Podcasts about aggravating

From the archives: 5-28-22In the state of Idaho, a capital punishment case refers to a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of a crime that carries the possibility of receiving the death penalty as a punishment. Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the legal imposition of death as a penalty for a serious crime.Here is a summary of what typically constitutes a capital punishment case in the state of Idaho:Eligible Crimes: Capital punishment in Idaho is primarily reserved for cases involving aggravated murder. Aggravated murder includes intentional killings with specific aggravating circumstances, such as murder for hire, multiple murders, or the murder of a child.Arrest and Indictment: The process begins with the arrest and indictment of the defendant for the alleged crime. The defendant is formally charged with the offense and is considered innocent until proven guilty.Prosecution and Defense: The case proceeds to trial where the prosecution presents evidence and argues for the defendant's guilt, while the defense presents its case to establish the defendant's innocence or to mitigate the severity of the crime.Sentencing Phase: If the defendant is found guilty of aggravated murder, a separate sentencing phase takes place. During this phase, both the prosecution and defense present additional evidence related to aggravating and mitigating factors to determine whether the death penalty is an appropriate punishment.Aggravating and Mitigating Factors: Aggravating factors are circumstances that make the crime more heinous or deserving of the death penalty, while mitigating factors are circumstances that may reduce the defendant's culpability. These factors may include the defendant's prior criminal record, the brutality of the crime, the defendant's mental state, or any evidence of remorse.Jury Decision: In Idaho, the jury plays a crucial role in determining the sentence. If the jury finds that one or more aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors, they can recommend the death penalty. However, if the jury unanimously finds that the mitigating factors outweigh the aggravating factors, they can recommend a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.Judicial Review: Following the jury's recommendation, the trial judge must review the case and determine whether the death penalty is justified based on the evidence presented. The judge has the discretion to accept or reject the jury's recommendation.Execution: If the judge imposes the death penalty, the defendant may be executed by lethal injection, which is the sole method of execution in Idaho.In this episode, we take look at the chances for a capital punishment case against Bryan Kohberger and if the proseuction is prepared to go down that road.(commercial at 9:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Prosecutor Likely to Push for Death Penalty: Legal Expert (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 5-28-22In the state of Idaho, a capital punishment case refers to a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of a crime that carries the possibility of receiving the death penalty as a punishment. Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the legal imposition of death as a penalty for a serious crime.Here is a summary of what typically constitutes a capital punishment case in the state of Idaho:Eligible Crimes: Capital punishment in Idaho is primarily reserved for cases involving aggravated murder. Aggravated murder includes intentional killings with specific aggravating circumstances, such as murder for hire, multiple murders, or the murder of a child.Arrest and Indictment: The process begins with the arrest and indictment of the defendant for the alleged crime. The defendant is formally charged with the offense and is considered innocent until proven guilty.Prosecution and Defense: The case proceeds to trial where the prosecution presents evidence and argues for the defendant's guilt, while the defense presents its case to establish the defendant's innocence or to mitigate the severity of the crime.Sentencing Phase: If the defendant is found guilty of aggravated murder, a separate sentencing phase takes place. During this phase, both the prosecution and defense present additional evidence related to aggravating and mitigating factors to determine whether the death penalty is an appropriate punishment.Aggravating and Mitigating Factors: Aggravating factors are circumstances that make the crime more heinous or deserving of the death penalty, while mitigating factors are circumstances that may reduce the defendant's culpability. These factors may include the defendant's prior criminal record, the brutality of the crime, the defendant's mental state, or any evidence of remorse.Jury Decision: In Idaho, the jury plays a crucial role in determining the sentence. If the jury finds that one or more aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors, they can recommend the death penalty. However, if the jury unanimously finds that the mitigating factors outweigh the aggravating factors, they can recommend a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.Judicial Review: Following the jury's recommendation, the trial judge must review the case and determine whether the death penalty is justified based on the evidence presented. The judge has the discretion to accept or reject the jury's recommendation.Execution: If the judge imposes the death penalty, the defendant may be executed by lethal injection, which is the sole method of execution in Idaho.In this episode, we take look at the chances for a capital punishment case against Bryan Kohberger and if the proseuction is prepared to go down that road.(commercial at 9:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Prosecutor Likely to Push for Death Penalty: Legal Expert (newsweek.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

It's an art, for sure.

Keith says it is the same things ailing the Yankees that cost them the game and series against the Rays. Boone has to play with the hand he's dealt, and the Yankees roster is not deep enough. Hour 1.

This week we asked what your FWs were up to. Of course, the goal is meh, but some of us are still coparenting, or in the midst of divorce, or news of their misadventures travels back. Often with a large dose of schadenfreude and gratitude that these folks are no longer our problem. Aggravating, in trouble with the law, irresponsible... they didn't get character transplants.     

Dealing with back pain doesn't mean you have to give up on building strength. In this episode, I share my journey with sciatica and chronic pain, common mistakes to avoid, and practical strategies for strength training without causing further damage. Discover how gradual progression, spine hygiene, and a mindful approach can help you break the pain cycle and regain control of your life.

>> Click here for the FREE 5-Day Course Click here for the FREE 5-Day Course

With opaque algorithms, and pricey membership schemes, do dating apps really have users' best interests at heart?

There's a belief that cracking down on abuse against public transport workers will help address a wider societal issue.  The Government is set to make it an aggravating factor in court after noting a worrying increase in abuse to staff and passengers.  Local authorities will soon be able to apply for funding to make safety improvements, including safety screens and real-time CCTV monitoring.  Bus and Coach Association chief executive Delaney Myers told Mike Hosking it's unacceptable.  She says the ramifications on them are significant and they need more help to keep people safe.  LISTEN ABOVE See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

From raised voices to personal attacks, aggressive communicators can be particularly challenging to deal with. Join us in this episode as we explore techniques for staying calm and composed in the face of aggression, while still standing up for yourself and your boundaries. Tell us how you deal with these people in the comments!InHerSelf She is Loved. Beautiful. & Strong!

A terror plot in Toronto gets thwarted, BC United wants to put their former name on the ballot, and Calgary’s Green line is more expensive and shorter than planned. Also, Harjit Sajjan lobbied to get soldiers to participate in a pop concert. Hosts: Shane and Patrick Duration: 54:22 For detailed show notes visit westerncontext.ca.

Medical expert Dr. Kevin Most joins the Steve Cochran Show to discuss whether prescription drugs can worsen allergy symptoms, home remedies for torn muscles, and the increase in cancer rates among young people.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

GenX discusses Iran and Israel trading attacks, pro-Palestinian protests, stabbings in Australia and 20 "Aggravating" Tendencies of GenX.

Latest news from 14 April 2024, as reported in the Ukrainian media. Easy ways to support us: Subscribe to our Patreon to give monthly support https://www.patreon.com/highlightsfromukraine Send us a one-time 'thank you' tip via PayPal at: highlightsfromukraine@gmail.com Out YouTube channel: https://bit.ly/3oH111z Special thanks to our top Patreon supporters - Helena Pszczolko O'Callaghan, mattg629, krissi, Jared and Dick Warner!

Ron "The Show" Hughley needs the truth

The activity at his mom's house ramped up so much that he was terrified to live there and moved in with his dad. What was causing the increased activity? Was the ghost fed up with his poor teenage choices? If you have a real ghost story or supernatural event to report, please write into our show or call 1-855-853-4802! If you like the show, please help keep us on the air and support the show by becoming a Premium Subscriber.  Subscribe here: http://www.ghostpodcast.com/?page_id=118 or at or at http://www.patreon.com/realghoststories Watch more at: http://www.realghoststoriesonline.com/ Follow Tony: Instagram: HTTP://www.instagram.com/tonybrueski TikToc: https://www.tiktok.com/@tonybrueski Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tony.brueski

The Middle East has been a thorn in the side for the US since day one, so why haven't the Americans just abandoned ship? To understand why the US is still involved in the Middle East (and openly facing these potshot-esqe attacks), we need to breakdown this region... Full Newsletter: https://mailchi.mp/zeihan/why-the-middle-east-is-so-aggravating

This week S. Dot Commas makes her return! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/rip-28-podcast/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/rip-28-podcast/support

Gain the confidence of getting a thorough history of present illness (HPI) in Spanish! Lesson2: ¡Bienvenidos! Welcome to Medical Spanish for Pediatric providers. Comenzamos! Let's get started! Lesson 2: The HPI. Where does it hurt? ¿Dónde té duele? How does it feel? ¿Cómo se siente? On a pain scale from 0-10, what would you rate it? En una escala de dolor de 0-10, qué número le darías? When does it occur? Duration? What is the Frequency? ¿Cuándo ocurre? ¿Cuánto dura? ¿Con que frecuencia? Aggravating and relieving factors? ¿Qué lo mejora? ¿Qué lo empeora? Associated symptoms? ¿Síntomas asociados? Allergies, to medications, foods, insects or environment ¿Tiene alergia a un medicamento, comida, insecto o al medio ambiente? Have you given any medications? ¿Ha dado medicamentos? Are immunizations UTD? Vacunas están al paso? Lastly, for the Teen, you might also ask: Any tobacco, alcohol, drug use or sexual contact? Uso de tabaco, alcohol, droga o contacto sexual? That's all for today. Join me in the extended lesson where we will put the HPI into practice, for a child with fever. Outro: Please don't forget to like, comment, follow and subscribe! ¡Hasta Luego! Learn more about the language program at: www.pediatricmedspanish.com Disclaimer: this program is not meant to teach medicine or give medical advice, if you or someone you know is in need of medical care, please visit your assigned medical provider.

BJ Kissel and Hayley Lewis give their 10 observations from the Kansas City Chiefs' frustrating 27-19 road loss to the Green Bay Packers on Sunday Night Football. — The Soul of KC Holiday Raffle & Toy Drive is BACK to spread joy and make a difference! Purchase tickets and be entered for a chance to win some awesome prizes. Venmo

When you look at your parish, is it a source of innovation and missionary outreach? Or, is it a resort for CAVE dwellers (people who are Constantly Against Veritably Everything that is new).Is your parish growing? Is it dying? Or is it somewhere in between?On the cusp of a new apostolic age, you might be tempted to toss up your hands, submit to the same old approach of CAVE dwellers, and hope that somehow the old model of evangelization will suddenly start working.We've outline a different approach in this episode, and its one that honors the need for innovation while preserving the good and tradition of the "old guard". You might even find they aren't really "CAVE dwellers" after all, but champions in disguise!Support the show____________________ ► Make sure to SUBSCRIBE to the Metanoia Catholic YouTube Channel!► Find out your temperament: Take the Free Quiz► Take the Quiz: WHAT TYPE OF COACH ARE YOU?► GET THE DAILY SEVEN JOURNAL!This interactive journal will help you transform your life from the inside out by teaching you how to grow in gratitude, set healthy goals, and gain mastery over your thoughts.► JOIN THE ACADEMY!Your online resource of classes, tools, and community to ramp up your growth and really change your life. Learn from the Metanoia Catholic coaches in webinars, live coaching calls, Lectio Divina, and more with your monthly membership.____________________ ► SUBSCRIBE TO THE CATHOLIC COACHING PODCASTApple PodcastsSpotifyYouTubeGoogle PodcastsAmazon MusicCastboxStitcher______...

Tune-in NOW to our live, fun, informative, and popular radio show! This will be a great show that you don't want to miss! Today's topic: "Seven Life Case Scenarios Aggravating And Causing Pain For Me And My Clients". We share important info with you about Health Insurance, Medicare, Life, Disability, Long Term Care, Accident, and other insurance solutions. Sure, we know that insurance is confusing and doesn't sound sexy, but we make our show fun, informative, and quite simply we provide, "Insurance Straight Talk" - No BS! Catch our show every Tuesday at 10am on WSTU1450 AM & WPSL1590 AM and FB Live @ Quality of LIFE Radio Show.

How do you avoid STALE intimacy, AGGRAVATING communication, and FRUSTRATING finances in marriage by being a DOER? How is being a DOER designed to change the destination of your marriage? This episode will blow the doors off of any limitations you've ever experienced as a LOVER! TUNE IN NOW to find out HOW!!!

The news broke Friday that Everton had been found guilty of Premier League Profit and Sustainability rules, and the independent commission appointed by the PL had reached their decision to deduct Everton 10 league points effective immediately. The ATP has done a deep dive on the report and Ryan, Alex and James are here to discuss the material in great detail. In this Part 1, they discuss: -The facts of the case -Key points for both parties -Aggravating and mitigating factors presented to impact the severity of the punishment Part 2 will be dropping shortly to discuss the "methodology" used to determine the 10 point deduction, a summary, and some excellent listener comments from our Discord.    LINKS: https://linktr.ee/usatoffeepod Intro: Steve Barkwill Production: James Boyman Outro: Kenboib

Factors Influencing Sentencing Decisions. Sentencing decisions are complex and take into account various factors. While specific laws and sentencing guidelines vary by jurisdiction, here are some common factors that influence sentencing decisions: Nature and Severity of the Crime: The type of crime and its seriousness are primary considerations. More severe crimes often result in harsher penalties. Criminal History: A defendant's prior criminal record can significantly impact their sentence. Repeat offenders may face longer sentences. Victim Impact: The harm suffered by the victim, including physical, emotional, and financial consequences, is considered. Mitigating and Aggravating Factors: Certain factors can mitigate or aggravate a sentence. Mitigating factors might include remorse, cooperation with law enforcement, or a lack of prior criminal history. Aggravating factors could involve hate crimes, use of a weapon, or crimes committed while on parole. Statutory Guidelines: Many jurisdictions have statutory guidelines that judges must consider when determining sentences. These guidelines often provide a range of potential penalties based on the specific circumstances of the case. Sentencing Options Criminal penalties can take various forms, depending on the nature of the offense and the jurisdiction. Common sentencing options include: Fines: Monetary penalties that the defendant must pay as punishment for the crime. Probation: A period of supervision in the community instead of incarceration, often with conditions such as regular check-ins with a probation officer. Incarceration: Serving time in jail or prison, with the length of the sentence determined by the seriousness of the crime and other factors. Restitution: Requiring the defendant to compensate the victim for financial losses resulting from the crime. Community Service: Mandating the defendant to perform unpaid work for the community as a form of punishment. Now for a Case Study: State v Martinez - Sentencing Considerations To better understand sentencing considerations, let's examine State v Martinez. In this case, the defendant has been convicted of embezzlement, a white-collar crime. The judge must now determine an appropriate sentence. The judge will weigh factors such as the defendant's criminal history, the amount of money embezzled, any mitigating or aggravating circumstances, and the impact on the victim. All of these factors will help the judge arrive at a fair and just sentence that reflects the severity of the crime and the defendant's culpability. Now for question 1: Are there any sentencing principles that prioritize rehabilitation over punishment? Yes, rehabilitation is a fundamental principle of modern sentencing in many jurisdictions. The goal is to help offenders address the underlying issues that led to their criminal behavior and reintegrate them into society as law-abiding citizens. Sentencing options that prioritize rehabilitation may include probation with mandatory counseling or educational programs, drug treatment programs, or diversion programs for non-violent offenders. These approaches aim to reduce recidivism and promote the offender's rehabilitation. Now for question 2: Can sentences be appealed if the defendant believes the judge made an error in determining the penalty? Yes, sentences can be appealed in many jurisdictions if the defendant believes there was an error in determining the penalty. However, appeals typically focus on legal errors or violations of the defendant's rights rather than challenging the judge's discretion in weighing the sentencing factors. For example, an appeal might allege that the judge misapplied the law, imposed a sentence outside the statutory range, or failed to consider relevant factors. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Teff is the star ingredient of Ethiopian cuisine and it's essential for the delicious chechebsca, a traditional breakfast dish in the country. This small grain can withstand harsh climate conditions and is mostly produced in the Horn of Africa. However, political and economic instability in Ethiopia has limited the country's ability to benefit from its production. Aggravating the situation is the issue of biopiracy, a topic we delve into in this episode.In Ethiopia, we meet Yonas Alemu to discover his business Love Grass. Put on your headphones to discover how the company wants to modernize teff production and restore the grain to its origins. Hosted by Tokunbo Salako. Written and produced by Naira Davlashyan, Aisling Ní Chúláin and Marta Rodriguez Martinez, in Lyon, France. Our assistant producer is Alice Carnevali. Original reporting by Suad Ahmed in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Consulting editor: Catalina MaySolutions journalism consultant: Michèle Foin. The theme music is by Andy Robini. Sound design is by Naira Davlashyan, sound mixing is by Hugo Pouillard.Production coordinator:Louise Lehec Editor-in-chief : Patrick Heery. For more information on The Star Ingredient, go to our website.Follow us on Instagram and Twitter. Are you a French speaker? You can find a version of this podcast in French with the name La Surprise du Chef.The podcast, The Star Ingredient, was funded by the European Journalism Centre, through the Solutions Journalism Accelerator. This fund is supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In capital punishment cases, the threshold of evidence typically refers to the level of proof required for a defendant to be convicted and potentially sentenced to death. In the United States, the constitutional standard established by the Supreme Court for capital cases is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This standard is the highest level of proof in the legal system.To secure a conviction in a capital punishment case, the prosecution must present evidence that proves the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.This means that the evidence must be strong enough that there is no reasonable alternative explanation that could cast doubt on the defendant's guilt. It requires a high degree of certainty in the jury's mind.In Idaho, the threshold of evidence for a capital punishment case would generally follow the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. The prosecution must present compelling evidence to convince the jury or judge that the defendant is guilty of the crime for which they face the death penalty. This evidence typically includes witness testimony, physical evidence, expert analysis, and other relevant information that establishes the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.In Idaho, the death penalty can be imposed for certain serious crimes, typically involving aggravated murder or murder with specific aggravating factors. Aggravating factors are circumstances that make the crime particularly heinous or warranting the harshest punishment.When the death penalty is sought in a capital case, the defendant goes through a separate sentencing phase after being found guilty.During this phase, the jury (or judge, in some cases) determines whether the death penalty is an appropriate punishment based on the presence of aggravating factors and any mitigating factors presented by the defense.If the jury determines that the death penalty is warranted, the judge will then issue a death sentence. However, it's worth noting that the actual implementation of the death penalty may be subject to legal challenges and lengthy appeals processes, which can extend the time between the imposition of the sentence and its execution.The state of Idaho has announced that they will be seeking the death penalty in Bryan Kohberger's case.(commercial at 9:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger could face the DEATH PENALTY as Idaho files notice of intent to execute | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

In capital punishment cases, the threshold of evidence typically refers to the level of proof required for a defendant to be convicted and potentially sentenced to death. In the United States, the constitutional standard established by the Supreme Court for capital cases is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This standard is the highest level of proof in the legal system.To secure a conviction in a capital punishment case, the prosecution must present evidence that proves the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.This means that the evidence must be strong enough that there is no reasonable alternative explanation that could cast doubt on the defendant's guilt. It requires a high degree of certainty in the jury's mind.In Idaho, the threshold of evidence for a capital punishment case would generally follow the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. The prosecution must present compelling evidence to convince the jury or judge that the defendant is guilty of the crime for which they face the death penalty. This evidence typically includes witness testimony, physical evidence, expert analysis, and other relevant information that establishes the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.In Idaho, the death penalty can be imposed for certain serious crimes, typically involving aggravated murder or murder with specific aggravating factors. Aggravating factors are circumstances that make the crime particularly heinous or warranting the harshest punishment.When the death penalty is sought in a capital case, the defendant goes through a separate sentencing phase after being found guilty.During this phase, the jury (or judge, in some cases) determines whether the death penalty is an appropriate punishment based on the presence of aggravating factors and any mitigating factors presented by the defense.If the jury determines that the death penalty is warranted, the judge will then issue a death sentence. However, it's worth noting that the actual implementation of the death penalty may be subject to legal challenges and lengthy appeals processes, which can extend the time between the imposition of the sentence and its execution.The state of Idaho has announced that they will be seeking the death penalty in Bryan Kohberger's case.(commercial at 9:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger could face the DEATH PENALTY as Idaho files notice of intent to execute | Daily Mail OnlineThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

When heavy rain strikes Metro Detroit, beach closures due to e. coli usually follow. On this Daily J, WWJ's Brian Fisher explores what causes this contamination, and what's being done to prevent it from continuing to ruin your summer. (Credit: Getty Images)

In capital punishment cases, the threshold of evidence typically refers to the level of proof required for a defendant to be convicted and potentially sentenced to death. In the United States, the constitutional standard established by the Supreme Court for capital cases is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This standard is the highest level of proof in the legal system.To secure a conviction in a capital punishment case, the prosecution must present evidence that proves the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.This means that the evidence must be strong enough that there is no reasonable alternative explanation that could cast doubt on the defendant's guilt. It requires a high degree of certainty in the jury's mind.In Idaho, the threshold of evidence for a capital punishment case would generally follow the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. The prosecution must present compelling evidence to convince the jury or judge that the defendant is guilty of the crime for which they face the death penalty. This evidence typically includes witness testimony, physical evidence, expert analysis, and other relevant information that establishes the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.In Idaho, the death penalty can be imposed for certain serious crimes, typically involving aggravated murder or murder with specific aggravating factors. Aggravating factors are circumstances that make the crime particularly heinous or warranting the harshest punishment.When the death penalty is sought in a capital case, the defendant goes through a separate sentencing phase after being found guilty.During this phase, the jury (or judge, in some cases) determines whether the death penalty is an appropriate punishment based on the presence of aggravating factors and any mitigating factors presented by the defense.If the jury determines that the death penalty is warranted, the judge will then issue a death sentence. However, it's worth noting that the actual implementation of the death penalty may be subject to legal challenges and lengthy appeals processes, which can extend the time between the imposition of the sentence and its execution.The state of Idaho has announced that they will be seeking the death penalty in Bryan Kohberger's case.(commercial at 9:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger could face the DEATH PENALTY as Idaho files notice of intent to execute | Daily Mail OnlinePatreon Page:Bobby Capucci | creating podcasts and writing/journalism | PatreonThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

In capital punishment cases, the threshold of evidence typically refers to the level of proof required for a defendant to be convicted and potentially sentenced to death. In the United States, the constitutional standard established by the Supreme Court for capital cases is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This standard is the highest level of proof in the legal system.To secure a conviction in a capital punishment case, the prosecution must present evidence that proves the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.This means that the evidence must be strong enough that there is no reasonable alternative explanation that could cast doubt on the defendant's guilt. It requires a high degree of certainty in the jury's mind.In Idaho, the threshold of evidence for a capital punishment case would generally follow the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard. The prosecution must present compelling evidence to convince the jury or judge that the defendant is guilty of the crime for which they face the death penalty. This evidence typically includes witness testimony, physical evidence, expert analysis, and other relevant information that establishes the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.In Idaho, the death penalty can be imposed for certain serious crimes, typically involving aggravated murder or murder with specific aggravating factors. Aggravating factors are circumstances that make the crime particularly heinous or warranting the harshest punishment.When the death penalty is sought in a capital case, the defendant goes through a separate sentencing phase after being found guilty.During this phase, the jury (or judge, in some cases) determines whether the death penalty is an appropriate punishment based on the presence of aggravating factors and any mitigating factors presented by the defense.If the jury determines that the death penalty is warranted, the judge will then issue a death sentence. However, it's worth noting that the actual implementation of the death penalty may be subject to legal challenges and lengthy appeals processes, which can extend the time between the imposition of the sentence and its execution.The state of Idaho has announced that they will be seeking the death penalty in Bryan Kohberger's case.(commercial at 9:25)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger could face the DEATH PENALTY as Idaho files notice of intent to execute | Daily Mail OnlinePatreon Page:Bobby Capucci | creating podcasts and writing/journalism | PatreonThis show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

Hey friends! Just a heads up, it was a warmer day when we recorded so you can hear our AC and we didn't catch it until editing time, so we're sorry for the fan sounds! This week we talk about Time Out by Sean Hayes, Todd Milliner and Carlyn Greenwald! We chat about the main character, media comparisons and much more ! Book info down below :) Theme song by Man With Roses In his small Georgia town, Barclay Elliot is basically a legend. Here basketball is all that matters, and no one has a bigger spotlight than Barclay. Until he decides to use the biggest pep rally in the town's history to come out to his school. And things change. Quickly. Barclay is faced with hostility he never expected. Suddenly he is at odds with his own team, and he doesn't even have his grandfather to turn to the way he used to. But who is Barclay if he doesn't have basketball? His best friend, Amy, thinks she knows. She drags him to her voting rights group, believing Barclay can find a bigger purpose. And he does, but he also finds Christopher. Aggravating, fearless, undeniably handsome Christopher. He and Barclay have never been each other's biggest fans, but as Barclay starts to explore parts of himself he's been hiding away, they find they might have much more in common than they originally thought. As sparks turn into something more, though, Barclay has to decide if he's ready to confront the privilege and popularity that have shielded him his entire life. Can he take a real shot at the love he was fighting for in the first place?

In the state of Idaho, a capital punishment case refers to a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of a crime that carries the possibility of receiving the death penalty as a punishment. Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the legal imposition of death as a penalty for a serious crime.Here is a summary of what typically constitutes a capital punishment case in the state of Idaho:Eligible Crimes: Capital punishment in Idaho is primarily reserved for cases involving aggravated murder. Aggravated murder includes intentional killings with specific aggravating circumstances, such as murder for hire, multiple murders, or the murder of a child.Arrest and Indictment: The process begins with the arrest and indictment of the defendant for the alleged crime. The defendant is formally charged with the offense and is considered innocent until proven guilty.Prosecution and Defense: The case proceeds to trial where the prosecution presents evidence and argues for the defendant's guilt, while the defense presents its case to establish the defendant's innocence or to mitigate the severity of the crime.Sentencing Phase: If the defendant is found guilty of aggravated murder, a separate sentencing phase takes place. During this phase, both the prosecution and defense present additional evidence related to aggravating and mitigating factors to determine whether the death penalty is an appropriate punishment.Aggravating and Mitigating Factors: Aggravating factors are circumstances that make the crime more heinous or deserving of the death penalty, while mitigating factors are circumstances that may reduce the defendant's culpability. These factors may include the defendant's prior criminal record, the brutality of the crime, the defendant's mental state, or any evidence of remorse.Jury Decision: In Idaho, the jury plays a crucial role in determining the sentence. If the jury finds that one or more aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors, they can recommend the death penalty. However, if the jury unanimously finds that the mitigating factors outweigh the aggravating factors, they can recommend a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.Judicial Review: Following the jury's recommendation, the trial judge must review the case and determine whether the death penalty is justified based on the evidence presented. The judge has the discretion to accept or reject the jury's recommendation.Execution: If the judge imposes the death penalty, the defendant may be executed by lethal injection, which is the sole method of execution in Idaho.In this episode, we take look at the chances for a capital punishment case against Bryan Kohberger and if the proseuction is prepared to go down that road. (commercial at 9:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Prosecutor Likely to Push for Death Penalty: Legal Expert (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5080327/advertisement

In the state of Idaho, a capital punishment case refers to a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of a crime that carries the possibility of receiving the death penalty as a punishment. Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the legal imposition of death as a penalty for a serious crime.Here is a summary of what typically constitutes a capital punishment case in the state of Idaho:Eligible Crimes: Capital punishment in Idaho is primarily reserved for cases involving aggravated murder. Aggravated murder includes intentional killings with specific aggravating circumstances, such as murder for hire, multiple murders, or the murder of a child.Arrest and Indictment: The process begins with the arrest and indictment of the defendant for the alleged crime. The defendant is formally charged with the offense and is considered innocent until proven guilty.Prosecution and Defense: The case proceeds to trial where the prosecution presents evidence and argues for the defendant's guilt, while the defense presents its case to establish the defendant's innocence or to mitigate the severity of the crime.Sentencing Phase: If the defendant is found guilty of aggravated murder, a separate sentencing phase takes place. During this phase, both the prosecution and defense present additional evidence related to aggravating and mitigating factors to determine whether the death penalty is an appropriate punishment.Aggravating and Mitigating Factors: Aggravating factors are circumstances that make the crime more heinous or deserving of the death penalty, while mitigating factors are circumstances that may reduce the defendant's culpability. These factors may include the defendant's prior criminal record, the brutality of the crime, the defendant's mental state, or any evidence of remorse.Jury Decision: In Idaho, the jury plays a crucial role in determining the sentence. If the jury finds that one or more aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors, they can recommend the death penalty. However, if the jury unanimously finds that the mitigating factors outweigh the aggravating factors, they can recommend a sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.Judicial Review: Following the jury's recommendation, the trial judge must review the case and determine whether the death penalty is justified based on the evidence presented. The judge has the discretion to accept or reject the jury's recommendation.Execution: If the judge imposes the death penalty, the defendant may be executed by lethal injection, which is the sole method of execution in Idaho.In this episode, we take look at the chances for a capital punishment case against Bryan Kohberger and if the proseuction is prepared to go down that road. (commercial at 9:20)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Bryan Kohberger Prosecutor Likely to Push for Death Penalty: Legal Expert (newsweek.com)This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5003294/advertisement

Disingenuous takes running amok in the sportsmedia world...?! Join as we discuss the outcomes of the NBA first round and evaluate current status of the conference semis in addition to holding accountable a prominent sportwriter.

Drs John M. Kane and Christoph U. Correll discuss the importance of ongoing assessment of psychiatric comorbidities in patients with schizophrenia and its impact on outcomes and treatment decisions. Relevant disclosures can be found with the episode show notes on Medscape (https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/984483). The topics and discussions are planned, produced, and reviewed independently of advertisers. This podcast is intended only for US healthcare professionals. Resources Schizophrenia https://www.medscape.com/resource/schizophrenia What Are the Major Metabolic and Neurologic Risks Associated With Antipsychotic Medications? https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/969525 Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Patients With Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19777347/ Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm Relationship Between Obsessive Compulsive Symptomatology and Severity of Psychotic Symptoms in Schizophrenia: Meta-analysis and Meta-Regression Analysis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36549240/ Clozapine-Induced Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: Mechanisms and Treatment https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30565908/ The Specific Phenotype of Depression in Recent Onset Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Symptom Profile and Network Comparison to Recent Onset Major Depressive Disorder Without Psychotic Features https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34942537/ Schizophrenia Comorbid With Panic Disorder: Evidence for Distinct Cognitive Profiles https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22417926/ Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Comorbid With Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30745688/ Depressive Symptoms in Schizophrenic Patients https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22112362/ Post-Psychotic Depression: An Updated Review of the Term and Clinical Implications https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35220306/ Mortality in People With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Relative Risk and Aggravating or Attenuating Factors https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35524619/ Comorbid Major Depressive Disorder in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33252130/ The RAISE Early Treatment Program for First-Episode Psychosis: Background, Rationale, and Study Design https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25830446/ First Episode Psychosis With and Without the Use of Cannabis and Synthetic Cannabinoids: Psychopathology, Global Functioning and Suicidal Ideation and Antipsychotic Effectiveness https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36682093/ Cannabis Use Among Patients With Psychotic Disorders https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35348056/ Methamphetamine Psychosis: Epidemiology and Management https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25373627/ Demographic and Clinical Correlates of Substance Use Disorders in First Episode Psychosis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28697856/ Why Do Patients With Schizophrenia Smoke? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20051860

Drs John M. Kane and Jonathan Meyer discuss treatment-resistant schizophrenia, how common it is, how to detect and manage it, and how delays in the initiation of treatment negatively affect patients. Relevant disclosures can be found with the episode show notes on Medscape (https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/984480). The topics and discussions are planned, produced, and reviewed independently of advertisers. This podcast is intended only for US healthcare professionals. Resources The Clozapine Handbook: Stahl's Handbooks (Stahl's Essential Psychopharmacology Handbooks) https://www.amazon.com/Clozapine-Handbook-Handbooks-Essential-Psychopharmacology/dp/1108447465 Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia: Clinical, Biological, and Therapeutic Perspectives https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30170114/ Predictors of Treatment-Resistant and Clozapine-Resistant Schizophrenia: A 12-Year Follow-up Study of First-Episode Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33043960/ Mortality in People With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Relative Risk and Aggravating or Attenuating Factors https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35524619/ Pharmacological Interventions for Clozapine-Induced Hypersalivation https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18646130/ The Effect of Clozapine on Premature Mortality: An Assessment of Clinical Monitoring and Other Potential Confounders https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25154620/ Antipsychotic Plasma Levels in the Assessment of Poor Treatment Response in Schizophrenia https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29072776/ Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group Consensus Guidelines on Diagnosis and Terminology https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27919182/ An International Adult Guideline for Making Clozapine Titration Safer by Using Six Ancestry-Based Personalized Dosing Titrations, CRP, and Clozapine Levels https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34911124/ FDA Strengthens Warning That Untreated Constipation Caused by Schizophrenia Medicine Clozapine (Clozaril) Can Lead to Serious Bowel Problems https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-strengthens-warning-untreated-constipation-caused-schizophrenia-medicine-clozapine-clozaril-can Cariprazine https://reference.medscape.com/drug/vraylar-cariprazine-999874 Lumateperone https://reference.medscape.com/drug/caplyta-lumateperone-1000316 Lurasidone https://reference.medscape.com/drug/latuda-lurasidone-999605

Gabe Ramirez opened his show by breaking down the Bulls' frustrating 108-103 loss to the Clippers on Tuesday evening. He's aggravated as hell with the Bulls, to say the least.

Hi Friends!Today we are kicking off a new series here at This ORGANIZED Life, called Organizing Room by Room. With January leading the charge for decluttering and getting organized, we thought it would be helpful to bring on a bunch of experts who specialize in certain spaces to talk about some of the struggles they see people facing, and share some solutions to help you in your organizing/decluttering journey.To start us off, I invited one of my friends, and one of your favorites, Organizational Designer Lisa Eckerle, to join me in talking about one of my favorite rooms in the house-The Kitchen.You might remember Lisa from Episode 268, where she shared her story of starting her Professional Organizing business on the weekends while working a full-time job and mothering 2 littles. Once folks got wind of her incredible eye for design and her on-point organizing skills, her business took off and she was able to leave her full time job and run Sort Support, full time. She specializes in ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN, and is currently one of the leading experts in the Indianapolis area. -So for all my Indy listeners-make sure to check her out!As the epicenter of our homes, kitchens do a lot of heavy lifting. From cooking and food storage, to conversation areas, command centers, or a homework hub-a good organization plan is critical for reducing anxiety and feeling in control of your space.Although you don't have to start in this room, for many it's their biggest pain point.If your kitchen is organized (or disorganized), it sets the tone for the rest of the house. During our conversation we talked about: Common pitfalls she sees and hears from her clients who struggle to keep their kitchens organized.Strategies to help make your kitchen more functional and less stressful.Why ditching (infrequently used) single use gadgets is a simple way to free up space. Lisa's signature “C.R.A.P “Method is great for this! Cheap, Repetitive, Aggravating, Past its prime.Breaking your kitchen into “zones” by categories to make finding things easier for the whole family. Some examples include Cutting Drawer, Baking Station, Prep Area, Cook CabinetKitchens are one area in the home where the right products can make a huge difference-(*disclaimer we don't want you buying the wrong products for your space or lifestyle). Lisa shares some of her “go-to” products when it comes to Kitchen organization, including turntables, drawer dividers and using a lid holder to store lids upright (one of my personal faves too!)Make sure to check out the links below to connect with Lisa or to find anything we talked about in this episode.Make sure to tune in next week as we continue our Room by Room Organizing Series with Closets! If you know someone who could benefit from this episode, do them a favor and forward to them!XOXO-LaurieP.S. If you are a professional organizer or thinking about becoming one, we'd love to chat with you to see if the SBO Partner Program is a good fit for you!CONNECT WITH LISA:WEBSITE | INSTAGRAM | FACEBOOKLINKS MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE:BOOK: The World Needs More Purple PeopleLID HOLDER | TURNTABLES | DRAWER DIVIDERS

This episode is a continuation of the STAR STREAKS✨ with 11th part called Aggravating Aquarius ♒️

Greg's brother rules, who do you love to aggravate?

Once again, VAR has dominated the headlines—it seems like there's a new controversy every week. I mean, the Argentine Lionel Messi (none other than Alexis Mac Allister) would've gotten a hat-trick were it not for a certain Chris Kavanagh sitting in front of a monitor in west London. Regardless, there were many incredible moments from this week's action, like Ivan Toney's hat trick and Man United's statement victory over Arsenal at Old Trafford. We also discuss when the optimal time to Wildcard is, and grumble about the lack of exciting captaincy options for GW 7. Instagram: @fplfortress Twitter: @FplFortress --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

(1:00) - PATRIOTS: Why Jacoby Myers shouldn't be the Pats' number one receiving option. (10:00) - CELTICS: Looking back on Danny Ainge's tenure in the Celtics' front office. Plus: how does the Jazz and Cavaliers affect Boston and the Eastern Conference? (16:15) - RED SOX: Jonny Gomes stops by to discuss his time on the Red Sox, why the Sox must keep Xander Bogaerts, and much more. (37:20) - The ten most aggravating Boston sports events since 2017. Host: Brian Barrett Guest: Jonny Gomes Associate Producers: Jonathan Kermah and Mike Wargon Producer: Steve Ceruti Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

This week on Legally Speaking with Michael Mulligan:Two men charged with criminal contempt for breaching an injunction prohibiting interference with the construction of the Trans Mountain Pipeline plead guilty and were sentenced. Neither man had a previous criminal record. The first man was a 69-yead old, retired university professor. He had climbed a tree and used a bicycle lock around his neck, and cables, to secure himself to the tree in order to slow construction of the pipeline. The police used a cherry picker to remote him. The second man was 21 yeas old. He provided no details of his personal circumstances. He attempted to use a “sleeping dragon” that was buried beside him to secure himself to the ground. He failed to properly secure himself within the device and so the RCMP were able to easily remove his hands and arrest him. Aggravating sentencing considerations included the fact that the injunction had been in place for some time, that the men had breached the injunction in a public way, including by the conduct of media interviews.  Mitigating factors included that they neither man had a previous record and both plead guilty. The judge pointed out that sentences for criminal contempt generally increase over time until compliance is achieved. The 69-year-old man was sentenced to 21 days in jail, while the 21-year-old received 14 days in jail. Distinguishing factors included the time and effort to remove them and the degree to which they had publicised their breached the court order.  Also on the show, the BC Court of Appeal overturned an award of punitive damages against an insurance company that denied a travel insurance claim and then managed to pay the hospital involved less than ordinarily billed by not telling them that that the claim had, eventually, been allowed. The incident involved a man who purchased travel insurance before a trip to Reno. He experienced a loss of consciousness (known as a “syncope”) while drinking at a bar and fell hitting his neck. He was hospitalized for 12 days and had a pacemaker installed. The hospital bill was $293,127.60. For two years, and with little investigation, the insurance company denied the claim alleging that it was caused by drinking alcohol, despite medical evidence to the contrary. Eventually the insurance company relented, once a court case had been commenced, and agreed to cover the claim. Without telling the hospital that they had agreed to cover the claim, the insurance company got the hospital to agree to apply an “uninsured discount” and settled with them for $47,000. This was upsetting to the man because of the excellent care he had received from the hospital. Insurance contracts require the insurance company, and the insured, to act in good faith. This means, amongst other things, that the insurance company must act fairly and reasonably. They must give as much consideration to the interests of the insured as their own interested. The trial judge concluded that the insurance company had not done this and awarded $100,000 in punitive damages against the insurance company.The BC Court of Appeal overturned this award on the basis that the insurance company eventually agreed to pay the claim and because the duty to act in good faith applies only to the insured person and not, for example, the hospital which may have been misled when it agreed to reduce its bill. Finally, on the show, the Crime Victim Assistance Act, and how it relates to civil claims for injuries caused by criminal activity, is also discussed. Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed. 

Josh & Zino sip jasmine tea and milkshake to discuss a viral video of auntie and a schoolgirl throwing fists, the differences in cultural approaches to respect, Nigerians aunties and Filipino titas demanding respect, Travis Scott's Astroworld, Alec Baldwin, the problems of iPhone updates, rich people going to quiet restaurants, and Jen Shah getting arrested on Real Housewives of Salt Lake City. Pour yourself some tea and come sit down with Josh & Zino. Visit us on our Instagram and Twitter: @coconutplantain 

TRIGGER WARNING!!! (00:24-24:44) The Plane Ride From Hell does involve instances of SA (s**ual assault), so if you're uncomfortable hearing about SA, please feel free to skip to another portion of the show.In this week's episode of HoopPlex, the guys discussed the WWE Plane Ride From Hell (00:20), moments in wrestling that pissed us off (24:25), re-booking moments from wrestling history (33:33), what to do with John Wall (40:30), too early NBA season predictions (47:41), the final WNBA playoff spot and final championship predictions (1:06:37), and our thoughts on the WNBA Top 25 list (1:15:45)

     Everyone gets annoyed now and then, no matter who they are.  It's nearly impossible to live in the world without something or someone getting in the way of something or someone else.  In this week's episode, it's time to talk stupid about what annoys us.Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/talkstupid2me)

Football wins in December are determined by the team who does not run away from the cold. If Kentucky can embrace the elements, the Wildcats can end the season on a high note with a win on Senior Day vs. South Carolina. Freddie Maggard shares his experience with the cold, what South Carolina brings to the table, and... A South Carolina freshman QB has never seen snow. You don't want to fist fight Mark Stoops.  The Gamecocks' depleted depth chart.  Concerns vs. Carolina's offense.  All of the games Freddie doesn't know how to play. Aggravating yards could formulate another Missouri-like game. The Inside Drill and Oklahoma Drill What a win could mean long-term for Terry Wilson. The Legend of Benham's Pickle Jones.   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices