Podcasts about new york court

A few years ago, in a spirit of post-pandemic experimentation, multiple countries ran formal trials to test a radical idea: shortening the workweek. In this episode, Cal returns to the results of these trials to identify an astounding finding that has critical implications about how we work in the 21st century and how this could be made much better. He then answers listener questions and concludes with a tech corner that addresses a simple question: when will AI begin to automate most of my work?Find out more about Done Daily at DoneDaily.com!Below are the questions covered in today's episode (with their timestamps). Get your questions answered by Cal! Here's the link: bit.ly/3U3sTvoVideo from today's episode:  youtube.com/calnewportmediaDeep Dive: The Workload Fairytale [3:39]- How would you rewrite A World Without Email to account for Slack? [18:16]- How should I manage multiple deadlines? [22:14]- How does Values-Based Lifestyle Centric Career Planning relate to Rutger Bregman's concept of Moral Ambition? [27:28]- How can I avoid burnout and use my career capital to find a less demanding job? [34:24]- Should I do my weekly plan on Sunday night to avoid the scaries? [40:32]CASE STUDY: A lawyer argues in front of the New York Court of Appeals [42:57]CALL: What exactly is considered task switching? [47:15]TECH CORNER: When will AI automate my job? [56:04]Links:Buy Cal's latest book, “Slow Productivity” at calnewport.com/slowGet a signed copy of Cal's “Slow Productivity” at peoplesbooktakoma.com/event/cal-newport/Cal's monthly book directory: bramses.notion.site/059db2641def4a88988b4d2cee4657ba?bbc.com/news/business-57724779theguardian.com/money/2023/feb/21/four-day-week-uk-trial-success-patterndw.com/en/german-firms-tested-4-day-workweek-heres-the-outcome/a-70685885calnewport.com/ai-and-work-some-predictions/Thanks to our Sponsors:udacity.com/deeplandroverusa.comcalderalab.com/deepThanks to Jesse Miller for production, Jay Kerstens for the intro music, Kieron Rees for the slow productivity music, and Mark Miles for mastering.

Rich welcomes RNC Chairman Michael Whatley to discuss the New York Court of Appeals blocking NYC from allowing non-citizens to vote. Next, we learn about "Wiseguys and the White House: Gangsters, Presidents, and the Deals They Made," from author Eric Dezenhall. Later, we're checking in with Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa, with an update on his mayoral campaign, and thoughts on the clash over congestion pricing in New York City. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Undisputed King of Stuff and Sink the Rising Sun author Jon Gabriel fills in for Jim today. Join Jon and Greg as they discuss New York's top court striking down non-citizen voting, the widening political divide between men and women—especially by education level—and a New York City mayoral candidate pushing for government-run grocery stores.First, they welcome the New York Court of Appeals decision to strike down a New York City law that allowed non-citizens to vote in local elections. They emphasize the importance of restricting voting to citizens and warn of the risks posed by non-citizen participation. Jon also explains why similar efforts have failed to gain traction in his state of Arizona.Next, they analyze NBC News polling that reveals a stark divide in political views between men and women, particularly between non-college-educated men and college-educated women. Jon explores why college-educated women have shifted so far left and shares insights from his college-age daughters and their peers about how they view politics and what ideas they are encountering on campus.Finally, they critique New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's proposal for government-run grocery stores with artificially low prices. They explain why it's bad economics and point to the Soviet Union as a glaring example of why this approach cannot work and always ends in misery.Please visit our great sponsors:This spring, get up to 50% off select plants at Fast Growing Trees with code MARTINI, plus an extra 15% off at checkout on your first purchase! at https://fastgrowingtrees.com/Martini

Sponsored by WatersEdge: Invest with purpose? With WatersEdge Kingdom Investments, you can! We offer great rates that multiply your resources and build churches. Learn more at: https://bit.ly/3CxWtFzTop headlines for Monday, March 17, 2025We examine a New York judge's recent decision allowing a pro-life group to continue their sidewalk counseling efforts near abortion clinics, a ruling poised to stir discussions on freedom of speech and access to healthcare. Next, we explore the case of Robert Morris, whose bond has been set at $50,000 as he confronts serious allegations of child sex abuse that could result in decades-long imprisonment. Plus, we address a groundbreaking settlement in Wisconsin where a teacher, fired for opposing the use of preferred pronouns for trans-identified students, reaches an agreement with his former employer.00:11 Pro-life group can protest near abortion clinic00:59 Robert Morris' bond set at $50K, could spend decades in prison02:03 School district settles with teacher fired over trans pronouns02:53 Hamas claims it's ready to release US-Israeli Edan Alexander03:48 Sponsor Message WatersEdge04:46 Franklin Graham proclaims 'unchanging Gospel' at Ethiopia event05:53 Episcopal bishop denounces Trump attempt to deport Mahmoud Khalil06:44 Pastor Joel Webbon: No place for non-Christians in US leadership#ChristianNews #ReligiousFreedom #ProLifeMovement #ChurchAndState #FaithNews #ChristianPodcast #CurrentEvents #ChristianPerspective #NewsFromAChristianPerspectiveSubscribe to this PodcastApple PodcastsSpotifyGoogle PodcastsOvercastFollow Us on Social Media@ChristianPost on TwitterChristian Post on Facebook@ChristianPostIntl on InstagramSubscribe on YouTubeGet the Edifi AppDownload for iPhoneDownload for AndroidSubscribe to Our NewsletterSubscribe to the Freedom Post, delivered every Monday and ThursdayClick here to get the top headlines delivered to your inbox every morning!Links to the NewsPro-life group can protest near abortion clinic: NY judge | U.S.Robert Morris' bond set at $50K, could spend decades in prison | Church & MinistriesSchool district settles with teacher fired over trans pronouns | U.S.Hamas claims it's ready to release US-Israeli Edan Alexander | WorldFranklin Graham proclaims 'unchanging Gospel' at Ethiopia event | Church & MinistriesEpiscopal bishop denounces Trump attempt to deport Mahmoud Khalil | PoliticsPastor Joel Webbon: No place for non-Christians in US leadership | U.S.

As I sit here on March 3, 2025, reflecting on the whirlwind of legal battles surrounding former President Donald Trump, it's hard to believe how much has unfolded in just the past few months. The nation has been captivated by the unprecedented spectacle of a former president facing multiple criminal charges, even as he returned to the White House for a second term.Just a few weeks ago, on January 10, Trump was sentenced in the New York hush money case. Justice Juan Merchan handed down an unconditional discharge, meaning Trump avoided jail time but still carries the weight of 34 felony convictions. The sentencing came after a dramatic eleventh-hour appeal to the Supreme Court, with Trump's team arguing that the proceedings should be halted due to his status as president-elect. Justice Sonia Sotomayor ultimately allowed the sentencing to proceed.The New York case, however, is far from over. Trump's legal team has vowed to appeal the conviction, citing the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States from last year. They argue that evidence related to Trump's official acts as president was improperly admitted during the trial. The case is now headed to the New York Court of Appeals, with the possibility of eventually making its way back to the Supreme Court.Meanwhile, the federal cases against Trump in Washington D.C. and Florida have taken surprising turns. Following Trump's election victory in November, both cases were dismissed. In D.C., Judge Tanya Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss on December 6, 2024. In Florida, Judge Aileen Cannon had already dismissed the classified documents case in July, ruling that Special Counsel Jack Smith was improperly appointed. The Justice Department's appeal of that decision was dropped shortly after the election.The legal drama hasn't been limited to Trump's criminal cases. On February 13, Susan Grundmann, the former chair of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, filed a lawsuit challenging her abrupt removal by the Trump administration. The case highlights the ongoing tensions between Trump's desire to reshape the government and the protections afforded to independent agency leaders.As we move further into Trump's second term, the legal landscape continues to shift. His administration has already taken aim at diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives with new executive orders, prompting swift legal challenges. A federal court temporarily blocked enforcement of these orders on February 27, setting the stage for yet another legal battle.The coming months promise more twists and turns in the ongoing saga of Trump's legal troubles. As a nation, we find ourselves in uncharted territory, grappling with the implications of a sitting president carrying felony convictions while simultaneously fighting to overturn them. The outcome of these cases could have far-reaching consequences for the balance of power in our government and the very nature of presidential accountability.

As we navigate the complex landscape of Donald Trump's legal battles, it's essential to understand the recent developments that have shaped his trials. On January 10, 2025, a significant milestone was reached when Justice Merchan sentenced President Trump to an unconditional discharge in the New York case. This decision came after a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records on May 30, 2024[1].However, this conviction may not be as definitive as it seems. The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Trump v. United States has introduced a new constitutional framework that could potentially reverse Trump's New York conviction. This ruling, which was decided after Trump's trial, establishes that evidence related to a president's "official acts" cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases unless prosecutors clear a high legal threshold. Trump's legal team has seized on this, arguing that the trial court failed to follow this new framework, and they are now seeking to have the conviction overturned[3].The case is expected to head to the New York Court of Appeals, which might agree with Trump's team that the Supreme Court's decisions require the conviction to be erased. Even if the trial court's errors were minor, the Supreme Court suggests that failing to follow its new framework can never be considered "harmless." This sets the stage for the Supreme Court to eventually weigh in on Trump's New York case, transforming it into a federal matter[3].In other developments, the federal indictment against Trump in the Southern District of Florida was dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon on July 15, 2024, due to the improper appointment and funding of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The Justice Department subsequently dismissed the appeal against Trump on November 29, 2024, and against his co-defendants on January 29, 2025[1].The District of Columbia case against Trump also saw significant changes. The original trial date was vacated by Judge Chutkan while the Supreme Court heard Trump's immunity claim. After the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court on August 2, 2024, Judge Chutkan granted the government's unopposed motion to dismiss the case on December 6, 2024[1].As these legal battles continue to unfold, it's clear that Donald Trump's trials are far from over. The Supreme Court's recent decisions have provided Trump with a powerful legal lifeline, and it remains to be seen how these cases will ultimately be resolved.

In the latest twist in Donald Trump's ongoing legal battles, the former president turned to the Supreme Court for help. On January 8, 2025, Trump asked the justices to intervene in his New York hush money case, seeking to halt the criminal sentencing scheduled for January 10. Trump's lawyers argued that forcing him to prepare for sentencing while preparing to take office as President of the United States imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him.Trump was found guilty in May of 34 counts of falsifying business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 presidential election. Judge Juan Merchan indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, instead planning to give him an "unconditional discharge," which would mean no serious punishment but the conviction would remain on his record.In his appeal to the Supreme Court, Trump cited the justices' decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed. Trump also claimed that prosecutors improperly relied on evidence of his official acts to obtain his convictions, which he argued conflicted with the court's decision in *Trump v. United States*.However, New York prosecutors quickly countered Trump's request. In a 38-page filing on January 9, they urged the Supreme Court to allow Trump's sentencing to proceed as scheduled. The prosecutors emphasized that Trump's conviction rests on conduct for which he is not entitled to immunity and that he can attend the hearing by video to minimize any burden. They also pointed out that Trump can appeal after he is sentenced, making the Supreme Court's intervention unnecessary at this stage.Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed the prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 9. The Supreme Court could act on Trump's request at any time, but as of now, the outcome remains uncertain. Trump's legal team also sought emergency relief from the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, but a judge turned him down on January 9.The drama surrounding Trump's legal battles continues to unfold, with the nation watching closely to see how the Supreme Court will respond to his latest appeal.

Here's a narrative script on the recent court trials involving Donald Trump:Donald Trump, the President-elect of the United States, has been at the center of a high-profile court case in New York. On January 10, 2025, Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge in his hush money case. This means that while he won't face any serious punishment, the fact of his conviction remains.The case revolves around Trump's falsification of business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records in May. The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, had indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, opting instead for an unconditional discharge.However, Trump sought to halt the sentencing process, arguing that as President-elect, he should be granted immunity from criminal proceedings. Trump's legal team filed an emergency appeal with the Supreme Court, asking the justices to intervene and put the sentencing on hold. In a 40-page filing, Trump argued that preparing for a criminal sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him.Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 10. Trump's appeal cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed.Despite Trump's efforts, the sentencing proceeded as scheduled on January 10, 2025. Trump's legal team also sought emergency relief from the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, but their request was denied.In another legal development, a federal court recently considered a case involving Trump's executive orders on federal funding. The court found that the states are likely to succeed on the merits of some of their claims, including allegations that Trump's actions violated the separation of powers and the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The court issued a temporary restraining order, citing the potential disruption to health, education, and other public services due to the pause in federal funding.These recent court cases highlight the ongoing legal challenges facing Donald Trump as he prepares to take office as President of the United States.

It's been a whirlwind few days for Donald Trump, the first criminal president in U.S. history. On January 20, Trump returned to office despite being convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a New York trial court. The case stems from his efforts to illegally influence the 2016 presidential election by hiding reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels.The trial court granted Trump an "unconditional discharge," meaning he won't face imprisonment, probation, or a fine. However, the conviction remains on his record, making him the first and only criminal elected to the presidency. Trump's legal team has been working to overturn the conviction, pointing to the landmark Supreme Court decision in Trump v. United States, which could potentially lead to the reversal of his New York conviction.In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court established a new constitutional rule that evidence related to a president's "official acts" cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases unless prosecutors clear a high legal threshold. Trump's team argues that the trial court failed to follow this new framework, which could render the conviction invalid.Before his sentencing, Trump asked the Supreme Court to intervene and block the proceedings, claiming that the charges were politically motivated and that he was entitled to presidential immunity. However, New York prosecutors urged the justices to allow the sentencing to go ahead as scheduled, emphasizing that Trump's conviction rests on conduct for which he is not entitled to immunity.The prosecutors argued that Trump can attend the sentencing hearing by video to minimize any burden and that he can appeal after being sentenced. They also dismissed Trump's suggestion that he cannot be sentenced because he is the president-elect, stating that no judicial decision or guidance from the Department of Justice has ever recognized that the unique temporary immunity of the sitting president extends to the president-elect.Despite Trump's efforts to have the Supreme Court intervene, the justices declined his request. However, four conservative justices – Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas – publicly noted their disagreement with this decision, signaling that they may be ready to take up the issue of Trump's conviction sooner rather than later.As the case heads to the New York Court of Appeals, Trump's legal team is likely to continue arguing that the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States requires the conviction to be erased. The Supreme Court's eventual involvement seems inevitable, and the outcome could have significant implications for Trump's presidency and the institution of the presidency as a whole.

Here's a narrative script based on recent events involving Donald Trump's court trials:As we step into February 2025, the legal entanglements surrounding Donald Trump continue to unfold. Just a few weeks ago, on January 8, Trump made an urgent appeal to the Supreme Court, seeking to halt his criminal sentencing in a New York hush money case. Trump, who was found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records to hide reimbursements made to adult film star Stormy Daniels, argued that preparing for sentencing while preparing to lead the country as President imposed an "intolerable, unconstitutional burden" on him.In his 40-page filing, signed by John Sauer, Trump's intended nominee for solicitor general, Trump cited the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, arguing that the criminal proceedings in state court should be put on hold while his claims of presidential immunity are addressed. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from New York, directed prosecutors to respond to Trump's request by January 9.However, Judge Juan Merchan, who presided over Trump's trial, had already indicated that he did not intend to sentence Trump to jail time, instead planning to give him an "unconditional discharge." This meant that Trump would not face any serious punishment, but the fact of his conviction would remain.Despite Merchan's intentions, Trump's legal team has been working to overturn his conviction. They argue that the trial court erred by admitting evidence related to Trump's official acts, which, according to the Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States*, should have been excluded unless prosecutors cleared a high legal threshold.Will Thomas, an assistant professor of business law at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, notes that this new framework has placed Trump's New York conviction in jeopardy. Trump's legal team has taken aim, pointing to language in *Trump v. United States* to argue that the conviction should be erased. The case is now headed to the New York Court of Appeals, which might agree with Trump's team that the Supreme Court's decisions require the conviction to be overturned.The Supreme Court's decision in *Trump v. United States* has transformed Trump's New York case into a federal matter, making it likely that the Supreme Court will eventually weigh in. Trump has already tried to skip to the end, asking the Supreme Court to shortcut New York's appeals courts and take his case now. While the high court declined his request, four conservative justices publicly noted their disagreement, signaling that they are ready to take up the issue of Trump's conviction sooner rather than later. The stage is set for Trump to challenge his New York conviction, and if things go his way, he may not only avoid punishment for his crimes but also stop being a criminal.

Donald Trump, the newly inaugurated President of the United States, has been at the center of a high-profile court case in New York. On January 3, 2025, a New York trial court denied Trump's motion to dismiss the criminal case against him, which involves 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The case stems from efforts to illegally influence the 2016 presidential election.The trial court's decision was swiftly followed by a sentencing hearing scheduled for January 10, 2025. However, Trump's legal team promptly filed an interlocutory appeal, arguing that the trial court's proceedings should be stayed pending the resolution of his appeal on Presidential immunity. Trump's lawyers contend that as President-elect, he is shielded from criminal process during the transition period, citing the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States, which established new protections for sitting Presidents.Despite the trial court's refusal to honor the automatic stay, Trump's team took their case to the Supreme Court, seeking an immediate stay of further proceedings in the New York trial court. In their application, Trump's lawyers emphasized the grave injustice and harm to the institution of the Presidency that would result from allowing the trial court to impose sentence and judgment on the President-elect before his appeal is resolved.On January 10, 2025, the New York trial court proceeded with the sentencing hearing, ultimately granting Trump an unconditional discharge instead of imprisonment, probation, or a fine. While this outcome may seem like a victory for Trump, his legal entanglements are far from over. The case is expected to head to the New York Court of Appeals, where Trump's team will argue that the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States requires the conviction to be erased due to the trial court's failure to follow the new framework for determining Presidential immunity.The Supreme Court's decision has significant implications for Trump's case, as it establishes that evidence related to a President's official acts cannot be admitted in subsequent criminal cases without clearing a high legal threshold. Trump's lawyers are likely to argue that the trial court's errors in handling this evidence were not harmless and that the conviction should be overturned. With the Supreme Court ultimately having the last word, Trump's fate remains uncertain, and the legal battle is far from over.

Thursday, January 9, 2025 Subscribe: Get the Daily Update in your inbox for free 1/ The New York Court of Appeals – the highest court in the state – denied Trump's request to block his Friday sentencing. The decision leaves the U.S. Supreme Court as Trump's final option to defer sentencing on 34 felony counts related to falsif... Visit WTF Just Happened Today? for more news and headlines, brought to you by Matt Kiser. The WTFJHT Podcast is narrated and produced by Joe Amditis.

On this episode of the podcast, Trump Attorney and Partner of the Binnall Law Group, Jesse Binnall dives into the latest updates on President Trump's legal battles, with a focus on the upcoming sentencing in New York. Binnall critiques the New York Court of Appeals for failing to intervene in what he views as a politically motivated case led by District Attorney Alvin Bragg and Judge Juan Merchan. He raises concerns about Judge Merchan's potential conflicts of interest, including political donations, and discusses their implications for civil rights and justice.Binnall urges everyone to remain vigilant and engaged in combating political bias within the legal system. Looking ahead, Binnall predicts ongoing legal challenges for Donald Trump, fueled by establishment opposition and underscores the critical need to support President Trump's nominees and stay active in the political process.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of The Isaac Hayes Show, Isaac dives into the latest political headlines, offering his unique perspective on the shifting landscape in Washington and beyond. From the Supreme Court's rejection of Trump's bid to delay sentencing in his Manhattan case, to Biden's bold decisions on Ukraine and pardons, Isaac breaks down the most pressing issues of the day. He also tackles the wildfires devastating Los Angeles, the growing debate over concealed carry permits, and the drama surrounding top lawmakers' stock market moves. With his signature blend of humor, insight, and unfiltered analysis, Isaac gives listeners a front-row seat to the political battles shaping the future. Tune in for a thought-provoking conversation and a no-holds-barred look at the latest headlines on The Isaac Hayes Show. Link to The Isaac Hayes Show page where you can leave a message, also don't forget to subscribe and share  https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theisaachayesshow https://www.facebook.com/theisaachayesshow https://thisaachayesshow.wordpress.com  

Mayor Adams delivers his fourth State of the City... New York Court of Appeals denies Trump's bid to halt his sentencing... Intrepid closes following an electrical fire full This is the All Local 4pm update for January 9, 2025 400 Thu, 09 Jan 2025 19:32:13 +0000 uEwFf6bd8IfjdlAs7cTFj4vBVz2da6MX news 1010 WINS ALL LOCAL news Mayor Adams delivers his fourth State of the City... New York Court of Appeals denies Trump's bid to halt his sentencing... Intrepid closes following an electrical fire The podcast is hyper-focused on local news, issues and events in the New York City area. This podcast's purpose is to give New Yorkers New York news about their neighborhoods and shine a light on the issues happening in their backyard. 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc.

The Smart 7 is an award winning daily podcast that gives you everything you need to know in 7 minutes, at 7am, 7 days a week…With over 17 million downloads and consistently charting, including as No. 1 News Podcast on Spotify, we're a trusted source for people every day and we've won Gold at the Signal International Podcast awardsIf you're enjoying it, please follow, share, or even post a review, it all helps... Today's episode includes the following:https://x.com/i/status/1871206867277418582 https://x.com/i/status/1871194670543622168 https://x.com/i/status/1871221863650672989 https://x.com/i/status/1870974337425268822 https://x.com/i/status/1871098138548678806 https://x.com/i/status/1871167764364423647 https://x.com/i/status/1871194332927057987 https://x.com/i/status/1871138124275093534 https://x.com/i/status/1871195129375257006Contact us over @TheSmart7pod or visit www.thesmart7.comVoiced by Jamie East, using AI, written by Liam Thompson, researched by Lucie Lewis and produced by Daft Doris. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Luigi Mangione, the suspect accused of fatally shooting a US healthcare insurance executive, has been extradited to New York to face new federal charges. Also: the ground squirrels in California that are hunting voles.

After weeks of fallout from "anonymous sources," Pete Hegseth appears to be a lock to become Donald Trump's Secretary of Defense. In today's show, we detail all the things that threatened Pete's confirmation and the details of things that now have cleared his path to the Pentagon: TRUTH! Meanwhile, the Legacy Media continue their incessant cries about their fears that Trump's DOJ is going to "come after them" - those media members - and throw them in jail. You'll hear an exclusive interview with Daniel Penny after a New York Court ruled him not guilty of charges of negligent homicide. Those charges came from a very public incident that happened in a New York subway when Penny restrained a violent man. Sadly, after the incident, the man died. Complete details are in today's show along with his live interview with Judge Jeannine.

In this week's episode, we're diving into an intriguing case from the New York Court of Appeals. Plus, stick around for a sneak peek at an upcoming episode I'm working on all about international travel. Oh, and just a heads-up—no articles this time because, honestly, I'm keeping things short today. And no general rules for...

AP correspondent Jennifer King reports that the suspect under arrest for the killing of UnitedHealthcare's CEO faces charges in New York.

AP correspondent Jennifer King reports legal wrangling continues as Steve Bannon faces charges over allegedly duping donors.

JOIN TRISH REGAN for her analysis of a historic election. As Kamala concedes, Leticia James just doubled  concession speech. Meanwhile… Leticia James, who is about to have her case against the incoming President reversed by the New York Court of Appeals just doubled down in her promise to fight Trump. That said, it's a new day with new opportunities. The stock market hit a record high and the dollar is soaring! Jack Smith is dropping his cases and there may be many more good things ahead. Subscribe to TRISH'S Financial Market Research HERE: https://76research.com

Was the DOJ running these cases behind-the-scenes after all? Just in: Fani Willis's boyfriend Nathan Wade had multiple conversations with the Biden-Harris White House as the state of Georgia attempted to prosecute the former President. The news comes amid growing expectation that the Letitia James nearly $500 million civil case against Donald Trump will be reversed by the New York Court of Appeals. Meanwhile, in a new interview on Fox News, Donald Trump insists these people—including Adam Shiff and Nancy Pelosi—really are his ‘enemies'. Trish Regan reports on all this and more, as polls continue to show the advantage to Donald Trump, in today's edition of the Trish Regan Show. SUBSCRIBE TO TRISH'S Financial Market Research HERE: https://76research.com

This Day in Legal History: West Law Reports PublishedOn October 21, 1876, the West Publishing Company, founded by John B. West, published its first legal reporter, The Syllabi. This marked the beginning of a transformation in how American legal professionals accessed and utilized case law. The Syllabi aimed to provide Minnesota lawyers with timely, accurate, and reliable legal information, distinguishing itself through its promise to be "prompt, interesting, full, and at all times thoroughly reliable." Over time, The Syllabi evolved into the Northwestern Reporter, which played a significant role in shaping the broader National Reporter System. West's innovation was groundbreaking because it standardized the reporting of judicial decisions across multiple jurisdictions, creating a centralized, accessible body of case law. The National Reporter System expanded to cover decisions from various courts in different regions, making it easier for lawyers to research case law beyond state boundaries. This system eventually became the foundation for modern legal research and was essential for the creation of tools like Westlaw, which revolutionized legal research with digital access in the 20th century. It is worth noting, the development of a centralized legal reporting system, while transformative, also raises important access to justice issues. West Publishing's dominance in legal reporting and the eventual emergence of paid research platforms like Westlaw created barriers for individuals and smaller firms with limited financial resources. The high cost of accessing comprehensive legal databases places those without the means at a significant disadvantage, potentially hindering their ability to conduct thorough legal research or build strong cases. This disparity underscores the ongoing challenge of ensuring equal access to legal resources, a critical factor in promoting fairness within the justice system.China-based drone manufacturer DJI has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Defense Department, challenging its inclusion on a list of companies allegedly linked to Beijing's military. DJI claims the designation is inaccurate and has caused substantial financial harm, including lost business deals and a tarnished reputation. The company, which controls over half of the U.S. commercial drone market, argues it is neither owned nor controlled by the Chinese military and seeks removal from the list. DJI alleges that the Pentagon did not engage with the company for over 16 months regarding the designation, leaving it no choice but to pursue legal action. The Pentagon has not commented on the suit. DJI is also facing increasing scrutiny in the U.S., with concerns raised about potential security risks from its drones. Earlier this week, U.S. Customs stopped some DJI imports under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, though DJI denies any involvement with forced labor. Meanwhile, the U.S. House has passed a bill to ban new DJI drones, pending Senate action.Drone maker DJI sues Pentagon over Chinese military listing | ReutersEli Lilly has filed lawsuits against three medical spas and online vendors—Pivotal Peptides, MangoRx, and Genesis Lifestyle Medicine—over selling unauthorized versions of its weight-loss drug, Zepbound, which contains tirzepatide. These lawsuits, filed in federal and state courts, accuse the companies of false advertising and promotion, including selling products without medical prescriptions and making unverified claims about the drug's safety and efficacy. Pivotal Peptides allegedly marketed tirzepatide for research but sold it directly to consumers, while MangoRx offered an unapproved oral version of the drug. Genesis was accused of selling compounded tirzepatide with vitamin B12, a combination that Lilly says is unsafe and untested. Lilly's lawsuits follow earlier legal actions against other companies for similar offenses. The drugmaker aims to protect consumers from potential health risks and seeks to stop the defendants from selling these products, as well as pursuing monetary damages.Lilly sues online vendors, medical spa over copycat weight-loss drugs | ReutersFour prominent labor lawyers from Baker McKenzie's New York employment practice—Paul Evans, Krissy Katzenstein, Blair Robinson, and Jeffrey Sturgeon—have moved to Paul Hastings, leaving Baker McKenzie short one-third of its employment lawyers. The team has represented Fox News in several high-profile employment disputes, including defending the network in cases involving former host Britt McHenry and a COVID-19 workplace exposure claim. The team has also worked with clients like CBS Broadcasting, Paramount Global, and Panda Express. Their move to Paul Hastings follows collaborations with the firm's employment lawyers, and they plan to continue growing Paul Hastings' client relationships. The transition strengthens Paul Hastings' East Coast employment practice, enhancing its capacity in complex employment matters, including Title VII representation, pay equity, and class actions. Paul Hastings' leadership sees this as a significant boost, especially ahead of regulatory shifts tied to the 2024 presidential election.Fox News Employment Defense Team Moves Over to Paul HastingsNew Jersey Transit Corp. (NJ Transit) is facing a patent infringement lawsuit from Railware Inc., which claims NJ Transit is using its railworker-safety technology without permission. NJ Transit is seeking to dismiss the case, asserting sovereign immunity as an "arm of the State of New Jersey." The issue is complicated by the fact that NJ Transit operates in both New Jersey and New York. While the Third Circuit, which covers New Jersey, has previously ruled that NJ Transit qualifies for immunity, the Second Circuit, which covers New York, uses a stricter test to determine state immunity. This case is significant because it could set a precedent for how sovereign immunity is applied across jurisdictions.Railware argues that NJ Transit's immunity claim is invalid, citing the agency's independent operation and non-state funding. The case also touches on broader legal debates about when state agencies can claim immunity in patent cases. NJ Transit is awaiting a key ruling from the New York Court of Appeals on whether it is immune from another lawsuit, which could influence this case. If conflicting rulings emerge from different courts, the matter may be escalated to the U.S. Supreme Court for resolution.NJ Transit Patent Immunity Claim Crosses Circuit-Court Divide This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

Rapper Sean Combs made his first appearance before a New York court yesterday in preparation for his trial on sex trafficking charges. We get the latest from New York-based Journalist Harriet Alexander who was at the hearing.

AP correspondent Julie Walker reports on Donald Trump's latest attempt to get one of his court cases thrown out.

PREVIEW: TRUMP: BRAGG: IMMUNITY: Conversation with colleagues Andrew McCarthy and Thaddeus McCotter re the immunity claim to be ruled on in a New York Court before the sentencing in the same court of former President Trump. More later. 1937 SCOTUS

In 2017, New York passed a law requiring employers to cover abortions in their health insurance plans. New York initially planned to exempt religious employers with sincere religious objections but later changed the exemption to protect only religious entities whose purpose is to inculcate religious values and who primarily employ and serve coreligionists. This exempted non-objecting ministries while leaving many religious groups that do object unprotected. Several of these unprotected religious groups—including an order of Anglican nuns, Roman Catholic dioceses, and Baptist and Lutheran churches—sued New York, arguing that the law forced them to violate their deeply held religious beliefs. The New York courts ruled against the religious groups and in 2021, represented by Jones Day and Becket, the groups asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its case. The Supreme Court granted the petition, vacated the bad rulings from the New York state courts, and told the state courts to reconsider the case in light of Fulton v. City of Philadelphia. But on May 21, 2024, the New York Court of Appeals found Fulton inapplicable and again upheld the abortion mandate. The religious groups’ cert petition is due on August 18, 2024. Featuring:Lori Windham, Vice President and Senior Counsel, The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty(Moderator) Whitney Hermandorfer, Director of Strategic Litigation Unit, Office of the Tennessee Attorney General

In this episode, we chat with Maneesha Deckha, Professor and Lansdowne Chair in Law at the University of Victoria, about her research in critical animal law. We discuss her 2021 book, Animals as Legal Beings: Contesting Anthropocentric Legal Orders in which she argues for a new legal category of “beingness” for animals that transcends the inadequate legal categories of “persons” or “property.” We also dive into her 2023 article Animalization and Dehumanization Concerns: Another Psychological Barrier to Animal Law Reform, in which she highlights why a critique of human exceptionalism is essential to advancing the goals of anti-racism and decolonization. Highlights include: Maneesha's personal journey into exploring the links between animal legal studies and critical animal studies, health law, reproductive ethics, feminist analysis of law, and postcolonial and critical race theory; Deckha's evaluation of the 2022 decision by the New York Court of Appeals with respect to the ongoing captivity of Happy, an elephant at the Bronx Zoo, in which she outlines why the dissociation of humans from animals is counterproductive to eliminating racism and other intra-human prejudices and inequities; How the legal classification of animals as “property” creates problems, such as commodification and objectification; meanwhile, using the “personhood” category for animals exacerbates the concept of human exceptionalism. Deckha argues for a new category of “beingness' for nonhuman animals which recognizes their embodiment, relationality, and vulnerability; A new six-part series documentary series targeted towards secondary school students, A Deeper Kindness: Animal Law and Youth Activism, which surveys the current field of animal law and policy through the eyes of four youth active in animal advocacy. See episode website for show notes, links, and transcript:  https://www.populationbalance.org/podcast/maneesha-deckha ABOUT US The Overpopulation Podcast features enlightening conversations between Population Balance executive director Nandita Bajaj, researcher Alan Ware, and expert guests that draw the connections between pronatalism, human supremacy, social inequalities, and ecological overshoot. Population Balance's mission to inspire narrative, behavioral, and system change that shrinks our human impact and elevates the rights and wellbeing of people, animals, and the planet. Learn more here: https://www.populationbalance.org/  Copyright 2024 Population Balance

* Guest: James Edwards - Race, Politics & Hypocrisy in 21st Century America - thepoliticalcesspool.org * TSA expects record Independence Day holiday airline travel! * On July 3, 1775, George Washington took command of the Continental Army at Cambridge, Massachusetts - ThisDayOfHistory.com * JULY 3, 1863: The ‘High-mark' Of The Confederacy At The Battle Of Gettysburg! * Fireworks, Gettysburg, and a Bittersweet Fourth of July! - Michael Peroutka, TheAmericanView.com * Rudy Giuliani, Booked In AZ Jail! - Has been disbarred from the practice of law, a New York State appellate court ruled. * Giuliani Disbarred in New York Court finds former Trump lawyer repeatedly made false statements about 2020 election. * Juan M. Merchan, The judge in Trump's Manhattan criminal case delayed his sentencing until Sept. 18 to weigh whether a new US Supreme Court ruling might imperil the former president's conviction. * Trump Pauses on Running Mate, Keeping Heat on Rival - NYT.

Former Trump Asst. Attorney General Jeff Clark joins Lou to bring us up to date on Marxist Lawfare against him and President Trump. The New York Court of Appeals rejected Trump's attempt to remove his gag order. Clark says the only reason to keep it in place is to interfere in the election, it's about political free speech at the heart of the First Amendment. Clark says we're watching warring factions in the Democrat Party. There are those who want Joe Biden because he's functionally a puppet and those running the country want to stay firmly in place. Then there are Dems who want to dump Biden fearing keeping him on the ticket will lead to another Trump term. Clark believes the debate will be Biden's big test.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Former Trump Asst. Attorney General Jeff Clark joins Lou to bring us up to date on Marxist Lawfare against him and President Trump. The New York Court of Appeals rejected Trump's attempt to remove his gag order. Clark says the only reason to keep it in place is to interfere in the election, it's about political free speech at the heart of the First Amendment. Clark says we're watching warring factions in the Democrat Party. There are those who want Joe Biden because he's functionally a puppet and those running the country want to stay firmly in place. Then there are Dems who want to dump Biden fearing keeping him on the ticket will lead to another Trump term. Clark believes the debate will be Biden's big test.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week on Miss Trial, KFA, Danya Perry, and Kathleen Rice discuss three significant political and legal topics. 2022 marked the first year in 17 years that Kathleen Rice didn't appear on a ballot. Drawing from her experience as a representative, Kathleen outlines the drama in Congress, explaining how the path to the majority relies more on New York than we might initially think. KFA introduces a discussion about the imminent Supreme Court decision regarding Donald Trump's presidential immunity case. Danya suggests a brilliant idea - if SCOTUS sends the case back down to Judge Chutkan, she should hold a mini-trial-like evidentiary hearing, where witnesses would testify about Trump's efforts to steal the election. Lastly, Danya, using her experience as Michael Cohen's lawyer, highlights the importance of the New York Court of Appeals' decision to maintain the gag order in Trump's election interference case. Step into the courtroom with MissTrial, a gripping new legal podcast where justice meets real-life drama, co-hosted by 3 accomplished women: Karen Friedman Agnifilo, the former Chief Assistant District Attorney at the Manhattan DA's office currently prosecuting Donald Trump; E. Danya Perry, former SDNY Federal Prosecutor and currently the formidable attorney representing Michael Cohen as he faced down Trump; and, Kathleen Rice, the first ever woman elected as Nassau County District Attorney and former New York Congresswoman who was present during the January 6 Capitol attack. Together, they dissect high-profile cases, share behind-the-scenes insights, and bring their unparalleled experience to the most pressing legal issues of our time. Tune in for candid conversations, expert analysis, and a deep dive into the trials that shape our nation. Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/coalition-of-the-sane/id1741663279

Description: TOP NEWS | On today's Daily Signal Top News, we break down: Law to crack down on deepfake porn announced.Appeals court upholds Trump gag orderBiden announces another illegal immigration executive order.Chicago mayor launches a reparations task force. Relevant Linkshttps://nypost.com/2024/06/02/us-news/biden-admin-offers-mass-amnesty-to-migrants-as-it-quietly-terminates-350000-asylum-cases-sources/ Listen to other podcasts from The Daily Signal: https://www.dailysignal.com/podcasts/Get daily conservative news you can trust from our Morning Bell newsletter: DailySignal.com/morningbellsubscription Listen to more Heritage podcasts: https://www.heritage.org/podcastsSign up for The Agenda newsletter — the lowdown on top issues conservatives need to know about each week: https://www.heritage.org/agenda Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

TOP NEWS | On today's Daily Signal Top News, we break down:   Law to crack down on deepfake porn announced. Appeals court upholds Trump gag order Biden announces another illegal immigration executive order. Chicago mayor launches a reparations task force.

This week we talk about secret documents, hush-money payouts, and federal court cases.We also discuss polling, independents, and post-presidential felonies.Recommended Book: The Final Empire by Brandon SandersonTranscriptIt's a weird time in American politics for many reasons, including but not limited to the increasing polarization of the two main parties, the difficulty in finding bipartisan opportunities to work together, the concomitant tendency for Congress, and lawmakers at other levels of governance to not get much done, and the heightening tension between federal and state-level governments on an array of hot-button issues.But one of the more bizarre ongoing narratives within this larger, stasis-inducing state of affairs, is the tale of former President Donald Trump and the legal woes he's faced since losing the 2020 election to now President Biden.Trump has denied, and continues to deny the outcome of that election, attributing his loss to all sorts of things, like corruption and fraud on the part of his political enemies, and in part because of things he's done in support of those, at this point evidence-less, allegations, a portfolio of legal intrigue has haunted him, even throughout his time in office, but especially since he left office in January of 2021.A lot of print and digital ink has been spilled on this subject, of late, because of the outcome of one of the legal cases in which Trump has been enmeshed: he was found guilty in New York on 34 counts of falsifying business records in order to cover up a payment he made to an adult film star, allegedly to keep her quiet about an affair they had back in the day.And that's the main topic I'd like to delve into on this episode, as the implications of that juried court ruling are many and varied, but to kick things off, I think it's worth taking a look at the state of those other ongoing cases, as while they're less immediately relevant to Trump and his ambitions to retake the White House in November's election, they're still pursuing him, in a way, serving as unknown variables that could pop up to bite him at some future moment, which is important when we're talking about someone who wants to become the most powerful person on the planet, once more.One such case is focused on Trump's handling of classified documents when he left the White House, the allegations being that he took classified documents that we wasn't supposed to take, handled them in such a way that they were stored in public where anyone could steal or read them, and that he may have even shown them to other people on purpose, which is a big no-no.He also allegedly went out of his way to keep government agents from reclaiming those documents after he was asked to return them.This is considered to be kind of a big deal in part because there were hundreds of these sorts of documents that Trump seemed to treat as if they belonged to him, and which he then allegedly conspired with folks in him employ to hide from the agency responsible for keeping such things safe and hidden, which they do because these sorts of documents often contain information about US military and intelligence matters—so that information getting out could conceivably put such assets, people and infrastructure, at risk.Trump was indicted on this matter in mid-2023 and charged with 37 felony counts, then another 3 were added that same year, bringing the total up to 40.Trump pleaded not guilty to all of these charges and his legal team has done all they can to slow the proceedings, which seems to have worked, as the case is now delayed indefinitely, the judge overseeing it—who was appointed to her position by Trump while he was in office—having been accused of slow-walking the process on purpose, though that's not really something that can be proven, and there's a chance the case is just complex enough that, as a fairly green judge attempting to tackle a big, important, complex case, she just fell behind and that stumbling is now in the spotlight and being reframed by folks who want to see this thing move forward, faster.Trump also faces a case in Georgia that focuses on his alleged efforts to interfere with the 2020 Presidential election, which, again, he lost to Biden, but which he claims he won; he also claims he was the victim of some sort of conspiracy, the nature of that supposed conspiracy having changed several times since he initially made that claim.Trump and 18 of his allies were indicted in August of 2023 for these efforts, which have been framed as an attempt to subvert election results in the state of Georgia, and similar delay tactics have been used in this case as in the other ones, though the District Attorney in charge of the case has made those efforts somewhat easier, having engaged in a relationship with the lead prosecutor, who she hired, which is arguably not relevant to the case, but is also a fairly overt conflict of interest.The timeline of this case has thus been pushed back, and an appeals court in the state is reviewing a ruling that allowed that DA to remain on the case, despite that apparent conflict of interest.This case was meant to go to trial beginning on August 5, but that timing is now in question, and during all this deliberation, several counts against Trump have been dismissed—and he has pleaded not guilty to all of them.And finally, there's another case related to Trump's alleged interference with the 2020 election, this one a federal case, while the other one is local to Georgia, and for this one, Trump was charged with conspiracy to defraud the US, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding—the election and the peaceful changing of the government, basically—conspiracy against rights, and obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding—again, referring to the election and the mechanisms of handing over power from one administration to the next following an election.The basis of these allegations are that Trump and his people did all sorts of things to disrupt the 2020 election, including trying to coerce lawmakers into backing his efforts to remain in power, despite the election not having gone his way.These efforts culminated with the attack on the US Capitol on January 6 by his supporters, and the case is predicated on the idea that while Trump was repeatedly told by his own people, experts on elections and everything about them, that he lost, fair and square, he continued to insist that he was robbed, that the election was rigged, etc, and that meant while he knew the election was not rigged, he acted as if he didn't, which means he tried to illegally and intentionally mess with a core component of the US democratic system, which is very much not allowed.Some of Trump's people were also indicted in this case, he was indicted on four counts, himself, and the case is currently on hold while the Supreme Court makes a determination about whether his position as President at the time gives him full or partial immunity to legal consequences for actions he takes while serving in that role: the idea being that maybe simply being president should give him some leeway, and maybe, if it could be argued that he did what he did because he genuinely thought something was amiss with the election process, that would count as his acting as president for the good of the country, and that would make him immune to legal consequences for doing what he did.Oral arguments before the Supreme Court in this case took place at the end of April 2024, and while we don't have a surefire timeline for a ruling in this case, it's expected that it will take long enough that the main, federal case that is waiting on the Supreme Court's judgement won't even begin, much less end, before the November election—at which point, some experts expect, at least, if Trump wins, even courts finding him guilty won't matter because the federal stuff he could brush away using the powers of the President, and the state stuff won't have the means to punish him, because he'll control enough levers of power that it wouldn't be a fight they could win.As I mentioned earlier, though, what I'd like to talk about today is the only court case Trump has been involved with since his Presidency that has thus far come to a close, and what his being found guilty in that case might mean.—Back in October of 2016, a recording of then-Presidential candidate Trump, in which Trump was heard telling the host of a show called Access Hollywood that if you're famous, you can get away with grabbing women's genitals without permission, was released to the public.This was after he became the Republican party's official nominee in July of that year, and a few months before that recording was released, American Media Inc, the company behind the National Enquirer, made a deal with an adult film star who performed under the name Stormy Daniels to buy her story about an affair with Trump years earlier, agreeing to pay her $150,000, to feature her on a couple of magazine covers, and to publish 100 articles written by her in their publications.This payout was part of a so-called "catch and kill" deal that AMI's CEO, David Pecker, made with the Trump campaign, to basically keep its ear to the ground for any bad news that might pop up and make the candidate or campaign look bad, and then to step in and buy the rights to such stories if possible, killing them, keeping them from going public, basically, because they would own the rights and then not do anything with them, keeping them from messing with Trump's campaign.Trump's fixer, Michael Cohen, then arranged to buy the affair story from AMI for $130,000, a deal which included a non-disclosure agreement on Daniels' part, so she wouldn't be able to tell the story to anyone else, legally, but then in November of that same year, 2016, The Wall Street Journal received a tip that helped them uncover elements of that deal and the alleged affair, and that in turn led to a slow drip of new divulgences that trailed Trump through his presidency, though mostly at a low level.Cohen then tried to get reimbursed for paying out of pocket to buy the story from AMI, and the compensation for that purchase was put in the books as a series of retainer fees; intentionally mis-recorded in order to conceal the hush-money payout in official business documents—the payout having been legal, but concealing such a payout in this way being illegal.In 2018 the Journal was able to publicly report the details of Cohen's payout to Daniels, and in April of that year, Federal agents raided Cohen's office and hotel room, which netted them documents that proved he made those payments, and that they differed from those aforementioned official business records.Everyone involved was denying any of this happened and any connection to any kind of payout for a long time, then, but in 2018 those same people started to change their stories, basically saying, yeah, there was some kind of deal, but it wasn't a big thing, don't worry about it, nothing illegal happened.And during this period Cohen pled guilty to campaign-finance violations and other related charges for making these hush-money payments, and he testified against Trump, saying that the then-president told him to do it.Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison, Trump wasn't charged with anything, and these two formerly close-knit people become very publicly at odds following all of this.In August of 2019, about a year after that public breakup in the relationship between Trump and Cohen, the Trump organization was served a grand jury subpoena, as the government wanted more paperwork related to these seeming violations, and then all of this kind of disappeared from the public radar until after the election, which Trump lost to Biden in 2020.In 2021, though, a new district attorney stepped into the role in Manhattan, Alvin Bragg, he inherited this still ongoing, but somewhat simmering at that point case from his predecessor. In January of 2023, he brought in a new grand jury to hear the evidence that had been collected on the matter, and that grand jury indicted Trump for falsifying the records his company kept related to these payments—the idea being that not only did he do an illegal business thing, but he did an illegal business thing in order to influence an election, because those payments were meant to keep an embarrassing thing that might keep him from becoming president from being publicly known.The trial officially began in April of 2024, gobbling up a lot of presidential candidate Trump's time, as he had to be in the courtroom most Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays, for the duration, which kept him from being as active on the campaign trail as he might have otherwise been.And throughout, Trump was issued gag orders to keep him from publicly attacking witnesses, jurors, court staff, and other people involved in the trial, which was something he seemed fond of doing: the concern was that he would smear those involved in order to keep them silent or to sway them to his side, or that Trump's followers might be motivated to do violence against these people, as seems to have been the case on January 6.Trump violated that gag order ten times, at which point the judge in the case said he would consider jail time as a punishment, since the relatively minors fines for these violations didn't seem to be having the intended effect, keeping Trump from badmouthing those involved in the press and online, when not in the courtroom.Then, on May 30, 2024, Trump became the first former US President to be convicted of a felony—and he was actually convicted of 34 of them—when the jury decided he was guilty of all the charges that were brought against him in this case.Trump says the case was rigged and that there's a conspiracy by his enemies that made all this happen.The Judge set July 11 as the sentencing date, so that's when we'll find out what the punishment will be—and that punishment could add up to as much as a couple of years in prison, but likely, because of all sorts of variables favorable to Trump, he'll only face a fine, or probation at worst, which would be embarrassing but not terribly impactful on his reelection efforts.After that, Trump will have 30 days to file an appeal, which he has said he will do, and once that's filed the case will move on to the New York Appellate Division, which will decide on the matter, and after that, the New York Court of Appeals can decide if it wants to get involved, to hear an appeal, as well.The Supreme Court could theoretically also get involved here, but they would need to find some aspect of the appeal that relates to federal law, or directly connects to the Constitution, and most experts have said, at this point at least, that seems unlikely.Because of how much time the appeal process typically takes, it's also considered unlikely that this will be sorted out before November, which lines up nicely with the approach Trump's team has been taking overall, to draw things out as long as possible in order to keep any definitive conclusions from arriving before votes are cast.So while appeals on cases like this one seldom result in an overturning of the verdict, that might be moot if Trump wins the election before the appeals process finishes up; though the flip-side of that is while he can claim the case is still being appealed potentially for years while it works its way through the system, it also means he's officially a felon until that happens, which means he'll almost certainly still be a felon, in the eyes of the law, when the votes are cast—though he'll still be able to vote in the election because of how Florida law works, in regard to convicts be allowed to voted, the case having been in New York, not in-state.That said, this conviction landed like a bomb in the political world, with conservative news outlets generally aligning themselves with Trump's claim that this was a baseless case brought by liberal leaders, meant to keep him from winning another election—though new polling data indicates that independents, which are considered to be vital for November's election, are not super thrilled about this outcome, 49% of them saying they think Trump should drop out of the race now that he's been convicted, and 15% of Republicans apparently said the same.The race is still largely tied up between Trump and Biden, though, and it'll be a while before we see any solid numbers about the impact of this case on possible votes come November; it may be significant enough to make a difference, and it may be a flash in the pan sort of thing.It's hard to tell which way it'll go at this point, and we don't have historical baselines for this, because this is the first time this has happened.There are concerns that Trump supporters might be nudged toward violent acts in the wake of this decision, and research from extremist watchdog groups have warned that some of them have already been attempting to dox, to get personal information, including addresses and family information, about the jurors and legal staff in the case, some of them calling for harassment campaigns and violence against them as revenge for finding as they did, against Trump, and there's also data indicating that trust of government institutions on the US right, amongst Republicans, might diminish even further than it already has, which doesn't tend to be great for democracy and stability in countries where that happens.President Biden administration initially remained mum on this topic, though he eventually said the justice system worked, that it applies to everyone, and that the only way to keep Trump out of office again, because he can continue to run and even win as a convict, even if he were to be put in jail, is to vote against him; and Trump said basically the same thing in reverse, that the only way to right this wrong is to elect him in November—and his campaign has said they pulled in tens of millions of dollars in campaign contributions in the hours following the this conviction.While this is being seen as a small victory in some circles and a massive injustice in others, then, the main takeaway, at the moment at least, as of the day I'm recording this, is that the election in November is the only really truly vital decision here, the wheels of justice moving very slowly and strangely, and not lining up terribly well with the time-constraints inherent in this sort of situation.Show Noteshttps://apnews.com/article/trump-trial-deliberations-jury-testimony-verdict-85558c6d08efb434d05b694364470aa0https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/30/trump-guilty-what-happens-next/https://www.readtangle.com/trump-verdict-hush-money-trial/https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-hush-money-stormy-daniels-707fa959https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/31/trump-campaign-donations-record.htmlhttps://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/05/31/trump-trial-verdict-conviction-consequences-00160933https://www.axios.com/2024/05/31/trump-appeal-guilty-verdict-argumentshttps://www.axios.com/2024/06/01/poll-trump-conviction-election-independent-votershttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/01/nyregion/trump-appeal-conviction.htmlhttps://www.cnn.com/2024/05/06/politics/merchan-trump-gag-order-contempt/index.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/02/us/politics/trump-cases-status.htmlhttps://www.axios.com/2024/05/08/trump-trials-update-hush-money-criminal-caseshttps://www.axios.com/2023/06/09/trump-indictment-unsealed-charges This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit letsknowthings.substack.com/subscribe

Just days after former President Donald Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts in a New York Court, he sat down the co-Hosts of FOX & Friends Weekend Will Cain, Pete Hegseth, and Rachel Campos-Duffy. In this 75-minute exclusive interview, former President Trump gives unique insight on everything from how he is feeling about the trial, how the campaign will carry on, and the specifics of what he will do in office if elected to a second term.  Tell Will what you thought about this podcast by emailing WillCainShow@fox.com Subscribe to The Will Cain Show on YouTube here: Watch The Will Cain Show! Follow Will on Twitter: @WillCain Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In this episode we dig deep into Harvey Weinstein’s overturned conviction by the New York Court of Appeals, focusing on legal aspects such as the admissibility of prior bad acts under Rule 404(b) and Molineux application. The conversation delves into the nuances of legal evidence, exploring exceptions and their implications on court trials, and emphasizing […]

Cup of Justice co-hosts Mandy Matney, Liz Farrell and Eric Bland — talk about how to handle one of the worst kinds of disputes … having beef with your neighbors. How do you keep a fight with your neighbor from turning into an episode of “Fear Thy Neighbor”?  Also on the show, what the New York Court of Appeals decision overturning Harvey Weinstein's conviction means for women and how Weinstein's case and Alex Murdaugh's case resemble each other.  Plus, the Federal Trade Commission's decision on noncompete agreements, the hilarious turn Dick Harpootlian's campaign is taking and what's happening with Cory Fleming's appeal?  Oh! And Luna Shark Premium Members get an extended cut of this episode that includes a deeper dive into neighborly pitfalls and some details on what our hosts consider still unchecked on their bucket lists. Let's get into it... Premium Members also get access to searchable case files, written articles with documents, case photos, episode videos and exclusive live experiences with our hosts on lunasharkmedia.com all in one place. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3BdUtOE. And for those just wanting ad-free listening without all the other great content, we now offer ad-free listening on Apple Podcast through a subscription to Luna Shark Plus on the Apple Podcasts App. And we also offer access to exclusive video content through our new YouTube Premiere subscription. Check out our new Luna Shark Merch With a Mission shop at lunasharkmerch.com/ SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP *** NEW: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email info@lunasharkmedia.com and we'll send you fun merch if you find something that needs to be adjusted! *** Find us on social media: Twitter.com/mandymatney - Twitter.com/elizfarrell - Twitter.com/theericbland https://www.facebook.com/cupofjustice/ |  https://www.instagram.com/cojpod/ YouTube *The views expressed on the Cup of Justice bonus episodes do not constitute legal advice. Listeners desiring legal advice for any particular legal matter are urged to consult an attorney of their choosing who can provide legal advice based upon a full understanding of the facts and circumstances of their claim. The views expressed on the Cup of Justice episodes also do not express the views or opinions of Bland Richter, LLP, or its attorneys. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

On this episode of ABL Live, we covered a variety of topics, including the Secret Service agent assigned to Vice President Kamala Harris who got into a fistfight with her fellow agents, the controversy surrounding South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem regarding putting her dog down, the Baltimore high school hate hoax that was perpetuated using artificial intelligence, California Rep Adam Schiff being burglarized in San Franciso before a speech that he was ultimately forced to do without a suit, Los Angeles Mayor Karen bass being the victim of a home invasion, UK deporting thousands of migrants to Rwanda, one of Harvey Weinstein's convictions being overturned by the New York Court of Appeals, and much more! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/anthony-logan/support

When the Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein was convicted of sex crimes four years ago, it was celebrated as a watershed moment for the #MeToo movement. Yesterday, New York's highest court of appeals overturned that conviction.Jodi Kantor, one of the reporters who broke the story of the abuse allegations against Mr. Weinstein in 2017, explains what this ruling means for him and for #MeToo.Guest: Jodi Kantor, an investigative reporter for The New York Times.Background reading: The verdict against Harvey Weinstein was overturned by the New York Court of Appeals.Here's why the conviction was fragile from the start.For more information on today's episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

The New York Court of Appeals has ruled that the disgraced movie producer Harvey Weinstein did not receive a "fair trial."See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ravi kicks off the show by tackling three of the week's biggest breaking news stories: what TikTok's future in the U.S. looks like after President Biden signed legislation that will ban or force a sale of the platform, the rationale behind the New York Court of Appeals' decision to overturn Harvey Weinstein's 2020 sex crimes conviction, and what to know about the pro-Palestine protests that have erupted on college campuses across the country. Ravi then welcomes Keri Rodrigues, co-founder and founding president of the National Parents Union and co-host of The National Parents Union Podcast. Keri and Ravi discuss the impact of Moms for Liberty, what Gen Z's future looks like, and why there's so much debate around whether students should be allowed to have their phones with them during school. Leave us a voicemail with your thoughts on the show! 321-200-0570 Subscribe to our feed on Spotify: http://bitly.ws/zC9K Subscribe to our Substack: https://thelostdebate.substack.com/ Follow The Branch on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thebranchmedia/ Follow The Branch on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebranchmedia Follow The Branch on Twitter: https://twitter.com/thebranchmedia The Branch website: http://thebranchmedia.org/ Lost Debate is also available on the following platforms:  Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-lost-debate/id1591300785 Google: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vTERJNTc1ODE3Mzk3Nw  iHeart: https://www.iheart.com/podcast/269-the-lost-debate-88330217/ Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.co.uk/podcasts/752ca262-2801-466d-9654-2024de72bd1f/the-lost-debate

Check out the STACK for links from each show here: http://JustinBarclay.comGet up to $10,000 in free silver with qualified accounts from my new partners at Goldco!Go to http://JustinLikesGold.com to get a free 2024 Gold Kit or call 855.512.GOLD (4653)#goldopartnerTry Cue Streaming for just $2 / day and help support the good guys https://justinbarclay.com/cueUp to 80% OFF! Use promo code JUSTIN http://MyPillow.com/JustinPatriots are making the Switch! What if we could start voting with our dollars too? http://SwitchWithJustin.comGrab gear in Justin's store http://JustinBarclay.com/storeNo matter what's coming, you can be ready for your family and others. http://PrepareWithJustin.com#ad

SEASON 2 EPISODE 161: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT: Justice Juan Merchan MUST put Trump's ass in jail for violating the gag order - even if it's only one hour at Rikers Island. Trump is determined to break Merchan, break the New York Court, break the Criminal Justice System. He is a cornered and wounded animal and this is life-or-death for him. Think of a cockroach - only with thumbs. So it's him or us that gets broken, and Merchan has to make sure it isn't us. Trump tried to finesse the gag order by quoting somebody else – this worm Watters from Fox – denigrating the jurors and the judge and adding to the pile of stochastic inducements to violence against anyone who thwarts Trump. And by morning one of the jurors – the silhouette of their name and the vague depiction of their home – was quitting out of fear. Because what Trump sought by denigrating the jury WORKS. Because Trump's intimidation WORKS. Because Trump's terrorism WORKS. Prosecutors began Day 3 of the trial yesterday noting he had violated the gag order SEVEN times just since jury selection started and they actually UNDER-SOLD the most egregious of the violations, with Joshua Steinglass saying “the defendant reposted about liberals lying to try to get on the jury, a post by Jesse Watters.” That was NOT a re-post. Trump does dozens of re-posts a day. You hit a re-post icon, a couple of rounded arrows. Maybe you add a comment. Trump KNOWS what a re-post IS. That is NOT what Trump – or someone in control of the social media account bearing his name – DID. What Trump did was to make a NEW post, QUOTING Watters. It redd – and still reads:“They are catching undercover Liberal Activists lying to the Judge in order to get on the Trump Jury - Jesse Watters.” It is in Trump's own electronic hand. It is not a re-post. It is not ‘technically ok within the gag order' because Trump ISN'T lying about the judge and the jurors and endangering them all, he's just QUOTING Jesse Watters lying about the judge and the jurors and endangering them all. RUNNING THE HEADLINES: Derrick Van Orden, a walking PTSD demonstration, calls Matt Gaetz "tubby" and Marjorie Taylor Greene demands anybody who votes for Ukraine aid be conscripting into its military as the House Republican caucus comes apart at the seems. Happily Jared Moskowitz is there with the big yucks and a Rick Perry protege has the best idea yet: four Republicans should resign from the House to own the liberals. FOUR? How about FIVE? FIFTY? Think big be big my friend! And why on earth did Kari Lake devote a disturbingly large part of a campaign speech to repeatedly saying "strap-on?" B-Block (31:18) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: Clay Travis goes from being the knight in shining armor defending the sanctity of women's sports from destruction by trans athletes, to insisting that Caitlin Clark isn't actually popular and nobody CARES about women's sports. The Charlotte GOP still hasn't realized it insulted Trump online and he'll see it eventually. And Twain was wrong: history DOES sometimes repeat itself. In 2005 I watched on in astonishment as Bo Dietl began his new MSNBC show by calling a gay reporter a "fudge-packer" and get fired within two weeks. Now, he's been fired for ANOTHER homophobic rant directed at ANOTHER reporter. Did you know Dietl's specialty in the NYPD was to serve as the mugging decoy? So he was mugged 500 times? Does it show? C-Block (48:00) EVERY DOG HAS ITS DAY: Snowie is fine - now - but her family could use a little help plowing through the bills for the medical wizardry that saved her life. (49:30) FRIDAYS WITH THURBER: Appropriately enough, Thurber takes a dog who was alive when Teddy Roosevelt was president and makes him seem as new as the youngest pup. "The Dog That Bit People."See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

On the April 16 episode - They Aren't Looking For Jurors, They're Looking for Executioners – our panel wonders whether Donald Trump can get a fair trial anywhere in America, dissects the ongoing crisis in the Middle East, and attempts to answer the eternal questions: “What do we do about what's happening to America?' All that and more on #TheWorldAccordingToBenStein.

GREETINGS: The show begins in Moscow in the aftermath of the mass murder by suspects now in custody. Then to Hong Kong to grieve for the death of a great city now closed to liberty.  To the United Nations and another display of bullying. To New York courtrooms with Donald Trump, to Tajikistan, to Hong Kong, to Haiti, to Buckingham Palace. To London to speak of the Federal Reserve, to California to speak of Covid 19 policies. 1918

A New York Court crushes the Democrat's effort to fill the voting roles with noncitizens. We're going to take a look at the latest and what it means to restoring the constitutional integrity of our republic. We're also going to see the massive social media backlash against the latest woke antics coming from Big Tech and what it really means for the growing revolt against all things woke! Highlights: “The ruling struck down a law that was passed back in December of 2021 by the Democrat-dominated New York City Council, which allowed upwards of 800 thousand noncitizens with federal work authorizations to vote in local elections. The appeals court ruled that that right belongs to US citizens and US citizens alone!” “An illegal alien is seeking legal protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act! This brings the whole absurdity of ‘what is a woman' to a whole new level!” “Our American citizenship, which guaranteed us certain unalienable rights, that very citizenship that guarantees those rights is unraveling!” Timestamps:    [00:40] New York State Appeals Court strikes down noncitizen voting [03:12] Examples of how the absurdities of abolishing the whole notion of citizenship know no bounds   [05:51] What should we make of this deliberate dismantling of our citizenship [08:22] Google's latest AI chatbot called Gemini is facing massive mockery online  Resources:  HE'LL BE BACK! Get your limited edition TRUMPINATOR 2024 Bobblehead HERE: https://offers.proudpatriots.com/order-form-TurleyTalks_Podcast Watch Letters to Freedom and enjoy Woke Free Entertainment at https://cavidproductions.ticketspice.com/letters-to-freedom-movie Don't let Big Tech WIN by staying connected to Dr Steve and joining the movement to reclaim our freedoms at: https://join.turleytalks.com/insiders-club=podcast Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode.  If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review. Sick and tired of Big Tech, censorship, and endless propaganda? Join my Insiders Club with a FREE TRIAL today at: https://insidersclub.turleytalks.com Make sure to FOLLOW me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks BOLDLY stand up for TRUTH in Turley Merch! Browse our new designs right now at: https://store.turleytalks.com/ Do you want to be a part of the podcast and be our sponsor? Click here to partner with us and defy liberal culture! https://advertising.turleytalks.com/sponsorship If you want to get lots of articles on conservative trends, sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe/.    *The content presented by our partners may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*  **All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

A group of ten current and formerly incarcerated people in Alabama filed a federal lawsuit on Tuesday to allege inhumane conditions in the state's prison system, and called it a “modern day form of slavery.” The lawsuit claims about 575 private companies and more than 100 public agencies have benefitted from incarcerated labor in Alabama in the past five years, and those benefits have amounted to an estimated $450 million annually.The latest Consumer Price Index showed that prices rose 3.1% in the year through November. By the numbers, economists say that data is supposed to be good news for the economy, but to Americans, it doesn't exactly feel that way. And with just over a month from the first primary election of the 2024 season, we wanted to know what this economic news means for President Biden and Republicans who want to unseat him. To answer that question and more, we're joined by Lindsay Owens, executive director of progressive economic think tank Groundwork Collaborative.And in headlines: The United Nations General Assembly voted to demand an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza, the New York Court of Appeals ordered the state to draw a new congressional map ahead of the 2024 elections, and we discuss whether or not to bring back intermissions during longer movies.Show Notes:What A Day – YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@whatadaypodcastFollow us on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/crookedmedia/For a transcript of this episode, please visit crooked.com/whataday

As the House prepared to vote on opening a formal impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden, Hunter Biden stood in front of the Capitol and refused to testify behind closed doors. Will the President's son face contempt charges, or will he get the public hearing he's demanding? Plus, the New York Court of Appeals orders a new congressional map, putting GOP seats, and the GOP House majority, in jeopardy.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices