Podcasts about christiano

This week, Sarrah sits down with Alex Cullen for his first interview since the controversial “Lambo guy” incident that resulted in his departure from Today and Nine Network — as he exclusively reveals his plans for the future. In January, after he took up an offer from Melbourne-based billionaire Adrian Portelli, Alex found himself in the middle of a media storm that sparked national headlines. Now, in a raw and reflective conversation, he opens up about the personal and professional fallout, the toll it took on his mental health, and how close he came to walking away from the industry altogether. He talks about starting over — with a big move to Melbourne for him and his family, a new radio role on The Christian O’Connell Show, and in a Stellar exclusive, the announcement of his return to TV with Seven News. This is a story about public fallout, private resilience, and what it takes to start again… when the whole country is watching. Alex begins tomorrow on The Christian O'Connell Show weekdays from 6am and weeknights from 7PM on GOLD104.3 Watch the full episode with Alex here. Something To Talk About is a podcast by Stellar, hosted by Sarrah Le Marquand Find more from Stellar via Instagram @stellarmag or stellarmag.com.auSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Christian O’Connell show returns Monday July 21st - while the team are away we’re taking a look back at some of our favourite bits of the show so far! One of our favourite weekly features is this - The Name Game As In! Play along every Thursday on The Christian O'Connell ShowSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

What does queer activism actually look like in 2025?It's not just about voting.It's not just about waving a flag in June.It's about how we show up — every single day — for ourselves, each other, and the future we're building.In this bold and tender episode of The Queer Quest Podcast, Christiano breaks down the state of queer political life post-Pride 2025, and offers a radically honest, deeply hopeful conversation on how LGBTQIA+ people are fighting back, healing forward, and reclaiming their power beyond the ballot box.Whether you're burnt out by rainbow-washed corporations or unsure how to contribute to real change — this episode will leave you with clarity, empowerment, and the permission to be both soft and strong.

The Christian O’Connell show returns Monday July 21st - while the team are away we’re taking a look back at some of our favourite bits of the show so far! After Christian got talking to a veteran Air Traffic Controller who told him about his love for the high stakes and fast paced career he found himself in, we wanted to hear more of your stories about your job and why you love it. Share your passion with us! christian@christianoconnell.com.auSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hugo Blankingship III is a highly respected attorney based in Washington, D.C., specializing in identity theft and false credit reporting issues. With over 30 years of experience, he has built a strong reputation for advocating on behalf of consumers who are struggling with inaccurate credit information. His mission is to help clients get incorrect data removed from their credit reports, allowing them to move forward with their financial lives. A graduate of the University of Virginia (B.A., 1982) and the Marshall-Wythe School of Law at the College of William & Mary (J.D., 1986), Hugo began his career as a law clerk to the Honorable Albert V. Bryan, Jr., former chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. This foundation shaped his career and led him to become a passionate consumer rights advocate. Throughout his career, Hugo has fought tirelessly against major credit reporting agencies like Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax, ensuring they adhere to the rules. In 2004, he argued the case Nigh v. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC before the U.S. Supreme Court, and has represented clients before the Supreme Court of Virginia and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Hugo's clients know him as a tenacious attorney who won't back down in the pursuit of justice. Thomas B. Christiano received a B.A. from the University of Virginia in 1993 and a J.D. from the Marshall-Wythe School of Law at the College of William & Mary in 1999. Mr. Christiano has handled numerous consumer protection cases and specializes in cases involving inaccurate credit reporting under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. He has reviewed the credit reporting procedure process from the major credit reporting agencies and the dispute investigation procedures of many banks who have furnished inaccurate credit information. As an experienced credit report lawyer, he can identify the actual damages associated with credit report problems, including emotional distress damages, the loss of employment opportunities, inability to obtain a mortgage, and loss of use of credit., Mr. Christiano also publishes a blog at yourfaircreditreportlawyernow.com, which is an excellent informational resource on the subject. Thomas B. Christiano has decades of experience helping clients who have been the victim of credit fraud and identity theft. Discover how he can help you!   During the show we discussed: Common credit report errors and their impact on consumers Effects of identity theft on credit and first steps to take Challenges in disputing false credit report information Overview of the dispute process with credit bureaus How bureaus respond to disputes and what to do if ignored Consumer rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) Role of Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion in disputes What to do when bureaus don't fix errors and how attorneys help Issues with mixed/merged credit files and how to resolve them Fraud tactics in credit manipulation and identity theft prevention Importance of checking credit reports and common review mistakes Steps to fix credit scores after finding report errors How bad credit affects loans, housing, and employment Benefits of working with a credit report attorney vs. doing it alone   Resources: https://www.yourfaircreditlawyer.com/  

Christian O. Erbe gibt nach 15 Jahren sein Amt als Präsident der IHK Reutlingen turnusgemäß Ende dieses Monats ab. Im Interview mit RTF.1 blickte er auf die vergangenen 15 Jahre zurück und zog Bilanz. | Videos in der RTF1 Mediathek: www.rtf1.tv | RTF1 - Wissen was hier los ist! |

In this episode of Let's Hear It, Eric sits down with two public interest comms powerhouses—Ann Searight Christiano and Angela Bradbury—who've just dropped what might be the most anticipated textbook in our field: Public Interest Communications Strategy for Change Makers. T Ann and Angela share how their years in the trenches at places like the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Public Citizen shaped this groundbreaking resource—and why storytelling, systems thinking, and listening (really listening) are the keys to actually making change. They discuss their “six spheres of influence,” the “back-of-the-envelope” strategy tool, and why being strategic isn't the same as shouting into the void (no offense to your latest TikTok brainstorm). It's a lively, insightful conversation filled with warmth, humility, and a generous dose of “finally, someone wrote this down.” If you've ever had a boss say, “just make it go viral,” this one's for you. Enjoy the episode—and if you love it, don't forget to follow, rate, and review. Your support helps others find the show (and helps keep us off TikTok, which we would suck at).

In this episode of Let's Hear It, Eric sits down with two public interest comms powerhouses—Ann Searight Christiano and Angela Bradbery—who've just dropped what might be the most anticipated textbook in our field: Public Interest Communications Strategy for Change Makers.  Ann and Angela share how their years in the trenches at places like the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Public Citizen shaped this groundbreaking resource—and why storytelling, systems thinking, and listening (really listening) are the keys to actually making change. They discuss their “six spheres of influence,” the “back-of-the-envelope” strategy tool, and why being strategic isn't the same as shouting into the void (no offense to your latest TikTok brainstorm). It's a lively, insightful conversation filled with warmth, humility, and a generous dose of “finally, someone wrote this down.” If you've ever had a boss say, “just make it go viral,” this one's for you. Enjoy the episode—and if you love it, don't forget to follow, rate, and review. Your support helps others find the show (and helps keep us off TikTok, which we would suck at).

In this episode of the Motiv8d Mindset Podcast, host Bobby Stein speaks with Christian O'Rourke about his journey in bodybuilding, the importance of mindset and focus, and the evolution of coaching in the fitness industry. They discuss the power of thoughts and manifestation, influential figures in bodybuilding, and the significance of building healthy relationships with food. Christian shares his personal experiences with faith, music, and his passion for cars, concluding with insights on personal growth and future aspirations.

In this bonus episode, we look at the results of Radio Ratings Survey 3 that took place today. Jen Seyderhelm dissects the numbers and we hear from the 5 main commercial radio group content directors. The overall results for the five metros: 2GB increased their lead as the top station with smooth fm gaining ground also in second. This was 2Day FM’s first full survey with their tailored to youth format and they’ll be happy with their increases, but bizarrely possibly not in the 40-64 age group which isn’t where they’re targeting. Kyle and Jackie O were steady and top FM breakfast behind Ben Fordham at 2GB. Triple M Sydney struggled the most, I suspect because their new lineup to start 2025 lost Tarsh Belling before the ink was dry on her contract. They have announced show anchor Cat Lynch to replace her today and that stability should help improve things from here. Melbourne - 3AW is still No1 and Gold 104.3 No 2, but both saw drops and it was a second significant one for Nine Radio even though Ross and Russ’s breakfast cumes improved. Ross and Russ were No 1 in breakfast but Jase and Lauren at Nova 100 regained FM No 1. They’re audience remained the same, Christian O’Connell’s dropped a percent. The biggest gaines overall though were for ABC Melbourne and Sharnelle Vella and Bob Murphy on breakfast which will be a relief to the pair and the broadcaster. Their 2% improvement saw them overtake Kyle and Jackie O who lost their gains, and more, from last survey. It was also not a great result for Mick Molloy and his crew on Triple M Melbourne. I thought that the sporting season and a bit of time would have seen them improve but not yet. Brisbane. The top four stations all lost a little ground with Triple M staying No 1 overall and Ash Luttsy and Nikki Osborne on Nova 106.9 in breakfast. The big winner however was 4BH and BBQ Gallagher on breakfast. I feel this also happened around this time last year. Both were up to a 9.3 audience share. Can he crack the top 3 this time around? 4BC also continued its steady improvement. Adelaide saw a changing of the guard on breakfast in one of the tightest races and markets. Mix 102.3 was No 1 station overall, increasing its lead over triple m and Nova but on breakfast, despite Roo, Ditts and Loz on Triple M increasing their audience share, Nova 91.9 Jodie and Hayesy has a bigger gain to pinch No 1which saw them end Roo, Ditts and Loz’s 20 survey winning streak. Finally Perth and it was no surprise that Nath, Nat and Shaun at Nova 93.7 remained No 1 on breakfast (but down 2%) however ARN’s 96FM took over as No 1 station. Clairsy and Lisa had good gains on 96FM breakfast to close the gap and this was the one market where triple m breakfast duo Xav and Katie have bedded in nicely and overtook 6PR to sit fourth in that market now. Addition mention to Gary Adshead who departed 6PR last year to join the ABC. ABC had a good survey in Perth and Gary was up 1.2% on Drive. More from the Content Directors at https://radiotoday.com.au/ratings Ratings charts at https://radioinfo.com.au/news/ratings-results-survey-3-2025 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode, queer transformation coach Christiano Green shares an intimate story about coming out and the long-lasting impact of a single sentence: “Life will be harder for you now.”For almost 20 years, Christiano carried that belief—until he discovered that queerness doesn't have to equal pain. It just means our path is different… not worse.Listen as Christiano explores:The emotional weight of coming outHow internalised beliefs shape our livesWhy comparison keeps us stuckAnd how queer people can reclaim their power and rewrite their storiesThis is a must-listen for any queer person navigating identity, healing, or self-worth.

The following article of the Cybersecurity industry is: “The Fight Against Identity Fraud: A Million-Dollar Challenge” by  Christiano Lucena, VP and General Manager Latin America, DocuSign.

Polisi menetapkan Christiano, pengemudi BMW yang men4br4k mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, Argo Eriko Achfandi, sebagai tersangka. Christiano diketahui juga berstatus sebagai mahasiswa UGM.

In this episode of the Radio Today Podcast, Jen Seyderhelm recaps the week in the radio and podcast industries: Sandon stirs the pot at SCA Court clears Nova of ASIC issue and the company's ongoing ATO audit 2TM flicks the switch to FM in Tamworth The Nova Network’s Ben, Liam and Belle head home to Adelaide Jack Post departs the Christian O’Connell show and the National Radio Airplay Chart song of the week, G Flip's Disco Cowgirl. If you make podcasts in Asia, don't forget to enter the Asia Podcast Awards. More information at www.radiotoday.com.au/asia-podcast-awards-2025-now-open www.radiotoday.com.au See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Christian O'Connell had everything he (thought he) ever wanted, but something just didn't feel right. Most of us have been there too. Christian O’Connell is one of the most beloved voices in radio and currently on Gold FM, an award-winning broadcaster who has reached millions across the UK and Australia. But behind the microphone and the confident persona is a man who has wrestled with fear, doubt, and a profound loss of identity. Sarah Grynberg sits down for a conversation with Christian, as he shares the highs and lows of his incredible journey. He opens up about the emotional weight of navigating anxiety, public scrutiny, and the false rumours that shook the foundation of his personal life. You’ll learn: *How Christian rebuilt his identity after hitting emotional rock bottom. *How he coped with debilitating panic attacks *How he dealt with hurtful fake news being written about his family *Why courage isn’t the absence of fear, but the willingness to keep going *How to make friends at any stage of life This is a story of resilience, rebirth, and having the strength it takes to be fully, fearlessly yourself while enjoying a healthy dose of hilarity along the way. Purchase Sarah's book: Living A Life Of Greatness here. To purchase Living A Life of Greatness outside Australia here or here. Watch A Life of Greatness Episodes On Youtube here. Sign up for Sarah’s newsletter (Greatness Guide) here. Purchase Sarah's Meditations here. Instagram: @sarahgrynberg Website: https://sarahgrynberg.com/ Facebook: facebook.com/sarahgrynberg Twitter: twitter.com/sarahgrynbergSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

From dominating the UK airwaves to starting over on the other side of the world, Christian O'Connell is a broadcaster and writer who has built a career out of connection, candour, and comedy.In this episode of Full Disclosure, James O'Brien sits down with Christian to trace the path from his childhood in Hampshire to becoming one of the UK's most celebrated radio voices- and the breakdown that forced him to confront what success really meant. They explore the roots of Christian's anxiety, the healing power of storytelling, and the courage it took to walk away from it all to begin again in Australia.Warm, unfiltered and often profound, Christian opens up about family, fame, fear and finding clarity in chaos- a conversation about reinvention, honesty, and what it takes to truly come home to yourself.Discover more about The Heart of Speaking here

Talk of Patsy's daughter Audie's school camp got us thinking.. should we take the show to a camp site for a whole week?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Christiano Sacha Fornaciari"La sedia del diavolo"Violenza, tortura e morte nel Brasile dei generaliEdizioni Lindauwww.lindau.itScritto con il rigore di un saggio storico e il ritmo incalzante di un romanzo, "La sedia del drago" racconta un Brasile poco noto e molto distante dallo stereotipo turistico «spiagge, calcio e samba», ancora oggi molto diffuso: è il Brasile dei generali e di una brutale dittatura che, nel quadro geopolitico disegnato dalla Guerra Fredda, a partire dal 1964 avrebbe governato il paese per oltre vent'anni, torturando e assassinando gli oppositori politici, perseguitando intellettuali e artisti, discriminando il mondo LBGTQ, ed esercitando una censura pervasiva su ogni mezzo di comunicazione. Facendo ricorso a fonti testimoniali, agli archivi dei quotidiani e delle riviste dell'epoca, a documenti originali reperiti negli archivi di Stato brasiliani e negli archivi digitali desecretati della CIA e del Dipartimento di Stato USA, nonché ai ricordi personali dell'autore, le pagine di questo libro descrivono con straordinaria efficacia eventi e atmosfere di quegli anni cupi, l'organizzazione e i principi dell'apparato repressivo, il coraggio dei dissidenti, le sofferenze delle vittime e la crudeltà dei loro carnefici. Un angosciante viaggio nel cuore di tenebra dell'uomo.Christiano Sacha Fornaciari, architetto, è nato a São Paulo del Brasile nel 1962. Si è laureato all'Istituto universitario di architettura di Venezia, dove è stato allievo di Massimo Cacciari per gli studi di estetica e di Franco Rella per gli studi di letteratura artistica. Componente della Consulta per l'arte sacra dell'arcidiocesi di Udine, si è perfezionato in Architettura e arte per la liturgia presso la Facoltà di sacra liturgia del Pontificio ateneo Sant'Anselmo in Roma.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarewww.ilpostodelleparole.itDiventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.

In Sydney 2GB is No 1 station just ahead of smooth 95.3. Ben Fordham is No 1 for GB on breakfast, Kyle and Jackie O No 1 FM. Smooth’s Bogart Torelli and Jonesy and Amanda on Gold 101.7 saw the biggest losses and the biggest gains were for triple j off the back of the Hottest 100 and for Nova 96.9, bearing in mind that Kate Ritchie has been on personal leave from breakfast with Fitzy and Wippa since early Feb. Mark Levy who took over from Ray Hadley on 2GB Mornings when Ray retired last year held on to No 1 spot. Melbourne, 3AW is a long way ahead at No 1 and for Ross and Russ on breakfast. No 1 FM breakfast belonged to Christian O’Connell who was up most of all and overtook Fifi Fev and Nick at the fox and Jase and Lauren at Nova 100 along the way. RSN 927 apparently will not feature in GfK surveys in 2025. Radioinfo has reached out to the station for comment. Brisbane – b105 retains No 1 overall and on breakfast. Marto Margaux and Dan at triple M have closed the gap though. Adelaide Triple M moved further in front at the top but strangely had a 2.1% drop on breakfast for Roo, Ditts and Loz. I expect that to change when survey 2 and AFL seasons are included. A massive congrats to Sonya and Jules on ABC Adelaide breakfast, up 2.8 and going from 5th to second behind the triple M team. And finally Perth where nova 93.7 and Nath, Nat and Shaun on breakfast are as unassailable as Russ and Ross on 3AW in Melbourne. Nath, Nat and Shaun were up 3.6% to a 19.8% audience share. 96FM’s Clairsy and Lisa were also up 1.5 to 12.6 in second. Jen Seyderhelm also explores the weekly reach results (cume) and the digital station results in this special boinus podcast episode of the Radio Today Podcast.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Building a successful blog takes more than just compelling writing and eye-catching photos. To truly expand your reach and attract consistent traffic, you need to harness the power of Search Engine Optimization (SEO). In this episode, we're joined by Anne Zirkle and AnnMarie Christiano to explore actionable strategies to help you grow your blog with SEO, making it more visible, valuable, and sustainable. Resources Mentioned Shift Boldfluence Simply2moms.com Connect with Simply2moms Simply2moms.com Find them on Facebook! Check out their Pinterest Page They're on TikTok! Follow their Youtube

No 43º episódio do B IS THE NEW A - The Podcast, Davi Cury sentou pra conversar com o Christiano Coelho. Executivo e consultor especialista em gestão de marca, o Christiano tem em sua bagagem nomes como Asics, Nike, Under Armor e Veja (antiga Vert no Brasil).   Se você é um(a) sneakerhead ou apaixonado(a) por marcas esportivas, não perca esse episódio!

On today's episode, Clay is joined by Cristiano Souza to discuss his three primary criteria in identifying an excellent business. Cristiano Souza is the founder of Zeno Equity Partners, a firm he started in 2022 after spending 28 years at Dynamo. From 1994 through 2015, he was on the team that managed the Dynamo Cougar fund, which invested in high-quality equities in Brazil. During that time, the fund compounded at 24% per year in US dollar terms. IN THIS EPISODE YOU'LL LEARN: 00:00 - Intro 03:33 - The three things that Cristiano looks for in a business. 13:43 - What the Founder's Mindset is, and why it is so difficult to find. 18:53 - Why Cristiano believes that LVMH has a significant opportunity to continue to grow. 33:53 - The mistakes Cristiano has made in assessing management teams. 39:57 - Why Linde PLC is a core position in Christiano's portfolio. 51:17 - Why AppFolio is well-positioned to continue growing in the property management space. And so much more! Disclaimer: Slight discrepancies in the timestamps may occur due to podcast platform differences. BOOKS AND RESOURCES Join the exclusive TIP Mastermind Community to engage in meaningful stock investing discussions with Stig, Clay, Kyle, and the other community members. Cristiano's firm: Zeno Equity Partners. Book mentioned: Mastery by Robert Greene, The Nvidia Way by Tae Kim. Email Shawn at shawn@theinvestorspodcast.com to attend our free events in Omaha or visit this page. Follow Cristiano on LinkedIn. Follow Clay on X. Check out all the books mentioned and discussed in our podcast episodes here. Enjoy ad-free episodes when you subscribe to our Premium Feed. NEW TO THE SHOW? Get smarter about valuing businesses in just a few minutes each week through our newsletter, The Intrinsic Value Newsletter. Check out our We Study Billionaires Starter Packs. Follow our official social media accounts: X (Twitter) | LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook | TikTok. Browse through all our episodes (complete with transcripts) here. Try our tool for picking stock winners and managing our portfolios: TIP Finance Tool. Enjoy exclusive perks from our favorite Apps and Services. Learn how to better start, manage, and grow your business with the best business podcasts. SPONSORS Support our free podcast by supporting our sponsors: Hardblock Found SimpleMining CFI Education Netsuite Unchained The Bitcoin Way Vanta Shopify Fintool Onramp TurboTax Vanta Fundrise HELP US OUT! Help us reach new listeners by leaving us a rating and review on Spotify! It takes less than 30 seconds, and really helps our show grow, which allows us to bring on even better guests for you all! Thank you – we really appreciate it! Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://theinvestorspodcastnetwork.supportingcast.fm

In this week's episode of The Queer Quest Podcast, Christiano shares a podcast episode from the Be Alive podcast where he was interviewed.Christiano discusses his journey from a high-figure corporate career in Australia to becoming a transformational coach for the queer community. The conversation covers Christiano's personal experiences with bullying, coming out as gay, and overcoming substance abuse, as well as the formation of his movement, Queer Quest.He also shares insights on journaling and self-acceptance, emphasizing the importance of self-awareness, self-worth, self-confidence, and self-care. The episode underscores the power of community, leadership, and radical self-acceptance in personal growth.To check out Queer Quest PRO visit https://courses.queerquest.vip/queer-quest-pro/Check it out and don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe so someone else in the queer community who needs it can see this video.

Toda sexta-feira a partir das 21:00, o canal do YouTube "Rock Doido do Argoth" entrevista bandas e músicos ligados a cena Rock/Metal do nosso país, sempre em um papo descontraído e cheio de informações para você.Apresentado por Argoth Rodrigues, o conteúdo dinâmico e acessível rende aos espectadores boas doses de entretenimento e também diversão.Neste segundo EP a entrevista foi com o músico Christiano Guerra da banda "Spectrummm".Gostou? Curta e compartilhe!Pesquise "Rock Doido do Argoth" nas redes sociais e fique ligado nos mais variados conteúdos semanais.Todos os direitos reservados ao canal "Rock Doido do Argoth", favor não reproduzir o conteúdo sem prévia autorização.

This week on 'The Queer Quest Podcast', host Christiano Green shares his brand new webinar 'How to Love Your Queer Self Unapologetically Without the Fears of Society's Judgments' with the queer community. Christiano runs this webinar live every few weeks and there are countless questions as to if there would be a replay available so Christiano has made that wish a possibility and shares the full webinar for his amazing followers. In the 'How to Love Your Queer Self Unapologetically Without the Fears of Society's Judgments' webinar you will uncover the 3 secrets of queer excellence: 1. How Generic Personal Development is Failing You: Discover the Queer-Centric Approach That Transforms Lives 2. How Fear Is a Sign You're On the Right Path: How to Embrace It and Move Forward 3. How Waiting for the ‘Right Moment' is Stopping You: Why Now is the Time to Start Your Queer Quest If you're curious to find out how queer-centric personal development can help you further on your journey then this episode is for you. Check out Queer Quest PRO today here: https://courses.queerquest.vip/queer-quest-pro

It's been a big year 2024, so come join the producers Caitlin and Rio as they recount some of the best moments of the year and share some behind-the-scenes information you won't hear anywhere else! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Dużym sukcesem zakończył się mecz Polski z Portugalią. Nasi zawodnicy zrobili sobie fotkę z Christiano Ronaldo. Nie jest łatwo o zdjęcie z Ronaldem. Bo jak jego drużyna przegra to jest zły, i z nikim nie rozmawia. Gdyby Polska wygrała z Portugalią, a Christiano nie strzeliłby gola, to byłby zły i nie dałby sobie zrobić fotki, a tak to… jest focisze. Można oprawić, powiesić na ścianie w stołowym. Tak, nasi piłkarze nie są takim ofiarami, jak się o nich po meczu mówi. Lewandowski nie przyjechał na zgrupowanie, bo on już ma zdjęcie z Ronaldo. Poza tym Robert ma dobre plecy. I plecy Lewandowskiego wyczuły jaki będzie wynik meczu i doradziły Lewemu niewyjazd. Lewy, powiedziały plecy. Co? Jajo. Ogarnij uwarunkowania. Takich pleców nie kupisz za pieniądze. Niektórzy byli kadrowicze i publicyści, komentując foty naszych z Ronaldo, mówią coś o braku honoru, o opadaniu rąk, o braku złości sportowej. Ale o co chodzi? Przegrali to przegrali. Co mieli popełnić honorowe sudoku?

While Christian is away sick, we're going through some of our favourite bits from the show so far!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

While Christian is away sick, we're going through some of our favourite bits from the show so far!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this week's episode of The Queer Quest Podcast, host Christiano Green talks about the tragic loss of one of his queer friends who passed away recently from a drug overdose. The tragedy hit hard for Christiano for a number of reasons and the main topic of discussion was how easily this could have been him and how these tragic stories are sadly not as rare as they should be. Come join the conversation to the end and if you're struggling then don't be afraid to reach out to someone as they just might be able to help you.

In this episode of ClassHorrorCast, we sit down with Cristiano Crawford, the visionary behind the UK's renowned Psychopath Scream Park.From teaching soccer in the States to running nightclubs and events back in the UK, Cristiano's journey is nothing short of extraordinary.We explore how his diverse experiences led to the creation of one of the biggest and most terrifying haunt attractions in the country. Cristiano opens up about the behind-the-scenes work involved in staging such a massive event, the creative inspirations behind the scares, and some of his all-time favourite moments from past attractions.He also shares valuable insights on the importance of being true to yourself, following your passions, and chasing your dreams, no matter where they lead you.Get ready for an in-depth conversation with the mind behind the screams!If you enjoyed this - Check out my other content here - https://linktr.ee/FirstClassHorrorCheck out more from PsychoPath here - https://www.psycho-path.co.uk/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/classhorrorcast--4295531/support.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Conflating value alignment and intent alignment is causing confusion, published by Seth Herd on September 5, 2024 on The AI Alignment Forum. Submitted to the Alignment Forum. Contains more technical jargon than usual. Epistemic status: I think something like this confusion is happening often. I'm not saying these are the only differences in what people mean by "AGI alignment". Summary: Value alignment is better but probably harder to achieve than personal intent alignment to the short-term wants of some person(s). Different groups and people tend to primarily address one of these alignment targets when they discuss alignment. Confusion abounds. One important confusion stems from an assumption that the type of AI defines the alignment target: strong goal-directed AGI must be value aligned or misaligned, while personal intent alignment is only viable for relatively weak AI. I think this assumption is important but false. While value alignment is categorically better, intent alignment seems easier, safer, and more appealing in the short term, so AGI project leaders are likely to try it.[1] Overview Clarifying what people mean by alignment should dispel some illusory disagreement, and clarify alignment theory and predictions of AGI outcomes. Caption: Venn diagram of three types of alignment targets. Value alignment and Personal intent alignment are both subsets of Evan Hubinger's definition of intent alignment: AGI aligned with human intent in the broadest sense. Prosaic alignment work usually seems to be addressing a target somewhere in the neighborhood of personal intent alignment (following instructions or doing what this person wants now), while agent foundations and other conceptual alignment work usually seems to be addressing value alignment. Those two clusters have different strengths and weaknesses as alignment targets, so lumping them together produces confusion. People mean different things when they say alignment. Some are mostly thinking about value alignment (VA): creating sovereign AGI that has values close enough to humans' for our liking. Others are talking about making AGI that is corrigible (in the Christiano or Harms sense)[2] or follows instructions from its designated principal human(s). I'm going to use the term personal intent alignment (PIA) until someone has a better term for that type of alignment target. Different arguments and intuitions apply to these two alignment goals, so talking about them without differentiation is creating illusory disagreements. Value alignment is better almost by definition, but personal intent alignment seems to avoid some of the biggest difficulties of value alignment. Max Harms' recent sequence on corrigibility as a singular target (CAST) gives both a nice summary and detailed arguments. We do not need us to point to or define values, just short term preferences or instructions. The principal advantage is that an AGI that follows instructions can be used as a collaborator in improving its alignment over time; you don't need to get it exactly right on the first try. This is more helpful in slower and more continuous takeoffs. This means that PI alignment has a larger basin of attraction than value alignment does.[3] Most people who think alignment is fairly achievable seem to be thinking of PIA, while critics often respond thinking of value alignment. It would help to be explicit. PIA is probably easier and more likely than full VA for our first stabs at AGI, but there are reasons to wonder if it's adequate for real success. In particular, there are intuitions and arguments that PIA doesn't address the real problem of AGI alignment. I think PIA does address the real problem, but in a non-obvious and counterintuitive way. Another unstated divide There's another important clustering around these two conceptions of al...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Conflating value alignment and intent alignment is causing confusion, published by Seth Herd on September 5, 2024 on LessWrong. Submitted to the Alignment Forum. Contains more technical jargon than usual. Epistemic status: I think something like this confusion is happening often. I'm not saying these are the only differences in what people mean by "AGI alignment". Summary: Value alignment is better but probably harder to achieve than personal intent alignment to the short-term wants of some person(s). Different groups and people tend to primarily address one of these alignment targets when they discuss alignment. Confusion abounds. One important confusion stems from an assumption that the type of AI defines the alignment target: strong goal-directed AGI must be value aligned or misaligned, while personal intent alignment is only viable for relatively weak AI. I think this assumption is important but false. While value alignment is categorically better, intent alignment seems easier, safer, and more appealing in the short term, so AGI project leaders are likely to try it.[1] Overview Clarifying what people mean by alignment should dispel some illusory disagreement, and clarify alignment theory and predictions of AGI outcomes. Caption: Venn diagram of three types of alignment targets. Value alignment and Personal intent alignment are both subsets of Evan Hubinger's definition of intent alignment: AGI aligned with human intent in the broadest sense. Prosaic alignment work usually seems to be addressing a target somewhere in the neighborhood of personal intent alignment (following instructions or doing what this person wants now), while agent foundations and other conceptual alignment work usually seems to be addressing value alignment. Those two clusters have different strengths and weaknesses as alignment targets, so lumping them together produces confusion. People mean different things when they say alignment. Some are mostly thinking about value alignment (VA): creating sovereign AGI that has values close enough to humans' for our liking. Others are talking about making AGI that is corrigible (in the Christiano or Harms sense)[2] or follows instructions from its designated principal human(s). I'm going to use the term personal intent alignment (PIA) until someone has a better term for that type of alignment target. Different arguments and intuitions apply to these two alignment goals, so talking about them without differentiation is creating illusory disagreements. Value alignment is better almost by definition, but personal intent alignment seems to avoid some of the biggest difficulties of value alignment. Max Harms' recent sequence on corrigibility as a singular target (CAST) gives both a nice summary and detailed arguments. We do not need us to point to or define values, just short term preferences or instructions. The principal advantage is that an AGI that follows instructions can be used as a collaborator in improving its alignment over time; you don't need to get it exactly right on the first try. This is more helpful in slower and more continuous takeoffs. This means that PI alignment has a larger basin of attraction than value alignment does.[3] Most people who think alignment is fairly achievable seem to be thinking of PIA, while critics often respond thinking of value alignment. It would help to be explicit. PIA is probably easier and more likely than full VA for our first stabs at AGI, but there are reasons to wonder if it's adequate for real success. In particular, there are intuitions and arguments that PIA doesn't address the real problem of AGI alignment. I think PIA does address the real problem, but in a non-obvious and counterintuitive way. Another unstated divide There's another important clustering around these two conceptions of alignment. Peop...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Am I confused about the "malign universal prior" argument?, published by nostalgebraist on August 28, 2024 on LessWrong. In a 2016 blog post, Paul Christiano argued that the universal prior (hereafter "UP") may be "malign." His argument has received a lot of follow-up discussion, e.g. in Mark Xu's The Solomonoff Prior is Malign Charlie Steiner's The Solomonoff prior is malign. It's not a big deal. among other posts. This argument never made sense to me. The reason it doesn't make sense to me is pretty simple, but I haven't seen it mentioned explicitly in any of the ensuing discussion. This leaves me feeling like either I am misunderstanding the argument in a pretty fundamental way, or that there is a problem with the argument that has gotten little attention from the argument's critics (in which case I don't understand why). I would like to know which of these is the case, and correct my misunderstanding if it exists, hence this post. (Note: In 2018 I wrote a comment on the original post where I tried to state one of my objections to my argument, though I don't feel I expressed myself especially well there.) UP-using "universes" and simulatable "universes" The argument for malignity involves reasoning beings, instantiated in Turing machines (TMs), which try to influence the content of the UP in order to affect other beings who are making decisions using the UP. Famously, the UP is uncomputable. This means the TMs (and reasoning beings inside the TMs) will not be able to use[1] the UP themselves, or simulate anyone else using the UP. At least not if we take "using the UP" in a strict and literal sense. Thus, I am unsure how to interpret claims (which are common in presentations of the argument) about TMs "searching for universes where the UP is used" or the like. For example, from Mark Xu's "The Solomonoff Prior is Malign": In particular, this suggests a good strategy for consequentialists: find a universe that is using a version of the Solomonoff prior that has a very short description of the particular universe the consequentialists find themselves in. Or, from Christiano's original post: So the first step is getting our foot in the door - having control over the parts of the universal prior that are being used to make important decisions. This means looking across the universes we care about, and searching for spots within those universe where someone is using the universal prior to make important decisions. In particular, we want to find places where someone is using a version of the universal prior that puts a lot of mass on the particular universe that we are living in, because those are the places where we have the most leverage. Then the strategy is to implement a distribution over all of those spots, weighted by something like their importance to us (times the fraction of mass they give to the particular universe we are in and the particular channel we are using). That is, we pick one of those spots at random and then read off our subjective distribution over the sequence of bits that will be observed at that spot (which is likely to involve running actual simulations). What exactly are these "universes" that are being searched over? We have two options: 1. They are not computable universes. They permit hypercomputation that can leverage the "actual" UP, in its full uncomputable glory, without approximation. 2. They are computible universes. Thus the UP cannot be used in them. But maybe there is some computible thing that resembles or approximates the UP, and gets used in these universes. Option 1 seems hard to square with the talk about TMs "searching for" universes or "simulating" universes. A TM can't do such things to the universes of option 1. Hence, the argument is presumably about option 2. That is, although we are trying to reason about the content of...

Join Christiano Green in this deeply personal and informative solo episode of The Queer Quest Podcast. Christiano shares his journey with substance abuse, shedding light on the challenges and triumphs he faced along the way. Dive into the latest statistics revealing the disproportionate impact of substance abuse on the LGBTQIA+ community and understand the crucial differences between substance abuse and addiction. We'll explore the societal pressures, mental health issues, and unique stressors that contribute to higher rates of substance use in the queer community. Learn about the historical context, the role of intersectionality, and how art and expression can aid in recovery. Discover the ongoing advocacy efforts and resources available for those in need. Whether you're personally affected by substance abuse, know someone who is, or simply want to be an ally, this episode is packed with insights and encouragement. Tune in for a heartfelt discussion that aims to foster understanding, hope, and community support.

Join us on this profound episode of The Queer Quest Podcast as Christiano Green delves into the spiritual dimensions of the queer coming out experience. In "Embracing Your Truth: Spiritual Insights on the Queer Coming Out Journey," Christiano shares his personal narrative and unpacks the transformative power of embracing one's queer identity. This episode is an intimate exploration of the trials and triumphs on the path to spiritual self-realization within the queer community. What You'll Discover: Personal Reflections: Hear Christiano recount the pivotal moments of his own coming out journey, and the spiritual awakening that followed. Overcoming Challenges: Learn how facing societal and personal hurdles can catalyze profound spiritual growth and resilience. Healing and Forgiveness: Gain insights into the healing practices that can mend the spiritual scars left by rejection and misunderstanding. Community Impact: Discover the crucial role that a supportive queer community plays in individual spiritual journeys. Practical Spiritual Practices: Get actionable advice on practices that foster spiritual well-being and connection to one's true self. This episode is not just a narrative but a resource, offering guidance and support to those navigating their own coming out journey, or anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of spiritual growth in the queer context. Whether you're seeking solace, inspiration, or companionship on your journey, this conversation aims to light the way. Tune in and let Christiano help you navigate the beautiful, complex journey of spiritual and personal discovery. Don't forget to subscribe and share this episode with anyone who might find it enlightening! --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/queer-quest/message

Christian O'Connell – the radio presenter who has opened up about his crippling panic attacks, life changing therapy and the danger zone of men's mental health – shares his three crisis comforts.  Full episode https://www.crisiswhatcrisis.com/podcasts/christian-oconnell-on-panic-attacks-a-professional-unravelling-and-how-story-telling-saved-him/  Links    https://christianoconnell.com/  Stream/buy ‘Allies' by Some Velvet Morning: https://ampl.ink/qp6bm    Some Velvet Morning Website: www.somevelvetmorning.co.uk      Your Daily Practice: Sleep by Myndstream: https://open.spotify.com/track/5OX9XgJufFz9g63o2Dv2i5?si=b2f9397c92084682    Host – Andy Coulson   CWC team: Jane Sankey, Louise Difford, Mabel Pickering   With special thanks to Ioana Barbu and the brilliant people at Global      For all PR and guest approaches please contact – podcast@coulsonpartners.com

Radio presenter Christian O'Connell talks to Andy about his crippling panic attacks, life changing therapy and the danger zone of men's mental health. As a young teenager Christian was hit with anxiety - beginning, as he puts it ‘as a whisper' - until it forced him off air … leading him to leave Britain's most popular breakfast show and risk it all on a life in Australia.  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------From working as a dustman, being fired from hospital radio and working in telesales - Christian O'Connell went on to host the Number 1 breakfast show on Absolute Radio and pick up 11 Sony Radio Academy Gold Awards. He was at the peak of his career, yet behind the scenes he was at his lowest point.  In 2018, after suffering a series of acute panic attacks, he finally sought help with the support of his wife, and then took a huge risk and uprooted his family to the other side of the world. This move to Australia however was met with more challenges of its own as Christian struggled to be accepted.  He talks candidly and with real emotion about how he had to build a new life, take care of his family and reach another peak in his career. Christian is arguably a national treasure both here and Down Under – his is a story of remarkable resilience and one we can all learn from.  Links    https://christianoconnell.com/  Stream/buy ‘Allies' by Some Velvet Morning: https://ampl.ink/qp6bm    Some Velvet Morning Website: www.somevelvetmorning.co.uk      Your Daily Practice: Sleep by Myndstream: https://open.spotify.com/track/5OX9XgJufFz9g63o2Dv2i5?si=b2f9397c92084682    Host – Andy Coulson   CWC team: Jane Sankey, Louise Difford, Mabel Pickering   With special thanks to Ioana Barbu and the brilliant people at Global      For all PR and guest approaches please contact – podcast@coulsonpartners.com   

In this solo episode of 'The Queer Quest Podcast,' join Christiano Green as they dive deep into the heart and soul of Queer Quest.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: My AI Model Delta Compared To Christiano, published by johnswentworth on June 12, 2024 on LessWrong. Preamble: Delta vs Crux This section is redundant if you already read My AI Model Delta Compared To Yudkowsky. I don't natively think in terms of cruxes. But there's a similar concept which is more natural for me, which I'll call a delta. Imagine that you and I each model the world (or some part of it) as implementing some program. Very oversimplified example: if I learn that e.g. it's cloudy today, that means the "weather" variable in my program at a particular time[1] takes on the value "cloudy". Now, suppose your program and my program are exactly the same, except that somewhere in there I think a certain parameter has value 5 and you think it has value 0.3. Even though our programs differ in only that one little spot, we might still expect very different values of lots of variables during execution - in other words, we might have very different beliefs about lots of stuff in the world. If your model and my model differ in that way, and we're trying to discuss our different beliefs, then the obvious useful thing-to-do is figure out where that one-parameter difference is. That's a delta: one or a few relatively "small"/local differences in belief, which when propagated through our models account for most of the differences in our beliefs. For those familiar with Pearl-style causal models: think of a delta as one or a few do() operations which suffice to make my model basically match somebody else's model, or vice versa. This post is about my current best guesses at the delta between my AI models and Paul Christiano's AI models. When I apply the delta outlined here to my models, and propagate the implications, my models mostly look like Paul's as far as I can tell. That said, note that this is not an attempt to pass Paul's Intellectual Turing Test; I'll still be using my own usual frames. My AI Model Delta Compared To Christiano Best guess: Paul thinks that verifying solutions to problems is generally "easy" in some sense. He's sometimes summarized this as " verification is easier than generation", but I think his underlying intuition is somewhat stronger than that. What do my models look like if I propagate that delta? Well, it implies that delegation is fundamentally viable in some deep, general sense. That propagates into a huge difference in worldviews. Like, I walk around my house and look at all the random goods I've paid for - the keyboard and monitor I'm using right now, a stack of books, a tupperware, waterbottle, flip-flops, carpet, desk and chair, refrigerator, sink, etc. Under my models, if I pick one of these objects at random and do a deep dive researching that object, it will usually turn out to be bad in ways which were either nonobvious or nonsalient to me, but unambiguously make my life worse and would unambiguously have been worth-to-me the cost to make better. But because the badness is nonobvious/nonsalient, it doesn't influence my decision-to-buy, and therefore companies producing the good are incentivized not to spend the effort to make it better. It's a failure of ease of verification: because I don't know what to pay attention to, I can't easily notice the ways in which the product is bad. (For a more game-theoretic angle, see When Hindsight Isn't 20/20.) On (my model of) Paul's worldview, that sort of thing is rare; at most it's the exception to the rule. On my worldview, it's the norm for most goods most of the time. See e.g. the whole air conditioner episode for us debating the badness of single-hose portable air conditioners specifically, along with a large sidebar on the badness of portable air conditioner energy ratings. How does the ease-of-verification delta propagate to AI? Well, most obviously, Paul expects AI to go well mostly via ...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: My AI Model Delta Compared To Yudkowsky, published by johnswentworth on June 10, 2024 on LessWrong. Preamble: Delta vs Crux I don't natively think in terms of cruxes. But there's a similar concept which is more natural for me, which I'll call a delta. Imagine that you and I each model the world (or some part of it) as implementing some program. Very oversimplified example: if I learn that e.g. it's cloudy today, that means the "weather" variable in my program at a particular time[1] takes on the value "cloudy". Now, suppose your program and my program are exactly the same, except that somewhere in there I think a certain parameter has value 5 and you think it has value 0.3. Even though our programs differ in only that one little spot, we might still expect very different values of lots of variables during execution - in other words, we might have very different beliefs about lots of stuff in the world. If your model and my model differ in that way, and we're trying to discuss our different beliefs, then the obvious useful thing-to-do is figure out where that one-parameter difference is. That's a delta: one or a few relatively "small"/local differences in belief, which when propagated through our models account for most of the differences in our beliefs. For those familiar with Pearl-style causal models: think of a delta as one or a few do() operations which suffice to make my model basically match somebody else's model, or vice versa. This post is about my current best guesses at the delta between my AI models and Yudkowsky's AI models. When I apply the delta outlined here to my models, and propagate the implications, my models basically look like Yukowsky's as far as I can tell. This post might turn into a sequence if there's interest; I already have another one written for Christiano, and people are welcome to suggest others they'd be interested in. My AI Model Delta Compared To Yudkowsky Best guess: Eliezer basically rejects the natural abstraction hypothesis. He mostly expects AI to use internal ontologies fundamentally alien to the ontologies of humans, at least in the places which matter. Lethality #33 lays it out succinctly: 33. The AI does not think like you do, the AI doesn't have thoughts built up from the same concepts you use, it is utterly alien on a staggering scale. Nobody knows what the hell GPT-3 is thinking, not only because the matrices are opaque, but because the stuff within that opaque container is, very likely, incredibly alien - nothing that would translate well into comprehensible human thinking, even if we could see past the giant wall of floating-point numbers to what lay behind. What do my models look like if I propagate that delta? In worlds where natural abstraction basically fails, we are thoroughly and utterly fucked, and a 99% probability of doom strikes me as entirely reasonable and justified. Here's one oversimplified doom argument/story in a world where natural abstraction fails hard: 1. Humanity is going to build superhuman goal-optimizing agents. ('Cause, like, obviously somebody's going to do that, there's no shortage of capabilities researchers loudly advertising that they're aiming to do that exact thing.) These will be so vastly more powerful than humans that we have basically-zero bargaining power except insofar as AIs are aligned to our interests. 2. We're assuming natural abstraction basically fails, so those AI systems will have fundamentally alien internal ontologies. For purposes of this overcompressed version of the argument, we'll assume a very extreme failure of natural abstraction, such that human concepts cannot be faithfully and robustly translated into the system's internal ontology at all. (For instance, maybe a faithful and robust translation would be so long in the system's "internal language" that the transla...

This week we have a father & daughter combo with Christiano and Francisca Van Zeller. The Van Zellers left the Netherlands for political and religious reasons, came to Portugal and settled in Porto as port wine merchants, and have been bound to the Douro and the production of wines since 1620. Cristiano and Francisca are nowadays at the wheel of Van Zellers & Co., a family business that has been going on for 15 generations. Listen in to learn what they love about Portuguese wines, especially Port Wine, and enjoy living the simple life in the Douro region of Portugal.FOLLOW OUR GUESTSVan Zellers & Co WebsiteVan Zellers & Co on InstagramVan Zellers & Co on FacebookVan Zellers & Co on LinkedInABOUT PORTUGAL THE SIMPLE LIFE PODCAST:   "Portugal - The simple life”, an insider's perspective to Portugal.  We already know about Portugal's fantastic weather, food and people. In this podcast, we go deeper to meet the people who make this country so wonderful.Dylan, who has made his life in Portugal, shares an insider's perspective on what makes Portugal the unique, beautiful and fantastic country it is. Join him and his guests weekly as they shed light on the incredible people, culture, history and lifestyle that make Portugal so appealing. A country where everyone feels like they belong.    Don't forget to subscribe to our Podcast to receive more stories about living and moving to Portugal!   SPONSOR:Portugal Realty, a Leisure Launch group company, sponsors this episode. 

Tune in to a very special episode of 'The Queer Quest Podcast,' where we bring you an exclusive crossover from the Thrive Network. In this poignant discussion, Christiano Green, our cherished host, sits down with Andro to explore the transformative and healing power of love within the queer community.

In an especially intimate and inspiring episode of 'The Queer Quest Podcast,' we take a moment to pause, reflect, and envision the future we desire and deserve as queer individuals.

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: AI #60: Oh the Humanity, published by Zvi on April 18, 2024 on LessWrong. Many things this week did not go as planned. Humane AI premiered its AI pin. Reviewers noticed it was, at best, not ready. Devin turns out to have not been entirely forthright with its demos. OpenAI fired two employees who had been on its superalignment team, Leopold Aschenbrenner and Pavel Izmailov for allegedly leaking information, and also more troubliningly lost Daniel Kokotajlo, who expects AGI very soon, does not expect it to by default go well, and says he quit 'due to losing confidence that [OpenAI] would behave responsibly around the time of AGI.' That's not good. Nor is the Gab system prompt, although that is not a surprise. And several more. On the plus side, my 80,000 Hours podcast finally saw the light of day, and Ezra Klein had an excellent (although troubling) podcast with Dario Amodei. And we got the usual mix of incremental useful improvements and other nice touches. Table of Contents Introduction. Table of Contents. Language Models Offer Mundane Utility. Ask all your stupid questions. Language Models Don't Offer Mundane Utility. That won't stop social media. Oh the Humanity. It will, however, stop the Humane AI pin, at least for now. GPT-4 Real This Time. The new version continues to look slightly better. Fun With Image Generation. There is remarkably little porn of it. Deepfaketown and Botpocalypse Soon. Audio plus face equals talking head. Devin in the Details. To what extent was the Devin demo a fake? Another Supposed System Prompt. The gift of Gab. Not what we wanted. They Took Our Jobs. A model of firm employment as a function of productivity. Introducing. The quest to make context no longer be that which is scarce. In Other AI News. Respecting and disrespecting the rules of the game. Quiet Speculations. Spending some time wondering whether you should. The Quest for Sane Regulations. Senators get serious, Christiano is appointed. The Week in Audio. I spend 3.5 of my 80,000 hours, and several more. Rhetorical Innovation. Words that do not on reflection bring comfort. Don't Be That Guy. Also known as the only law of morality. Aligning a Smarter Than Human Intelligence is Difficult. Subproblems anyone? Please Speak Directly Into the Microphone. Thanks, everyone. People Are Worried About AI Killing Everyone. They are no longer at OpenAI. Other People Are Not As Worried About AI Killing Everyone. Mundane visions. The Lighter Side. The art of fixing it. Language Models Offer Mundane Utility The best use of LLMs continues to be 'ask stupid questions.' Ashwin Sharma: reading zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance changed the way I looked at the inner workings of my mind. It was like unlocking a secret level of a video game. what are you reading today? Tom Crean: Tried to read Zen… as a teenager and felt disoriented by it. I kept wondering who "Phaedrus" was. But I liked the general atmosphere of freedom. The philosophy went over my head. Now I'm reading Akenfield by Ronald Blythe. A portrait of a Suffolk Village in the 1960s. Ashwin Sharma: use GPT to help analyse the sections you're stuck on. Seriously, try it again and i promise you it'll be worth it. Joe Weisenthal: I've found this to be a great ChatGPT use case. Understanding terms in context while I'm reading. When I was a kid, my dad told me when reading to immediately stop and grab a dictionary every time I got to a word I didn't understand. Not really feasible. But AI solves this well. It's still a bit cumbersome, because with kindle or physical, no quick way to copy/paste a section into an AI or just ask the book what it means. But even with those hurdles, I've found the tools to be a great reading augment. Patrick McKenzie: It's surprisingly reliable to just point phone camera at screen and then ask questions about t...

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: Paul Christiano named as US AI Safety Institute Head of AI Safety, published by Joel Burget on April 16, 2024 on LessWrong. U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo announced today additional members of the executive leadership team of the U.S. AI Safety Institute (AISI), which is housed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Raimondo named Paul Christiano as Head of AI Safety, Adam Russell as Chief Vision Officer, Mara Campbell as Acting Chief Operating Officer and Chief of Staff, Rob Reich as Senior Advisor, and Mark Latonero as Head of International Engagement. They will join AISI Director Elizabeth Kelly and Chief Technology Officer Elham Tabassi, who were announced in February. The AISI was established within NIST at the direction of President Biden, including to support the responsibilities assigned to the Department of Commerce under the President's landmark Executive Order. Paul Christiano, Head of AI Safety, will design and conduct tests of frontier AI models, focusing on model evaluations for capabilities of national security concern. Christiano will also contribute guidance on conducting these evaluations, as well as on the implementation of risk mitigations to enhance frontier model safety and security. Christiano founded the Alignment Research Center, a non-profit research organization that seeks to align future machine learning systems with human interests by furthering theoretical research. He also launched a leading initiative to conduct third-party evaluations of frontier models, now housed at Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR). He previously ran the language model alignment team at OpenAI, where he pioneered work on reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), a foundational technical AI safety technique. He holds a PhD in computer science from the University of California, Berkeley, and a B.S. in mathematics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org

Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. This is: U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo Announces Expansion of U.S. AI Safety Institute Leadership Team [and Paul Christiano update], published by Phib on April 16, 2024 on The Effective Altruism Forum. U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo announced today additional members of the executive leadership team of the U.S. AI Safety Institute (AISI), which is housed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Raimondo named Paul Christiano as Head of AI Safety, Adam Russell as Chief Vision Officer, Mara Campbell as Acting Chief Operating Officer and Chief of Staff, Rob Reich as Senior Advisor, and Mark Latonero as Head of International Engagement. They will join AISI Director Elizabeth Kelly and Chief Technology Officer Elham Tabassi, who were announced in February. The AISI was established within NIST at the direction of President Biden, including to support the responsibilities assigned to the Department of Commerce under the President's landmark Executive Order. ... Paul Christiano, Head of AI Safety, will design and conduct tests of frontier AI models, focusing on model evaluations for capabilities of national security concern. Christiano will also contribute guidance on conducting these evaluations, as well as on the implementation of risk mitigations to enhance frontier model safety and security. Christiano founded the Alignment Research Center, a non-profit research organization that seeks to align future machine learning systems with human interests by furthering theoretical research. He also launched a leading initiative to conduct third-party evaluations of frontier models, now housed at Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR). He previously ran the language model alignment team at OpenAI, where he pioneered work on reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), a foundational technical AI safety technique. He holds a PhD in computer science from the University of California, Berkeley, and a B.S. in mathematics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Following up from previous news post: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/9QLJgRMmnD6adzvAE/nist-staffers-revolt-against-expected-appointment-of Thanks for listening. To help us out with The Nonlinear Library or to learn more, please visit nonlinear.org

While Christian is away on his break, we're going through some of our favourite bits from the show so far.  We can't go past some of these calls we got off the back of Christian's story about coming to this wife's rescue when she ran out of fuel. Do you do run the fuel gauntlet? Got a funny story about running out of petrol? Email us christian@christianoconnell.com.au  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

While Christian is away on his break, we're going through some of our favourite bits from the show so far! Like this heated debate about CROCS. Jack yearns for the day when these plastic shoes will be widely accepted in society. Have your say! Email us at: christian@christianoconnell.com.auSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.