Podcasts about pain gain

No Pain, No Gain! Well let's add in Patience to this so you can get long term gains, not short term.   In today's conversation I discuss “Patience+Pain=Gains'' in life and your coaching business.   Make sure you have your note pads or apps out and listen to the full episode.   Keep taking action, pursuing personal excellence, and impacting lives!   In This Episode, we discuss: Patience+Pain=Gains Abraham Lincoln's Pain Timeline When you lose your Patience, you will lose your Promise   Follow Us: Instagram YouTube Attention: Icon Meals is offering 40% off your first order for Dynamic Lifestyle Podcast Listeners!   See all the delicious Meals and Goodies they have HERE  and use the Code: FITPROS when you checkout.     Attention Health Professionals & Coaches: "FREE Online Health Coaching Biz Scan + a 15 Min Business Consult”  See HERE   Free Online Workshop:   How driven health pro's/coaches break the chains of the brick and mortar and build an online health coaching business so they can create more impact, time freedom, and income   Watch Here   See the full Show Notes to this episode here: https://www.liveadynamiclifestyle.com/podcast/patiencepaingain/

Daniel gets nostalgic with this week's movie picks highlighting heist/ crime movies from the mid 2000s ! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thecleanslatepodcast/support

Jake and Justin believe in fitness, and you should too. Fitness this whole podcast straight to your eardrums. The two of them go on a Bay-fueled journey into the somewhat true story of a bunch of juiceheads who did some bad stuff. Is this one of Bay's better offerings? Is it nice to see The Rock play a character? Yes, definitely. --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/cleartintedclassics/support

Era el 25 de mayo de 1995 cuando la mucama de Frank Griga, un millonario húngaro, llegó a su trabajo en la mansión ubicada en el pueblo Golden Beach de Florida, Estados Unidos. Al ingresar al interior de la vivienda, notó algo sumamente extraño: la mascota estaba sola y su dueño no le había dejado agua ni comida. Este comportamiento no era habitual ni en él ni en su pareja, por ende comenzó a buscarlos. Ese mismo día, un conocido de la pareja vio el Lamborghini amarillo que les pertenecía a los desaparecidos circulando por las calles. Quien conducía no era su amigo, sino un hombre cubano. En el vehículo de al lado, un Mercedes, viajaba otro sujeto al que reconoció rápidamente: se llamaba Daniel Lugo y había intentado hacer negocios con Griga tan solo unos días atrás. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

How can you use Voiceover without it feeling like a cheat? In this episode, we finally delve into the world of VOICEOVERS (as part of our larger series exploring craft tools that allow characters & storytellers to talk directly to the audience). Chas, Stu and Mel deep dive into the VERONICA MARS pilot, Disney's THE EMPEROR'S NEW GROOVE, and the Michael Bay epic PAIN & GAIN. In exploring what makes these particular examples of Voiceover great (and not feel like a cheat or a well-worn trope), we apply the four levers identified in our Part 1 (in particular ‘when in time is the Voiceover coming from'). In this episode we discover how Voiceover can set tone, reveal character motivations, enhance viewer empathy, or even create tension. Don't forget to check out the Backmatter (https://www.patreon.com/posts/backmatter-for-105083575) to this episode answering Patreon Abigail's question. As always: SPOILERS ABOUND and all copyright material used under fair use for educational purposes. Thanks to Chris Walker for his excellent editing this episode. CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 - Cold open 00:00:23 - Voiceover craft levers to pull 00:03:48 - Veronica Mars (pilot) 00:32:43 - The Emperor's New Groove 00:54:11 - Pain & Gain 01:31:30 - Key Learnings & Wrap Up 01:39:34 - Thanks Patreons!   RELATED EPISODES: DZ-109: Talking DIRECTLY to your audience DZ-18: Michael Bay – F*ing the Frame and P*ing the Page How can we forget our awesome Patreons, especially Lily, Alexandre, Malay, Jennifer, Thomas, Randy, Jesse, Sandra, Theis, and Khrob. Please considering rating or subscribing to us on Apple Podcasts or sharing us on the Social Medias! We like finding new listeners. We are @stuwillis, and @chasffisher on twitter. You can find @draft_zero and @_shotzero on Instagram and Twitter. BUY DRAFT ZERO MERCH via TeePublic SUBSCRIBE TO SHOT ZERO via Substack

This week we are hitting the GYM and discussing Michael Bay's American Masterpiece, 2013's Pain & Gain. Should The Rock have an Oscar? Is Michael Bay the only filmmaker to have multiple Razzies AND multiple entries in The Criterion Collection? Listening to the difference between Caroline's presumed opinions in the first half and her actual opinions in the second half is worth the price of admission alone.  A HUGE thank you to Kalie McAlexander for our social media. Make sure to Follow us on FB, Twitter, Instagram, & Tiktok- hhynspod And, be sure to check out Kalie's podcast, The Liberty Hall Video podcast, where her and Jon discuss whatever they happen to pull off the shelves of the last video store on Earth!  A special thank you to our patrons- Carrie Betts, Sherry Betts, J.D. Smith, Darrin Freeborn, & Stephen Woosley.  If you'd like a shoutout on the show and bonus content, head over to our Patreon- patreon.com/hhynspod. 

In life, pain is inevitable, but when we follow the purpose God has for us, He will bring purpose through our pain that will lead to gain for His Kingdom. Check out week three of our series, “Actions Speak Louder Than Words”, to learn the role of persistence and perseverance in the pain. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Visit our Website⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠  |  ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Check out our YouTube Channel⁠

The pain of loss leads to the gain of new life.

In this week's episode, Riccardo switches chairs and guest host, Jim Barnard, asks all the questions. Riccardo shares insights from his Oxford Saïd Business School dissertation on the use of collaborative contracting into major programmes, specifically PPP structures. Riccardo and Jim delve into the complications and complexities of risk management, adversarial situations, stakeholders and shareholders and private financing.   “When you have collaborative contracting, you almost waive your legal rights or your rights to pursue legal remedies. And so, all of the parties are around the table. There are many advantages of collaborative contracting, but the simplest one is, instead of hiring lawyers to sort out disputes, you're redeploying those resources to actually solving project problems.” Key Takeaways:  The price of winning contracts in the PPP market and how the public sector entity comes into playWhy collaborative contracting provides better odds for finishing on time and on budget, but equity has to take more riskPPP and politics, how do we navigate it?  If you enjoyed this episode, make sure and give us a five star rating and leave us a review on iTunes, Podcast Addict, Podchaser or Castbox. The conversation doesn't stop here—connect and converse with our community: Riccardo Cosentino on LinkedInJim Bernard on LinkedIn Transcript:Riccardo Cosentino 00:05You're listening to navigate the major problems, the podcast that aims to elevate the conversationshappening in the infrastructure industry and inspire you to have a more efficient approach within it. I'myour host, Riccardo Cosentino brings over 20 years of major product management experience. Mostrecently, I graduated from Oxford University Said business school, which shook my belief when itcomes to navigating major problems. Now, it's time to shake yours. Join me in each episode, as I pressthe industry experts about the complexity of major program management, emerging digital trends andthe critical leadership required to approach these multibillion-dollar projects. Let's see what theconversation takes us. Hello, and welcome to a new episode of navigating major programs. Todaywe're going to be doing things a little bit differently. My friend, and one point guest of the show asagreed kindly to be hosting this podcast. And we'll do a role reversal where I'm going to be doing thepresenting and Jim Barnard is going to co-host the show. And today we're going to talk about a topicthat is very close to my heart, which is the use of collaborative contracting into major programs,especially into PPP structures. I've done a full dissertation at Oxford as part of my master, majorprogram management, and I decided that it'd be good to walk you through my findings and myconclusion. Anyway, let me introduce the host for today. Jim Bernard. How you doing? Jim?Jim 02:00I'm great. Riccardo, thanks for having me. Big fan of the podcast, obviously had the chance to be on apreviously so very much appreciate the opportunity to be host this time.Riccardo Cosentino 02:11So today, as I said, I'll be a be doing the talking. And you'll be doing the asking. Maybe I can start? I'lljump right into it unless you have a specific question for me. And maybe I can give a bit of a bit of anoverview of my research thesis and some of my findings and some of my conclusions.Jim 02:34 2Transcribed by https://otter.aiYes, summary will be great, a perfect place to start. But some of our folks listening may not becompletely familiar with even the concept of collaboration. And I know having read your dissertationthat you get into some fairly technical and detailed topics relative to finance and how structures are setup and that type of thing. So for those of us either less familiar or kind of new to the topic, if you don'tmind, let's start as basic as possible.Riccardo Cosentino 03:03Okay, well, let's start with, let's start with what prompted me to research this specific topic, the probablya good place to start here. I you know, I'm a professional the work in public private partnership over thelast 20 years. So again, a lot of knowledge about the topic, I have structured and finance manytransactions that use non recourse financing. And a couple of years ago, my company decided to exitthe what we call the lump sum turnkey business, which is the type of contracting where a private sectorentity commits to deliver a project on time and on budget and every any cost overruns. And at any cost,and any time overruns are absorbed by the entity that has committed to deliver the project. So mycompany has been losing a lot of money with the stock form a contract. So in 2018, we decided toexited. However, this type of contract is the cornerstone of non recourse financing, recourse financingis financing that doesn't, doesn't lean on the asset of the parent company, but the only leans on theasset of the other special purpose vehicle that is delivering the project,Jim 04:26basically. Project.Riccardo Cosentino 04:29Yes. Right. So it's basically the future revenues, that that's the only recourse available to lenders debtand equity lenders is access to, to project revenues rather than corporate revenue associated with theentity that is delivered project.Jim 04:49Right.Riccardo Cosentino 04:50And because my company exited this business lumpsum turnkey, indirectly we also exited theconstruction portion of public private partnerships were where entities or companies, contractors arehired to deliver the project under the structure. However, we still wanted to stay involved in contracting.So what we started researching is different types of contracts and collaborative contracting, came upalliances IPD all forms of contract that they include a large component of collaboration. In this type ofcontracts, the risk is not transferred to the product to the contracting entity is the risk of on timecompletion and on budget completion stays within the project sponsor. There is a Pain Gain sharingmechanism, where the contracting entity, the contractor that is delivering the project puts their fee risk,but they're not taking on the cost of around burden that is typical of lump sum turnkey. So once westarted researching this, the question that I was asked many, many times, being the expert in publicprivate partnership is can we convince clients and lenders to use collaborative contracting within thenon recourse PPP structure? And intuitively, I didn't think it was possible, I did some preliminary 3Transcribed by https://otter.airesearch as part of my job. But I couldn't really find conclusive answers of why collaborativelycontracting could or could not be used within a PPP structure,Jim 06:45where I take a step back down, how did you do your preliminary research was at a qualitative research,quantitative research and kind of benefits of both detriments of both How did you choose what methoddid you use and how did you choose it.Riccardo Cosentino 06:58So during what while I was still working, so before I use an academic method, I, I just looked at thecommercial parameters, I just look at the commercial framework and in the legal framework, and I justtried to see if the economic principle of the commercial principle would support these type ofcommercial and legal structure, right. And based on my understanding of the commercial principle, nonrecourse financing, where risk has to be transferred, and where lenders that especially debt lenders,needs to be kept whole in the PPP structure, the only entity that can keep the lenders or is thecontractor delivering the work? I mean, no, it's not the only way. But it's the most economical way. Andthe cheapest way of implementing a project finance structure is to have the contractor guaranteeing thedelivery of the project by putting up the balance sheet and by taking on the cost of Iran in a lump sumturnkey model,Jim 08:07but the fee, the fees at that point are fixed, right. So you're really talking all downside, fixed upside inthat structure. I mean, it sounds not just unpalatable, but somewhat dangerous for the contractor to getinto that arrangement.Riccardo Cosentino 08:23It is and they think he has worked in the past to a certain degree where Contractor have been able tomanage that risk the took on. But I think over the last 15 years, the market got so competitive, thatcontractors have been racing to the bottom sometimes fixing the cost of the project to a level too low toactual deliver and then end up absorbing all of the losses at the back end or the contraction period. Imean, that's definitely what happened to our company we overcommitted in order to win the contract,and then we ended up with a lot of the losses. However, there are instances where the model works.It's just you know, I think you the model can work if you have a healthy competitive process, if you havean unhealthy race to the bottom is probably dangerous, dangerous territoryJim 09:23that can open up even getting into different ways of gaming. Bidding processes itself is a massive topic,I'm sure that gets into behavioral economics and how people bid and upsides and downsides andpsychology and all this other stuff. So we probably want to table that for a future episode because wecould spend hours just on that aspect of it. I'm sure. So, but I guess the conclusion is at some point inthe market, the bids got so tight in the market, the fees got compressed, so low that the people who arewinning the bids were just really behind the eight ball at the beginning. I mean, it was it was almost Iwant to say it was, you know, failure was baked into the to the process. But it sounds like you're in areally tight spot straight out of the gate. 4Transcribed by https://otter.aiRiccardo Cosentino 10:13That's correct. And it's not unlikely It's not unlike the, you know, bid low claim high model that westudied in, at Oxford, right, I think there was a case about how the it's, we live in an industry wherethere's a lot of, you know, contractors make their money through the claims. And then and I think that'swhere the PPP market got to where, you know, companies bid low in order to secure the contract, andthen then trying to deal with the consequences afterwards,Jim 10:46by claim process, you're talking going to court litigation,Riccardo Cosentino 10:50eventually. Yeah, that's where he ends up. I mean, you can try and settle. I mean, there are settlementalong the way that you can do there are but you know, ultimately, yeah, you go to court, and, you know,20 to 30 cents on the dollars if you're lucky when you play.Jim 11:05So that whole system sounded like from the day that they decided to race to the bottom of the wholesystem seems like it's building upon a weak foundation to start. And it's crumbling from there. I mean, ifyou're going to court to deal with inevitable complexity of a major program seems like somethingstarted wrong. I mean, it's not in it's not within the project itself, which obviously has its own complexityfrom a cost standpoint, engineering standpoint, and construction execution stakeholders, and then wehave this whole network of influencers within any major program. But this is like on top of that, this is awhole kind of external integration challenge. That, before you even get to the complexity of the project,you're kind of off off center to begin with that fair.Riccardo Cosentino 11:58That's, that's very fair. And, and but that's probably not something caused by the PPP structure or thenon recourse financing structure is more caused by, you know, public sector entity, especially beingsubjected to optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation in order to get these projects off the ground.And I think we PPP that problem is accentuated by the fact that there's a bit of heuristics, which is theprivate sector can do it better. So we don't have to develop the project to you know, 50% 60% design,in order to get to get bids in, we're gonna put out a 5% design, the private sector will take a developergive us a fixed price. And, and we'll go from there, which breeds a situation where you have contractorcommitting to a fixed price contract with only 15 20% design done. Because that's the nature of PPPwhere, you know, the government or the public sector doesn't want to develop the project, becausethey don't want to stifle the innovation that the private sector could bring. But on the other hand, theydon't really give a lot of opportunity to the private sector, to develop the design, to you know, 60 70%,which is what you need to have certainty, and then an ability to commit to a fixed price.Jim 13:28So are sort of back to that master, the opposite of the master builder heuristic. We're not planning longand or planning slow and building quickly, we're planning quickly and just accumulating delays and costoverruns. 5Transcribed by https://otter.aiRiccardo Cosentino 13:41Absolutely, absolutely. And then, you know, and you know, we seen this, because these projects are solong. And by the time that all the problems actually materialize, it's probably six, seven years down theline. So nobody worries about that at the beginning, and you will worry about that at the end. And youalways people somehow scratch their heads is that how do we get here, but pretty simple how we gothere.Jim 14:07So not to not to necessarily prompt a sales pitch for collaborative contracting. But how do you see orhow what did your research determine the benefits of collaborative contracting? We're, and then howlikely is it that it's going to become part of part of the industry?Riccardo Cosentino 14:31So my research was wasn't so much about collaborative contracting. So I took I took the benefit ofcollaborative contracting as a given and I said, you know, if collaborative contracting is such a goodway of delivering projects, How come is not used in PPP structures? What are the limiting factors thatdon't allow the implementation of collaborative contracting into PPP P. So my starting premises wascollaborative contracting is good. It is the way forward, and how do we how do we roll it out in differentparts of the industry?Jim 15:12Can we explore that just for a second? What is it about collaborative contract? And what benefits? Doyou believe that delivers to the industry?Riccardo Cosentino 15:21Well look, to me, just the fundamental principle that when you have collaborative contracting, youalmost you're almost waive your legal rights or your rights to pursue legal remedies. And so all of theparties are around the table. So the, you know, there are many advantages of collaborative contractcontracting, but the simplest one is, instead of hiring lawyer to sorting out disputes, you redeployingthose resources to actually solving project problems. So if you think of the litigation costs in thesemajor, major programs, if you just take those costs, and you were to use that financial resource toactually solve actual problems on the project, I mean, it doesn't take a lot of research to know thatanecdotally, that that's a good thing. Developed with all due respect to our attorney friends out there,your role may not best to be solving problems after the fact. Right? I mean, that's kind of the idea.Yeah, I mean, look, I mean, a claim against the client doesn't get concrete poured faster. Right. Okay.Fair point. You know, a few extra engineers and a few extra project resources could get that concretepoured faster, or figure out a way to pour the concrete faster.Jim 16:56Yeah, have the magic communications better to when you're not having to run it through attorneys andlegal filings?Riccardo Cosentino 17:02 6Transcribed by https://otter.aiYeah, I mean, I use I use that example. Because it's, you know, we just talked about claims we justtalked about, you know, ended up in court. So that's, that's the thing that comes to mind. But, you know,in general, I think we can all agree that a non antagonistic environment is more conducive to betterworking relation and better outputs. It's just anecdotally, we intuitively we can all see thatJim 17:34Sure.Riccardo Cosentino 17:35That we all want to work in a collaborative space, because, you know, when you bring the intellect ormultiple people together, and you foster that, you definitely want to get a better outcome.Jim 17:47Right, more rewarding toRiccardo Cosentino 17:48Yes. So that's, that's why I've took that I took it as a dogma, I said, collaborative contracting, is the rightway forward,Jim 17:58okay.Riccardo Cosentino 17:59So, okay, so why can we use that in PPP structures. And so, this is where it gets a little bit technical.Where, you know, PPP are really know nothing more than non recourse financing or project financing.That was it was a financing mechanism that was developed in the 70s. for oil exploration in the NorthSea, there weren't enough oil and gas company, there wasn't a big enough oil and gas company toabsorb the risk of oil exploration in the North Sea. So, they came together and came up with thestructure, which basically insulate the parent companies for the loss from the losses of the project. Andso, you know, if you take all exploration, and you lend him money into oil exploration Norh sea lenderscan only go after the asset to the oil platform or the future revenues associated with the asset. And thatbasically insulate the parent company for wo po things go really wrong,Jim 19:11but is there is there a completion guarantee built into this? I mean, the contractor can't just walk awaywithout recourse, can they?Riccardo Cosentino 19:18So, sorry, what I was describing is the is the is the structure or the client level? Yes.Jim 19:25Got it.Riccardo Cosentino 19:26 7Transcribed by https://otter.aiSo at the at the contractor level, yeah, absolutely the contractor. So that's what I was saying that inthese non recourse structures, the completion guarantee comes from the contractor. So ultimately, theback so although the project itself is non recourse, the contractor does put up guarantees becauseultimately the guarantees are in favor of the project sponsor and the project lenders right debt thatlenders, right? So the equity lenders is typically the developers, obviously they take equity risk, so Theyhave high amounts of risk or high amount of returns. So the first one, they get wiped out if the projectdoesn't do well. However, the debt lender has less, you know, these are big institution, they don't likerisk, they want to be insulated. So if the project was in to reach substantial completion, the contractorwould keep the lenders whole up to a point. And there's this is, this is why collaborative contracting isnot quite easy to implement in the structure, because the debt lenders always looking to recover themoney, right? And if the risk hasn't been transferred to a contractor, where the lender is going torecover the money for right,Jim 20:47where does it go, because it doesn't leave the project, just because nobody raised their hand to take it,it's not going away.Riccardo Cosentino 20:55So it's a Series is brought by non recourse financing PPP, these a zero sum games, where either thecontractor loses money, or the client loses money. And so that that creates the adversarial situation,especially if you haven't bid the job properly, you're going to be losing money, you're going aftersomebody because nobody likes to lose money, you're going to go after the client, and then theadversarial scenario sets in.Jim 21:24So the most important relationship, the most important relationship between the client and thecontractor for the project success is immediately set up on a weak foundation, like, yes. Okay. Thatexplains anything.Riccardo Cosentino 21:40And it will be, you know, is not impossibly, you could implement a collaborative contract between theclient and the contractor. However, the lenders need to get repaid, and the lender is only going to getrepaid when you reach substantial completion, you start extracting oil, you start selling the oil, and thatgenerates the revenues that are then used to repay the debt lenders, right? Yeah, so we couldimplement collaborative contract between the contractor and the project developer. However, in case ofcost overruns, the developer would pick up those costs. And because obviously, the lenders are still,you know, they still have debt service that you have to repay. And so somebody's got to pick up theircosts. And if he's not, there is not the contractor for a lump sum turnkey, then is the developer. Andhowever, that is not then becomes a more expensive structure, got a sense that you now have to putthe equity in. So now, it's very, very technical.Jim 22:55So maybe complex is that is that a good way to put it? 8Transcribed by https://otter.aiRiccardo Cosentino 22:59Is the well yes, complex, as actually complicated. It's very mechanical, there's no complex, it's theJim 23:07Swiss watch. It's not the flock of birds,Riccardo Cosentino 23:11which is basically, you know, when you inject equity, you know, when lenders lend you manage for aproject, that lenders lend you money for a project, they want to know that they're going to get paid back,right? And so they are going to look at the cost overruns. And they're going to look at who's going toabsorb the cost overruns. And so if the contractor is not going to pick up the cost overruns, becauseyou now have a relational contract in place, then the sponsor will, however, the sponsor has norecourse, there is no recourse to anybody above, right, typically, the contractor provides a parentcompany guarantee, and as the recourse to the parent company, but a developer because there's norecourse is not providing that they're there for they have to actually inject all of the equity upfront, rightto cover potential cost overruns. So you now have cash injected into the project, even though you mightnot need it, which makes it very, very expensive.Jim 24:08But you also have the benefit of big contingency.Riccardo Cosentino 24:11Absolutely. Absolutely. So, again, it's not is not impossible, this is just gets to the conclusion of mydissertation, which is it's possible to have relational contracting, it's going to be more expensive.However, the flip side, if we believe that collaborative Contracting is the way forward, you're going to bemore likely to finish on time and on budget, through collaboration that adversarial relations.Jim 24:38It's a funny, it's a funny perspective, to me having been involved in some complex projects, and itseems a little bit short sighted that somebody would really object to a 200 basis points or 2% increasein their cost of capital. Over massive cost overruns in the back end, huge attorney He's fees, delays,which we know costs money, I mean, time is actually money in a major program. So it's always justshocked me how everybody wants to bid to be as low as possible. Everybody wants to make sure thatthat interest rate is just as thin as they can possibly get it without giving any consideration to the factthat you're not saving anything. Because when you set up the program, that way, you're justguaranteed you're going to be over budget far more than you would ever save, and then add thelitigation on top of it that delays everything else. I mean, it just seems short sighted to me,Riccardo Cosentino 25:35unfortunately. So I'm, I specialize in public sector infrastructure. So I deal mostly with municipal, stateand federal government projects. And unfortunately, in the public sector, you have to demonstratevalue for money. And, you know, I think PPP is, it's particularly, the value for money analysis makesthings even worse, because what you end up now with is, private sector financing is more expensive inthe public sector financing a public, they know, the United States government can borrow at a cheaper 9Transcribed by https://otter.airate than any other corporation. So if you have a federal project, you're now adding, you know, 100 150bips to the cost to the cost of that because you have the private sector taken. So you now have a valuefor money analysis that already starts with you being in a hole. Because you now they Yeah, are goingto do it for a PPP are going to use private finance, but it's more expensive. So how do I balance thevalue for money? How do I justify that this is good value for money. And, you know, that's where youare starting play with risk transfer, you start quantify, the more risk you transfer, the more able you'regoing to be to show value for money, the lower the cost, the better because then again, you're going tobe able to show value for money. And as I said, The problem is that you're starting in a hole, right,because you already have to demonstrate why are using private finance. And then, and thencompound, the problem is, the way you justify private finance is by transferring risk, that are going totransfer more risks to the private sector are going to pay them more, you know, are going to pay theirhigher cost of capital. But that will bring me benefit because I have transferred to them the risk ofcompletion.Jim 27:37So you've got a, you've got a problematic paradigm may not be the it's a bit overused word, but you'vegot a problematic equation at the front end, which is creating some pretty significant adverseconsequences at the backend. Before you even get in to start talking about planning fallacy andstrategic misrepresentation. I mean, it, it sounds like the entrenched thought process behind howprojects should be evaluated, needs some work. And a fundamental understanding of the flaws in valuefor money might help. Because we know the results. I mean, there's plenty of data out there that showsI mean, independent of structure, how badly these projects perform. It's astronomical. But but it seemslike there's still some pretty heavy resistance to changing a perspective or methodology on the frontend to try to make up for some of that stuff. Is that fair?Riccardo Cosentino 28:35Yeah. I mean, you're also dealing with politicians right at this point. So it makes things even morecomplex. I think it's important that we talk about the I have other theory evidence, I guess it's furtherarea research, maybe for my PhD. But in my mind, PPP is our Chem, there is a role for PPP. So whenyou have low complexity projects, where you can actually define what you want, and you have very fewstakeholders. It's not it's not a bad model. So in Canada, various jurisdictions have had a lot of successwith hospital building, procuring them and building them using the PPP structure and as being as beingpositive as being a positive experience for all stakeholders. And this bill because it's a box, right, youbuilding a building, and it's any, you know, you can define what you want, and contractors are fairlyexperienced. And you know, it's a it's a Vertical Box. I think we're a falls apart where the PPP falls apartis when you have linear project and you start having more complexity in terms of many morestakeholders Many more moving parts in terms of you know, if you're building a railway, you now needto choose the technology, you go for different jurisdictions. And so the PPP, so having the privatesector lenders into a PPP structure creates more complexity, because he adds an additionalstakeholder and shareholder into the project. And it makes things a bit more complex, especially whenyou when you hit in problems.Jim 30:30 10Transcribed by https://otter.aiSo there's a every program has got a certain complexity threshold, that it cannot pass, it sounds like soif it's going to be, or if it's simple, from an engineering design perspective, single site, you know, squarepiece of property, whatever it can tolerate, and maybe even benefit from a certain addition ofcomplexity on top of, you know, in this case, the private sector provides access to resources thatmaybe the public sector doesn't have or can't appropriate. So the project can kind of hit that threshold.Whereas a complex project, just in the engineering and design side, may already be at that threshold orpast it. So adding another layer of financing complexity sounds disastrous,Riccardo Cosentino 31:18that's certainly the anecdotal evidence I have that especially so the way we differentiate is linear versusvertical. Right? When you have a linear project, yeah, the complexity is too high. And the benefit is,because you remember, the argument of bringing private sector lenders is that you have additionaloversight, you have an additional layer of oversight, you're going to use, the private sector lender isgoing to keep all the other stakeholder honest. So we're going to keep, let's say, the hospital ownerhonest, in terms of change order, they're not going to be able to halfway through the process, that issuechange order change in their mind, or what the scope of the project is, right? There's, you know, withthe with the design, build, finance, maintain and operate, you're actually maintaining the hospital for 30years. So you have now forced the Minister of Health to ring fence, the money required to maintain theproject for 30 years, because you're sending up a contract upfront, right. And if you if you know, publicsector, you know that the first thing the public sector cuts is operating budgets, right, so the PPP bringsbenefits. So the additional layer of complexity brought in by the private sector lenders iscounterbalanced by all these other benefits that a private sector lender brings in on a linear projectwhere the complexity is much higher, the benefits are outweighed by the negative of adding additionalcomplexity to something that cannot absorb it like you describe it very well.Jim 32:50So what conclusions did you draw from the research? I mean, PPP, the resistance to PPP,collaborative contracting, and PPP sounds fairly high. Yet the benefits seem fairly easy to argue. Andcertainly, anecdotally, we've got enough evidence where things don't work that you'd like to think afresh approach might be warmly received. But what are the impediments? What are the realistic optionsas they are today, relative to how successfullyRiccardo Cosentino 33:19I you know, can be my conclusion was pretty straightforward. It's actually it's the money issue, right? Imean, it's you, you could have collaborative contracting, it means equity has to take more risk. Andtherefore the project is going to be a little more expensive to finance because equity is taking more risk.However, if truly collaborative Contracting is the way forward and can actually deliver better on timeand on budget outcomes, then the additional cost of the private finance, to have collaboratedcontracting is, is insignificant. I haven't quantified it. But you know, you know, several basis points,compared to hundreds of millions of cost overruns. Yeah, I think if we were to do a back of theenvelope, we'll probably come to the conclusion that it's the cost benefit analysis, justify the additionalcost of financing,Jim 34:20 11Transcribed by https://otter.aiwhat's there, there's some and I'm going to get it wrong, but there's some colloquialism about steppingover dollars to pick up pennies kind ofRiccardo Cosentino 34:30Pound Foolish Pennywise PoundJim 34:32Foolish Yeah, the British the British version of the same sentiment. I keep having to remind myself thatwe went to went to graduate school in the UK, butRiccardo Cosentino 34:42yeah, so that's, you know, it'd be interesting it'd be a be interesting. The problem is PPP is a politicalbeast. I mean, the reason PPP was created, it's a political tool.Jim 34:55I mean, it to your point, it serves a purpose. It is a tool that has An application. But they the othercolloquial, I mean God, there's so many colloquialisms we could use. But if all you've got as a hammer,everything starts to look like a nail. I could go on, I'll spare the listeners, too many mixed metaphors andbad analogies. But the it sounds like your research is, or the conclusion is, it's got its place, it can bevery effective. But don't over rely on and the industry really should be open to a candid and evidencesupported discussion about alternatives.Riccardo Cosentino 35:32And it's admitting that to private finance, add an additional layer of complexity. And then the private Jimis that most practitioners don't understand complexity don't understand my major program is complexsystems. So it's not understood that you can't keep adding complexity and, and not not having negativeoutcome. Right, the more complexity you add, the more likely you have to have negative outcome, andadding a private sector lender is adding. So if you if you understand that, then you can manage andmitigate it. But if you don't even understand that private sector lending is additional complexity, thenthen you findJim 36:17that that may be the message or the beginning of the next research project or the next mission,understanding the level of complexity and how major programs are, in fact, complex adaptive systems,maybe we can take that step to your point, everything else will start to improve as well.Riccardo Cosentino 36:35So maybe we should start published, shared that complexity tool that we used complexity assessmenttool,Jim 36:46I'm sure Harvey Mahler would be thrilled if you would post a link to his research on complexity. Well,this has been fascinating. Riccardo, I certainly appreciate it. I've learned a lot. I really enjoyed readingyour research. I do think that there are opportunity. I mean, we've got enough evidence that the PPP is 12Transcribed by https://otter.aidon't work that well outside of some pretty specific application. So I think the work that you've done willcertainly push that conversation forward. And I, you know, I appreciate the opportunity to talk with youabout it.Riccardo Cosentino 37:21Thank you very much, Jim. And thanks for hosting the episode today. And hopefully, I'll have you backover guest in the foreseeable future.Jim 37:28That'd be great. I'd certainly appreciate the chance. Thank you.Riccardo Cosentino 37:32Thank you. That's it. For this episode, we'll navigate the major problems. I hope you found today'sconversation as informative and thought provoking as I did. If you enjoyed this conversation, pleaseconsider subscribing and leaving a review. I would also like to personally invite you to continue theconversation by joining me on my personal LinkedIn at Riccardo Cosentino. Listening to the nextepisode, where we will continue to explore the latest trends and challenges in major programmanagement. Our next in depth conversation promises to continue to dive into topics such asleadership, risk management, and the impact of emerging technology in infrastructure. It's aconversation you're not going to want to miss. Thanks for listening to navigate major problems. And Ilook forward to keeping the conversation going Music: "A New Tomorrow" by Chordial Music. Licensed through PremiumBeat.DISCLAIMER: The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the hosts and guests on this podcast do not necessarily represent or reflect the official policy, opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of Disenyo.co LLC and its employees.

What does God's word say about pain? As in NOTHING is wasted!... Romans 3: 3-5

What does God's word say about pain? As in NOTHING is wasted!... Romans 3: 3-5

What does God's word say about pain? As in NOTHING is wasted!... Romans 3: 3-5

On todays Podcast Bry the Movie Guy talks about a Cody guilty pleasure in the Michael Bay 2013 film Pain and Gain! Let's dive into the multiverse to see who could have stared. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/inaworldwhatifpodcast/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/inaworldwhatifpodcast/support

One of us is here to show Michael Bay some love and the other is completely baffled. In this episode we are discussing ‘Ambulance' and ‘Pain & Gain.' Full spoilers ahead! Ambulance discussion starts 00:47, Pain & Gain discussion starts 31:05, Next episode recommendation starts 1:13:20

Di beste Business-Tipps fürs Jahr 2023.

Dr. Christine Chambers on how to manage needle nervousness for grandkids; Family Counsellor Alyson Schafer on how to talk to grandkids about world events; Take 5 With RBC looks at the latest economic outlook for fall of 2022.

SOURCES: GRISLY ACTS ARE DESCRIBED IN COURT – Sun SentinelPain & Gain: Where the Real-Life Sun Gym Gang Characters Are Now | NewsFLORIDA IS FOR . . . THE BOLD & THE BEAUTIFUL, IN MIAMI'S SOUTH BEACH - The Washington PostPain and Gain-The Untold True Story: Schiller, Marc: 9780615740065: Amazon.comPain & Gain | News | MiamiDOORBAL v. STATE | FindLawLUGO v. STATE | FindLawHollywood Docket: The Clemency Project; Erin Andrews Deal; ‘Pain & Gain' Settlement

Big budgets. Explosions. Fast cuts. Chances are, you're watching a Michael Bay film. Join us for a look at one of his better films; the based-on-a-true-story crime comedy "Pain & Gain." Bay delves into the Sun Gym Gang's crazy story with his signature visuals, and over-the-top performances by Mark Wahlberg, Anthony Mackie, and Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. www.afilmbypodcast.comafilmbypodcast@gmail.com@afilmbypodcast on Facebook and Twitter

Welcome back to the SHUDcast and boy do we have some gloopy deliciousness in stock for this one (and aside from our lives in general)! We get past some initial wildness as Cody forces us to watch the end of a hockey match during our recording (and of course we kept it in because who doesn't want to hear us marvel at the oddness of our beloved Cody) and dig deep, deep, DEEP into the mind of one of our true artistic geniuses, Phil Tippet, with his stop-motion labor of love and all things bodily fluids: MAD GOD. Check it out and enjoy!   00:00 - 28:30ish Intros: Please excuse Cody as he makes us watch the ending of a hockey match as we open… but it highlights more of who he is as a lovely human being so bear with us. The boys experience weather for the first time, what it might be like to get old, Austin and Cody go to the Halsey show, our thoughts on other “pop acts”, Steve Albini and how music producers work, and Hollywood Bowl stuff.    28:30ish - 1:14:30ish  What we watched this time: Errementari, Anaconda, Nobody Sleeps in the Woods Tonight, Hustle, Shoresy, Alligator, Eyes of Fire, Stranger Things Season 4, Obi-Wan Kenobi, For All Mankind, Pain & Gain, Severance, The Bourne Supremacy, The Bourne Ultimatum, Everything Everywhere All At Once (Austin finally took the plunge), and Jackass 4.5 (we contain multitudes).   1:14:30ish - 2:04:20 MAD GOD SHUDdown and discussion   2:04:20 - What we're watching next time!

Los incómodamente divertidos crímenes de la pandilla de SUN GYM de MIAMi historia que eventualmente seria inspirado la pelicula de "PAIN AND GAIN" ¿conocían esta increíble historia? ----------------------------------------///----------------------------------- Este episodio es patrocinado por: *HAIKU; comida+cultura japonesa: https://www.facebook.com/haikumexicali *MANJARES MACHETE: https://www.facebook.com/manjaresmachete *CERVECERIA MANDALA: https://www.facebook.com/cerveceriamandala *NEXT LEVEL TATTOO: https://www.facebook.com/nextleveltatt -La búsqueda incansable de respuestas es la que nos mueve! SIGUENOS EN REDES SOCIALES: IG: https://www.instagram.com/sindicatodeignorantes FB: https://www.facebook.com/sindicatodeignorantes YT: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfaZMRIyl-yDJGJQeYSfUkQ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/sindicatodeignorantes/message

Most homeowners are still making healthy profits when they sell their houses, despite growing weakness in the market. CoreLogic's latest "Pain & Gain" report shows 98.1 percent of properties resold in the June quarter made a profit, down 1-point from the previous quarter. The median gain fell about $48,000 to $370,000, while the median loss increased to $40,000. CoreLogic chief economist Kelvin Davidson spoke to Corin Dann.

SUBSCRIBE NOW for early access and exclusive bonus episodes at WWW.PATREON.COM/ROTTENREWIND "When it started, America was just a handful of scrawny colonies. Now, it's the most buff, pumped-up country on the planet." - Daniel Lugo To celebrate the most buff, pumped-up country on the planet, Rotten Rewind is kicking off our most epic miniseries to date. For the next 6 months, we'll be asking listeners the question: "What is Vulgar Auteurism?" In its simplest terms, it's a movement that celebrates the reappraisal of filmmakers that critics have often scorned or even lamented as the death of cinema. In other words, it's a perfect subject for the podcast. And what better filmmaker to kick the series off with than the most buff, pumped-up filmmaker on the planet: Michael Bay. We're joined by #1 Bay Stan, Olivia Willke, to finally unpack one of the films we've been thirsty for since we first conceived of the podcast: Michael Bay's "Pain and Gain." A pulverizing, grimly funny, relentlessly entertaining satire on the American Dream gone awry, "Pain and Gain" might have been one of Bay's most well-received films at the time of its release, but that didn't stop a majority of un-American critics from trying to stop the party. Thankfully, we're here to put these unpatriotic cucks in their place as we pay our fucking respects to the big dick king of Bayhem. So join us as we discuss Bay's unfiltered vision of American vulgarity and the modern masterpiece known as "Pain and Gain."

Welcome to Book of Lies Podcast! It's true I bought $25 shoes in a Vegas Bathroom, so sad yet worth it. Have a listen to what unfolded in Las Vegas.Jen Shah from Real Housewives of Salt Lake City, has plead guilty to Fraud and is looking at some serious time. This week we bring you the TRUE story behind the 2013 film Pain & Gain starring Mark Wahlberg, Dwayne Johnson and Anthony Mackie. Trigger warnings include - Kidnapping, Torture and Sexual Assault Visit us online at www.bookofliespodcast.com Promo from A Date with Murder PodcastShout Out to Murderific True Crime Podcast on ig @murderificpodcast Stay safe friends. We love you! Join us on Patreon www.patreon.com/bookofliespodcast

A trio of bodybuilders (Mark Wahlberg, Dwayne Johnson, and Anthony Mackie) in Florida get caught up in an extortion ring and a kidnapping scheme that goes terribly wrong. This was one of those ridiculous movies that came out 9 years ago that just came across my TV recently. I had to give my thoughts about this one! Check it out today! --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/kevin-casey8/support

Can't extort millions of dollars from a guy with a little torture. No pain, no gain, as the saying goes.  This week we look at the 2013 Michael Bay biopic, Pain & Gain. Based on a true story of a group of criminals from the beautiful city of Miami, Pain & Gain certainly provides so pain and gain. Dalé! As always, if you have any suggestions or concerns email me at videostorewasteland@gmail.com

BONUS EPISODES & PREMIUM ACCESS: https://auxoro.supercast.com This time, Zach discusses conquering his inner b*tch in the sauna, the movie Pain & Gain with The Rock and Mark Wahlberg, and an excerpt from Steven Pressfield's 'The War of Art.' THE AUX LINKSApple: https://apple.co/3yc6CQXSpotify: https://spoti.fi/3icuZIIOvercast: https://bit.ly/3j1B8qgWebsite: https://www.auxoro.com/Newsletter: https://www.auxoro.com/thesource SOCIAL LINKS:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aux.pod/TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aux.podNewsletter: https://www.auxoro.com/thesourceYouTube: https://bit.ly/3jHsJcm If you enjoy the show, please consider leaving a short review on Apple Podcasts. It takes less than 60 seconds, helps us appear higher in searches so more people discover the show, and it boosts my ego;) 

Teamwork makes the dream work. But what if your dream is a get-rich-quick scheme involving kidnapping and murder? And what if your team is a ragtag squad of steroid-swollen gym rats sharing about sixteen brain cells between them? This is the story of what happens when ego meets incompetence, with a generous handful of evil thrown in. Plus: Abs. Lots and lots of abs. Join us for the story of the Sun Gym gang--a case so strange, Hollywood turned it into the movie "Pain & Gain." Sources:Pete Collins, Pain and Gain (3-part longform article) https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/pain-and-gain-6396870Murderpedia, various articles: https://murderpedia.org/male.L/l/lugo-daniel.htmCBS' "48 Hours," episode "Pain and Gain"Follow us, campers!Patreon (join to get all episodes ad-free, at least a day early, an extra episode a month, and a free sticker!): https://patreon.com/TrueCrimeCampfireFacebook: True Crime CampfireInstagram: https://gramha.net/profile/truecrimecampfire/19093397079Twitter: @TCCampfire https://twitter.com/TCCampfireEmail: truecrimecampfirepod@gmail.comMERCH! https://true-crime-campfire.myspreadshop.com/

Tällä kertaa podcast jaksossa aiheena juuri 50 vuotta täyttänyt entinen WWE painija, josta sittemmin tuli Hollywoodin eniten tienaava näyttelijä Dwayne ”The Rock” Johnson. Olen ollut iso Dwayne Johnson fani sieltä 2000-luvun alusta, jolloin näin ensi kertaa vapaapainia TV:stä. Ja olin innoissani kun mies siirtyi näyttelemään. Mutta onko miehen leffat hyviä, vai ei? Siihen koitan hieman pureutua jaksossa, jossa käsittelen seitsemää miehen elokuvaa. Joo herralla on jo monta kymmentä leffaa, mutta ei vain ole aikaa käsitellä niitä kaikkia, joten melko randomisti valitsin 7 leffaa, jotka katsoin. Arvostelussa miehen leffoista Faster, Baywatch, Central Intelligence, Snitch, Rampage, Pain & Gain ja Jumanji: The Next Level.

We're back with an all-new BAYhem episode of the podcast as Ed & Justin team up to breakdown Michael Bay's little indie darling, 2013's Pain & Gain!! In 'Pain & Gain', a trio of bodybuilders in Florida get caught up in an extortion ring and a kidnapping scheme that goes terribly wrong.. Episode Directory: *Intro (0:00) *First Time Viewings (9:43) *Live Top Five (10:46) *Plot Breakdown (22:53) *Box Office Receipts (2:28:41) *Critic's Corner (2:31:07) *Pros/Cons (2:38:29) *Mulligan Moment (2:50:25) *Finger-Lickin' Good (2:54:25) *Movie MVPs (2:57:15) *Final Thoughts (3:03:29) *Wrap-Up (3:08:43) New episodes of “The Film Effect Podcast” premiere every Tuesday morning!! Website: https://www.thefilmeffectpodcast.com Get all your 'Film Effect' merch here: https://www.thefilmeffectpodcast.com/store Find us on social media! Facebook: https://facebook.com/thefilmeffectpodcast IG: https://instagram.com/thefilmeffectpodcast Twitter: https://twitter.com/filmeffectpod TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@filmeffectpodcast Email: thefilmeffectpodcast@gmail.com --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/thefilmeffectpodcast/support

**TRIGGER WARNING** This episode contains discussions of gender politics and sexual assault. In this episode, Ricardo and Seth flex their analytical muscles as they reflect on the themes of toxic masculinity, gender biases and stigmas, classism, and the poisonous side of the American Dream present in Michael Bay's 2013 gym rat tragicomedy, PAIN & GAIN. For those of you watching along, the next film we'll be discussing is...: EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE (2022) If you're enjoying the discussion as much as we are, please subscribe and share this with all your film nerd friends! Thank you! Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/whatsitaboutpodcast/?hl=en You can find Seth and Ricardo at: Ricardo Blayde Diaz: https://www.instagram.com/ricardoblaydediaz/?hl=en Seth Crowe: https://www.instagram.com/sethadamcrowe/?hl=en Theme song: "Dancing Time" by Infraction (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-2fZGtmSgU) --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app

2013s Pain & Gain versus 2014s Nightcrawler. Apologies for the slight moments of lagging, hopefully the episode is still worth it. Indulge!

Michael Bay's 10th film is all about the insane true story of 3 body builders who sought the American dream...by kidnapping and robbing a wealthy guy. It's completely ridiculous but Michael Bay is the PERFECT director for this, and with some career best performances from The Rock and Mark Wahlberg, this is not only one of my favourite Michael Bay films, but also one of my favourites ever!

The Secret Movie Club Team (Connor Lloyd Crews, Edwin Gomez, Daniel Ott, Craig Hammill) discuss when comedians begin to make dramas and art films, a transition that often happens mid-career. Well known examples of Robin Williams, Jim Carrey, Adam Sandler get discussed as well as international art house sensation Beat Takashi. The Team then flips the script and discusses when action and drama stars start making comedies like The Rock in PAIN & GAIN. Edwin yet again attacks Craig for perceived programming slights. Connor remotes in from Texas after some dental work. 

Pain and Gain is a 2013 American True Crime Action Comedy from Michael Bay - The film is loosely based on a series of 1999 news articles which detail the kidnapping, extortion, torture, and murder of several victims by the Sun Gym gang. Today Peter and Corey talk about it. Plugs: Corey's Album "Julia" out soon. Sponsors:  www.TotallyGoodTime.com - USE CODE FLORIDAVS15 FOR 15% OFF  @LuckyNicksPizza - Lucky Nick's Pizza - Wood-fired sourdough pizza and more --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/floridavs/support

People use a lot of phrases and terms nobody really understands in sales - it can be highly confusing. That is detrimental for salespeople because they need to know how to communicate with their prospects. People who have never heard about them before. Patrick only understood many of these terms very late in his career and that is why he wants to make them available for others earlier. Happy learning!

Eliza Owen sits down with Grace Ormsby to look at the factors that have led to record vendor profitability to date in 2021. The head of research at CoreLogic discusses findings from the most recent Pain & Gain report, pointing out just how much protection of the Australian property market has taken place. The pair compare completely different market environments across the June quarter and the September quarter, before analysing the potential impacts of a release from lockdown coinciding with APRA's lending intervention. In this episode, you will hear: - Why Australia isn't headed for a property downturn - Which factors are generating the most profit for vendors - What agents can expect from the December quarter   Make sure you never miss an episode by subscribing to us now on Apple Podcasts. Did you like this episode? Show your support by rating us or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts (REB Podcast Network) and by liking and following Real Estate Business on social media: Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. If you have any questions about what you heard today, any topics of interest you have in mind, or if you'd like to lend a voice to the show, email editor@realestatebusiness.com.au for more insights.

私たちが克服していきたいものは大きく二つある。それがPAINとGAIN。目標設定としても使える PAINとは痛み 業界標準や世界標準と比べた時に当社が劣っていることを何とかしたい 男性の育休取得やテレワークの比率など、生産性、利益率など 弱みを標準にする 損失回避（Loss Aversion）とは、人々は損失を避けるような意思決定を行う傾向が強いということである。 KahnemanとTverskyは同じ額の利得を得るときの喜びに比べて、損失を被る悲しみは2倍であると述べている。（こちらに目が向きやすい） GAINとは得たいもの 標準的なことを押し上げて、強みにしたい まずは、PAINに目を向けつつも、GAINにも配慮するのが目標設定のポイント

This episode finds our heroes reviewing the 2013 Action/Crime film Pain & Gain. With the employ of an elite cast ( Mark Wahlberg, Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, And Tony Shalhoub to name a few), as well as being based on a true story, numerous talking points await. Tune in and give us a listen.

Greg's WMD (Wacky Movie Disclaimer) pick is 2013's Pain & Gain. As Lauren and Greg watch through this ‘based on a true story' crime film about the Miami Sun Gym Gang, we pick apart the Michael Bay action influences on this ‘true story', Superfluous Ed Harris, and why it's a seriously bad idea to move into the mansion of the person you robbed but didn't kill. Music: 64Sunday by Twinmusicom.org

How many doctors of physical therapy do you know who are not only elite level athletes and coaches, but also have experience as a lawyer, military veteran, and champion level speedgolfer? Our guest today is all those things and more, and joins us discuss everything from running shoes to rehab protocols and then some.

Mark Wahlberg, aka Marky Mark, luci ed ombre di una carriera tutta d'un pezzo, commentata per l'occasione dal dinamico duo Houssy e Carfa.Elenco dei titoli trattati: Mezzo professore tra i marines (Renaissance Man), regia di Penny Marshall (1994)Paura (Fear), regia di James Foley (1996)Boogie Nights - L'altra Hollywood (Boogie Nights), regia di Paul Thomas Anderson (1997)Il grande colpo (The Big Hit), regia di Kirk Wong (1998)Three Kings, regia di David O. Russell (1999)La tempesta perfetta (The Perfect Storm), regia di Wolfgang Petersen (2000)Planet of the Apes - Il pianeta delle scimmie (Planet of the Apes), regia di Tim Burton (2001)Rock Star, regia di Stephen Herek (2001)The Truth About Charlie, regia di Jonathan Demme (2002)The Italian Job, regia di F. Gary Gray (2003)Four Brothers - Quattro fratelli (Four Brothers), regia di John Singleton (2005)The Departed - Il bene e il male (The Departed), regia di Martin Scorsese (2006)Shooter, regia di Antoine Fuqua (2007)I padroni della notte (We Own the Night), regia di James Gray (2007)E venne il giorno (The Happening), regia di M. Night Shyamalan (2008)Max Payne, regia di John Moore (2008)Amabili resti (The Lovely Bones), regia di Peter Jackson (2009)I poliziotti di riserva (The Other Guys), regia di Adam McKay (2010)The Fighter, regia di David O. Russell (2010)Contraband, regia di Baltasar Kormákur (2012)Ted, regia di Seth MacFarlane (2012)Broken City, regia di Allen Hughes (2013)Pain & Gain - Muscoli e denaro (Pain & Gain), regia di Michael Bay (2013)Cani sciolti (2 Guns), regia di Baltasar Kormákur (2013)Lone Survivor, regia di Peter Berg (2013)Transformers 4 - L'era dell'estinzione (Transformers: Age of Extinction), di Michael Bay (2014)The Gambler, regia di Rupert Wyatt (2014)Ted 2, regia di Seth MacFarlane (2015)Daddy's Home, regia di Sean Anders e John Morris (2015)Deepwater - Inferno sull'oceano (Deepwater Horizon), regia di Peter Berg (2016)Boston - Caccia all'uomo (Patriots Day), regia di Peter Berg (2016)Transformers - L'ultimo cavaliere (Transformers: The Last Knight), regia di Michael Bay (2017)Daddy's Home 2, regia di Sean Anders (2017)Tutti i soldi del mondo (All the Money in the World), regia di Ridley Scott (2017)Red Zone - 22 miglia di fuoco (Mile 22), regia di Peter Berg (2018)Instant Family, regia di Sean Anders (2018)Spenser Confidential, regia di Peter Berg (2020)Good Joe Bell, regia di Reinaldo Marcus Green (2020)Infinite, regia di Antoine Fuqua (2021)

In this episode of The Great Australian Dream we welcome back Eliza Owen - Head of Australian Research at Core Logic Australia and discuss what dynamics may change and see a decline in demand. We also look at the segmentation of the market (The winners & Losers) along with the Pain & Gain report.

One of my favourite movies is Pain & Gain starring Mark Wahlberg and Dwayne Johnson. Based on true events of the Sun Gym Gang's extortion and murder of wealthy business people the 90's sun-soaked Miami, Florida. This is the mixed story, sort of. 

On this episode of Coach Fred's Authentic Quote of the Day: Sat, Jun 26, 2021 - “When life gets hard, ask yourself, ‘What do I want for my life?' Remember that is the reason why you're doing what you're doing. Keep going.” Know your ‘Why' and go for what you want in life. ✅ SUBSCRIBE TO THIS PODCAST and get your daily dose of AUTHENTIC POSITIVE VIBES!!

data: 3 mei en 8 juni 2021 gasten: Seppe Toremans en Sven De Ridder Wie is de beste regisseur: David Lynch of Michael Bay? We hebben het er met Seppe over. Hij bekeek de Michael Bay film: Pain & Gain en Fokke moest The Straight Story en Inland Empire van David Lynch zien. Daarna voegt Sven zich in het gesprek en bespreken we de Michael Bay film uit 2001: Pearl Harbour.

The episode that almost wasn't. After many delays the boys are back in the studio with remote special guest Micah Smith to discuss 2005's financial masterpiece The Big Short. Along the way they break down the fiasco of events leading up to the recording, weeding out the real listeners, Comfort Colors, cuditing, slanging mortages, The Big Shirt, heavy metal, Pain & Gain and much, much more on this episode of The Loosest Conceptual Movie Podcast On The Internet™.

This week we continue our season of Mark Wahlberg with 2013's Pain & Gain. Including our favorite moments of the movie, full character breakdowns, trivia, and more. If you love dumb movies and even more idiotic humor then you've stumbled across the perfect podcast. Each and every Thursday we bring you some of the best content Mark Wahlberg has ever been a part of. All in the hopes of creating the definitive top 10 list of Marky Mark movies. So make sure to subscribe to this podcast on your favorite listening platform. Music Credits: LAKEY INSPIRED - Better Days Stream on Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2YxsvYG Download→ https://soundcloud.com/lakeyinspired/... ► Music Credit: Dj Quads Track Name: "It's Near" Music By: Dj Quads @ https://soundcloud.com/aka-dj-quads Original upload HERE - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UI79n... • Music promoted by NCM: https://goo.gl/fh3rEJ ► Music Credit: SUNDANCE Track Name: "Perséphone - Retro Funky (SUNDANCE remix)" Music By: SUNDANCE @ https://soundcloud.com/sundancemusic

Tonight we have a bunch of TV and Movie news for you. Plus we will give you out review of Pain & Gain starring Dwayne Johnson.

Episode 60 - 2013 Year in Preview (Feature Film) Erik Woods (Cinematic Sound Radio) joins Christopher, Marius, Richard and Edmund for our final edition of the 2013 Year in Preview series. For this final installment, they tackle the rest of 2013's announced feature films and their respective scores. The fellows sidetrack on to Hans Zimmer versus Trevor Morris' use of synths and symphonic orchestra, just how good/bad Ramin Djawadi's score for Iron Man is and Romeo "Versus" Juliet? Episode Highlights 00:00 "I don't need a microphone, I can use my staff!" 01:15 Welcome back 02:57 A wizard is never out of touch...(Contact Us) 06:33 Jan.- Escape from Tomorrow, Gangster Squad, The GrandMaster, Momma 09:32 Feb. - Side Effects, A Good Day to Die Hard 11:16 March - Emporer, Jack/Giant Slayer, Oz, G.I. Joe, 14:36 Trevor Morris versus Hans Zimmer and the use of synths 24:43 April - Evil Dead, 42, Oblivion, Pain & Gain, Star Trek Into Darkness, Fast/Furious 6 32:12 May - Iron Man 3, The Great Gatsby 33:47 What did Djawadi do? 45:49 June - After Earth, Man of Steel, World War Z, White House Down 58:52 July - The Lone Rangers, Pacific Rim, The Wolverine 63:53 August - 300: Rise of an Empire, Two Guns, Elysium, Percy Jackson 2, Kick Ass 2 74:14 Sept. - Riddick, Unforgiven, Rush, The Tomb 76:20 Oct. - Gravity, Old Boy, Captain Phillips, Winter's Tale, Romea & Juliet 83:03 Nov. - Ender's Game, Thor 2, Lone Survivor, The Hunger Games 2, 86:36 Dec. - The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug, Mobster: Call of the New Order, 47 Ronin, Jack Ryan, Grace of Monaco 94:27 2013 Year in Preview: No release date - Snowpiecer, Zulu, Killing Season 104:24 "Oh! I've forgotten me fireworks!" Music Selections 00:31 "Old Friends (Extended)" - (The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey - SE) by Howard Shore 01:01 "Can You Dig It (Iron Man 3 Main Titles)" (Iron Man 3) by Brian Tyler 14:39 "The Full Package Snowy Car Talk" (Olympus Has Fallen) by Trevor Morris 17:00 "The Gladiator Waltz" (More Music from Gladiator) by Hans Zimmer 23:57 "Arishkage" (G.I. Joe Retaliation) by Henry Jackman 28:14 "StarWaves" (Oblivion) by Anthony Gonzales, Joseph Trapanese 32:20 "Iron Man 3" (Iron Man 3) by Brian Tyler 36:57 "Driving with the Top Down" (Iron Man) by Ramin Djawadi 40:17 "Star Trek" (Star Trek) by Michael Giacchino 44:46 "Fast Five" (Fast Five) by Brian Tyler 52:28 "Weightlifting" (Unbreakable) by James Newton Howard 58:57 "Rango Retruns" (Rango) by Hans Zimmer 63:58 "Returns a King" (300) by Tyler Bates 67:36 "Prelude" - (Percy Jackson and Sea of Monsters) by Andrew Lockington 81:46 "Young Diana's Future - A Future That Could Have Been" (Life Before Her Eyes) by James Horner 83:48 "To Jotunheim" (Thor: The Dark World) by Patrick Doyle 85:50 "Horn of Plenty (Panem_s National Anthem)" (The Hunger Games) by James Newton Howard 86:42 "A Good Omen" (The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug) by Howard Shore 92:07 "Bright Eyes Escapes" (Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes) by Patrick Doyle 100:39 "A World Without End" (Priest) by Christopher Young Additional Notes: Listen to Cinematic Sound Radio Follow: Erik Woods (@cinsoundradio) Download the Episode Subscribe and More Info