Podcasts about national oceanographic

In the latest episode of the award-winning Rising Tide: the Ocean Podcast David and Vicki talk with retired NOAA Captain Craig McLean about the Trump administration's attacks on the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. 20 percent of its workforce including weather forecasters and ocean and climate scientists have already been laid off and more than 10 percent of the budget cut and things could get worse. Having spent his career as a ship's master in the uniformed NOAA Corps and as a lawyer and administrator including Acting Chief Scientist during the first Trump administration when he stood up for scientific integrity during the Sharpie-gate scandal, Craig will give us his unique perspective on what's going on, and the importance of what NOAA does day to day to help our economy, security and environment and what we can all do to protect its work. This is one you won't want to miss. ** Links & Resources ** NOAA : https://www.noaa.gov/ Dr. Carol Lichfield: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Litchfield  Dr.Rita Caldwell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rita_R._Colwell United States Coast and Geodetic Survey: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Coast_and_Geodetic_Survey  National Marine Sanctuary Program: https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/ Blue Frontier: bluefront.org Building the solution-based citizen movement needed to protect our ocean, coasts and communities, both human and wild. Blue Frontier on Substack: https://davidhelvarg.substack.com/ Inland Ocean Coalition: inlandoceancoalition.org Building land-to-sea stewardship - the inland voice for ocean protection Fluid Studios: fluidstudios.org Thinking radically different about the collective good, our planet, & the future. photo src: Photo by Brett Jordan on Unsplash

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sense of unease settles in, not just because of its ambitious scope, but also due to the profound implications it holds for the future of American governance. This initiative, spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation and crafted by former Trump administration officials, is more than just a policy blueprint; it is a comprehensive plan to reshape the federal government in the image of conservative ideology.At its core, Project 2025 is a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership," which outlines a radical restructuring of the executive branch. The project's architects, including Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, both veterans of the Trump administration, have woven together a tapestry of policy proposals that touch nearly every aspect of American life. From immigration and abortion rights to free speech and racial justice, no area is left unscathed[1][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its expansion of presidential powers. The initiative advocates for a unitary executive theory, which centralizes greater control over the government in the White House. Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation, has been clear about this vision: "All federal employees should answer to the president." This approach aims to eliminate the independence of key agencies such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)[3].The project's personnel strategy is equally alarming. It proposes reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees, allowing for their replacement with loyalists to a conservative president. This is part of a broader effort to create a "wrecking ball for the administrative state," as described by Russ Vought, a key figure in the project. The Heritage Foundation plans to have 20,000 personnel in its database by the end of 2024, all screened through a questionnaire designed to test their commitment to Trump's "America First" agenda[3].The Department of Justice is another target for significant reform under Project 2025. The initiative views the DOJ as a "bloated bureaucracy" that has "forfeited the trust" of the American people. It recommends a thorough overhaul, with the DOJ's Civil Rights Division focusing on combating "affirmative discrimination" or "anti-white racism." This would involve prosecuting state and local governments, institutions of higher education, and private employers with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or affirmative action programs. Gene Hamilton, a former Trump DOJ official, argues that these programs "come at the expense of other Americans—and in nearly all cases violate longstanding federal law"[3].In the realm of economic policy, Project 2025's proposals are just as far-reaching. It suggests cutting overtime protections for 4.3 million workers, stopping efforts to lower prescription drug prices, and limiting access to food assistance for over 40 million people who rely on it monthly. The project also aims to eliminate funding for key public transportation projects, such as the Capital Investment Grants (CIG) program, which has been crucial for awarding billions of dollars for infrastructure projects across the country. This could make it much harder for Americans without cars to get to work and travel around their communities[2].Environmental policies are not spared either. Project 2025 seeks to undo significant climate action by attacking the EPA's "Endangerment Finding," a critical component of the Clean Air Act that requires the EPA to curb emissions of greenhouse gases. The project proposes 'updating' this finding, which would restrict the federal government's mandate to combat climate change. Additionally, it suggests disbanding the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which provides critical weather data and scientific research[2].The impact on healthcare is also profound. Project 2025 recommends pushing more people towards Medicare Advantage and other private options, which could affect 33 million people. It also proposes eliminating the Head Start early education program, which serves over 1 million children, and restricting access to medication abortion[2].Despite the project's sweeping ambitions, its architects and supporters face significant criticism. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been vocal about the project's potential to erode democracy and perpetuate bigotry, injustice, and inequality. The ACLU argues that many of Project 2025's recommendations are outright unconstitutional and rely on support from the executive branch and Congress[1].Donald Trump, despite his claims of having no connection to Project 2025, has ties that are hard to ignore. At least 140 people who worked on the project previously worked in Trump's administration, and Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has described his organization's role as "institutionalizing Trumpism." Trump's disavowal of the project in public statements contrasts sharply with the involvement of his former officials and the alignment of the project's policies with his own campaign promises[1][4].As we move forward, the implications of Project 2025 become increasingly clear. If implemented, it could fundamentally alter the balance of power within the federal government, centralizing control in the White House and undermining the independence of critical agencies. The project's focus on dismantling safety nets, rolling back civil rights protections, and undoing climate action sets a perilous course for the nation.In the coming months, as the 2024 elections approach, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be a central issue. Will it serve as a blueprint for a new administration, or will it be rejected as an overreach of executive power? The answer will depend on the choices made by voters and policymakers. One thing is certain, however: the future of American governance hangs in the balance, and the decisions made now will shape the country for generations to come.

SpaceTime Series 28 Episode 07Dark Matter's Role in Milky Way's Stellar StreamsNew research suggests that dark matter may have influenced the formation of the GD-1 stellar stream in the Milky Way. A study in the Astrophysical Journal Letters proposes that a core-collapsing, self-interacting dark matter subhalo could explain the unusual spur and gap features observed in the stream. This finding could deepen our understanding of dark matter's properties and its influence on the universe.Sun's Triple Solar Flare EruptionThe Sun has unleashed three significant X-class solar flares in a single day, with the first and third being X1.1 flares and the second an X1.5. These powerful eruptions, detected by NOAA's Solar Ultraviolet Imager, are part of the Sun's approach to solar maximum, the peak of its 11-year solar cycle. Solar flares can disrupt Earth's communications, power grids, and pose health risks to astronauts.Quadrantids Meteor Shower SpectacleThe Earth is experiencing the Quadrantids meteor shower, offering a dazzling display of shooting stars. Originating from the near-Earth asteroid 2003 EH1, the Quadrantids are best viewed from dark locations, with peak sightings expected in the Pacific region. Sky watchers can anticipate around 50 meteors per hour, with potential fireballs enhancing the spectacle.00:00 This is space time series 28 episode 7 for broadcast on 15 January 202500:46 New research proposes a self interacting dark matter subhalo could explain GD1 features04:24 The sun unleashed three significant X class solar flares on the same day07:19 Earth is experiencing one of its most spectacular meteor showers, the Quadrantids14:31 A quarter of the world's freshwater animals are at risk of extinction16:43 Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg admits that his fact checkers are dishonest20:28 CES has wrapped up in Las Vegas with lots of interesting gadgetswww.spacetimewithstuartgary.comwww.bitesz.com

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sprawling initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and depth of its ambitions. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2023, is more than just a policy document; it is a vision for a radical restructuring of the American federal government, aligned with a staunchly conservative agenda.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive plan designed to guide a potential future conservative administration, with ties that are unmistakably linked to the Trump campaign. Despite Trump's public disavowal, the connections run deep: many of the project's authors and contributors are veterans of Trump's first administration or are closely associated with his inner circle. For instance, John McEntee, a senior advisor to Project 2025, was the director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office under Trump, and Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, was part of Trump's 2016 transition team[4][5].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its sweeping proposal to overhaul various federal agencies. The Department of Education, for example, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Homeland Security would be dismantled, and the Department of Justice, along with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, would come under partisan control. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) would also face significant changes, with the FTC potentially being abolished altogether[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 outlines a future where fundamental research is prioritized over practical applications. The Department of Energy would focus on research that the private sector would not otherwise undertake, while programs focused on climate change would be significantly curtailed. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities heavily criticized as part of the "climate change alarm industry"[2].The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would undergo a transformative shift, with proposals to prevent the agency from using what the project deems "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts. The EPA would also be required to obtain clear congressional authorization for any science activity, and its staff would be selected based on managerial skills rather than scientific qualifications. This approach is encapsulated in the words of Mandy Gunasekara, the EPA chapter author and former chief of staff at the EPA during the previous Trump administration, who advocates for reforms that would significantly limit the EPA's role in addressing climate change[2].The project's stance on social and civil rights issues is equally profound. It labels diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) initiatives as "managerialist left-wing race and gender ideology" that must be eradicated. Funding for critical race theory would be banned, and civil rights data collection, including racial classifications, would be halted. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) would be shrunk, with its resources redirected to protect white men from employment discrimination rather than its traditional role of safeguarding the rights of marginalized groups[3].In the realm of technology and media, Project 2025 proposes significant reforms. The FCC would be held to greater accountability while reducing what the project sees as wasteful spending. Regulations on media ownership would be revised to promote competition, though with a caveat: adversary ownership above 10% in any American entity would need to be transparently disclosed for national security reasons. The project also advocates for expanding 5G and satellite connectivity, such as StarLink, to reduce the digital divide and support economic prosperity[4].The economic policies outlined in Project 2025 are no less ambitious. The plan includes tax cuts, though there is internal disagreement on protectionism. Medicare and Medicaid would face cuts, and the government would be urged to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. Emergency contraception and abortion pills would be subject to prosecution under the Comstock Act, a law dating back to the 19th century. Work requirements would be instituted for those reliant on food stamps, and overtime rules could be altered to weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers[1].Critics argue that these proposals amount to a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, eroding democratic norms and civil liberties. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been vocal in its opposition, highlighting the project's potential to undermine protections for LGBTQ employees, immigrants, and racial equity. As the ACLU puts it, Project 2025 threatens to "erode our democracy" and is a call to action against "bigotry, injustice, and inequality"[5].As we approach the potential implementation of these policies in 2025, the stakes are high. The project's authors envision a rapid and comprehensive transformation of the federal government, one that would align with conservative principles and significantly alter the landscape of American governance. Whether these proposals will become reality remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Project 2025 represents a seismic shift in policy direction, one that will have far-reaching implications for every aspect of American life.In the coming months, as the political landscape continues to evolve, the fate of Project 2025 will likely be a central point of contention. Will its vision for a radically restructured government come to fruition, or will it face significant resistance? The answer to this question will shape the future of American governance in ways both profound and far-reaching. As we navigate this critical juncture, it is imperative to remain vigilant and informed, for the decisions made now will have lasting impacts on the nation's trajectory.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, it becomes clear that this is more than just a policy blueprint – it's a comprehensive vision for a radical restructuring of the American government and its agencies.Project 2025, published in April 2022, is the brainchild of former Trump administration officials, including Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, who have woven together a 900-page manual titled "Mandate For Leadership." This document outlines a sweeping overhaul of the federal government, touching on nearly every aspect of American life, from economic policies and social programs to science agencies and environmental regulations.One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its ambition to reshape the very fabric of federal agencies. For instance, the project proposes dismantling the Department of Education, transferring its programs or terminating them altogether, in favor of promoting school choice and increasing parental control over schools[1][3][4].The Department of Homeland Security is another target, with Project 2025 advocating for its dismantling. This move is part of a broader strategy to redefine immigration policies, aligning with the project's stance that "men and women are biological realities and married men and women are the ideal, natural family"[3].Economic reforms are a significant component of Project 2025. The plan criticizes the Federal Reserve, blaming it for the business cycle, and suggests abolishing it in favor of a commodity-backed currency, such as the gold standard. It also recommends simplifying individual income taxes to two flat tax rates: 15% on incomes up to the Social Security Wage Base and 30% above that. However, this proposal is likely to increase taxes for millions of low- and middle-income households[1].The project's approach to science policy is equally transformative. It prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current Department of Energy programs act as subsidies to the private sector. The plan proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change programs, and reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program to critically analyze and potentially refuse any assessments prepared under the Biden administration[2].Climate change research is a particular target, with Project 2025 describing the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) as "one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry." The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also in the crosshairs, with proposals to prevent the agency from using "unrealistic" climate change impact projections and to require clear congressional authorization for any science activity[2].Healthcare is another area where Project 2025 seeks significant changes. The plan calls for cutting Medicare and Medicaid, and urges the government to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. It also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills[1].The project's vision for the workforce is marked by a push for more stringent work requirements. For example, it proposes legislation requiring Americans to be paid more for working on Sundays and institutes work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which issues food stamps. Additionally, changes to overtime rules could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers[1].The influence of Project 2025 extends beyond policy proposals; it also envisions a structural overhaul of the federal bureaucracy. The project advocates for the "unitary executive" theory, which would place the entire federal bureaucracy under the direct control of the president, eliminating civil service protections for thousands of government employees. This move would allow these positions to be filled by political appointees beholden to the executive[3].Despite attempts by Donald Trump to distance himself from Project 2025, the connections between the two are undeniable. The project's senior advisor, John McEntee, has stated that they and the Trump campaign planned to "integrate a lot of our work"[1]. Russell Vought, founder of the Center for Renewing America (CRA), which is on Project 2025's advisory board, has been named policy director of the Republican National Committee platform committee. Vought has acknowledged that Trump has "blessed" the CRA's efforts and is "very supportive of what we do"[1].As we look ahead, the implications of Project 2025 are profound. If implemented, these policies could fundamentally alter the balance of power within the federal government, reshape the social and economic landscape, and have far-reaching consequences for environmental and healthcare policies.In the words of Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, the goal is to "institutionalize Trumpism." However, critics argue that many of these proposals are not only radical but also potentially unconstitutional. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has warned that Project 2025 threatens to erode democracy and has called for action to fight against its implementation[5].As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Project 2025 stands as a critical blueprint that could shape the future of American governance. Whether these proposals will become reality remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the potential impact on American society is immense. As we navigate these uncertain times, it is crucial to remain vigilant and informed about the policies that could redefine our nation's trajectory.

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a initiative spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer scope and ambition of its proposals. This is not just a policy guide; it is a comprehensive blueprint for a radical overhaul of American governance, tailored for the next Republican president, with many eyes on Donald Trump should he win the presidential election.At its core, Project 2025 is built around four pillars: a detailed policy guide, a database of potential personnel for the next administration, a training program dubbed the "Presidential Administration Academy," and a playbook for actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office. Led by former Trump administration officials Paul Dans and Spencer Chretien, this project has drawn significant attention and criticism for its ties to Trump's past policies and current campaign promises[3].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its vision for the federal government's structure and function. The project proposes dismantling several key departments, including the Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished to facilitate school choice and increase parental control over schools, with federal programs and standards devolving to the states. This move would also see the elimination of programs like Head Start, which serves over 833,000 children living in poverty, and the federal fund for low-income students under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965[1][2].The project's approach to education is emblematic of its broader philosophy: education is viewed as a private rather than a public good. This is reflected in proposals to make public funds available as school vouchers, even for parents sending their children to private or religious schools, and cuts to funding for free school meals. The critique of "woke propaganda" in public schools further underscores the project's commitment to conservative principles in education[1].In the realm of healthcare, Project 2025 suggests significant changes, including cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, and the explicit rejection of abortion as healthcare. The plan also urges the government to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and to use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills. These proposals align with the project's stance on social issues, such as declaring that "men and women are biological realities and married men and women are the ideal, natural family"[1][2].The project's energy and climate policies are equally contentious. It advocates for reducing environmental and climate change regulations to favor fossil fuels, repealing the Inflation Reduction Act, and closing offices focused on clean energy and climate change mitigation. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the EPA should support the consumption of more natural gas, despite concerns about methane leaks. The project also proposes relaxing restrictions on oil drilling and preventing states from adopting stricter regulations on vehicular emissions[1][4].The impact on science agencies is profound. Project 2025 recommends prioritizing fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current programs act as subsidies to the private sector. It proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change, and reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program to align with conservative principles. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities heavily curtailed. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be subject to closer oversight by political appointees, with a focus on managerial skills over scientific qualifications[4].The project's approach to labor and employment is also noteworthy. It suggests eliminating civil service protections for thousands of government employees, allowing them to be replaced by political appointees. This "unitary executive" theory aims to streamline decision-making but raises concerns about the politicization of the federal bureaucracy. Additionally, the project proposes changes to overtime rules that could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers, and introduces work requirements for people reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)[1][2].Expert analyses highlight the inconsistencies and potential implications of these proposals. Darrell West argues that the inconsistencies are designed for fundraising from certain industries or donors that would benefit. The project's emphasis on political appointees over merit-based staffing and its push for deregulation in key sectors have raised alarms about the potential for increased corruption and decreased public oversight[1].As I reflect on the breadth of Project 2025's proposals, it becomes clear that this initiative represents a fundamental shift in how the federal government operates and the values it upholds. The project's backers see it as a necessary correction to what they perceive as a bloated, inefficient, and overly liberal bureaucracy. Critics, however, view it as a dangerous erosion of public services, environmental protections, and social safety nets.Looking forward, the implementation of Project 2025's policies hinges on the outcome of the next presidential election. If a Republican president aligned with these proposals takes office, the first 180 days will be crucial in setting the tone for the administration. The project's playbook outlines a series of swift actions designed to reshape the government according to its vision. Whether this vision aligns with the broader interests of the American public remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Project 2025 is a blueprint for a significantly different America.

Where do whales live? Where do they go? These are just some of the questions the US federal government would like to answer by introducing a bill (H.R. 10292) called the Whale CHARTS Act. In this episode of the How to Protect the Ocean podcast, host Andrew Lauren discusses the recently introduced Whale Conservation Habitat Analysis Research and Technical Strategies Act, also known as the Whale Charts Act. This bipartisan legislation aims to enhance the protection of baleen and sperm whales by improving our understanding of their feeding areas, calving grounds, and migration routes. Key points covered in the episode include: Objectives of the Whale Charts Act: The bill seeks to create high-resolution distribution maps of whale populations, develop predictive models to forecast shifts in whale habitats due to climate change, and conduct targeted research on understudied baleen whale species. Importance of Mapping: Enhanced mapping and predictive modeling are crucial for preventing dangerous collisions between vessels and whales. The North Atlantic right whale, for example, is often struck by ships, and understanding their migration routes is essential for their conservation. Use of Technology: The act encourages the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to utilize innovative data sources, such as passive acoustic monitoring and satellite imagery, to improve the accuracy of habitat maps. This technology integration aims to safeguard marine wildlife while ensuring safer navigation for boaters. Bipartisan Support: The episode emphasizes that the Whale Charts Act has bipartisan support, making it a viable piece of legislation that could pass. Listeners are encouraged to contact their federal representatives to express support for the bill. Overall, the episode highlights the significance of mapping and tracking whale populations not only for their protection but also for the safety of human activities in marine environments. By leveraging advanced technology and data, the Whale Charts Act represents a proactive step towards harmonizing maritime operations with the natural behaviors of whales. Link to article: https://ecomagazine.com/news/policy/new-bill-introduced-to-improve-predictive-mapping-technology-for-whale-and-boater-safety/ US Congresspeople associated with the bill: Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-Florida): https://buchanan.house.gov/constituent-validation  Rep. Doris Matsui (D-California): https://matsuiforms.house.gov/contact/ Rep. Nicole Malliotakis(R-New York): https://malliotakis.house.gov/contact Rep. Jared Huffman (D-California): https://huffman.house.gov/contact/ Follow a career in conservation: https://www.conservation-careers.com/online-training/ Use the code SUFB to get 33% off courses and the careers program.   Do you want to join my Ocean Community? Sign Up for Updates on the process: www.speakupforblue.com/oceanapp   Sign up for our Newsletter: http://www.speakupforblue.com/newsletter   Facebook Group: https://bit.ly/3NmYvsI Connect with Speak Up For Blue: Website: https://bit.ly/3fOF3Wf Instagram: https://bit.ly/3rIaJSG TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@speakupforblue Twitter: https://bit.ly/3rHZxpc YouTube: www.speakupforblue.com/youtube  

As I delve into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I am struck by the sheer breadth and ambition of its proposals. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2022, outlines a radical restructuring of the federal government, aligning it with a staunchly conservative agenda. Despite President Donald Trump's attempts to distance himself from the project, the connections between Project 2025 and his campaign are undeniable.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive plan to reshape American governance, touching on nearly every aspect of federal policy. One of the most striking aspects is its vision for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The project proposes politicizing these agencies, empowering the president to use them to target political opponents and enforce a radical agenda. As the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) notes, this could lead to a significant erosion of civil liberties and the rule of law[5].The project's authors also envision drastic changes to various federal agencies. For instance, they recommend dismantling the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and abolishing the Department of Education (ED), transferring or terminating its programs. The Department of Commerce would see significant alterations as well, with the Economic Development Administration (EDA) either abolished or repurposed to assist "rural communities destroyed by the Biden administration's attack on domestic energy production"[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 is equally transformative. It suggests focusing the Department of Energy on fundamental research, rather than technology development and climate change programs. The report argues that many current DOE programs act as subsidies to the private sector for government-favored resources, and proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology and climate change. This shift is part of a broader strategy to roll back climate science initiatives, including reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program and preventing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts[2].The EPA itself would undergo significant changes, with its research activities subject to closer oversight by political appointees rather than scientists. The project proposes that EPA grants be managed by political appointees and that the public be incentivized to scrutinize the agency's scientific conduct. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, has suggested that the EPA support increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the potential for increased methane leaks[1].Project 2025 also targets the National Institutes of Health (NIH), aiming to make it less independent and stopping its funding for research involving embryonic stem cells. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities severely curtailed. Thomas Gilman, who served under Trump as the chief financial officer of the Commerce Department, describes NOAA as "one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry"[2].The project's economic policies are just as far-reaching. It proposes instituting tax cuts, though there is disagreement among its writers on the issue of protectionism. Medicare and Medicaid would face significant cuts, and the government would be urged to explicitly reject abortion as healthcare. The project also seeks to eliminate coverage of emergency contraception and use the Comstock Act to prosecute those who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills[1].In the area of labor and employment, Project 2025 recommends instituting work requirements for those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and weakening overtime protections. It also suggests legislation requiring Americans to be paid more for working on Sundays, based on the premise that "God ordained the Sabbath as a day of rest"[1].The implications of these proposals are profound. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, compromising the checks and balances of the U.S. system of government. The plan involves purging the civil service, firing independent agency leaders, and conditioning federal funding on political fealty. This could lead to a situation where thousands of political operatives, hand-picked for their loyalty to the president, control key government positions regardless of their qualifications or commitment to constitutional duty[3].The project's approach to technology and media policies is equally concerning. It proposes increasing agency accountability at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) while decreasing wasteful spending and promoting national security and economic prosperity. However, it also suggests that Big Tech companies should fund the Universal Service Fund, currently supported through telephone bills, and that media ownership regulations are outdated and stifle competition[4].As I reflect on the scope of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a policy blueprint but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's authors and supporters see it as a way to "institutionalize Trumpism," as Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has described it. However, critics like the ACLU warn that it threatens to erode democracy, perpetuate bigotry, and undermine justice and equality[5].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's proposals hinges on several key milestones. The upcoming presidential term will be crucial, as the project's success depends on a conservative administration willing to enact its recommendations. With Russell Vought, the founder of the Center for Renewing America, now serving as the policy director of the Republican National Committee platform committee, and given the ongoing connections between Project 2025 and the Trump campaign, the stage is set for a potentially transformative period in American governance[1].As the nation approaches these critical decision points, it is imperative to engage in a thorough and informed discussion about the implications of Project 2025. Whether one views this initiative as a necessary correction to current policies or a dangerous erosion of democratic principles, its impact on American life will be profound. As we navigate this complex landscape, it is crucial to remain vigilant and ensure that any changes to our governance system are made with the utmost care and a deep respect for the principles of democracy.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a sweeping initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and trepidation. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2022, outlines a radical restructuring of the federal government, envisioning a future that is as ambitious as it is contentious.At its core, Project 2025 is a comprehensive policy agenda designed to guide a potential conservative administration, with ties that run deep into the circles of former President Donald Trump. Despite Trump's public disavowal of the project, the connections are undeniable; many of its authors and contributors are veterans of Trump's first administration or closely aligned with his inner circle[3][4].One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to overhaul various federal agencies. The Department of Education, for instance, would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Homeland Security would be dismantled, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) would be made less independent, with a specific ban on funding research involving embryonic stem cells[1].The project also targets environmental and climate change regulations, advocating for a significant rollback to favor fossil fuels. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, the Heritage Foundation's energy and climate director, suggests that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should support increased consumption of natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the potential for increased methane leaks[1].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 prioritizes fundamental research over deployment, arguing that many current Department of Energy (DOE) programs act as subsidies to the private sector. It proposes eliminating offices focused on energy technology development and climate change programs, and reshaping the U.S. Global Change and Research Program to critically analyze and potentially refuse any assessments prepared under the Biden administration[2].The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is another agency in the crosshairs, with Project 2025 describing it as a "main driver of the climate change alarm industry" and proposing its breakup. The EPA would be restricted from using "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts and would require clear congressional authorization for any science activity[2].The project's vision extends to the economy and labor policies as well. It recommends instituting work requirements for those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and proposes changes to overtime rules that could weaken protections and decrease overtime pay for some workers. Additionally, it suggests legislation requiring higher pay for working on Sundays, based on the principle that "God ordained the Sabbath as a day of rest"[1].In the technology and media sector, Project 2025 is keen on addressing what it perceives as the threats posed by Big Tech. The authors argue that business concentration should no longer be considered solely in economic terms but also in socio-political terms, suggesting that antitrust laws should be applied more rigorously to prevent what they see as a "leftist" agenda. The project also emphasizes the need to subvert China's goal of becoming the global leader in artificial intelligence (AI) by investing in and protecting American innovation[3].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching and have sparked significant debate. Critics, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), view Project 2025 as a blueprint for an "autocratic takeover," threatening to erode democracy and undermine various rights, including abortion and reproductive rights, LGBTQ rights, immigrants' rights, and racial equity[4].Darrell West, an expert in the field, points out the inconsistencies in the plan, suggesting they are designed to attract funding from certain industries or donors that would benefit from the proposed changes. This raises questions about the true motivations behind the project and whether it serves a broader conservative agenda or specific corporate interests[1].As the 2024 elections have concluded, the connections between Project 2025 and the Trump campaign have become more apparent. Despite Trump's attempts to distance himself, the involvement of key figures like John McEntee and Russell Vought, who have transitioned between roles in the Trump administration and Project 2025, underscores the deep ties between the two[1][4].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's recommendations would depend on the next conservative president's willingness to adopt these sweeping changes. With Kevin Roberts, who previously worked on Trump's transition team, now leading the project, the stage is set for a potentially transformative period in American governance.As we approach 2025, the fate of Project 2025 hangs in the balance. Will its ambitious and sometimes controversial proposals reshape the federal government, or will they face significant resistance from Congress, civil society, and the courts? One thing is certain: the next few years will be pivotal in determining the future of American governance and the extent to which Project 2025's vision becomes a reality.

As I delved into the intricacies of Project 2025, a comprehensive policy initiative crafted by the Heritage Foundation, I couldn't help but feel a sense of both fascination and trepidation. This 900-page blueprint, released in April 2022, is more than just a set of policy recommendations; it is a vision for a fundamentally transformed American government, closely aligned with the ideals of conservative thinkers and, notably, the Trump administration.At its core, Project 2025 is a sweeping plan to overhaul various aspects of federal governance, from economic and social policies to the very structure of government agencies. The project's authors, many of whom have ties to Donald Trump's previous administration, envision a future where conservative principles are deeply embedded in every facet of government operations.One of the most striking aspects of Project 2025 is its proposal to drastically reshape key federal agencies. For instance, the Department of Education would be abolished, with its programs either transferred or terminated. The Department of Homeland Security would be dismantled, and the Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Commerce, Federal Communications Commission, and Federal Trade Commission would all come under partisan control[1].The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is another target for significant change. Project 2025 suggests that the EPA should stop using what it calls "unrealistic" projections of climate change impacts and refrain from conducting any science activity without clear congressional authorization. The plan also recommends closing the EPA's Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights and selecting EPA staff based on managerial skills rather than scientific qualifications[2].In the realm of science policy, Project 2025 outlines a future where fundamental research is prioritized over applied research and technology development. The Department of Energy, for example, would focus on basic research that the private sector would not otherwise undertake, while eliminating many of its current programs focused on energy technology and climate change. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) would be broken up, with its climate change research activities significantly curtailed[2].The project's stance on climate change is particularly contentious. It proposes repealing the Inflation Reduction Act, which allocates $370 billion for clean technology, and eliminating climate change mitigation from the National Security Council's agenda. Instead, it encourages the use of fossil fuels and natural gas, despite concerns from climatologists about the environmental impacts[1].Project 2025 also delves into the realm of technology and media policies, with a strong focus on the adversarial relationship with China. The plan advocates for investing in American innovation while barring American companies from aiding China's technological advancements. It envisions the use of artificial intelligence to detect and disrupt foreign interference on social media and to identify Medicare and trade abuses[4].The implications of these proposals are far-reaching. Critics argue that Project 2025 represents a blueprint for an autocratic takeover, aiming to dismantle the bureaucracy of the "Administrative State" and bring independent agencies under White House control. The plan includes reforms such as ending the merit-based civil service for some segments of the federal workforce, requiring government employees to take constitutional exams, and relocating agency headquarters[3][4].Russell Vought, founder of the Center for Renewing America and a key figure in Project 2025, has been instrumental in drafting hundreds of executive orders, regulations, and memos that would facilitate rapid action on Trump's plans if he were to win the presidency. Vought has stated that Trump has "blessed" these efforts, despite Trump's public attempts to distance himself from the project[1].The connection between Project 2025 and the Trump campaign is undeniable. John McEntee, a senior advisor to Project 2025, has confirmed ongoing connections with the Trump campaign, and the project's leadership has expressed plans to "integrate a lot of our work" with Trump's campaign[1].As I reflect on the scope and ambition of Project 2025, it becomes clear that this initiative is not just a set of policy proposals but a vision for a fundamentally different America. The project's authors see themselves as part of a broader conservative movement, one that aims to reverse what they perceive as the "economic, military, cultural, and foreign policy turmoil" of the Biden administration[4].Looking ahead, the implementation of Project 2025's recommendations will depend on the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. If Trump or another conservative candidate wins, these proposals could become the blueprint for a new era in American governance. As Paul Dans, the former director of Project 2025, stepped down in August 2024, Kevin Roberts took the helm, signaling a continued commitment to the project's goals[1].As the nation approaches this critical juncture, it is essential to understand the depth and breadth of Project 2025's vision. Whether one views this initiative as a necessary corrective to current policies or a dangerous overreach, its potential impact on American governance is undeniable. As we move forward, the choices made in the coming months will shape the future of federal agencies, scientific research, environmental policies, and much more, setting the stage for a new chapter in American history.

In this edition of Plan Sea, hosts Anna Madlener and Wil Burns are joined by returning guest Mike Kelland, CEO and co-founder of Planetary Technologies, as well as Dr. Will Burt, Planetary's Chief Ocean Scientist. Planetary is an ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) startup based in Halifax, Canada.Link to Planetary's webinar on recent trial results here. Listen to our first episode with Mike Kelland here. ACRONYMS / CONCEPTS:NOAA (19:39): National Oceanographic and Atmospheric AssociationMRV (32:39): Monitoring, Reporting and VerificationROMS (34:35): Regional Ocean Modeling SystemEPA (53:06): Environmental Protection AgencyLondon Convention and Protocol (53:41)Plan Sea is a semi-weekly podcast exploring ocean-based climate solutions, brought to you by the Carbon to Sea Initiative & the American University Institute for Responsible Carbon Removal.

How do you find the truth about anything without succumbing to the hype, misinterpretations, poor reporting and outright lies?Dr. Madhava Setty shares his model for separating fact from fiction using 9/11 as an example so you won't outsource the heavy lifting to anyone else, this week on Spirit Gym. Learn more about Madhava and his work on his website, Substack and Instagram. Read his contributions for The Defender, published by the Children's Health Defense, here. Buy his book, WOKE. An Anesthesiologist's View, on Amazon. Learn about his work as an advisor at the International Center for 9/11 Justice.Timestamps5:34 Madhava was very suspicious of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.7:36 “I believe 9/11 is more pivotal now more than ever because we are being bombarded with misinformation left and right.”12:26 The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association's (NOAA) 10-step approach to examine conspiracy theories.18:18 Do you believe in mainstream media sources like CNN or the Wall Street Journal?29:24 Madhava's 12-step approach to get to the truth, so you don't outsource your sense-making to anyone else.36:24 Can you embrace uncertainty?40:53 The difference between believing and knowing.45:59 Sharpen your powers of observation.54:32 Familiarize yourself with scientific principles.59:19 “They're telling us what happened, but not telling us why.”1:05:46 Assess the initial coverage of the event.1:10:58 What is the narrative we are being asked to believe?1:19:01 Identify a better alternative explanation.1:25:39 Listen to the witnesses.1:36:24 Did the deep state tip its hand?1:49:28 The Kyle Kingsbury formula.1:53:32 “Notice how dirty these people are.”2:09:40 “The cost of being ignorant is potentially death.”2:19:49 How do you transform your way of thinking to create a shift in the collective consciousness?2:23:15 “We can only be certain about what isn't, not what is.”ResourcesPaul's Living 4D conversations with Ervin Laszlo and Jayne BuxtonGregg Braden talks to Danica Patrick on YouTubeFind more resources for this episode on our website.Thanks to our awesome sponsors:PaleovalleyBiOptimizers US and BiOptimizers UK PAUL10Organifi CHEK20Wild PasturesCHEK Academy Open House We may earn commissions from qualifying purchases using affiliate links.

In this episode, Scott explains the predictions for the 2024 hurricane season and visits with a special guest – Matthew Rosencrans, the Climate Testbed Director at NOAA's Climate Prediction Center – to get his top three things a local official should know about this season. Unsurprisingly, being prepared is one thing. Local officials from almost every part of the state should tune in to learn about one you might not know!Further information:National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's Hurricane Preparedness Website and 2024 Season PredictionsColorado State University Climate Prediction Center 2024 forecastFederal Emergency Management Agency's Hurricane Preparedness and Evacuation Planning WebsiteTexas Department of Emergency Management's Preparedness WebsiteTML Risk Pool's Hurricane Resources Web Page

New challenges for our power supplies in a warming world.Global temperatures have been breaking records this summer. On some estimates, the earth is the hottest that it has been for about 125,000 years. In Phoenix, Arizona, temperatures have consistently reached over 110 degrees Fahrenheit, and people are being hospitalized with severe burns after falling on the ground. The heat is bringing other threats, including the wildfires that have been burning out of control in parts of southern Europe and Canada. Extreme heat inflates the demand for energy, particularly power for cooling and air conditioning, putting new strains on the power grid. In the US, electricity demand has been shattering records in Texas and Phoenix, and it's on a similar trend in other arts of the world, too. India's power demand, for instance, has been hitting new record highs due to the scorching temperatures and a steadily expanding economy.To explore the impacts of the extreme weather we've been seeing, host Ed Crooks is joined by Energy Gang regulars Dr Melissa Lott of Columbia University's Centre on Global Energy Policy, and Amy Myers Jaffe, from NYU's Energy, Climate Justice, and Sustainability Lab. The gang discusses the ramifications of a warming world, and the stresses that it creates. To take just one example, to cope with extreme temperatures more people use air-conditioning, which often means increasing the use of fossil fuels, adding to the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. In China, coal-fired power output in June was up 14% from the same month in 2022.The gang discuss the huge global disparities in energy usage around the world. In the US, about 90% of households have air-conditioning, while in the lower-income economies of Asia and Africa, it is 10% or less. Melissa and Amy discuss how the transition to a lower-carbon world will be viable only if it acknowledges the rest of the world's demand for the comforts enjoyed in rich countries today.Climate change also causes problems for energy production. In Africa, hydropower plays a large role in electricity generation. As weather patterns shift, regions that rely on particular patterns of rainfall can struggle. Parts of China have been suffering blackouts this summer because of low hydro power generation, while California has been helped by relatively high snow and rainfall over the past winter. Picking up a theme from a previous episode of the show, when Dr Sarah Kapnick of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration was a guest, the gang discuss the need for more advanced climate modelling to understand the factors shaping energy demand and supply. Finally, there is news of a potentially exciting breakthrough in what could be an important source of dispatchable power with zero emissions: geothermal energy. A company called Fervo Energy, led and staffed by people with backgrounds in both low-carbon energy and oil and gas, has reported a successful test of its first pair of geothermal wells drilled horizontally for more than 3,000 feet, using techniques pioneered in the shale industry. Could this technology eventually be a big piece of the energy transition puzzle? It's all examined on this week's show. Remember to subscribe so you don't miss an episode, and follow the discussion on Twitter – we're @theenergygang.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

By Walker Mills Sea Control is joined by guests Major Kristen Heiserman, USAF; Dr. Ryan Burke, a professor at the U.S. Air Force Academy; and Lieutenant Commander Adrienne Hopper from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). We discuss a pair of articles by our guests arguing for greater integration of the NOAA fleet with … Continue reading Sea Control 448 – Integrating NOAA Into DoD’s Arctic Operations →

Scientists say an El Nino weather event has started. Its effects will be felt everywhere in the form of heavier rainfall in some parts of the world and deeper droughts in others. What's the link with Climate Change? And is it making it harder for us to prepare? On this week's edition of The Climate Question, Graihagh gets a briefing on El Nino from a leading expert; we travel to Peru to meet the coastal communities on the front line; and we hear how ancient civilisations not only learned to deal with El Nino, but managed to use it to their advantage. Presenter Graihagh Jackson is joined by: Tom Di Liberto, Meteorologist at the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration in the US Dr George Adamson, Senior Lecturer in Geography, King's College London Dr Laila Shahzad, Disaster Risk expert at Government College, Lahore. Producer: Osman Iqbal BBC reporter in Peru: Guillermo Olmo Research: Octavia Woodward and Matt Toulson Sound: Tom Brignell Series Producer: Simon Watts Editor: China Collins

Scientific and artistic endeavors are used to explore and understand the world around us. Art helps visualize data and communicate results and the integration of art into science yields immeasurably better science. Join this conversation with Alejandra Enriquez, a science communicator at the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration as she talks about her journey in science, her experience with The Nature Conservancy's Women in Climate Coalition, and how she combines her scientific and artistic backgrounds. Through this conversation, I hope you gain insight into how Alejandra is working toward creating climate change solutions through marine biology art and what you can do to combat climate change.Follow Alejandra on Twitter at the following link: https://twitter.com/marinesciart View her website at this link: https://www.marinebioartist.com/ 

Dr. Jessica Cross joins Anna Madlener and Wil Burns on the podcast to discuss the driving and scientifically informed academic, entrepreneurial, and legislative pathways for ocean-based carbon removal approaches.Jessica is a research oceanographer at the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) where she leads the Carbon Dioxide Removal Task Force and manages the Carbon System Observing Research and Development for the Alaska and Pacific Arctic regions. Jessica, Anna, and Wil have a great discussion on the successes and challenges they are currently facing in the carbon removal field and three things she would like to see the industry focus on over the next year.

Undersecretary of Commerce Dr. Rick Spinrad, Administrator of  the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) talks with us about his responsibilities from the surface of the sun to the bottom of the sea. He discusses NOAA's varied resources and people working for our public seas plus ongoing challenges including sea level rise, overfishing and ocean acidification. We also discuss its billions in new Infrastructure and climate funding and how he came out of retirement for “the best job in the world.”Rising Tide, the Ocean Podcast is co-hosted by Blue Frontier's David Helvarg and the Inland Ocean Coalition's Vicki Nichols-Goldstein. This podcast aims to give you information, inspiration and motivation (along with a few laughs) to help understand our ocean world and make it better. The ocean is rising, and so are we!Learn more at bluefront.org

In this episode of the Knowledge to Action series, host Jen Whitelaw is joined by Theresa Talley, Scientist and Extension Specialist at California Sea Grant. Theresa talks about using science to advance the field of ecology, address coastal environmental issues, train tomorrow's leaders, and raise awareness of our local ecosystems. She talks more with Jen about how Sea Grant bridges the gap between academia and policy, the four main pillars behind Sea Grant's mission, and how we can strengthen our community connection to coastal resources and education. Theresa also talks about the future of San Diego's coastline, and what we can do to help provide safe and sustainable access to all.   Timestamps: [2:11] California Sea Grant is a collaboration between NOAA, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, and the state of California. [2:56] Theresa gives a brief history of the Sea Grant program and its relationship to Scripps Institute of Oceanography. [4:47] Sea Grant has four main roles: Issuing grants and funding for research Education Extension Communication [6:58] Theresa discusses Sea Grant's commitment to sustainable seafood systems and aquaculture, and to making sure a diversity of species is harvested. [9:36] Theresa talks about Sea Grant's work in the social and economic well-being of communities in California, and the education and fellowship opportunities. [18:23] How do social justice and access issues play into Sea Grant's mission? [20:55] What does sea level rise look like now and in the future for our region? [23:26] What can we do to become more resilient along the coast? [29:17] Many organisms use the kelp forests not just for food, but also for habitat structure. [33:09] Theresa gives her advice to those looking to become more involved.   About C-3 In its 60 years of existence, Citizens Coordinate for Century 3 (C-3) has brought together local thought leaders from planning, design, policy, academia, community development, and more to address our region's distinctive and pressing land use challenges. In founding C-3 almost 60 years ago, architect Lloyd Ruocco's vision was to bring together our region's most creative minds from the arts, sciences, academia, and government to share ideas, learn new perspectives, and build fellowship around the idea of creating livable communities.   Opportunities for Advocacy and Engagement: C3sandiego.org California Sea Grant California Collaborative Fisheries Program

According to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, ice jams on bodies of water are caused by melting snow and ice in the springtime. Warm temperatures and spring rains cause snow and ice to melt very rapidly. All this extra water causes frozen rivers and streams to swell up, and the layer of ice on top of the river begins to break up. The rushing river carries large chunks of ice downstream, and sometimes a group of ice chunks get stuck in a narrow passage of a river or stream. The ice chunks form an ice jam or ice dam, that blocks the natural flow of the river. Ice jams can be dangerous for people living in towns nearby. Because the river is blocked, the rushing water has nowhere to go and it can cause flooding in the surrounding area. On March 29th, 1848 a very unusual ice jammed formed. Centered on that day for about 24 hours, Niagara Falls ran dry. The Niagara River was reduced to a trickle as a massive ice jam formed near Buffalo. Strong winds has blown ice from Lake Erie into the River entrance and completely blocked it. It was only when the ice shifted the next day that the water resumed its flow over the falls. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

According to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, ice jams on bodies of water are caused by melting snow and ice in the springtime. Warm temperatures and spring rains cause snow and ice to melt very rapidly. All this extra water causes frozen rivers and streams to swell up, and the layer of ice on top of the river begins to break up. The rushing river carries large chunks of ice downstream, and sometimes a group of ice chunks get stuck in a narrow passage of a river or stream. The ice chunks form an ice jam or ice dam, that blocks the natural flow of the river. Ice jams can be dangerous for people living in towns nearby. Because the river is blocked, the rushing water has nowhere to go and it can cause flooding in the surrounding area. On March 29th, 1848 a very unusual ice jam formed. Centered on that day for about 24 hours, Niagara Falls ran dry. The Niagara River was reduced to a trickle as a massive ice jam formed near Buffalo. Strong winds has blown ice from Lake Erie into the River entrance and completely blocked it. It was only when the ice shifted the next day that the water resumed its flow over the falls. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Brought to you by Remarkably Remote, a microcast from GoToMeeting. Looking for a few pointers on keeping you and your team motivated? Head to gotomeeting.com/tips or listen on your favorite podcasting platform. May 20, 1916, 1917 and 1918: Tornadoes are a weather reality that millions of Americans have learned to live with. Those living in the Midwest and Southeast regions of the United States have come to expect at least a few twisters every year. Depending on the intensity, the path, tornadoes result in varying degrees of damage, and sometimes, most tragically, even in death. According to statistics from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration the odds of being killed in a tornado in a given year are 1 in 5,693,092. Only 2% of tornadoes result in the loss of human life. 1 in 1,000 tornadoes documented in the United States are the strongest level, Category 5 tornadoes. While the combined totals of EF4 and EF5 tornadoes make up less than 1% of all tornadoes, together they contribute nearly 70% of all of the deaths caused by tornadoes. Odds focusing on a particular location getting hit by a tornado more than once are hard to come by. Some would argue that the odds never change, that’s it like flipping a coin and each separate weather situation presents the same odds. But don’t talk to the folks in Cordell, Kansas about tornado odds. For 3 consecutive years on May 20, 1916, May 20 1917 and May 20 1918 incredibly a tornado struck the town. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Hurricane Hunters have the seemingly crazy task of flying directly into one of the most destructive forces known to man.  From June to November, these brave pilots are busy flying researchers, scientist and meteorologist into the Atlantic to gather crucial data that will help forecast, track and warn those in harms way.  For Episode 33, we talk with NOAA pilot, LT Kevin Doremus, fresh off of flying into the Cat. 5 hurricane Dorian, about what it is like to punch through the eye wall. Plus, we ask him about the worst weather he has flown through. Believe it or not, it wasn't a hurricane. Listen in!

Record West Coast heat and unprecedented wildfires are wreaking havoc in California while it it is snowing in Texas. What’s wrong with this picture? How will farmers grow food with so many abrupt and extreme weather fluctuations? How can the flora and fauna survive? The science community and government sources are still trying to claim that the technology to engineer the climate does not currently exist. Does such a narrative hold up to even the slightest objective investigation? As a result of our ongoing “Freedom of Information Requests” from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric administration, GeoengineeringWatch.org has recently received hundreds of additional documents on surface UV radiation. How many were redacted? Almost all of them. The US government and the agencies it controls have become nothing less than a covert criminal organizations. Is Earth’s ozone layer actually recovering? Or continuing toward total collapse? An official source of atmospheric testing for government agencies has admitted on the record to GeoengineeringWatch.org that their testing protocol is not sufficient to detect dangerous pollutants. Who has admitted this and what did they say? The latest installment of Global Alert News is below.

Episode all about Blue Fin Tune, also featuring an interview with Brad McHale of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. Fishing New England is weekly fishing show on Boston's WNTN 1550 AM featuring Fisherman Jason Kacoyanis. Tune in Thursday's from 4:00 - 5:00pm on the radio or stream worldwide at www.wntn1550am.com, and check out archived episodes here on SoundCloud, or on Spotify and the Apple Podcast app.

ARTIFISHAL is a film about wild rivers and wild fish. It explores the high cost – ecological, financial and cultural – of our mistaken belief that engineered solutions can make up for habitat destruction. The film traces the impact of fish hatcheries and farms, and the extraordinary amount of American taxpayer dollars wasted on an industry that hinders wild fish recovery, pollutes our rivers, and contributes to the problem it claims to solve. ARTIFISHAL also dives beneath the surface of the open-water fish farm controversy, as citizens work to stop the damage done to public waters and our remaining wild salmon. Director Josh Murphy joins us for a conversation on the devastating consequences that fish hatcheries are having on the salmon and other native species, the damage being done vital eco-systems and the enormous cost of a failed system. Call to Action: Wild salmon and southern resident killer whales are on the brink of extinction. Now a misguided plan to feed the starving whales with hatchery salmon will push both endangered species closer to the edge, while costing taxpayers millions of dollars per year. Hatcheries and over harvest, along with net-pen fish farms and dams, are key contributors to the catastrophic decline of wild Chinook salmon and southern resident killer whales in the Pacific Northwest. Now, Washington state’s Orca Task Force recommendations include a plan to “feed the orcas” with 60 million more hatchery salmon per year. The proposed budget requests up to $87 million dollars to fund this plan for 10 years. Science tells us this won’t work: orcas need larger wild salmon, while adding more hatchery fish further weakens the wild-salmon gene pool. The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) have the power to make this change. Patagonia's petition calls on NOAA Regional Administrator Barry Thom, WDFW Director Kelly Susewind, and our elected decision makers to stop wasting money on failed plans and invest in science-based solutions: reduce hatchery production, remove dams and change how we harvest salmon. For more on Artifishal go to: patagonia.com/artifishal For more on Josh Murphy go to: Liarsandthieves.tv/josh-murph

Quay Dortch discusses “Red Tide” from the algal blooms which creates irritants in the air. She is the Coordinator for the Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms (ECOHAB) Program in the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). ECOHAB funds research to understand the causes and impacts of HABs and their toxins, which is fundamental … Continue reading Red Tide with Quay Dortch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration →

Michael Milstein from the National Oceanographic & Atmospheric Administration in Portland Oregon, speaks about an international effort to save an ailing killer whale.

This October, an international team of scientists set out to save the vaquita, the most endangered whale in the world. This October, an international team of scientists set out to save the vaquita, the most endangered whale in the world. Recent estimates suggest that as few as 30 individuals remain in the Gulf of California, the slim body of water that separates mainland Mexico from the Baja peninsula. These numbers are considered unsustainable given that every year many vaquitas are found drowned in gill nets, the main culprit in their dwindling numbers. The ambitious, last-ditch effort, now dubbed VaquitaCPR, was designed hoped to round up the remaining vaquitas and move them into holding pens. For an intimate look at how the VaquitaCPR operation fared, we talked to one of its lead scientists, Barbara Taylor, a marine biologist with the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, and Frances Gulland, the veterinarian responsible for the care of captured vaquitas. More resources on the vaquita from NATURE on PBS: Featured Creature: The Vaquita http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/blog/featured-creature-vaquita/ Previous podcast interview with Barbara Taylor http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/blog/uncertain-future-vaquita/

Valentine's day is here and to celebrate the season, Ocean Science Radio is teaming up with Strictlyfishwrap Science Radio Hour (strictlyfishwrap.com/) in a series of episodes on ocean reproduction titled "Ocean Lovin'." In this, the second episode of the series, we will be featuring: Mike Vecchione - Cephalopod expert at Smithsonian Natural History Museum and National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (http://invertebrates.si.edu/staff/vecchione.cfm) Bret Grasse - Aquarist at the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole Mass and previously at the Monterey Bay Aquarium (https://www.montereybayaquarium.org/animal-guide/octopuses-and-kin/flamboyant-cuttlefish) Tim Carpenter- Curator of Fish and Invertebrates at Seattle Aquarium (www.seattleaquarium.org) Many thanks to the Midnight Snackers (www.msnackers.com/)for letting us use their track for our intro music and Rod Schroufe for his Giant Pacific Octopus photo.

The election really threw everyone, or most people for a loop, especially the Marine Science and Conservation community. The President-Elect, Donald Trump, has been determined about denying climate change and reducing environmental government departments such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Environment (DOE), and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).  The reduction in government resources to adequately deal with Ocean issues such as Climate Change, Over fishing, Ocean Mining, Plastic Pollution, etc., will mean that there will have to be grassroots movements to ensure the federal government will honour what is important to their constituents. It will require strategic planning to ensure your environmental values (similar to your country's values) are upheld.  For the next four years, Speak Up For Blue will do our best to provide you with the guidance required to effectively get your environmental values heard by the current administration.

(http://www.advanceyourart.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/wyland-art-10.jpg) Wyland: Art, Community, Conservation “One person can make a difference…be that person.” Renowned marine life artist Wyland changed the way people think about our environment when he started painting life-size whales on the sides of buildings in the 1980s. Wyland always thought big. And he never stopped. Today, the Wyland name has become synonymous with the new generation of awareness about environmental conservation. Through his unique marine life paintings, sculptures, and photography, Wyland has inspired a generation about the importance of marine life conservation. His life – like his art – can find him anywhere around the world, at any time, from the Antarctic ice shelf on a photo expedition to document climate change to a grassroots journey down the Mississippi River on a mission of conservation. The multi-faceted artist, scuba diver, educator, and explorer has hosted several television programs, including, “Wyland’s Ocean World” series on the Discovery Channel’s Animal Planet Network, “Wyland: A Brush With Giants” and “Wyland’s Art Studio,” a series for national public television. His mission of engaging people through nature-themed art and a more environmentally friendly lifestyle has led to strategic alliances with such notable organizations as the United States Olympic Team, United Nation Environment Program, and Walt Disney Studios, to name a few. His 100th and final Monumental Marine Life Mural, Hands Across the Oceans, a 24,000-square-foot, half-mile-long series of canvas murals with student artists from 110 countries, was displayed in October 2008 at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., and honored by the National Park Service, Smithsonian Institution, White House Council on Environmental Quality, and the U.S. Department of the Interior. In May 2010, the United Nations released six Wyland images for an international stamp issue celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. Since 1993, the non-profit Wyland Foundation has set the standard for environmental outreach. In partnership with the United States Forest Service and National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), He is actively engaged in teaching millions of students around the world to become caring, informed stewards of our ocean, rivers, lakes, estuaries, and wetlands. The enormous extent of Wyland public artworks (it is estimated that his murals are viewed by more than a billion people every year), his award-winning art galleries, and community service projects have made him one of the most recognized and beloved artists in the nation. He is considered one of the most influential artists of the 21st Century, with artwork in museums, corporate collections, and private homes in more than one hundred countries. www.wyland.com (http://www.wyland.com) (http://www.wyland.com) Quotes: The artist Wyland has been “green” since the early 1970s, so it is high time the rest of the world caught on to the idea that saving the planet is a way cool thing to do. – Mobile Press-Register Wyland is considered by many to be the finest environmental artist in the world. – The Congressional Record, Vol 139, No. 112-Part II Your organization is making an invaluable contribution to effort to promote environmental awareness among our youth and to encourage them to continue their own efforts. – Al Gore Wyland is a Marine Michelangelo. – USA Today

Please RSVP to expedite check-in A live webcast will be streamed at 10:00 AM EDT at www.eesi.org/livecast (wireless connection permitting) The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) invites you to a briefing examining the current and projected impacts of climate change in the Southeast, and efforts to manage these risks. According to the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, the Southeast region has experienced more billion-dollar natural disasters than any other region in the United States, primarily from hurricanes, but also from tornadoes and winter storms. Climate change will increase the frequency and strength of such extreme weather events. Coastal areas in the Gulf already grapple with hurricane damages that cost an average $14 billion a year, and conservative estimates project that these costs could rise to $23 billion by 2030, with 50 percent of this increase attributable to climate change. Rising sea levels also have the potential to create widespread damage. The Third National Climate Assessment (NCA) projects between 1 to 4 feet of sea level rise by 2100, and many of the region’s major cities are in low-lying, coastal areas, as are critical highways, trade ports, and military installations.

Dr. Chip Konrad is the Director of NOAA’s Southeast Regional Climate Center (SERCC), which provides operational climate service programs and expertise in climate science for the southeastern United States.  He is an Associate Professor in the Department of Geography at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  Konrad explores the spatial and temporal patterns of atmospheric processes/patterns and the multiple linkages of these processes/patterns to surface weather and climate variability. He has over 20 years experience monitoring and studying extreme weather and climate events in the Southeast U.S. Konrad serves as a co-principal investigator of the Carolinas Integrated Sciences and Assessments, an interdisciplinary research team that bridges climate science and decision-making.  He was the lead author on the climate chapter of the Southeast Region Technical Report to the National Climate Assessment.  He has published articles in a wide range of geography and atmospheric science journals on topics that include heat waves, tropical cyclones, heavy precipitation, ice storms, high winds, and cold air outbreaks. His research is largely supported by grants from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration.