Podcasts about Justification

Demonstrating Dr. Barnhouse's acute understanding of Romans and his heart for effective preaching, these messages skillfully and reverently expound even the most difficult passages in a clear way. Dr. Barnhouse's concern for a universal appreciation of the epistle fuels this series and invites all listeners into a deeper understanding of the life-changing message of Romans. To support this ministry financially, visit: https://www.oneplace.com/donate/791/29

1. Those whom God effectually calleth he also freely justifieth;a not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous: not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ's sake alone; nor by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness; but by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them,b they receiving and resting on him and his righteousness by faith; which faith they have not of themselves, it is the gift of God.c a. Rom 3:24; 8:30. • b. Jer 23:6; Rom 3:22, 24-25, 27-28; 4:5-8; 5:17-19; 1 Cor 1:30-31; 2 Cor 5:19, 21; Eph 1:7; Titus 3:5, 7. • c. Acts 10:44; 13:38-39; Gal 2:16; Eph 2:7-8; Phil 3:9. 2. Faith, thus receiving and resting on Christ and his righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification;a yet is it not alone in the person justified, but is ever accompanied with all other saving graces, and is no dead faith, but worketh by love.b a. John 1:12; Rom 3:28; 5:1. • b. Gal 5:6; James 2:17, 22, 26.

A new MP3 sermon from Anchored In Truth Ministries is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: Justification Speaker: Jeff Noblit Broadcaster: Anchored In Truth Ministries Event: Sunday Service Date: 6/8/2025 Length: 32 min.

Why must we be born again? Because we are born in sin, inheriting Adam's fallen nature. Jesus, the last Adam, gives us a new nature. Salvation isn't self-improvement—it's total transformation. Are you growing to reflect your Heavenly Father? How can we follow Christ without first being transformed by Him? Jesus commands us to be born again, not by our own efforts but through the Holy Spirit. This series explores why new birth is essential, how it happens, and the fruit it produces. Have you been born again? If so, does your life reflect Christ's transforming power? Join Nate and Gabe as they look at Christ Command to “Be Born Again.” Want to go deeper in studying this command of Christ? Download a free study guide at https://homediscipleship.com  Study guide includes:  Scriptures referenced in podcastReview of Old Testament contextGuide for Scripture meditationQuestions for application and prayerFor more information, visit us at https://homediscipleship.com  Find us on Facebook and Instagram @homediscipleshiphttps://www.facebook.com/homediscipleshipnetworkhttps://instagram.com/commandsofchristpodcast 

This week, Paul reminds us that the Christian life is not a straight line of spiritual victories. It's often messy, inconsistent, and filled with struggle. But our hope isn't found in our faithfulness, but in the unshakable faithfulness of God.Join us for a weekly narration of Paul Tripp's popular devotional. You can subscribe to our email list to receive this devotional straight to your inbox each week, or read online at PaulTripp.com/Wednesday or on Facebook, Instagram, and the Paul Tripp App.If you've been enjoying the Wednesday's Word podcast, please leave us a review! Each review helps us reach more people with the transforming power of Jesus Christ.

Psalm 137 (NLT)Andrew and Edwin consider the contrast between Jerusalem/Zion and Babylon/Edom. We can't be in favor of both. Being for Jerusalem means being against Babylon. Being for Zion means being against Edom. We can't keep a foot in each city.Read the written devo that goes along with this episode by clicking here.    Let us know what you are learning or any questions you have. Email us at TextTalk@ChristiansMeetHere.org.    Join the Facebook community and join the conversation by clicking here. We'd love to meet you. Be a guest among the Christians who meet on Livingston Avenue. Click here to find out more. Michael Eldridge sang all four parts of our theme song. Find more from him by clicking here.   Thanks for talking about the text with us today.________________________________________________If the hyperlinks do not work, copy the following addresses and paste them into the URL bar of your web browser: Daily Written Devo: https://readthebiblemakedisciples.wordpress.com/?p=21598The Christians Who Meet on Livingston Avenue: http://www.christiansmeethere.org/Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/TalkAboutTheTextFacebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/texttalkMichael Eldridge: https://acapeldridge.com/ 

On todays show the Full Crew of Jimmy, Texas Jim, Pastor Chris, James, Charlotte and Glenn we talk about Justification and Dispensationalism and N.T.Wright. Don't miss this Show!

Dr. Tom Curran testifies to the difficulty of overcoming arrogance, condescension, stubbornness, and self justification. Tom talks about many signs of someone lacking in humility, according to St. Josemaria Escriva. (Ascension Press)

A new MP3 sermon from 500 Plus Community is now available on SermonAudio with the following details: Title: The Wondrous Cross | Justification Subtitle: The Wondrous Cross Speaker: Dr Hamilton Moore Broadcaster: 500 Plus Community Event: TV Broadcast Date: 5/30/2025 Length: 26 min.

In this episode, Hanson explains what Trump is really signaling: that his strategy was always about making peace through strength — not appeasement. And now that Putin is throwing that opportunity away, the world sees who truly wants war. “ I think what Vladimir Putin thinks, that he's going to continue the war; continue the terror campaign; get greater concessions from the Europeans, the Americans, and the Ukrainians; and move the battle lines a little bit to the west. And I think he's sorely mistaken. He's misreading Donald Trump.  “If I was Vladimir Putin, I would cut a deal today. And then, I would resume natural gas and oil shipments to Europe. I would open the economy back up. And I would tell the Russian people what you did.  … And that's a lot better—it's not a good scenario, but it's a lot better than another Stalingrad or Verdun or Somme for the next two years for Russia.”

In 1868 Pope Pius IX issued a call to those who, in his words, 'glory in the name of Christian, yet do not profess the true faith of Christ, nor hold to and follow the Communion of the Catholic Church.' He wanted them to submit to and join with the Catholic church, and hoped that the forthcoming First Vatican Council would catalyse this. Grasping the need for a concise and clear response, grounded in the biblical teaching recovered by the Reformers, Princeton theologian Charles Hodge penned a letter on behalf of the two General Assemblies of the Presbyterian Church in the USA. His explanation of the non-attendance of Protestant clergy at 'Vatican I' is helpful to us as the Pope and the Catholic Church once again loom large in the headlines.   Featured Resources: – Charles Hodge, 'Letter to Pope Pius IX', as re-published in the Banner of Truth Magazine, Issue 415 (April 1998). – W. Robert Godfrey, 'The Lutheran–Roman Catholic Joint Declaration', Banner of Truth Magazine, Issue 436 (January 2000).   Materials Referenced: Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification: The Lutheran World Federation and the Roman Catholic Church The Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification in Confessional Lutheran Perspective (The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod)   Banner Resources on Justification: Buchanan, James, The Doctrine of Justification (Clothbound, 520 pages) Roberts, Maurice, Finding Peace with God: Justification Explained (Booklet, 40 pages) Traill, Robert, Justification Vindicated (Puritan Paperback, 96 pages) Venema, Cornelis P., Getting the Gospel Right: Assessing the Reformation and New Perspectives on Paul (Paperback, 112 pages) Venema, Cornelis P., The Gospel of Free Acceptance in Christ: An Assessment of the Reformation and the New Perspective on Paul (Clothbound, 352 pages)   Banner Resources on Catholicism and its Claims: Bennett, Richard, Catholicism: East of Eden (Catholicism for the 21st Century) (Paperback, 336 pages) Bennett, Richard, Far from Rome Near to God: Testimonies of Fifty Converted Catholic Priests (Paperback, 360) Pollitt, H. J., The Inter-Faith Movement: The New Age Enters the Church (Paperback, 224 pages) Webster, William, Salvation, the Bible & Roman Catholicism (Paperback, 184 pages) Webster, William, The Church of Rome at the Bar of History (Paperback, 256 pages)   Explore the work of the Banner of Truth: www.banneroftruth.org Subscribe to the Magazine (print/digital/both): www.banneroftruth.org/magazine Leave us your feedback or a testimony: www.speakpipe.com/magazinepodcast

Date: Sunday, June 1, 2025Title: Much More: The Joys of JustificationPreacher: Wayne MeadowsSeries: Romans (Part 16)Passage: Romans 5:1-5

This message is by Bill Parker and taken from Romans 8.  You can order a book written on this subject by Bill parker as well here.

Pastor Philip Caines | ROMANS Sermon Date: 2025-06-01

The Church is simple: believers gathered to hear the voice of the Good Shepherd. The holiness of those who gather is fully dependent on the Word by faith in Christ's forgiveness, not on ceremonies. Although our salvation is not dependent on works, faith in Christ has a natural outflow of good works. The Church, that is, believers in Christ, are to make their boast in the Lord and follow His will. Rev. James Roemke joins Rev. Brady Finnern to study the Church and justification. Find your copy of the Book of Concord - Concordia Reader's Edition at cph.org or read online at bookofconcord.org. Study the Lutheran Confession of Faith found in the Book of Concord with lively discussions led by host Rev. Brady Finnern, President of the LCMS Minnesota North District, and guest LCMS pastors. Join us as these Christ-confessing Concordians read through and discuss our Lutheran doctrine in the Book of Concord in order to gain a deeper understanding of our Lutheran faith and practical application for our vocations. Submit comments or questions to: listener@kfuo.org. 

ABSTRACT Many of our practices presuppose moral responsibility. Arguably, agents can only be morally responsible if they are able to act otherwise than they do. Compatibilists and incompatibilists traditionally disagree about whether determinism precludes the ability to do otherwise, often reaching an impasse because they endorse different readings of “able to do otherwise”. I argue that the correct reading of “able to do otherwise” depends on the purposes of our responsibility-entailing practices. Practices serving different purposes may warrant different readings. Consequently, there may be no single independently ascertainable definition of freedom to do otherwise that justifies our responsibility-entailing practices wholesale ABOUT Nadine Elzein is an Associate Professor at the University of Warwick. She completed her PhD at University College London, and has held posts at the University of Oxford, King's College London, the University of Southampton, and University College London. Her research focuses predominantly on free will, moral responsibility, blame, and determinism. She has a present writing project with OUP on this theme.

Send us a textI believe The Book of Romans stands as the most  profound of all the biblical letters, meticulously crafted by the Apostle Paul to address the pressing question: How can a righteous God make unrighteous people righteous? This exploration unfolds through a structured progression, revealing the depth of God's redemptive plan.1. Righteousness Needed (Romans 1:18–3:20)Paul begins by establishing the universal need for righteousness. He portrays humanity's descent into sin, highlighting that both Gentiles and Jews are under sin's dominion. This section culminates in the assertion that "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23), emphasizing that no one is justified by works of the law.2. Justification by Faith (Romans 3:21–4:25)Transitioning from the problem to the solution, Paul introduces justification by faith. He explains that God's righteousness is revealed through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe (Romans 3:22). This justification is a gift of grace, made possible through the redemption in Christ Jesus. Paul uses Abraham as a prime example, illustrating that righteousness was credited to him through faith, not works.Desiring God3. Righteousness Accomplished (Romans 5–8)Having established justification, Paul delves into its implications. He contrasts Adam's act, which brought condemnation, with Christ's act of righteousness, leading to justification and life for all men (Romans 5:18). Believers are united with Christ in His death and resurrection, symbolized through baptism, and are called to live as instruments of righteousness. Paul acknowledges the struggle with sin but assures that through the Spirit, believers are empowered to live victoriously, with nothing able to separate them from God's love (Romans 8:38-39).4. Righteousness Vindicated (Romans 9–11)Paul addresses the complex relationship between God's sovereignty and human responsibility, particularly concerning Israel. He affirms that God's word has not failed and that not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel (Romans 9:6). While Israel pursued righteousness through the law, they stumbled over the "stumbling stone," Christ. However, Paul holds hope for Israel's future salvation, emphasizing God's mercy and the mystery of His redemptive plan.5. Righteousness Practiced (Romans 12:1–15:13)Concluding with practical exhortations, Paul urges believers to present their bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God (Romans 12:1). He outlines how righteousness manifests in daily life: sincere love, honoring others, being zealous in service, patient in affliction, and faithful in prayer. Believers are called to live in harmony, overcome evil with good, and submit to governing authorities, embodying the transformative power of the gospel in all aspects of life.SummaryRomans masterfully articulates the journey from recognizing humanity's unrighteousness to embracing God's provision of righteousness through faith in Christ. It underscores that righteousness is not achieved by human effort but is a gift received by faith, leading to a transformeSupport the showFor an ad-free version of my podcasts plus the opportunity to enjoy hours of exclusive content and two bonus episodes a month whilst also helping keep the Bible Project Daily Podcast free for listeners everywhere support me at;|PatreonSupport me to continue making great content for listeners everywhere.https://thebibleproject.buzzsprout.com

Living Justified – The Practical Impact of JustificationSegment 1: The Comfort of Justification Assurance of salvation – no dependence on our worksComfort in Christ's completed work on the cross (John 19:30)Personal peace knowing justification is secure (Romans 5:1)Segment 2: Justification and Our Relationships How justification transforms our relationships: humility, forgiveness, and reconciliationPractical examples: forgiving as we have been forgiven (Colossians 3:13)Building church communities centered on grace, not legalismSegment 3: Responding to Challenges and Objections Addressing the accusation that justification promotes sinfulness (Romans 6:1-4)Maintaining balance between freedom and responsibilityHow justification shapes our approach to evangelism and witnessingSegment 4: Justification in Daily Life and Decision-MakingExamples of living justified in vocation, work, and personal ethicsEncouraging grace-centered rather than performance-driven livingFreedom from guilt and performance anxiety in daily tasksQuestions for Application and ReflectionWhat areas of your life might change if you more deeply embraced the truth of justification by grace?How can understanding justification help you handle failure and success in daily life?

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

As the student questions series continues, I'm talking through ideas for conversation inspired from a text we use in Core Theology class at Concordia University-Irvine–Called to Believe by Steven Mueller. In this episode we continue to look at chapter 9 of the book, which deals with justification.  Some ideas to get people talking: Justice demands equity.  What if equity can't be provided?  What about countless injustices? What if we prosecute every injustice or inequity? When will all thse injustices be remedied?  Consider the life of Jesus. Is justice inescapable?  How can that change our attitudes? Respond to this statement: The short duration of human life justifies whatever it takes for happiness in this life.

127 founders (net worth: ~$1M–$100M+) opened up their personal books. Want to see how your finances stack up? https://www.joinhampton.com/wealth-reportHe's worth 8 figures, owns a private jet, and still tracks every dollar. Nick Huber says avoiding lifestyle creep is harder, and more important, than getting rich.Here's what we talk about:How Nick Huber built an 8-figure net worth from sweaty startups and smart real estate plays.Why he keeps over $2M liquid and doesn't touch stocks.His exact monthly burn (yes, including the jet) and how he keeps it under $25K.The psychology behind lifestyle creep, and why he's borderline paranoid about fixed costs.Why he'd rather live modestly than risk losing what he's built.The emotional rollercoaster of lumpy cash flow, $900K tax bills, and late-night financial dread.How he justifies buying a private jet.His next goal: $1M/month in personal profit, and why he's not trying to be a media mogul along the way.Cool Links:Hampton https://www.joinhampton.com/Lower Street https://www.lowerstreet.co/Nick's Stuff  https://www.nickhuber.com/Chapters:(00:00) Introduction to Nick Huber's Success(00:48) Nick Huber's Financial Journey(01:20) Breaking Down Net Worth and Assets(03:12) Cash Flow Management(05:16) Nick's Humble Beginnings(08:49) Entrepreneurial Lessons and Challenges(13:44) The Rise of Storage Squad(17:42) Maintaining Frugality Despite Wealth(20:10) Managing Lifestyle Creep(22:09) The Justification for Owning a Jet(24:11) Avoiding Fixed Costs(24:56) Balancing Ego and Humility(30:45) The Role of Media in Entrepreneurship(35:57) The Emotional Roller Coaster of Entrepreneurship(39:16) Conclusion and Final ThoughtsThis podcast is a ridiculous concept: high-net-worth people reveal their personal finances.Inspired by real conversations happening in the Hampton community.Your Host: Harry MortonFounder of Lower Street, a podcast production company helping brands launch and grow top-tier podcasts.Co-parents a cow named Eliza.

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

Justification is by faith alone, but not a faith that remains alone. We look at Romans 3-4 among other passages to show this truth in Scripture. You can watch this message here.

Gal 2:15-16 Eccl 7:20 Gal 3:10-15 II Cor 5:12 Rom 4:5 Gen 15:6 Gal 2:17-21 Rom 5:1

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

Today, we have two messages as we continue our Sermon on the Mount series. Jimmy Cleary and Andy Rosse each unpack one of the most sobering passages in Scripture — Matthew 7:21-23 — revealing the uncomfortable truth that religious activity alone doesn't secure eternity.We're challenged to examine our hearts honestly: Are we relying on empty religious activities, or do we have a daily habit of repentance and a genuine relationship with Christ? If you've ever felt uncertain about your standing with God or questioned whether your life reflects your beliefs, this message offers clarity and hope.Thank you for listening to this message from Northwest Hills Community Church in Corvallis, Oregon, on May 25, 2025, at 8:30am & 10:15am. You can find us online at nwhills.com.Key Moments00:00 Welcome01:03 Jimmy's Message: Justified or Just Pretending?06:05 Understanding Matthew 7:21-2312:54 The Concept of Justification and Sanctification22:25 The Importance of Repentance32:58 Andy's Message: Knowing Jesus vs. Knowing About Jesus35:38 The Passage and Its Misinterpretations39:12 Reading and Reflecting on Matthew 7:21-2355:15 The Importance of a Personal Relationship with Jesus01:00:07 Practical Steps to Know Jesus More

Pastor Philip Caines | ROMANS Sermon Date: 2025-05-25

A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:Purpose:Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.Content:Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.Common Arguments:Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.Supporting Evidence:The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.Legal Standards:It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.(commercial at 8:13)to contact me:bobbycapucci@protonmail.comsource:gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.

In this episode we discuss the lengths we can sometimes go to in our efforts to justify a watch purchase, Vu gives an update on his Zombie Apocalypse Watch plans, and we touch on a recent Rolex event we attended and whether our thoughts have changed on any of the new releases.

As the student questions series continues, I'm talking through ideas for conversation inspired from a text we use in Core Theology class at Concordia University-Irvine–Called to Believe by Steven Mueller. In this episode we continue to look at chapter 9 of the book, which deals with justification.  Some ideas to get people talking: Why doesn't God destroy the wicked?  How can God demand us to be just if He Himself isn't just? What if justice is inescapable? Which is worse: unrighteousness or self-righteousness?

Justifications are one of the biggest hidden barriers in early alcohol-free living.  They're the stories we tell ourselves to make drinking seem okay, even when it's not. Let's break down the brain science, psychology, and social dynamics behind these patterns and explore how to move beyond them with awareness and choice. Download my FREE guide: The Alcohol Freedom Formula For Over 30s Entrepreneurs & High Performers: https://social.alcoholfreelifestyle.com/podcast ★ - Learn more about Project 90: www.alcoholfreelifestyle.com/Project90 ★ - (Accountability & Support) Speak verbally to a certified Alcohol-Free Lifestyle coach to see if, or how, we could support you having a better relationship with alcohol: https://www.alcoholfreelifestyle.com/schedule ★ - The wait is over – My new book “CLEAR” is now available. Get your copy here: https://www.alcoholfreelifestyle.com/clear  

We would love to hear from you! Please send us your comments here. --------Thank you for listening! Your support of Joni and Friends helps make this show possible. Joni and Friends envisions a world where every person with a disability finds hope, dignity, and their place in the body of Christ. Become part of the global movement today at www.joniandfriends.org. Find more encouragement on Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube.

In this episode, we dive into the profound theme of justification, exploring its application in our lives and how it leads us to find peace with God. As the world grapples with unrest, the believer can have complete peace that comes from justification. Understanding the dual aspects of our Christian life—standing and state—we navigate the concepts of justification and sanctification, discussing the peace that comes when we stop trying to earn favor with God. Our sins are forgiven, clearing our conscience and removing fear, enabling us to live a life of peace. We also discuss the invaluable access to God we gain through justification. Accepted and adopted into God's family, we enjoy full access to the God, transforming our approach to prayer and personal growth. By embracing forgiveness and peace, we can strengthen our relationships with others and live victoriously as children of the King.

Understanding Justification – The Heart of the GospelSegment 1: Historical Context Background: Reformation context, why justification became centralPhilip Melanchthon's defense against Roman Catholic misunderstandingsBrief comparison: Lutheran view vs. Catholic viewSegment 2: The Lutheran Definition of JustificationJustification by grace through faith alone (Ephesians 2:8-9)Key biblical passages: Romans 3:21-28, Romans 4:1-8Christ's righteousness credited to believersThe role of faith as the means (instrument) of receiving justificationSegment 3: Common Misunderstandings and Clarifications Misinterpretations of faith as a workDistinction between justification and sanctificationRole of good works in a justified believer's life (Ephesians 2:10)Questions for Application and Reflection How does understanding justification by faith alone impact your daily Christian living?Why is it important to maintain the distinction between justification and sanctification in your faith life?Wrap-Up and Preview of Next Episode

In this episode we continue our series on Predator Strategies where we discuss the justification for predator hunting and why they come to your call. Enjoy! Stock media provided by Artmuns / Pond5

Send us a textThis week we're tackling the question of eternal security. Can you lose your salvation? What does that bible say about it? Support the show If you have any questions about the subjects covered in today's episode you can find us on Facebook at the links below or you can shoot me an email at joe@buddywalkwithjesus.com One Stop Shop for all the links Linktr.ee/happydeamedia

As the student questions series continues, I'm talking through ideas for conversation inspired from a text we use in Core Theology class at Concordia University-Irvine–Called to Believe by Steven Mueller. In this episode we continue to look at chapter 9 of the book, which deals with justification.  Some ideas to get people talking: What is necessary to restore creation to the image of God? Can you save yourself?  Is justification based on some just reality? What does a person cry out when he needs others to do what he cannot do for himself? In this episode, I mention the iceberg model.  You can find a document and podcast episode to explain that model here.