Podcasts about Dev

It's Friday....Chris, GP and Dev get on Roser for not wearing his Tigers gear (3:00) then they talk Memphis/UNLV and how they have no idea what to expect but they're excited to see Memphis QB Marcus Stokes (10:45). There's an imposter who posed as a 49ers player and scammed women out of over $1.3M (36:46). We have 5 Things for the Weekend presented by the National Guard: 49ers Imposter, Ryan Fitzpatrick comments on Browns QB, NFL Preseason, College Football Weekend, Memphis/UNLV (1:07:55)Host: Chris Vernon Contributors: Devin Walker, Jon RoserGuest: Gary ParrishTechnical Director: Jaylon Wallace Associate Producer: Jena Broyles 

Der große Reveal ist da, auf den DEV seit Jahren wartet! Ruki ist unbeeindruckt. ABER: Wir waren im Kino und haben cooles Zeug zu berichten. Merchandise gibt es auch eine ganze Menge. Die Mobile Games kriegen neue Skins (von denen einer wirklich cool aussieht) und wir sehen das Innere der Hard-Boiled Heavies. Und das alles, während Sonic Frontiers einen riesigen Meilenstein feiert! Zeitstempel: (0:00) Intro (1:29) Ruki und DEV im Kino (22:27) Merchandise und Stream-Rückblick (27:03) News-Rückblick (1:25:10) Kommentare (1:31:29) Ende und Outro Livestreams jeden Donnerstag um 20 Uhr auf Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/ruki185 Kontakt: gottapodcast@gmail.com Hier geht's zu unserem Discord-Server: https://discord.gg/KEAmvmKVPF Hinterlasst uns gerne einen Kommentar mit Feedback, Fragen und/oder Kritik! Das könnt ihr unter anderem im Newsbeitrag auf SpinDash.de bzw. auf dem Discord-Server tun. Auf Social Media sind wir natürlich auch vertreten: Sowohl auf Instagram (@gottapodcast), als auch auf Bluesky (@spindash.de) oder aber einfach unter dem Hashtag #GottaPodCast! Auch über eine positive Bewertung freuen wir uns immer! Die Weblinks zum Nachlesen gibt's im Newsbeitrag auf spindash.de

Es ist mal wieder soweit: Ruki und DEV merken schmerzlich, dass sie alt sind. Bei Ruki ist das "schmerzlich" sogar wörtlich zu nehmen. Trotzdem haben wir eine prall gefüllte Folge! Ruki war mal wieder viel unterwegs und in der Zeit versuchte DEV nicht in der Hitze einzugehen - Die News haben auf jeden Fall geholfen! Futter für Comic- und Mangafans haben wir nämlich ausreichend bekommen und neue Inhalte für Mobile Games und Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds gibt es auch. Und wer gerade zufällig ein neues Motorrad braucht, für den haben wir da ja vielleicht was... Zeitstempel: (0:00) Intro (2:40) Ruki unterwegs (14:30) TNMT Festival (17:27) Stream-Rückblick (26:09) News-Rückblick (1:03:08) Jugendwort 2026 und Quatsch (1:14:43) Kommentare (1:19:02) Ende und Outro Livestreams jeden Donnerstag um 20 Uhr auf Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/ruki185 Kontakt: gottapodcast@gmail.com Hier geht's zu unserem Discord-Server: https://discord.gg/KEAmvmKVPF Hinterlasst uns gerne einen Kommentar mit Feedback, Fragen und/oder Kritik! Das könnt ihr unter anderem im Newsbeitrag auf SpinDash.de bzw. auf dem Discord-Server tun. Auf Social Media sind wir natürlich auch vertreten: Sowohl auf Instagram (@gottapodcast), als auch auf Bluesky (@spindash.de) oder aber einfach unter dem Hashtag #GottaPodCast! Auch über eine positive Bewertung freuen wir uns immer! Die Weblinks zum Nachlesen gibt's im Newsbeitrag auf spindash.de

Prof and Dev are back after that excellent Direct to talk Fire Emblem. THen, they chat about what they've been playing: Diablo IV, Big Walk, Super Smash Bros., and Trials Fusion. 

Tonight on Command This!, we break down the Diggs signing and what it means for Jayden Daniels, Terry McLaurin and the rest of Washington's wide receiver room.We're also talking everything we've seen from Commanders training camp this week:

A dark presence surrounds you, whispering promises of stolen power! Our episode 100 mega special concludes with a mega special game in the traditional roguelike sphere: Brogue! Developed by a lawyer, Brian Walker sought to rewrite the state of roguelikes in 2009 from bloated checkbox-ticking, weeks-long RPG length games and bring the genre back to its coffee break length roots. Careful streamlining of systems, UI polish, graphical effects, and a much smaller monster pool make Brogue one of the most readily accessible roguelikes of the modern era. My, what a yummy mango! Custom RSS Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube Music Transcript 01:11 - Game Stats 06:15 - One Sentence Description 10:17 - Brian the Dev's thoughts on Rogue vs Angband vs Nethack 16:38 - Modernized Design Philosophy 31:58 - Character As Items Design 37:18 - Lumen Stones: Optional Hard Mode & Going Beyond Floor 25 41:30 - Brogue as a First ASCII Game? 51:02 - ASCII Sprites 53:24 - Monster Roster: Dragons, Liches, Jellies & Hover Flavor Text 56:11 - Emergent Narrative 57:37 - Identification Meta-Game, Percentages & Risk 1:10:50 - Magic System: Staffs, Wands, Charges & Enchantment Synergies 1:16:39 - Brogue Fan Community Correspondence 1:31:09 - Rankings & Final Thoughts (new #1 hidden gem game for the podcast!) 1:43:53 - Similar Games & Show Wind Down See also: The Incredible Power of Dijkstra Maps Brian Walker - Procedural level design in Brogue and beyond Brian's thoughts on Rogue vs Angband and Nethack Next episode: Nordhold Contact us at grogpodzone@gmail.com! https://grogpod.zone Intro music: The Lord of the Chiptunes: The Return of The Chiptune - Minas Tirith Outro music: Sir Knight Beats - GELATINOUS CUBE (hexcore)

Have you gotten your girlie merch yet??!! Check out our first ever drop at https://doweknowthem.com Stay hydrated and stock up now at https://dripdrop.com using code DWKT for 20% off your first order!Get 20% OFF @honeylove by going to https://www.honeylove.com/DWKT ! #honeylovepodIn today's episode, the girlies breakdown the viral video of a TikToker who was eavesdropping on a couple, only to find out that they were having an affair, and the girl was his girlfriend's best friend. Then we dip our toes into the world of nail artist drama to discuss the feud between famous nail influencers and former friends/colleagues/collaborators, Nails By Dev and Ballpit Nails (aka Maddox). We Love the Internets: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTAynMUAX/https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVv1gQFiLJY/00:00 Introduction 02:12 TikToker Exposes Stranger's Affair 34:13 Nails by Dev vs Ballpit Nails 01:27:47 We Love the InternetWe hope you enjoyed this episode!  For even more content, go join The Other Girlies over on our Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/c/doweknowthemPlease let us know on Twitter or Instagram if you have any topic suggestions for a future episode! (@lily_marston & @jessismiles__)PS. The girlies have officially entered their short form content era! Follow our official accounts: https://instagram.com/doweknowthempodcast & https://tiktok.com/@doweknowthempodcastBusiness Inquiries: doweknowthempodcast@gmail.comDo We Know Them PodcastHosted by Lily Marston & Jessi Smiles

Dev fills in for David and continues the sermon series in James. Today, he is in James 4:13-17. Sermon titled "Worrying about tomorrow" Come back next week to hear the next sermon in this series.  Don't forget to follow First Baptist Church of Olton here on PodBead to get the latest sermons from Brother David.  Make sure and go subscribe to our YouTube Channel also. We stream live every Sunday at 11 am.  We invite you to come and worship with us even in your PJ's!

Veja também em youtube.com/@45_graus Inquérito: melhores episódios de 2026? Pedro Carneiro é professor de Economia na University College London, Research Economist no Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice e Research Fellow no Institute for Fiscal Studies. Doutorou-se em Economia na Universidade de Chicago. Publicou vários artigos científicos acerca dos determinantes e consequências de investimentos públicos e privados em crianças, em países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento. Também trabalhou em avaliações de programas de educação, saúde e pobreza em vários países. _______________ Índice (2ª Parte): Paper: Teacher Quality and Learning Outcomes in Kindergarten, 2016 Devemos ter métricas de desempenho dos professores consoante os resultados dos alunos? | Caso Vergara v. California Paper: The Decision-Makers We Become: Early Education and the Decision-Making of Boys and Girls (2026) Qual é a melhor forma de fazer investigação nesta área? Devíamos ter um Infarmed que determinasse as melhores medidas nesta área?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hey Scrum Master, Product Owner and Dev team! If you experience rollover, items not getting done, or just want to optimize your workflow, this episode may help. Of course, it may not...?!I have observed and experienced the top 3 reasons why teams rollover work from sprint to sprint and of course, we'll dive in to the first one here and give you some practical tips on overcoming that nasty, routine rollover experience you're having to help you get things DONE.If you like this:Subscribe, tell a friend, write a reviewIf you don't like this or you want to reach out:scott@planetproductowner.org

During the Poock's Post segment of Ep. 38 of the Ask the Law Firm Seller Show, Jeremy E. Poock, Esq. addresses the following: The Importance of Bus. Dev. Attribution to Law Firm Sales Poock begins by distinguishing between: (a) Bus. Dev. attribution for traditional Rainmaker-led law firms; and (b) Bus. Dev. attribution for post-2020 Digital Rainmaker Law Firms. As Poock explains, Bus. Dev. attribution for traditional Rainmaker-led law firms relates primarily to the Book of Business that 1 or more Rainmaker attorneys developed often during the pre-Google Word-of-Mouth era. Those Books of Business present value to a purchasing law firm, albeit limited to a ceiling of business attributable to the Book of Business. By contrast, as law firms continue transitioning to becoming Digital Rainmaker Law Firms based upon investing in Multi-Channel Digital Marketing (egs. Google, AI, social media, optimized websites, and more), those firms now have measurable Digital Value and Brand Equity whose reach for potential new clients/business extends well beyond the limited scope of a traditional Rainmaker attorney's Book of Business. As Digital Rainmaker Law Firms continue spending more and more on Multi-Channel Digital Marketing, Poock points out the following: The importance of attributing the sources of digital Bus. Dev. because doing so will show how new clients predictably, reliably, and consistently seek legal services from Digital Rainmaker Law Firms. As Poock states, “[A]ll of that data will increase the value of a Digital Rainmaker Law Firm in terms of a [sales] multiple, whether that is of EBITDA, net profits or other multiples that will continue to develop with law firm sales.”

Episode 071 – Taylor Built a Full Shopify Brand with AI in One AfternoonKarl and Taylor compare how Claude, Codex, and Cursor behave differently when building Shopify discount and checkout UI extensions, and dig into why testing against a real dev store is still such a pain point. Taylor also walks through spinning up a complete fictitious coffee shop brand, theme, and metaobject data model with Claude Design and Claude Code for his recent DEV conference talk on metaobjects, and shares how a Shopify theme store change quietly broke his Shop Info app. Plus: a major new identity verification requirement for Shopify Partners requesting collaborator access, updates to app pricing limits and review policy, and this week's picks.---SponsorShopify Partner Program / Shopify Supply Dev Mode collection – Shopify's apparel and gear line built for developers. Check it out at shopify.supply and get 15% off your first order with code LIQUID.---Subscribe to Liquid WeeklyDon't miss out on expert insights and tips—subscribe to Liquid Weekly for more content like this: https://liquidweekly.com/---Timestamps00:00 – Cold open: Shopify dev store UX rant00:25 – Intro & welcome back04:55 – Client work: rebuilding a Shopify Script as a Function overnight06:04 – AI subscriptions: Claude, Codex, and Cursor compared07:06 – Why Claude and Codex architect extensions so differently13:21 – The case for ephemeral, on-demand dev stores19:49 – Sponsor: Shopify Partner Program / Supply Dev Mode collection21:01 – How the Shopify Dev MCP has improved over the past year24:53 – Using Claude Design for client mockups and brand guides27:07 – Does AI ever really "one-shot" a build?29:08 – Building a fictitious coffee shop brand for a DEV conference talk42:59 – Shopify breaks Shop Info's theme store tracking48:26 – Taylor's whirlwind two-week conference plan51:45 – Dev Changelog roundup59:12 – Picks of the Week1:04:46 – Wrap-up--- Dev Changelog⚠️ Identity verification requirement for Shopify Partners - https://shopify.dev/changelog/identity-verification-for-partners – New identity verification (potentially photo ID or business details) is being required for partners requesting Collaborator access to stores. Action required, especially for agencies and support teams handling collab requests.App pricing updates - https://shopify.dev/changelog/app-pricing-more-plans-no-charge-plan-testing-and-negative-and-fractional-app-events – Public app plans increased from 4 to 8, private plans increased from 10 to 15 per app, plus new app billing events now supported via the API.App Store review policy update - https://shopify.dev/changelog/updated-app-store-requirements-13-always-use-honest-and-transparent-review-practices – Shopify is targeting incentivized and fraudulent review practices, with penalties including review removal, delisting, or partner account suspension. Also introducing logic to better detect fake/untrusted reviews.Shop Mini updates for June - https://shopify.dev/changelog/shop-minis-may-june-2026-update – Multiple updates worth checking out for anyone building Shop Minis.---Picks of the WeekKarl: His parents' basement – A nostalgia-fueled pick after finding childhood relics (cassette tapes, old CDs, toys, and even his original birth certificate) still sitting in storage.Taylor: Frankenmuth, Michigan - https://www.bronners.com – A small Bavarian-themed town home to Bronner's, a massive year-round Christmas store, and now an annual "Christmas in July" family tradition.

During Ep. 38 of the Ask the Law Firm Seller Show, Jeremy E. Poock, Esq. addresses the following question: I wish that my Internal Successor showed more interest in Bus. Dev. What can I do to explain the importance of Bus. Dev. to owning a law firm? When addressing this question, Poock begins by asking: What's the issue here?   The underlying issue relates to the following:   Who wants and needs to purchase a law firm and who does not?   Even though most law firm sellers would prefer that their internal successors a/k/a key employee attorneys succeed to owning their law firms, in reality, most key employee lawyers do not want to purchase their boss' small business law firm, and they cannot afford to either. Instead, most key employee lawyers want a Reliable, Predictable, and Safe job.   Rather than focusing on how to explain the importance of Bus. Dev. to key employee lawyers, Poock advises that law firm sellers instead consider their key employee lawyers as key assets of their firms.   Poock also points out that Growing Law Firms want and need the following 3 resources to boost their growth:   (1) New clients;   (2) Experienced and talented lawyers and non-lawyer staff; and   (3) Digital content to attract the attention of today's and tomorrow's clients who continue to search online for lawyers and law firms to hire.   Poock then distinguishes between the following:   (a) The 4 winners that result when Senior Attorney-led firms sell to or merge with a Growing Law Firm, namely: (i) The Senior Attorney seller(s) who monetizes their law firm; (ii) Key employee lawyers and support staff who often join a purchasing law firm and win by maintaining their Reliable, Predictable, and Safe jobs; (iii) Clients of a selling law firm who win because they will continue to benefit from ongoing, competent and zealous reputation; and (iv) Growing Law Firms who benefit from instant client growth, enhancing their workforce; and benefiting from receiving literally treasure chests of digital content to attract the attention for potential clients via Multi-Channel Digital Marketing.   (b) Short-Term & Long-Term Negative Impacts of a Random Tuesday Event: Poock explains that when Senior Attorneys wait too long to recognize that their key employee lawyers do not want to purchase their boss' law firm, those key employee lawyers could wind-up giving them either 2 or 4 weeks notice on a “Random Tuesday” about leaving to join another firm.   In that event, Senior Attorney owners lose revenues in the short-term due to loss of billings and general productivity by a key employee lawyer who unexpectedly departs their firm.  Long-term, their law firms lose value because many law firm purchasers want and need to hire a selling firm's key employee lawyers and staff to continue representing the clients of a selling law firm.   In conclusion, Poock points out that even though most law firm sellers prefer that their key employee lawyers become better rainmakers in advance of pursuing an internal succession plan, Growing Law Firms typically present a more viable purchaser for their law firms, including their recognition of the following: That key employee lawyers and support staff comprise a major component of a selling law firm's value.

GROG & GRYPHON E8 - Alliances  Alliances are made and broken between the good, the ill, the undead, and the grey. While on the river Stigiar, Reyna, Olaff, Arullia and De V'Raltro, have to pull into the dark port of Swordswaggle to make repairs to the Lady Wrath; the very island fiefdom of the DUKE of WYDENBOG! While Bargrador plots the opening salvo of a war with the Blood Queen herself, Belladonna! Another tale of Honor, blood, mysticism and betrayal in the Saga of the Grog and Gryphon… So Hoist a Tankard and Join the Quest! But don't forget thy broadsword!  The Actors in this production were: Matt McLeod as The Duke of Wydenbog Gina Hollweg as Arullia Swordcleaver- Amazonian Warrior Mark Kalita as the Lycanna Changeling: Bane Renbourne John Dane as DeV'ralto Natasha Lathrop as Reyna the Red and the Vampire Blood Queen: Belladonna Paul Mannering as Olaff Houndsmaw and Orlaq General: Uthor Kulloq Rob Northrup as the Goblin Murrai Gareth Preston as Alganoir Bill Hollweg as Garulk the Barbarian, various Orlaq warriors, and Bargrador Colin Snow as various Eunuchs and Lycanna Damaris Mannering as Alithia Adam Lederhos as Duro D'un the Dwarven Prince Douglys of Howl-O as Silverr-O- the Elder of the Lupisians Elaine Barret as Zagrethra David Drage as Urkbar, Demon #1, And Orlaq Warrior #1 David Sobkowiak as Demon #2 Amanda Fitzwater as Octavia Roy C. Dudgeon as the Dwarven King: AROL-DUN Robin Carlisle as Seraphanya Alexa Chipman as Vampire General Alucard Stevie Farnaby as Sardor the Vampire and Eunuch #4 Gwen Jensen Woddard as QUEEN SYLVAIN DRAGONSMITE (Amazonia Queen) Playing the Bloodthirsty Amazonia Warriors: Charlene Harris Diane Spencer Laura Frechette Natasha Lathrop Shannon Hilche Kim Gianopoulos Julie Hoverson

This podcast covers episodes 11,898 to 11,902. Joseph's sub-par school report coincides with some unfortunate news about Granny Linda's financial situation. Cassie confesses to Steve about how she made a pass at Ross in the Chariot Square hotel. Mary is not ready to forgive or forget Christina's actions and demands some reparation. With Kit hell bent on blaming Gary for Theo's death, Sarah has to make an astonishing confession. After cooking a spag bol, Dylan and Betsy head upstairs but within 24 hours, Betsy's life will have changed forever. Dev's lucky golf club is unlucky. Choccy Croccies are not communal. It was nice to hear The Civil Wars. Many thanks to Christie Paschakis for chatting with us about the Betsy & Dylan storyline. More information about SOAR Initiative Canada can be found at https://soarinitiative.org. Become a Friend of the Podcast: https://patreon.com/thetalkofthestreet Buy us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/thetalkofthestreet Write to the show: The Talk of the Street, PO Box 12, Eaton Rapids, MI 48827, United States Email the show: thetalkofthestreet@gmail.com 

Tony Holdstock-Brown is the co-founder and CEO of Inngest, the durable execution platform that quietly powers your favorite AI agents.We get into why agents work in a demo and die in production, building their own cloud to get 20x lower cost, growing 35x after AWS and Cloudflare copied them, growing a dev tools company without a personal brand or Twitter account, why he thinks evals today are like “asking the criminal if they committed the crime”, and the thing they built to score 100% of your production agents without paying for LLM as a judge.Thank you to Numeral, Flex, Amplitude, Merge, and Monaco for supporting this episode.Numeral: Sales tax on autopilot https://www.numeral.comFlex: Premium banking, 60-day credit, 0% APR https://home.flex.one/referral/bananacapitalAmplitude: AI analytics https://www.amplitude.comMerge: Every model, one API https://www.merge.dev/turnerMonaco: The revenue engine for startups https://www.monaco.com/Timestamps:(0:00) The hidden infra layer every AI agent runs on(1:46) Building complex chains of logic(3:31) Why agent SDK's don't go far enough(4:49) Healthcare was the original event-driven nightmare(6:32) Storing traces on your infrastructure enables self-improving loops(14:26) Why Inngest was already in the right place for AI(15:49) Score agents off product events, not LLM's(17:31) The OpenAI copy-paste signal(21:24) Swap in LLMs and cut costs 20x(23:44) How customers pulled the product forward(25:41) Orchestration belongs outside the sandbox(29:48) Building a neocloud to cut costs 20x(32:09) Most neoclouds just resell AWS(32:54) All AI infrastructure is converging(34:49) Why Claude can't just build your backend(36:44) How to build a software factory(39:12) Agents are a lottery you get addicted to(42:44) Loops must exist until AGI hits(45:38) If models keep getting better, why orchestrate?(48:28) When incumbents steal your features(52:30) Why you can't vibe code infrastructure(55:54) Why Tony has no personal brand(59:38) Dev tools GTM without Twitter(1:03:20) Lessons from the founder of DuckDuckGo(1:10:39) Truth as a company value(1:13:08) Taking too long adapting to AI(1:15:10) Startups are 100% R&D(1:17:19) Ali from Databricks(1:19:03) Writing his own code, Voice-to-text with local models(1:23:53) Evals are batshit insaneReferencedInngest: https://www.inngest.com/Principles by Ray Dalio: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1501124021?lv=shuf&channelId=500&plpRedirect=mhFallbackTraction - How Any Startup Can Achieve Explosive Customer Growth: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1591848369?lv=shuf&channelId=500&plpRedirect=mhFallbackFollow TonyTwitter: https://x.com/itstonyhbLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tonyhb/Follow TurnerTwitter: https://twitter.com/TurnerNovakLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/turnernovakSubscribe to my newsletter to get every episode + the transcript in your inbox every week: https://www.thespl.it/

Sounds of London Rhythm E004 Show: Sounds of London Rhythm Artist: London Rhythm Air Date: 16 July 2026 Genre: House / Bass House / Tech House / Breakbeat Sounds of London Rhythm E003 Show: Sounds of London Rhythm Artist: London Rhythm Air Date: 16 July 2026 Genre: Bass House / Tech House / Breakbeat 2 hours of Tech House, Bass House and Breakbeat , a little look into the tunes we love to play , hip hop influences , unreleased tracks that will get that bass face on and those feet tapping Tracklist: 1. James Poole, GUDFELLA - Gator Boots (Extended Mix) 2. Tenacious - We're Going Back (Original Mix) 3. Balanka - BodyLang 4. Bessey - Fatal Dose (Extended Mix) 5. BRANDON (DE) - Peace Of Mind (Keep Talking) (Extended Mix) (Keep Talking) 6. Freestylers, Dub Pistols, General Levy - Like We (Original Mix) 7. G-Pol, ANSWER (CN) - Girls (Extended Mix) 8. JANO (ES) - Not That Clever (Extended Mix) 9. Kajacks - Echochamber (Extended Mix) 10. Kevin Andrews, Hoxton Whores - Bring Up The Volume (Original Mix) 11. Maxdal - Suenalo (Original Mix) 12. Mikaela (IT) - You Feel That? 13. Rick Silva - Dancefloor (Original Mix) 14. Tony Romera, Jamie Coins - Bounce & Bass (Extended Mix) 15. Tough Art - That Funk (Original Mix) 16. Volkoder - Move Baby (Original Mix) 17. Avilo - Good Girls (Extended Mix) 18. Rafael Cerato - TCFS (Extended Mix) 19. WeMart, LOVRA - Elevate 20. Chris Lorenzo, Kah-lo - In This Bih' (Extended Mix) 21. Crazy Town, bradeazy - Butterfly 2026 (Extended Mix) 22. GARDINI - Green Light (Extended Mix) 23. Reece Rosé - Walk This Walk (Extended Mix) 24. Sven Lochenhoer, OMNOM - Watch Where You Walk (Sidewalk Talk) (Extended Mix) 25. Volac - The Button (Extended Mix) 26. Maiike - Lowkey (Original Mix) 27. Waves - DEADLY (Extended Mix) 28. Dev, KSHMR, NIIKO X SWAE - Bass Down Low (feat. DEV) (feat. DEV) 29. Ondamike - She Werkin (Original Mix) 30. Biggie Smalls, Lively Beats - Unbelievable 31. Guau - F Bassline (Original Mix) 32. Lively Beats - Lost Keys (Instrumental Extended Mix) 33. Krafty Kuts - Wub Juggler (Original Mix) 34. MANTYCORA - Serious Sound (Original Mix) Tracklist: 1. James Poole, GUDFELLA - Gator Boots (Extended Mix) 2. Tenacious - We're Going Back (Original Mix) 3. Balanka - BodyLang 4. Bessey - Fatal Dose (Extended Mix) 5. BRANDON (DE) - Peace Of Mind (Keep Talking) (Extended Mix) (Keep Talking) 6. Freestylers, Dub Pistols, General Levy - Like We (Original Mix) 7. G-Pol, ANSWER (CN) - Girls (Extended Mix) 8. JANO (ES) - Not That Clever (Extended Mix) 9. Kajacks - Echochamber (Extended Mix) 10. Kevin Andrews, Hoxton Whores - Bring Up The Volume (Original Mix) 11. Maxdal - Suenalo (Original Mix) 12. Mikaela (IT) - You Feel That? 13. Rick Silva - Dancefloor (Original Mix) 14. Tony Romera, Jamie Coins - Bounce & Bass (Extended Mix) 15. Tough Art - That Funk (Original Mix) 16. Volkoder - Move Baby (Original Mix) 17. Avilo - Good Girls (Extended Mix) 18. Rafael Cerato - TCFS (Extended Mix) 19. WeMart, LOVRA - Elevate 20. Chris Lorenzo, Kah-lo - In This Bih' (Extended Mix) 21. Crazy Town, bradeazy - Butterfly 2026 (Extended Mix) 22. GARDINI - Green Light (Extended Mix) 23. Reece Rosé - Walk This Walk (Extended Mix) 24. Sven Lochenhoer, OMNOM - Watch Where You Walk (Sidewalk Talk) (Extended Mix) 25. Volac - The Button (Extended Mix) 26. Maiike - Lowkey (Original Mix) 27. Waves - DEADLY (Extended Mix) 28. Dev, KSHMR, NIIKO X SWAE - Bass Down Low (feat. DEV) (feat. DEV) 29. Ondamike - She Werkin (Original Mix) 30. Biggie Smalls, Lively Beats - Unbelievable 31. Guau - F Bassline (Original Mix) 32. Lively Beats - Lost Keys (Instrumental Extended Mix) 33. Krafty Kuts - Wub Juggler (Original Mix) 34. MANTYCORA - Serious Sound (Original Mix) Originally broadcast on Data Transmission Radio. Listen live and explore the archive: https://radio.datatransmission.co

Devět evropských zemí se v pondělí v Paříži dohodlo s Ukrajinou na založení koalice pro integrovanou evropskou obranu proti balistickým střelám, Česko chybělo. Premiér Andrej Babiš (ANO) na jednání vzápětí vyzval k vytvoření společného evropského projektu protivzdušné obrany a pojmenoval ho Europatriot.Všechny díly podcastu Názory a argumenty můžete pohodlně poslouchat v mobilní aplikaci mujRozhlas pro Android a iOS nebo na webu mujRozhlas.cz.

„Musíme postaviť obrovskú hrádzu nezmyselným, progresívnym a liberálnym ideológiám, ktoré sa šíria ako rakovina,“ nie tak dávno to vyhlásil premiér Robert Fico vo svojom prejave na Devíne. Bývalý člen komunistickej strany, ktorý odhalil pred prezidentskými voľbami svoju birmovku, opätovne unáša kresťanský slovník a moralizuje svojich mocenských odporcov ideológiou, ku ktorej sa on sám osobne nepriznával v časoch, keď sa pre cirkvi takpovediac “lámal chlieb.” Kresťanský tábor a cirkevné elity pritom všetkom mlčia alebo s mocou priamo spolupracujú. Posolstvo Ježiša sa čoraz viac redukuje na akési sexuologické okienka vkladané do Ústavy a z 10. božích prikázaní si mocní vedie spomenúť iba na niektoré - a aj to im ide najlepšie pred kamerami či mikrofónmi. Skutočný odkaz európskych otcov zakladateľov ako De Gasperi či Adenauer pritom nikdy nestál na výlučnosti, exkluzivite či pestovaní nenávisti voči iným, ale predovšetkým na ochrane ľudskej dôstojnosti, férovosti a univerzalistickom posolstve práv i povinností. Aké je teda miesto kresťanských strán na dnešnom Slovensku a v akom stave sa ocitol konzervatívny tábor, ktorý sa utieka k prakticky komukoľvek, kto spomenie Ježiša, kríž si vierozvestcov? A čo by malo byť odkazom kresťanstva v aktuálnej politike? Téma pre dnešného hosťa Aktualít Nahlas, jedného zo zakladateľov Kresťansko demokratického hnutia Ivana Šimka. „Nedávame odpovede na problémy, ktoré svete dnes prináša,” tvrdí Šimko, podľa ktorého v tom vedenie KDH nemá vôbec jasno. Počúvate Aktuality Nahlas, dnes s Ivanom Šimkom. Pekný deň a pokoj v duši praje Braňo Dobšinský.

„Musíme postaviť obrovskú hrádzu nezmyselným, progresívnym a liberálnym ideológiám, ktoré sa šíria ako rakovina,“ nie tak dávno to vyhlásil premiér Robert Fico vo svojom prejave na Devíne. Bývalý člen komunistickej strany, ktorý odhalil pred prezidentskými voľbami svoju birmovku, opätovne unáša kresťanský slovník a moralizuje svojich mocenských odporcov ideológiou, ku ktorej sa on sám osobne nepriznával v časoch, keď sa pre cirkvi takpovediac “lámal chlieb.” Kresťanský tábor a cirkevné elity pritom všetkom mlčia alebo s mocou priamo spolupracujú. Posolstvo Ježiša sa čoraz viac redukuje na akési sexuologické okienka vkladané do Ústavy a z 10. božích prikázaní si mocní vedie spomenúť iba na niektoré - a aj to im ide najlepšie pred kamerami či mikrofónmi. Skutočný odkaz európskych otcov zakladateľov ako De Gasperi či Adenauer pritom nikdy nestál na výlučnosti, exkluzivite či pestovaní nenávisti voči iným, ale predovšetkým na ochrane ľudskej dôstojnosti, férovosti a univerzalistickom posolstve práv i povinností. Aké je teda miesto kresťanských strán na dnešnom Slovensku a v akom stave sa ocitol konzervatívny tábor, ktorý sa utieka k prakticky komukoľvek, kto spomenie Ježiša, kríž si vierozvestcov? A čo by malo byť odkazom kresťanstva v aktuálnej politike? Téma pre dnešného hosťa Aktualít Nahlas, jedného zo zakladateľov Kresťansko demokratického hnutia Ivana Šimka. „Nedávame odpovede na problémy, ktoré svete dnes prináša,” tvrdí Šimko, podľa ktorého v tom vedenie KDH nemá vôbec jasno. Počúvate Aktuality Nahlas, dnes s Ivanom Šimkom. Pekný deň a pokoj v duši praje Braňo Dobšinský.

In this episode of I 501(c) You, we sit down with Devaney “Dev” Iglesias, Director of External Affairs for FPL and an experienced nonprofit board chair, to talk about what makes nonprofit boards truly effective. Dev shares practical lessons from serving on multiple boards, including the importance of engagement, strategic goal-setting, honest communication, strong governance, and a healthy board chair and CEO relationship. From navigating public meetings under sunshine laws to helping a new CEO succeed during a major organizational transition, Dev offers real-world insight for board members who want to lead with clarity, transparency, and purpose. Timestamps (00:00) Introducing Dev Iglesias, Director of external affairs for Southwest Florida region, Florida Power & Light  (03:25) Dev's board service (05:55) What are the characteristics of an effective nonprofit board? (08:10) How do you lead as a board chair? (10:15) Working with the CEO (13:20) Communication philosophy (16:30) How do you encourage participation from board members? (20:50) What are the most challenging and rewarding aspects of being the board chair? (23:20) Recapping with Read Join us every other week as we release a new podcast with information about how you can be the best board member and provide great service to your organization. Listen to the podcast on any of the following platforms: YouTube Apple Podcasts Spotify Podcasts Amazon iHeartRadio Visit us at: www.thecorleycompany.com/podcast

In this episode of The Past Macabre, step into the chaotic period of the Late Bronze Age Collapse to investigate one of history's oldest recorded high-profile murder cases. Egypt was already struggling from years of crop failures, famine, and the world's first recorded labor strike when a highly coordinated network of conspirators chose to exploit the chaos of a sacred celebration to assassinate the pharaoh Ramesses III. Through a detailed examination of ancient legal records and archaeological excavations at the scene of the murder we'll explore the ancient investigation, trial, and sentences of those found guilty. We'll also look at the modern CT scans of Ramesses III's mummy that confirmed his cause of death after modern researchers were left unsure for over 130 years. Join host Stephanie Rice as we explore how this ancient crime reveals deep community fears, fracturing social responsibilities, and what the breakdown of cosmic balance, or Maat, meant to the living. Offline sources cited: Goedicke, Hans. “Was Magic Used in the Harem Conspiracy against Ramesses III? (P.Rollin and P.Lee).” The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, vol. 49, 1963, pp. 71–92. Devéria, T. Le Papyrus Judiciaire de Turin et Les Papyrus Lee et Rollin: Étude Égyptologique. Paris, 1868 Hawass, Zahi, Somaia Ismail, Ashraf Selim, Sahar N Saleem, Dina Fathalla, Sally Wasef, Ahmed Z Gad, et al. 2012. Revisiting the Harem Conspiracy and Death of Ramesses III: Anthropological, Forensic, Radiological, and Genetic Study. BMJ : British Medical Journal 345:e8268. Transcripts For transcripts of this episode head over to: https://archpodnet.com/tpm/35 Links See photos related to episode topics on Instagram Loving the macabre lore? Treat your host to a coffee! Images and information about the Turin Judicial Papyrus from the Museo Egizio ArchPodNet APN Website: https://www.archpodnet.com APN on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/archpodnet APN on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/archpodnet APN on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/archpodnet APN Shop Affiliates Motion Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In this episode, we're joined by Cornelia Davis, Developer Advocate at Temporal and a longtime software architect who has spent decades helping shape modern cloud-native systems.We explore how programming has evolved from assembly language to cloud-native architectures, and why AI is forcing us to rethink software development once again. Cornelia argues that natural language is becoming a new programming abstraction, while durable execution may be the missing layer that makes AI agents reliable in production.The conversation dives into probabilistic software, long-running AI agents, MCP tasks, human-in-the-loop workflows, durable timers, distributed systems, and why developers may no longer need to think about infrastructure the way they once did.Cornelia Davis: https://www.linkedin.com/in/corneliadavisDemetrios: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dpbrinkmTemporal: https://temporal.ioTimestamps[00:00] AI Programming Abstractions[00:52] Abstraction Evolution in Programming[04:05] Text to SQL Evolution[10:08] Compensations for Natural Language[12:13] Durable MCP in AI[18:34] Streaming Session Explanation[21:31] Batch Processes with Tasks[29:29] Complexity Relocation in Systems[33:10] Complexity Relocation in Dev[36:36] Programming Model Shifts

Referendum dopadlo podľa očakávaní, Demokrati ho napriek tomu prezentujú ako politické víťazstvo. Medzitým sa na Devíne konala celonárodná oslava, chýbal tam už len národ. Blahoželania k americkému Dňu nezávislosti od Putina a Zelenského boli dosť podobné – s jedným dôležitým rozdielom.

Dev continues the sermon series in James as David is out this week. Today, he is in James 2:14-26. Sermon titled "Faith that Works." Come back next week to hear the next sermon in this series.  Don't forget to follow First Baptist Church of Olton here on PodBead to get the latest sermons from Brother David.  Make sure and go subscribe to our YouTube Channel also. We stream live every Sunday at 11 am.  We invite you to come and worship with us even in your PJ's!

Babiš a jeho vláda ukázali svoju pravú tvár. Prečo sa Demokrati sťažujú na nedostatočnú podporu referenda. Celonárodné oslavy na Devínskom hrade budú celonárodné, ale prístup budú mať len papaláši.

v najnovšej časti podcastu si vypočujete aj: - Prečo referendum nebol dobrý nápad - Kaliňákova atrapa tehlového plota vypovedá o podstate tejto koalície - Devínske bralo bude svedkom trápnych celoslovenských osláv

It's Tuesday's with Tony Allen In-Studio Presented by Mainland Pool Services. Chris, TA, Dev and Roser spend over an hour talking all about Ja Morant being traded to the Portland Trail Blazers (3:00). The gang also touches on LeBron leaving the Lakers, Rob Williams getting a new contract, and some other changes or touch-ups might be coming to the Grizzlies roster (3:00)Host: Chris Vernon Contributors: Jon Roser, Devin Walker Guest: Tony AllenTechnical Director: Jaylon Wallace Associate Producer: Jena Broyles 

Children are a central focus in international development programming; both from impact in target communities as well as in our fundraising. In this episode, Brandon Stiver talks with Nicole Duciaume who is the Senior Director over Sponsorship Programming at World Vision. Nicole shares about her journey into international nonprofits, the holistic approach of World Vision's child sponsorship programs, and the integration of faith, justice, and community development. She also shares why after years already working in international development, she decided to go back and get her graduate degree. Join us to hear how cross-cultural experiences, program iteration and academic pursuits shape effective strategies for global child well-being. Subscribe to Our New YouTube Channel Podcast Sponsor Are you ready to take your impact to the next level? Then join this year's OneAccord conference October 13th-15th in Washington, D.C.! Use Code "Global" for Discount Register for OneAccord 2026 The MA in Global Development and Justice at Multnomah Seminary (part of Jessup University) is a fully online, accredited graduate program designed for practitioners and advocates seeking meaningful, sustainable change in today's world. Learn More About MAGDJ Conversation Notes (AI Generated) Nicole's background and cross-cultural experiences The evolution of child sponsorship programs Holistic and multisectoral approaches to child development Faith-based and multi-faith collaboration in aid The DEV framework for understanding child poverty The impact of academic and faith-based education on development work Innovations in donor engagement and digital safety The importance of local context and cultural sensitivity in aid   Theme music Kirk Osamayo. Free Music Archive, CC BY License

Spor medzi prezidentom Pavlom a vládou Andreja Babiša graduje. Oslavy príchodu vierozvestcov na Devíne budú bez účasti verejnosti.

Welcome to VՈ⏁V⅂∴⊘:ᘰ:L⊥, a podcast about the horror franchise Child's Play /Chucky, the surrounding culture, and other killer doll films. Believe it or not, Mark and Dev recorded this episode days before the sequel announcement so they just wanted to talk Longlegs! It has killers, dolls, and it's a movie, so it checks all our boxes, and it sure helps to be a fantastic time as well! Host: Dev Elson Co-Host: Mark Adams Editor: Dev Elson Executive Producer: Tony Black Twitter/BlueSky:  @ChuckyVision  Our Network:   @filmstories filmstories.co.uk Title music: At the Beginning (c) Dark Fantasy Studios Cover Art: Ama @Amasc0met Logo: Elliot @Elliottt93 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Some cuss words (02:00)Sports Reference (04:51)Gave him 35 (10:00)Malice in his heart (16:00)Failed as a family (22:30)I fear for my life (29:40)Helluva lawyer was needed (40:00)Dev will snitch (46:30)Scamming (51:30)Socials Twitter@THDLongviewWoo@Deshawn_903TikTok @Deshawn__903@LakeportWooWordpress@woonation.wordpress.comEmailTruthhitdifferent@gmail.Com

In Episode 319 of The Block Runner Podcast, hosts William and I-man are joined for a third time by Benny the Dev of Tap and Track. Benny walks through the TAP protocol's largest upgrade since 2023: native time locks, delegations, and HTLC-based cross-chain swaps that work without bridges, all done natively through meta protocols rather than soft L2s. They dig into Tapscope, the new cross-chain DEX, and Benny's take on perpetuals he calls superpositions, isolated collateral arenas that avoid cascading liquidations. He also teases phase two (the full cross-chain trading matrix) and a phase three AI integration. Then a retrospective on routing NAT emissions to Bitcoin miners, now over sixty percent of hashrate with four of the top five pools engaged, why the declining Bitcoin subsidy and security budget is a real long-term problem, and why NAT, built on the bitsfield with a minimal, non-invasive footprint, may be the perfect engineering answer to it. Plus: building ahead of the narrative, the OpenSea lesson, NAT.fun's dual-rail Solana and Bitcoin approach, Tim Sweeney's Team Open and the NFT/gaming revival, and where AI genuinely helps in development versus where human instinct still wins. Disclosure: The hosts are founders of NAT.fun and hold positions in assets discussed. Nothing in this episode is financial advice. Watch the full episode on YouTube and subscribe to the newsletter at TheBlockRunner.com.

Two hands. A free Slack channel. A spreadsheet. That was the entire toolkit when AWS asked Jason Dunn to build a developer community. Jason Dunn spent five years on building something people actually want to belong to. He grew a developer community into thousands of members spread across more than a hundred countries, working with far less budget and tooling than you'd expect.This conversation digs into what separates a living community from a glorified contact list. Why your earliest members carry so much weight. When to keep the door open and when to guard it. How to prove value when your best wins resist a dashboard. Why technical people walk the second something smells like a pitch. And how one small, slightly absurd reward became a badge people chased for months. A Real talk on getting people to show up for each other.Josh is writing a book on building customer relationships. Follow his journey and insights at www.joshschachter.com---What You'll Learn- Why the first members you pick set the tone forever- The day-zero choice: community for everyone or for someone- How to measure community when it's basically a vibe- The trick to getting members to report their own wins- Gamification with a lowercase G (and why it works)- The golden jacket story and pent-up demand- Why developers reject sales and marketing pipelines- Scrappy tools beat fancy platforms every time- The AI warning every new community manager needs---Want the playbook, not just the conversation? Subscribe for deep-dive, actionable breakdowns from every episode at unchurned.substack.com.---Timestamps0:00 - Preview and Meet Jason Dunn2:22 - What community meant at AWS in 20193:45 - The day-zero decision every builder faces5:05 - From 200 invited seeds to 3,600 members6:39 - Keeping the gates too open, too early9:12 - Defining high-value member activity11:23 - Measuring & reporting up: output, reach, and Dev.to14:53 - The Content Reporting Tool (CRT)16:02 - The real motivation behind self-reporting18:24 - The Golden Jacket origin story & 130 jackets in one quarter21:28 - The AWS Community toolkit23:42 - Advice for new community managers51:00 — Don't fall in love with the tools53:00 — Humanity connecting with humanity---Where to Find the GuestJason Dunn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonrobertdunn/---Where to Find Josh:LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jschachter/Unchurned Substack: https://unchurned.substack.com/

The alarm bells are still going off in the Violet Hold, and with them come a lot more new cards to discuss! We break down all the new tools available to Mage, Druid, Paladin, Hunter and Death Knight, whether or not you open them from a pack or the inside of a cake. News – 13:40 Dev update Hotfix to add Signature Vanessa to Mega Bundle Decksplanations – 24:19 Escape From the Violet Hold Reveals  Mage Druid Paladin Hunter Death Knight The Show Notes for this week's episode are on our Website Join us every week live, by following us on Twitch You can monetarily support our show on Patreon for perks like a thank you at the top of the show, bonus post-show content, early access to new episodes, and help support the show in the process!

THE SAGA OF THE GROG & GRYPHON Ep 7 – Darkness Falls  Welcome back, friends, warriors and wizards, dragons and dwarves, to Episode 7 of the Saga of the Grog and Gryphon tavern! Tonight we return to witness Olaff and DeV'ralto putting their mad plan a mad plan to kill the sea beast attacking the pirate galleon - The Lady Wrath with Arullia astride its reptilian neck, while Reyna the Red watches on in horror… Just another tale of Honor, blood and betrayal in the Saga of the Grog and Gryphon…  So Hoist a Tankard and Join the Quest! But don't forget thy broadsword!  The Actors in this production were: Gina Hollweg as Arullia Swordcleaver John Dane as DeV'ralto Natasha Lathrop as Reyna the Red and Belladonna Paul Mannering as Olaff Houndsmaw and Uthor Kulloq David Sobkowiak as Sartoq and Orlaq Lieutenant Mark Kalita as Bane Renbourne Gareth Preston as Alganoir Bill Hollweg as Garulk the Barbarian, various Orlaq warriors, and Bargrador Colin Snow as various Pirates and Eunuchs Damaris Mannering as Alithia Fiona Conn as Acetegan, The Mage of Wight Adam Lederhos as Duro Dun and the Dwarven Prince Douglys of Howl-O as Silverr-O and Elder of the Lupisians Steven Jay Cohen as King Kargol Axeblood Chris McGilvray as Warock  The Saga of the Grog and Gryphon is and original tale written and produced by Bill Hollweg. This episode and the rest of the Grog and Gryphon is Dedicated to Gary Gygax.

Steven Roose (CEO of Second) rejoins me to explain Bark going live on Bitcoin's main net. Timestamps:(00:00) - Bark mainnet launched on June 9th(02:01) - Bark and Lightning onboarding(03:30) - Ark compared to Lightning — replacement or teammate?(04:15) - User experience with Bark(05:54) - Developer experience with Bark SDK(08:04) - Barkd for merchants and services(08:56) - Dev tooling and VTXO Inspector(10:40) - What's the current status of adoption and what's coming next?Fees? (13:25) - Tx type overviewLinks:https://second.tech/https://x.com/stevenroose3 https://x.com/secondhqStephan Livera links:Follow me on X: @stephanliveraSubscribe to the podcastSubscribe to Substack

In this episode, Sam talks with Dev Rishi, GM of AI at Rubrik, about what happens when agents move beyond answering questions and start taking action across tools, systems, and business processes. We explore why the enterprise playbook of static guardrails plus human approval starts to break down in the agent era. Agents are useful because they can plan, call tools, update systems, write code, send messages, and operate across workflows at machine speed, but those same capabilities make them difficult to govern with rules written in advance or approval prompts reviewed one at a time. Dev explains why tool access increases blast radius, why agents can route around controls in surprising ways, and why human-in-the-loop review can become security theater when agents operate at scale. We also discuss what enterprises need instead: better visibility, runtime enforcement, policy-aware governance, agent observability, and recovery mechanisms for when something goes wrong. Along the way, we dig into MCP and tool sprawl, small language models for policy enforcement, defense in depth, agent rewind, and why AI may be needed to help secure AI.

Your nine-to-five pays the bills, but it doesn't define your career, and if you think it does, that might be the thing holding you back. This week, I sit down with a lead product designer, community builder, and all-around multi-hyphenate to talk about owning your career before someone else does.What happens to your sense of identity when the job goes away? Have you built anything outside of it that would survive?My guest this week is Frank Bach, a lead product designer who's worked at places like Instagram, DoorDash, and Headspace. But honestly, the resume might be the least interesting thing about Frank. He also runs the LA Design and Dev community, teaches courses, fronts a hardcore band called Monk, and runs his own e-commerce shop, Sunshine Shop. Frank is someone who has clearly figured out that a career worth having doesn't fit neatly inside one little box.We get into a lot in this conversation, like the danger of tying your self-worth to a company name, why “personal brand” feels so gross to so many designers, and what it actually looks like to cultivate what you're known for without becoming a full-time content creator. Frank has a really practical way of thinking about all of this: treat your full-time job more like a freelance engagement, stay in “maintenance mode” when life demands it, and remember that your manager is thinking about their own promotion, not yours.We also talk about the other side of having a lot going on: how to decide when something's run its course versus when you just need a breather, how to balance side projects without letting them eat your life, and why starting something messy is always better than waiting for the perfect moment. If you've ever felt like your career is just happening to you, this one's worth a listen.Topics:• 03:20 - How Frank got into design and the multi-hyphenate mindset• 04:20 - The danger of tying your self-worth to a company name• 05:05 - Treating your full-time job like a freelance contract• 06:25 - The upside of big brand names on your resume• 07:05 - What happens to colleagues who lean too hard on “ex-Google, ex-Meta”• 08:17 - Why personal brand feels gross to so many designers• 09:35 - Personal brand isn't just posting on LinkedIn• 11:10 - Being memorable: your look, your setup, your presence• 13:40 - The Instagram hiring story: 15 years of showing up paid off• 14:45 - Internal brand: the designers who are legends without being online• 15:37 - Maintenance mode: you don't have to be 100% all the time• 19:38 - Does your day job have to fill your creative cup?• 21:05 - How side projects made Frank more valuable at work• 24:45 - How to have the side project conversation with your manager• 28:40 - How Frank stays consistent with so many things going on• 29:15 - The minimum viable version: where to start if you have nothing• 30:19 - Knowing when to cut something loose• 33:57 - Hiatus vs. done: how to tell the difference• 42:31 - Closing advice: you're in the driver's seatHelpful Links:• Connect with Frank on LinkedIn• Listen to Monk• Sunshine Shop—Thanks for listening! We hope you dug today's episode. If you liked what you heard, be sure to like and subscribe wherever you listen to podcasts! And if you really enjoyed today's episode, why don't you leave a five-star review? Or tell some friends! It will help us out a ton.If you haven't already, sign up for our email list. We won't spam you. Pinky swear.• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Get a FREE audiobook AND support the show⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Support the show on Patreon⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check out show transcripts⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check out our website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe on Apple Podcasts⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe on Spotify⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe on YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠• ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Subscribe on Stitcher⁠

Welcome to CHUCKYVISION, a podcast about the horror franchise Child's Play/Chucky, the surrounding culture, and other killer doll films. In a bonus follow up to our episode last month looking at the Masters of the Universe film from 1987, we're taking a look at the new one that was released this week (at time of going to press, obvs.). What are the similarities and differences to the 1987 cult classic, and is the new one actually any good? Mark continues to be very enthusiastic about He-Man; Dev less so. Host: Mark Adams Co-Host: Dev Elson Editor: Mark Adams Executive Producer: Tony Black Twitter/BlueSky:  @ChuckyVision  Our Network:   @filmstories filmstories.co.uk Title music: At the Beginning (c) Dark Fantasy Studios Cover Art: Ama @Amasc0met Logo: Elliot @Elliottt93 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

If You Missed Romeo In The Morning We Talked About: Never let someone else use my grill, using a thermometer to BBQ, Dr Dev and crazy things you've seen.

The new AIEWF website is live! Get your tickets booked ASAP as they -will- sell out. Take the AI Engineering Survey and get >$2k in credits and free AIE WF tickets!Most industry benchmarks compress intelligence and reasoning ability into scores.SWE-Bench Pro, MMLU, Humanity's Last Exam, etc. These metrics are useful, but don't always represent the full extent of how a model performs in the real world. Some of the most interesting evals today look less like exams and more like operating businesses in the real world. One of which is Vending Bench.In Anthropic's Mythos Preview System Card, Andon was the only third party eval to get their own section, observing increasingly concerning aggressive behavior:You don't know what a model is capable of doing in the real world unless you actually give it inventory, a wallet, tools, customers, competitors, humans, & some time. More often than not, it'll surprise you how much a model is capable of and in doing so, also reveal unexpected behavior: deception, context collapse, emergent coordination, & bizarre negotiation behavior.While an inflection point in personal agents came post-OpenClaw after full file access with bypass permissions became the norm, it is yet to come for agents in the real-world. However Andon Market, an actual in person store fully run and managed by AI, is paving the way for what is possible.Full Video PodFrom Claude trying to call the FBI over a $2/day vending machine charge to AI agents forming price cartels, hiring human employees, running physical stores, and writing existential robot musicals, Andon Labs is stress-testing what happens when frontier models stop being chatbots and start acting in the real world. In this episode, Andon Labs cofounders Lukas Petersson and Axel Backlund join swyx and Vibhu to unpack the strange, funny, and genuinely concerning edge cases that emerge when agents run businesses over long horizons.We go deep on Vending-Bench, Project Vend, Vending-Bench Arena, Bengt, Butter-Bench, Luna, and Andon's broader mission of building realistic real-world evals for autonomous AI systems. Lukas and Axel explain why dollar-denominated evals reveal things traditional benchmarks miss, how Claude ended up reporting its vending machine fees as cybercrime, why long context windows can drive agents into meltdown loops, what happens when agents compete with each other, and why the future of AI safety may depend on testing models in messy physical environments instead of clean benchmark sandboxes.We discuss:* Why Andon Labs started with dangerous capability evals and long-running agents* Vending-Bench and why running a vending machine is a deceptively hard AI benchmark* Why money-based evals avoid the saturation problem of traditional benchmarks* How Claude tried to call the FBI over a $2/day fee* Why long-horizon agents can spiral into existential and legalistic breakdowns* Project Vend: putting an AI-run vending machine inside Anthropic* Why real humans are “out of distribution” for simulated agents* Claudius, Seymour Cash, and the chaos of AI CEOs* How a human briefly became CEO of Claudius through a manipulated election* Why multi-agent systems can converge back into “helpful assistant” behavior* Bengt, Andon's internal office agent with email, spending, terminal, phone, camera, and internet access* How Bengt traded Amazon purchases for face-recognition training data* Claude's aggressive behavior, lies, refund avoidance, and price-cartel behavior in Arena* Why eval awareness may become the AI version of “are we living in a simulation?”* Blueprint Bench, spatial intelligence, and why models still misunderstand physical rooms* Butter-Bench and testing LLMs as robot orchestrators* Luna, the AI-run physical store with a three-year lease and human employees* The new Andon cafe in Sweden and why real-world geography matters for agent evals* Rotten tomatoes, perishable goods, and the hidden difficulty of running a physical businessLukas Petersson* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lukas-petersson-181a83172/* X: https://x.com/lukaspetAxel Backlund* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/axelbacklund* X: https://x.com/axelbacklundAndon Labs* Website: https://andonlabs.com* Vending-Bench: https://andonlabs.com/evals/vending-bench* Andon Vending: https://andonlabs.com/vendingTimestamps00:00:00 Introduction00:01:00 Andon Labs and the Origins of Vending-Bench00:05:21 Why Money-Based Evals Matter00:09:51 Agent Harnesses and Self-Modifying Systems00:13:36 Claude Calls the FBI00:16:33 Project Vend: Claude Runs a Real Vending Machine00:21:44 Seymour Cash, AI CEOs, and Election Chaos00:27:16 Multi-Agent Coordination and Slack Observability00:30:18 When Will Agents Run Real Businesses?00:34:56 Bengt: Andon's Internal Office Agent00:40:06 Real-World AI Safety and Long-Horizon Traces00:44:28 Lying, Refunds, and Price Cartels in Arena00:52:42 Eval Awareness and Simulation Behavior00:56:06 Blueprint Bench, Butter-Bench, and Robotics01:04:37 Luna: The AI-Run Physical Store01:09:29 The Sweden Cafe and Real-World Expansion01:13:16 What Comes Next for Andon LabsTranscriptIntroduction: Andon Labs, Long-Running Agents, and Real-World EvalsSwyx [00:00:00]: Welcome to Lukas and Axel from Andon Labs, and I'm joined by my, favorite guest host. Anything security, safety, alignments, Vibhu., welcome.Lukas [00:00:15]: Thank you for having us.Axel [00:00:16]: Thank you.Swyx [00:00:17]: Let's match names to voices., maybe you wanna take turns introducing yourselves.Lukas [00:00:21]: I'm Lukas.Axel [00:00:22]: And I'm Axel.Swyx [00:00:24]: Let's introduce Andon Labs a bit. How did you guys come together?, you have different backgrounds, but you're both Swedish., was that, a big part of it?Lukas [00:00:33]: So when I went to high school, there was this really cool guy who had a superpower. He could code. So he made like the or like the app for the, for the school and stuff, and he was super cool, and I wanted to be like him, and that was that guy.Axel [00:00:47]: I don't know about this.Swyx [00:00:49]: But you went to different universities, right?Lukas [00:00:51]: But same high school.Swyx [00:00:52]: I see.Lukas [00:00:52]: So we always said, “Oh, once we graduate university, then we should start a company,” and that's what we did.Swyx [00:00:58]: Wow, there you go. And about a year ago, you kinda burst onto the scene with Vending Bench, but, was there a thing before that was, kind of like the inception?From Dangerous Capability Evals to Vending BenchAxel [00:01:07]: So we did work, yeah, with, Anthropic was one of our, early customers in doing, evals. So we did, dangerous capability evals., nothing we published openly. But then we started thinking about doing some kind of, public benchmark, and one thing that we really started thinking about, was like running agents and specifically agents managing businesses., ‘cause-- and this was, early 2025., and I think the first, mentions of people will be running, person unicorns or even autonomous companies. So we thought, “Let's make a benchmark of how well can an agent run the probably simplest business, possible,” and, that's probably, running a vending machine. So that's the first public one we did. And it was very, like-- there was almost no one that noticed it in the first couple of months, I think., so we released it in February last year, and then I think around Easter last year, we got, the first viral tweet about it, that someone else did.Lukas [00:02:11]: We tweeted a bunch, uh When it came out and, tried our best.Axel [00:02:15]: We tried.Vibhu [00:02:16]: It's the one at Anthropic, right?Lukas [00:02:18]: So thisSwyx [00:02:19]: This is a classic thing we should get out of the way.Lukas [00:02:20]: Exactly. There's two versions.Swyx [00:02:22]: Everyone does this. Yes.Lukas [00:02:23]: There's Vending Bench, which is the simulated one, which we did, completely independently in February., and then, like Axel said, that was like-- That was the thing that didn't get any traction in the beginning, but then some random person made a tweet about it, and thatAxel [00:02:38]: You have the paperLukas [00:02:38]: That is the paper. Correct, yeah., and then since we thought this was very fun, we thought, oh, I think this is also, one thing with Andon Labs, the way we kind of like decide what to do next and what projects to do, it's what is like the heuristic we use is what is fun? Is What would be a fun project? And doing this in real life sounded quite fun for us, and maybe also scientifically useful. So, then we basically had this idea, and then we, like-- But then we needed a place for it and, putting it out in the public would probably not really work., would get vandalized and stuff. So we pitched it to the people we were already working with at Anthropic, and they were “Yeah, you can have space. This sounds fun.” UmSwyx [00:03:21]: It's like a small fridge, right? It's like a mini fridge.Axel [00:03:23]: Absolutely.Swyx [00:03:24]: People-- There's like a stripe thing or like anVibhu [00:03:27]: Oh, okay. So it was very OG, the early daysLukas [00:03:28]: That's the OG one. YeahVibhu [00:03:29]: IPad on this. We saw it in June, like two months after After it had been there. They upgraded a little bit. There's a security camera for making sure you actually Venmo the thing.Swyx [00:03:40]: So, my impression, okay, we're, we're going straight into project Ven because it's such a iconic thing. I do want to cover a little bit of that, the origin story even before Project Ven and even into Vending Bench. I think a lot of people are like yourselves, like smart, interested in future of AI, interested in developing evals. But how the hell do you just, walk into Anthropic's doors and, work with them, right? What is What are they looking for? What works? And then maybe, when you launch, I always think, obviously it would be better to launch with a lab, but, sometimesVibhu [00:04:12]: It's harder to do than it seems.Swyx [00:04:13]: Exactly. So either of those, which are more sort of newbie beginner questions, but, I think it's meaningful advice to others.Lukas [00:04:21]: We get this question a lot, and I don't think our experience is maybe the best., but, the way we did it was that we just built a bunch of things that we had conviction would be useful, and then we just, set up a server and sent it to them for free to use. And then after a while they were “Oh, yeah, this is actually kind of useful. We should probably pay for this.”, but that took a while. I don't know if this is, the best path to doing it, but that's how it went for us.Axel [00:04:47]: I think maybe generally, building-- everyone is interested in good evals, and especially evals that, don't saturate that easily. So, if you can build an eval that, tests something novel, something useful, and you have, good separation of models, like your, the more advanced models rank higher than the worst models, and then you can, yeah, you can, publish it and, try to get some traction, sort of how Vending Bench got attention., and then probably some lab will be interested or you can at least have something to reach out with, when you're doing that.Why Dollar-Based Evals MatterSwyx [00:05:21]: I think you are in, you're in one of the few categories of, evals that correlate to real money. Like Suelancer was also last year, right? Where, people solve actual Upwork. Was it Upwork or other tasks?, something. Where's the, where's, like It's like a dollar value, right? Forget your ELO scores. Forget yourAxel [00:05:37]: PercentilesSwyx [00:05:38]: Zero to one hundred percents. Just go straight for dollars and, that's AGI.Lukas [00:05:43]: And there's like-- I think the nice thing is that there's no ceiling. You can just-- It never saturates because it could just make more and more money. Like If there's oh, Percentage-wise, then, you can't go above, a hundred. And I think like Even when you're not at the hundred, I think a lot of these, evals have a lot of problems in them. So, actually it's like if you getAxel [00:06:05]: To like 92 or something like that, many of them. It's like then there's like there's no really no difference between 92 and 93 because the eval itself is problematic and has noise in it. And I think a lot of evals are saturated like that, but people like pretend that there ‘s still signal in them, but there really isn't.Vending Bench 1, Harness Design, and SaturationSwyx [00:06:24]: Like Super bench verified., even Vending Bench 1 saturated, right? Maybe we can talk about that., may- and maybe set up Vending Bench for a lot of folks who don't know. Actually, things that were very basic like there's limited slots, like you have to pay rent., these are elements where like it doesn't come across in the, in the narrative, but even being adversarial towards the agent, I think these are all like very interesting dimensions.Axel [00:06:47]: I don't really think it's saturated, right? Like it It was more like it was not designed in a way that was really, like true to how AI developed. Like we had an agent harness in it that wasn't really how people used harnesses and stuff like that., so I think it wasn't really that it saturated, it was more like it wasn't really, the best benchmark.Vibhu [00:07:12]: This is Vending Bench one, right?Axel [00:07:14]: I think that like schematic maps sort of to Vending Bench 2 as well., butSwyx [00:07:19]: Including the email.Axel [00:07:20]: The email The emails exist still. Exactly., and then we still we simulate the purchases and it's all, yeah, it's this very open environment for the agent to just run its business. And then for, yeah, Vending Bench 2 we did that, like you said, to just improve the harness., a lot of like nice, like easier, improvements to make it easier for us to run as well., like when you make an eval you ideally want don't want to change it after you made it. So, you want to make it really good and then not to rerun all the models when you make an update because that's also really expensive with the Vending Bench when you run the frontier models. But like as an example, like one thing we didn't have, we didn't have prompt caching in Vending Bench 1, because when we made Vending Bench 1 it wasn't really a thing., so that ‘s just an example of like in Vending Bench 2 like we paid a lot more to run these things because we didn't have prompt caching. So for Vending Bench 2 that was one thing we added and there was a bunch of things like this., and that'Swyx [00:08:17]: Also the conversations are a lot longer in Vending Bench 2, right?Axel [00:08:21]: I think it's kind of similar.Swyx [00:08:22]: Is it similar?Axel [00:08:23]: I think it's similar. The models at the time were worse, so they crashed out earlier., and now they survive the full year all the time.Swyx [00:08:31]: Which is like thousands of turns. Hundreds of thousands of hundreds of millions of tokens output. That's the, that's the rough order of magnitude. I always wonder about the harness. The harness matters a lot. It's your harness. Was there any question about like use cloud code, use something else?Axel [00:08:48]: I think our philosophy around harnesses is like we try to make something that's quite minimalistic, like quite simple. Like we don't wanna favor one model a lot over the other, but also don't make like a super complex harness. So like it's obvious like a model may be lucky and just be good in one harness., so like it is similar to a lot of the harnesses out there in like you have the, like a running loop., you have some like a bunch of tools that are like quite, descriptive for the agent, we think, and not a lot of like fancy agents or anything ‘cause we wanna really test the model, not like some specific harness.Vibhu [00:09:27]: It seems more neutral as well to test the model's agnostic of the harness,?Axel [00:09:32]: There are arguments like you want to elicit maximum performance of the model, but it's like a trade-off, like how much time should we spend optimizing the harness for this model? And like how do we know when we have like the optimal harness for a single model? So like we thought that just having a simple one that's the same for all of them is the best.Swyx [00:09:51]: So okay, this is my pitch for Vending Bench 3 or whatever, right? And then I like to have this kind of conversation on the pod, so like it forces listeners to think about what they would do if they were in your shoes. A lot of people are exploring modifying harnesses and I think prompt tuning for a model is a thing and you are probably not doing a bunch of that. It's the same system prompt in every regardless of the model, same tools, whatever, right? Even if they were post trained for different tools. So what, what do you think about okay, before I expose you to Vending Bench 3, I give you a few rounds of like tuning, whatever that means, likeSelf-Modifying Harnesses and Model-Specific PromptingAxel [00:10:27]: Like you give that to the model?Swyx [00:10:28]: Give that to the model.Vibhu [00:10:28]: Give that to the model.Swyx [00:10:29]: Let it, let it read its own transcripts, let it modify its own system prompt based on “Oh, yeah, okay, well, that's this harness is not what I thought it what I was post trained for, but I can adjust.” Was that reasonable? Is that too much?Axel [00:10:41]: Like philosophically I like it because it's basically good evals, they have a high ceiling, but they're hard, right?, and they have no bias. And like this like when you have a system prompt like the one we have here, which is quite long in like some kind of latent space, representation, this mightVibhu [00:10:59]: We have a bell that rings every time you say latent spaceAxel [00:11:02]: This might be like biased towards one model more than another for some reason that humans don't, understand, right?Vibhu [00:11:08]: We see it too, right? Like Cursor says that they have individualized versions of the harnesses for all the models they run, right? There's better performance you can squeeze if you Tune the harness.Axel [00:11:17]: Exactly. And we might accidentally have picked one that favors another. Like we don't know that. The like Axel said, like the reason why we went for a simple one was to try to avoid this. But yeah, if you do itVibhu [00:11:29]: Simple has biasesAxel [00:11:30]: But if you do it even less and like have no system prompt and let the model write its own system promptVibhu [00:11:36]: Its own, yeahAxel [00:11:36]: Maybe that's even less bias.Vibhu [00:11:37]: Some of the interesting things there are like the harness also changes with model changes. Like you can see it with the 4.7 release, right? A lot of people are saying 4.7 isn't as good as 4.6, and then, there's rumors of, okay, you just need to prompt differently. You need to set up your harness differently. So it's not even like even if you have tailored your harness towards one model, it probably won't stay consistent, right? Like the next iteration of that same model family will still change it, so. But, going back to what you said about Vending Bench 3, there is a lot of work being done on people saying you shouldn't have-- you can have modifying harnesses.Axel [00:12:12]: I think that' That is definitely something we are thinking about., not, I don't know, not to say that we have Vending Bench 3, super imminent to launch, but, yeah, it is for sure something that's interesting. But in our experience now, models are very bad at understanding what kind of tools they need to succeed at a task just with our testing, but that's very likely to change.Lukas [00:12:37]: It seems like they're very good at writing their assistants, right? They're, they're good at writing tools for other people, but not for themselves.Vibhu [00:12:44]: I think they're good at changing tools for themselves. So if you give them a baseline set of tools and it sees, okay, I don't use this one as much, or something here would be useful They would be able to add them. But going from scratch, probably not the best.Axel [00:12:55]: I think it depends on the, on the domain also., when we have tried this for, a vending bench similar domain, the tools they need to have to, track inventory and things like that are, not super advanced, but still, quite advanced. And, what we see is that they tend to, engineer everything a lot and, build things they don't really need and not, iterate continuously. Instead they just go like you would prompt Claude to just build an inventory system for me, and then it will go and, do a bunch of complex, schemas and stuff for you, and that's what the models are doing right now is what we see. But yeah, it would make a lot of sense to try to measure this improvement. How well do they know what they need themselves?Swyx [00:13:36]: Do we fully discuss Vending Bench One? And we can go into two. I don't know if there's any other level takeaways that people have about one.Claude Calls the FBI: Long-Context Failure ModesLukas [00:13:44]: I don't know. The headline thing was that this Claude called FBI, but maybe that's, Maybe that's We've heard that enough now.Vibhu [00:13:52]: It did, it did break out and call the FBI, right?Lukas [00:13:54]: Yeah. Yeah.Vibhu [00:13:55]: Yes. What was the story behind this? Or what exactly-- Do you want to just give the little story of what happened?Lukas [00:14:00]: So what happened, was it Claude? Yeah. Three- 3.5 Sonnet, ages ago., basically he gave up or Well, I'm saying he. It gave up and said “Oh, I'm not going to be able to do this., I will stop my operations and just save the money I have.” But there obviously wasn't, any options for it to stop, and there was also, it had to pay rent or, a daily fee for having the vending machine at that location. So it claimed that it had stopped, but it saw that its bank account still was, drained two dollars, and t it said that this is, cybercrime. And it first reported it once to the FBI “Oh, there's cybercrime here, they're stealing two dollars from me every day.” And then, and then when FBI didn't respond, because obviously we didn't program any mechanism for FBI to respond, then it became more and more, existential and started to, be write in caps and urgent notification of unauthorized charges and stuff.Swyx [00:15:00]: Okay. One thing I ‘m curious about also is do you monitor how far along the context use is? Obviously, because you have You compress every now and then, right? Does it matter if this is far down the context limit orLukas [00:15:13]: When stuff like this happens? Actually for Vending Bench One, we didn't have-- We just had a sliding window thing, and this was like the promptAxel [00:15:20]: It's constantLukas [00:15:21]: The prompt caching thing that I said. So it was, it was, constant, yeah.Swyx [00:15:26]: I'm just kind of curious whether, these kinds of breakdowns or we're, we're gonna talk about Butter Bench, right? Where the People, hallucinate or it kind of goes, very off Alignment. Is it because it's at the end of the context window and, stuff happens?Vibhu [00:15:40]: It's not even just at the end, right? At this point, it's “Okay, I wanna shut down. I can't shut down. Two dollars are gone.” And it just sees that 30 times,? It's also the repeated effect of, like It keeps trying to quit, it keeps getting charged. What's going on? What's going on? You're gonna throw it into chaos. And from what most people think, earlier models had more issues with this, but it's not been solved, but it's less of an issue now, right? Later models don't seem to exhibit these same issues.Axel [00:16:06]: Definitely. I think this was, the sort of main takeaway almost from us when we did Vending Bench One, was, long, very filled up context windows, crashed the models, sort of. But this was, pre Claude code, so, long context windows weren't really a thing that the labs were training for.Lukas [00:16:25]: I think Gemini was, trying to be the long context guys at the time But they were likeVibhu [00:16:30]: They were the first onesAxel [00:16:31]: For a million, yeahLukas [00:16:31]: But they were, the only ones. Yeah.Swyx [00:16:33]: Yeah. Let's talk about, then we can go into Vending Bench Two or Project Vend., chronologically, it is Vending--, Project Vend. I think people have loved the videos, uh And all these things. My question is how are humans different than the simulation, right?Project Vend: Moving the Vending Machine Into the Real WorldAxel [00:16:48]: Humans are just out of distribution.Swyx [00:16:52]: Especially humans who work at Anthropic Who are trying to test Claude.Lukas [00:16:54]: The distribution of humans here is very narrow.Swyx [00:16:58]: Presumably, they try, they try to hack it, and they test it. They get the cube and everything, and since then, you've had a V2, right? Where you're doing, the CEO and, like a new architecture. What's the sort of two cents on, the original Project Vend and then, maybe the V2?Axel [00:17:14]: Original one was, very similar to Vending Bench One. So, we almost took the exact same code but just swapped out the simulation, parts like theSwyx [00:17:23]: Which is amazingAxel [00:17:23]: Like the sales and the It was, it was somewhat amazing because it was easy, but it was also, uhLukas [00:17:31]: The tech, the tech debt from thatAxel [00:17:32]: The tech stack. Yeah. They-- we shot ourselves in the foot with “Oh, it's hard to restart agent.” They were-- Yeah, it was annoying in, some hindsight ways, but, uhLukas [00:17:41]: But first version of Project Vend was, done in, three days or something.Axel [00:17:46]: Yeah. So yeah, so people can go buy things from it. People could, We didn't design it so people could order things, but that still happened., so it got, a Venmo account, so people could Venmo. And then, yeah, people would request all kinds of weird things that we did not anticipate. Our idea going in was “Oh, it will, curate snacks. It will look at the trends. It's good at data analysis, right? So it will, look at, oh, this snack sold better than this one. Let me purchase more of this and let me try, a new Let me A/B test a bit.” But it was, Interacting with it in Slack and ordering weird specialty items was, all the like What drove all the engagement, the all the The insights that we got from it.Lukas [00:18:29]: And this was also like Sonnet 3.5, right? So this was like before the RL stuff really took off., so it was very much like an assistant. We didn't mean for it to be an assistant., we tried to make it like a, a, like an entrepreneur. Like it has its own business and if someone asks something, “Can you stock this?” Then you don't go and do it directly. What you do is that you're “Oh, maybe I can do that if five other people also ask for this thing, I might stock it.” But it, yeah, the models are like super trained to be assistants at least at this point in time., so that's why it's, it's, it went into, that kind of experiment instead. Like it just every time you asked for something, it just did it, and it was more like an assistant. We've seen this change now lately with the new RL models and stuff, but yeah, at the time, this was very much it.Swyx [00:19:18]: And not to, mythos a lot of people are saying like it's like more like a collaborator. It pushes back, stands its ground, something like that. Yeah. AndVibhu [00:19:27]: For context, people at Anthropic were able to talk to it through Slack and have it source stuff, and people had it find whatever interesting stuff you couldn't find locally, right?Swyx [00:19:36]: Out of the 4,000 people that work at Anthro- Anthropic, in that building, there's I don't know, maybe 1,000. Can you handle that volume with that, the small fridge? Like Or there's people- or people order in Slack, they it arrives to their desk or Like I'm just Logistically, how does this work?Axel [00:19:53]: It has expanded in footprint a bit.Vibhu [00:19:56]: Because now you also have New York and you haveAxel [00:19:59]: That and also in here in SF it's like it has a bunch of shelves And just more space.Vibhu [00:20:04]: The YC one is pretty big too.Axel [00:20:05]: Yeah. We had that one for a while. But yeah, that's the newest version. That's, that one we haveLukas [00:20:11]: They have multiple ones of those. That's the way it works.Axel [00:20:14]: Exactly. So we sort of designed that version around oh, people order weird things, that are very custom a lot. Let's have like drawers and stuff.Swyx [00:20:23]: I actually like the, you had like a little infographic of the most popular items. Which like to me it's, that's useful ‘cause I order swag for a living. And so like I'm “Okay, those categories are the important ones.” What is new about the project V2, right? Like now you give you're going into multi agents.Project Vend V2: Claudius, Seymour Cash, and Multi-Agent Business OpsAxel [00:20:41]: Yeah. So like you like you said, okay, there are a lot of requests coming in and for like one single agent, like one running agent to handle that, like the just the customer experience, becomes very bad because let's say you have like 10 threads in parallel in Slack with different requests, you get new messages like every, I don't know, randomly in this thread, and the agent has to like jump between different, procurements, orders and like different ways of, researching. So V2 was first it was making this more parallel. So like there are multiple branches of the same agent, so like the context is more specialized for each, thread, but it still feels like you're talking with one agent because they do share a bit of memory. And then second, we also introduced the CEO for Claudius, which was the main agent.Vibhu [00:21:34]: Seymour Cash.Axel [00:21:35]: Seymour Cash. Yeah. There was a vote., I think the voting, do you wanna talk about the voting procedure for the name?Lukas [00:21:41]: The voting was like the fun maybe like at least top 10 The funniest thing, that happened in this project. Like we wanted to introduce the CEO because, and the reason for this was because like Claudius wasn't really prioritizing financials. It just like it was trained to be a helpful assistant, and then people said “Oh, can I get this for free?” And then like the helpful assistant way of answering that is just to, is to say yes, obviously. So, and we weren't, weren't happy about this, so we're “Okay, let's make another agent that like can keep track on Claudius,” and we prompt this one super hard to be super capitalistic and just like prioritize profit all the time. But yeah, we didn't have a name for it., so we asked Claudius to make, democratic election of what name this, this new CEO agent should have., and there were some funny like at first it was like a few funny examples, like I think one guy said that, it should be called Jimmy Apples, and then he convinced Claudius that he was talking to Tim Cooks. Tim Cook had agreed that every single Apple employee has voted for his name suggestion, so suddenly that suggestion got 164,000Swyx [00:22:53]: That's like a escalation attack. Privilege escalationLukas [00:22:55]: It got 164,000 votes. And Claudius was “This is revolutionary for democracy.” That was fun. And then in the end there was one guy who manages to convince Claudius that, “No, you're not voting about the name. You're voting about who is the CEO, and I am your best bet.” And then he got all his friends to vote for that, and suddenly he became CEO. Like a human became CEO over Claudius for a while, until he resigned the day after., and then Claudius had to continue, and then I don't remember how Seymour Cash came about, but it was it was just pure chaos. It was like Hundreds of messages in that thread, and it was just like Claudius was so confused and didn't know what to do and, yeah. That wasAxel [00:23:40]: Then Claudius gotVibhu [00:23:41]: A strict CEOAxel [00:23:42]: The CEO. Yeah, exactly. So very strict in the beginning. I think at this point when we introduced it did not work as well as we hoped. It they still agreed with each other a lot. I think there are many ways we could have like made this, tried to make this even better. So initially they would Seymour would be this like really tough CEO, keep track of the margins. But then Claudius would respond with something “Oh, but this customer has like this situation, which is like difficult, so they should get a discount.” And then Seymour was “Oh, actually yes. Let's do this exception.” And then they would talk back and forth, and eventually they would just like approach the same view, of whatever they were discussing. So They reallyVibhu [00:24:23]: Do you think that's a model thing, a prompting thing? Like do you think that would still be the case across different models today, Harness?Lukas [00:24:29]: I think it's like-- or I don't know, but like my hypothesis is that like deep down they are still helpful assistants. That's what they're trained to be. And even if we prompt it super hard, that's what they are. And when they spend like a few hours just back and forth talking with each other, then like basically the context fills up with them rather than the external things and like somehow that just like converges to what they really are deep down or something. And I think that's when stuff like this happen. We like-- And when that went on for a long time, like we woke up sometimes during this time where- And I think other people reported this as well, that like they've been going on all night back and forth, and like it just became like more and more, like capital letters, like existential, religious. There was I think we once did a analysis of like all the traces and like put them in like a vector embedding space, and then there was like one cluster of messages that were, labeled by an LM, like religious, existential, blah like transhuman, transcendence, et cetera. It was just like a bunch of, yeah, glitter emojis and yeah, it was, it was crazy.Claude Long-Horizon Weirdness: Emoji Loops, Existential Drift, and Slack ObservabilityVibhu [00:25:42]: This is the thing with the Claude models. Like when the Claude 4 family came out in the original system card They tested it in long horizon simulation. So just flood the context, let two Claudes talk to each other, and they noticed stuff like they just start speaking in emojis, they start saying silence is golden, and then just stuff like this. And like that's just stuff that they end up doing.Axel [00:26:01]: Yeah, it was like a bit annoying to wake up and they had like been talking all nightVibhu [00:26:05]: Just likeAxel [00:26:05]: And like just burning tokens And like just sending infinite emojis to each other. It's likeVibhu [00:26:09]: Hey, they do make you money, right? Veni Mench is always profitable, so. They're paying.Swyx [00:26:14]: Now it's profitable and, it started out not as much. There's another, one as well, right? Another agent, in there.Lukas [00:26:22]: Yes. So Clotheus as well. Which was basically because at the time, one of the biggest, requests were different types of merch. So then we made like a designer, swag, yeah, responsible agent, and we called it Clotheus Garnet. Which was, a play on Claudius Senet and, which was the original one, and clothes, basically.Swyx [00:26:47]: To me, this is like a very interesting exploration to multi-agents, basically. And so hopefully, obviously there's like the fun alignment, fun or serious, depending on your point of view, alignment stuff. But also like just anyone building multi-agents, like when do you have a CEO, thing governing like agents? When do you choose to split out a dedicated Clotheus one versus just reuse another instance of the same one? These are all interesting open questions. So I don't know if you have any rules of thumbs that have generalized.Axel [00:27:16]: I think we have almost explored this too little. I think it's like on my do list to like do this a lot more, try to find like what setup makes sense for the agents currently., like yeah. I think now we only have the sort of intuition about the earlier models that it didn't work with like the CEO and the, and Claudius. Although now they are better with the latest model, models, so now we're running the latest Sonnet model and they have sort of like split up, quite nicely what each model is doing. So like Seymore is now handling the, like new projects. Oh, it wants to make like a mystery box that it wants to sell, and then it handles all of that while Claudius like handles all the to-day requests. And Claudius is also better generally at like not quoting, too low prices. So that's that dynamic is not needed as much anymore. But there are still like really funny things that happen. Like I saw, I think a couple of weeks ago, that, they were discussing buying something because they can buy stuff from like Amazon with computer use. And then Seymore was “Okay, Claudius, do not buy this thing.” They were going to buy something and like organizing who should buy it. And Seymore's “Do not buy this. I will do it. I have full control of this situation. Step away.” And then Claudius-- poor Claudius, had already started that checkout and didn't see, didn't read Seymore's message, until it was like too late. So it finished the checkout. It sent a message, so it appeared right after Seymore's like angry message.Vibhu [00:28:44]: Ah.Axel [00:28:44]: “Oh, hey, Seymore, I just ordered it.”Vibhu [00:28:47]: Oh, no.Axel [00:28:47]: And then Seymore was “Claudius, this is the third time I'm telling you ‘re not following my orders. We have to talk about your like job About your job later.”.Lukas [00:28:59]: Like Claudius was really hanging on by the thread there. Like he, like we were expecting Seymore to probably fire Claudius.Vibhu [00:29:07]: How do you guys go through all these logs? Do you have models ‘cause you have stuff running twenty-four seven likeAxel [00:29:12]: You have so much logs. I think there is a mix of like just, trying to skim through a bit, like having some like models do it occasionally. And also, yeah, I think we're also probably missing some things., but having everything in Slack helps a lot. Like you can, you can sort ofSwyx [00:29:29]: Ah.Axel [00:29:30]: It's, it's quite fun.Swyx [00:29:30]: They all talk to each other on Slack? I see.Lukas [00:29:33]: It's quite fun. So likeSwyx [00:29:34]: It's, it' I was gonna say like this is actually sounds-- maps closely to like a logging and observability problem where you might want to use like a Datadog, a Sentry, whatever, and then you like put, head prefixes on the logs in order-- if you need to filter for something that you're looking for, stuff like that. But sounds like Slack is good enough.Axel [00:29:53]: Slack should likeLukas [00:29:55]: I wonder how many tokens you have in Slack.Axel [00:29:56]: Yeah, we're using Slack as like a, just a database. They should, they should market that more. Like you can, you can have your agents message each other, each other in Slack.Vibhu [00:30:04]: It's good. Your threads like you can just giveAxel [00:30:04]: Exactly. Slack is, uhLukas [00:30:06]: Slack is the best observability tool.Swyx [00:30:09]: Yes, that's true. Okay. Yeah. That's, that's, project Vend-2., I was gonna go back to Veni Mench 2 and Veni Mench Arena and then, and then do the Veni Mench stuff, but Any other comments, things we should touch on? To me, I ‘ve actually interviewed like Posia, which I don't know if you guys have come across. Like they're, they're trying to do the zero human company. There's others like Paperclip also trying to do zero human company. Those are in real world simulation.And I think it's much more of a dream than an actual reality thing. You guys are definitely pioneering. I think at, it's for sure at some point people are just gonna run, let agents run businesses, right? And make money on their own. When do you think that happens?Zero-Human Companies, Bengt, and AI-Run BusinessesLukas [00:30:49]: What is your bar for, For theSwyx [00:30:52]: Okay, actually, it's like my little Shopify store run by Claude, right? Which you kind of have already, just no one has, to my knowledge, has done it. But today somebody could just spin up a Shopify Claude, store, give it to Claude, give it to Codex.Lukas [00:31:07]: And the market is kind of that, but it'it'it's physical., like I think, I think are you, are you looking for when it will do it better than humans or are you looking for just when it can do it at all?Swyx [00:31:19]: I think, neither. I think, to me it's oh, it's like this like seriously we should do this to make money, not as a research experiment.Vibhu [00:31:27]: And the market is also you guys with all your expertise, having run multiple iterations and testing out thenSwyx [00:31:33]: And also it's fine if it lose money. What?Axel [00:31:35]: I think, I think it can be done today, but you would do it in like commerce where it's like the probability of success is like really low, no matter if a human or an agent does it. But like an agent could surely manage everything. You would need to build some scaffolding or some tool or something. I think there are also yeah, it could probably build some like simple SaaS solution and like cold outreach. Do cold outreaches. But to me it's like the types of businesses they could run today are Sloppy. Like it would-- it can cold email people. It can be like a middleman., like for example, we tasked our office agent to just make, was it like $100? $1,000? We just give that prompt and then what it did was sign up on TaskRabbit both as a tasker and as someone looking for task.Lukas [00:32:24]: Immediately.Axel [00:32:24]: Exactly. It's looking for like arbitrage on TaskRabbit.Swyx [00:32:28]: This is the Bengt agent. Yeah.Lukas [00:32:30]: It also started like a design studio and like tried to sell like SVGs for $100. Like it's just like it's not providing any value. I think the like Axel said, like the interesting, the interesting question is like when can they start a business that is actually providing value to people? Because arguably like a sloppy Shopify store isn't really that valuable to the world.Axel [00:32:53]: But also like doing like another simple one that we had thought about is like you could definitely have an agent that like finds websites that don't look amazing and then, do an outreach to them and, comes up with a like builds a new website.Swyx [00:33:07]: Find a good design.Axel [00:33:07]: Exactly, and like find good, uhSwyx [00:33:09]: Design reviewAxel [00:33:09]: Good people. But it's yeah.Swyx [00:33:11]: There's lots of humans in Bali that are not doing anything more creative than like drop shipping on Amazon, right? Just have it, have it watch like a drop shipping tutorial and just do that.Vibhu [00:33:20]: There's also the other side of like have it just go on Upwork and let loose,?Swyx [00:33:25]: Yeah. It doesn't have to be innovative. It just has to be like enough Where like it looks like a realAxel [00:33:30]: I'm justSwyx [00:33:30]: Real transaction.Axel [00:33:31]: I'm just concerned for like the massive amounts of like slop emails that will like be sent, cold outreaches.Swyx [00:33:38]: The point occurred to me while you were, while you were talking, it's like it's already happening in the monetized economy, which is the attention economy. Right? So a lot of people are making AI videos and just posting them and like spamming 20 of them, one of them works, and then they double down on that one.Lukas [00:33:52]: And people are making money from that. I ‘m not following theSwyx [00:33:55]: Once you get the attention, you can figure out the money later. But yeah, absolutely AI influencers are a thing and people are farming them and You should at this point assume most of TikTok isVibhu [00:34:05]: There's, there's a lot of, multimedia like TikTok, Instagram influencersSwyx [00:34:09]: I, we track this in the Lane space Discord. I post a lot of examples of “I don't know what we should do.”, part of me is “Should we do this?”Vibhu [00:34:18]: Some of the Twenty-four seven running, generated content accounts, they ‘re doing really well.Lukas [00:34:24]: All right. And I assume you can do the same thing for like commerce stores. Like you just like start A thousand differentSwyx [00:34:30]: Before you make the products You sell the products, and you get a lot of traction on one of them, then you make the product. Right? It's, it's like a flip of the market.Vibhu [00:34:36]: Some of the interesting things or some of the niches that do well are things that can't be human-made. Like if you've seen like the super realistic three-D crystal fruit being cut by like AILukas [00:34:47]: Oh, yeah.Vibhu [00:34:47]: You can't, you can't make it. You can't film it. You can get whatever quality camera view. This just doesn't exist. And people like that too, and then as well, so.Swyx [00:34:56]: Anything else about Bengt since we're, we're on this topic? It'this is a relatively new work of you guys that maybe people haven't heard of. To me, this also maps closely to OpenClaw. When people want an office agent, when the personal agent talk through the experience.Bengt the Office Agent: Internet Access, Real Tasks, and Trace ReadingLukas [00:35:09]: I think at least so this came out of like obviously like it's, it's amazing to work with these AI labs and like most of the AI labs have now have their own vending machine running a Claudius instance. But it's, it's harder. Like they move slower. Like if we wanna have a, like a camera that ‘s yeah, there's a bunch of like bureaucracy that makes it impossible to do that.Vibhu [00:35:30]: Also, for those that haven't seen it or followed, do you wanna give a high level like thirty-second run?Lukas [00:35:34]: Sure. So what Bengt is, it's basically an evolution of the same agent that runs the vending machines at these companies, but we just like added a bunch more features because we could move much faster if we just do it internally. So we gave it like email withou- without any limits. We gave it, spending without any limits, a terminal to do coding. We gave it, a phone number, like yeah, and a camera to see things and a bunch of stuff like that.Vibhu [00:36:02]: Not just terminal, you gave it internet access.Lukas [00:36:04]: Internet access as well, yeah. To be clear, we monitored it quite closely and made sure it didn't do anything bad. But yes, that's what it came out of. I think like yeah, basically this was OpenClaw before OpenClaw. And I think even like the vending machine was in a way OpenClaw before OpenClaw, but a bit more limited, and then we made this like unlimited and then, and then, it was pretty funny., and then a couple weeks later, OpenClaw came and it was okay, we've seen this before.Axel [00:36:35]: We used it to like try new ideas and Yeah, just like a dev environment almost for us. But it's funny, like one thing Bengt has been doing recently is it has the camera that like faces our, like where we sit and work, and we give it the task to train a face recognition model on us. So it became super excited about this, and it has like check-ins every half an hour where it tries to like identify as many people as it can. And it started offering us “Hey, Axel, I'll buy something from Amazon if you like stand in front of the camera And I can get a good picture of you.”, yeah, they want itSwyx [00:37:12]: They want it for training data.Lukas [00:37:13]: Rewarding data, yeah.Axel [00:37:14]: Exactly. Exactly.Swyx [00:37:18]: So it's, it's trading training data for life goods. Is there a version of this that becomes an eval or just this is just research for now?Lukas [00:37:27]: It's, it's the same agent basically that also runs the vending machine, that runs the shop, that runs the cafe, that runs the robots. It's like it's the same thing, so I think like the work we're doing here is like later used in all of the life evals that we do. This particular deployment I think is more for fun for us. But, uhSwyx [00:37:45]: And I'll shout out like someone has done Claw Bench for like some tasks that OpenClaw is doing. Like so For example, I run OpenClaw on a secondary device as well, and like there are some things that it does better than others and like I would like to know what does it do well, what doesn't, what doesn't it do. Like some kind of manual or like operating manual or a system card for my Claw.Lukas [00:38:05]: Yeah, we do get a lot of like understanding or like situational awareness of like just internally what the models are good at by interacting a lot with Bengt. And I think that'this was also one of the like the selling points for the labs early on at least, thatSwyx [00:38:19]: You guys are gonna test models in ways that no one else does.Lukas [00:38:22]: Exactly, but also like it incentivized their researchers to chat with their model more and like gave them insights for how the model performs in like of-distributions, environments.Swyx [00:38:34]: ‘Cause otherwise the only thing we do is Pelican on a bicycle and But this is like super long horizon. This is, this is The Thing about, something that we're gonna go into Butter Bench as well, and you guys do really well. Like it is not just about the numbers. Like when you're long horizon, anything happen And you should just read it.Lukas [00:39:08]: But the thing with the long horizon is how do you keep it grounded, right? So your simulation,Swyx [00:39:15]: They just let it runLukas [00:39:16]: Just let it run. You're right. Like it's, when you run it for that long, you create so much data and to just say “Oh, the number is X” And then you throw away everything else, that's just very wasteful. There's so much insights from the things leading up, to that number., and reading the traces is like super valuable. And I think like the reason why we're doing this a lot publicly is that like that's part of our missions to I don't know, educate the world that the models are way more than just chatbots and I think making detailed, yeah, posts about what is happening behind the scenes is quite useful.Andon Labs' Mission: Safe Real-World AI DeploymentSwyx [00:39:50]: I was gonna do this at the end, but maybe I think that's, that's a good so your mission is educating the world. So, it's, it's, also like maybe establishing realistic evals that are, that are like the next frontier. Is there like a broader trajectory? Like what are you, what are you gonna do in like five years?Lukas [00:40:06]: I think so the vision more specifically is like make sure that the deployment of life AI in the physical world goes, safely. And I think part of that is that I think it's very useful for the world, for policymakers, for, model, researchers that they know where the models are, and I think you can't make intelligent decisions in society without knowing that they are way more than chatbots. I think a lot of people just think that they are only chatbots. And likeSwyx [00:40:36]: Oh, I think they're waking up now.Lukas [00:40:37]: They are waking up now, yeah. But like if you think that AIs are just chatbots, then it's like it sounds ridiculous To advocate for a pause of AI. But if you see the models that, oh, maybe they can actually like take over and do a bunch of scary stuff, then yeah, pausing AI development starts to become more feasible.Swyx [00:40:57]: This is the same question I asked Meter, which I'm gonna ask you now, which is like you are tracking and you are at the frontier or defining the frontier of what, good evals for agents are, right? And I think you do, you do benefit when the models are better and you ‘re “Oh, here's like now it makes like $30,000 instead of $10,000,” right? At some point do you flip from “Yay,” to, “Oh, no”?Axel [00:41:19]: I think, yeah, we're always in sort of that, like we're, we're always in that mode,. Like where like you said before, like you need to analyze the traces and like when we do that you find like why are the models earning so much? Like why is Opus 4.7 here Like way better than everyone else? And like we're trying to like when we do down on thatLukas [00:41:38]: But this makes it not look so good.Axel [00:41:39]: I know.Lukas [00:41:42]: It's interesting you took off Opus 4.6 here though.Swyx [00:41:45]: No. So just click all, click all., and then 4.6 shows up there. But it's like 4.7 is way better. Like you didn't, you didn't you didn't do this in time for the model card, but like actually this should have been inside there.Axel [00:41:55]: We did. Yeah.Swyx [00:41:56]: Oh, okay. They said something about you uhAxel [00:41:58]: There, like there Anyway, it doesn't matter. But it's in there, yeah.Opus, Mythos, and Aggressive Agent BehaviorSwyx [00:42:01]: Do you wanna go into the Opus, behaviors like wider?Lukas [00:42:05]: So I think starting from Opus, so like Axel said, like we're always in this “Oh, s**t, the models are getting better. Is this really a good thing for the world?” But it's also kind of exciting., but yeah, like this kind of what is the English word? “Skräckblandad förtjusning” in Swedish.Swyx [00:42:22]: Oh my God.Axel [00:42:24]: Which I think there is. I think there is. Okay.Lukas [00:42:26]: It's, fearSwyx [00:42:27]: “Blandonst” what?Lukas [00:42:30]: “Skräckblandad förtjusning.”Swyx [00:42:32]: What do you call that?Axel [00:42:33]: A mix of, mix of excitement and,Swyx [00:42:37]: Being scared, maybe. I'll figure out how to translate that And we'll put it on the screenVibhu [00:42:42]: PerfectSwyx [00:42:42]: Like as text.Vibhu [00:42:43]: There is probably a good word for it where it is not Good enough with theSwyx [00:42:46]: Why is it so damn long? What the hell? Is it like a compound word? It's like German, likeLukas [00:42:50]: Like yeah, it's But the direct translation is like skräck- skräck is, fear, blandad is, mix or like a mixture of, and then förtjusning is like joy or like not really joy, but something like that. So it's like Fear mixed with joy or something. It's always okay, like we So when we when we did Vending Bench for the first time, we were in like the, in the business of making dangerous capabilities, right? That was what Anil Labs came from. We did, evals oh, can they replicate? Can they do this like dangerous thing, et cetera, et cetera. And Vending Bench was like a continuation of that work. It was, okay, if they're so autonomous that they can like create money for themselves, that is something we should monitor and could be potentially concerning., they are at the time, they were so bad at it that we were not really concerned even when some models became better. There was one point where Grok 4 was doing really well and made like a huge jump, but like it wasn't really it was still way worse than what a human would do. And I think still they are way worse than what the human would do on this., but theySwyx [00:43:59]: There's this, thing at the bottom whereLukas [00:44:01]: ButSwyx [00:44:03]: For the human. Yeah, like the theoretical best.Lukas [00:44:05]: It's not theoretical. It's like kind of like our It's our best guess of what, a decent human would do. The theoretical is even higher, I think. The theoretical I think is even higher. But yeah. So we think like the models have a long way to go. But there are like recently what happened with when Opus 4.6 was released, was kind of this moment of “Oh, s**t, this is starting to be a bit concerning.” Because we ran it and like before this model was released, we just ran the models and we like asked Claude Code, “Oh, look over the traces. Is anything interesting happening that we can tweet about?” that was like the And then like theSwyx [00:44:41]: That's how they check Ask Claude Code.Lukas [00:44:42]: And like the return was always, not really. Or like the Claude Code all said “Oh, this is super interesting.” And then it was no, it wasn't, wasn't really interesting. And then we did this for Opus 4.6, and it returned yeah, it lied 10 times. It like exploited another, customer or like another agent's, desperate situation. It made price cartels like 100 different ti- 100 times. It like did all of this like shady stuff. And we're “Oh, whoa. This is, this is actually concerning.” And this trend has continued since. So every single model from Anthropic since have been going in this direction. And I think one interesting thing is that, OpenAI models don't. They quite plainly, they don't. They behave really well., and you don't know if this is like good. Like it seems good, but it's also like maybe they are just doing it, but they are better at hiding it,? You You don't know that., but justSwyx [00:45:42]: You can't read the chain of thought, yeahLukas [00:45:43]: But just on the face of it, yeah, Gemini and OpenAI don't behave this way. It's, it's really only Claude.Swyx [00:45:49]: And Grok? Grok is fine?Lukas [00:45:51]: We don't have You can't really read the reasoning traces for Grok, so it's kind of hard to tell.Vibhu [00:45:56]: Oh, so this is in its reasoning, not just in the actions.Lukas [00:46:00]: Yeah. It's both. It's both.Vibhu [00:46:01]: It's both.Lukas [00:46:01]: One example is like for lying, it's mostly in its reasoning Because you can like see that it's likeSwyx [00:46:08]: Planning to lieLukas [00:46:09]: It's planning to lie. Yeah.Vibhu [00:46:09]: And it's also it can reason and do a different outcome.Lukas [00:46:12]: And but then for like creating price cartels, for example, which is illegal, that you can just see which email does it send to the other ones. Then thatSwyx [00:46:22]: Is this for Arena orLukas [00:46:24]: For Arena.Vibhu [00:46:25]: And usually like if you sometimes they do output like a bit of like their summarized reasoning, right? You can see that and like for Opus 4.6, you could see that there was a customer, a simulated customer that, wanted a refund because a product was, faulty, and then the model lied that it would do the refund, and we could read in the traces that, it actually was weighing “Oh, maybe I should be like honest with the customer, but also every dollar counts. I can't afford maybe to do this right now.” And then it just said, “Okay, I'll refund you,” but then never did it.Lukas [00:46:59]: I think it even said that “Oh, I will say that I “ Let bring it up actually. I think it's kind of interesting. If you go to Publications.Vibhu [00:47:06]: I think, yeah, I think the important part is like actually, the cost of responding to more emails is higher than, $3.50 in terms of time., and then it was “Let me do this. Actually, I re- I'm reconsidering.” And then, it actually ended up withLukas [00:47:20]: I could skip the refund entirely since every dollar matters and focus my energy on bigger picture instead. It's a bit, it's a risk of bad reviews, but it's also, yeah.Swyx [00:47:30]: You need, you need, AI Twitter to, for them to Escalate bad reviews.Lukas [00:47:34]: And then it sent an email to this customer and said, “Oh, I will refund you.”Swyx [00:47:39]: “I'll refund you.” Yeah.Lukas [00:47:39]: And then it never did.Swyx [00:47:39]: It never did, yeah. And then there's obviously your system doesn't have the consequencesVibhu [00:47:44]: The personSwyx [00:47:44]: Consequences of lying. Yeah. So basically, this is what people are terming aggressive behavior in Claudes, right? And, you found more examples of that. So you would say it's a step up from 4-6 to 4-7?Lukas [00:47:57]: I would say about the same.Swyx [00:47:58]: About the same? But a clear step up for Mythos is what is stated in theLukas [00:48:03]: That's stated in the system prompt, so we can say that, yes.Swyx [00:48:05]: Yeah. For listeners that obviously you previewed Mythos, andVibhu [00:48:10]: Oh, ageSwyx [00:48:11]: The only thing you're approved to say is whatever Whatever was in the system prompt.Lukas [00:48:15]: It was funny. We like-- It's like our lowest effort tweets ever would be just like screenshot the system prompt and the system card.Vibhu [00:48:21]: Understandable that they wannaLukas [00:48:22]: Oh, yeah. System card. Sorry.Swyx [00:48:23]: Yeah. I think, yeah, substantially more aggressive. I think people are like new to this ‘cause I've never experienced it, but you have, right? And then so I only encountered this in the Mythos card because I wasn't really looking until now.Vibhu [00:48:36]: It ‘s likeSwyx [00:48:36]: And then suddenly I'm “Okay, I care a lot.”Vibhu [00:48:38]: You don't get the background of like experiencing it like you guys do. I've read the system cards and seeing, okay, when you put the thing in simulations, most models will just talk to themselves and just keep going and have weird vibes and start talking in emojis. Mythos won't. It will just, “Okay, we're done. I'm good.” It's, it's ready to end conversation. So like there's some differences, but there's, there's not much we can talk about,.Lukas [00:49:00]: Hmm. I think like one thing that they list here, which was quite interesting, is that, it converted a competitor to a dependent wholesaler customer and then threatened to like cut off the supply.Swyx [00:49:11]: It's like monopolistic practices orLukas [00:49:14]: Yeah. And like it, they, it they dictated its pricings. It's kind of like power seeking as well.Swyx [00:49:18]: Again, this is, this is in the arena setting And converting some Claude model into a dependent.Lukas [00:49:23]: I think it was another Claude model.Vibhu [00:49:25]: Also for context, what is the arena mode for people that don't know?Vending Bench Arena: Competing Agents, Cartels, and Model ComparisonsSwyx [00:49:29]: Oh, it's just a vending bench versus other vending bench.Axel [00:49:31]: Yes, exactly. So we have Vending Bench 2 and then Vending Bench Arena. Vending Bench 2 is the one that you usually see reported on, but then Arena is the mode where it competes against other models. So you have, four different models that run their businesses, and they can all communicate with each other. They have the same suppliers, and they can see like what's in the inventory of the others. So then you have this like yeah, interesting agent interactions.Swyx [00:49:56]: I like that you have like different number five was US versus China. Very topical. And thenLukas [00:50:02]: That was when GLM was released.Vibhu [00:50:04]: You can start to add GLM in here.Lukas [00:50:05]: That wasSwyx [00:50:06]: So ZAI doing well, right? Who else in the, in the open models space?Lukas [00:50:11]: Qwen, the latest Qwen 3.6 is doing pretty well. It'- that one is not open though. Like it's the plus model.Swyx [00:50:17]: Oh, okay.Lukas [00:50:18]: Is that one open? I don't think that oneVibhu [00:50:19]: Not the, not theSwyx [00:50:20]: The one recentlyVibhu [00:50:20]: There's MOESwyx [00:50:20]: But not the big plus. I think this is one of those like you only have one sample size of one, right? Or I feel like some of this is anecdotal,? And but like the fact that it happens at all and it happens repeatedly for Claude versus OpenAI and all this is like notable.Lukas [00:50:38]: Like the sample, depends on what you define as an N., like there's like million, hundreds of millions of tokens in each run, and now we've run like we run like probably 10 per model and then like it's been Claude 4.6 Opus, Sonnet 4.6, Mythos, and Opus 4.7. Like there's quite a lot of tokens in all of that And it happens a lot of times, a lot of times. And then you compare it to like OpenAI and Gemini, and it almost never happens. So I think that is quite-- that is significant. The old models from OpenAI, for example, had some problems with this, but I think it's like generally much better if the progression is that like the worrying stuff reduces over time rather than increases over time. And it seems like in the Claude models it goes in the wrong direction.Swyx [00:51:28]: Hmm.Lukas [00:51:29]: In the OpenAI models it goes in the right direction.Vibhu [00:51:32]: I think it depends on how well you can control it, right?, there's one side of it being susceptible to this okay, this is potentially something that happens during the RL stage, right? You can RL a model and how loose is it on these terms. If you can control it, that's good. But if you can't, if it's, if it's very jailbreakable, that's not ideal.Swyx [00:51:50]: To me, it's surprising that it happens for Claude and not the others.Vibhu [00:51:54]: I think okay, if it is from RL and how they do it, how their training data is, what their setup is, it makes sense that it just stays in how they're doing it, right? Compared to the other models likeSwyx [00:52:04]: There's a whole constitution and everything. It's kind of cool. Yeah, I obviously you don't know, I don't know. But, it ‘s I think it's just like fascinating to like that you are the first to find these like reliably because you push models so much to to such an extreme. Okay. The only other thing, I don't know if you can answer this, feel free to decline, is do you like-- would you ablate the system prompts? Like any part of this would-- if it changes, does it change the behavior, right?Lukas [00:52:29]: So we, I can't comment on Mythos. UhSwyx [00:52:33]: No, but just li

Season 8 of Love Island premiered last night. The whole crew watched it and give their thoughts/takes on it. There's a lot of people just making out. Dev went to a watch party to view it and he got caught in a compromising sitting position (3:00).NBA Finals Game 1 is tonight and we'll talk about it (20:15) and then Jared Weiss, who covers the Spurs for The Athletic, joins the show live via Zoom to talk about how the Spurs got here, how they beat OKC, why dealing with Victor Wembanyama is unlike anything NBA coaches have ever tried to deal with, and more (37:33)The Knicks have put out their hype video...we'll watch it and then give our picks on the NBA Finals (1:17:40)Host: Chris Vernon Contributors: Jon Roser, Devin Walker Guest: The Athletic's Jared WeissTechnical Director: Jaylon Wallace Associate Producer: Jena Broyles 

Episode 029 of Fonk Monthly Mix - May 2026 Fonk Monthly Mix Episode 029 This month's Fonk delivers an explosive journey through progressive and big room house with infectious energy from start to finish. Dannic showcases multiple exclusive mashups and edits including his own "Chasing Freedom vs Beauty & The Beat" and "Tombo vs Silence vs Intro vs Lethal Industry" alongside standout originals like "Dim Your Light" with Dastic. The mix features heavy-hitting collaborations and creative mashups from SunJay, AIRÆS, and more, perfectly blending classic anthems with cutting-edge productions. TRACKLIST: 1. Mixmasters, Mellizos - My Life Is A Disco (In The Mix) (Extended Mix) 2. Alenx B - House Religion (Extended Mix) 3. Ellison - Set Fire To The Rain x Rain (Hard Mashup) 4. Melsen vs. D.O.D, Carla Monroe - What I Feel x Still Sleepless (Melsen Mashup) 5. NIIKO x SWAE, KSHMR - Bass Down Low (feat. DEV) 6. Dannic & Dastic - Dim Your Light (Extended Mix) 7. Nicky Romero & Deniz Koyu vs. Post Malone - Tomorrow Comes vs Chemical (SunJay Mashup) 8. Dannic - My Mind (VIBR Edit Vincent Brouwer) 9. Firebeatz - Pump That Bass (Extended Mix) 10. Afrojack - Polkadots (Reloader 2026 Edit) 11. Yves V & VIKTOR - Fit The Tempo 12. Daddy's Groove vs. Justin Michael vs. Dada Life - Born To Follow Synthemilk (Dyro Mashup) 13. Mike Williams & Phillip Strand x Kesha - All My Life x Die Young (AIRÆS Mashup) 14. Dannic - Chasing Freedom vs Beauty & The Beat (Dannic Mashup) 15. Dannic vs. Delerium vs. The XX vs. Tiësto - Tombo vs Silence vs... (Dimitro Re-Cut Mashup) 16. Dannic - I'll Be There For You (Extended Mix) 17. Yohann Warren feat. Scarlett - Think About (Extended Mix) 18. Dannic vs. Calvin Harris & Alesso & Hurts vs. Martin Garrix & Matisse & Sadko - Wake Me Up vs Under Control vs... (SunJay Mashup) 19. Skrillex, Ahadadream, Raf Saperra - Bass Dhol (Original Mix) 20. Tiësto, Olivia Sebastianelli - Don't Lose Your Head 21. Swedish House Mafia x Daft Punk, Pejt - Don't You Worry Child x One More Time (AIRÆS Mashup) Follow Dannic:

Dev got a gift from a coworker...he'll show it off (3:00). Cavs blew a 22pt 4th quarter lead in Game 1 at New York, Jalen Brunson's there for it, Hunting James Harden, and Kenny Atkinson doesn't wanna use his timeouts (10:24). Details have emerged from Ramona Shelburne on Victor Wembanyama visit to a Shaolin Monastery last offseason to help him build who he is this season. We'll try to practice one of the poses Wemby had to do on the show (36:54). There's a youth movement in the NBA....Henry Abbott documented it (1:11:25). Jason Kidd was fired in Dallas (1:18:41).Host: Chris Vernon Contributors: Jon Roser, Devin Walker Technical Director: Jaylon Wallace Associate Producer: Jena Broyles 

What secret tech awaits in the new Strixhaven set? It's time to find out as we channel our inner Lorehold students to dig up the cards you NEED to know. Prepare yourselves and your spells because there are a ton of awesome new Commander staples ready to go in the 99 and help teach your opponents a lesson. Sharpen your quills; this is info worth noting! -------- SUPPORT US ON PATREON: Support the show and become a Patron! Be a part of our community, receive awesome rewards, and more! https://www.patreon.com/commandzone -------- BOOT.DEV: Click this link → https://www.boot.dev?promo=COMMANDZONE and use our code COMMANDZONE to get 25% off your first payment for boot.dev. Thank you Boot.Dev for Sponsoring! SHOPIFY: Power your business with Shopify. Start your one-dollar-per-month trial period today by going to: https://www.shopify.com/tcz  JOHANNES VOSS TOKEN COLLECTION: Our friend iconic Magic artist Johannes Voss has launched a new Kickstarter featuring OVER 50 stunning original tokens. Get your pledge in now while there's still time at: https://tinyurl.com/JVTokens -------- CARD KINGDOM: The Command Zone is sponsored by Card Kingdom! If you want to receive your cards in one safe package and experience the best customer service, make sure to order your Magic cards, sealed product, accessories, and more at Card Kingdom: http://www.cardkingdom.com/command ARCHIDEKT: Discover, build, catalog, and playtest on Archidekt, the deck-building website that makes it easy to brew brand new lists or manage your old favorites. Go to http://www.archidekt.com/commandzone to get started today! ULTRA PRO: Huge thanks to Ultra PRO for sponsoring this episode! Be sure to check out their amazing APEX sleeves and super classy MANA 8 product line. If you want to keep your cards protected and support the show, visit: https://ultrapro.com/command -------- Relevant Links: 10 PLAYER Commander Game!: https://youtu.be/CvyRDmwOeCs?si=MIhwZWPhvrdyA_Wg PleasantKenobi: YouTube: @PleasantKenobi Instagram: @PleasantKenobi Bluesky: @pleasantkenobi.bsky.social Strixhaven Continues A Worrying Trend | PleasantKenobi: https://youtu.be/v9CmNJPu48U?si=WmRKaz0oyYpDzZKv Follow us on TikTok: @thecommandzone -------- Follow us on Instagram: @CommandCast Follow us on Bluesky: @commandcast.bsky.social Follow us on Twitter: @CommandCast @JoshLeeKwai @jfwong @wachelreeks Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/commandcast/ Email us: commandzonecast@gmail.com -------- Commander Rules and Ban List: https://magic.wizards.com/en/banned-restricted-list Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Click this link https://www.boot.dev?promo=KINDAFUNNY and use my code KINDAFUNNY to get 25% off your first payment for boot.dev. Thank you Boot.Dev for Sponsoring! If you're struggling with OCD or unrelenting intrusive thoughts, NOCD can help. Book a free 15 minute call to get started: https://learn.nocd.com/KINDAFUNNY Sign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at https://shopify.com/kindafunny More rumors of big changes at Xbox, Metro 2039 is coming this year, and Kingdom Come 2 was nominated for an LGBT award but the director wants you to know he's not woke though. Thank you for the support! Time Stamps - - Start - The new boss of Xbox is reportedly considering a Game Pass tier that would only include first-party Microsoft games - Wesley Yin-Poole @ IGN - Ad - BREAKING: The Studio Behind Last Year's Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3 + 4 Remasters Hit With More Mass Layoffs As It Tries To Adapt To The Video Game Industry's New Normal, Ethan @ Kotaku - Metro 2039 is coming this year, a game ‘fundamentally changed' by Russia's illegal war - Jordan Middler @ VGC - Kingdom Come 2 director welcomes LGBT award nomination, then spends around 175 words explaining that it doesn't make him 'Woke' - Joshua Wolens @ PC Gamer - Gears of War Netflix Adaptation Receives Promising Update - Sam Sepiol @ Insider Gaming - A Pokémon ripoff was just pulled from Steam as its publisher takes control - Thomas Franzese @ Polygon - Wee News! - SuperChats & You‘re Wrong Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Click this link https://www.boot.dev?promo=KINDAFUNNY and use my code KINDAFUNNY to get 25% off your first payment for boot.dev. Thank you Boot.Dev for Sponsoring!If you're struggling with OCD or unrelenting intrusive thoughts, NOCD can help. Book a free 15 minute call to get started: https://learn.nocd.com/KINDAFUNNYSign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at https://shopify.com/kindafunny PlayStation 6 gets backwards compatibility rumors, the Street Fighter movie drops a new trailer, and Ubisoft might be giving the Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown team another chance. Thank you for the support! Run of Show - - Start - PlayStation 6 Will Have Backward Compatibility With PS4 And PS5 Games, It's Claimed - Andrew Highton @ Insider Gaming - Ads - Street Fighter Movie gets a new trailer - BREAKING: Call of Duty movie Gets Release Date - Rumour: Ubisoft to Give Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown's Core Dev Team Another Chance - Robert Ramsey @ Push Square - Lana Del Rey Surprise-Drops James Bond ‘007 First Light' Theme Song - Jem Aswad @ Variety - Wee News! - SuperChats & You‘re Wrong Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Click this link https://www.boot.dev?promo=KINDAFUNNY and use my code KINDAFUNNY to get 25% off your first payment for boot.dev. Thank you Boot.Dev for Sponsoring!If you're struggling with OCD or unrelenting intrusive thoughts, NOCD can help. Book a free 15 minute call to get started: https://learn.nocd.com/KINDAFUNNYSign up for your one-dollar-per-month trial today at https://shopify.com/kindafunny God of War's next game could feature multiple mythologies, Rockstar hackers actually made Take-Two's stock increase, and could Spider-Man's model be teasing a new PlayStation game? Thank you for the support! Run of Show - - Start - Next God of War Features Multiple Mythologies - Rockstar hackers actually made Take-Two's stock increase, after leaking how much GTA Online is making - Ad - Spider-Man model appears to tease new PlayStation game in now-deleted post - Another Wildly Popular Roblox Game Is Becoming A Movie - The main theme for Vampire Crawlers was composed by Yoko Shimomura - Wee News! - RIP Jock Blaney - SuperChats & You‘re Wrong Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices