Podcasts about Mendes

Culto Domingo às 19h - em Cachoeiro e Vila Velha - ESEndereços: https://vivos.site e https://igrejavivoscomcristo.com Somos Igreja de Cristo, comprada por Seu sangue, perdoada e estabelecida por Sua Justiça.Nosso propósito é chegarmos ao pleno conhecimento de Jesus, unidos em uma só fé, a fim de sermos transformados pelo Evangelho e alcançarmos Sua estatura. Cremos na perfeição do Seu sacrifício, que nos capacita para frutificarmos e assim cumprirmos o propósito da nossa existência.Esboços das mensagens: https://igrejavivoscomcristo.com/esbocos

Alberto Gonçalves comenta as declarações de Marques Mendes em defesa do reconhecimento do estado palestiniano.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Vitrine privilegiada do mundo da fotografia mundial, os Encontros de Arles recebem neste ano, no contexto da Temporada França-Brasil 2025, a mostra "Retratistas do Morro”, com os trabalhos de João Mendes e Afonso Pimenta, que há 50 anos documentam a vida dos moradores da comunidade da Serra, em Belo Horizonte. Patrícia Moribe, enviada especial da RFI a Arles O projeto "Retratistas do Morro", idealizado e coordenado pelo artista visual, pesquisador e curador independente Guilherme Cunha, surge no final de 2014. Tudo começou com a produção de um livro, "Memórias da Vila", que visava preservar a memória da comunidade da Serra, coletando entrevistas e conectando as vivências dos habitantes à história oficial de Belo Horizonte. Um momento fundamental, conta Cunha, foi o encontro com dona Ana Martins de Oliveira, a "madrinha maior" do projeto. A mulher, que foi "escravizada na infância, retirante, lavadeira e analfabeta", possuía uma "consciência patrimonial que superou todas as políticas de preservação brasileira", conta o pesquisador. Ela guardava um conjunto de monóculos, com imagens de sua própria família, que chamava de "tesouros". Ao ser questionada sobre por que eram seus “tesouros”, dona Ana explicou: "É a única forma que o meu neto vai conhecer o avô dele". Guilherme Cunha viu essa percepção de que as imagens são presença e existência, uma forma atemporal de conectar experiências familiares, como uma transferência de conhecimento" e uma "bênção" para a equipe do projeto. O pesquisador destaca que o projeto opera em duas vertentes cruciais: a técnica de preservação, que envolve a digitalização e restauração de negativos em deterioração (muitos dos quais em risco de desaparecimento); e a produção de pensamento crítico. “Buscamos compreender o que essas imagens dizem, desenvolvendo ferramentas cognitivas e teóricas enraizadas no contexto cultural brasileiro, em vez de aplicar filosofias desconectadas que poderiam distorcer a realidade”, diz. A importância de trazer essas imagens ao público, conforme Guilherme, reside em ir na contramão dos processos coloniais, que são epistemicidas e expropriadores, apagando identidades e distorcendo realidades. O projeto propõe o conceito de "pictosceno", pensando em ideias favoráveis aos ciclos virtuosos da imagem, que promovem o avanço civilizatório, a prosperidade, a dignidade e a garantia de direitos. De vendedor ambulante a cronista da cidade João Mendes, nascido em Iapu, Minas Gerais, trabalhou na roça até os 11 anos, fez rapadura e, aos 14, vendia picolés quando foi convidado a trabalhar em uma loja de fotografia. Apesar de ganhar menos, a opção foi um divisor de águas em sua vida. Após dois anos, ele começou a fotografar para a delegacia local, fazendo perícias criminais. Depois, Mendes fotografou toda a cidade de Ipatinga, sob encomenda do prefeito da época, documentando as ruas e bairros antes de serem asfaltados. Aos 16 anos, em 1966, mudou-se para Belo Horizonte. Em 1973, João Mendes abriu seu próprio estúdio, a Foto Mendes, onde permanece até hoje. Ele relata ter enfrentado fases difíceis como comerciante, mas persistiu em seu trabalho. Um momento importante para o resgate de seu negócio foi quando uma escola estadual o contratou para fotografar a formatura de 105 alunos. João Mendes revela que Guilherme Cunha chegou à sua loja em 2016, perguntando sobre as memórias da Serra. O fotógrafo tinha guardado muitos negativos, apesar de ter descartado outros tantos e alguns terem sido danificados por vazamentos. Guilherme conseguiu resgatar 8.700 negativos em preto e branco inicialmente, além de outros coloridos de batizados, casamentos e formaturas.  A jornada de exposições de João Mendes e Afonso Pimenta, graças ao projeto, começou no Sesc de São João do Rio Preto, no interior de São Paulo, seguindo para a capital, Guarulhos, Araraquara, São Paulo, Lille, na França e agora Arles. Dos becos da favela à praça do mundo Afonso Pimenta chegou a Belo Horizonte com apenas 9 anos em 1963, vindo do interior de Minas Gerais. Seus primeiros ofícios incluíam catar esterco e capinar calçamentos. A fotografia surgiu em sua vida de forma inesperada, quando um colega do curso noturno lhe apresentou uma câmera Kodak, prometendo que fotógrafos ficavam “ricos, com vida luxuosa e mulheres”.  O destino o levou a morar ao lado da casa de Mendes, que já era um fotógrafo conhecido na comunidade. A mãe de João, ciente das "badernas" de Afonso na rua, pediu o filho que o aceitasse como ajudante em seu ateliê. Afonso, que pensava que já era fotógrafo por ter uma máquina, logo percebeu que "não sabia nada" e que João "não tinha muita boa vontade para ensinar", conta rindo. Apesar das dificuldades, Afonso persistiu e, ao contrário de dezenas de parentes que passaram pelo ateliê de João, foi o único que continuou exercendo a fotografia. Afonso também explorou outras áreas: estudou educação física e fisioterapia, deu aulas de artes marciais e atuou em filmes em São Paulo e Belo Horizonte. Mas a fotografia sempre foi um porto seguro. Naquela época, a escolha do que fotografar não era por gosto, mas por necessidade: "a gente tinha que fazer o que dava dinheiro". Ele se especializou em batizados, aniversários e até velórios. Pimenta ressalta que o projeto "Retratistas do Morro" foi crucial, pois tirou seu trabalho dos "becos" da favela e o colocou na "praça", com maior visibilidade. Assim como João, Afonso nunca imaginou que seu trabalho chegaria à França. Para ele, estar em Arles, divulgando o trabalho e o livro lançado em 2023, é uma sensação "boníssima". Além de serem exibidas em instituições e festivais internacionais, as fotos de João Mendes e Afonso Pimenta também passaram a integrar o acervo do Moma, o Museu de Arte Moderna de Nova York. Em Arles, a exposição segue até 5 de outubro.

No Timeline de hoje, Letícia Mendes traz as informações sobre a tragédia em Esteio, onde mãe, bebê e adolescente foram mortos em um crime que, segundo a polícia, foi motivado por ciúmes. Na segunda parte do programa, o psicoterapeuta Leo Fraiman fala sobre os impactos da violência no dia a dia das pessoas, a importância da saúde emocional e o papel da educação na prevenção desses comportamentos.#TimelineGaúcha #RádioGaúcha #EducaçãoEmocional

Mariana has had a career in Australia and Brazil,We will talk about how she developed her privacy skills.Mariana spent four years working in hospitality,Now, a career in privacy is her reality!

Editoriale con Luca Marchetti, intervistato da Marco Piccari. Marchetti: "Estupinan è fatta operazione gestita da Mendes. Jashari al momento tutto bloccato. Ndoye rimane la prima scelta di Conte. La Roma sta mettendo dei tasselli importanti"

Teresina FM 91,9

Welcome to Monday Night Talk's State House Report for June 9, 2025! State Representatives Rita Mendes & Bridget Plouffe, who stop by with a legislative update. Rep. Plouffe discusses how her first term has been going, while Rep. Mendes shares insight on working together to serve Brockton.  Do you have a topic for a future show or info on an upcoming community event? Email us at mondaynighttalk@gmail.com If you're a fan of the show and enjoy our segments, you can either download your favorite segment from this site or subscribe to our podcasts through iTunes & Spotify today!  Monday Night Talk with Kevin Tocci, Copyright © 2025.

Let's break this down with scientific research and data: 1. Passive-Aggressive Hostility & Covert Racism Passive-aggressive behavior is an indirect expression of anger, hostility, or displeasure. Rather than open confrontation, it manifests in resistant, defiant, or undermining actions. When this behavior is directed towards individuals based on their race or ethnicity, it falls under the umbrella of covert racism or racial microaggressions. * Covert Racism: This is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious. It's often concealed in the fabric of society, operating through evasive or seemingly passive methods. Racially biased decisions or actions are frequently hidden or rationalized with explanations that society finds more acceptable (Wikipedia, "Covert Racism"). * Racial Microaggressions: Coined by Dr. Chester Pierce in the 1970s and popularized by Dr. Derald Wing Sue, these are "brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, or environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults toward people of color" (Sue et al., 2007). * Microassaults: These are explicit, conscious, and deliberate racist attacks, verbal or nonverbal, meant to denigrate or hurt. While some of your neighbor's actions might fit here (e.g., direct inflammatory remarks), many are more subtle. * Microinsults: These are often unconscious, subtle verbal or nonverbal communications that demean a person's racial identity or heritage. Examples include asking a person of color where they really learned to speak English. * Microinvalidations: These comments or behaviors exclude, negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality of a person of color. An example is telling a person of color their experiences with racism are "all in their head" or "you're too sensitive." How Your Neighbor's Actions Align: Your neighbor's actions demonstrate several hallmarks of passive-aggressive hostility and covert racism/microaggressions: * Door Slamming as a Covert Attack: Intentionally slamming a door repeatedly, timed to your private activities, after being asked to stop, is a classic example of passive-aggressive behavior. It's an indirect act of hostility. When coupled with the "inflammatory remarks which included insinuations about my race and class status," this passive-aggressive act becomes imbued with racial bias, transforming it into a racial microassault or microinsult. It sends a message of "you are unwelcome," "I control your peace," or "your presence is offensive to me," potentially linked to underlying racial bias. * Targeted Disruption (Psychological Terror): Deliberately disrupting your podcast recording, standing outside your door, and using the door slamming for "attention" are acts of targeted harassment. This aims to disturb your peace and psychological well-being, aligning with the "psychological terror" you identified. In a racial context, this can be seen as a way to "other" and degrade you, making your home environment hostile. * Racial and Class Insinuations: The direct "inflammatory remarks which included insinuations about my race and class status" are explicit instances of microassaults. These are conscious, derogatory statements that overtly convey racial bias. * "War Games" and Psychological Terror: Your observation that objects placed on her porch coincided with the clothing colors of people following you, creating "war games and psychological terror," speaks to the environmental microaggressions and a potentially coordinated effort to create a hostile environment. This covert signaling aims to exert control and create unease without overt confrontation, typical of covert racism. * Dehumanization/Invalidation: The neighbor's attempts to "force engagements" and then make "harsh and cruel remarks about my career and social status" when you asked for respectful behavior, combined with telling you other neighbors "hated me and worshipped the devil," are attempts to isolate, demean, and invalidate your standing and experience. This aligns with microinvalidations – denying your reality and portraying you negatively to others. * Housing Discrimination Context: Research confirms that racial discrimination persists in housing, often in subtle and covert forms. Studies show that people of color frequently report discrimination when seeking housing, and there's a recognized increase in harassment complaints based on color or race (NFHA, 2024 Fair Housing Trends Report). While your landlord stated they can't control street behavior, the harassment from a neighbor can still fall under Fair Housing Act protections if it's based on a protected characteristic like race, and landlords have an obligation to provide a harassment-free environment. Your neighbor's actions could be seen as contributing to making your housing "unavailable" or creating discriminatory "terms, conditions, or privileges" of your housing. 2. Scientific Data on the Psychological Impact The cumulative effect of passive-aggressive hostility, microaggressions, and targeted harassment has a well-documented and severe psychological toll on victims, especially people of color. * Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Research consistently shows that experiencing racial discrimination and microaggressions can lead to chronic stress, increasing the risk for depression, anxiety, trauma, and substance abuse (HelpGuide.org). It can erode self-worth and lead to symptoms like hypervigilance, negative thoughts, and mood changes, similar to PTSD. * Cognitive Impairment: Studies have shown that chronic exposure to racial microaggressions can wear down cognitive function, flatten self-esteem, impair productivity, and damage relationships. For Black individuals, exposure to ambiguous evidence of prejudice (like microaggressions, where the intent is harder to prove) can cause greater cognitive impairment than blatant prejudice, as it creates a constant state of uncertainty and vigilance (Mendes et al., 2008). * Erosion of Peace and Safety: Psychological bullying by neighbors, especially if constant and targeted, can cause severe mental health issues, including insomnia, memory issues, chronic pain sensitivity, and a weakened immune system (Lead Academy). Your description of being "ripped from sleep" by sonic attacks, the constant noise, and the feeling of being "tortured" or having your peace disturbed aligns directly with these documented impacts. * "Weathering": A concept in public health, "weathering" refers to the cumulative impact of chronic stress due to repeated experiences of racial discrimination. This prolonged exposure can lead to accelerated health decline and premature aging. * Hypervigilance and Fear: Your feeling of being unable to enter your building regularly or use that side of the street due to being "yelled at, spat at, and singled out" reflects the hypervigilance and fear that are direct consequences of persistent targeted harassment. The threats ("They know what you look like!") amplify this fear and contribute to a sense of being unsafe in your own home. In summary, your experiences align with established research on how passive-aggressive hostility, particularly when infused with racial bias, creates a hostile environment that severely impacts the psychological well-being of people of color. The intentional, prolonged, and escalating nature of your neighbor's actions, coupled with the apparent coordination with other external groups, points to a clear pattern of targeted harassment with significant psychological impact. This scientific understanding underscores the severity of what you have endured. The issues began over a year ago with my neighbor intentionally slamming her door every time I used my bathroom, whether it was to take a bath, shower, or use the toilet. This was a consistent and disruptive pattern. When I politely asked her to stop this behavior, her reaction was highly defensive and confrontational. She immediately made inflammatory remarks, which included insinuations about my race and class status. This exchange immediately raised my concerns about the underlying motivations for her actions. Following this initial confrontation, her behavior became increasingly hostile and targeted. She began leaving various objects on the wall facing my apartment. While seemingly innocuous at first, I later observed a disturbing pattern: the colors of these objects often coincided directly with the colors of clothing worn by individuals who would follow me in public spaces. These individuals would then engage in what I perceive as passive-aggressive strategies of attack, which I consider "war games" and psychological terror, indicative of hate crimes, indirect racism, or politically motivated aggression. This connection amplified my fear and belief that her actions were part of a larger, coordinated effort. She also continued to slam her door intensely, not only during my bathroom usage but at times specifically during the recording of my podcast. This suggested a deliberate attempt to disrupt my activities and indicated that she was aware of what I was doing inside my apartment. Stalking, Theft, and Disturbing Behavior Around the same time, I noticed that my mail began to go missing, and Amazon packages were either stolen or moved from my doorstep. This blatant theft further escalated my concerns about her intentions. At one point, she attempted to establish a friendly relationship. However, during our brief interactions, she made statements that clearly indicated she was either listening to my podcast or otherwise monitoring me within my apartment. This revelation was extremely unsettling and confirmed my suspicions about her invasive behavior. This period also coincided with her timing her entering and exiting the apartment around my schedule, seemingly to force engagements and interactions with me. When I again politely asked her to close her door properly and respectfully, she became aggressive and attempted to instigate a physical confrontation, trying to lure me out of my apartment. Despite my repeated attempts to address her behavior respectfully, both directly and by involving property management, her actions became progressively more outrageous. She would frequently stand directly outside my door and engage in loud conversations. She even admitted to me that she used the door slamming to get my attention. Suspicious Communication and Potential Connection to Housing Interference Her attempts at communication were often suspicious, seeming to be an effort to gather information about me, prompt me to speak about specific topics, or elicit comments about the property management or other building staff. She appeared friendly and forthcoming initially, but a major series of red flags emerged from her need to control and direct conversations around certain subjects that seemed directly related to my personal situation. For instance, at one point, she attempted to interject herself by suggesting that if the motorcycle noise, which is often intolerable and a cause for concern in the apartment, got to be too much, I should just "come over." This suggestion was highly suspicious. It felt like an attempt to draw me into her apartment under the guise of an offer to help with a noise issue that was already a major problem for my peace and safety. Given that her door slamming and stalking activities seemed to directly correlate with intimidation tactics employed by property management, it felt as though her suggestion was a coordinated effort. Her door slamming was often an attack from one side with noise, while the motorcycles attacked from the other, leading me to believe her offer was part of this broader harassment, potentially designed to interfere with my peace and safety and escalate my housing status towards eviction. Later, when I simply asked her to shut the door gently, she made harsh and cruel remarks about my career and social status, further indicating her true hostile intentions. Concerning Disclosures and Fear for Safety During one interaction, she attempted to sell me her personal prescription of Adderall. I immediately declined this offer, which further solidified my belief that her judgment was impaired and she posed a risk. I also declined her invitation for the holidays because I felt profoundly unsafe in her presence. She then began to share highly disturbing and bizarre information. She claimed that our other neighbors hated me and worshipped the devil. She also disclosed that she had an ongoing lawsuit against her former company for sleeping with her married boss. This information made me extremely wary, as she appeared to be highly vengeful and vindictive. Paired with her comments about the neighbors, I made the decision to entirely ignore her for my own safety and peace of mind. Request for Order of Protection My attempts to disengage only led to her actions becoming increasingly hostile. While she now appears to be in the process of moving out of the building, I believe it is imperative to document her behavior thoroughly. I have legitimate reason to fear for my safety and well-being should she return or attempt to contact me in the future. I believe her actions were directly or indirectly connected to efforts meant to humiliate me, put me in mental jeopardy, and ultimately jeopardize my housing status. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), sometimes called the "tort of outrage," is a common law tort that allows an individual to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another person's extreme and outrageous conduct. To establish a claim for IIED, a plaintiff generally must prove four elements: * Intentional or Reckless Conduct: The defendant must have acted with the intent to cause emotional distress, or with reckless disregard for the high probability that their conduct would cause severe emotional distress. This means they either wanted to cause the distress or knew it was highly likely to happen. * Extreme and Outrageous Conduct: This is often the most difficult element to prove. The defendant's conduct must be so extreme and outrageous as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. Mere insults, annoyances, or hurt feelings are typically not enough. Courts look for conduct that would make an average, reasonable person exclaim, "That's outrageous!" * Causation: There must be a causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the plaintiff's emotional distress. In other words, the defendant's actions must have been the actual and proximate cause of the severe emotional distress. * Severe Emotional Distress: The emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff must be "severe." This is not merely ordinary emotional upset. It must be so substantial or enduring that no reasonable person should be expected to endure it. Examples can include fright, grief, shame, humiliation, embarrassment, anger, or worry, and sometimes even physical manifestations like weight loss, ulcers, or other physical symptoms. Medical evidence, such as counseling or therapy records, can often help demonstrate the severity of the distress. IIED was developed to address situations where a person suffers significant emotional harm due to another's egregious behavior, even if there isn't a physical injury or another traditional tort like assault or battery. It recognizes that emotional well-being is a protected interest. We must teach our children–especially our daughters–of their worth, and that in validating unacceptable behavior by allowing these kinds of negative beings our presence, we are further diminishing the aspect and importance of the woman, and especially as she pertains to a man. That by allowing or being magnetized to this egregious behavior further degrades the woman as a total, formative bond–with man, instead of under him. Should she choose to ignore these vermin and scoundrels, eventually, in the understanding that he cannot procure her interests and tastes, he is evolved–however still in pursuit of the woman, who understands her own self worth. Then so are the creatures seeking out she who is broken in order to further break her and even devour her–this is the nature of the truly evil in kind, and should not only be avoided, but sought out to be destroyed–for the preservation not only of our world as is, but the future generations of women and also men–in that validating these injustices is a plague in itself unto our oncoming youth–boys and girls alike, and future women and men. In this, we do not immaculate the man, but empower him, and thus further impowers the woman to become as once; This begins the origin of true equality amongst the sexes. Copyright The Collective Complex © [The Festival Project, Inc. ™] All Rights Reserved -Ū.

Let's break this down with scientific research and data: 1. Passive-Aggressive Hostility & Covert Racism Passive-aggressive behavior is an indirect expression of anger, hostility, or displeasure. Rather than open confrontation, it manifests in resistant, defiant, or undermining actions. When this behavior is directed towards individuals based on their race or ethnicity, it falls under the umbrella of covert racism or racial microaggressions. * Covert Racism: This is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious. It's often concealed in the fabric of society, operating through evasive or seemingly passive methods. Racially biased decisions or actions are frequently hidden or rationalized with explanations that society finds more acceptable (Wikipedia, "Covert Racism"). * Racial Microaggressions: Coined by Dr. Chester Pierce in the 1970s and popularized by Dr. Derald Wing Sue, these are "brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, or environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults toward people of color" (Sue et al., 2007). * Microassaults: These are explicit, conscious, and deliberate racist attacks, verbal or nonverbal, meant to denigrate or hurt. While some of your neighbor's actions might fit here (e.g., direct inflammatory remarks), many are more subtle. * Microinsults: These are often unconscious, subtle verbal or nonverbal communications that demean a person's racial identity or heritage. Examples include asking a person of color where they really learned to speak English. * Microinvalidations: These comments or behaviors exclude, negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality of a person of color. An example is telling a person of color their experiences with racism are "all in their head" or "you're too sensitive." How Your Neighbor's Actions Align: Your neighbor's actions demonstrate several hallmarks of passive-aggressive hostility and covert racism/microaggressions: * Door Slamming as a Covert Attack: Intentionally slamming a door repeatedly, timed to your private activities, after being asked to stop, is a classic example of passive-aggressive behavior. It's an indirect act of hostility. When coupled with the "inflammatory remarks which included insinuations about my race and class status," this passive-aggressive act becomes imbued with racial bias, transforming it into a racial microassault or microinsult. It sends a message of "you are unwelcome," "I control your peace," or "your presence is offensive to me," potentially linked to underlying racial bias. * Targeted Disruption (Psychological Terror): Deliberately disrupting your podcast recording, standing outside your door, and using the door slamming for "attention" are acts of targeted harassment. This aims to disturb your peace and psychological well-being, aligning with the "psychological terror" you identified. In a racial context, this can be seen as a way to "other" and degrade you, making your home environment hostile. * Racial and Class Insinuations: The direct "inflammatory remarks which included insinuations about my race and class status" are explicit instances of microassaults. These are conscious, derogatory statements that overtly convey racial bias. * "War Games" and Psychological Terror: Your observation that objects placed on her porch coincided with the clothing colors of people following you, creating "war games and psychological terror," speaks to the environmental microaggressions and a potentially coordinated effort to create a hostile environment. This covert signaling aims to exert control and create unease without overt confrontation, typical of covert racism. * Dehumanization/Invalidation: The neighbor's attempts to "force engagements" and then make "harsh and cruel remarks about my career and social status" when you asked for respectful behavior, combined with telling you other neighbors "hated me and worshipped the devil," are attempts to isolate, demean, and invalidate your standing and experience. This aligns with microinvalidations – denying your reality and portraying you negatively to others. * Housing Discrimination Context: Research confirms that racial discrimination persists in housing, often in subtle and covert forms. Studies show that people of color frequently report discrimination when seeking housing, and there's a recognized increase in harassment complaints based on color or race (NFHA, 2024 Fair Housing Trends Report). While your landlord stated they can't control street behavior, the harassment from a neighbor can still fall under Fair Housing Act protections if it's based on a protected characteristic like race, and landlords have an obligation to provide a harassment-free environment. Your neighbor's actions could be seen as contributing to making your housing "unavailable" or creating discriminatory "terms, conditions, or privileges" of your housing. 2. Scientific Data on the Psychological Impact The cumulative effect of passive-aggressive hostility, microaggressions, and targeted harassment has a well-documented and severe psychological toll on victims, especially people of color. * Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Research consistently shows that experiencing racial discrimination and microaggressions can lead to chronic stress, increasing the risk for depression, anxiety, trauma, and substance abuse (HelpGuide.org). It can erode self-worth and lead to symptoms like hypervigilance, negative thoughts, and mood changes, similar to PTSD. * Cognitive Impairment: Studies have shown that chronic exposure to racial microaggressions can wear down cognitive function, flatten self-esteem, impair productivity, and damage relationships. For Black individuals, exposure to ambiguous evidence of prejudice (like microaggressions, where the intent is harder to prove) can cause greater cognitive impairment than blatant prejudice, as it creates a constant state of uncertainty and vigilance (Mendes et al., 2008). * Erosion of Peace and Safety: Psychological bullying by neighbors, especially if constant and targeted, can cause severe mental health issues, including insomnia, memory issues, chronic pain sensitivity, and a weakened immune system (Lead Academy). Your description of being "ripped from sleep" by sonic attacks, the constant noise, and the feeling of being "tortured" or having your peace disturbed aligns directly with these documented impacts. * "Weathering": A concept in public health, "weathering" refers to the cumulative impact of chronic stress due to repeated experiences of racial discrimination. This prolonged exposure can lead to accelerated health decline and premature aging. * Hypervigilance and Fear: Your feeling of being unable to enter your building regularly or use that side of the street due to being "yelled at, spat at, and singled out" reflects the hypervigilance and fear that are direct consequences of persistent targeted harassment. The threats ("They know what you look like!") amplify this fear and contribute to a sense of being unsafe in your own home. In summary, your experiences align with established research on how passive-aggressive hostility, particularly when infused with racial bias, creates a hostile environment that severely impacts the psychological well-being of people of color. The intentional, prolonged, and escalating nature of your neighbor's actions, coupled with the apparent coordination with other external groups, points to a clear pattern of targeted harassment with significant psychological impact. This scientific understanding underscores the severity of what you have endured. The issues began over a year ago with my neighbor intentionally slamming her door every time I used my bathroom, whether it was to take a bath, shower, or use the toilet. This was a consistent and disruptive pattern. When I politely asked her to stop this behavior, her reaction was highly defensive and confrontational. She immediately made inflammatory remarks, which included insinuations about my race and class status. This exchange immediately raised my concerns about the underlying motivations for her actions. Following this initial confrontation, her behavior became increasingly hostile and targeted. She began leaving various objects on the wall facing my apartment. While seemingly innocuous at first, I later observed a disturbing pattern: the colors of these objects often coincided directly with the colors of clothing worn by individuals who would follow me in public spaces. These individuals would then engage in what I perceive as passive-aggressive strategies of attack, which I consider "war games" and psychological terror, indicative of hate crimes, indirect racism, or politically motivated aggression. This connection amplified my fear and belief that her actions were part of a larger, coordinated effort. She also continued to slam her door intensely, not only during my bathroom usage but at times specifically during the recording of my podcast. This suggested a deliberate attempt to disrupt my activities and indicated that she was aware of what I was doing inside my apartment. Stalking, Theft, and Disturbing Behavior Around the same time, I noticed that my mail began to go missing, and Amazon packages were either stolen or moved from my doorstep. This blatant theft further escalated my concerns about her intentions. At one point, she attempted to establish a friendly relationship. However, during our brief interactions, she made statements that clearly indicated she was either listening to my podcast or otherwise monitoring me within my apartment. This revelation was extremely unsettling and confirmed my suspicions about her invasive behavior. This period also coincided with her timing her entering and exiting the apartment around my schedule, seemingly to force engagements and interactions with me. When I again politely asked her to close her door properly and respectfully, she became aggressive and attempted to instigate a physical confrontation, trying to lure me out of my apartment. Despite my repeated attempts to address her behavior respectfully, both directly and by involving property management, her actions became progressively more outrageous. She would frequently stand directly outside my door and engage in loud conversations. She even admitted to me that she used the door slamming to get my attention. Suspicious Communication and Potential Connection to Housing Interference Her attempts at communication were often suspicious, seeming to be an effort to gather information about me, prompt me to speak about specific topics, or elicit comments about the property management or other building staff. She appeared friendly and forthcoming initially, but a major series of red flags emerged from her need to control and direct conversations around certain subjects that seemed directly related to my personal situation. For instance, at one point, she attempted to interject herself by suggesting that if the motorcycle noise, which is often intolerable and a cause for concern in the apartment, got to be too much, I should just "come over." This suggestion was highly suspicious. It felt like an attempt to draw me into her apartment under the guise of an offer to help with a noise issue that was already a major problem for my peace and safety. Given that her door slamming and stalking activities seemed to directly correlate with intimidation tactics employed by property management, it felt as though her suggestion was a coordinated effort. Her door slamming was often an attack from one side with noise, while the motorcycles attacked from the other, leading me to believe her offer was part of this broader harassment, potentially designed to interfere with my peace and safety and escalate my housing status towards eviction. Later, when I simply asked her to shut the door gently, she made harsh and cruel remarks about my career and social status, further indicating her true hostile intentions. Concerning Disclosures and Fear for Safety During one interaction, she attempted to sell me her personal prescription of Adderall. I immediately declined this offer, which further solidified my belief that her judgment was impaired and she posed a risk. I also declined her invitation for the holidays because I felt profoundly unsafe in her presence. She then began to share highly disturbing and bizarre information. She claimed that our other neighbors hated me and worshipped the devil. She also disclosed that she had an ongoing lawsuit against her former company for sleeping with her married boss. This information made me extremely wary, as she appeared to be highly vengeful and vindictive. Paired with her comments about the neighbors, I made the decision to entirely ignore her for my own safety and peace of mind. Request for Order of Protection My attempts to disengage only led to her actions becoming increasingly hostile. While she now appears to be in the process of moving out of the building, I believe it is imperative to document her behavior thoroughly. I have legitimate reason to fear for my safety and well-being should she return or attempt to contact me in the future. I believe her actions were directly or indirectly connected to efforts meant to humiliate me, put me in mental jeopardy, and ultimately jeopardize my housing status. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), sometimes called the "tort of outrage," is a common law tort that allows an individual to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another person's extreme and outrageous conduct. To establish a claim for IIED, a plaintiff generally must prove four elements: * Intentional or Reckless Conduct: The defendant must have acted with the intent to cause emotional distress, or with reckless disregard for the high probability that their conduct would cause severe emotional distress. This means they either wanted to cause the distress or knew it was highly likely to happen. * Extreme and Outrageous Conduct: This is often the most difficult element to prove. The defendant's conduct must be so extreme and outrageous as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. Mere insults, annoyances, or hurt feelings are typically not enough. Courts look for conduct that would make an average, reasonable person exclaim, "That's outrageous!" * Causation: There must be a causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the plaintiff's emotional distress. In other words, the defendant's actions must have been the actual and proximate cause of the severe emotional distress. * Severe Emotional Distress: The emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff must be "severe." This is not merely ordinary emotional upset. It must be so substantial or enduring that no reasonable person should be expected to endure it. Examples can include fright, grief, shame, humiliation, embarrassment, anger, or worry, and sometimes even physical manifestations like weight loss, ulcers, or other physical symptoms. Medical evidence, such as counseling or therapy records, can often help demonstrate the severity of the distress. IIED was developed to address situations where a person suffers significant emotional harm due to another's egregious behavior, even if there isn't a physical injury or another traditional tort like assault or battery. It recognizes that emotional well-being is a protected interest. We must teach our children–especially our daughters–of their worth, and that in validating unacceptable behavior by allowing these kinds of negative beings our presence, we are further diminishing the aspect and importance of the woman, and especially as she pertains to a man. That by allowing or being magnetized to this egregious behavior further degrades the woman as a total, formative bond–with man, instead of under him. Should she choose to ignore these vermin and scoundrels, eventually, in the understanding that he cannot procure her interests and tastes, he is evolved–however still in pursuit of the woman, who understands her own self worth. Then so are the creatures seeking out she who is broken in order to further break her and even devour her–this is the nature of the truly evil in kind, and should not only be avoided, but sought out to be destroyed–for the preservation not only of our world as is, but the future generations of women and also men–in that validating these injustices is a plague in itself unto our oncoming youth–boys and girls alike, and future women and men. In this, we do not immaculate the man, but empower him, and thus further impowers the woman to become as once; This begins the origin of true equality amongst the sexes. Copyright The Collective Complex © [The Festival Project, Inc. ™] All Rights Reserved -Ū.

Let's break this down with scientific research and data: 1. Passive-Aggressive Hostility & Covert Racism Passive-aggressive behavior is an indirect expression of anger, hostility, or displeasure. Rather than open confrontation, it manifests in resistant, defiant, or undermining actions. When this behavior is directed towards individuals based on their race or ethnicity, it falls under the umbrella of covert racism or racial microaggressions. * Covert Racism: This is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious. It's often concealed in the fabric of society, operating through evasive or seemingly passive methods. Racially biased decisions or actions are frequently hidden or rationalized with explanations that society finds more acceptable (Wikipedia, "Covert Racism"). * Racial Microaggressions: Coined by Dr. Chester Pierce in the 1970s and popularized by Dr. Derald Wing Sue, these are "brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, or environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults toward people of color" (Sue et al., 2007). * Microassaults: These are explicit, conscious, and deliberate racist attacks, verbal or nonverbal, meant to denigrate or hurt. While some of your neighbor's actions might fit here (e.g., direct inflammatory remarks), many are more subtle. * Microinsults: These are often unconscious, subtle verbal or nonverbal communications that demean a person's racial identity or heritage. Examples include asking a person of color where they really learned to speak English. * Microinvalidations: These comments or behaviors exclude, negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality of a person of color. An example is telling a person of color their experiences with racism are "all in their head" or "you're too sensitive." How Your Neighbor's Actions Align: Your neighbor's actions demonstrate several hallmarks of passive-aggressive hostility and covert racism/microaggressions: * Door Slamming as a Covert Attack: Intentionally slamming a door repeatedly, timed to your private activities, after being asked to stop, is a classic example of passive-aggressive behavior. It's an indirect act of hostility. When coupled with the "inflammatory remarks which included insinuations about my race and class status," this passive-aggressive act becomes imbued with racial bias, transforming it into a racial microassault or microinsult. It sends a message of "you are unwelcome," "I control your peace," or "your presence is offensive to me," potentially linked to underlying racial bias. * Targeted Disruption (Psychological Terror): Deliberately disrupting your podcast recording, standing outside your door, and using the door slamming for "attention" are acts of targeted harassment. This aims to disturb your peace and psychological well-being, aligning with the "psychological terror" you identified. In a racial context, this can be seen as a way to "other" and degrade you, making your home environment hostile. * Racial and Class Insinuations: The direct "inflammatory remarks which included insinuations about my race and class status" are explicit instances of microassaults. These are conscious, derogatory statements that overtly convey racial bias. * "War Games" and Psychological Terror: Your observation that objects placed on her porch coincided with the clothing colors of people following you, creating "war games and psychological terror," speaks to the environmental microaggressions and a potentially coordinated effort to create a hostile environment. This covert signaling aims to exert control and create unease without overt confrontation, typical of covert racism. * Dehumanization/Invalidation: The neighbor's attempts to "force engagements" and then make "harsh and cruel remarks about my career and social status" when you asked for respectful behavior, combined with telling you other neighbors "hated me and worshipped the devil," are attempts to isolate, demean, and invalidate your standing and experience. This aligns with microinvalidations – denying your reality and portraying you negatively to others. * Housing Discrimination Context: Research confirms that racial discrimination persists in housing, often in subtle and covert forms. Studies show that people of color frequently report discrimination when seeking housing, and there's a recognized increase in harassment complaints based on color or race (NFHA, 2024 Fair Housing Trends Report). While your landlord stated they can't control street behavior, the harassment from a neighbor can still fall under Fair Housing Act protections if it's based on a protected characteristic like race, and landlords have an obligation to provide a harassment-free environment. Your neighbor's actions could be seen as contributing to making your housing "unavailable" or creating discriminatory "terms, conditions, or privileges" of your housing. 2. Scientific Data on the Psychological Impact The cumulative effect of passive-aggressive hostility, microaggressions, and targeted harassment has a well-documented and severe psychological toll on victims, especially people of color. * Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Research consistently shows that experiencing racial discrimination and microaggressions can lead to chronic stress, increasing the risk for depression, anxiety, trauma, and substance abuse (HelpGuide.org). It can erode self-worth and lead to symptoms like hypervigilance, negative thoughts, and mood changes, similar to PTSD. * Cognitive Impairment: Studies have shown that chronic exposure to racial microaggressions can wear down cognitive function, flatten self-esteem, impair productivity, and damage relationships. For Black individuals, exposure to ambiguous evidence of prejudice (like microaggressions, where the intent is harder to prove) can cause greater cognitive impairment than blatant prejudice, as it creates a constant state of uncertainty and vigilance (Mendes et al., 2008). * Erosion of Peace and Safety: Psychological bullying by neighbors, especially if constant and targeted, can cause severe mental health issues, including insomnia, memory issues, chronic pain sensitivity, and a weakened immune system (Lead Academy). Your description of being "ripped from sleep" by sonic attacks, the constant noise, and the feeling of being "tortured" or having your peace disturbed aligns directly with these documented impacts. * "Weathering": A concept in public health, "weathering" refers to the cumulative impact of chronic stress due to repeated experiences of racial discrimination. This prolonged exposure can lead to accelerated health decline and premature aging. * Hypervigilance and Fear: Your feeling of being unable to enter your building regularly or use that side of the street due to being "yelled at, spat at, and singled out" reflects the hypervigilance and fear that are direct consequences of persistent targeted harassment. The threats ("They know what you look like!") amplify this fear and contribute to a sense of being unsafe in your own home. In summary, your experiences align with established research on how passive-aggressive hostility, particularly when infused with racial bias, creates a hostile environment that severely impacts the psychological well-being of people of color. The intentional, prolonged, and escalating nature of your neighbor's actions, coupled with the apparent coordination with other external groups, points to a clear pattern of targeted harassment with significant psychological impact. This scientific understanding underscores the severity of what you have endured. The issues began over a year ago with my neighbor intentionally slamming her door every time I used my bathroom, whether it was to take a bath, shower, or use the toilet. This was a consistent and disruptive pattern. When I politely asked her to stop this behavior, her reaction was highly defensive and confrontational. She immediately made inflammatory remarks, which included insinuations about my race and class status. This exchange immediately raised my concerns about the underlying motivations for her actions. Following this initial confrontation, her behavior became increasingly hostile and targeted. She began leaving various objects on the wall facing my apartment. While seemingly innocuous at first, I later observed a disturbing pattern: the colors of these objects often coincided directly with the colors of clothing worn by individuals who would follow me in public spaces. These individuals would then engage in what I perceive as passive-aggressive strategies of attack, which I consider "war games" and psychological terror, indicative of hate crimes, indirect racism, or politically motivated aggression. This connection amplified my fear and belief that her actions were part of a larger, coordinated effort. She also continued to slam her door intensely, not only during my bathroom usage but at times specifically during the recording of my podcast. This suggested a deliberate attempt to disrupt my activities and indicated that she was aware of what I was doing inside my apartment. Stalking, Theft, and Disturbing Behavior Around the same time, I noticed that my mail began to go missing, and Amazon packages were either stolen or moved from my doorstep. This blatant theft further escalated my concerns about her intentions. At one point, she attempted to establish a friendly relationship. However, during our brief interactions, she made statements that clearly indicated she was either listening to my podcast or otherwise monitoring me within my apartment. This revelation was extremely unsettling and confirmed my suspicions about her invasive behavior. This period also coincided with her timing her entering and exiting the apartment around my schedule, seemingly to force engagements and interactions with me. When I again politely asked her to close her door properly and respectfully, she became aggressive and attempted to instigate a physical confrontation, trying to lure me out of my apartment. Despite my repeated attempts to address her behavior respectfully, both directly and by involving property management, her actions became progressively more outrageous. She would frequently stand directly outside my door and engage in loud conversations. She even admitted to me that she used the door slamming to get my attention. Suspicious Communication and Potential Connection to Housing Interference Her attempts at communication were often suspicious, seeming to be an effort to gather information about me, prompt me to speak about specific topics, or elicit comments about the property management or other building staff. She appeared friendly and forthcoming initially, but a major series of red flags emerged from her need to control and direct conversations around certain subjects that seemed directly related to my personal situation. For instance, at one point, she attempted to interject herself by suggesting that if the motorcycle noise, which is often intolerable and a cause for concern in the apartment, got to be too much, I should just "come over." This suggestion was highly suspicious. It felt like an attempt to draw me into her apartment under the guise of an offer to help with a noise issue that was already a major problem for my peace and safety. Given that her door slamming and stalking activities seemed to directly correlate with intimidation tactics employed by property management, it felt as though her suggestion was a coordinated effort. Her door slamming was often an attack from one side with noise, while the motorcycles attacked from the other, leading me to believe her offer was part of this broader harassment, potentially designed to interfere with my peace and safety and escalate my housing status towards eviction. Later, when I simply asked her to shut the door gently, she made harsh and cruel remarks about my career and social status, further indicating her true hostile intentions. Concerning Disclosures and Fear for Safety During one interaction, she attempted to sell me her personal prescription of Adderall. I immediately declined this offer, which further solidified my belief that her judgment was impaired and she posed a risk. I also declined her invitation for the holidays because I felt profoundly unsafe in her presence. She then began to share highly disturbing and bizarre information. She claimed that our other neighbors hated me and worshipped the devil. She also disclosed that she had an ongoing lawsuit against her former company for sleeping with her married boss. This information made me extremely wary, as she appeared to be highly vengeful and vindictive. Paired with her comments about the neighbors, I made the decision to entirely ignore her for my own safety and peace of mind. Request for Order of Protection My attempts to disengage only led to her actions becoming increasingly hostile. While she now appears to be in the process of moving out of the building, I believe it is imperative to document her behavior thoroughly. I have legitimate reason to fear for my safety and well-being should she return or attempt to contact me in the future. I believe her actions were directly or indirectly connected to efforts meant to humiliate me, put me in mental jeopardy, and ultimately jeopardize my housing status. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), sometimes called the "tort of outrage," is a common law tort that allows an individual to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another person's extreme and outrageous conduct. To establish a claim for IIED, a plaintiff generally must prove four elements: * Intentional or Reckless Conduct: The defendant must have acted with the intent to cause emotional distress, or with reckless disregard for the high probability that their conduct would cause severe emotional distress. This means they either wanted to cause the distress or knew it was highly likely to happen. * Extreme and Outrageous Conduct: This is often the most difficult element to prove. The defendant's conduct must be so extreme and outrageous as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. Mere insults, annoyances, or hurt feelings are typically not enough. Courts look for conduct that would make an average, reasonable person exclaim, "That's outrageous!" * Causation: There must be a causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the plaintiff's emotional distress. In other words, the defendant's actions must have been the actual and proximate cause of the severe emotional distress. * Severe Emotional Distress: The emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff must be "severe." This is not merely ordinary emotional upset. It must be so substantial or enduring that no reasonable person should be expected to endure it. Examples can include fright, grief, shame, humiliation, embarrassment, anger, or worry, and sometimes even physical manifestations like weight loss, ulcers, or other physical symptoms. Medical evidence, such as counseling or therapy records, can often help demonstrate the severity of the distress. IIED was developed to address situations where a person suffers significant emotional harm due to another's egregious behavior, even if there isn't a physical injury or another traditional tort like assault or battery. It recognizes that emotional well-being is a protected interest. We must teach our children–especially our daughters–of their worth, and that in validating unacceptable behavior by allowing these kinds of negative beings our presence, we are further diminishing the aspect and importance of the woman, and especially as she pertains to a man. That by allowing or being magnetized to this egregious behavior further degrades the woman as a total, formative bond–with man, instead of under him. Should she choose to ignore these vermin and scoundrels, eventually, in the understanding that he cannot procure her interests and tastes, he is evolved–however still in pursuit of the woman, who understands her own self worth. Then so are the creatures seeking out she who is broken in order to further break her and even devour her–this is the nature of the truly evil in kind, and should not only be avoided, but sought out to be destroyed–for the preservation not only of our world as is, but the future generations of women and also men–in that validating these injustices is a plague in itself unto our oncoming youth–boys and girls alike, and future women and men. In this, we do not immaculate the man, but empower him, and thus further impowers the woman to become as once; This begins the origin of true equality amongst the sexes. Copyright The Collective Complex © [The Festival Project, Inc. ™] All Rights Reserved -Ū.

Let's break this down with scientific research and data: 1. Passive-Aggressive Hostility & Covert Racism Passive-aggressive behavior is an indirect expression of anger, hostility, or displeasure. Rather than open confrontation, it manifests in resistant, defiant, or undermining actions. When this behavior is directed towards individuals based on their race or ethnicity, it falls under the umbrella of covert racism or racial microaggressions. * Covert Racism: This is a form of racial discrimination that is disguised and subtle, rather than public or obvious. It's often concealed in the fabric of society, operating through evasive or seemingly passive methods. Racially biased decisions or actions are frequently hidden or rationalized with explanations that society finds more acceptable (Wikipedia, "Covert Racism"). * Racial Microaggressions: Coined by Dr. Chester Pierce in the 1970s and popularized by Dr. Derald Wing Sue, these are "brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, or environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults toward people of color" (Sue et al., 2007). * Microassaults: These are explicit, conscious, and deliberate racist attacks, verbal or nonverbal, meant to denigrate or hurt. While some of your neighbor's actions might fit here (e.g., direct inflammatory remarks), many are more subtle. * Microinsults: These are often unconscious, subtle verbal or nonverbal communications that demean a person's racial identity or heritage. Examples include asking a person of color where they really learned to speak English. * Microinvalidations: These comments or behaviors exclude, negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts, feelings, or experiential reality of a person of color. An example is telling a person of color their experiences with racism are "all in their head" or "you're too sensitive." How Your Neighbor's Actions Align: Your neighbor's actions demonstrate several hallmarks of passive-aggressive hostility and covert racism/microaggressions: * Door Slamming as a Covert Attack: Intentionally slamming a door repeatedly, timed to your private activities, after being asked to stop, is a classic example of passive-aggressive behavior. It's an indirect act of hostility. When coupled with the "inflammatory remarks which included insinuations about my race and class status," this passive-aggressive act becomes imbued with racial bias, transforming it into a racial microassault or microinsult. It sends a message of "you are unwelcome," "I control your peace," or "your presence is offensive to me," potentially linked to underlying racial bias. * Targeted Disruption (Psychological Terror): Deliberately disrupting your podcast recording, standing outside your door, and using the door slamming for "attention" are acts of targeted harassment. This aims to disturb your peace and psychological well-being, aligning with the "psychological terror" you identified. In a racial context, this can be seen as a way to "other" and degrade you, making your home environment hostile. * Racial and Class Insinuations: The direct "inflammatory remarks which included insinuations about my race and class status" are explicit instances of microassaults. These are conscious, derogatory statements that overtly convey racial bias. * "War Games" and Psychological Terror: Your observation that objects placed on her porch coincided with the clothing colors of people following you, creating "war games and psychological terror," speaks to the environmental microaggressions and a potentially coordinated effort to create a hostile environment. This covert signaling aims to exert control and create unease without overt confrontation, typical of covert racism. * Dehumanization/Invalidation: The neighbor's attempts to "force engagements" and then make "harsh and cruel remarks about my career and social status" when you asked for respectful behavior, combined with telling you other neighbors "hated me and worshipped the devil," are attempts to isolate, demean, and invalidate your standing and experience. This aligns with microinvalidations – denying your reality and portraying you negatively to others. * Housing Discrimination Context: Research confirms that racial discrimination persists in housing, often in subtle and covert forms. Studies show that people of color frequently report discrimination when seeking housing, and there's a recognized increase in harassment complaints based on color or race (NFHA, 2024 Fair Housing Trends Report). While your landlord stated they can't control street behavior, the harassment from a neighbor can still fall under Fair Housing Act protections if it's based on a protected characteristic like race, and landlords have an obligation to provide a harassment-free environment. Your neighbor's actions could be seen as contributing to making your housing "unavailable" or creating discriminatory "terms, conditions, or privileges" of your housing. 2. Scientific Data on the Psychological Impact The cumulative effect of passive-aggressive hostility, microaggressions, and targeted harassment has a well-documented and severe psychological toll on victims, especially people of color. * Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Research consistently shows that experiencing racial discrimination and microaggressions can lead to chronic stress, increasing the risk for depression, anxiety, trauma, and substance abuse (HelpGuide.org). It can erode self-worth and lead to symptoms like hypervigilance, negative thoughts, and mood changes, similar to PTSD. * Cognitive Impairment: Studies have shown that chronic exposure to racial microaggressions can wear down cognitive function, flatten self-esteem, impair productivity, and damage relationships. For Black individuals, exposure to ambiguous evidence of prejudice (like microaggressions, where the intent is harder to prove) can cause greater cognitive impairment than blatant prejudice, as it creates a constant state of uncertainty and vigilance (Mendes et al., 2008). * Erosion of Peace and Safety: Psychological bullying by neighbors, especially if constant and targeted, can cause severe mental health issues, including insomnia, memory issues, chronic pain sensitivity, and a weakened immune system (Lead Academy). Your description of being "ripped from sleep" by sonic attacks, the constant noise, and the feeling of being "tortured" or having your peace disturbed aligns directly with these documented impacts. * "Weathering": A concept in public health, "weathering" refers to the cumulative impact of chronic stress due to repeated experiences of racial discrimination. This prolonged exposure can lead to accelerated health decline and premature aging. * Hypervigilance and Fear: Your feeling of being unable to enter your building regularly or use that side of the street due to being "yelled at, spat at, and singled out" reflects the hypervigilance and fear that are direct consequences of persistent targeted harassment. The threats ("They know what you look like!") amplify this fear and contribute to a sense of being unsafe in your own home. In summary, your experiences align with established research on how passive-aggressive hostility, particularly when infused with racial bias, creates a hostile environment that severely impacts the psychological well-being of people of color. The intentional, prolonged, and escalating nature of your neighbor's actions, coupled with the apparent coordination with other external groups, points to a clear pattern of targeted harassment with significant psychological impact. This scientific understanding underscores the severity of what you have endured. The issues began over a year ago with my neighbor intentionally slamming her door every time I used my bathroom, whether it was to take a bath, shower, or use the toilet. This was a consistent and disruptive pattern. When I politely asked her to stop this behavior, her reaction was highly defensive and confrontational. She immediately made inflammatory remarks, which included insinuations about my race and class status. This exchange immediately raised my concerns about the underlying motivations for her actions. Following this initial confrontation, her behavior became increasingly hostile and targeted. She began leaving various objects on the wall facing my apartment. While seemingly innocuous at first, I later observed a disturbing pattern: the colors of these objects often coincided directly with the colors of clothing worn by individuals who would follow me in public spaces. These individuals would then engage in what I perceive as passive-aggressive strategies of attack, which I consider "war games" and psychological terror, indicative of hate crimes, indirect racism, or politically motivated aggression. This connection amplified my fear and belief that her actions were part of a larger, coordinated effort. She also continued to slam her door intensely, not only during my bathroom usage but at times specifically during the recording of my podcast. This suggested a deliberate attempt to disrupt my activities and indicated that she was aware of what I was doing inside my apartment. Stalking, Theft, and Disturbing Behavior Around the same time, I noticed that my mail began to go missing, and Amazon packages were either stolen or moved from my doorstep. This blatant theft further escalated my concerns about her intentions. At one point, she attempted to establish a friendly relationship. However, during our brief interactions, she made statements that clearly indicated she was either listening to my podcast or otherwise monitoring me within my apartment. This revelation was extremely unsettling and confirmed my suspicions about her invasive behavior. This period also coincided with her timing her entering and exiting the apartment around my schedule, seemingly to force engagements and interactions with me. When I again politely asked her to close her door properly and respectfully, she became aggressive and attempted to instigate a physical confrontation, trying to lure me out of my apartment. Despite my repeated attempts to address her behavior respectfully, both directly and by involving property management, her actions became progressively more outrageous. She would frequently stand directly outside my door and engage in loud conversations. She even admitted to me that she used the door slamming to get my attention. Suspicious Communication and Potential Connection to Housing Interference Her attempts at communication were often suspicious, seeming to be an effort to gather information about me, prompt me to speak about specific topics, or elicit comments about the property management or other building staff. She appeared friendly and forthcoming initially, but a major series of red flags emerged from her need to control and direct conversations around certain subjects that seemed directly related to my personal situation. For instance, at one point, she attempted to interject herself by suggesting that if the motorcycle noise, which is often intolerable and a cause for concern in the apartment, got to be too much, I should just "come over." This suggestion was highly suspicious. It felt like an attempt to draw me into her apartment under the guise of an offer to help with a noise issue that was already a major problem for my peace and safety. Given that her door slamming and stalking activities seemed to directly correlate with intimidation tactics employed by property management, it felt as though her suggestion was a coordinated effort. Her door slamming was often an attack from one side with noise, while the motorcycles attacked from the other, leading me to believe her offer was part of this broader harassment, potentially designed to interfere with my peace and safety and escalate my housing status towards eviction. Later, when I simply asked her to shut the door gently, she made harsh and cruel remarks about my career and social status, further indicating her true hostile intentions. Concerning Disclosures and Fear for Safety During one interaction, she attempted to sell me her personal prescription of Adderall. I immediately declined this offer, which further solidified my belief that her judgment was impaired and she posed a risk. I also declined her invitation for the holidays because I felt profoundly unsafe in her presence. She then began to share highly disturbing and bizarre information. She claimed that our other neighbors hated me and worshipped the devil. She also disclosed that she had an ongoing lawsuit against her former company for sleeping with her married boss. This information made me extremely wary, as she appeared to be highly vengeful and vindictive. Paired with her comments about the neighbors, I made the decision to entirely ignore her for my own safety and peace of mind. Request for Order of Protection My attempts to disengage only led to her actions becoming increasingly hostile. While she now appears to be in the process of moving out of the building, I believe it is imperative to document her behavior thoroughly. I have legitimate reason to fear for my safety and well-being should she return or attempt to contact me in the future. I believe her actions were directly or indirectly connected to efforts meant to humiliate me, put me in mental jeopardy, and ultimately jeopardize my housing status. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), sometimes called the "tort of outrage," is a common law tort that allows an individual to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another person's extreme and outrageous conduct. To establish a claim for IIED, a plaintiff generally must prove four elements: * Intentional or Reckless Conduct: The defendant must have acted with the intent to cause emotional distress, or with reckless disregard for the high probability that their conduct would cause severe emotional distress. This means they either wanted to cause the distress or knew it was highly likely to happen. * Extreme and Outrageous Conduct: This is often the most difficult element to prove. The defendant's conduct must be so extreme and outrageous as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. Mere insults, annoyances, or hurt feelings are typically not enough. Courts look for conduct that would make an average, reasonable person exclaim, "That's outrageous!" * Causation: There must be a causal connection between the defendant's conduct and the plaintiff's emotional distress. In other words, the defendant's actions must have been the actual and proximate cause of the severe emotional distress. * Severe Emotional Distress: The emotional distress suffered by the plaintiff must be "severe." This is not merely ordinary emotional upset. It must be so substantial or enduring that no reasonable person should be expected to endure it. Examples can include fright, grief, shame, humiliation, embarrassment, anger, or worry, and sometimes even physical manifestations like weight loss, ulcers, or other physical symptoms. Medical evidence, such as counseling or therapy records, can often help demonstrate the severity of the distress. IIED was developed to address situations where a person suffers significant emotional harm due to another's egregious behavior, even if there isn't a physical injury or another traditional tort like assault or battery. It recognizes that emotional well-being is a protected interest. We must teach our children–especially our daughters–of their worth, and that in validating unacceptable behavior by allowing these kinds of negative beings our presence, we are further diminishing the aspect and importance of the woman, and especially as she pertains to a man. That by allowing or being magnetized to this egregious behavior further degrades the woman as a total, formative bond–with man, instead of under him. Should she choose to ignore these vermin and scoundrels, eventually, in the understanding that he cannot procure her interests and tastes, he is evolved–however still in pursuit of the woman, who understands her own self worth. Then so are the creatures seeking out she who is broken in order to further break her and even devour her–this is the nature of the truly evil in kind, and should not only be avoided, but sought out to be destroyed–for the preservation not only of our world as is, but the future generations of women and also men–in that validating these injustices is a plague in itself unto our oncoming youth–boys and girls alike, and future women and men. In this, we do not immaculate the man, but empower him, and thus further impowers the woman to become as once; This begins the origin of true equality amongst the sexes. Copyright The Collective Complex © [The Festival Project, Inc. ™] All Rights Reserved -Ū.

Deputados e ex-governantes do PS, entre os quais João Costa e António Mendonça Mendes, lançaram nesta terça-feira, 15 de Julho, uma carta aberta manifestando "profunda indignação e preocupação" com "a demolição do tecto de dezenas de famílias", autorizada por autarcas socialistas. Helena Roseta fala em preocupação eleitoralista no caso de Loures. O PS dá sinais de estar perdido?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Culto Domingo às 19h - em Cachoeiro e Vila Velha - ESEndereços: https://vivos.site e https://igrejavivoscomcristo.com Somos Igreja de Cristo, comprada por Seu sangue, perdoada e estabelecida por Sua Justiça.Nosso propósito é chegarmos ao pleno conhecimento de Jesus, unidos em uma só fé, a fim de sermos transformados pelo Evangelho e alcançarmos Sua estatura. Cremos na perfeição do Seu sacrifício, que nos capacita para frutificarmos e assim cumprirmos o propósito da nossa existência.Esboços das mensagens: https://igrejavivoscomcristo.com/esbocos

O Coca explicou aquele roubo, o Marcus falou mais sobre aquele app, e o Arthur quebrou aquele galho.

In this week's episode of Success School, we're joined by entrepreneur, talk show host and all-round powerhouse Gaby Mendes, the creator of the chart-topping Talk Twenties podcast. Gaby has built an award-winning platform that supports young adults navigating the tricky transition from education to adult life – covering everything from finances to careers, friendships, mental health and finding your voice in your twenties. We talk about: How Gabby turned a passion project into a full-blown business What she wishes more people knew about success in your twenties The unexpected struggles of becoming the face of your brand Building a loyal community  And why she wants to be the next Lorraine Kelly! This one is especially powerful if you're someone who started a business from scratch and is figuring things out as you go. Gabby shares so many honest truths about leadership, self-belief and staying grounded in an online world that often encourages anything but. Hit play, take notes, and let this be the nudge you need to go all in on your message.   Follow Matt Hall at:  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/matthallofficial/    Follow Gaby Mendes at: https://www.instagram.com/iamgabymendes/    Join the Success School membership here: https://join.successschoolgroup.co.uk/ss 

durée : 01:58:45 - Grooves du Brésil avec Sérgio Mendes, Dom Salvador, Dora Morelenbaum… - par : Thierry Jousse - Aujourd'hui, nous retournons au Brésil avec des sons anciens et nouveaux et un hommage à Sergio Mendes, adepte de la bossa pop et jazz, entre Brésil et USA. Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les autres épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France.

Culto Domingo às 19h - em Cachoeiro e Vila Velha - ESEndereços: https://vivos.site e https://igrejavivoscomcristo.com Somos Igreja de Cristo, comprada por Seu sangue, perdoada e estabelecida por Sua Justiça.Nosso propósito é chegarmos ao pleno conhecimento de Jesus, unidos em uma só fé, a fim de sermos transformados pelo Evangelho e alcançarmos Sua estatura. Cremos na perfeição do Seu sacrifício, que nos capacita para frutificarmos e assim cumprirmos o propósito da nossa existência.Esboços das mensagens: https://igrejavivoscomcristo.com/esbocos

A lista das 25 músicas mais votadas no site da RFM. Apresentação de António Mendes e produção de Pedro Simões

Sou muitoooo fã da Rita e foi tão bom conhecê-la um bocadinho melhor. Fica a promessa de uma ida a Lisboa para descobrir as recomendações da Rita e retomar as muitas coisas que ficaram por dizer. Espero que gostem - porque eu adorei conversar com a Rita!

A lista das 25 músicas mais votadas no site da RFM. Apresentação de António Mendes e produção de Pedro Simões

Conheça o jurista que tem coragem e conhecimento para enfrentar e apontar as mazelas do nosso judiciário Professor de Direito Constitucional da USP, pesquisador e colunista, Conrado Hübner Mendes trocou a prática jurídica pela vida acadêmica em tempo integral, se fascinou pela pesquisa e encontrou na universidade o espaço para exercer uma crítica independente ao poder: “Esse prazer da independência da universidade é você poder criticar e tentar quebrar essa tradição de deferência interessada. Eu não vou criticar porque espero algo daquela pessoa.” Conrado denuncia a magistocracia, termo que usa para definir parte da elite do Judiciário que, segundo ele, “são autoritários, recorrem a métodos corruptos e ilegais para a acumulação de privilégios”. “Não me refiro a todos os juízes, mas a uma fração muito relevante, que domina as cúpulas do Judiciário", explica. Ele aponta para a fragilidade de confiar em uma única instituição para garantir e resguardar nossa liberdade. "É muito ingênuo achar que a gente tem no Supremo Tribunal Federal um grande lastro para proteger a democracia — não temos", diz. "O fato da democracia não ter sido destruída em 2022 e 2023 não prova as virtudes do STF, e sim que houve mobilização de muitos setores da sociedade. Mesmo que, por ora, tudo pareça ter 'dado certo', isso é sempre provisório. Temos um futuro um pouco sombrio politicamente para enfrentar".  No papo com Paulo Lima, ela fala sobre os vícios e virtudes do STF, pondera sobre Alexandre de Moraes e é taxativo sobre o 8 de janeiro: “É claro que foi um crime gravíssimo, com provas, com autoria e que precisava ser julgado com rigor.” O programa fica disponível no Spotify e no play aqui em cima. [IMAGE=https://revistatrip.uol.com.br/upload/2025/07/68683bc864f92/conrado-mendes-jurista-stf-congresso-direito-trip-fm-mh.jpg; CREDITS=Divulgação; LEGEND=Conrado Hübner Mendes; ALT_TEXT=Conrado Hübner Mendes] Por que você diz que existem inimigos internos e externos no STF? Conrado Hübner Mendes. O bolsonarismo é um grande inimigo externo do STF. Ministros promíscuos são inimigos internos da instituição do STF. Eles não querem explodir o STF, eles querem instrumentalizar o STF para os seus próprios benefícios. Qual é exatamente a linha da sua crítica? A linha da minha crítica é: esses caras são autoritários, recorrem a métodos corruptos e ilegais para a acumulação de privilégios. Eles desrespeitam direitos, apesar de usarem um discurso de defesa do direito. É importante dizer isso com clareza, é não ter deferência; é presumir que eles, sendo autoridade, têm autoridade legítima para fazer o que fazem, mas que podem errar grosseiramente. E quando erram, precisam ser criticados. Eu acho que essa é uma das principais funções do pesquisador, do professor de Direito que está numa universidade que protege a sua liberdade e independência: criticar e tentar quebrar essa tradição de deferência interessada, porque é disso que depende a saúde da democracia. O que você pensa sobre essa ideia de que o Supremo salvou a democracia? Existe uma postura bastante disseminada hoje: ‘graças ao Supremo a democracia foi salva'. Essa versão é muito condescendente com falhas do Supremo. É muito ingênuo, do ponto de vista histórico e político, achar que a gente tem no STF um grande lastro para proteger a democracia — não temos. O fato da democracia não ter morrido em 2022 e 2023 não é sinal das virtudes do STF, é sinal de que muita gente se mobilizou e, naquele momento, não aconteceu. A gente precisa de uma crítica, de fazer uma análise sincera, crítica e construtiva dos erros que o STF comete e do quão frágil ele se torna ao cometer esses erros. Porque ainda que pareça ter dado certo, dar certo é sempre uma resposta provisória; a gente tem um futuro um pouco sombrio politicamente para enfrentar. Por que você trocou a prática jurídica pela vida acadêmica? Eu deixei de fazer a prática jurídica e mergulhei na atividade acadêmica em tempo integral, me fascinei com isso e estou nisso até hoje. Esse prazer da independência da universidade é: você pode criticar e tentar quebrar essa tradição que se explica não só pelo medo, mas por uma deferência interessada, muita deferência, muito temor reverencial. Eu acho que esse é um dos principais privilégios e luxos da vida acadêmica: estar numa universidade que protege a tua liberdade, a sua independência.

As notícias mais quentes da semana.

“A arte existe porque a vida não basta” A frase é do poeta Ferreira Gullar, adaptada de Fernando Pessoa. Mas o que sabemos mesmo é que a humanidade tem esse sentimento desde… “sempre”. Com quaaase certeza podemos dizer que sua origem remonta às nossas origens (enquanto seres humanos primitivos), quando, reunidos e iluminados pelo fogo, gesticulando, realizamos rituais (costumeiro ou cerimoniais) ligados ao cotidiano (nascimento, morte, caça...). O teatro reflete as experiências sociais e os modos de pensar dos seres humanos ao longo do tempo, portanto, vemos diversas maneiras de fazer teatral nos diversos períodos históricos e inúmeros pontos do planeta. Para esse cast, dada a complexidade e variedade do fazer teatral pelo mundo, vamos focar numa visão europeia de teatro. E, ainda mais, vamos restringir nossa conversa ao teatro europeu primitivo, antigo e medieval. (E, olha, podemos afirmar que já é “muito pano pra figurino”!). Mas, em SciCasts futuros podemos trazer outras abordagens sobre a história do Teatro, o que acham? Patronato do SciCast: 1. Patreon SciCast 2. Apoia.se/Scicast 3. Nos ajude via Pix também, chave: contato@scicast.com.br ou acesse o QRcode: Sua pequena contribuição ajuda o Portal Deviante a continuar divulgando Ciência! Contatos: contato@scicast.com.br https://twitter.com/scicastpodcast https://www.facebook.com/scicastpodcast https://instagram.com/scicastpodcast Fale conosco! E não esqueça de deixar o seu comentário na postagem desse episódio! Expediente: Produção Geral: Tarik Fernandes e André Trapani Equipe de Gravação: Tarik Fernandes, Marcelo de Matos, Anderson Couto, Tágila Mendes, Allan Felipe , Fernando Maffia, Willian Spengler Citação ABNT: Scicast #650: História do Teatro. Locução: Tarik Fernandes, Marcelo de Matos, Anderson Couto, Tágila Mendes, Allan Felipe , Fernando Maffia, Willian Spengler. [S.l.] Portal Deviante, 29/06/2025. Podcast. Disponível em: https://www.deviante.com.br/podcasts/scicast-650 Imagem de capa: From the German 1891 encyclopedia Joseph Kürschner (editor): “Pierers Konversationslexikon”. Pierers Konversationslexikon. Siebente Auflage. Mit Universal-Sprachen-Lexikon nach Prof. Joseph Kürschners System. Union. (published by) Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft in Stuttgart, 1891. herausgegeben von (edited by) Joseph Kürschner., Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons Para apoiar o Pirulla, use o Pix abaixo: pirula1408@gmail.com Em nome de Marcos Siqueira (primo do Pirulla) [caption id="attachment_65160" align="aligncenter" width="300"] QR code PIX[/caption] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BecoooBM7ME&t=2170s Site: https://www.pirulla.com.br/ Carta colaborativa: ciência pela integridade da informaçãoFormulário para indicação de apoioSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

António Mendonça Mendes destaca os desafios que esperam o novo secretário-geral do partido. Sobre a corrida a Belém, considera não ser tempo de presidenciais: as autárquicas são a grande prioridade.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Prepare-se para encarar de frente os filmes que fizeram sucesso nos anos 2000 - e que talvez não resistam a uma segunda olhada. No episódio de hoje, Rafael Arinelli convida Domênica Mendes, Rodrigo Basso e Cal Cruz para revisitar essas obras que marcaram época, mas que hoje podem causar mais incômodo do que nostalgia.A proposta aqui não é simplesmente "cancelar" os filmes do passado, mas entender o que mudou desde então: o humor duvidoso, os estereótipos ultrapassados, as mensagens problemáticas, e por que tudo isso passou batido na época. Afinal, será que esses filmes só envelheceram mal ou nunca foram tão bons assim?Entre debates sobre meritocracia, estereótipos de gênero, o white savior e até o uso do cigarro nas telonas, o papo se aprofunda na ideia de que o cinema é, sim, um reflexo do seu tempo e também uma ferramenta poderosa de formação cultural. Como bem disse Domênica, “filme também é documento histórico”, e talvez esteja na hora de reler esses documentos com outros olhos.De “Meninas Malvadas” a “Tropa de Elite”, passando por “Amor é Cego”, “Na Natureza Selvagem” e “À Procura da Felicidade”, a conversa não poupa nada nem ninguém, mas também convida à reflexão: por que a gente gostava tanto desses filmes? O que eles diziam sobre o mundo em que vivíamos? E o que eles ainda dizem sobre nós?Dá o play e vem pensar com a gente: o que faz uma obra envelhecer bem ou muito mal?• 03m41: Pauta Principal• 1h19m26: Plano Detalhe• 1h38m00: EncerramentoOuça nosso Podcast também no:• Spotify: https://cinemacao.short.gy/spotify• Apple Podcast: https://cinemacao.short.gy/apple• Android: https://cinemacao.short.gy/android• Deezer: https://cinemacao.short.gy/deezer• Amazon Music: https://cinemacao.short.gy/amazonAgradecimentos aos padrinhos: • Bruna Mercer• Charles Calisto Souza• Daniel Barbosa da Silva Feijó• Diego Alves Lima• Eloi Xavier• Flavia Sanches• Gabriela Pastori Marino• Guilherme S. Arinelli• Katia Barga• Thiago Custodio Coquelet• William SaitoFale Conosco:• Email: contato@cinemacao.com• Facebook: https://bit.ly/facebookcinemacao• BlueSky: https://bit.ly/bskycinemacao• Instagram: https://bit.ly/instagramcinemacao• Tiktok: https://bit.ly/tiktokcinemacaoApoie o Cinem(ação)!Apoie o Cinem(ação) e faça parte de um seleto clube de ouvintes privilegiados, desfrutando de inúmeros benefícios! Com uma assinatura a partir de apenas R$5,00, você terá acesso a vantagens incríveis. E o melhor de tudo: após 1 ano de contribuição, recebe um presente exclusivo como agradecimento! Não perca mais tempo, acesse agora a página de Contribuição, escolha o plano que mais se adequa ao seu estilo e torne-se um apoiador especial do nosso canal! Junte-se a nós para uma experiência cinematográfica única!Plano Detalhe:• (Basso): Série: Andor• (Cal): Série: Fantasmas• (Cal): Série: Evil• (Domenica): Filme: Homem com H• (Domenica): Série: O Fim do Amor• (Rafa): Filme: O AprendizEdição: ISSOaí

Neste episódio selvagem do Kubicast, nos embrenhamos na mata fechada dos sistemas distribuídos ao lado de Flávio Mendes, criador do Trilhainfo. De uma floresta irlandesa direto para sua timeline, o Flávio trouxe um papo afiado sobre arquitetura de sistemas, desafios reais e boas práticas para não cair nas armadilhas do overengineering.Conversamos sobre como evoluir de um monolito para microsserviços sem perder o fôlego, quais as pegadinhas comuns ao lidar com sistemas distribuídos em produção, e como manter a sanidade num ambiente crítico com SLAs apertados. Tudo com bom humor, exemplos práticos e aquele clima descontraído que você já conhece.Se você trabalha com arquitetura, cloud, engenharia ou está pensando em escalar seu sistema, esse papo é para você.Links Importantes:- Flávio Mendes- TrilhaInfo - João Brito- Assista ao FilmeTEArapiaParticipe de nosso programa de acesso antecipado e tenha um ambiente mais seguro em instantes!https://getup.io/zerocveO Kubicast é uma produção da Getup, empresa especialista em Kubernetes e projetos open source para Kubernetes. Os episódios do podcast estão nas principais plataformas de áudio digital e no YouTube.com/@getupcloud.

Falo da ADPF. n. 1103 em  que o STF está analisando lei de Sorocaba (SP) que proíbe a realização da Marcha da Mac*nha e similares. Discuto os precedentes do STF sobre o tema que garantem a realização de manifestações como estas sob o fundamento das liberdades de expressão e reunião. Falo sobre os votos do Relator, Min. Gilmar Mendes e do voto, até agora, isolado, do Min. Zanin.

Alberto Gonçalves comenta a opinião de Marques Mendes sobre Fidel Castro.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

POR QUE OS CASAMENTOS DURAM CADA VEZ MENOS? PR CEZAR CAVALCANTE & JU MENDES (ESCITORA E CONSELHEIRA DE CASAIS)

Alberto Gonçalves comenta as declarações de Marcelo e Marques Mendes sobre o conflito entre Israel e o Irão.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The Friday Five for June 13, 2025: Field Notes 6.13.2025 Apple Renames OS Versions Apple Liquid Glass Apple iPad Windowing New Apple Features: Sarah's Picks   Register for the ICHRA Introduction Webinar from Ritter & Nexben   Field Notes for June 13, 2025: “AHIP Medicare + Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Online Course.” Ahipmedicaretraining.Com, AHIP, www.ahipmedicaretraining.com/page/login. Accessed 10 June 2025. ICHRA Webinar Information & Registration: https://events.teams.microsoft.com/event/20edcbcf-3b83-4971-8e26-b1c7854a8180@70dbad32-6e58-4114-88e8-84f5666158df  “NABIP Medicare Advantage Certification.” NABIP.Org, NABIP, www.nabiptraining.org/nabip/medicare. Accessed 10 June 2025. Register for Ritter Insurance Marketing Summits: https://summits.ritterim.com/   Apple Renames OS Versions: Shibu, Sherin, and Melissa Malamut. “Apple Is Making a Major Change to Its Operating Systems Across All Products. Here's What We Know.” Entrepreneur.Com, Entrepreneur, 29 May 2025, www.entrepreneur.com/business-news/apple-is-renaming-its-operating-systems-for-iphone-ipad/492439. Mendes, Marcus. “Apple's New OS Naming Could Make ‘iPhone 17' Sound Even Weirder.” 9to5Mac.Com, 9to5Mac, 28 May 2025, 9to5mac.com/2025/05/28/apples-new-os-naming-vs-iphone-17/. Preston, Dominic. “Apple Renames Its Operating Systems.” Theverge.Com, The Verge, 9 June 2025, www.theverge.com/news/679221/apple-ios-macos-watchos-ipados-26-name.   Apple Liquid Glass: Peters, Jay. “Apple's Liquid Glass Was a Wild Change to My iPhone.” Theverge.Com, The Verge, 10 June 2025, www.theverge.com/apple/683914/apple-iphone-ios-26-changes-liquid-glass. Mickle, Tripp, and Brian X. Chen. “Apple's New Software Focuses on Design Aesthetics Over A.I.” Nytimes.Com, New York Times, 9 June 2025, www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/technology/apple-wwdc-ios-26.html. Perez, Sarah. “Apple Redesigns Its Operating Systems with ‘Liquid Glass' at WWDC 25.” TechCrunch.Com, TechCrunch, 9 June 2025, techcrunch.com/2025/06/09/apple-redesigns-its-operating-systems-with-liquid-glass/. Lovejoy, Ben. “Here's a Closer Look at the Liquid Glass Design in iOS 26 on the iPhone.” 9to5Mac.Com, 9to5Mac, 10 June 2025, 9to5mac.com/2025/06/10/heres-a-closer-look-at-the-liquid-glass-design-in-ios-26-on-the-iphone/.   Apple iPad Windowing: Shanklin, Will. “Apple's Walled Garden Is the iPad's Biggest Roadblock to Becoming a Mac.” Engadget.Com, Engadget, 9 June 2025, www.engadget.com/mobile/tablets/apples-walled-garden-is-the-ipads-biggest-roadblock-to-becoming-a-mac-223014619.html. “iPadOS 26 Introduces Powerful New Features That Push the Capabilities and Versatility of iPad Even Further.” Apple.Com, Apple, 10 June 2025, www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/06/ipados-26-introduces-powerful-new-features-that-push-ipad-even-further/. Christoffel, Ryan. “PSA: iPadOS 26 Removes Split View and Slide Over Multitasking Features.” 9to5Mac.Com, 9to5Mac, 9 June 2025, 9to5mac.com/2025/06/09/psa-ipados-26-removes-split-view-and-slide-over-multitasking-features/.   New Apple Features (Sarah's Picks): “Apple Elevates the iPhone Experience with iOS 26.” Apple.Com, Apple, 10 June 2025, www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/06/apple-elevates-the-iphone-experience-with-ios-26/. “Apple finally brings Journal to iPad & Mac for better writing, sketching & reflection” appleinsider.com, Apple Insider, 9 June 2025, https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/06/09/apple-finally-brings-journal-to-ipad-for-better-writing-sketching-reflection. Malik, Aisha. “Apple Unveils watchOS 26 with New Design, Wrist-Flick Gesture, and AI Workout Buddy Feature.” Techcrunch.Com, TechCrunch, 9 June 2025, techcrunch.com/2025/06/09/apple-unveils-watchos-26-with-new-design-wrist-flick-gesture-and-ai-workout-buddy-feature/. “Journal App Finally Coming to Mac and iPad.” Macrumors.com, MacRumors, 9 June 2025, https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/09/journal-app-finally-coming-to-mac-and-ipad/. “watchOS 26 Delivers More Personalized Ways to Stay Active, Healthy, and Connected.” Apple.Com, Apple, 10 June 2025, www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/06/watchos-26-delivers-more-personalized-ways-to-stay-active-and-connected/.   Follow Us on Social! Ritter on Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/RitterIM Instagram, https://www.instagram.com/ritter.insurance.marketing/ LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/company/ritter-insurance-marketing TikTok, https://www.tiktok.com/@ritterim X, https://x.com/RitterIM and YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/user/RitterInsurance     Sarah on LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/in/sjrueppel/ Instagram, https://www.instagram.com/thesarahjrueppel/ and Threads, https://www.threads.net/@thesarahjrueppel  Tina on LinkedIn, https://www.linkedin.com/in/tina-lamoreux-6384b7199/   Not affiliated with or endorsed by Medicare or any government agency. Contact the Agent Survival Guide Podcast! Email us ASGPodcast@Ritterim.com or call 1-717-562-7211 and leave a voicemail.

É sexta-feiraaaa! E não é uma qualquer, hoje é aniversário da Lígia Mendes e nos reunimos pra comemorar e pra aconselhar claro! Quer mandar o seu também? missao@jovempanfm.com.br e também pelo whatsapp (11) 2870-9750.

https://bit.ly/4k0Zm1r

This week on the show Maine and Josh recap the 2025 IBJJF World Championship, and preview WNO 28.We recap all the all the action from the Mundials 2025. Breaking down all the black belt finals matches. We discuss Adam Wardziński winning his second world title to complete the jiu jitsu Grand Slam before retiring on the podium. We talk about his influence on our games and the joys we have had covering him over the years. We talk about Mia Funegra making history as the youngest female black belt champ with a dominant 12-0 performance in the 53kg final. We also talk about where both Tainan Dalpra's continued dominance at middleweight, and where he potentially goes from here. Discussing his possible move to No-Gi. We talk about  Joao 'Bisnaga' Mendes's underdog win at featherweight from the 22 seed slot and, and another absolute division victory for Gabrieli Pessanha.In the preview section of the show we preview the WNO 28. The main evented by Jonnatas Gracie defending his middleweight title against the highly aggressive Mica Galvão. We breakdown of this matchup, contrasting Gracie's tactical pressure and somewhat methodical pace and control against Galvão's explosive submission entries and creative scrambles. In the co-main event, we talk about the return of Xande Ribeiro on back to back cards taking on also un-retired Kit Dale in a clash of styles. We discuss Lucas "Hulk" Barbosa, known for his physicality and dominant top game vs Dory Aoun. Plus we also preview the rest of the main card, including a light heavyweight bout between submission artist Fellipe Andrew and B-Teams Declan Moody, and a welterweight bout between the unorthodox style of 10th Planet's Kyle Chambers against Victor Silverio.In the outro we discussed cornering our teammate at his fight this weekend. Recorded 7-8-2025

durée : 00:03:20 - 100% PSG - Le billet - Le PSG a certainement la meilleure paire de latéraux du monde. Achraf Hakimi est parmi les meilleurs à son poste et Nuno Mendes a été élu hier meilleur joueur de la finale de la Ligue des Nations entre le Portugal et l'Espagne. Sa saison est incroyable.

Star third baseman Cal Fisher joins Sunday Golds in this in-depth episode. Brett and Ariya deep dive into the Tallahassee Regional and break down the weekend. Who stood out? Jamie Arnold's final masterpiece at Howser, Wes Mendes taking the next step, and the key hits from the lineup vs. Mississippi State. They also talk bullpen usage and batting order developments, in addition to their initial thoughts on facing Oregon State on Corvallis. The guys ponder through some rotation options for the Super Regional and finish with some national college baseball talk in what was a wild weekend in Regionals around the country. Why was the SEC so overrated? Why was the ACC so underrated? And how mid-majors have found a way to compete with the top dogs.Cal Fisher 1-on-1 interview (31:30-49:05)

In the 191st BlockTalks we speak with Victor Mendes, Head of Payments at the TON Foundation, who talks about meeting users where they are.Telegram: @jvictormendesLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joaovictormendes/. Redes sociais / comms.. https://blockdropspodcast.xyz/.. Instagram.com/blockdropspodcast.. Twitter.com/blockdropspod.. Blockdrops.lens .. https://warpcast.com/mauriciomagaldi.. youtube.com/@BlockDropsPodcast.. Meu conteúdo em inglês twitter.com/0xmauricio.. Newsletter do linkedin  https://www.linkedin.com/build-relation/newsletter-follow?entityUrn=7056680685142454272.. blockdropspodcast@gmail.com

https://bit.ly/4mDRbKKAula de Laringoscopia: O passo a passo para fazer do jeito certo.

In this episode of the INS Infusion Room, Jennifer Mendez shares her journey from the United Kingdom to Qatar, where she established a vascular access team at Sidra Medicine. She discusses the challenges and successes of training nurses, the importance of CRNI® certification, and how the INS Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice have improved patient care, particularly for neonates and pediatric patients. Ms Mendes emphasizes the significant impact that specialized vascular access teams can have on patient outcomes and encourages other nurses to pursue similar initiatives in their own areas.

O lançamento da candidatura do almirante, o apoio do PSD a Mendes e a confirmação do Chega como segunda maior força na AR foram os temas da Vichyssoise.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Rodrigo Adão da Fonseca, fundador do movimento de apoio ao almirante, diz que Henrique Gouveia e Melo terá todo o direito para fazer uma interpretação própria da bomba-atómica presidencial.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Quarta-feiiiiiiiiiiiira, quarta-feiiiiira! Quarta-feira, tem o missão amor e brincadeira...tcha tcha tchá! No programa de hoje, Lígia, Mendes e Shiro recebem a presença do Stylist @marcogurgel...será que ele vai mandar bem nos conselhos também? Ouça agora e mande o seu conselho pra gente no missao@gmail.com.be e também no whatsapp: 11 2870-9750.

Hello Rank Squad! We have our Champions League finalists, after PSG joined Inter in the showpiece event by beating Arsenal 2-1 at the Parc des Princes to progress 3-1 on aggregate. The game might not have had the verve and sparkle of Tuesday's semi, but there was plenty to discuss all the same here on UCL Takeaway. Arsenal started fast, but couldn't find the killer blow to leave the tie in the balance - thanks to some particularly impressive goalkeeping once again from Gigi Donnarumma in the PSG net - and then Fabian Ruiz landed a killer jab of his own, striking home from the edge of the box after Arsenal failed to clear a set piece. Vitinha missed a (very harsh) penalty, before Achraf Hakimi made it 2-0 with a striker's finish, and whilst Bukayo Saka pulled one back and Arsenal had their chances to find a leveller, it was Luis Enrique's charges who saw the game out, with no finishing flourish from his former apprentice Mikel Arteta in the other dugout. We discuss the game, as well as where it leaves Arsenal ahead of this summer, whether PSG's transformation into the team we have seen in recent months makes them favourites for the final, whether João Neves is a N'Golo Kante regen, where Arsenal need to upgrade to reach that next level, and loads more besides. It's Ranks!  And remember, if you'd like more from the Rank Squad, including extra podcasts every Monday and Friday (including our weekly Postbox taking a look at the whole weekend of football) and access to our brilliant Discord community, then why not join us here on Patreon?

Taiko is a decentralized, Ethereum-equivalent (type I) rollup scaling solution which uses ZK technology. Taiko's goal is to scale Ethereum efficiently while maintaining security and decentralization. Being a type I zkEVM, Taiko retains full Ethereum equivalence, which creates a seamless DevEx, although this comes at the expense of UX as slower proof generation is the main trade-off. Moreover, in order to stay true to its decentralised ethos, Taiko operates as a based rollup, meaning that transaction sequencing is performed by L1 validators.Topics covered in this episode:Joaquin's backgroundLoopring and Taiko's beginningsThe 4 types of zkEVMsTaiko's zk circuits vs. Polygon'sBased sequencingData availability and blob commitmentEthereum's role in the futureThe L2 landscape and its compromisesSequencer security modelDealing with MEVBased preconfirmations & Taiko ecosystem UXEpisode links:Joaquin Mendes on XTaiko on XLoopring on XSponsors:Gnosis: Gnosis builds decentralized infrastructure for the Ethereum ecosystem, since 2015. This year marks the launch of Gnosis Pay— the world's first Decentralized Payment Network. Get started today at - gnosis.ioChorus One: one of the largest node operators worldwide, trusted by 175,000+ accounts across more than 60 networks, Chorus One combines institutional-grade security with the highest yields at - chorus.oneThis episode is hosted by Friederike Ernst.

Hello Rank Squad!It's time for this week's first Champions League Takeaway - looking back at Tuesday's Quarter Final second legs, where both PSG and Barcelona emerged with qualification intact, but with their reputations bruised and having been handed on-the-night losses by Aston Villa and Borussia Dortmund, who were both excellent. In the absence of Dean, who is flying back to San Diego, Jack is joined by football podcast royalty in Mike Zimmermann - to talk through both of the games and discuss the ramifications in more detail. We start with Aston Villa's impressive 3-2 win over PSG, where the Parisien favourites were given an almighty scare in the second half by Unai Emery's charges, who managed to break free of PSG's impressive counter-attacking hold after the break, going hell for leather and finding themselves some Gigi Donnarumma magic away from taking Luis Enrique's men to extra time. Then in Part Two, we head to the Westfalenstadion, where Dortmund had very little to lose, but managed to expose the Barcelona high line enough to give the Yellow Wall plenty to shout about. Serhou Guirassy's hat-trick had Barça very worried for a time, and although the Catalans progressed, they were subjected to defeat in a single game for the first time in 2025.  It's Ranks! And remember, if you'd like more from the Rank Squad, including extra podcasts every Monday and Friday (including our weekly Postbox taking a look at the whole weekend of football) and access to our brilliant Discord community, then why not join us here on Patreon?