's the genetic sequence of a deadly pathogen. And we'll then wrap that up in a lipid nanoparticle and say that if we get your body to make that pathogenic compound, to get your immune system to attack your own body, to trigger immunity to this deadly pathogen, we can scare everybody, get governments to put billions of dollars into our business model, and we'll be billionaires. You'd have probably gotten laughed off stage. You probably would have failed your business school course. But wait a minute. That's what just happened. Well, that's a really good business model. And I got clued in to great detail in November of 2022. I was actually waiting and trying to find, I had put in freedom of information requests and they were being denied. By that time, the treaty had first come out in July and then again in November. But the amendments that were not the ones Biden proposed, but a whole new batch of amendments had been submitted, but they were being kept secret. So I was looking all over the place to try to find information. And I watched the Indonesian health minister speak before the B20 meeting, not the G20, the 20 biggest countries, but the business leaders from the 20 biggest countries. And he had advanced information about something that was going to be happening the next month in December. And what he told the audience was, hey, United States and a whole bunch of other nations, they're about to implement through the World Bank, the pandemic fund, got a multi-billion dollar fund. And this is a great business opportunity. Go invest. Well, invest in what? Pandemic-related products and the industry that surrounds them. Testing, laboratory, genetic analysis, anything related to pandemic-related products was viewed as a potential growth industry because the nations were putting together this multi-billion dollar fund and contracts were going to have to be dished out. The next month, the Congress of the U.S. passed and President Biden signed the National Defense Authorization Act. Well, that pledged $5 billion a year from the U.S. Defense Department to oversee the global health security agenda, which is a build out of, you know, bio labs and the one health approach, which is predicated on the, I think, misguided belief. Oh, well, you know what happened in Wuhan is, you know, a bat and a pangolin got together and somebody had some soup in a wet market in Wuhan. And that's why we got a pandemic as opposed to, Hey, wait a minute. People were going to bat caves in some other part of China, bringing the guano or whatever they use to get the pathogens. And they're messing with them in the lab. Maybe that's where the problem started. Who the heck knows at this point, right? But what they want to do is shut down, you know, animal, trade with wild animal meats or domestic animal, you know, oh, you're going to get sick because you're eating meat and there's going to be some pathogen in there and it's going to transfer to humans and we're all going to die. So the solution is let's go find those pathogens and bring them into a whole WHO coordinated laboratory network where if we identify a pathogen, we'll put that into the pathogen access and benefit sharing system, stamp it with our information so that if anybody turns that into a product, we get to share the benefits. And we'll put the WHO in charge of a global distribution and logistics network to distribute the products. Well, if you've ever worked retail, you know that if you have a lot of products in storage, you've got to rotate your stock. So if you've got pandemic related products sitting in a big old warehouse, they proudly talk about their 20,000 square meter distribution hub in Dubai. That's four football fields. Okay. How many contracts could you disperse amongst your cronies to fill four football fields with pandemic related products? Well, that's not good enough. You got to rotate that stock. You need an emergency here and an early action alert and a pandemic and this and that and the other to move those products, get them either jabbed into people's arms or, or use the gloves, or use the tests, or whatever it might be. What we're dealing with here is organized crime and racketeering and a business model that needs another pandemic. Let's go look for it. They call it a pathogen with pandemic potential. Whenever I hear that phrase, my mind says, well, that's a pathogen with pandemic profiteering potential. Let's go find something scary. Scare the people who will be scared by that kind of thing. People will line up to get jabbed or take drugs or whatever it might be. What it's really predicated on is an argument from the relatively poor nations who, when the jabs rolled out in 2021, they couldn't afford to get contracts to buy the jabs. Canada bought 400 million jabs for 40 million people. European Union did a few text messages and cut a deal and bought up gobs and gobs. So the smaller nations, while they gave the information about Omicron, they couldn't beg, borrow, or buy, get a contract for any of the jams. They should be down on their knees praising God that they were so lucky that they missed out. But they also missed out on the profits. And that's what these negotiations are about. Nobody, nobody has had the guts to go, excuse me, the jabs didn't work. They didn't stop infection. They didn't stop transmission. They deranged people's immune system. Now we've got, you know, disease, disability, and death, excess deaths, sudden deaths. Why are we arguing that we want investment to build out mRNA manufacturing plants? You know, send a container from Germany to build a manufacturing plant, you know, in Rwanda or wherever they're setting this up. They're not questioning the flaws in the treatment, right? They want more ventilators and more midazolam and more, you know, Paxlovid and Molnupiravir or whatever the next drug, you know, Remdesivir, whatever it might be. They missed out on the the profit of being able to produce that and poison their own people with it, but they don't seem to understand what probably most of your audience understands, that they did quite better than the nations who did all of the pharmaceutical treatments. On the WHO's own website, site, if you look at the stats, on a population basis, there's about a billion people in North and South America. There's about a half a billion in Europe, and there's over a billion in Africa. 16 times as many people in North and South America died and their deaths were attributed to COVID when compared to Africa. And in Europe, it's like 30 times. We should be exporting whatever they did into our systems, but that's not profitable. So they're trying to export what killed many, many more people into their nations so that they can profit from it. And the cognitive dissonance and the just bias in their thinking were if you stood up in one of the rooms where they're having these meetings and you said, excuse me, are you people absolutely insane? Why do you want the thing that doesn't work and causes health problems? Oh, wait a minute. It's very profitable. What they want is the wealthy nations, United States, UK, Canada, European Union, Australia, the global north, which is not a geographical thing. It's a line of of wealthy versus poor. They want the global north to put a bunch of money into a big fund. I actually think the WHO has fund envy. They're looking at the United States and the WHO pandemic fund, and they want to have a bigger fund, you know, $30 billion a year that they can distribute to oligarchs in poor nations to build out what I call the other fake. You know, they talk about the Public Health Emergency of International Concern, PHEIC, and I talk about the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex. They want poor people in rich nations to either take their tax dollars or debt money, put it into a fund that they control to give to oligarchs in poor nations under the premise that looking for pathogens, bringing them into the laboratory and turning them into pandemic-related products is how you would stop the next pandemic. Well, how about good, clean water and healthy food and essential medications and nutrition and maybe herbs and some vitamins? How about that? Well, that's just nowhere near as profitable. There are lots I'd like to pick up on you, but I will hold myself back. And I will ask you for what's been happening the last number of days. And that is the ninth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body, which most of the public will not know this group has ever met once, never mind nine times or whatever it is. And that's, I think, how a lot of these organizations wanted to be. But that was going to finish on the 28th. So we record this Good Friday, so yesterday. And they don't seem to have come to an agreement. So I think you're saying it's going to resume again end of April for another 10, 12 days. What exactly was the international governmental negotiating body negotiating and what exactly did they not, were they not able to agree on? Pretty much what I was just talking about. They were negotiating the new agreement. Many people call it a treaty, but it's really not properly called a treaty. It's a framework convention, think framework convention for climate change. That was an agreement that was reached in 1992. And year after year after year, unelected, unaccountable, unknown bureaucrats get together. They have a conference of the parties and they would decide how to dish out all this money, have all the contracts to fill up the distribution hubs with whatever they think they need for whatever pandemic they're looking for. And so the problem that they're having are many. I'll try to summarize it this way. They keep saying that it's a member nation-led series of negotiations. Well, what they've been doing is they get together, they talk, they submit for two years now, whatever their input would be. And then the six members of the the Bureau, the Intergovernmental Negotiating Bodies Bureau, one from each region of the WHO, would then craft a new version of the treaty. Well, that was the wrong way to do it if they were really trying to reach an honest agreement, because what has consistently happened is when they came back with each new version, all of the member nations said, well, did you not hear what what we told you we wanted in that treaty, you ignored us, right? Back in April, they did this, and there was a 208-page compilation text that was everything that all the nation said they wanted. And rather than make that public, they kept that hidden forever. They came out with a 43-page Bureau's text. Well, you can't eliminate 200, you know, take 208 pages and boil it down to 43 and keep everybody happy. So all summer long in 2023, they were arguing about that. They came out with another one in October. Same thing. They came out with another one in February. Same thing. In these past couple of weeks of negotiations, it was the first time that they took the Bureau's draft submission and treated it as a negotiating text. And so in these past two weeks, they started with a 29-page document that looked all nice nice and clean, you know, here's what it is. But it didn't reflect what the nations actually said that they wanted. It was all sugar-coated and sweet looking, but it didn't actually say what the nations had been telling them they wanted. So in the last two weeks, that ballooned up to 140 pages with over 5,000 text edits. It's the first time the nations actually got to have them, you know, put that in and they're going to go back and do the same dumb thing. They're going to have the Bureau take that 140 page document and have them try to winnow it down to probably even smaller than 30 pages because they're desperate to just get any agreement. Because if they get any agreement and it's a framework convention, then next year they can add whatever they want to add. It's like signing a blank check or an empty contract. If you were contracting with somebody to do something, and at the last minute they said, hey, you know what? Let's just sign on the dotted line. I've got all these blank pieces of paper. We'll figure this out next year. Just agree, and we'll have other people work out the details later. That's insane. But that's what they're trying to ram through. And tell us how there has been some pushback on this WHO power grab in the UK media. We had that petition. And I know there's a pandemic treaty, there's international health regulations. And I know, I don't want to confuse them, but also want to simplify them. Maybe another time we can delve even deeper into this. But there is a slow awareness, but yet governments seem to be very willing. And I guess the government doesn't want to be left behind. It has to join in the club and agree. It doesn't want to have any punishments or any negative response from Big Pharma. You know, if they don't sign this, then I can imagine the UK being told by Pfizer, well, you may not get the drug at that cheap price. It may be double the price for you. So I'm sure there's pushing behind the scenes. But how does it, I think I've watched some of your videos talking about, and you've mentioned the beginning, this automatically comes in, that it's not that governments opt into it, it's kind of they need to opt out of it. And if they don't put up their hand, disagree, it automatically becomes part of the laws of each country. To clarify all of that, again, it is important to start with the awareness that there's two separate negotiations, okay? And so in the UK, very specifically, it's a little bit unique in how international agreements are concluded and agreed upon and put into force. And so in other countries, it's very, very different. So everybody needs to take this with the proverbial grain of salt, depending upon where you live. In the UK, what is supposed to happen is the executive branch of government, the foreign minister, the health minister, the prime minister, whoever is given the authority from the crown to approve or adopt any international agreement is supposed to then have the foreign development and Trade Office, submit it for 21 days to Parliament, not to be approved, but to be reviewed and potentially rejected. If they just sit on their butt for 21 days and don't do anything, you missed your chance too late. Okay, so that's for any new agreement. With the international health regulations, it's cooked into the IHR from 1969 and 2005. If your nation and your executive branch sends a delegate to the yearly World Health Assembly and they agree to regulation changes or amendments to the international health regulations, it's assumed that you're good with it unless the executive, you know, head head of state, writes a letter to the WHO and says, nope, we reject them. And so in 2022, they tried to pull a fast one. They submitted amendments in violation of Article 55, which says you've got to give four months notice. They submitted amendments to five articles on May 24th, 2022, four days later, they concocted a fake document saying that they adopted them, but they never voted. And nobody, with the exception of Rob Roos and 11 other members of the European Parliament, on November 28th, 2023, they wrote a letter to Tedros and they said, said, hey, you guys purportedly adopted these amendments in May of 2022, but there's no record that you ever voted. Silence. November. So what is that? Four, five months now, four months, five months. They don't really seem to care because the propaganda and the hypnosis, they just keep saying, well, we adopted these amendments. No, you didn't. Not by any proper voting means that anybody's been able to find. And so they don't really seem to care about rules. Article 55 said that they should have submitted a final package of amendments by January 27th, 2024, four months in advance of their May meeting. Well, they just blew that off and they're still negotiating. So to wrap this up and let everybody know what's coming in April, from April 22nd to the 26th, they're supposed to have the last week of negotiations about the amendments, which we we haven't really spent too, too much time talking about. And what's of great concern to me in the amendments is they want to make it easier to quarantine people when they're traveling internationally. Look at article 24 and 27 and articles 35, 36, 37, and annexes, you know, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, and eight, they want the WHO to be the one to determine which vaccines can be required. They're not requiring them. They would be the ones who decide if the nation you're traveling to, when you disembark, if they say, well, you got to take a rapid antigen test, or you got to show that you've gotten this jab, or boom, you're in quarantine. The WHO's international health regulations have almost always been about restricting international travel, and now they want to add quarantine to the language that was not there before. Now, that's not your doctor and you. Whatever people are talking about in terms of mandates and mask mandates and any kind of lockdowns or social distancing, no one in the UK, no one in the United States, no one in any nation around the world needed any amendments or a new treaty to abuse your rights and freedoms over the last four years. So the concern about that is local. What is your local health official doing? What is your local city council or mayor or school board or medical review board? What is your hospital making their doctors do, the NHS or whatever it might be? Those issues are very, very local. The amendments are about international travel and quarantining. You know, you get off the cruise boat and your vacation might go to crap in a heartbeat because you didn't pass the test that the WHO authorized and the nation you're visiting requires. The treaty is a big money game. It's just corruption. Let's get rich nations to put billions of dollars to build out the infrastructure in poor nations so all our cronies can make a bunch of money because they missed out the first time. And so in the end of April, from the 29th of April to I believe May 10th, they've scheduled a new additional two weeks worth of negotiations on the treaty because they're having a hell of a time, meaning the greed on both sides is causing great difficulty in reaching an agreement on how to distribute all of the billions of dollars that they want to collect to run this criminal operation. So we've got two months to flatten the WHO, and I have every faith that people around the world can see through this. They're not addressing the real issues of what it is that people need to do to be healthy. They're just trying to redistribute the wealth under the guise of preventing the next pandemic. But I'm pretty sure that going out looking for pathogens and bringing them into laboratories to do gain of function and then create more biological weapon mRNA jabs that local people can manufacture and profit from. I think that's how you profiteer from the next pandemic, not how you prevent it. 100% and can I just remind people of James Substack, jamesroguski.substack.com, piece every day and it is, when I looked into it I thought this is good and then as I've looked into it further I think it's probably the go-to place to understand what exactly is happening with the World Health Organization. So to our viewers and listeners, make sure, sign up and make that your go-to place for understanding the WHO. Jim, just as we finish, as the viewers, the listeners go and make use of your Substack and read it. And I'm amazed at the, always at the time that people put into those articles, I've gotten into doing videos, actually writing, that is a whole other skill. And the work, the effort, the research that you put in on each individual article is phenomenal. But what do you want the viewers, the listeners, how do they respond? What is your point in that? It's educating, and then they take that information. And what can they do with it? Where do they go with that then? Well, step number one is to understand what the heck is going on. And, I think we gave a pretty decent summary. And so the easy answer for the people watching this video is take the link to this video and share it like you've never shared anything in your life. OK, what's going on is all of these many documents are getting confused and people are talking about all kinds of different things. The documents are changing, you know, on an ongoing basis. They've got amendments and treaties last year and this year. If you just share this video and I don't mean just post it on Facebook and walk away and think that Facebook is gonna knock on everybody's door and go, Hey did you see this okay, If you have a phone and you have a contact list, take the link and start with a, Ann and Bob and Carol and Doug and Emily and Fred and on down the list, if there's a person that you don't share this video with you're censoring this information. They're not going to find it on the mainstream news. They're probably not going to find it on most alternative news. They're probably going to get it wrong. Now, I've put all of this information in exitthewho.org. I've been working with people in dozens of countries around the world. So if you want the mother load, right, Go to exitthewho.org. But what we've just done here is a reasonable summary of what the heck is going on. For most people, this is enough to alert them, hey, you ought to pay attention. You got two months from about now to when they're meeting. Spread the word. Take this video, share it. Take that video, share it. Share it, share it, share it. I'll leave you with a math problem. Okay. If you tell a hundred people and they do the same and they do the same through five levels of referral, five degrees of separation, a hundred to the fifth power is 10 billion. So if you share this and other people share this, it could go viral overnight. And so you could be sharing a TikTok video of your cat doing something funny. OK, or you could be sharing this with everybody, you know, go from A to Z, send them a text message, then go to your email account and send this video to everybody that, you know, via email. And then if you have a social media account, you can post it on there, but go to your direct messages and direct messages to everybody that you've got a friend or a follower or whatever it might be. And then call up everybody you've got a phone number for and go, hey, I texted you, I emailed you, I DM'd you, are you okay? You know, what do you think about this video that I just sent you? And if they don't care, that's okay. You can spend your time trying to convince them, right? Or you can blame me for not being able to convince them. Take the easy road. And there will be some people who go, oh my God, I had no idea this was going on. Thank you so very much. Work with the willing, organize your actions. There's on exitthewho.org. It's an activist toolbox. There's an endless list of things you can do. And my phone number is in every article. If you have a question, I'm in California. So you got to use whatever codes you need to use or signal or telegram or WhatsApp, send me a text message, whatever it might be if you have any questions be more than happy to help you but it starts with awareness. And so you can do your part just by making as many people as you possibly can aware of this discussion that we just had. Well James once again thank you for giving us your time expanding on that and all those links will be in the description for the viewers and listeners to make use of and to pass on to share and to encourage friends family colleagues to actually delve into the subject and understand what we all face worldwide. So thank you, James, for your time. Thank you, Peter.

The climate change policies of the European Union are driven by the ideology of “climate communisms,” whose goal is to degrow the economy and instill China-style societal control over society, says Rob Roos, the member of the European Parliament representing the Netherlands. In this interview with The New American, Mr. Roos discusses the recent panel ... The post MEP Rob Roos: Nuclear Energy vs. Climate Communism appeared first on The New American.

As the European farmer's revolt gains powerful momentum, Dutch MP, Rob Roos, joins Del with his take on why the EU is placing these strict restrictions on European farmers in the guise of climate activism. He breaks down the reasons behind the pushback of European farmers and the elimination of rights looming for everyday citizens under the guise of climate change.

In de nieuwste aflevering van ‘Op Z'n Kop!' bespreken Marianne Zwagerman en Rick van Velthuysen met voormalig omroepdirecteur en journalist Ton F. van Dijk de actuele stand van zaken rondom de formatie en de drijfveren achter de handelingen van Pieter Omtzigt. Daarnaast gaan ze ook in gesprek met Europees Parlementslid Rob Roos over de naderende verkiezingen voor het Europees Parlement, het mandaat en de werking van dit Parlement en de omvangrijke boerenprotesten in verschillende Europese landen.

Het boerenprotest dat we in Nederland afgelopen jaren al uitgebreid zagen is overgeslagen naar heel Europa. Veel van de boosheid richt zich op 'Brussel'. Daar legden boeren vandaag met zo'n 1300 trekkers de stad plat op het moment dat er ook een EU-top georganiseerd werd.  Presentator Jan Willem Wesselink in gesprek met: * Rob Roos, onafhankelijk Europarlementariër  * Sophie in 't Veld, Europarlementariër voor Volt

De 16e aflevering van Ongehoord Nieuws seizoen 4. Presentatie: Tom de Nooijer. Gasten: Bert Weteringe, Harry van den Berg, Rob Roos en Marcel Crok.

Chris en Tink. Over hoe het allemaal misging met Het Belang Van Nederland (en Wybren van Haga). Met daarnaast hele aardige woorden over Nynke Koopmans en over Yoeri Albrecht.Verder praten Chris en Tink nog na in een extra aflevering die u kunt beluisteren via www.petjeaf.com/hoehetallemaalmisging. Daar hebben we het over de uitvloeisels van FvD, over het vertrek van Rob Roos en het gelijk van Arjan Noorlander. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In de nieuwste aflevering van Op Z'n Kop praten Rick van Velthuysen en Marianne Zwagerman met Europees Parlementslid Rob Roos (JA21) over de natuurherstelwet van Frans Timmermans. Welke gevolgen heeft deze wet voor Nederland? ‘De nieuwe natuurherstelwet, die noem ik ook bewust de Nederland-op-slot-wet,' vertelt Rob Roos. Ook vindt Roos dat het een slechte zaak is als Brussel het voor ons gaat regelen, dat moeten we als Nederland gewoon zelf doen. Gelukkig is er veel weerstand tegen in Europa. Gaat Frans Timmermans de natuurherstelwet halen?   

“For Pfizer … total contracts of the European Union was 72 billion euros to buy vaccines. They bought 10 vaccines for every person in the European Union. So, it's a huge amount of taxpayers' money.”I sit down with Rob Roos, a Dutch member of the European Parliament. Roos made global headlines after he got a Pfizer executive to publicly admit that Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine was never tested for stopping transmission of the virus.“At that moment, I realized this is a game changer,” says Roos. “We put it online and it was crazy. It went so far off, because everyone in the Western world—I can speak for them, I think—had the feeling they were fooled, really fooled by their governments. And that's not what governments should do. They're chosen to serve the people. But they fooled the people. It was a false narrative.”Roos says that media attempts to frame him as a purveyor of “misinformation” and the counter-argument that Pfizer had never claimed that the vaccine was tested on stopping transmission is mere gaslighting.“That was not my argument,” says Roos. “My argument was that our governments said that. But [Pfizer CEO] Mr. Bourla could have said to our governments, ‘Listen, we didn't test it on that. You better not push people to these vaccines with that argument.' He didn't do that because there's a lot of money involved, of course.”We discuss the response to the pandemic in the Netherlands and in Europe, and why Roos believes common sense should prevail over official guidelines when liberty is at stake.“It's a dangerous situation, because now it's the vaccine. What's the next time?” Roos asks.

The Global War on Farmers just keeps chugging along. For instance, as you likely know, farmers in the Netherlands have been taking a stand for the past year now, and protesting against their government's crackdown on the agricultural industry. Since last year, they have been using their tractors to block traffic, shut down distribution centers, and peacefully protest against the Dutch government's Green Agenda—an agenda that would shut down somewhere around 40 to 50 percent of the farms in the country. However, after over a year of protests, the Dutch government appears to not really care. Which is rather bewildering when you consider the results of the most recent election. That's because, just a few weeks ago, in March, elections were held across the entirety of the country. And a newly formed party called the Farmer–Citizen Movement party, became the single largest party in the Dutch Senate. So many people voted for them, that they went from having zero seats in the Senate, to have 17. However, despite this electoral surge—the Dutch government is actually doubling down on its green agenda. In fact, just yesterday, the Dutch Prime Minister vowed to accelerate the implementation of the EU green agenda and force the farmers to cut their nitrogen emissions by at least 50 percent by the end of the decade. And at the same time, under a new scheme that the government implemented back in October, 3,000 farms are about to be closed down across the country—and that's only the beginning. And so, in order to get a clearer picture of what's going on with the farmers, I took the opportunity to sit down and speak with Mr. Rob Roos—he's a Dutch member of the European Parliament. ⭕️ Sign up for our NEWSLETTER and stay in touch

Rob Roos van JA21 denkt dat dat de duurzaamheidswinst van elektrisch rijden meevalt. Hij zegt ''Door hun batterij zijn elektrische auto's zo'n 40 procent zwaarder dan auto's met een verbrandingsmotor. De banden en remmen van een elektrische auto produceren daardoor veel meer schadelijke deeltjes dan een conventionele auto.'' Maar klopt dat wel? En worden elektrische auto's straks lichter dan auto's met een verbrandingsmotor? We zochten het uit!

What is Babel X? Why is the FBI and military pumping millions of dollars into it? The truth is disturbing on many levels. The AI program is developed to track us on every social media platform, through our phones etc. Creating a profile on us to be used for what? That's what we dive into on this weeks episode. Email Us At: downtherh@protonmail.com SHOW NOTES: https://www.babelstreet.com/platform/babel-x https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/babel-street-adds-former-naval-intelligence-officer-to-board-of-advisors-301474491.html https://www.defensedaily.com/babel-street-sap-in-partnership-for-open-source-intelligence-2/uncategorized/ https://www.inputmag.com/culture/fbi-investing-social-media-surveillance-software https://www.liberationnews.org/privatized-mass-surveillance-babel-streets-new-product-is-watching-your-networks-synthesizing-your-connections/ https://intelligencecommunitynews.com/babel-street-adds-defense-intel-leaders/ https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/following-a-powerful-18-months-babel-street-renews-contract-with-intel-471-300862182.html https://summit.news/2022/10/26/us-citizens-were-tracked-via-secret-covid-decree-violation-scores/ https://reclaimthenet.org/mastercard-just-outlined-its-digital-id-push/ https://reclaimthenet.org/pakistan-flood-victims-biometric-verification/ https://www.technocracy.news/technocracy-the-full-digitization-of-everything-and-then-some/ https://warroom.org/2022/09/29/federal-research-on-manipulating-brains-should-worry-us-all/ https://www.technocracy.news/poor-in-uk-major-supermarket-to-pitch-bugs-for-survival/ https://twitter.com/Rob_Roos/status/1579759795225198593 https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/21/jokes-on-you-looks-like-the-biden-administration-wrote-snls-unfunny-covid-comedy/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email https://www.judicialwatch.org/covid-booster-use-and-approval/ https://www.technocracy.news/2022/10/26/ https://reclaimthenet.org/alberta-premier-danielle-smith-vaccine-passports-amnesty/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/1584462514313891840/video/2 https://twitter.com/draseemmalhotra/status/1582595328867729409?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email https://twitter.com/BandyGit/status/1525039676536631296?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/nwczradios-dtrh/message

“Pandemic of the unvaccinated,” they said. “Your unvaccinated kids will bring home the virus and kill grandma,” they said. “Was the Pfizer Covid vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?” asked Rob Roos, a Dutch MEP, on Oct 12, 2022. “No,” responded Janine Small, Pfizer's president of international developed markets. “We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market,” Small continued. “And from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk.” Will Pfizer be suspended and deplatformed for misinformation? Dr. Drew is answering your calls LIVE on any topic: politics, censorship, health, vaccines, relationships, and anything you'd like to discuss. 「 SPONSORED BY 」 • BIRCH GOLD - Don't let your savings lose value. You can own physical gold and silver in a tax-sheltered retirement account, and Birch Gold will help you do it. Claim your free, no obligation info kit from Birch Gold at https://birchgold.com/drew • GENUCEL - Using a proprietary base formulated by a pharmacist, Genucel has created skincare that can dramatically improve the appearance of facial redness and under-eye puffiness. Genucel uses clinical levels of botanical extracts in their cruelty-free, natural, made-in-the-USA line of products. Get 10% off with promo code DREW at https://genucel.com/drew 「 MEDICAL NOTE 」 The CDC states that COVID-19 vaccines are safe, effective, and reduce your risk of severe illness. Hundreds of millions of people have received a COVID-19 vaccine, and serious adverse reactions are uncommon. Dr. Drew is a board-certified physician and Dr. Kelly Victory is a board-certified emergency specialist. Portions of this program will examine countervailing views on important medical issues. You should always consult your personal physician before making any decisions about your health.  「 ABOUT the SHOW 」 Ask Dr. Drew is produced by Kaleb Nation (https://kalebnation.com) and Susan Pinsky (https://twitter.com/firstladyoflove). This show is for entertainment and/or informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. 「 GEAR PROVIDED BY 」 • BLUE MICS - Find your best sound at https://drdrew.com/blue • ELGATO - See how Elgato's lights transformed Dr. Drew's set: https://drdrew.com/sponsors/elgato/ 「 ABOUT DR. DREW 」 For over 30 years, Dr. Drew has answered questions and offered guidance to millions through popular shows like Celebrity Rehab (VH1), Dr. Drew On Call (HLN), Teen Mom OG (MTV), and the iconic radio show Loveline. Now, Dr. Drew is opening his phone lines to the world by streaming LIVE from his home studio. Watch all of Dr. Drew's latest shows at https://drdrew.tv

GET HEIRLOOM SEEDS & NON GMO SURVIVAL FOOD HERE: https://heavensharvest.com/ USE Code WAM to get FREE shipping in the United States! GET TICKETS to The Red Pill Expo in Salt Lake City and use code WAM HERE: https://redpilluniversity.org/expo-homepage/ref/146/ GET VITAMINS AND SUPPLEMENTS FROM DR. ZELENKO HERE: https://rdm.go2cloud.org/aff_c?offer_id=225&aff_id=1682 LION ENERGY: Never Run Out Of Power! PREPARE NOW! https://rdm.go2cloud.org/aff_c?offer_id=223&aff_id=1682 Josh Sigurdson reports on the recent video of EU Parliament member and politician Mislav Kolakušić demanding not only a further investigation into Pfizer after they admitted in front of the parliament recently to member Rob Roos that they never tested the vaccines for transmission, but he's also demanding a refund from the company in the billions of dollars and is calling for prosecution! In the video that has now gone viral in the face of the so-called "Pfizergate" controversy, the already outspoken Croatian politician echoes what billions worldwide are thinking. Meanwhile, there are still court proceedings to give the death penalty to a member of the WHO in India over her dissuading of people away from Ivermectin as well as the recent court hearing against Bill Gates and the Indian government (by our friend Yohan Tengra and others) launched by the High Court in India for vaccine death and injury. Things are getting excited but will these initiatives work? That's another question all together and we need to continue being loud. We cannot let these psychopaths win. They must face justice. The same psychopaths are already moving us into the Great Reset with other crazy eugenicist initiatives. The time is NOW. Stay tuned for more from WAM! GET TIM'S FREE Portfolio Review HERE: https://bit.ly/redpilladvisor And become a client of Tim's at https://www.TheLibertyAdvisor.com STOCK UP ON STOREABLE FOODS HERE: http://wamsurvival.com/ OUR GOGETFUNDING CAMPAIGN: https://gogetfunding.com/help-keep-wam-alive/ PURCHASE PART 1 of TipToe To Tyranny HERE: https://vimeo.com/ondemand/tiptoetotyranny/ GET YOUR APRICOT SEEDS at the life-saving Richardson Nutritional Center HERE: https://rncstore.com/r?id=bg8qc1 OUR PODBEAN CHANNEL: https://worldaltmedia.podbean.com/ Or SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/5JWtlXypfL8iR8gGMg9MME Find us on Vigilante TV HERE: https://vigilante.tv/c/world_alternative_media/videos?s=1 FIND US on Rokfin HERE: https://rokfin.com/worldalternativemedia FIND US on Gettr HERE: https://www.gettr.com/user/worldaltmedia See our EPICFUNDME HERE: https://epicfundme.com/251-world-alternative-media JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER HERE: https://www.iambanned.com/ JOIN our Telegram Group HERE: https://t.me/worldalternativemedia JOIN US On BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/gzFCj8AuSWgp/ JOIN US On Flote: https://flote.app/JoshSigurdson JOIN US On Odysee (formerly LBRY) HERE: https://odysee.com/@WAM:0 BUY WAM NFTs HERE: https://rarible.com/worldalternativemedia JOIN US on Rumble Here: https://rumble.com/c/c-312314 FIND WAM MERCHANDISE HERE: https://teespring.com/stores/world-alternative-media FIND OUR CoinTree page here: https://cointr.ee/joshsigurdson JOIN US on SubscribeStar here: https://www.subscribestar.com/world-alternative-media We will soon be doing subscriber only content! Follow us on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/WorldAltMedia Help keep independent media alive! Pledge here! Just a dollar a month can help us alive! https://www.patreon.com/user?u=2652072&ty=h&u=2652072 BITCOIN ADDRESS: 18d1WEnYYhBRgZVbeyLr6UfiJhrQygcgNU World Alternative Media 2022

https://www.subscribestar.com/thatfakeguydan Craig and I are talking about tech, politicians (getting called out), recent studies, some legal issues around the ATF and relates rights issues, the corporate fist and it's friends in government. That and a lot more. https://t.me/joinchat/F_cKGTWhXPRjMTRh https://odysee.com/@ThatFakeGuyDan:a https://www.patreon.com/ThatFakeGuyDan https://www.minds.com/ThatFakeGuyDan https://www.twitter.com/ThatFakeGuyDan https://www.parler.com/ThatFakeGuyDan https://www.instagram.com/ThatFakeGuyDan https://gab.com/ThatFakeGuyDan Showlinks: https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1580399538979753989 https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1580383630433878016?s=20&t=4qTIY23cpOrepnbjU6bUVA https://twitter.com/LeeCamp/status/1580081608564310016?s=20&t=4qTIY23cpOrepnbjU6bUVA https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/10/11/sec-investigating-bored-ape-creator-yuga-labs-over-unregistered-offerings-report/ https://twitter.com/Rob_Roos/status/1579759795225198593 https://twitter.com/JodieElfwick/status/1581071317675438081 https://twitter.com/JodieElfwick/status/1581056020800933890 https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1577388470200311810 https://justthenews.com/government/congress/federally-backed-censorship-machine-raises-separation-powers-election-meddling https://twitter.com/StefanPatatu/status/1579473814563745794 https://search.brave.com https://web.archive.org/web/20220927223312/https://www.paypalobjects.com/marketing/ua/pdf/US/en/acceptableuse-full-110322.pdf https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1580880321804804096 https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/border-issues/2022/10/12/arizona-gun-dealers-accused-of-trafficking-weapons-sued-by-mexican-government/10477794002/ https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1580621846193795072 https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1580639051774054404 https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-us-district-court-rules-ban-on-possession-of-gun-with-serial-numbers-removed-is-unconstitutional/ https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/saf-sues-state-of-new-york-over-church-gun-carry-prohibition/ https://reclaimthenet.org/paypal-terminates-account-of-hong-kong-democracy-party/ https://twitter.com/RyanGirdusky/status/1581104185634074626 https://twitter.com/ultabeauty/status/1580604338761650176 --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/thatfakeguydan/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thatfakeguydan/support

Ook in dit weekjournaal nemen Jeroen en Willem de gebruikelijke onderwerpen door: het politiek theater met alle blunders van Klaver en Remkes, het opschalen van de maatregelen terwijl nu toegegeven wordt dat dat de maatregelen eigenlijk geen zin hebben gehad, het OVV-rapport dat zegt dat er een potje van gemaakt is en censuur en propaganda. De prijzen voor de kleine grote vriend uit België zijn opvallend, het lijkt erop dat hoe meer je bedriegt, hoe meer je in de prijzen valt. Het internationale nieuws gaat over de Oekraïne, de Verenigde Staten die duidelijk een trans humanistische agenda aan het uitvoeren zijn, Duitsland, Polen en Frankrijk komen langs. Bij onderwerp Agenda 2030 blijkt dat McKinsey inderdaad een sturende rol heeft, het afschaffen van vleesconsumptie, het uitsluiten van betalingsverkeer van kritischen en de enorme investering van Bill Gates in de Digital Identity, het is allemaal geen verrassing meer. Bij het juridisch nieuws zijn ook een aantal opmerkelijke dingen, Jeroen en Willem zoomen vooral in op de uitspraken rond de stikstof. Gelukkig mag een koe in de wei staan. Dat een rechter daar een uitspraak over moet doen is tekenend voor de gekte in onze maatschappij. Bij het medisch nieuws gaat het over de vele overlijdens en ook het steeds duidelijker toegeven dat de prikken niet werken, wel gevaarlijk zijn en de kans op Covid juist vergroten. De vraagstelling van Rob Roos aan een Pfizer medewerkster gaat de wereld rond, inmiddels is duidelijk dat het ook hier om een gedragsexperiment gaat en niets te maken had met transmissie. Als laatste nemen zij de demonstraties door die gepland zijn de komende tijd. --- Deze video is geproduceerd door Café Weltschmerz. Café Weltschmerz gelooft in de kracht van het gesprek en zendt interviews uit over actuele maatschappelijke thema's. Wij bieden een hoogwaardig alternatief voor de mainstream media. Café Weltschmerz is onafhankelijk en niet verbonden aan politieke, religieuze of commerciële partijen. Waardeer je onze video's? Help ons in de strijd naar een eerlijker Nederland, vrij van censuur en Steun Café Weltschmerz en word Stamgast! https://cafeweltschmerz.nl/register/ Wil je onze nieuwsbrief ontvangen in je mailbox? https://www.cafeweltschmerz.nl/nieuwsbrief/ Wil je op de hoogte worden gebracht van onze nieuwe video's? Klik hierboven dan op Abonneren!

Tucker Carson interviews Rob Roos member of European Parliament, who got the Pfizer Director to admit the vaccine was a fraud from the beginning. DISCLAIMER: Views and opinions expressed on The Ben Armstrong Show are solely those of the host and do not necessarily represent those of The New American. TNA is not responsible for, ... The post Vaccine Was Never Tested For Stopping COVID! Pfizer Director Admits  appeared first on The New American.

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks about the Elon Musk's Ukraine peace plan to deescalate the Russia-Ukraine war and if we can avert a nuclear war; Stephen Colbert attacking Elon Musk with the baseless accusation that he is a stooge for Vladimir Putin; Elon Musk's jab at Sam Harris; MSNBC's Joe Scarborough going full antifascist; CNN's Jake Tapper's disastrous interview with Joe Biden where he gave conflicting answers about whether or not the U.S. was likely to go into a recession; JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon ripping apart the US energy policy of Joe Biden and how the attacks on the oil and gas industry have actually made climate change worse; White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre commenting on Senator Tommy Tuberville's controversial reparations remarks and using them to smear all MAGA Republicans as agents of racism; Dr. Ashish Jha getting worried about the new COVID variants; Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo asking tough questions about the side effects of the COVID vaccine and it's connections to increasing the risk of myocarditis in men; European Parliament member Rob Roos exposing that Pfizer never did the proper studies to see if the COVID vaccine would stop transmission of the virus which was the entire basis of the COVID passport system that was used in various parts of the world; and much more. ---------- Today's Sponsors: FastGrowingTrees.com - Don't let your yard look like a plant cemetery. Get your place looking like a resort, easy, with FastGrowingTrees.com. Rubin Report viewers will get 15% off of their entire order. Go to https://www.fastgrowingtrees.com/RUBIN Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Things are a-changing; Pfizer director admitted when asked by Rob Roos, member of the European Parliament, that the vax was never tested for stopping transmission (and it doesn't.) The narrative is interestingly and excitedly unraveling. Still don't understand why smart people have gone along with it but then you see people driving alone in their car wearing a mask...wow science and health class just didn't cut it...Today I am so happy to have Dr Michael Mason-Wood to teach us about plant medicine and men's health naturally. His website is renewedvigour.com. (He is in Canada so don't forget the "u".Here is his bio:"I grew up in Mayo, Yukon, a First Nations community.  I was taught to value the planet we live on and this is where my passion for environmental medicine, plant medicine and gardening was initially birthed.  Prior to becoming a Naturopathic Doctor, I started my mining career as a placer (gold) miner on Duncan Creek, Yukon.  After getting a geology diploma from NAIT, I worked for a few companies exploring the wilds of the Yukon and Alaska, even working for a short time in the south pacific country of Vanuatu.  My love for botanical medicine lead me to get a degree in Biological Science from Simon Fraser University, not knowing that naturopathic medicine was a real thing.  Since becoming a father, I have become even more passionate about the environment.  I want to ensure that there is a planet for my grandchildren to thrive in which is why I completed advanced specialty training in Environmental Medicine and Autism.  One of the missing links in Western medicine is connecting the rising rates of infertility to the increase in chemicals we are exposed too.  I like to use the garden analogy since I am a gardener.  If you want to be healthy, you have to take care of the body (ie soil) and give it the right nutrients as well as environment (sun, water) in order to grow an amazing crop.  I truly believe that we need to be proactive about our health using functional (i.e., Naturopathic, integrative) medicine to prevent many different diseases."Support the show

Beluister hier de volledige uitzending van blckbx today #86 maandag 12 oktober 2022 of bekijk via: https://www.blckbx.tv/livestreams/blckbx-today-2022-10-12Waardeer je deze uitzending? Like deze uitzending, abonneer je op het YouTube kanaal en steun de onafhankelijke journalistiek van blckbx met een donatie ➡ https://www.blckbx.tv/donerenWoensdag 12 oktober 2022- Stichting Clintel heeft bij het Gerechtshof in Den Haag het verzoek ingediend om te worden toegelaten tot de geruchtmakende klimaatzaak tussen Shell en Milieudefensie. „Het eerste vonnis schetst een verkeerd beeld van de klimaatwetenschap en schaadt burgers en bedrijven in Nederland", verklaart Clintel-directeur Marcel Crok die hier vandaag tekst en uitleg komt geven waarom zij zich mengen in de zaak.- "In een covid-hoorzitting geeft de Pfizer-directeur Small toe dat het vaccin nooit was getest op voorkoming van virus-verspreiding. Je doet het voor een ander was dus altijd een leugen", aldus Europarlementariër Rob Roos gisteren. Stevige woorden waarmee hij in Nederland de grote talkshows haalde. Sietske Bergsma onderzocht of het klopt wat Rob Roos zegt, en zo ja, waarom de overheid dan toch de slogan "je doet het voor een ander" gebruikte.- "Investeerders zullen afhaken als bedrijven niet voldoende uitgeven aan CO2 politiek" was de boodschap van Klaas Knot, de directeur van de Nederlandse Bank. Maar afgelopen maandag zei Knot op een persconferentie niets over het feit, dat zijn eigen beleid een groeiende oorzaak is van stijgende energielasten voor burgers en bedrijfsleven via CO2-beprijzing. Is Klaas Knot wel eerlijk over de lastenverdeling van klimaatdoelen vraagt wetenschapsjournalist Rypke Zeilmaker zich af?Desk: wetenschapsjournalist Rypke Zeilmaker, jurist/journalist Sietske Bergsma en wetenschapsjournalist Marcel CrokPresentatie: Anne WillemsenRelevante achtergrondinformatieVoor alle relevante achtergrondinformatie en bronnen m.b.t. de uitzending, zie https://www.blckbx.tv/livestreams/blckbx-today-2022-10-12 (na afloop van de uitzending)Iedere maandag, woensdag en vrijdag LIVE om 19:00 uur.Het nieuws belicht vanuit het oogpunt dat je van blckbx gewend bent, diepgravend en kritisch. Dat is wat je van blckbx today kan verwachten. Onder aanvoering van Flavio Pasquino verzorgt het team van redacteuren, de webredactie, video editors, de regie en de techniek drie keer in de week dit unieke live actualiteitenprogramma. Hierbij zal geen enkel onderwerp geschuwd worden en streven wij ernaar om de nodige balans aan te brengen in het brede medialandschap.blckbx today is iedere maandag, woensdag en vrijdag LIVE te zien op blckbx.tv om 19:00 uur. Heb je de uitzending gemist of wil je op een later moment blckbx today terugkijken? blckbx today is na afloop altijd terug te kijken via blckbx.tv.Over stichting blckbx:Blckbx is een stichting zonder winstoogmerk die wordt gefinancierd door donaties van haar eigen publiek. Voor de mensen, door de mensen en met de mensen: dát is waar blckbx voor staat.Hoewel we zorgdragen om de kosten zo minimaal te houden, zijn er toch doorlopende kosten om gedegen en professionele content te maken. Denk hierbij aan de techniek, de regie, de redactie, de webredactie en het onderhoud van de studio. Om de continuïteit van blckbx te waarborgen, hebben we daarom jouw hulp nodig.Als je deze uitzending waardeert en de urgentie van Nederlands grootste onafhankelijke nieuwsplatform inziet, dan nodigen we je van harte uit om ons te steunen. Alleen dankzij regelmatige donaties kunnen wij onafhankelijke content blijven produceren en onze reikwijdte vergroten, met als doel om de wereld beter te begrijpen. Voor de mensen, door de mensen en met steeds méér mensen.Doneren kan via https://blckbx.tv/donerenSupport the show

A Pfizer pharmaceutical executive made a stunning admission on Monday during testimony before a European Parliament committee. Janine Small is the Regional President of the Vaccines Division of Pfizer's International Developed Markets. She has over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry and has represented Pfizer in numerous countries in Europe and Asia. Mrs. Small was questioned by Mr. Rob Roos, a Dutch member of the European Parliament. He asked Ms. Small if Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine was ever tested prior to its public release to know whether it would stop the transmission of Covid-19 virus. Rick Wiles, Doc Burkhart. Airdate 10/11/22.It's the Final Day! The day when Jesus Christ bursts into our dimension of time, space, and matter. You can order the second edition of Rick's book, Final Day!  https://rickwiles.com/final-day

Rob Roos MEP's address at the Brussels National Conservatism Conference on March 24, 2022.

In Straatsburg spreekt Geert Jan in het Europees Parlement met voorstanders van een coronapas op de werkvloer, maar ook tegenstanders. Europarlementariër Rob Roos startte zelfs een rechtszaak tegen de coronapas. Zijn verhaal en standpunten kun je hier beluisteren. Lees ook | 2G en 3G: Wat vinden Europparlementariërs in Straatsburg? Meer luisteren? Abonneer je dan op BNR Europa en krijg meerdere keren per week de beste inzichten en analyses.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Straatsburg spreekt Geert Jan in het Europees Parlement met voorstanders van een coronapas op de werkvloer, maar ook tegenstanders. Bert Jan Ruissen van de SGP, zit samen met Rob Roos van JA21 in de ECR-fractie. Volgens Ruissen wordt er in hun fractie goed en kritisch op 2G, 3G en een coronapas op de werkvloer gereflecteerd. Lees ook | 2G en 3G: Wat vinden Europparlementariërs in Straatsburg? Meer luisteren? Abonneer je dan op BNR Europa en krijg meerdere keren per week de beste inzichten en analyses.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Te gast zijn onder andere Thierry Baudet, Rob Roos en Wybren van Haga! We hebben het over het idiote voorstel van GroenLinks, een uniek FVD-event en nog veel meer!

We praten met Eva Vlaardingerbroek, Rob Roos en Thierry Baudet over de afgelopen zomer en het nieuwe parlementaire jaar. En: We hebben een nieuwe presentator!

Deze keer hebben we het onder andere over de toekomst van de EU, hatespeech-wetten en rechtsongelijkheid. Te gast zijn Sietske Bergsma en Rob Roos.