Podcasts about berners lee

In this episode of Climate Positive, host Gil Jenkins sits down with Mike Berners-Lee—author, professor, and leading expert on sustainability—to explore the central message of his latest book, "A Climate of Truth." In a world spiraling deeper into climate, ecological, and social crises, Mike argues that the most powerful lever we have isn't new technology—it's honesty. The conversation unpacks why truth in politics, media, and business is essential to breaking the deadlock on climate action and building a livable future.Links:Purchase “A Climate of Truth: Why We Need It and How To Get It” (Published April 2025)Mike Berners-Lee on LinkedInMike Berners-Lee WebsiteEpisode recorded March 26, 2025 Email your feedback to Chad, Gil, Hilary, and Guy at climatepositive@hasi.com.

In this powerful fireside chat, climate expert Mike Berners-Lee joins Chris Caldwell, CEO of United Renewables and host of the Conversations on Climate podcast, to tackle the uncomfortable truth behind why we're still failing to address climate change, despite decades of scientific knowledge. Speaking at the London Business School Alumni Sustainability Club, Mike Berners-Lee reveals how the climate crisis is, at its core, a crisis of truth, and why that matters for every one of us. We answer the question Can We Really Fix Climate Change Together?   Key insights include: • Why knowledge alone isn't enough to drive climate action • How systematic deception blocks meaningful progress • The crucial role of truth in leadership and decision-making • Why businesses must evolve to serve both people and planet • Practical ways to challenge misinformation and drive real change   As author of the 2024 book A Climate of Truth: Power, Privilege and the Path to Climate Justice, and professor at Lancaster University, Berners-Lee combines stark realism with grounded hope. His latest work focuses on the urgent need for truth, transparency, and justice in our collective climate response.   Whether you're a student, business leader, or concerned citizen, this conversation offers critical insight into how we can work together to create honest, informed, and lasting climate solutions.   REFERENCES   Small World Consulting: https://www.sw-consulting.co.uk/mike-berners-lee Lancaster University: https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/lec/about-us/people/mike-berners-lee   BOOKS: A Climate of Truth: Why We Need It and How to Get It: https://bit.ly/4k7urRa There Is No Planet B: A Handbook for the Make or Break Years: https://bit.ly/42VcXlq How Bad are Bananas?: The Carbon Footprint of Everything: https://bit.ly/4j42ZmB The Burning Question: We Can't Burn Half the World's Oil, Coal and Gas. So How Do We Quit?: https://bit.ly/42ThtRp   ***** This episode of Conversations on Climate is a podcast brought to you by UNITED RENEWABLES in association with London Business School. We'd love to have you join us! Don't forget to share with your colleagues, friends, and family. We would love to hear your opinions and feedback, so please leave your comments on our platforms.   DON'T FORGET TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL 

An episode all about the subtle art of talking bollocks. We live in a golden age of bullshit. It can seem that our politics is riddled with it. Corporate climate communications are drenched in it. And despite the looming eco-crisis, perhaps our own brains are too. In this episode, Dave meets author Mike Berners-Lee to chew over his new book, A Climate of Truth. It's a brilliant balance of home truths about the state of things, with unputdownable optimism that humanity can - and must - do better. What distinguishes glorious bullshit from mere lying? How do we get more honesty about the state of the world into our politics and our own lives? And in the age of Trump and Boris, how realistic is it to hope that any of this will change in time to face up to, and head off climate disaster? All this, and Macavity the cat too. If you liked this episode, check out episode 19 on Honesty, with Rupert Read. Let me know your thoughts on the show - hello@yourbrainonclimate.com. Please rate, review and subscribe, and share the show on socials. Please consider chucking this humble indie podcaster a few quid at www.patreon.com/yourbrainonclimate. Owl noises = references: 14:34 - Harry Frankfurt's 1986 'On Bullshit', later turned into a book. 18:55 - Quassam Cassim's brilliant term, 'epistemic insouciance'. 21:22 - the Political Lies website: Boris and much more. 25:13 - in case you don't still remember, here's what naughty Volkswagen did. 25:39 - the always superb You Are Not So Smart podcast, here talking about that study that showed you prefer sharing fake news that makes you look good. 34:10 - Julian Kirchherr's paper on bullshit in sustainability literature. The show is hosted and produced by me, Dave Powell, who you can find @powellds on Bluesky and X/Twitter, although I don't use the latter any more. YBOC theme music and iterations thereof, by me.  Show logo by Arthur Stovell at www.designbymondial.com. 

Mike Berners-Lee is a consultant and author of the new book A Climate of Truth. In this episode we discuss the polycrisis and how raising standards of honesty is essential to respond to the challenges we are facing.Learn more about and purchase the book: A Climate of Truth- - - https://greenurbanist.org/ Consulting: Book a Discovery Call to discuss your project Subscribe to the Green Urbanist Newsletter The Green Urbanist podcast is hosted by Ross O'Ceallaigh.

The climate crisis is spiraling, Trump's back in the White House, and the headlines keep getting worse. It's easy to feel powerless. But what if the first step toward saving the planet is something you learned in primary school? In this episode of The Bunker, Zing Tsjeng sits down with Mike Berners-Lee, author of A Climate of Truth, who argues that radical honesty about what's happening, who's responsible, and what must change might just be our most powerful tool against the looming polycrisis.  We are sponsored by Indeed. Go to https://Indeed.com/bunker for £100 sponsored credit. Buy A Climate of Truth: Why We Need It and How To Get It through our affiliate bookshop and you'll help fund The Bunker by earning us a small commission for every sale. https://bookshop.org/'s fees help support independent bookshops too. www.patreon.com/bunkercast  Written and presented by Andrew Harrison. Producer: Liam Tait. Audio editor: Tom Taylor. Managing editor: Jacob Jarvis. Music by Kenny Dickinson. Group Editor: Andrew Harrison. THE BUNKER is a Podmasters Production. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

In this Climategenn episode I am speaking with Mike Berners-Lee about his new book ‘Climate Of Truth'. Mike gives us his spiralling definition of the poly crisis that we are faced with today.Order here: https://amzn.to/3G59RlPHe cites examples of deceit in our society that have not just created the dire problems we face today but are actually doubling down as we accelerate into the crosshairs of nightmare consequences.Despite the seriousness of the threats, ‘Climate of Truth' is a pragmatic book helping to find ways to tap into personal agency, switching off malignant media, while calling out the lies and delusion that have gripped western society.In the next episode I will be speaking with esteemed legal expert, Professor Dan Bodansky from Arizona State University, about the 2nd Edition of ‘The Art And Craft of International Environmental Law'. We'll be discussing the complexities of how International Environmental Law has emerged, how it is effective and whether it is even going to survive what some are calling the ‘post-rules' era – which sounds to me like an age of total chaos.Subscribers help keep the interview series going and we have many more episodes in the pipeline in this period of environmental-socio-political flux. Thank you to all who subscribe - please do send feedback or add comments. I do try to read and respond. You can also order my cook COPOUT that is available worldwide from many online retailers.

Sustainability expert and professor Mike Berners-Lee argues that dishonesty in politics, business, and the media is one of the biggest barriers to tackling global crises like climate change, social inequality, and environmental destruction. In this episode of Ways to Change the World, he talks to Krishnan Guru-Murthy about the need for a cultural shift where honesty is valued, and where deceit in public life carries real consequences. Without this, he warns, we risk making the world's biggest challenges even harder to solve. Produced by Silvia Maresca, Ka Yee Mak, Tom Gordon-Martin.

Mike Berners-Lee is Professor in Practice at Lancaster University and director and principal consultant of Small World Consulting. His books include How Bad are Bananas?, The Burning Question and There Is No Planet B and he is a contributing author to The Climate Book created by Greta Thunberg. His latest book is A Climate of Truth.In Sentientist Conversations we talk about the most important questions: “what's real?”, “who matters?” and "how can we make a better world?"Sentientism answers those questions with "evidence, reason & compassion for all sentient beings." The video of our conversation is ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here on YouTube⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.00:00 Clips01:02 Welcome03:03 Mike's Intro- "A professor of what... I'm not really quite sure... a professor of the future?"- Academic: Climate change, carbon flows, sustainable food systems, AI, technology- Small World Consulting "help organisations to respond to the environmental and wilder polycrisis that we are accelerating towards"- "Trying to create a better world for humans and other beings to live in"- From climate change to "the climate emergency... crisis... breakdown"- From trying to deal with climate change in isolation to..."all these things are just so joined up... climate... nature... food... population... social questions... politics... economics..."- "You can't deal with that separate from questions about what matters, who matters, does truth matter... you have to go deeper and deeper..."- Philosophy "I'm very pragmatic about it."- "It's important to work at all of these levels at once"- "I lose patience [with fellow academics] when they lose contact with everyday reality"- "How much of how we basically think and how we basically run society is fit for purpose... and how much we need to go back to the drawing board?"- The Anthropocene "the era in which suddenly it's humans that are so powerful"- "How we do economics... politics... how we think... it all dates back to a time when we could just expand our activities... the world was a robust playground... we could get away with anything we liked... Now we're right up against the stops... a hard physical boundary"- "We've given ourselves enormous physical power and wejust haven't given ourselves, yet, the wisdom with which to wield that power"- "We're like babies running around with machine guns"09:52 What's Real?- Mathematician parents "they also went to church"- "They asked a lot of questions [about religion]... they were not literalists"...21:53 What Matters?34:00 Who Matters?51:05 A Better World?01:24:30 Follow Mike: - "A Climate of Truth" A very simple guide to what's going on in the world…"- Mike on BlueSky @mikebernerslee “I'm on BlueSky and I'm not on X… Please do avoid any social media in which you do not trust the owner… please switch right now”.- Mike on Sentientism.infoAnd more... full show notes at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sentientism.info⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.Sentientism is “Evidence, reason & compassion for all sentient beings.” More at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Sentientism.info⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Join our⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠"I'm a Sentientist" wall⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ via⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ this simple form⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠.Everyone, Sentientist or not, is welcome in our ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠groups⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. The biggest so far is ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠here on FaceBook⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠. Come join us there!

I hope that the man who invented the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee, with all of his brilliance, appreciates Donald J. Trump. Berners-Lee, who shares my birthday of June 8,

INIZIA LA SECONDA STAGIONE di "Memorie Binarie", il podcast che racconta la storia e le storie della tecnologia, dell'informatica e della sicurezza.Ascolta la nostra puntata dedicata ai trucchi di Microsoft, a Sir Berners-Lee e a tanto altro.E il trucco binario di Alberico per questo episodio è "LIBRE OFFICE"Vuoi conoscere storie particolari o ti chiedi come e perché abbiamo certe tecnologie? Scrivici su staff@memoriebinarie.it ti risponderemo nel podcast! Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Eine faire Bezahlung unabhängig vom Geschlecht einer Person sollte in der heutigen Zeit eigentlich selbstveständlich sein, doch leider ist der sogenannte Gender Pay Gap in unserer Gesellschaft noch immer eklatant. Eine solche Ungleichbehandlung ist kein neues Problem, sondern hat seinen Ursprung in den Rollenbildern der Vergangenheit.   In der 27. Folge von Informatik für die moderne Hausfrau geht es um die britische Informatikpionierin Mary Lee Berners-Lee, die schon in den 1950er Jahren ein gleiches Gehalt für alle Programmierer*innen in ihrem Team heraushandelte und auch sonst ein eher ungewöhnliches Leben führte. Das Transkript eines Interviews mit Mary Lee Berners-Lee aus dem Jahr 2001 ist (frei zugänglich) hier zu finden: https://ethw.org/Oral-History:Mary_Lee_Berners-Lee Alle Informationen zum Podcast findet ihr auf der zugehörigen Webseite https://www.informatik-hausfrau.de. Zur Kontaktaufnahme schreibt mir gerne eine Mail an mail@informatik-hausfrau.de oder meldet euch über Social Media. Auf Twitter, Instagram und Bluesky ist der Podcast unter dem Handle @informatikfrau (bzw. @informatikfrau.bsky.social) zu finden.  Wenn euch dieser Podcast gefällt, abonniert ihn doch bitte und hinterlasst eine positive Bewertung oder eine kurze Rezension, um ihm zu mehr Sichtbarkeit zu verhelfen. Rezensionen könnt ihr zum Beispiel bei Apple Podcasts schreiben oder auf panoptikum.social.  Falls ihr die Produktion des Podcasts finanziell unterstützen möchtet, habt ihr die Möglichkeit, dies über die Plattform Steady zu tun. Weitere Informationen dazu sind hier zu finden: https://steadyhq.com/de/informatikfrau Falls ihr mir auf anderem Wege etwas 'in den Hut werfen' möchtet, ist dies (auch ohne Registrierung) über die Plattform Ko-fi möglich: https://ko-fi.com/leaschoenberger Dieser Podcast wird gefördert durch das Kulturbüro der Stadt Dortmund.

Plongeons ensemble dans les coulisses de l'invention du World Wide Web, un événement qui a profondément marqué l'histoire de l'informatique et des technologies de l'information.

L'auteur et chercheur anglais publie pour la première fois pour le public français sa bible de l'empreinte carbone au quotidien, adapté à la France. Avec un titre provoquant et intriguant : "Peut-on encore manger des bananes ?", aux éditions de l'Arbre qui Marche. De l'e-mail à l'achat d'une maison en passant par la baguette ou encore faire la vaisselle, tout est passé au crible, avec parfois quelques surprises ! Ne pas perdre son temps avec des gestes insignifiants, et se concentrer sur des points essentiels, voilà ce que propose Mike Berners-Lee avec son livre. Objectif : donner une « intuition carbone » aux lecteurs. Tout le monde connaît les prix des objets de notre quotidien, alors tout le monde devrait aussi connaître leur empreinte carbone. Cela passe aussi par le fait de tordre le coup aux idées reçues : les bananes viennent de loin, oui, mais elles sont cultivées au soleil avec peu d'engrais et voyagent en cargo, finalement leur empreinte carbone est faible ! Vous préférez faire la vaisselle en laissant couler l'eau plutôt que d'utiliser le lave-vaisselle ? Mauvaise idée, le lave-vaisselle est plus économe en carbone. Dans un monde en plein réchauffement climatique, l'idée n'est pas de donner des leçons mais de faire sa part et de livrer les bonnes batailles. En vous faisant découvrir l'impact carbone de votre quotidien, Mike Berners-Lee vous propose ceci : un effort minimum pour un impact maximum. Replay : https://www.tf1info.fr/replay-lci/video-impact-positif-du-samedi-16-mars-2024-mike-berners-lee-peut-on-encore-manger-des-bananes-2289742.html

L'émission 28 Minutes du 20/03/2024 Mike Berners-Lee : "mangez des bananes, c'est bon pour la planète !" « La situation est la suivante : nous devons réduire considérablement nos émissions de carbone. » Professeur à l'Université de Lancaster, Mike Berners-Lee est souvent présenté comme un pionnier de la quantification carbone. Après avoir élaboré un tour d'horizon des plus grands défis de notre siècle et prodigué des conseils pour y faire face dans son essai "There Is No Planet B", le chercheur réactualise le sujet des émissions carbone dans "Peut-on encore manger des bananes ? - L'empreinte carbone de tout" aux éditions L'arbre qui marche. Sur ce sujet, notre intuition peut être trompeuse : si consommer des bananes paraît inapproprié pour réduire notre empreinte carbone, elles sont en réalité bien plus vertueuses que la viande ou le lait. Un manuel pédagogique pour aider à prendre les bonnes décisions dans la lutte contre le changement climatique.  Faut-il "rationner internet" pour lutter contre notre addiction aux écrans ? Lundi dernier, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem publiait une tribune dans “Le Figaro” intitulée “Libérons-nous des écrans, rationnons internet !”. L'ancienne ministre de l'Éducation nationale y fait une proposition choc : un rationnement d'internet, en limitant la connexion individuelle à trois giga par semaine. Cette contrainte externe, qui serait imposée par l'État, devrait compenser notre incapacité à "nous poser des limites" et inciterait "à la sagesse" dans notre consommation d'écran. Si cette idée est présentée comme "progressiste" car bénéfique pour la santé physique et mentale des utilisateurs, elle n'a pourtant pas manqué de faire réagir, celle-ci étant perçue comme une dérive étatique similaire à la Chine. Pourtant, la question se pose alors que depuis janvier, une commission d'experts étudie la question de la régulation face à l'addiction des écrans chez les jeunes. Internet et les réseaux sociaux sont-ils un fléau ou une richesse ? La contrainte doit-elle prendre le pas sur l'éducation ? Nos invités en débattent.   Enfin, retrouvez également les chroniques de Xavier Mauduit et Marie Bonnisseau !  28 Minutes est le magazine d'actualité d'ARTE, présenté par Elisabeth Quin du lundi au jeudi à 20h05. Renaud Dély est aux commandes de l'émission le vendredi et le samedi. Ce podcast est coproduit par KM et ARTE Radio.  Enregistrement : 20 mars 2024 - Présentation : Elisabeth Quin - Production : KM, ARTE Radio

This episode explores the multifaceted nature of creativity, highlighting how its essence has been overshadowed by commercial and institutional agendas. Creativity, once a vehicle for artistic expression and societal transformation, now often serves to further corporate and various group interests, losing its authentic impact.Tim Berners-Lee's creation of the internet exemplifies true creativity that changed the world without commercialization. Unlike Silicon Valley's trend of rebranding old ideas as groundbreaking innovations, Berners-Lee's approach to the internet was a revolutionary act of creation for public good, not personal gain.However, the episode also delves into the darker side of tech advancements. Companies like Facebook are critiqued for their role in undermining social connections and democratic processes. The argument is made that many of the brightest minds are now employed not to create radical new ideas, but to enhance corporate profits, often at the cost of societal well-being.The conversation shifts to discuss marginalized communities and their unique perspectives. For instance, the host shares personal experiences with the deaf community, revealing a world of insights and expressions unknown to many. This highlights the richness that lies in exploring and embracing diverse experiences.The episode concludes with a critical view of austerity measures and their impact on creativity. As budgets shrink, professionals in sectors like education and healthcare are forced to 'do more with less,' which is seen as a deceptive narrative that perpetuates inequality. It's a call to recognize our collective strength and to resist the forces that seek to divide and diminish our creative potential.Reimagine is a podcast with host Babak Behrad, brought to you by Society Lab.

The usual format of The 17 podcast is to focus each episode on one of the UN's 17 SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) but the next two episodes are different. They will feature Sustainability Pioneers - the experts, thought-leaders and innovators who have shaped sustainability up to the present day, and will address the challenges of the future.In this Pioneers episode we talk to:Mike Berner-Lee, an expert on carbon footprints and net zero and a globally-respected expert on the changes needed at a global systemic level to protect the future of the planet.Jo Fairley, one of the leaders of the Fairtrade movement, who, as co-Founder of Green & Black's chocolate, changed the game in terms of business being done in a sustainable way.John Elkington, often referred to as a founding father of sustainability, he pretty much coined the term and has written many influential books grappling with a path through the competing pressures of economic thriving and environmental responsibility.Asking the questions are Kate Hutchinson and Lella Halloum. These interviews were recorded at Yorkshire Sustainability Week 2023. The 17 is a podcast themed around the UN's 17 Sustainable Development Goals. A new episode is published on the 17th of each month, and explores a different one of the 17 goals in detail. The UN SDGs represent an all-encompassing plan to protect the future of our planet, it is our responsibility to know what they are, understand them, and make sure that we are doing our bit to help.We are a new podcast and keen to grow. Please subscribe on your usual podcast platform, leave reviews and spread the word about the podcast. Thank you.The 17 is produced by Bwlb - www.bwlb.co.uk

Aquí tienes algunas curiosidades sobre la web 3.0: El término "web 3.0" fue acuñado por Tim Berners-Lee, el inventor de la World Wide Web, en 2006. Berners-Lee definió la web 3.0 como una tercera generación de aplicaciones web que se caracterizan por ser más semántica, inteligente y accesible. La web 3.0 aún está en desarrollo, pero ya hay algunas aplicaciones que están comenzando a utilizar sus características. Estas aplicaciones incluyen las criptomonedas, las NFT y los metaversos. La web 3.0 tiene el potencial de revolucionar la forma en que interactuamos con Internet. Podría hacer que Internet sea más personal, seguro y transparente. Aquí tienes algunas curiosidades más específicas: La primera criptomoneda, Bitcoin, fue lanzada en 2009. Bitcoin es una moneda digital descentralizada que utiliza la tecnología blockchain para registrar sus transacciones. El primer NFT, CryptoKitties, fue lanzado en 2017. CryptoKitties son gatos digitales coleccionables que se almacenan en la cadena de bloques Ethereum. El primer metaverso, Second Life, fue lanzado en 2003. Second Life es un mundo virtual en línea donde los usuarios pueden crear sus propios avatares y explorar un mundo virtual compartido. La web 3.0 sigue evolucionando y creciendo. Es probable que continuemos viendo nuevas e innovadoras aplicaciones web que cambien la forma en que interactuamos con Internet. Aquí tienes algunas curiosidades adicionales: La web 3.0 se basa en la tecnología de la cadena de bloques. La cadena de bloques es una tecnología que permite registrar datos de forma segura y transparente. La web 3.0 es descentralizada. Esto significa que no hay una sola entidad que controle la web. La web 3.0 es interoperable. Esto significa que las aplicaciones web 3.0 pueden comunicarse entre sí. La web 3.0 tiene el potencial de hacer que Internet sea más democrático y accesible. También tiene el potencial de crear nuevas oportunidades económicas y sociales. Libros recomendados: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://infogonzalez.com/libros⁠⁠ --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/infogonzalez/message

Questa settimana nel nostro podcast "W La Dislessia”, abbiamo affrontato un argomento fondamentale: il mondo del web.Abbiamo iniziato distinguendo tra World Wide Web e Internet, spiegando che il primo è un servizio che si basa sul secondo, ma non sono la stessa cosaPoi, abbiamo fatto un tuffo nella storia, raccontandovi come il World Wide Web sia nato dall'idea di Tim Berners-Lee nel 1989. Berners-Lee voleva creare un sistema informativo universale interconnesso, in cui chiunque potesse condividere e trovare informazioni facilmente. Il prototipo iniziale includeva la prima pagina di informazioni digitali al mondo, il primo browser e il primo server web. Da quel momento, il numero di pagine web è esploso, superando persino il trilione. Il Web è diventato la principale fonte di informazioni per molte persone e ha trasformato radicalmente il nostro modo di apprendere e comunicare. Infine, abbiamo discusso delle raccomandazioni per genitori e ragazzi riguardo all'uso responsabile dei social media e del Web. Abbiamo sottolineato che il Web non è solo una fonte di distrazione, ma anche un luogo in cui si può apprendere a una velocità sorprendente, specialmente ora.In conclusione, il Web è una risorsa incredibile, ma bisogna usarla con consapevolezza.

Sir Timothy John Berners-Lee (born 8 June 1955), also known as TimBL, is an English computer scientist best known as the inventor of the World Wide Web, the HTML markup language, the URL system, and HTTP. He is a professorial research fellow at the University of Oxford and a professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Berners-Lee proposed an information management system on 12 March 1989 and implemented the first successful communication between a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) client and server via the Internet in mid-November. He devised and implemented the first Web browser and Web server, and helped foster the Web's subsequent explosive development. He is the founder and director of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), which oversees the continued development of the Web. He co-founded (with Rosemary Leith) the World Wide Web Foundation. In April 2009, he was elected as Foreign Associate of the National Academy of Sciences. Berners-Lee is a senior researcher and holder of the 3Com founder's chair at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL). He is a director of the Web Science Research Initiative (WSRI) and a member of the advisory board of the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence. In 2011, he was named as a member of the board of trustees of the Ford Foundation. He is a founder and president of the Open Data Institute and is currently an advisor at social network MeWe. In 2004, Berners-Lee was knighted by Queen Elizabeth II for his pioneering work. He received the 2016 Turing Award "for inventing the World Wide Web, the first web browser, and the fundamental protocols and algorithms allowing the Web to scale". He was named in Time magazine's list of the 100 Most Important People of the 20th century and has received a number of other accolades for his invention. Original video ⁠here⁠⁠ Full Wikipedia entry ⁠here⁠ Tim Berners-Lee's books ⁠here --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/theunadulteratedintellect/support

Tim Berners-Lee uploaded a photo of parody doo-wop group Les Horrible Cernettes on 18th July 1992 - the first image to be shared online. The photograph was taken at the CERN Hardronic Festival by Silvano de Gennaro, an analyst in the Computer Science department. The girlband were striking a pose for their forthcoming CD cover, little realising their comedy love songs about colliders, quarks, liquid nitrogen, microwaves, and antimatter would soon go down in internet history. In this episode, Arion, Rebecca and Olly consider the spooky social media resonance of this earliest online picture; explain how Berners-Lee used ‘sex' to ‘sell' the world wide web; and check out the Cernette's biggest banger, ‘Collider'... Further Reading: • ‘The true story behind the 'first picture on the internet' myth' (Metro, 2022): https://metro.co.uk/2022/07/18/the-true-story-behind-the-first-picture-on-the-internet-myth-16945088/?ito=article.mweb.share.top.link&fbclid=IwAR1BGGcwPK2HYL1f3-KBtCfQBILTtCtKOlq4aYIcZRfBzUJ8ssN0RwjPwi8 • ‘Was this the 1st photo on the web? 25 years on, Quebec woman tells how she came to be in it' (CBC News, 2017): https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/first-internet-photo-features-sherbrooke-woman-1.4206913 • ‘LHC - Collider' (Cernettes, 2000): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1L2xODZSI4 #Internet #Music #90s #Switzerland Love the show? Join 

It was such an honour to chat with Professor Mike Berners-Lee, of the Institute for Social Futures at Lancaster University and director and principal consultant of Small World Consulting. Mike is the author of environmental books including The Burning Question, How Bad are Bananas?, There Is No Planet B, a contributor to Greta Thunberg's The Climate Book, as well as numerous speaking, radio and TV appearances.  We covered a lot of ground, with brilliant insights all the way. Topics discussed include carbon footprints, carbon-offsetting, Greenwashing, the rebound effect - and more - with Mike always delving into the reasons why things are so and what solutions are required, as well as how having a change of mindset and a real look at our values are much more important than any of the global decarbonising efforts underway. This is an entertaining chat, honestly looking at where we are, while offering valuable insights for lasting and meaningful change. Links: https://www.sw-consulting.co.uk https://howbadarebananas.com There Is No Planet B (theresnoplanetb.net) www.burningquestion.info https://theclimatebook.org https://twitter.com/MikeBernersLee

This week my guest is professor and fellow of the Institute for Social Futures at Lancaster University, Mike Berners-Lee.  With a brother who is often referred to as the inventor of the internet, Mike Berners-Lee carries on his family's legacy of scientific brilliance through the domain of climate change. Specifically, Mike is considered one of the leading experts studying carbon footprints, and has written extensively on the subject in books such as The Carbon Footprint of Everything and There Is No Planet B. In this episode we discuss Mike's work more broadly, focusing on some of the big questions and criticisms facing climate science. For example, what are the common misconceptions around climate change? Is it man-made? Can we fix it? And what role will technology play? Find out more about Mike and his work at Small World Consulting or follow him at twitter.com/MikeBernersLee ** Learn more about Singularity: ⁠⁠su.org⁠⁠ Host:⁠⁠ Steven Parton⁠⁠ - ⁠⁠LinkedIn⁠⁠ /⁠⁠ Twitter⁠⁠ Music by: Amine el Filali

In this episode Darren and Nico chat with the renowned climate scientist, author and founder of Small Word Consulting, Mike Berners-Lee. A fascinating chat that kept coming back to the poly-crisis and the existential threats facing our planet. This is an episode you really don't want to miss!

Cuando el científico de computadoras inglés Tim Berners Lee inventó la red mundial de comunicación en el 1989, jamás pensó que se convertiría en lo que hay hoy en día. De hecho, muchos repiten equivocadamente que Berners-Lee inventó la Internet. Y eso no es cierto. Lo cierto es que la Internet fue un esfuerzo combinado de científicos militares y universitarios que dio origen a lo que se llamó ARPANET. Y, por si te interesa, las siglas ARPANET significan “Advanced Research Projects Agency Network”. En ese momento el productor de contenido no soñaba ni con nacer. Para esa época las personas que escribíamos, publicábamos boletines de papel que enviábamos a nuestros clientes y relacionados comerciales mediante correo convencional. Todos los meses había que ensobrar cientos de boletines, lamer cientos de sellos y llevarlos físicamente al correo. El primer blog que registra la historia fue “LINK”, de Justin Hall, y consistía de escritos breves con “enlaces” y muy poco más. Ni remotamente se trataba de un blog estilizado como los que que producimos los usuarios de Wordpress hoy en día. Pero tenía algo en común. Tenía enlaces. ¿Y quién inventó el enlace? Pues Tim Berners Lee. O sea que Berners Lee no inventó la Internet, pero inventó el hipervículo que dio origen a todo lo que existe hoy en día. Sin hipervículos nada de lo que vemos hoy en día funcionaría. Ah, y si no sabes lo que es un “hipervículo” es lo que comúnmente llaman por ahí un enlace o un “link”. La idea del blog, o “weblog” como se llama realmente, se propagó como la pólvora. Tanto así que se estima que hoy en día hay sobre 600 millones de blogs. Eso equivale al 31.57% del total de páginas que existen en la Internet. No fue hasta el 1996 que nació el término “mercadeo mediante contenido” o “content marketing”. Nació de la mente del periodista John F. Oppedahl. Con él también nació el “productor de contenido”. Pero no quiere decir que el trabajo no se hiciera antes. De hecho, se ha venido haciendo desde mediados del siglo 18. Lo que pasa es que el nombrecito “catchy” de “productor de contenido” nación con Oppedahl. Pero fue el nombre, no la cosa. Pero todavía faltaba una pieza para llegar a la “mogolla” que tenemos hoy en día. De hecho, faltaban dos. Casi paralelo con la llegada de la Internet surgieron los primeros navegadores. El primero fue Lynx en el 1992. Antes de eso la gente usaba “pseudonavegadores como America Online y CompuServe. ¿Te cuerdas de esos? Y el primer navegador —que de verdad se podría considerar un navegador como lo conocemos hoy en día— fue Netscape en el 1994. En el '95 surgió Internet Explorer de Microsoft y la Internet comenzó a perder su inocencia. Microsoft vio por fin el potencial que tenía la internet y comenzó a incluir Explorer con cada instalación de Windows. El enorme control que tenía Microsoft del mundo de las computadoras hizo que a la larga dominara el mundo de los navegadores. El 1 de marzo del 2008 Netscape fue descontinuado. Ese mismo año Google lanzó el navegador Chrome valiéndose, precisamente, del dominio que tenía en el mundo de la búsqueda. Ya para entonces Yahoo había comenzado a hacer agua y en julio del 2016 fue vendido por 5 billones a Forbes. Hoy en día Chrome domina el mundo de los navegadores, Google domina el de la búsqueda y los otros como: Edge de Microsoft, Safari de Apple y Duck, Duck, Go son distantes segundos, terceros y cuartos. Con ese dominio férreo de la navegación y la búsqueda Google controla una parte substancial del tráfico en la Internet. Lo demás lo controlan las redes sociales y una ínfima parte —pero BIEN ÍNFIMA— la controlan los millones de productores de contenido que día a día se levantan a producir blogs, podcasts, videos, contenido profesional de todo tipo y la bazofia que inunda las redes sociales. Sí, porque a eso también le llaman contenido. Entonces ¿cuál es la situación y cuál es el problema? La situación es que tanto Google y los demás motores de búsqueda más pequeños,

Peter Berners Lee draws together anyone is St Albans who wants to pray….. Pray for… The post One to One with… Peter Berners-Lee (Prayer) appeared first on St Albans Podcast with Danny Smith.

Professor Mike Berners-Lee is an author and a Professor at the Institute for Social Futures at Lancaster University. His work for the past few decades has focused on how to tackle the worsening climate emergency. Mike joins Will Hutton to discuss how there has to be a global shift in our values for us to have a chance of reversing climate change.  The We Society podcast on ideas that shape the world we live in. From countering social inequality to rebooting public services, host Will Hutton and his guests encourage you to think critically and collectively, as part of The We Society. This podcast is brought to you by the Academy of Social Sciences.  Tell us who we should be speaking to, or what questions we should be asking by emailing wesociety@acss.org.uk 

They make everything from the software we use at work, to games consoles and laptops. Microsoft says eventually it wants to remove all of the carbon it's emitted since 1975, but in the meantime its emissions are still rising. So what is the company doing to tackle that and is it right to place so much emphasis on technology that does not exist at scale yet, to remove carbon from the atmosphere? Fliss and Deborah grill Musidora Jorgensen, Chief Sustainability Officer at Microsoft UK.Also: carbon footprint expert Professor Mike Berners-Lee talks to listener Joey about how he can live a greener life. Joey knows that one big thing many of us can do to lower our footprint is to make our homes more energy efficient. But, like millions of us, he rents and so there's very little about his flat that he can change. But with the professor's help, he learns what he can do instead and how much of a difference those changes will make. There's some good tips there for anyone who wants to understand more about their impact on the planet.Plus Deborah reveals what computer games the Dragons play between the pitches on Dragons' Den. And does Fliss need to delete her 135,000 unread emails?With Deborah Meaden and Felicity Hannah.Like us? Please subscribe and if the platform you are using allows it, do rate us and leave us a review.Production team: Lexy O'Connor, Luke Wilson, Hal Haines, Natasha Johannsen, Justin Bones.Useful links https://energysavingtrust.org.uk/shivering-winter-wonderland-7-top-tips-make-your-home-warmer/

Peter Berners-Lee and Elspeth discuss how churches today all so very different in practice and… The post One to One with… Peter Berners-Lee (what is the Spirit saying to our churches?) appeared first on St Albans Podcast with Danny Smith.

Deze keer hebben we niet één, maar twee gasten over de vloer bij Radio Raccoons: Esther De Loof en Ruben Verborgh. Topic van de dag: Solid, een nieuwe technologie én ook een nieuwe manier om om te gaan met onze persoonlijke data. Veel potentieel, maar ook veel vragen. De antwoorden op die vragen krijg je in deze aflevering.Het SolidlandschapIn deze aflevering komen Esther De Loof, business development Europe bij Inrupt, en Ruben Verborgh, professor bij UGent en researcher bij imec, aan bod. Zij delen hun expertise over Solid. Ze zijn uiteraard geen twee willekeurige mensen, maar ze doen samen - en apart - een aantal interessante zaken.Van een ver verleden tot vandaagRuben en Esther kennen elkaar al een heel lange tijd. In een ver verleden stond Esther op de planken en deed Ruben daarvoor geluid en belichting. Fast forward naar 2015, wanneer ze samen begonnen te werken aan de universiteit. Dat klikte zodanig dat in het najaar van 2020 Ruben haar contacteerde om de dots te connecteren voor Solid in Vlaanderen. “Toen ben ik met de verschillende partijen beginnen babbelen, en ben ik terechtgekomen bij Inrupt, de start-up van Tim Berners-Lee,” volgens Esther. Die laatste ken je misschien beter als de uitvinder van het web en is nu ook - door het Solidinitiatief - heruitvinder van het web.Hoe Ruben van klankman naar professor decentralized web technologies ging? “Ik wilde eigenlijk rockster worden. Ik heb altijd die passie voor enerzijds muziek en anderzijds technologie gehad. Met een elektrische gitaar combineer je beiden. Maar gaandeweg werd het duidelijk dat mijn technologische passie - en talenten - groter was dan die andere,” volgens Ruben. De job die hij vandaag doet komt wel dichtbij die van een rockster: als onderzoeker reist hij de wereld rond om zijn boodschap over het world wide web te verkondigen.Ruben begon in 2010 aan de UGent en imec als onderzoeker webtechnologie (data op het web). Dat was de voorloper op wat nu vandaag Solid heet. Even een fast forward naar 2017: Ruben pikt de draad op met Tim Berners-Lee door hem te bezoeken in MIT en samen zijn ideeën rond Solid te bekijken. “Daar heb ik de Solid ideeën meegenomen naar Vlaanderen. Toen was dat nog een klein zaadje, maar dat klein zaadje heeft een heel goede voedingsbodem gevonden. Nu begint het een groot verhaal te worden op technologisch vlak, maar ook op een heel aantal andere vlakken.” De rest is geschiedenis. Eind 2020 kon Ruben het niet meer alleen. “Ik had mijn oude compagnon de route Esther nodig om contacten op te volgen, want uiteindelijk ben ik de computernerd en wil ik achter de knoppen zitten.”Naast zijn academische taken bij de UGent, heeft Ruben besloten om deels voor de industrie te werken omdat de vraag zodanig groot is. Hij adviseert bedrijven die aan Solid willen doen en Inrupt is daar één van.Solid, gedefinieerd“Solid is heel veel, maar laten we kijken naar een korte geschiedenis van het web,” begint Ruben. Berners-Lee heeft het web uitgevonden in de jaren ‘80 - ‘90 met de intentie om kennis makkelijker te laten verspreiden, over de grenzen van machines heen. Het kernidee daarvan was universaliteit. “Iedereen moet kennis kunnen consumeren ongeacht op welke manier het gepubliceerd is en ongeacht op welk toestel je wil gebruiken om de kennis te consumeren. Het probleem was toen dat kennis vaak bleef plakken aan machines in verschillende soorten en maten. Het web bracht een technologisch laagje om ervoor te zorgen dat informatie zich tussen machines heen wereldwijd kon verspreiden en dat al die informatie aan elkaar kon gelinkt worden.”Gaandeweg transformeerde het web van een technologische uitdaging naar universaliteit op een hoog niveau: Hoe kunnen we informatie in andere talen doorgeven? Hoe kunnen we informatie doorgeven aan mensen die niet visueel aan de slag kunnen, maar bijvoorbeeld in braille? Het werd ook meer dan enkel universaliteit. “Het web heeft ook de weg gevonden naar het commerciële: hoe kunnen we zaken verkopen? Uiteraard heeft het verhaal zich ontpopt naar een verhaal dat we allemaal wel kennen.”Rond de jaren 2000 lanceerden er veel nieuwe ideeën die voorheen niet mogelijk waren. Kijk naar eBay, waar je tweedehands spullen kon verkopen, of Amazon, koop wat je maar wil en laat het voor je deur leveren. “Een paar jaar later vormden zich totaal nieuwe paradigma's. Denk maar aan persoonlijke data die plots op het web stond en plots ook gebruikt werd voor zowel positieve als negatieve zaken. Verkiezingen beïnvloeden, reclame maken en mensen verleiden tot zaken die ze anders niet zouden doen... Het web is verwijderd geraakt van het originele idee dat Tim Berners-Lee had, namelijk, het moet voor iedereen werken,” vertelt Ruben. “Je moet bijvoorbeeld aanwezig zijn op Facebook, wat het idee van universaliteit in de weg staat.”“Het feit dat een klein clubje van bedrijven bepaalt hoe wij informatie consumeren, dat gaat volledig in tegen de geest van het world wide web en innovatie, want het idee was dat iedereen zich kon aansluiten en nieuwe ideeën kon uitwerken. Als je een paar gatekeepers krijgt, valt dat idee in duigen. Daarom is Tim Berners-Lee bezorgd. We moeten terug naar universaliteit, iedereen moet alles kunnen doen en de toestemmingsloze innovatie moet terugkomen.”De sleutel, volgens Berners-Lee, is persoonlijke data. “Als mensen terug controle geven over hun eigen data via persoonlijke datakluizen, dan zullen we weer in staat zijn om te innoveren op het web en terug constructieve uitwisselingen op het web te hebben. Vandaar dus Solid als the web reimagined*,*** maar dan anno 2022 en verder.”Solid in de praktijkHoe we dat gaan uitwerken in de praktijk? Esther geeft antwoord: “Momenteel is het businessmodel van veel bedrijven dat zij hun data niet willen delen, aangezien het een competitief voordeel is. Maar we hebben binnen Europa gemerkt dat zo'n model niet werkt voor ons. We kunnen niet op tegen bedrijven uit China en Amerika, dus we moeten heel het idee van die datalaag anders aanpakken, zodanig dat we meer kunnen innoveren.”Hoe gaan we die shift er laten komen? Dat is wat Inrupt probeert uit te zoeken op wereldwijd niveau door samen te werken met organisaties die een digital footprint hebben, denk aan overheden, grote bedrijven, ngo's, enzovoort. “We willen zo snel mogelijk dat er zoveel mogelijk mensen een persoonlijke datakluis hebben met daarin toch minstens al een deel van hun persoonlijke data.”Vlaanderen is daarin een echte koploper, wereldwijd. “Ik wil dat duidelijk zeggen want Vlamingen zijn wat bedeesder van aard, maar wat we hier in Vlaanderen hebben is een uniek iets. Een cocktail van verschillende partners,” volgens Esther. “SolidLab langs de ene kant als academische partner, daarnaast het Datanutsbedrijf van de overheid als neutrale speler die de markt in gang steekt, en dan een heel aantal bedrijven, waaronder ook Cronos, die kijken naar hoe we naar de markt kunnen met Solid. Die dynamiek van private bedrijven, de overheid, en academia is echt uniek.”Tim Berners-LeeDeevid is benieuwd naar de visie van Tim Berners-Lee en hoe hij actief is in het project. Volgens Ruben is hij actief op twee fronten. Enerzijds is hij bezig met de visie rond Solid. Waar moet het web naartoe? Waar kunnen we als wereld naartoe met een informatienetwerk? Langs de andere kant is Berners-Lee ook met het technische luik bezig, net zoals Ruben is hij een developer. “We zijn allebei redelijk geeky over dat soort zaken en zijn zo ook aan de praat geraakt. Ik had toevallig een zomer vrij en kon naar MIT komen en Tim was akkoord. Dat was een beetje een Trojaans paard: ik ging development doen, maar uiteindelijk zijn we aan de praat geraakt over de high-level visie rond Solid. Al snel werd duidelijk dat we samen aan de slag moesten.”Eigenlijk is Ruben pas op het einde van het onderzoeksproject bij het team van MIT binnengekomen. Toen hij toekwam, was het duidelijk dat de eerste laag van de onderzoekschallenges aangepakt waren. Het was tijd om te beginnen aan de andere, meer commerciële aspecten, waar Esther het eerder al over had. “Dat is wat ik wilde doen met mijn leven. Half toevallig is dat in Vlaanderen opgepikt en beginnen bloeien. Tim Berners-Lee komt vaak langs bij ons in Gent om aan Solid verder te werken, we halen inspiratie uit elkaar. We mogen dus echt wel trots zijn om wat we al bereikt hebben.”Technische standaard“In heel het verhaal is technologie de basiswaarde, maar ook alleen dat. Zonder technologie gaat het niet lukken, maar met alleen technologie ook niet.”Volgens Ruben moet je Solid bekijken als post-big data. Voor Solid was er de big datastroming waarbij men keek naar hoeveel data je op één plaats tesamen kan krijgen. Het antwoord daarop? Oneindig veel, technologisch gezien. Wat big data ons geleerd heeft, is dat er hoewel er geen technologische limieten zijn, er wel economische, sociale en ethische limieten zijn.“Eerlijk gezegd, vanuit technologisch oogpunt: big data is saai. Natuurlijk gaan er interessantere zaken gebeuren als je zoveel data op één plaats brengt, maar wat als dat niet kan? Wat als er dwingende reden zijn die niet technologisch zijn van aard, zoals GDPR, maar ook het competitieniveau. Het kost enorm veel geld om dat te gaan doen. Dataverzameling vertraagt innovatie.”Dat is ook het doel van Solid. In plaats van alle data op één systeem te verzamelen, krijgt iedereen een eigen datakluis. Daardoor krijg je in plaats van enkele zeer grote big datasets een heel groot aantal kleine datasets. “De toekomst, voor mij, bestaat uit heel veel kleine data,” volgens Ruben. “Iedereen krijgt dus een dataset, maar ook gebouwen, wagens, en zelfs slimme verkeerslichten kunnen zo'n kluis krijgen. Dan is de vraag: hoe ga je daarmee om? Technologisch is dat een gigantische puzzel om op te lossen. Big data is veel simpeler. Maar de filosofie achter het decentralizen is dat de voordelen zo belangrijk zijn, dat wij als technologen praktisch verplicht zijn om het op te lossen.”Als de technologen het dan kunnen oplossen, wat moeten we dan doen? Esther bekijkt het vanuit drie standpunten: Gebruiker → hoe voelt dat om een datakluis te hebben? We eindigen waarschijnlijk in een wereld waar we verschillende datakluizen hebben: een datakluis van de overheid, de bank, telecomprovider. Hoe ga je naar die datakluizen kijken? Je gaat waarschijnlijk een loskoppeling hebben tussen waar de data staat en hoe je naar de data kijkt via verschillende applicaties. Als eindgebruiker kan je dus een browser hebben met een overzicht van je verschillende kluizen, onafhankelijk van hoeveel dat er zijn of waar ze staan. Uiteindelijk heb je dan een geïntegreerde ervaring voor de eindgebruiker. Bedrijven en overheden → geven je een kluis en steken data in die kluis. Daar is het een kwestie van visionaire overheden en bedrijven vinden die weten dat als ze angstvallig vasthouden aan die hopen data, dat het niet meer werkt. Als bedrijf of overheid moet je dan bekijken wat het kan opleveren als je die data deelbaar maakt. Wat voor een businessmodel kan ik daarmee bouwen? Dat is het soort denkoefeningen dat Inrupt maakt met bedrijven. Developers → apps ontwikkelen bovenop die datalaag. Eens de datalaag bestaat, krijg je de situatie dat er heel veel data van personen bestaat, die je kan gebruiken om een bepaalde dienst te creëren. Consent - read the terms of agreementsHoe vermijden we dat we in een soortgelijke situatie als nu komen? “We gaan niemand overtuigen van Solid omdat je meer privacy en consent aanbiedt. Nobody cares. Some of us do, maar wij zijn de 1%. De meeste mensen geven er alleen om als het ook gemakkelijk is. Dus we gaan niemand overtuigen op basis van ideologische gronden, maar juist wél omdat het het leven beter maakt. Wat het leven niet beter maakt? Constant in dialoog gaan,” vertelt Ruben.De vergelijking met cookies is interessant. Cookies zijn een voorbeeld van wetgeving die het omgekeerde effect heeft gehad. De Nederlandse kunstenares Julia Jansen gaf bijvoorbeeld een boek uit van 900 pagina's lang, gevuld met alle terms and conditions waarmee je akkoord gaat als je op een bepaalde website op het knopje klikt. “Niemand begrijpt dat, zelfs de meest gespecialiseerde jurist geraakt er niet aan uit. Los daarvan, waar de cookievensters werken voor de websites die toestemming vragen, gaat een datakluis werken voor jou. Ook de ervaring die je krijgt, kan er anders uitzien voor andere mensen. Dat is het verschil tussen controle en consent. Bij consent ga je het misschien niet altijd begrijpen, dat zijn dialoogvensters die anderen maken. Bij controle ga je zelf beslissen. Het kan ook zijn dat je bij controle net geen keuze wil maken. Bijvoorbeeld: ‘bij elke kledingwinkel mag je mijn schoenmaat tonen, maar als er financiële vragen gesteld worden, wil ik het wel zien'. Je gaat dus de keuze maken afhankelijk van jouw geprefereerd gebruik.”Als gebruiker kan je ook beslissen om de controle gedeeltelijk door te geven, bijvoorbeeld bij vragen over medische data. Stel dat een potentiële verzekeraar toegang wil tot die data, en je kent er eigenlijk niets van, dan kan je die controle geven aan je huisarts. “Controle is een sterker en flexibeler concept dan consent. Én het geeft een betere ervaring,” vertelt Ruben.“Ik denk dat Solid een heel goede implementatie is voor het idee dat achter GDPR zat,” vertelt Esther. “Niemand ligt er wakker van, maar vooral omdat we geen goede tool om er effectief iets mee te doen. Het goede hier is: de overheden en grote organisaties liggen er van wakker dat ze met een integere manier met je data omgaan. Solid geeft hun de kans om dat op een actionable manier naar de eindgebruiker te brengen.”Esther neemt de vergelijking nog verder. “Typisch bij cookies is dat je op één moment controle hebt en daarna eigenlijk niet meer. Bij Solid kan je dat moment stretchen in de tijd. Je hebt controle de eerste keer dat je data deelt, je kan dat op een gestructureerde manier doen, maar nog belangrijker: je kan op elk moment je consent intrekken op een veel intuïtievere manier. Dat is wat het echt is om controle te hebben,” vertelt ze.Ruben pikt daar verder op in: “De reden waarom wij over privacy praten is omdat het een eenzijdig verhaal is. Grote bedrijven weten dat het een straatje is dat doodloopt. Je kan geen oplossing vinden voor privacy. Privacy is een verhaal waar de consument en bedrijven tegen elkaar worden opgezet. De bedrijven zijn evil, ze willen zoveel mogelijk data verzamelen en arme mensen geraken die data kwijt. Maar: bedrijven liggen daar van wakker. Ze hebben door dat het vandaag geen zin meer heeft om zoveel data te verzamelen. Dat is een enorme verantwoordelijkheid, legaal gezien.”Bedrijven zien zich vandaag genoodzaakt om data te verzamelen omdat ze data nodig hebben om te innoveren, maar eigenlijk doen ze dat liever niet, vertelt Ruben. Dat probleem lost Solid op, want bedrijven hoeven geen data meer te verzamelen. In dat systeem leveren mensen zelf data, en als bedrijven die bepaalde data nodig hebben, kunnen mensen hun consent geven als ze dat zelf wensen. “We laten data beter stromen, maar onder controle van mensen.”De grote spelersWe kunnen niet om een paar grote spelers in het internetlandschap. Hoe gaan we om met zo'n bedrijven? Volgens Ruben ligt dat anders dan we denken. “Wij hebben Facebook, Google, en andere grote bedrijven niet nodig in dit verhaal. De data die op Facebook staat is in de eerste plaats vooral nuttig voor adverteerders, maar niet erg nuttig voor mij. Laat ze maar verzamelen. Dat is data die niet werkt voor mij, en zelfs als ze werkt voor mij, kan ik die data er ook uithalen,” vertelt Ruben. “Ze weten wel wat mijn likes en vrienden zijn, wat nuttig is voor advertenties. Wat ze niet weten, is wat ik vorige week in de Delhaize kocht, wat ook nuttige data is om voor mij te laten werken.”Als we kijken naar de eerste use cases rond Solid, zien we eigenlijk vooral cases rond data die Facebook ook niet heeft. Solid hangt dus niet af van zo'n bedrijven en staat er dus ook niet mee in competitie. “Die bedrijven zijn in essentie verkopers van advertenties. Dat werkt voor andere partijen, maar niet voor mij. Solid is data die voor mij werkt.”“Met Solid kunnen we ook sociale interacties doen op een sociale en ethische manier, maar dat is niet ons doel. We willen geen vervanger voor Facebook maken. We kijken naar wereldwijde innovatieproblemen over een gebrek aan data die niet goed stroomt. Als we in passant zulke problemen kunnen oplossen, perfect, maar het is onze driver niet,” sluit Ruben de vergelijking af.De toekomst van Solid? Zo onzeker als toen Berners-Lee het internet initieel bouwde in 1988, volgens Esther. “Waarschijnlijk kunnen we op dit moment helemaal niet inschatten waar we binnen tien jaar staan met Solid. We weten totaal nog niet wat voor socialemediaervaringen mogelijk kunnen zijn.” Esther ziet het nu als een idee van loskoppeling: data en apps loskoppelen van elkaar met als doel tailored apps te maken voor verschillende doelgroepen.“Kijk naar Facebook bijvoorbeeld: de app wordt vooral gebruikt door kleinkinderen en grootouders om elkaars foto's te zien, maar het platform is helemaal niet gemaakt voor kleine kinderen en oudere mensen. Toch zijn mensen geforceerd om het op die manier te doen, want het is de enige manier. Solid kan daar verandering in brengen,” vertelt Esther. Zo kan iedereen een verschillende app gebruiken, met elk zijn socialemediaervaring, bovenop de datalaag van kluizen. “Jij kan mijn foto's zien met een app die meer bij jou past, en ik kan jouw foto's zien met een app die meer bij mij past.”Blockchain vs. SolidDeevid vraagt zich af waarom we Blockchain en Solid niet met elkaar mogen verwarren. Of hebben ze toch iets met elkaar gemeen? Ruben legt uit: “Wat ze gemeenschappelijk hebben, is dat ze beide gedecentraliseerd zijn. Zowel blockchain als Solid willen dingen doen zonder een centrale speler nodig te hebben. Simpel gezegd: we willen met elkaar foto's delen zonder Facebook in het midden te hebben.”Tot zo ver de vergelijking, want er zijn ook heel wat verschillen, vooral de doelstellingen. Bij blockchain gaat men zonder centrale speler het eens worden over dezelfde waarheid. “Het gaat om transacties waar iedereen een kopie heeft van het transactieregister. We zijn het allemaal eens over dezelfde waarheid.” Daartegenover staat Solid, waar we zonder centrale speler onze eigen data bijhouden. “Het gaat net om allemaal verschillende data in plaats van dat iedereen dezelfde kopie heeft. Daarnaast zijn er veel meer use cases voor persoonlijke data zonder centrale mediator dan voor blockchain. Er zijn veel minder blockchain cases dan de hype ons vandaag doet geloven.”Deevid kan zich use cases voorstellen waar we de gebruiker niet zomaar willen toelaten om zaken in die persoonlijke data te veranderen, denk maar aan je rijksregisternummer of je strafblad. “Wel, dat is het grootste verschil met blockchain,” legt Esther uit. “Eens het in de chain zit, kan je er niet aan prutsen zonder dat iedereen het weet. Solid is heel anders: sommige dataelementen in je Solid pod moet je kunnen aanpassen. Als je favoriete kleur vandaag rood is, en morgen is dat blauw, moet je dat kunnen aanpassen en kan niemand je tegenhouden.” Maar wat als dat nu om essentiële informatie gaat? Hoe ze dat precies gaan aanpakken in een Solidecosysteem, dat is wat ze vandaag testen in Vlaanderen, door bijvoorbeeld een label te geven van een authentieke bron.Ruben vult aan: “Dat kan bijvoorbeeld opgelost worden met digitale handtekeningen. Als de overheid ‘ja' zegt, dan klopt het. Hier zie je ook dat blockchain niet nuttig zou zijn: als de overheid zegt dat het een bepaalde dag is, dan maakt het niet uit of alle andere mensen ook zeggen dat het klopt. Je hebt daar geen consensus over nodig.”Artificial intelligenceDeevid bedenkt zich - als AI man - dat als je toestemming geeft aan een bedrijf om je data te gebruiken voor een AI model, en je bedenkt je, dat de data al in het model zit en verwerkt is. Wat dan? Ruben antwoordt: “Alles waar we over spreken, is artificial intelligence. We moeten het breder zien dan alleen machine learning.”Ruben legt uit dat er binnen AI twee stromingen zijn: White box: een intelligent systeem dat kan uitleggen waarom het beslissingen neemt. Die logica is nodig voor consent en bewijsbaarheid. Black box: kan niet uitleggen waarom, maar het doet wel spectaculaire dingen. Bijvoorbeeld gezichtsherkenningsalgoritmes kan in een foto van duizend mensen één persoon herkennen. Het is krachtiger, maar ook onzekerder. Wat als we Solid ook gebruiken voor die black box-omgeving? “Daar is innovatie voor nodig. Heel veel van machine learning is geënt op big data technologie. Er is nog onderzoek nodig om dat soort zaken te doen, en daarvoor kan federated machine learning nuttig zijn, waar we data in stukken aanleveren en dus ook makkelijker in en uithalen,” vertelt Ruben.Terugkoppelend naar consent: niemand kan 100% begrijpen wat het black box-systeem doet met data, per definitie. “Daar zijn veel legale vragen die we nog moeten oplossen.”Vlaamse overheidBinnen de Vlaamse overheid zitten er momenteel veel zaken in de pipeline, vertelt Esther. Momenteel zijn er bijvoorbeeld volgende doelstellingen bij een opkomend datanutsbedrijf: Elke burger moet over een Solid pod kunnen beschikken Een aantal goede use cases vinden en naar de markt brengen om te tonen wat het potentieel van Solid is, zowel vanuit het perspectief van de burger als dat van bedrijven Wat betekent zo'n datanutsbedrijf nu? “Elke samenleving kan maar draaiende blijven zolang de infrastructuur van de samenleving werkt. Dat kan gaan over waterwegen, snelwegen, en spoorwegen, maar ook data is nu een cruciaal iets. Het is een basisstructuur die in orde moet zijn,” vertelt Esther.Ruben haalt Telenet in de jaren ‘90 als voorbeeld aan. “De overheid gaf de impuls om Telenet op te richten. Er was geen enkel privébedrijf dat investeringen wilde doen om glasvezel in de grond te steken. De reden waarom de overheid toen geïnvesteerd heeft was niet louter om mensen internet te geven, maar omdat er een nieuwe economie in aantocht was. We moesten daarin kunnen meedoen,” legt Ruben uit. “Nu gebeurt eigenlijk hetzelfde. Er komt een nieuwe dataeconomie aan en we moeten meegaan in die stroom. Daarvoor hebben we datakluizen nodig. Het doel is niet die kluis op zich, maar de innovatie die mogelijk wordt als de juiste infrastructuur aanwezig is, dus het datanutsbedrijf zal nu die investeringen doen om het dan op langere termijn over te laten aan de markt.”“Het datanutsbedrijf neemt eigenlijk een aantal drempels weg en creëert die markt. Het grote doel is data laten stromen,” sluit Esther af.ToekomstHet is lastig om de toekomst te voorspellen, maar we laten het Esther en Ruben toch problemen. Ruben start: “Ik denk dat dingen gemakkelijker gaan worden. Er zijn vandaag veel handelingen die we - onnodig - moeten doen met betrekking tot het verhuizen van data. Ik denk dat die later veel naadlozer over zullen gaan in elkaar. Eerlijk gezegd, hoe het er precies uitziet, dat weet ik ook niet, maar ik beeld me een wereld in waar ik veel minder moet nadenken over in welke silo's ik zaken moet doen. Ik denk dat we van hokjesdenken evolueren naar een meer immersive manier van zaken doen.”Esther's visie? “Het is moeilijk om de toekomst te voorspellen, maar er zijn wel een aantal principes waar we willen aan vasthouden. Als je je data zelf in handen hebt, is het makkelijker om diensten te krijgen die op eigen maat zijn. We moeten goed nadenken over hoe we dat willen doen, maar we willen ook geen Black Mirror aflevering creëren. Hoe gaan we de gebruikerservaring zodanig maken dat het tailored is zonder dat het voelt alsof er ingebroken wordt op privacy?” Esther kan zich voorstellen dat het heel indringend is als je bepaalde reclames op maat ziet en wil dat gevoel omdraaien zodat het niet meer intrusief voelt. “Als ik een app zou hebben die mij assisteert bij reizen, en weet wat mijn smaak is qua eten, die dan voorstelt om bij een Mexicaans restaurant te eten... Dat is comfortabel en niet creepy.”SolidLabLangs de ene kant heb je een uitvoerende poot rond Solid in Vlaanderen, dat is het Datanutsbedrijf dat praktisch nadenkt over wat bedrijven moeten doen. “Langs de andere kant moeten we beseffen dat we er nog niet helemaal zijn. Solid is een nieuwe technologie met nieuwe ideeën en nieuwe modellen. SolidLab is de pijler waarin de overheid investeert om onderzoek te voeren om het gat dicht te maken.”SolidLab gaat concreet enkele uitdagingen helpen wegnemen: technologische uitdagingen socio-economische vraagstukken legale vraagstukken “SolidLab wil die vraagstukken voor zijn en uitdagingen wegnemen zodanig dat wanneer het datanutsbedrijf klaar staat met bedrijven om te beginnen innoveren, de eerste struikelblokken al weg zijn,” sluit Ruben af.Solid community VlaanderenAlle bedrijven die rond Solid werken, zitten samen in een Solid Community die ééns per maand samenkomt. Er zijn verschillende tracks rond technologie en business development waar je aan kan deelnemen. https://youtu.be/ycc1GEWU0n0 

I'm joined by my husband Andrei in this episode for a lively discussion on the Internet's Saturn Return.With Saturn currently transiting Aquarius, the Internet as we know it is having its Saturn Return.On August 6, 1991, a CERN physicist named Tim Berners-Lee uploaded the first publicly accessible website.While there were many technological precedents leading up to it, this date is often cited as the birth of the Internet as we know it.Berners-Lee wanted to create a vast hyperlinked global network that would allow for the swift exchange of scientific research.what started as an internal database designed to store and share scientific research through hypertext has evolved into the single largest body of human knowledge.It has united the global village with oftentimes miraculous and equally disastrous consequences.It is responsible for how you send and receive information—whether it's text message, social media, or streaming video.Nearly everything you think or say is mediated in some measure by something you read or heard online.So now that the Saturn is back in Aquarius, the Internet is having its Saturn Return.In this episode, we discuss the advances in media + technology that have taken place during Saturn's transit through Aquarius, the dark side of the sign of the Water Bearer, and what the future might hold.If you want to learn more about the things we discussed in this episode, then check out my new masterclass CYBERSPACE: Storming the Reality Studio with Saturn in Aquarius.CYBERSPACE examines the effects that mass media and digital technology have had on society through the lens of Saturn in Aquarius.You will explore the many dimensions of this transit through a synthesis of astrological lore, historical analysis and media theory.You will learn how this transit has historically been associated with breakthroughs in propaganda, mass media and digital technology......and you will walk away with a set of tools to work with through this transit that will help you deprogram yourself from the spell of mass media mind control that you've been under your entire life.Right now, CYBERSPACE is free my Patreon subscribers. Sign up at http://www.patreon.com/aeolianheartThis offer ends on February 11, 2022Support the show (https://www.patreon.com/aeolianheart)

US President Joe Biden signed an executive order on December 8 outlining a multi-billion-dollar plan for the federal government to achieve ‘net zero' by 2050, The Verge reports. Under the plan, the US government will switch to electric vehicles, upgrade federal buildings, and use the power of the government to shift to cleaner forms of electricity. The government will stop purchasing petrol-powered passenger cars in 2027 but would only achieve 100 percent electric vehicle purchases by 2035. Biden's order will direct the government to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 65 percent by the end of the decade before reaching full carbon neutrality by 2050. Amazon has been fined € 1.13 billion ($1.28 billion) by Italy's anti-trust regulator, CNBC reports. The Italian competition regulator, AGCM, has found that Amazon abused its market dominance by promoting its own logistics service, called Fulfilment Amazon. It claimed businesses had to use the FBA service to access benefits such as selling products with Prime delivery and participation in Black Friday sales. Amazon said, it "strongly disagrees" with the decision, and would appeal. Instagram's chief Adam Mosseri has called on US lawmakers to help regulate the platform, at a Senate hearing on December 8, which examined the harmful impact of social media on the mental health of teen users, BBC reports. Mosseri argued that Instagram is actively working to address the app's negative effects. However, he called for the creation of industry-wide regulations to police how social media platforms can operate. Inrupt, a startup co-founded by Tim Berners-Lee—widely credited as the leading figure in the creation of the internet—has raised about $30 million in Series A funding, TechCrunch reports. Forte Ventures led Inrupt's new round, the two said on Thursday, but both declined to disclose the size of the deal. The round saw participation from all existing investors, including Akamai Technologies and Glasswing Ventures, as well as new investors Allstate and the Minderoo Foundation's Frontier Technology Initiative. At Inrupt, Berners-Lee, the creator of the standards of the world wide web, and co-founder John Bruce are attempting to “reshape the internet” by building a platform that gives users control of their data. Miro, a visuals-based collaboration software maker, is seeking $17 billion in a new round of venture capital funding, Financial Times reports. The 10-year old startup describes itself as an online whiteboard platform for team collaboration. Miro's ‘infinite canvas' enables teams to lead engaging workshops and meetings, design products, and brainstorm ideas. Miro claims 25 million users worldwide, including more than 100,000 enterprise customers and 95 percent of the world's 100 biggest companies. Miro was founded by Andrey Khusid and Oleg Shardin in 2011. Meanwhile, Pleo, a Danish startup that makes expense management tools aimed at SMBs, has raised $200 million in fresh funding that doubles its value to $4.7 billion, TechCrunch reports. Jeppe Rindom, Pleo's co-founder and CEO, said it will use the money for acquisitions, accelerating expansion to new markets, adding more functionality to its product. Pleo helps SMBs issue company cards and better manage how employees spend money. Indian architect Balkrishna Doshi has been awarded the Royal Institute of British Architects' Royal Gold Medal for 2022, Dezeen magazine reports. Awarded annually by the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) and personally approved by the Queen, the Royal Gold Medal celebrates those who have shaped the "advancement of architecture”. Doshi was selected in recognition of his 70-year career and his influence on the direction of architecture in India.

Anne Wignall joins Dan for this week's Science Weekly podcast talking about the history and importants of the assassin bug and how it uses taps to calm its prey. We catch up with Sidney McSprockett who's teaching us about great british scientists, this week its Babbage, Lovelace and Berners Lee. In Karina's Chemistry we find out about how we can help save the environment. Plus in Science in the News, Dan talks about a new small but mighty satellite that spots deforestation! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Heute vor 30 Jahren ging die erste Homepage des World Wide Web in die Öffentlichkeit. Der britische Physiker Tim Berners-Lee wollte so das Informationschaos beim Europäischen Kernforschungszentrum (Cern) eindämmen. Im März 1989 schlug er seinem Arbeitgeber ein Projekt auf Basis des Hypertexts vor, um den Datenaustausch zwischen den Forschern weltweit zu vereinfachen. Weihnachten 1990 legte Berners-Lee mit info.cern.ch den ersten Web-Server der Welt an. Am 6. August 1991 machte der damals 36-Jährige die erste Webseite im Internet öffentlich. DNEWS24Radio-Podcast am 6.8.2021 von Uwe-Matthias Müller. DNEWS24-Podcast - überall, wo es gute Podcasts zu hören gibt Spotify Apple Podcasts Google Podcasts Die Intro-Musik stammt mit freundlicher Genehmigung von Ronald Kah.

Mike Berners - Lee - There is no Planet B... with TRE´s Hannah Murray

Road tripping a very re-opened California; crypto & NFT drops; Facebook launches Live Audio Rooms, Clubhouse adds DMs, they all start to morph together; Google seeks to stop slander; Google AI/ML/AI/ML; Amazon worries about running out of workers to exploit; introducing Amazon Sub-Prime; Onlyfans pivots; Penn's poor Op-Sec; Reality Winner released; caught by smartwatch; Bo Burnham Inside; pandemic-inspired music; Lupin; Legendary; moving to Podpages; Facebook VR ads; tweaking Twitter; Neeva might be great, someday; Ted Chiang; the world's greatest con.This episode is brought to you by Adorama! Use code “grumpyoldgeeks” at checkout for an additional 20% off!This episode is brought to you by Hover. For 10% off your first order head over to hover.com/gog and get your domain on!Show notes at https://gog.show/511FOLLOW UPIt's Official: El Salvador's Legislature Votes to Adopt Bitcoin as Legal TenderWeb inventor Berners-Lee to auction original code as NFTMoviePass was even shadier than we thoughtIN THE NEWSFacebook officially launches Live Audio Rooms and podcasts in the USClubhouse is building a DM text chat featureGoogle Seeks to Break Vicious Cycle of Online SlanderGoogle is using AI to design its next generation of AI chips more quickly than humans canAmazon burns through workers so quickly that executives are worried they'll run out of people to employ, according to a new reportAmazon WorkersInternal Amazon documents shed light on how company pressures out 6% of office workersOne Amazon warehouse destroys 130,000 items per week, including MacBooks, COVID-19 masks, and TVs, some of them new and unused, a report saysAmazon is reportedly buying 1,000 autonomous truck-driving systems, which could pave the way for one day ditching driversDo not allow Jeff Bezos to return to EarthOnlyFans is reportedly in talks to raise new funding at a valuation above $1 billion, as it plots a move away from adult content to become more mainstreamTesla backs vision-only approach to autonomy using powerful supercomputerMEDIA CANDYBo Burnham – InsideK.Flay – Inside Voices EPLorde – Solar PowerMarina – Ancient Dreams in a Modern LandGarbage – No Gods No Masters69: The Saga of Danny HernandezLupinLegendaryThe Lazarus HeistKim's ConvenienceAPPS & DOODADSThe one developer that publicly agreed to try Facebook's VR ads is already backing awayDay one has been acquired by AutomatticMastonautTweak New Twitter for Chrome/BraveLeviton T5633-W 15-Amp Type-C USB Charger/Tamper Resistant Receptacle, 1-Pack, WhiteNeevaWebcam Settings (Mac App Store)AT THE LIBRARYExhalation by Ted ChiangStories of Your Life and Others by Ted ChiangThe World Greatest ConOperation Mincemeat: How a Dead Man and a Bizarre Plan Fooled the Nazis and Assured an Allied Victory by Ben MacintyreSECURITY HAH!The CyberWireDave BittnerHacking HumansCaveatRecorded FutureReality Winner, the Contractor Who Leaked Classified Russian Election Meddling Info, Released From PrisonSmartphone and smartwatch data led husband to confess to murdering his wifeVigilante malware rats out software pirates while blocking ThePirateBayCLOSING SHOUT-OUTS4 tech podcasts you should be listening toPrivacy Policy and California Privacy Notice.

Our expert hosts, Adam Davis and David Brear, are joined by some great guests to talk about the most notable fintech, financial services and banking news from the past week. This week's guests include: Gus Tomlinson, General Manager Identity Fraud Europe, at GBG Sammy Fry, Net Zero Lead at Tech Nation Soundbites: * Matt Henderson, EMEA Business Lead at Stripe * Kathryn Petralia, co-founder of Kabbage We cover the following stories from the fintech and financial services space: Stripe moves beyond payments with Stripe Identity 4:22 UK tech leaders team up to fight climate crisis 14:50 AmEx opens its first business accounts with Kabbage 29:01 Shopify expands its one-click checkout, Shop Pay, to any merchant on Facebook or Google 37:10 Laybuy brings in store BN/PL to the UK 44:50 Bitcoin tops $40,000 after Musk says Tesla could use it again 46:50 Fintech giant Wise push button on long-awaited listing 48:51 Web founder Berners-Lee to auction source code as NFT 51:09 This episode is sponsored by Temenos. Temenos is the world's leader in banking software, helping over 3,000 banks serve over 1.2 billion people. Our purpose is to make banking better. Together with our community, we make banks more successful, individuals better banked, and society better served. With our software banks can create more human digital experiences, hyper-efficient business models, and transform their back-office. Our clients are the highest performing banks with cost-income ratios which are twice better than the industry average. Learn more at Temenos.com (https://go.temenos.com/11fs). This episode is brought to you by Visa. one of the world's leaders in digital payments. Visa's Fintech Fast Track program is a quick and easy way to connect to the Visa network and issue payment credentials. Whether you're an up and coming neobank, modernizing B2B payments, or launching a new crypto solution - amazing things can happen when your innovation is combined with the power of one of the world's largest payment networks. Learn more about the possibilities at partner.visa.com (https://partner.visa.com/homepage.html?utm_source=partner&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_content=sponsored-podcast_english_60min0sec&utm_campaign=us_fintech_q3-fy21-11fs-fintechinsider&utm_creative=awareness_11fs-fintech-insider) This episode is also sponsored by YouGov. With a global consumer panel of 15 million registered members, 11+ years' historic single-source data, and proprietary technology that connects data and simplifies research, YouGov is home to the largest collection of constant, entirely permissioned consumer opinion and rich behavioural intelligence in the world. YouGov's latest report measures the effect of COVID-19 on consumer attitudes, behaviours, and preferences when it comes to financial services. Beyond the pandemic, it examines the payments landscape, investments, sustainability & ethics and more in 17 markets. Download On the money: YouGov's Global Banking & Finance Report 2021 (https://yougov.co.uk/topics/finance/articles-reports/2021/02/16/global-banking-2021?utm_medium=advertising&utm_source=11FS&utm_campaign=ADV-2021-05-UKI-11FS) Fintech Insider by 11:FS is a podcast dedicated to all things fintech, banking, technology and financial services. Hosted by a rotation of 11:FS experts including David Brear, Simon Taylor, Jason Bates and Sarah Kocianski and joined by a range of brilliant guests, we cover the latest global news, bring you interviews from industry experts or take a deep dive into subject matters such as APIs, AI or digital banking. If you enjoyed this episode, don't forget to subscribe and please leave a review Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/fintechinsiders where you can ask the hosts questions, alternatively email podcasts@11fs.com! Special Guests: Gus Tomlinson, Kathryn Petralia, Matt Henderson, and Sammy Fry.

The Tokyo Olympic Games will need a public bailout of about $800m if spectators are banned, and the end of the interminable EU and US struggle over aircraft subsidies marks a major truce in what seemed an intractable trade conflict. Plus, the FT's global technology correspondent, Tim Bradshaw, spoke to world wide web founder Tim Berners-Lee about his decision to auction off the original source code as digital art. Tokyo Olympics will need bailout if games go ahead without spectatorshttps://www.ft.com/3cd58c64-039e-4147-a744-af676de1691d?Airbus/Boeing deal explained: what is in it and what happens nexthttps://www.ft.com/content/1e04dfe1-9651-4b9e-90d9-fdbd82b45253Web inventor Berners-Lee to auction original code as NFThttps://www.ft.com/content/a77ad1bf-fae0-478b-aa05-a07790314ebc? See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Automattic acquires the popular iOS and iPad OS journaling app, Day One. Everybody wants a piece of Stripe. Stripe wants to be the “Stripe for Identity” all by itself. With HBO vanquished, now Netflix wants to become Disney faster than Disney can become Netflix. And could I interest you in an NFT of the entire World Wide Web?Sponsors:LinkedIn.com/rideCybereason.comLinks:WordPress.com owner Automattic acquires journaling app Day One (Tech Crunch)U.S. Supreme Court revives LinkedIn bid to shield personal data (Reuters)Investors Clamor for a Bigger Piece of Payments Company Stripe (Wall Street Journal)Stripe goes beyond payments with Stripe Identity to provide AI-based ID verification for transactions and much more (Tech Crunch)Amazon brings cashierless tech to full-size grocery store for first time at new Seattle-area location (Geek Wire)Netflix Has a Plan to Sell You Toys, T-Shirts and Concert Tickets (Bloomberg)Web inventor Berners-Lee to auction original code as NFT (Financial Times)See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

If patients ever figured out how to organize around the privacy of their data how would that impact how healthcare data is handled.Sir Timothy Berners-Lee, known as the founder of the world wide web has an idea for health data, pods.  FTA:"We are on a mission to change the way the web works, to make it a better place for all of us," said Berners-Lee in a November YouTube video with Technology Intelligence Live. "It's a mid-course correction to restore the values of individual and group empowerment that the internet used to have and seems to have lost.""This is the opposite way that apps are built," Berners-Lee said. "You don't have to hand your data over and then it's locked away in that app forever."----Today we look at  the concept, then it's application to healthcare, and then we are going to ask what this might mean to your local health system.The National Health System in the UK is one of the first clients of this pod concept.  Could it work in the US?

A szerző, Mike Berners-Lee egyetemi professzor a lehető legszélesebb perspektívában vizsgálja a 21. század szinte valamennyi környezeti és gazdasági kihívását, kérdőjelezi meg azt, ahogyan élünk, gondolkodunk, és mindeközben az egyes ember felelősségére is apellál. Egyszerre sokkolja, meglepi és meg is nevetteti az olvasót.

Counting carbon has become a quagmire for consumers trying to understand quite how much impact their travel or work is having on the environment. Quite what the carbon footprint of a business is can be a bit of a moving target and some companies are able to hide their carbon in all sorts of places.

Counting carbon has become a quagmire for consumers trying to understand quite how much impact their travel or work is having on the environment. Quite what the carbon footprint of a business is can be a bit of a moving target and some companies are able to hide their carbon in all sorts of places.

Climate change, feeding the world, biodiversity, plastics – the list of environmental concerns seems endless. But which of these is the most pressing and, given the global nature of the challenges we face, what can any of us do as individuals to make a difference? Do we all need to become vegan? Is local food best? How should we spend and invest our money? In January 2021 leading carbon expert Mike Berners-Lee, author of the bestselling book There Is No Planet B, came to Intelligence Squared to answer these and other questions. Having crunched the numbers, he argued that there is a course of action we can all follow which doesn’t require donning a hair shirt. And reflecting on the turbulent last 12 months, he tackled the thorny issues of protests, pandemics, wildfires and more.The event was hosted by Jenny Kleeman,journalist and author of Sex Robots and Vegan Meat. To buy Mike's book click here: https://bit.ly/2Yh55ZyTo buy Jenny's book click here: https://bit.ly/2M6qBNZ Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/intelligencesquared. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Welcome!   This has been quite the week for Tech news with Big Tech lowering their Iron Fist on any opinions with which they don't agree.  Social Media censorship is here and it has taught us that if you want to communicate freely you cannot and must not use their platforms or services.  I will introduce you to a new service that is out of their control and completely decentralized -- like the original internet. Plus we will talk about Elon Musk, What'sApp and More so be sure to Listen in. For more tech tips, news, and updates, visit - CraigPeterson.com. --- Tech Articles Craig Thinks You Should Read: WhatsApp gives users an ultimatum: Share data with Facebook or stop using the app Insurrectionists’ social media presence gives feds an easy way to ID them Elon Musk is the world’s richest person What to expect from the first-ever virtual CES Google, Apple, and Amazon bans Parler Mastodon is the Only Open Social Network Remaining Malware Developers Refresh Their Attack Tools How the Shady Zero-Day Sales Game Is Evolving --- Automated Machine-Generated Transcript: Craig Peterson: [00:00:00] Hi. Hey everybody. Craig Peterson here. Thanks for joining me. We're going to talk about that. WhatsApp. What are the alternatives to WhatsApp that you might want to use to have private communications? We're going to talk about zero day attacks. This is a very big deal, particularly for us regular users and businesses and what. Does that mean to you? What does that mean to me? The whole thing about in these insurrectionists on social media, what happened down at the white house? Not the white house, but excuse me. The Capitol building. And what are the federal and local police doing to track down the people they are using tech, which should not come as a surprise to anybody. Ilan Musk is the world's richest person. Now we'll go into a little bit about him and what's going on. We are in the middle of the virtual CES. This is the first time that consumer electronic show has been virtual because of the lock. Down. They couldn't have all of these people out in Vegas. I can't imagine what the finances are like in Vegas right now.  That place has to be destroyed. Oh my gosh. What's been going on. People just aren't going out there. I was listening this morning to an interview with the head of the Manchester, Boston Regional Airport. And he was saying that, they had a peak, during the holidays, people were traveling no matter what the advice was, and they had a decent time of it. They were able to handle the volume. But now that those travel days are over with we're just basically Thanksgiving and then around Christmas, they're now seeing just a glut. Because nobody's going to Vegas. Right now they'd be pretty busy. Today they probably wouldn't because most people will be in Vegas for the consumer electronic show, but they built up Vegas, Las Vegas in order to handle this show. It's the second biggest show in the world and the largest consumer show in the world. And it's not even happening this year. At least not the way it's happened in years past. I'm so glad I'm not out there. I used, I loved going to Vegas. I really did, because you could do people watching. I'd usually bring a roll of nickels and it's hard to find the nickel slot machines, I'd blow every nickel I had that was running joke of mine for a few decades. Yeah. Boring guy.  But the rest of the time I was watching people enjoying the restaurant. I loved walking around Vegas. Absolutely loved it. It was so much fun because it's just an exciting place to be. But now, Oh my gosh. We have some clients out in Vegas, a medical client actually. We will have to comply with the HIPAA regulations and all of these, obviously that's part of what we do, is hip hop because we help businesses with their regulatory burdens. And I saw a mountain Vegas and we were taking care of this client and we just hop over to this trip. And in talking with them, some of these different clients out there, none of them go to the strip. If you're a resident, you just don't go. Unless you're going to meet a friend from out of town and you go to a great restaurant. And I remember this last time I was out there, we went to Like it was Gordon Ramsey's new restaurant at the time, and it was a kind of an English pub theme. And I had, smashed peas and bangers and potatoes. I forget what they called the potatoes. But that's for those of us who speak American English, it's sausages and peas and potatoes. It was actually very good. What's happening now because so many of these restaurants are shut down the casinos? We just had a major casino owner just passed away this week as well. What's going to happen there?  So CES. It was what kept that whole economy really in the black frankly, and it's not even happening. So we'll, anyways, we'll talk a little bit about what's happening out there at the first ever Virtual Consumer Electronic show. And if you don't hear it, make sure you go check it out. Online. Craig peterson.com got lots of great stuff there. For you a Google banning parlor from the Android app store. We're going to talk a little bit about that. What does it mean? Not just Google. Of course now we have Apple has banned them from their app store. We've got Amazon who's kicked them off of their platform. We actually know a fair amount about this right now, but where are things going? How the biggest decentralized social network is dealing with its Nazi problem. We'll talk a little bit if we can get to it today, but about something called Mastodon. And I'm going to probably try and bring a Mastodon server up online, and it's designed for your own social network and these servers can tie together and each server can have its own standards in a way people can say and do and whatever online.  And Gab, which is where a lot of the people have gone that have been disaffected from Twitter and other places, and Gab had kicked them off. And so they went over to Mastodon and of course, Gab's has been having problems now, too. I guess a president just opened a gab account, just Gab, gab.com this week for people to follow him. We'll see how that works out. It's just incredible. I mentioned this week on the air. I'm want, I consider myself anyways to be a, I'm the regionalist particularly here when we're talking about the internet and internet originalists. I firmly believe that the internet was intended to be just a free and open place, not just for exchanging ideas, which is. Ultimately incredibly important. And it's so important that I think the only real way to solve problems isn't to find a new energy source or whatever it might be. I think that ultimately. It's the human mind, the human intellect, that is the most valuable resource on earth because we've been able to solve every problem that has come along. So having this ability to communicate was what we saw the internet capable of back in the early 1980s, and then in the nineties. And when Berners Lee came out with the concept with NCSA, Mosaic of the web browser was just, Oh my gosh, that's just brilliant. Again, it was a simple step, but a brilliant idea that he was able to implement and he gave us the web. And I was just so excited then, because what I thought was, what would happen is we would all be able to communicate and we'd see each other's ideas. And at the time the internet was probably about 90, 95% conservative, because remember where it came from, it was all of us working on government funded projects, many in universities. But we were libertarian, we were conservative and this is going to be wonderful. We're going to get our libertarian message out about government control. In fact, I had a signature back in the day that I wrote a little bit of code in order to generate a new signature. Every time an email went out and it had all of these NSA buzzwords in it. I was going to solve this problem all by myself by just making the NSA monitor my email. Now the stupid things we do is kids. But that's what we were seeing. We were originalist. This was just so exciting. So you had the free speech part of it, but you also have the freedom of development of you taking your ideas. Finally, now you could connect with anyone in the world, anything in the world. Ultimately, of course we couldn't when it first started, right? How many of us were on the internet? My node is listed on some of those early maps of the internet. It's fun. Look at it. Oh, there I am. That's me. That was my machine. That was my company. That's what I was doing at the time.  Looking at it today. That excitement that we had of being able to develop software and new protocols and new technologies. And we weren't even thinking about competition because there was no competition. It was just a wonderful time to what we have today. We've got our friends primarily at Facebook and Twitter, but also at Google, but maybe Facebook and Twitter are some of the worst offenders I'm going to lump Google into. Okay. But where we had all of these people, having free conversations and disagreeing with each other about political things and technological things and ways to move forward and how much security do we need, and should we be sending these commands in-line as just text real texts that you could read? Just like the protocol that runs our email today. It says, hello, literally. Hello. When it connects. Nowadays the more advanced version say E H L O, but anyways you send real text commands to the machine so people could watch what was going on and debug it and figure things out. And talking about email, our email servers, the earlier versions of sendmail that we had were set up so that a remote person could get onto your server without your knowledge or permission even, and fix a configuration problem and debug a problem.  Think of that world, what that world was like. It was so exciting. We were in on something that just had never, ever happened before. And what Facebook and Twitter have done is completely turned the tables on this whole thing. And I'm going to tell you what they did to turn the tables and we'll get into also what is going on with social networking? Where is it ultimately going to end up at? So we've got a lot to talk about today and I hope that you can stick around and pick up on all of this stuff. How did we get there from here? Really don't know. I'm my head's still spinning, but here's, what's happened. You had Facebook start and Facebook's whole business model is to have you be the product. You've heard this a million times before. And so Google. Oh, and Facebook and Twitter all want you to use their services. And they're going to, you pay the highest bidder for you, right? For your eyeballs. Okay. That's all fine. I understand that. But in order for them to make more money, what do you have to do? As a business person, you know what you have to do, either get more customers, you have to increase the volume of purchases by the customers you have, or perhaps you need to increase your prices or cut your costs. There's only so many metrics that are available to a business. Two that you can manipulate in order to really come out. I had to have the game so that you can create more jobs and more opportunity for people by hiring them. If Facebook is going to be able to sell your information to more people, they need you on the platform for longer periods of time. That basically gives them more product to offer. Again, remember you are the product. So if they're going to try and keep you on Facebook, what are they going to do? They have on staff, all kinds of psychiatrists, psychologists, and sociologists who try and figure out how to really pull your strings. That's what they want. They want you on there. They're going to have colors that are designed to keep you on the website. Again, going back to the Vegas thing from the prior segment, you go into Las Vegas and do a casino and you are going to be completely oblivious as to what time of day it is. You have no idea. There aren't any windows. The light is always the same. The flooring the weird patterns they have in the carpets on the floors are designed to slightly disorient. You. So you're just sitting there playing the slots, getting free booze, because that's going to keep you playing because you don't make the best decisions when you are on the tipsy side. You are not going to be an effective gambler. Get, you might stay there all night and you have no idea. Use your Apple watch in order to remind you when you should be leaving right, or whatever, watch out. The same types of things have gone into all of these social media sites. And now one of the things that they have found out is if you get pissed off, if you're very angry at something, you are going to leave. Now you may just go and do something else because you're so upset, right? You're steaming over. You're boiling. You might leave the site permanently, just so many Twitter users have done thousands of them here after president Trump. Had decided he wasn't going to post because he couldn't on Twitter anymore. And moved over to Gab.com, as I mentioned. So what should they do? They want more product. They need more eyeballs that they can sell. So they're going to show you things that you want to see that are going to keep you on their site. So they're going to upset you. Yeah they want to upset you because if you are a little upset, you're going to pay more attention, right? Your eyeballs are going to be drawn in as it were. So they're going to show you things that effectively you want to see, but it's really more than that. It's really, they've got to get your hormones flowing to such a degree at such a level that you are going to stay on this site. And you're going to share content with your friends and. You're going to comment on a tweet and they're going to show it to the people that it's really going to upset in, but not so much that they're going to get off of the site for the day, but enough that they're going to want to jump in because their opinion matters. And in reality on these social media sites your opinion really doesn't matter that much, right? None of us are as important as we think, like to think we are. So they have sucked you in. And how many times have we seen people who are stuck in these sites all day long? They have a spare moment. They are just flipping through headlines and those headlines are designed to get you. To stick on the site to share stuff. That's what it's designed for. I didn't see that common. I really didn't and a really good friend of mine. He pointed out something the other day, cause he was asking about, what's the ultimate outcome going to be of what we've seen with president Trump and. Social media and banning conservatives, et cetera, et cetera. And so we had a great little chat about that and he pointed out Craig, normally you don't think this way. I don't think like the people that are trying to shut us up. I don't think like the people that are trying to take control, I'm I am not a socialist. I'm not a national socialist. Also called Nazi the German word for national socialists. I'm not a communist, which is again, an international socialist. You notice they're all socialists. And I just think everybody should have reasonable freedoms. Obviously we need laws and the right for me to swing my fist, stops somewhere before your nose.  And I understand all of that and I believe firmly in all of that. And I was raised remember in a socialist country that there has discussions about some of this stuff.  But I really am very libertine I think is maybe the way to put it because you have the Libertarian party, the uppercase L. I am a lowercase L I think that people have the right to privacy, for instance, which used to be something that the Democrat party talked about. And that used to be something the Democrat party cared about. But now with these massive businesses, That want your eyeballs that are keeping your eyeballs, it's all changed. And part of the reason it's all changed. And this is what I explained to my friend is if you're a big company, you don't want competition, right? So you get Facebook buying Instagram, you get Facebook buying WhatsApp because they were competition to them. What's another great way to get rid of competition if you don't have any morals? And we know from all of the stories we've seen about Zuckerberg and how he stole photos from Harvard university of all of the co-eds that were there and put them up and had people rating their them based on their looks. That story would tell us the Zuckerberg doesn't have those morals, but if you don't have any morals and you have enough money to get the attention of Congress or State legislatures, then what can you do? And I think that's where our problem has come in. Frankly, these guys want legislation.  So when we get back, I'll tell you why I think they want this legislation. Why they want the types of enforcement they have, because many times you might be scratching your head. I know I used to do saying why would this company be lobbying for legislation to regulate themselves? I think there's a pretty simple answer here. I mentioned how I am an intranet originalist because I was around in the days of the founding of the internet. Absolutely. So I was looking forward to all of this freedom, to all of this open space, to the ability to communicate back and forth with anybody, to be able to develop applications, whatever I needed to do, whatever I might want to do. It was just an incredible day. Incredible time to where we're at today. So you have these big businesses, Facebook and others who are doing the nasty, frankly, where they are controlling us. They really are because they're controlling the content we see, and we are no longer able to distinguish between something that is being fed to us. Because they think it'll keep us on the site longer. They think it'll make us talk about an article or something. And the difference between that and something maybe we need to see, which is most likely an opposing opinion now, just because there's an opposing opinion doesn't mean that it's a worthwhile opinion, right? There are some seriously crazy people out there, but we're not making that decision anymore. That decision is being made by the tech tyrant and the tech tyrant's love to have government intervene. If the tech titans, the Facebooks and Googles and Twitters of the world can get the government to put various controls in place because "in  this industry, we have not done a great job of controlling ourselves. So we need the government to control us."  When the government starts "controlling," it's quote unquote, right? These big tech giants and puts rules and regulations in place saying thou shall do this thou shalt not do that. We all chair many of us anyways, chair. And we cheer because the problem solved. And of course, as we know, anytime government quote "solves" unquote, a problem they've created three, four, five, six other problems. So government loves it because there's more problems to solve, but the original problem was never solved, but here's the trick. These tech tyrants or tyrants of other kinds, we'll talk about some others in just a minute, are now under new regulations. But they can afford those regulations. Who cannot afford to comply with those regulations? It's a little guy, isn't it? The small companies is small startups. That, that I was so excited were coming our way because we had this new internet technology. This wonderful tech that was going to change our lives. Those companies are squashed. They're stepped on. They are little gnats that are flying about their heads that are now starved because they can't comply. Now, let me give you an example.  I deal with regulatory compliance. My business is all about cyber security right now. We're not a law firm. I don't give legal advice, but I help them comply. And how do I help them comply? We'll go in and we'll do audits on their networks. Figure out what it is that needs to be done on their network. How can that work? What problems might we have? What problems might they have and then move forward right to the next step. And that is solve the problems. Just this week we delivered a case of paper to one of our clients. Now this is a moderately small client there. They're not huge. They are considered a small business by the Small Business Administration. So they're not a particularly big customer or business, but here's, what's happened in their industry. There are rules called CMMC, which are based on some National Institutes of Standards and Technology requirements or guidelines that were put in place. And anyone that manufacturers anything or provides anything to the federal government has to comply with these rules. And compliance is very expensive. We're talking a half, a million dollars upfront for a small business. And then if you really are complying probably about 300,000 a year, if you're trying to do it all yourself, okay. Very expensive.  Now I look at these cybersecurity rules and say you know to me anyways, being a cybersecurity guy, these are legitimate, they're reasonable. But most of these small companies are looking at it and say it's easy enough for one of these major contractors that you probably heard, their names is places like Boeing or BAE. And those types of places it's easy enough for them to comply because they've got great profit margins and they have thousands of people working for them. Tens of thousands. It's easy for them. It's hard for us. So we delivered. A case of printed paper, where we had gone through and written up all of the documentation necessary for them to comply with the CMMC rules. Now this documentation set that we wrote up for them is, as you can guess, Thousands and thousands of pages long, and it's all stuff that they're supposed to comply with. And it goes into every level. What should happen from the physical security, which the fed call ITAR all the way through the computer security and password changes. When should they happen, et cetera, et cetera. And this is a $50,000 project. How is a small company going to be shelling out this kind of money? Now we try and make it easy for them because we will rent them the equipment as opposed to sell them equipment. And we'll, we will do the documentation for them at this cost because the 50,000 frankly, is cheap. If they had done it themselves it would have been closer to 200,000. But because we do it for so many businesses and so much of it, the same.  we're able to give it to them at a savings, but how can a small business comply with all these regulations? A startup business comply. It's very difficult. If not impossible to be able to comply with this stuff. And there are some market opportunities for us that we're pursuing where they, these customers are actually using our systems in order to help stay safe. And I think that might be a good way for them to get around that initial quarter million, half a million dollar investment in upgrades that they have to do. But it makes it difficult to enter the market, right? Investors they're always looking at what's the barrier to entry here for potential competitors? If you can get the federal government's ear, if you are a big contractor, you can get regulations put in place that you could comply with. No problem. I'll just add it onto my bill, which they were able to do by the way. If the regulations were written so they could bill it back to the federal government, but for various reasons, very small businesses and startups just cannot bill it back. How's that for our scary situation?  We don't like the fact that frankly, Google Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, you name any of these big companies. We don't like the fact that they are able to control the market that they're in. Now we had this whole antitrust system set up, you might remember the robber barons and what they were doing, which was just totally immoral and really hurt a lot of people a hundred years ago. This is the modern version of the robber barons. If you can't beat them, join them. And as I mentioned in the last segment .   They love the regulations and the regulations love them.  Now, the reason I say the regulations love them is because the regulators love them. Mel Brooks. You remember with the the movie, it was just absolutely fantastic. And they're all sitting around the table with the Governor and they're talking about their phony baloney jobs. That's really what so many of these regulations are. Do we really need them, do we really need all of these laws? And the answer is obviously no. We just cut back on tons of regulations, tens of thousands of regulations that were just absolutely not needed, but the regulators love it.  If you are a regulator and you are sitting behind a desk and you'd like to earn more money. And of course, who wouldn't like to make a few extra bucks, and maybe take a vacation for once. But you're sitting behind a desk as a regulator. How are you going to justify a higher salary? Obviously more work would help justify that. And you're probably looking, as part of that raise to maybe move up the ladder. In order to move up the ladder and manage people, you have to have more people. So the more work you can make for yourself and for your department, so that the department has to grow, the better, the chance of you being able to move up the ladder and get that extra salary bump. You see how that works. I know you guys. You're the best and brightest and you're like me. We don't think that way, but many regulators do think that way. And I know there's some great, honest people out there that are trying to do the right thing. We work with a number of State organizations from school districts to counties. We've done it for years to State governments, in fact, and we always try and do the right thing, but the tendency. The gravity is towards these regulatory agencies growing and just grabbing more and more power and authority so that they can justify more and more. And the big companies don't actually really complain about it much because that helps them keep the small guys out. That's what I've been talking about. They don't want those small guys. They don't want the startups. They don't want what the internet had so much hope and opportunity held out for. They want to stay in their phony baloney positions as well at the head of some of these things. So they've made it very difficult for us to get in. Then on the state and local level, look at what's happened. Again, government likes to control government likes to regulate, which is controlled. That's what it's all about. Remember, regulator was the brand name for a clock because it helped to regulate the time. Ball was the first watch. That was good enough for the railroad to keep track of time. And we have our time zones today because of the railroad, nothing to do with what the real time of day is. If we were at noon, when the sun was high overhead, when it was directly overhead, we'd have an even amount of time in the afternoon as we do in the morning. In other words, the sun would rise at 8:00 AM and set at 8:00 PM. But that doesn't happen. Does it? And that's all because of regulation or just because of the railroad who was huge at the time. So State and local think about the licenses that are required in so many places. Do we really need to have a business license? Did you know, Singapore does not require business licenses. They hardly have any licenses. In fact, in Singapore, and they have one of the best economies in the world and have had for a very long time, because a simple idea might be a great idea, but it might not work in the real world. Look at the numbers coming out of the small business administration. Most businesses fail.  And the best way to fail is to fail fast before you spend all of your money, your savings. Hopefully you have something after this whole lockdown, but that's the best way to figure out if an business idea is a good one. Failed. You got to try it, but if you have to have a license from the town for the business, you have to have an occupancy permit for the office space. You have to have an, a license to run it out of your house nowadays, right? Because we're working from home and then consider things like a license for a hairdresser for a barber really. Really you need a license for that? It is great because it keeps people out of the business. It keeps the number of barbers down, the number of hairdressers down there aren't as many because you need a license, but do we really need a license for that? So I wanted to use that as a lower end example because barbershops and hair salons tend to be much, much smaller than trillion dollar companies. So we have to be very careful about our tendencies growing up, my father and my mother, they would continually say, ah, there ought to be a law about that. Really do we need a law? How long has murder being illegal? Go back to British common law where a lot of our laws started from anyways. It was illegal. Then it was illegal to cheat somebody out of something. It was illegal to do these various things, but the lawyers, the whole law community has built it up. Along with the politicians, so that everything's become incredibly complicated, which benefits who again, does it really benefit you? If someone cheats you? Those laws had been on the books since the Magna Carta. Okay? So do we really need to have a specific law about cheating on the internet using this type of achieved against this type of a person that applies to this type of a company? Really? Do we really need that? Isn't that what the whole courts were about is to interpret the law. We have come so far from our founding. And I'm referring to the internet here, not just the country, but it applies to both. So we are now faced with this problem of the internet and these mega-monopolies effectively, when you control 60% of the online servers and data processing storage that's pretty much a monopoly and that's the position Amazon is in right now. How do you get rid of those monopolies while we've tried legislatively before? But those laws don't work. They've worked a way around those laws. They've said, okay, we're going to actually use the laws to protect our monopoly. And they go to the government and they say, Hey we want to buy Instagram or we want to buy WhatsApp. And we're not gaining any sort of a monopoly position by doing this because we do have laws in place that require these big companies to go before a federal bureaucracy who by the way, is going to regulate them and has that additional incentive hidden away in their back pocket. If we have this bigger company here, we can regulate it easier than all of these little companies. So they go and they get permission to buy these competitors. And they were competitors because Instagram was taking those ever valuable eyeballs that are needed by Facebook, away from Facebook. WhatsApp was taking people away from messenger and WhatsApp was great at the time because it was end to end encrypted used MarlinSpike's algorithms. It just was a nice little product. But Facebook already had a competing product called Messenger, and yet they were able to buy it anyways and become bigger and get more regulations in place, which keeps the small guys out. It keeps the best ideas, ideas we never saw because frankly they never saw the light of day. So how could we see them? Are you willing to put all of this money into something and find out there's all these regulations in your way where you have to hire a company like mine and hire me because you need to do an audit. You need to comply with the HIPAA regulations. You need to comply with these CMMC regulations. And in some cases it makes sense. And I got to say, I think in most cases I've seen these regulations do nothing but preserve and create monopolies. So not that I have an opinion on the matter, but I thought it was while in these turbulent times to explain what I think is going on. And these calls for further regulations I think are going to ultimately have the exact opposite effect. That these new regulations that people are calling for more regulations from the FTC, from the FCC  Pitt and PI I should say and company did not do enough regulations. They got rid of regulations. And we don't have free speech that gamer, he can't get internet cheap because he's using a lot of internet compared to what that granny next door who wants to send a nice picture of her cat or get pictures of the grandkids. She has to pay the same as him. That's what they want. That's what they want. And I think it's going to be destructive  Let's talk about secure communications right now. And I'm talking about talking to your kids at school or grandkids, or, any type of communication you might want to have, including of course, business communication that you want to be. Relatively / reasonably secure. You can't expect to using just regular hardware to have military grade security. It's just not reasonable. Apple went to all of the trouble and they got their iPhone certified for certain types of data. And I think it's great that they did because it's helping all of us. But in, in, unless you are a spy working for a foreign government or something, Really these things are going to work for you. So when the number one out there is an app called WhatsApp and it is an app that was designed using a very good base. There's a guy out there by the name of MarlinSpike. Probably not the name he was born with. And he designed a end-to-end state-of-the-art encryption mechanism. And it was used, it still is used in an app called Signal. And another app called WhatsApp. I got about a week ago, a notification on WhatsApp because we use WhatsApp for a mastermind group on men. And the idea is we don't want people spying in maybe competitors who knows who. And so we wanted something that was secure end to end and remember that's what zoom was telling us. Yeah. It's secure end to end. And of course we find out later on that it wasn't, they were absolutely lying. Big surprise there. But when we're talking about secure communications, it has to be end to end. And what that means is you type into your phone for instance, and it's in the clearer right there on your phone and then the app, whatever it might be will encrypt it. Send it to the remote site. Now we obviously, it's going to go through a bunch of routers on the internet. It may end up in a server or two, depending on the app and how it's written, and then it'll end up on the other person's smartphone or desktop, whatever it might be end to end means that anyone in the middle who is capturing the data only sees it as random letters and numbers. That's the idea behind this. So it won't prevent someone from listening in on your conversation because they can certainly listen in, but it will prevent them from listening intelligibly to your conversation. In other words, they've got all of the data. It's encrypted data, it looks like trash and they have it now. Is that any good for people? Again, it depends on how spy worlds you want to get here? Is it something where knowing that there's a communication going on means something right there. There's a lot of stuff you can read into it. How active is it? You might remember in world war II, we were listening to German communications and you could tell something's ramping up here because we've got more units, transmitting unit codes, and we use that as did our enemies in the war to fool them as well. We had pretended we had a whole tank divisions that didn't actually exist as well as various other things. So secure communications means a lot of things, but when we're talking end to end, all it means is  when you send it is basically garbage one is being transmitted. And then it's in the clear when it arrives at the far side. So that's end to end communications what app has had and then communications encrypted, which is why people have been using it. If you listen to the first hour, you heard me complaining about Facebook and how they've been buying their competition, and then the competition that they can't buy that doesn't even exist yet. Before it gets started, they've been using government regulations to suppress them and make sure they just don't become competitors. One of the apps that was bought by Facebook, because it was taken away a lot of eyeballs, is called WhatsApp. It's a messaging app. It has, or at least used to have privacy coded into the way it was designed. Now, Facebook owning it means who knows if it still does. We don't have the source code that Facebook is using, who knows what they've gotten into it, but we're talking about 2 billion users. Worldwide. And I got this message from WhatsApp saying that if I don't concede to these new terms of service, I'm not going to be able to use WhatsApp anymore. While these terms of service include. And I had to look at this and now I have it up on my screen right now. They are changing WhatsApp service and the way they process your data, how businesses can use Facebook hosted services to store and manage. There are WhatsApp client chats, how they partner with Facebook to offer integrations across the Facebook company products. So guess what that all means. And they said, if you don't agree to this by February 8th, you will no longer be able to use WhatsApp. Now remember they paid $19 billion for WhatsApp in 2014, and it's really going to make you wonder what they were thinking. All right. They have not been making money off of WhatsApp. They haven't been able to track you what you're doing, insert ads, et cetera. And there have been a lot of people over the years who have said to guests, what's going to happen here. Our friends at Facebook are going to start monetizing WhatsApp. If I paid $19 billion for an app, I'd want a mob monetize it as well.  This is getting scary in 2016. WhatsApp gave users the ability to pull out of having your account data transferred over to Facebook. So it took them about. Two years after the acquisition to say, okay, now we're going to grab all of your count data. And now this updated privacy policy is changing. Everything you will no longer have that choice. Like you had four years ago. So some of the data that WhatsApp collects is going to be available and open to Facebook. So that includes user phone numbers, other people's phone numbers that are stored in your address. Book, profile names, profile pictures, status messages, indicating when you were last online diagnostic data collected from app blogs. Now. The diagnostic data can tell them a lot. And it isn't just used to fix broken programs. This diagnostic data oftentimes contains things like passwords or user account names, other websites that you visit. It's got. Just a ton of stuff. So under these new terms, Facebook is saying they have the right to share all of this data with its family of companies. So think about what that means. They've got the Facebook payments. Family member. And part of the reason that they're probably doing this is Facebook really wants to get in the money business. You might remember. We talked last year about how Facebook wants to have their own cryptocurrency and manage it. So be careful here they have the right to collect purchase information, your financial information, location, contacts, user content. So what should you use? I'm not going to delve into more about what this problem is. I think it should be pretty obvious. If you want something that's quick and easy to use. If you're following in my advice so far, you're using an iPhone because that is your best bet, generally speaking out there right now. And when it comes to security and even for some of these regulated industries that we serve with these services, like doing the documentation. Fixing up networks doing audits, all of that sort of stuff. It's good for them too. It works for them. And on your iPhone and also your Macs. There's something called I message. And I message is end to end encrypted. And Apple is not using it for advertising. It is not using it for your financial transactions and spying on you. Okay.  You had another reason to use your iPhone. If you're on an Android, we've got something for you here in a minute as well. So iPhone problem with iPhone and iMessage is, the recipient has to have an iPhone or a Mac in order for it to be encrypted. So what do I recommend overall? I use I message when I want something easy, maybe talking to family members and I use Signal it's called Signal messenger. It's fantastic. It is end to end. It is what. The pros you, so check it out. you are not hearing the truth. The algorithms at Facebook and Twitter and every other place was social media. Those programs are not designed to show you the truth. They're just designed to manipulate you. And I explained what that was all about, how it works and why. So if you missed that, make sure you check out the podcast, CraigPeterson.com/podcast, and you'll see them all there. Or just in your favorite podcast app, just search for Craig Peterson. You should be able to find it that way. We have had a lot of turmoil lately and I chalk a lot of it, much much of it to the social media sites that are out there because these social media sites are doing a disservice. By dividing us up even further. They are just letting us know things they think we want to know and you know what, they're not wrong. We do want to know those things and it gets to be a problem certainly. But how do you deal with that problem? Yeah. I was just thinking of the sound of music. When I said that you can deal with this problem in a number of different ways, but social media is not helping the matter at all. These people that broke into the Capitol building on Wednesday, we're not very subtle about what they were doing. There were filming themselves, actively tweeting, actively posting things on Instagram, on and on. And they were uploading them to websites. It was pretty obvious where they were and many people, of course, they don't know how to, I don't maybe, maybe you don't know, but the photos you take, the videos you take, they have information embedded into them that tells you where and when the photo was taken. That frankly is a huge problem for these people. So law enforcement agencies are now trying to track down these people. They're calling insurrectionists who have  done things that I guess you could call a bit of an insurrection. The Washington DC attacks seem to have been mostly conservative people that may have gotten caught up. There could be people who were embedded into the crowd just to rile them up and get them in and get them going. Many of these BLM and Antifa protests, of course they are actively burning and looting and mugging and shooting. It there's a huge difference here, but in both cases, local police and the FBI are trying to find out who these people were.  I got an email from the FBI earlier in the week where the FBI was asking, Hey here are some posters that we put together and we're trying to identify these people in it. It had what they had identified as kind of leaders of what was going on. They had pictures of them. And of course, people have been reporting them and saying who it is because they were allegedly actively instigating violence. There were thousands of photos also in videos taken by some of the media who were on site. But several police departments here recently, like my Miami, Philadelphia, and New York city of Portland, Seattle they've turned to facial recognition platforms. Now, in some cases, these cities have said it's illegal, but the police have been using it. And one of them is something we talked about last week and that's this clear view. A I. We've got to keep an eye on that one clear view, AI, for those who don't remember, maybe you haven't heard of it before is a company that went online and against the policies of these websites scraped all of the pictures. It could find. And scraping in this case means downloading the photographs. So they downloaded them. They put them into a database. There were billions, as I recall of these photos, and then they had some facial recognition software they were using to try and figure out who's who there. Now they use this for these demonstrations by the BLM and the Antifa people. And they were able to find a lot of the people and arrest them and charge them. So they used in Philadelphia , Again protest footage against Instagram photos to identify and arrest restaurant protestor there in November. The Washington post reported that investigators from 14 local and federal agencies in the DC area used it more than 12,000 times since 2019. So over a two year period, and they haven't disclosed who it was, et cetera. And in many cases they odd few skate where they got the photo from the, this is a technique that the police department have been using more recently, like over the last decade or two, where. They don't want to disclose the way they found out about something. And a good example of that are these stingray devices, which are fake mobile towers that the police will put in place. Now they're not a tower, it's a mobile, it's a a cellular site. And so any phone that comes within that cell sites area is going to link up to the stingray device. And then the stingray device is going to monitor everything going through it, which means, by the way, remember your text messages, your SMS messages can all be grabbed by a stingray device, which is really a huge problem. So they were trying to hide the source of the stingray as being the source, because they didn't want to reveal that these stingray, these fake cell sites they were using were actually in use that they even existed. They were denying even the existence for a long time. And eventually we found out, yeah, that's what. They were doing until that's over with. But anyways, what they do oftentimes when they don't want to reveal the source is they'll lie about it. So they'll use that source, like a stingray device to identify someone, and then they'll go the next step and investigate that person a little bit and try and find something else and say yeah. Someone at this diner reported this person, or we were at this diner having lunch, and we saw this person walk in knowing full well that the only reason they're there they're at that diner, which is 20 miles off of their beat, if you will, was because the stingray device had grabbed that person's phone number and they knew that they had been communicating and in fact, maybe planning some operation. Or another. Okay. So they'll lie about the source and we've seen that again and again many times. So the law enforcement now is using also something called geo-fence warrants. And they take them to companies like Google who is collecting data on us and where we are. If you have an Android phone, it's guaranteed, the Google is tracking you. So one of these geo-fence warrant is issued saying, I want to know. Everyone that was within this area. That's geo fences and they will look in their database and check and see, okay. Who was in that area at that time. And then they'll give it. This list of all mobile devices that were within that geographic carrier during the given time, they'll give it to law enforcement, then we've seen how people have been arrested and even charged for no good reason other than they got caught up in one of these geo-fence warrants.  Now, I don't want you guys to get the wrong idea here. The reason I'm telling you this is these tools for identifying people are not just in the hands of law enforcement. They are in the hands of bad guys. They're in the hands of advertisers. They're in everybody's hands. Remember Google, their whole business model, is making money off of you by you being the product. So if you are using Google maps, even if it's on an iPhone, Google knows where you are. They may not know exactly what you're doing, but they probably have a pretty good idea. And they're willing to sell this to absolutely anyone, the data aggregators, the same sort of a thing that free app that you play. Isn't it fun? Yeah. Yeah. Well, Apple shut down the ability of many of these apps now to track you because that's how they were paying for themselves. It wasn't that, you know, Hey, I made this free app out of the goodness of my heart. Isn't this wonderful look at this. No, no, no. It's because they were tracking you. Some of these were even malicious, particularly in the early days of Android screensavers that were downloading everything. It was just, it was crazy what was going on back in the days. But our social media, the pictures that we're posted  are available, not just to law enforcement, but to bad guys, nation States like China, uh, Russia, North Korea. Now we've got Iran and Vietnam involved in some of these things. And when we're posting the pictures, some of these sites will remove the geo information from the pictures and the videos. Others do not.  So be very careful with them, you might want to double check it. And it's handy sometimes, right? Like you can look at that beautiful trip to Disney world that you talk just by the geo codes on those pictures. Putting it all together. That's how some of these services, like if you have Amazon and you're uploading your photos to Amazon, they will put together a little photo book for you because they know, okay, from this day to this day, you were in Disney world and off it goes, and you can make your nice little photo book. So be very, very careful about this because you, the identities that we have are not so secret and letting all of this stuff go, letting it become effectively public knowledge, I think is potentially a big problem. It isn't that I have anything to hide. It's that I have nothing to share. It's a great concept. Remember, on, on all of that stuff, people were reporting what they were doing in DC and at these other riots around the country. Including, putting them up on Parler, which is offline, going to be online, probably would be offline. Gab is another big one, Telegram's, another one. But we gotta be very, very careful. Okay. Be careful. Uh, there's home, honey. So many things we could talk about here. It's it's just absolutely crazy. Uh, but I want to get into Elon Musk here for a quick minute. He has been absolutely amazing. This man has taken some huge, huge risks. He said moving to the United States was the best move he ever made. And I can see that. And he says, it's because of the freedoms we have here. Again, my cautionary tales here about regulation. You got to be very careful. He's now, Elon Musk, worth more than $180 billion looking at his shares. Isn't that crazy? And that of course is mostly because of Tesla. He has a lot of great ideas, including he's got this whole thing about going to Mars and he also has the, uh, the boring company, few other things, including a little thing called Space X, uh, stuff you might've heard about before too. He's got some amazing rockets, but that is just, just amazing this week, at least on one point, Tesla was valued at almost $800 billion, which is several times more than any other car company. Which means that investors are thinking that Tesla is going to be worth more than any other car company and you know what? I think they're probably right.   I think Tesla is going to pretty much own the automobile industry and just a few years from now. Oh. And speaking of that, I don't know if you saw this, but apparently Apple is in talks right now. The very preliminary stage with Hyundai, who is a huge manufacturer, not just of cars, like the Hyundai and Kia brands, but of ships. And that's how I've known them too, in the shipping industry. Having some kids in that industry. But think about this just over a year ago, 2020 Musk was only worth 27 billion. It's just, just absolutely amazing. So Tesla is really winning the game. They have the most miles they have the most cars. Uh, we'll see, and we'll see how this goes. And by the way, mosque is making a lot of his money. From stock options that he gets based on the valuation of the company, which is not a bad way to incentivize these people. I mentioned earlier Parler. It was banned and is banned from the Android store, from the Apple's store. And also from Amazon, which was a major platform they were using. We have seen over the last week, a ton of conservatives just being de-platformed and Parler was this free speech app. No, it wasn't the wild, wild West. They had restrictions on speech and it was clearly spelled out and Parler had committees that would look at things that were questionable. That had been reported. And were we moving things and because of that and the wording in what was said by these trillion dollar tech companies has got Parler now suing them. So we'll see how that ends up going.  But this is just absolutely amazing to me. There is. Or at least there was no true free speech outlet online until Parler came up. Well, recently, right? Until Parley came along, we used to be a lot of free speech online, but you know, it gets, gets a little troublesome sometimes.  Google, it's just, it's incredible what they did here. And what Amazon did. Amazon pulled all of their servers. All of the services Parler was using and knocked it offline. So there are some lawsuits underway, expect more lawsuits over time. We'll see what happens.  A lot of  libertarian as well as conservative people have had their platforms yanked. Ron Paul, who has never been one out there saying anything about an insurrection. Ron Paul's account was also yanked. So it's, I don't know. It's just crazy. What's going on. Guess we'll see, keep up, keep watching, keep listening. Many people have gone over to some other sites like Gab right now is a Twitter replacement and good for them too. Pretty decent Twitter replacement, frankly, but there's another one out there called Mastodon. This is really an interesting one. I like it. It's open source. Everybody can view the source. Anyone can run their own Mastodon server, which I think is just absolutely amazing here. And the idea behind Mastodon is all of these Mastodon servers can talk to each other, can share things so you can have the large conversations, but each server can have its own set of rules. That's the part that makes it really interesting. And that's why I want to try and bring a Mastodon server up on the line And I am looking for someone right now who loves to correspond to people and do some follow-up because I get a lot of inquiries and I want to make sure that I am getting back to people and getting back to them in a timely manner, because frankly, I get distracted as well .  So if you are someone that has a question, or if you think you might be able to help, wanna little bit of work and you know, every day to, do some follow-up and some tracking, make sure you just email me me@CraigPeterson.com. I'd absolutely love to hear from you.  Before the break we were talking about some of these social media sites and how conservative voices have been shut down. What's interesting is that Gab has picked up a lot of people, including president Trump, but Gab's had a problem too.  Gab has been kind of taken over by some of these. People might call them far right. Wingers, but that's not true. The United States has a different political scale than any other country, really in the world. In the United States, if you are on the right of the political scale. The far right is complete libertarian small "L" Libertine that's on the far right. And then you start moving left to get into the conservatives, and then you keep moving a lot further left. You ended up in the Democrats and then further left from them you have the communist and further left from them you have the Nazis, right? All different forms of socialism. On the left. So left is socialism, right is freedom is kind of how you boil it down. That's the way it works in the United States.  In Europe, it is a different scale. In Europe. The scale is entirely socialist. The assumption has in Europe has gotten to the point where everyone wants to be socialist. It's just what kind of socialist. So on the right hand side of the European political scale, you have the national socialists, IE, the Nazis. So the national socialists are on the right side of the scale. And on the left side of the European political scale, you have the communists, which are the international socialists. And then in the middle, you have these socialists that are, you know, kind of pro their country , maybe a little bit more international. So think of a communist as it's my, my union brother, uh, in Minsk. And I am here in Detroit. That's what a communist would be. It's international. It's kind of what the United Nations is doing. It's an international socialist organization. And then you have over on the far right of the European scale these people who are Nazis, which is, I am in Detroit. I am a union member. I am making automobiles. And that's all that matters, you know, forget about Minsk. You know, I don't forget about it. Right. So that's the big difference nationalist versus internationalist.  Well, when we're talking about Gab.com, which is one of these social media sites out there, there have been many people who are national socialists who have been prominent on gab. Of course, the people that make the most noise, the people that are the least appealing, the people that are the most offensive are the squeaky wheel by definition. And they're the ones who are going to be talking about right. So I think that's a, that's a good thing. And so a lot of these people migrated, these people on the socialist scales, the national socialists and the international socialists, both of whom want to control your life. They started going over onto Gab and the. Only real free and open social network right now is something called Mastodon, M A S T O D O N. And it is based on originalist internet views of the internet. And I explained that last hour as well. I'm an internet originalist. I believe the internet should be open. It should be freedom to speak and speak our mind. And obviously there's a line there and that is where it's legal to speak our minds. Right. You can't be, be plotting. Things are going to result in imminent death or destruction, et cetera. Um, But that's where I sit. And I also think that anyone should be able to make anything and have it go on the internet for anyone to use and compete freely. Well that complete freely is not a big part of the internet nowadays. Unfortunately. So with Mastodon, you can put your own server up and there is a map out there right now that's showing this is unofficial, but showing about 2,500 mastodon servers that are out there. That's pretty huge. That's a very, very big deal. And it is kind of a friendlier social network, but some people have moved there that have these extremist ideas like BLM and Antifa, uh, who are, you know, obviously facist organizations in both cases. In other words, national socialists. And Mastodon's admins have been forced to deal with this problem, but the beauty of Mastodon. Is it as completely decentralized kind of like the internet was designed going right back to what I was saying about being an internet originalist. You don't want any single point of failure, so I'll, I'll let you know how it goes here. I'm going to put a Mastodon server up. And maybe we can try it. Maybe I'll invite you guys to it once I kind of got at work and we can see how it does and how it all works, but you can find it out there right now. There's lots of apps that speak this protocol that is used by these Mastodon servers, which have apparently been also integrated into other websites and network, but it's essentially a way to host a social media website. Users can post 500 character messages called "toots." Uh, and you can repost or boost messages on your own timeline, follow, or privately message other users. But instead of it being a single site run by a company it is software built on open source freely available and using this Activity Pub protocol. So we'll see how this all goes. I will let you guys know.  Consumer electronics show. I am just disappointed . It was canceled due to the lockdown. And that means that we aren't out in Vegas. And the beautiful thing about it was you could wander around the floors for days, seeing new gadgets, seeing new technology improvements, dramatically new ones. There's so many things. And it's just not happening this year. Now they have this virtual version that I signed up for, and I've got a lot of emails from people who are promoting the different products and, you know, the all well and good. But when you get back down to it, um, It's just not, it's not the same. Right? How can you get excited? How can you have buzz? It just doesn't make sense, but some of the things that people have pointed out, like CNET has a lot of coverage this year, they have been the official coverage platform for the consumer electronics show for quite a while. But it is not like it used to be because they got caught with some bribes and other things.  So here's a few things just for you to keep an eye out for remember oftentimes stuff shown at CES doesn't show up for six months or a year, but foldable phones are one thing, but LG has shown off. A rollable smartphone. Yeah, really the expecting to release it later on this year and you roll it up and you stick it  in your pocket. I'm looking at a picture right now of  a company called TCLs new phone. This is a Chinese company and it has a 6.7 inch phone that can expand into a 7.8 inch tablet. And actually. Pretty big tablet looking at this picture here. They also have a 17 inch. That's what I'm looking at. 17 inch printed, OLED scrolling display that can be unfurled and has a 100% color gamut. So I'm looking at this thing. It's basically a rollout think of your blinds in your windows, where you pull it out. That's what it is. And it rolls out to a 17 inch wide screen. Absolutely amazing. Now we are giving some of our clients, um, we actually haven't handed them out yet. This was an end of year gift and it took us until now to get it together. But these little devices that you can put your phone in, and it has an inductive charger, it creates ozone. And also has ultraviolet light. So in other words, it kills germs.  There's a company that introduced an ultraviolet light treatment system for your car to kill pathogens. This man, this frame TV from Samsung is amazing. This thing is only 25 millimeters thick, which is crazy. It's the smallest ever. And 75 inches, seven, five inch display. Is that something or what?  A bunch of a wireless phone chargers that came out. There is a kind of a neat little, um, Bluetooth shower speaker from AMP that is powered by the water that flows through it. Right? So it's stealing some of the water energy.  This Cold Snap you might've seen. They won an innovation award this year. It kind of was like a career machine you'd use for making coffee, but it makes single serve. Pod dispensed ice cream. It's just amazing.  An infinity table game. This kind of reminds me of Ms. Pac-Man and the table version that you can use for running games.  Samsung has new robots for the home. They have three of them. They've got one that's for helping to clean the house. One's a personal assistant and also acts as a security camera.  OWC I love these guys, Other World Computing. I've had them on the show a lot of times. They got a new charging port again, uh, it's amazing what these guys were able to do, but there's, there's lots of cool stuff that's coming out this year. I think it's going to be a bit of a slower year than usual for some of these innovations. But, I expect next year we'll be back in full swing.  Thanks for listening today. Make sure you are on my email list. I've been sending out trainings about what to do with VPNs, how to lock down your Windows computer, and much more. And you only get that if you're on my email list and I send out that email once a week, Craigeterson.com. And you'll find my podcast there. The articles I talk about my appearances on radio ,TV, everything. CraigPeterson.com and have a great week. --- More stories and tech updates at: www.craigpeterson.com Don't miss an episode from Craig. Subscribe and give us a rating: www.craigpeterson.com/itunes Follow me on Twitter for the latest in tech at: www.twitter.com/craigpeterson For questions, call or text: 855-385-5553

Review of How Bad are Bananas?: The Carbon Footprint of Everything by Mike Berners Lee. Available from Amazon here. How Bad Are Bananas? was a groundbreaking book when first published in 2009, when most of us were hearing the phrase ‘carbon footprint’ for the first time. Mike Berners-Lee set out to inform us what was important (aviation, heating, swimming pools) and what made very little difference (bananas, naturally packaged, are good!). This new edition updates all the figures (from data centres to hosting a World Cup) and introduces many areas that have become a regular part of modern life – Twitter, the Cloud, Bitcoin, electric bikes and cars, even space tourism. Berners-Lee runs a considered eye over each area and gives us the figures to manage and reduce our own carbon footprint, as well as to lobby our companies, businesses and government. His findings, presented in clear and even entertaining prose, are often surprising. And they are essential if we are to address climate change. How Bad are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint of Everything, 2020 edition, reviewed This is a fun, and yet also deadly serious book. Updated and rewritten for 2020, to factor in changes in the relative impact of, well, everything, in terms of its carbon footprint. The book is written in a smart, informative, and accessible way. It also makes you look at all aspects of your life and what you do, and its impact on the planet. If you want the high-level summary and the biggest way to have a positive impact, don’t fly, stop flying, and if you can’t do that, then greatly reduce the number of flights you make. Pretty much everything else you do pales into comparison in relation to flying, though new laptops are of course a big impact too. However, the book takes you along a whole series of other things that have an impact, even down to receiving emails. This immediately inspired me to realise that simply deleting junk email is less effective than unsubscribing to those updates that you endlessly get without ever having consciously signed up to them. From emails at one end of the spectrum to flying at the other end the book walks you through the relative impact of a wide range of things that we do in our lives. Children are naturally a big impact too, though we can’t exactly hand them back, so we do have a responsibility to do what we can to raise them to be aware of what we do, and how we live our lives. This is a great book to have, and makes a good christmas stocking filler, yes it will trigger some impact on your carbon footprint but if it makes you aware of the bigger impacts you can avoid making then it will be money well spent. Mike Berners-Lee tweeted: To clarify, following FT and BBC pieces, the carbon footprint of sending an email is trivial. Looks like UK gov has misused a press release from OVO that in turn used estimates from the 2010 version of my book 'How Bad Are Bananas?' (now updated). More about Irish Tech News and Business Showcase here. FYI the ROI for you is => Irish Tech News now gets over 1.5 million monthly views, and up to 900k monthly unique visitors, from over 160 countries. We have over 860,000 relevant followers on Twitter on our various accounts & were recently described as Ireland’s leading online tech news site and Ireland’s answer to TechCrunch, so we can offer you a good audience! Since introducing desktop notifications a short time ago, which notify readers directly in their browser of new articles being published, over 50,000 people have now signed up to receive them ensuring they are instantly kept up to date on all our latest content. Desktop notifications offer a unique method of serving content directly to verified readers and bypass the issue of content getting lost in people’s crowded news feeds. Drop us a line if you want to be featured, guest post, suggest a possible interview or just let us know what you would like to see more of in our future articles. We’re always open to new and i...

Efter 20 år kanske vi får version 3 av Gimp, Tim Berners-Lee försöker att överträffa sig själv med Inrupt och Solid. Vad hände med Vim egentligen? Det och mycket mer! Länkar: https://trevligmjukvara.se/s05e04 Stöd Trevlig Mjukvara: https://liberapay.com/TrevligMjukvara/donate

Inrupt, the startup from World Wide Web founder Tim Berners-Lee, announced an enterprise version of the Solid privacy platform today, which allows large organizations and governments to build applications that put users in control of their data. Berners-Lee has always believed that the web should be free and open, but large organizations have grown up […]

Climate expert Mike Berners Lee paints a positive picture of a world that lies in our hands, and fills us in on his latest research.

Climate expert Mike Berners Lee paints a positive picture of a world that lies in our hands, and fills us in on his latest research.

In this episode we meet the carbon footprint connoisseur who wants us to hone our instincts for measuring the production of harmful greenhouse gases before, during and after everything we make, eat, live and love to do… from sending an email to flying round the world…it all adds up to tonnes of trouble for life on earth as we know it today. Get a copy of Mike's book HERE

Kunz and Addis were both enthusiastic purveyors of research at SLAC. They each played their part in advancing information discovery. When Kunz told Addis about the web, they both had the same idea about what to do with it. SLAC was going to need a website. Kunz built a web server at Stanford — the first in the United States. Addis, meanwhile, wrangled a few colleagues to help her build the SLAC website. The site launched on December 12, 1991, a year after Berners-Lee first published his own website at CERN.

That's where Nicola Pellow came in. An undergraduate at Leicester Polytechnic, Pellow was still an intern at CERN. She was assigned to Berners-Lee's and Calliau's team, so they tasked her with building an interoperable browser that could be installed anywhere. The fact that she had no background in programming (she was studying mathematics) and that she was at CERN as part of an internship didn't concern her much.

Sir Sidney McSprocket takes us on a journey to meet three Great British Minds who are responsible for the invention of computing and the internet.       See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Inventor of the world wide web, Berners-Lee argues that we need to start designing the digital habits we want.

Welcome to the World news. World news keeps you updated news around the nations. Today's topic is "Web Inventor: World Must Close Internet Divide" World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee has said the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates "the gross inequality" of a world where almost half the population is unable to connect to the internet. Speaking at the launch of the UN's Roadmap for Digital Cooperation, Berners-Lee said that around 3.5 billion people have missed out on the "lifeline" the internet has provided by enabling work and education to continue during the pandemic. Since the onset of the pandemic, internet usage has jumped 70%, the use of communication apps has grown by 300%, and virtual collaboration tools by 600%. Some video streaming services have grown 20-fold, said Klaus Schwab, executive chairman of the World Economic Forum. But Schwab also emphasized that only about half of the world has internet access. Of the 25 least connected countries, 21 are in Africa. "This inequality is a barrier to wider equality, and we know it most affects those who are already marginalized — people in developing countries, those on low incomes, and of course, women and girls, Berners-Lee said. Tackling inequality requires raising the bar from basic access to ensuring that people have "meaningful connectivity" to the internet "that must include data and devices to use the full power of it," Berners-Lee said. By 2030, the UN Roadmap says that every person should have affordable access to the internet. The Roadmap aims "to connect, respect, and protect people in the digital age," and was partly developed by the World Wide Web Foundation, co-founded by Berners-Lee. Last year the foundation launched the "Contract for the Web," a global plan for governments, companies and individuals to increase connectivity, protect people's privacy, and keep knowledge freely available, among other goals. The contract has 1,300 endorsements and the foundation is developing ways for governments and companies to show how they're living up to commitments.

Tim Berners-Lee, the pioneer of the World Wide Web, launches a plan to fix issues related to the Internet. According to Berners-Lee, the plan was created as a way to act against the prevalence of issues like misinformation, privacy violations, and surveillance on the Internet. The plan involves the Contract for the Web, a document that requires governments, companies, and individuals to abide by a set of nine principles. The goal of the contract and its principles is to protect the Internet and act as a guide to safeguard it. Under the contract, governments are required to ensure that everyone can connect to the Internet, which should be constantly available. Governments should also ensure that people can use the Internet safely and without fear. Other principles of the contract urge companies to make the Internet accessible and affordable to everyone and to develop technologies that people can benefit from. In addition, companies are also called on to build online trust by respecting and protecting people's privacy and personal data. The rest of the principles urge individuals to create valuable online content, build strong online communities that provide safety and a sense of belonging to users, and support the web so that it remains accessible to the public at all times. The World Wide Web Foundation, a non-profit organization and one of the contract's backers, is currently working on tools that can assess the contract's effectiveness. More than 150 organizations, including Google and Facebook, have backed the contract. The German, French, and Ghanese governments have also endorsed the contract. These governments and organizations pledge to implement the contract's principles and are listed as its endorsers. Organizations that fail to follow the principles will be removed from the list of endorsers.

In this episode we were joined by Mike Berners-Lee, the climate change expert and author of There Is No Planet B: A Handbook For The Make Or Break Years. He was interviewed by Matthew Taylor of the RSA in a discussion on the real, concrete steps that we can all take to reduce our contributions to climate change and the destruction of the planet. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

The RSA Student Design Awards is a global curriculum and competition for emerging designers that’s been running since 1924. We challenge students and recent graduates to tackle pressing social, environmental and economic issues through design thinking. This audio was recorded in 2019 and is part of the annual SDA competition

Se state guardando il sito del podcast, se comprate su Amazon, se usate Google è tutto merito dell’inventore del World Wide Web: Tim Berners-Lee. Questo è il primo sito al mondo, scritto da lui, ovviamente.

Hi Everyone This is our weekly digest episode where we share some of what we liked, discovered and was recommended to us.We start with: LAST WEEKS EPISODELast weeks guest was Emily Oberman Partner at Pentagram Design. In this engaging 2 parter we cover her upbringing; being immersed in art, discovery and joy, and how humor and singing was never far; the work ethic her parents instilled; and being introduced her to Monty Python,The Marx Brothers and MAD Magazine at an early age.She explains why the idea of being a beautiful weirdo has remained with her throughout her career as she seeks out oddness in everyone she meetsWe discuss her early design influences, her approach to design and the role of story and ideas her work. We explore how Emily met and formed a 17 year partnership, with Bonnie Siegler, in the New York design firm Number17 before we dive deep into her 20 seasons of driving the identity of Saturday Night Live. We also discuss her leadership experience at Pentagram and the challenges of combining that with motherhood. PODCAST WE LOVED CODE SWITCH - NPRRegardless of where you live, race and identity are part of the often cultural charged narrative. So if you ever find yourself in a conversation about race and identity where you just get...stuck, Code Switch can help.Created by journalists of color, and as they say themselves - this isn't just the work they do, it's the lives they lead.' It's a great listen, its funny and it will certainly make you reflect on some of your own cultural assumptions.WHAT WE DISCOVERED CONTRACT FOR THE WEBIn the 90's I think many of us expected The internet herald some from of global online utopia. Fast forward 25 years, flooded with fake news, election meddling, online bullying and a slew of other ills The Internet descended into a nightmarish mess. Its creator, Tim Berners-Lee, wants to reverse the slide.On November 25, Berners-Lee unveiled the Contract for the Web, an action plan he crafted with the help of over 80 other experts. It aims to boost privacy protections online, reduce digital incivility and discourage government crackdowns on the Web while ensuring that everyone on the planet gets access to the internet. There might well be hope for the future of The Internet. RECOMMENDED TO USARCADIA EARTH We recently took the recommendation of previous guest Alessandro Armillotta and visited Arcadia Earth her in Manhattan. It's an immersive augmented reality driven journey through Planet Earth that educates us on the impact of our behavior on the climate. On this large scale multi-sensorial journey will guide you through underwater worlds, fantasy lands, and inspirational art installations. powered by augmented reality, virtual reality, projection mapping, and interactive environments. As we explored, we learned how small lifestyle changes can have a massive impact on the future of our planet. MULLING ON THIS APOCALYPSE WHEN?It's easy to fall into the trap of helplessness and indifference in the face of the number of apocalyptic predictions about the impact of climate change. Bill McKibben

The inventor of the worldwide web, Tim Berners-Lee, has launched an ambitious plan to govern it. - İnterneti kontrol altına almak için çok mu geç?

Warnings of looming environmental catastrophe rain down on us with increasing frequency, and only the most ardent climate change sceptics deny we live at a crucial point for the Earth's future. Join sustainability expert Mike Berners-Lee in a live conversation with WWF’s Tanya Steele at the Edinburgh International Book Festival 2019, as he cuts through the noise with practical advice on how we can avoid calamity, drawn from his book There is No Planet B, a ‘Handbook for the Make or Break Years’.

Welcome to the History of Computing Podcast, where we explore the history of information technology. Because understanding the past prepares us for the innovations of the future! Today we're going to cover one of the most important and widely distributed server platforms ever: The Apache Web Server. Today, Apache servers account for around 44% of the 1.7 Billion web sites on the Internet. But at one point it was zero. And this is crazy, it's down from over 70% in 2010. Tim Berners-Lee had put the first website up in 1991 and what we now know as the web was slowly growing. In 1994 and begins with the National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Yup, NCSA is also the organization that gave us telnet and Mosaic, the web browser that would evolve into Netscape. After Rob leaves NCSA, the HTTPdaemon goes a little, um, dormant in development. The distress had forked and the extensions and bug fixes needed to get merged into a common distribution. Apache is a free and open source web server that was initially created by Robert McCool and written in C in 1995, the same year Berners-Lee coined the term World Wide Web. You can't make that name up. I'd always pictured him as a cheetah wearing sunglasses. Who knew that he'd build a tool that would host half of the web sites in the world. A tool that would go on to be built into plenty of computers so they can spin up sharing services. Times have changed since 1995. Originally the name was supposedly a cute name referring to a Patchy server, given that it was based on lots of existing patches of craptostic code from NCSA. So it was initially based on NCSA HTTPd is still alive and well all the way up to the configuration files. For example, on a Mac these are stored at /private/etc/apache2/httpd.conf. The original Apache group consisted of * Brian Behlendorf * Roy T. Fielding * Rob Hartill * David Robinson * Cliff Skolnick * Randy Terbush * Robert S. Thau * Andrew Wilson And there were additional contributions from Eric Hagberg, Frank Peters, and Nicolas Pioch. Within a year of that first shipping, Apache had become the most popular web server on the internet. The distributions and sites continued to grow to the point that they formed the Apache Software Foundation that would give financial, legal, and organizational support for Apache. They even started bringing other open source projects under that umbrella. Projects like Tomcat. And the distributions of Apache grew. Mod_ssl, which brought the first SSL functionality to Apache 1.17, was released in 1998. And it grew. The Apache Foundation came in 1999 to make sure the project outlived the participants and bring other tools under the umbrella. The first conference, ApacheCon came in 2000. Douglas Adams was there. I was not. There were 17 million web sites at the time. The number of web sites hosted on Apache servers continued to rise. Apache 2 was released in 2004. The number of web sites hosted on Apache servers continued to rise. By 2009, Apache was hosting over 100 million websites. By 2013 Apache had added that it was named “out of a respect for the Native American Indian tribe of Apache”. The history isn't the only thing that was rewritten. Apache itself was rewritten and is now distributed as Apache 2.0. there were over 670 million web sites by then. And we hit 1 billion sites in 2014. I can't help but wonder what percentage collections of fart jokes. Probably not nearly enough. But an estimated 75% are inactive sites. The job of a web server is to serve web pages on the internet. Those were initially flat HTML files but have gone on to include CGI, PHP, Python, Java, Javascript, and others. A web browser is then used to interpret those files. They access the .html or .htm (or other one of the other many file types that now exist) file and it opens a page and then loads the text, images, included files, and processes any scripts. Both use the http protocol; thus the URL begins with http or https if the site is being hosted over ssl. Apache is responsible for providing the access to those pages over that protocol. The way the scripts are interpreted is through Mods. These include mod_php, mod_python, mod_perl, etc. The modular nature of Apache makes it infinitely extensible. OK, maybe not infinitely. Nothing's really infinite. But the Loadable Dynamic Modules do make the system more extensible. For example, you can easily get TLS/SSL using mod_ssl. The great thing about Apache and its mods are that anyone can adapt the server for generic uses and they allow you to get into some pretty really specific needs. And the server as well as each of those mods has its source code available on the Interwebs. So if it doesn't do exactly what you want, you can conform the server to your specific needs. For example, if you wanna' hate life, there's a mod for FTP. Out of the box, Apache logs connections, includes a generic expression parser, supports webdav and cgi, can support Embedded Perl, PHP and Lua scripting, can be configured for public_html per-user web-page, supports htaccess to limit access to various directories as one of a few authorization access controls and allows for very in depth custom logging and log rotation. Those logs include things like the name and IP address of a host as well as geolocations. Can rewrite headers, URLs, and content. It's also simple to enable proxies Apache, along with MySQL, PHP and Linux became so popular that the term LAMP was coined, short for those products. The prevalence allowed the web development community to build hundreds or thousands of tools on top of Apache through the 90s and 2000s, including popular Content Management Systems, or CMS for short, such as Wordpress, Mamba, and Joomla. * Auto-indexing and content negotiation * Reverse proxy with caching * Multiple load balancing mechanisms * Fault tolerance and Failover with automatic recovery * WebSocket, FastCGI, SCGI, AJP and uWSGI support with caching * Dynamic configuration * Name- and IP address-based virtual servers * gzip compression and decompression * Server Side Includes * User and Session tracking * Generic expression parser * Real-time status views * XML support Today we have several web servers to choose from. Engine-X, spelled Nginx, is a newer web server that was initially released in 2004. Apache uses a thread per connection and so can only process the number of threads available; by default 10,000 in Linux and macOS. NGINX doesn't use threads so can scale differently, and is used by companies like AirBNB, Hulu, Netflix, and Pinterest. That 10,000 limit is easily controlled using concurrent connection limiting, request processing rate limiting, or bandwidth throttling. You can also scale with some serious load balancing and in-band health checks or with one of the many load balancing options. Having said that, Baidu.com, Apple.com, Adobe.com, and PayPal.com - all Apache. We also have other web servers provided by cloud services like Cloudflare and Google slowly increasing in popularity. Tomcat is another web server. But Tomcat is almost exclusively used to run various Java servers, servelets, EL, webscokets, etc. Today, each of the open source projects under the Apache Foundation has a Project Management committee. These provide direction and management of the projects. New members are added when someone who contributes a lot to the project get nominated to be a contributor and then a vote is held requiring unanimous support. Commits require three yes votes with no no votes. It's all ridiculously efficient in a very open source hacker kinda' way. The Apache server's impact on the open-source software community has been profound. It iis partly explained by the unique license from the Apache Software Foundation. The license was in fact written to protect the creators of Apache while giving access to the source code for others to hack away at it. The Apache License 1.1 was approved in 2000 and removed the requirement to attribute the use of the license in advertisements of software. Version two of the license came in 2004, which made the license easier for projects that weren't from the Apache Foundation. This made it easier for GPL compatibility, and using a reference for the whole project rather than attributing software in every file. The open source nature of Apache was critical to the growth of the web as we know it today. There were other projects to build web servers for sure. Heck, there were other protocols, like Gopher. But many died because of stringent licensing policies. Gopher did great until the University of Minnesota decided to charge for it. Then everyone realized it didn't have nearly as good of graphics as other web servers. Today the web is one of the single largest growth engines of the global economy. And much of that is owed to Apache. So thanks Apache, for helping us to alleviate a little of the suffering of the human condition for all creatures of the world. By the way, did you know you can buy hamster wheels on the web. Or cat food. Or flea meds for the dog. Speaking of which, I better get back to my chores. Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule to listen! You probably get to your chores as well though. Sorry if I got you in trouble. But hey, thanks for tuning in to another episode of the History of Computing Podcast. We're lucky to have you. Have a great day!

Welcome to the History of Computing Podcast, where we explore the history of information technology. Because understanding the past prepares us for the innovations of the future! Today we're going to talk about Gopher. Gopher was in some ways a precursor to the world wide web, or more specifically, too http. The University of Minnesota was founded in 1851. It gets cold in Minnesota. Like really cold. And sometimes, it's dangerous to walk around outside. As the University grew, they needed ways to get students between buildings on campus. So they built tunnels. But that's not where the name came from. The name actually comes from a political cartoon. In the cartoon a bunch of not-cool railroad tycoons were pulling a train car to the legislature. The rest of the country just knew it was cold in Minnesota and there must be gophers there. That evolved into the Gopher State moniker, the Gopher mascot of the U and later the Golden Gophers. The Golden Gophers were once a powerhouse in college football. They have won the 8th most National titles of any University in college football, although they haven't nailed one since 1960. Mark McCahill turned 4 years old that year. But by the late 80s he was in his thirties. McCahill had graduated from the U in 1979 with a degree in Chemistry. By then he managed the Microcomputer Center at the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities. The University of Minnesota had been involved with computers for a long time. The Minnesota Education Computing Consortium had made software for schools, like the Oregon Trail. And even before then they'd worked with Honeywell, IBM, and a number of research firms. At this point, the University of Minnesota had been connected to the ARPANET, which was evolving into the Internet, and everyone wanted it to be useful. But it just wasn't yet. TCP/IP maybe wasn't the right way to connect to things. I mean, maybe bitnet was. But by then we knew it was all about TCP/IP. They'd used FTP. And saw a lot of promise in the tidal wave you could just feel coming of this Internet thing. There was just one little problem. A turf war between batch processed mainframes had been raging for a time with the suit and tie crowd thinking that big computers were the only place real science could happen and the personal computer kids thinking that the computer should be democratized and that everyone should have one. So McCahill writes a tool called POPmail to make it easy for people to access this weird thing called email on the Macs that were starting to show up at the University. This led to his involvement writing tools for departments. 1991 rolls around and some of the department heads around the University meet for months to make a list of things they want out of a network of computers around the school. Enter Farhad Anklesaria. He'd been working with those department heads and reduced their demands to something he could actually ship. A server that hosted some files and a client that accessed the files. McCahill added a search option and combined the two. They brought in four other programmers to help finish the coding. They finished the first version in about three weeks. Of those original programmers, Bob Alberti, who'd helped write an early online multiplayer game already, named his Gopher server Indigo after the Indigo Girls. Paul Lindner named one of his Mudhoney. They coded between taking support calls in the computing center. They'd invented bookmarks and hyperlinks which led McCahill to coin the term “surf the internet” Computers at the time didn't come with the software necessary to access the Internet but Apple was kind enough to include a library at the time. People could get on the Internet and pretty quickly find some documents. Modems weren't fast enough to add graphics yet. But, using the Gopher you could search the internet and retrieve information linked from all around the world. Wacky idea, right? The world wanted it. They gave it the name of the school's mascot to keep the department heads happy. It didn't work. It wasn't a centralized service hosted on a mainframe. How dare they. They were told not to work on it any more but kept going anyway. They posted an FTP repository of the software. People downloaded it and even added improvements. And it caught fire underneath the noses of the University. This was one of the first rushes on the Internet. These days you'd probably be labeled a decacorn for the type of viral adoption they got. The White House jumped on the bandwagon. MTV veejay Adam Curry wore a gopher shirt when they announced their Gopher site. There were GopherCons. Al Gore showed up. He wasn't talking about the Internet as though it were a bunch of tubes yet. So then Tim Berners-Lee had put the first website up in 1991, introducing html on Gopher and what we now know as the web was slowly growing. McCahill then worked with Berners-Lee, Marc Andreessen of Netscape, Alan Emtage and former MIT whiz kid, Peter J. Deutsch. Oh and the czar of the Internet Jon Postel. McCahill needed a good way of finding things on his new Internet protocol. So he invented something that we still use considerably: URLs, or Uniform Resource Locators. You know when you type http://www.google.com that's a URL. The http indicates the protocol to use. Every computer has a default handler for those protocols. Everything following the :// is the address on the Internet of the object. Gopher of course was gopher://. FTP was ftp:// and so on. There's of course more to the spec, but that's the first part. Suddenly there were competing standards. And as with many rapid rushes to adopt a technology, Gopher started to fall off and the web started to pick up. Gopher went through the hoops. It went to an IETF RFC in 1993 as RFC 1436, The Internet Gopher Protocol (a distributed document search and retrieval protocol). I first heard of Mark McCahill when I was on staff at the University of Georgia and had to read up on how to implement this weird Gopher thing. I was tasked with deploying Gopher to all of the Macs in our labs. And I was fascinated, as were so many others, with this weird new thing called the Internet. The internet was decentralized. The Internet was anti-authoritarian. The Internet was the Subpop records of the computing world. But bands come and go. And the University of Minnesota wanted to start charging a licensing fee. That started the rapid fall of Gopher and the rise of the html driven web from Berners-Lee. It backfired. People were mad. The team hadn't grown or gotten headcount or funding. The team got defensive publicly and while traffic continued to grow, the traffic on the web grew 300 times faster. The web came with no licensing. Yet. Modems got faster. The web added graphics. In 1995 an accounting disaster came to the U and the team got reassigned to work on building a modern accounting system. At a critical time, they didn't add graphics. They didn't further innovate. The air was taken out of their sales from the licensing drama and the lack of funding. Things were easier back then. You could spin up a server on your computer and other people could communicate with it without fear of your identity being stolen. There was no credit card data on the computer. There was no commerce. But by the time I left the University of Georgia we were removing the gopher apps in favor of NCSA Mosaic and then Netscape. McCahill has since moved on to Duke University. Perhaps his next innovation will be called Document Devil or World Wide Devil. Come to think of it, that might not be the best idea. Wouldn't wanna' upset the Apple Cart. Again. The web as we know it today wasn't just some construct that happened in a vacuum. Gopher was the most popular protocol to come before it but there were certainly others. In those three years, people saw the power of the Internet and wanted to get in on that. They were willing it into existence. Gopher was first but the web built on top of the wave that gopher started. Many browsers still support gopher either directly or using an extension to render documents. But Gopher itself is no longer much of a thing. What we're really getting at is that the web as we know it today was deterministic. Which is to say that it was almost willed into being. It wasn't a random occurrence. The very idea of a decentralized structure that was being willed into existence, by people who wanted to supplement human capacity or by a variety of other motives including “cause it seemed cool at the time, man.” It was almost independent of the action of any specific humans. It was just going to happen, as though free will of any individual actors had been removed from the equation. Bucking authority, like the department heads at the U, hackers from around the world just willed this internet thing into existence. And all these years later, many of us are left in awe at their accomplishments. So thank you to Mark and the team for giving us Gopher, and for the part it played in the rise of the Internet.

Mike Berners-Lee, an expert in greenhouse gas carbon footprinting, founder of Small World Consulting and author of 'There Is No Planet B', was a speaker at this year's Seed Festival. This episode was produced by Laura Byng, with music by Daisy Burt playing an original composition, Berta. http://www.hawkwoodcollege.co.uk/ ttps://twitter.com/HawkwoodCFT (https://twitter.com/HawkwoodCFT) https://www.sw-consulting.co.uk/people/ https://twitter.com/mikebernerslee?lang=en https://daisyandherkora.com/ http://www.seedfestival.co.uk/

We're all aware that we need to start making some changes in our lives to help the environment, but it can be difficult to know where to begin.Should we start with food? Energy? Travel? Work? And how can we inspire others to make changes too?We caught up with Mike Berners-Lee, author of There Is No Planet B (Cambridge University Press, £9.99), at Hay Festival 2019.In this episode, we speak to Mike about the challenges we all face in our daily lives, from what to buy at the supermarket to how we go on holiday.Get 20% off Dentogen using the code 'INTHEMOMENT' head to www.crescentpharma.com to order yours now.Order your copy of Save the Planet today for only £9.99 with FREE UK postage. EUR £11.99, ROW £12.99.https://www.buysubscriptions.com/special-editions/save-the-planet?PROMO=SOCL1 or call 03330 162 138 See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Be A Leader is a series that looks into the lives of historic, popular and even famous leaders from all walks of life. In episode six, Roshan Thiran looks into the life of Tim Berners Lee, the inventor of the world wide web. Find out the inspiration behind his invention and the lessons of leadership we can learn from the humble inventor. Music: https://www.purple-planet.com

World Wide Web – How Safe Is It? Are children any safer now than they were 30 years ago on the Internet? Join Tom Osborne’s US World Report radio news team for this week’s broadcast. Tech firms are finding themselves on the defensive these days. Critics accuse them of not doing enough to curb the spread of "fake news" which has helped polarize election campaigns around the world and of maximizing profits by harvesting data on consumers’ browsing habits. British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee, who in 1989 invented the World Wide Web as a way to exchange information, said the Internet had deviated from the goals its founders had envisaged. "All kinds of things have have gone wrong. We have fake news, we have problems with privacy, we have people being phished, profiled and manipulated," he said in a recent symposium. Berners-Lee, 63, called on governments, companies and citizens to iron out a "complete contract" for the web that will make the internet "safe and accessible" for all by May 2019, the date by which 50 percent of the world will be online for the first time. That’s only 2 weeks from now… Can they do it?

A truly global approach to climate change doesn't just involve a policy shift—it will mean changing how we live our lives together. Author and researcher Mike Berners-Lee joins Prospect to explain why he's (cautiously) optimistic.Plus: Steve Bloomfield on the schools funding crisis, and Sameer Rahim on how Muslims are represented in British literature. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

30 years ago Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web as a way to let physicists share their papers and data on a distributed network. It's changed a lot since then and not all for the better. Dominant technology companies monopolise our data and many, including Berners-Lee are worried about the growth of state sponsored hacking, misinformation and scamming. One solution is to re-decentralise the web, giving us more control of our information and what is done with it, but at what cost? Founder and director of Redecentralize.org, Irina Bolychevsky and technology guru Bill Thompson discuss the future. BBC Space Correspondent Jonathan Amos has news on some space rocks this week. Ultima and Thule, make up a bi-lobe comet out in the far reaches of the Solar System in the Kuiper Belt. Ultima-Thule was visited by the New Horizons mission in January. More data is being analysed and giving scientists insight into how these two planetary building blocks collided and merged and also on how it got its strange flattened shape. Another rock seems to be a rubble pile. The asteroid Ryugu is currently hosting the Japanese Space Agency's Hayabusa 2 spacecraft and landers. Jonathan explains to Gareth what stage the missions' audacious sample collect and return is now at. And there's a shock discovery by spacecraft OSIRIS-REx from asteroid Bennu. The NASA spacecraft analysing the asteroid has observed it shooting out plumes of dust that surround it in a dusty haze. It's a phenomenon never seen in an asteroid before. Back down on Earth and under the surface of the earth are the earthworms. As any savvy gardener will know, earthworms make a big difference to the health of soil and plants. What isn’t as well understood is how changes to the soil - like climate change and the intensification of agricultural practices - have impacted on the all-important worm population. In fact, scientists don’t even know what’s down there, wriggling underneath the surface. To find out, farmers recently undertook to the first worm survey in the UK. Finding that 42% of fields had very few or completely lacked key types of earthworm, the results suggest that over-cultivation has led to poor soil health in significant amounts of farmland. Producer: Fiona Roberts

Some have decried the Green New Deal because it touches on numerous areas outside of climate change, including universal health care, a universal basic income, job guarantees and worker rights. The assumption has been that climate change exists in some kind of a vacuum. Mike Berners-Lee, an English researcher, writer on greenhouse gases, professor at Lancaster University, and our guest on this week’s WhoWhatWhy podcast, argues that the critics have it all wrong — because everything is connected. We cannot even begin to address climate change without also looking at food, biodiversity, income inequality, population, plastics, and more. Berners-Lee says that the challenges facing humanity today are inescapably global and interconnected. It no longer works, he tells Jeff Schechtman, to tackle environmental issues one at a time or to keep science, economics, sociology, politics, and psychology separate from one another. All parts of our complex global system must be addressed simultaneously if we are to have any positive impact. Despite all our individual and collective efforts with alternative energy and conservation, we have not made even the slightest improvement in the global “carbon curve,” Berners-Lee says. Moreover, in a kind of environmental Catch-22, it turns out that greater energy efficiency can sometimes increase carbon output. Nevertheless, Berners-Lee is slightly optimistic that we can solve some of these problems and improve our global quality of life.   After all, he reminds us, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos notwithstanding, it’s very unlikely that we’re going to find another planet to move to anytime soon. As Berners-Lee says, “there is no planet B.”

One week before the 30th anniversary of the World Wide Web, Washington Post Live sat down with the man who invented it, Sir Tim Berners-Lee. During the exclusive one-on-one, Berners-Lee shared his plans for the big day.

Berners-Lee's World Wide Web (WWW) was not his original aim, which was closer to what we now call the Semantic or Data Web (SW): documents and images where the system itself 'understands' its content as the WWW certainly does not, any more than a television knows what it is showing. Professor Wilks will describe the Semantic Web and its origin in annotation methods from the humanities and will argue the need for this form of AI to manage a lifetime's information on the web.A lecture by Yorick Wilks, Visiting Professor of AI 15 January 2019The transcript and downloadable versions of the lecture are available from the Gresham College website: https://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/semantic-web-a-lifetime-of-informationGresham College has been giving free public lectures since 1597. This tradition continues today with all of our five or so public lectures a week being made available for free download from our website. There are currently over 2,000 lectures free to access or download from the website.Website: http://www.gresham.ac.uk Twitter: http://twitter.com/GreshamCollege Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/greshamcollege Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/greshamcollege

Wir brauchen einen neuen Vertrag für das Internet Web-Erfinder Tim Berners-Lee hat zum Auftakt des Web Summit in Lissabon dazu aufgerufen, die “vielen Probleme” des Webs anzugehen. Das freie Internet werde bedroht durch Missbrauch, Desinformation und Kontrollverlust. Das Web brauche also einen Neustart. An die Besucher, die an der Gestaltung des Web mitwirken, appellierte Berners-Lee, die Benutzer wieder mehr in den Fokus zu rücken. Gemeinsam soll die Gemeinschaft die Probleme der einen Hälfte der Menschheit lösen helfen, etwa Fake News und Datenmissbrauch, und der anderen Hälfte helfen, ins Netz zu kommen. Chrome-Browser blockiert "irreführende Inhalte" Chrome will besser vor irreführenden Inhalten schützen: Versucht eine Werbeanzeige, den Nutzer auszutricksen, blockiert sie der Browser künftig. Seitenbetreiber können in der "Search Console" prüfen, ob ihr Angebot betroffen ist. Entdeckt Google auf einer Seite eine irreführende Anzeige, hat der Betreiber 30 Tage Zeit, sie zu entfernen, bevor Chrome sie blockiert. Die Chrome-Nutzer können den Filter jederzeit abschalten, dann verzichten sie aber auf den Schutz. 0,5 Prozent-Regelung für elektrische Dienstwagen Aufwind für batterieelektrische Autos und Plug-in-Hybride: Die Bundesregierung plant, die pauschale Besteuerung für die private Nutzung betrieblich zugelassener Pkw von 1 auf 0,5 Prozent des Bruttolistenpreises pro Monat zu senken. Die befristete Regelung ist Teil eines großen Steuerpakets, soll noch im November beschlossen werden und ab 1. Januar 2019 in Kraft treten. Amazon plant Eröffnung von zwei Hauptsitzen statt einem Amazon will zwei weitere Hauptsitze eröffnen – statt nur einem. Die entstehenden Arbeitsplätze und die nötigen Büroflächen würden bei dem neuen Plan zwischen den beiden Standorten geteilt. Das berichtete das Wall Street Journal. Dadurch würden statt 50.000 Jobs in einer Stadt je 25.000 in zwei Städten entstehen. Grund für die Entscheidungsei vor allem das Problem, ausreichend qualifiziertes Technik-Personal zu finden. Zudem gebe es Bedenken, dass die geplante Expansion, die mit starkem Zuzug von Arbeitskräften verbunden sein dürfte, einen einzelnen Standort und dessen Infrastruktur überfordern könnte. Diese und alle weiteren aktuellen Nachrichten finden Sie auf heise.de

In Episode 66 of Hidden Forces, Demetri Kofinas speaks with serial technology entrepreneur and host of the Internet History Podcast, as well as the Techmeme Ride Home, Brian McCullough. Brian is also the author of HOW THE INTERNET HAPPENED, published by Liveright, a subsidiary of W.W. Norton. In 2014 he was the co-founder of a startup human named Penelope, and in 2016 he launched Maxwell into beta. In March of 1989, CERN scientist Tim Berners-Lee wrote a proposal to develop a distributed information system for the laboratory. “Vague, but exciting,” was the comment that his supervisor, Mike Sendall, wrote on the cover, and with those words, gave the green light to what would become the information revolution.  Before the end of 1990, Berners-Lee would define the Web’s basic concepts: the URL, http, and html, writing the first browser and server software. For the next two years the web would remain largely inaccessible to all but the most niche academics and hypertext enthusiasts. “…there was a definite element of not wanting to make it easier, of actually wanting to keep the riff raff out," recalled Marc Andreessen, founder of Netscape. His own big idea in the winter of 1992 was the let the riff-raff in. That opening came in the form of the Mosaic browser, which brought with it two key implementations: the support for images, and, more importantly, compatibility with Microsoft Windows, which at the time accounted for more than 80 percent of the world’s operating systems. Shortly after Mosaic launched in January of 1993, the number of websites in existence could be measured in the hundreds. By the end of 1994, that number had surpassed tens of thousands, and Mosaic was adding as many as 600,000 new users every month. Berners-Lee may have been responsible for creating the web, but it was Marc Andreessen and his team of misfits and geeks at The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, surrounded by empty pizza boxes and soda cans, that took the web mainstream.= Andreessen and his team eventually left Mosaic behind to found Netscape, taking it public in August of 1995, kicking off a 5 year mania of creative energy and enthusiasm that would see the creation of the first search engines, e-commerce platforms, and weblogs. More than seventeen million new websites were created before the end of the 20th century. In five short years, the Internet craze kicked off by the commercialization of the browser culminated in the bursting of the most spectacular stock market bubble seen since 1929. That story – one predicated on a revolutionary technology and enabled by the dreams, ambitions, and avarice of a generation unrestrained by the prudence of their parents and untouched by the failures of the past – is a history that, until this day, has remained largely untold. This week, on Hidden Forces, Brian McCullough joins us for a conversation on, search engines, e-commerce, web portals, social networks, and the history of the information revolution. Producer & Host: Demetri Kofinas Editor & Engineer: Stylianos Nicolaou Join the conversation on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at @hiddenforcespod

In Episode 64 tauschen wir uns aus über das Vorhaben des "Web-Erfinders" Tim Berners-Lee, der eine neue Firma gegründet hat, um damit ein Konstrukt names Solid zu entwicklen, das Usern Kontrolle über ihre Daten gibt.

Benvenuti alla puntata 3 di Innovazione e imprecazione per tutti quelli che hanno detto o non vorrebbero mai dire “maledetto il giorno che ho innovato”. Oggi parleremo di Solid il progetto di Tim Berners Lee AKA Mr WWW AKA Mr OpenData AKA Mr LinkedOpenData. Solid è un’architettura informatica nata al MIT che si propone di riportare gli utenti in possesso dei propri dati, controllando e scegliendo la quantità e la modalità di accesso ad essi da parte dei vari servizi web, come social network, abbonamenti online e sottoscrizioni varie. Accenneremo al modello, alle implicazione e agli sviluppi con le possibili ricadute nel quotidiano.https://solid.mit.edu/https://github.com/solidhttps://solid.github.io/dweb-summit-2018/https://www.inrupt.com/

Dopo Kilby e il microchip, la storia di Pionieri_Informatica lascia gli USA e torna nel cuore del Vecchio Continente. Svizzera, anni Ottanta. Scambiare documenti in modo veloce ed efficiente, favorire lo scambio di dati fra scienziati di una delle più importanti sedi di ricerca del mondo, il CERN di Ginevra. È così che è nata l'idea di una rete di computer tutti collegati capaci di comunicare fra loro. Ma perché limitarsi al CERN? Tim Berners-Lee, un ingegnere informatico britannico, ha immaginato e realizzato una rete mondiale unica e capace di stravolgere le nostre vite: il World Wide Web. Ha dovuto lavorare duramente, ha dovuto accettare anche qualche "no" pesante ma alla fine ce l'ha fatta. Come il brutto anatroccolo che si trasforma in un cigno, il suo computer alla fine è diventato un server, il primo server del mondo, il ragno che ha creato la tela. "Non spegnetelo, per favore!", recita un adesivo posto su quella macchina. E oggi tra i corridoi del CERN una targa ricorda ancora quell'evento, collocata esattamente davanti alla stanza dove lavorava Berners-Lee. Ascoltaci su YouTube: https://youtu.be/SVFB06RYF6k

Photo: Hugh Masekela Matthew Bannister on Hugh Masekela the South African jazz trumpeter and anti apartheid activist. Ursula K. Le Guin whose science fiction and fantasy books sold millions of copies. Mary Lee Berners-Lee, the computer pioneer and mother of the world wide web creator Sir Tim Berners-Lee. John Barton the director and writer who taught a generation of actors how to speak Shakespearian verse. Mark E. Smith, the controversial front man of the post punk band The Fall.

London's Science Museum has a new exhibit which takes visitors on a voyage of discovery through two-hundred years of communication and technological evolution. CRI's Li Peichun has the story. Among the exhibits, visitors can find a wooden contraption which is an aerial tuning inductor. It was once the height of technological innovation. There are also some enormous coils which were part of Rugby Radio Station's powerful transmitter used in the 1940s, allowing them to send signals to the British Empire. Tilly Blyth, the exhibition's lead curator says this exhibition looks at the last two-hundred years of information and communication technology. "So, for us it was really important to invite our visitors to think beyond the devices that they're so familiar with - their TVs, their mobile phones, their computers - and actually think; 'Well, how did we get here? What are all the different transformations that have happened and what's the infrastructure that makes all of this possible?" Among the 800 or more objects on show are six distinct sections which deal with areas such as broadcasting, the internet and telephone communication. The exhibition begins with the first transatlantic cable laid by the Victorians in 1858 that connected Europe and North America. From that point on, inventors created a range of technology which allowed mankind to communicate in different ways. On show, there's this original Marconi radio transmitter used by the BBC to make the first public broadcast in 1922. There's also a section of a manual telephone exchange switchboard used in 1925 in north London. Fast-forwarding over 70 years, visitors will find the computer used by British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee. Blyth explains: "This is an NeXT computer, it was at CERN in 1990 and Sir Tim actually sat there and designed the World Wide Web and launched the first web page from this computer." It was Berners-Lee's innovation that set the human race onto another stage of communication development. The exhibition also features a collection of modern smart phone designs and a Google Street View tricycle. Tilly Blyth says: "We've come an incredible way in just 200 years, but I think it also shows we're living through this moment of innovation now, we're constantly told this is an incredible period of change but actually these transformations have been happening over a whole 200 year-period." 'Information Age: Six Networks That Changed Our World' opens at the Science Museum in London on 25 October 2014. For CRI,I'm Li Peichun.

Australia's former Prime Minsister Gough Whitlam is dead. Politicians across the political spectrum praise Whitlam as a man of vision, but how does the current mob stand up? And yesterday was International Fisting Day. What did you do to celebrate?Elephant stamps of approval go to an Australians this time: Bronwyn Bishop, Speaker of the House of Representatives, for her rumour-based security process; and Senator Jacqui Lambie, for confusing outrageous movie-plot ideas with reality.We received two listener comments! In my response, I referred to some things I've discussed previously in Berners-Lee, Silicon Valley, and Australia's cultural cringe and And the digital Antoinettes cried ‘Unemployed? Let them cut code' and iPhone, therefore I am …a selfish disruptor and Enjoy your Ubergasm, but don't expect respect in the morning.And we refer to videos including the 1972 campaign song It's Time, tributes to Gough Whitlam by Tony Abbott and Malcolm Turnbull, and Will.I.Am's launch video for i.am/PULS.Episode notes and full credits are at:https://stilgherrian.com/edict/00031/

Classic shell in Windows 8, SMS gateways (email to text message), Bose noise cancellation headphone, Profiles in IT (Herman Hollerith, father of machine data processing), David Burd visit (drones, driverless cars and airplanes, 3D printers), HP inventing new computer (memrister memory, optical interconnects, new OS), FBI using face recogntion (putting all photos into next gen ID database), NeXT computer used to invent the WWW (Jobs inspired Berners-Lee), CodersTrust breaks poverty (microloans allow the poorest to learn coding in Bangledesh), World Cup goal line technology (14 cameras track ball), and eBay Valet (new iPhone app automates selling on eBay, seller gets 70% of sale). This show originally aired on Saturday, June 21, 2014, at 9:00 AM EST on WFED (1500 AM).

Classic shell in Windows 8, SMS gateways (email to text message), Bose noise cancellation headphone, Profiles in IT (Herman Hollerith, father of machine data processing), David Burd visit (drones, driverless cars and airplanes, 3D printers), HP inventing new computer (memrister memory, optical interconnects, new OS), FBI using face recogntion (putting all photos into next gen ID database), NeXT computer used to invent the WWW (Jobs inspired Berners-Lee), CodersTrust breaks poverty (microloans allow the poorest to learn coding in Bangledesh), World Cup goal line technology (14 cameras track ball), and eBay Valet (new iPhone app automates selling on eBay, seller gets 70% of sale). This show originally aired on Saturday, June 21, 2014, at 9:00 AM EST on WFED (1500 AM).

The New Elizabethans: Jim Naughtie on Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web and unlikely hero of the Olympic opening ceremony. Berners-Lee is a key figure in the digital revolution that has re-fashioned social lives, working practices and the flow of information around the globe. The New Elizabethans have been chosen by a panel of leading historians, chaired by Lord (Tony) Hall, Chief Executive of London's Royal Opera House. The panellists were Dominic Sandbrook, Bamber Gascoigne, Sally Alexander, Jonathan Agar, Maria Misra and Sir Max Hastings. They were asked to choose: "Men and women whose actions during the reign of Elizabeth II have had a significant impact on lives in these islands and/or given the age its character, for better or worse." Producer Clare Walker Presenter James Naughtie.

Geneva, 1980s. Based at CERN, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research in Switzerland, Tim Berners-Lee was suffering from a case of information overload at work. Desperately trying to coordinate a mass of research and data from incompatible computer systems around the globe, Berners-Lee figured there must be a better way to do things. So he set about creating a space where any piece of information could be linked to any other piece of information out in the world. To do this he joined two separate ideas that had been knocking about for some time - hypertext and the internet - and he created the World Wide Web.

Geneva, 1980s. Based at CERN, the European Organisation for Nuclear Research in Switzerland, Tim Berners-Lee was suffering from a case of information overload at work. Desperately trying to co-ordinate a mass of research and data from incompatible computer systems around the globe, Berners-Lee figured there must be a better way to do things. So he set about creating a space where any piece of information could be linked to any other piece of information out in the world. To do this he joined two separate ideas that had been knocking about for some time - hypertext and the internet - and he created the World Wide Web. He gave his invention to us, the public, for free and, after a cautious start, we all leapt on board to create the huge collective brain that we now use daily. Imagine a world without the world wide web. You can't, can you?

Nora on Berners-Lee's call for interoperabilityCathi on the LED saber.