Podcasts about new york court

President Trump said that the decision by the Supreme Court on his tariffs was a disgrace. Some of the justices who opposed the president were appointed by Trump in his first term. The justices offered different opinions about why they decided what they did. We take a look at the lessons we can learn from this. What does it mean for the balance of power? We explore it with our guest:Richard A. Dollinger, retired New York Court of Claims judge---Connections is supported by listeners like you. Head to our donation page to become a WXXI member today, support the show, and help us close the gap created by the rescission of federal funding.---Connections airs every weekday from noon-2 p.m. Join the conversation with questions or comments by phone at 1-844-295-TALK (8255) or 585-263-9994, email, Facebook or Twitter. Connections is also livestreamed on the WXXI News YouTube channel each day. You can watch live or access previous episodes here.---Do you have a story that needs to be shared? Pitch your story to Connections.

Judge Richard Dollinger writes about the history of birthright citizenship, and a little-known Rochester connection that goes back to the late 1800s. A Rochester native and lawyer named John Norton Pomeroy argued the first birthright case in California. He contended that a Chinese man, born in California, could not qualify for citizenship because his parents (as non-citizens) were not "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States." Pomeroy lost, and the matter was assumed to be settled for decades. But now the Trump administration wants the current Court to decide that Pomeroy was right all along — and flip birthright citizenship on its head. We discuss it with our guests. Richard A. Dollinger, retired New York Court of Claims judge Toni Jaeger-Fine, senior counselor at Fordham Law School and principal of Jaeger-Fine Consulting Lucrecia Knapp, immigration attorney at Mancuso Brightman PLLC ---Connections is supported by listeners like you. Head to our donation page to become a WXXI member today, support the show, and help us close the gap created by the rescission of federal funding.---Connections airs every weekday from noon-2 p.m. Join the conversation with questions or comments by phone at 1-844-295-TALK (8255) or 585-263-9994, email, Facebook or Twitter. Connections is also livestreamed on the WXXI News YouTube channel each day. You can watch live or access previous episodes here.---Do you have a story that needs to be shared? Pitch your story to Connections.

The Smart 7 is an award winning daily podcast, in association with METRO, that gives you everything you need to know in 7 minutes, at 7am, 7 days a week…With over 19 million downloads and consistently charting, including as No. 1 News Podcast on Spotify, we're a trusted source for people every day and we've won Gold at the Signal International Podcast awardsIf you're enjoying it, please follow, share, or even post a review, it all helps... Today's episode includes the following: https://x.com/i/status/2008082550527558038 https://x.com/i/status/2008173188132303238 https://x.com/i/status/2008165663743869367 https://x.com/i/status/2008114765500182846 https://x.com/i/status/2008092104115831046 https://x.com/i/status/2008173260614008955 https://x.com/i/status/2008134055779316042 https://www.etonline.com/media/videos/kristen-stewart-is-down-to-direct-a-twilight-remake-exclusive-239226 https://x.com/i/status/2008162878428209651 Contact us over @TheSmart7pod or visit www.thesmart7.com or find out more at www.metro.co.uk Voiced by Jamie East, using AI, written by Liam Thompson, researched by Lucie Lewis and produced by Daft Doris. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

There were reports of gunfire in Caracas, the capital of Venezuela, overnight, with videos circulating on social media. It comes after toppled President Nicolas Maduro pleaded not guilty to charges of narco-terrorism following his capture by US authorities. His arrest has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Speaking to Shane this morning with more on this was Former Chief of Staff to Nicolas Maduro, Temir Porras Ponceleon.

Deposed Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores were arraigned in a New York courtroom yesterday. The pair pled not guilty to drugs and weapons charges with maduro striking a defiant tone, stating he was the President of Venezuela and had been kidnapped.We get the latest on this with Sam Kiley, World Affairs Editor, The Independent and also Terry Sheridan, Senior Director of News at WSHU Public Radio.

There were reports of gunfire in Caracas, the capital of Venezuela, overnight, with videos circulating on social media. It comes after toppled President Nicolas Maduro pleaded not guilty to charges of narco-terrorism following his capture by US authorities. His arrest has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Speaking to Shane this morning with more on this was Former Chief of Staff to Nicolas Maduro, Temir Porras Ponceleon.

Carl Quintanilla, Sara Eisen, & David Faber kicked off the hour with the latest on the breaking news of the day: Venezuela, moments before ousted leader Maduro is due to appear in a New York Court - with wide-ranging implications for global markets, the energy complex, and the geopolitical order.  Hear from a great lineup this hour: Rockefeller's Ruchir Sharma joined the team with a look at the market impact; Signum Global Advisors Founder Charles Myers - who's planning a trip to Venezuela with business leaders to explore investment prospects; and former Trump NSA head H.R. McMaster - with his take on what happens next in the country and beyond.  Squawk on the Street Disclaimer Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

The ousted Venezuelan President, Nicolas Maduro, has appeared in court in New York, two days after he was seized by US special forces during a raid in Caracas. Also: 10 people have been found guilty of cyberbullying the French President's wife, Brigitte Macron. And there will be a public holiday in Scotland to celebrate the country's return to the men's football World Cup.

Deposed Venezuelan leader Maduro, wife to appear in New York court after U.S. capture. CES 2026. Ayatollah Khamenei plans to flee to Moscow if Iran unrest intensifies. Medical AI. Copyrights entering the public domain. 

Following his kidnapping, Nicolás Maduro pleads not-guilty.  Plus: Trump warns Europe they'll be next, and the insider who made big bucks betting on Maduro's kidnap. With Michael Walker, Aaron Bastani, and Juan David Rojas.

Venezuela's political crisis takes a dramatic turn as President Nicolas Maduro is due in a New York federal court on drug trafficking and corruption charges. President Donald Trump is openly claiming the U.S. now controls Venezuela, tying Maduro's removal to the nation's vast oil reserves. On Capitol Hill, Democrats are demanding answers in a classified Gang of Eight briefing about the operation and what comes next. Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed with the latest news from a leading Black-owned & controlled media company: https://aurn.com/newsletter Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said the Government's view was that it "never accepted the legitimacy of the Maduro regime", but has said he wants a peaceful transition to a democratic regime. It's as Nicolas Maduro appeared in court today after his weekend capture by US forces. He pleaded not guilty to charges. Joining Ciara Doherty with the latest and to discuss the implications of his ousting as president was Harriet Alexander senior features reporter for The Times and The Sunday Times, based in New York, Dr Valesca Lima Assistant Professor of Politics at the School of Law and Government and researcher in Latin America and Jerry McDermott is the owner of McDermott Realty Associates and former Sheriff of Norfolk County.

After several more controversial pardons from President Trump, legal scholars are debating how to reform the pardon process. Trump's pardons come on the heels of a wave of pardons from President Biden, shielding family and close associates from possible future legal consequences. What changes should be made to the process, if any? Our guests discuss it. In studio: John Ark, retired New York State Supreme Court justice Richard Dollinger, retired New York Court of Claims judge Thomas VanStrydonck, retired New York State Supreme Court justice ---Connections is supported by listeners like you. Head to our donation page to become a WXXI member today, support the show, and help us close the gap created by the rescission of federal funding.---Connections airs every weekday from noon-2 p.m. Join the conversation with questions or comments by phone at 1-844-295-TALK (8255) or 585-263-9994, email, Facebook or Twitter. Connections is also livestreamed on the WXXI News YouTube channel each day. You can watch live or access previous episodes here.---Do you have a story that needs to be shared? Pitch your story to Connections.

The indictments of former FBI Director James Comey and New York State Attorney General Letitia James appear to be a clear case of political retribution. President Trump himself has made public statements to that effect. But the president's supporters say it is a logical response to what they perceive to be an unfair legal campaign against him. So what happens if the Justice Department becomes weaponized? Our guests discuss it. In studio: Hon. John Ark, retired New York State Supreme Court justice Hon. Richard Dollinger, retired New York Court of Claims judge Hon. Thomas VanStrydonck, retired New York State Supreme Court justice Hon. Joanne Winslow, retired New York State Supreme Court justice and former Monroe County prosecuting attorney  ---Connections is supported by listeners like you. Head to our donation page to become a WXXI member today, support the show, and help us close the gap created by the rescission of federal funding.---Connections airs every weekday from noon-2 p.m. Join the conversation with questions or comments by phone at 1-844-295-TALK (8255) or 585-263-9994, email, Facebook or Twitter. Connections is also livestreamed on the WXXI News YouTube channel each day. You can watch live or access previous episodes here.---Do you have a story that needs to be shared? Pitch your story to Connections.

We condemn political violence, and we will have more to discuss on this tragic subject soon. For now, we continue as planned with our first-hour discussion: President Trump and Vice President Vance have said that the courts should not stand in the way of their administration's priorities. The courts are, of course, supposed to be an equal branch of government. But are they? We welcome three retired judges — Republican and Democrat — to discuss it.In studio: Hon. Richard Dollinger, New York Court of Claims Judge (ret.) Hon. Joseph Valentino, New York State Supreme Court Justice (ret.) Hon. Thomas VanStrydonck, New York State Supreme Court Justice (ret.)

Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton! If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too. Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. Clay's Prediction Comes True A breakdown of the New York Court of Appeals' unanimous decision to overturn the $500 million civil fraud fine levied against President Donald Trump by Attorney General Letitia James. The hosts frame this legal victory as a major turning point in the ongoing battle against politically motivated lawfare and judicial overreach. Clay Travis is credited for accurately predicting the case’s dismissal, reinforcing his credibility among listeners. The episode dives deep into the origins of the case, which alleged Trump inflated asset values—most notably Mar-a-Lago—to secure favorable mortgage terms. However, the hosts emphasize that Trump repaid all loans with interest, and the banks involved expressed no concerns, even stating they’d gladly do business with him again. The legal theory behind the case is described as “harebrained,” with no actual victim, and the $600 million penalty (including interest) is portrayed as a product of Trump Derangement Syndrome infecting the courtroom. Clay and Buck also explore the broader implications of this ruling, suggesting it signals the unraveling of other politically charged cases against Trump, including the E. Jean Carroll civil suit and the 34 felony counts related to bookkeeping. They argue these cases are built on weak legal foundations and will likely be tossed on appeal. Yuge Trump Victory Clay and Buck criticize Letitia James for her public statements promising to prosecute Trump, calling her actions disgraceful and politically motivated. They speculate she may face legal consequences herself for alleged mortgage fraud and call for her disbarment. The episode also features Trump’s reaction via Truth Social, where he celebrates the court’s courage and labels the case a “political witch hunt.” Clay compares Trump to Neo from The Matrix, highlighting his growing popularity and influence. The hosts argue that Trump’s legacy will become even more iconic over time, especially as the public recognizes the extent of misinformation and partisan targeting. Cracker Barrel Crackup? Cracker Barrel’s rebranding backlash. The hosts criticize the removal of the iconic grandfather logo and the chain’s attempt to modernize its image, arguing that the move alienates its core Southern customer base. The rebrand is compared to Bud Light’s marketing missteps, with Clay and Buck warning that corporate identity crises often stem from executives disconnected from their consumers. The stock market agrees—Cracker Barrel’s shares dropped $8, wiping out $100 million in market cap. In a humorous interlude, Producer Greg apologizes for ending a previous show with a somber suicide hotline story, coining the phrase “Meow Culpa” in reference to cat owners finding purpose in caring for their pets. Rep. Byron Donalds Congressman Byron Donalds, who shares his personal experience as a Cracker Barrel waiter, calls the show to slam the rebrand as unnecessary and culturally tone-deaf. He emphasizes the restaurant’s nostalgic value and calls for companies to embrace their roots rather than chase trends. The segment also features listener feedback from Virginia and North Carolina, echoing dissatisfaction with menu changes and declining food quality. The hosts explore chain restaurant branding, comparing Cracker Barrel to Olive Garden, Outback Steakhouse, and Applebee’s, and discuss the cultural symbolism of Southern food. They also touch on beer branding myths, revealing that Foster’s is brewed in Texas and Budweiser is marketed as premium in Australia. Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8 For the latest updates from Clay and Buck: https://www.clayandbuck.com/ Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton on Social Media: X - https://x.com/clayandbuck FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/ IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/ YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuckYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruzSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The past few days in the saga of Donald Trump's court trials have felt less like legal proceedings and more like a high-stakes national drama, with major developments piling up almost daily. Let's dive right into the action, because there's hardly time to catch your breath with what's unfolded.The most electrifying headline landed when a federal appeals court delivered a decisive blow to Donald Trump's latest order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. According to NBC4 News, it was a two-to-one decision out of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, where the judges ruled President Trump's executive order unconstitutional. This case was brought by multiple states hoping to block the order, which sought to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are here either temporarily or without documentation. Not only did the court uphold the nationwide block on Trump's policy, but it firmly pointed to the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to all born or naturalized in the U.S. The judges emphasized the chaos that would ensue if birthright citizenship applied in only half the country, a scenario they found unacceptable. With the Supreme Court recently limiting wide-ranging injunctions, there was question as to whether this one would stand, but the court found this case did meet a rare exception. The battle isn't over, though. The matter is almost certainly headed to the Supreme Court, so expect tensions—and legal wrangling—to rise.Meanwhile, in New York, Trump's criminal cases are anything but quiet. The New York Court system's official records confirm Trump was sentenced in January 2025 in People v. Donald J. Trump. This case, spearheaded by District Attorney Alvin Bragg, centered on falsifying business records, and although the audio of sentencing made waves earlier this year, it's been a running theme as Trump and his legal team continue to file appeals. Most recently, they've made efforts to remove Bragg's state prosecution to federal court, but that push hasn't gotten traction, facing rejections and denied permissions all the way up to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.On a separate but equally crucial front, the Supreme Court itself figures prominently. Just this week, the high court dealt with emergency stay applications related to Trump administration cases, as documented in official opinions. One particularly notable action: the Supreme Court granted a stay in Trump v. Boyle, temporarily blocking a lower court's ruling that had threatened executive power within the administration. The justices pointed to their approach in a recent case, Trump v. Wilcox, indicating ongoing tension between lower courts and the executive branch in these speedy legal maneuvers.For broader context, the Trump Administration Litigation Tracker from Lawfare Media shows that there are now over 300 active legal challenges tied to executive action or resistance to state laws. These include everything from national security orders to challenges over immigration and civil rights. With dozens of Supreme Court interventions, it's made for a dizzying calendar even seasoned court watchers struggle to follow.Thanks for tuning in to this whirlwind account of Donald Trump's ongoing trials and appeals. Come back next week for more coverage, as these legal turns are far from over. This has been a Quiet Please production—find out more at Quiet Please Dot A I.Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3QsFor more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

On this episode, we're zooming out, tracing how nearly four decades of federalism, landmark statutes like the 1984 Sentencing Reform Act, and a public appetite for tougher penalties have pushed federal and state sentencing systems down increasingly different paths. Those contrasts aren't just academic; they reveal the collective choices we've made, sometimes consciously, sometimes in...

A few years ago, in a spirit of post-pandemic experimentation, multiple countries ran formal trials to test a radical idea: shortening the workweek. In this episode, Cal returns to the results of these trials to identify an astounding finding that has critical implications about how we work in the 21st century and how this could be made much better. He then answers listener questions and concludes with a tech corner that addresses a simple question: when will AI begin to automate most of my work?Find out more about Done Daily at DoneDaily.com!Below are the questions covered in today's episode (with their timestamps). Get your questions answered by Cal! Here's the link: bit.ly/3U3sTvoVideo from today's episode:  youtube.com/calnewportmediaDeep Dive: The Workload Fairytale [3:39]- How would you rewrite A World Without Email to account for Slack? [18:16]- How should I manage multiple deadlines? [22:14]- How does Values-Based Lifestyle Centric Career Planning relate to Rutger Bregman's concept of Moral Ambition? [27:28]- How can I avoid burnout and use my career capital to find a less demanding job? [34:24]- Should I do my weekly plan on Sunday night to avoid the scaries? [40:32]CASE STUDY: A lawyer argues in front of the New York Court of Appeals [42:57]CALL: What exactly is considered task switching? [47:15]TECH CORNER: When will AI automate my job? [56:04]Links:Buy Cal's latest book, “Slow Productivity” at calnewport.com/slowGet a signed copy of Cal's “Slow Productivity” at peoplesbooktakoma.com/event/cal-newport/Cal's monthly book directory: bramses.notion.site/059db2641def4a88988b4d2cee4657ba?bbc.com/news/business-57724779theguardian.com/money/2023/feb/21/four-day-week-uk-trial-success-patterndw.com/en/german-firms-tested-4-day-workweek-heres-the-outcome/a-70685885calnewport.com/ai-and-work-some-predictions/Thanks to our Sponsors:udacity.com/deeplandroverusa.comcalderalab.com/deepThanks to Jesse Miller for production, Jay Kerstens for the intro music, Kieron Rees for the slow productivity music, and Mark Miles for mastering.

Rich welcomes RNC Chairman Michael Whatley to discuss the New York Court of Appeals blocking NYC from allowing non-citizens to vote. Next, we learn about "Wiseguys and the White House: Gangsters, Presidents, and the Deals They Made," from author Eric Dezenhall. Later, we're checking in with Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa, with an update on his mayoral campaign, and thoughts on the clash over congestion pricing in New York City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Undisputed King of Stuff and Sink the Rising Sun author Jon Gabriel fills in for Jim today. Join Jon and Greg as they discuss New York's top court striking down non-citizen voting, the widening political divide between men and women—especially by education level—and a New York City mayoral candidate pushing for government-run grocery stores.First, they welcome the New York Court of Appeals decision to strike down a New York City law that allowed non-citizens to vote in local elections. They emphasize the importance of restricting voting to citizens and warn of the risks posed by non-citizen participation. Jon also explains why similar efforts have failed to gain traction in his state of Arizona.Next, they analyze NBC News polling that reveals a stark divide in political views between men and women, particularly between non-college-educated men and college-educated women. Jon explores why college-educated women have shifted so far left and shares insights from his college-age daughters and their peers about how they view politics and what ideas they are encountering on campus.Finally, they critique New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's proposal for government-run grocery stores with artificially low prices. They explain why it's bad economics and point to the Soviet Union as a glaring example of why this approach cannot work and always ends in misery.Please visit our great sponsors:This spring, get up to 50% off select plants at Fast Growing Trees with code MARTINI, plus an extra 15% off at checkout on your first purchase! at https://fastgrowingtrees.com/Martini

Sponsored by WatersEdge: Invest with purpose? With WatersEdge Kingdom Investments, you can! We offer great rates that multiply your resources and build churches. Learn more at: https://bit.ly/3CxWtFzTop headlines for Monday, March 17, 2025We examine a New York judge's recent decision allowing a pro-life group to continue their sidewalk counseling efforts near abortion clinics, a ruling poised to stir discussions on freedom of speech and access to healthcare. Next, we explore the case of Robert Morris, whose bond has been set at $50,000 as he confronts serious allegations of child sex abuse that could result in decades-long imprisonment. Plus, we address a groundbreaking settlement in Wisconsin where a teacher, fired for opposing the use of preferred pronouns for trans-identified students, reaches an agreement with his former employer.00:11 Pro-life group can protest near abortion clinic00:59 Robert Morris' bond set at $50K, could spend decades in prison02:03 School district settles with teacher fired over trans pronouns02:53 Hamas claims it's ready to release US-Israeli Edan Alexander03:48 Sponsor Message WatersEdge04:46 Franklin Graham proclaims 'unchanging Gospel' at Ethiopia event05:53 Episcopal bishop denounces Trump attempt to deport Mahmoud Khalil06:44 Pastor Joel Webbon: No place for non-Christians in US leadership#ChristianNews #ReligiousFreedom #ProLifeMovement #ChurchAndState #FaithNews #ChristianPodcast #CurrentEvents #ChristianPerspective #NewsFromAChristianPerspectiveSubscribe to this PodcastApple PodcastsSpotifyGoogle PodcastsOvercastFollow Us on Social Media@ChristianPost on TwitterChristian Post on Facebook@ChristianPostIntl on InstagramSubscribe on YouTubeGet the Edifi AppDownload for iPhoneDownload for AndroidSubscribe to Our NewsletterSubscribe to the Freedom Post, delivered every Monday and ThursdayClick here to get the top headlines delivered to your inbox every morning!Links to the NewsPro-life group can protest near abortion clinic: NY judge | U.S.Robert Morris' bond set at $50K, could spend decades in prison | Church & MinistriesSchool district settles with teacher fired over trans pronouns | U.S.Hamas claims it's ready to release US-Israeli Edan Alexander | WorldFranklin Graham proclaims 'unchanging Gospel' at Ethiopia event | Church & MinistriesEpiscopal bishop denounces Trump attempt to deport Mahmoud Khalil | PoliticsPastor Joel Webbon: No place for non-Christians in US leadership | U.S.

As I sit here on March 3, 2025, reflecting on the whirlwind of legal battles surrounding former President Donald Trump, it's hard to believe how much has unfolded in just the past few months. The nation has been captivated by the unprecedented spectacle of a former president facing multiple criminal charges, even as he returned to the White House for a second term.Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, Trump was sentenced in the New York hush money case. Justice Juan Merchan handed down an unconditional discharge, meaning Trump avoided jail time but still carries the weight of 34 felony convictions. The sentencing came after a dramatic eleventh-hour appeal to the Supreme Court, with Trump's team arguing that the proceedings should be halted due to his status as president-elect. Justice Sonia Sotomayor ultimately allowed the sentencing to proceed.The New York case, however, is far from over. Trump's legal team has vowed to appeal the conviction, citing the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States from last year. They argue that evidence related to Trump's official acts as president was improperly admitted during the trial. The case is now headed to the New York Court of Appeals, with the possibility of eventually making its way back to the Supreme Court.Meanwhile, the federal cases against Trump in Washington D.C. and Florida have taken surprising turns. Following Trump's election victory in November, both cases were dismissed. In D.C., Judge Tanya Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss on December 6, 2024. In Florida, Judge Aileen Cannon had already dismissed the classified documents case in July, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed. The Justice Department's appeal of that decision was dropped shortly after the election.The legal drama hasn't been limited to Trump's criminal cases. On February 13, Susan Grundmann, the former chair of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, filed a lawsuit challenging her abrupt removal by the Trump administration. The case highlights the ongoing tensions between Trump's desire to reshape the government and the protections afforded to independent agency leaders.As we move further into Trump's second term, the legal landscape continues to shift. His administration has already taken aim at diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives with new executive orders, prompting swift legal challenges. A federal court temporarily blocked enforcement of these orders on February 27, setting the stage for yet another legal battle.The coming months promise more twists and turns in the ongoing saga of Trump's legal troubles. As a nation, we find ourselves in uncharted territory, grappling with the implications of a sitting president carrying felony convictions while simultaneously fighting to overturn them. The outcome of these cases could have far-reaching consequences for the balance of power in our government and the very nature of presidential accountability.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's legal battles, it's essential to understand the recent developments that have shaped his trials. On January 10, 2025, a significant milestone was reached when Justice Merchan sentenced President Trump to an unconditional discharge in the New York case. This decision came after a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records on May 30, 2024[1].However, this conviction may not be as definitive as it seems. The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Trump v. United States has introduced a new constitutional framework that could potentially reverse Trump's New York conviction. This ruling, which was decided after Trump's trial, establishes that evidence related to a president's "official acts" cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases unless prosecutors clear a high legal threshold. Trump's legal team has seized on this, arguing that the trial court failed to follow this new framework, and they are now seeking to have the conviction overturned[3].The case is expected to head to the New York Court of Appeals, which might agree with Trump's team that the Supreme Court's decisions require the conviction to be erased. Even if the trial court's errors were minor, the Supreme Court suggests that failing to follow its new framework can never be considered "harmless." This sets the stage for the Supreme Court to eventually weigh in on Trump's New York case, transforming it into a federal matter[3].In other developments, the federal indictment against Trump in the Southern District of Florida was dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon on July 15, 2024, due to the improper appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The Justice Department subsequently dismissed the appeal against Trump on November 29, 2024, and against his co-defendants on January 29, 2025[1].The District of Columbia case against Trump also saw significant changes. The original trial date was vacated by Judge Chutkan while the Supreme Court heard Trump's immunity claim. After the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court on August 2, 2024, Judge Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss the case on December 6, 2024[1].As these legal battles continue to unfold, it's clear that Donald Trump's trials are far from over. The Supreme Court's recent decisions have provided Trump with a powerful legal lifeline, and it remains to be seen how these cases will ultimately be resolved.

In the latest twist in Donald Trump's ongoing legal battles, the former president turned to the Supreme Court for help. On January 8, 2025, Trump asked the justices to intervene in his New York hush money case, seeking to halt the criminal sentencing scheduled for January 10. Trump's lawyers argued that forcing him to prepare for sentencing while preparing to take office as President of the United States imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him.Trump was found guilty in May of 34 counts of falsifying business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election. Judge Juan Merchan indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, instead planning to give him an "unconditional discharge," which would mean no serious punishment but the conviction would remain on his record.In his appeal to the Supreme Court, Trump cited the justices' decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed. Trump also claimed that prosecutors improperly relied on evidence of his official acts to obtain his convictions, which he argued conflicted with the court's decision in *Trump v. United States*.However, New York prosecutors quickly countered Trump's request. In a 38-page filing on January 9, they urged the Supreme Court to allow Trump's sentencing to proceed as scheduled. The prosecutors emphasized that Trump's conviction rests on conduct for which he is not entitled to immunity and that he can attend the hearing by video to minimize any burden. They also pointed out that Trump can appeal after he is sentenced, making the Supreme Court's intervention unnecessary at this stage.Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed the prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 9. The Supreme Court could act on Trump's request at any time, but as of now, the outcome remains uncertain. Trump's legal team also sought emergency relief from the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, but a judge turned him down on January 9.The drama surrounding Trump's legal battles continues to unfold, with the nation watching closely to see how the Supreme Court will respond to his latest appeal.

Here's a narrative script on the recent court trials involving Donald Trump:Donald Trump, the President-elect of the United States, has been at the center of a high-profile court case in New York. On January 10, 2025, Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in his hush money case. This means that while he won't face any serious punishment, the fact of his conviction remains.The case revolves around Trump's falsification of business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records in May. The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, had indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, opting instead for an unconditional discharge.However, Trump sought to halt the sentencing process, arguing that as President-elect, he should be granted immunity from criminal proceedings. Trump's legal team filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court, asking the justices to intervene and put the sentencing on hold. In a 40-page filing, Trump argued that preparing for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him.Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 10. Trump's appeal cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed.Despite Trump's efforts, the sentencing proceeded as scheduled on January 10, 2025. Trump's legal team also sought emergency relief from the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, but their request was denied.In another legal development, a federal court recently considered a case involving Trump's executive orders on federal funding. The court found that the states are likely to succeed on the merits of some of their claims, including allegations that Trump's actions violated the separation of powers and the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The court issued a temporary restraining order, citing the potential disruption to health, education, and other public services due to the pause in federal funding.These recent court cases highlight the ongoing legal challenges facing Donald Trump as he prepares to take office as President of the United States.

It's been a whirlwind few days for Donald Trump, the first criminal president in U.S. history. On January 20, Trump returned to office despite being convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a New York trial court. The case stems from his efforts to illegally influence the 2016 presidential election by hiding reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels.The trial court granted Trump an "unconditional discharge," meaning he won't face imprisonment, probation, or a fine. However, the conviction remains on his record, making him the first and only criminal elected to the presidency. Trump's legal team has been working to overturn the conviction, pointing to the landmark Supreme Court decision in Trump v. United States, which could potentially lead to the reversal of his New York conviction.In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court established a new constitutional rule that evidence related to a president's "official acts" cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases unless prosecutors clear a high legal threshold. Trump's team argues that the trial court failed to follow this new framework, which could render the conviction invalid.Before his sentencing, Trump asked the Supreme Court to intervene and block the proceedings, claiming that the charges were politically motivated and that he was entitled to presidential immunity. However, New York prosecutors urged the justices to allow the sentencing to go ahead as scheduled, emphasizing that Trump's conviction rests on conduct for which he is not entitled to immunity.The prosecutors argued that Trump can attend the sentencing hearing by video to minimize any burden and that he can appeal after being sentenced. They also dismissed Trump's suggestion that he cannot be sentenced because he is the president-elect, stating that no judicial decision or guidance from the Department of Justice has ever recognized that the unique temporary immunity of the sitting president extends to the president-elect.Despite Trump's efforts to have the Supreme Court intervene, the justices declined his request. However, four conservative justices – Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas – publicly noted their disagreement with this decision, signaling that they may be ready to take up the issue of Trump's conviction sooner rather than later.As the case heads to the New York Court of Appeals, Trump's legal team is likely to continue arguing that the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States requires the conviction to be erased. The Supreme Court's eventual involvement seems inevitable, and the outcome could have significant implications for Trump's presidency and the institution of the presidency as a whole.

Here's a narrative script based on recent events involving Donald Trump's court trials:As we step into February 2025, the legal entanglements surrounding Donald Trump continue to unfold. Just a few weeks ago, on January 8, Trump made an urgent appeal to the Supreme Court, seeking to halt his criminal sentencing in a New York hush money case. Trump, who was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels, argued that preparing for sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him.In his 40-page filing, signed by John Sauer, Trump's intended nominee for solicitor general, Trump cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 9.However, Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Trump's trial, had already indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, instead planning to give him an "unconditional discharge." This meant that Trump would not face any serious punishment, but the fact of his conviction would remain.Despite Merchan's intentions, Trump's legal team has been working to overturn his conviction. They argue that the trial court erred by admitting evidence related to Trump's official acts, which, according to the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, should have been excluded unless prosecutors cleared a high legal threshold.Will Thomas, an assistant professor of business law at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, notes that this new framework has placed Trump's New York conviction in jeopardy. Trump's legal team has taken aim, pointing to language in *Trump v. United States* to argue that the conviction should be erased. The case is now headed to the New York Court of Appeals, which might agree with Trump's team that the Supreme Court's decisions require the conviction to be overturned.The Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States* has transformed Trump's New York case into a federal matter, making it likely that the Supreme Court will eventually weigh in. Trump has already tried to skip to the end, asking the Supreme Court to shortcut New York's appeals courts and take his case now. While the high court declined his request, four conservative justices publicly noted their disagreement, signaling that they are ready to take up the issue of Trump's conviction sooner rather than later. The stage is set for Trump to challenge his New York conviction, and if things go his way, he may not only avoid punishment for his crimes but also stop being a criminal.

Donald Trump, the newly inaugurated President of the United States, has been at the center of a high-profile court case in New York. On January 3, 2025, a New York trial court denied Trump's motion to dismiss the criminal case against him, which involves 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The case stems from efforts to illegally influence the 2016 presidential election.The trial court's decision was swiftly followed by a sentencing hearing scheduled for January 10, 2025. However, Trump's legal team promptly filed an interlocutory appeal, arguing that the trial court's proceedings should be stayed pending the resolution of his appeal on Presidential immunity. Trump's lawyers contend that as President-elect, he is shielded from criminal process during the transition period, citing the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States, which established new protections for sitting Presidents.Despite the trial court's refusal to honor the automatic stay, Trump's team took their case to the Supreme Court, seeking an immediate stay of further proceedings in the New York trial court. In their application, Trump's lawyers emphasized the grave injustice and harm to the institution of the Presidency that would result from allowing the trial court to impose sentence and judgment on the President-elect before his appeal is resolved.On January 10, 2025, the New York trial court proceeded with the sentencing hearing, ultimately granting Trump an unconditional discharge instead of imprisonment, probation, or a fine. While this outcome may seem like a victory for Trump, his legal entanglements are far from over. The case is expected to head to the New York Court of Appeals, where Trump's team will argue that the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States requires the conviction to be erased due to the trial court's failure to follow the new framework for determining Presidential immunity.The Supreme Court's decision has significant implications for Trump's case, as it establishes that evidence related to a President's official acts cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases without clearing a high legal threshold. Trump's lawyers are likely to argue that the trial court's errors in handling this evidence were not harmless and that the conviction should be overturned. With the Supreme Court ultimately having the last word, Trump's fate remains uncertain, and the legal battle is far from over.

Thursday, January 9, 2025 Subscribe: Get the Daily Update in your inbox for free 1/ The New York Court of Appeals – the highest court in the state – denied Trump's request to block his Friday sentencing. The decision leaves the U.S. Supreme Court as Trump's final option to defer sentencing on 34 felony counts related to falsif... Visit WTF Just Happened Today? for more news and headlines, brought to you by Matt Kiser. The WTFJHT Podcast is narrated and produced by Joe Amditis.

On this episode of the podcast, Trump Attorney and Partner of the Binnall Law Group, Jesse Binnall dives into the latest updates on President Trump's legal battles, with a focus on the upcoming sentencing in New York. Binnall critiques the New York Court of Appeals for failing to intervene in what he views as a politically motivated case led by District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Judge Juan Merchan. He raises concerns about Judge Merchan's potential conflicts of interest, including political donations, and discusses their implications for civil rights and justice.Binnall urges everyone to remain vigilant and engaged in combating political bias within the legal system. Looking ahead, Binnall predicts ongoing legal challenges for Donald Trump, fueled by establishment opposition and underscores the critical need to support President Trump's nominees and stay active in the political process.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Mayor Adams delivers his fourth State of the City... New York Court of Appeals denies Trump's bid to halt his sentencing... Intrepid closes following an electrical fire full This is the All Local 4pm update for January 9, 2025 400 Thu, 09 Jan 2025 19:32:13 +0000 uEwFf6bd8IfjdlAs7cTFj4vBVz2da6MX news 1010 WINS ALL LOCAL news Mayor Adams delivers his fourth State of the City... New York Court of Appeals denies Trump's bid to halt his sentencing... Intrepid closes following an electrical fire The podcast is hyper-focused on local news, issues and events in the New York City area. This podcast's purpose is to give New Yorkers New York news about their neighborhoods and shine a light on the issues happening in their backyard. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc.

Luigi Mangione, the suspect accused of fatally shooting a US healthcare insurance executive, has been extradited to New York to face new federal charges. Also: the ground squirrels in California that are hunting voles.

In this week's episode, we're diving into an intriguing case from the New York Court of Appeals. Plus, stick around for a sneak peek at an upcoming episode I'm working on all about international travel. Oh, and just a heads-up—no articles this time because, honestly, I'm keeping things short today. And no general rules for...

AP correspondent Jennifer King reports that the suspect under arrest for the killing of UnitedHealthcare's CEO faces charges in New York.

JOIN TRISH REGAN for her analysis of a historic election. As Kamala concedes, Leticia James just doubled  concession speech. Meanwhile… Leticia James, who is about to have her case against the incoming President reversed by the New York Court of Appeals just doubled down in her promise to fight Trump. That said, it's a new day with new opportunities. The stock market hit a record high and the dollar is soaring! Jack Smith is dropping his cases and there may be many more good things ahead. Subscribe to TRISH'S Financial Market Research HERE: https://76research.com

Was the DOJ running these cases behind-the-scenes after all? Just in: Fani Willis's boyfriend Nathan Wade had multiple conversations with the Biden-Harris White House as the state of Georgia attempted to prosecute the former President. The news comes amid growing expectation that the Letitia James nearly $500 million civil case against Donald Trump will be reversed by the New York Court of Appeals. Meanwhile, in a new interview on Fox News, Donald Trump insists these people—including Adam Shiff and Nancy Pelosi—really are his ‘enemies'. Trish Regan reports on all this and more, as polls continue to show the advantage to Donald Trump, in today's edition of the Trish Regan Show. SUBSCRIBE TO TRISH'S Financial Market Research HERE: https://76research.com

PREVIEW: TRUMP: BRAGG: IMMUNITY: Conversation with colleagues Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter re the immunity claim to be ruled on in a New York Court before the sentencing in the same court of former President Trump. More later. 1937 SCOTUS

Former Trump Asst. Attorney General Jeff Clark joins Lou to bring us up to date on Marxist Lawfare against him and President Trump. The New York Court of Appeals rejected Trump's attempt to remove his gag order. Clark says the only reason to keep it in place is to interfere in the election, it's about political free speech at the heart of the First Amendment. Clark says we're watching warring factions in the Democrat Party. There are those who want Joe Biden because he's functionally a puppet and those running the country want to stay firmly in place. Then there are Dems who want to dump Biden fearing keeping him on the ticket will lead to another Trump term. Clark believes the debate will be Biden's big test.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Former Trump Asst. Attorney General Jeff Clark joins Lou to bring us up to date on Marxist Lawfare against him and President Trump. The New York Court of Appeals rejected Trump's attempt to remove his gag order. Clark says the only reason to keep it in place is to interfere in the election, it's about political free speech at the heart of the First Amendment. Clark says we're watching warring factions in the Democrat Party. There are those who want Joe Biden because he's functionally a puppet and those running the country want to stay firmly in place. Then there are Dems who want to dump Biden fearing keeping him on the ticket will lead to another Trump term. Clark believes the debate will be Biden's big test.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Description: TOP NEWS | On today's Daily Signal Top News, we break down: Law to crack down on deepfake porn announced.Appeals court upholds Trump gag orderBiden announces another illegal immigration executive order.Chicago mayor launches a reparations task force. Relevant Linkshttps://nypost.com/2024/06/02/us-news/biden-admin-offers-mass-amnesty-to-migrants-as-it-quietly-terminates-350000-asylum-cases-sources/ Listen to other podcasts from The Daily Signal: https://www.dailysignal.com/podcasts/Get daily conservative news you can trust from our Morning Bell newsletter: DailySignal.com/morningbellsubscription Listen to more Heritage podcasts: https://www.heritage.org/podcastsSign up for The Agenda newsletter — the lowdown on top issues conservatives need to know about each week: https://www.heritage.org/agenda Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Just days after former President Donald Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts in a New York Court, he sat down the co-Hosts of FOX & Friends Weekend Will Cain, Pete Hegseth, and Rachel Campos-Duffy. In this 75-minute exclusive interview, former President Trump gives unique insight on everything from how he is feeling about the trial, how the campaign will carry on, and the specifics of what he will do in office if elected to a second term.  Tell Will what you thought about this podcast by emailing WillCainShow@fox.com Subscribe to The Will Cain Show on YouTube here: Watch The Will Cain Show! Follow Will on Twitter: @WillCain Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Cup of Justice co-hosts Mandy Matney, Liz Farrell and Eric Bland — talk about how to handle one of the worst kinds of disputes … having beef with your neighbors. How do you keep a fight with your neighbor from turning into an episode of “Fear Thy Neighbor”?  Also on the show, what the New York Court of Appeals decision overturning Harvey Weinstein's conviction means for women and how Weinstein's case and Alex Murdaugh's case resemble each other.  Plus, the Federal Trade Commission's decision on noncompete agreements, the hilarious turn Dick Harpootlian's campaign is taking and what's happening with Cory Fleming's appeal?  Oh! And Luna Shark Premium Members get an extended cut of this episode that includes a deeper dive into neighborly pitfalls and some details on what our hosts consider still unchecked on their bucket lists. Let's get into it... Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. And we also offer access to exclusive video content through our new YouTube Premiere subscription. Check out our new Luna Shark Merch With a Mission shop at lunasharkmerch.com/ SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP *** NEW: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send you fun merch if you find something that needs to be adjusted! *** Find us on social media: Twitter.com/mandymatney - Twitter.com/elizfarrell - Twitter.com/theericbland https://www.facebook.com/cupofjustice/ |  https://www.instagram.com/cojpod/ YouTube *The views expressed on the Cup of Justice bonus episodes do not constitute legal advice. Listeners desiring legal advice for any particular legal matter are urged to consult an attorney of their choosing who can provide legal advice based upon a full understanding of the facts and circumstances of their claim. The views expressed on the Cup of Justice episodes also do not express the views or opinions of Bland Richter, LLP, or its attorneys. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

When the Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes four years ago, it was celebrated as a watershed moment for the #MeToo movement. Yesterday, New York's highest court of appeals overturned that conviction.Jodi Kantor, one of the reporters who broke the story of the abuse allegations against Mr. Weinstein in 2017, explains what this ruling means for him and for #MeToo.Guest: Jodi Kantor, an investigative reporter for The New York Times.Background reading: The verdict against Harvey Weinstein was overturned by the New York Court of Appeals.Here's why the conviction was fragile from the start.For more information on today's episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

SEASON 2 EPISODE 161: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: Justice Juan Merchan MUST put Trump's ass in jail for violating the gag order - even if it's only one hour at Rikers Island. Trump is determined to break Merchan, break the New York Court, break the Criminal Justice System. He is a cornered and wounded animal and this is life-or-death for him. Think of a cockroach - only with thumbs. So it's him or us that gets broken, and Merchan has to make sure it isn't us. Trump tried to finesse the gag order by quoting somebody else – this worm Watters from Fox – denigrating the jurors and the judge and adding to the pile of stochastic inducements to violence against anyone who thwarts Trump. And by morning one of the jurors – the silhouette of their name and the vague depiction of their home – was quitting out of fear. Because what Trump sought by denigrating the jury WORKS. Because Trump's intimidation WORKS. Because Trump's terrorism WORKS. Prosecutors began Day 3 of the trial yesterday noting he had violated the gag order SEVEN times just since jury selection started and they actually UNDER-SOLD the most egregious of the violations, with Joshua Steinglass saying “the defendant reposted about liberals lying to try to get on the jury, a post by Jesse Watters.” That was NOT a re-post. Trump does dozens of re-posts a day. You hit a re-post icon, a couple of rounded arrows. Maybe you add a comment. Trump KNOWS what a re-post IS. That is NOT what Trump – or someone in control of the social media account bearing his name – DID. What Trump did was to make a NEW post, QUOTING Watters. It redd – and still reads:“They are catching undercover Liberal Activists lying to the Judge in order to get on the Trump Jury - Jesse Watters.” It is in Trump's own electronic hand. It is not a re-post. It is not ‘technically ok within the gag order' because Trump ISN'T lying about the judge and the jurors and endangering them all, he's just QUOTING Jesse Watters lying about the judge and the jurors and endangering them all. RUNNING THE HEADLINES: Derrick Van Orden, a walking PTSD demonstration, calls Matt Gaetz "tubby" and Marjorie Taylor Greene demands anybody who votes for Ukraine aid be conscripting into its military as the House Republican caucus comes apart at the seems. Happily Jared Moskowitz is there with the big yucks and a Rick Perry protege has the best idea yet: four Republicans should resign from the House to own the liberals. FOUR? How about FIVE? FIFTY? Think big be big my friend! And why on earth did Kari Lake devote a disturbingly large part of a campaign speech to repeatedly saying "strap-on?" B-Block (31:18) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Clay Travis goes from being the knight in shining armor defending the sanctity of women's sports from destruction by trans athletes, to insisting that Caitlin Clark isn't actually popular and nobody CARES about women's sports. The Charlotte GOP still hasn't realized it insulted Trump online and he'll see it eventually. And Twain was wrong: history DOES sometimes repeat itself. In 2005 I watched on in astonishment as Bo Dietl began his new MSNBC show by calling a gay reporter a "fudge-packer" and get fired within two weeks. Now, he's been fired for ANOTHER homophobic rant directed at ANOTHER reporter. Did you know Dietl's specialty in the NYPD was to serve as the mugging decoy? So he was mugged 500 times? Does it show? C-Block (48:00) EVERY DOG HAS ITS DAY: Snowie is fine - now - but her family could use a little help plowing through the bills for the medical wizardry that saved her life. (49:30) FRIDAYS WITH THURBER: Appropriately enough, Thurber takes a dog who was alive when Teddy Roosevelt was president and makes him seem as new as the youngest pup. "The Dog That Bit People."See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

GREETINGS: The show begins in Moscow in the aftermath of the mass murder by suspects now in custody. Then to Hong Kong to grieve for the death of a great city now closed to liberty.  To the United Nations and another display of bullying. To New York courtrooms with Donald Trump, to Tajikistan, to Hong Kong, to Haiti, to Buckingham Palace. To London to speak of the Federal Reserve, to California to speak of Covid 19 policies. 1918

A group of ten current and formerly incarcerated people in Alabama filed a federal lawsuit on Tuesday to allege inhumane conditions in the state's prison system, and called it a “modern day form of slavery.” The lawsuit claims about 575 private companies and more than 100 public agencies have benefitted from incarcerated labor in Alabama in the past five years, and those benefits have amounted to an estimated $450 million annually.The latest Consumer Price Index showed that prices rose 3.1% in the year through November. By the numbers, economists say that data is supposed to be good news for the economy, but to Americans, it doesn't exactly feel that way. And with just over a month from the first primary election of the 2024 season, we wanted to know what this economic news means for President Biden and Republicans who want to unseat him. To answer that question and more, we're joined by Lindsay Owens, executive director of progressive economic think tank Groundwork Collaborative.And in headlines: The United Nations General Assembly voted to demand an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza, the New York Court of Appeals ordered the state to draw a new congressional map ahead of the 2024 elections, and we discuss whether or not to bring back intermissions during longer movies.Show Notes:What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday