Podcast appearances and mentions of erik menendez

Episode Summary:In this episode of Criminal Motives, we revisit one of the most polarizing true crime cases of the 20th century — the Menendez brothers. On the surface, Lyle and Erik Menendez appeared to be two privileged sons who brutally murdered their wealthy parents. But behind the headlines was a darker, more disturbing family history filled with manipulation, deep trauma, and long-buried secrets.From Beverly Hills opulence to courtroom drama, media manipulation, and a second trial that stripped away key testimony — we walk you through everything. And now, decades later, this case is back in the spotlight as new evidence and evolving views on male victims have society asking: Did justice get it right?

Will the Menendez Brothers get Out of Prison? That's the question everyone is asking but for now...everyone will have to wait another month after the hearing abruptly ended. Joel & #BestGuests Josh Ritter and Robert Rand bring us all up to speed on the latest news today. Erik and Lyle Menendez's resentencing hearing started April 17th and was filled with tension and tempers. Erik and Lyle have served time in prison for more than 3 decades after attacking and killing their mother and father, Kitty and Jose Menendez. Lyle and Erik Menendez murdered their parents on Aug. 20, 1989. The Menendez brothers testified that they killed their mother and father in self-defense after a lifetime of emotional, physical and SA. At the time, Lyle was 21, and Erik was 18. This high profile case has now come down to the brothers' attorney trying to get them released and Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman trying to keep both brothers behind bars.Get Joel's Book: Https://amzn.to/48GwbLxAll Things STS: Https://linktr.ee/stspodcastSupport the show on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/SurvivingTheSurvivorCatch us live on YouTube: Surviving The Survivor: #BestGuests in True Crime - YouTube

Explosive sparring and another delay in the long-awaited hearing for Lyle and Erik Menendez. The hot club that closes at 10pm. Tom Cruise's death-defying stunt. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

It's the story that's shocking the country - a high school athlete fatally stabbing another athlete at a track meet. The 17-year-old charged with first-degree murder, who said he acted in self-defense, is out on bail. Now, for the first time his parents are breaking their silence saying they are being unfairly targeted. And is Elon Musk the father of actress Amber Heard's babies? The ex of Johnny Depp, who has a four-year-old daughter and another on the way, has never revealed the identity of the father, but it's now being reported she and Musk had embryos frozen when they dated. And after a Wall Street Journal story claimed musk has a harem of women delivering as many of his babies as possible, many are wondering if Heard's children are indeed, Musk's. Plus, today is the day the Menendez brothers have been waiting for, for more than three decades… a chance to be resentenced with the hope of being freed from prison. Several family members showed up at the courthouse for support including Erik Menendez's daughter. And it's been a popular candy for generations - the Jawbreaker. Now, it's living up to its name after a young woman landed in the emergency room with... you guessed it... a broken jaw!  To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Menendez Brothers Breakthrough, Judge Allows Resentencing Hearing  In this episode, we dive deep into the stunning developments unfolding in the case of Erik and Lyle Menendez—the brothers convicted of killing their parents in 1989. After more than 30 years behind bars, the Menendez brothers have just been granted a formal resentencing hearing, scheduled for April 17–18, 2025. This courtroom move, driven by shifts in California law and a high-profile legal tug-of-war between DAs past and present, could be their first real chance at parole eligibility. We break down what happened in court, why it matters now, and what this hearing could mean for their future. But the legal battle doesn't end there. Current Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman is aggressively pushing back against any effort to reduce the brothers' life sentences. He calls the abuse narrative a “fabrication” and insists the murders were premeditated executions. Meanwhile, the defense points to explosive new evidence, including Erik Menendez's 1988 letter detailing alleged sexual abuse and sworn testimony from a former Menudo band member accusing José Menendez of assault. These revelations are fueling not just courtroom motions—but a growing movement demanding a second look at this case. We also explore California Governor Gavin Newsom's clemency review, which includes a parole board-ordered risk assessment now underway. Could the Menendez brothers actually be released? What happens next in this complex, emotionally charged case? Tune in as we unpack every legal angle, every new development, and every piece of evidence reshaping one of America's most infamous murder trials. Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Menendez Brothers Breakthrough, Judge Allows Resentencing Hearing  In this episode, we dive deep into the stunning developments unfolding in the case of Erik and Lyle Menendez—the brothers convicted of killing their parents in 1989. After more than 30 years behind bars, the Menendez brothers have just been granted a formal resentencing hearing, scheduled for April 17–18, 2025. This courtroom move, driven by shifts in California law and a high-profile legal tug-of-war between DAs past and present, could be their first real chance at parole eligibility. We break down what happened in court, why it matters now, and what this hearing could mean for their future. But the legal battle doesn't end there. Current Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman is aggressively pushing back against any effort to reduce the brothers' life sentences. He calls the abuse narrative a “fabrication” and insists the murders were premeditated executions. Meanwhile, the defense points to explosive new evidence, including Erik Menendez's 1988 letter detailing alleged sexual abuse and sworn testimony from a former Menudo band member accusing José Menendez of assault. These revelations are fueling not just courtroom motions—but a growing movement demanding a second look at this case. We also explore California Governor Gavin Newsom's clemency review, which includes a parole board-ordered risk assessment now underway. Could the Menendez brothers actually be released? What happens next in this complex, emotionally charged case? Tune in as we unpack every legal angle, every new development, and every piece of evidence reshaping one of America's most infamous murder trials.  Want to listen to ALL our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Send us a textThis week, Amanda and Lauren wrap up their Women's History Month series with the story of the tragic murder of Dominique Dunne, and the injustice that followed.Sources:People Magazine: “What Happened to Dominique Dunne? How Her 1982 Death is Connected to the Menendez Brothers Trial” by Rebecca AizinCosmopolitan: “The Dominique Dunne Case and Its Connection to Lyle and Erik Menendez, Explained” by Lydia VeninScreen Rant: “Poltergeist Actress Murdered: Dominique Dunne's 1982 Death (& How It Connects to the Menendez Brothers) Explained by Jeffrey NemonVanity Fair: “Justice: A Father's Account of the Trial of His Daughter's Killer” by Dominick DunneTown & Country: “What Happened to Dominique Dunne?” by Emily BurackThe Tab: “Where is John Sweeney now? Dominique Dunne murder case brought up on Monsters on Netflix” by Hayley SoenThe Kelly Clarkson Show on YouTube: “Griffin Dunne Opens Up about Sister's Tragic Death in ‘Friday Afternoon Club'”County Office Law on YouTube: “What Happened to Judge Burton Katz”Wikipedia

En Août 1989, Lyle et Erik Menendez commettent l'horreur. L'affaire Menendez débute et fera même l'objet d'une série Netflix par la suite. Voici l'affaire Menendez en HVF. Hébergé par Acast. Visitez acast.com/privacy pour plus d'informations.

In 1989, on a quiet night in Beverly Hills California, Jose and Kitty Menendez were gunned down in their living room.At first, police thought Jose – a hotshot entertainment executive – had been involved in some shady business dealings. But it wasn't long before we learned what really happened: Jose and Kitty had been murdered by their own sons. The trials of Lyle and Erik Menendez captivated the world, and ultimately ended with both brothers being sentenced to life without parole.Today, more than 35 years after the killings, the Menendez brothers have come back into the public consciousness, in part because new evidence has emerged that could lead to the brothers walking free. Before all this though – before the brothers were even considered suspects – a Miami Herald reporter named Robert Rand flew to Beverly Hills to write a profile on the late Jose Menendez. That fateful trip resulted in Rand being swept up in one of the most shocking murder trials of the 20th century. Feedback for us? You can email us directly at crimestory@cbc.ca.Hear new episodes of Crime Story early and ad-free by subscribing to CBC True Crime Premium on Apple Podcasts.

In this long-awaited episode, we dive into one of the most infamous true-crime cases in American history: the story of Lyle and Erik Menendez. The brutal 1989 slayings of their wealthy parents, José and Kitty Menendez, divided a nation: but where do we stand?In Part 1, we take you through the chilling night of the crime, the early investigations, and the lavish spending spree that raised eyebrows everywhere. We unravel the media frenzy, the shocking confessions, and the family secrets that would go on to define this sensational story… Were the brothers cold-blooded killers driven by greed? Or victims of unimaginable abuse who saw no other way out?Ahead of their resentencing hearing later this year, this is your first and final stop for everything you need to know about the Menendez Brothers case.Video version will be available Thursday 20th March on our YouTube channelExclusive bonus content:Wondery - Ad-free & ShortHandPatreon - Ad-free & Bonus EpisodesFollow us on social media:YouTubeTikTokInstagramVisit our website:WebsiteSources available on redhandedpodcast.comSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman isn't buying the Menendez brothers' version of events. He's made it clear: they're not getting out of prison on his watch. Standing before the press, Hochman didn't mince words. The self-defense claim? A lie. The supposed rehabilitation? Not enough. His office is officially opposing resentencing for Lyle and Erik Menendez, who are serving life without parole for the 1989 murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez. Hochman's argument is simple: the brothers have spent the last 30 years weaving a story that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. They say they were terrified of their father, that years of sexual abuse led them to kill out of fear. But Hochman, after poring over trial transcripts, prison records, and testimony, says that's just not true. He points to the undeniable premeditation—how they drove to San Diego days before the murders to buy shotguns with a fake ID, how they planned an alibi by buying movie tickets, and how, after unloading their weapons into their parents, they shot them again in the kneecaps to stage a gang hit. They even picked up the shotgun shells and dumped their bloody clothes and weapons. None of that screams "panic." It screams "plan." When the police started digging, the brothers initially played innocent, pushing a theory that their parents were killed by the Mafia. That held up until Erik confessed to his therapist—an admission that eventually made its way into the hands of investigators. Only then did their story change. Suddenly, it was self-defense. And as Hochman laid out, they were willing to go to great lengths to sell it. At one point, Lyle allegedly tried to convince his girlfriend to lie under oath, saying Jose had drugged and raped her. The trial testimony evolved yet again, with claims that both brothers had suffered sexual abuse at the hands of their father, with their mother complicit. But Hochman says there's a problem with that story too: it wasn't mentioned in Erik's original confession. In those tapes, Erik reportedly said their father was a controlling force, that their mother couldn't live without him, and that both had to die. Self-defense never came up. Then there's the forensic evidence. The brothers claimed it was dark when they burst into the den, that their parents were standing or lunging at them. But crime scene experts determined that at all times, Jose and Kitty were seated or already wounded on the ground. Hochman says that's just one of 20 lies the brothers have told over the years. Four have been admitted to. Sixteen remain. And unless they acknowledge those, he says they don't deserve a second chance. Naturally, the Menendez family members who support the brothers are outraged. In a statement, they accused Hochman of "ignoring the reality" that Erik and Lyle were "repeatedly abused, feared for their lives, and have atoned for their actions." They argue that Hochman is sending a dangerous message—that male victims of childhood sexual abuse won't be believed. But Hochman is standing firm, and he's not alone. He invoked California Governor Gavin Newsom's 2022 decision to deny parole to Sirhan Sirhan, Robert F. Kennedy's assassin. Despite Sirhan's decades of rehabilitation, Newsom blocked his release because he failed to fully accept responsibility. Hochman says the same logic applies here. No full admission, no second chances. This stance is a complete reversal of former DA George Gascón's position. Before losing re-election to Hochman in December 2024, Gascón supported resentencing, arguing that because the brothers were under 26 at the time of the murders, they should be eligible for parole immediately. Hochman wasted no time undoing that. Still, the brothers aren't out of options. They have a pending habeas corpus petition citing two new pieces of evidence: a letter Erik wrote to a cousin months before the murders describing his father's alleged abuse and allegations from a former boy band member who claims Jose Menendez raped him. Hochman, unsurprisingly, has asked the court to throw it out, calling it unreliable and inadmissible. Their last hope? Clemency. The brothers have petitioned Governor Newsom, and in February, Newsom ordered a 90-day risk assessment to determine whether they pose "an unreasonable risk to the public" if released. It's the final door left open. Whether they walk through it or it slams shut is still up in the air. #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #DAHochman #Justice Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman isn't buying the Menendez brothers' version of events. He's made it clear: they're not getting out of prison on his watch. Standing before the press, Hochman didn't mince words. The self-defense claim? A lie. The supposed rehabilitation? Not enough. His office is officially opposing resentencing for Lyle and Erik Menendez, who are serving life without parole for the 1989 murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez. Hochman's argument is simple: the brothers have spent the last 30 years weaving a story that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. They say they were terrified of their father, that years of sexual abuse led them to kill out of fear. But Hochman, after poring over trial transcripts, prison records, and testimony, says that's just not true. He points to the undeniable premeditation—how they drove to San Diego days before the murders to buy shotguns with a fake ID, how they planned an alibi by buying movie tickets, and how, after unloading their weapons into their parents, they shot them again in the kneecaps to stage a gang hit. They even picked up the shotgun shells and dumped their bloody clothes and weapons. None of that screams "panic." It screams "plan." When the police started digging, the brothers initially played innocent, pushing a theory that their parents were killed by the Mafia. That held up until Erik confessed to his therapist—an admission that eventually made its way into the hands of investigators. Only then did their story change. Suddenly, it was self-defense. And as Hochman laid out, they were willing to go to great lengths to sell it. At one point, Lyle allegedly tried to convince his girlfriend to lie under oath, saying Jose had drugged and raped her. The trial testimony evolved yet again, with claims that both brothers had suffered sexual abuse at the hands of their father, with their mother complicit. But Hochman says there's a problem with that story too: it wasn't mentioned in Erik's original confession. In those tapes, Erik reportedly said their father was a controlling force, that their mother couldn't live without him, and that both had to die. Self-defense never came up. Then there's the forensic evidence. The brothers claimed it was dark when they burst into the den, that their parents were standing or lunging at them. But crime scene experts determined that at all times, Jose and Kitty were seated or already wounded on the ground. Hochman says that's just one of 20 lies the brothers have told over the years. Four have been admitted to. Sixteen remain. And unless they acknowledge those, he says they don't deserve a second chance. Naturally, the Menendez family members who support the brothers are outraged. In a statement, they accused Hochman of "ignoring the reality" that Erik and Lyle were "repeatedly abused, feared for their lives, and have atoned for their actions." They argue that Hochman is sending a dangerous message—that male victims of childhood sexual abuse won't be believed. But Hochman is standing firm, and he's not alone. He invoked California Governor Gavin Newsom's 2022 decision to deny parole to Sirhan Sirhan, Robert F. Kennedy's assassin. Despite Sirhan's decades of rehabilitation, Newsom blocked his release because he failed to fully accept responsibility. Hochman says the same logic applies here. No full admission, no second chances. This stance is a complete reversal of former DA George Gascón's position. Before losing re-election to Hochman in December 2024, Gascón supported resentencing, arguing that because the brothers were under 26 at the time of the murders, they should be eligible for parole immediately. Hochman wasted no time undoing that. Still, the brothers aren't out of options. They have a pending habeas corpus petition citing two new pieces of evidence: a letter Erik wrote to a cousin months before the murders describing his father's alleged abuse and allegations from a former boy band member who claims Jose Menendez raped him. Hochman, unsurprisingly, has asked the court to throw it out, calling it unreliable and inadmissible. Their last hope? Clemency. The brothers have petitioned Governor Newsom, and in February, Newsom ordered a 90-day risk assessment to determine whether they pose "an unreasonable risk to the public" if released. It's the final door left open. Whether they walk through it or it slams shut is still up in the air. #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #DAHochman #Justice Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman isn't buying the Menendez brothers' version of events. He's made it clear: they're not getting out of prison on his watch. Standing before the press, Hochman didn't mince words. The self-defense claim? A lie. The supposed rehabilitation? Not enough. His office is officially opposing resentencing for Lyle and Erik Menendez, who are serving life without parole for the 1989 murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez. Hochman's argument is simple: the brothers have spent the last 30 years weaving a story that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. They say they were terrified of their father, that years of sexual abuse led them to kill out of fear. But Hochman, after poring over trial transcripts, prison records, and testimony, says that's just not true. He points to the undeniable premeditation—how they drove to San Diego days before the murders to buy shotguns with a fake ID, how they planned an alibi by buying movie tickets, and how, after unloading their weapons into their parents, they shot them again in the kneecaps to stage a gang hit. They even picked up the shotgun shells and dumped their bloody clothes and weapons. None of that screams "panic." It screams "plan." When the police started digging, the brothers initially played innocent, pushing a theory that their parents were killed by the Mafia. That held up until Erik confessed to his therapist—an admission that eventually made its way into the hands of investigators. Only then did their story change. Suddenly, it was self-defense. And as Hochman laid out, they were willing to go to great lengths to sell it. At one point, Lyle allegedly tried to convince his girlfriend to lie under oath, saying Jose had drugged and raped her. The trial testimony evolved yet again, with claims that both brothers had suffered sexual abuse at the hands of their father, with their mother complicit. But Hochman says there's a problem with that story too: it wasn't mentioned in Erik's original confession. In those tapes, Erik reportedly said their father was a controlling force, that their mother couldn't live without him, and that both had to die. Self-defense never came up. Then there's the forensic evidence. The brothers claimed it was dark when they burst into the den, that their parents were standing or lunging at them. But crime scene experts determined that at all times, Jose and Kitty were seated or already wounded on the ground. Hochman says that's just one of 20 lies the brothers have told over the years. Four have been admitted to. Sixteen remain. And unless they acknowledge those, he says they don't deserve a second chance. Naturally, the Menendez family members who support the brothers are outraged. In a statement, they accused Hochman of "ignoring the reality" that Erik and Lyle were "repeatedly abused, feared for their lives, and have atoned for their actions." They argue that Hochman is sending a dangerous message—that male victims of childhood sexual abuse won't be believed. But Hochman is standing firm, and he's not alone. He invoked California Governor Gavin Newsom's 2022 decision to deny parole to Sirhan Sirhan, Robert F. Kennedy's assassin. Despite Sirhan's decades of rehabilitation, Newsom blocked his release because he failed to fully accept responsibility. Hochman says the same logic applies here. No full admission, no second chances. This stance is a complete reversal of former DA George Gascón's position. Before losing re-election to Hochman in December 2024, Gascón supported resentencing, arguing that because the brothers were under 26 at the time of the murders, they should be eligible for parole immediately. Hochman wasted no time undoing that. Still, the brothers aren't out of options. They have a pending habeas corpus petition citing two new pieces of evidence: a letter Erik wrote to a cousin months before the murders describing his father's alleged abuse and allegations from a former boy band member who claims Jose Menendez raped him. Hochman, unsurprisingly, has asked the court to throw it out, calling it unreliable and inadmissible. Their last hope? Clemency. The brothers have petitioned Governor Newsom, and in February, Newsom ordered a 90-day risk assessment to determine whether they pose "an unreasonable risk to the public" if released. It's the final door left open. Whether they walk through it or it slams shut is still up in the air. #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #DAHochman #Justice Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

A Menendez-Inspired Murder: The Chilling Case of Reed Gelinskey  In the quiet village of Caledonia, Wisconsin, a chilling event unfolded that left the community in shock. On March 4, 2025, 15-year-old Reed Gelinskey allegedly murdered his mother, Suzanne Gelinskey, in their family home, drawing eerie inspiration from a Netflix documentary about the Menendez brothers. That evening, after returning from school, Reed reportedly felt a profound sense of depression and an unsettling urge to harm his parents. He had been consuming his brother's anxiety medication for about a month, and on that night, he ingested approximately nine pills. Seeking distraction, he and his mother watched "The Menendez Brothers" documentary on Netflix, which delves into the infamous case of Lyle and Erik Menendez, who were convicted of murdering their parents in 1989. During the "shotgun scene" of the documentary, Reed allegedly conceived a plan to kill his parents. After the documentary ended, Suzanne went upstairs. Seizing the moment, Reed hid a steak knife in his pocket and concealed a dumbbell bar within his sweatshirt sleeve. He then called his mother downstairs under the pretense of needing help finding his medication. As she searched, Reed allegedly struck her twice in the head with the dumbbell. When she didn't fall, he threw her to the ground and stabbed her multiple times. In her final moments, Suzanne asked her son, "Why?" to which he chillingly replied, "Pain." In a state of distress, Reed contacted a friend via Snapchat, sending images of the crime scene and confessing to the act. The friend immediately alerted the authorities. When officers arrived at the Gelinskey residence around 10:30 p.m., they found Reed exiting the house, covered in blood. He surrendered without resistance, repeatedly stating, "She is dead from what I did," and implored the officers to kill him. Inside, officers discovered Suzanne lying unresponsive with multiple stab wounds and blood-soaked clothing. Despite their efforts, she was pronounced dead at the scene. Investigators recovered the bloodied kitchen knife Reed had dropped, another knife near the kitchen sink, and a silver adjustable dumbbell bar near the refrigerator. Further investigation revealed that Reed had also contemplated killing his father upon his return from work but couldn't find a suitable weapon. He admitted to feeling an overwhelming urge to kill both his parents that day. Reed Gelinskey has been charged with first-degree intentional homicide and is being tried as an adult. His bond was set at $1 million, and he is currently held in a juvenile detention center. He is permitted supervised contact with his father and is scheduled to appear in court on March 12 for a preliminary hearing. The community mourns the loss of Suzanne Gelinskey, a dedicated 4K Educational Assistant at Knapp Elementary School. Parents and colleagues remember her as a kind-hearted individual who always had a smile on her face and could brighten any child's day. This tragic incident underscores the profound impact media can have on impressionable minds and raises critical questions about mental health, the influence of media, and the importance of vigilance in recognizing and addressing signs of distress in our loved ones. #InspiredByDarkness #CaledoniaTragedy #MenendezBrothers #MentalHealthAwareness Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

A Menendez-Inspired Murder: The Chilling Case of Reed Gelinskey   In the quiet village of Caledonia, Wisconsin, a chilling event unfolded that left the community in shock. On March 4, 2025, 15-year-old Reed Gelinskey allegedly murdered his mother, Suzanne Gelinskey, in their family home, drawing eerie inspiration from a Netflix documentary about the Menendez brothers. That evening, after returning from school, Reed reportedly felt a profound sense of depression and an unsettling urge to harm his parents. He had been consuming his brother's anxiety medication for about a month, and on that night, he ingested approximately nine pills. Seeking distraction, he and his mother watched "The Menendez Brothers" documentary on Netflix, which delves into the infamous case of Lyle and Erik Menendez, who were convicted of murdering their parents in 1989. During the "shotgun scene" of the documentary, Reed allegedly conceived a plan to kill his parents. After the documentary ended, Suzanne went upstairs. Seizing the moment, Reed hid a steak knife in his pocket and concealed a dumbbell bar within his sweatshirt sleeve. He then called his mother downstairs under the pretense of needing help finding his medication. As she searched, Reed allegedly struck her twice in the head with the dumbbell. When she didn't fall, he threw her to the ground and stabbed her multiple times. In her final moments, Suzanne asked her son, "Why?" to which he chillingly replied, "Pain." In a state of distress, Reed contacted a friend via Snapchat, sending images of the crime scene and confessing to the act. The friend immediately alerted the authorities. When officers arrived at the Gelinskey residence around 10:30 p.m., they found Reed exiting the house, covered in blood. He surrendered without resistance, repeatedly stating, "She is dead from what I did," and implored the officers to kill him. Inside, officers discovered Suzanne lying unresponsive with multiple stab wounds and blood-soaked clothing. Despite their efforts, she was pronounced dead at the scene. Investigators recovered the bloodied kitchen knife Reed had dropped, another knife near the kitchen sink, and a silver adjustable dumbbell bar near the refrigerator. Further investigation revealed that Reed had also contemplated killing his father upon his return from work but couldn't find a suitable weapon. He admitted to feeling an overwhelming urge to kill both his parents that day. Reed Gelinskey has been charged with first-degree intentional homicide and is being tried as an adult. His bond was set at $1 million, and he is currently held in a juvenile detention center. He is permitted supervised contact with his father and is scheduled to appear in court on March 12 for a preliminary hearing. The community mourns the loss of Suzanne Gelinskey, a dedicated 4K Educational Assistant at Knapp Elementary School. Parents and colleagues remember her as a kind-hearted individual who always had a smile on her face and could brighten any child's day. This tragic incident underscores the profound impact media can have on impressionable minds and raises critical questions about mental health, the influence of media, and the importance of vigilance in recognizing and addressing signs of distress in our loved ones. #InspiredByDarkness #CaledoniaTragedy #MenendezBrothers #MentalHealthAwareness Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In the quiet village of Caledonia, Wisconsin, a chilling event unfolded that left the community in shock. On March 4, 2025, 15-year-old Reed Gelinskey allegedly murdered his mother, Suzanne Gelinskey, in their family home, drawing eerie inspiration from a Netflix documentary about the Menendez brothers. That evening, after returning from school, Reed reportedly felt a profound sense of depression and an unsettling urge to harm his parents. He had been consuming his brother's anxiety medication for about a month, and on that night, he ingested approximately nine pills. Seeking distraction, he and his mother watched "The Menendez Brothers" documentary on Netflix, which delves into the infamous case of Lyle and Erik Menendez, who were convicted of murdering their parents in 1989. During the "shotgun scene" of the documentary, Reed allegedly conceived a plan to kill his parents. After the documentary ended, Suzanne went upstairs. Seizing the moment, Reed hid a steak knife in his pocket and concealed a dumbbell bar within his sweatshirt sleeve. He then called his mother downstairs under the pretense of needing help finding his medication. As she searched, Reed allegedly struck her twice in the head with the dumbbell. When she didn't fall, he threw her to the ground and stabbed her multiple times. In her final moments, Suzanne asked her son, "Why?" to which he chillingly replied, "Pain." In a state of distress, Reed contacted a friend via Snapchat, sending images of the crime scene and confessing to the act. The friend immediately alerted the authorities. When officers arrived at the Gelinskey residence around 10:30 p.m., they found Reed exiting the house, covered in blood. He surrendered without resistance, repeatedly stating, "She is dead from what I did," and implored the officers to kill him. Inside, officers discovered Suzanne lying unresponsive with multiple stab wounds and blood-soaked clothing. Despite their efforts, she was pronounced dead at the scene. Investigators recovered the bloodied kitchen knife Reed had dropped, another knife near the kitchen sink, and a silver adjustable dumbbell bar near the refrigerator. Further investigation revealed that Reed had also contemplated killing his father upon his return from work but couldn't find a suitable weapon. He admitted to feeling an overwhelming urge to kill both his parents that day. Reed Gelinskey has been charged with first-degree intentional homicide and is being tried as an adult. His bond was set at $1 million, and he is currently held in a juvenile detention center. He is permitted supervised contact with his father and is scheduled to appear in court on March 12 for a preliminary hearing. The community mourns the loss of Suzanne Gelinskey, a dedicated 4K Educational Assistant at Knapp Elementary School. Parents and colleagues remember her as a kind-hearted individual who always had a smile on her face and could brighten any child's day. This tragic incident underscores the profound impact media can have on impressionable minds and raises critical questions about mental health, the influence of media, and the importance of vigilance in recognizing and addressing signs of distress in our loved ones. #InspiredByDarkness #CaledoniaTragedy #MenendezBrothers #MentalHealthAwareness Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Dr. Phil unravels the Menendez Case with DA Nathan Hochman and Loni Coombs The Menendez case involves brothers Lyle and Erik Menendez, who were convicted in 1996 for the 1989 murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills home. The brothers, who were 21 and 18 at the time of the crime, claimed they acted in self-defense after years of sexual abuse by their father, but prosecutors argued the motive was financial. In a recent development, District Attorney Nathan Hochman has taken a firm stance against granting a new trial for the Menendez brothers and has asked the court to deny Erik and Lyle Menendez's habeas corpus petition.  Following his pivotal press conference, Dr. Phil spoke with the DA who tells him about his recent crucial decisions that could profoundly impact the brothers' legal status. Dr. Phil talks to Merit TV's own Loni Coombs to unpack this case that has been grabbing our attention for decades now. Thank you to our sponsors: Tax Network USA:CALL 1-800-958-1000 or visit https://TNUSA.com/DRPHIL to speak to one of our strategists for FREE today Zecliner: Visit https://Zecliner.com today Preserve Gold: Visit: https://drphilgold.com/  Get a FREE precious metals guide that contains essential information on how to help protect your accounts. Text “DRPHIL” to 50505 to claim this exclusive offer from Preserve Gold today.  

#STSNation, Welcome to Surviving the Survivor, the show that brings you the very #BestGuests in all of #TrueCrime, discussing trending cases like the Menendez Brothers. California Governor Gavin Newsom has fast-tracked a parole board assessment to determine whether Lyle and Erik Menendez should be granted clemency after serving life without parole for the 1989 murders of their parents. This decision has sparked new hope for the brothers and their family, with supporters arguing their rehabilitation and history of alleged abuse warrant a second look. However, Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman is pushing back, calling for their habeas corpus petition to be denied. #BestGuests: Robert Rand – Award-winning journalist who has covered the Menendez case since 1989 and produced compelling documentaries on the case: Truth and Lies: The Menendez Brothers and Unthinkable: The Menendez Murders Professor Jo Potuto – Legal expert breaking down what the parole board's investigation means and what could happen next. Is justice finally shifting in the Menendez Brothers' case, or will they remain behind bars?

California Governor Gavin Newsom has ordered the state parole board to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment on Lyle and Erik Menendez, determining whether the brothers, who have spent nearly 35 years behind bars, would pose a danger to the public if released. This decision marks a pivotal moment in a case that has fascinated and divided the public since 1989 when the Menendez brothers brutally shot their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills mansion. Attorneys for the brothers, Mark Geragos and Cliff Gardner, expressed their gratitude for Newsom's action, acknowledging that it does not guarantee clemency but rather serves as an essential step in evaluating whether the Menendez brothers have demonstrated the rehabilitation necessary for potential release. There is no specified timeline for the parole board's investigation, leaving the outcome uncertain as the legal process continues to unfold. Meanwhile, Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman has publicly opposed granting the brothers a new trial but remains undecided on whether to support resentencing, a legal maneuver that could drastically alter their fate. The Menendez brothers have pursued multiple legal avenues in recent years, including clemency from the governor, a resentencing hearing, and a renewed push for a retrial based on allegations of long-standing sexual abuse by their father. The claims, initially dismissed by prosecutors, have gained traction with the support of the Menendez extended family, who believe the brothers have been unjustly imprisoned. Despite this familial backing, Hochman has challenged the credibility of the abuse allegations, asserting that the evidence remains insufficient to warrant a legal reassessment. He has pointed out inconsistencies in the brothers' testimonies, arguing that their varying explanations of the murders undermine their claim of self-defense. His recent response to their 2023 habeas petition urges the court to reject their plea for a fresh examination of the case. The Menendez brothers' defense team continues to argue that the justice system failed them, not only in their initial conviction but also in the decades since. They claim that crucial details of the alleged abuse were excluded from their 1996 trial, where prosecutors maintained that the murders were driven by greed rather than fear. According to the prosecution's narrative, Lyle and Erik, then 21 and 18, executed their parents in order to inherit their wealth, a theory that has been central to their life-without-parole sentence. With the March hearing approaching, resentencing remains a viable possibility. If granted, the Menendez brothers would become immediately eligible for parole, adding another layer of complexity to an already contentious legal battle. Former Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón had previously recommended reducing their sentences to 50 years to life, a move that would have put them on track for eventual parole consideration. However, with Hochman now leading the district attorney's office, the outlook remains uncertain. As Hochman reviews thousands of pages of prison records and meets with relatives of the Menendez family, the brothers' fate hangs in the balance. Their case, reignited by renewed public interest and recent portrayals in true-crime media, remains a legal battleground where the questions of justice, rehabilitation, and accountability continue to collide. #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #ParoleReview #LegalDebate Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

California Governor Gavin Newsom has ordered the state parole board to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment on Lyle and Erik Menendez, determining whether the brothers, who have spent nearly 35 years behind bars, would pose a danger to the public if released. This decision marks a pivotal moment in a case that has fascinated and divided the public since 1989 when the Menendez brothers brutally shot their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills mansion. Attorneys for the brothers, Mark Geragos and Cliff Gardner, expressed their gratitude for Newsom's action, acknowledging that it does not guarantee clemency but rather serves as an essential step in evaluating whether the Menendez brothers have demonstrated the rehabilitation necessary for potential release. There is no specified timeline for the parole board's investigation, leaving the outcome uncertain as the legal process continues to unfold. Meanwhile, Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman has publicly opposed granting the brothers a new trial but remains undecided on whether to support resentencing, a legal maneuver that could drastically alter their fate. The Menendez brothers have pursued multiple legal avenues in recent years, including clemency from the governor, a resentencing hearing, and a renewed push for a retrial based on allegations of long-standing sexual abuse by their father. The claims, initially dismissed by prosecutors, have gained traction with the support of the Menendez extended family, who believe the brothers have been unjustly imprisoned. Despite this familial backing, Hochman has challenged the credibility of the abuse allegations, asserting that the evidence remains insufficient to warrant a legal reassessment. He has pointed out inconsistencies in the brothers' testimonies, arguing that their varying explanations of the murders undermine their claim of self-defense. His recent response to their 2023 habeas petition urges the court to reject their plea for a fresh examination of the case. The Menendez brothers' defense team continues to argue that the justice system failed them, not only in their initial conviction but also in the decades since. They claim that crucial details of the alleged abuse were excluded from their 1996 trial, where prosecutors maintained that the murders were driven by greed rather than fear. According to the prosecution's narrative, Lyle and Erik, then 21 and 18, executed their parents in order to inherit their wealth, a theory that has been central to their life-without-parole sentence. With the March hearing approaching, resentencing remains a viable possibility. If granted, the Menendez brothers would become immediately eligible for parole, adding another layer of complexity to an already contentious legal battle. Former Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón had previously recommended reducing their sentences to 50 years to life, a move that would have put them on track for eventual parole consideration. However, with Hochman now leading the district attorney's office, the outlook remains uncertain. As Hochman reviews thousands of pages of prison records and meets with relatives of the Menendez family, the brothers' fate hangs in the balance. Their case, reignited by renewed public interest and recent portrayals in true-crime media, remains a legal battleground where the questions of justice, rehabilitation, and accountability continue to collide. #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #ParoleReview #LegalDebate Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

California Governor Gavin Newsom has ordered the state parole board to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment on Lyle and Erik Menendez, determining whether the brothers, who have spent nearly 35 years behind bars, would pose a danger to the public if released. This decision marks a pivotal moment in a case that has fascinated and divided the public since 1989 when the Menendez brothers brutally shot their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills mansion. Attorneys for the brothers, Mark Geragos and Cliff Gardner, expressed their gratitude for Newsom's action, acknowledging that it does not guarantee clemency but rather serves as an essential step in evaluating whether the Menendez brothers have demonstrated the rehabilitation necessary for potential release. There is no specified timeline for the parole board's investigation, leaving the outcome uncertain as the legal process continues to unfold. Meanwhile, Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman has publicly opposed granting the brothers a new trial but remains undecided on whether to support resentencing, a legal maneuver that could drastically alter their fate. The Menendez brothers have pursued multiple legal avenues in recent years, including clemency from the governor, a resentencing hearing, and a renewed push for a retrial based on allegations of long-standing sexual abuse by their father. The claims, initially dismissed by prosecutors, have gained traction with the support of the Menendez extended family, who believe the brothers have been unjustly imprisoned. Despite this familial backing, Hochman has challenged the credibility of the abuse allegations, asserting that the evidence remains insufficient to warrant a legal reassessment. He has pointed out inconsistencies in the brothers' testimonies, arguing that their varying explanations of the murders undermine their claim of self-defense. His recent response to their 2023 habeas petition urges the court to reject their plea for a fresh examination of the case. The Menendez brothers' defense team continues to argue that the justice system failed them, not only in their initial conviction but also in the decades since. They claim that crucial details of the alleged abuse were excluded from their 1996 trial, where prosecutors maintained that the murders were driven by greed rather than fear. According to the prosecution's narrative, Lyle and Erik, then 21 and 18, executed their parents in order to inherit their wealth, a theory that has been central to their life-without-parole sentence. With the March hearing approaching, resentencing remains a viable possibility. If granted, the Menendez brothers would become immediately eligible for parole, adding another layer of complexity to an already contentious legal battle. Former Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón had previously recommended reducing their sentences to 50 years to life, a move that would have put them on track for eventual parole consideration. However, with Hochman now leading the district attorney's office, the outlook remains uncertain. As Hochman reviews thousands of pages of prison records and meets with relatives of the Menendez family, the brothers' fate hangs in the balance. Their case, reignited by renewed public interest and recent portrayals in true-crime media, remains a legal battleground where the questions of justice, rehabilitation, and accountability continue to collide. #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #ParoleReview #LegalDebate Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Puntata a cura di Jacopo Bulgarini d'Elci e Francesca Sarah Toich.Il 20 agosto 1989, Lyle ed Erik Menendez uccisero i genitori nella loro lussuosa casa di Beverly Hills. Dopo mesi in cui continuarono a condurre una vita apparentemente normale, i fratelli finirono sotto indagine e, infine, confessarono gli omicidi. La loro difesa si basava su un'accusa scioccante: affermarono di aver agito per proteggersi dagli abusi che il padre avrebbe inflitto loro per anni. Il caso si trasformò rapidamente in uno dei più seguiti e controversi degli anni '90…La vicenda dei Menendez è tornata sotto i riflettori nel 2024 grazie a due uscite, entrambe su Netflix. La bella serie Monsters: La storia di Lyle ed Erik Menendez, di Ryan Murphy, che è al centro di questa puntata del podcast (8 episodi). E il documentario The Menendez Brothers, diretto da Alejandro Hartmann, di circa un'ora e mezza. “2 voci, 1 serie”: dialoghi sulle cose che ci piacciono, o ci interessano, nel podcast di Mondoserie.Leggi l'articolo sul primo capitolo di Monsters, Dahmer: https://www.mondoserie.it/dahmer/Parte del progetto: https://www.mondoserie.it/ Iscriviti al podcast sulla tua piattaforma preferita o su: https://www.spreaker.com/show/mondoserie-podcast Collegati a MONDOSERIE sui social:https://www.facebook.com/mondoseriehttps://www.instagram.com/mondoserie.it/ https://twitter.com/mondoserie_it https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwXpMjWOcPbFwdit0QJNnXQ https://www.linkedin.com/in/mondoserie/

Lawyers for Lyle and Erik Menendez say California Governor Gavin Newsom has ordered the state parole board to investigate whether the brothers would pose a risk to the public if they are released; A parcel containing a common date-rape drug has led police to 6.5 tonnes of the prohibited substance; Hamas has handed over the bodies of four Israeli hostages while it waits for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners to be released by Israel in return; The 'jam wars' are heating up as Catherine, Princess of Wales shares secrets to her plum jam recipe. The Quicky is the easiest and most enjoyable way to get across the news every day. And it’s delivered straight to your ears in a daily podcast so you can listen whenever you want, wherever you want...at the gym, on the train, in the playground or at night while you're making dinner. Support independent women's media CREDITS Host/Producer: Alix Nicholson Audio Producer: Lu Hill Become a Mamamia subscriber: https://www.mamamia.com.au/subscribeSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

LA DA Nathan Hochman recounted five different stories the Menendez Brothers told as he explained why his office did not support a new trial for the convicted killers. Plus, the latest on the search for a woman accused of killing a California fire captain.For more episodes, CLICK HERE. (https://www.courttv.com/trials/opening-statements-with-julie-grant/?itm_campaign=menu)Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today https://www.courttv.com/Join the Investigation Newsletter https://www.courttv.com/email/Court TV Podcast https://www.courttv.com/podcast/FOLLOW THE CASE:Facebook https://www.facebook.com/courttvTwitter/X https://twitter.com/CourtTVInstagram https://www.instagram.com/courttvnetwork/TikTok https://www.tiktok.com/@courttvliveYouTube https://www.youtube.com/c/COURTTVWATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVEhttps://www.courttv.com/trials/HOW TO FIND COURT TVhttps://www.courttv.com/where-to-watch/This episode of the Opening Statements Podcast is hosted by Julie Grant, produced by Jim Broyles and Eric Goldson, and edited by Autumn Sewell.

In this final episode of our series, So, I Married a Serial Killer..., we unravel the complex and unconventional love stories of Lyle and Erik Menendez—two brothers sentenced to life in prison for the brutal murder of their parents. Despite being condemned to spend the rest of their lives behind bars with no chance of parole, both Lyle and Erik found love. In fact, Lyle has been married twice while in prison, and Erik has maintained a marriage for over 25 years. But how did these romances blossom without shared homes, date nights, or even the possibility of physical touch? In this episode, we explore the women who chose to say, “I do,” to men they would never truly have in the real world. Who are these women? What drives someone to fall in love—and even marry—a convicted murderer they can never live with? Join us as we close out the series by diving deep into the love lives of the Menendez brothers and the women who chose to become Mrs. Menendez.   Sources: https://people.com/who-did-the-menendez-brothers-marry-8713328  https://www.eonline.com/news/1408857/lyle-menendez-and-erik-menendezs-wives-what-to-know-about-the-women-the-brothers-married-in-prison  https://www.today.com/popculture/lyle-erik-menendez-brothers-wives-married-rcna170459  https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna10573267  https://heavy.com/news/2017/01/rebecca-sneed-lyle-menendez-wife-married-prison-ceremony/  https://radaronline.com/exclusives/2014/09/lyle-menendez-gay-life-prison-eugene-weems-book/  https://thecinemaholic.com/anna-eriksson/  https://people.com/archive/life-love-behind-bars-vol-64-no-19/  https://people.com/archive/lyles-lady-vol-46-no-4/  https://thecinemaholic.com/anna-eriksson/  https://coopermagazine.co.uk/rebecca-sneed/  https://www.grunge.com/1436876/who-is-lyle-menendez-wife-rebecca/  https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna3540836#.WG8ThLYrLVo  https://www.msn.com/en-in/family-and-relationships/marriage/meet-milley-bucksey-lyle-menendez-s-21-year-old-girlfriend/ar-AA1uEvE7   Sponsors:  Bamboo HR - Get the free demo at BambooHR.com/freedemo. Gabb - Get $25 off any device at Gabb.com/ONCE. Greenlight - Start your risk-free trial today at Greenlight.com/ONCE.  Fabric - Start investing in your child's future today at meetfabric.com/ONCE. Hungryroot - Get 40% off your first box PLUS a FREE item in every box for LIFE at hungryroot.com/once, code ONCE.    Links:  Patreon - www.patreon.com/onceuponacrime  Our Website -  www.truecrimepodcast.com  YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@OnceUponACrimePodcast

Hochman Rejects New Trial for Menendez Brothers, Citing ‘Lies and Deception' Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman has formally opposed granting Erik and Lyle Menendez a new trial for the 1989 killings of their parents, dismissing their latest appeal as another attempt to rewrite history. Citing what he called a pattern of “lies and deception,” Hochman said the brothers' ever-changing narratives undermine their claims of self-defense. “Erik and Lyle Menendez had told five different versions of what happened,” Hochman stated, pointing to past inconsistencies, including the brothers' initial suggestions that their parents were killed in a mafia hit and their solicitation of a friend to falsely claim she had been raped by their father, Jose Menendez. The Menendez brothers have spent over three decades behind bars for the murders of Jose and Kitty Menendez in their Beverly Hills mansion. Prosecutors successfully argued in their second trial that they killed their parents out of greed, aiming to inherit their family's multimillion-dollar fortune. The brothers, however, have long maintained they acted in self-defense after years of sexual and emotional abuse at the hands of their father. Their latest bid for a new trial hinges on what they claim is fresh evidence supporting their abuse allegations. This includes a 1988 letter written by Erik Menendez to his cousin, in which he detailed ongoing abuse, and accusations from former Menudo band member Roy Rosselló, who has publicly stated that Jose Menendez raped him when he was a teenager. Despite this, Hochman said the sexual abuse allegations do not change the core issue of the case—murder. He cited statements from a defense attorney during the brothers' original trials, who acknowledged that sexual abuse alone was not a justification for killing. “For self-defense to apply, they needed to have an imminent fear that their parents would kill them,” Hochman argued, reinforcing his position that the murders were premeditated rather than reactive. Legal analysts say that while a new trial is unlikely, the possibility of resentencing based on rehabilitation remains open. Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, noted that Hochman's emphasis on the brothers' deception suggests he will likely oppose any effort at leniency. “But given that Hochman talked at length about the Menendez brothers' lies, I think this is less likely,” Rahmani said. “Although Hochman said he has not made a decision on resentencing, reading the tea leaves, I'm guessing he will oppose.” The Menendez case continues to capture public attention, decades after it first made headlines. Renewed interest surged following Netflix's true crime documentary series, which highlighted the abuse allegations and led to calls for a reassessment of their sentences. However, Hochman's stance signals that he will not be swayed by public sentiment. Criminal defense attorney Louis Shapiro said the district attorney's statement was a clear message. “He is saying they follow the law pure and simple,” Shapiro said. “His demeanor and tone tells you he is not sympathetic to the Menendez brothers' cause.” Supporters of the Menendez brothers, including relatives, expressed their frustration with Hochman's position. The Justice for Erik and Lyle Coalition, an advocacy group pushing for their release, strongly criticized his remarks. “Abuse does not exist in a vacuum,” the group said in a statement. “To say it played no role in Erik and Lyle's action is to ignore decades of psychological research and basic human understanding.” Family members who support the brothers' release were also vocal in their disappointment. “We are profoundly disappointed by [Hochman's] remarks, in which he effectively tore up new evidence and discredited the trauma they experienced,” they said in a joint statement. As the debate continues, the next key decision will be whether the Menendez brothers could receive a new sentence. California Governor Gavin Newsom has said he will not weigh in on clemency until after Hochman makes a final decision on resentencing. With Hochman set to review the case in the coming weeks, the brothers' fate remains uncertain. #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #NathanHochman #CrimeNews #LegalBattle #Netflix Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman has formally opposed granting Erik and Lyle Menendez a new trial for the 1989 killings of their parents, dismissing their latest appeal as another attempt to rewrite history. Citing what he called a pattern of “lies and deception,” Hochman said the brothers' ever-changing narratives undermine their claims of self-defense. “Erik and Lyle Menendez had told five different versions of what happened,” Hochman stated, pointing to past inconsistencies, including the brothers' initial suggestions that their parents were killed in a mafia hit and their solicitation of a friend to falsely claim she had been raped by their father, Jose Menendez. The Menendez brothers have spent over three decades behind bars for the murders of Jose and Kitty Menendez in their Beverly Hills mansion. Prosecutors successfully argued in their second trial that they killed their parents out of greed, aiming to inherit their family's multimillion-dollar fortune. The brothers, however, have long maintained they acted in self-defense after years of sexual and emotional abuse at the hands of their father. Their latest bid for a new trial hinges on what they claim is fresh evidence supporting their abuse allegations. This includes a 1988 letter written by Erik Menendez to his cousin, in which he detailed ongoing abuse, and accusations from former Menudo band member Roy Rosselló, who has publicly stated that Jose Menendez raped him when he was a teenager. Despite this, Hochman said the sexual abuse allegations do not change the core issue of the case—murder. He cited statements from a defense attorney during the brothers' original trials, who acknowledged that sexual abuse alone was not a justification for killing. “For self-defense to apply, they needed to have an imminent fear that their parents would kill them,” Hochman argued, reinforcing his position that the murders were premeditated rather than reactive. Legal analysts say that while a new trial is unlikely, the possibility of resentencing based on rehabilitation remains open. Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, noted that Hochman's emphasis on the brothers' deception suggests he will likely oppose any effort at leniency. “But given that Hochman talked at length about the Menendez brothers' lies, I think this is less likely,” Rahmani said. “Although Hochman said he has not made a decision on resentencing, reading the tea leaves, I'm guessing he will oppose.” The Menendez case continues to capture public attention, decades after it first made headlines. Renewed interest surged following Netflix's true crime documentary series, which highlighted the abuse allegations and led to calls for a reassessment of their sentences. However, Hochman's stance signals that he will not be swayed by public sentiment. Criminal defense attorney Louis Shapiro said the district attorney's statement was a clear message. “He is saying they follow the law pure and simple,” Shapiro said. “His demeanor and tone tells you he is not sympathetic to the Menendez brothers' cause.” Supporters of the Menendez brothers, including relatives, expressed their frustration with Hochman's position. The Justice for Erik and Lyle Coalition, an advocacy group pushing for their release, strongly criticized his remarks. “Abuse does not exist in a vacuum,” the group said in a statement. “To say it played no role in Erik and Lyle's action is to ignore decades of psychological research and basic human understanding.” Family members who support the brothers' release were also vocal in their disappointment. “We are profoundly disappointed by [Hochman's] remarks, in which he effectively tore up new evidence and discredited the trauma they experienced,” they said in a joint statement. As the debate continues, the next key decision will be whether the Menendez brothers could receive a new sentence. California Governor Gavin Newsom has said he will not weigh in on clemency until after Hochman makes a final decision on resentencing. With Hochman set to review the case in the coming weeks, the brothers' fate remains uncertain. #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #NathanHochman #CrimeNews #LegalBattle #Netflix Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman has formally opposed granting Erik and Lyle Menendez a new trial for the 1989 killings of their parents, dismissing their latest appeal as another attempt to rewrite history. Citing what he called a pattern of “lies and deception,” Hochman said the brothers' ever-changing narratives undermine their claims of self-defense. “Erik and Lyle Menendez had told five different versions of what happened,” Hochman stated, pointing to past inconsistencies, including the brothers' initial suggestions that their parents were killed in a mafia hit and their solicitation of a friend to falsely claim she had been raped by their father, Jose Menendez. The Menendez brothers have spent over three decades behind bars for the murders of Jose and Kitty Menendez in their Beverly Hills mansion. Prosecutors successfully argued in their second trial that they killed their parents out of greed, aiming to inherit their family's multimillion-dollar fortune. The brothers, however, have long maintained they acted in self-defense after years of sexual and emotional abuse at the hands of their father. Their latest bid for a new trial hinges on what they claim is fresh evidence supporting their abuse allegations. This includes a 1988 letter written by Erik Menendez to his cousin, in which he detailed ongoing abuse, and accusations from former Menudo band member Roy Rosselló, who has publicly stated that Jose Menendez raped him when he was a teenager. Despite this, Hochman said the sexual abuse allegations do not change the core issue of the case—murder. He cited statements from a defense attorney during the brothers' original trials, who acknowledged that sexual abuse alone was not a justification for killing. “For self-defense to apply, they needed to have an imminent fear that their parents would kill them,” Hochman argued, reinforcing his position that the murders were premeditated rather than reactive. Legal analysts say that while a new trial is unlikely, the possibility of resentencing based on rehabilitation remains open. Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, noted that Hochman's emphasis on the brothers' deception suggests he will likely oppose any effort at leniency. “But given that Hochman talked at length about the Menendez brothers' lies, I think this is less likely,” Rahmani said. “Although Hochman said he has not made a decision on resentencing, reading the tea leaves, I'm guessing he will oppose.” The Menendez case continues to capture public attention, decades after it first made headlines. Renewed interest surged following Netflix's true crime documentary series, which highlighted the abuse allegations and led to calls for a reassessment of their sentences. However, Hochman's stance signals that he will not be swayed by public sentiment. Criminal defense attorney Louis Shapiro said the district attorney's statement was a clear message. “He is saying they follow the law pure and simple,” Shapiro said. “His demeanor and tone tells you he is not sympathetic to the Menendez brothers' cause.” Supporters of the Menendez brothers, including relatives, expressed their frustration with Hochman's position. The Justice for Erik and Lyle Coalition, an advocacy group pushing for their release, strongly criticized his remarks. “Abuse does not exist in a vacuum,” the group said in a statement. “To say it played no role in Erik and Lyle's action is to ignore decades of psychological research and basic human understanding.” Family members who support the brothers' release were also vocal in their disappointment. “We are profoundly disappointed by [Hochman's] remarks, in which he effectively tore up new evidence and discredited the trauma they experienced,” they said in a joint statement. As the debate continues, the next key decision will be whether the Menendez brothers could receive a new sentence. California Governor Gavin Newsom has said he will not weigh in on clemency until after Hochman makes a final decision on resentencing. With Hochman set to review the case in the coming weeks, the brothers' fate remains uncertain. #MenendezBrothers #TrueCrime #JusticeSystem #NathanHochman #CrimeNews #LegalBattle #Netflix Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Menendez brothers' release has become a hot topic in recent years as new evidence and shifting public opinion have reignited interest in their case. Convicted in 1996 for the brutal murder of their parents, Lyle and Erik Menendez were sentenced to life without parole, with prosecutors arguing they killed for financial gain. However, their defense claimed the killings were driven by years of sexual and emotional abuse at the hands of their father, José Menendez. With the discovery of a 1988 letter from Erik describing the abuse and new testimony from a former Menudo band member alleging similar assaults by José Menendez, supporters believe the brothers deserve a new trial or resentencing. In 2023, former Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón took the unprecedented step of reviewing the case, acknowledging evolving legal perspectives on trauma and abuse. His office proposed resentencing the Menendez brothers, which could make them immediately eligible for parole. The case gained even more momentum through Netflix documentaries and viral TikTok campaigns, reframing the brothers as victims of lifelong abuse rather than privileged killers. However, in February 2025, newly elected DA Nathan Hochman shut down their request for a new trial, arguing that the new evidence was either inadmissible or irrelevant to their state of mind at the time of the crime. With their new trial denied, the Menendez brothers' last hope for release may come through resentencing or clemency from California Governor Gavin Newsom. If the resentencing effort succeeds, the brothers could face a parole board after more than 30 years behind bars, marking a significant legal shift in their decades-long battle for freedom. As their March 2025 court hearing approaches, the fight for their release remains one of the most controversial true-crime cases in modern history. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Menendez brothers' release has become a hot topic in recent years as new evidence and shifting public opinion have reignited interest in their case. Convicted in 1996 for the brutal murder of their parents, Lyle and Erik Menendez were sentenced to life without parole, with prosecutors arguing they killed for financial gain. However, their defense claimed the killings were driven by years of sexual and emotional abuse at the hands of their father, José Menendez. With the discovery of a 1988 letter from Erik describing the abuse and new testimony from a former Menudo band member alleging similar assaults by José Menendez, supporters believe the brothers deserve a new trial or resentencing. In 2023, former Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón took the unprecedented step of reviewing the case, acknowledging evolving legal perspectives on trauma and abuse. His office proposed resentencing the Menendez brothers, which could make them immediately eligible for parole. The case gained even more momentum through Netflix documentaries and viral TikTok campaigns, reframing the brothers as victims of lifelong abuse rather than privileged killers. However, in February 2025, newly elected DA Nathan Hochman shut down their request for a new trial, arguing that the new evidence was either inadmissible or irrelevant to their state of mind at the time of the crime. With their new trial denied, the Menendez brothers' last hope for release may come through resentencing or clemency from California Governor Gavin Newsom. If the resentencing effort succeeds, the brothers could face a parole board after more than 30 years behind bars, marking a significant legal shift in their decades-long battle for freedom. As their March 2025 court hearing approaches, the fight for their release remains one of the most controversial true-crime cases in modern history. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

The Menendez brothers' case remains one of the most shocking family murder mysteries in American history. For over three decades, Lyle and Erik Menendez have sat behind bars, their story captivating audiences worldwide. Sasha Masjedi, a Beverly Hills High classmate of the Menendez brothers, shares rare and personal insights into what the brothers were like before their lives took a dark turn. Sasha describes their privileged but complicated upbringing in the heart of Beverly Hills, their father's intense demands, and the pressure to fit into an elite social circle. Allegations of abuse, a shocking double murder, and a high-profile trial transformed the Menendez family from Hollywood's elite to true crime's most infamous. With resentencing hearings now on the horizon, could Lyle and Erik Menendez walk free? Tom, Kato, and Sasha break down the controversy, the trial's impact, and the lingering question: did their parents' alleged actions justify their sons' horrifying retaliation?For anyone intrigued by true crime and the psychology of one of America's most infamous families, this episode of One Degree of Scandalous is a must-watch.Connect with Tom on social media Facebook | http://bit.ly/3YJI1jH Instagram | http://bit.ly/3XJ1pvB Twitter | http://bit.ly/3lSjSsoBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/one-degree-of-scandalous-with-tom-zenner-and-kato-kaelin--6258576/support.

On this episode, Tony Brueski digs into the shocking postponement of the Menendez brothers' resentencing hearing, not due to legal maneuvering, but because of the devastating wildfires ravaging Los Angeles. As the city battles an inferno, newly elected District Attorney Nathan Hochman faces a trial by fire, forced to navigate a high-stakes legal drama amidst a backdrop of unprecedented chaos and destruction while simultaneously taking a hardline stance against those seeking to take advantage of the chaos through looting, arson, and insurance fraud. On this episode, Tony Brueski digs into the heart of Hochman's dilemma: Will he uphold his tough-on-crime stance and oppose resentencing for Lyle and Erik Menendez, or will he follow the path of his predecessor, George Gascón, who favored a chance at parole for the infamous brothers? Tony examines the complex layers of this case, from the horrific 1989 murders to the controversial trials and the lingering questions about justice, abuse, and the possibility of redemption, all while a city burns and a new legal chapter unfolds. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

On this episode, Tony Brueski digs into the shocking postponement of the Menendez brothers' resentencing hearing, not due to legal maneuvering, but because of the devastating wildfires ravaging Los Angeles. As the city battles an inferno, newly elected District Attorney Nathan Hochman faces a trial by fire, forced to navigate a high-stakes legal drama amidst a backdrop of unprecedented chaos and destruction while simultaneously taking a hardline stance against those seeking to take advantage of the chaos through looting, arson, and insurance fraud. On this episode, Tony Brueski digs into the heart of Hochman's dilemma: Will he uphold his tough-on-crime stance and oppose resentencing for Lyle and Erik Menendez, or will he follow the path of his predecessor, George Gascón, who favored a chance at parole for the infamous brothers? Tony examines the complex layers of this case, from the horrific 1989 murders to the controversial trials and the lingering questions about justice, abuse, and the possibility of redemption, all while a city burns and a new legal chapter unfolds.  Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

In case you didn't get enough of the Memendez Brother's story at the end of 2024, we thought we'd do a deep dive into it anyway!Ash is joined by research assistant Erin Collins as they look at themes of abuse, mental health, and privilege. They explore the dark side of wealth, parenting gone wrong, and the psychological scars of a toxic family dynamic. This episode delves into the brothers' abusive upbringing, the brutal killings of Jose and Kitty Menendez, and the aftermath—from confessions to legal battles.✨Please consider supporting us on Patreon, for early ad-free content and so much more for as little as $5 a month! 

The new Los Angeles district attorney delays a decision on resentencing the Menendez brothers after meeting with their family. Drew Nelson reports.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In the justice system, where legacies of decisions linger for decades, few cases have the staying power of the Menendez brothers. Convicted of murdering their parents in 1989, Lyle and Erik Menendez have spent more than three decades behind bars, with their case periodically reemerging in the public eye. Now, a new Los Angeles County District Attorney, Nathan Hochman, has taken office and is reshaping the case once again. One of Hochman's first moves was to replace two deputy prosecutors, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had filed a motion under former D.A. George Gascón's administration seeking to reduce the brothers' sentences. Theberge and Lunsford's motion argued that the brothers had shown substantial rehabilitation and should be resentenced to 50 years to life, which would make them eligible for parole. Hochman's decision to reassign them signals a potential shift away from Gascón's reform-oriented policies and has drawn significant attention to the direction Hochman intends to take with such high-profile cases. The January 30-31 resentencing hearing could determine the Menendez brothers' futures, but Hochman's office has not yet stated whether it will uphold or withdraw the resentencing request. Hochman's statements indicate a detailed review process, with an emphasis on examining the case files and treating each brother's case separately. Hochman's approach signals a departure from treating the Menendez brothers as a unit and instead evaluates the specifics of each individual's circumstances and actions. This perspective may allow for a more granular and balanced assessment of justice in a case that has been controversial for decades. The brothers' defense team, led by Mark Geragos, is also pursuing a habeas corpus petition based on newly emerged evidence of alleged sexual abuse by their father, Jose Menendez. The petition includes claims that Erik Menendez wrote letters detailing the abuse before the murders, as well as allegations from Roy Rosselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, who said Jose Menendez sexually assaulted him. These revelations add another layer of complexity to the case, challenging the prosecution's original narrative that the murders were motivated solely by greed. The defense contends that these claims provide a broader context for understanding the brothers' actions, focusing on the psychological toll of prolonged abuse. Judge Michael Jesic, who postponed the resentencing hearing to allow the new administration time to review the case, acknowledged the significant volume of material involved. Hochman's office is also tasked with responding to the habeas corpus petition, a process that could influence the outcome of both the resentencing and broader legal proceedings. This decision underscores the intricate balancing act between revisiting past decisions and maintaining the integrity of the justice system. It also highlights the importance of judicial discretion in managing such a high-profile and emotionally charged case. The case has reignited public debate, with advocates for the brothers pointing to their alleged victimization and rehabilitation as grounds for leniency, while others argue that the brutal nature of the murders justifies their life sentences without parole. The Netflix series Monsters, which revisited the case, has further polarized public opinion, bringing new attention to the decades-old crime. By shedding light on the personal lives of the Menendez brothers and their upbringing, the series has sparked fresh discussions on the intersections of familial abuse, trauma, and criminal behavior. The widespread public interest underscores how deeply this case resonates with broader societal issues of power, family dynamics, and accountability. Governor Gavin Newsom's role also looms over the case, as the brothers have filed a clemency request. However, Newsom has deferred any decisions until after Hochman completes his review. This delay underscores the high stakes and intricate political dynamics surrounding the Menendez brothers' potential release. Newsom's cautious approach reflects the broader implications of granting clemency in a case that continues to polarize opinions across the political and social spectrum. The involvement of the governor further elevates the case to a state-wide platform, where its outcome could set a significant precedent for executive intervention in criminal sentencing. As the January hearing approaches, the Menendez brothers' case remains a flashpoint in discussions about justice, rehabilitation, and the evolving societal understanding of abuse and trauma. The decisions made in the coming months could not only shape the lives of Lyle and Erik Menendez but also set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future. The hearing promises to be a critical juncture, where the legal arguments, new evidence, and broader societal shifts converge to determine whether justice is best served by maintaining their sentences or by granting them a second chance. The Menendez brothers' journey from wealthy Beverly Hills teenagers to convicted murderers and now potential symbols of rehabilitation continues to captivate the public. It raises questions about the capacity of the justice system to adapt to new evidence and evolving perceptions of crime and punishment. Hochman's role in shaping the outcome of this case places him at the center of a legal and cultural crossroads, where each decision carries the weight of decades of debate over what justice truly means. This case, with its layers of legal complexity and emotional resonance, serves as a test of the justice system's ability to reconcile past convictions with new evidence and shifting public sentiment. In addition to the legal implications, the Menendez brothers' case also reflects broader trends in criminal justice reform. The focus on rehabilitation, the consideration of trauma, and the evolving perceptions of abuse survivors all come into play in this intricate legal drama. As society continues to grapple with questions of fairness and accountability, the case's outcome could offer insight into how the justice system may evolve to address similar cases in the future. This ongoing saga remains a profound reminder of the intersection between law, psychology, and societal change, making it one of the most compelling criminal cases of our time. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

A New D.A., A New Direction: The Menendez Brothers' Fate Hangs in the Balance  In the justice system, where legacies of decisions linger for decades, few cases have the staying power of the Menendez brothers. Convicted of murdering their parents in 1989, Lyle and Erik Menendez have spent more than three decades behind bars, with their case periodically reemerging in the public eye. Now, a new Los Angeles County District Attorney, Nathan Hochman, has taken office and is reshaping the case once again. One of Hochman's first moves was to replace two deputy prosecutors, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had filed a motion under former D.A. George Gascón's administration seeking to reduce the brothers' sentences. Theberge and Lunsford's motion argued that the brothers had shown substantial rehabilitation and should be resentenced to 50 years to life, which would make them eligible for parole. Hochman's decision to reassign them signals a potential shift away from Gascón's reform-oriented policies and has drawn significant attention to the direction Hochman intends to take with such high-profile cases. The January 30-31 resentencing hearing could determine the Menendez brothers' futures, but Hochman's office has not yet stated whether it will uphold or withdraw the resentencing request. Hochman's statements indicate a detailed review process, with an emphasis on examining the case files and treating each brother's case separately. Hochman's approach signals a departure from treating the Menendez brothers as a unit and instead evaluates the specifics of each individual's circumstances and actions. This perspective may allow for a more granular and balanced assessment of justice in a case that has been controversial for decades. The brothers' defense team, led by Mark Geragos, is also pursuing a habeas corpus petition based on newly emerged evidence of alleged sexual abuse by their father, Jose Menendez. The petition includes claims that Erik Menendez wrote letters detailing the abuse before the murders, as well as allegations from Roy Rosselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, who said Jose Menendez sexually assaulted him. These revelations add another layer of complexity to the case, challenging the prosecution's original narrative that the murders were motivated solely by greed. The defense contends that these claims provide a broader context for understanding the brothers' actions, focusing on the psychological toll of prolonged abuse. Judge Michael Jesic, who postponed the resentencing hearing to allow the new administration time to review the case, acknowledged the significant volume of material involved. Hochman's office is also tasked with responding to the habeas corpus petition, a process that could influence the outcome of both the resentencing and broader legal proceedings. This decision underscores the intricate balancing act between revisiting past decisions and maintaining the integrity of the justice system. It also highlights the importance of judicial discretion in managing such a high-profile and emotionally charged case. The case has reignited public debate, with advocates for the brothers pointing to their alleged victimization and rehabilitation as grounds for leniency, while others argue that the brutal nature of the murders justifies their life sentences without parole. The Netflix series Monsters, which revisited the case, has further polarized public opinion, bringing new attention to the decades-old crime. By shedding light on the personal lives of the Menendez brothers and their upbringing, the series has sparked fresh discussions on the intersections of familial abuse, trauma, and criminal behavior. The widespread public interest underscores how deeply this case resonates with broader societal issues of power, family dynamics, and accountability. Governor Gavin Newsom's role also looms over the case, as the brothers have filed a clemency request. However, Newsom has deferred any decisions until after Hochman completes his review. This delay underscores the high stakes and intricate political dynamics surrounding the Menendez brothers' potential release. Newsom's cautious approach reflects the broader implications of granting clemency in a case that continues to polarize opinions across the political and social spectrum. The involvement of the governor further elevates the case to a state-wide platform, where its outcome could set a significant precedent for executive intervention in criminal sentencing. As the January hearing approaches, the Menendez brothers' case remains a flashpoint in discussions about justice, rehabilitation, and the evolving societal understanding of abuse and trauma. The decisions made in the coming months could not only shape the lives of Lyle and Erik Menendez but also set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future. The hearing promises to be a critical juncture, where the legal arguments, new evidence, and broader societal shifts converge to determine whether justice is best served by maintaining their sentences or by granting them a second chance. The Menendez brothers' journey from wealthy Beverly Hills teenagers to convicted murderers and now potential symbols of rehabilitation continues to captivate the public. It raises questions about the capacity of the justice system to adapt to new evidence and evolving perceptions of crime and punishment. Hochman's role in shaping the outcome of this case places him at the center of a legal and cultural crossroads, where each decision carries the weight of decades of debate over what justice truly means. This case, with its layers of legal complexity and emotional resonance, serves as a test of the justice system's ability to reconcile past convictions with new evidence and shifting public sentiment. In addition to the legal implications, the Menendez brothers' case also reflects broader trends in criminal justice reform. The focus on rehabilitation, the consideration of trauma, and the evolving perceptions of abuse survivors all come into play in this intricate legal drama. As society continues to grapple with questions of fairness and accountability, the case's outcome could offer insight into how the justice system may evolve to address similar cases in the future. This ongoing saga remains a profound reminder of the intersection between law, psychology, and societal change, making it one of the most compelling criminal cases of our time. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com 

Nathan Hochman had barely unpacked his office when his tenure as Los Angeles County District Attorney began with a seismic jolt. In his first major act, he dismissed two high-ranking deputies, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had become central figures in the simmering controversy surrounding Lyle and Erik Menendez. The Menendez brothers, infamous for the brutal 1989 murders of their parents, were the focus of a contentious resentencing appeal that had ignited public and legal debate alike. Hochman's decisive move sent shockwaves through the legal community, marking a clear departure from the policies of his predecessor, George Gascon. Theberge and Lunsford had been instrumental in a 57-page appeal filed just weeks earlier, advocating for a reduction in the brothers' life sentences without the possibility of parole. Their argument rested on evidence of rehabilitation. The proposed revision—50 years to life—would have made the Menendez brothers immediately eligible for parole after 34 years of incarceration. Critics lambasted the move as a slap in the face to justice, reigniting the fierce divide that had characterized public opinion since the sensational trial in the mid-1990s. Hochman's stance was unequivocal. He publicly criticized Gascon's approach to the Menendez case, accusing him of leveraging high-profile cases for political gain. By removing Theberge and Lunsford from their positions, Hochman made it clear that his administration would be taking a different path. Theberge, who had led the resentencing unit under Gascon, was transferred to the office of the Alternate Public Defender, while Lunsford was reassigned within the DA's office. These personnel shifts signaled a stark policy pivot—one that appeared to prioritize retribution over rehabilitation. Yet the personnel changes only deepened the intrigue. Shortly after Hochman's announcement, the DA's office declared that Antonio Aguilar would take over as head of the resentencing unit and the post-conviction and discovery division. However, Aguilar denied the appointment, despite his name being listed on the official roster of new appointments. The office, tight-lipped as ever, declined to clarify the discrepancy, leaving Observers speculated about the true state of affairs within the DA's administration. This lack of transparency only added fuel to the growing skepticism about Hochman's intentions and the broader direction of his administration.   The Menendez brothers' resentencing hearing, initially scheduled for mid-December, became another casualty of the administrative upheaval. Judge Michael Jesic postponed the hearing to late January, citing the need to give Hochman's team sufficient time to familiarize themselves with the voluminous case file. This delay added another layer of uncertainty to an already convoluted saga. Hochman now faced a critical decision: whether to proceed with the original recommendation for resentencing or to withdraw it, provided he could present a legitimate reason for doing so. Either choice carried significant risks, not only for the Menendez brothers but also for the credibility of the DA's office under its new leadership. With public scrutiny intensifying, Hochman's next move could set a precedent for how his tenure would be judged.   Meanwhile, Mark Geragos, the brothers' high-profile attorney, had been busy mounting a parallel offensive. Geragos filed a habeas corpus petition that introduced new evidence allegedly corroborating the brothers' claims of sexual abuse by their father. This revelation, Geragos argued, warranted a new trial. The petition awaited a response from the DA's office, which had initially been due in late November but requested an extension until December 20. The delay only heightened the tension, as all parties braced for a showdown in the courtroom. Geragos's strategy was clear: keep the focus on the alleged abuse and its potential impact on the original trial's outcome. This approach not only put pressure on Hochman but also revived public interest in the case, ensuring that every development was scrutinized by the media.   Complicating matters further was the Menendez brothers' clemency appeal to Governor Gavin Newsom. The governor deferred any action, citing respect for Hochman's review of the case. The clemency request represented a long-shot bid for freedom, but it also underscored the high stakes involved. Clemency, a rarely granted relief, would require compelling evidence of miscarriage of justice, rehabilitation, or extenuating circumstances. Newsom's decision to defer highlighted the gravity of the situation and the potential political ramifications of any action he might take. For the brothers, it was a sliver of hope in an otherwise daunting legal landscape.   The January 30–31 hearing loomed large on the horizon, poised to become a pivotal moment not just for the Menendez brothers but for the broader conversation about justice, rehabilitation, and the legacy of one of the most notorious cases in American legal history. The outcome of this hearing could redefine the narrative surrounding the Menendez brothers, shifting it from one of cold-blooded killers to victims of a deeply dysfunctional family dynamic. However, such a shift would not come easily. The prosecution's team was expected to vigorously oppose any motion that might appear to lessen the severity of the brothers' crimes.   What began as a family tragedy has evolved into a multifaceted legal drama, replete with power struggles, moral quandaries, and the ever-present specter of public scrutiny. Hochman's early moves have set the stage for a high-stakes confrontation, one that promises to test the limits of justice and redemption in a system often criticized for its rigidity. As the Menendez brothers await their day in court, the question remains: will this new chapter bring closure to a case that has haunted the public imagination for decades, or will it only deepen the mystery?   Adding to the drama is the renewed cultural fascination with the case, spurred in part by the Netflix series "Monsters," which revisited the Menendez brothers' story in a broader context of sensationalized family crimes. The series has reignited debates over the fairness of the original trial, the admissibility of abuse claims, and the role of public opinion in shaping legal outcomes. For many, the Menendez case serves as a litmus test for how society balances the scales of justice against the backdrop of human complexity. This renewed attention has amplified the stakes for all involved, from the DA's office to the defense team, and even the public officials who might be drawn into the fray.   As the clock ticks down to the January hearing, one thing is certain: the Menendez brothers' story is far from over. With new evidence, shifting legal strategies, and a public hungry for resolution, the next chapter promises to be as riveting and consequential as the events that have already unfolded. The question of justice—what it means, who deserves it, and how it should be administered—looms large, casting a shadow over the proceedings and ensuring that this case will remain etched in the annals of American legal history. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Nathan Hochman had barely unpacked his office when his tenure as Los Angeles County District Attorney began with a seismic jolt. In his first major act, he dismissed two high-ranking deputies, Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford, who had become central figures in the simmering controversy surrounding Lyle and Erik Menendez. The Menendez brothers, infamous for the brutal 1989 murders of their parents, were the focus of a contentious resentencing appeal that had ignited public and legal debate alike. Hochman's decisive move sent shockwaves through the legal community, marking a clear departure from the policies of his predecessor, George Gascon. Theberge and Lunsford had been instrumental in a 57-page appeal filed just weeks earlier, advocating for a reduction in the brothers' life sentences without the possibility of parole. Their argument rested on evidence of rehabilitation. The proposed revision—50 years to life—would have made the Menendez brothers immediately eligible for parole after 34 years of incarceration. Critics lambasted the move as a slap in the face to justice, reigniting the fierce divide that had characterized public opinion since the sensational trial in the mid-1990s. Hochman's stance was unequivocal. He publicly criticized Gascon's approach to the Menendez case, accusing him of leveraging high-profile cases for political gain. By removing Theberge and Lunsford from their positions, Hochman made it clear that his administration would be taking a different path. Theberge, who had led the resentencing unit under Gascon, was transferred to the office of the Alternate Public Defender, while Lunsford was reassigned within the DA's office. These personnel shifts signaled a stark policy pivot—one that appeared to prioritize retribution over rehabilitation. Yet the personnel changes only deepened the intrigue. Shortly after Hochman's announcement, the DA's office declared that Antonio Aguilar would take over as head of the resentencing unit and the post-conviction and discovery division. However, Aguilar denied the appointment, despite his name being listed on the official roster of new appointments. The office, tight-lipped as ever, declined to clarify the discrepancy, leaving Observers speculated about the true state of affairs within the DA's administration. This lack of transparency only added fuel to the growing skepticism about Hochman's intentions and the broader direction of his administration.   The Menendez brothers' resentencing hearing, initially scheduled for mid-December, became another casualty of the administrative upheaval. Judge Michael Jesic postponed the hearing to late January, citing the need to give Hochman's team sufficient time to familiarize themselves with the voluminous case file. This delay added another layer of uncertainty to an already convoluted saga. Hochman now faced a critical decision: whether to proceed with the original recommendation for resentencing or to withdraw it, provided he could present a legitimate reason for doing so. Either choice carried significant risks, not only for the Menendez brothers but also for the credibility of the DA's office under its new leadership. With public scrutiny intensifying, Hochman's next move could set a precedent for how his tenure would be judged.   Meanwhile, Mark Geragos, the brothers' high-profile attorney, had been busy mounting a parallel offensive. Geragos filed a habeas corpus petition that introduced new evidence allegedly corroborating the brothers' claims of sexual abuse by their father. This revelation, Geragos argued, warranted a new trial. The petition awaited a response from the DA's office, which had initially been due in late November but requested an extension until December 20. The delay only heightened the tension, as all parties braced for a showdown in the courtroom. Geragos's strategy was clear: keep the focus on the alleged abuse and its potential impact on the original trial's outcome. This approach not only put pressure on Hochman but also revived public interest in the case, ensuring that every development was scrutinized by the media.   Complicating matters further was the Menendez brothers' clemency appeal to Governor Gavin Newsom. The governor deferred any action, citing respect for Hochman's review of the case. The clemency request represented a long-shot bid for freedom, but it also underscored the high stakes involved. Clemency, a rarely granted relief, would require compelling evidence of miscarriage of justice, rehabilitation, or extenuating circumstances. Newsom's decision to defer highlighted the gravity of the situation and the potential political ramifications of any action he might take. For the brothers, it was a sliver of hope in an otherwise daunting legal landscape.   The January 30–31 hearing loomed large on the horizon, poised to become a pivotal moment not just for the Menendez brothers but for the broader conversation about justice, rehabilitation, and the legacy of one of the most notorious cases in American legal history. The outcome of this hearing could redefine the narrative surrounding the Menendez brothers, shifting it from one of cold-blooded killers to victims of a deeply dysfunctional family dynamic. However, such a shift would not come easily. The prosecution's team was expected to vigorously oppose any motion that might appear to lessen the severity of the brothers' crimes.   What began as a family tragedy has evolved into a multifaceted legal drama, replete with power struggles, moral quandaries, and the ever-present specter of public scrutiny. Hochman's early moves have set the stage for a high-stakes confrontation, one that promises to test the limits of justice and redemption in a system often criticized for its rigidity. As the Menendez brothers await their day in court, the question remains: will this new chapter bring closure to a case that has haunted the public imagination for decades, or will it only deepen the mystery?   Adding to the drama is the renewed cultural fascination with the case, spurred in part by the Netflix series "Monsters," which revisited the Menendez brothers' story in a broader context of sensationalized family crimes. The series has reignited debates over the fairness of the original trial, the admissibility of abuse claims, and the role of public opinion in shaping legal outcomes. For many, the Menendez case serves as a litmus test for how society balances the scales of justice against the backdrop of human complexity. This renewed attention has amplified the stakes for all involved, from the DA's office to the defense team, and even the public officials who might be drawn into the fray.   As the clock ticks down to the January hearing, one thing is certain: the Menendez brothers' story is far from over. With new evidence, shifting legal strategies, and a public hungry for resolution, the next chapter promises to be as riveting and consequential as the events that have already unfolded. The question of justice—what it means, who deserves it, and how it should be administered—looms large, casting a shadow over the proceedings and ensuring that this case will remain etched in the annals of American legal history. Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK's Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

  Aphrodite Jones is a New York Times best-selling author who dissects bizarre murder cases and brings readers into the heart of crime. She is also the host of the hit TV show True Crime with Aphrodite Jones, which airs on Investigation Discovery and is available on Amazon Prime. Listeners can learn more about Aphrodite at her website: aphroditejones.com/, or on X @Aphrodite_Jones  Resources:   In this episode of Zone 7, Crime Scene Investigator, Sheryl McCollum, talks with renowned true crime author and TV personality Aphrodite Jones to discuss the impact Hollywood dramatizations have on the public perception of true crime cases. Sheryl and Aphrodite discuss infamous cases like the Menendez brothers and Michael Peterson, scrutinizing how factual distortions in cinematic portrayals influence public opinion. They dive into the differences between documentaries and dramatizations, focusing on the new evidence that can reshape our understanding of these cases. They also touch on the broader implications of misleading narratives in true crime media and appeal for a more truthful representation of victim and perpetrator lives. Show Notes: (0:00) Welcome back to Zone 7 with Crime Scene Investigator, Sheryl McCollum   (0:10) Sheryl welcomes Aphrodite Jones back to Zone 7 (2:30) The Menendez case - public perception vs. reality (6:50) “It's incredible to me that people watch a series and then jump to reasoning and theories about what could have or should have happened, and want to argue about it.” (7:30) New pieces of evidence for a potential new sentencing  (10:00) Reflections of All He Wanted  (14:00) The Case of Brandon Teena   (15:00) Opinions on the title - “Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story”  (18:30) Aphrodite reads elements of Erik Menendez's letter (24:30) Dissecting the scenes in Monsters and the incest claim (27:00) The Staircase - Michael Peterson's case (34:00) The owl theory and its absurdity (41:00) Harmful impact of online conspiracies (46:10) “A half-truth is a lie.” -L.M.R Thanks for listening to another episode! If you're loving the show and want to help grow the show, please head over to Itunes and leave a rating and review!  --- Sheryl “Mac” McCollum is an Emmy Award winning CSI, a writer for CrimeOnLine, Forensic and Crime Scene Expert for Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, and a CSI for a metro Atlanta Police Department. She is the co-author of the textbook., Cold Case: Pathways to Justice. Sheryl is also the founder and director of the Cold Case Investigative Research Institute, a collaboration between universities and colleges that brings researchers, practitioners, students and the criminal justice community together to advance techniques in solving cold cases and assist families and law enforcement with solvability factors for unsolved homicides, missing persons, and kidnapping cases.   Social Links: Email: coldcase2004@gmail.com Twitter: @ColdCaseTips Facebook: @sheryl.mccollum Instagram: @officialzone7podcastSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

A California judge has pushed back the resentencing hearing for Lyle and Erik Menendez, to allow the incoming Los Angeles District Attorney time to review evidence from the case. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Laura continues her discussion with Matt Murphy about one of America's most prolific serial killers Rodney Alcala, diving deeper into his horrific and brutal crimes, along with his background and psychopathology.   Laura asks Matt his opinion about the latest developments in Lyle and Erik Menendez's case and Matt shares why he believes they should never be released from prison. Hold on to your hats!   For more in-depth conversations, extra episodes and videos and to be a part a fast growing, dynamic, empowering and supportive community join the Crime Analyst Squad: www.patreon.com/CrimeAnalyst   #TaliShapiro #MorganRowan #RobinSamsoe #JillBarcomb #JillParenteau #GeorgiaWixted #CharlotteLamb #CorneliaCrilley #EllenJaneHover #RuthThornton #WomanOfTheHour #RodneyAlcacla #DatingGameKiller #CrimeAnalyst #TrueCrime #Podcast   Clips https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0GcHdvr2KY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4G1FNFGHXA   Sources https://www.forbes.com/sites/monicamercuri/2024/10/22/who-escaped-rodney-alcala-where-the-survivors-of-the-dating-game-killer-are-now/ https://www.mattmurphylaw.com/about-matt-murphy-law/ https://www.amazon.com/Book-Murder-Prosecutors-Journey-Through/dp/1368104061     REGISTER For Laura's 2024 Coercive Control Dec 4/5 Masterclass: https://shoutout.wix.com/so/b4P5SKknQ?languageTag=en®ion=e839f6de-f0cb-480d-9551-060150ae2499   More Training Info: www.dashriskchecklist.com www.thelaurarichards.com   YouTube, Socials and Website YouTube @crimeanalyst Facebook Crime Analyst Podcast Instagram @crimeanalyst @laurarichards999 Threads @crimeanalyst X @thecrimeanalyst @laurarichards999 TikTok @crimeanalystpod Website www.crime-analyst.com Leave a Review https://www.crime-analyst.com/reviews/new/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

We were hoping for a fun light episode this week, maybe a good heist story or a con man gets his comeuppance after a long FBI cat and mouse. And Dateline has answered our prayers with THE MENENDEZ BROTHERS: A CHANCE AT FREEDOM! Here is the thing, there is nothing light and fun about this case, so please listen with caution! But never fear, despite this case being 35 years old, Kimberly & Katie are ever questioning and trying to gain knowledge, and we have scholarly questions. Were all 90's lawyers assigned a trendy hairstyle or did they get to pick? Why was there a boy band named after soup? What day is bring your son to the homicide press conference day? Do you still have to pay for sessions when you're sleeping with your therapist? Did OJ Simpson worm his way into every murder trial in 1994? Find out the answers to none of these important questions by joining us as we dive into the deep rabbit hole of a very famous case! Trigger Warning: This episode contains discussions of childhood sexual abuse. Please listen with caution and take care of yourself. https://rainn.org/ is available 24/7 with help.  Official Description from Peacock: Latest developments and new interviews in the high-profile murder trial of Lyle and Erik Menendez; a scripted show reignites public interest in the case. Keith Morrison reports.  Support our show and take a moment to check our our fantastic sponsors! Head to acorns.com/datedateline or download the Acorns app to start saving and investing for your future today! Plant some Acorns and invest in your future money tree! We're sure your cats have been on the nice list this year, but let's be real, you're going to treat them with great food even if they were naughty! Head to smalls.com/DATEDATELINE use promo code DATEDATELINE at checkout for 50% off your first order PLUS free shipping! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Keith Morrison reports on the latest developments in the high-profile murder case of Lyle and Erik Menendez that continues to captivate the nation.

This week, Scheana is back at the Hot Topics table with Mercedes ‘MJ' Javid and Kiki Monique, discussing everything from their favorite Halloween candy and when it's okay to put up the Christmas tree to what MJ's former classmates (Erik Menendez, Monica Lewinsky & Angelina Jolie) were like in high school. Does she agree with Ryan Murphy's portrayal of events in the Menendez case? How does she feel about Erik potentially getting released? And how would he be received at their HS Reunion? Also, the group discusses the latest drama in the Bravo world, sharing their thoughts on the reason Vicki Gunvalson said she will never forgive Bravo and Brandi Glanville's recent tweet directed at Caroline Manzo. Plus, did Stassi shade Scheana in her recent book? Tune in to find out! Follow us: @scheana @scheananigans Co-Hosts: @mercedesjavid @thetalkofshame The video version of this episode will be available on Scheana's YouTube page on Friday, November 1st.Episode Sponsors:Start all of your holiday shopping at Rakuten.com or download the Rakuten app to start saving today.Get up to 50% off your first crate at kiwico.com, promo code HONEY. Produced by Dear MediaSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On a special episode of Stay Tuned in Brief, Jesse Weber, anchor and host at the Law & Crime Network, joins former federal prosecutor Elie Honig to discuss the criminal cases of brothers Lyle and Erik Menendez, who were convicted of first-degree murder in the ‘90s for killing their parents. Did they have a legitimate claim of imperfect self-defense based on imminent danger? Should evidence of sexual abuse been fully admissible? And should the emergence of new evidence prompt a reevaluation of the convictions?  This conversation is part of a new series of episodes that will be exclusively for members of CAFE Insider. Each week, Elie Honig and special guests will tackle one major legal or policy issue, helping you stay informed. To become a member of CAFE Insider and never miss new episodes head to cafe.com/insiderpod. You'll get access to two full episodes of the podcast each week and other exclusive content. Shownotes & transcript can be found at CAFE.com. This podcast is brought to you by CAFE and Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

A new documentary and a Ryan Murphy drama have Lyle and Erik Menendez back in the news. Vox's Aja Romano explains how new evidence and new attitudes about abuse survivors might help free the brothers. This episode was produced by Hady Mawajdeh, edited by Matt Collette, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Patrick Boyd and Andrea Kristinsdottir, and hosted by Noel King. Transcript at vox.com/today-explained-podcast Support Today, Explained by becoming a Vox Member today: http://www.vox.com/members A1992 photo of Erik and Lyle Menendez during a court appearance in Los Angeles. Photo by MIKE NELSON/AFP via Getty Images. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In August of 1989, two brothers entered their parents' Beverly Hills mansion, and shot them multiple times, killing them almost instantly. When police arrived, the men maintained that the murders had taken place while they were at the movies, which police initially believed. But after a painstaking, months-long investigation, and a guilt-ridden confession to a therapist, the men were arrested for the murders. There seemed to be no question whether or not they had committed the crime, but the real question was why. Did the horrific abuse they alleged to suffer at the hands of their mother and father justify their parents' brutal end, or were the brothers just out for their family's fortune? These are the murders of Kitty and Jose Menendez, and the stories of Lyle and Erik Menendez. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In August of 1989, two brothers entered their parents' Beverly Hills mansion, and shot them multiple times, killing them almost instantly. When police arrived, the men maintained that the murders had taken place while they were at the movies, which police initially believed. But after a painstaking, months-long investigation, and a guilt-ridden confession to a therapist, the men were arrested for the murders. There seemed to be no question whether or not they had committed the crime, but the real question was why. Did the horrific abuse they alleged to suffer at the hands of their mother and father justify their parents' brutal end, or were the brothers just out for their family's fortune? These are the murders of Kitty and Jose Menendez, and the stories of Lyle and Erik Menendez. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In August of 1989, 21-year-old Lyle and 18-year-old Erik Menendez murdered their parents in Beverly Hills after years of abuse. Afterward, they attempted to cover it up, but their stories quickly unravelled. Keep up with us on Instagram @serialkillerspodcast! Have a story to share? Email us at serialkillerstories@spotify.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices