Podcasts about conservative women

Hillary Clinton Said WHAT about Conservative Women?! | Mundo Clip 5-20-25See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Send us a textThe boundaries of self-defense become starkly racialized when examining the Karmelo Anthony case, where a young Black man defended himself against aggressors but found himself characterized as a "thug" despite evidence supporting his claim. Through eyewitness testimony and analysis of Texas' Stand Your Ground law, we unpack how the right to self-defense often carries different consequences depending on race.Social media continues to blur the lines between entertainment and exploitation, as demonstrated by the viral Joe Budden and Rocky Twitter space confrontation. What began as a heated exchange quickly escalated into serious allegations, garnering attention from major content creators and highlighting how conflict drives engagement in today's digital landscape. We examine why these spaces command such attention and what they reveal about our consumption habits.The curious contradiction of conservative women seeking career success while adhering to traditional values creates a fascinating dating dilemma. When Megyn Kelly laments that conservative women can't find partners who accept their professional ambitions, she unwittingly exposes the fundamental incompatibility between career aspirations and traditional gender roles. This cognitive dissonance reflects broader tensions within conservative ideology about women's place in society.Our animated mom bracket competition sparked passionate debate about representation, aesthetics, and subtle biases, while our discussion on sexual health disclosure ethics challenged conventional thinking about personal responsibility versus obligation to others. Throughout every topic, we maintain our signature blend of critical analysis and humor, pushing boundaries while asking uncomfortable but necessary questions about how we navigate race, gender, and social norms in contemporary America.How are you approaching your personal boundaries? Are you taking full responsibility for your health and safety, or expecting others to manage risks for you? These questions extend beyond relationships into every aspect of how we interact with others and society at large.

On today's Quick Start podcast: NEWS: Candace Cameron Bure Announces Dave Coulier Is Cancer-Free, Operation Blessing Deploys to Burma After Deadly Earthquake FOCUS STORY: A new animated Disney series surprised viewers by including a Christian character who prays and shares her faith. The move is raising eyebrows given Disney's recent controversies—and sparking new conversations about faith and media. THE MAIN THING: YETI is facing backlash after rejecting a mug order from the Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women, claiming the phrase “conservative women” was too political. Kimberly Begg joins CBN's Tara Mergener to respond and highlight growing corporate bias. TODAY'S VERSE: 1 John 4:8 – “Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.” SHOW LINKS JESUS AND THE PROPHECIES OF CHRISTMAS : https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/jesus-and-the-prophecies-of-christmas/id1783607035 NEWSMAKERS POD: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/newsmakers/id1724061454 DC DEBRIEF POD: https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/d-c-debrief/id1691121630 CBN News YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CBNnewsonline CBN News https://www2.cbn.com/news Faithwire https://www.faithwire.com

(7:05am) Mark Mix from National Right To Work talks about Trump's nominee for Secretary of Labor, Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer of Oregon, and why she's a bad choice. Mark is urging Trump to reject a ploy by Big Labor to put Chavez-DeRemer in charge of overseeing the nation's labor policy. She's a union boss lackey who sold out American workers' individual rights during her tenure. Mark explains that Chavez-DeRemer tried to ingratiate the union political machine to boost her political fortunes, most notably by co-sponsoring the so-called “PRO Act,” which would expose millions more workers nationwide to the threat of being forced to pay union dues or be fired by eliminating state Right to Work laws nationwide. But her attempt to line union bosses’ pockets with forced union dues didn’t win over voters, who threw her out of office. The PRO Act’s other provisions provide more than enough evidence for why Chavez-DeRemer would jeopardize worker freedom if installed as Labor Secretary: The Act would wipe out the gig economy by subjecting independent contractors to union boss power, it would give union bosses far more power to seize power in a workplace without even letting workers vote on the matter, and it would gag employers during a union organizing drive so employees only hear union bosses’ side of the story, and much more. (https://www.nrtw.org/) (https://nrtwc.org/) (7:20am) Good and bad suggestions for your Valentine's Day card! (7:35am) Are conservative or liberal women more content with their lives? (7:50am) Gabe says Not Today, Satan! NewsTalkSTL website: https://newstalkstl.com/ Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/NewsTalkSTL Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/NewstalkSTL Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NewsTalkSTL Livestream 24/7: bit.ly/NEWSTALKSTLSTREAMSSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Vogue published an ugly and mean-spirited attack on First Lady Melania Trump’s official portrait. For the record, they have never featured a Republican First Lady on the cover of their magazine. Their beauty standard is Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Regular listeners and readers of my podcast and blog know I grew up with parents who helped form a grocery buying group which folded into a food co-op. Different co-ops work differently, but the general idea is that shoppers co-own the business. There's less motivation to stock doof and more to source local, fresh produce and keep money in the community. While we still shopped at supermarkets, we favored the co-op for having greater selection of produce that was fresher and tasted better. It was such a part of my childhood that I make sure to belong to a co-op today.Many people today see co-ops as luxuries or privileged, which seems bizarre to me since they did it because they didn't have much time or money and had three children to feed. I also see them as not capitalist, communist, or representing any particular political or economic system. They're just people shopping together.Nick Romeo's book title refers to Margaret Thatcher saying there was no alternative. Quoting Wikipedia:"There is no alternative" is a political slogan originally arguing that liberal capitalism is the only viable system. At the turn of the 21st century the TINA rhetoric became closely tied to neoliberalism, and its traits of liberalization and marketization. Politicians used it to justify policies of fiscal conservatism and austerity.In a speech to the Conservative Women's Conference on 21 May 1980, Thatcher appealed to the notion saying, "We have to get our production and our earnings into balance. There's no easy popularity in what we are proposing but it is fundamentally sound. Yet I believe people accept there's no real alternative." Later in the speech, she returned to the theme: "What's the alternative? To go on as we were before? All that leads to is higher spending. And that means more taxes, more borrowing, higher interest rates more inflation, more unemployment."I grew up knowing plenty of alternatives to what other people couldn't imagine alternatives to. Nick's book treats plenty of alternative systems that work. I found the book while researching Mondragon by way of his New Yorker article How Mondragon Became the World's Largest Co-Op: In Spain, an industrial-sized conglomerate owned by its workers suggests an alternative future for capitalism.Beyond the details of particular alternatives like co-ops, purpose trusts, letting citizens make crucial budget decisions, job guarantee programs, and so on, his book undermines the belief that no alternatives exist. Unquestioned beliefs are a big part of culture. Sustainability is full of them. They show a failure of imagination and promote it too.Nick's book reverses that course.Nick's home pageNick's articles at the New Yorker Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Liz receives the Woman of the Year award from the Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women. CBL is "an all-women organization that specializes in educating and mentoring young women to empower them to live happier, freer lives and contribute to a stronger, freer America. We recognize that young women face incredible pressure to conform to a leftist worldview that sabotages their well-being and that of their loved ones and fellow Americans." Enjoy Liz's speech and her Q&A with young women from around the country! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Liberal women across America have pledged to stop having sex with men, and now the AMAZING conservative women have finally stepped up with an AWESOME response!

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Even though her name is Lindsey Graham, Patriot Barbie is A DAMN GOOD WOMAN! Lindsey is a viral sensation and outspoken America First activist. Getting millions of views by going to school board meetings and fighting against the Democrat agenda, Patriot Barbie comes on Twins Pod to talk about how f***ed up our world is. Yeahhhhh Get your Twins merch and have a chance to win The Iconic General Lee! - https://officialhodgetwins.com/ Get Optimal Human, your all in one daily nutritional supplement - https://optimalhuman.com/ Secure your financial future today - https://goldrushpatriot.com/op/exclusive-gold-guide-vb-copy-2/ American-made, top of the line knives - https://dmoknives.com/ Want to be a guest on the Twins Pod? Contact us at bookings@twinspod.com Download Free Twins Pod Content - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1_iNb2RYwHUisypEjkrbZ3nFoBK8k60CO Follow Twins Pod Everywhere - X - https://twitter.com/TheTwinsPod Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/thetwinspod/ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/twinspod TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@twinspod YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCX8lCshQmMN0dUc0JmQYDdg Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/TwinsPod Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/79BWPxHPWnijyl4lf8vWVu?si=03960b3a8b6b4f74 Apple - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/twins-pod/id1731232810

Welcome to Khandaan: A Bollywood Podcast where this week we're taking a trip back to the early 90s with EK LADKA EK LADKI (1992).  This remake of 1987's Goldie Hawn/ Kurt Russell starrer OVERBOARD, stars Salman Khan and Neelam Kothari who follow the same enemies to lovers path. However, this is the early Salman so watch out for the sibling chemistry, the muscle vests, the fatphobia and the seeds of his love for farms.  Join us for a round of nostalgia. Shownotes: Here are some of the other podcast we have been on recently: Hanisha's Making Things Happen Podcast Asian Network Bollywood Ultimate 90s Bollywood Asian Network News Presents: 90s Bollywood Follow us on Socials: Amrita, Sujoy, Asim YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Tik Tok Sujoy's Instagram  Amrita's YouTube Book Channel- Amrita By The Book You can listen to Khandaan- A Bollywood Podcast episodes on the following apps: Apple Podcast Spotify Jio Saavn Deezer Audible Amazon Music Omny iHeart TuneIn  

In the 5 AM Hour: Larry O'Connor and Julie Gunlock discussed:  NY MAG: How Did Republican Women End Up Like This? The baffling, contradictory demands of being female in the party of Donald Trump. ‘Squad' Rep. Cori Bush claimed she miraculously healed woman with tumors in bizarre resurfaced TV interview ‘Cheapfakes': White House blasts clips purporting to show Biden's decline Where to find more about WMAL's morning show:  Follow the Show Podcasts on Apple podcasts, Audible and Spotify. Follow WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" on X: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor,  @Jgunlock,  @patricepinkfile and @heatherhunterdc.  Facebook: WMALDC and Larry O'Connor Instagram: WMALDC Show Website: https://www.wmal.com/oconnor-company/ How to listen live weekdays from 5 to 9 AM: https://www.wmal.com/listenlive/ Episode: Tuesday, June 18, 2024 / 5 AM Hour  O'Connor and Company is proudly presented by Veritas AcademySee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpScWes_g_Z95ViTF5vdkiA/join Let us know if you agree in the comments below! ----email us at----thepanicbuttonpodcast@gmail.com New REACTIONS Every Week! SUPPORT THE CHANNEL

Show Notes and Transcript Professor Dalgleish has spoken out about his concerns of the mRNA jab for years. And for the last 2 he has written about the rise of cancers he believes are linked to the jab.  We start by looking back at Professor Dalgleish's career and ask why he chose to speak up and what was the response from his colleagues?  He then delves into this rise of turbo cancers and why he had to sound the alarm despite the struggle to get full transparency from the authorities and "Move on, nothing to see here" is the reply to most requests for data.  His fellow cancer specialists agree with his concerns, but the authorities simply will not listen. Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London. Article in The Conservative Woman: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/massive-cancer-deaths-study-vindicates-my-warnings-over-covid-boosters/ Japan Data: https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/ The Death of Science:      https://amzn.eu/d/2w1wxk4 Interview recorded 15.4.24 Connect with Hearts of Oak... WEBSITE            heartsofoak.org/ PODCASTS        heartsofoak.podbean.com/ SOCIAL MEDIA  heartsofoak.org/connect/ SHOP                  heartsofoak.org/shop/ TRANSCRIPT (Hearts Of Oak) I'm delighted to have Professor Angus Dalgleish with us today. Professor, thank you so much for your time. (Prof Angus Dalgleish) You're welcome. Great to have you. And of course, people will have read, I'm sure, many of your articles, more recently in The Conservative Woman, back before that, I think in certainly The Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail. And since 1991, I know you've been the Professor of Oncology at St. George's University, London. And during this time, you focused on the immunology of cancer and conducted numerous clinical trials involving a variety of vaccines and immune therapy. I know you're well known for your contributions on HIV AIDS research. And of course, you stood for UKIP, which is another part of your story back in 2015. There's so many areas, Professor, I want to talk to you, but maybe you have got a background in understanding vaccines. We'll get on to, I think, the first article you wrote, certainly I read, was back two years ago, actually, on the madness of vaccinating children against COVID, and they started discussing cancer and what you were seeing back in December 2022. I certainly saw it in the Conservative Woman but maybe I can ask you just for a little bit of your background and then we can get on to what you have seen with your patients and the data. Okay well with regards to my background I mean it's, I've been reminded of something I'd forgotten and that is that I'm probably one of the only people in the country who's been an NHS consultant in virology, immunology, general medicine, and oncology. So when I had my chair in oncology, I had a great background in immunology and virology, which is what led me to go into tumour immunology. And I continued working on HIV pathogenesis for several years and worked with colleagues in Norway with designing a very good HIV vaccine, which is the only one that works. But I was staggered that nobody was interested or would support it. And yet the big medical industrial complex, such as the NIH and Big Pharma, kept plowing ahead with vaccines that had the whole envelope in different technologies, and none of them worked. In fact, it was worse than working. They had to stop all these worldwide trials costing billions because the vaccine was worse than the placebo, now so that's a very good entrée as to where I came from with the COVID virus. When that became a pandemic and the sequence became available. I was called up by my colleagues in Norway saying, would I be happy to do the same process? I help identify the major immunological components and avoid all the unnecessary ones, which is the most important thing. And I said yes, obviously. And we started to plan a MAPA plan when they came back and said, this is not an actual virus, this has been released from the lab in Wuhan or escaped then as we put it and the reasons for this was absolutely plain, is that there were charged inserts around the receptor binding site not one or two but six as well as the fusion site, fusion domain and I looked at that you know, and I had a background because I've done so much work on the HIV receptor, even as a clinician I was you know, had a scientific understanding of interactions and what is required etc and it occurred to me that these inserts some of them had been previously published and, you know, by the Wuhan group, they'd said, aren't we clever? We put this insert in and we made this virus more infectious to human cells. This is very good. They went on with two or three. But here we had one with six inserts. Now, my molecular biology, virology friends all told me, oh, don't get excited. All these things happen at random. And here I then realized what a problem was with science, people are only in their boxes, they don't get out of the boxes. Changes in sequence only matter when they translate into the amino acids which translate into proteins and that's what does the interaction, once the amino acids were translated by these inserts they broke all the rules of the game, they were far too too positively charged, which meant that the virus had been altered so it would act like a fridge magnet. So it would zap onto human cells over and above its natural ACE receptor. And when I realized this, it was 100% I was convinced it could not have come from anywhere else because it had broken the rules of biology. And the rules of biology would have edited out those changes because, put it in a simple way, the charge was around pH 8. The charge of any normal virus is around 6 or less. So it was just a supernatural leap. And that's what convinced me. But the big problem was that having written papers in Nature Science, Lancet on HIV and its receptor and how it causes disease and the epidemiology and got them all in the leading papers. When I pointed this out with my colleagues, Nature, Science, all these papers, Lancet, they all turned us down and said, this data is not in the public interest. Seriously, I've got the copies. It is unbelievable. So I realized then that a discussion about the science was being banned. This led to me, and I'm flagrantly admit that, you know, this ended up in us writing a book called The Death of Science, which is actually available, and I've probably got it somewhere. But this was unbelievable that we suddenly realized everything was being censored. I was told by my own university we were not allowed to discuss or research the origin of the virus. Well, I mean, that was really quite draconian. But then where do so many universities get their funding from these days? They're far too reliant on China. So it clearly comes from that source, the way China stopped the WHA doing their work. Now, I'm just going to mention, this is relevant to what you've asked me to talk about, because when we had that spike protein, we realized it was very fully charged. We also looked at it for a homology with now an epitopes. And 80% of it was similar to the human epitopes, some of them unbelievably identical, platelet factor IV myelin. So we said, do not use this as a vaccine, because it will cause all sorts of terrible side effects. This is how you do it. We've learned from HIV, a vaccine is not how much you can put in it, but how little you can put in it. So you go for the Achilles heels of the structure. So if those structures no longer exist, the virus doesn't exist in any variant. So we actually had a blueprint. And we told everybody about this. We had access to the cabinet, the SAGE, Chief Medical Officer of Science. Who basically deemed it all interesting but not relevant. Can you believe that? But they had a point that there was 150 groups reviewed by a Nature paper, all of them so stupid, I use the word advisedly, that they all said, this is our vaccine. They all used the whole spike protein. Well, it was obvious that you must not use the whole spike protein, in the same way we'd spent 30 years saying don't use the whole HIV envelope. And they still haven't got the process. I mean, it is unbelievable stupidity group thing. And anyhow, so we knew there was going to be a big problem if they use the spike protein with autoimmunity, etc. However, that had nothing to do with my interest with cancer at all. What got my interest in cancer in this was when they brought out the booster program. Now, I've done lots of model work on vaccines, you know, basic research funded by charity, done for industry too. And a basic adage is, if a vaccine needs a booster, it doesn't work. So here we are being forced by the government and all the authorities to have a booster when it was all based on the grounds that people who monitor the effects of people who've been vaccinated, their antibody titer falls off. Well, of course it does. I mean, that's what you want. And that was the basis for doing boosters, to stop it falling off. Well, I knew enough then about the booster is that by the time they were talking about rolling out the booster, we were already in Omicron territory. They were boosting a virus that didn't exist on the grounds that there was crossover. And there was all these species, the booster will give you extra protection from crossover. Well, apart from the fact that we'd widely published and it had been downloaded over a quarter of a million times, our objection to using the spike protein and what you should use for a vaccine, with another group of colleagues, I wrote a review of a virus. Coxsackie viruses and the attempts to vaccinate against them and why they had all failed. And actually, the need for them is greater in animal work than it is in humans. But they all fail because the vaccines against coronavirus lead to antigenic sin or immunological imprinting. Once you are vaccinated against a component of that and you challenge with a different variant, it will only see the first component. And it will not see the variants. But it will make antibodies that will bind to them. And then that enhances infection and this explains why people have just woken up scratched their heads and say why does everybody who gets a booster get infected again with COVID in fact three and a half times more likely according to the big Cleveland study and more than twice as likely according to one published after the second vaccine in BMJ, so this was not a surprise. I couldn't believe why nobody heeded and listened to these warnings. And the people that made the decision. It must have made them in ignorance because they certainly didn't read any of this stuff. Otherwise, they'd have been much more cautious. Now, instead, they were being pushed by Big Pharma, who selected the data. It's now obvious that Pfizer, if they had revealed the data, the VAERS data, nobody in their right mind would ever have approved it. And you've had Clare Craig and Norman Fenton on board. So all I can just point out was I was unaware of this carry on at the time, but they brilliantly pointed out that they did it all on relative risk as opposed to absolute risk and the number needed to vaccinate to prevent. If that data had been presented properly, nobody in their right mind would have approved a vaccine. It's just meaningless to have to vaccinate 120 people to prevent one infection. And when the VAERS data came out, it was clear that if you had a serious adverse event, you had a 3% chance of dying. Whereas if you got COVID, you had less than 1% chance of dying. In fact, a lot, lot less than 1% at the very most. So there was no way anybody should have done it. So I would argue that the Pfizer, and I'm not alone in having said that they went into shenanigans and all sorts of smoke and mirror to hide the truth and get everything approved. But, you know, others, such as the state of Texas, are actually suing them for fraud. So, I mean, it's not exactly, it's an open secret. So get back to the booster and the cap.... Could I just ask you just one little sidestep, I remember reading your numerous articles, I think it's probably in the Daily Mail and I remember thinking Professor Angus is saying, speaking his concerns in a great way to stay within certain restrictions and yet get the message out. And I was reading, thinking, this is exactly what I am hearing as a lay person. And you're explaining from your medical professional background. And those articles in the mainstream media, the newspapers, I think were vital in helping people understand what was happening. And you wrote them in such an intelligent, smart way. Well, thank you very much. With regards to the Daily Mail and the articles, I was staggered by the letter. Sometimes they would print a page of letters in the printed edition, and they were all from people saying, thank you so much for helping us understand just what the hell has been going on. You know that was the great thing, the big problem I had with the Daily Mail as soon as I pointed out that there was a problem with the vaccine, I would get to the draft I'd submit it, it'd be accepted and then it wouldn't appear and it had been censored by the chief editor, as soon as it was a vaccine, we now know why, it's because the mainstream media were paid a fortune to push the narrative by the government. A fortune so big that none of them were prepared to challenge it. The Mail did a fantastic job, and I helped as much as I could on the grounds that the lockdowns were madness, and there's no scientific justification for it. It was absolute madness, even to think of a second one. And many others, Carl Heneghan, et cetera, came up, and I was saying that natural immunity, and I was one of the few clinicians to sign the Great Barrington Declaration because that's what I said we should have done straight from day one. In fact, now in retrospect, my gut feeling we didn't need a vaccine program has been proven to be absolutely true because had we done the vitamin D properly and had one or two other drugs out there, we would not, and I include there, without beating around the bush ivermectin, I think Peter Curry's book is absolutely damning how Fauci and others went out of their way to damp that down. And the only reason they did was because you cannot introduce a vaccine if you've got an effective therapy. I mean, I really do believe it was that bad that they were doing this. And so many people suffered. I think it was criminal. I make no bones about that. But the media wouldn't touch my concerns about the vaccine, which is why I ended up publishing them in the Daily Skeptic and the Conservative Women, who, I must say, they challenge anything that they find they cannot collaborate. Corroborate they they check they do their own referencing and everything so they are very very hot and quite a lot of stuff I've had toned down because of challenges to the refereeing for instance etc, but the stuff that they do put out there they're all very happy about it, now what I did and why you were talking is that when the booster came in, I've said it's a complete waste of time. Not only will it induce antibodies to a virus that doesn't exist, but they will lead to more infection. What I wasn't prepared for was that my patients who I was monitoring carefully, who'd been stable melanoma for years, I had half a dozen of them go down within six to eight weeks of the booster program being wheeled out. And they had relapsed. And some of these had been stable for over 15 years. The average was five to seven. And I knew then something was going on because melanoma patients, once they're induced to be stable with immunotherapy like they all had, because I was using immunotherapy 20, 25 years ago, long before it became popular, I knew there had to be a tremendous immune suppression event going on, life event. It's usually bereavement, severe depression, divorce, bankruptcy. Something that goes over three months to cause this. Yet I was seeing it clear. I reported it. I was told by my own people to shut up and stop frightening the patients. There is no evidence. Get the evidence. So I said, you know, I am a canary in a mine and a man with a red flag. It's up to everybody else to react to this. Now, I was told no. I've subsequently seen a dozen and I've continued to shout. And I saw eight cases within my social and family circle of people who developed leukaemia lymphoma after the booster and so we started to say how is it doing that? When it became evident there was a very good, I mean my own group have done work on this, but to me what really convinced it when other people found that t-cell responses were suppressed after the booster not the first and second but after the booster and the t-cell suppression was so bad they called it exhaustion in cancer patients, well we know that the people who've got cancer under good control, it is t-cells nothing to do with antibodies. So the booster was doing more harm than good, it's suppressing the t-cell response, and then I found papers that was even worse on the grounds that the booster switched the IgG1, immunoglobulin class structure antibodies, from ones that would normally be intent on fighting viruses to one that were tolerizing them, tolerizing the IgG. The sort you induce in transplant patients. So not only had you switched the T cell response off, but you'd sent all the antibodies on to be tolerizing so they didn't reject the transplant. Of course the transplant in this case is the cancer so there's no doubt that it popped up, that was a major reason why it popped up, now why it's important to discuss this now is, having been told to shut up and be quiet, I did get by the way, people from all over the world saying thank you for pointing this out, we've seen exactly the same thing. I mean from America, Canada, South America, Europe, South Africa, Australia, all around the world people said we're seeing exactly the same thing. Well now we have this paper that's come from Japan, it's pure statistical analysis of events over COVID, including all causes of death and this is important, not incidents death, and they noticed there was no increase in death of any cause or cancer during the first one and two waves of COVID. But it started in late 21 and continued to rise, hardly doubling in 22. And so the all-cause in 21 went from a few percentage, three or four, to over 9% in 22. Death from cancer went from 1.1 to 2.2 + in 22 these are small figures but it's a very strong trend because it was in all the cancers, it wasn't just in any one and I got particularly interested because there was no great increase in colorectal cancer, which is what we've seen in the UK in fact the colorectal surgeons were the first to phone me and say we're seeing unbelievable colon cancer in young people, and they've all had the booster vaccine. You know, we think there is something related. So I reacted that there was no signal in Japan. And then remember, they have an incredibly different diet. It's a completely anti-inflammatory diet. So they haven't been primed for colon cancer to take off. But all the ones that were killing them were those that killed them before, but much quicker. But I mentioned mortality. I predicted there would be a massive increase in cancer problems just on lockdown alone because we weren't screening. People weren't coming to with their symptoms. We weren't doing the scanning. We weren't getting them on treatment early. So that alone, I predicted more people would die of that lockdown on cancer than would die from any benefit of lockdown on COVID deaths, which we now know there were zero. I mean I think most people will now agree with that, it was introduced far too late on both occasions, it was introduced just as the hot, the waves were dying out, completely utterly pointless, so I was very aware and actually preached a bit that you know, the problem with this issue is cancer incidence is massive, cancer deaths not nearly as much because we've got very good at treating it and the incidence to death can take several years, so here in Japan you've actually got the death rate clearly rising, it's all very statistical this, in one year two year now, That was finished in 2023, submitted in 2023. If we had the 23 data, I would bet that that would be a doubling again, probably, on the 22 data, because they have shown in the data they've got, it's worse with each booster, not just the first. If you have a fourth and a fifth, it gets worse. And what is great about this paper is it goes into explaining how it's actually induced the cancer early as opposed to just waiting for it to develop which is what I would have expected had it just been suppression of the immune system and one thing they have suggested, which I totally go along with and I hadn't thought of it first-hand myself but I'm fully aware and support it, is that the clotting tendency, these micro-clots that the spike protein causes. Actually would lead to enhancing the cancers to spread and metastasize. And we know that this clotting abnormality occurs in some cancers, prostate and pancreas, and all sorts of unusual things occur, like disseminated intravascular coagulation, etc. Now, this is the sort of thing, that it was being reported in people who died of cancer who'd been vaccinated. Really abnormal clots. If you look at the literature, there's a lot of people pointing out that the autopsy is highly unusual clotting going on. So the fact that that process was actually driving cancer is a very interesting suggestion. It's not proof, but it's yet another reason that might be driving it. In the literature are reports that the spike protein binds to p53 and msh3. These are suppressor genes. If you have mutations in these genes you're much more likely to develop cancer because they normally switch the cancer that has arisen by accident off. They're suppressor genes, they switch it off. So if you compromise your suppressor genes you're much more likely to develop cancer quickly. And I think that this is part of what the Japanese data is showing. I just point out that I don't think there is any ulterior motive in just pointing out what we've seen, whereas I am very concerned that the Office of National Statistics keep changing the rules with data. They stopped reporting the COVID deaths in May 22, and they've been doing adjustments and all sorts of things, which I think, what are they trying to hide? And Carl Heneghan has made a very, and Norman Fenton, made a very big issue of this. Why don't they just release all the data? And I'm convinced that data shows something very similar, just because of what I see. I look around my friends, the number who've gone down with cancer since they had the booster. Which they only had so they could travel in lockdown, and they wanted to have a decent holiday. And he said, you can't get on this plane or this boat unless you have the booster. And so they had the booster. And in two cases, they never, ever going to get on the boat and do the traveling. One of them died very quickly, and I was horrified by it because he'd had perfect treatment, absolute perfect treatment, but still progressed, suggesting there were other mechanisms going on. And another one had a lymphoma that he had years ago it resurfaced rapidly and killed him and his oncologist, I was quite surprised told him, I really can't ignore the fact that this has been stable for years but it's come back as soon as you had the booster and there's a chap in England who's pointing this out, I was a friend of this guy, he's in America. And then I've had other cases which have popped up completely unexpected. In my family, I've had cases of leukaemia uncovered after the boosters and brother-in-laws, etc. So it's really real. And friends who developed aggressive prostate, pancreatic, ovarian cancer since the booster program has been wheeled out. And my main reason for shouting about this is that I am still being told I can have a spring booster to protect myself. I spoke to a friend today and they were talking about their father who was told he had prostate cancer and I think he went for a psa testing, that's to look at how far the cancer is and it was very low it was six or eight, then after the boosters he went for another test and they'd gone up to 170 and was told it spread throughout out the body and that was it and I get those are similar stories you have heard and I'm looking at these studies which are coming out and obviously you, this has just come out, you've just published this in the conservative woman as of when we're recording actually on the 15th, but you need studies I guess to analyse the data and put it together it's one thing having the individual stories, but these studies seem to be telling you what you already had heard in your individual patients. Yes, indeed. I mean, we've been really waiting for proper studies like this, and there seemed to be a real hesitation. I mean, I told everybody who criticized me, well, go away and look at it. You're sitting on the data. You're head of trusts. You're head of of MRC, CRUK, all these things. That's your job. It's not my job. My job is to be the whistle-blower. But as we know, whistle-blowers in the health service are persecuted, and it would have seemed to be the same in science and everything as well. It's been going on a long time. I was reminded yesterday that Semmelweis, who was the first person to point out that the dreadful sepsis deaths in the maternity ward were due to the fact nobody washed their hands, and if you washed their hands, you didn't get it. All his colleagues turned around and said, you're a lunatic, and had him locked up. I mean, I don't think things have changed with this pandemic at all. That's exactly what's going on. It's the death of science. nobody wants to discuss the data whether it be the origin of the virus whether it be with a pandemic it's a good or bad thing whether it be that masks are a good or bad things or that whether we should have been able to early treat as you would any respiratory virus with a good boost of vitamin D, soluble aspirin, intranasal interferon, beclamide, if it goes to the chest all these things I believe, and ivermectin which having looked at all the data, I can understand now why nobody in the establishment wanted it anywhere near a COVID patient because it worked and it saved them and there would be no need for any vaccine whatsoever and Fauci demonized it as a horse de-wormer when it is probably one of the most effective drugs in humans ever in the history of medicine, because it It prevents all sorts of things, river blindness and the liver, all the flukes, et cetera, in Africa and Asia. And may well be a major reason why the incidence of COVID deaths in these places was so low, because they were all on ivermectin and getting good vitamin D, of course. I've just spoken out as these studies are coming out, and we'll put the link to the Japanese study in the description. Of course, it's in that article. As more and more people have spoken out, are you seeing more of your colleagues going public on it? Because surely when the studies are coming out, the data is released, then that's proving what has happened. And therefore, you will get more and more people from the medical community who actually are speaking up and saying, yeah, this is correct. Do you think that will happen? Well, I hope so. I hope so. So the ones that spoke up and said, you're correct, all said, by the way, we've been told to shut up too and not upset the patients. This is like it was a central script written somewhere because they told me the same in America, Canada, Australia, Europe and Britain, that to be quiet. I got carpeted for pointing all these things out and said I was breaking NHS guidelines. And this would go down on my thing as breaking rules. I said, I don't give a damn. All I'm doing is making sure I do no harm. I suggest you do the same. NHS is causing more harm. I think the NHS, one of the reasons it's crippling, it's spending so much time treating the side effects of the vaccine program. And they won't admit it, of course. And I've been doing some medical legal instances where people have clearly been damaged by the vaccine and none of the people concerned will admit it. They just say coincidence. It's just like a tape. And I've spoken to lots of people who had very bad vaccine and had just been really badly treated. They go out of the way to make sure it's not enough for compensation. And I hadn't realized how many people had lost their jobs in the UK because they refused to get vaccinated or they refused to get the booster because they had had such bad bad side effects from the first two. How can you possibly justify that? If you have a bad reaction to a drug, you don't take it again. You don't take another dose and hope it's not as bad this time, which seems to be the NHS and the government's attitude to it. Yeah. Another part is the cancer issue, and obviously seems to be speeding up cancer much faster. That's certainly the people I've talked to. But the other side, and a lot of the media reports have been a shocking cancer amongst younger people. And the journalists, right, they have no idea why…. Yes, they do. this has been happening recently but I mean tell because, it's that concern you think cancer is something you get maybe later on in life but this is happening younger, this changes the very nature of what that is the impact on society. Yes I mean we have seen and there there is a paper showing that there is a real increase in patients under 44. I think it's 19 to 44 a massive increase in cancers and particularly abdominal cancers. So colorectal. We were seeing this before, by the way, in young people in this country, obviously not in Japan. And so I've always said it must be something to do with the diet is driving this, and so do most people. But it seems to have accelerated since the vaccine program came on. But we're seeing all the others. I mean, I was really surprised. We're seeing oesophageal cancer, biliary, liver, pancreatic, upper and lower bowel, weird ones like appendix cancers. You know, incredibly rare. I was contacted by a fellow who said that he'd seen about one of these. He runs a colorectal surgery and he's seen about one in the last five years. And he said, I've seen 13 recently, and they'd all had the vaccine. They were all in young people. So, I mean, so when people get cancers, unusually unexpected. The first thing you should do is say, why? Do they have something in common? Well, they do. The vast majority, again, not all of them, because there's a background incidence, have all had the vaccine or a booster. And that to me is stop the bloody program now, you know instead I'm being told to go and get my spring booster what planet are these people on? This is, since you've spoken up nearly or 18 months or 21 months ago I've seen more and more people write about it, is this the end then of this worldwide experiment of this new type of technology, this mRNA which is massively backfired or is it just how Big Pharma work and then they come up with the mRNA now to fix cancer which is the the latest thing we've heard. Yeah, well, they were always working on that. And I actually, you know, when people tell me I'm a clinician and I don't know what I'm talking about and to shut up, I tell them I know a darn sight more than they do. And especially about the dangers of messenger RNA vaccine, because I was on a scientific advisory board for a company whose subtitle was the messenger RNA vaccine company for five years and I left about seven years ago and they were targeting cancer and they didn't get through, BioNTech had the same thing. Big Pharma and whatever's behind them at far more sinister, has used this pandemic and I mean, when it started I wouldn't even have thought along these lanes. I honestly think it was planned, it's like it was planned to get the messenger rna out, when you go back and you look at the Manhattan project for vaccines and world health, their big issue was why do we make all these vaccines? If we don't have a pandemic we won't make any money, we'll lose money so this really looks like it was all planned, why did Moderna have a patent on sars-2 in February 2019? Why did the German government go ahead and fund an an enormous big vaccine facility in Marburg to produce messenger RNA, long before they were anywhere near being approved. It sounds like the whole thing was part of some sinister plan. And that's what I find really, really concerning. And I've spoken up and on the record. I think the messenger RNA vaccines are an absolute disaster, should be banned. They should be completely, utterly banned. And they are what they say on the till in the early BN Biotech preparations for Pfizer, they have COVID vaccine-gene therapy. Well, that was honest. You don't use gene therapy on a pandemic that kills less than 1% of people. And then you go ahead with the plan, when you know that the people who did die had an average age in the UK of 82, whereas average age of anybody else dying of anything else was 81. So the logical thing for a statistician was to go around and prepare COVID and spray it all around the population and tell them they'll live an extra year longer, because you've got I mean, being very cynical about it. But why would you? You shouldn't do it. Chris Whitty occasionally said some sensible things, but then went on to being beheaded or whatever it is and go along with this madness. He said, you can't use a vaccine unless you've got a death rate of 30% in the main population. You can't justify it if you haven't got the safety data. Why did he not stand up when it was 1% and stop it? Could it be something to do with shut up and you'll get your rewards in the honours list which they all did these people all of them, Vallance, Whitty and all these, I was going to say goons from SAGE, I'll say that again I do, I disagreed with them totally and utterly and even the people working with the vaccines from Oxford, the Astra Zeneca, they all got knighthoods, damehoods everything long before there was any evidence it was of any any benefit. It's unbelievable. When these studies come out, a lay person like myself will think this then starts a catalyst of looking at other countries and wanting the data. But then the flip side is you realize the difficulty of data, and you touched on that. I think you had mentioned that whenever I saw you speak at Andrew Bridgen's event the end of last year in Parliament, the lack of data. It seems like there is British data. there is Israeli data and there does seem some Japanese data. Many other countries seem to have a complete void, but the UK government don't even want to release any of the data. Will this force them to release it? Will this mean there are possible financial penalties? I mean, these companies getting sued? Where does this go whenever one country brings out a study like this, which is so comprehensive? Well, I think you'll get other countries that will do it. I really do. I mean, Australia, who behaved appallingly during the pandemic, I mean, they were run by a bunch of, not just clowns, but really ghoulish clowns who seem to relish in power and locking down and God knows what else, have mandatory vaccines. Well, at least they have. They've had a lot of revolt over this, and they finally had a formal Australian Commission on Excess Deaths. And I've been asked to give evidence for it as have some other people who've raised their voice and we'll make it very very clear what's going on, some of the senators now in Australia know exactly what was going on and they're baying for blood as it were and the thing that I'm baying for, why were the people like me in Australia and I worked in Australia for seven years by the way, I did flying doctor for a year and I did internal medicine and oncology. I know it very very well, why did these doctors who thought like me, I'm going to look after the patients, this, that and the other, they got struck off if they they wouldn't go along with this madness. I mean, it's unbelievable. It was inhumane. And at least that commission is going to uncover it. I think our COVID inquiry is a whitewash to kick the can down the road for so long. By the time it comes to the conclusions, nothing to see here, nobody, no one person was guilty. There'll be lessons to learn. No, there won't be any lessons to learn unless they hold people to account, unless we withdraw from the WHO, this madness, this treaty they want us to sign up to, once they're all signed up, they release the next pandemic and they will have another round of vaccines for you. I mean, I thought this was absolute madness to even think like that. But George Orwell saw it all 70 years ago, 70 years plus. And I mean, it's just unbelievable. I re-read 1984 and Animal Farm when I went on holiday recently. They had a package, and I'd read them 40, 50 years ago, a long time. If I hadn't have read them, I'd have thought, oh, somebody's seen through the lockdown and written these in lockdown as to where it could lead once you give the power to the governments to bully the thing. Yeah, it's incredible. They could have been written in the lockdown, but he wrote them 50 years ago. He saw what was coming. Obviously, it was about the communist model coming out of Russia and the implications. But I never thought I would live long enough to see democracy being destroyed by the same tentacles of control that emerged due to the COVID. And it's given them a power to interfere in everything else. I mean, a power to block all kinds. I've lost my faith totally in justice in the UK, probably worldwide. The Postmaster scandal was unbelievable. when the guy was told you're the only one, I remember that's what I was told when I made a great fuss, you're the only one, it transpires there were dozens and dozens of us who made, said the same thing to the government, they ignored, there were hundreds and hundreds of postmasters who said the same thing that they ignored and now, you know we're going we're having the same absolute nonsense over climate control. I mean I went and researched climate control, I didn't have to do much research before I realized that the data is very clear out there that carbon dioxide rises when the world warms. And it is actually something that's trying to do something good about it. And it does. It's a heavy gas, falls to the ground, encourages plant growth, tree growth, which produces more oxygen. It is. It's like a controller. It's like a thermostat. It is not the cause. And you've got all these morons, and I use the word advisedly, and people like Ed Miliband should springs to mind this guy is a total moron, who thinks that if you stop the co2 from the cars, this, that and the other, you'll save the world from global warming, it won't make one iota difference and if you really succeeded in lowering co2 significant, you would actually start extinguishing life they don't seem to understand any basic biology at all and yet these morons are running our parliament, running our lives and they are impoverishing everybody on this planet. I saw my energy bill even though we tried very hard, it's absolutely ludicrous and it's even worse knowing it is five times higher than if I was in the United States where at least they've got some pragmatism with regards is, we can't do everything in the solar and wind we're going to need our oil and gas and by the way it's beneath us, ours is beneath us but we've basically said we're not going to use it and so we're dependent on China who's polluting the world to death, it's unbelievable. I think many people have had their eyes open to many of these issues over the last couple of years of COVID tyranny. Professor Dalgleish, I'm honoured really to have you on, it's wonderful to hear your thoughts and your writings, it's good to delve into them, people can get the Conservative Woman, but thank you so much for the stand you've taken and thank you for sharing your thoughts with us today. Right. Well, thank you very much for having me. But just remember, we've written an enormous amount of this up in The Death of Science, which is available on Kindle, Amazon, and is multi-author. And it's got contributions from Karol Sikora, Sir Richard Dearlove, Clare Craig, Ros Jones. I mean, I'm really proud that we've been able to really put the gauntlet down, that this government and the world's governments and the scientists and the institutions and the medical profession have killed science. We have to do everything we can to rectify that. Thank you. And the viewers and listeners can get that. The links will be in the description. So however you're watching, however you're listening, you can just click on that. So, Professor, once again, thank you for your time today. Cheers. Thank you.

Rod Arquette Show with Greg Hughes Rundown – “Wingman Wednesday,” April 10, 20244:20 pm: Kimberly Begg, President of the Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women, joins the guys for a conversation about her piece for The Federalist about how most young women have conservative values, but feel pressure to suppress them.5:05 pm: U.S. Senate candidate Carolyn Phippen joins the show to discuss why she says she agrees with Donald Trump when he says abortion is an issue for the states and disagrees with the push for a national abortion ban.

What's the difference between conservative and liberal women? Do you know??

Shelby County Commissioner Mick Wright and Shelly Cheng, of Conservative Women of Collierville, stop by the show to discuss coffee, crime, accountability, the Tennessee gas station cold beer ban bill, the Gen Z generation, and restaurant tipping. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Nikki Haley is claiming that there WILL be a female president this election cycle and that it will be her or Kamala Harris. That statement has to inspire all kinds of enthusiasm for her campaign. As women become more liberal, men become more conservative, and the experts become more baffled, it becomes clear that what we are dealing with is a theft of identity. The Democrats have done a great job of confusing people's identities at the core, once again partnering with Satan's agenda.What does God's Word say? Psalm 139:14I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.John 15:18-2518 “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. 20 Remember what I told you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.'[a] If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. 21 They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the one who sent me. 22 If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not be guilty of sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin. 23 Whoever hates me hates my Father as well. 24 If I had not done among them the works no one else did, they would not be guilty of sin. As it is, they have seen, and yet they have hated both me and my Father. 25 But this is to fulfill what is written in their Law: ‘They hated me without reason.'Episode 1,381 Links:“​​Here's the truth: we're going to have a woman president. It will either be me, or it will be Kamala Harris. Because Donald Trump can't beat Joe Biden, and Joe Biden won't finish his term.”Gen Z's gender divide is huge — and unexpectedFAA created “secret code words” for blacks so they could one-up whites and Asians…Mark Cuban slips up in Twitter post, admits to possible illegal DEI hiring, opening himself up endless lawsuits…the Cuban message crisis; the cure for ego is a soapbox.How Christians are treated by police singing on the streets of London Vs how Muslims are treated. Notice a difference? Ilhan Omar addressing the Revolutionary Somali Youth League in 2015: “You guys have the ability to make an impact where our nation is headed. Not only here in the United States, but even in OUR NATION BACK HOME”Not Just Claudine Gay. Harvard's Chief Diversity Officer Plagiarized and Claimed Credit for Husband's Work, Complaint AllegesThe Beltway Judge Hearing Trump Cases and Her Anti-Trump, Anti-Kavanaugh HusbandTrump Admin Official Shot In DC, In Critical Condition After Carjacking Rampage4Patriots https://4Patriots.com/Todd Stay connected when the power goes out and get free shipping on orders over $97. Alan's Soaps https://alanssoaps.com/TODD Use coupon code ‘TODD' to save an additional 10% off the bundle price. Bioptimizers https://bioptimizers.com/todd Use promo code TODD for 10% off your order. Bonefrog https://bonefrogcoffee.com/todd Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions. Bulwark Capital Bulwark Capital Management (bulwarkcapitalmgmt.com) Call 866-779-RISK or visit online to get their FREE Common Cents Investing Guide. SOTA Weight Loss https://sotaweightloss.com SOTA Weight Loss is, say it with me now, STATE OF THE ART! GreenHaven Interactive Digital Marketing https://greenhaveninteractive.com Your Worldclass Website Will Get Found on Google!

4Patriots https://4Patriots.com/Todd Stay connected when the power goes out and get free shipping on orders over $97. Alan's Soaps https://alanssoaps.com/TODD Use coupon code ‘TODD' to save an additional 10% off the bundle price. Bioptimizers https://bioptimizers.com/todd Use promo code TODD for 10% off your order. Bonefrog https://bonefrogcoffee.com/todd Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions. Bulwark Capital Bulwark Capital Management (bulwarkcapitalmgmt.com) Call 866-779-RISK or visit online to get their FREE Common Cents Investing Guide. SOTA Weight Loss https://sotaweightloss.com SOTA Weight Loss is, say it with me now, STATE OF THE ART! GreenHaven Interactive Digital Marketing https://greenhaveninteractive.com Your Worldclass Website Will Get Found on Google!

All my links: http://DreamRareLinks.com My Shop! http://DreamRare.com My new single out in a few days! Pre-Order to help me chart! http://Song.Link/WorkingClassBoy

Recap of the impact we've made at Texas Values in 2023 with a focus on what's to come in 2024. Panelists on the issues of banning drag shows in front of children, banning gender modification in children, pro-life, save women's sports, religious liberty, and youth in politics. Panelists Include: - Jonathan Saenz, President & Attorney for Texas Values - Jonathan Covey, Policy Director, Texas Values - Mary Elizabeth Castle, Director of Government Relations, Texas Values - Megan Benton, Policy Intern, Texas Values, Alex Woodby, Development Associate, Texas Values - Pastor Jorge Tovar, Church Outreach Coordinator South Texas, Church Ambassador Network of Texas (TXCAN) - Macy Petty, Female Athlete & Conservative Women for America Spokeswoman - Christian Collins, President of Texas Youth Foundation (Texas Youth Summit - Rep. Tom Oliverson, Texas State Representative - Rep. Valoree Swanson, Texas State Representative - Rep. Barbara Ehardt, Idaho State Representative - Kim Jones, Co-founder of Independent Council on Women's Sports (ICONS) - Lori DeVillez, Founder & CEO, Trotter House Pregnancy Resource Center - Dr. Abby Johnson, Former Planned Parenthood Director and now Pro-life Leader - Cheryl Bean, Owner, B Smart Builders - Matt Long, Host of The Matt Long Show on The Hill Country Patriot, 9-10am weekdays - Autumn Stroup, Sr. VP of Strategy, Family Policy Alliance - Pastor Steve Riggle, Sr. Pastor Grace Church

Clip From Ep #665 Of The Clay Edwards Show On 103.9 WYAB (12/28/23) 1. Conservative Dad's - Ultra Right Beer releases their "Real Women Of America" 2024 calendar and so-called "conservative" women are upset about it and calling the women in the calendar out and suggesting they're not "real" conservatives for embracing their sexuality.   Check out my website at Www.ClayEdwardsShow.Com for all things Clay

Can the average family still get by on a single income, or has that become a far-fetched dream? Can traditional gender roles still work, or are they outdated and archaic? In this episode, the guys cover the ins and outs of the "trad-life" from both the male and female perspective. Expect lots of value, insight and laughs! Find us on Instagram and Twitter.Brendan's Instagram & TwittterMike's Instagram, Youtube & Twitter Apply to join over 55 men in the Masculine Revival Brotherhood HERE.Looking for 1:1 coaching? View Mike's 1:1 mentorship program HERE. INTRO (00:50)TRUE OR FALSE?Adhering to traditional gender roles is the best relationship model for men, women, children and society as a whole (04:44)Traditional gender roles are about adhering to strict rules and guidelines based on gender (09:03)Due to inflation and increased costs of living, the trad life is not possible for the average couple anymore (11:25)If a woman becomes a trad-wife, she becomes completely dependent on her husband (19:25)Living the trad life is a one-way ticket to happiness and fulfillment (27:20)It is NOT good for a woman to be the primary breadwinner in a marriage (31:39)For the trad life to work, a man MUST be in a high earning career (38:07)Women cannot work outside of the home under any circumstance (42:03)Every task between husband and wife should be divided based on gender (46:28)Living the trad life and being in a biblically based marriage are the same (49:08)Living the trad life is still possible | Closing Thoughts  (55:18)

Ariana is joined by Jordan Leighty, a student at the University of Texas at Austin and co-chair of the Young Conservatives of Texas, to discuss her experiences and the hardships she has faced as a conservative on a college campus.

Today the Chicks discuss the latest legal trouble for Trump, the deliciously nasty Congressional hearing about the Biden family crime drama, and the announcement that Diane Feinstein has passed away at 90.Birch GoldText CHICKS to 989898 for your FREE gold info kitBoneFrog CoffeeHappy National Coffee Day! Bone Frog Coffee .COM/CHICKS Code CHICKS Limited Time Offerbuy 3 Bags of Coffee and get a Free $10 eGift Card! 15% off subscriptions too!Bulwark Capitalhttps://knowyourriskradio.comActively manage your retirement accounts with Bulwark Capital and get a free copy of Common Cents Investing.EdenPUREhttps://edenpurdeals.comUse discount code CHICKS360 to save over $25 and free shipping on the EdenPURE 360 Air Fan.Field Of Greenshttps://fogchicks.comUse promo code CHICKS to save 15% off your order plus an additional 10% when you subscribe..Genucelhttps://genucel.com/chicksSave 70% off Genucel Most Popular Package: https://genucel.com/CHICKSHealthycellhttps://healthycell.com/chicksSupport healthy joint movement and flexibility with Joint Health and Mobility from Healthycell. Use promo code CHICKS for 20% of your first order.My Pillowhttps://mypillow.com/chicksEnter code Chicks in the Radio Listener's Square for 50% off the My Pillow 6-Piece Towel Set. Now only $39.99.Omaha Steakshttps://omahasteaks.comEnter code CHICKS in the search bar to save 50% on Steaks and get 2 FREE NY Strip Steaks with select packages during Steaktember!Patriot Mobilehttps://patriotmobile.com/chicksGet Free activation today with offer code CHICKS. Call today 878-PATRIOT.RuffGreenshttps://ruffchicks.comGet your FREE Jumpstart Trial Bag of Ruff Greens, simply cover shipping.

We discuss how retired h*es who label themselves as "trad wives" become Twitter bullies and shame other women for their current lifestyles. The toxic manosphere content has merged with some fractions of the right/conservative movement with ideas such as "repeal the 19th amendment", which is causing a backlash from conservative/right wing women. The men are lonely and somehow women are to blame, how can we fix this?Today's Sponsors:Sentry H2o: Get 5% off your under-the-sink, water filtration system with code "MPL10" | https://www.sentryh2o.com Patriot Shave: Get 10% off USA-made razors made by patriots with code "MPL" | https://www.patriotshave.com----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------DONATE TO OUR WORK: https://paypal.me/MPLatinas?country.x...SHOP THE MERCH: http://www.wakeupwithlinda.comFOLLOW UP ON TWITTER: https://twitter.com/mplpodcast305FOLLOW LINDA ON INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/wakeupwithl...FOLLOW US ON TIK TOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@mostlypeacefu...FOLLOW BELLA ON TELEGRAM: https://t.me/redpillbabee

WarRoom Battleground EP 342: EventBrite Cancels Conservative Women's Event

Racist Sexist Democrats Hate Conservative Women and Minorities Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Young people are being intentionally confused about their traditional gender roles and responsibilities, and the importance of marriage and family. No wonder fewer people are choosing not to tie the knot or have children, said Megann Robinson and Megan Cradduck of the That's It podcast.  In this interview with The New American, young conservative commentators reflect on the ... The post Young Conservative Women: Don't Let Demons Confuse You About Marriage  appeared first on The New American.

In this week's edition of THOUGHTCRIME, Charlie, Poso, Andrew Kolvet, and Blake Neff sit down to assess questions of global importance, including:   -Is there anything immoral about paying $250,000 to see the Titanic in a deathtrap submarine? -Why are conservative women so obviously hotter than liberal ones, and what on earth is "Bioleninism"? -Who will win the cage match between Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg? -Why are millions of people reading fake articles about military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay?Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

AI Study Finds Conservative Women More Attractive Than Liberals

Clip From Ep #539 Of The Clay Edwards Show On 103.9 WYAB (06/21/23) 1. #TrustTheScience a new scientific study shows that conservative women are more likely to be more attractive that liberal women (lol no kidding) Check out my website at Www.ClayEdwardsShow.Com for all things Clay

Conservative female politicians tend to appear happier and more attractive in pictures than liberal politicos, a new artificial intelligence study conducted. AI can predict a person's political ideology with 61% accuracy. Stonehenge welcomes 8,000 visitors for the summer solstice. Druids, pagans, hippies, local residents and tourists, many clad in an array of colorful costumes and even antlers, stayed and celebrated at Stonehenge for the night and greeted sunrise on Wednesday, which is the longest day in the Northern Hemisphere. Yosemite visitors warned they need to be careful of the 600-year-old plague. Officials say that plague in Yosemite is most commonly associated with fleas found on ground squirrels and chipmunks – but the plague in humans is very rare, with only about ten cases per year in the United States See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ed Henry joined me to discuss the hit song he produced "82 million votes my ass"

Tomorrow's news today from the legendary Rob Smith! It is June 7th 2023! Today's stories are Laura Loomer confronts Comey, Anna Paulina Luna goes after Adam Schiff, January 6th Footage, the War on Christians, Walmart Melania, PGA LIV Merger, and Taylor Swift's Love Life. Don't forget to LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, COMMENT, ALL THAT GOOD STUFF! WE POST DAILY! If you don't see us, check our other socials. If you got a favorite, we are most likely on it!The AllmyLinks has all of our Socials! - https://allmylinks.com/robisright

Are you a spiritually conservative woman looking to increase your confidence in the bedroom and enjoy a more fulfilling sex life? Look no further than this podcast episode. Sharing a few tips game changers that can transform your sexual experiences.Connect with Olivia Email - olivia@oliviatmcook.comLink's and freebies- https://linktr.ee/OliviatmcookAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Mayra Flores was the first Mexican-born member of Congress in the U.S. She is a conservative and the first Republican Congresswoman from a traditionally Democratic district in South Texas. The Left doesn't like her! They don't like Nikki Haley, either. Don Lemon was suspended at CNN for saying she's "past her prime." Why does the Left have such an issue with women of color being conservative? Congresswoman Flores joins Rick to talk about that and much more on The Rick Roberts Show....(Photo Courtesy of WFAA) Mayra is now the Senior Political Commentator for Americano Media with a focus on the Hispanic shift to the GOP. For more information click here: https://americanomedia.com/in-english  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In another episode brought to you in partnership with 50:50 Parliament, this week I sit down with the formidable Baroness Jenkin of Kennington, or Anne as she prefers, to talk about the challenges of getting conservative women elected to Parliament.  As the Co-Chair of Women2Win, a campaign group she co-founded with former Prime Minister Theresa May, Anne has been on the front lines of the fight to get more women elected on behalf of the Conservative Party. Anne and I explore what Women2Win does to help women candidates, what she's learned from a lifetime in Parliament, and the pride she feels for her family's role in achieving women's suffrage in the UK. She'll also share her thoughts on imposter syndrome as a Baroness and why women don't talk about their health enough. So grab your popcorn because we're about to dive into a real-deal conversation about empowering women in politics! About Baroness Jenkin:“Gets stuff done, rattles cages, and wings it much of the time” as her bio puts it,  Anne Jenkin is a powerhouse in UK politics. A Member of the UK's House of Lords, and Great-granddaughter of Sir Willoughby Dickinson, who introduced the 1907 Women's Enfranchisement Bill in the House of Commons, she is part of a political dynasty that covers all three of the UK's major political parties. After a career working as a Conservative parliamentary researcher, Anne co-founded Women2Win with former Prime Minister Theresa May in 2005 and currently serves as the organisation's Co-Chair. In 2011, she was made a Life Peer by David Cameron and has continued to work tirelessly to promote women in public life. She is also a vocal campaigner for reducing waste in all its forms and promoting sustainable development, at home and abroad.Real, relatable, or downright wrong? We want to know!Tweet your opinion: @_badasscass_Give us a like on Facebook: @powerdonedifferntlyCheck out exclusive behind-the-scenes action on Insta: @powerdonedifferentlyFind us at our new home: www.powerdonedifferently.comExplore Baroness Jenkin's work at: www.women2win.comShare your support at @women2winNotice:This episode of the Power Done Differently podcast was brought to you in partnership with 50:50 Parliament, the campaign to promote equal seats and equal say for women in parliament. The views and opinions expressed within do not necessarily reflect the views and positions, or official policy of 50:50 Parliament, and do not constitute an endorsement guarantee, warranty, or recommendation. The Power Done Differently podcast assumes no responsibility or liability for the accuracy contained in third-party materials or on third-party sites referenced in this podcast.

Join the Unapologetic Discord Server: https://discord.gg/unapologetic Jubilee creates weekly videos that aim “to create a movement of empathy for human good.” I recently filmed a video with Jubilee titled “Trans vs Conservative Women” where two conservative women and I went back and forth with three trans women on many of today's most pressing debates about gender. Let's watch and react! Follow me on Social Media: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theamalaekpunobi TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@amalaekpunobi Twitter: https://twitter.com/amalaekpunobi Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheAmalaEkpunobi #jubilee #middleground #reaction #civildiscussion #civildebate #civildiscourse #trans #conservative #liberal #react #debate #podcast #amala #amalaekpunobi #unapologetic #culture #socialmedia #trending #politics #leftist #woke #conservative #genz #viral #censorship #freespeech

Get your Gold: https://noblegoldinvestments.com/gold... In this video I discuss this totally random 2015 style hit piece against Lauren Southern & other right wing female creators/politicians. I explain why I think this video is ridiculous & pretty inaccurate Website: https://www.actualjusticewarrior.com/ https://linktr.ee/ActualJustice Odysee: https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewarr... Rumble: https://rumble.com/ActualJusticeWarrior Instagram NEW: https://www.instagram.com/actualjustice/ Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/actualjusticewa... Utreon: https://utreon.com/c/ActualJusticeWar... 2nd Channel: https://www.youtube.com/ajw2dreamscom... TeeSpring Store: https://teespring.com/stores/actualju... New Store: https://actualjusticewarrior.myspread... Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/iamsean90 Parler: https://parler.com/profile/Actualjust... https://www.minds.com/actualjusticewa... Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SeanFitzgerald Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/Iamsean90 Venmo: https://venmo.com/iamsean90 Support me on Subscribe Star: https://www.subscribestar.com/seanfit... Gab: https://gab.com/Iamsean90 Twitter https://twitter.com/iamsean90 Backup Twitter https://twitter.com/AJWSean Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/actualjustic... Discord: https://discord.gg/c7PGFFp 3rd: https://www.youtube.com/user/DudeMonk... Get Storable Food: https://www.preparewithajw.com Get Pocketnet: https://pocketnet.app/actualjusticewa... Podcast Links: Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1o0q86A... Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... Lauren's Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@LaurenSouthe... Blonde Belly Of The Beast: https://www.youtube.com/@BlondeintheB... Sources: Vice Video: https://youtu.be/rQKLOK4SU64 Lauren's Tweet: https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/s... Stream Clip: https://odysee.com/@laurenchen:0/midt... German Mayor: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo... Australian Wife Clip: https://youtu.be/J2mMhzZxt-w Lauren's Website: https://laurensouthern.net/ #LaurenSouthern #Vice #IamSean90 FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

John and Maria consider the latest cheating scandals in competitions, recognizing people's capacity for self-rationalization. After a discussion about government-funded suicide of young people in Canada, they conclude with a recent survey in the U.S. showing that conservative women are happier.

Married conservative women with kids are happier with their lives and make far more money than childless unmarried liberal women. The science is settled. https://www.bollandbranch.com/?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=radio&utm_campaign=ERICK

Married conservative women with kids are happier with their lives and make far more money than childless unmarried liberal women. The science is settled.https://www.bollandbranch.com/?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=radio&utm_campaign=ERICK

In the second hour of the morning show, Larry O'Connor and Julie Gunlock talked to Cal Thomas and discussed the latest trans news, a study on happy conservative women and Tucker Carlson has more exclusives with Tony Bobulinsky. For more coverage on the issues that matter to you, visit www.WMAL.com, download the WMAL app or tune in live on WMAL-FM 105.9 FM from 5-9 AM ET. To join the conversation, check us out on Twitter: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor,  @Jgunlock,  @patricepinkfile and @heatherhunterdc.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

New sexual misconduct allegations have been made about a cabinet minister and a top Number 10 aide who serve at the heart of Boris Johnson's government according to a Sky News investigation. They've published testimony from two women who give detailed, first-hand accounts of what they claim happened to them when one was assaulted and the other groped by political figures who are both now in senior roles. Liz Bates is the political correspondent at Sky News and presenter of the Open Secret Podcast. The race to be the next Prime Minister comes to an end of Monday, when either Liz Truss or Rishi Sunak will enter Number 10. Ella Robertson McKay has recently interviewed both candidates as the National Chair of the Conservative Young Women group – which represents female party members under the age of 35. Ella joins Anita to discuss what each candidate is offering to young women and what Ella's members think the winner should prioritise. At the start of lockdown in spring 2020 two friends living in Hastings set up a Facebook group for friends to experience the excitement of dressing up on a Friday and getting read to go out when everybody was forced to stay at home. The “Frock up Friday” movement was born and within three weeks the group had 10,0000 members worldwide and now two years later, they number 15,000 and are still growing. The friends who founded the group call themselves the “Mother Frockers” – Beverli Francis and Suzie Simms – and they'll be joining Anita Rani this morning to talk about their picture book which details many of the fabulous outfits members share, their festival this weekend for online friends to finally meet up in person, as well as their plans for the future. In July the healthcare charity Nuffield Health published data which showed that 47% of women had done no vigorous exercise in the past year. It was quickly pointed out that there might be lots of reasons for this - lack of time and money for example but there are other factors too. Every Body Outdoors is a group of women who are determined to fight for clothing and kit which fits them and they want to see larger and plus-sized people out and doing exercise, Charlotte Petts joins 5 of the group in the Brecon Beacons as they walk and talk about their campaign and their experiences. In the third and final part of our Woman's Hour series on Fangirls we ask: Is there a darker side to being a fangirl? We speak to freelance writer Jessica Lucas Presenter: Anita Rani Producer: Kirsty Starkey Interviewed Guest: Liz Bates Interviewed Guest: Ella Robertson Mckay Interviewed Guest: Beverli Francis Interviewed Guest: Suzie Simms Reporter: Charlotte Petts Interviewed Guest: Jessica Lucas

Competing with China in the 21st century requires more than just a sound foreign policy. It requires strengthening America from within. One area where much work is needed in the United States is education, including the education of our young women. This is an area to which the Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women […]

Just weeks ahead of Turning Point USA's annual event in Dallas, TX—the Young Women's Leadership Summit, where thousands of young, female, conservative, patriots from across the nation for an always-unforgettable and awe-inspiring weekend—Charlie is joined in studio by TPUSA Contributor, Host of ‘POPLitics,' ‘The Spillover Podcast,' and the Chairwoman of #YWLS2022 herself, Alex Clark, for her expert take on all things pop culture and more. Throughout the episode, they also discuss technology, family life, relationships, and even fashion—so needless to say, you won't want to miss Charlie's take on all of that and so much more.  Be sure to register for the TPUSA Young Women's Leadership Summit if you haven't already and join Alex, Charlie, Kayleigh McEnany, Candace Owens, Sarah Palin, and SO MANY other incredible speakers and activists June 2-4 in Dallas, Texas. Reserve your spot today, tickets are going fast: TPUSA.com/YWLS Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/support See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Michelle Easton is the founder and president of the Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women, which prepares young women for leadership in policy, civil society, and the family. The mother of three grown sons, she has hundreds of “daughters” whom she has helped launch into productive and fulfilling adulthood. A lawyer and laborer in the conservative movement since the early 1970s, Michelle worked through all twelve years of the Reagan-Bush administrations, including in presidential appointments in the Education Department. Tune into the conversation between Dr. Meeker and Michelle as they discuss Michelle's new book, How to Raise a Conservative Daughter.  MEG and GUEST MICHELLE EASTON (PART 1) Dr. Meeker and Michelle review Michelle's latest book, focusing on: - Why society praises liberal women and disparages conservative women - The origin of the feminist movement - Nonie Darwish, a former muslum who speaks on the dangers of misogyny and abuse towards women - Kellyanne Conway's character and the example she set as the Senior Counselor to former president, Donald Trump. BREAK  MEG and GUEST MICHELLE EASTON  (PART 2) Dr. Meeker and Michelle discuss Star Parker, who is another conservative woman of faith that made it into Michelle's book. Equally important to kindness and encouragement, Dr. Meeker and Michelle agree that a woman must have courage to speak into issues that truly matter. The two deliberate on the significance of women applauding virtue in other women and they also share why they are hopeful that younger generations of women will change the current liberal tide.  FROM THE PRODUCER Thanks for listening to Episode 161, How to Raise a Conservative Daughter, and for helping Dr. Meg's parenting revolution reach more than SIX MILLION downloads! Subscribe, rate, and leave a review for us on iTunes! Get Social with Dr. Meg on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram @MegMeekerMD   Dr. Meg's parenting resources and tools are available at www.meekerparenting.com.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.