Contractual agreement not to disclose specified information
POPULARITY
32 episodes with non disclosure agreements
4 episodes with non disclosure agreements
4 episodes with non disclosure agreements
2 episodes with non disclosure agreements
2 episodes with non disclosure agreements
2 episodes with non disclosure agreements
2 episodes with non disclosure agreements
2 episodes with non disclosure agreements
2 episodes with non disclosure agreements
An NDA, or Non-Disclosure Agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties.NDAs are used for various reasons:Protecting Intellectual Property: Businesses often use NDAs to safeguard their trade secrets, proprietary information, or other sensitive data from being disclosed to competitors or the public.Maintaining Confidentiality: In certain business dealings, such as partnerships, mergers, or acquisitions, sensitive information may be shared between parties. NDAs ensure that this information remains confidential and is not used for purposes other than what is agreed upon.Facilitating Collaboration: When multiple parties collaborate on a project, they may need to share sensitive information to achieve their goals. NDAs help establish trust among collaborators by legally binding them to maintain confidentiality.Preventing Information Leakage: Employees, contractors, or consultants often have access to sensitive information about a company's operations, products, or plans. NDAs help prevent them from disclosing this information to unauthorized individuals or entities.In this episode, we get a look at what a standard NPA in the world of Diddy consists of.(commercial at 10:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.16.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is a legal contract used to protect sensitive and confidential information shared between parties. It creates a confidential relationship between the parties to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets.In the context of relationships, particularly those involving rich and famous individuals, NDAs are often used to maintain privacy and confidentiality. When celebrities or wealthy individuals engage in personal relationships, they may use NDAs to prevent their partners from disclosing any details of the relationship, including intimate details, personal conversations, financial information, or other sensitive matters.The NDA typically outlines what information is considered confidential, the obligations of both parties to maintain confidentiality, the duration of the agreement, and the consequences of breaching the agreement, which may include legal action and financial penalties.Rich and famous individuals may utilize NDAs in their personal relationships for several reasons:Privacy Protection: Celebrities and wealthy individuals often value their privacy and may want to prevent any details of their personal lives from becoming public knowledge.Protecting Reputation: NDAs can help protect the reputation of both parties involved by preventing potentially damaging information from being disclosed.Preserving Business Interests: In some cases, personal relationships may involve discussions about business ventures or proprietary information. NDAs can ensure that such information remains confidential.However, it's important to note that NDAs have limitations, especially when it comes to legal investigations by law enforcement:Limited Scope: NDAs cannot be used to prevent someone from reporting illegal activity to law enforcement. If the information covered by the NDA is related to criminal activity, the NDA may not hold up in court.Public Interest Exception: In cases where public safety or the public interest is at stake, courts may invalidate NDAs or allow individuals to disclose information protected by the agreement.Evidence in Legal Proceedings: NDAs may not prevent someone from disclosing information if subpoenaed by a court or required to testify in a legal proceeding.In this episode, we learn why NDA's are worth less than the paper they are printed on when it comes to law enforcement, and how previously signed NDA's might come back to haunt Diddy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy accusers can't be silenced by NDAs in trafficking probe: experts | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is a legal contract used to protect sensitive and confidential information shared between parties. It creates a confidential relationship between the parties to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets.In the context of relationships, particularly those involving rich and famous individuals, NDAs are often used to maintain privacy and confidentiality. When celebrities or wealthy individuals engage in personal relationships, they may use NDAs to prevent their partners from disclosing any details of the relationship, including intimate details, personal conversations, financial information, or other sensitive matters.The NDA typically outlines what information is considered confidential, the obligations of both parties to maintain confidentiality, the duration of the agreement, and the consequences of breaching the agreement, which may include legal action and financial penalties.Rich and famous individuals may utilize NDAs in their personal relationships for several reasons:Privacy Protection: Celebrities and wealthy individuals often value their privacy and may want to prevent any details of their personal lives from becoming public knowledge.Protecting Reputation: NDAs can help protect the reputation of both parties involved by preventing potentially damaging information from being disclosed.Preserving Business Interests: In some cases, personal relationships may involve discussions about business ventures or proprietary information. NDAs can ensure that such information remains confidential.However, it's important to note that NDAs have limitations, especially when it comes to legal investigations by law enforcement:Limited Scope: NDAs cannot be used to prevent someone from reporting illegal activity to law enforcement. If the information covered by the NDA is related to criminal activity, the NDA may not hold up in court.Public Interest Exception: In cases where public safety or the public interest is at stake, courts may invalidate NDAs or allow individuals to disclose information protected by the agreement.Evidence in Legal Proceedings: NDAs may not prevent someone from disclosing information if subpoenaed by a court or required to testify in a legal proceeding.In this episode, we learn why NDA's are worth less than the paper they are printed on when it comes to law enforcement, and how previously signed NDA's might come back to haunt Diddy.(commercial at 7:27)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy accusers can't be silenced by NDAs in trafficking probe: experts | Fox News
On Track - Trending Topics in Business and Law - by Haynes and Boone, LLP
In Episode 4 of Paige Against the Machine, Hayley Paige and Haynes Boone Partner Tiffany Cooke try to demystify NDAs (Non-Disclosure Agreements) and confidentiality clauses. Learn how these contracts work, what red flags to spot, including overly broad terms or "perpetuity", and how to protect your work and worth. This episode offers essential advice for employees, contractors and business owners. Discover your power to negotiate reasonable carve-outs, understand what happens if you unintentionally breach confidentiality, and gain insights into protecting your intellectual property. Learn to navigate legal pressures and ensure agreements are tailored for clarity and enforceability.
Non-Disclosure Agreements are a common part of buying RV Parks, but they have to be properly analyzed to protect your interests. In this RV Park Mastery podcast we're going to explore the concept of NDA's, what the risks are, and how to mitigate them.
Non-disclosure agreements were originally a mechanism for protecting trade secrets. But they are now increasingly used as a matter of default in settlement agreements for all kinds of civil disputes, including those related to sexual misconduct, harassment and discrimination. We speak with Julie Macfarlane of Can't Buy My Silence, a campaign to end the misuse of NDAs.
An NDA, or Non-Disclosure Agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties.NDAs are used for various reasons:Protecting Intellectual Property: Businesses often use NDAs to safeguard their trade secrets, proprietary information, or other sensitive data from being disclosed to competitors or the public.Maintaining Confidentiality: In certain business dealings, such as partnerships, mergers, or acquisitions, sensitive information may be shared between parties. NDAs ensure that this information remains confidential and is not used for purposes other than what is agreed upon.Facilitating Collaboration: When multiple parties collaborate on a project, they may need to share sensitive information to achieve their goals. NDAs help establish trust among collaborators by legally binding them to maintain confidentiality.Preventing Information Leakage: Employees, contractors, or consultants often have access to sensitive information about a company's operations, products, or plans. NDAs help prevent them from disclosing this information to unauthorized individuals or entities.In this episode, we get a look at what a standard NPA in the world of Diddy consists of.(commercial at 10:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.16.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In this episode, David Jones and Dr Naomi Murphy meet with Julie McFarlane, a prominent figure in the fight against exploitative non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and advocate for access to justice. Julie shares her insights on the challenges faced by individuals navigating the legal system, particularly those who self-represent. We discuss the implications of NDAs in workplace investigations, the importance of knowledge as power, and the need for systemic change within the legal profession. https://www.cantbuymysilence.com/ https://representingyourselfcanada.com/ https://www.amazon.co.uk/Going-Public-Survivors-Journey-Action/dp/1771134755 Key Topics Discussed: - Julie's background and her journey towards advocating for marginalized individuals. - The purpose and structure of the Canadian side of Can't Buy My Silence, focusing on educating people about NDAs. - The psychological impact of navigating the legal system, including experiences of PTSD among self-representing litigants. - The challenges faced by individuals when dealing with health authorities and legal agreements. - The importance of trauma-informed approaches in legal processes. - The role of whistleblowing lawyers and the current landscape in Canada. - Julie's personal experiences with the legal system and her advocacy work.
In this episode, David Jones and Dr Naomi Murphy meet with Julie McFarlane, a prominent figure in the fight against exploitative non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and advocate for access to justice. Julie shares her insights on the challenges faced by individuals navigating the legal system, particularly those who self-represent. We discuss the implications of NDAs in workplace investigations, the importance of knowledge as power, and the need for systemic change within the legal profession. https://www.cantbuymysilence.com/ https://representingyourselfcanada.com/ https://www.amazon.co.uk/Going-Public-Survivors-Journey-Action/dp/1771134755 Key Topics Discussed: - Julie's background and her journey towards advocating for marginalized individuals. - The purpose and structure of the Canadian side of Can't Buy My Silence, focusing on educating people about NDAs. - The psychological impact of navigating the legal system, including experiences of PTSD among self-representing litigants. - The challenges faced by individuals when dealing with health authorities and legal agreements. - The importance of trauma-informed approaches in legal processes. - The role of whistleblowing lawyers and the current landscape in Canada. - Julie's personal experiences with the legal system and her advocacy work
No NDAs Before the Investor Pitch Hello, this is Hall T. Martin with the Startup Funding Espresso -- your daily shot of startup funding and investing. In startup fundraising, the NDA comes near the end of the process, not at the beginning. An NDA stands for Non-Disclosure Agreement and requires the signatory to keep confidential any, and all information disclosed. A founder asking an investor to sign an NDA before the pitch signals to the investor that there's nothing protectable about the business. In most cases, the investor will not sign the NDA and will take a pass on the deal. A founder should give the investor basic information without an NDA. The founder should focus on the benefits of their technology and business model instead of describing exactly how it works. An example includes, our software reduces cost by 3x. There is a place for NDAs later in the process. When investors go into diligence, it's appropriate for the founder to ask the investor to sign an NDA. Other cases to use an NDA in the startup space include the following: A potential acquirer wants to license a product or technology. A potential acquirer wants to buy the company. The diligence box has employee, customer, or partner information that is sensitive. Keep the dialog on a non-confidential basis with investors so they can learn more about the business. Thank you for joining us for the Startup Funding Espresso where we help startups and investors connect for funding. Let's go startup something today. _______________________________________________________ For more episodes from Investor Connect, please visit the site at: Check out our other podcasts here: For Investors check out: For Startups check out: For eGuides check out: For upcoming Events, check out For Feedback please contact info@tencapital.group Please , share, and leave a review. Music courtesy of .
A school operator in the Tokyo suburbs required parents of newly enrolled students to submit a written pledge promising not to leak internal school information to outside parties, sources have told the Mainichi Shimbun. Musashino Higashi Gakuen is known for its inclusive education model, in which children with and without autism study together. Some parents have noted that "few places offer inclusive education for children with autism," amid growing unease about the institution's future. Episode Notes: ‘Tokyo operator of school for children with autism required nondisclosure ‘pledge' from parents: Mainichi exclusive': https://barrierfreejapan.com/2025/03/26/tokyo-operator-of-school-for-children-with-autism-required-nondisclosure-pledge-from-parents-mainichi-exclusive/ ‘The ‘Non-Disclosure Agreement' New Neurodivergent Students & Their Parents Attending ‘Inclusive' School in Tokyo May Have to Sign': https://barrierfreejapan.com/2025/03/27/the-non-disclosure-agreement-new-neurodivergent-students-their-parents-attending-inclusive-school-in-tokyo-may-have-to-sign/
Guest: Allison Field, communications consultant in Saskatoon, recently on vacation in Cancun with family
An NDA, or Non-Disclosure Agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties.NDAs are used for various reasons:Protecting Intellectual Property: Businesses often use NDAs to safeguard their trade secrets, proprietary information, or other sensitive data from being disclosed to competitors or the public.Maintaining Confidentiality: In certain business dealings, such as partnerships, mergers, or acquisitions, sensitive information may be shared between parties. NDAs ensure that this information remains confidential and is not used for purposes other than what is agreed upon.Facilitating Collaboration: When multiple parties collaborate on a project, they may need to share sensitive information to achieve their goals. NDAs help establish trust among collaborators by legally binding them to maintain confidentiality.Preventing Information Leakage: Employees, contractors, or consultants often have access to sensitive information about a company's operations, products, or plans. NDAs help prevent them from disclosing this information to unauthorized individuals or entities.In this episode, we get a look at what a standard NPA in the world of Diddy consists of.(commercial at 16:59)source:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.16.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)NDAs, or non-disclosure agreements, will not protect Sean "Diddy" Combs in his criminal trial because NDAs are primarily civil agreements designed to prevent parties from disclosing certain information publicly. However, they do not shield individuals from testifying in criminal cases. Criminal law supersedes any private agreements, as the government has a vested interest in prosecuting crimes and ensuring justice. Therefore, if someone has relevant knowledge about criminal activities, they can still be compelled to testify, even if they have signed an NDA.In the case of Cassie Ventura, although she signed an NDA as part of her settlement with Diddy, this does not prevent her from being called to testify in a criminal trial. NDAs cannot override a subpoena or prevent someone from providing testimony if it pertains to criminal conduct. The court can compel Ventura to testify about any relevant events, even if they were covered by the terms of the NDA, as the pursuit of justice in criminal cases takes precedence over any civil agreement. Thus, despite the NDA, Cassie can be legally obligated to provide testimony in the ongoing criminal proceedings against Diddy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cassie may be called to testify at Diddy trial despite signing NDA, lawyer says | Daily Mail OnlineBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Non-disclosure agreements were originally a mechanism for protecting trade secrets. But they are now increasingly used as a matter of default in settlement agreements for all kinds of civil disputes, including those related to sexual misconduct, harassment and discrimination. We speak with Julie Macfarlane of Can't Buy My Silence, a campaign to end the misuse of NDAs.
Text us your thoughts about this episode or ideas for future episodes!In this episode, we're joined by returning guests Abby Levene of Outside Magazine and Kelly Newlon of RAD Boulder. Together, we dive into the big news of Tara Dower's groundbreaking sponsorship deal with Altra, which positions her as one of the higher-paid athletes in the ultra-trail running world. Timestamps:00:30 Introduction to Tara Dower's Contract with Altra06:22 Gender Pay Inequality in Sports09:26 The Role of Non-Disclosure Agreements in Athlete Contracts13:42 Market Dynamics and Athlete Compensation16:37 The Impact of Tara's Contract on the Trail Running Community19:28 The Future of Sponsorships in Trail Running22:21 Tara Dower's Unique Position in the Sport25:36 Measuring Success for Brands and Athletes28:30 The Evolution of Altra's Brand Strategy35:28 The Evolution of Athlete Representation39:01 The Role of Agents in Ultra Trail Running50:48 The Future of Sports Reporting54:39 The Concept of a Signing Day in Trail Running56:48 Safeguarding Athlete Obligations01:01:55 Final Thoughts on Tara's ImpactPartners:Naak - use code SINGLETRACK20 at checkout on their website (https://www.naak.com/) to get 20% off your purchase.Rabbit - use code Singletrack10 at checkout on their website (https://www.runinrabbit.com/) to get 10% off your next order.Pillar Performance - use code SINGLETRACK at checkout on their website (https://pillarperformance.us/) to get 15% off your next order.deltaG Ketones - use code Singletrack20 at checkout on their website (https://www.deltagketones.com/SINGLET...) to get 20% off your next order.Additional Links:Abby Levene - Outside Mag ArticleKelly Newlon - RadBoulderFollow Finn on Instagram, Strava, Twitter, Support the show
An NDA, or Non-Disclosure Agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties.NDAs are used for various reasons:Protecting Intellectual Property: Businesses often use NDAs to safeguard their trade secrets, proprietary information, or other sensitive data from being disclosed to competitors or the public.Maintaining Confidentiality: In certain business dealings, such as partnerships, mergers, or acquisitions, sensitive information may be shared between parties. NDAs ensure that this information remains confidential and is not used for purposes other than what is agreed upon.Facilitating Collaboration: When multiple parties collaborate on a project, they may need to share sensitive information to achieve their goals. NDAs help establish trust among collaborators by legally binding them to maintain confidentiality.Preventing Information Leakage: Employees, contractors, or consultants often have access to sensitive information about a company's operations, products, or plans. NDAs help prevent them from disclosing this information to unauthorized individuals or entities.In this episode, we get a look at what a standard NPA in the world of Diddy consists of.(commercial at 16:59)source:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.16.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)NDAs, or non-disclosure agreements, will not protect Sean "Diddy" Combs in his criminal trial because NDAs are primarily civil agreements designed to prevent parties from disclosing certain information publicly. However, they do not shield individuals from testifying in criminal cases. Criminal law supersedes any private agreements, as the government has a vested interest in prosecuting crimes and ensuring justice. Therefore, if someone has relevant knowledge about criminal activities, they can still be compelled to testify, even if they have signed an NDA.In the case of Cassie Ventura, although she signed an NDA as part of her settlement with Diddy, this does not prevent her from being called to testify in a criminal trial. NDAs cannot override a subpoena or prevent someone from providing testimony if it pertains to criminal conduct. The court can compel Ventura to testify about any relevant events, even if they were covered by the terms of the NDA, as the pursuit of justice in criminal cases takes precedence over any civil agreement. Thus, despite the NDA, Cassie can be legally obligated to provide testimony in the ongoing criminal proceedings against Diddy.to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Cassie may be called to testify at Diddy trial despite signing NDA, lawyer says | Daily Mail Online
“Protect Children. Support Survivors. Protest Pete Newman's Parole!” are the opening lines readers will see when they click on the new website, protestpetesparole.com. As the September 25 parole hearing for serial child sexual abuser Peter Newman quickly approaches, survivors and advocates continue to call for support in urging the Missouri Department of Corrections Board and Parole to deny his possible release. Previously, survivors and advocates have urged concerned citizens to write letters to the parole board expressing their grievances regarding Newman's crimes. This new website reminds viewers of these instructions. It also offers viewers a way to fill out an online form to submit their letters directly to the parole board. The form includes the option to submit an editable pre-loaded statement or follow a template to craft your own. In addition to letter-writing, the website also links to a petitionagainst Newman's parole, which will be “submitted to the Missouri Parole Board as part of Newman's hearing.” Despite being sentenced to two life terms plus 30 years — a total of 90 years, with 30 counting for each life sentence — Newman is eligible for parole after serving just 15. This is the minimum portion of his sentence that must be completed, according to RSMo 217.690 which mandates that offenders serving multiple sentences totaling 45 or more years must complete at least 50% of one sentence before parole eligibility. After a hearing, the parole board typically takes eight to 12 weeks to come to a decision. If Newman's parole is denied, he will be eligible for a reconsideration hearing every one to five years until a release date is established. The new website reminds viewers that all evidence from the Sept. 25 hearing can be used in future hearings, including contributions to the petition as supporters continue to sign. Access to MinistryWatch content is free. However, we hope you will support our work with your prayers and financial gifts. To make a donation, click here. In the event Newman were to be granted parole, he would go to an offender treatment program for “approximately 12 months of therapy and a Sex Offender Assessment Process,” designed to help offenders reintegrate into regular society and prevent recidivism, the website explains. However, survivors and advocates note concerns regarding his ability to avoid returning to abuse. According to Elizabeth Carlock Phillips' statement, while the prosecution estimates Newman's victim count to be in the hundreds, “clinical experts estimate (the count) to be between 2,000 and 5,000 due to the patterns of his perpetration, (his) amount of unfettered access and time with children year-round and the victim count known at sentencing.” She argues the impact of his crimes is far deeper than a simple felony charge, calling him a “murderer” who “butchered the souls of boys with his deceit and abuse, some even to their graves.” Phillips' submitted her statement on behalf of her late brother, Trey Carlock, who died by suicide due to the traumatic effects of his abuse by Newman. She says Trey was “silenced to his grave” by Newman's abuse compounded by further civil litigations, which included a Non-Disclosure Agreement. This article was originally published by Baptist News Global. It is reprinted with permission.
An NDA, or Non-Disclosure Agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties.NDAs are used for various reasons:Protecting Intellectual Property: Businesses often use NDAs to safeguard their trade secrets, proprietary information, or other sensitive data from being disclosed to competitors or the public.Maintaining Confidentiality: In certain business dealings, such as partnerships, mergers, or acquisitions, sensitive information may be shared between parties. NDAs ensure that this information remains confidential and is not used for purposes other than what is agreed upon.Facilitating Collaboration: When multiple parties collaborate on a project, they may need to share sensitive information to achieve their goals. NDAs help establish trust among collaborators by legally binding them to maintain confidentiality.Preventing Information Leakage: Employees, contractors, or consultants often have access to sensitive information about a company's operations, products, or plans. NDAs help prevent them from disclosing this information to unauthorized individuals or entities.In this episode, we get a look at what a standard NPA in the world of Diddy consists of.(commercial at 10:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.16.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
Kristina Fifield is a registered social worker and trauma therapist who specializes in gender-based violence.She spoke with guest host Preston Mulligan about the series of events being put on in partnership with the campaign 'Can't Buy My Silence'.
In this week's episode of Raw Politics, Christopher Luxon must wake up some days with the Sound of Music song of exasperation playing in his head. How does he deal with the problem of ACT leader David Seymour and his will-o-the-wisp coalition contrarianism?Newsroom political editor Laura Walters, senior political reporter Marc Daalder and co-editor Tim Murphy discuss Seymour's carefully calibrated political agitation, externally on the Treaty Principles Bill and internally in the coalition, sticking his ACT Party's view into other minister's portfolios, other parties' business.Politics doesn't come any bigger globally than Wednesday's presidential debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, and the Raw Politics panel assess the fallout, and the media and social media verdicts on an historic face-off.Our reader question asks where and why public servants have been made to sign additional Non-Disclosure Agreements under this Government. The panel has fears for growing secrecy in the machinery of state.Finally, the panelists recommend something to read, listen to or watch on the weekend ahead.--------------------This week's recommendations:Laura: Andrea Vance's latest piece in The Post on the $410k spend on contractors and consultants at the Ministry for Regulation;Tim: RNZ's Eloise Gibson's report on Climate minister Simon Watts distinguishing between ‘coal and coal' to defend opening up to mining;Marc: A piece by the second-best writer with the surname Daalder, in The Atlantic on the US election.--------------------Raw Politics will be available every Friday, and you can watch it on YouTube too.Read more on newsroom.co.nz
It's been revealed nearly 70 Te Whatu Ora staff have signed non-disclosure agreements since the end of November and 38 within the Ministry for the Environment. It's prompted a complaint to the Public Service Commission from Labour. Its health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall said the NDAs stifle internal debate and legitimate scrutiny. Health NZ chief executive Margie Apa said agreements were for staff involved in addressing recent financial pressures and dealing with Budget-sensitive information. Employment law expert Barbara Buckett spoke to Lisa Owen.
The Health Minister is defending staff confidentiality agreements. Labour has complained to the Public Service Commission about the number of non-disclosure agreements gagging Health New Zealand staff from talking about work. It claims 67 staff have signed them since June - including senior leaders responsible for briefing media and members of Parliament. Minister Shane Reti says he has no concerns. "The previous Government did as well - whether they used confidentiality agreements or NDAs or a similar sort of process. They need to be used appropriately, but it's commonplace in commercial environments with particularly sensitive issues." LISTEN ABOVESee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
An NDA, or Non-Disclosure Agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties.NDAs are used for various reasons:Protecting Intellectual Property: Businesses often use NDAs to safeguard their trade secrets, proprietary information, or other sensitive data from being disclosed to competitors or the public.Maintaining Confidentiality: In certain business dealings, such as partnerships, mergers, or acquisitions, sensitive information may be shared between parties. NDAs ensure that this information remains confidential and is not used for purposes other than what is agreed upon.Facilitating Collaboration: When multiple parties collaborate on a project, they may need to share sensitive information to achieve their goals. NDAs help establish trust among collaborators by legally binding them to maintain confidentiality.Preventing Information Leakage: Employees, contractors, or consultants often have access to sensitive information about a company's operations, products, or plans. NDAs help prevent them from disclosing this information to unauthorized individuals or entities.In this episode, we get a look at what a standard NPA in the world of Diddy consists of.(commercial at 10:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.16.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is a legal contract used to protect sensitive and confidential information shared between parties. It creates a confidential relationship between the parties to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets.In the context of relationships, particularly those involving rich and famous individuals, NDAs are often used to maintain privacy and confidentiality. When celebrities or wealthy individuals engage in personal relationships, they may use NDAs to prevent their partners from disclosing any details of the relationship, including intimate details, personal conversations, financial information, or other sensitive matters.The NDA typically outlines what information is considered confidential, the obligations of both parties to maintain confidentiality, the duration of the agreement, and the consequences of breaching the agreement, which may include legal action and financial penalties.Rich and famous individuals may utilize NDAs in their personal relationships for several reasons:Privacy Protection: Celebrities and wealthy individuals often value their privacy and may want to prevent any details of their personal lives from becoming public knowledge.Protecting Reputation: NDAs can help protect the reputation of both parties involved by preventing potentially damaging information from being disclosed.Preserving Business Interests: In some cases, personal relationships may involve discussions about business ventures or proprietary information. NDAs can ensure that such information remains confidential.However, it's important to note that NDAs have limitations, especially when it comes to legal investigations by law enforcement:Limited Scope: NDAs cannot be used to prevent someone from reporting illegal activity to law enforcement. If the information covered by the NDA is related to criminal activity, the NDA may not hold up in court.Public Interest Exception: In cases where public safety or the public interest is at stake, courts may invalidate NDAs or allow individuals to disclose information protected by the agreement.Evidence in Legal Proceedings: NDAs may not prevent someone from disclosing information if subpoenaed by a court or required to testify in a legal proceeding.In this episode, we learn why NDA's are worth less than the paper they are printed on when it comes to law enforcement, and how previously signed NDA's might come back to haunt Diddy.(commercial at 10:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy accusers can't be silenced by NDAs in trafficking probe: experts | Fox News
Maria Varmazis host of the N2K daily space show, T-Minus, joins Dave to share her story on how recent research by security firm Veriti reveals a phishing campaign targeting Trump's 2024 supporters, soliciting cryptocurrency donations through fake WinRed-branded domains, with limited transactions and some activity traced to China. Dave and Maria share some follow-up from a listener, including suggestions for protecting Dave's father's computer from phishing scams by using LibreWolf browser, UBlock Origin extension, and NextDNS, as well as a listener sharing insights on the pronunciation of "Ports-Muth." Dave's story follows how in June, Ferrari CEO Benedetto Vigna was impersonated via deepfake technology in an attempted scam to deceive a Ferrari executive into signing a Non-Disclosure Agreement for a fictitious acquisition, but the ruse was detected and the company emerged unscathed. Dave also goes on to share news about his own home state Maryland and their gift card policy. Our catch of the day come from the scam subreddit and follows a text message where a scammer is trying to intimidate the recipient. Please take a moment to fill out an audience survey! Let us know how we are doing! Links to the stories: Ferrari exec foils deepfake attempt by asking the scammer a question only CEO Benedetto Vigna could answer Maryland becomes first state to pass law against gift card draining TRUMP CAMPAIGN CRYPTO SCAM: UNVEILING THE PHISHING PLOT You can hear more from the T-Minus space daily show here. Have a Catch of the Day you'd like to share? Email it to us at hackinghumans@thecyberwire.com.
Katherine's Telling Everybody Everything about her trip to Germany to watch England vs Netherlands in the Euros semi-final. Crowds, Noise, Beer and Atmosphere. LOVE IT. After 14 years in power, the Tories were handed their most forceful flogging in the party's 200+ year history as America and its politics still hangs in the balance. Plus, are we entering the NDA Era? The new legal normal of the 21st century sees Non Disclosure Agreements for everybody and everything. Will dating ever be the same? Finally, Fred struggles with the abstract concept of time. x Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Last month, as California prepared to roll out a new $20 minimum wage for fast food workers, attention on an exemption for restaurants that bake their own bread surprised many, including both the bill's author, Asm. Chris Holden, and Gov. Newsom. "Paneragate" (named for the restaurant chain that some claimed would benefit from the exemption - note that both the governor and the franchisee dispute that the exemption applies) spotlighted a little-known tool in the legislative toolbox: the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) in crafting public policy.While NDAs are commonplace in the business world, their use in policy work was a surprise to many, even some elected officials. In March, Republican Assemblyman Vince Fong introduced AB 2654, which would ban lawmakers from entering into confidentiality agreements related to proposed legislation. The bill failed to advance out of the Assembly Elections Committee last week.But is the use of NDAs as sinister as critics make out? Our guest today, former Speaker Robert Hertzberg argues that confidentiality agreements are a key part of building trust in sensitive legislative negotiations between diametrically opposed parties - and are sometimes the only way to get warring sides to the table. :36 The use of NDAs in lawmaking2:17 How common is the use of NDAs in policymaking?3:07 "What an NDA does is builds trust - so that people can talk to each other"5:49 Who is covered by this type of NDA?7:29 Does the use of NDAs - effective or not - just look bad?9:53 The art of blowing up the deal12:27 "It's getting harder and harder and harder to solve big problems"12:43 Chilling effect14:34 When are NDAs not appropriate?15:14 Impact of parties NOT in the NDA16:43 Is anything gonna change?17:49 "It's used in Washngton a lot more than it is here"21:20 #WWCAWant to support the Capitol Weekly Podcast? Make your tax deductible donation here: capitolweekly.net/donations/Capitol Weekly Podcast theme is "Pickin' My Way" by Eddie Lang"#WorstWeekCA" Beat provided by freebeats.io
SERIES 2 EPISODE 163: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANNA-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: Trump faces a month in jail for contempt of court - or at minimum, he will be THREATENED with a month in jail for contempt of court. Trump's lawyers, led by Todd (of Todd, Emil, Susan and Alina) beclowned themselves before Justice Juan Merchan during the Trump Gag Order Violation Hearing yesterday and the judge said he was "reserving his decision" which is almost always news so bad for the one side that has so infuriated the judge that he doesn't want to be in the room with them when he rules against them. The prosecution demanded $10,000 in fines and the threat of a month in jail and as Merchan told the lawyers they were losing their credibility, another story broke. Whatever happens there have already been quiet conversations with the Secret Service over what you do when you finally do put a former president in jail for an hour or a lifetime. As to the trial and the only witness thus far David Pecker – as to what came out of the Pecker at the Trump Trial – nothing new, if you've been paying attention. He and Trump and Michael Cohen set up a machine by which they bought stories about Trump – true ones, false ones, something-in-between ones – like the child out of wedlock one and the Stormy Daniels one and the Karen McDougal one – and the critical testimony was about the love child story. The doorman selling it got $30,000 to start, then they checked the story, found it wasn't true, Pecker of the National Enquirer was about to release the doorman from his Non-Disclosure Agreement when Michael Cohen said don't do that until AFTER the 2016 election because it could damage the Trump campaign. That's the conviction right there. They paid these people – Stormy Daniels included – not to protect Trump the person, not to save him from lies, not to save him from the truth - but to influence the outcome of 2016 election. And it would be sad in another context, but the lede yesterday? That he wanted his mobs to at minimum SURROUND every courthouse in the country? Especially New York State Supreme Court, 100 Centre Street? I got a few scoffs at that. Turns out he REALLY expected. He REALLY believed it. And it didn't happen. It REALLY didn't happen: CNN's Jim Sciutto with the sad truth. He wrote “Other than the first day of jury selection when I saw a pickup waving Trump flags and heard a handful of Trump supporters, their presence has dwindled. I don't see any outside the courthouse today. If Trump was expecting a large and lasting public show of support here, it hasn't materialized.” Well of COURSE that's what he was expecting. IN FACT he was expecting another January 6th. And I emphasize again that the ultimate importance of this trial may simply be exposing him to weeks of radiation-leak-levels of reality. Because after it DIDN'T happen he had to tell his people – and most importantly his EGO – that it DID: “Thousands of people were turned away from the courthouse in Lower Manhattan by steel stanchions and police, literally blocks from the tiny side door from where I enter and leave,” unquote. Utterly untrue. Nobody showed up. Not thousands, not hundreds, not dozens, not even family and friends. Like he has FRIENDS. That was his friend testifying against him. His friend – a Pecker. PLUS: Tucker Carlson is dunked on by Mitch McConnell, Trump is dunked on by Mitt Romney, and the Republicans are dunked on by...Axios? Which reports they've... castrated themselves? Video or it didn't happen! B-Block (26:44) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL: This surfeit of media-government interaction reminded me of the first time I ever encountered it, back when the Bushies were so naive they thought I was doing their bidding during the controversy over the made-up story of Saddam Hussein getting nukes from Niger. I was to interview Ambassador Joe Wilson - who debunked the W bull - and yet they thought I was going to slice him up, so they sent me all their talking points, and revealed the identities of all their "friends" at NBC. C-Block (41:00) GOOD NIGHT AND GOOD LUCKSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
An NDA, or Non-Disclosure Agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties.NDAs are used for various reasons:Protecting Intellectual Property: Businesses often use NDAs to safeguard their trade secrets, proprietary information, or other sensitive data from being disclosed to competitors or the public.Maintaining Confidentiality: In certain business dealings, such as partnerships, mergers, or acquisitions, sensitive information may be shared between parties. NDAs ensure that this information remains confidential and is not used for purposes other than what is agreed upon.Facilitating Collaboration: When multiple parties collaborate on a project, they may need to share sensitive information to achieve their goals. NDAs help establish trust among collaborators by legally binding them to maintain confidentiality.Preventing Information Leakage: Employees, contractors, or consultants often have access to sensitive information about a company's operations, products, or plans. NDAs help prevent them from disclosing this information to unauthorized individuals or entities.In this episode, we get a look at what a standard NPA in the world of Diddy consists of.(commercial at 10:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.16.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)
An NDA, or Non-Disclosure Agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties.NDAs are used for various reasons:Protecting Intellectual Property: Businesses often use NDAs to safeguard their trade secrets, proprietary information, or other sensitive data from being disclosed to competitors or the public.Maintaining Confidentiality: In certain business dealings, such as partnerships, mergers, or acquisitions, sensitive information may be shared between parties. NDAs ensure that this information remains confidential and is not used for purposes other than what is agreed upon.Facilitating Collaboration: When multiple parties collaborate on a project, they may need to share sensitive information to achieve their goals. NDAs help establish trust among collaborators by legally binding them to maintain confidentiality.Preventing Information Leakage: Employees, contractors, or consultants often have access to sensitive information about a company's operations, products, or plans. NDAs help prevent them from disclosing this information to unauthorized individuals or entities.In this episode, we get a look at what a standard NPA in the world of Diddy consists of.(commercial at 10:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.16.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)
An NDA, or Non-Disclosure Agreement, is a legal contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to or by third parties.NDAs are used for various reasons:Protecting Intellectual Property: Businesses often use NDAs to safeguard their trade secrets, proprietary information, or other sensitive data from being disclosed to competitors or the public.Maintaining Confidentiality: In certain business dealings, such as partnerships, mergers, or acquisitions, sensitive information may be shared between parties. NDAs ensure that this information remains confidential and is not used for purposes other than what is agreed upon.Facilitating Collaboration: When multiple parties collaborate on a project, they may need to share sensitive information to achieve their goals. NDAs help establish trust among collaborators by legally binding them to maintain confidentiality.Preventing Information Leakage: Employees, contractors, or consultants often have access to sensitive information about a company's operations, products, or plans. NDAs help prevent them from disclosing this information to unauthorized individuals or entities.In this episode, we get a look at what a standard NPA in the world of Diddy consists of.(commercial at 10:00)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.16.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
In this episode of Marked by Grace, Pastor Heath discusses whether Christian ministries should use non-disclosure agreements.
Mark talked with Vincent in Brooklyn about Non-Disclosure Agreements. Chris in NYC talked with Mark about the DJT stock. Bob in NJ Talked about the Congress Hush Money Fund
A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is a legal contract used to protect sensitive and confidential information shared between parties. It creates a confidential relationship between the parties to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets.In the context of relationships, particularly those involving rich and famous individuals, NDAs are often used to maintain privacy and confidentiality. When celebrities or wealthy individuals engage in personal relationships, they may use NDAs to prevent their partners from disclosing any details of the relationship, including intimate details, personal conversations, financial information, or other sensitive matters.The NDA typically outlines what information is considered confidential, the obligations of both parties to maintain confidentiality, the duration of the agreement, and the consequences of breaching the agreement, which may include legal action and financial penalties.Rich and famous individuals may utilize NDAs in their personal relationships for several reasons:Privacy Protection: Celebrities and wealthy individuals often value their privacy and may want to prevent any details of their personal lives from becoming public knowledge.Protecting Reputation: NDAs can help protect the reputation of both parties involved by preventing potentially damaging information from being disclosed.Preserving Business Interests: In some cases, personal relationships may involve discussions about business ventures or proprietary information. NDAs can ensure that such information remains confidential.However, it's important to note that NDAs have limitations, especially when it comes to legal investigations by law enforcement:Limited Scope: NDAs cannot be used to prevent someone from reporting illegal activity to law enforcement. If the information covered by the NDA is related to criminal activity, the NDA may not hold up in court.Public Interest Exception: In cases where public safety or the public interest is at stake, courts may invalidate NDAs or allow individuals to disclose information protected by the agreement.Evidence in Legal Proceedings: NDAs may not prevent someone from disclosing information if subpoenaed by a court or required to testify in a legal proceeding.In this episode, we learn why NDA's are worth less than the paper they are printed on when it comes to law enforcement, and how previously signed NDA's might come back to haunt Diddy.(commercial at 7:27)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy accusers can't be silenced by NDAs in trafficking probe: experts | Fox News
A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is a legal contract used to protect sensitive and confidential information shared between parties. It creates a confidential relationship between the parties to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets.In the context of relationships, particularly those involving rich and famous individuals, NDAs are often used to maintain privacy and confidentiality. When celebrities or wealthy individuals engage in personal relationships, they may use NDAs to prevent their partners from disclosing any details of the relationship, including intimate details, personal conversations, financial information, or other sensitive matters.The NDA typically outlines what information is considered confidential, the obligations of both parties to maintain confidentiality, the duration of the agreement, and the consequences of breaching the agreement, which may include legal action and financial penalties.Rich and famous individuals may utilize NDAs in their personal relationships for several reasons:Privacy Protection: Celebrities and wealthy individuals often value their privacy and may want to prevent any details of their personal lives from becoming public knowledge.Protecting Reputation: NDAs can help protect the reputation of both parties involved by preventing potentially damaging information from being disclosed.Preserving Business Interests: In some cases, personal relationships may involve discussions about business ventures or proprietary information. NDAs can ensure that such information remains confidential.However, it's important to note that NDAs have limitations, especially when it comes to legal investigations by law enforcement:Limited Scope: NDAs cannot be used to prevent someone from reporting illegal activity to law enforcement. If the information covered by the NDA is related to criminal activity, the NDA may not hold up in court.Public Interest Exception: In cases where public safety or the public interest is at stake, courts may invalidate NDAs or allow individuals to disclose information protected by the agreement.Evidence in Legal Proceedings: NDAs may not prevent someone from disclosing information if subpoenaed by a court or required to testify in a legal proceeding.In this episode, we learn why NDA's are worth less than the paper they are printed on when it comes to law enforcement, and how previously signed NDA's might come back to haunt Diddy.(commercial at 7:27)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:Diddy accusers can't be silenced by NDAs in trafficking probe: experts | Fox NewsBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
The process of creating laws is under new scrutiny after a political ally of Gov. Gavin Newsom – the owner of the Panera Bread chain – appeared to benefit from an exemption in a new state law taking effect next month that will raise the hourly wages of fast food workers to $20 an hour. Finding out exactly how the exemption got into the legislation was complicated after it was revealed that a major labor union required negotiators working on the bill to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement. Now a Republican lawmaker is trying to ban NDAs in lawmaking. Scott talks with Chris Micheli, a registered lobbyist and former general counsel for the California Manufacturers Association, about the use of NDAs in drafting state legislation.
THE Sales Japan Series by Dale Carnegie Training Tokyo, Japan
Salespeople are good talkers. In fact, they are often so good, they decide to do all the talking. They try to browbeat the buyer into submission. Endless details are shared with the client about the intricacies of the widget, expecting that the features will sell the product or service. Do we buy features though? Actually, we buy evidence that this has worked for another buyer very similar to us, in a very similar current situation in their business. We are looking for proof to reduce our risk. To get us to the proof point, we make a big deal about how the buyer can apply the benefits of our solution inside their company. Is that what happens in reality though? In Japan, judging by what our clients tell us and by the raw material we find attending our training classes, it would be a miracle if the salesperson went through these critical five phases of the explanation of the solution: 1. feature 2. benefit 3. application of the benefit 4. evidence and 5. trial close. Most Japanese salespeople are absolute experts on the most intimate details to do with the features. However, they completely forget to expand that information to elucidate the benefits and beyond that, they have no clue what is supposed to come next. In fact, finding a similar client in a similar situation in the current market is usually a stretch for us in sales. Even if we had such a rare case, often we are precluded from talking about it because of certain clauses in the contract or by a Non-Disclosure Agreement we signed. How do we prove what we are saying then? This is where a trial session or a demonstration comes in handy. We can talk as much as we like about how great we are and our solution, but seeing is believing. If it is equipment, then running the machine can show whether the output will satisfy the demands of the buyer. If it is a service, we may have to recreate the situation and show how we do things. Recently we did both. We had a request from one of Japan's biggest financial institutions to run a sales training session, to see if we have what they want for their 3000 person sales team. In any trial, we have to make a decision on what we will choose for the content? My advice would always be to choose the most difficult content. Isolate out the areas where everyone really struggles. This is usually the most relevant content and also the content which they currently have the most trouble with too. If the content is too easy, then they will think they can do it themselves and therefore they don't need us. In the services sector, this also raises the bar on the delivery side of things. Complex content needs a lot of expertise to deliver it professionally. If they are thinking to bring it in-house, they may watch the session and decide that they do not have the right resources to pull that off by themselves. Ergo, they have to buy from us to eliminate the gap they are facing between where they are and where they want to be. In a demonstration, similar to a trial session, getting the participants to get their hands dirty is critical. Theory is fine, but doing it for real is a totally different thing. I was teaching a module on “How To Disagree Agreeably” to the leadership team of one of the 5 star hotels here in Tokyo. We went through the theory and then we had the role play practice. It was revealing how much they struggled to replace their old habits with what they had just learnt. It really brought home the importance of not just understanding things intellectually, but the importance of getting it to gel inside yourself and make it your own. When we run a session or a demonstration, the client can see the content relevancy for their need and our expertise to deliver it to the team. We can usually customise the content further, if it is not quite where they need it. The delivery part shows our professional standards, our ability to relate to the team and whether we can be trusted. We have talked up a big game in the first few meetings about how great we are and now it is “game time” to show what we have. These impressions have to match up or there is no trust. No trust means no sale and we can't have that outcome, can we!
Continuing on from TM's, Jeff dives deeper into NDA's like a fat kid with a golden ticket. With all the latest news on Non-Disclosure Agreements in wrestling, we've decided to drop a bonus episode to have our in-house legal expert, Jeff, to help explain what you need to know about NDA's in professional wrestling. Are all NDA's necessarily bad? What reasons would organizations need confidentiality agreements?- Support Wrestling Soup on Patreon:https://www.patreon.com/wrestlingsoupSOCIAL CHANNELS ʕ̡̢̡ʘ̅͟͜͡ʘ̲̅ʔ̢̡̢Twitter: https://twitter.com/WrestlingSoupInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/wrestlingsoup/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WrestlingSoup/Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/wrestlingsoup:shirt: PRO WRESLTING TEES STORE :shirt: ／(=✪ x ✪=)＼https://www.prowrestlingtees.com/wrestlingsoupBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/wrestling-soup--1425249/support.
With all the latest news on Non-Disclosure Agreements in wrestling, we've decided to drop a bonus episode to have our in-house legal expert, Jeff, to help explain what you need to know about NDA's in professional wrestling. Are all NDA's necessarily bad? What reasons would organizations need confidentiality agreements? Tap in to find out!- Support Wrestling Soup on Patreon:https://www.patreon.com/wrestlingsoupSOCIAL CHANNELS ʕ̡̢̡ʘ̅͟͜͡ʘ̲̅ʔ̢̡̢Twitter: https://twitter.com/WrestlingSoupInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/wrestlingsoup/Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WrestlingSoup/Discord Channel: https://discord.gg/wrestlingsoup:shirt: PRO WRESLTING TEES STORE :shirt: ／(=✪ x ✪=)＼https://www.prowrestlingtees.com/wrestlingsoupBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/show/wrestling-soup/support.
This week brings a somber Travis-T. After Nubby shares the results of CSW, & Pacman give results from Destination 6, Travis-T shares the match card for SCW Artic Takeover. Travis-T shares some unfortunate news pertaining to High Voltage this Saturday. 2024 PPV Wins: Dizzle J: Nubby/Turtle: Pacman: Travis-T: As always, this episode was brought to you by: Carter Comics - CarterComics.Com - Use Discount Code "FreakNet" to save 10% on your order & Audible.com - Audibletrial.com/freaknet - Get a 30 Day Free Trial of Audible!!! Check Facebook for Dizzle J's Bi-Weekly "Freakin' 5". Check Out Our Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/JFWPodcast We Have Merchandise!!!! Check out our merch at www.TeePublic.com by searching "JFW" JFW Podcast is now part of Freak Net Studios!! Facebook: Freak Net Studios Instagram: @freaknetstudios YouTube: Freak Net Studios Follow us on Social Media! Website: http://justfreakinwrestlin.myfreesites.net Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/JFWPodcast Twitter: https://twitter.com/JFWPodcast Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jfwpodcast Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGXWC9tJtbjv1ocVxbhai0g
A Non Disclosure Agreement is a legal document you might ask a manufacturer to sign in order to protect your designs. Find out what the pros and cons are of asking a manufacturer to sign an NDA, and what the alternatives are.FURTHER RESOURCESHow to find a UK manufacturerHANDY LINKSBritish Brand AcceleratorMake it British WebsiteYouTubeInstagramRate This Podcast
Daniel Morris Salter worked for over 20 years with the USAF as an electronics communications expert and, in 1968, retired from active duty as a Command Sergeant Major—the highest rank for a non-commissioned officer. Early in his Air Force career, Salter had a UFO sighting in 1949, which propelled him to being offered a senior position in the Interplanetary Phenomenon Unit – a top secret intelligence unit that investigated the UFO phenomenon. After his USAF retirement, he was recruited by the National Reconnaissance Office to work on extraterrestrial-related issues concerning covert UFO crash retrieval operations. His duties included silencing witnesses to crashed UFOs or extraterrestrial contact as part of a multitiered official intimidation program that began with verbal warnings, harassment and ended with assassination. After more than a decade of working with the NRO, he retired. In 1993 he began revealing details of his experiences. Salter was among the Disclosure Project witnesses who gave video testimonies to Dr. Steven Greer and attended the latter's famous May 2001 National Press Club Conference. In 2003, Salter wrote Life With a Cosmos Clearance, where he shared some of his direct knowledge of extraterrestrial contact and UFO history. In it, he discussed several leaked Majestic documents that he knew to be real, but could not directly confirm with his own direct experiences due to Non-Disclosure Agreements with the NRO and the threat of assassination. Significantly, Salter shared some of his experiences and insider knowledge with his two grandsons, Daniel and Derek, who both graduated as mechanical engineers and currently work in the engineering industry. In their second Exopolitics Today interview, Daniel and Derek share new documents they recently received from the US National Archives about their grandfather with more details about his USAF career. They also discuss other UFO whistleblowers such as Clifford Stone, Steve Wilson, and Robert Dean; as well as crash retrieval programs such as Project Moondust, Project Blue Fly and Project Pounce. Finally, they share their views about corporate UFO reverse engineering efforts from whistleblowers such as David Grusch and Bob Lazar as a Limited Hangout as they don't reveal the truth about reverse engineered antigravity spacecraft. Daniel and Derek have their own podcast where they discuss Daniel Salter's revelations and other witness testimonies on UFOs/ET life at: https://www.infynit.tv/shows/shred-the-veil-popup/ https://www.youtube.com/@clrthought3341/ --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/exopolitics/support
The Houston government has long said it will not introduce legislation to ban non-disclosure agreements, but didn't give a reason. Within recent weeks, two universities and a large union have pledged to not use NDAs in cases involving harassment and abuse. Host Jeff Douglas is joined by Liz LeClair, a volunteer with the Can't Buy My Silence campaign, to talk about the misuse of NDAs and the need for reform.
Rep. Steve Carra, R-Three Rivers. Rep. Carra announces plan to ensure legislators never sign non-disclosure agreements again
On today's episode of the podcast I share the common misunderstandings about non-disclosure agreements and when you actually need one. To learn more about NDAs, check out the Non-Disclosure Agreement section of the blog post "The Legal Essentials for Creative Small Businesses" at notavglaw.com/legal-essentials A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) protects you and/or your client, contractor, employee, etc. from having confidential information shared. It's basically a confidentiality agreement between you and the person you're working with. Most of the time an NDA can be just one of the terms in your contract but if no contract has been signed yet and confidential information is being handed out, you may need an NDA ahead of the contract. An example of this would be hiring a bookkeeper. Here at the Not Your Average law firm we offer bookkeeping services and to write an action plan for your bookkeeping proposal we might need to access your Quickbooks account. While we will never share your information, because your account contains personal tax information, we could send you an NDA upon your request as an extra level of confidence that we won't share your personal information. Stand alone NDAs are for when you are looking for a potential client to share confidential information to help you create your proposal. Another example is if you are receiving confidential information to perform a service as part of a monthly subscription i.e. when you share info with us as a member of our monthly legal subscription. In this example, you do not need an NDA because there is a confidentiality clause in our terms and conditions that our clients agree to when signing up for the subscription. That is what will apply to most people. Unless it is for a pre-contract proposal, instead of an NDA what most people need is a confidentiality clause in their client contract. If someone's hiring you and wants you to keep their info private, that can be covered inside your contract and that is covered in our Contract Club templates (notavglaw.com/club) A third example we see is when hiring contractors. If you hire an independent contractor, to streamline onboarding the independent contractor may need info about our clients before they know what type of work is needed. Because they need to access confidential information before signing our agreement, they will need to sign a separate NDA. Contractors and employees typically have different contracts to sign and employees would get a standalone NDA as part of a collection of contracts to sign in addition to their offer letter. There is a new hire NDA for employees available in the Contract Club and we are working on adding other NDAs. If you need an NDA template, let us know in the Braden's Besties group at bradensbesties.com Get more information about NDAs at notavglaw.com/legal-essentials
On today's MJ Morning Show: Studio needs a new TV Roxanne's kids Morons in the news Teacher only gives three bathroom passes to students per month... we took calls An angry e-mail A happy e-mail What is the 'triangle of death'? Howard Frankland Bridge stabby attorney Sadie's Pizza owner Hal Herman Headlines We took calls about Hal's news report 'Sitting is the opposite of standing' Britney Spears news Kelly Clarkson had a costume malfunction Travis Kelse & Taylor Swift... IRS wants money from profits of reselling event tickets Mr. Big has Florida tour dates! MJ tells engineer Max he wants to go get a new TV Roxanne wants her own segment MJ called Andrew Duncan about putting funny signs on 'for sale' signs Celebrities that require dates/relationships to sign non-disclosure agreements Olive Garden stories
Erica Herman is in court accusing Tiger Woods of something that is potentially criminal or abusive, these accusation come after she signed and Non-Disclosure Agreement. Who's side are you on? Also, need help placing your bets. Anita Marks joins the show to help you make your picks for the NBA, College Basketball, etc. Plus, Is there a possibility that Matthew Stafford might not come back to the Rams next season? and the topics are in for another version of WASSUP FOO! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Natasha Elisa and I discuss the latest in my IVF journey. I ask Natasha about figuring out how to sift thru advice. What do you take and what do you leave? Plus, an update on firing my IVF doc, and do doctors now have agreements that you can't speak negatively about them? Show is sponsored by: Carawayhome.com use code TSFS for 10% OFF your order at check out Cosmetic Plastics and Dr. Magge Book Dr. Magge for your mommy makeover, breast implants, botox and more. New patients mention The Sarah Fraser Show or code Podcast for 10% OFF ALL SERVICES Camposfinancialgroup.com Doesn't matter if you have $500 or $5,000,000 Dan Campos is your financial advisor. Call him today: 240-207-3618 David Ruben Family Lawyer David is a lawyer practicing in Maryland who specializes in difficult divorces and narcissists, call for a FREE consultation 301-587-8900 Financialgym.com/TSFS use code TSFS to get 20% your first year of membership Horizonfibroids.com - Get rid of those nasty fibroids! Jennikayne.com - Use code TSFS for 15% OFF your first order Nutrafol.com: use code TSFS for FREE shipping and $15 off Plantoeat.com/tsfs: Get 25% off a yearly subscription by using my link Thirdlove.com/tsfs Use this link to get 20% OFF your first order Zocdoc.com/tsfs - Download the Zocdoc App for FREE Advertise on The Sarah Fraser Show: Contact Laila Kalantari at True Native Media campaigns@truenativemedia.com Got at TIP on 90 Day Fiance, a TLC Show, Welcome To Plathville? Email: thesarahfrasershow@gmail.com Follow me on Tiktok: @thesarahfrasershow Book me on Cameo: cameo.com/sarahfraser Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Convicted serial rapist Harvey Weinstein (HW) will be sentenced AGAIN in Los Angeles on February 23, 2023 following his conviction of rape, sexual penetration by foreign object and forcible oral copulation. He is already serving a 23-year prison sentence after being convicted of rape and sexual assault charges in New York in 2020. Joining us today are Sarah Ann Masse and Rowena Chiu who say they survived assaults by HW though sadly their cases were not addressed in these convictions. You will not believe it when Rowena tells us the abhorrent details of the Non Disclosure Agreement she was made to sign by HW's lawyers in order to silence her about almost being raped. Sarah Ann tells us about the RICO action she was part of to hold his enablers accountable as they were complicit in his alleged illegal activities including rape, assault, and sex trafficking. Sarah Ann -- who stars in the movie about HW "She Said" playing journalist Emily Steel -- also started the advocacy group "Hire Survivors Hollywood" to support silence breakers who are facing backlash in the entertainment industry. Think this kind of thing only happens in Hollywood? Think again, as Laura and Jim weigh in. Please subscribe, share and leave us a 5 star review wherever you listen to your podcasts. In today's episode we mention Stephen Mill's must-read book “Chosen” about being sexually assaulted as a child at a Jewish summer camp. You can get his book here https://amzn.to/3kJYFjM#SarahAnnMasse#RowenaChiu #Survivors#HarveyWeinstein #powerimbalance#podcast #Hollywood #sexualassault#Grooming #guilty#nondisclosureagreement#NDA#VictimsMatter #Entitlement#realcrimeprofile #ExpertAnalysis #FBI#NewScotlandYard #HireSurvivorsHollywood #silencebreakers#RICO#DavidCarrick #SerialPerpetrator*************** SUPPORT OUR OTHER SHOWS ***************CRIME ANALYST PODCAST - You're interested in real crime? Tick You're interested in good storytelling? TickYou want content that's respectful to the victims and honours them TickAnd you want more insight and in-depth analysis about “the who” “the what” “the where” “the when” “the how” and “the why”? TickAnd you want to know how you can prevent it? TickCongratulations! You've found your next podcast!Ride shotgun with me, Laura Richards world renowned and award-winning Criminal Behavioural Analyst, former New Scotland Yard every week as we profile behaviour and identify the red flags to prevent murders in slow motion.Come join me in the intelligence cell as we deconstruct and analyse real cases.www.crime-analyst.comKILLER CASTING PODCAST - Join Lisa and her guests, legendary casting director Carla Hool and multi-hyphenate actress/producer/casting director Elaine del Valle as they break down why authenticity in representation on screen is so important — not just to the Latin and Hispanic communities, but to ALL communities. We analyze comedian Bill Maher's now famous rant about “woke” casting and his criticism of actor John Leguizamo daring to voice his opinion on the casting of James Franco as Fidel Castro in the indie film “Alina of Cuba”.www.killercastingpod.com BEST CASE WORST CASEBe sure and check out Jim's podcast Best Case/Worst Case that he does along with former Federal Prosecutor Francey Hakes. Join them as they go behind police lines with unparalleled access to law enforcement officers, looking back at their most memorable cases – for better or for worse. Subscribe now!https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/best-case-worst-case/id1240002929See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Emma hosts Laura Katz Olson, professor of Political Science at Lehigh University, to discuss her recent book Ethically Challenged: Private Equity Storms U.S. Healthcare. First, Emma runs through updates on the Fed approving another interest hike as they continue their push against labor, Biden and McCarthy's unsurprisingly unproductive debt ceiling meeting, the GOP's ousting of Ilhan Omar from the Foreign Affairs Committee, the College Board removing myriad Black authors from their AP AfAm syllabus, protests in France and the UK, and the US upping their military presence in the Philippines as they wrap up tensions with China, before diving into the incoming House Budget Chair's concerning statements on the GOP's targets for debt ceiling cuts. Professor Laura Katz Olson then joins as she dives right into the deregulation of the 1970s and '80s which saw a huge influx of money into the junk bond industry, and opened up the economy to much broader investments into private equity and venture capitalism, beginning a period of corporate raiding and butchering by these firms, taking prospering companies, chopping costs to pay off debt, and then selling them off as a shell of their former selves. Professor Katz Olson then walks Emma through the contrast between the perspective we were sold on private equity by the neoliberal pioneers, that they come in and save struggling companies, with their actual practice of relying on the income of prosperous companies to pay off the debt of their own acquisition, before expanding on private equity's recent entrance into the world of medical care, seeing the vast income in the healthcare industry as the perfect tool to rake up profits from the working class, in a comparable manner to their takeover of the Dental industry in the 1990s. Stepping back, Laura Katz Olson parses through the playbook of private equity and their reliance on Non-Disclosure Agreements and Non-Disparagement clauses to keep their destructive practices under wraps, as their cost-cutting practices inevitably break down the capacity of the company to function by piling more and more responsibility on workers. Wrapping up, Profesor Katz Olson discusses the specific impact this process has on medical care, which works along the lines of life and death, and how venture capitalists are stepping into Medicare and Medicaid-funded care to rip dollars from our taxes. Emma concludes the free half by reflecting on Ilhan Omar's response to being ousted from the Foreign Affairs Committee, her role as one of the few Representatives willing to question corporations, and what this loss means moving forwards. And in the Fun Half: Emma is joined by Brandon Sutton and Matt Binder as they assess the absurd discourse about whether non-consensual porn of someone is okay, the beginnings of the multi-millionaire class truly separating themselves from humanity, and Casey from Tennessee dives into Memphis' history of police abuses against its Black population. Denis Prager has a moral panic about the left starting moral panics about the right's moral panics about… before the MR Crew also touches on DeSantis' attempt to undermine Florida's big liberal arts college, AJ from Chicago discusses Crowder's sexual revelations, and Marjorie Taylor Greene demands to get to the root of why elementary schools individually received billions in COVID money for “diversity.” Mark the Barb from Buffalo discusses his escape from Jordan Peterson's ideology, plus, your calls and IMs! Check out Laura's book here: https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/12719/ethically-challenged Become a member at JoinTheMajorityReport.com: https://fans.fm/majority/join Subscribe to the ESVN YouTube channel here: https://www.youtube.com/esvnshow Subscribe to the AMQuickie newsletter here: https://am-quickie.ghost.io/ Join the Majority Report Discord! http://majoritydiscord.com/ Get all your MR merch at our store: https://shop.majorityreportradio.com/ Get the free Majority Report App!: http://majority.fm/app Follow the Majority Report crew on Twitter: @SamSeder @EmmaVigeland @MattBinder @MattLech @BF1nn @BradKAlsop Check out Matt's show, Left Reckoning, on Youtube, and subscribe on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/leftreckoning Subscribe to Brandon's show The Discourse on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/ExpandTheDiscourse Subscribe to Discourse Blog, a newsletter and website for progressive essays and related fun partly run by AM Quickie writer Jack Crosbie. https://discourseblog.com/ Check out Matt Binder's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/mattbinder Check out Ava Raiza's music here! https://avaraiza.bandcamp.com/ The Majority Report with Sam Seder - https://majorityreportradio.com/
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
