Podcasts about bourdieu

In der heutigen Folge sprechen Zetti und Martin mit Dennis (d11n), der schon früh bei Einundzwanzig dabei war und einen guten Einblick in die Subkultur der Bitcoiner liefern kann. Mit der Hilfe der Theorie des Soziologen P. Bourdieu erhält man einen umfassendere Eindruck davon, was das Wesen (Habitus) eines Bitcoiners ausmacht und ändert. Dabei rückt vor allem die Betrachtung anderer Kapitalarten als der ökonomischen in den Mittelpunkt. Eine Reise zu Zitadellen, in die Geschichte und letztendlich in das eigene Ich.Von und mit: - Martin - Zettizettler - Dennis (d11n)Produziert und geschnitten: MartinHier könnt ihr uns eine Spende über Lightning da lassen: ⚡️nodesignal@getalby.comNeben dem Podcast findet ihr uns auch auf YouTubeFür Feedback und weitergehenden Diskussionen kommt gerne in die Telegramgruppe von Nodesignal und bewertet uns bei Spotify und Apple Podcasts, das hilft uns sehr. Folgt uns auch gerne bei Nostr:npub1n0devk3h2l3rx6vmt24a3lz4hsxp7j8rn3x44jkx6daj7j8jzc0q2u02cy und Twitter.https://nodesignal.space/E261/Blockzeit: 924462Webseite von EinundzwanzigKarte mit den MeetupsEinundzwanzig MagazinPlebrapDennis Vortrag auf der Btc Prag 2023Pierre Bourdieu, Ökonomisches Kapital - Kulturelles Kapital - Soziales Kapital. In: Pierre Bourdieu, Die verborgenen Mechanismen der Macht, Hamburg 1992.Pierre Bourdieu, Die feinen Unterschiede. Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft, Frankfurt 1982.Timestamps:(00:00:22) Begrüßung, Blogzeit und Vorstellung des Gastes Dennis(00:01:12) Rolle von 21 und Dennis Beitrag im deutschsprachigen Bitcoin Space(00:03:56) Vom Projekt zur Community: Warum 21 als Verein statt Firma(00:06:46) Martins Weg: Deep Dive, Meetups und der Vibe von endlich normale Leute(00:09:16) Einordnung Bourdieu: Kapitalarten und Bitcoin-Kontext(00:11:42) Ökonomisches vs. soziales Kapital: Was zählt im Space wirklich?(00:18:53) Kulturelles Kapital: Wissen, Erfahrung, Diamond Hands(00:21:23) Vom Kaninchenbau zur Selbstsouveränität: Werte im Alltag(00:24:09) Der Kapital-Loop: Wissen teilen, Status, Engagement(00:28:23) Meetup-Explosion nach der Zitadelle: Karte, Telegram und Wachstum(00:33:53) Abgrenzung und Ethos: Warum 21 Anziehungskraft entfaltet(00:34:38) Habitus nach Bourdieu: Innerer Kompass und Selbstveränderung(00:36:48) Konferenzkater und Nachhall: Erlebnisse verarbeiten(00:40:38) Soziales Kapital aufbauen: Feuer ber Fiat und kreative Beiträge(00:45:14) Symbolisches Kapital: Memes, Titel, Sammelkarten, Magazin(00:47:00) Fuck you money-Effekt: Verhalten, Sicherheit und Sparen(00:55:45) Dezentralisierung vs. Institution: 21 als Verein und Selbstregulierung(00:59:26) Zentralisierungstendenzen: Große Akteure, Reputation und Einfluss(01:02:49) Reputation, Glaubwürdigkeitsverluste und Autoritäten im Space(01:06:57) Fallstudie Saylor: Polarisierung zwischen Ethos und Fiat-Spiel(01:09:42) Spekulative Attacke, Risiken und symbolische Wirkung(01:10:44) Fazit: Rundumschau der Kapitalarten und Ausblick(01:10:50) Abschluss: Focus on signal, Dank und Verabschiedung

Vänskap är ett begrepp som har sysselsatt tänkare i åtminstone 2400 år. Mikael Timm ansluter sig till grubblarna och tar hjälp av Martin Scorsese. Lyssna på alla avsnitt i Sveriges Radio Play. ESSÄ: Detta är en text där skribenten reflekterar över ett ämne eller ett verk. Åsikter som uttrycks är skribentens egna. Ursprungligen sänd 2020-08-20.Ordet ”vän” behöver ingen förklaring, men det behöver ordet ”vänskap”.Grunden för systematiskt tänkande om begreppet ger Aristoteles som definierar tre olika sorter: sådan vänskap man har nytta av, sådan man har nöje av och så en tredje sorts perfekt vänskap när vännerna delar allt utan egennyttiga intressen. De flesta skulle kanske invända att de tre kan flyta ihop, men låt oss ta det i Aristoteles ordning.Sociologen Pierre Bourdieu slog igenom drygt 2000 år efter Aristoteles med sina studier av vänskap som baseras på utbyte av tjänster, alltså Aristoteles första art av vänskap. Verkligen inget nytt – men det som väckte uppmärksamhet var att Bourdieu hävdade att systemet också gällde inom det kulturella fältet. Vänskap, som vi uppfattar som något mycket individuellt, skulle alltså följa samma mönster överallt.Att det är bra med vänner som kan hjälpa en är självklart men Aristoteles framhåller att det inte gäller att ha för många vänner – för vem hinner med att utföra alla dessa gentjänster? Man bör alltså skaffa sig just så många vänner som man har behov av. Denna första sorts vänskap kräver beräkningar.Den andra sortens vänskap, den som man har nöje av, låter trevligare. Men Aristoteles ser förstås problem. Dels är det svårt att dela känslor och tid med en massa människor, dels bör ju ens vänner också vara vänner sinsemellan. Kan bli krångligt om man också tar hänsyn till den första sortens vänskap med tjänster och gentjänster. Och är det inte något skumt med den som har en massa vänner? Har hen en enda sann vän, är inte vännerna egentligen beundrare, snyltare eller bara festande affärsbekanta?Skummisarna i Martin Scorseses film The Irishman funderar inte på detta. Sheeran, (spelad av Robert de Niro) en lite grovhuggen chaufför som är torped och hans mentor Russell Buffalino (spelad av Joe Pesci) mördar sig igenom decennierna och blir allt bättre vänner. Deras vänskap är visserligen från början nyttoinriktad, alltså kategori ett hos Aristoteles. Men den övergår till nästa nivå – de har roligt tillsammans i pauserna mellan morden. Och mot slutet är de verkligen vänner utan utbyte av tjänster. De befinner sig i den oegennyttiga – och framtidslösa - vänskapens sista stadium som för dem också är livets sista stadium."The Irishmans" storhet är inte intrigen, skildringen av brottlighetens koppling till politiken utan vänskapen som just därför att den omges av grymhet är gripande och öm. Ja, Aristoteles tredje kategori av vänskap ligger inte så långt från kärleken. Så vad skiljer dem åt:Det har sagts att berättelser om kärlek visar hur man kan knyta an till en specifik individ, medan berättelser om vänskap visar hur man kan knyta an till livet självt.Jag vet inte om vi får de vänner vi förtjänar eller får vi kanske de vänner vi inte förtjänar. Hmm…Eller så får vi inga alls. När Jacques Derrida på 80-talet gav en serie föreläsningar om vänskap var det helt i tidens anda. Han var den store dekonstruktören som öppnade välbekanta begrepp som man öppnar konservburkar och tömde ut innehållet på laboratoriebänken. Föreläsningarna blev en bok som Derrida inleder med Aristoteles ord ”Åh vänner, ingen vän”. Eller talspråkligt: ”Oh, mina vänner, det finns ingen vän” Vad menar Aristoteles – finns det ingen verklig vänskap? Eller fanns det inga vänner bland lyssnarna?Derrida utgick från en felöversättning. Aristoteles menade nog helt enkelt att den som har många vänner inte har någon. Men felöversättningen var en bra utgångspunkt för Derrida som var ute efter något annat än att förstå vänskapens psykologi. Han såg vänskap som ett politiskt fenomen och försökte via vänskapen förstå individens plats i kollektivet.Men Derrida var ofta lika mystisk som klarläggande. Texten glimrar vackrast när han belyser hemligheternas betydelse för vänskap – något som varje barn som varit medlem i ett hemligt sällskap känner till och som protagonisterna i The Irishman erfar.De som delar en hemlighet delar sina själar.Derrida påpekar att man ser sig själv i sin vän. Möjligen är det förutsättningen för både hemligheter och vänskap. Men finns där redan från början en önskan om att överleva den andre? Ser vi vännens död i samma ögonblick vi delar något med vännen?Liksom ett barn kan föreställa sig hur de orättvisa föräldrarna gråter vid barnets grav föreställer sig Derrida vännernas mumlande vid graven. Men det räcker inte att sörja den döde vännen. Derrida menar att man måste kunna se framtiden i vänskapen, alltså en framtid utan vännen.Hans bok är skriven i klyftan – låt mig säga avgrunden – mellan samhälle och individ. Då blir den självklara frågan: Kan vänskap vara en modell för hur politiken bör fungera?I så fall bör vi betänka att Aristoteles menade att för att vänskap ska existera måste vännerna vara jämställda. Vänskap mellan människor med alltför olika tillgångar fungerar inte.Den italienske sociologen Francesco Alberoni publicerade i början av 80-talet en bok om Vänskap. Man skulle kunna tro att han som sociolog skulle närma sig ämnet realpolitiskt men begreppet vänskap låter sig inte trivialiseras.”Det är med vänskap som med renhet: det behövs bara en liten dos förorening för att en substans inte längre ska vara ren” menar Alberoni som också säger att det inte går att rädda en förlorad vänskap. När tilltron är förlorad är den förlorad för alltid.Han menar i likhet med Aristoteles att vänskap bygger på jämlikhet. Men Alberoni går längre än Aristoteles och beskriver vänskapen som en ideal form av kärlek eftersom parterna är jämställda vilket de inte är i en kärleksrelation.Undrar just om de italiensktalande gangstrarna i The Irishman hörde talas om Alberoni. Förmodligen inte, de läste nog mest om mord i tidningen. Men de kunde ha instämt i den italienske sociologens synpunkt. Vännerna är viktigare än makarna i filmen. När deras familjer är borta når deras vänskap perfekt balans. När Frank och Russell är gamla, utslagna och maktlösa behöver de inte balansera känslor mot nytta.En som skulle förstått svårigheterna i denna balansakt är Cicero, antikens bäste talare. Cicero såg vänskap inte som psykologi, inte som utbyte av tjänster utan som en form av godhet, nästan en ideologi: goda senatorer skulle tillsammans sträva efter goda mål. Dygden skulle sprida sig och man skulle kunna lita på varandra.Vänskap var alltså för Cicero ett idealtillstånd. Och sann vänskap skulle utmärkas av uppriktighet… Ja, vi kan se var svårigheterna börjar. Inte långt efter att Cicero hade avslutat boken om vänskap blir han mördad. De blir också de flesta i The Irishmans cirkel av vänner. Filmen slutar och börjar på ett ålderdomshem där torpeden minns sitt liv.I Montaignes berömda essä om vänskapen till Etienne de la Boétie minns essäisten sin vän i ett förklarat ljus. Det gör inte Frank Sheeran. Han minns det förflutna med obarmhärtig klarhet.Ingen försoning är möjlig, det goda fanns bara i gemenskapen med Russel Buffalino trots att det var denne som gjorde Frank Sheeran till mördare. Jimmy Hoffa, deras gemensamma vän, en officiell makthavare, var i grunden solospelare och måste därför mördas av vännerna. Som Cicero. De två maktpelarna förstod inte den grundläggande regeln: Utan vänskap inget liv.Mikael Timmkulturjournalist, filmare och författare samt tidigare medarbetare på Sveriges Radios kulturredaktion

Prawdziwa historia o tym, jak jeden cytat z Webera zmienił wszystko w niemieckim kabriolecie – i co to mówi o nas wszystkich.Odkryjesz:

Hoy vimos Las Niñas Bien de Alejandra Márquez Abella. Aprovechamos la historia de Sofía, su protagonista, para hablar de crisis económicas y de las ideas de Bourdieu sobre capital social, simbólico y cultural.

In this episode of the Coconut Thinking Podcast, I take a hard look at what school really does, and what it would cost to truly change it. We keep saying education needs fixing, but maybe it's doing exactly what it was built to do: sort, rank, and hold the world in place.Drawing on Bourdieu, cultural capital, and the myth of meritocracy, I unpack why mastery and competency models only repaint the same house, why knowledge has to be understood as situated rather than transferable, and why real transformation demands letting go of the symbolic capital many of us depend on.From learning&doing in service of Life to the testimonies of humans and more-than-humans, this episode asks: if learning isn't serving Life, what are we still schooling for?

Das Ding ist... People Pleasing! Warum sagen wir eigentlich so oft „Klar, mach ich!“, obwohl wir innerlich schreien „Nein, nicht einmal vielleicht!“? In dieser Folge reden Lensi und Anna über das Phänomen „People Pleasing“, also den Drang, es allen recht machen zu wollen.Zwischen Psychologie, Soziologie und ein bisschen Eigenanalyse fragen sich die beiden: Ist das wirklich so schlimm, nett zu sein? Wo hört Höflichkeit auf und wo fängt Selbstverleugnung an? Und warum betrifft das vor allem Frauen?Es geht um Kindheitsprägungen, kulturelle Unterschiede, symbolische Gewalt nach Bourdieu, aber auch um Freundschaft, klare Kommunikation und den Mut, mal nicht zu gefallen.Viel Spaß mit der vorerst letzten Folge Das Ding ist...Bis bald

Habitus. Kulturellt kapital. Symboliskt våld. Man behöver inte vara expert på Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002) för att någon gång ha hört ett av hans begrepp. Många av den berömda sociologens tankar har idag blivit allmängods i samhällsdebatten. Bourdieu tog sig från en lantlig uppväxt i södra Frankrike till elituniversiteten i Pars, där han blev del av en stjärngeneration av franska intellektuella. Idag är han en av de mest citerade forskarna över huvud taget. Men vad gick Bourdieus tänkande ut på? Vilka är de vanligaste missuppfattningarna om hans begrepp? Och hur kan vi använda hans teorier idag? Bildningspodden introducerar en av 1900-talets mest inflytelserika tänkare. Gäster i studion är Mikael Palme och Raoul Galli. Samtalsledare: Ruhi Tyson Ljudproduktion och klippning: Lars in de Betou Redaktionskoordinator: Elin Sahlin Producent: Magnus Bremmer Bildningspodden är en del av Anekdot – det digitala bildningsmagasinet. Produceras vid Humanistiska fakulteten vid Stockholms universitet, och finansieras av Kungl. Vitterhetsakademien och Riksbankens Jubileumsfond.

In this episode, Raúl Sánchez-García—researcher at King Juan Carlos University—reflects on the use of the sociological concept of habitus in martial arts studies. Sánchez-García demonstrates the utility of both Elias's and Bourdieu's formulation of the concept, and discusses how the martial arts scholar benefits from acquiring a fighter's habitus. Sánchez-García also discusses his newer work on the spectacularization of violence in MMA as well as in bareknuckle fighting, especially as this pertains to masculinity in the current socio-political climate.

Helge Heynold liest: Schwarzer Tango & Space Cats - von Michael Speier

☀️ Pour l'été, je vous propose de plonger dans les archives de Finta! pour découvrir ou redécouvrir, entendre ou réentendre les épisodes qui m'ont marquée depuis le début du podcast. Aujourd'hui, dans la collection pour se reconnecter aux lieux et au territoire je vous propose... Lilian Derruau, ou Wally... pour les intimes.Cet épisode a été publié pour la première fois en 2024.Sur les planches, on s'affaire autour de l'échelle et du tourne-disque qui résument la scénographie de son dernier spectacle, « Ma Distinction ». Dans quelques heures, il le donnera sur la scène de la MJC de Rodez, le théâtre des Deux points, qu'il connaît bien.Cela fait plus de 40 ans que Lilian Derruau, sous son masque de Wally, traîne ses guêtres sur les scènes de France. Chanteur, humoriste, chansonnier, il assume aujourd'hui de se définir comme un artiste, tout simplement. Dans son dernier spectacle, un récit écrit comme une trace pour ses petits-enfants, Lilian Derruau convoque la sociologie de Bourdieu pour apaiser ce sentiment de ne plus être à la place qui lui était destinée. Il assume de s'être décalé, non pas pour s'élever, mais horizontalement. Comme s'il voulait mieux regarder ce milieu dans lequel il a baigné, qui l'a façonné, et dont il a fait un pas de côté.De son enfance dans les lotissements ouvriers de Viviez, de l'usine qui régissait toute sa vie, du mépris qu'il a parfois ressenti par l'institution culturelle, de l'Aveyron qu'il n'a jamais pu quitter, regrettant de ne pas avoir eu ce choix : c'est dans les loges de la MJC, entourés de miroirs entêtants et de néons criants, que nous nous sommes retrouvés, Lilian Derruau, Wally, Finta ! et moi.Si vous êtes curieux, je vous invite à faire un saut sur mon site, fintapodcast.fr, je vous y partage les incroyables photos de Mathieu Lacout, qui a assisté à notre enregistrement. Bonne écoute !Vous pouvez également écouter ou réécouter l'histoire du Bassin minier de Decazeville dans ce triptyque documentaire de Finta! : Mines de rien.

Tras muchos meses de silencio, vuelve Pensar Un Rato con la última parte de la miniserie sobre la clase social de la gran serie sobre el Estado. En este episodio, terminamos de juntar todos los elementos que nos permiten identificar y entender la clase social, así como su importancia en nuestro estudio del Estado. Hablamos de Durkheim, y de Weber, y de Bourdieu y de Marx. Todo esto de la mano de nuestros ya no tan jipis hipotéticos. Recuerden amar PuR y compartirlo en todas sus redes sociales, comentarlo, criticarlo, reseñarlo y calificarlo allá donde se pueda. Y si además quieren y pueden, amen PuR monetariamente en www.patreon.com/pensarunrato. Su aporte hace toda la diferencia del mundo.Contacto en: proyectopensarunrato@gmail.comReferencias: Créditos:Yo soy Betty, la fea - RCN TelevisiónRoyalty Free Music: Bensound.com/royalty-free-musicLicense code: M9NEXHMISAXDCGYPLicense code: EEHUUMZCB6JNLDNVLicense code: IM6HHTT8IFOT11AECours de sociologie générale I et II, Pierre BOURDIEULes règles de la méthode sociologique, Émile DURKHEIMIntroducción a la Crítica de la economía política, Karl MARX

Ceci est une lecture améliorée de ma newsletter : Il y a quelques semaines, je me suis surpris à rêver d'acheter un tapis de marche. Assis devant mon écran, je comparais les modèles, je regardais les différentes options (pliables ou pas), comparais les prix. Mais si je suis vraiment sincère avec moi-même, j'ai vu ce tapis de marche chez une amie, je parle beaucoup de mouvement avec mon ami Alex...Si je vous demande ce que vous désirez, vous allez répondre une chose ou une autre.Mais que désirez-vous vraiment ?Combien de fois avez-vous désiré quelque chose parce que votre collègue, votre beau-frère ou cette personne sur Instagram le possédait ? Il peut basiquement s'agir d'un objet mais cela peut aussi être une envie de couple, de vacances, d'enfants ou simplement d'un chien...Trop souvent on désire des « choses » pour combler un vide qui n'avait rien à voir avec l'objet de la convoitise. Combien de fois avez-vous cru vouloir quelque chose alors qu'en réalité, vous ne faisiez que singer les désirs des autres ? Mais surtout combien de fois avez-vous ressenti le vide après avoir acquis l'objet en question.Si ces questions vous dérangent, c'est normal. Elles remettent en cause l'une des illusions les plus tenace de notre époque individualiste : celle que nos désirs nous appartiennent.Qu'ils jaillissent spontanément de notre être le plus authentique. Qu'ils sont le reflet de notre personnalité unique et singulière. Mensonge.Dans cet épisode solo j'explore sans fard ce qui motive nos choix. À travers l'exemple anodin d'un tapis de marche ou d'une montre connectée, je remonte le fil de mes envies. Pourquoi désirons-nous ? D'où viennent ces pulsions ? Et surtout : à qui appartiennent-elles vraiment ?J'ai convoqué René Girard, Bourdieu, Spinoza ou encore Clouscard, mais aussi mes propres expériences – de mes années d'ascension sociale à mes doutes de quadragénaire sur Instagram. J'y parle de capitalisme, de développement personnel, d'authenticité performative, mais aussi de spiritualité.J'ai voulu écrire cette épisode comme une boussole pour moi-même – et peut-être pour vous – dans un monde qui ne cesse de nous souffler quoi vouloir.5 citations marquantes« Nos désirs ont appris à mentir mieux que nous. »« Le désir est l'essence de l'homme, mais il peut aussi être sa prison. »« L'authenticité est devenue un produit de consommation comme un autre. »« Nous courons après des désirs qui ne sont pas les nôtres. »« Désirer ce que l'on a déjà, c'est peut-être ça la vraie liberté. »10 questions structurées posées (ou implicites)Qu'est-ce que je désire vraiment ?Pourquoi ai-je envie de tel objet ou telle expérience ?Mes désirs sont-ils vraiment les miens ou ceux des autres ?Pourquoi continue-t-on de courir après des choses qui nous laissent vides ?Quelle est la différence entre plaisir immédiat et joie profonde ?Pourquoi les désirs des adultes sont-ils parfois plus pernicieux que ceux des jeunes ?Quel rôle joue notre classe sociale dans la fabrication de nos désirs ?Comment savoir si un désir est authentique ?Pourquoi l'industrie du développement personnel ne nous aide-t-elle pas à mieux nous connaître ?Comment orienter nos désirs plutôt que les subir ?Timestamps clés pour YouTube00:00 – Introduction : le tapis de marche et l'origine du désir04:30 – Le grand mensonge du désir autonome10:00 – L'âge adulte et ses désirs déguisés15:40 – L'illusion de la réussite et de l'accumulation20:10 – Le piège du mimétisme selon René Girard25:00 – Clouscard, Bourdieu et la fabrique sociale des envies30:00 – Désir, insatiabilité et dopamine35:20 – L'obsession moderne de l'authenticité40:45 – Mes 5 critères pour reconnaître un vrai désir48:00 – Vers un art du désir conscient et libérateur Suggestion d'autres épisodes à écouter : [SOLO] Atrophie sociale : anatomie d'une manipulation de masse (https://audmns.com/UouEwvn) Vlan #51 (VF) Hacker votre cerveau pour être heureux avec Mo Gawdat (https://audmns.com/vPjaTsU) [SOLO] Gâcher du temps est un acte de résistance (https://audmns.com/YGGCTKa)Distribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Mystic SyndicateThis is the final two-hander episode featuring the brilliant and sorely missed Terry Robinson, recorded with Pooka before Terry's passing. In this deeply personal and intellectually rich conversation, Terry and Pooka dive headfirst into the mystic heart of the Syndicate , exploring its layered portrayal across Mage: The Ascension editions—from Mafia caricature to modern myth-makers of the market. Revised & M20 era implications:Syndicate in charge—but how and when did that happen? Bourdieu's Capital Theory: Economic, social, cultural, and linguistic capital in Mage terms Roland Barthes & Jean Baudrillard: Semiotics, simulation, and consumer ritual as hyper-sigil work Pierre Lévy's Anthropological Spaces: Syndicate mages as avatars of the Commodity Space Control, Blindsight & Data Visualization: Facial recognition as magical parsing; the uncanny art of market faces Tate Modern installation: A stock ticker + Greek lament = sublime Syndicate paradox realm? The Syndicate as potential chaos magicians of the Technocracy

Les invités :· Etienne Anheim, directeur d'études à l'EHESS· Paul Pasquali, chargé de recherche au CNRS Le livre : Bourdieu et Panofsky. Essai d'archéologie intellectuelle, suivi de leur correspondance inédite, Paris, Minuit, 2025 La discussion :· À l'origine du livre, la correspondance Bourdieu-Panofsky (1:00)· Qui sont Panofsky et Bourdieu en ce milieu des années 1960 ? (9:45)· Les éditions de Minuit dans le paysage intellectuel d'après 1945 (17:25)· La course de vitesse Bourdieu-Nora pour publier Panofsky en France (21:15)· Panofsky dans le moment structuraliste (23:00)· Le lien gothique-scolastique, un problème ancien d'histoire des arts et des idées, bien avant Panofsky (25:40)· Bourdieu traducteur (35:00)· D'où vient le concept d'habitus ? (42:00)Un podcast créé, animé et produit par André Loez et distribué par Binge Audio. Contact pub : project@binge.audioDistribué par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Deux-cent-vingt-deuxième numéro de Chemins d'histoire, vingt-septième numéro de la sixième saison, émission animée par Luc Daireaux Émission diffusée le lundi 16 juin 2025 Thème : Panofsky lu par Bourdieu Invités : Etienne Anheim, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, et Paul Pasquali, chargé de recherche au CNRS, auteurs de Bourdieu et Panofsky. Essai d'archéologie intellectuelle, Minuit, 2025.

durée : 00:29:01 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Albane Penaranda - Dans le cinquième volet de la série “A voix nue” avec Jérôme Lindon, en 1994, le directeur des Éditions de Minuit explique comment sa maison retrouve un élan dans les années 1980, avec des romanciers, tel Jean Echenoz et avec les sciences humaines et des auteurs comme Bourdieu et et Jakobson. - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé - invités : Jérôme Lindon Editeur, président des Editions de Minuit

Militer sans se perdre. Bourdieu, Lénine, Malcolm X et les autres : les luttes vues d'en haut.

Über Geschmack lässt sich bekanntlich streiten. Moderator Jürgen Wiebicke spricht mit dem Philosophen Gunter Gebauer über das Phänomen des Geschmacks und darüber, welche Rolle Immanuel Kant und Pierre Bourdieu dabei spielen. Von WDR 5.

durée : 00:28:15 - Les Midis de Culture - par : Marie Labory - Ami du fils de Pierre Bourdieu, Emmanuel, Denis Podalydès évoque ses souvenirs lumineux au sein de la famille Bourdieu, son admiration discrète pour le grand sociologue et la manière dont ses thèses ont durablement marqué son rapport au théâtre. - réalisation : Laurence Malonda - invités : Denis Podalydès Acteur, metteur en scène, scénariste et écrivain français, sociétaire de la Comédie-Française

durée : 00:26:07 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Mathilde Wagman - Le 21 février 1972, pour ouvrir une série d'émissions intitulée "Musées d'aujourd'hui et de demain", Jocelyn de Noblet recevait Pierre Bourdieu, qui exposait le cadre, les conclusions et les enjeux de son étude sur la fréquentation des musées et leur signification sociale. - réalisation : Lise Côme - invités : Pierre Bourdieu Sociologue, professeur au Collège de France (1930-2002)

The prominent sociologist, writer, and U.C. Berkeley professor emeritus Michael Burawoy passed away on February 3. We present excerpts from three interviews with Burawoy, about marketization and commodification (from 2016), Pierre Bourdieu and Karl Marx (2019), and W. E. B. Du Bois's understanding of the period of Reconstruction (2023). In Memoriam: Michael Burawoy Michael Burawoy, Public Sociology Polity, 2021 Full-length interviews with Burawoy about marketization and commodification, Bourdieu and Marx, and Du Bois (Part 1 and Part 2) The post Remembering Michael Burawoy appeared first on KPFA.

durée : 00:02:08 - L'Humeur du matin par Guillaume Erner - par : Guillaume Erner - Dans son livre "Sur la télévision", Bourdieu estime que "les faits divers, ce sont aussi des faits qui font diversion". Les faits divers sont du temps en moins pour la véritable information, celle qui nous concerne tous, c'est du divertissement morbide. - réalisation : Félicie Faugère

Sociologists have had surprisingly little to say about poetry as a topic while sometimes also making grandiose claims that sociology is/should be like poetry. These are the prompts which begin Andrew Smith's Class and the Uses of Poetry: Symbolic Enclosures (2024, Palgrave Macmillan). Drawing upon discussions with working class readers of poetry, and interviews with unpublished poets, Smith draws our attention to the ways in which poetry has been enclosed, or fenced off, from working class readers. Influenced by, though offering some criticisms, of, Bourdieu's approach to the sociology of culture, he shows us how readers become aware of this enclosure but nevertheless engage in collective understanding of the poems they are presented with. In doing do, Smith reminds us of the need to emphasise the aesthetic elements of poetry, and culture more generally, including its creative and expressive affordances. A reader of his book realises that a critical sociology of poetry needs to attest not just to the symbolic capital in who is seen as ‘legitimate' readers and producers of poetry but also how those shut off from it lose out on the uses of poetry. Our discussion covers what led Smith to pursue this work, how sociology has, and might in future confront poetry, his experiences of running these reading groups and suggests why, perhaps, we should also perhaps reject the ‘society of the segue way' and savour some of the finitude which poetry might offer. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), along with other texts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Sociologists have had surprisingly little to say about poetry as a topic while sometimes also making grandiose claims that sociology is/should be like poetry. These are the prompts which begin Andrew Smith's Class and the Uses of Poetry: Symbolic Enclosures (2024, Palgrave Macmillan). Drawing upon discussions with working class readers of poetry, and interviews with unpublished poets, Smith draws our attention to the ways in which poetry has been enclosed, or fenced off, from working class readers. Influenced by, though offering some criticisms, of, Bourdieu's approach to the sociology of culture, he shows us how readers become aware of this enclosure but nevertheless engage in collective understanding of the poems they are presented with. In doing do, Smith reminds us of the need to emphasise the aesthetic elements of poetry, and culture more generally, including its creative and expressive affordances. A reader of his book realises that a critical sociology of poetry needs to attest not just to the symbolic capital in who is seen as ‘legitimate' readers and producers of poetry but also how those shut off from it lose out on the uses of poetry. Our discussion covers what led Smith to pursue this work, how sociology has, and might in future confront poetry, his experiences of running these reading groups and suggests why, perhaps, we should also perhaps reject the ‘society of the segue way' and savour some of the finitude which poetry might offer. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), along with other texts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/literary-studies

Sociologists have had surprisingly little to say about poetry as a topic while sometimes also making grandiose claims that sociology is/should be like poetry. These are the prompts which begin Andrew Smith's Class and the Uses of Poetry: Symbolic Enclosures (2024, Palgrave Macmillan). Drawing upon discussions with working class readers of poetry, and interviews with unpublished poets, Smith draws our attention to the ways in which poetry has been enclosed, or fenced off, from working class readers. Influenced by, though offering some criticisms, of, Bourdieu's approach to the sociology of culture, he shows us how readers become aware of this enclosure but nevertheless engage in collective understanding of the poems they are presented with. In doing do, Smith reminds us of the need to emphasise the aesthetic elements of poetry, and culture more generally, including its creative and expressive affordances. A reader of his book realises that a critical sociology of poetry needs to attest not just to the symbolic capital in who is seen as ‘legitimate' readers and producers of poetry but also how those shut off from it lose out on the uses of poetry. Our discussion covers what led Smith to pursue this work, how sociology has, and might in future confront poetry, his experiences of running these reading groups and suggests why, perhaps, we should also perhaps reject the ‘society of the segue way' and savour some of the finitude which poetry might offer. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), along with other texts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

Sociologists have had surprisingly little to say about poetry as a topic while sometimes also making grandiose claims that sociology is/should be like poetry. These are the prompts which begin Andrew Smith's Class and the Uses of Poetry: Symbolic Enclosures (2024, Palgrave Macmillan). Drawing upon discussions with working class readers of poetry, and interviews with unpublished poets, Smith draws our attention to the ways in which poetry has been enclosed, or fenced off, from working class readers. Influenced by, though offering some criticisms, of, Bourdieu's approach to the sociology of culture, he shows us how readers become aware of this enclosure but nevertheless engage in collective understanding of the poems they are presented with. In doing do, Smith reminds us of the need to emphasise the aesthetic elements of poetry, and culture more generally, including its creative and expressive affordances. A reader of his book realises that a critical sociology of poetry needs to attest not just to the symbolic capital in who is seen as ‘legitimate' readers and producers of poetry but also how those shut off from it lose out on the uses of poetry. Our discussion covers what led Smith to pursue this work, how sociology has, and might in future confront poetry, his experiences of running these reading groups and suggests why, perhaps, we should also perhaps reject the ‘society of the segue way' and savour some of the finitude which poetry might offer. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), along with other texts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology

Sociologists have had surprisingly little to say about poetry as a topic while sometimes also making grandiose claims that sociology is/should be like poetry. These are the prompts which begin Andrew Smith's Class and the Uses of Poetry: Symbolic Enclosures (2024, Palgrave Macmillan). Drawing upon discussions with working class readers of poetry, and interviews with unpublished poets, Smith draws our attention to the ways in which poetry has been enclosed, or fenced off, from working class readers. Influenced by, though offering some criticisms, of, Bourdieu's approach to the sociology of culture, he shows us how readers become aware of this enclosure but nevertheless engage in collective understanding of the poems they are presented with. In doing do, Smith reminds us of the need to emphasise the aesthetic elements of poetry, and culture more generally, including its creative and expressive affordances. A reader of his book realises that a critical sociology of poetry needs to attest not just to the symbolic capital in who is seen as ‘legitimate' readers and producers of poetry but also how those shut off from it lose out on the uses of poetry. Our discussion covers what led Smith to pursue this work, how sociology has, and might in future confront poetry, his experiences of running these reading groups and suggests why, perhaps, we should also perhaps reject the ‘society of the segue way' and savour some of the finitude which poetry might offer. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), along with other texts. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

How do Black women experience education in Britain? Within British educational research about Black students, gender distinctions have been largely absent, male-dominated or American-centric. Due to the lack of attention paid to Black female students, relatively little is known about how they understand and engage with the education system, or the influences which shape their long-term strategies and decision-making in order to gain educational 'success'. Babygirl, You've Got This! Experiences of Black Girls and Women in the English Education System (Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. April-Louise Pennant will illustrate the educational experiences and journeys of Black British women graduates and considers the influence of the intersections of race, gender, ethnicity, culture and social class on their educational journeys. Dr. Pennant uniquely documents the entire educational journey - from primary school to university - within both predominantly white (PW) and predominantly global majority (PGM) educational institutions in order to examine the various accessibility, financial and academic hurdles which face Black girls and women. The book combines theoretical frameworks such as Critical Race Theory, Bourdieu's Theory of Practice and Black Feminist epistemology, alongside the personal accounts of the author and a range of Black British women graduates. Through analysis of the strategies, choices and decisions made by Black British women in their educational journeys, the book ultimately provides insights into how to navigate the education system effectively, and provides alternatives to normalised understandings of educational 'success'. Find out more about Dr. April-Louise Pennant on her website! This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

How do Black women experience education in Britain? Within British educational research about Black students, gender distinctions have been largely absent, male-dominated or American-centric. Due to the lack of attention paid to Black female students, relatively little is known about how they understand and engage with the education system, or the influences which shape their long-term strategies and decision-making in order to gain educational 'success'. Babygirl, You've Got This! Experiences of Black Girls and Women in the English Education System (Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. April-Louise Pennant will illustrate the educational experiences and journeys of Black British women graduates and considers the influence of the intersections of race, gender, ethnicity, culture and social class on their educational journeys. Dr. Pennant uniquely documents the entire educational journey - from primary school to university - within both predominantly white (PW) and predominantly global majority (PGM) educational institutions in order to examine the various accessibility, financial and academic hurdles which face Black girls and women. The book combines theoretical frameworks such as Critical Race Theory, Bourdieu's Theory of Practice and Black Feminist epistemology, alongside the personal accounts of the author and a range of Black British women graduates. Through analysis of the strategies, choices and decisions made by Black British women in their educational journeys, the book ultimately provides insights into how to navigate the education system effectively, and provides alternatives to normalised understandings of educational 'success'. Find out more about Dr. April-Louise Pennant on her website! This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology

How do Black women experience education in Britain? Within British educational research about Black students, gender distinctions have been largely absent, male-dominated or American-centric. Due to the lack of attention paid to Black female students, relatively little is known about how they understand and engage with the education system, or the influences which shape their long-term strategies and decision-making in order to gain educational 'success'. Babygirl, You've Got This! Experiences of Black Girls and Women in the English Education System (Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. April-Louise Pennant will illustrate the educational experiences and journeys of Black British women graduates and considers the influence of the intersections of race, gender, ethnicity, culture and social class on their educational journeys. Dr. Pennant uniquely documents the entire educational journey - from primary school to university - within both predominantly white (PW) and predominantly global majority (PGM) educational institutions in order to examine the various accessibility, financial and academic hurdles which face Black girls and women. The book combines theoretical frameworks such as Critical Race Theory, Bourdieu's Theory of Practice and Black Feminist epistemology, alongside the personal accounts of the author and a range of Black British women graduates. Through analysis of the strategies, choices and decisions made by Black British women in their educational journeys, the book ultimately provides insights into how to navigate the education system effectively, and provides alternatives to normalised understandings of educational 'success'. Find out more about Dr. April-Louise Pennant on her website! This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

How do Black women experience education in Britain? Within British educational research about Black students, gender distinctions have been largely absent, male-dominated or American-centric. Due to the lack of attention paid to Black female students, relatively little is known about how they understand and engage with the education system, or the influences which shape their long-term strategies and decision-making in order to gain educational 'success'. Babygirl, You've Got This! Experiences of Black Girls and Women in the English Education System (Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. April-Louise Pennant will illustrate the educational experiences and journeys of Black British women graduates and considers the influence of the intersections of race, gender, ethnicity, culture and social class on their educational journeys. Dr. Pennant uniquely documents the entire educational journey - from primary school to university - within both predominantly white (PW) and predominantly global majority (PGM) educational institutions in order to examine the various accessibility, financial and academic hurdles which face Black girls and women. The book combines theoretical frameworks such as Critical Race Theory, Bourdieu's Theory of Practice and Black Feminist epistemology, alongside the personal accounts of the author and a range of Black British women graduates. Through analysis of the strategies, choices and decisions made by Black British women in their educational journeys, the book ultimately provides insights into how to navigate the education system effectively, and provides alternatives to normalised understandings of educational 'success'. Find out more about Dr. April-Louise Pennant on her website! This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies

How do Black women experience education in Britain? Within British educational research about Black students, gender distinctions have been largely absent, male-dominated or American-centric. Due to the lack of attention paid to Black female students, relatively little is known about how they understand and engage with the education system, or the influences which shape their long-term strategies and decision-making in order to gain educational 'success'. Babygirl, You've Got This! Experiences of Black Girls and Women in the English Education System (Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. April-Louise Pennant will illustrate the educational experiences and journeys of Black British women graduates and considers the influence of the intersections of race, gender, ethnicity, culture and social class on their educational journeys. Dr. Pennant uniquely documents the entire educational journey - from primary school to university - within both predominantly white (PW) and predominantly global majority (PGM) educational institutions in order to examine the various accessibility, financial and academic hurdles which face Black girls and women. The book combines theoretical frameworks such as Critical Race Theory, Bourdieu's Theory of Practice and Black Feminist epistemology, alongside the personal accounts of the author and a range of Black British women graduates. Through analysis of the strategies, choices and decisions made by Black British women in their educational journeys, the book ultimately provides insights into how to navigate the education system effectively, and provides alternatives to normalised understandings of educational 'success'. Find out more about Dr. April-Louise Pennant on her website! This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/education

How do Black women experience education in Britain? Within British educational research about Black students, gender distinctions have been largely absent, male-dominated or American-centric. Due to the lack of attention paid to Black female students, relatively little is known about how they understand and engage with the education system, or the influences which shape their long-term strategies and decision-making in order to gain educational 'success'. Babygirl, You've Got This! Experiences of Black Girls and Women in the English Education System (Bloomsbury, 2024) by Dr. April-Louise Pennant will illustrate the educational experiences and journeys of Black British women graduates and considers the influence of the intersections of race, gender, ethnicity, culture and social class on their educational journeys. Dr. Pennant uniquely documents the entire educational journey - from primary school to university - within both predominantly white (PW) and predominantly global majority (PGM) educational institutions in order to examine the various accessibility, financial and academic hurdles which face Black girls and women. The book combines theoretical frameworks such as Critical Race Theory, Bourdieu's Theory of Practice and Black Feminist epistemology, alongside the personal accounts of the author and a range of Black British women graduates. Through analysis of the strategies, choices and decisions made by Black British women in their educational journeys, the book ultimately provides insights into how to navigate the education system effectively, and provides alternatives to normalised understandings of educational 'success'. Find out more about Dr. April-Louise Pennant on her website! This interview was conducted by Dr. Miranda Melcher whose new book focuses on post-conflict military integration, understanding treaty negotiation and implementation in civil war contexts, with qualitative analysis of the Angolan and Mozambican civil wars. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rural speech is often denigrated, but how might it also be valuable? How might rural economies benefit from their linguistic diversity through tourism? In this third and final installment of our “Is Talk Cheap?” series on language and value, Kate and Ariana interview Dr. Thea Strand about a highly valorized dialect of rural Norway that won a national popularity contest and is increasingly being used commercially. Dr. Strand gives us some background on how the political and cultural history of Norway has produced a deep appreciation of dialect diversity and an ethos against language standardization. We talk about how the Valdres dialect is now used commercially for tourists in diverse places, from wayfinding signs on ski trails to advertising car washes at gas stations. Learn the significance of a single vowel in advertising a festival for fermented fish! We discuss hyperlocal language use, language change over time, and why some kinds of linguistic difference are available to use in marketing when others are not. In the last part of the episode, Thea tells us about her new research with Michael Wroblewski on another aspect of this rural economy: the decline of transhumance (the seasonal movement of grazing livestock) among local family farmers. Residents lament the resulting reforestation and their changing landscape alongside their changing dialect, underscoring how people experience economic transformations through landscape and language. Thea Strand is a Senior Lecturer in Anthropology at Loyola University Chicago. Her primary research is sited in rural Valdres, Norway, examining language and political economy, broadly construed. She has studied changes in linguistic structure, value, and ideologies surrounding the distinctive Valdres dialect since the late 2000s. Her current project focuses on the deeply intertwined environmental, cultural, and linguistic effects of tourism development and declining transhumant farming in Valdres' mountain areas.   Co-hosted by Dr. Kathryn Graber [Link] and Ariana Gunderson [Link]. Edited and mixed by Richard Nance.   https://econanthro.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/TheaStrand.mp3     References from our conversation with Thea Strand: Strand, Thea. 2024. A Winning Dialect: Inventing Linguistic Tradition in Rural Norway. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.  Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Economics of Linguistic Exchanges.” Social Science Information 16, no. 6 (1977): 645–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847701600601. Valdres Nature and Culture Park: https://www.valdres.no/ Rakfisk Festival: https://www.rakfisk.no/

It is only in recent years that sociologists and historians of the social sciences have given empire the attention it deserves in histories of the discipline. In this context, George Steinmetz's The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire (Princeton University Press) is likely to be a touchstone text in these debates. Providing a new history of the French national discipline inspired by a ‘Neo-Bourdieusian Historical Sociology of Science', Steinmetz highlights the centrality of ‘colonial sociology', work centered on and/or created in the French overseas colonies and protectorates to the discipline's development.  The French state, eager to consolidate its empire after World War II, were eager to draw on the expertise of sociologists in pursuing this goal; as Steinmetz shows therefore, during this period, a focus on ‘the colonial' became central to French sociology to the extent that roughly half the French sociological field could be considered ‘colonial sociologists'. Despite this entanglement with the French state these colonial sociologists became strong critics of imperialism. Alongside the many stories he uncovers Steinmetz explores in depth the case of four such colonial sociologists: Raymond Aron, Jacque Berque, Georges Balandier and Pierre Bourdieu, seeking to show not just the centrality of colonialism to each writer but how their experiences of empire formed their basis for their future work; for example, how Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and field can be traced to his experiences in colonial Algeria. In our discussion, which also marks the imminent release of the text in paperback, George takes us through this hugely enlightening text, including reflections on why there may have been some ‘disciplinary amnesia' in sociology's unwillingness to confront empire, the relations between sociology and other imperial disciplines, how sociologists from the colonies developed their own work, the lessons from his text about how we should confront colonial sociologists and whether Durkheim had an ‘imperial gaze'. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and is the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), among other books. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

It is only in recent years that sociologists and historians of the social sciences have given empire the attention it deserves in histories of the discipline. In this context, George Steinmetz's The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire (Princeton University Press) is likely to be a touchstone text in these debates. Providing a new history of the French national discipline inspired by a ‘Neo-Bourdieusian Historical Sociology of Science', Steinmetz highlights the centrality of ‘colonial sociology', work centered on and/or created in the French overseas colonies and protectorates to the discipline's development.  The French state, eager to consolidate its empire after World War II, were eager to draw on the expertise of sociologists in pursuing this goal; as Steinmetz shows therefore, during this period, a focus on ‘the colonial' became central to French sociology to the extent that roughly half the French sociological field could be considered ‘colonial sociologists'. Despite this entanglement with the French state these colonial sociologists became strong critics of imperialism. Alongside the many stories he uncovers Steinmetz explores in depth the case of four such colonial sociologists: Raymond Aron, Jacque Berque, Georges Balandier and Pierre Bourdieu, seeking to show not just the centrality of colonialism to each writer but how their experiences of empire formed their basis for their future work; for example, how Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and field can be traced to his experiences in colonial Algeria. In our discussion, which also marks the imminent release of the text in paperback, George takes us through this hugely enlightening text, including reflections on why there may have been some ‘disciplinary amnesia' in sociology's unwillingness to confront empire, the relations between sociology and other imperial disciplines, how sociologists from the colonies developed their own work, the lessons from his text about how we should confront colonial sociologists and whether Durkheim had an ‘imperial gaze'. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and is the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), among other books. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/history

It is only in recent years that sociologists and historians of the social sciences have given empire the attention it deserves in histories of the discipline. In this context, George Steinmetz's The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire (Princeton University Press) is likely to be a touchstone text in these debates. Providing a new history of the French national discipline inspired by a ‘Neo-Bourdieusian Historical Sociology of Science', Steinmetz highlights the centrality of ‘colonial sociology', work centered on and/or created in the French overseas colonies and protectorates to the discipline's development.  The French state, eager to consolidate its empire after World War II, were eager to draw on the expertise of sociologists in pursuing this goal; as Steinmetz shows therefore, during this period, a focus on ‘the colonial' became central to French sociology to the extent that roughly half the French sociological field could be considered ‘colonial sociologists'. Despite this entanglement with the French state these colonial sociologists became strong critics of imperialism. Alongside the many stories he uncovers Steinmetz explores in depth the case of four such colonial sociologists: Raymond Aron, Jacque Berque, Georges Balandier and Pierre Bourdieu, seeking to show not just the centrality of colonialism to each writer but how their experiences of empire formed their basis for their future work; for example, how Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and field can be traced to his experiences in colonial Algeria. In our discussion, which also marks the imminent release of the text in paperback, George takes us through this hugely enlightening text, including reflections on why there may have been some ‘disciplinary amnesia' in sociology's unwillingness to confront empire, the relations between sociology and other imperial disciplines, how sociologists from the colonies developed their own work, the lessons from his text about how we should confront colonial sociologists and whether Durkheim had an ‘imperial gaze'. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and is the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), among other books. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/anthropology

It is only in recent years that sociologists and historians of the social sciences have given empire the attention it deserves in histories of the discipline. In this context, George Steinmetz's The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire (Princeton University Press) is likely to be a touchstone text in these debates. Providing a new history of the French national discipline inspired by a ‘Neo-Bourdieusian Historical Sociology of Science', Steinmetz highlights the centrality of ‘colonial sociology', work centered on and/or created in the French overseas colonies and protectorates to the discipline's development.  The French state, eager to consolidate its empire after World War II, were eager to draw on the expertise of sociologists in pursuing this goal; as Steinmetz shows therefore, during this period, a focus on ‘the colonial' became central to French sociology to the extent that roughly half the French sociological field could be considered ‘colonial sociologists'. Despite this entanglement with the French state these colonial sociologists became strong critics of imperialism. Alongside the many stories he uncovers Steinmetz explores in depth the case of four such colonial sociologists: Raymond Aron, Jacque Berque, Georges Balandier and Pierre Bourdieu, seeking to show not just the centrality of colonialism to each writer but how their experiences of empire formed their basis for their future work; for example, how Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and field can be traced to his experiences in colonial Algeria. In our discussion, which also marks the imminent release of the text in paperback, George takes us through this hugely enlightening text, including reflections on why there may have been some ‘disciplinary amnesia' in sociology's unwillingness to confront empire, the relations between sociology and other imperial disciplines, how sociologists from the colonies developed their own work, the lessons from his text about how we should confront colonial sociologists and whether Durkheim had an ‘imperial gaze'. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and is the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), among other books. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

It is only in recent years that sociologists and historians of the social sciences have given empire the attention it deserves in histories of the discipline. In this context, George Steinmetz's The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire (Princeton University Press) is likely to be a touchstone text in these debates. Providing a new history of the French national discipline inspired by a ‘Neo-Bourdieusian Historical Sociology of Science', Steinmetz highlights the centrality of ‘colonial sociology', work centered on and/or created in the French overseas colonies and protectorates to the discipline's development.  The French state, eager to consolidate its empire after World War II, were eager to draw on the expertise of sociologists in pursuing this goal; as Steinmetz shows therefore, during this period, a focus on ‘the colonial' became central to French sociology to the extent that roughly half the French sociological field could be considered ‘colonial sociologists'. Despite this entanglement with the French state these colonial sociologists became strong critics of imperialism. Alongside the many stories he uncovers Steinmetz explores in depth the case of four such colonial sociologists: Raymond Aron, Jacque Berque, Georges Balandier and Pierre Bourdieu, seeking to show not just the centrality of colonialism to each writer but how their experiences of empire formed their basis for their future work; for example, how Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and field can be traced to his experiences in colonial Algeria. In our discussion, which also marks the imminent release of the text in paperback, George takes us through this hugely enlightening text, including reflections on why there may have been some ‘disciplinary amnesia' in sociology's unwillingness to confront empire, the relations between sociology and other imperial disciplines, how sociologists from the colonies developed their own work, the lessons from his text about how we should confront colonial sociologists and whether Durkheim had an ‘imperial gaze'. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and is the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), among other books. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

It is only in recent years that sociologists and historians of the social sciences have given empire the attention it deserves in histories of the discipline. In this context, George Steinmetz's The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire (Princeton University Press) is likely to be a touchstone text in these debates. Providing a new history of the French national discipline inspired by a ‘Neo-Bourdieusian Historical Sociology of Science', Steinmetz highlights the centrality of ‘colonial sociology', work centered on and/or created in the French overseas colonies and protectorates to the discipline's development.  The French state, eager to consolidate its empire after World War II, were eager to draw on the expertise of sociologists in pursuing this goal; as Steinmetz shows therefore, during this period, a focus on ‘the colonial' became central to French sociology to the extent that roughly half the French sociological field could be considered ‘colonial sociologists'. Despite this entanglement with the French state these colonial sociologists became strong critics of imperialism. Alongside the many stories he uncovers Steinmetz explores in depth the case of four such colonial sociologists: Raymond Aron, Jacque Berque, Georges Balandier and Pierre Bourdieu, seeking to show not just the centrality of colonialism to each writer but how their experiences of empire formed their basis for their future work; for example, how Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and field can be traced to his experiences in colonial Algeria. In our discussion, which also marks the imminent release of the text in paperback, George takes us through this hugely enlightening text, including reflections on why there may have been some ‘disciplinary amnesia' in sociology's unwillingness to confront empire, the relations between sociology and other imperial disciplines, how sociologists from the colonies developed their own work, the lessons from his text about how we should confront colonial sociologists and whether Durkheim had an ‘imperial gaze'. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and is the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), among other books.

It is only in recent years that sociologists and historians of the social sciences have given empire the attention it deserves in histories of the discipline. In this context, George Steinmetz's The Colonial Origins of Modern Social Thought: French Sociology and the Overseas Empire (Princeton University Press) is likely to be a touchstone text in these debates. Providing a new history of the French national discipline inspired by a ‘Neo-Bourdieusian Historical Sociology of Science', Steinmetz highlights the centrality of ‘colonial sociology', work centered on and/or created in the French overseas colonies and protectorates to the discipline's development.  The French state, eager to consolidate its empire after World War II, were eager to draw on the expertise of sociologists in pursuing this goal; as Steinmetz shows therefore, during this period, a focus on ‘the colonial' became central to French sociology to the extent that roughly half the French sociological field could be considered ‘colonial sociologists'. Despite this entanglement with the French state these colonial sociologists became strong critics of imperialism. Alongside the many stories he uncovers Steinmetz explores in depth the case of four such colonial sociologists: Raymond Aron, Jacque Berque, Georges Balandier and Pierre Bourdieu, seeking to show not just the centrality of colonialism to each writer but how their experiences of empire formed their basis for their future work; for example, how Bourdieu's concepts of habitus, capital and field can be traced to his experiences in colonial Algeria. In our discussion, which also marks the imminent release of the text in paperback, George takes us through this hugely enlightening text, including reflections on why there may have been some ‘disciplinary amnesia' in sociology's unwillingness to confront empire, the relations between sociology and other imperial disciplines, how sociologists from the colonies developed their own work, the lessons from his text about how we should confront colonial sociologists and whether Durkheim had an ‘imperial gaze'. Your host, Matt Dawson is Professor of Sociology at the University of Glasgow and is the author of G.D.H. Cole and British Sociology: A Study in Semi-Alienation (2024, Palgrave Macmillan), among other books. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/european-studies

How did the Algerian war of independence shape contemporary sociology? In Bourdieu and Sayad Against Empire: Forging Sociology in Anticolonial Struggle (Polity Press, 2023), Amin Perez, an Assistant Professor of Sociology at University of Quebec in Montreal, explores the sociological practice and friendship of Pierre Bourdieu and Abdelmalek Sayad. Using a range of archival and contemporary methods, the book shows the impact of anticolonialism on these key figures in sociology and demonstrates the ongoing importance of their work today. Theoretically and historically rich, as well as being accessible, the book is essential reading across the social sciences and humanities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

How did the Algerian war of independence shape contemporary sociology? In Bourdieu and Sayad Against Empire: Forging Sociology in Anticolonial Struggle (Polity Press, 2023), Amin Perez, an Assistant Professor of Sociology at University of Quebec in Montreal, explores the sociological practice and friendship of Pierre Bourdieu and Abdelmalek Sayad. Using a range of archival and contemporary methods, the book shows the impact of anticolonialism on these key figures in sociology and demonstrates the ongoing importance of their work today. Theoretically and historically rich, as well as being accessible, the book is essential reading across the social sciences and humanities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/middle-eastern-studies

How did the Algerian war of independence shape contemporary sociology? In Bourdieu and Sayad Against Empire: Forging Sociology in Anticolonial Struggle (Polity Press, 2023), Amin Perez, an Assistant Professor of Sociology at University of Quebec in Montreal, explores the sociological practice and friendship of Pierre Bourdieu and Abdelmalek Sayad. Using a range of archival and contemporary methods, the book shows the impact of anticolonialism on these key figures in sociology and demonstrates the ongoing importance of their work today. Theoretically and historically rich, as well as being accessible, the book is essential reading across the social sciences and humanities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

How did the Algerian war of independence shape contemporary sociology? In Bourdieu and Sayad Against Empire: Forging Sociology in Anticolonial Struggle (Polity Press, 2023), Amin Perez, an Assistant Professor of Sociology at University of Quebec in Montreal, explores the sociological practice and friendship of Pierre Bourdieu and Abdelmalek Sayad. Using a range of archival and contemporary methods, the book shows the impact of anticolonialism on these key figures in sociology and demonstrates the ongoing importance of their work today. Theoretically and historically rich, as well as being accessible, the book is essential reading across the social sciences and humanities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/african-studies

How did the Algerian war of independence shape contemporary sociology? In Bourdieu and Sayad Against Empire: Forging Sociology in Anticolonial Struggle (Polity Press, 2023), Amin Perez, an Assistant Professor of Sociology at University of Quebec in Montreal, explores the sociological practice and friendship of Pierre Bourdieu and Abdelmalek Sayad. Using a range of archival and contemporary methods, the book shows the impact of anticolonialism on these key figures in sociology and demonstrates the ongoing importance of their work today. Theoretically and historically rich, as well as being accessible, the book is essential reading across the social sciences and humanities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

How did the Algerian war of independence shape contemporary sociology? In Bourdieu and Sayad Against Empire: Forging Sociology in Anticolonial Struggle (Polity Press, 2023), Amin Perez, an Assistant Professor of Sociology at University of Quebec in Montreal, explores the sociological practice and friendship of Pierre Bourdieu and Abdelmalek Sayad. Using a range of archival and contemporary methods, the book shows the impact of anticolonialism on these key figures in sociology and demonstrates the ongoing importance of their work today. Theoretically and historically rich, as well as being accessible, the book is essential reading across the social sciences and humanities. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/sociology

In this episode, Dr. Kathryn (Kate) Graber and doctoral student Ariana Gunderson interview linguistic anthropologist Jillian Cavanaugh about all things language and value. Much of Dr. Cavanaugh's research in Bergamo, Italy, summarized here, has been on the political economy of code choice–that is, why people choose the ways of speaking they do, whether to access economic opportunities or to have a language of regional belonging, intimacy, and home. Turning to questions of authenticity and materiality, Dr. Cavanaugh discusses how to approach language not only as an expressive system but also as an embodied, material practice. We talk about how food gains value through the different kinds of linguistic labor that are undertaken in its production and ask whether language and food are analogous semiotic systems (spoiler alert: not quite). Thinking about her current work with small-scale, hyper-local sausage producers, Jillian discusses the roles of individual choice and consumption, and/versus the role of production in the construction of value. At the end, we talk about intersections between linguistic and economic anthropology in Jillian's role as President-Elect of the Society for Linguistic Anthropology (SLA). Jillian R. Cavanaugh is a linguistic anthropologist whose research, centered in northern Italy, has considered language shift and social transformation, value, language ideologies, materiality, gender, and heritage food. Her current research focuses on heritage food producers and the labor they undertake to make good, safe, and valuable food. She is interested in how people use the semiotic and material resources available to them to make sense of their pasts in order to live in the present and envision their futures. Her publications include Living Memory: The Social Aesthetics of Language in a Northern Italian Town (Wiley-Blackwell 2009) and Language and Materiality: Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations (Cambridge University Press 2017, co-edited with Shalini Shankar). Her work has been published in American Anthropologist, the Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, and Ethnos, among other venues. She received her PhD in anthropology at New York University and is Professor of Anthropology at Brooklyn College and the Graduate Center CUNY. Co-hosted by Dr. Kathryn Graber [Link] and Ariana Gunderson [Link]. Edited and mixed by Richard Nance. .player4989 .plyr__controls, .player4989 .StampAudioPlayerSkin{ border-radius: 10px; overflow: hidden; } .player4989{ margin: 0 auto; } .player4989 .plyr__controls .plyr__controls { border-radius: none; overflow: visible; } .skin_default .player4989 .plyr__controls { overflow: visible; } Your browser does not support the audio element.   References from our conversation with Jillian Cavanaugh: Cavanaugh, Jillian. 2009. Living Memory: The Social Aesthetics of Language in a Northern Italian Town. Chichester, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. "The Economy of Linguistic Exchanges." In Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gal, Susan. 1988. The Political Economy of Code Choice. In Codeswitching: Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Monica Heller, ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Pp. 245–264. Cavanaugh, Jillian R. 2023. “Authenticity and Its Perils: Who Is Left Out When Food Is ‘Authentic'?” Gastronomica 23 (1): 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1525/gfc.2023.23.1.28. Cavanaugh, Jillian R., and Shalini Shankar. 2014. “Producing Authenticity in Global Capitalism: Language, Materiality, and Value.” American Anthropologist 116 (1): 51–64. Riley, K. C., & Cavanaugh, J. R. 2017. Tasty Talk, Expressive Food: An Introduction to the Semiotics of Food-and-Language. Semiotic Review 5: The Semiotics of Food and Language. Chumley, Lily Hope, and Nicholas Harkness. 2013.

durée : 00:02:24 - L'Humeur du matin par Guillaume Erner - par : Guillaume Erner - J'imagine que lorsque vous avez appris la mort du leader du Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, vous vous êtes immédiatement demandé ce qu'en aurait pensé le sociologue Pierre Bourdieu… Si ce n'est pas le cas, session de rattrapage. - réalisation : Félicie Faugère

From the protests in Brazil initially focused on bus fares to the protests in Hong Kong seeking to stop an extradition bill to the protests across the Middle East now collectively referred to as the "Arab Spring," the political and economic mass demonstrations from 2010 to 2020 made it a decade of public protest like no other. Yet the vast majority of these efforts failed to bring about their desired changes--and many of them actually led to the opposite of what they wanted. Vincent Bevins, author of the new book If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and the Missing Revolution, has chronicled this decade with stories from his on-the-ground reporting and extensive interviews with activists in ten countries around the globe.David Priess spoke with Vincent about why mass protests during this decade so often fell short of their objectives, the principle of horizontalism, the role of social media in mobilization and action, and other themes as they relate to the mass protests in Brazil, Turkey, Hong Kong, Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain, Syria, South Korea, and other countries.Among the works mentioned in this episode:The book If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and the Missing Revolution by Vincent BevinsThe movie The CandidateThe book From Mobilization to Revolution by Charles TillyThe book Minor Detail by Adania ShibliThe book Bourdieu's Secret Admirer in the Caucasus by Georgi DerluguianChatter is a production of Lawfare and Goat Rodeo. This episode was produced and edited by Noam Osband and Cara Shillenn of Goat Rodeo. Podcast theme by David Priess, featuring music created using Groovepad.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.