Podcasts about Post-truth politics

In this episode of Climate Positive, host Gil Jenkins sits down with Mike Berners-Lee—author, professor, and leading expert on sustainability—to explore the central message of his latest book, "A Climate of Truth." In a world spiraling deeper into climate, ecological, and social crises, Mike argues that the most powerful lever we have isn't new technology—it's honesty. The conversation unpacks why truth in politics, media, and business is essential to breaking the deadlock on climate action and building a livable future.Links:Purchase “A Climate of Truth: Why We Need It and How To Get It” (Published April 2025)Mike Berners-Lee on LinkedInMike Berners-Lee WebsiteEpisode recorded March 26, 2025 Email your feedback to Chad, Gil, Hilary, and Guy at climatepositive@hasi.com.

JD Vance whines because Margaret Brennan wanted him to tell the truth. Ben riffs. Curtis Lawrence talks journalism in the post-truth era, when Trump and Vance believe they should be able to say whatever they want. Even if they're lying. Also, the Lu Palmer legacy. And the Abe Peck legacy. And reflections on the disappearance of great neighborhood high schools, like Harlan. A lifelong Chicagoan, Curtis is an editor, reporter, playwright and journalism professor, who's worked at the Sun-Times, Block Club and other outlets.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The truth is dead. Can politics survive?Armando and Anoosh speak to journalist James Ball and political campaigner Mae Dobbs to explore the impact of misinformation and disinformation, and also meet a former BBC executive, Pat Younge, to discuss how the broadcaster could do more to tackle a culture of lying among politicians.GuestsMae Dobbs is a digital campaign strategist who worked on the presidential campaigns of Barack Obama and Joe Biden, and Anas Sarwar's campaign for the Scottish Labour leadership.James Ball is the author of Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World, and The Other Pandemic, exploring the impact of the Qanon conspiracy theory.Pat Younge is a broadcast executive with over 30 years experience at the BBC, Channel 4 and ITV, among others.--This episode was originally published in the New Statesman podcast feed on Nov 25, 2022.Listen to the New Statesman podcast here: https://podfollow.com/new-statesmanSubscribe to the New Statesman for full access to all our reporting and analysis.Get your first month free: www.newstatesman.com/30daytrial Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Former Editor of DAWN, Abbas Nasir, comes on The Pakistan Experience for a detailed discussion on everything wrong with the Pakistani News Industry and how they tried destroying DAWN. On this deep dive podcast, we discuss Dawn's Editorial Policy, Abbas Nasir's Life Journey, Post-Truth Politics, The Loss of Objectivity, The Commercialization of Media, Clickbait Journalism, Partisan Journalists, Imran Riaz Khan, PTI, the politics of Imran Khan, Covering PPP in the 80s, and the Economic Disparity in Pakistan. Abbas Nasir is Pakistani journalist and former editor of Pakistan's English language daily DAWN. Previously he was the head of the BBC Urdu Service, where he has been appointed as Executive Editor for the Asia and the Pacific Region at BBC World Service. The Pakistan Experience is an independently produced podcast looking to tell stories about Pakistan through conversations. Please consider supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/thepakistanexperience To support the channel: Jazzcash/Easypaisa - 0325 -2982912 Patreon.com/thepakistanexperience And Please stay in touch: https://twitter.com/ThePakistanExp1 https://www.facebook.com/thepakistanexperience https://instagram.com/thepakistanexpeperience The podcast is hosted by comedian and writer, Shehzad Ghias Shaikh. Shehzad is a Fulbright scholar with a Masters in Theatre from Brooklyn College. He is also one of the foremost Stand-up comedians in Pakistan and frequently writes for numerous publications. Instagram.com/shehzadghiasshaikh Facebook.com/Shehzadghias/ Twitter.com/shehzad89 Chapters: 0:00 Introduction 2:00 DAWN, Reporting and Working in Pakistan 11:00 Censorship, Zia-ul-Haq and Interference by the Establishment 17:00 What is wrong with the News Media? 28:00 The Role of Journalism and Journalists 38:00 Social Media Toxicity 46:00 Covering Benazir's Return and PPP's victory in the 80s 51:00 Journalists and Journalism being attacked 58:30 Trying to destroy DAWN to create Chaos 1:06:00 Post-Truth Politics, Elections and Politics 1:19:00 Economic Disparity in Pakistan and Elite Capture 1:34:00 Zia-ul-Haq and Hamid Gul's Legacy 1:36:30 Audience Questions 2:15:00 Conclusion

The United Kingdom, contrary to increasingly popular belief, is not a Hollywood movie. Listen to Coach Mark In Manila's new sub-podcasts on controversial, hot or debatable topics - listen to and use the advanced English vocab and phrasing, challenge your thinking, consider your own perspective, practice using similar sentence structures to express your own opinions / points of view and widen your horizons all in one podcast! Love my podcast? Sponsor an episode here: https://anchor.fm/markinmanilacamblyesl/support or buy me a coffee & help me continue making FREE content for you: https://buy.stripe.com/dR67vtcTvbubefmcN2 Beta test my Coach Mark In Manila 'Accent Ace' Audio Coaching MP3 Program for FREE: https://coachmarkinmanilanlpcoaching.company.site/Coach-Mark-In-Manila-Accent-Ace-Audio-Coaching-Pre-Launch-Interest-p509219010 High IELTS Score - Magoosh Prep: https://track.flexlinkspro.com/g.ashx?foid=156074.11490.826499&trid=1261319.160955&foc=16&fot=9999&fos=5 http://www.eslbusinessenglishexperts.com Ask Me:https://t.me/eslbusinessenglishexperts Expert in Coaching French, German, Arabic, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Russian, Spanish and Brazilian ESL speakers and business professionals from UAE - Dubai, Abu Dhabi - Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, Jordan, Iraq, Tokyo, Moscow, Seoul, Bejing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Madrid, Germany. FREE English & Success Newsletter: https://coachmarkinmanilanlpcoaching.company.site/Coach-Mark-In-Manila-Wealth-Health-ESL-English-&-Career-Success-Creation-Newsletter-PLUS-FREE-Instant-Money-Creation-Links-p495003506 IELTS Online Courses. Take Mock Tests From Home - Get Your Dream IELTS Score Use My 10% Off Link: https://i.preptical.com/login?ref=17760&apply-promo=initial-impact All Copyright and Opinions Expressed In The Article Cited Belongs To Bayo Awesu Director at theafrohairplug.com https://aninjusticemag.com/how-post-truth-politics-destroyed-the-united-kingdom-ec5c52dda35c FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER * Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. 1) This audio has no negative impact on the original works 2) This audio is also for teaching purposes. 3) It is transformative in nature. This material in this podcast is kindly shared by Bayo Awesu and re-published here under the Fair Use Act for Educational Purposes. --- This episode is sponsored by · Anchor: The easiest way to make a podcast. https://anchor.fm/app --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/markinmanilacamblyesl/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/markinmanilacamblyesl/support

Post-truth politics is essentially the idea that politicians repeatedly share ideas/statements that are not true, despite being proven wrong. Learn more as hosted by Victor Varnado, KSN and Rachel Teichman, LMSW.  Produced and hosted by Victor Varnado & Rachel Teichman Full Wikipedia article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-truth_politics  WE APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT ON  PATREON!https://www.patreon.com/wikilistenpodcast  Find us on social media!  https://www.facebook.com/WikiListen  Instagram @WikiListen  Twitter @Wiki_Listen  Get bonus content on Patreon Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Are 'facts' a tool for manipulation? Listen to find out!Looking for a link we mentioned? It's here: https://linktr.ee/philosophyforourtimesFacts and reason are essential if we are to make progress and create a better world. At least that's how it used to be. But now it seems everyone has their own 'facts'. Our political leaders have 'alternative' facts, but so, it is also claimed, do the liberal elite and the mainstream media. Meanwhile, reason has been derided by many as a typically male bludgeon to deny alternative views. Should we welcome the challenge to facts and reason as a progressive move undermining the authority of traditional Western hierarchies? Or is the undermining of facts and reason a singularly dangerous exercise?Professor of Philosophy at the Open University Sophie-Grace Chappell, Professor of Philosophy at Stockholm University Anandi Hattiangadi and Professor of Philosophy at the New College of the Humanities Simon Blackburn dicuss the changing value of truth in contemporary society. Julian Baggini hosts.There are thousands of big ideas to discover at IAI.tv – videos, articles, and courses waiting for you to explore. Find out more: https://iai.tv/podcast-offers?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=shownotes&utm_campaign=a-matter-of-factsSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

#NatureTruthPower: Política ambiental na era da pós-verdade e das plataformas digitais Bram Büscher Professor and Chair of the Sociology of Development and Change group at Wageningen University How should we share the truth about the environmental crisis? At a moment when even the most basic facts about ecology and the climate face contestation and contempt, environmental advocates are at an impasse. Many have turned to social media and digital technologies to shift the tide. But what if their strategy is not only flawed, but dangerous? In this presentation, Bram Büscher traces how environmental action is transformed through the political economy of digital platforms and the algorithmic feeds that have been instrumental to the rise of post-truth politics. Building on a novel account of post-truth as an expression of power under platform capitalism, he shows how environmental actors mediate between structural forms of platform power and the contingency of environmental issues in particular places. Key in understanding this mediation is a reconfiguration of the relations between nature, truth and power in the 21st century. Its upshot is the need for an environmental politics that radically reignites the art of speaking truth to power. Bio Bram Büscher is Professor and Chair of the Sociology of Development and Change group at Wageningen University and is a visiting professor at the Department of Geography, Environmental Management and Energy Studies at the University of Johannesburg. His research and writing revolve around the political economy of environment and development with specific interests in biodiversity, conservation, new media, digitalization and violence. He developed the concept of Nature 2.0, which focuses on the political economy of new media and its implications for participation in nature conservation. He is the author of Transforming the Frontier: Peace Parks and the Politics of Neoliberal Conservation in Southern Africa (2013), co-author, with Robert Fletcher, of The Conservation Revolution: Radical Ideas for Saving Nature Beyond the Anthropocene (2020) and author of The Truth About Nature: Environmentalism in the Era of Post-Truth Politics and Platform Capitalism (2021). This talk was followed by a Q&A session. https://brambuscher.com https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520371453/the-truth-about-nature https://twitter.com/brambuscher

Are we living in a post-truth world? Are we entering, as Barack Obama claims, a crisis of epistemology? Separating truth from the misinformation and disinformation that permeates the internet is no simple task. So what does the spread of falsehoods online mean for democracy and society? Clare Precey and Prof Alan Finlayson discuss all this and more with Dr Sally Broughton Micova and Dr Maria Serban from the University of East Anglia.  

Vinita Srivastava is the senior editor of culture and society for The Conversation Canada, and host of the podcast Don't Call Me Resilient, as well as a research associate with the Global Journalism Innovation Lab. This episode, Vinita and Elizabeth chat about post-truth politics and the idea that how people feel about information is sometimes more influential than the actual facts. They discuss differences between the facts contained in a story versus the perspective of who is telling a story, as well as the question of which stories get told, who gets to decide that, and the idea of truth as a product of power. Additional ResourcesElizabeth notes that “post-truth” was Oxford Dictionary's Word of the Year in 2016. This Washington Post story explains why (and also gives a good overview of the term). Elizabeth mentions that a key feature of a post-truth world is that there are no longer “universally recognized arbiters or referees of fact.” This idea comes from David Roberts' 2013 post on Grist. There is also general consensus that Roberts coined the term “post-truth politics” in this earlier post.For a more academic take, philosopher Lee McIntyre wrote a book called Post-Truth. Here's a 2020 interview with him.Also, this article by Matt Carlson looks at how the concept of post-truth politics affects journalism specifically.Elizabeth brings up the concept of the “relativization of facts.” Learn more about that in this article by Sebastien Schindler.Vinita gives an example of how India's press is being muzzled by its government. Reporters Without Borders generates an annual World Press Freedom Index to track where press freedoms are being violated and how. (India ranked 142 of 180 in 2020; Canada was 14th and the U.S. was 44th).Vinita brings up the old adage that journalism is “the first draft of history.” Here's the backstory of that saying.Elizabeth talks about how emotion is a big part of mis and dis information. Check out this study that showed how anger contributes to the spread of misinformation. This was also something Claire Wardle talked about in her episode earlier this season on information disorder. Listen here.Check out www.polcommtech.ca for annotated transcripts of this episode in English and French.

One of the more celebrated aspects of contemporary media is that it seems so much more participatory. In principle, at least, anyone can for example establish a Twitter or a YouTube account, and share their experiences or views with minimal censorious intervention. Some have explained this apparently more participatory media culture with reference to the capacities of technologies. After all, people can participate more easily when so many media functions are collapsed into an internet-enabled device like a smartphone. And yet, for others, this technological explanation is flawed, underplaying longer-term cultural shifts, which these new technologies might more properly be seen as crystallizing.  In this episode, we begin with work by thinkers such as Henry Jenkins, who have notably opposed technological explanations for a participatory media culture. For Jenkins, ordinary people's participation in media creation is about more than gadgets, devices or platforms. Rather, it is a momentous cultural shift, towards new and potentially democratising forms of 'collective intelligence' that blur the old distinction between media ‘producers' and ‘audiences'. Jenkins' work has been widely discussed. For some, his model of ‘a convergence culture' overemphasises the individual agency of media participants. Sure, they may be technically freer and more enabled than in the past, but when someone creates or shares a meme, for example, they also partially reproduce or conform to cultural norms. We might also ask: does insisting on ‘culture' bring us back to the same unsustainable technology/culture dichotomy we have challenged in earlier episodes?  It is probably difficult to conceive, for example, of the cultural conditions for a so-called post-truth politics without some account of the technical affordances of social media platforms. Thinkers Discussed: Tim Dwyer (Media Convergence); Lev Manovich (Software Takes Command); Ithiel de Sola Pool (Technologies of Freedom: On Free Speech in an Electronic Age); Thomas Friedman (Thank you for Being Late: An Optimist's Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations); Henry Jenkins (Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide); Axel Bruns (Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage); Pierre Lévy (Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace); Bernard Stiegler (The Economy of Contribution); Jose Van Dijck (Users Like You? Theorizing Agency in User-Generated Content); Richard Dawkins (The Selfish Gene); Limor Shifman (Memes in Digital Culture); Noam Gal, Limor Shifman and Zohar Kamph (‘It Gets Better': Internet Memes and the Construction of Collective Identity); danah boyd (Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications); Jason Hannan (Trolling Ourselves to Death? Social Media and Post-Truth Politics); Neil Postman (Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business).

This is a conversation with Bram Büscher around the topics discussed in his book ‘The Truth about Nature: Environmentalism, in the Era of Post-Truth Politics and Platform Capitalism‘ Get early access + more perks at Patreon.com/firethesetimes Blog: https://thefirethisti.me You can follow on Twitter or Instagram @ firethesetimes too. Topics Discussed: Meaning of ‘post-truth' and platform capitalism Environmentalism, political action and social media Mediating knowledge and politics through new media platforms “Doom and gloom” versus “being optimistic” Temporality on social media and the urge of the ‘now' New media platforms are not neutral platforms Alienation, politics and new media Can it be good? The role of new media in the conservation and environmental movements South Africa's Kruger National Park, new media and racial politics The difference between understanding and knowledge, and how new media plays into that Recommended Books: Platform Capitalism by Nick Srnicek Darwin's Hunch by Christa Kuljian If you can't donate anything, you can still support this project by sharing with your friends and leaving a review wherever you get your podcasts!

Dr. Bram Büscher is Professor and Chair of the Sociology of Development and Change group at Wageningen University and holds visiting positions at the University of Johannesburg and Stellenbosch University. His research looks at the political economy of environment and development, including in the politics of conservation, energy and extraction, ecotourism, new media, violence and social theory. He is the author of ‘The Truth About Nature. Environmentalism in the Era of Post-Truth Politics and Platform Capitalism and co-author of ‘The Conservation Revolution: Radical Ideas for Saving Nature Beyond the Anthropocene' . He is also a senior editor of the journal Conservation & Society. In this conversation we talk about the interaction between capitalism and conservation, and how the neoliberal fascination with growth influences our relationship with the natural world. We discuss the historical context of this ideology, the supply and demand approach to natural commodities including the green energy transition, and alternative ways we might relate to nature and the economy.Check out more at www.talkingferal.com where you can support the podcast and listen to more episodes. 

That we live in an era of 'post truth politics' has become a widespread mantra since the shock of the Brexit vote and the 2016 election of Donald Trump. But Matt Sleat (University of Sheffield) believes this is a mistake: politics is no more 'post truth' now than it has ever been. To understand what has been happening, we need to look elsewhere. Join us on this episode of the Counterintuitive Series on the Governance Podcast.

One of the more celebrated aspects of contemporary media is that it seems so much more participatory. In principle, at least, anyone can for example establish a Twitter or a YouTube account, and share their experiences or views with minimal censorious intervention. Some have explained this apparently more participatory media culture with reference to the capacities of technologies. After all, people can participate more easily when so many media functions are collapsed into an internet-enabled device like a smartphone. And yet, for others, this technological explanation is flawed, underplaying longer-term cultural shifts, which these new technologies might more properly be seen as crystallizing.  In this episode, we begin with work by thinkers such as Henry Jenkins, who have notably opposed technological explanations for a participatory media culture. For Jenkins, ordinary people's participation in media creation is about more than gadgets, devices or platforms. Rather, it is a momentous cultural shift, towards new and potentially democratising forms of 'collective intelligence' that blur the old distinction between media ‘producers' and ‘audiences'. Jenkins' work has been widely discussed. For some, his model of ‘a convergence culture' overemphasises the individual agency of media participants. Sure, they may be technically freer and more enabled than in the past, but when someone creates or shares a meme, for example, they also partially reproduce or conform to cultural norms. We might also ask: does insisting on ‘culture' bring us back to the same unsustainable technology/culture dichotomy we have challenged in earlier episodes?  It is probably difficult to conceive, for example, of the cultural conditions for a so-called post-truth politics without some account of the technical affordances of social media platforms. Thinkers Discussed: Tim Dwyer (Media Convergence); Lev Manovich (Software Takes Command); Ithiel de Sola Pool (Technologies of Freedom: On Free Speech in an Electronic Age); Thomas Friedman (Thank you for Being Late: An Optimist's Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations); Henry Jenkins (Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide); Axel Bruns (Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage); Pierre Lévy (Collective Intelligence: Mankind's Emerging World in Cyberspace); Bernard Stiegler (The Economy of Contribution); Jose Van Dijck (Users Like You? Theorizing Agency in User-Generated Content); Richard Dawkins (The Selfish Gene); Limor Shifman (Memes in Digital Culture); Noam Gal, Limor Shifman and Zohar Kamph (‘It Gets Better': Internet Memes and the Construction of Collective Identity); danah boyd (Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications); Jason Hannan (Trolling Ourselves to Death? Social Media and Post-Truth Politics); Neil Postman (Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business).

We've all been there, falling for fake news and posting it only to take it down in a rush 2 hours later because you only read the headline and didn't check your sources. We get it. And telling real news from fake news can be hard. In this episode Emily and Karbon reveal just how hard it is to identify real news from fake news. Let us know how many you get right. Enjoy!MORE QUEER CONTENT Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/queer.collective/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/queer.collective.to/ Website: https://www.queercollectiveto.com/ Email: queer.collective.to@gmail.com Karbon: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/iam_karbon/ Emily: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/emgiosk/

Peter Pomerantsev is a former producer of Russian television, and currently the Visiting Senior Fellow at the Institute of Global Affairs at London School of Economics. He is the author of This is Not Propaganda and Nothing is True and Everything is Possible.

#S1E7｜Conspiracy Theories and Post-Truth Politics  feat.  She Tells True Crime Lily   節目內容 為什麼邀她說犯罪？懸案和陰謀論的共通點 「更值得探討的是背後那些你我都不知道的事」：Lily分享簡訊殺人事件心得 事實未明，如何能作出評價？片面真實夾雜個人揣測，傳播後導致社會不信任 稱讚 session 如果對相信陰謀論的人來說，陰謀論就是真實，真實還重要嗎？ 後真相時代  錯信、帶著偏見刻意製造的謊言 陰謀論反科學、反權威；每個人都有自己這一方的專家、科學家 創作者蒐集資料的取捨：《鄰家好爸爸》紀錄片，Lily 分享「她說犯罪 5.Watts family murder-看似完美家庭的背後竟存在著無情的惡魔？」後續 後真相：我們有可能獲知真相嗎？中歐流浪仔的時間差說 她說犯罪第二季預告：兒童性交易案件 民主黨人都是貓派？！歐巴馬的基因讓他沒有辦法被貓恢復？！ covid-19（武漢肺炎）相關的陰謀論 陰謀論和 說謊/三人成虎的小道消息/政治宣傳/假消息/胡扯 的差別 （陰謀論是集團懷著惡意、為了私利，在掩蓋真相） 虎姑婆陰謀論 光明會陰謀論 陰謀論和反烏托邦世界觀：如果地球是人類後代的監獄，你會和外星人走嗎？ 中歐仔回應英國國家體質：個人自由受限、境外勢力威脅、英國川普，國內動盪 義大利流傳的反難民陰謀論 馬來西亞流傳的反猶太陰謀論、反猶首相馬哈迪 艾薇兒的替身陰謀論 BTS CP世界觀：錯誤信仰（false belief）帶來幸福感？ 聖誕節陰謀論 公布聖誕禮物 活動辦法   1. 追蹤 WTHELL IG: wwwt.hell   2. 在 WTHELL 的 IG 指定貼文留言，或私訊 WTHELL   3. 留言或私訊一個 你 聽過/相信/懷疑 的陰謀論   4. 活動時間：即日起至12/20的留言及私訊皆可算，抽獎日期另行於IG公佈  5. 以留言/私訊時間為準，請於收到表單後盡速選擇您的贈品，以免限量一下就消失惹~   6. 實體明信片以平信寄出   贈品內容   壹、抽獎5名： 隨機圖樣的台灣特色明信片，含她說犯罪 Lily、古亭桂綸鎂及中歐流浪仔的【親筆簽名及留言】（可指定一位或多位成員）。 我們不是網美，就是你的朋友寫給你聖誕卡的感覺。只有５張，數量有限，先搶先贏。   貳、人人有獎： 古亭桂綸鎂設計的明信片樣式會公布在wthell的IG 參加者皆可獲得您指定圖樣的明信片，可以自行到【全台灣 ibon 機台】付費6元列印。   參考資料   Butter, M., & In Knight, P. (2020). Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories.   Khristov, T. (2019). Impossible knowledge: Conspiracy theories, power, and truth.   Harambam, J. (2020). Contemporary conspiracy culture: Truth and knowledge in an era of epistemic instability.   Viren Swami. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: the case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology 郭力特（2019）。該相信誰？：性侵指控與後真相時代。思想，(38)，183-192。   李振華. (2018). 網際網路對後真相政治之影響 : 以網路社群為例 The impact of internet on the past-trust politics : analysis of the virtual community / Chen-Hua Li. 國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所.  何晴（2014）。沒有巫師的巫術：轉基因「陰謀論」在中國。華人應用人類學學刊，3(1)，29-45。doi:10.6290/CJAA.2015.0301.03  Vox，2016/4/21，"Food companies distort nutrition science. Here's how to stop them."，https://www.vox.com/2016/3/3/11148422/food-science-nutrition-research-bias-conflict-interest   Matthew D. Atkinson, Darin DeWitt, and Joseph E. Uscinski. 2017. How conspiracy theories helped power Trump's disruptive politics. Vox, 2 May 2017.  https://www.vox.com/mischiefs-of-faction/2017/5/2/15517266/conspiracy-theories-trump-populism?fbclid=IwAR0i6PiKY5w1Sahjh0ITjJrgw46pkKUIoYHHPBQyx2BgsWq9sPYFRNUjmHI https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2020-05-22-conspiracy-beliefs-reduces-following-government-coronavirus-guidance# 「她說犯罪 5.Watts family murder-看似完美家庭的背後竟存在著無情的惡魔？」 https://player.soundon.fm/p/012ad0ee-6f2a-4700-ad6d-774fe3c6c966/episodes/ce3be395-32c0-45f2-abd0-ce1cb47c14a0

This week, Twitter created a new policy and applied it to an edited video of Joe Biden that a White House official posted, and of course, President Trump retweeted.  The material was not original – it had been tampered with. The video triggered Twitter to create a new policy banning the use of synthetic or manipulated media. In other words, videos that were not original would be in violation.Twitter has faced push-back from activists citing First Amendment rights and the difficulty in identifying what is “fake” versus what isn’t. Their policy reads:“You may not deceptively share synthetic or manipulated media that are likely to cause harm. In addition, we may label Tweets containing synthetic and manipulated media to help people understand their authenticity and to provide additional context.”The criteria Twitter laid out include: 1. Is the content synthetic or manipulated?  2. Is the content shared in a deceptive manner?  3. Is the content likely to impact public safety or cause serious harm? The best form of punishment for creating deceptive messaging, however, is not retweeting in disgust, but silence. According to former Twitter employee Nathan Hubbard, “Hot Twitter tip from someone who worked there: every time you retweet or quote tweet someone you’re angry with, it *helps* them. It disseminates their B.S.! Hell for the ideas you deplore is silence. Have the discipline to give it to them.”We hope you enjoy our discussion of the behavioral science implications of Twitter's new policy. © 2020 Weekly GroovesTim Houlihan: @THoulihanKurt Nelson, PhD: @WhatMotivates LinksTwitter Synthetic and Manipulated Media policy: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/manipulated-mediaPolitico – Biden video first manipulated media label: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/08/manipulated-media-twitter-biden-video-124116?cid=apn“Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing” by Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook: http://www.emc-lab.org/uploads/1/1/3/6/113627673/lewandowskyecker.2012.pspi.pdf“Stopping the spread of fake news with behavioral sciences” by IE University: https://drivinginnovation.ie.edu/stopping-the-spread-of-fake-news-with-behavioral-sciences/“Fighting Fake News and Post-Truth Politics with Behavioral Science: The Pro-Truth Pledge” by Gleb Tsipursky and Fabio Votta: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3138238“Sources of the Continued Influence Effect: When Misinformation in Memory Affects Later Inferences” by Hollyn M. Johnson and Colleen M. Seifert: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232501255_Sources_of_the_Continued_Influence_Effect_When_Misinformation_in_Memory_Affects_Later_InferencesCommon Biases and Heuristics: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XHpBr0VFcaT8wIUpr-9zMIb79dFMgOVFRxIZRybiftI/edit#Behavioral Grooves: https://behavioralgrooves.com/

More at www.philosophytalk.org/shows/post-truth-politics. You've probably heard about the dangerous effects of fake news, and the spread of sensational and targeted falsities. But what about "legitimate" news, one might still ask? Well, do you want the "liberal truth" or the "conservative truth"? Just stick to the facts? What if my "facts" differ from yours? Listen to science? Those scientists are all in someone's pocket, you know. Can we know anything anymore in this age of epistemic nihilism? Have we entered the "post-truth" era? What does this mean for politics, policy, and accountability? The Philosophers don't fake it with Christopher Meyers from CSU Bakersfield, editor of "Journalism Ethics: A Philosophical Approach."

We've seen 'post-truth' politics flourish in the US and Britain - are New Zealand politicians also starting to adopt the tactic of 'alternative facts'?

Our current political climate as being centred around and influenced by emotions and hyperboles as opposed to level-headed factual analysis.

Welcome to La Trobe University’s Clever Conversations. This episode, from our Bold Thinking Series, explores the hottest issues and social media coverage in the 2019 federal election. In an age of fake news and voter cynicism, our expert panel cuts through the political spin to help you, the voter, make your vote count. We hear from La Trobe University’s political scientist Andrea Carson, who reveals what side of politics is most likely to resort to fake news. She’s joined by retiring independent MP, Cathy McGowan, who shares what it takes to create a confident and engaged community. While Chief Political Correspondent for The Saturday Paper, Karen Middleton, describes the national poll as 131 grassroot elections. And media commentator, Nasya Bahfen, from La Trobe university explains why she’s changed her mind about young people’s apathy. This panel conversation is facilitated by journalist Ali Moore.

Brian and Don discuss the important topic of living in a post-truth world.

James and Tom talk about fighting incivility with incivility after an EU minister slaps down Italy’s Matteo Salvini for migrant-bashing. Respect. Far-right activist Lauren Southern tells her half-million followers she helped save Europe from refugees. James unpacks Southern’s claims — and her antics on the Mediterranean — with Karen Mets of Save the Children. Far-right Internet trolls have used a photograph of Ukrainian human rights campaigner Lyudmyla Kozlovska to give the false impression Christine Blasey Ford met George Soros. Kozlovska shares her strange tale, which offers another glimpse into post-truth politics."Beethoven Symphony No. 9 in D minor, Op. 125" by Papalin is licensed under CC BY 3.0"They're coming" by Zapac is licensed under CC BY 3.0 license"Muscovite No. 9" is played by Lara Natale Support the show (https://euscream.com/donate/)

Joey recounts the roots of his political perspective with the help of Brandon as his witness.

Stream podcast episodes on demand from www.bitesz.com (mobile friendly).Polygraph (Theatreworks, Melbourne)In this era of Post-Truth Politics, does lying need to be disguised anymore? Is the notion of truth a reality or only a perception? In POLYGRAPH, truth is on trial just as it is in our current political landscape.POLYGRAPH is a play noir: part metaphysical thriller, part murder mystery and part love story. Based on a series of interwoven true stories, the story unfolds as personal and political perspectives shift.Following the brutal murder of a young woman, police suspicion rests on one of her close friends: Francois, a student of political science. Six years later, during the making of a film about the incident, Francois meets Lucie, an actress, and David, criminologist in charge of polygraph examinations. Together, they uncover a series of unanswered questions with dire implications for everyone involved.Written by the globally-acclaimed director, playwright and actor, Robert Lepage and presented by the physically dynamic, boundary-pushing OpticNerve Performance Group, POLYGRAPH has been metamorphosed to reflect the perception of our changing global reality.For more details, visit:  https://theatreworks-premier.eventfinda.com.au/2018/polygraph/melbourne/st-kilda-east Theatre First RSS feed:   https://audioboom.com/channels/4839371.rssSubscribe, rate and review Theatre First at all good podcatcher apps, including Apple Podcasts (formerly iTunes), Stitcher, Pocket Casts, audioBoom, CastBox.FM, Podbean etc.If you're enjoying Theatre First podcast, please share and tell your friends. Your support would be appreciated...thank you.#theatre #stage #reviews #melbourne #australia Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky talks "Post-truth Politics, Fake news, and Alternative Facts"

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky talks "Post-truth Politics, Fake news, and Alternative Facts"

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky talks "Post-truth Politics, Fake news, and Alternative Facts"

Why are post-truth politics destructive? Check out this "Core Brain Journal" podcast episode for the answer. Original link here: http://www.corebrainjournal.com/2018/02/196-destructive-post-truth-politics-tsipursky/ Please express your thoughts on the podcast through leaving comments, clicking Like if you like it, and if you do like it, Follow us!The podcast was brought to you by Intentional Insights, a nonprofit organization that popularizes science-based strategies to help people make wise decisions and reach their goals, with the aim of building an altruistic and flourishing world (www.intentionalinsights.org).Sign up for our newsletter here: http://intentionalinsights.org/newsletterDonate to support our work here: http://intentionalinsights.org/view/donate

Post-Truth Politics - Systems-2 Thinking & LeadershipDr. Gleb Tsipursky, from Columbus, OH, provides expertise in science-based decision-making through emotional and social intelligence to help leaders and organizations avoid disaster. He researches these and similar post-truth topics as a tenure-track https://news.osu.edu/faculty-experts/n%E2%80%93z/tsipursky-gleb.html (professor) at The Ohio State University's Decision Sciences Collaborative and History Department. Truth and Politics? Listen as we discuss Post-Truth...Does Tsipursky's name sound familiar? I invited him back for this second interview here at CBJ - his first at http://corebrainjournal.com/124 (CBJ/124) discussed essential evolutionary details for the values of System-2 thinking patterns and is well worth a review. This interview is so timely as Dr. Tsipursky weights in on the abundance of political lies and their contributions to the disorder of our society. Strongly recommended. His new book is coming out soon, stay posted here as I will add it as soon as he sends me his Amazon Link. Next: Post-Truth Politics & Emotional IntelligenceIt's important to note that Gleb runs a nonprofit that popularizes science-based strategies for effective decision-making, goal achievement, emotional and social intelligence, meaning and purpose, mental and emotional well-being, and altruism in politics, business, and other life areas, http://intentionalinsights.org/ (Intentional Insights). He publishes articles on these topics in prominent venues and http://glebtsipursky.com/about/ (appears regularly) as a guest expert on TV, radio, podcasts, and videocasts. An Amazon best-selling https://smile.amazon.com/Gleb-Tsipursky/e/B00SF051VK/ref=dp_byline_cont_ebooks_1 (author), he is most well-known for http://geni.us/tsipursky (Find Your Purpose Using Science), and his Pro-Truth Politics: Fighting Post-Truth Politics and Alternative Facts with Behavioral Science is forthcoming soon. He does http://glebtsipursky.com/speaking/ (speaking and training), as well as http://glebtsipursky.com/coaching/ (consulting and coaching), for current and future leaders and teams in mid-size and large corporations and nonprofits. *Photo by https://unsplash.com/photos/EAJ1L4ZjrB4?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText (James Newcombe) on https://unsplash.com/@nstudio?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText (Unsplash) Dr. Tsipursky's Website & Books - Other Book Recommendations & Referenceshttp://glebtsipursky.com/about/ (http://glebtsipursky.com/about/) http://intentionalinsights.org/findyourpurpose (http://intentionalinsights.org/findyourpurpose) http://geni.us/tsipursky2 (The Truth Seekers Handbook) - Tsipursky - Global Amazon Link http://geni.us/tsipursky (Find Your Purpose Using Science) - Tsipursky - Global Amazon Link http://geni.us/kahneman (Thinking Fast And Slow) - Daniel Kahneman - Global Amazon Link - Nobel Prize Economics His First CBJ Interview, Systems-2 Thinking Detailed: http://corebrainjournal.com/124 (http://corebrainjournal.com/124) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases (Wikipedia List of Cognitive Biases) - patterned, impulsive, emotionally based thinking -----------Additional CBJ Experts Weigh In On Mindsethttp://corebrainjournal.com/mindset (http://corebrainjournal.com/mindset) http://corebrainjournal.com/vets (CBJ/Vets) Our Summary Veteran Page - Relevant Tools for Recovery from Trauma & Stress http://corebrainjournal.com/031 (CBJ/031) Combat Stress Recovery - Dr. Bart Billings http://corebrainjournal.com/169 (CBJ/169) Narcissism Survival Guide - Behary ----------Forward This Audio Message Link To a Friendhttp://corebrainjournal.com/196 (http://corebrainjournal.com/196) ---------ThanksThanks, Gleb for joining us here at CBJ to review the...

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, Author and Pro-Truth Politics Advocate Dr. Gleb Tsipursky talks "Post-truth Politics, Fake news, and Alternative Facts"."

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, Author and Pro-Truth Politics Advocate Dr. Gleb Tsipursky talks "Post-truth Politics, Fake news, and Alternative Facts"."

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky goes on the show of a right-wing, conservative host to discuss fake news and post-truth politics. Watch the sparks fly! Original link here: https://www.spreaker.com/user/sackheadsradio/dr-gleb-tsipursky-talks-post-truth-polit_1Please express your thoughts on the podcast through leaving comments, clicking Like if you like it, and if you do like it, Follow us!The podcast was brought to you by Intentional Insights, a nonprofit organization that popularizes science-based strategies to help people make wise decisions and reach their goals, with the aim of building an altruistic and flourishing world (www.intentionalinsights.org).Sign up for our newsletter here: http://intentionalinsights.org/newsletterDonate to support our work here: http://intentionalinsights.org/view/donate

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, Author and Pro-Truth Politics Advocate Dr. Gleb Tsipursky talks "Post-truth Politics, Fake news, and Alternative Facts"."

How do we fight fake news and post-truth politics to protect American democracy? See Dr. Gleb Tsipursky's interview on this episode of "Speak Out with Tim Wise" to learn!Please express your thoughts on the podcast through leaving comments, clicking Like if you like it, and if you do like it, Follow us!The podcast was brought to you by Intentional Insights, a nonprofit organization that popularizes science-based strategies to help people make wise decisions and reach their goals, with the aim of building an altruistic and flourishing world (www.intentionalinsights.org).Sign up for our newsletter here: http://intentionalinsights.org/newsletterDonate to support our work here: http://intentionalinsights.org/view/donate

Tired of living in a “post-truth” political world where lies become “alternative facts” and social media facilitates the spreading of nonsense faster than ever before? Worried about the way we often find ourselves, and others, in walled-off political and cultural silos, only hearing things that reinforce our pre-existing assumptions? Concerned about the way our brains seem almost wired for irrationality? You’re not alone. And luckily, things are not hopeless! On today's episode, I'll speak with Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, a professor at Ohio State University who specializes in the science of irrational decision making, and is committed to fostering fact-based inquiry and rationality in our daily and political lives. As co-founder of the “Pro-Truth Pledge,” Tsipursky is pushing for a renewed commitment to accuracy, fact-checking and honesty in our daily discourse, whether on social media or in politics. And as Tsipursky explains, there are strategies we can employ to foster the search for truth, short-circuit our own tendencies to irrational thinking, and encourage the same in others. This episode also features my commentary on the “post-truth” claims of conservatives and Republicans, to the effect that “they are the party of civil rights and anti-racism,” in which I explain the historical deception behind such a claim.

How can we effectively fight against post-truth politics? Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, lead author of the Pro-Truth Pledge: https://www.protruthpledge.org/ goes on "The Atheist Roundtable" to discuss this question with host Andrew Garber. Original link here: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/atheist-roundtable/2017/05/08/post-truth-politics-with-gleb-tsipursky-pt-1Please express your thoughts on the podcast through leaving comments, clicking Like if you like it, and if you do like it, Follow us!The podcast was brought to you by Intentional Insights, a nonprofit organization that popularizes science-based strategies to help people make wise decisions and reach their goals, with the aim of building an altruistic and flourishing world (www.intentionalinsights.org).Sign up for our newsletter here: http://intentionalinsights.org/newsletterDonate to support our work here: http://intentionalinsights.org/view/donate

How can we effectively advocate for pro-truth politics? Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, lead author of the Pro-Truth Pledge: https://www.protruthpledge.org/ returns to "The Atheist Roundtable" to discuss this question with host Andrew Garber, after discussing how to fight against post-truth politics last time on the show. Original link here: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/atheist-roundtable/2017/05/11/gleb-tsipursky-part-2-pro-truth-politicsPlease express your thoughts on the podcast through leaving comments, clicking Like if you like it, and if you do like it, Follow us!The podcast was brought to you by Intentional Insights, a nonprofit organization that popularizes science-based strategies to help people make wise decisions and reach their goals, with the aim of building an altruistic and flourishing world (www.intentionalinsights.org).Sign up for our newsletter here: http://intentionalinsights.org/newsletterDonate to support our work here: http://intentionalinsights.org/view/donate

The Donald (or Donald Trump to be more precise) is quite the character isn't he? I explore what he's done in the White House since taking the role of US president in January and I speak to Gleb Tsipursky, an Ohio State professor in Behavioural Science, all about his Pro-Truth Pledge. If you would like to sign it or find out more, go to http://protruthpledge.org. Follow the show on social media! http://twitter.com/amytalksp http://facebook.com/amytalkspolitics Funin and Sunin Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

I get to talk to the one and only Gleb Tspursky, who is on a mission to make things better in a post-truth world.  We talk about what post truth is, how it works and what we can do about it. Gleb is amazing.  His passion is unequalled and his knowledge is unsurpassed.  I just loved this interview so much, it hurt to have to chop it into parts. Part 2 will air Tuesday at 11:00pm. http://intentionalinsights.org/ https://www.protruthpledge.org/ gleb@intentionalinsights.org/  

Jesse and Brittany interview Gleb Tsipursky, a professor from The Ohio State University. Gleb runs an organization called Intentional Insights, which “unites reason-oriented people to popularize science-based strategies for wise decision-making and rational thinking in politics and other life areas.” He is passionate about truth in politics and information shared via the Internet. We discuss... The post #BONUS – “Gleb Tsipursky from The Ohio State University on the Pro-Truth Pledge and Post-Truth Politics, How to Counter Misinformation and Create a More Honest Internet.” appeared first on I Doubt It Podcast.

2016 was a good and bad year for efforts to tackle climate change. The good news is that 120 parties have ratified the Paris Convention; the bad news is the emergence of post-truth politics and the associated denial of the evidence that climate change is a threat to our future. Leading environmentalist and Member of UK House of Lords John Krebs discusses the trends and their implications for global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Series: "Bren School of Environmental Science & Management" [Public Affairs] [Science] [Show ID: 31961]

2016 was a good and bad year for efforts to tackle climate change. The good news is that 120 parties have ratified the Paris Convention; the bad news is the emergence of post-truth politics and the associated denial of the evidence that climate change is a threat to our future. Leading environmentalist and Member of UK House of Lords John Krebs discusses the trends and their implications for global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Series: "Bren School of Environmental Science & Management" [Public Affairs] [Science] [Show ID: 31961]

2016 was a good and bad year for efforts to tackle climate change. The good news is that 120 parties have ratified the Paris Convention; the bad news is the emergence of post-truth politics and the associated denial of the evidence that climate change is a threat to our future. Leading environmentalist and Member of UK House of Lords John Krebs discusses the trends and their implications for global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Series: "Bren School of Environmental Science & Management" [Public Affairs] [Science] [Show ID: 31961]

2016 was a good and bad year for efforts to tackle climate change. The good news is that 120 parties have ratified the Paris Convention; the bad news is the emergence of post-truth politics and the associated denial of the evidence that climate change is a threat to our future. Leading environmentalist and Member of UK House of Lords John Krebs discusses the trends and their implications for global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Series: "Bren School of Environmental Science & Management" [Public Affairs] [Science] [Show ID: 31961]

2016 was a good and bad year for efforts to tackle climate change. The good news is that 120 parties have ratified the Paris Convention; the bad news is the emergence of post-truth politics and the associated denial of the evidence that climate change is a threat to our future. Leading environmentalist and Member of UK House of Lords John Krebs discusses the trends and their implications for global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Series: "Bren School of Environmental Science & Management" [Public Affairs] [Science] [Show ID: 31961]

2016 was a good and bad year for efforts to tackle climate change. The good news is that 120 parties have ratified the Paris Convention; the bad news is the emergence of post-truth politics and the associated denial of the evidence that climate change is a threat to our future. Leading environmentalist and Member of UK House of Lords John Krebs discusses the trends and their implications for global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Series: "Bren School of Environmental Science & Management" [Public Affairs] [Science] [Show ID: 31961]

The Truth has become less important today, but as Christians we should uphold the truth.

Donald Trump is emulating some of Vladimir Putin's post-truth tactics when the latter took Russia from a democracy to an authoritarian state. Can that happen here? Check out the latest episode of The Robert Christian Show, whose host Robert Christian discusses this topic with Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, a scholar of truth in politics and author of the forthcoming book "The Alternative to Alternative Facts: Fighting Post-Truth Politics with Behavioral Science".Please express your thoughts on the podcast through leaving comments, clicking Like if you like it, and if you do like it, Follow us! The podcast was brought to you by Intentional Insights, a nonprofit organization that popularizes science-based strategies to help people make wise decisions and reach their goals, with the aim of building an altruistic and flourishing world (www.intentionalinsights.org).Sign up for our newsletter here: http://intentionalinsights.org/newsletterDonate to support our work here: http://intentionalinsights.org/view/donate

Many people don't realize the dangers of "alternative facts." How do we convey to them the dangers associated with lies in politics? On this interview on KGO Radio, the host Ethan Bearman discusses seeks answers to these questions from guest Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, scholar of decision-making and emotions in politics and author of the forthcoming Pro-Truth Politics: Fighting Alternative Facts and Post-Truth Politics with Behavioral Science.Please express your thoughts on the podcast through leaving comments, clicking Like if you like it, and if you do like it, Follow us! The podcast was brought to you by Intentional Insights, a nonprofit organization that popularizes science-based strategies to help people make wise decisions and reach their goals, with the aim of building an altruistic and flourishing world (www.intentionalinsights.org).Sign up for our newsletter here: http://intentionalinsights.org/newsletterDonate to support our work here: http://intentionalinsights.org/view/donate

This marks the beginning of a conversation that we’ll be continuing in the future: the relationship between design and politics. Maurice Cherry and Robyn Kanner join us to talk about whether or not design is inherently political, turning down jobs for ethical reasons, and practical ways we can have a positive impact on the world around us. Links MyTransHealth Consulting Bias Sunk Cost RFP (Request for Proposal) Dear Design Student: How to Fight Fascism Developing Citizen Designers Voter Suppression Law of the Instrument Black Lives Matter Linguistic Relativity Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. "Obamacare") Cold War Propaganda Posters Kony 2012 Milton Glaser's "We are all African" Poster Post-Truth Politics Know Your Enemy

Why should conservatives care about post-truth politics? After all, the current president won using post-truth tactics. To learn about the dangers of post-truth politics for conservatives, check out this radio interview on 700 WLW with host Scott Sloan, a prominent conservative radio host, and Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, the author of the forthcoming Pro-Truth Politics: Fighting Alternative Facts and Post-Truth Politics With Behavioral Science.Please express your thoughts on the podcast through leaving comments, clicking Like if you like it, and if you do like it, Follow us! The podcast was brought to you by Intentional Insights, a nonprofit organization that popularizes science-based strategies to help people make wise decisions and reach their goals, with the aim of building an altruistic and flourishing world (www.intentionalinsights.org).Sign up for our newsletter here: http://intentionalinsights.org/newsletterDonate to support our work here: http://intentionalinsights.org/view/donate

This episode Dave talks to interesting people Dr Joel Harrison (law scholar) and Byron Smith (theological ethicist and environmental activist) about the concept of 'post-truth politics.' Can justice prevail without truth?

God, Family, and Country is the slogan of The Black Bearded Cowboy show. This show is part of Red Nation Rising, which describes itself as "the new dominant force in internet conservative talk radio." In this interview on The Black Bearded Cowboy, Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, scholar of decision-making and emotions in politics and author of the forthcoming Solving Post-Truth Politics: Fighting Alternative Facts With Behavioral Science, discusses how to unite folks across the political spectrum to fight post-truth politics.Please express your thoughts on the podcast through leaving comments, clicking Like if you like it, and if you do like it, Follow us! The podcast was brought to you by Intentional Insights, a nonprofit organization that popularizes science-based strategies to help people make wise decisions and reach their goals, with the aim of building an altruistic and flourishing world (www.intentionalinsights.org).Sign up for our newsletter here: http://intentionalinsights.org/newsletterDonate to support our work here: http://intentionalinsights.org/view/donate

North by North Westminster is back for 2017, and January has been showering us with gold (in a manner of speaking). We've got ambassadors, dossiers, Presidents and lies. It's fake news these days, but this is real comedy. Written & Presented by Jack Blackburn With Ben Mepsted, Sarah Anson, Tristan Rogers & Joe Mills Script-Editor: Tristan Rogers

The word of the year in 2016 was post-truth. But what does that mean, was there ever such a thing as truth politics and how do we fight the pervasiveness of fake news without tipping over into censorship? Jemima Lovatt, the founder of the London Legal Forum and host of a recent panel discussion on how to ensure honest elections in post-truth politics came on the podcast to share some of her biggest takeaways from the event. #Podcast #Brexit #BrexitPodcast #Referendum #EUReferendum #VoteLeave #VoteRemain #VoteIn #EU #UK #TimHeming #JenniferHahn #News #Politics #JemimaLovatt #LondonLegalForum #RebelLaw #law #legislative #judiciary #executive #government #parliament #post-truth #censorship #theresamay

Talking to my Dad about recent news, and we talked about Brexit, post-truth politics, the US election, the right-wing press in the UK, the political landscape in the EU, the rules of international cricket and the music from Tetris. http://wp.me/p4IuUx-75O 

  Post-truth politics: Where we surround ourselves with what we want to believe and make it our reality.

Lionel Shriver and Professor Sarah Churchwell in conversation about one of the strangest U.S. elections in living memory, whether the Trump phenomenon has any historical precedent, and what the future holds. Recorded at Mark's Club, Mayfair, 12th October 2016.

This episode Tom is flying solo as Hyman deals with the realities of Brexit-limbo. Tom tackles the topics of "conspiratorial ideation" and "post-truth politics", two phrases you're going to be seeing a lot of in the upcoming months, and their impact on public discourse and the fate of democracy itself. All music used under creative commons license: "Hungaria" by Latché Swing (http://www.latcheswing.fr/) "Sandu" by Hugo 'Droopy' Contini (http://www.myspace.com/rawbounce) "Books (Instrumental)" by Minden (http://www.needledrop.co/wp/artists/minden/)

Mark Thompson and Emma Burnell discuss recent events in politics in the all new revived House of Comments podcast. This week they are joined by Lib Dem activist Jennie Rigg to discuss "Post truth politics" in the wake of Iain Duncan-Smith having been caught out misusing statistics (again), Michael Gove's comments on the Lib Dem internal struggles, fish quotas and the ongoing effects of the bedroom tax.