Podcasts about Polyandry

Run and hide!  Today we jump into the 1870s and 80s to see what made our beloved ancestors be so eager to ditch the law and go underground.  (Spoilers, it's more polygamy!).  Part of our ongoing series covering American Zion: A New History of Mormonism, by Benjamin E. Park! Link to our Face in Hat discord server! https://discord.gg/MnSMvKHvwh YouTube channel!  Thanks Eric! https://www.youtube.com/@FaceinHat https://www.youtube.com/@FaceinHat/playlists Dialogue Podcast Network https://www.dialoguejournal.com/podcasts/ American Zion: A New History of Mormonism, by Benjamin E. Park https://www.amazon.com/American-Zion-New-History-Mormonism/dp/1631498657 A Mormon Maid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Mormon_Maid Emmeline B. Wells https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmeline_B._Wells Episode 1.8 Polygamy's Ghost https://faceinhat.podbean.com/e/episode-8-polygamy-s-ghost/ Polygamy (Polygyny, Polyandry), by Miriam Koktvedgaard Zeitzen https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1377 Find Randy Astle on the AML Discord server!  Eric can spot you an invite.  AML: https://www.associationmormonletters.org/

Clarence Ford speaks to Renowned artist Freya Willemoes-Wissing is set to unveil her provocative new exhibition, Love Unbound, at the AVA Gallery – Long Gallery from 10 October to 10 December 2024.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode we discuss our experiences with Prodommes, and the extent to which the they can reasonably be considered to be professionals.Episode Art: Unknown Woman,  Artist: Lavinia Fontana, c. 1600Support the Show.

This episode is the first of a two-part episode about the kinkification of misogyny.Support the Show.

This week on the Erotic Awakening Podcast, @dananddawn interview a Polyandry household w/Goddess April, Rickie and Steve ….. ……plus, they chat about ethical BDSM porn….explain the Star Wars meme they were confused about on a previous show, and share their thoughts on Bastinado and how dawn has changed her mind about it…   Links mentioned on the show: New Education Videos by Dan and dawn             www.eroticawakening.com    Midwest Fem Domme Group      https://fetlife.com/users/9932213 TransALL Chicago Group   https://fetlife.com/groups/154079 Ethical BDSM Porn         www.kink.com   Enjoy!!! Dan and dawn   *********************************** Discounts on our books, free eBooks, weekly exclusive content, and support Dan & dawn   https://www.patreon.com/eroticawakening   *****************************************   Find us on YouTube, Discord, Facebook, TikTok; check out our Podcast, our books, calendar, and sign up for our Monthly Newsletter!   www.eroticawakening.com  

In this episode we discuss Part 3 in More Than Two, focusing on differences between power dynamics in polyamory and our 24/7 TPE dynamic. Episode Art: Louis XIV,  Hyacinth Rigaud, 1701Support the show

The girls are back with another Seeking Sister Wife recap and Garrick just keeps getting worse! We can't help but hate his guts! Trash is trash though, and these Raccoons are hungry! Get a bunch of uncensored cringey content by joining our Patreon! https://patreon.com/realitytvcringeFollow us on IG https://instagram.com/realitytvcringeSubscribe to see our raccoon faces on YouTube! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_2CgqXLWjIEKV9PCtH3Kjw?sub_confirmation=1Leave a message for us on SpeakPipe: https://speakpipe.com/realitytvcringeSupport the pod by leaving a 5-star review on your favorite podcast platform! Thank you so much!

In this episode, we discuss our experiences at a local Femdom event.Episode Art: No Title, Dorothea Lange, 1939,  Yale/Library of CongressSupport the show

In this episode, we discuss Jislaaik's penchant for breaking rules. Episode Art:  Isabella Stewart Gardner in Venice,  Anders Zorn, 1894Support the show

In this episode, we discuss the uses of nakedness in our power exchange dynamic. Episode Art: Study of a Nude Man, Gustave Corbet, c. 1840sSupport the show

In this episode we discuss a variety of relationship tools that could be useful to both polyamorists and polyandrists. Episode Art: Bacchus [detail],  Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, 1596Support the show

In this episode, we discuss the extent to which we can adapt ideas and strategies from the world of polyamory to our future polyandrous relationships. Episode Art: Polyamory Symbol, Artist: Opensofia, Wikimedia CommonsSupport the show

In this episode we'll discuss our interest in polyandry (one woman with multiple male partners) and provide a brief overview of Season 5. Support the show

Topic: Joseph Smith's Polyandry, Part 2 Co-host: Earl Erskine

Topic: Joseph Smith's Polyandry, Part 1 Co-host: Earl Erskine

The title says it all. Have you ever heard of the show “Sister Wives”? Well, this episode talks about the idea of Brother Husbands. Jenny also shares another idea of a “book she will never write”, and we hope someday she will! Show Notes: 0:00: Intro 0:45: Greeting 0:50: Instagram numbers  1:30: Netflix show: Mask Girl  2:10: Netflix has destroyed Korean shows  4:20: Sister Wives 5:22: Break  5:28: Polygamy  7:15: He's demanding for Patriarchy  7:30: Kody and Mary Hierarchy  8:20: Hierarchy in families  9:00: When one woman marries brothers  10:05: You need a Hierarchy in your family  11:05: Break  11:27: Polygamy and Polyandry  12:30: Similar to Royalty  12:45: Mandy's thoughts  14:20: Jenny's book she'll never write  16:45: Oral Fixation from Sigmund Freud  17:16: Break 17:23: This would be a great book series! 17:43: What would Kurt Cobain be doing? 18:25: They cleaned up: they either survived or died  18:55: How are these people still alive?  19:25: Back to Jenny's book 19:45: What do you think Cobain would be doing now? 21:15: How did we get here?  21:35: No takeaways  21:40: Kite Flying Hiatus  22:10: New Podcast scheme  23:40: Ending 23:45: Outro

Jesus proved resurrection with scripture to the unbelievers Sadducees. After His own resurrection, we have evidence that God sovereignly will raise all who died in Christ. - SERMON TRANSCRIPT - A number of years ago, I was in an old cemetery in the center of the state of Kentucky. I was going through that area and there was this old kind of country church, and as often happens with these country churches, there was a cemetery connected with it, and I was walking through it. I came to a headstone that had been completely weathered, effaced by wind and rain and time. Based on the dates that were on the stones around it, probably in the latter part of the 19th century, quarter of the 19th century, 1870s, 1880s. As I knelt down, I could feel with my fingertips some slight indentations on the headstone, but I couldn't read any letter, not a single letter. I thought, "Who was this person? What did they do? How long did they live? Male or female? Is there anybody alive today in that area that would know who that person was?" I thought about the finality of death and how awesome an enemy death really is, how all of the glory of humanity is stripped away by death. Within a short amount of time in most cases, there's not a person on earth that remembers that that person ever lived. The book of Ecclesiastes faces these truths square on and speaks bleakness over human life, vanity of vanities. Everything is vanity. Everything we put our hand to is vanity. Ecclesiastes 3:20, "We come from dust and to dust we return." All of our great projects, we have to entrust them to someone else who didn't build them, and who knows what's going to happen with them. Within a short amount of time, all that we have constructed becomes destructed, blows away like chaff in the wind. ,Ecclesiastes 9:6, "The dead in the grave. They know nothing,” the writer says. "All of their loves and hates their envys and their achievements are forgotten." Ecclesiastes, I think, the way I look at that book, is that's what life would be like if there is no resurrection from the dead. But friends, I stand before you today to say that there is resurrection from the dead, therefore our labor in the Lord is not “vanity of vanities.” The things we do in the Lord will last for all eternity. They will have eternal consequence. Apostle Paul on trial for his life stood before the Sanhedrin and said these words, "I stand before you today because of my hope in the resurrection from the dead." I feel like as a preacher today, that's what I'm doing. I stand before you today because of my hope in the resurrection from the dead. But that's insufficient. I stand before you today on behalf of your hope in the resurrection from the dead, my hope and your hope, and I want our hope to be robust. I want it to be fed today, and there's only one food for that hope and that is the Word of God. Only by the Word of God can our hope in the resurrection from the dead be strengthened. I. Is Death the End? So the question in front of us, because of these Sadducees that came to question Jesus, is, "Is death the end?” Job asked this question. Job 14:14, "If a man dies, will he live again?” We walked through the Book of Job and we saw that despite remarkable faith at the beginning of his trial, Job was worn down by the sorrows, worn down by the grief, and began to say some things that were, putting it gently, questionable. He wrestled it seems with doubts concerning death in that very chapter in which he raises the question, "If a man dies, will he live again?" He seems to say, "I don't think so." In Job 14:7-12 he says, "At least there is hope for a tree. If it is cut down, it will sprout again and its new chutes will not fail, but man dies and is laid low. He breathes last and is no more. Man lies down and does not rise. Until the heavens are no more, men will not awake or be roused from their sleep." Praise God, that's not true. But Job had never seen any evidence to the contrary, neither have we with our own eyes. When I was preaching through Job, I made this statement, “Job is a better man than any of us will ever be, but we have a better hope than he ever had.” Hallelujah. We have a better hope. Christ is that better hope, and we're going to see that in this sermon all over the world people are yearning for an answer to death. You see evidence of it in the mausoleums and the different things, artifacts that people do in connection with funerals. The pyramids of Egypt were built in preparation for the Pharaohs to live after death. They were arranging a bunch of things they thought they might need in the next life. So also the emperor of China centuries ago, millennia ago, crafted a vast terracotta army to be with him, to fight there. I don't know how much those terracotta soldiers would do for him, but there it was. That's what he was yearning for. A coin was placed in the mouth of the dead by the ancient Greeks to pay the ferrymen for a boat ride across the river Styx, the River of Death. Some plains Indians buried dead warriors with a horse with a bow and arrow to help them hunt in the next world. So also, Eskimos of Greenland bury a guide dog with deceased person to help guide them through the cold wasteland of death. Ecclesiastes says, Ecclesiastes 3:11, that "God has set eternity in the hearts of men.” We have a sense that death is an interloper, an enemy, it shouldn't be there, something's wrong here. We don't have an answer. Now we're surrounded by scientific unbelief on this question. We live in a very scientific region of the country. This area's growing by leaps and bounds, population wise, and tons of people pouring in here to work in the RTP, the semiconductors, pharmaceutical research, all of that. I'm aware of the atheistic materialistic mindset concerning this question. It goes something like this: Death can be described as the failure of a body to metabolize. Once you're dead, you're dead. Asking what lies in store for us after death is about as meaningful as asking what you remember from before your birth with pretty much the same answer. Before your birth you didn't exist, and after your death, well you won't exist either. So in short, you will not be around to worry about it. But never fear. If you make use useful use of your potential, what you are, what you can become, what you want to be, you'll enjoy the ride. Remember to stop and smell the roses along the way because you'll never get the chance again. Sounds like the biblical statement, "Let's eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow we die." If there's no resurrection from the dead, just get as much joy as you can out of life because that's it. So for centuries, skeptics have doubted the existence of the afterlife, and the Sadducees were Jesus's generation version of that. We're called on as a church to reach people who are without hope and without God in the world. Of the essence of being without hope is this question of life after death. They don't believe in it, they don't think it can happen or they don't know what it is. "So for centuries, skeptics have doubted the existence of the afterlife, and the Sadducees were Jesus's generation version of that. We're called on as a church to reach people who are without hope and without God in the world." II. The Sadducees: Enemies of the Resurrection But I love this encounter that we're about to walk through between Jesus and the Sadducees who are very clever. Do you get the sense, witty and clever, they’ve got this whole test case worked out? They’re coming, these witty, clever debaters thinking that they have proven that there can be no resurrection from the dead based on this test case. Imagine them debating with the man who said, "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live even though he dies, and whoever lives and believes in me will never die." That's who they're debating. So we're going to walk through this. We are at verse 18. We're dealing with these Sadducees, the enemies of the resurrection, the Sadducees who say there is no resurrection, who came to Jesus with a question. The Sadducees were a religious sect, the most powerful in terms of political power and money, and control of society. They were aristocratic. They controlled the temple and the priesthood, the Sanhedrin. It was through their corrupt control of the temple's sacrificial system that they became fabulously wealthy. They were pro-Roman because they drive their position from Roman consent. So that's who they were. Spiritually, they're kind of an odd combination of weird literalists as we're going to see in the text today, but also unbelievers who denied the scripture. They say there is no resurrection and there are neither angels nor spirits [Acts 23:8]. III. Their Test Case: Marriage at the Resurrection They bring their test case, and it's about marriage at the resurrection. Look at verse 19-23, “‘Teacher,' they said, ‘Moses wrote for us that if a man's brother dies and leaves a wife but no children, the man must marry the widow and have children for his brother. Now there were seven brothers. The first one married and died without leaving any children. The second one married the widow, but he also died leaving no child. It was the same with the third. In fact, none of the seven left any children. Last of all, the woman died too. Now at the resurrection, whose wife will she be since the seven were married to her?’” Here we go again. This is the last week of Jesus's life. Jesus's enemies are coming at him in waves, one after the other trying to trick him or trap him or box him in some way, just like the Pharisees and Herodians had come with the question on paying taxes to Caesar that we walked through last week. They're going to try to do the same thing. The Sadducees are trying to trap Jesus with this whole thing. They figured they got this thing all worked out. But Jesus cannot be tricked. He cannot be trapped. His mind soars infinitely higher than theirs. Isaiah 55:9 says, "As the heavens are higher than theirs, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts higher than your thoughts.” They come with this test case from the books of Moses, from Deuteronomy, it's called Levirate marriage. In that, the law of Moses stated that a Jewish man is required to marry his deceased brother's wife if they have no children and raise children in his brother's name so his name will not disappear from Israel and his property can continue as well. That's a system set up in Deuteronomy 25:5-6, a true law. But they're coming with a ridiculous test case that I have to say I'm highly skeptical ever happened. This is like some parable or something they came up with. It's like, "Ah, what about this? What if this happened?" All right. Seven brothers, all of them unmarried, stair step brothers, I would guess, over maybe, I don't know, 18 months between each one, something like that. We're going to go with it. Let's just try to figure out this test case. The first one takes a wife and then tragically dies without children. It's very sad. And then the next one steps up. I picture them like standing in a line here. It's hard for me to do this with a straight face, but there they are standing in a line. And then that one dies without children and then the next one and the next one and the next one and so on down to the seventh. They all die without children and finally the woman dies. The point is they're all dead. Seven brothers and one woman at the resurrection. Whose wife will she be since they all married? Now their assumptions are that the next world will be essentially like this one. You're raised up into the same life that we have now, and that's not true. There is continuity but difference. It's very important we understand continuity and difference. Their second assumption is that while in those days and before that, polygamy may have been acceptable because frequently kings, like David, had multiple wives. Polyandry, which is one woman married to seven men, that is not acceptable. That could not happen. That's a basic assumption to their argument. So bottom line, resurrection cannot happen. That's the whole approach. Jesus answers them. "Are you not in error? You are in error." Jesus is the judge of all the earth. He gets to make these kinds of pronouncements. "You're wrong. You're in error. Let me tell you how." He addresses thoughts, motives, lifestyle, everything. He also addresses doctrine. He addresses issues of truth and error and He always judges by what is right and He judges by scripture. We live in a day and age in which absolute truth is questioned. Truth for me, truth for you, et cetera. That's the world we live in, postmodernism. We're defining our own realities for us even to the point of gender or other things like that. We can define it for ourselves. Jesus believed in absolute truth. He believed in standards, believed in judging, saying to people, "You're in error." There is truth. What gave him the right? God gives him the right. John 5:22-23 says, "The father judges no one but has entrusted all judgment to the son that all may honor the son even as they honor the Father.” Jesus is positioned as judge of all the earth. He will judge our doctrines. He will judge our lifestyles, the attitudes and motives. He'll judge it all. Therefore, Jesus in his ministry through the scripture, gives all of us the same invitation which He gave to Pontius Pilate. For this reason, John 18:37-38, "For this reason I was born and for this I came into the world to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me." Jesus is testifying to the truth. He's telling the truth, leading people to the truth. Sadly, Pilate sarcastically said, "What is truth?" and didn't wait around for the answer, implying, like an early version of a postmodernist, there is no truth. But there is. You're in error, Sadducees. It came from two related forms of ignorance. "You're in error," He said, "because you do not know the scriptures or the power of God. That's the source of your error, you not know. Ignorance, willful, sinful ignorance concerning these things. First of all, you don't know the scriptures. Now we can be familiar with the Bible, but it doesn't mean we know it, not like that. The Sadducees would've been offended at this statement. They actually came to Jesus in the name of the Levirate marriage command from Moses. They didn't know the scriptures like they needed to. There's a vast difference between being familiar with or knowing the words of the scripture and understanding the truth, understanding the Word of God. They did not know the scriptures. Jesus is about to refer to a very familiar passage, but they didn't understand it properly, the burning bush. I just want to make an application for you all, First Baptist Church, all of you, never stop learning the Bible. Drink it in, feed your souls on it. You don't know it as well as you think you do. By God's grace, you don't know it as well as you will a year from now. Never stop learning, never stop being hungry for the Word of God. It says more than you think it does. The thing that's beautiful about the Bible is the milk is so clear, so simple, a child could understand it. That's what you need to be saved. But there's more in there than milk. There's a lot that we need to learn just be feeding on God's word. It's a saying, "familiarity breeds contempt." "You're in error," Jesus said, "because you don't know the scriptures," and then, "or the power of God." "Never stop learning the Bible. Drink it in, feed your souls on it. You don't know it as well as you think you do. By God's grace, you don't know it as well as you will a year from now." Power here means God's ability to do anything that He wills to do. Omnipotence, the Sadducees probably denied the bodily resurrection because they didn't see how God could do it. There seemed to be insurmountable logistical problems. The body's destroyed at death. Within a certain amount of time worms completely devour it. There’s nothing left but skeleton. If it's an incineration kind of situation, maybe that's burned to dust. It's all gone. How could it ever? God could never reassemble the body. It can't happen, so they think God cannot do it. They don't understand the power of God. I believe, by the way, this is the very reason why the apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 15, when he is addressing philosophical opposition to the resurrection from the dead, "How can some of you Corinthians say there is no resurrection from the dead?" , it’s the same thing like the Sadducees. Later on in 1 Corinthians 15, he says, “Some of you will ask, ‘What about the resurrection body? What kind of body will it come?’ He answers, ‘How foolish.’” That's an interesting rebuke there. Why does he say that? "How foolish." Then he goes on to answer the question, which we'll talk about in a minute, the nature of the resurrection body. Why is he saying, "How foolish"? I think this is the issue. They don't see how it can happen, so they think it can't happen. That's foolish. Our God is the God who calls things that are not, as though they were and gives life to the dead. Romans Chapter 4, “He created everything out of nothing by the Word of His power." Is there anything too difficult for God? You don't understand the power of God. The philosophers in Athens on Mars Hill, they sneered when they heard about the resurrection, mocked it, thought it was foolish. "Why would anyone want to be raised again," they think. In the same body, again back into the same life, the body is negative, the spirit is positive. Why would you want that? They sneered, they mocked. And so it is today, the urbane, witty, scholarly atheists of our day mock our faith. Now for me as a pastor, just in general, together with the other elders of the church, I am responsible for the doctrinal health of this church and the lifestyle of this church, and as well, responsible to line it up with scripture. I think this is one of the key phrases that I use. “You're in error because you don't know the scriptures or the power of God.” So again and again on every topic we bring Romans 4:3, that one statement, "What does the scripture say?" All controversies, in any topic that comes up, in my opinion are because those people, we, us, don't know the scriptures or the power of God. Debates over predestination, divorce and remarriage, gender based roles in the church, complementarianism, charismatic gifts, whatever, whatever's in your mind that's controversial and you want to talk to me about, all those debates and discussions, the disagreement comes because one or both parties, they're in error because they don't know the scriptures or the power of God. IV. Jesus’ Timeless Answer: “I Am Abraham’s God. . .” Now Jesus begins, interestingly, his answer with a revelation of something entirely new that's not related anywhere in scripture. It's quite remarkable. My sermon title is “Jesus Proves Resurrection from Scripture.” This isn't scripture before He spoke it. Once He spoke it became scripture. So we're reading it. But before that, there's nothing in the 39 books of the Bible about marriage at the resurrection. You're not going to find it. Jesus is prophet, priest, and king. And as a prophet, He gets to teach us new things that we didn't know anywhere else, and this is a new thing. Look at verse 25, "When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given a marriage. They will be like the angels in heaven." I have searched the 39 books of the Bible. You're not going to find it anywhere in the Old Testament. This is new. Does Jesus have the right to do that? He does. He has the right to teach us new things and that's what He does here. What He teaches is consistent with other doctrines in the Bible, connected with the resurrection, consistent, but it's new. The implications are the next world and life therein will be in some way significantly different than the life we have now. There'll be some significant disconnects, but there will be continuity or else we wouldn't use the word “resurrection". Resurrection means something was lifted up, something was raised, there's continuity, but difference. In the present world, vital to the mandate God gave to Adam and Eve was, "Be fruitful and multiply. Fill the earth and subdue it.” Have children, procreate, and marriage is given for that. One man, one woman in covenant relationship for life, that's what sex is for. The two become one flesh in marriage. That's God's intention. But in the next world, procreation it seems will no longer be needed. The number of human souls, human beings, will be fixed, done. There are no new people. He also teaches us something about angelic life. But we're not taking that off ramp right now to go off and say, "Angels don't marry," but that's what He says. Next, Jesus proves the resurrection by scripture. He goes to an amazingly familiar passage, the burning bush account. Now as I look over, and I did this with Job, I tried to say, "Does the Old Testament teach resurrection?", and it does. There's some key verses. Jesus could have gone to Psalm 16, where David writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit says, "You'll not abandon me to the grave, nor will you let your holy one see decay." Peter quoted that on the day of Pentecost, Jesus could have gone there. He could have gone to Isaiah 26:19, which says, "Your dead will rise. Their bodies will live. You who dwell in the dust, wake up and shout for joy." Or Daniel 12:2, "Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will arise.” Those are pretty clear, but that's about it. There's not a lot of others. There's a lot more about blood atonement, his death on the cross in prophecy, than there's about his bodily resurrection. I think the reason for that is Jesus preferred to show us. He preferred to say, "Touch me and see. Look at my hands and feet." He wanted to live it out. Then the apostles proclaimed it, and we got all of these verses in the New Testament that are clear about it. Jesus opened wide the gates of Hades. But there are prophecies and He goes to this burning bush. Look at verse 26- 27, “Now about the dead rising, have you not read in the book of Moses in the account about the bush, how God said to him, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.’” He is not the God of the dead but of the living. You are badly mistaken. In Matthew's account, Jesus introduces scripture beautifully. "Have you not read what God says to you?" Isn't that beautiful? When you read Exodus 3, the burning bush, God is saying this to you, “Now the word of God is living and active.” He's really saying it to you. Now I know He said it to Moses, but that's how it was introduced. Moses wrote it down. He's saying it to them now. The root problem is the Sadducees do not believe God speaks through Scripture, therefore, they don't understand the relationship God had with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. How does this prove resurrection? That's a head scratcher. It's like, "Help me Jesus, help me. Holy Spirit, help me understand how this proves bodily resurrection from the grave. It's not obvious." Isaiah 26:19, "Your dead will live. Their bodies will rise. You who dwell in dust, wake up and shout for joy." That's pretty straightforward. I like that. But how does the burning bush prove bodily resurrection? It's not the same. It's interesting why He would choose that, but it all comes down to the grammar, the present tense. "I AM the God of Abraham," and I'm going to put it in "I AM”, "I AM the God of Isaac and I AM the God of Jacob.” Remember that that "I AM" statement is the key assertion, the key revelation. What is your name? "I AM," "I am the I AM." But He zeroes us in. "I AM the God of Abraham." What He's saying is, "I am Abraham's God right now. Abraham and I are continuing our friendship." Abraham is called the friend of God. "We're continuing our friendship now. I am Abraham's God and I am Isaac's God and I am Jacob's God right now.” At least that means that they have continued awareness and existence after death. But it doesn't prove bodily resurrection, not yet, but it just shows that the fundamental concept that you cease to exist at death is false. It is not true. "I am Abraham's God right now." But essential to this is God's original purpose in giving human beings a body to begin with. Why did He make us with bodies? Why did He put together a body for Adam? Why did He give him eyes and hands and feet and ears and all of that? And how is it that humans lost their bodies? It's called death. The separation of the soul from the body is death. That's separation. We believe that spirits, souls can, do have a continued existence apart from the body, unlike atheistic, materialistic types that say all of these things are biochemical illusions in the brain. That's false. There is something called the soul and it continues to exist. And those believers who died, they are absent from the body, present with the Lord. I believe the thief from the cross is absent from the body, present with the Lord. Jesus said, "Today you'll be with me in paradise." He's in relationship with God, but he doesn't have a body. But will he get one? Yes, he will. Why? Because that's God's purpose. He will not be defeated by death. When Jesus did all those healings He is saying, "God didn't make the eyes to be blind." So He touches the blind man. "Now I can see." God didn't make the legs to be lame. So He touches the lame person. Now they can walk like God intended its original purpose. What was his intention? So it is with the entire function of the body, completely destroyed by death, restored by resurrection. How beautiful is that? So that's how the argument works. I will say better proof than this awaits, clearer proof. I don't deny that this is a difficult argument. But Jesus's own resurrection from the dead clearly recorded for us in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John is better evidence that the dead can rise. So also, all of the doctrinal instruction entrusted to the apostles to explain it all as eyewitnesses is better. There is such a thing according to the author of Hebrews, a “better hope,” [Hebrews 7:19] founded on better promises. Better, better, better promises. I've already given you the best one. John 11:25-26, "I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live even though he dies and whoever lives and believes in me will never die." Jesus asked Martha, "Do you believe this?" I'm going to stop and say, do you all believe this? Do you believe in the resurrection from the dead? Yes. Amen. If you came here as a guest or just a visitor and you have not yet come to faith in Christ, I'm here to tell you today that Jesus has triumphed over the grave. And I believe that it is natural to the as yet an unbeliever, to be afraid of death, to be enslaved through fear of death. Let Jesus set you free. All you have to do is trust in him, his blood shed on the cross, sufficient for the forgiveness of all of your sins, past, present, and future, and a promise based on John 11 that you'll live forever. Trust in Him. That's a better promise. Or how about this one, John 6:39-40, "This is the will of Him who sent me that I shall lose none of all that He has given me, but raise them up at the last day, for my Father's will is that everyone who looks to the Son in faith and believes in Him shall have eternal life and I will raise him up at the last day." That's the promise of resurrection. So clear. Or 1 Corinthians 15:20, "Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who have fallen asleep.” It is a vast harvest yet to come. Now about the resurrection of the dead, "Well, what kind of body will they have? How foolish." Then He tells us what kind of body we'll get. 1 Corinthians 15:42-44, "So it'll be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable. It is raised imperishable. It is sewn in dishonor. It is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness. It is raised in power. It is sown in natural body. It is raised a spiritual body." You're going to get, if you're a believer in Christ, a resurrection body characterized by these words, imperishable, glorious, powerful, and spiritual. That's where we're heading. The best proof of all, Luke 24:36-40, "Jesus himself stood among them and said to them, 'Peace be with you.'They were startled and frightened thinking they saw a ghost. He said to them, ‘Why are you troubled? Why do doubts rise in your minds? Look at my hands and feet. It is I myself. Touch me and see. A ghost does not have flesh and bones as you see I have.’ And when he had said this, he showed them his hands and feet.” Now here's the thing, you're not going to be able to touch him and see. You have to believe based on scripture. It is by the scripture alone that you'll believe in the resurrection from the dead. It's the only way. But we have these beautiful historical accounts of eyewitnesses to the resurrection of Jesus who actually did or were able to touch Him and see, like Thomas. "Put your hands in my wounds." Hand on the side, stop doubting and belief. Jesus said in John 20, "Because you have seen me, you have believed. Blessed are they who have not seen and yet have believed." That's all of us today who are believers in Christ. We have not seen, and yet we have believed based on what? Scripture's testimony. The Old Testament, yes, but even brighter in the New Testament. Christ has risen. And because of that better hope, because Jesus said, "Because I live, you also will live," because of that, the Apostle Paul just did so much better than Job when it came to questions of the grave. He says, "For me, I desire to depart and be with Christ, which is better by far. For me, to live as Christ and to die as gain.” It's gain. It's better, more Christ. That's all that means. Live as Christ. And to die is to get more Christ, to see Him face to face and to be with Him. Paul said in 1 Thessalonians 4, “We believe that Jesus died and rose again. And so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in Him. According to the Lord's own word. We tell you that we who are still alive, who are left to the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord himself will come down from heaven with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel, with the trumpet call of God and the dead in Christ will rise first.” Praise God. V. Application To sum it all up, the Sadducees were just wrong. They were wrong. You know what that means for all of us who are Christians? The best is yet to come. The best is yet to come. Even when you're on the deathbed, if you're in the ICU and you're dying, the best for you is yet to come. You're looking ahead to a glorious world. And I'm going to extend that, friends, to marriage. I know Jesus said they'll neither marry nor be given a marriage, but that doesn't mean that the relationship between Christian spouses will be over. Not at all. What do you think your relationship with your Christian spouse will be like in heaven? Better, same or worse? You're like, "Oh, Pastor, I'm hoping better. I definitely want better." Look, even if you have a wonderful marriage, if you have a wonderful marriage, you do not have the level of unity with your spouse that you will have in heaven because Jesus prayed in John 17, "Father, may they be brought to complete, to perfect unity. As the Father and the Son are one, we are going to be one with each other.” So that's what I call super marriage, the best possible thing. You and your spouse will perfectly agree. But both of you'll have some learning to do. But that's our future, our oneness with each other. It's beautiful. No sex, no procreation, but infinitely better relationship. Then concerning the ongoing life we have with the doctrine here, our job as elders, but all of us as Christians, is to fight the ways that we are in error because we don't know the Scriptures or the power of God. All of our sins that we commit are because of faithlessness, because we've not trusted in the God of the Bible, because we've not believed in Him. We've not believed that God was strong enough to help us put that troubling sin to death, to mortify that sin habit. God is powerful. He can do it. The Scriptures tell you to put sin to death, but you think that you can't do it. It's too strong. Satan's lying to you. God is powerful through the spirit to mortify sin. And the same thing with our witness. God is powerful. You'll see power when the Holy Spirit comes on you. We're in error in not witnessing because we don't know the Scriptures or the power of God. I would urge you to meditate on God's omnipotence, that God is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine. And when it comes to personal holiness, say, "I don't want to be in error anymore because I don't know the scriptures or the power of God. I want to live a holy life." Concerning our witness, we are strategically positioned here to speak to people who are without hope and without God in the world. Let's be so buoyantly filled with hope in the resurrection that people ask us to give a reason for the hope that we have. One of the pastors that spoke at the 9Marks conference that we hosted over the last couple of days, H.B. Charles, a godly man, said that his church has seen an unbelievable upswing in members sharing their faith and winning people to Christ in baptisms. I said, "How did that happen?" He said, "You remember a number of years ago, the SBC had a, "who's your one?" kind of approach. I would just commend that to all of you. That's what they did. They just said, every member of the church take responsibility for a lost person. Take them on as a project. Pray for them. Pray that you yourself will have an opportunity to witness to them and don't stop praying for them and seeking. You could say, "Well, why not who's your five? Why not who's your 10?" Well, you can do that if you want, but let's start with "who's your one?" and say for whom you going to take responsibility. It could be a neighbor, could be a coworker, could be a lost relative, somebody. Take a responsibility for a lost person and focus on that person and see where God leads. Close with me in prayer. Lord, we thank you for the beauty of the scripture. We thank you for the power of the Word of God. Thank you for the truth of the resurrection. Thank you for the deep mind of Jesus, how he just doesn't do what we think he's going to do. I thank you for how he used this passage, "I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob," to prove resurrection. I thank you that you have that intimate relationship with each one of us now through Christ. Help us to believe in it, to walk in it, and to be filled with hope and help us to be faithful in putting sin to death and being witnesses to this world that is so hopeless. In Jesus' name. Amen.

“The divorce industry has to be dismantled, burned and buried like the monster it is.” "Men will have to demand nothing less than the full reestablishment of what feminists call patriarchy" Three obstacles to male recognition of female infidelity:  1. a kind of high-minded attitude that “my wife simply isn't ‘that kind' of woman,” which usually amounts to wishful thinking; 2. an invalid inference from the wife's lack of interest in sexual relations with them to a lack of sexual interests generally; and  3. a failure to discuss and compare notes on marital problems with other men, as women routinely do with one another.  Review of: 1. Michelle Langley, Women's Infidelity: Living In Limbo 2. Stephen Baskerville, Taken into Custody: The War Against Fatherhood, Marriage, and the Family

Bea and Dee are caravanning with the Browns again, this time to Boston! Leon, Aspyn, Logan, and Maddie tag along to look at some boring colleges and later, answer some interesting questions from curious undergrads. Oh, and Kody then has a spiritual moment with a pilgrim. Did you see his ridiculous sideburns, though?Want first dibs on ad-free episodes, plus plenty of bonus content?! Support us here: https://patreon.com/realitytvcringeFollow RTC on IG: https://instagram.com/realitytvcringe

Bea and Dee are here for their 60th episode and they've got a special one for all you trash Raccoons out there! The girls get into Season 2 of You, Me and My Ex and a brief kiki over the Ultimatum: Queer Love. The girls are in disbelief as to how ANY of these couples stay together! These shows are dramalicious and full of stinky, trash! But you know what else is full of trash?! Our Patreon - which is now is LIVE!! Come one, come all, Raccoons! Bonus content and ad-free episodes - what more could you want?! Support us here: https://patreon.com/realitytvcringeAnd if you love our podcast, be sure to leave a 5 star review wherever you are listening! Follow RTC on IG: https://instagram.com/realitytvcringe

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares why he is not the "National POLYGYNY Advocate." In this Episode #271, Mark Henkel teaches the meanings of the words, Polygamy, Polyandry, and Polygyny. After that, he shares the three reasons why he is NOT the "National POLYGYNY Advocate." Listeners will find this episode as both educational and fun. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠ --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/nationalpolygamyadvocate/support

As if Sister Wives couldn't get any more boring, Bea and Dee must settle for another monotonous and pointless episode in which Meri gets a colonoscopy, and then throws a party with the rest of the family for their monogamous friends. What kind of production is this, TLC?! Snooze! Later, the girls head on to Plathville. It's poppin'! There's ballroom dancing! There's sexy pole dancing! Annnnnnnd there's deep emotional family turmoil... Big yikes. No cap. D-I-V-O-R-C-E is on the horizon, and again: these people need therapy. If you love our trashy podcast, be sure to leave us a trashy 5 star review wherever you are listening! Follow RTC on IG: https://instagram.com/realitytvcringe

Bea and Dee are together again to talk some MAD shit, starting with Daniele of 90 Day Fiancé The Other Way. Later, the girls discuss the complex relationship dynamics of the Couples and Thruples on Seeking Brother Husband. Is it love or is it cuckholdry? Why Polyandry and not Polyamory? We have questions that need answers! If you love this podcast, be sure to leave a good review wherever you are listening!Follow RTC on IG: https://instagram.com/realitytvcringe

After feasting on some tasty trashy Hot Goss, Bea and Dee get into not one, but TWO, Boring Ass episodes of Sister Wives. Kody is putting on quite the facade for the camera, orange hair and all! But the girls see right through his receding hairline - and they do not prefer him! With a belly full of Goss and Fundamental Mormonism, Bea and Dee move on to Plathville, where they channel the Holy Spirit (vodka) to cringe, laugh and analyze all the ins and outs of the Plath family dynamic. Someone, please get these people some therapy! If you love our podcast, be sure to leave us a good review wherever you are listening! Follow RTC on Instagram https://instagram.com/realitytvcringe

It's the first week of April, and Bea and Dee waste no time as they dive head first into the dumpster that is 90 Day Fiancé The Other Way. To no one's surprise, Nicole and Mahmoud are still mad at each other, and the girls can't figure out why the pair are still married! Later, Bea and Dee disect the puzzling (and unfair) concept of Polyandry following this week's episode of Seeking Brother Husband. If you love our Podcast, be sure to leave us a 5 star review wherever you are listening! Follow RTC on IG: https://instagram.com/realitytvcringe

As time moves forward multi-person relationships become more common, and we felt we needed to break this down. What about you all? Could you be in a relationship with multiple people? Let us know!We would love your feedback... If you enjoyed this episode, or if you find our podcast helpful, tell us why! Please leave us a review and make sure you subscribe.If you have a topic you would like us to discuss in an upcoming episode, please reach out to us on:https://www.instagram.com/theperfectpairpodcasthttps://www.instagram.com/krystalskisshttps://www.instagram.com/rockthollaIf you are interested in advertising on this podcast or having Rock-T & Krystal as guests on your Podcast, Radio Show, or TV Show, reach out to podcast@yeanetworks.c

Bea and Deelia excitedly swan dive into the first juicy episode of the new Trashy TLC series, Seeking Brother Husband - what a wild first Episode! Later, the girls dissect the fascinating and alarming developments with the couples of 90 Day Fiancé - The Other Way, starting with Nicole and Mahmoud's toxic ass relationship. What a dumpster fire!Follow RTC on IG: https://instagram.com/realitytvcringeIf you enioy this pod, be sure to leave us a 5 star review wherever you are listening!

I fully support polyandry, that's first and foremost. What is polyandry? Listen to the latest podcast where I go into what that is, and my thoughts on polyamory, why I think the term poly is being overused by people who have poor life management skills, and why polygamy is not for broke bitches. Hint: Traditional women, passport bro mentality. If you want to read the blog about polyandry and the poly lifestyle please go to https://ebonyfemdomphonesex.com/ebony-femdom-polyamory-and-polyandry/ and don't forget to subscribe to this podcast, and to the blog rss feed, and you can follow me on Twitter @DuchessWillow_ --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/duchess-willow/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/duchess-willow/support

CONTENT WARNINGS: repeated use of the word "harem," non-explicit discussions of sexual exploitation, the potential harm and benefits of polyamory, and brief mention of cultic practices in the United States both historically and contemporaneously. Specifically @20:21-21:20 discussions of sexual exploitation from lack of consent; @24:05 - 24:35 discussion of "Ascended fellowship" and child abuse; @1:01:53 - 1:05:50 discussion of the usage of "harem" and the problematic associations with that term in romancelandiaBut hey! Let's have this discussion, because we know you love a Jackie deep dive...and this time she gets to talk anthropology. Plus Jen gets to share some of her highschool trauma, I mean, ahem, memories.@13:49 please note these practices are *illegal* even though it sounds like Jackie says *legal*Visit us online at NOPL.org!Fictional Love SurveyWho's Listening?Books we mention:Katee Robert's Dark Olympus and Wicked Villains seriesSp. Cruel SeductionIntroductions by C.L. StoneCat Kid Comic Club: Collaborations by David PilkeyThe Starless Crown and The Cradle of Ice by James Rollins (Moon Fall series)Sigma Force series by James RollinsRough, Raw, and Ready by Lorelei JamesDen of Vipers by K.A. KnightHer Pastry Shifters by Mia Harlan (croissant shifter book...)Three Swedish Mountain Men by Lily GoldEntranced by Basilisks & Deceived by the Gargoyles by Lillian LarkLearn My Lesson & The Sea Witch by Katee RobertBroken Bonds by J. BreeCaged Wolf by Caroline PeckhamQueen Takes Knights by Joely Sue BurkhartNights in Bliss series by Sophia Oak (aka Lexi Blake)Episodes we recommend:#27 Werewolves#55 Sports#56 Christmas trees#15 Dark romanceOther resources we recommend:Trust Me PodcastPolygyny and Canada's Obligations under International Human Rights Law (Canadian Government, 2006)"Keep Sweet: Pray and Obey" documentary (Netflix)"How to Build a Sex Room" (Netflix)Sources:"Polycule" (dictionary.com)"Polyamory" (dictionary.com)"Polyandry" (dictionary.com)"Polygamy" (dictionary.com)"Bigamy" (dictionary.com)"Polyandry, the Practice of Taking Multiple Husbands" (Heaphy, n.d.) One Bridge For Multiple Brothers, July 17, 2010 (page A4 N). (Barry, New York Times, 2010, Jul 17)Polyandry, or the practice of taking multiple husbands” (Inglis-Arkell, 2012)“Polygamy is rare around the world and mostly confined to a few regions” (Kramer, PEW, 2020)"A Survey of Non-Classical Polyandry" (Starkweather & HAmes, 2012)"What Makes Reverse-Harems Different From Harems (Other Than the Obvious)" (Ramsburg, 2021)"Is The Reverse Harem Trope A Hopelessly Outdated Thing Of The Past?" (Lu, 2021)“Is Polygamy Legal In the United States?” (Portman, ed. O'Connell, 2022)“A Select History of Consensual Nonmonogamies in the US” (Sheff, 2022)“The Truth About Threesomes, Throuples, and Triads” (Sheff, Aug. 2022)"Oneida Community (1848-1880): A Utopian Community" (VCU Libraries Social Welfare History Project, 2017)"The Rich, Sexy History Of Oneida — Commune And Silverware Maker" (wbur.com, 2016)“Reverse Harem Romance” (Johnson, 2018)"Reverse Harem, gyaku-harem 逆ハーレム" (japanesewithanime.com, 2019)“Otome game” (wikipedia)"Shōjo manga" (Wikipedia)The History of Anime in the USA: The 2000s" (Cooper, n.d.)"Why are Girls Better at Reading Than Boys?" (Wong, 2018)“Sheiks; Middle Eastern Representation in Romance Fiction” (Li, 2018)“History of Reverse Harem and Reverse Harem Garden” (reverseharem.blogspot.com)"Consensual Non-Monogamy Fact Sheet" (Moors et. al.)"When Taking Multiple Husbands Makes Sense (Dreger, 2013)"Plural relationships, when consensual and gender-neutral, may actually help reduce gender inequality" (lse.ac.uk, 2014)"Polyamorous parenting: The surprising benefits of the ultimate modern family" (Smith, 2020)

Oct 23, 2022 Greetings brothers and sisters! Welcome to the weekly MormonNewsRoundup where Dives and Al ruminate on the great and spacious beehive! Full Title Oct 23, 2022 Episode 30 - PD from Priesthood Dispatches joins the podcast, Deseret News comes out against polygamy/polyandry, anti-gay Mormon dad goes viral, Ukraine Temple reopens amidst fighting, BYU enrollment may be in trouble, and Bad Mormon book author sued by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Connect with Al and Dives! www.MormonNewsRoundup.org kolob@mormonnewsroundup.org Voicemail Twitter Patreon YouTube Official Sponsor Music MormonMovieReviews Priesthood Dispatches Get to know PD! News Articles Perspective: The courts are coming for monogamy. We should resist Mormon dad blasted for saying gay daughter won't be tolerated at home Latter-day Saints temple in Ukraine reopened after closure amid fighting BYU Football struggling, but that's ok cause Jesus! BYU Enrollment Craters? Dustin Lance Black Documentary 'Mama's Boy' on HBO October 18 Utah Lighthouse Ministry to Close President Nelson breaking ground at new U of U medical center Mormon NOT a victory for Satan? RFM says he is going to come on sometime soon, perhaps Nov 6! Shoutout to Weird Alma for this episode's music. Thanks so much for ruminating with us on the great and spacious beehive! And remember, remember: No unhallowed hand can stop this podcast from progressing! #lds, #mormon, #exmormon, #postmormon,#religion, #news, #ldschurch, #comeuntochrist, #churchofjesuschrist, #churchofjesuschristoflatterdaysaints, #byu, #byui, #josephsmith, #comefollowme, #polygamy, #bookofmormon, #becauseofhim, #hearhim --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/mormonnewsroundup/support

Cuck-T joins Venus on this episode to talk about his unique relationship that blends cuckolding, FLR, and polyandry and how compersion and female leadership has created a really beautiful and fulfilling marriage for both him and his wife. Links:Cuck-T on Twitter - @cuck_stCuck-T on Fetlife - @cuck-tThe Queen's Quarters Fan Destination - https://www.venuscuckoldress.com/Queens-quarterFriday Night Live Special Pillow Talk Event - https://www.crowdcast.io/venuscuckoldressVenus Connections Matchmaking - https://venusconnections.com/Destination Links for Venus - https://linktr.ee/venuscuckoldressSupport the show

Polygamy is a type of relationship that typically involves a person marrying more than one partner. When a woman marries more than one man, it's called polyandry. Polygamy is the opposite of monogamy, where one person marries one spouse. Polygamy is getting common in the US. In countries like the Middle East, Asia and West Africa, this is common practice. Please join Kim Drake, Felicia Love Washington and I as we discuss Polygamy, polyandry and polyamory.

Hour 3 of Friday's A&G: Alejandro Mayorkas says the Border is secure. In other news, Mayorkas is a liar. We are in an era of untransit. Which Disney movies deserve an R rating?  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 3 of Friday's A&G: Alejandro Mayorkas says the Border is secure. In other news, Mayorkas is a liar. We are in an era of untransit. Which Disney movies deserve an R rating? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hour 3 of Friday's A&G: Alejandro Mayorkas says the Border is secure. In other news, Mayorkas is a liar. We are in an era of untransit. Which Disney movies deserve an R rating?See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Come explore with us at https://truenorthproject.com Jeremy Runnells is the author of the CES Letter - a bombshell document that went viral in 2013 and sent waves out through the greater Mormon community. This document has impacted thousands of Mormons and has been a contributing factor to the mass exodus currently occurring in Mormonism. You can explore this document, the LDS response, and much more, at https://cesletter.org In this conversation Jeremy and I discuss both of our Mormon stories (Jeremy's being LDS and mine being Fundamentalist) We also take a high level perspective of the CES Letter and Mormonism including:  - DNA evidence of the peopling of the America's - Anachronisms found in the Book of Mormon - Translator verbiage of the 1769 King James Bible (that Joseph Smith had in his possession) showing up in the 1st edition of the Book of Mormon - The book of Abraham and the actual Egyptian translation of the source document papyrus  - Polygamy, Polyandry, and the suspect behavior of Joseph Smith. - Dartmouth College and the group collaboration of the Smith family and others in founding a Masonic religion (Mormonism) Links mentioned in the podcast: Jeremy Runnells' CES Letter  Alan Watts - Jesus, His Religion Graham Handcock's book America Before  Brian Muraresku's book The Immortality Key  --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/truenorthproject/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/truenorthproject/support

What determines our long-term sexual satisfaction? What defines sexual confidence? What role does communication play in our sex lives? Dr. Tara joins us as a co-host to walk us through considering these questions and more! Dr. Tara holds a Ph.D. from Arizona State University. She is a tenured professor at California State University, Fullerton where she teaches Relational and Sexual Communication, Online Communication and Personal Relationships, and Quantitative Research Methods.Her work has featured in Cosmopolitan, Women's Health Magazine, HelloGiggles, Tusk Magazine, Bustle, and she has given talks nationally and internationally including presenting a TEDx talk on Sexual Confidence.Dr. Tara also hosts the Luvbites by Dr. Tara Podcast.Our Hot or Not section brings the usual laughs and sexy insights! This week featured sex with superheroes, Tik-Tok creeps, Polyandry, Johnson's six-hour sex-fest and Dr. Tara's anal exploits! We had a fascinating conversation about Dr. Tara's research and the insights that gives into sexual behaviours of people of different generations, genders, and sexual orientations.The 4 key variables determining our sexual satisfaction are Sexual Confidence, Sexual Self-Esteem, Sexual Mindfulness, and Communication. It turns out that communication is the key to long-term sexual satisfaction for couples!DR TARA'S AWESOME WORKWebsitePodcastTEDx TalkYouTubeInstagramSTUFF WE MENTIONEDYoni Pleasure Palace In The Flow CacaoCome and join our community of sex positive, eager to learn and beautiful listeners. Everyone is welcomeWHERE TO FIND USOur Website Instagram TwitterFacebookYouTubePlease consider buying us a coffee to support the show and join our community of sexy Patrons by heading to our Patreon page.

Is polyamory just gentrified polygamy? Hosts Lauren McQ and Rebecca Rush present an in depth study into polygamy in American culture and around the world. LDS, FLDS, and the the plural marriage principle, the economy of child brides, the psychological impact of polygamy on women and children, polyandry (plural husbands) around the world, polygamy today, and the stories of three women who escaped. On Patreon, Rebecca will tell the story of a girl she knew who grew up in the FLDS in Texas and how it appeared to affect her as an adult where Lauren discusses all the men who've tried to wife her (which is basically like marrying three people) Sponsored by WorkitHealth Follow us on Instagram Join for 30-45 minute brutally personal video episodes on each topic on our Patreon

What to do with polygamy and polyandry? If a polygamist comes to follow Christ, how should he deal with his multiple wives? If a polyandrist comes to follow Christ, how should she deal with her multiple husbands? Today on the podcast, Pastor Peter untangles some of the ethical dilemmas involved in these situations. If you have a question that you would like Pastor Peter to address on Westside Unscripted, please email it to josh@bibledirectionforlife.com.

The long-awaited return of the podcast is back and crazier than ever. CP, AT, and Dwight discuss the recent string of Sex tapes hitting the scene (6:45), Dwight advocates for Certain group of men out there (11:50), the guys tackle Polygamy and Polyandry type relationships (16:10), The Dating scene and Social media (30:54), Nick Cannon (46:29), and more.     

Todays episode We talk about the three relationships types monogamy, Polygamy, Polyandry and which one suites you. Enjoy!! --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/casual-ninja6/support

Hey Babies, what fun I had today answering those awesome topics YOU sent in; Polygamous vs. Polyandry! Let's Review Documentaries! Spiritual vs. Sexual Healing! and more! So go ahead and SUBSCRIBE & SHARE! xoxoxox Jess FEELIN FRISKY? VENMO: @ JESS-WOOD-10 PAYPAL: @ WOOD382 PATREON: @ GETWOOD69

Many people confuse polyamory, polygamy, polygyny, and polyandry — and this confusion is unsurprising, considering that those terms are new to most of us! While these are all different relationship styles that involve more than two people, there are some key differences between them. In short, polyamory is the act of having intimate relationships with more than one person at the same time. A polyamorous person might have or might be open to having multiple romantic partners. Polygamy, on the other hand, involves being married to multiple partners.  Some polyamorous people are married and have partners outside of their marriage. However, polygamy exclusively describes relationships where people are married. Polyandry and polygyny are both forms of polygamy (in other words, they involve marriage too).Polyamory and polygamy might sound similar, but in practice, they're quite different.  Polyamory and polygamy are both gender-neutral terms. They can refer to women having multiple partners of any gender, men having multiple partners of any gender, or nonbinary people having partners of any gender. Polygyny specifically refers to a man who has multiple wives. Polyandry refers to a woman who has multiple husbands.In practice, polygyny is far more common than polyandry.Tune in a figure out the pros and cons of both Polyamory and polygamy!

This episode I discuss A house down in Bedrock, Polyandry, Seattle Black Pride charging reparations, Sipping through the wire & much more! FOR ALL THINGS SHENANIGANS WITH FRIENDS: https://linktr.ee/shenanigans_podcast​​ ⁠ FOR ALL THINGS ALL DOC'D UP: https://linktr.ee/alldocdup Check out all of the Podcast Happy Hour Co-Hosts below:⁠ @Tamara_The_Dawn https://www.TamaraTheDawn.com⁠ @AudTalesPod https://linktr.ee/audnicki⁠ @JsQuick3 https://linktr.ee/JsQuick3⁠ @AutumnTheAries https://www.autumnthearies.com⁠

A MUST LISTEN! SLAMMIN N JAMMIN?! IT'S NOT WHAT YOU THINK. On This Episode: We are back in full effect! We start by responsibly recapping updates from Palestine and Israel, as well as the death anniversary of George Floyd (7:50). President Obama confirms UFOs are real (12:15) and the jokes start to fly. People who are umasked and pretending to be #vaxxed need to Simmer Down (17:00). Are You Around covers Polyandry in South Africa (20:00) and fans being inducted into sports Hall of Fames (33:30). NBA Season award predictions and MVP criteria are discussed in the Detrimental Sports Report (38:30). We find out that Bill Gates had an affair (1:01:20) and A$AP Rocky is in love with Rihanna (1:08:18) on the timeline. R.I.P. to Internet Explorer (1:10:15). Pure comedy throughout. YOU REALLY DON'T WANT TO MISS THIS ONE! We'll be back June 8th! Who Knew? (27:00) Today, the man with the "World's Largest Family" has 94 children, 14 daughters-in-law , 33 grandchildren and 1 great grandchild. How many wives does he have? --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/detrimental-podcast/message

The ladies discuss Polyandry, Man Makeup, Who is having another baby, The Kardashian sisters, Paul Mooney, and more.. --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/opinionatedvoices/message

That Polygamy Life is the practice of marrying multiple spouses. When a man is married to more than one wife at the same time, sociologists call this polygyny. This Episode the guy will answer the Question "could they handle two wives or is one Just enough?"

Hi Family!We took Sunday off to have some family time but your two favourite brothers are back again to talk polygamy In This  Episode*The Difference Between  Polygamy, Polygyny, Polyandry & Polyamory * Would You Love Your Mum The Same If You Grew Up With 3 Mums?* Why Dating Is Like Loaning A CarPlease don't forget to leave a 5* rating and comment if you enjoyed the showCreditsTheme Song: by Annodomination Sound effects obtained from https://www.zapsplat.com Contact Instagram: @thefamilypodcast @don.speaks Website: https://www.thefamilypodcast.co.uk

Polygamy, Polyamory, Polygyny, Polyandry...things are getting crowded this week as the girls talk group sex, plural marriages, and the VIBRANT Salt Lake City Swingers Scene. Come for the spin the bottle stories, stay for the Joseph Smith f*ck boy antics. --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/missionarypodcast/support

Associated Links: Blog: https://harrisees.wordpress.com/2020/09/19/polyandry/ Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoS6H2R1Or4MtabrkofdOMw/videos Twitter: https://twitter.com/TracieHarris Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/tharris1773/ Paypal: http://paypal.me/athomeinmyhead Helpful Resources: Polyandry - Britannica entry: https://www.britannica.com/topic/polyandry-marriage "A Survey of Non-Classical Polyandry" - Katherine E. Starkweather & Raymond Hames https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12110-012-9144-x "When Taking Multiple Husbands Makes Sense" - The Atlantic - Alice Dreger https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/02/when-taking-multiple-husbands-makes-sense/272726/ "When Brothers Share a Wife" - Melvyn C. Goldstein https://case.edu/affil/tibet/booksAndPapers/family.html "Fraternal Polyandry and Fertility in a High Himalayan Valley in Northwest Nepal" - Melvyn C. Goldstein https://case.edu/affil/tibet/booksAndPapers/fraternal.html Music Credits: “Wishful Thinking” - Dan Lebowitz [https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOg3zLw7St5V4N7O8HSoQRA] --- Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/tracie-harris/support