Podcasts about Caterpillar

Bigfoot Destroys Heavy EquipmentBill, a forest ranger student and Timber Cruiser in Eureka, California, worked alone on weekends marking redwood trees for logging. One Monday, he and the logging crew arrived at their forest landing—a cleared area for storing equipment and fuel—to find an astonishing scene: three 55-gallon fuel drums had been thrown down a hill, a locked tool shed was overturned, and, most unbelievably, three 54-ton D-9 Caterpillar tractors had been flipped onto their sides. The crew was baffled by the immense strength required for such feats, and no explanation for the mysterious incident was ever found.Join my Supporters Club for $4.99 per month for exclusive stories:https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/what-if-it-s-true-podcast--5445587/support

S&P Futures are moving higher mainly due to optimism on tariff exemptions. The Trump tariff narrative remain the key focus as the White House indicates that that it is looking to help the auto sector. Pharma & semiconductor stocks are on watch as they are under review by the Trump tariff team. China has suspended jet deliveries from Boeing in retaliatory move. U.S. trade officials met with EU's trade representative yesterday, the demands from the Trump administration will be difficult for the Eurozone to agree to. Mining stocks are displaying gains due to a report that indicates President Trump has plans to stockpile critical metals to counter China. On the economic calendar today are reports on Import Exports prices and the Empire state Manufactuing index. JNJ, BACPNC & ERIC are higher after earnings announcements. Caterpillar named a new CEO.

This morning on The Greg & Dan Show, for CAT's 100 Year anniversary we are joined by the Caterpillar Guest and Community Relations Director Henry Vicary.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This morning on The Greg & Dan Show, for CAT's 100 Year anniversary we are joined by the Caterpillar Archivist Katie Potempa.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This morning on The Greg & Dan Show, for CAT's 100 Year anniversary we are joined by the Caterpillar Foundation Operations Manager Kylene Anthony.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This morning on The Greg & Dan Show, for CAT's 100 Year anniversary we are joined by the Caterpillar Large Power Systems Division VP and a 5th Generation Caterpillar Employee.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Love The Very Hungry Caterpillar?

A couple years ago, an entomologist named Martha Weiss got a letter from a little boy in Japan saying he wanted to replicate a famous study of hers. We covered that original study on Radiolab more than a decade ago in an episode called Goo and You – check it out here – and in addition to revealing some fascinating secrets of insect life, it also raises big questions about memory, permanence and transformation. The letter Martha received about building on this study set in motion a series of spectacular events that advance her original science and show how science works when a 12-year-old boy is the one doing it. Martha's daughter, reporter Annie Rosenthal, captured all of it and turned it into a beautiful audio story called “Caterpillar Roadshow.” It was originally published in a brand new independent audio magazine called Signal Hill, which happens to have been created in part by two former Radiolab interns (Liza Yeager and Jackson Roach, both of whom worked on this piece), and we loved it, so we're presenting an excerpt for you here.Special thanks to Annie Rosenthal, Liza Yeager, Jackson Roach, Leo Wong, Omar Etman, the whole team at Signal Hill, Carlos Morales, John Lill, Marfa Public Radio and Emma Garschagen.EPISODE CREDITS: Reported by - Annie RosenthalProduced by - Annie Rosenthalwith help from - Leo Wong and Omar EtmanSound design contributed by - Liza Yeager and Jackson RoachFact-checking by - Alan Deanand Edited by  - Liza Yeager and Jackson RoachEPISODE CITATIONS:Audio -  Listen to the original Radiolab episode, Goo and You, here (https://zpr.io/qh9xqpkXzk7j).Or the Signal Hill podcast here (https://zpr.io/CDfwyK7Zkrva).Guests - And if you want to learn more about Martha Weiss, and her work, head over here (https://zpr.io/aBw2YsqWB6NZ).Signup for our newsletter!! It includes short essays, recommendations, and details about other ways to interact with the show. Sign up (https://radiolab.org/newsletter)!Radiolab is supported by listeners like you. Support Radiolab by becoming a member of The Lab (https://members.radiolab.org/) today.Follow our show on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook @radiolab, and share your thoughts with us by emailing radiolab@wnyc.org.Leadership support for Radiolab's science programming is provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Science Sandbox, a Simons Foundation Initiative, and the John Templeton Foundation. Foundational support for Radiolab was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

How BIG is Ritchie Brothers spring auction? Well on this episode, we find out! Mack sits down with Mark McPyke, Edmonton yard refurb manager, and Rob Chappell, Regional Sales Manager for Ritchie Brothers to talk all about Ritchie Bros big spring auction in Edmonton AlbertaWe learn about what it takes to move thousands of pieces of equipment through the Edmonton yard to buyers around the world. From inspections and refurb, to lining it all up for buyers to view, we cover it on this episode!Learn more about Ritchie Bro's Edmonton auction here https://www.rbauction.com/lp/edmonton-abFind Ritchie Bros on social media @ritchiebrosFind Mack on social media @earthmovers_media or visit the website https://earthmoversmedia.com/

Los riesgos de estanflación aumentan hoy en Estados Unidos. La confianza del consumidor cae a su mínimo en tres años. Las expectativas de inflación a largo plazo (para los próximos 5 a 10 años) suben al 4,4%, el nivel más alto desde 1991. Entre medias, cuenta CNN que la Casa Blanca presiona a los chinos para que Pekín solicite una llamada entre Trump y XI. Allí no se amilanan. Consideran limitar las operaciones de importantes empresas estadounidenses en China, como Apple, Tesla, Caterpillar y Starbucks. Y el CEO de Blackrock, Larry Finck, dice que la economía está muy cerca de la recesión si no lo está ya. Tras apertura en rojo y pese a datos económicos, índices americanos están en verde. Y los europeos han reducido ventas. Analizamos todo esta hora con Enrique Zamácola, de WIO Capital. Y, como todos los viernes, vistazo a gráficos de valores Ibex con Gerardo Ortega, de Trive.

It is a golden show. Krystle had to buy a new birth certificate and Jeffrey could not find his. NASCAR was hit with cyber-attack demanding a four-million-dollar ransom. Skinny sends Krystle the filthiest messages. Charlie would pay the ransom so his phone records would not be leaked. The Battle for Britain. A couple caught on camera scamming a restaurant by putting glass in their food. Charlie's friend found a caterpillar in their food. Parents are filing a lawsuit after their 12-year-old girl lost in a spelling bee. A baseball executive resigned hours before he could be fired. A former RMG program director is joining a morning show. Apollo astronauts left bags of trash on the moon. Poop slide. Final Quentin Tarantino film. Wag Bags. Snitzer's mouse friend was seen again roaming the hallway. What are Snitzer's plans for when he retires? The Homicide Prediction Project.

It is a golden show. Krystle had to buy a new birth certificate and Jeffrey could not find his. NASCAR was hit with cyber-attack demanding a four-million-dollar ransom. Skinny sends Krystle the filthiest messages. Charlie would pay the ransom so his phone records would not be leaked. The Battle for Britain. A couple caught on camera scamming a restaurant by putting glass in their food. Charlie's friend found a caterpillar in their food. Parents are filing a lawsuit after their 12-year-old girl lost in a spelling bee. A baseball executive resigned hours before he could be fired. A former RMG program director is joining a morning show. Apollo astronauts left bags of trash on the moon. Poop slide. Final Quentin Tarantino film. Wag Bags. Snitzer's mouse friend was seen again roaming the hallway. What are Snitzer's plans for when he retires? The Homicide Prediction Project. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Zack Lemann, Curator of Animal Collections at the Audubon Insectarium, joins Ian Hoch to talk about buck moths and buck moth caterpillars, what to know about them, and what you should do if you were to get stung by one.

Ben and Ione recap a wild week hosting Ione's childhood friend Karis in Sydney and Melbourne, contemplate Henry Winklers casting in Happy Days, and why the Caterpillar Club is committing an unforgivable sin with their door policy. To dive deeper into our world visit us at https://weirdertogether.substack.com/

In this travel-prep-focused episode of AwesomeCast, Michael Sorg, Dave Podnar, and Zach Rizza get geeky about all things tech and production as Sorg prepares for a massive livestream event at SAE Aero Design West in California. From wireless HDMI gadgets and Pelican cases to Nintendo's shocking Switch 2 reveal, the team dives into the logistics of pro-level field production and the nerd-worthy new gadgets catching their eye. Plus, exclusive commentary on Nintendo's new game announcements, including open-world Mario Kart and Kirby Riders!

In this travel-prep-focused episode of AwesomeCast, Michael Sorg, Dave Podnar, and Zach Rizza get geeky about all things tech and production as Sorg prepares for a massive livestream event at SAE Aero Design West in California. From wireless HDMI gadgets and Pelican cases to Nintendo's shocking Switch 2 reveal, the team dives into the logistics of pro-level field production and the nerd-worthy new gadgets catching their eye. Plus, exclusive commentary on Nintendo's new game announcements, including open-world Mario Kart and Kirby Riders!

The Caterpillar and The Moth (Mark 8:27-9:13)

Podcast: Bites & Bytes PodcastEpisode: Securing Food Systems with a Defense Mindset with Brian SchleiferPub date: 2025-04-02Get Podcast Transcript →powered by Listen411 - fast audio-to-text and summarization

The Caterpillar and The Moth (Mark 8:27-9:13)

A special Saturday Breakfast broadcast from the banks of the Swan River as part of the River Guardians Festival:19:10 Two year old peppermint tree suddenly very sick23:59 Can you induce flowering and fruiting with a dragon fruit cactus?45:45 Caterpillar infestation near a lilac treeSubscribe to the podcast through the ABC Listen App, Apple Podcasts or wherever you like to listen.Listen to the program live on Saturdays at 9:00AM on ABC Radio Perth and ask your questions by calling in on 1300 222 720 or text 0437 922 720.

Memorial High School is reeling again after a 17-year-old junior was stabbed by another student at a school track meet on Wednesday, dying in his twin brother's arms. That followed what Frisco police called a possible double murder-suicide in December involving a15-year-old Memorial High School freshman. In other news, Dallas-Fort Worth's Fortune 500 companies lost $49 billion in market value Thursday by the close of trading. Investors retreated after President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs on what he called “Liberation Day” the prior afternoon. In North Texas, hard hit companies such as Caterpillar lost $13.8 billion in value and Texas Instruments devalued $12.7 billion; members of the Texas House Transportation Committee pushed for details about a long-discussed high-speed rail project linking Dallas to Houston, but the company behind the project had few answers to provide lawmakers; and if you are a lover of pickles, The Big Dill is making its Texas debut in Arlington on Nov. 8. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

964: Caterpillar is celebrating 100 years of innovation—and it's just getting started. In this episode of Technovation, host Peter High welcomes Jamie Engstrom, CIO and SVP of IT at Caterpillar, to discuss how the industrial giant is evolving through data strategy, digital transformation, and customer-centric innovation. Jamie shares her insights on leading a global IT organization of 2,200 professionals, the company's customer-back mindset, and how Caterpillar leverages AI, telematics, and real-time analytics to support over 4 million assets across the globe. From smart manufacturing to supply chain modernization and condition monitoring systems, Jamie explores how Caterpillar is shaping the next century of industrial excellence.

Show Notes In this conversation, Chris Yates and Simon Western discuss how organizations have become modern temples of power, shaping societal norms in positive and challenging ways. Organizations offer spaces to be productive, to deliver services and to provide meaning and development for individuals, yet they also can stifle individuality and feedback through corporate conformity. The podcast reflects on how art, small acts of kindness and ecosystems thinking are the leadership approaches that can transform organisations and liberate employees to engage relationally and realise their full potential. Chris questions traditional leadership models, highlighting the need to prioritize character over competence and move beyond the military-influenced structures that dominate corporate life. Leadership, they argue, is not about static positions but fluid relationships—emerging in unexpected places and shaped by small moments of humanity rather than grand, ego-driven achievements. The conversation also highlights the burden of projections on leaders, who risk becoming seduced by the images others place upon them. Looking ahead, Simon and Chris consider the future of leadership in a world that increasingly demands authenticity and interconnectedness. They call for a shift to eco-centric leadership,  one that embraces moral responsibility, acknowledges the social role of organizations, and also seeks inspiration from art to reimagine work and leadership. Chris closes by reminding us that the smallest acts of kindness and courage in the face of adversity can reshape leadership, organizations, and society itself. Key Reflections Organizations hold immense power as modern temples, shaping societal norms and driving change. Corporate cultures often enforce conformity, stifling individuality, feedback, and personal identity. Leadership discussions focus too much on competence and too little on the moral character of leaders. Leadership is not a fixed title but a fluid, relational process that can emerge from unexpected places. Leaders must resist being seduced by the projections and expectations placed upon them. The future of leadership requires shifting from ego-driven ambition to collective, eco-centric responsibility. True leadership is found not in grand gestures but in small, everyday acts of humanity. Creativity and art offers a powerful lens to rethink work, leadership, and our role in the world. Keywords corporate culture, society, leadership, power dynamics, identity, character, reimagination, eco-leadership Brief Bio Christopher Yates, Senior Vice President of Talent at Equinix, is a leader committed to professional and personal growth within organizations. He oversees Equinix's global talent strategy, focusing on attracting, developing, and retaining diverse talent while aligning leadership initiatives with the company's growth and innovation objectives.  Previously Chris held senior OD positions in Microsoft, Ford, American Express, Caterpillar and HSBC bank, playing a vital role in shaping business transformation.  Chris is co-author with Pooja Sachdev of Rewire: A Radical Approach to Tackling Diversity and Difference and has also co-authored Share: How Organizations Can Thrive in an Age of Networked Knowledge, Power and Relationships. Chris brings a huge breadth of experience to organisational thinking, and is admired for his empathy, dynamism and original and imaginative leadership. 

Activate OS is transforming equipment management in the construction industry with a networked approach that connects fleet owners with their equipment providers. Starting as a consulting project to solve equipment management challenges for Caterpillar, Activate OS has evolved into a comprehensive platform that facilitates real-time collaboration between construction companies and their equipment dealers and rental partners. In this episode of Category Visionaries, we spoke with Brian Giamo, CEO and Co-Founder of Activate OS, about the company's journey from a consulting business offshoot to a SaaS platform that's creating network effects and delivering measurable value to some of the largest construction projects in the country. Topics Discussed: Activate's origin story as a consulting project for Caterpillar The evolution from broad market approach to a focused go-to-market strategy How Activate connects fleet owners with equipment dealers and rental companies The three-stage go-to-market model that creates network effects The shift in VC interest toward construction tech verticals Future vision for expanding into transaction facilitation and AI-enabled services GTM Lessons For B2B Founders: Get laser-focused on your entry point: Brian's team initially tried selling to equipment dealers and rental companies first, expecting them to distribute to fleet owners. After struggling, they flipped their approach to target fleet owners first, which created natural pull from the dealers. As Brian explained, "The natural way that this works is acquire the fleet owner, get them connected to provider, they mutually see value and benefit in keeping their equipment up and running." Sell outcomes, not software: Activate OS doesn't position itself as merely selling software. Brian emphasized, "We're really selling a result. We're really selling production of those assets on a job site and more effective communications to enable that." This outcome-focused approach resonates with customers who care about equipment uptime, not technology. Create strategic network effects: Activate's three-stage go-to-market model (1. acquire fleet owner, 2. connect them to providers, 3. convert providers to distribution partners) creates powerful network effects. Each new customer expands their reach to 5-10 equipment providers who then become potential distribution channels themselves. Be patient with product-market fit: It took Activate nearly six years to truly crystallize their go-to-market approach and product-market fit. Brian acknowledged, "I would say we really have sort of just arrived there in 2022 or 2023. It took a lot of years." Leverage strategic investors from your industry: Activate raised over $4M without traditional fundraising, instead bringing on strategic investors including a major Caterpillar dealer. These industry insiders provided both capital and valuable market insights, creating mutual benefits beyond just funding.   //   Sponsors: Front Lines — We help B2B tech companies launch, manage, and grow podcasts that drive demand, awareness, and thought leadership. www.FrontLines.io The Global Talent Co. — We help tech startups find, vet, hire, pay, and retain amazing marketing talent that costs 50-70% less than the US & Europe.  www.GlobalTalent.co

We learn about the life cycle of a caterpillar.

Mini-podcast about an event on this day in working class history.Our work is only possible because of support from you, our listeners on patreon. If you appreciate our work, please join us and access exclusive content and benefits at patreon.com/workingclasshistory.See all of our anniversaries each day, alongside sources and maps on the On This Day section of our Stories app: stories.workingclasshistory.com/date/todayBrowse all Stories by Date here on the Date index: https://stories.workingclasshistory.com/dateCheck out our Map of historical Stories: https://map.workingclasshistory.comCheck out books, posters, clothing and more in our online store, here: https://shop.workingclasshistory.comIf you enjoy this podcast, make sure to check out our flagship longform podcast, Working Class History.  AcknowledgementsWritten and edited by Working Class History.Theme music by Ricardo Araya. Check out his YouTube channel at youtube.com/@peptoattack

Unveiling Caterpillar's new Gas Mechanical System, an innovative solution for burning 100% natural gas in frac operations, improving efficiency and power density.

In this episode of Widowed AF, host Rosie Gill-Moss speaks with Sophie Ransom from Suffolk. At 25 years old, Sophie's fiancé, Paul was killed in a motorcycle accident when she was 17 weeks pregnant with their daughter. Now 27, Sophie shares her experience of widowhood at a young age and the reality of navigating pregnancy, birth, and raising a child on her own.Sophie recounts meeting Paul at 19, marrying at 24, and becoming pregnant shortly after their wedding. She describes their last evening together sharing a Colin the Caterpillar cake before Paul's fatal collision with a lorry while riding to work the next morning. The conversation covers Sophie's experience of learning about his death, attending hospital appointments without him, and giving birth via emergency C-section without Paul by her side.The episode addresses Sophie's thoughts of not wanting to continue living without Paul and how her daughter Poppy gave her purpose. Sophie discusses practical aspects of her situation, including her approach to telling a child about a parent they never met, reading "I Have an Angel" nightly, and moving away from their shared home. She also shares her process of working through anger toward Paul, connecting with others in similar situations through WAY (Widowed and Young), and finding happiness again 18 months after his loss. Topics: Young widowhood, pregnancy after loss, parenting after loss, motorcycle accident, sudden death, raising children who never met their parentConnect with Us: Follow us on Instagram @widowedAF Email: theshow at widowedAF.com Web: (https://www.widowedaf.com) Watch on (YouTube)

Welcome!

Arguably Cat's most iconic dozer, the D8, turns 100 this year alongside Caterpillar. Mack sits down with Sam Meeker, market professional for medium track type tractors (D4-D8 size), to talk about the next gen D8 which so happens to be in production the year Caterpillar turns 100 years old as a company.You won't find a more genuine Cat guy than Sam. Mack and Sam talk about what has and what hasn't changed with the new D8, technology on the new dozer, Cat's unqiue "first cut" blade design, undercarriage, the new cab, and of course farming as Sam grew up in a farming family. Sit back, grab your favourite beverage or snack, and learn all about the new D8!You can find Sam on social media, @yieldmapAdditionally you can find more info about the D8 on Cat's website: https://www.cat.com/en_US/products/new/equipment/dozers/medium-dozers/120120.htmlFind Mack on social media @earthmovers_media or check out their website to learn more https://earthmoversmedia.com/

Click here to Shop Affirmation Decks, Oracle Decks, and more! Use Promo code: RCPODCAST20 for 20% off your first order!   Today's Power Affirmation: When I slow down, I feel alive. In stillness, I learn how to fly.   Today's Oracle of Motivation: As you twirl in this experience and the fast-paced days tug your dress, remember that the race is not real. There is no competition. All that matters is that you, so beautiful in your sparkles, only hit the throttle in areas of life that call you to dance. Especially if it means naps by the river, sunsets on the hill, and bear hugs for daysss. Be still, caterpillar. Only in stillness will you learn how to fly. Inhale. Exhale. Jive! Neverland awaits!   Designed to Motivate Your Creative Maniac Mind The 60-Second Power Affirmations Podcast is designed to help you focus, affirm your visions, and harness the power within your creative maniac mind! Join us daily for a new 60-second power affirmation followed by a blast of oracle motivation from the Universe (+ a quick breathing meditation). It's time to take off your procrastination diaper and share your musings with the world!   For more musings, visit RageCreate.com     Leave a Review & Share! Apple Podcast reviews are one of THE most important factors for podcasts. If you enjoy the show, please take a second to leave the show a review on Apple Podcasts! Click this link: Leave a review on Apple Podcasts Hit “Listen on Apple Podcasts” on the left-hand side under the picture. Scroll down under “Ratings & Reviews” & click “Write A Review” Leave an honest review. You're awesome!  

Welcome to Episode #151 of Everything Under the Sun! This week, we’re joined by the wonderful Justin Pollard, historian and author, to help us uncover a curious question from the past—how did the ancient Egyptians blow their noses? Then, we’ll burrow into the world of wildlife to discover how hedgehogs build their cozy homes. And finally, we’ll take a closer look at tiny caterpillar eggs—how do they stick so securely to leaves? Get ready for another fascinating episode packed with history, nature, and amazing facts!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The American economy is growing, and, in many ways, it's looking a lot like the 1990s. Upward trends in productivity growth and employment paired with downward trends in inflation are cause for optimism. The question is whether we will maintain this trajectory or be derailed by this emerging era of uncertainty.Today on Faster, Please! — The Podcast, I talk with Skanda Amarnath about trade policy, fiscal and monetary policy, AI advancement, demographic trends, and how all of this bodes for the US economy.Amarnath is the Executive Director of Employ America, a macroeconomic policy research and advocacy organization. He was previously vice president at MKP Capital Management, as well as an analyst at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.In This Episode* The boomy '90s (1:24)* Drivers of growth (7:24)* The boomy '20s? (11:38)* Full employment and the Fed (22:03)* Demographics in the data (25:37)* Policies for productivity (27:55)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. The boomy '90s (1:24)The '90s stand out as a high productivity growth, low inflation, high employment economy, especially if we look at the years 1996 to the year 2000.Pethokoukis: What got me really excited about all the great work that Employ America puts out was one particular report that I think came out late last year called “The Dream of the 90's is Alive in 2024,” and hopefully it's still alive in 2025. By '90s of course you mean the 1990s.Let me start off by asking you: What was so awesome about the 1990s that it is worth writing about a dream of its return?Amarnath: The 1990s — if you're a macroeconomist, at least — had pitch-perfect conditions. Employment was reasonably high, we achieved the highest levels of prime-age employment relative to the population. We had low and declining inflation, and that variable that we use to say, this is the driver of welfare over time, productivity outcomes, the amount of output we can spin up from finite inputs, was also growing at a very strong rate, and one that we haven't really seen replicated since or really in the decades before.The '90s stand out as a high productivity growth, low inflation, high employment economy, especially if we look at the years 1996 to the year 2000. We'd had high productivity maybe even afterwards . . . but that was also a period where a lot of that productivity was gained from the recession. When employment falls really quickly, productivity can go up for illusory reasons, but it's really that '90s sweet spot where everything was kind of moving in the right direction.Obviously, over the last several years, we've seen a lot of those different challenges flare up, whether it was employment during Covid, but then also inflation over the last few years. So . . . a model to build towards, in some ways.Some of us — not me, and I don't think you — remember the very boomy immediate post-war decades. Probably many more of us remember the go-go 1990s. One thing I always find interesting is how gloomy people were in those years right before the takeoff, which is a wonderful contrarian indicator that we had this period [when] we appeared to have won the Cold War but we had a nasty recession early in the decade, kind of a choppy recovery, and there was plenty of gloom that the days of fast growth were over. And just as we sort of reached the nadir in our attitudes, boy, things took off. So maybe that's a good omen for right nowIf we're a contrarian, and if the past can be present, maybe that is a positive indicator to consider. In some ways, it's a bit surprising how much you hear the talk about growth [being] stuck in a very low-growth environment. Over the last two years, we have seen above-trend real GDP growth, above-trend productivity growth. We're going to get some productivity data revisions tomorrow. Again, this measure of productivity is output per hour, so it's basically, to a first approximation, real GDP divided by hours worked. We've seen that the labor market has, largely speaking, held itself up over the last few years, and yet, at the same time, real output has accelerated.So that's at least something that suggests better things are possible. It's a sign that productivity can accelerate, and with the benefit of revisions tomorrow, we are likely to see at least . . . I'd say if you take a fair reading of the pre-pandemic trend on productivity growth, so five to 15 years, maybe you want to include the financial crisis and what happened before, maybe you don't, but you end up with something like 1.4 percent is what we were seeing. 1.4, maybe 1.45, that's a pretty generous view of pre-pandemic productivity growth.I would like to do better than that going forward.I would too. And since 2019 Q4, with the benefit of data revisions, until now, we're likely to see something like 1.9 percent — 50 basis points higher, 0.5 percent higher, we could ideally like to do even better than that. But it's 0.5 percent better over a five-year horizon in which whatever labor market weirdness spanned Covid, we've largely recovered from that. Obviously, there are a lot of different things that have changed between now and five years ago, but at least the data distortion issues should hopefully have been filtered out at this point. And yet, we probably are posting much better real output outcomes.So through a lot of this turbulence, through a lot of the dynamism that's kind of transpired over the last few years, especially in terms of business formation activity, there was a high labor turnover environment in '21 and '22. That churn has come down in more recent quarters, but we have seen better productivity outcomes.Now, can they sustain? There's a lot of things that probably go into that. There are some new potential risks and shocks on the horizon, but at least it tells you better things are possible in a way that if — I'm sure you've had these discussions throughout the previous decade, in the 2010s, when people made a lot of claims about why productivity growth was destined to be stuck, that we were either not innovating enough, or we were not able to capture that into GDP, or else there are just some secular reasons, and so I think it's an instructive moment. If people are actually looking at the data, the last two years, real output and productivity growth has been very impressive, objectively. And it's not just about, “Hey, we're reverting to the pre-pandemic trend and nothing more.” I think there are signs that this is something at least a little different from what an honest forecast pre-pandemic would've suggested.Drivers of growth (7:24)The three-legged stool is one where you want have a labor market that's strong, fixed investment that's growing (ideally faster than usual), and on the third leg it's the set of things that you can do to control really salient costs that everyone's paying.Let's talk about those signs, but first let's take a quick step back. When you look at what drove growth, and productivity growth, specifically, in the '90s, give me the factors that drove growth and then why those factors give us lessons for policymaking today.I think there are three drivers I can point to that are a little bit independent of each other.One is we had — I don't want to say a tight labor market, but especially a fully employed labor market is helpful in so far as, and we see this now over multiple episodes, especially when you're at high levels of prime-age employment, that's typically a point when there's a lot of human capital that's accumulated. People who have been employed for a while, they've been trained up, there's a little more returns to scale, they can scale revenue, they can scale output better. You don't need to add an additional worker to add additional unit of GDP.In the more tangible sense, it's that people are trained up, they have more tangible experience, productive experience. You're able to see output gains without necessarily having to add hours worked. We generally saw over the late ‘90s: Hours worked slowed down, but real GDP growth held up very well.The labor market wasn't contracting by any stretch, it was just, largely speaking, finding an equilibrium in which employment levels were high, job growth was solid if not always spectacular, but we were still seeing that real GDP growth could still be scaled up in a lot of ways. So there is a labor market dynamic to this.There is a fixed investment dynamic. Fixed investment growth is very strong in the late '90s. That was about information processing equipment, IT, software. We did telecommunications deregulation in 1996, which is meant to really expand and accelerate the rollout of things. That became the fiber boom. We saw a lot of construction that went into those sectors, and so we saw it really touch construction, we saw it touch equipment, and we also saw it effect intellectual property.An investment to prevent the millennium bug?There was probably a lot of overinvestment that also was born of some of that deregulation, but at least in terms of it adding to our welfare, making it easier for us to use the internet and the long-term benefits of that, a lot of that was built in the late '90s. You could probably point to some stuff in policy, obviously interacting with technology that was very favorable.The third thing I would say is also probably underrated is inflation fell over that whole period. While some of that inflation falling would've been some fortuitous dynamics, especially in the late '90s around food and energy prices falling, the Asian financial crisis, there were also things that were very important for creating space for the consumer to spend more. Things like HMOs. Healthcare inflation really fell throughout the '90s.Now, HMOs became more unpopular for a lot of reasons. These health management organizations were meant to control costs and did a pretty good job of it. This is something that Janet Yellen actually wrote about a long time ago, talking about the '90s and how the healthcare dynamic was very underrated. In the 2000s, healthcare inflation really picked up again and a lot of the cost-control measures in the private sector were less effective, but you could see evidence that that was also creating space in terms of price stability, the ability for the consumer to spend more on other types of goods and services. That also allows for both more demand to be available but also for it to be supplied.I think with all these stories there's a demand- and a supply-side aspect to them. I think you kind of need both for it to be successful. The three-legged stool is one where you want have a labor market that's strong, fixed investment that's growing (ideally faster than usual), and on the third leg it's the set of things that you can do to control really salient costs that everyone's paying. Like healthcare, obviously there's a lot of cost bloat, and thinking about ways to really curb expenditure without curbing quality or real consumption itself, but there's obviously a lot of room for reforms in that area.The boomy '20s? (11:38)Right now, you have still an increasing number of people who have had meaningful work experience over the last one, two, three, years. That human capital should accumulate and be more relevant for GDP growth going forward . . .So you've identified what, in your view, is a very successful mix of these very critical factors. So if you want to be bullish about the rest of this decade, which of those factors — maybe all of them — are at play right now? Or maybe none of them!Right now, the labor market is still holding up rather well. While we may not be seeing quite the level of labor market dynamism we saw earlier in this expansion, at the same time, that was also a period of great turbulence and high inflation. Right now, you have still an increasing number of people who have had meaningful work experience over the last one, two, three, years. That human capital should accumulate and be more relevant for GDP growth going forward, assuming we don't have a recession in the next year or two or whatever.If we do, I think it obviously would mean a lot of people are probably likely to not be as employed, and if that's the case, their marketable and productive skills may atrophy and depreciate. That's the risk there, but, all things considered, right now, non-farm payroll growth has been roughly speaking 160,000 per month. Employment rates adjusted for demographics are a little higher than they were before the pandemic. It's pretty historically high. That's not a bad outcome to start with and those initial conditions should hopefully bode well for the labor market's contribution to productivity growth.The challenge is in terms of real GDP growth. It's also a function of a lot of other factors: What are we going to see in terms of cost stability? I would generally say there's obviously a lot of turbulence right now, but what's going to happen to a lot of these key costs? On one hand, commodity prices should hopefully be stable, there's a lot of signs of, let's say, OPEC increasing production.On the other hand, we have also things about tariffs that are pretty significant threats on the table and I think you could also be equally concerned about how much this could matter. We've already had a bigger run-through of this with a lot of this supply chain turbulence, pandemic error stimulus, and how that stuff interacted. That was quite turbulent. Even if tariffs aren't quite as turbulent as that, it could still be something that detracted from productivity growth.We saw, actually, in the first two quarters of 2022 when inflation exploded, there were a compounding number of shocks on the supply side with the demand side that it did have a depressing effect on productivity in the short run. And so you can think if we see things on the cost side blow out, it will also restrict output. If you have to mark up the price of a lot of things to reflect different costs and risks, it's going to have some output-throttling effect, and a productivity-throttling effect. That's one side of things to be concerned about.And then the other side of it, in terms of fixed investment, I think there's a lot of reasons for optimism on fixed investment. If we just took the start of the year, there's clearly a lot of investment tied to the artificial intelligence boom: Data centers, all of the expenditures on software that should change, expenditures on hardware that should be upgraded, and there's a whole set of industrial infrastructure that's also tied to this where you should see capital deepening really emerge. You should see that there should be more room to scale up in capital formation relative to labor. You can probably point to some pockets of it right now, but it hadn't shown up in the GDP data yet. That was the optimistic case coming into this year and I think it's still there. The challenge is there's now other headwinds.The tariffs make me less optimistic. I really worry about the uncertainty freezing business investment and hiring, for that matter.I share your sentiment there. I think we learned in 2018 and -19, there were tariffs being implemented but on much smaller scale and scope, and even those had a pretty meaningful or identifiable impact on the manufacturing sector, leave aside even the other sectors that use manufactured inputs from imports or otherwise. So these are going to be likely headwinds if you're any kind of company that exports at any point in time to something across borders, you have to now incorporate higher costs, more uncertainty. We don't know how long this is supposed to stick. Are you supposed to assume this is going to be a transition period, as Treasury Secretary Bessent said, or is this something that is just like a little negotiation tactic, you get a win and then we move on?I don't think anyone's quite sure how this is supposed to play out and I worry both for the manufacturing sector itself because, contrary to the popular conception of it, we still export a lot of things. We still export, and the most competitive industries are exporting industries, and so that's a concern for whether you're a manufacturing construction machinery, you're Caterpillar, or if you're agricultural machinery and you're John Deere, you have to start to think about this stuff more and the risk that's attached to it. The hurdle rates to investment go up, not down.And on the other side of the ledger then we have, or at least in terms of the sectors that use manufactured inputs. Transformers are really important for building out the energy infrastructure if we're going to have load growth that's driven by AI or whatever else, we're kind of entering more uncertainty on that side as well, and not really clear what the full strategy is. It strikes me as going to be very challenging.And then on the monetary policy [side], and this is the difference, you had in the '90s a Federal Reserve which seems to have defeated the Great Inflation Monster of the 1970s while the Fed today is battling inflation.What do you make of that as far as setting the stage for a productivity boom, a Fed which is quite active and still quite concerned about that inflation surge and perhaps tariffs further playing into it going forward?I think the Fed's stuck in a hard spot here. If you think about a trade shock as likely being some mix of — well, it could be output throttling. Maybe the output throttling and the effects in the labor market are more outsized than the inflation effects? That was what we saw in 2018 and 19, but it's not a given that that's going to be the case this time. The scale of the threats are much bigger and much wider, and especially coming through a period now where there's higher inflation, maybe there's more willingness to raise prices in response to these shocks. So these things are a little different.The Fed has basically said, “We don't know exactly how this is going to play out and we're going to need to watch the data, keep an open mind, be pretty risk-averse about how we're going to adjust interest rate policy.” We've seen evidence of inflation expectations going up. That will not give the Fed a lot of confidence about cutting interest rates in the absence of other things getting worse. What the Fed's supposed to do in response to supply shock is almost a philosophical question because you obviously don't want to break things if there's really just a supply shock that is a one-off that you can see through, but if it starts to have longer term consequences, create bigger pain points in terms of inflation, it's just a tough spot.When I try to square the circle here — and this will be no surprise to the listeners — I can't help but thinking, boy, it would be really fantastic if all the most techno-optimist dreams about AI came true, and this is not just an important technology, but an unbelievably important technology that diffuses through the economy in record time. That would be a wonderful factor to add into that mix.If there are ways for that to be a bigger tailwind — and there could be, I wouldn't be too pessimistic about how that could filter through even the GDP data amidst a lot of these trade policy headwinds, we're expected to see a lot grand buildout of data centers, for example. There's an energy infrastructure layer to that.But even beyond the investment side, actually being used, improving total factor productivity. Super hard to predict, and no one wants to do a budget forecast under the assumption we're going to be doubling a productivity growth, but it would be nice to have.Sure would. I will say about one of the things on the inflation side, especially with the Fed, we've come through a period now where the Fed has kept restrictive interest rate policies, but only more recently have we seen a little bit more of that show up in financial markets, for example. So the stock market over the last two years has ran up quite a bit, historically, and only now we've seen some signs of maybe some pricing of risk and some of the issues around the Fed.Inflation data itself coming into this year, relative to the Fed's target on the Fed's gauges, it was right now about 2.6, 2.7 percent. Most of that reflects a lot of lags of the past, I would say. If you look through the details, you see a lot of it in how inflation is measured for housing rent. How inflation is measured for financial services really tracks the stock market, and then there's obviously some other idiosyncratic stuff around where they're using wages as the measure of prices in PCE, which is the Fed's inflation gauge. If you take that stuff out, we still have a little bit of inflation work to do in terms of getting inflation down, but it would sound pretty manageable. If I told you, actually, if you take away those lags, you probably get some only 2.2 percent, that seems like we're almost there.Let's take away a little more, then we get to two percent. We can just keep cutting things outAnd there would probably be conditions for a lot. But if we can give the benefit of the time and do no harm, there's probably a positive story to be told. The challenge is, we may not be doing no harm here. There may be new things that rear up, to your point. If you start just deducting stuff just because you think it lags, but you don't think about forward-looking risks, which there are, then you start to get into a more challenged view of how things improve on the inflation side.I think that's a big dilemma for the Fed, which is, they have to be forward-looking. They can't just say, well, this stuff is lagging, we can ignore it. That doesn't cash when you have forward-looking risks, but if we do see that maybe some of these trade policy risks go away, if there's a change of heart, a change of mind, I think you can possibly tell yourself a more positive story about how maybe interest rates can come down a bit more and financial conditions can be more supportive of investment over time. So I think that that is the optimistic case there.Full employment and the Fed (22:03)Taking people away from their job and then trying to just bring them back in several years later, don't expect the productivity dividends to be quite the same.For someone who cares about full employment, how would you rate the Fed's performance after the global financial crisis? Too tight?It was too tight and also it was an environment in which the Fed, at various points from 2010, maybe 2009, through to 2015, they were very eager to try and get interest rates up before the economy was giving their hard signal that it was time to raise interest rates. Inflation hadn't really reared its head, nor had we seen evidence of really strong labor markets. We were seeing a recovery that was very gentle, and slow, and maybe we were slowly getting out of it, but it was a slow grind. GDP growth was not particularly stellar over that period. That's pretty disappointing, right? We don't want do that again. Obviously, there are things like maybe fiscal policy could have been done differently, as well as monetary policy on some level, but I think the Fed was very eager to get off of zero to the point where they weren't looking at the data, just didn't like the fact they were at zero.Coming out of it, now it's like that recovery is a lot of wasted output. We lost a lot of output out of that. We lost a lot of employment out of that. It's kind of just a big economic waste. Obviously, this past recovery has been very different and Covid was a different type of shock relative to the global financial crisis.The thing that worries me is actually, when we start to look at the global financial crisis and we look at, say, even the recession from the dot com boom, or even the recession, to your point, in the early '90s, prime-age employment rates took a long time to recover and it's not ideal from a productivity perspective that you want to have people out of the labor force for long periods of time, people out of employment for an extended number of years —Also not good for social cohesion.The social fabric, yeah. There's a lot of stuff it's not great for. We don't want hysteresis of that kind. We don't want to have people who are, “Oh, because I lost my job, I'm not going to be able to get a new job in the foreseeable future.” A lot of skills, general intangible knowledge, that's kind of part of how people become more productive and how firms become more productive. You want that stuff to keep going on some level. That's also probably why even Covid was very turbulent. It's a lot of things that we kind of have in motion, we just switched it off and then switched it back on. Even that over a short horizon can be very disruptive. There was a reason, on some level, to do it, but it is also something to learn from: Taking people away from their job and then trying to just bring them back in several years later, don't expect the productivity dividends to be quite the same.So I look at those three recessions at least to say, if we're going to have slow recoveries out of those, it's going to cause problems. So it's a balance of Fed and fiscal policy, I'd say, because there are certain things — there was a 2001, -2, -3, there were attempts to lower taxes at the same time. That actually may have been the key catalyst, more so than the Fed cutting rates, but when you think about how the Fed is sometimes antsy to get off of low rates when the economy is depressed, that's not great. Right now the Fed has a very different set of trade-offs. Thankfully, on some level, for full employment especially, [we're] not in that world, we're now more trying to defend full employment, protect full employment, ideally not have a recession now, would be great.Demographics in the data (25:37)When you see how population growth has a twofold dynamic, we typically see in periods of high population growth are the periods also where you tend to see both strong investment but also inflation risk.I would love to avoid that. That's the last thing we need.I have two questions: One, how much do demographics, and there's been a lot of talk about falling fertility rates, is that something you think about much?I think demographics play a lot of tricks on the data itself. When you see how population growth has a twofold dynamic, we typically see in periods of high population growth are the periods also where you tend to see both strong investment but also inflation risk. Obviously, when you know that there's a bigger base of people who you can sell your goods and services to, you might be more inclined to go forward with a longer-dated investment with some confidence that there will be growth to validate it. On the other hand, it's also because there's more spending that's happening in the economy, that's higher growth, there might be more inflation risk.I think that those background conditions then filter in various ways. You can kind of see how Japan and Europe have, generally speaking, at least maybe prior to this pandemic-era episode of inflation, are seeing lower inflation rates, lower growth rates, though, too. So lower real growth, lower inflation, real per capita outcomes are always hard to square in terms of Japan's population is declining, but also Japan's real GDP, is it declining as much more or less? These things are very hard to identify going forward.I think it's going to just muddy a lot of different math as far as what counts as strong investment. We've gotten used to a world of non-farm payroll growth every month in the job report. If it's like 150,000 to 200,000, that's pretty solid and great. Do we need to change our expectations to it being a 100,000 is good enough because we're not actually expanding the working age population as much? Those things are going to have an effect on the macroeconomic data and how we evaluate it in real time. Even just this year, because for some people's assessments of what counts as strong payroll growth, there was a sense that payroll employment was strong in '23 and '24 because of immigration. I'm a little bit more skeptical than most of those claims, but if it's true, which I think it's still possibly true, that it's then the case right now if we do see less immigration, is that the breakeven, the place where what counts as healthy employment growth might be a lot lower because of it.Policies for productivity (27:55)Healthcare cost growth and managing it will be important both in terms of what people see in the budgetary outcomes, but also inflation outcomes.My last question for you, I'll give you a choice of what to answer. If you were to recommend a pro-productivity piece of public policy, either give me your favorite one or the least-obvious one that you would recommend.Right now, I'd say the things that worry the most in productivity, and it's on the table, is the trade policy. This stuff has adverse impacts on prices and investment, and it may have impacts on employment, too, over time, if they stick. We're talking about really high, sizable numbers here, in terms of what's threatened now. Maybe it's all bark and no bite, but I would say this is what's on the table right now. I don't know what else is on the table at the very moment, but I'd say that's a place where you have to wonder what's the merits of any of this stuff, and I think I'm not seeing it.I am more intellectually flexible than most about where sometimes some very specific, targeted, narrow trade barriers have a lot of sense in them, either because solving a particular externalities, over-capacity kind of problem that might exist. There are some intellectualized reasons you can offer if it's narrow and targeted. If you're doing stuff at a really broad-based level, the way it's currently being evaluated, then I have to ask, what are we doing here? I am not sure this is good for investment, and investment is also part of how we are able to unlock a lot of general corporate technologies, able to actually see total factor productivity growth and increase over time. So I worry about that. That's top of mind.Things that are kind of underrated that I think is really important over time, that'll probably be also important, both for people who are thinking about efficiency, thinking about where there's room for public policy to support productivity growth, I'd say healthcare is a really prominent place right now. Healthcare cost growth and managing it will be important both in terms of what people see in the budgetary outcomes, but also inflation outcomes. There's just a lot of expenditures there where there's not a lot of incentive for rationalization that needs to be brought. And there's a way to do it equitably. There's a lot of low-hanging fruit out there in terms of ways we can reform the healthcare system. Site neutral payments, being one easy example to point to.The federal government itself and private insurers, both of them, though, in terms of paying for healthcare, how they pay for healthcare and actually ensure cost control in that process, if we're able to do that well, I think the space for productivity is pretty underrated and could be quite sizable. That's also, I'd say, an underrated reason why the 2000s became far less productive. Healthcare services inflation, healthcare cost growth really exploded over that period, and we did not get a good handle on it, and we kind exited the '90s productivity boom phase. It was more obvious towards the latter half of the 2000s as a result.On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedMicro ReadsFaster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Today, we're heading to Los Angeles to chat with entrepreneur and philosopher, Mr. Sid Mohasseb. Sid is a best-selling author, serial entrepreneur, venture investor, university professor, and innovation leader. Following the success of his books, ‘The Caterpillar's Edge' and ‘You Are Not Them,' he has been actively involved in high-level advisory, early-stage investments, and speaking engagements. An adjunct professor at USC Marshall Business School and the Viterbi School of Engineering, Sid focuses on AI, data analytics, and dynamic business strategy. Visit the C4C website to gain full access to the transcript, show notes, and guest links. Coaching 4 Companies

Send your questions or provocations to Adam or Budi here!In the fist book club episode of the year, Adam and Budi discuss The Poetics written by Aristotle, with commentary from David Bruin. Support the showIf you enjoyed this week´s podcast, please leave a review on Apple Podcasts. To submit a question: Voice- http://www.speakpipe.com/theatreofothers Email- podcast@theatreofothers.com Show Credits Co-Hosts: Adam Marple & Budi MillerProducer: Jack BurmeisterMusic: (Intro) Jack Burmeister, (Outro) https://www.purple-planet.comAdditional compositions by @jack_burmeister

Send us a textWhat if you could unlock four decades of industry secrets from a heavy machinery veteran? Join us for an eye-opening conversation with Ron Wilson as he takes us through his 40-year journey in the heavy machinery industry. From his humble beginnings at Empire to his influential roles in launching a Komatsu dealership in California, Ron offers profound insights into the consolidation of dealerships, the competitive landscape with giants like Komatsu and Caterpillar, and the impact of corporate influences like Mitsui on U.S. operations. Gain a glimpse of the future, as Ron speculates on what the industry might look like by 2060, amidst the ongoing consolidation trends.Explore the complex dance between mining and construction companies as we dive into dealer strategies in the face of Komatsu's strategic division of operations and Caterpillar's machine rebuild programs. Understand the intricate balance dealers must maintain between parts and service to stay profitable, and discover innovative ways they align sales and product support to enhance machinery lifecycle management. Unpack the challenges of cost-per-hour contracts and learn why maintaining high customer service standards is critical, even as the workforce shrinks.The episode doesn't shy away from tackling tough topics like the declining market share of parts and the evolving customer purchasing behavior influenced by online shopping. Ron sheds light on the importance of effective employee evaluation and communication, drawing from his rich career experiences. With a focus on bridging the skills gap between generations, the conversation also delves into preparing for potential industry downturns and the crucial role of preserving historical knowledge for future leaders. Listen in as we discuss strategies for navigating the ever-changing heavy machinery landscape, ensuring your business remains resilient in the face of uncertainty. Visit us at LearningWithoutScars.org for more training solutions for Equipment Dealerships - Construction, Mining, Agriculture, Cranes, Trucks and Trailers.We provide comprehensive online learning programs for employees starting with an individualized skills assessment to a personalized employee development program designed for their skill level.

Preview of LGIS2025 Volume 25 "Gaga Caterpillar" is here for free. 

01:00 WHCA president Eugene Daniels, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Daniels 02:00 FB: MNSBC's Newest Anchor Eugene Daniels Is a 'Kamala Harris Expert' and 'Walking Beyoncé Encyclopedia' Who Has Revolutionized the DC Fashion Scene, https://freebeacon.com/media/mnsbcs-newest-anchor-eugene-daniels-is-a-kamala-harris-expert-and-walking-beyonce-encyclopedia-who-has-revolutionized-the-dc-fashion-scene/ 06:00 Winners and losers from the 2024 election, https://freebeacon.com/author/stiles/politics/fighters-failures-and-freaks-the-definitive-list-of-winners-and-losers-of-the-2024-election/ 10:00 The Morning Meeting S4E39 | Trump's First 100 Days, Democrat Realignment & Today's Political News, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K34LAkfHzhA 14:00 The right takes back institutions 15:00 Fast Company: Robby Starbuck's anti-DEI activism uses a very familiar playbook: Here's why big brands like Harley-Davidson, Caterpillar, and Lowe's are caving to the anti-DEI crusader. https://www.fastcompany.com/91214494/robby-starbucks-anti-dei-activism-uses-a-very-familiar-playbook 16:00 Jeff Bezos says the WP Op/Ed page won't be liberal any more 24:00 2WAY TONIGHT 2/26 | Mark Halperin on Trump's First 100 Days, Democrats & Today's Political News, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpfjo8j-n78 26:00 CNN: New book on Biden by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson reports a ‘cover-up' about his decline, https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/26/media/joe-biden-book-jake-tapper-alex-thompson/index.html 30:45 The 10 Trump Secrets You Never Knew From Michael Wolff Book, https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-10-trump-secrets-you-never-knew-from-michael-wolff-book/ 34:30 Amber Duke & the NatCon Squad on the WH vs WHCA, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDaXb0OS_ys 40:45 Every time the left changes the name of a place, the AP goes along with it, so why not with the Gulf of America? 48:30 VF: Michael Wolff at the Door: His New Bombshell Book on Donald Trump and the MAGA Bubble, https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/michael-wolff-at-the-door-his-new-bombshell-book-on/id1232383877?i=1000696239956 52:00 Axios: Supreme Court eyes lower bar for white, straight workers to sue for bias, https://www.axios.com/2025/02/26/marlean-ames-reverse-discrimination-lawsuit 53:00 WP: Supreme Court seems poised to lower bar for Whites to sue for job bias, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/26/supreme-court-workplace-discrimination-marlean-ames/ 54:00 WSJ: Supreme Court Signals Minority Groups Get No Edge in Bias Suits, https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/supreme-court-reverse-discrimination-case-complaint-edab2cbf?mod=hp_lead_pos6 57:00 Ten: Marty Sheargold Forced To Apologise After Making Misogynistic Remarks About Matildas, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txX3bQTlm3A&ab_channel=10NewsFirst 1:00:00 Dave: Straight White Man FIRED For Doing His Job! (Marty Sheargold), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QGfbb5R6i0 1:08:00 Luke as Kwisatz Haderach, https://dune.fandom.com/wiki/Kwisatz_Haderach 1:17:00 Selling your online vs the adaptive approach to livestreaming 1:19:00 Michael Wolff's dinner with Trump & Melania 1:29:00 Chris LaCivita has disappeared, he's not MAGA, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_LaCivita

Franco Macchiavelli, analista independiente, examina las acciones de Sacyr, Bankinter, Caterpillar, Apollo Global, Costco, Línea Directa Aseguradora o Endesa

Frustrated with outdated manufacturing processes? Discover how engineering expert Andrew Schiller of Utah Tech University is revolutionizing how students and professionals think about design, automation, and the future of construction. Andrew reveals that engineering isn't just about calculations, you get to see real world applications of everything from start to finish. Download the FREE Step-by-Step Guide to Recruiting & Retaining the Best Workers: https://www.conexpoconagg.com/recruit

Maria Morera Johnson interviews Catholic Mom contributor Kimberly Novak, author of Bella's Beautiful Miracle. Kimberly Novak is a wife, mother, author, and spiritual director. Her passion for inspiring and motivating those on a spiritual journey has bloomed into various ministries. Kimberly's mission is to enhance each journey by guiding others where the light of strength is…God's love. Find out more about Kimberly's life and work at KimberlyNovak.com. Additionally, Kimberly welcomes prayer requests at A Little God Time.   Links in Show: Author of Bella's Beautiful Miracle, A Caterpillar's Journey www.kimberlynovak.com www.outofthechrysalis.com Read all articles by Kimberly Novak.

There is a difference between being anti-war, pro-peace, and simply saying you are while your actions invoke conflict. How the United States is handling the Israel situation is not smart, America first, or part of some 4D chess game; it is a direct assault with a public plan and potential consequences that include more global conflict, especially with Arab nations. With the president's plan to take ownership of Gaza and bring “great stability” comes the ethnic cleansing of its people, the expansion of Israel, and the payoff of luxury vacation spots for the wealthy. It's the playbook of Jared Kushner who called it “oceanfront property” back in February 2024. The first payoff came with the naming of Trump Heights. The second will be hotels Gaza, as a NYT article put it in October 2024: “The Trump Organization was in talks about Israeli hotels before the Hamas attack last year.” Trump supporters are saying it's a strategic 4D chess move to take the land from Israel; it's actually the opposite. It's a blatant case of the big brother taking something for the little brother. Others are saying let's wait to see what happens, or ‘do you have a better idea', or ‘you just want to see more Jews killed'. But we are seeing what's happening, and the better idea would be to follow Washington's advice: "It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world.” Washington even warned about countries like Israel and the danger of political parties in creating favoritism toward the former: “It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.”And what is happening domestically is just as bad. The cleaning out of the USAID, CIA, FBI, etc., all sounds great, but what MAGA neglects to realize is that the house cleaning is due to new tenants who believe in expansionism and technocracy not liberty, from Musk to Altman and Ellison. The money being saved is going to be relocated to programs like STARGATE and to countries like Israel, which is exempt from nearly every major action, including foreign aid and weapons sales with another $1 billion being allocated for Israel this week: 4,700 1,000-pound bombs, worth more than $700 million, as well as armored bulldozers built by Caterpillar, worth more than $300 million. Furthermore, all the things once rejected by Christians, conservatives, and conspiracy theorists are now being demanded: cryptocurrency, the North American Union, DNA specific injections, support of the Deep State (Israel), etc. And nearly all the major issues for Republicans, and especially MAGA, are supported by Israel: porn, pedophilia, LGBTQ, transgender surgeries and hormones, circumcision, DEI and racism, and illegal immigration. In fact, after a letter protesting Trump's deportation policy was signed by 88 Jewish organizations, including HIAS, it only took a few days for many illegals to be set free as NBC News reported: "some have already been released back into the United States on a monitoring program.” Israel also wants criticism in the U.S. silenced, and that is exactly what Trump has continued during his second term: “my administration will inform every college president that if you do not end anti-semitic propaganda they will lose their accreditation and federal taxpayer support.”  This has led to the arrest of protesters and a muzzling of debate. Even the so-called peace agreement and ceasefire has been violated numerous times by Israel with no mention by either party, let alone repercussions. Now the U.S. Justice Department, coming off 4 years of weaponization against conservatives, is going to be weaponized via a task force to “fight antisemitism in schools and universities,” or effectively to go after Democrats, while the Department of Education, set to be dismantled, will spend its final days “investigating five universities for alleged antiseptic harassment.” This is alongside the censorship operations of any criticism of Israel. The U.S. is also withdrawing from the UN Human Rights Council, not because of MAGA, but because they support supplying food and water to Gaza. Ever notice why Republicans attack China and Islam, while Democrats attack Russia and white Christians, yet Israel and Jews are always untouchable?There is no longer any intelligent person who can say Israel, at the very least through tightly knit and mutually beneficial backdoor deals, doesn't control the United States of America. The little messes Trump is cleaning up were made by the same people giving him obvious marching orders so that he is presented as a hero while Israel raids our treasury. Probably why Israel's PM brought Trump a golden pager at their first meeting; so he could be on call for the real Deep State. The U.S. is Black Cube Mailed.-FREE ARCHIVE (w. ads)SUBSCRIPTION ARCHIVEX / TWITTER FACEBOOKWEBSITEPAYPALCashApp: $rdgable EMAIL: rdgable@yahoo.com / TSTRadio@protonmail.comBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/tst-radio--5328407/support.

Cozy up in your cocoon and drift into the dreams of a sleepy caterpillar.Narrated by: Nadine BrownWritten by: Nadine BrownWelcome to Snuggle! The best kid's story-telling podcast. Enter a cozy world of imagination perfect for bedtime, quiet time, or any time you want to embark on an enchanting adventure. Learn more at ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠slumberstudios.com/snuggle⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠To enjoy ad-free listening, start your 7-day free trial of Snuggle Premium: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://snuggle.supercast.com/⁠

Carl Quintanilla, David Faber and Sara Eisen led off in-depth coverage of Wednesday night's tragic collision involving an American Airlines jet and an Army helicopter near Reagan Washington National Airport. Southwest Airlines CEO Bob Jordan offered his perspective on the crash as well as his company's quarterly results. The anchors also discussed market reaction to earnings from three of the "Magnificent 7": Meta, Microsoft and Tesla. Also in focus: An OpenAI executive talks about the startup's future in wake of DeepSeek, Fed aftermath, Caterpillar and UPS join the earnings parade. Squawk on the Street Disclaimer

What is riding on Apple results in Overtime? We discuss with Malcolm Ethridge from Capital Area Planning Group and Bryn Talkington of Requisite Capital. Top financial advisor Rich Saperstein from Treasury Partners tells us the one sector he is betting on in the wake of the Deepseek drama. And, we drill down on the big move in Caterpillar's stock today. 

We're gearing up for the Fed's first rate decision under the second Trump administration, and what to expect Chair Powell to say at his press conference. Plus, Nvidia falling again on more AI news and reports of potentially stricter restrictions on their China sales. And we'll look ahead to Microsoft, Tesla and Caterpillar's results after the bell in Earnings Exchange.

Welcome back to another insightful clip of Market Mondays! In this engaging clip, Rashad Bilal, Ian Dunlap, and Troy Millings break down the stocks that are poised to benefit from Donald Trump's tenure in office. This detailed discussion covers several sectors and highlights key companies that investors should have on their radar.*Key Highlights:*

William helps lead Ziegler Cat, a Caterpillar and other equipment dealer with 2,400+ people across several states and 29 locations. They've played an integral role in developing the Midwest, from construction to agriculture to power systems. Learn more at https://www.zieglercat.com/ Questions or feedback? Email us at dirttalk@buildwitt.com! Stay Dirty! **UPDATE** Dirt Talk is STOKED to announce Ariat as our first official sponsor for the year! They make world-class footwear and workwear that we see on every job site we visit, and their folks are just as great as their products. Dirt Talk listeners can receive 10% off their first order with Ariat by clicking here or visiting Ariat.com/dirttalk.

Colin v. Cuthbert is the food lawsuit that stole my heart. It might have been the first Food Court topic. This Trademark Case is filled with cheeky replies from Aldi's social media campaign that is delightful.Enjoy this blast from the past that you didn't know you needed.RESOURCESFood Court Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKZ4dv4LpAmHKT-czjE9Dl9This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy