Podcasts about legal philosophy

Branch of philosophy examining the nature of law

  • 29PODCASTS
  • 86EPISODES
  • 58mAVG DURATION
  • 1WEEKLY EPISODE
  • Apr 25, 2025LATEST
legal philosophy

POPULARITY

20172018201920202021202220232024


Best podcasts about legal philosophy

Latest podcast episodes about legal philosophy

The Constitutionalist
#57 - Tocqueville's Point of Departure

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 25, 2025 65:24


On the fifty-seventh episode of the Constitutionalist, Shane and Matthew discuss Volume 1, Chapter 2 of Alexis De Tocqueville's "Democracy in America." We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast co-hosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal abraham lincoln impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot departure ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott american democracy amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law senate judiciary committee john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris american exceptionalism alexis de tocqueville thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones social activism john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education electoral reform john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history constitutionalism tammy baldwin american founding civic education department of transportation summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey democracy in america benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson social ethics thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases deliberative democracy american constitution society george taylor civic responsibility department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander temperance movement ben cardin antebellum america department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush revolutionary america brian schatz state sovereignty civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era early american republic roger sherman maggie hassan constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase american political development civic culture richard stockton alcohol prohibition constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american political culture american governance constitutional conservatism lyman hall constitutional rights foundation
The Constitutionalist
#56 - Federalist 37

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 18, 2025 52:14


On the fifty-sixth episode of the Constitutionalist, Shane, Ben, and Matthew discuss Federalist 37, and Madison's teachings on political and epistemological limits. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast co-hosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law senate judiciary committee john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse mark warner tammy duckworth john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies electoral reform legal education political analysis john hart bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history american founding tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education department of transportation stephen hopkins summer institute james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen bob casey constitutionalists benjamin harrison war powers angus king mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases deliberative democracy american constitution society department of veterans affairs george taylor civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer apush department of commerce revolutionary america brian schatz state sovereignty founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era early american republic roger sherman maggie hassan constitutional advocacy martin heinrich contemporary politics jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center mercy otis warren living constitution civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee american political development samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance constitutional conservatism lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#55 - Gouverneur Morris with Dennis C. Rasmussen

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 11, 2025 60:27


Purchase Professor Rasmussen's book here.We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com  The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org.The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.   

united states america american founders history president donald trump culture house politics college doctors phd colorado joe biden elections dc local congress political supreme court union bernie sanders democracy kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law senate judiciary committee john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education electoral reform john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism american founding department of transportation summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases deliberative democracy american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush revolutionary america brian schatz state sovereignty civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era early american republic roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich constitutional advocacy jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee american political development samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance dennis c rasmussen constitutional conservatism lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#54 - Defending the Electoral College (Martin Diamond and Herbert Storing)

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 4, 2025 64:38


On the fifty-fourth episode of the Constitutionalist, Shane, Ben, and Matthew discuss the arguments of Martin Diamond and Herbert Storing in favor of preserving the Electoral College, presented to the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Senate Judiciary Committee in July 1977. The readings may be accessed here: Martin Diamond: http://www.electoralcollegehistory.com/electoral/docs/diamond.pdf Herbert Storing (Chapter 21 in this volume): https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/-toward-a-more-perfect-union_154408483501.pdf?x85095 We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast co-hosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives diamond nonprofits heritage defending political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington herbert princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin electoral college mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham storing bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law senate judiciary committee john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott subcommittee tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy senate hearings constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education electoral reform john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism american founding civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases deliberative democracy american constitution society george taylor civic responsibility department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander david nichols ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer apush department of commerce revolutionary america brian schatz state sovereignty civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era early american republic roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich constitutional advocacy jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee american political development samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo government structure department of health and human services american governance constitutional conservatism lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#53 - Lincoln's Temperance Address

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 28, 2025 61:40


On the fifty-third episode of the Constitutionalist, Shane, Ben, and Matthew discuss Lincoln's famous "Temperance Address," delivered on Washington's birthday in 1842 to the Washington Society in Springfield, Illinois. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast co-hosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local illinois congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm address constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal abraham lincoln impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor springfield george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott temperance federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones social activism john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse mark warner tammy duckworth john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education john hart political analysis bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education stephen hopkins summer institute james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen bob casey constitutionalists benjamin harrison war powers angus king mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson social ethics thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society george taylor department of veterans affairs civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin temperance movement antebellum america department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer apush department of commerce brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan constitutional advocacy martin heinrich contemporary politics jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton alcohol prohibition constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall washington society constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#52 - Texas Annexation - Adding the Lone Star with Jordan Cash

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 21, 2025 66:19


On the fifty-second episode of the Constitutionalist, Shane, Ben, and Matthew are joined by Jordan Cash, Assistant Professor at the James Madison College at Michigan State University, to discuss Texas's declaration of independence from Mexico, and its annexation by the United States. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history texas president donald trump culture power house washington politics college mexico state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives assistant professor nonprofits heritage michigan state university political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency sherman ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell declaration of independence supreme court justice baylor university american politics alamo lone star joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological manifest destiny constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand sam houston department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry 14th amendment annexation political history davy crockett benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism american founding civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman texas history chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun texas revolution thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases department of veterans affairs george taylor civic responsibility civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush revolutionary america brian schatz state sovereignty founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era mexican history early american republic maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought texas independence elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe james madison college jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning texians department of the interior tom carper james bowie constitutional affairs richard henry lee american political development samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure texas republic american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#51 - Madison on Property

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 14, 2025 45:47


On the fifty-first episode of the Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Matthew Reising discuss James Madison's Note on Property for the National Gazette, published March 27, 1792 We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union rights senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm property constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history constitutionalism tammy baldwin american founding civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society department of veterans affairs civic responsibility george taylor civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush revolutionary america brian schatz state sovereignty founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era roger sherman early american republic maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee american political development samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#50 - The Constitution of 1787

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 7, 2025 56:11


To commemorate the fiftieth episode of The Constitutionalist, Benjamin Kleinerman, Shane Leary, and Matthew Reising discuss the Constitution of 1787. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin american founding constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society department of veterans affairs civic responsibility george taylor civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush revolutionary america brian schatz state sovereignty founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era roger sherman early american republic maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich constitutional advocacy jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase american political development richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Dare to know! | Philosophy Podcast
Re-Conceptualizing the Corporation: A New Approach

Dare to know! | Philosophy Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 5, 2025 106:28


This conversation is part of the podcast series 'Corporate Sustainability: A Philosophical Perspective'. GUEST INFO: Christopher M. Bruner is the Stembler Family Distinguished Professor in Business Law at the University of Georgia School of Law and serves as a faculty co-director of the Dean Rusk International Law Center. He holds a courtesy appointment at the UGA Terry College of Business. Bruner teaches a range of corporate and transactional subjects, and he has received the School of Law's C. Ronald Ellington Award for Excellence in Teaching. BOOKS BY PROFESSOR BRUNER: The Corporation as Technology Re-Calibrating Corporate Governance for a Sustainable Future - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-corporation-as-technology-9780197635179?q=bruner&lang=en&cc=us The Cambridge Handbook of Corporate Law, Corporate Governance and Sustainability - https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-corporate-law-corporate-governance-and-sustainability/34E428DB18C05F02B9E8CB19E22437DA - Corporate Governance in the Common-Law World The Political Foundations of Shareholder Power - https://www.cambridge.org/us/universitypress/subjects/law/corporate-law/corporate-governance-common-law-world-political-foundations-shareholder-power?format=PB A Research Agenda for Corporate Law - https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/a-research-agenda-for-corporate-law-9781800880436.html HOST INFO: https://www.rug.nl/staff/f.m.corver/?lang=en

The Constitutionalist
#49 - Madison's Notes on Ancient and Modern Confederacies

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 28, 2025 55:45


On the forty-ninth episode of The Constitutionalist, Benjamin Kleinerman, Shane Leary, and Matthew Reising discuss James Madison's "Notes on Ancient and Modern Confederacies," compiled in 1786, and his early thinking regarding confederacies, union, and the necessity of a new Constitution. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local modern congress political supreme court union senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm ancient constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional convention constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history constitutionalism tammy baldwin american founding civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society department of veterans affairs civic responsibility george taylor civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush revolutionary america brian schatz state sovereignty founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris founding era roger sherman early american republic maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich constitutional advocacy jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee american political development samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#48 - Adams and Jefferson on Natural Aristocracy

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 21, 2025 52:48


On the forty-eighth episode of the Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Matthew Reising discuss John Adams and Thomas Jefferson's discussion of natural aristocracy, in a series of letter from August 14 to October 28 of 1813. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, Shane Leary, a graduate student at Baylor University, and Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court natural senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris adams blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones montesquieu john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin aristocracy political debate political thought sherrod brown republicanism david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin american founding constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society department of veterans affairs civic responsibility george taylor civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#47 - The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance with Matthew Reising

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 11, 2025 69:10


On the forty-seventh episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University, to discuss John Ford's classic film "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance." We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college law state doctors phd truth professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local lies congress political supreme court force senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell john wayne supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham old west bill of rights tim scott jimmy stewart federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee john ford ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton james stewart ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller lee marvin dick durbin political thought political debate sherrod brown republicanism david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism american cinema civic education stephen hopkins summer institute james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey classic hollywood benjamin harrison liberty valance angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross man who shot liberty valance cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams western genre american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee cowboy code samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure hollywood westerns american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#46 - Monarchy vs. Democracy in Herodotus with Matthew K. Reising

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 4, 2025 51:37


On the forty-sixth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary is joined by Dr. Matthew Reising, a John and Daria Barry Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Princeton University, to discuss the constitutional debate that occurs in Book 3 of Herodotus' Histories and its implication for American constitutionalism. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington princeton university american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics monarchy joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley herodotus department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris matthew k roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#45 - Brutus XV

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 24, 2025 43:22


On the forty-fifth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Brutus XV and his concern that the judiciary will prove to be the most dangerous branch. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement brutus rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson jeff merkley thom tillis benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#44 - Federalist 78

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 16, 2025 43:46


On the forty-fourth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Federalist 78 and the role of the Supreme Court. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott judiciary federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson jeff merkley thom tillis benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#43 - Biden's Pardons

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 18, 2024 66:56


On the forty-third episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by both Dr. Jordan Cash, Assistant Professor of Political Science of James Madison College at Michigan State University, and Isabelle Thelen, a Ph.D. student at Baylor University. They discuss President Biden's controversial pardons, including his own son, as well as his issuance of mass pardons and commutations, which the administration has described as 'the largest single-day clemency event for any president in modern U.S. history. Moreover, they discuss the administration's indication that Biden is considering preemptively pardoning political opponents of Donald Trump. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives assistant professor nonprofits heritage michigan state university political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate pardon baylor george washington american history presidency hunter biden ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison pardons lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich constitutional advocacy jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe james madison college jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#42 - Keeping the Republic with Marc Landy

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 20, 2024 64:16


On the forty-second episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by Marc Landy, professor of Political Science at Boston College. They discuss his latest book, "Keeping the Republic: A Defense of American Constitutionalism," coauthored with professor Dennis Hale (also of Boston College). We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm republic constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot boston college ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller landy dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#41 - Should Biden Pardon Trump? (Federalist 74)

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 12, 2024 50:34


On the forty-first episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Federalist no. 74, the executive power to pardon, and whether President Biden should consider pardoning President Trump. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate pardon baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson jeff merkley thom tillis benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#39 - Jefferson's Call for Unity

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 8, 2024 42:52


On the thirty-ninth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Jefferson's First Inaugural, his understanding of the inherently tumultuous character of a free society, and the criticisms leveled against his legacy. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local unity congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson jeff merkley thom tillis benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#40 - Trump's Second Term

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 8, 2024 59:35


On the fortieth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Donald Trump's election victory, and consider both why the victory was so surprising to many observers, and the possibility of moderating American political discourse going forward. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy second term robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson jeff merkley thom tillis benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#38 - Civic Leadership with Justin Dyer

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 19, 2024 58:01


On the thirty-eighth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by Justin Dyer, professor of government and the inaugural dean of UT Austin's School of Civic Leadership (SCL). They discuss SCL's aims and objectives, and the growing civic education movement within the American academy. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power school house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc vice president dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate assassination baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell jd vance supreme court justice baylor university american politics dropout joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized ut austin mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education stephen hopkins summer institute james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen scl constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society department of veterans affairs civic responsibility george taylor civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan martin heinrich contemporary politics constitutional advocacy jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen university of texas at austin constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase justin dyer richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#37 - October 7th and Political Violence

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 7, 2024 56:27


On the thirty-seventh episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Dr. Kleinerman's latest article "There are no "both sides" to October 7th." The two co-hosts reflect on the relationship between day's of remembrance and intellectual debates, before considering the degree to which the University ought to take clear moral stances in shaping its students. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power israel house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court protests senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage hamas political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights political violence federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford international justice richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#36 - Mark Twain's Joan of Arc with Bernard J. Dobski

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 5, 2024 72:52


On the thirty-sixth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by Dr. Bernard J. Dobski, Professor of Political Science at Assumption University to discuss his latest book, "Mark Twain's Joan of Arc: Political Wisdom, Divine Justice, and the Origins of Modernity," which examines Mark Twain as a sophisticated political thinker, and his efforts to confront the political-theological problem in his final book "Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc." We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court origins senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment arc graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs mark twain elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham modernity bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris joan of arc thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst divine justice grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase bernard j richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#35 - The Bill of Rights with Tony Bartl

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 17, 2024 52:05


On the thirty-fifth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by Dr. Tony Bartl, Professor of Political Science and Philosophy at Angelo State University to discuss Federalist no. 84 and the consequences of the Bill of Rights. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress philosophy political supreme court hamilton rights senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson angelo state university thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents bartl jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#34 - Russel Kirk's Conservatism with Michael Lucchese

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 12, 2024 54:31


On the thirty-fourth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by Michael Lucchese to discuss the legacy of Russel Kirk and the contours of American conservatism. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc vice president dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate assassination baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell jd vance supreme court justice baylor university american politics dropout joe manchin john adams rand paul conservatism polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock neocon fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton lucchese judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society department of veterans affairs civic responsibility george taylor civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe paul gottfried jacky rosen patrick buchanan constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure russel kirk american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#33 - Reagan

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 5, 2024 60:12


On the thirty-third episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss President Reagan's 1964 speech, "A time for choosing," and his legacy in shaping the Republican Party. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington republican party american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson jeff merkley thom tillis benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#32 - Montesquieu & the Separation of Powers

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 30, 2024 49:54


On the thirty-second episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Montesquieu's understanding of the separation of powers, and its relationship to the US Constitution. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc vice president dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate assassination baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell jd vance supreme court justice baylor university american politics dropout joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer us constitution marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones montesquieu john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#31 - John Quincy Adam's The jubilee of the Constitution

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 23, 2024 54:40


On the thirty-first episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss John Quincy Adam's Jubilee of the Constitution speech, and consider its relationship to Lincoln's understanding of the founding. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc vice president dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris adams blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate assassination baylor george washington american history presidency jubilee ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell jd vance supreme court justice baylor university american politics dropout joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#30 - The Declaration of Independence

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 13, 2024 41:56


On the thirtieth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss the Declaration of Independence, and reflect on their respective Independence Day traditions. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc vice president dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives independence day nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate assassination baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell jd vance declaration of independence supreme court justice baylor university american politics dropout joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#29 - The Gettysburg Address

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 8, 2024 51:40


On the twenty-ninth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss the Gettysburg Address. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc vice president dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate assassination baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell jd vance supreme court justice baylor university american politics dropout joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins gettysburg address patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility department of veterans affairs george taylor civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#28 - Supreme Court Reform & Presidential Immunity

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 2, 2024 64:41


On the twenty-eighth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Biden's plan for Supreme Court reform, and the landmark Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage reform political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell supreme court justice baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine presidential immunity political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances political commentary ron wyden originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson jeff merkley thom tillis benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#26 - Trump Assassination Attempt & VP Pick

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 23, 2024 83:53


On the twenty-fourth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, and the announcement that Senator J.D. Vance will be his running mate. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc vice president dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate assassination baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell jd vance supreme court justice baylor university american politics dropout joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics constitutional advocacy martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#27 - Biden's Drop Out and Project 2025

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 23, 2024 55:12


On the twenty-seventh episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Biden dropping out of the 2024 election, support for Kamala Harris, and Project 2025. We want to hear from you! Constitutionalistpod@gmail.com The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor project colorado joe biden elections washington dc vice president dc local drop congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment civil rights public policy amendment graduate assassination baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin 2024 mitch mcconnell jd vance supreme court justice baylor university american politics dropout joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham bill of rights tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives project 2025 paul revere george clinton ideological constitutional rights federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy constitutional amendments john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student checks and balances ron wyden political commentary originalism american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies legal education political analysis john hart bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center separation of powers department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy legal history constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education stephen hopkins summer institute james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton judicial review mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow landmark cases american constitution society department of veterans affairs civic responsibility george taylor civic leadership demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington founding principles constitutional government political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin dropping out department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe constitutional change gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich constitutional advocacy jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton constitutional conventions legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Kreisky Forum Talks
Samuel Moyn, Herlinde Pauer-Studer, Alexander Somek & Fabio Wolkenstein: LIBERALISM AGAINST ITSELF

Kreisky Forum Talks

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 10, 2024 67:13


Samuel Moyn, Herlinde Pauer-Studer, Alexander Somek, Fabio Wolkenstein LIBERALISM AGAINST ITSELFThe Cold War Roots of Liberalism´s Present Crisis By the middle of the twentieth century, many liberals looked glumly at the world modernity had brought about, with its devastating wars, rising totalitarianism, and permanent nuclear terror. They concluded that, far from offering a solution to these problems, the ideals of the Enlightenment, including emancipation and equality, had instead created them. The historian of political thought Samuel Moyn argues that the liberal intellectuals of the Cold War era—among them Isaiah Berlin, Gertrude Himmelfarb, Karl Popper, Judith Shklar, and Lionel Trilling—transformed liberalism but left a disastrous legacy for our time. In his new book “Liberalism Against Itself” Moyn outlines how Cold War liberals redefined the ideals of their movement and renounced the moral core of the Enlightenment for a more dangerous philosophy: preserving individual liberty at all costs. In denouncing this stance, as well as the recent nostalgia for Cold War liberalism as a means to counter illiberal values, Moyn presents a timely call for a new emancipatory and egalitarian liberal philosophy—a path to undoing the damage of the Cold War and to ensuring the survival of liberalism. Herlinde Pauer-Studer, Alexander Somek and Fabio Wolkenstein will discuss with Samuel Moyn his findings and thoughts.   Samuel Moyn is Chancellor Kent Professor of Law and History at Yale University and author of many books on the history of ideas and politics in the twentieth century Herlinde Pauer-Studer is Professor emeritus, Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna Alexander Somek is Professor of Legal Philosophy at the Faculty of Law, University of Vienna Fabio Wolkenstein is Associate Professor at the Institute for Political Science, University of Vienna

The Constitutionalist
Episode #25 - Presidential Fantasy Draft

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later May 21, 2024 60:40


To celebrate the twenty-fifth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman host a presidential fantasy draft. For this episode they are joined by three faculty of the Baylor University political science department, previous guests Dr. Jordan Cash and Dr. David Bridge, as well as Dr. Curt Nichols. The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris presidential blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell fantasy drafts baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political thought political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student ron wyden political commentary american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education department of transportation stephen hopkins summer institute james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen bob casey constitutionalists benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society george taylor civic responsibility department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis founding principles political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan martin heinrich contemporary politics jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry william floyd george wythe jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Lightning
The Lightning Podcast S1 E29: Traipsing Through Tragedy

Lightning

Play Episode Listen Later May 10, 2024 66:49


"The keenest sorrow is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities."  – Sophocles, Oedipus Rex   Change of format! This week, host Cyrus Palizban invites a single guest, Nico Sarian, to dive into the quote of the week and meander from there! Starting with the quote from Sophocles' “Oedipus Rex”, we take a deep dive into the nature of Greek tragedy, the significance of individual actions and fate, and the impact of historical and cultural context on literary interpretation. The discussion ranges from the origins of the dithyramb of the ancient cult of Dionysus to the many names of Apollo in the further-flung Hellenic reaches to the intricate subtexts of theology, the creative reconstruction of historical narratives, and the philosophical underpinning of tragedy as a genre. Additionally, Nico shares some of his personal theses on the nature of good and evil, and how their distinction is often hidden from us. Can we really be responsible for that which we cannot know?   00:00 Welcome to the Lightning Podcast: A Unique Exploration 00:47 Diving Deep into Greek Tragedy with Nico Sarian 02:30 The Lost Art of Tragedy and the Mystery of Missing Plays 03:54 Reimagining Ancient Greece: Color, Art, and History Misconceptions 24:10 Exploring the Depths of Apollo's Cults and Nietzsche's Critique 31:36 The Modern Predicament: Religion, Philosophy, and Individual Responsibility 35:45 Exploring Self-Improvement and Reality 25:08 The Journey Through Nigredo and Personal Reflections 38:30 Delving into the Essence of Evil and Darkness 39:32 The Philosophical Debate on Good, Evil, and Accountability 46:28 A Deep Dive into Darkness, Perception, and Moral Realizations 52:01 Connecting Martial Arts, Legal Philosophy, and Fate 01:02:42 Wrapping Up: From Apollo to Lupercalia and Beyond   Want to continue the discussion? Join us for more learning and discussion in our Meditations and Chronicles WhatsApp groups!   Meditations: https://chat.whatsapp.com/JIFXc06ABCPEsyfUBtvm1U Chronicles: https://chat.whatsapp.com/FD6M9a35KCE2XrnJrqaGLU   Follow us on other platforms for more content!   Twitter: https://x.com/lightinspires   Instagram: https://instagram.com/lightning.inspiration?igshid=NzZlODBkYWE4Ng==   LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lightning-meditations/

Legal Beagles
E5 Standing Firm: Holding Fast to the Letter of the Law

Legal Beagles

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 25, 2024 48:44


Explore the critical importance of adhering strictly to the letter of the law in this insightful video. We delve into why maintaining a literal interpretation of legal texts is crucial for fairness and consistency in justice. Featuring interviews with legal scholars and examples from case law, this video highlights the debates and consequences of strict legal interpretation versus a more flexible approach. Join us as we uncover the significance of the letter of the law in shaping just societies. #LetterOfTheLaw #LegalInterpretation #JusticeSystem #CaseLaw #LegalDebateRumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-5882193 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqs_hlmHECejgCAvQCa-r5Q X: https://twitter.com/zeus02377 Telegram: The BigSib Chat

The Constitutionalist
Episode #24 - The Anti-Federalists

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 18, 2024 53:53


On the twenty-fourth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman turn to the Anti-Federalists for their prescient concerns regarding the republic. The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political thought political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse mark warner tammy duckworth john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student ron wyden political commentary american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies john hart political analysis bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education department of transportation summer institute stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy anti federalists todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society george taylor civic responsibility department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis founding principles political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy mike crapo government structure department of health and human services american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#23 - The People and Their Passions (The Executive Continued)

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 9, 2024 52:36


On the twenty-third episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman continue their discussion of the constitutional structure of the executive through Federalist no. 71 and 72. The Constitutionalist is proud to be sponsored by the Jack Miller Center for Teaching America's Founding Principles and History. For the last twenty years, JMC has been working to preserve and promote that tradition through a variety of programs at the college and K-12 levels. Through their American Political Tradition Project, JMC has partnered with more than 1,000 scholars at over 300 college campuses across the country, especially through their annual Summer Institutes for graduate students and recent PhDs. The Jack Miller Center is also working with thousands of K-12 educators across the country to help them better understand America's founding principles and history and teach them effectively, to better educate the next generation of citizens. JMC has provided thousands of hours of professional development for teachers all over the country, reaching millions of students with improved civic learning. If you care about American education and civic responsibility, you'll want to check out their work, which focuses on reorienting our institutions of learning around America's founding principles. To learn more or get involved, visit jackmillercenter.org. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors phd professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress executives political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment public policy amendment graduate passions baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political thought political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student ron wyden political commentary american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies john hart political analysis bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education department of transportation stephen hopkins summer institute james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen bob casey constitutionalists benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young jmc gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society george taylor civic responsibility department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis founding principles political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan martin heinrich contemporary politics jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Legal Beagles
Exploring Textualism: A Study of Canons of Interpretation

Legal Beagles

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 4, 2024 34:32


Embark on an intellectual journey into the world of textualism and the canons of interpretation in this insightful video. We delve into the principles of textualism, its application in legal analysis, and how the canons of interpretation play a crucial role in understanding statutory and constitutional texts. Through expert interviews and case studies, gain a deeper appreciation of this legal philosophy and its impact on the interpretation of laws. Join us for a thought-provoking exploration of textualism and its significance in the legal system. #Textualism #LegalInterpretation #ConstitutionalLaw #StatutoryInterpretation #LegalPhilosophyRumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-5882193 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqs_hlmHECejgCAvQCa-r5Q X: https://twitter.com/zeus02377 Telegram: The BigSib Chat

Legal Beagles
Deciphering Scalia's Legacy: Exploring the Canons of Construction

Legal Beagles

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 28, 2024 70:16


Dive into the judicial philosophy of Justice Antonin Scalia as we explore the Canons of Construction, a set of principles that played a pivotal role in his legal reasoning. Understand how these canons guide judges in interpreting statutes and the Constitution, and see how Scalia's approach has influenced modern legal thought. Whether you're a law student, legal professional, or just curious about the inner workings of the judiciary, this video is your gateway to understanding one of the most influential legal minds of our time. Subscribe for more insightful legal analyses!Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-5882193 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqs_hlmHECejgCAvQCa-r5Q X: https://twitter.com/zeus02377 Telegram: The BigSib Chat

The Constitutionalist
#22 - The Executive

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 22, 2024 47:45


On the twenty-second episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss the constitutional structure of the executive through Federalist no. 68-70. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress executives political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political thought political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse mark warner tammy duckworth john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student ron wyden political commentary american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education department of transportation stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton john dickinson jeff merkley thom tillis benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society civic responsibility george taylor department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer apush department of commerce brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#21 - State of the Union with Charles Zug

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 14, 2024 59:41


On the twenty-first episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman and joined by Charles Zug, the Kinder Assistant Professor of Constitutional Democracy and Assistant Professor of Political Science in the Truman School of Government and Public Affairs at University of Missouri, to discuss the recent State of the Union and the place of this presidential duty within the American tradition. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors professor colorado joe biden elections government washington dc dc local congress political supreme court missouri senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives assistant professor nonprofits heritage state of the union political science liberal impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political thought political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student ron wyden political commentary american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy tammy baldwin constitutionalism civic education department of transportation stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen bob casey constitutionalists benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society george taylor civic responsibility department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith constitutional democracy kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan martin heinrich contemporary politics jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens
Samantha Sweetwater: "Life at the Center”

The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 6, 2024 82:38


On this episode, thought leader and ceremonial guide Samantha Sweetwater joins Nate to share her journey through mysticism and guiding others through their own unique spiritual paths. Strengthening relationality is a critical component for fostering deeper connections to nature - including fellow humans - and subsequently creating more cooperative, peaceful societies. Within a culture which predominantly values linear processes, Samantha's work has centered around finding a balance between convergent thinking and the relational intelligence we've neglected. What can we learn from the various indigenous cultures who understand their entanglement with the land? Is it possible for future societies to value a more balanced development across the spiritual, mental, emotional, and physical aspects of its people? How can we - as individuals - nurture the subjective, intersubjective, and objective within ourselves to create more holistic sensemaking within a complex world?  About Samantha Sweetwater:   Samantha Sweetwater is a writer, soul mentor, strategic partner and deeply loved ceremonial guide. She has facilitated transformational experiences in diverse communities, cultures and industries on five continents for over 30 years. Her work bridges spirituality, science, psychedelics, indigenous wisdom, transpersonal psychology, embodiment and deep ecology. She leads experiences and conversations about our relationship with the earth, spirituality and systemic change that transform the way we think about what it means to be human. Samantha is the founder and director of One Life Circle, a plant medicine ministry tending our intimacy with and belonging to Life. She also advises companies and organizations in the areas of technology, health, materials economy and psychedelics. As the former founder of Dancing Freedom and Peacebody Japan, she pioneered the conscious dance movement—facilitating tens of thousands of people and training hundreds of facilitators to seed communities around the globe. She holds an MA in Wisdom Studies and a BA in Social Theory and the Dance with a minor in Legal Philosophy. She has been initiated by indigenous teachers in Africa, South America and the US.    Her first book, True Human: Reimagining Ourselves at the End of Our World, will be available Fall Equinox 2024. For Show Notes and More visit: https://www.thegreatsimplification.com/episode/112-samantha-sweetwater To watch this video episode on YouTube: https://youtu.be/-D_y4jqxnmM

The Constitutionalist
#20 - Marbury v. Madison

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 27, 2024 32:05


On the twentieth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss the landmark Supreme Court decision, Marbury v. Madison. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell baylor university versus american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political thought political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse mark warner tammy duckworth john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment marbury joni ernst grad student ron wyden political commentary american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education department of transportation stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun judicial review john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society george taylor civic responsibility department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
Seize The Moment Podcast
Mark D. White - Dissecting Antitrust: Balancing Rights and Welfare | STM Podcast #206

Seize The Moment Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 18, 2024 83:28


On episode 206, we welcome Mark White to discuss the drawbacks of antitrust laws, what rights consumers actually have, if trusts are unfair and unjust, the utilitarian argument against those laws, the flawed healthcare insurance system in the US and how its consumers struggle, whether it's feasible to constantly have new entrepreneurs challenging trusts, the trading system in the NFL and how it prevents unfair competition, and what the economy could look like if antitrust laws are relaxed Mark D. White is Professor and Chair of the Department of Philosophy at the College of Staten Island/CUNY, where he teaches courses in philosophy, economics, and law, and is also a member of the economics doctoral faculty at the Graduate Center of CUNY. His books include A Philosopher Reads Marvel Comics' Thor, A Philosopher Reads Marvel Comics' Civil War, The Virtues of Captain America, Batman and Ethics, The Oxford Handbook of Ethics and Economics and A Philosopher Reads...Marvel Comics' Daredevil: From the Beginning to Born Again. His newest book is called Rights versus Antitrust: Challenging the Ethics of Competition Law. | Mark D. White | ► Website | https://www.profmdwhite.com ► Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/profmdwhite ► Twitter | https://twitter.com/profmdwhite ► Rights versus Antitrust | https://amzn.to/49HNVa7 Where you can find us: | Seize The Moment Podcast | ► Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/SeizeTheMoment ► Twitter | https://twitter.com/seize_podcast ► Instagram | https://www.instagram.com/seizethemoment ► TikTok | https://www.tiktok.com/@seizethemomentpodcast ► Patreon | https://www.patreon.com/user?u=32208666  

The Constitutionalist
#19 - The Immigration Bill with David Bridge

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 13, 2024 56:55


On the nineteenth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by Dr. Bridge, Associate Professor of Political Science at Baylor University. They discuss Congress's recent failure to pass legislation on immigration and the broader implications of this dysfunction in American political life. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court bridge senate bernie sanders associate professor democracy federal kamala harris immigration blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional dysfunction ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political thought political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student ron wyden political commentary american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies john hart political analysis department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy immigration bill constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education department of transportation stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen bob casey constitutionalists benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society george taylor civic responsibility department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross mike rounds cindy hyde smith kevin cramer apush department of commerce brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan martin heinrich contemporary politics jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#18 - Title IX with Elizabeth Busch

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 6, 2024 53:05


On the eighteenth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by Dr. Elizabeth Busch, the Laura and Pete Walker Professor in American Studies, Co-Director of the Center for American Studies, and Director of American Studies at Christopher Newport University. They discuss her 2018 book, Title IX: The Transformation of Sex Discrimination in Education, and the developments since then surrounding the controversial statute. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american director university founders history president donald trump culture power education house washington politics college state doctors professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency co director ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell title ix baylor university american politics busch joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison american studies lindsey graham college campuses tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political debate political thought sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student political commentary ron wyden american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies political analysis john hart department of homeland security bill cassidy publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy constitutionalism tammy baldwin christopher newport university civic education department of transportation stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr rob portman tina smith chris van hollen bob casey constitutionalists benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey john morton mike braun john dickinson jeff merkley thom tillis benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society department of veterans affairs george taylor civic responsibility civic leadership sex discrimination demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer apush department of commerce brian schatz founding documents civic participation jim inhofe gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan martin heinrich contemporary politics jeanne shaheen title nine roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services government structure american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#17 - George Washington's Farewell Address

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 1, 2024 45:10


On the seventeenth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss President Washington's famous "Farewell Address," and contest the common takeaways that have embedded themselves in the American education system. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics college state doctors professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local congress political supreme court senate farewell bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris blm address constitution conservatives nonprofits heritage political science liberal impeachment public policy amendment graduate baylor george washington american history presidency ballot ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell baylor university american politics joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker james madison lindsey graham tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein civic engagement rule of law john kennedy civil liberties claremont josh hawley polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological federalism james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory bob menendez john witherspoon political philosophy john hancock fourteenth susan collins patrick henry john marshall 14th amendment farewell address political history benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay tim kaine political discourse jack miller dick durbin political thought political debate sherrod brown david perdue ben sasse mark warner tammy duckworth john cornyn abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student ron wyden political commentary american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies john hart political analysis bill cassidy department of homeland security publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy constitutionalism tammy baldwin civic education department of transportation stephen hopkins james lankford richard burr tina smith rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture john morton mike braun john dickinson thom tillis jeff merkley benjamin rush patrick leahy todd young gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society george taylor civic responsibility department of veterans affairs civic leadership demagoguery samuel huntington historical analysis political education charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state george ross cindy hyde smith mike rounds kevin cramer apush department of commerce brian schatz civic participation founding documents jim inhofe gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan contemporary politics martin heinrich jeanne shaheen roger wicker pat roberts john barrasso william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen constitutional accountability center living constitution mercy otis warren civic learning department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy mike crapo government structure department of health and human services american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
The Constitutionalist
#16 - Federalist 10, Factions, and the Republican Primary

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 23, 2024 45:10


On the sixteenth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Federalist no. 10, and Publius' proposed solutions for factions, an element of political life he argues is inherent to free and popular government. They then discuss the perception of factions in contemporary American politics and developments in the Republican primary following the Iowa Caucus. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

america american founders house politics college colorado joe biden elections dc congress political republicans bernie sanders federal kamala harris constitution conservatives heritage political science liberal george washington american history ballot constitutional ideology thomas jefferson mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell baylor university polarization chuck schumer iowa caucuses marco rubio lindsey graham tim scott factions federalist dianne feinstein polarized mike lee ron johnson constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton aaron burr rick scott chris murphy thomas paine department of justice political philosophy republican primary john hancock susan collins patrick henry 14th amendment chuck grassley department of defense samuel adams marsha blackburn john quincy adams james wilson john paul jones john jay dick durbin tammy duckworth john cornyn abigail adams ed markey joni ernst grad student michael bennet john hart bill cassidy publius national constitution center department of labor chris coons legal analysis richard blumenthal department of energy tammy baldwin stephen hopkins james lankford chris van hollen constitutionalists angus king mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture pat toomey mike braun patrick leahy todd young debbie stabenow american constitution society department of veterans affairs samuel huntington cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state mike rounds department of commerce apush brian schatz civic participation jim inhofe gouverneur morris pat roberts john barrasso william floyd george wythe living constitution tom carper samuel chase legal philosophy department of health and human services lyman hall constitutional rights foundation
The Constitutionalist
#15 - Antisemitism on Campus with Dr. Greg Weiner

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 9, 2024 58:42


On the fifteenth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman are joined by Dr. Greg Weiner, President of Assumption University and an expert in the political thought of the American founding. They discuss the recent response, both on and off campus, to antisemitism. More importantly, they investigate the moral and intellectual sources of this behavior, and the purpose of the University in American political life. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

The Constitutionalist
#14 - Federalist 1 and a Politics of Interest

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Jan 4, 2024 64:08


On the fourteenth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss Federalist no. 1, and the way in which our politics have moved away from interests and towards symbolism and ideology at the expense of unity. We'd like to issue a correction for this episode. During our discussion of the FDA, it was mistakenly said that two of the last forty FDA Commissioners had not worked for Big Pharma following their tenure with the FDA. The intended statistic was two over the last forty years. While we could have removed the incorrect statement in post or rerecorded the section, we believe that podcasting as a medium is first and foremost conversational, and as such, a conversation should leave room for errors which are otherwise carefully controlled for in more sterile informational environments. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

america american founders president donald trump house politics college colorado joe biden elections dc congress political bernie sanders democracy federal kamala harris fda constitution conservatives heritage political science liberal george washington american history ballot ted cruz big pharma elizabeth warren constitutional ideology thomas jefferson mitt romney benjamin franklin mitch mcconnell baylor university joe manchin john adams rand paul polarization chuck schumer marco rubio james madison lindsey graham tim scott federalist dianne feinstein john kennedy polarized mike lee ron johnson supreme court decisions constitutional law house of representatives paul revere george clinton ideological aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton chris murphy thomas paine department of justice political philosophy john hancock susan collins patrick henry 14th amendment benedict arnold chuck grassley department of defense samuel adams marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine dick durbin political debate david perdue tammy duckworth mark warner john cornyn abigail adams ed markey joni ernst grad student american presidency michael bennet john thune constitutional studies john hart bill cassidy national constitution center department of labor chris coons richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy tammy baldwin department of transportation stephen hopkins james lankford rob portman chris van hollen constitutionalists bob casey benjamin harrison angus king mazie hirono jon tester pat toomey department of agriculture mike braun john dickinson jeff merkley patrick leahy todd young debbie stabenow american constitution society department of veterans affairs demagoguery samuel huntington charles carroll cory gardner lamar alexander ben cardin department of state mike rounds apush department of commerce brian schatz civic participation jim inhofe gouverneur morris pat roberts john barrasso elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd living constitution department of the interior tom carper samuel chase legal philosophy mike crapo department of health and human services lyman hall constitutional rights foundation
The Constitutionalist
#12 - Trump in Colorado & Lincoln's 2nd Inaugural

The Constitutionalist

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 21, 2023 46:53


On the Twelfth episode of The Constitutionalist, Shane Leary and Dr. Benjamin Kleinerman discuss the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to disqualify Donald Trump from the state ballot by way of the 14th amendment. To shed light on the tensions that undergird decisions like these, they turn to Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address. The Constitutionalist is a podcast cohosted by Professor Benjamin Kleinerman, the RW Morrison Professor of Political Science at Baylor University and Founder and Editor of The Constitutionalist Blog, and his student, Shane Leary. Each week, they discuss political news in light of its constitutional implications, and explore a unique constitutional topic, ranging from the thoughts and experiences of America's founders and statesmen, historical episodes, and the broader philosophic ideas that influence the American experiment in government.

united states america american university founders history president donald trump culture power house washington politics doctors professor colorado joe biden elections washington dc dc local senate democracy federal kamala harris constitution heritage political science liberal impeachment public policy graduate george washington american history presidency inaugural ted cruz public affairs elizabeth warren ideology thomas jefferson founding fathers baylor university american politics john adams polarization marco rubio alexander hamilton cory booker lindsey graham tim scott federalist amy klobuchar dianne feinstein rule of law john kennedy josh hawley ron johnson constitutional law house of representatives george clinton ideological federalism twelfth james smith aaron burr department of education rick scott tom cotton robert morris thomas paine kirsten gillibrand department of justice political theory colorado supreme court john witherspoon political philosophy john marshall political history department of defense american government samuel adams aei marsha blackburn james wilson john quincy adams john paul jones john jay tim kaine dick durbin political thought david perdue mark warner tammy duckworth abigail adams ed markey american experiment joni ernst grad student ron wyden american presidency john thune constitutional studies department of homeland security publius department of labor richard blumenthal legal analysis department of energy constitutionalism department of transportation richard burr tina smith rob portman constitutionalists angus king war powers mazie hirono jon tester department of agriculture john morton todd young gary peters debbie stabenow american constitution society department of veterans affairs george taylor demagoguery historical analysis samuel huntington cory gardner lamar alexander department of state george ross kevin cramer apush department of commerce founding documents gouverneur morris roger sherman maggie hassan martin heinrich contemporary politics jeanne shaheen roger wicker william williams american political thought elbridge gerry george wythe william floyd jacky rosen living constitution department of the interior tom carper constitutional affairs richard henry lee samuel chase richard stockton legal philosophy government structure department of health and human services american governance lyman hall constitutional rights foundation constitutional literacy
TNT Radio
Prof Augusto Zimmermann on The Ross Cameron Show - 17 December 2023

TNT Radio

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 17, 2023 54:42


GUEST OVERVIEW: Professor Augusto Zimmermann is a former Law Reform Commissioner with the Law Reform Commission of Western Australia (2012-2017) and a former Associate Dean (Research) and Postgraduate Research Director at Murdoch University's School of Law. He is also the Founder and President of the Western Australian Legal Theory Association (WALTA), a former Vice-President of the Australian Society of Legal Philosophy, an Elected Fellow at the International Academy for the Study of the Jurisprudence of the Family (IASJF) and Editor-in-Chief of the Western Australian Jurist law journal. A prolific writer and author of numerous articles and academic books, Professor Zimmermann is generally recognised as a fierce advocate for freedom of speech and the Rule of Law.

BIC TALKS
274. None Wiser than the Law (Part 7 of 7)

BIC TALKS

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 22, 2023 35:10


None Wiser than the Law is a miniseries of in-depth conversations with Justice MN Venkatachaliah, providing an intimate exploration of the legal realm, his life journey, political insights, and the Indian constitution. The title of this podcast draws inspiration from Aristotle, who said to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden. Justice Venkatachaliah, a distinguished figure in the realm of jurisprudence, acknowledges this aphorism in one of his landmark judgments, setting the tone for this series of conversations. The host, Alok Prasanna Kumar, a co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, spoke to former Chief Justice of India MN Venkatachaliah in August 2023. Their discussion spans an array of topics, encapsulating the Justice's journey from a young lawyer to a Supreme Court judge, his landmark judgments, and his insights on the ever-evolving legal landscape and society. In this final episode of the mini-series, Alok and Justice Venkatachaliah spoke on a range of issues related to the Indian Constitution, the evolution of its basic principles and the challenges that lie ahead for India in the coming years. Subscribe to the BIC Talks Podcast on your favourite podcast app! BIC Talks is available everywhere, including iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Overcast and Stitcher.  

BIC TALKS
273. None Wiser than the Law (Part 6 of 7)

BIC TALKS

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 16, 2023 50:02


None Wiser than the Law is a miniseries of in-depth conversations with Justice MN Venkatachaliah, providing an intimate exploration of the legal realm, his life journey, political insights, and the Indian constitution. The title of this podcast draws inspiration from Aristotle, who said to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden. Justice Venkatachaliah, a distinguished figure in the realm of jurisprudence, acknowledges this aphorism in one of his landmark judgments, setting the tone for this series of conversations. The host, Alok Prasanna Kumar, a co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, spoke to former Chief Justice of India MN Venkatachaliah in August 2023. Their discussion spans an array of topics, encapsulating the Justice's journey from a young lawyer to a Supreme Court judge, his landmark judgments, and his insights on the ever-evolving legal landscape and society. With over seventy years of experience as a lawyer, judge and public figure, Justice Venkatachaliah has seen it all - the birth of indepedendent India, the tenures of multiple Prime Ministers, the rise of social movements, secession, deep social conflicts and their resolutions.  What does he make of India and the journey it has taken over the last 75 odd years?  In this episode, we will be hearing from Justice Venkatachaliah on his perspectives on the state of the Indian judiciary, what the legal profession ought to be like and where legal education should go.  Subscribe to the BIC Talks Podcast on your favourite podcast app! BIC Talks is available everywhere, including iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Overcast and Stitcher.   Cases DPP v. Shaw [1961] UKHL 1 (04 May 1961) https://judicialacademy.nic.in/sites/default/files/1453024387_Shaw%20v%20DPP%201961.pdf In re, Erada Padinharedil Govindan Nair v. State , May 4, 1992 https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56e138de607dba3896624e18 Ameer Khan case (1870), https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/the-habeas-corpus-case-1870/article10107326.ece, for a larger discussion on the larger principles : https://deepakmiglani.com/writ-jurisdiction-of-the-high-courts/ Legislation The Bill of Rights, 1689, UK https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/parliamentaryauthority/revolution/collections1/collections-glorious-revolution/billofrights/ US Patriots Act, https://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/what_is_the_patriot_act.pdf Books Responsa: Selected Legal Opinions by Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru, 1976 https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Responsa.html?id=zIBRAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y The theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith 1790. https://www.ibiblio.org/ml/libri/s/SmithA_MoralSentiments_p.pdf

BIC TALKS
272. None Wiser than the Law (Part 5 of 7)

BIC TALKS

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 14, 2023 80:55


None Wiser than the Law is a miniseries of in-depth conversations with Justice MN Venkatachaliah, providing an intimate exploration of the legal realm, his life journey, political insights, and the Indian constitution. The title of this podcast draws inspiration from Aristotle, who said to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden. Justice Venkatachaliah, a distinguished figure in the realm of jurisprudence, acknowledges this aphorism in one of his landmark judgments, setting the tone for this series of conversations. The host, Alok Prasanna Kumar, a co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, spoke to former Chief Justice of India MN Venkatachaliah in August 2023. Their discussion spans an array of topics, encapsulating the Justice's journey from a young lawyer to a Supreme Court judge, his landmark judgments, and his insights on the ever-evolving legal landscape and society. In this fifth episode, Justice Venkatachaliah recollects his interactions with eminent judges, lawyers and politicians with whom he crossed paths.  Subscribe to the BIC Talks Podcast on your favourite podcast app! BIC Talks is available everywhere, including iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Overcast and Stitcher.  

BIC TALKS
271. None Wiser than the Law (Part 4 of 7)

BIC TALKS

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 9, 2023 61:38


None Wiser than the Law is a miniseries of in-depth conversations with Justice MN Venkatachaliah, providing an intimate exploration of the legal realm, his life journey, political insights, and the Indian constitution. The title of this podcast draws inspiration from Aristotle, who said to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden. Justice Venkatachaliah, a distinguished figure in the realm of jurisprudence, acknowledges this aphorism in one of his landmark judgments, setting the tone for this series of conversations. The host, Alok Prasanna Kumar, a co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, spoke to former Chief Justice of India MN Venkatachaliah in August 2023. Their discussion spans an array of topics, encapsulating the Justice's journey from a young lawyer to a Supreme Court judge, his landmark judgments, and his insights on the ever-evolving legal landscape and society. Justice Venkatachaliah was elevated as a permanent judge of the Karnataka High Court on November 6, 1975. In October 1987, he was elevated to the Supreme Court of India to become only the third judge from the Karnataka High Court to have been appointed a judge of the Supreme Court of India. As the senior-most judge of the Supreme Court of India in February 1993, he succeeded Justice LM Sharma as the Chief Justice of India and held that position until his retirement in October, 1994. In his 20 month tenure as the Chief Justice of India, Justice Venkatachaliah initiated a wide set of reforms that are remembered to this day. In this, the fourth episode, Justice MN Venkatachaliah delves his career as a judge of the High Court and Supreme Court, and as the Chief Justice of India, and his subsequent post-judicial career.  Subscribe to the BIC Talks Podcast on your favourite podcast app! BIC Talks is available everywhere, including iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Overcast and Stitcher.  

BIC TALKS
270. None Wiser than the Law (Part 3 of 7)

BIC TALKS

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 6, 2023 28:57


None Wiser than the Law is a miniseries of in-depth conversations with Justice MN Venkatachaliah, providing an intimate exploration of the legal realm, his life journey, political insights, and the Indian constitution. The title of this podcast draws inspiration from Aristotle, who said to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden. Justice Venkatachaliah, a distinguished figure in the realm of jurisprudence, acknowledges this aphorism in one of his landmark judgments, setting the tone for this series of conversations. The host, Alok Prasanna Kumar, a co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, spoke to former Chief Justice of India MN Venkatachaliah in August 2023. Their discussion spans an array of topics, encapsulating the Justice's journey from a young lawyer to a Supreme Court judge, his landmark judgments, and his insights on the ever-evolving legal landscape and society. In this third episode, Justice Venkatachaliah talks about his early life and career as a lawyer in Bengaluru. In this conversation the Justice looks back on his memories of Bengaluru at the turn of independence, influences in his life, and what the Bar and the Bench in Bengaluru was like. Subscribe to the BIC Talks Podcast on your favourite podcast app! BIC Talks is available everywhere, including iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Overcast and Stitcher.  

BIC TALKS
269. None Wiser than the Law (Part 2 of 7)

BIC TALKS

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 2, 2023 36:48


None Wiser than the Law is a miniseries of in-depth conversations with Justice MN Venkatachaliah, providing an intimate exploration of the legal realm, his life journey, political insights, and the Indian constitution. The title of this podcast draws inspiration from Aristotle, who said to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden. Justice Venkatachaliah, a distinguished figure in the realm of jurisprudence, acknowledges this aphorism in one of his landmark judgments, setting the tone for this series of conversations. Alok Prasanna Kumar, a co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, spoke to former Chief Justice of India MN Venkatachaliah in August 2023. Their discussion spans an array of topics, encapsulating the Justice's journey from a young lawyer to a Supreme Court judge, his landmark judgments, and his insights on the ever-evolving legal landscape and society. In the second episode of the series, Justice MNV and Alok delve into two pivotal judgments that revolve around two of the most harrowing incidents in independent India's history: the Bhopal Gas disaster in 1984 and the Babri Masjid demolition in 1991. These tragic events spawned a multitude of legal cases, with two of the most significant cases finding their way to the Supreme Court, with Justice Venkatachaliah on the bench. These cases, namely Union Carbide Corporation Ltd v the Union of India (decided in 1991) and Dr Ismail Faruqui v Union of India (decided in 1994), hold paramount importance in the context of these events. The Supreme Court's role in facilitating the settlement between the Union of India and Union Carbide has been a subject of extensive debate, as has its contribution to the eventual resolution of the Babri Masjid dispute. In this episode of BIC Talks, we endeavor to shed light on the motivations and considerations that underpinned the court's decisions, providing insight into why the court took the actions it did in these consequential cases. Subscribe to the BIC Talks Podcast on your favourite podcast app! BIC Talks is available everywhere, including iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Overcast and Stitcher.

BIC TALKS
268. None Wiser than the Law (Part 1 of 7)

BIC TALKS

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 30, 2023 38:35


None Wiser than the Law is a miniseries of in-depth conversations with Justice MN Venkatachaliah, providing an intimate exploration of the legal realm, his life journey, political insights, and the Indian constitution. The title of this podcast draws inspiration from Aristotle, who said to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden. Justice Venkatachaliah, a distinguished figure in the realm of jurisprudence, acknowledges this aphorism in one of his landmark judgments, setting the tone for this series of conversations. Alok Prasanna Kumar, a co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, spoke to former Chief Justice of India MN Venkatachaliah in August 2023. Their discussion spans an array of topics, encapsulating the Justice's journey from a young lawyer to a Supreme Court judge, his landmark judgments, and his insights on the ever-evolving legal landscape and society. In this first episode, Justice MNV and Alok discuss two landmark judgements delivered by benches headed by Justice Venkatachaliah, namely Kihoto Hollohan v Zachillhu and AR Antulay v RS Nayak. These two cases involved two major political issues that continue to bedevil Indian politics: defections and corruption. In the Antulay case, Justice Venkatachaliah's judgement says, “to be wiser than the law is what by good laws is forbidden” and that the “well trodden path is the best path”. This captures the essence of Justice Venkatachaliah's judicial philosophy, as we shall discover this episode. Subscribe to the BIC Talks Podcast on your favourite podcast app! BIC Talks is available everywhere, including iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Castbox, Overcast and Stitcher.  

The Cognitive Crucible
#147 Nita Farahany on Cognitive Liberty

The Cognitive Crucible

Play Episode Listen Later May 9, 2023 39:12


The Cognitive Crucible is a forum that presents different perspectives and emerging thought leadership related to the information environment. The opinions expressed by guests are their own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of or endorsement by the Information Professionals Association. During this episode, Nita Farahany discusses her cognitive liberty concept, as well as her book: The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology. Research Question: Prof. Farahany asks what can we do individually to tell fact from fiction, safeguard against manipulation, engage critical thinking skills, and develop greater mindfulness so that we may flourish in the Digital Age. What are the limits of the human mind to protect against distortion of cognitive freedoms? Resources: The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology by Nita Farahany Prof Nita Farahany's Webpage https://law.duke.edu/fac/farahany/ Recent news article: “We need a new human right to cognitive liberty” Link to full show notes and resources https://information-professionals.org/episode/cognitive-crucible-episode-147 Guest Bio:  Nita A. Farahany is a leading scholar on the ethical, legal, and social implications of emerging technologies. She is the Robinson O. Everett Distinguished Professor of Law & Philosophy at Duke Law School, the Founding Director of Duke Science & Society, the Faculty Chair of the Duke MA in Bioethics & Science Policy, and principal investigator of SLAP Lab. Farahany is a frequent commentator for national media and radio shows and a regular keynote speaker. She presents her work to diverse academic, legal, corporate, and public audiences including at TED, the World Economic Forum, Aspen Ideas Festival, Judicial Conferences for US Court of Appeals, scientific venue including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the Society for Neuroscience, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, and by testifying before Congress. Her current scholarship focuses on the implications of emerging neuroscience, genomics, and artificial intelligence for law and society; legal and bioethical issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic; FDA law and policy; and the use of science and technology in criminal law. In addition to publishing in legal and scientific journals, as well as edited book volumes, Farahany is the author of the forthcoming book The Battle for Your Brain: Defending Your Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology (St. Martin's Press 2023). In 2010, Professor Farahany was appointed by President Obama to the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues and served until 2017. She is an appointed member of the National Advisory Council for the National Institute for Neurological Disease and Stroke, an elected member of the American Law Institute and Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, past President of the International Neuroethics Society, an ELSI (ethical, legal, and social implications) advisor to the NIH Brain Initiative and to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, an appointed member of both the Forum on Neuroscience and Nervous System Disorders and the Standing Committee on Biotechnology Capabilities and National Security Needs for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, and a member of the Global Future Council on Frontier Risks and Expert Network for the World Economic Forum. She served as Reporter for the Study Committee and later Drafting Committee on updating the Uniform Determination of Death Committee for the Uniform Law Commission. In 2022, she was appointed by Governor Roy Cooper to the NC Delegation for the Uniform Law Commission, and currently serves in that capacity. Farahany is a co-editor-in-chief and co-founder of the Journal of Law and the Biosciences and on the Board of Advisors for Scientific American. She also serves on scientific and ethics advisory boards for corporations. Farahany received her AB in Genetics, Cell, and Developmental Biology from Dartmouth College, an ALM in biology from Harvard University, and a JD and MA from Duke University, as well as a Ph.D. in philosophy. In 2004-2005, Farahany clerked for Judge Judith W. Rogers of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, after which she joined the law faculty at Vanderbilt University. In 2011, Farahany was the Leah Kaplan Visiting Professor of Human Rights at Stanford Law School. About: The Information Professionals Association (IPA) is a non-profit organization dedicated to exploring the role of information activities, such as influence and cognitive security, within the national security sector and helping to bridge the divide between operations and research. Its goal is to increase interdisciplinary collaboration between scholars and practitioners and policymakers with an interest in this domain. For more information, please contact us at communications@information-professionals.org. Or, connect directly with The Cognitive Crucible podcast host, John Bicknell, on LinkedIn. Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, 1) IPA earns from qualifying purchases, 2) IPA gets commissions for purchases made through links in this post.

Africa Rights Talk
S4 E9: 2023 Freedom Day

Africa Rights Talk

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 27, 2023 37:18


In conversation with Professor Joel Modiri Freedom Day is the commemoration of the first democratic elections held in South Africa on 27 April 1994. These were the first post-apartheid national elections to be held in South Africa, where anyone could vote regardless of race. This day reminds South Africans of the incalculable sacrifices made by individuals and nations in order to liberate them from the chains of discriminatory segregation imposed by the pre-1994 apartheid government. It also reminds South Africans of their national icons, the values they represent and the need to continue to fight for actual freedom and  equality in South Africa. We spoke to Prof Joel Modiri, on this episode of Africa Rights Talk, who reiterates these reflections. Prof Modiri discusses the importance of understanding what freedom means, the importance of history as an ongoing accumulation of the human experience, the need for South Africa to reconcile herself with her past and be in good relations with her history to be able to determine the future of her freedom. He describes Freedom Day as a day for honouring the liberation struggle as well as its failures and understanding the possibilities for freedom today. Professor Modiri is an Associate Professor and Head of the Department of Jurisprudence at the University of Pretoria. He holds degrees LLB cum laude (Pret) and PhD (Pret). His PhD thesis was entitled “The Jurisprudence of Steve Biko: A Study in Race, Law and Power in the ‘Afterlife' of Colonial-apartheid”. He mainly teaches in the field of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy. He has convened and taught a number of law subjects such as Social Justice and Human Rights, African Human Rights, Research Methodology, Legal Problems of HIV & AIDS, and Law and Transformation. He has also taught portions of courses in Political Science, Sociology and Public Policy presented by the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Pretoria. He currently convenes the LLM/MPhil in Post-apartheid jurisprudence. He has over 20 publications in academic journals under his name and has edited books and delivered lectures internationally and nationally. Prof Modiri has previously been on an episode of  Africa Rights Talk titled “Institutional racism and how it manifests in the African context”. To listen to his previous conversation on Africa Rights Talk, follow the ink: https://www.up.ac.za/faculty-of-law/news/post_2916503-africa-rights-talk-season-2-episode-9-joel-modiri    The conversation was recorded on 19 April 2023.   Do not forget to follow our Twitter page. Music and news extracts: Inner Peace by Mike Chino https://soundcloud.com/mike-chinoCreative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported — CC BY-SA 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b...Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/0nI6qJeqFcc   

Robinson's Podcast
51 - Scott Shapiro: Hackers, Cybersecurity, and Legal Philosophy

Robinson's Podcast

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 13, 2023 72:28


Scott Shapiro is the Charles F. Southmayd Professor of Law and Professor of Philosophy at Yale Law School, where he is also the founding director of the Yale CyberSecurity Lab. Robinson and Scott talk about studying at Columbia University under the auspices of the legendary Isaac Levi, Sidney Morgenbesser, and Haim Gaifman before discussing the philosophy of law, one of Scott's areas of expertise. Among the topics they touch on are the distinction between analytic and normative jurisprudence, the problem of the chicken and the egg, and progress in legal thought from Austin to Hart and beyond. Then they turn to Scott's upcoming book, Fancy Bear goes Phishing: The Dark History of the Information Age, in Five Extraordinary Hacks, where Scott explores the intersection of cybersecurity, hacking, and legal philosophy. Scott is also the author of Legality and the host of the Jurisprudence Course podcast, the latter of which will soon have a second season. You can keep up with Scott on Twitter at @scottjshapiro, and preorder Fancy Bear Goes Phishing on Amazon. Fancy Bear Goes Phishing: https://a.co/d/aPv2zpY Legality: https://a.co/d/1qYg0OY Jurisprudence Course: https://open.spotify.com/show/6yOIMnVASRLN2nPLlBL0Dn?si=0de8b550346942d6 Twitter: https://twitter.com/scottjshapiro Outline: 00:00 In This Episode 00:20 Introduction 3:35 Scott the Jurisprude 7:49 War Stories From Columbia 18:36 Analytic Versus Normative Jurisprudence 22:23 The Chicken And The Egg Problem For Jurisprudence 28:03 Austin, Hart, and Progress in Legal Philosophy 44:43 Fancy Bear Goes Phishing 43:23: Cybersecurity and Legal Philosophy 59:02:40 Hacking Paris Hilton's Cell Phone 1:05:07 The Psychology of Hackers Robinson Erhardt researches symbolic logic and the foundations of mathematics at Stanford University. Join him in conversations with philosophers, scientists, weightlifters, artists, and everyone in-between. linktree: https://linktr.ee/robinsonerhardt --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/robinson-erhardt/support

Advisory Opinions
Professor Vladeck Talks Progressive Legal Philosophy

Advisory Opinions

Play Episode Listen Later Apr 26, 2022 73:42 Very Popular


Sarah and David talk about the First Amendment, 14th Amendment, Puerto Rico, and progressive legal philosophy. They start with a big Supreme Court case that makes David fall asleep, move on to Clarence Thomas' musings, and then finish with an enlightening and interesting conversation with Steve Vladeck, law professor at the University of Texas, about the shadow docket, Kagan originalism, and much, much more. Oh, and David ends with a movie recommendation. Since his pop culture recommendations are infallible, you'll want to listen to the end. Show Notes:-City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC-Hill v. Colorado-United States v. Vaello Madero-New York Times: “Roberts Has Lost Control of the Supreme Court”-The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent trailer

Thought and Leaders
Dr Florian Willet. Understanding biases in science, business and life.

Thought and Leaders

Play Episode Listen Later Aug 25, 2021 52:52


In late 2002, Florian heard that psychologist Daniel Kahneman had been awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. That set him off on a journey that saw him writing The Social Swan, a Ph.D. paper turned into a book, fusing theory from behavioural biology, economics, and cognitive psychology.Florian has a particular interest in the economic analysis of law.  He has a Master of Business Studies, a Master of Arts in Communication Psychology, a PhD in Legal Philosophy, and a Ph.D. in Evolutionary and Behavioral Economics.He advises on the theories of human behaviour and evolutionary game theory.Florian works mainly from Switzerland, Germany, and Liechtenstein.  In the first part of this episode of Thought and Leaders, Florian discusses some key cognitive biases and their implications on business and life. In the second part, he tackles some fascinating, questions about social behaviours, including a theory related to primates and penises!This is a highly original and eye-opening episode of THOUGHT AND LEADERS.Put on your ear-pods, tune in, and get ready for a fascinating adventure of wonder.(52 minutes listening time)If you are interested in award-winning content or are looking for a cost-effective way to reach a highly discerning global audience, please DM or email: ask@thoughtandleaders.comwww.thoughtandleaders.comFor more on psychology please see:  https://v.gd/M8AQjx

Ethics in AI
AI in a Democratic Culture - Presented by the Institute for Ethics in AI

Ethics in AI

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 12, 2021 90:20


Launch of the Institute for Ethics in AI with Sir Nigel Shadbolt, Joshua Cohen and Hélène Landemore. Part of the Colloquium on AI Ethics series presented by the Institute for Ethics in AI Introduced by the Vice-Chancellor, Professor Louise Richardson and chaired by Professor John Tasioulas. Speakers Professor Joshua Cohen (Apple University), Professor Hélène Landemore (Yale University), and Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt (Computer Science, Oxford) Speakers: Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt is Principal of Jesus College Oxford and a Professor of Computer Science at the University of Oxford. He has researched and published on topics in artificial intelligence, cognitive science and computational neuroscience. In 2009 he was appointed along with Sir Tim Berners-Lee as Information Advisor to the UK Government. This work led to the release of many thousands of public sector data sets as open data. In 2010 he was appointed by the Coalition Government to the UK Public Sector Transparency Board which oversaw the continued release of Government open data. Nigel continues to advise Government in a number of roles. Professor Shadbolt is Chairman and Co-founder of the Open Data Institute (ODI), based in Shoreditch, London. The ODI specialised in the exploitation of Open Data supporting innovation, training and research in both the UK and internationally. Professor Joshua Cohen Joshua Cohen is a political philosopher. He has written on issues of democratic theory, freedom of expression, religious freedom, political equality, democracy and digital technology, good jobs, and global justice. His books include On Democracy; Democracy and Associations; Philosophy, Politics, Democracy; Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals; and The Arc of the Moral Universe and Other Essays. He is co-editor of the Norton Introduction to Philosophy. Cohen taught at MIT (1977-2005), Stanford (2005-2014), is currently on the faculty at Apple University, and is Distinguished Senior Fellow in Law, Philosophy, and Political Science at Berkeley. Cohen held the Romanell-Phi Beta Kappa Professorship in 2002-3; was Tanner Lecturer at UC Berkeley in 2007; and gave the Comte Lectures at LSE in 2012. Since 1991, he has been editor of Boston Review. Professor Hélène Landemore (Yale) is Associate Professor of Political Science, with Tenure. Her research and teaching interests include democratic theory, political epistemology, theories of justice, the philosophy of social sciences (particularly economics), constitutional processes and theories, and workplace democracy. Hélène is the author of Hume (Presses Universitaires de France: 2004), a historical and philosophical investigation of David Hume's theory of decision-making; Democratic Reason (Princeton University Press: 2013, Spitz prize 2015), an epistemic defense of democracy; and Open Democracy (Princeton University Press 2020), a vision for a new kind, more open form of democracy based on non-electoral forms of representation, including representation based on random selection. Chaired by Professor John Tasioulas, the inaugural Director for the Institute for Ethics and AI, and Professor of Ethics and Legal Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford. Professor Tasioulas was at The Dickson Poon School of Law, Kings College London, from 2014, as the inaugural Chair of Politics, Philosophy and Law and Director of the Yeoh Tiong Lay Centre for Politics, Philosophy and Law. He has degrees in Law and Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, and a D.Phil in Philosophy from the University of Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar. He was previously a Lecturer in Jurisprudence at the University of Glasgow, and Reader in Moral and Legal Philosophy at the University of Oxford, where he taught from 1998-2010. He has also acted as a consultant on human rights for the World Bank.

Ethics in AI
Ethics in AI Colloquium with Adrienne Mayor: Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology

Ethics in AI

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 12, 2021 86:00


Part of the Colloquium on AI Ethics series presented by the Institute of Ethics in AI. This event is also part of the Humanities Cultural Programme, one of the founding stones for the future Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities. What, if anything, can the ancient Greeks teach us​ about robots and AI? Perhaps the answer is nothing, or nothing so straightforward as a correct 'solution' to the problems thrown up by robots and AI, but instead a way of thinking about them. Join us for a fascinating presentation from Adrienne Mayor, Stanford University, who will discuss her latest book, Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology. This book investigates how the Greeks imagined automatons, replicants, and Artificial Intelligence in myths and later designed self-moving devices and robots. Adrienne Mayor, research scholar in the Classics Department and the History and Philosophy of Science program at Stanford University since 2006, is a folklorist and historian of ancient science who investigates natural knowledge contained in pre-scientific myths and oral traditions. Her research looks at ancient "folk science" precursors, alternatives, and parallels to modern scientific methods. She was a Berggruen Fellow at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, 2018-2019. Mayor's latest book, Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology, investigates how the Greeks imagined automatons, replicants, and Artificial Intelligence in myths and later designed actual self-moving devices and robots. Mayor's 2014 book, The Amazons: Lives and Legends of Warrior Women across the Ancient World, analyzes the historical and archaeological evidence underlying myths and tales of warlike women (Sarasvati Prize for Women in Mythology). Her biography of King Mithradates VI of Pontus, The Poison King, won the Gold Medal for Biography, Independent Publishers' Book Award 2010, and was a 2009 National Book Award Finalist. Mayor's other books include The First Fossil Hunters (rev. ed. 2011); Fossil Legends of the First Americans (2005); and Greek Fire, Poison Arrows, and Scorpion Bombs: Biological and Chemical Warfare in the Ancient World (2009, rev. ed. forthcoming). Commentators: Shadi Bartsch-Zimmer - Helen A. Regenstein Distinguished Service Professor of Classics and the Program in Gender Studies. Professor Bartsch-Zimmer works on Roman imperial literature, the history of rhetoric and philosophy, and on the reception of the western classical tradition in contemporary China. She is the author of 5 books on the ancient novel, Neronian literature, political theatricality, and Stoic philosophy, the most recent of which is Persius: A Study in Food, Philosophy, and the Figural (Winner of the 2016 Goodwin Award of Merit). She has also edited or co-edited 7 wide-ranging essay collections (two of them Cambridge Companions) and the “Seneca in Translation” series from the University of Chicago. Bartsch's new translation of Vergil's Aeneid is forthcoming from Random House in 2020; in the following year, she is publishing a new monograph on the contemporary Chinese reception of ancient Greek political philosophy. Bartsch has been a Guggenheim fellow, edits the journal KNOW, and has held visiting scholar positions in St. Andrews, Taipei, and Rome. Starting in academic year 2015, she has led a university-wide initiative to explore the historical and social contexts in which knowledge is created, legitimized, and circulated. Armand D'Angour is Professor of Classical Languages and Literature at the University of Oxford. Professor D'Angour pursued careers as a cellist and businessman before becoming a Tutor in Classics at Jesus College in 2000. In addition to my monograph The Greeks and the New (CUP 2011), he is the author of articles and chapters on the language, literature, psychology and culture of ancient Greece. In 2013-14 he was awarded a British Academy Fellowship to undertake research into ancient Greek music, and in 2017 was awarded a Vice Chancellor's Prize for Public Engagement with Research. Professor D'Angour has since co-edited with Tom Phillips Music, Text, and Culture in Ancient Greece (OUP 2018), and in addition to numerous broadcasts on radio and television, a short film on Youtube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hOK7bU0S1Y) has reached over 650,000 views since its publication in December 2017. His book Socrates in Love: The Making of a Philosopher was published in April 2019, and How to Innovate: An Ancient Guide to Creating Change is due from Princeton University Press in 2021. Chaired by John Tasioulas, the inaugural Director for the Institute for Ethics and AI, and Professor of Ethics and Legal Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford. Professor Tasioulas was at The Dickson Poon School of Law, Kings College London, from 2014, as the inaugural Chair of Politics, Philosophy and Law and Director of the Yeoh Tiong Lay Centre for Politics, Philosophy and Law. He has degrees in Law and Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, and a D.Phil in Philosophy from the University of Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar. He was previously a Lecturer in Jurisprudence at the University of Glasgow, and Reader in Moral and Legal Philosophy at the University of Oxford, where he taught from 1998-2010. He has also acted as a consultant on human rights for the World Bank.

MinddogTV  Your Mind's Best Friend
John D Lefebvre - Musician - Activist - Author

MinddogTV Your Mind's Best Friend

Play Episode Listen Later May 22, 2021 70:23


https://www.johnlefebvre.com/https://www.facebook.com/thoughtfulspeciesPATREON: https://www.patreon.com/minddogtvSponsors:https://podmatch.com/signup/minddogtv
https://mybookie.com Promo Code minddog
https://record.webpartners.co/_6_DFqqtZcLQWqcfzuvZcQGNd7ZgqdRLk/1
https://apply.fundwise.com/minddog
https://myvitalc.com/minddog. promo code minddogtvhttps://skillbuilder.academy/dashboard?view_sequence=1601856764231x540742189759856640&promoCode=MINDDOG100OFFhttps://shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=599839&u=1659788&m=52971&urllink=&afftrack=https://enticeme.com/#minddog

Pandemic Ethics
Should Vaccination Be Mandatory?

Pandemic Ethics

Play Episode Listen Later May 4, 2021 44:16


Even as vaccines become more widely available there is serious concern that, due to persistent reluctance to get vaccinated, protection through herd immunity will be unattainable. This episode considers the ethical and legal principles involved in decisions to make vaccination mandatory. What would mandatory vaccination entail in the case of Covid? Should the same principles that apply to governments also apply to employers, universities, airlines, and other businesses and associations? Are there relevant differences between vaccinations for Covid and other infectious diseases, such as measles or polio? My guest is Roland Pierik, Associate Professor of Legal Philosophy at the University of Amsterdam and a member of the Dutch Health Council.

Rozmawiamy, czyli kultura i filozofia w Teologii Politycznej
[ENG] JP2 Lectures // prof. John Finnis: John Paul II and the Fundamentals of Ethics

Rozmawiamy, czyli kultura i filozofia w Teologii Politycznej

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 27, 2020 109:44


The topic is "John Paul II and the Fundamentals of Ethics" concerning the ethical and metaphysical problems of Christianity in the modern world. In the course of his reflections, Prof. Finnis will refer to particular issues, considered by John Paul II in his writings, especially the concept of Person and Deed in Redemptor Hominis, Familiaris Consortio, Laborem Exercens, Veritatis Splendor, and Novo Millennio Ineunte. The lecture will also be a voice on “apologia fidei ex ratione”, one of the significant theological debates, of which Prof. Finnis is a contemporary expert. Prof. John M. Finnis – born in 1940 in South Australia. Jurist, philosopher and scholar, taught Law in the University of Oxford 1965-2010 and is Professor of Law and Legal Philosophy emeritus there and also in the University of Notre Dame, Indiana, where he was a chaired Professor 1995-2020. Author of Natural Law and Natural Rights (1980; 2011) elaborating a new approach to classical natural law theory; Fundamentals of Ethics (1983); Moral Absolutes (1991); Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory (1995); and in five volumes Collected Essays of John Finnis (2011). He was a member of the International Theological Commission of the Holy See 1986-91, the Pontifical Council of Justice and Peace (1990-95), and the Pontifical Academy Pro Vita (2001-2016). This is another of the series of "Janopawłowe Lectures" organized by the Institute of Culture of St. John Paul II at Angelicum. See full list of "JP2 Lectures": https://angelicum.it/news/2020/10/16/jpii-concert-institute-of-culture/

Ethics in AI
Algorithms Eliminate Noise (and That Is Very Good)

Ethics in AI

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 5, 2020 76:10


Part of the Colloquium on AI Ethics series presented by the Institute of Ethics in AI. This event is also part of the Humanities Cultural Programme, one of the founding stones for the future Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities. Imagine that two doctors in the same city give different diagnoses to identical patients - or that two judges in the same courthouse give different sentences to people who have committed the same crime. Suppose that different food inspectors give different ratings to indistinguishable restaurants - or that when a company is handling customer complaints, the resolution depends on who happens to be handling the particular complaint. Now imagine that the same doctor, the same judge, the same inspector, or the same company official makes different decisions, depending on whether it is morning or afternoon, or Monday rather than Wednesday. These are examples of noise: variability in judgments that should be identical. Noise contributes significantly to errors in all fields, including medicine, law, economic forecasting, police behavior, food safety, bail, security checks at airports, strategy, and personnel selection. Algorithms reduce noise - which is a very good thing. Background reading: two papers (i) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3300171; (ii) https://hbr.org/2016/10/noise Speakers Professor Cass Sunstein (Harvard Law School) Commentators: Professor Ruth Chang (Faculty of Law, University of Oxford) and Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt (Jesus College, Oxford and Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford) Chaired by Professor John Tasioulas (inaugural Director for the Institute for Ethics and AI, and Professor of Ethics and Legal Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford). Biographies: Professor Cass Sunstein is currently the Robert Walmsley University Professor at Harvard. He is the founder and director of the Program on Behavioral Economics and Public Policy at Harvard Law School. In 2018, he received the Holberg Prize from the government of Norway, sometimes described as the equivalent of the Nobel Prize for law and the humanities. In 2020, the World Health Organization appointed him as Chair of its technical advisory group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health. From 2009 to 2012, he was Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and after that, he served on the President's Review Board on Intelligence and Communications Technologies and on the Pentagon's Defense Innovation Board. Mr. Sunstein has testified before congressional committees on many subjects, and he has advised officials at the United Nations, the European Commission, the World Bank, and many nations on issues of law and public policy. He serves as an adviser to the Behavioural Insights Team in the United Kingdom. Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt is Principal of Jesus College Oxford and a Professor of Computer Science at the University of Oxford. He has researched and published on topics in artificial intelligence, cognitive science and computational neuroscience. In 2009 he was appointed along with Sir Tim Berners-Lee as Information Advisor to the UK Government. This work led to the release of many thousands of public sector data sets as open data. In 2010 he was appointed by the Coalition Government to the UK Public Sector Transparency Board which oversaw the continued release of Government open data. Nigel continues to advise Government in a number of roles. Professor Shadbolt is Chairman and Co-founder of the Open Data Institute (ODI), based in Shoreditch, London. The ODI specialised in the exploitation of Open Data supporting innovation, training and research in both the UK and internationally. Professor Ruth Chang is the Chair and Professor of Jurisprudence and a Professorial Fellow of University College. Before coming to Oxford, she was Professor of Philosophy at Rutgers University, New Brunswick in New Jersey, USA. Before that she was a visiting philosophy professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, and a visiting law professor at the University of Chicago. During this period she also held a Junior Research Fellowship at Balliol College where she was completing her D.Phil. in philosophy. She has held fellowships at Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, and the National Humanities Center and serves on boards of a number of journals. She has a J.D. from Harvard Law School. Her expertise concerns philosophical questions relating to the nature of value, value conflict, decision-making, rationality, the exercise of agency, and choice. Her work has been the subject of interviews by various media outlets in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Germany, Taiwan, Australia, Italy, Israel, Brazil, New Zealand, and Austria, and she has been a consultant or lecturer for institutions ranging from video gaming to pharmaceuticals to the CIA and World Bank. Professor John Tasioulas is the inaugural Director for the Institute for Ethics and AI, and Professor of Ethics and Legal Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford. Professor Tasioulas was at The Dickson Poon School of Law, Kings College London, from 2014, as the inaugural Chair of Politics, Philosophy & Law and Director of the Yeoh Tiong Lay Centre for Politics, Philosophy & Law. He has degrees in Law and Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, and a D.Phil in Philosophy from the University of Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar. He was previously a Lecturer in Jurisprudence at the University of Glasgow, and Reader in Moral and Legal Philosophy at the University of Oxford, where he taught from 1998-2010. He has also acted as a consultant on human rights for the World Bank.

Ethics in AI
Privacy Is Power

Ethics in AI

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 5, 2020 61:25


Part of the Colloquium on AI Ethics series presented by the Institute of Ethics in AI. This event is also part of the Humanities Cultural Programme, one of the founding stones for the future Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities. In conversation with author, Dr Carissa Veliz (Associate Professor Faculty of Philosophy, Institute for Ethics in AI, Tutorial Fellow at Hertford College University of Oxford). The author will be accompanied by Sir Michael Tugendhat and Dr Stephanie Hare in a conversation about privacy, power, and democracy, and the event will be chaired by Professor John Tasioulas (inaugural Director for the Institute for Ethics and AI, and Professor of Ethics and Legal Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford). Summary Privacy Is Power argues that people should protect their privacy because privacy is a kind of power. If we give too much of our data to corporations, the wealthy will rule. If we give too much personal data to governments, we risk sliding into authoritarianism. For democracy to be strong, the bulk of power needs to be with the citizenry, and whoever has the data will have the power. Privacy is not a personal preference; it is a political concern. Personal data is a toxic asset, and should be regulated as if it were a toxic substance, similar to asbestos. The trade in personal data has to end. As surveillance creeps into every corner of our lives, Carissa Véliz exposes how our personal data is giving too much power to big tech and governments, why that matters, and what we can do about it. Have you ever been denied insurance, a loan, or a job? Have you had your credit card number stolen? Do you have to wait too long when you call customer service? Have you paid more for a product than one of your friends? Have you been harassed online? Have you noticed politics becoming more divisive in your country? You might have the data economy to thank for all that and more. The moment you check your phone in the morning you are giving away your data. Before you've even switched off your alarm, a whole host of organisations have been alerted to when you woke up, where you slept, and with whom. Our phones, our TVs, even our washing machines are spies in our own homes. Without your permission, or even your awareness, tech companies are harvesting your location, your likes, your habits, your relationships, your fears, your medical issues, and sharing it amongst themselves, as well as with governments and a multitude of data vultures. They're not just selling your data. They're selling the power to influence you and decide for you. Even when you've explicitly asked them not to. And it's not just you. It's all your contacts too, all your fellow citizens. Privacy is as collective as it is personal. Digital technology is stealing our personal data and with it our power to make free choices. To reclaim that power, and our democracy, we must take back control of our personal data. Surveillance is undermining equality. We are being treated differently on the basis of our data. What can we do? The stakes are high. We need to understand the power of data better. We need to start protecting our privacy. And we need regulation. We need to pressure our representatives. It is time to pull the plug on the surveillance economy. To purchase a copy of ‘Privacy is Power', please click https://www.amazon.co.uk/Privacy-Power-Should-Take-Control/dp/1787634043 Biographies: Dr Carissa Véliz is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Philosophy and the Institute for Ethics in AI, and a Tutorial Fellow in Philosophy at Hertford College. Carissa completed her DPhil in Philosophy at the University of Oxford. She was then a Research Fellow at the Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics and the Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities at the University of Oxford. To find out more about Carissa's work, visit her website: www.carissaveliz.com Sir Michael Tugendhat was a Judge of the High Court of England and Wales from 2003 to 2014 after being a barrister from 1970. From 2010 to 2014 he was the Judge in charge of the Queen's Bench Division media and civil lists. He was Honorary Professor of Law at the University of Leicester (2013-16) and is a trustee of JUSTICE. His publications include Liberty Intact: Human Rights in English Law: Human Rights in English Law (Oxford University Press 2017) and Fighting for Freedom? (Bright Blue 2017), The Law of Privacy and Media (Oxford University Press 1st edn 2002). Dr Stephanie Hare is an independent researcher and broadcaster focused on technology, politics and history. Previously she worked as a Principal Director at Accenture Research, a strategist at Palantir, a Senior Analyst at Oxford Analytica, the Alistair Horne Visiting Fellow at St Antony's College, Oxford, and a consultant at Accenture. She holds a PhD and MSc from the London School of Economics and a BA in Liberal Arts and Sciences (French) from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her work can be found at harebrain.co Professor John Tasioulas is the inaugural Director for the Institute for Ethics and AI, and Professor of Ethics and Legal Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford. Professor Tasioulas was at The Dickson Poon School of Law, Kings College London, from 2014, as the inaugural Chair of Politics, Philosophy & Law and Director of the Yeoh Tiong Lay Centre for Politics, Philosophy & Law. He has degrees in Law and Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, and a D.Phil in Philosophy from the University of Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar. He was previously a Lecturer in Jurisprudence at the University of Glasgow, and Reader in Moral and Legal Philosophy at the University of Oxford, where he taught from 1998-2010. He has also acted as a consultant on human rights for the World Bank.

Was weiss ich? Ein Podcast über das Weissein
Ubuntu: How a new white identity based on humany will change our relationships and society?

Was weiss ich? Ein Podcast über das Weissein

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 11, 2020 38:26


This podcast is in English. The African concept of Ubuntu teaches us that we are only human beings because of our inter-connectedness to other human beings. Our humanity (or human being) is mostly a copy and paste of the general humanity (or human being) of other human beings, we live in communities with. As such, in order to secure and keep secured our own humanity (or human being) we must secure and keep securing the humanity (or human being) of others with who we are in members of communities with. Ubuntu promotes the philosophy that the attributes we puzzle together to form our own humanity (or human ‘be-ing') comes from the collective attributes of the communities we form a part of. For example, this means that you can only develop a sense of love if an ethic love is expressed within the community you are a member. Ubuntu as a way of life has the potential to transform how we live together and to change societal structures in relation to race and gender among others. This podcast is in English because it was most important to us to speak to an expert on the topic of Ubuntu. Rantsho Moraka lives in South Africa and works as a lawyer in Johannesburg. He has teaching and conference experience in race and feminist studies and taught Legal Philosophy at the University of Pretoria. He published on topics of gender, film and social justice and has been thinking extensively about Ubuntu from a theoretical and practical approach. We discussed the following topics: - What does the concept of humanity or Ubuntu mean? - How different would our communities and societies look if we lived by the philosophy of Ubuntu? - In your opinion, how has racism attacked the humanity of individuals? - How can white people reconnect with a sense of humanity in this world? - In the past, we have excluded and oppressed black people and other members of society for different reasons. What can we do now to address these injustices and ensure that all individuals become members of our communities and societies?

Africa Rights Talk
S2 E9: Institutional racism and how it manifests in the African context

Africa Rights Talk

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 7, 2020 58:56


In conversation with Dr Joel Modiri Dr Joel Modiri is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Jurisprudence in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria. He holds the degrees LLB cum laude and a PhD both from the University of Pretoria. His PhD thesis was titled ‘The Jurisprudence of Steve Biko: A Study in Race, Law and Power in the ‘Afterlife’ of Colonial-apartheid’. Dr Modiri mainly teaches in the field of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy. He has convened and taught a number of law subjects such as Social Justice and Human Rights, African Human Rights, Research Methodology, Legal Problems of HIV & AIDS, and Law and Transformation. He has also taught portions of courses in Philosophy, Political Science, Sociology and Public Policy presented by the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Pretoria. He currently convenes the LLM/MPhil in Law and Political Justice. In light of the lives of black people that have been sacrificed senselessly at the hands of police brutality, Dr Joel Modiri discusses and explains what institutional racism is and how it manifests in the African context. He discusses the correlational link between institutional racism and police brutality. He reflects on the victimisation of black people at the hands of police and armed forces and other forms of racism. He assesses the impact of this on the South Africa’s democracy project. The discussion also analyses the effectiveness of legal responses to racism and provides strategies on what can be done to eliminate racism. This conversation was recorded on 29 June 2020.Music: Inner Peace by Mike Chino https://soundcloud.com/mike-chinoCreative Commons — Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported — CC BY-SA 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b...Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/0nI6qJeqFcc               

GRADCAST
274 | Environmental Conservation, Kant, and Legal Philosophy

GRADCAST

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 22, 2020 34:59


Attila Ataner, who is doing his PhD in Philosophy, chats about his research on the philosophical movement known as German Idealism. He discusses his ideas with hosts Ariel Frame and Yousuf Hasan and explains in what ways the 18th and 19thcentury philosophical works are relevant and helpful in legal matters today. Attila suggests that Kant’s works on duties, for example, can help provide a basis for having legally enforceable protectionist duties when it comes to the environment. It is fascinating to see how he extrapolates environmental conservation from German Idealism. More information about Attila's work can be found at Western Academia Full video available on YouTube Recorded on June 16th, 2020.  Produced by Laura Muñoz

Future Hindsight
The New Conspiracism: Nancy Rosenblum

Future Hindsight

Play Episode Listen Later Jun 4, 2020 30:06


Conspiracism A functional conspiracy theory uses facts and rational arguments to prove that things are not as they seem. Conspiracism is a conspiracy without the theory. Conspiracism takes the form of a bold assertion without any evidence, even fake evidence, to back it up. It’s an assault on common sense. Prominent examples are “climate change is a hoax!” and “the election is rigged!” Conspiracy claims spread quickly because they require no explanation and are impossible to counter. Moreover, they ring “true enough” by playing into an emotional narrative of fear or hatred. When the president engages in conspiracism, such as the press being the enemy of the people, he imposes his reality on the nation, with violent consequences. Dangers of conspiracism One of the most devastating side effects of conspiracism is the delegitimation of democratic institutions, such as the party system. The notion of a loyal opposition party is key to democracy; without it, democracy ceases to exist. Republicans rely heavily on this delegitimating tactic to hold power, and it’s growing more rampant. Birtherism towards Obama and painting Hillary Clinton as a criminal mastermind are examples of this. By equating Democrats with traitors, as the president has explicitly done, he implies they are not a loyal opposition but enemies of the state. Once delegitimated, violence against them becomes acceptable. This is an old tactic, but one we’re seeing for the first time in the US. Protecting Reality and enacting democracy Conspiracism is destructive, delegitimating, and disorienting. However, it has no program, no policy, and no ideology. Conspiracism is now mainly used by conservatives, but it can easily travel across the political spectrum. In fact, conspiracism has already replaced ideology as the dominant political tool in the US. It is critical to speak truth to conspiracism—not for the person spreading it, who is unlikely to be persuaded—but for yourself and others. For starters, it is morally right. Speaking truth also reinforces reality, shows other truth-seekers they are not alone, and creates solidarity. Equally important is voting for politicians who emphasize facts and explain how and what their actions are accomplishing. Lawmakers help sustain democratic norms when they are transparent and make acts of government open and legible. Find out more: Nancy Rosenblum is the Harvard University Senator Joseph S. Clark Professor of Ethics in Politics and Government emerita. Her field of research is historical and contemporary political thought. She is the co-author of A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy, among other books. Prof. Rosenblum is Co-Editor of the Annual Review of Political Science and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Science. She has served as the President of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, Vice-President of the American Political Science Association, Board Member of the Russell Sage Foundation, and Chair of the Department of Government from 2004 to 2011.

LawPod
Episode 61 – Global Norms in a Divided World: Discussion with Professor Hans Lindahl

LawPod

Play Episode Listen Later May 21, 2020 71:40


Dr Mark Hanna and Professor Hans Lindahl, Chair of Legal Philosophy at Tilburg University in a wide ranging conversation about law, philosophy, boundaries and social movements. Dr Mark Hanna in discussion with Professor Hans Lindahl, Chair of Legal Philosophy at Tilburg University and Chair of Global Law at Queen Mary University of London. Professor Lindahl discusses a range of issues, including the importance of boundaries to legal orders and their relevance to Brexit and Northern Ireland, as well as the importance of social movements from the aboriginal Tent Embassy in Australia in the 1970s to the more recent phenomenon of Greta Thunberg and the school strike for climate.Professor Lindahl has published Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality with Oxford University Press in 2013, and Authority and the Globalisation of Inclusion and Exclusion with Cambridge University Press in 2018. His research is focused on globalization processes, such as the concept of legal order in a global setting; the relation of boundaries to freedom, justice, and security; a politics of boundary-setting alternative to both cosmopolitanism and communitarianism; transformations of legal authority and political representation; immigration and global justice; collective identity and difference in the process of European integration.

LawPod
Episode 61 - Global Norms in a Divided World: Discussion with Professor Hans Lindahl

LawPod

Play Episode Listen Later May 21, 2020 71:40


Dr Mark Hanna and Professor Hans Lindahl, Chair of Legal Philosophy at Tilburg University in a wide ranging conversation about law, philosophy, boundaries and social movements.

Metagnosis
Scalia and the Law

Metagnosis

Play Episode Listen Later Feb 29, 2020 78:10


Antonin Scalia - A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the New Law.Send us feedback at MetagnosisPodcast@gmail.com. Join our community at: https://www.reddit.com/r/Metagnosis/. [The following is a mediocre transcript.]Yuta    0:16  So this time we are reading a text by Scalia, a short text, and it's in the book called a matter of interpretation by Scalia. And in the book he explains his general legal philosophy, I would say, in an accessible way, I would say. And so I'll just quickly outline his argument, which is, he starts off with talking about the common law and how law students are taught the law through reading about these cases and then thinking about what a judge would say. Based on these cases, and when the judge what they would decide as a judge, and then talks about how laws kind of built up through these decisions by judges, and thenHenry  1:10  yeah, I think you're probably going through this quickly. But this is a thing that I think a lot of people are not super familiar with. So it might be useful to explain it a little bit. So what is common law when you talk about that?Yuta    1:23  Yeah, I didn't know much about this subject before reading about it. So I think what he's saying is that common law is the law that gets built up through the history of judges citing cases, so it's not like a law that was signed by some Parliament or something like that.Henry  1:47  It's decided by precedent.Yuta    1:50  Yeah.Henry  1:52  And precedent is continually refined over time. And essentially, the laws coming from the minds of the judges.Yuta    2:02  Yeah. And he writes about I have a quote about this. And he's writing about the way that common law was built up in England, and he says "all of this would be an unqualified good, were it not for a trend in government that has developed in recent centuries called democracy." Henry  2:24  Yes, that's a great line. This is Yuta    2:26  Yeah, this is his basic argument, which is things like statutes, which are laws, I guess, that are written by Congress, aren't like the common law. And they're supposed to reflect, you know, the will of the people in a way. And so it's not up for the judges to decide what the law is. It's up to the judges to just interpret what the law is. And yeah, he talks about maybe the training of people in law schools is a little opposed to how they should be interpreting the law in some other contexts, Henry  3:12  because the education in law school starts off with an analysis of this case law, the common law, Yuta    3:21  yeah, says like most classes in the first year, not based on this method, Henry  3:25  as opposed to interpretive law where you're reading side of the Constitution or something like that, a legal document that needs to be maintained. Yeah. Yuta    3:48  So he describes the opposing view as the view that prioritizes the intent of person who makes laws. So he says like, in a lot of cases, lawyers will. When they go in front of the Supreme Court, they'll talk about the history of how the legislating legislation came to be and kind of what the congressman at the time intended and kind of the debates that they had while making the law, and he says that that should not be what decides the interpretation of law. And says, like what should be prioritized is the letter of the law. And he distinguishes two kinds of intent. He says, like the subjective intent is what people think the law givers intended. And he says he objectified intent is kind of the intent that you that a reasonable person would gather from reading the texts of law. So just the text of law, Henry  4:55  right. And I think that people listening as well here will be like, well, what is a reasonable person? mean, and I think that that's up for debate. But that's a concept that is not, you know, strictly defined in legal terms. Yuta    5:09  Yeah. And in a lot of cases, it's pretty obvious what a reasonable person would breed. But yeah, in some cases useful. You have to decide maybe No, no. Henry  5:20  But there is a I think that this is an interesting split. That is relevant, because there are some arguments that end up saying, well, then everyone is textualist by this definition, but I think the the interesting split is between how you justify your interpretation of the law, because on the one hand, it doesn't matter at all what a reasonable person thinks. So you wouldn't argue about what a reasonable person is. On one side, you're just saying, What did the person who wrote the law, man, it doesn't matter if they're reasonable or not? And you might think, like, well, they meant it in a certain way. That applies very differently now. They did when they wrote it, for example, whereas deduction aside is saying, but it has to be up to a reasonable person in general. Yuta    6:09  way. Okay. The way you phrase that I don't maybe I disagreed with some parts of it. But I'll lay out what Scalia said first, Henry  6:16  so we're clear we can get to more of our talking about it later. Yeah. So, Yuta    6:22  um, one of the comments he makes is that there is no the intent of the law maker because there's no law maker. Like if you receive a letter from someone, there's a writer, and there's an intent behind it. But if it's a lot, you know, there's like, now there's thousands of people involved. Most congressmen don't even read the legislation. Maybe member some members of the committee have heard summaries of the legislation at best, it sounds like and then the votes kind of are usually split. It's usually Not unanimous and so it's he says it doesn't make a lot of sense to say there's one intention. And he Yeah, kind of says there's basically no subjective intent. Henry  7:14  I think that's a good word to use to distinguish it. There's the subjective attend. And then there's the reasonable intent, or what did you call it? Yuta    7:21  objectified and objectifies that is our he that's his word. Henry  7:25  Yeah. He gives us a dialogue as an example of the sort of ambiguity of intent that is occurring in the legislative process. And it ends with this quote by Mr. Armstrong, it's Mr. I'm sorry, Mr. Dahle, talking about a or a congressman and someone working with them talking about this bill that's being proposed. And it ends with us. Mr. President, the reason I raised this issue is not perhaps apparent on the surface, and let me just say it, the report itself is not considered by the Committee on Finance. It was not subject to amendment by the Committee on Finance. It is not subject to amendment now by the Senate. If there were matter within this document, which was disagreed to by the Senator from Colorado, or even by a majority of all senators, there would be no way for us to change the report. I could not offer an amendment tonight to amend the committee report. For any jurist, administrator, bureaucrat, tax practitioner, or other who might chanced upon the written record of this proceeding. Let me just make this point that this is not the law. It was not voted on. It is not subject to amendment, and we should discipline ourselves to the task of expressing congressional intent in the statute. So just one person in this process complaining about how almost no one knows anything about the the contents of this document, and the people that do know only know very sparse parts. Yeah, and there was little way for them to change any part of the document or to interpret it or do anything. Yuta    9:04  The machine funny. You're just writing that down. Henry  9:08  Oh, yeah, since this was transcripted. But the point is just that. Yeah, it's a there's not just one person behind this that knows what it was meant to be written. Yeah. Yuta    9:20  Hopefully the lawn doesn't abolish America. Henry  9:24  Right. But then the the result, obviously, is that this, you know, written piece that was pure occurred in some way becomes the law of the land. Yeah. Yuta    9:34  So let's do an example. I'll just go through an example quickly, which is the gun example. Oh, yeah, this one. So he says that there was some statute that banned the use of gun or I think had harsh penalties for using a gun during drug transaction Henry  9:58  and drug trafficking. The use of firearm. Yuta    10:01  Yeah. The and he wrote a dissent on that case, because the majority decided that a gun was being used in a case where the gun was used to barter for drugs. And Scalia says reasonable person would read the use of a firearm as meaning the use of a firearm as a weapon, not as a, you know, as the bartering tool. Henry  10:28  Yeah, this was this was the specific circumstance just so that we're talking about the same thing. The statute at issue provided for an increased jail term if, during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime. The defendant, quote, uses a firearm, unquote. The defendant in this case had sought to purchase the quantity of cocaine. And what he offered to give in exchange for the cocaine was an unloaded firearm, which you showed to the drug seller. The court had the court held I forgot to say The defendant was subject to an increased penalty because he had, quote, used a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime. Unquote. Yuta    11:09  Yep. Henry  11:10  Which he dissented to this case, but it was majority he lost it. Yeah. Now on Yuta    11:17  I think the thing that struck me reading this is I thought the writing was so good. And I read this for cost. And I'm like the best writing and Fred, for a class, just terms of the style of the of the prose, and it's just very nice to read. That's why I think we're quoting it more than we've quoted anything else. Yeah, I have one more. Quote, well, maybe a couple more above it. Here's one. Henry  11:46  Well, do we want to mention the significance of this example? Yuta    11:51  I think I explained it. He says that the guns are reasonable person would read the law as banning the use of guns as a weapon, firearms this weapon, right? Henry  12:08  whereas it was not literally written within the law and maybe wasn't intended by the person who wrote. Yuta    12:17  Who knows? Yeah, although he says that that part is irrelevant, Henry  12:24  right. So he's already put himself on the side of saying the tax matters. And now he's trying to say the tax matters, but in terms of a reasonable person's interpretation, not literally to the letter of the law. Yuta    12:38  Yeah. Oh accord about that, as a tech should not be construed strictly and it should not be concerned leniently, it should be construed reasonably to contain all that it fairly means. Henry  12:48  Right? Right. And this is definitely a really tricky subject. Because, you know, how do you know what is too lenient and what is too strict? Yuta    12:58  Yeah. Oh, We'll get to that. Sure. Yeah. All good selection. Okay, another quote before. He says a society that adopts a bill of rights is skeptical of that evolving standards of decency always Mark progress, and the societies always mature, as opposed to rot. Yeah, so he's just arguing against the the tendency to read. I guess more into the law then. is in the law. Yeah. Henry  13:41  Right. So the two sides, the two tendencies are there to just to read the law very strictly and not allow for any sort of deviation in meaning, even if it's reasonable, and then the other side of being reading too much into law, so now it doesn't really have that. Have any reasonable attachment to what was written? Yuta    14:03  Yeah. Okay. Should I talk about the tribe? Oh, Henry  14:10  yeah. Yuta    14:11  So I saw I read a response that Lawrence tribe, a really famous law professor at Harvard, wrote to Scalia. Henry  14:21  Yeah, so the format of this book is that the first essay is Scalia's, you know, main thesis. And then there's a couple responses including this one. Yuta    14:30  Yeah. And we're not gonna really talk about it much other than this one point. Yes. Go, I guess some goes to this point, we think. And so tribes argument is that he agrees that we should focus on the text of the law. But he's saying we don't know how to read the text because it sounds like the text gives you instructions on how to read it and how to read itself. And so Scalia says he should read the text as a reasonable person would interpret it. And tribe says, well, it's not really clear how you should read it. He can't say that because the constitution doesn't say Henry  15:19  it doesn't say read this as if a reasonable person was interpreting it doesn't say that in the Constitution. Yuta    15:25  Yeah, and then Henry  15:29  Okay, so this is conclusion, all observations. Okay. Yuta    15:38  So okay, the quote is from tribe. There's certainly nothing in the text itself that proclaims the Constitution's text to be the sole or ultimate point of reference. And even if it were, such a self referential proclamation would raise the problem of infinite regress. Oh, no. Yeah, yeah, I thought this was so funny. Henry  16:08  Yeah, it just doesn't really make any sense. But I think that it gives a little context to who exactly Scalia is arguing against in terms of alternative approaches to interpreting the law. Yeah. And Yuta    16:22  in a footnote here, he cites girdle. Which we think I mean, we both really like that book. Unknown Speaker  16:31  But Yuta    16:32  I think it's a ridiculous book. It's just totally irrelevant. I mean, we've read the book, and it's totally irrelevant. I mean, you can you don't even have to look at the citation. I mean, this quote, that, even if the constitution proclaimed how it should be read, even if that were the case, such as self referential pregnancy provocation, raise the problem of infinite regress. Yeah, that's crazy. Henry  17:03  Cuz, like, talking about Yeah, me talking to you right now like I didn't tell you how to read what I'm saying. So it's an infinite regress if I told you how to read what I'm saying. Yeah, Yuta    17:14  like if you asked me to pass you this bottle of water. It's like, I don't know what you meant by that since he didn't tell me how to interpret your words. Maybe, maybe by those words, you meant I should throw the water in your face. It's true. Henry  17:31  That is a possible interview. Yeah, you Yuta    17:33  didn't know. Or maybe it's just like, you didn't tell me to use English. So you were just like, shouting random. Sounds me? Yep. The Constitution doesn't say that. You should read this as an English person. Yeah, speaking person. Yeah. Okay, well, maybe we're not being totally fair, but I'm just Well, I think Has the argument that the constitution isn't clear about how it should be read. And so it's more open to interpretation. That is tribes argument. And that's a little fair. But and he did quote him directly and I think, I don't know it's, well, it sounds crazy, but I think I know this is just the only way I can think of to read the infinite regress thing. So, Henry  18:27  yeah, it's pretty funny. It's good to bring it up. But in the context of Scalia's original argument, I think that he is addressing what Scully is trying to talk about, which is that there doesn't seem to be a definitive way to read the Constitution. You know, there are multiple interpretations that are considered legitimate, you know, so how do you resolve that? And and Scalia's point is that, well, we need to think about it in this way in terms of a reasonable person's approach. But tribes seems to be pointing out like, Well, why is that the right way to do it? You could just pick anyway. And it would be just as justified. Yuta    19:08  Yeah, I guess I think he'd be. I mean, he would say he should read as a reasonable person. I agree. But it's just unclear what the reason person would read. Henry  19:18  Okay. And now, I haven't read the rest of tribes. Yuta    19:20  Yeah. Because I mean, nobody would argue he should read it reasonably, in a way. But he's, he's arguing against Scalia's interpretation of how a reasonable person would read it. But so Henry  19:32  yeah, so that's another way to argue about schooling, which is that Scalia is gonna have certain decisions about what he thinks a reasonable person would say. But people can disagree on that. But I think that the first point to get is to agree that we should be judging us in terms of how a reasonable person would interpret it. Yuta    19:53  And I think tribes definition definitely is more expansive, and it seems no more Yeah, I think liberals tend to be on that side of kind of expanding rights more than what you wouldn't kind of read into the actual texts of law. Um, Henry  20:15  yeah, Scalia does make a point about this a little later. But yeah, we can get to that. Yuta    20:19  So I'm glad I read this response to this reading Scalia. He's kind of arguing against people who, you know, we aren't really in this community of legal people. So he's kind of arguments people whose arguments we have that he's not directly citing usually. And but then you read tribe, and you kind of see what he means by a reasonable interpretation means that you don't read it in a way where he would come up with the problem of infinite regress. Unknown Speaker  20:53  That is not a reasonable human interpretation. Well, Scalia didn't write Henry  20:57  his original essay. How to interpreted. So that is fine way. Yuta    21:06  Oh, yeah, he didn't write that. We shouldn't read his text the way a reasonable person. Henry  21:13  Yeah. So he was just interpreting a different way. Yeah. Yuta    21:17  It's like very clear. So yeah, if you're coming up with infringer as you're breeding it way too closely, Henry  21:26  I guess. Well, it's kind of hard to say you'd have to ask. Yeah. Yuta    21:33  But yeah, maybe I'm like infinite regress maybe like you meant that in some way. Or it doesn't mean infinite regress like back then it could be reasonable, obviously, like, if he meant something, but then he cites girdle Escher, Bach, so we know exactly what he meant by infinite regress. We won't read the book. Yeah. Henry  21:56  I mean, there is Yeah, it just like, Oh, it's I mentioned the words infinite regress. Unknown Speaker  22:04  So I'm gonna reference this book. This is a very cool topic that we both really like. But Henry  22:13  yeah. I mean, I do see the literal way you could take it that leads to infinite regress, which is? Well, if I tell you how to interpret it, you have to already have presumed a certain way to interpret it to get that message from me telling you how to interpret it. Yeah. So there is a very literal way in which you could take that, yeah, that is not how any legal document or any document ever is written, or REL will use when you get to the part that the text refers to itself. You read it like a reason person would read it like, you know, right. I think that's what Scalia is trying to point out, at least on interpreting his entire point. And how I'm trying to condense it to this part is that he's not proposing an entirely new way to interpret legal documents or in particular the Constitution. He's trying to refine what people understand as the right way already to interpret these documents and formalizing that in terms of like, a reasonable person would interpret it this way. So if you disagree with me on what a reasonable person would interpret it, then we're still on the same page about how to judge it. But if you don't think it even has to do with what reasonable people think, then you're on a completely different way of interpreting documents in general. Yuta    23:28  Yeah, I mean, I do think tribe would be okay with the description of the Constitution should be read as a reasonable person read it, but but just just be really expansive about you know, the reasonable person. And honest like, so I followed Lawrence travel and Twitter and Oh, right. He, I think he's kind of something's happened to him. So but I'm sure he was like very bright when he wrote This, though the one. Yeah, it's just the one Twitter thing I remember from him is that he shared an article about Ted Cruz being this being like a pathetic person sucking up to Trump. It was like a hit piece on Ted Cruz. And then Ted Cruz quoted the tweet, and he said, or he quoted someone else who, like had a article of the tweet or something. And then he wrote, I tried to message you, but you blocked me. You were a law professor at Harvard, and I respected you at the time. Like, there's like nothing more perfect than the fact that you blocked me and show like, how close minded you are. Henry  24:50  Yeah, that's great when you have public and private to each. Yuta    24:55  Yeah, totally irrelevant. side. Henry  25:01  Yes. Now you know our Yuta    25:04  introduction. Yeah, that's my character talk on. Yeah. What if? Yeah, let's hire him. Now I'm thinking of infinite regress in random places in Henry  25:20  one way. Or did its, you know, tweet quote itself. You, when we first mentioned this topic, we seem to have slightly different interpretations of Scalia. I think that we we resolve that a little bit, but do you want to outline how you read Scully and what you disagree with? Yuta    25:37  I think, um, yeah, I don't know. Yeah, I don't know if we solve the disagreement, but I think um, I heard you as saying that. Scalia kind of resolved how text should be read and that the debate is over, I guess, and I thought, kind of the debates are gonna happen. between people who think, who disagree on what how a reasonable person would read this specific law. And so I think it's, it doesn't totally, I basically I read the text as kind of giving a broad argument, but it doesn't totally resolve the specifics and kind of what makes it compelling. The fact that it's not ultra specific. Henry  26:25  I agree with that. I think that we're on the same page. And I think that, you know, the common phrases, you know, reasonable people can disagree. Yeah. And while that might, this is more of a meta point, which is like, reasonable people can disagree on how to interpret things. You think that that's sort of the result. So if there was only one reasonable way? Okay, yeah, the debate would be over, but there does seem to be multiple reasonable ways to interpret legal documents. Yuta    26:58  Yeah. I think The people he really disagrees strongly with are people who actually do have like a strong moral stance on the issue at hand. And then they'll say, Oh, this text wrote, maybe, for example, cruel and unusual punishment. He talks about this a little, and oh, cruel and unusual. That means now we know that that means capital punishment. Capital punishment is cruel and unusual as we found out. But then Scalia says, well, in texts in the Constitution, it actually mentions capital punishment. And it doesn't mention that capital punishment is cruel and unusual. So like, you can see that clearly they meant that capital punishment is not cruel, unusual. And so capital punishment is fine, or it's legal and and then he says there's a lot of people who argue that punishment should be is outlawed by the Constitution. Because it's quite unusual, and I think, yeah, he's saying like, he read the letter of law, using the meanings of the words and the meaning of law, as it would have been interpreted when the law was written, then the reasonable interpretation would be that capital punishment is not cruel and unusual. And Henry  28:22  then when you say the interpretation, you mean the objective interpretation? Yuta    28:28  He calls Yeah, the intent to say that criminal is not cruel, unusual. He calls that the object if I didn't turn right along. Yeah, that's a kind of a made up intent is usually people have intentions not text, but right. It's kind of kind of coming up with what a reasonable person would write if they wrote Yeah, Henry  28:52  and it still leaves open the question of what thought I've justified a ton is obviously but yeah, yeah. I think that the the tricky part about punishment, I think it's pretty clear that they meant that capital punishment is not right, right. Yeah. And I think that what he is arguing and just to reinforce your point is that he wants to prevent these law judgers to become law givers. He doesn't want the judge to try to interpret into the law, what it should mean, what an intelligent person should have meant when they wrote this thing. Yeah. Yuta    29:32  And I think he, the people he most disagrees with our people who, yeah, basically, they think crucial. They feel strongly that it means capital punishment, and because of that, they vote for that or vote for that in the supreme court as as their interpretation, but I think it's like it'll be very rare. What you'll find someone actually articulating that view that this is, I feel like capital punishment is bad, therefore I'm going to vote this way. But I think it's kind of implied that some people might, in their behavior act in that way, even if they don't articulate. But I think if someone actually defended that viewpoint that would be shut down pretty easily. But he's kind of implying that even people who maybe agree with them that the tech should be the tech should be read recently, might not behave as if they actually believe that. Henry  30:35  Right? Maybe this summarize your point, it's that almost everyone would proclaim that the reason they think the law should be interpreted in this way is because that's a reasonable interpretation. But the facts might be that not everyone actually, is legitimately using that reasoning correctly. But when you argue that cruel for Like, I think that using this example is good. When you argue that cruel and unusual punishment applies to the capital punishment, then you're saying that a reasonable person would have judged capital punishment to be cruel and unusual. But even if you're giving that as your reason, and it is clear, that's not the case, because in other parts of the Constitution, it doesn't make that judgment. So you're reading into what cruel and unusual is based on what you think it should mean, in this context, rather than what you think it actually means. Yuta    31:43  Or to them to the lawmakers. But yeah, I mean, I'm unclear some versions of the argument but or maybe better. Maybe you like if the constitution had written cruel and unusual punishment is punishment that is very painful. Basically, they have like, all these examples of things that are painful and outlawed, and then they say, capital punishment is painless. And then we find out 100 years later that it's actually way more painful than any of the things I mentioned, that are painful and therefore cruel and evil. Right now, maybe, maybe, you know, there's some American there. Maybe it's a version of that argument that people on that side want to make. Right. I disagree. I don't think Bill law says that kind of a punishment is cruel, unusual. Henry  32:34  So there are certainly cases which it could go the other way. But I think that the point is that, regardless, you're still using the same standard that Scully is proposing in order to make that judgment. Whereas seems like the argument about cruel and unusual punishment is not abiding by that standard of judgment. Yuta    32:54  Well, I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who just explicitly disagrees with Scalia. Do you recognize the textualist approach? As he defines it? But Henry  33:05  yeah, it's just yeah, this is the difficult part, which is that any disagreement about the matter of fact, can always be phrased in terms of a disagreement about what a reasonable person would think. As long as you're not admitting that your interpretation is not reasonable, and you just want to change the thing to be what you want it to be, then you can all as long as you don't want to explicitly admit that you can phrase your argument as well. I just think that a reasonable person thinks less. Yeah, you never are gonna get people that explicitly disagree with Scalia. But in disagreeing with him, say on certain judgments, you could still make the case that they're not being reasonable. That's fine. Yeah. Yuta    33:50  Definitely in like society, maybe there's millions of people who if you ask, they would actually they would take like the caricature and tie it textualist position that is totally indefensible, which is like, oh, gay marriage is a good thing. So the Supreme Court should vote for gay marriage, or knockout punch, and it's bad. So the supreme court or abortion is good. So the Supreme Court should support it. But just to be very clear Henry  34:18  here, I think we could easily get into bad territory, which is we're not saying that the Supreme Court shouldn't vote for, you know, gay marriage because gay marriage is good. We're just saying that that shouldn't be the reason that they decide the law is because it's moral. They should decide the law based on what the law actually is. Yuta    34:40  Yeah. Henry  34:42  Well, if the laws immoral, they shouldn't be the ones changing the law. Yuta    34:48  Yeah, I mean, just as if you just as a judge, I would think it would be hard to fun you know, the idea that like the argument game, response, I should vote for gay marriage. But I think if you ask regular people like you would find plenty of examples. But yeah, on the Supreme Court or among lawyers, you probably wouldn't find people who would explicitly endorse that position. Henry  35:18  I think this is a So the interesting part of this to me, in this section that we're talking about is that when you ask a common person, you know, I mean, we've already done this in that country, but you know, should gay marriage be legal? Right. When you ask them that, I think that you're asking them a sort of a counterfactual question, like a possibility question. It's like, you know, in if you were choosing between possible worlds, one where gay marriage is legal and one word isn't legal, then which one would you choose? And they would say, well, let's say you know, I choose the one where gay marriage is legal because I think gay marriage should be allowed. Because of my moral views, and I would agree with that. And then when you ask the Supreme Court Justice, should gay marriage be legal? Well, they're going to interpret that, I think as a different question, because it's not a matter of changing which world we're in. It's a matter of given the world we are. And does the law facts say that gay marriage is allowed or not? Yuta    36:21  Right? Yeah. Henry  36:22  And it might be that it's not allowed. And that is a bad decision. And that shouldn't be maintained in terms of legislature in terms of policy. But it's not up for the justice to decide whether or not to uphold the law based on that. I think that you actually have a good point about this, which is that if the just if the judges did decide to change laws based on what they thought should be the law, then that never offers an opportunity to the legislature to actually change bad laws and make good ones. Yuta    36:57  Yeah, there would be no incentive to or no pressure To change the law, there's if it wouldn't make a practical difference. And also think just the infrastructure works in a way where, you know, people do their jobs, lawmakers make laws and the president, the executive branch enforces them. Legislative Branch interprets them. And it's just the function the system works well as it's designed. And it works less well, if people don't carry out their functions, even if, you know, in that specific instance, they would make things better. Like, you know, on a lot of these social issues, I think still overall in the long term, you know, hopefully, America has been around three engineers under this constitution. And hopefully, it'll be around for hundreds of years more and I think for the long term, it works best if we have a law govern society. Henry  37:55  Oh, well, I mean, I don't know anyone who's or I don't think a lot of people are you gonna saw it. Yuta    38:00  Well, I think that's what we're implying is the counter argument. A society governed by the what judges think the law should be instead of pylons. Henry  38:11  Oh, okay. Okay. But I mean, I would, I guess that just law govern is a general term that I would think would apply to both. But I get what you mean. So one where the law is held up as a matter of precedent, whereas the other circumstance where it's just decided case by case based on what should Yuta    38:30  be decided on precedent, either precedent is like what judges decided in the past, and that should play a role. But if the president goes against the letter of the law, then I think you should write in a Henry  38:43  letter of law. It should be according to the written law, not according to judges, decisions about what the law should be. Yuta    38:51  Yeah, I mean, that can play a role and that's helpful, but like, you know, this Dred Scott decision was reversed. Yeah, decisions got reversed, Henry  38:57  right. But but Yuta    38:59  by the way, yeah, I think Dred Scott decision, Scalia says, cited the 10th. amendment or the amendment about I forget what it's called. Remember? No. It's an amendment that kind of give has been used often to expand the power of the government through interpreting the law. And Scalia says that was improper. So in many cases, he's kind of not on. He argues that trumping the constitution strictly would have led to more social progress in in the immediate sense. He's also right right voted for allowing for categorizing like flag burning and stuff like that as free speech, and I think he voted against some other people on the Supreme Court. So it's not, which you wouldn't expect to consider would have to do that. So it's like not, not super, you can't totally predict what side he would come on based on based off of Indian conservative conservative for whatever. 

Macdonald-Laurier Institute's Pod Bless Canada
Ep. 19 - The Resource Economy and Indigenous Rights with Ken Coates and Dwight Newman

Macdonald-Laurier Institute's Pod Bless Canada

Play Episode Listen Later Dec 17, 2018 22:14


In this episode of Pod Bless Canada, Ken Coates is joined by MLI Senior Fellow Dwight Newman to discuss the current state of affairs in Canada with respect to Indigenous rights in law, recent court cases, and what this all means for the resource economy. Their discussion traces watershed events in Canadian legal history to the present, clarifying the legal standing of claims now at the heart of a national debate around Bill C-69. Dwight Newman is Professor at the University of Saskatchewan and holds the Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Rights in Constitutional and International Law. Dwight is a foremost scholar and regular commentator concerning the topics discussed in this episode. He holds a doctorate in Legal Philosophy from Oxford University where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar.

ZION NEWS
Israel's African Asylum Seekers still in limbo | 7/24/18

ZION NEWS

Play Episode Listen Later Jul 24, 2018 24:50


Breaking: I.D.F. downs Syrian jet Moments ago a Syrian fighter jet apparently breached Israeli airspace over the Golan Heights. The I-D-F has confirmed that two patriot missiles were launched to neutralize the jet and at this time it appears that the jet was downed, and crashed inside Syrian territory. 2. Breaking: I.D.F. downs Syrian jet Brig. Gen. (Ret.) Ram Shmueli, Former Head of Israeli Air Force Intelligence speaking at ILTV Studio about the incursion of a Syrian jet while Israeli Air Defense systems triggered above the Golan Heights. 3.  Israel draws red line with Russia Following this week's dramatic escalation of tensions along the Syrian border, Israel has reportedly refused a Russian offer to keep Iranian forces some sixty miles away from Israel's front door. According to officials, Israel is demanding that exactly zero Iranian forces be allowed anywhere in Syria, period– a red line that's driving a wedge between Israeli-Russian relations. 4. State earmarks $8 billion for missile defense Israel puts its National Security above all else, and this latest news is clear proof of that mission. The state has just announced the single largest defense plan in I-D-F history, an 8-billion dollar makeover of the country's missile defense network. The proposal is about to clear the final hurdle of approval at the security cabinet and would take place over ten years. 5. Deadly wildfire kills 60 in Athens, Greece Deadly wildfires have engulfed the mountain range surrounding Athens, Greece. This situation has already turned tragic as at this time, at least 60 people have been killed in the flames. Another 150 have been injured, with hundreds more evacuated from their homes as the crisis continues to surround the capital city. Israel has extended a hand to help Greek firefighters on the ground. Israel's African Asylum Seekers still in limbo It's been almost half a year since Prime Minister Netanyahu scrapped a plan with the U-N to safely resettle nearly half of Israel's African Asylum Seekers in western countries. Today, that community's future is still very much in limbo and the Israeli government, has just announced two very different proposals, which would assign this community two very different fates. Kotel could be a ‘danger zone' Yesterday we reported on the condition of the Western Wall in Jerusalem when a piece of the wall spontaneously crumbled off of the structure, crashing down on the ground below. As it turns out, a Jerusalem resident was praying just feet from where the two-hundred-plus pound rock landed and now, experts apparently believe that the entire Kotel may, indeed, be decaying at a potentially dangerous pace. 8. Over 30% of humanity is infertile? Adv. Irit Rosenblum, Expert in Legal Philosophy & Founder of New Family speaking at ILTV Studio about the 'new family' organization that is fighting for the rights to reproduce. 9. Israeli fruit fly lure helps infested Togo An Israeli startup is helping rid the African nation Togo of a massive pest problem. The company is called Biofeed, which creates a no-spray, environmentally-friendly fly-lure. When its founder heard of Togo's devastating infestation, he decided to take action and deliver support on the ground. Thanks to this help, Togo has now managed to salvage its mango crop and deliver a ray of hope to a part of the world that needs it most. Hebrew word Of The Day: ‘AZAKAH' | Alert Learn a New Hebrew word every day. Today's word is "azakah" which means "alert" See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
30/10/2017: John Gardner on Discrimination: The Good, the Bad, and the Wrongful

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society

Play Episode Listen Later Nov 10, 2017 53:25


John Gardner FBA is a Senior Research Fellow at All Souls College, Oxford, with the title of Professor of Law and Philosophy in the University of Oxford. From 2000 to 2016 he held Oxford’s Chair of Jurisprudence. Before that he was Reader in Legal Philosophy at King’s College London (1996-2000), Fellow and Tutor in Law at Brasenose College, Oxford (1991-6) and Examination (‘Prize’) Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford (1986-91). He has also held visiting positions at Columbia University, Yale University, the University of Texas at Austin, Princeton University, the Australian National University, the University of Auckland, and most recently Cornell University. He serves on the editorial boards of numerous journals including the Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Ethics, Law and Philosophy, and The Journal of Moral Philosophy. Called to the Bar in 1988, he has been a Bencher of the Inner Temple since 2002 (although he does not practice). He was elected a Fellow of the British Academy in 2013. He teaches and writes on the philosophy of private law, of criminal law, of public law, and of law in general, as well as in nearby areas of moral philosophy, political philosophy, and the philosophy of action. This podcast is an audio recording of Professor Gardner's talk - 'Discrimination: The Good, the Bad, and the Wrongful' - at the Aristotelian Society on 30 October 2017. The recording was produced by the Backdoor Broadcasting Company.

Five Observations
Few consumers of anime are motivated by a passion for legal philosophy

Five Observations

Play Episode Listen Later Sep 13, 2017 38:54


Welcome to Five Observations, an anime and pop culture podcast! Each episode, I will share five things I have been thinking about. In this instalment: Legal philosophy in anime, the lives and art of Hukusai and his daughter Oei, Grand Sumo, the good and the bad of the Summer anime season, and my early impression of … Continue reading "Few consumers of anime are motivated by a passion for legal philosophy"

Charles Moscowitz
Gandhi and the Unspeakable, America's Forgotten Founders

Charles Moscowitz

Play Episode Listen Later Mar 12, 2014 119:57


Chuck and Patrick are joined by James Douglas, author of Gandhi and the Unspeakable. Review A slim, elegant volume containing explosive insight into who conspired to assassinate the father of modern nonviolence and why. . . No other contemporary writer is exposing the mechanics of assassination as methodically and bravely as Douglass. But because he is a Catholic scholar and activist most well-known for his writings on nonviolence and suffering, this book is more than a fresh look at historical circumstances: it s spiritual spelunking into the depravity of unchecked political power. -- --Publisher's Weekly. In the second hour we are joined by Mark David Hall. Mark’s primary research and writing interests are American political theory and the relationship between religion and politics. He has written or co-edited The Political and Legal Philosophy of James Wilson, 1742-1798 (1997); The Founders on God and Government (2004); Collected Works of James Wilson 2 vol. (2007); The Forgotten Founders on Religion and Public Life (2009); The Sacred Rights of Conscience: Selected Readings on Religious Liberty and Church-State Relations in the American Founding (2009); America’s Forgotten Founders (2011), and Roger Sherman and the Creation of the American Republic (Oxford University Press, 2013). He has also written more than fifty journal articles, book chapters, reviews, and sundry pieces. He is currently co-editing Faith and the Founders of the American Republic (forthcoming, Oxford University Press) and co-authoring a book tentatively titled America’s “Godless” Constitution, Deist Founders, and other Myths About Religion and the American Founding. Mark also serves as a Senior Fellow at Baylor University’s Institute for the Studies of Religion.

Rockefeller Center
James E. Fleming: The Myth of Strict Scrutiny for Fundamental Rights

Rockefeller Center

Play Episode Listen Later Oct 30, 2013 83:02


The Roger S. Aaron '64 Lecture "The Myth of Strict Scrutiny for Fundamental Rights" James E. Fleming Professor of Law and The Honorable Frank R. Kenison Distinguished Scholar in Law, Boston University School of Law Thursday October 31, 2013, 4:30 PM Room 003, Rockefeller Center The Nelson A. Rockefeller Center for Public Policy and the Social Sciences Co-sponsored with the Dartmouth Lawyers Association and the Dartmouth Legal Studies Faculty Group In constitutional law, it is commonplace to say that the Supreme Court applies "strict scrutiny" in protecting fundamental rights under the Due Process Clause -- almost automatically invalidating any statute restricting such rights. Professor Fleming will debunk this view as a myth propounded by Justice Scalia, an opponent of stringent protection for rights of privacy or autonomy, to make it harder to justify protecting such rights. Supporters of these rights have fallen for this myth and helped perpetuate it. Through careful examination of the cases protecting privacy and autonomy, Fleming will show that the Court has applied a more defensible framework: "reasoned judgment" in protecting "ordered liberty." James E. Fleming is Professor of Law, The Honorable Frank R. Kenison Distinguished Scholar in Law, and Associate Dean for Research and Intellectual Life at Boston University School of Law. He is author or co-author of Securing Constitutional Democracy: The Case of Autonomy (University of Chicago Press, 2006); Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions (Oxford University Press, 2007) (with Sotirios A. Barber), and American Constitutional Interpretation (4th ed., Foundation Press, 2008) (with the late Walter F. Murphy, Barber, and Stephen Macedo). He has just published a new book, Ordered Liberty: Rights, Responsibilities, and Virtues (Harvard University Press, 2013), with his wife, Linda C. McClain (who is Professor of Law and Paul M. Siskind Research Scholar at Boston University School of Law). He is working on a book on constitutional interpretation, Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution (under contract with Oxford University Press). Finally, he is outgoing Editor of Nomos, the annual book of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, and incoming Vice President (for Law) of the Society.