Podcasts about Foucault

Orlando Paris"Pensare l'odio"L'umano di fronte all'estremoLuca Sossella Editorewww.lucasosselaeditore.itLa cronaca mondiale restituisce immagini di distruzione e sofferenza: un genocidio si consuma nella Striscia di Gaza sotto gli occhi della società civile internazionale; una guerra infuria alle porte dell'Europa, mentre altri conflitti insanguinano molte regioni del mondo. Allo stesso tempo, nelle democrazie occidentali, si assiste a una legittimazione pubblica del discorso d'odio: retoriche xenofobe riemergono nei linguaggi della politica, nei media e nello spazio digitale, trovando eco in movimenti che fanno dell'ostilità verso l'altro un principio identitario. Questo libro nasce dalla necessità, insieme etica e scientifica, di confrontarsi con questo scenario per renderne leggibili le logiche profonde, mettendo a fuoco l'intreccio tra odio, potere e società. Il volume dialoga con una tradizione di pensiero che, dalla metà del novecento, ha interrogato le forme storiche della disumanizzazione: da Hannah Arendt a Michel Foucault, da Giorgio Agamben a Zygmunt Bauman, fino agli sviluppi degli Hate Studies e dei Genocide Studies. Quanto emerge è un archivio concettuale capace di orientare lo sguardo sul presente e di indicare pratiche di resistenza alle sue derive estreme.Orlando Paris, professore di filosofia e teoria dei linguaggi all'Università per Stranieri di Siena. I suoi studi vertono sulle patologie del discorso pubblico – discorsi d'odio, stereotipi, infodemia – e si estendono fino al campo degli Hate Studies. Sul tema dell'odio discorsivo ha pubblicato libri e articoli scientifici.Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Ceci est un épisode Solo et donc une lecture de ma newsletter à laquelle vous pouvez vous abonner juste ici - Je vous invite également à participer à ma cagnotte sur Tipeee, c'est juste là.j'ai beaucoup approché ce sujet sans jamais en parler directement alors dans cet épisode, je parle de l'épuisement systémique, pas de fatigue passagère. J'interroge l'incertitude comme carburant silencieux de notre surcharge cognitive, l'accélération décrite par Hartmut Rosa, la pression financière documentée par Antoine Foucher, le capitalisme de la jouissance analysé par Michel Clouscard, la machine à attention qui se nourrit de notre peur, et l'isolement silencieux de nos grandes villes. J'ai questionné aussi le grand mensonge de la productivité, et ce que Viktor Frankl, Pablo Servigne, Byung Chul Han et Olivier Hamant ont chacun à nous dire sur comment traverser ça sans se noyer. Et je finis par trois directions concrètes, pas des solutions miracles, juste des pas de côté qui permettent de ne pas s'épuiser à nager à contre-courant.Citations marquantes"Notre réponse à l'épuisement est presque toujours la même : on essaie de trouver une méthode pour optimiser. Et c'est là que ça devient pathétique, parce que même ceux qui veulent ralentir adorent une méthode pour le faire rapidement.""L'amygdale ne fait pas vraiment la différence entre 'un lion va me dévorer' et 'je ne sais pas ce qui va se passer dans six mois avec mon boulot, mon loyer, la géopolitique, l'IA ou le prix de l'énergie.' Les deux produisent de l'épuisement.""On n'a jamais été aussi optimisé et pourtant on n'a jamais eu aussi peu de temps.""L'ennui est biologiquement plus proche de l'énergie que de la léthargie. Le vide n'est pas un problème à remplir, c'est une condition nécessaire à la pensée profonde.""L'épuisement que vous ressentez n'est pas une faiblesse. C'est une réponse rationnelle à un système qui n'est pas conçu pour l'humain."Idées centrales 1. L'épuisement est systémique, pas personnel Ce n'est pas parce que vous êtes mal organisé ou pas assez zen. Nous sommes collectivement victimes d'un système qui n'est pas conçu pour l'humain, avec des ressources inégales pour y faire face. L'individualiser, c'est exactement ce que le système veut qu'on fasse. [~03:00]2. Notre cerveau est une machine à prédire coincée dans un monde imprévisible Pendant des millions d'années, l'anticipation était une question de survie. Aujourd'hui, cette même mécanique tourne en surchauffe permanente face à des menaces diffuses et globales qu'elle ne peut ni identifier clairement ni neutraliser. C'est là que commence l'épuisement, bien avant le surmenage. [~06:30]3. Trois accélérations simultanées qui se renforcent Hartmut Rosa distingue l'accélération technique, l'accélération du changement social et l'accélération du rythme de vie lui-même. Nous vivons les trois en même temps, sans jamais avoir le temps de nous adapter à l'une avant que la suivante arrive. [~12:00]4. La productivité vendue comme remède est souvent une cause supplémentaire L'ennui n'est pas de la paresse, c'est une émotion fonctionnelle qui prépare biologiquement le corps à l'action et ouvre la porte à la créativité. Remplir chaque vide par une stimulation externe, c'est se priver de la condition nécessaire à la pensée profonde. [~22:00]5. Le contrat du travail est rompu, et on fait semblant de ne pas le voir Pendant les Trente Glorieuses, on doublait son niveau de vie en 15 ans. Aujourd'hui, il faut 84 ans, soit deux vies de travail. Ce n'est pas une opinion, c'est documenté. Et continuer à courir plus vite dans ce contexte s'appelle de l'épuisement par définition. [~17:00]6. Nager en perpendiculaire plutôt qu'à contre-courant Résister frontalement épuise. Comme dans une baïne, la bonne réponse n'est pas de nager vers la plage mais à la perpendiculaire. Silence, soutien, sens : trois mouvements latéraux qui permettent de sortir sans s'y laisser noyer. [~28:00]Questions structurantes de l'épisodePourquoi notre réponse instinctive à l'épuisement est-elle toujours de chercher une méthode pour l'optimiser ?En quoi l'incertitude du monde contemporain active-t-elle les mêmes mécanismes que la menace physique dans notre cerveau ?Qu'est-ce que Hartmut Rosa entend exactement par "immobilisme frénétique" et en quoi ça décrit notre condition ?Comment le passage de la "société disciplinaire" de Foucault à la "société de la performance" a-t-il transformé la domination en auto-exploitation ?Pourquoi les médias et les algorithmes ont-ils intérêt à nous maintenir dans la peur plutôt que dans la réalité des chiffres ?Ce que nous avons sacrifié à vivre en grande ville mérite-t-il vraiment qu'on ne le questionne pas ?L'ennui est-il vraiment une ressource productive que l'on a collectivement décidé de détruire ?Comment Viktor Frankl trouvait-il du sens dans les camps de concentration, et qu'est-ce que ça nous dit sur notre propre rapport à l'adversité ?En quoi la "résonance" de Rosa est-elle incompatible avec le contrôle et la performance ?Qu'est-ce que vous faites parce que vous en avez envie, et qu'est-ce que vous faites parce que vous avez peur de ne pas le faire ?Références citéesPersonnesPablo Servigne (chercheur sur l'effondrement, invité de Vlan!) : "La vie danse toujours au bord du chaos. L'inverse du chaos, c'est la mort." [~05:00]Donna Brothers (psychanalyste américaine) : concept d'"anxiété cartésienne", l'idéal de certitude hérité de Descartes comme source de souffrance [~08:00]Hartmut Rosa (sociologue et philosophe allemand) : trois formes d'accélération, "immobilisme frénétique", concept de résonance [~11:00 / ~31:00]Byung Chul Han (philosophe coréen) : "société de la fatigue", dépression et burn-out comme symptômes civilisationnels [~15:00]Antoine Foucher (ancien directeur général adjoint du MEDEF, invité de Vlan!) : livre "Sortir du travail qui ne paye plus", distinction des trois périodes de progression salariale [~16:00]Michel Clouscard (sociologue français) : mutation du capitalisme de la répression vers le capitalisme de la jouissance [~19:00]Rousseau : "Malheur à celui qui n'a plus rien à désirer." [~20:00]René Girard (anthropologue français) : désir mimétique [~20:00]Jonathan Crary (chercheur américain) : Le capitalisme est à l'assaut du sommeil (2013) [~22:30]Reed Hastings (fondateur de Netflix) : "notre plus grand concurrent est le sommeil" [~22:30]Yohan Hari (auteur, invité de Vlan!) : marché de l'attention [~23:00]Kenneth Schlenger (fondateur de Opal, invité de Vlan!) : marché de l'attention [~23:00]Sherry Turkle (professeure au MIT) : Seuls ensemble, trente ans d'étude de notre relation à la technologie [~25:00]Bruno Marzloff (sociologue de la ville, invité de Vlan!) : plus une ville est grande, plus elle rend seul [~25:00]Tim Ferris : La semaine de 4 heures comme symbole du mensonge productiviste [~27:00]Olivier Hamant (biologiste, invité de Vlan!) : robustesse vs performance, l'arbre qui ne transforme que 1% de la lumière [~29:00]Marc de Smedt (invité de Vlan!) : épisode sur le silence intérieur [~32:00]Viktor Frankl (psychiatre autrichien, survivant des camps de concentration) : le sens comme condition de survie, déplacement du regard de soi vers l'autre [~34:00]Sénèque : "Ce n'est pas que nous ayons peu de temps, c'est que nous en perdons beaucoup." [~36:00]LivresLe capitalisme est à l'assaut du sommeil, Jonathan Crary (2013)Seuls ensemble, Sherry TurkleSortir du travail qui ne paye plus, Antoine Foucher"Sur la fonction de l'ennui", article de psychologie cité (deux auteurs non nommés)FilmsFight Club : "Nous achetons des choses dont nous n'avons pas besoin..." [~21:00]SourcesCentre d'observation de la société : données sur l'évolution de l'insécurité en France [~24:00]Timestamps clés (optimisés YouTube)00:00 - Le bracelet connecté et le piège de l'optimisation J'ai voulu mieux écouter mon corps. J'ai obtenu un tableau de bord qui me disait si je méritais d'être fatigué. La réponse à l'épuisement est presque toujours la même : trouver une méthode. Et c'est là que tout déraille.03:00 - L'épuisement n'est pas un problème personnel Ce n'est pas parce que vous êtes mal organisé ou pas assez zen. C'est un épuisement systémique, dont nous sommes tous victimes à des degrés divers. L'industrie du développement personnel, 1.500 milliards de dollars, s'est construite exactement sur ce mensonge.05:30 - Pablo Servigne et le chaos comme condition du vivant "L'opposé du chaos, c'est la mort." Si c'est vrai, alors nous ne nous épuisons pas du chaos lui-même, mais de l'énergie colossale que nous dépensons à tenter de le fuir.07:00 - L'amygdale et le lion derrière le rocher Notre cerveau ne distingue pas entre une menace physique et l'incertitude géopolitique, économique ou climatique. Les deux produisent la même mobilisation d'urgence. Répétée sur des années, cette mobilisation s'appelle de l'épuisement.09:00 - L'anxiété cartésienne de Donna Brothers La pensée occidentale a construit un idéal de certitude. Quand on ne le trouve pas, on ne souffre pas de l'incertitude elle-même, mais de la collision entre ce qui est et ce qu'on croit qui devrait être.11:30 - Hartmut Rosa et les trois accélérations Technique, sociale, rythme de vie. Elles se renforcent mutuellement et nous n'avons jamais le temps de nous adapter à l'une avant que la suivante arrive. "On court de plus en plus vite pour rester sur place."16:30 - Le contrat du travail est rompu Pendant les Trente Glorieuses, on doublait son niveau de vie en 15 ans. Aujourd'hui, il faut 84 ans. Deux vies de travail. Ce n'est pas une opinion. C'est la réalité documentée qu'Antoine Foucher résume dans son titre.18:30 - De Foucault à Byung Chul Han : l'auto-exploitation Le passage de "tu dois" à "tu peux" est la mutation la plus insidieuse du système. Nous ne sommes plus soumis à une contrainte externe, mais à une injonction permanente à nous dépasser, au nom de notre liberté.20:00 - Le désir mimétique et Instagram Rousseau l'avait vu avant tout le monde : "on est heureux qu'avant d'être heureux." René Girard a théorisé le reste. Et Instagram est la machine à désir mimétique la plus efficace jamais construite.22:30 - Reed Hastings et le marché de l'attention "Notre plus grand concurrent est le sommeil." Ce marché n'est pas construit sur votre plaisir, mais sur votre peur. Peur de rater, d'être déclassé, d'être moins compétent. Et les médias ont appris à amplifier cette peur parce que ça marche.25:00 - Seuls dans la ville Sherry Turkle, trente ans au MIT : on peut être hyperconnecté et ne jamais vraiment rencontrer personne. Plus une ville est grande, plus elle rend seul. Et chaque interaction avec un inconnu est une donnée qui échappe aux plateformes.27:00 - Le grand mensonge de la productivité L'ennui est biologiquement plus proche de l'énergie que de la léthargie. C'est une émotion fonctionnelle qui prépare le corps à l'action. Remplir chaque vide par une stimulation, c'est se priver de la condition nécessaire à la pensée profonde.29:30 - Olivier Hamant et la robustesse Un arbre ne transforme que 1% de la lumière qu'il capte. Il est en sous-optimal quasi permanent pour pouvoir survivre les jours sans soleil. La nature entière sacrifie la performance pour la robustesse. Notre cerveau aussi.32:00 - Nager en perpendiculaire Résister frontalement épuise. Comme dans une baïne, nager vers la plage est la mauvaise réponse. Nager à la perpendiculaire, c'est aller ni contre ni avec, mais à côté. C'est là que commence la sortie.33:00 - Silence, soutien, sens : trois mouvements latéraux Pas des solutions miracles. Trois directions concrètes pour ne pas se laisser paralyser. Viktor Frankl dans les camps de concentration. Hartmut Rosa et la résonance. Et cette question finale à garder dans un coin de la tête.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Everybody's talking about “justice” right now—social justice, racial justice, climate justice. Your feed is full of call‑outs, hashtags, and hot takes. Modern Social Justice Theory tells you the world is a battlefield of oppressed vs. oppressors, where morality is measured by where you sit on the grid of race, gender, and sexuality. It gives you a language of systems, privilege, microaggressions—and a mission: dismantle power.But there's an older, sharper word sitting on the table: justice in the Bible. Not just “be nice,” not a thin “God loves everybody,” but a thick, demanding vision where God Himself defines right and wrong, defends the poor, confronts the powerful, and calls everyone to account. A justice that sees sin deeper than systems, grace deeper than guilt, and hope bigger than the latest revolution.An Introduction to Foucault's ThoughtDialectic of Enlightenment Enlightenment Now

Why were Laetitia Casta and Aishwarya Rai criticized for their appearance at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?What starts as celebrity gossip quickly becomes a much bigger conversation about beauty standards, aging, body image, and social media. Because the more I looked at the comments coming out of Cannes, the more one question kept nagging at me:Did the tabloids disappear—or did we become them?Are. You. Ready?****************Sources & References:Andrejevic, Mark. iSpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era. University Press of Kansas, 2007.Andrejevic, Mark. Reality TV: The Work of Being Watched. Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. Penguin Books, 1972.Bordo, Susan. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. University of California Press, 1993.Dyer, Richard. Stars. British Film Institute, 1979.Festinger, Leon. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.” Human Relations, vol. 7, no. 2, 1954, pp. 117–140.Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. Vintage Books, 1977.Gamson, Joshua. Claims to Fame: Celebrity in Contemporary America. University of California Press, 1994.Marwick, Alice E. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. Yale University Press, 2013.Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen, vol. 16, no. 3, 1975, pp. 6–18.Senft, Theresa M. Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks. Peter Lang, 2008.Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. William Morrow, 1991.Articles & Reporting:Arieux, Chloe B. “Laetitia Casta : insultes, grossophobie… ce qui s'est passé à Cannes choque.” Public, 29 May 2026.Reporting and commentary covering public reactions to Laetitia Casta and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan during the 2026 Cannes Film Festival, including discussions of ageism, body shaming, beauty standards, and social media scrutiny.****************Leave Us a 5* Rating, it helps the show!Apple Podcast:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/beauty-unlocked-the-podcast/id1522636282Spotify Podcast:https://open.spotify.com/show/37MLxC8eRob1D0ZcgcCorA****************Follow Us on TikTok & Subscribe to our YouTube Channel!YouTube:@beautyunlockedspodcasthourTikTok:tiktok.com/@beautyunlockedthepod****************Intro/Outro Music:“Fame Inc” by Savvier — https://icons8.com/music

durée : 00:30:55 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Albane Penaranda - L'émission "Thèmes et controverses" proposait en 1961, un dialogue captivant entre Michel Foucault et Pierre Sipriot sur la folie et la raison, alors que Foucault publiait "Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique" (1ère diffusion : 20/10/1961 sur France III Nationale). - réalisation : Mathias Le Gargasson, Antoine Dhulster, Rafik Zénine, Vincent Abouchar, Emily Vallat, Hassane M'Béchour, INA Vous aimez ce podcast ? Pour écouter tous les épisodes sans limite, rendez-vous sur Radio France

Gianluca Corrado"De Mente"Filosofia e follia nella disputa tra Michel Foucault e Jacques DerridaEdizioni Studiumwww.edizionistudium.it1961, esce in Francia "Storia della follia" nell'età classica di Michel Foucault. 1963, Jacques Derrida rivolge all'opera critiche affilate. 1972, in occasione della nuova edizione del libro, Foucault replica. 1992, ormai scomparso quest'ultimo, Derrida rivisita l'ambiguo rapporto tra la concezione foucaultiana della follia e la psicoanalisi freudiana.Su queste date si articola il dibattito tra la pionieristica indagine dell'altra faccia della mente – la follia –, svolta dalla "Storia", e i rilievi filosofici mossi da Derrida. Con Cartesio sullo sfondo, in gioco il dovere ma insieme la difficoltà della ragione di misurarsi, arrischiarsi e convalidarsi/invalidarsi con quell'altro da sé che può cercare di capire senza tuttavia poter evadere da se stessa. Un tentativo di dialogo, d'altra parte, quanto mai ineludibile appena ci ricordiamo che la follia non è un'astrazione, ma s'incarna in persone accanto a noi.È necessario riconoscere l'alterità del loro pensiero, senza però estremizzarla in una differenza coi tratti della distanza o, peggio ancora, coi tratti residuali di quelle emarginazioni, espulsioni, segregazioni, relegazioni medicaliste che i matti hanno subìto soprattutto tra il XVII e parte del XIX secolo, l'“età classica” considerata dall'autore.Nel centenario della nascita di Foucault, nato nel 1926 e morto nel 1984, un'occasione per rileggere la sua incisiva visione della "folie" nel confronto più importante che ha avuto.Gianluca Corrado ha pubblicato, tra gli altri, i saggi La follia in scena (2008), Il folle e la società. Il dibattito tra Foucault e Chomsky (2009), Oltre l'indifferenza. Barthes e Derrida (2025), il romanzo La Sapiente (2025), le raccolte di racconti In credito di sole (2022) e Strabismo perfetto e altri racconti (2023).Diventa un supporter di questo podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/il-posto-delle-parole--1487855/support.IL POSTO DELLE PAROLEascoltare fa pensarehttps://ilpostodelleparole.it/

Tous les jours, retrouvez le meilleur des archives de Laurent Gerra en podcast sur RTL.fr, l'application et toutes vos plateformes.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

“O mundo não pode continuar com a política da inimizade.” É desta forma que o Presidente de Cabo Verde enquadra a realização da Cimeira das Nações Crioulas, que decorre entre 28 e 30 de Maio, na cidade da Praia. Numa altura marcada por guerras, intolerância e profundas desigualdades, José Maria Neves defende um novo humanismo assente no diálogo, na cooperação e na valorização das identidades crioulas. O que representa esta Cimeira das Nações Crioulas num momento em que o mundo atravessa tantas tensões e conflitos? Essencialmente, este é um espaço de encontro. Vivemos num mundo disruptivo, de rupturas. Há muitas guerras, muitos confrontos e alguma desumanidade. Nós queremos recuperar a ideia do encontro, do diálogo, da busca de soluções negociadas e da cooperação para o desenvolvimento. As nações crioulas são nações que resultam de encontros entre culturas, entre povos, e mostram que o diálogo é possível. Precisamos de criar um movimento que defenda um novo humanismo. É por isso que estamos a realizar este encontro: para discutirmos, sobretudo, os novos caminhos para o futuro. Quantos países participam nesta primeira cimeira? Estarão presentes mais de três dezenas de países. A sessão de abertura contará com intervenções do secretário-geral das Nações Unidas, António Guterres, do presidente da Aliança das Civilizações, ex-ministro dos Negócios Estrangeiros de Espanha, Miguel Ángel Moratinos e do Presidente de Portugal, António José Seguro, De que forma é que a cooperação entre as nações crioulas pode traduzir-se em ganhos concretos nas áreas da cultura, educação e economia? Nós vamos mostrar a enorme riqueza cultural das nações crioulas e isso contribui não só para o desenvolvimento das economias criativas, mas também para o crescimento económico e para a competitividade dos diferentes espaços. O que se pode ver nas nações crioulas é talento, criatividade, resiliência e uma enorme disponibilidade para as trocas. Ao realizarmos uma cimeira em que mostramos não só o percurso histórico das nações crioulas, mas também toda a sua riqueza cultural, as suas potencialidades económicas e os recursos disponíveis para que as pessoas vivam com mais dignidade, estamos naturalmente a criar uma cultura voltada para o desenvolvimento humano, para o crescimento económico e para o progresso. As línguas crioulas continuam, em muitos casos, a enfrentar dificuldades de reconhecimento institucional. Esta cimeira poderá contribuir para reforçar essa valorização? Espero que sim. No caso de Cabo Verde, o consenso tem sido difícil. Desde a Claridade, ou mesmo antes, com o movimento literário protagonizado, por exemplo, por Pedro Cardoso e Eugénio Tavares, houve um esforço de dignificação do crioulo. Depois, o próprio movimento da Claridade, com Baltasar Lopes da Silva, também ele filólogo, escreveu sobre a língua cabo-verdiana. Há hoje um novo momento de valorização da língua cabo-verdiana. Mas não tem sido fácil alcançar consenso, sobretudo por causa da riqueza do crioulo cabo-verdiano, que assenta na existência de várias variantes. Essa pluralidade dificulta um pouco, pelo menos no plano das ideias, a padronização da língua cabo-verdiana. Mas espero que, com este debate, com este encontro, com as discussões que vão ter lugar e com as perspectivas que se abrem para novos debates e novos temas relacionados com o crioulo, a língua cabo-verdiana possa afirmar-se cada vez mais. Cabo Verde pode afirmar-se como uma referência diplomática e cultural no espaço crioulo internacional? A ideia é precisamente essa: criar um movimento. Um pequeno Estado, como é o caso de Cabo Verde, tem de liderar pelo exemplo. Cabo Verde é um país que tem a ambição de ser útil à comunidade internacional. Nós podemos mostrar que o mundo, quando assente no racismo, na violência e nos confrontos, tem de encontrar novos caminhos. E as nações crioulas mostram um pouco esses caminhos. São povos que vieram de várias origens e que formaram outras culturas, outras nações. Independentemente da violência ou das rupturas iniciais, o importante é o caminho que foi feito no sentido de esses países e dessas nações criarem novas pontes de diálogo e espaços de entendimento. O não-racismo, a não-violência - estes encontros acabam por mostrar que há novas possibilidades, outras formas de viver. Nós podemos olhar para a dignidade da pessoa humana e não assentar o mundo no racismo, na violência, nas guerras e num confronto permanente. Penso que este é o contributo das nações crioulas e Cabo Verde pode liderar esse movimento. Não há alternativa: existem outras formas de viver e outras formas de pensar. A cooperação solidária para o desenvolvimento é possível.  A cimeira surge também como uma mensagem política em defesa do diálogo e da paz? Exactamente. Temos de perceber que não podemos continuar com a política da inimizade. Achille Mbembe escreve precisamente sobre a política da inimizade, que se aproxima, de certa forma, da biopolítica de que fala Foucault. O que queremos aqui é mostrar que é preciso respeitar o outro e abandonar uma perspectiva permanente de intolerância, destruição ou eliminação do outro. Portanto, a amizade, o diálogo, a paz e a cooperação são fundamentais. O que encontramos hoje é uma grande desigualdade nos termos de intercâmbio. Mas devemos construir intercâmbios entre os Estados, entre o Norte e o Sul, em novas bases - bases mais igualitárias, com mais tolerância e com os olhos postos na dignidade da pessoa humana.

Dans l'émission du 27 mai 2026, Marc-Antoine Le Bret a imité Jean-Pierre Foucault, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Cyril Lignac et Chantal Ladesou . Retrouvez tous les jours le meilleur des Grosses Têtes en podcast sur RTL.fr et l'application RTL.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

In this episode, I'm unpacking the history of female body hair removal, the rise of shaving and Brazilian wax culture, and why women are taught to see natural body hair as “gross.”From Ancient Egypt and razor advertising to pornography, patriarchy, and Eurocentric beauty standards, we're digging into how female hairlessness became tied to femininity, desirability, cleanliness, and control. Why is body hair considered masculine on men but unacceptable on women? And why does modern beauty culture reward women for removing visible signs of adulthood from their bodies?Are. You. Ready?****************Sources & References:Attwood, Feona. Mainstreaming Sex: The Sexualization of Western Culture. I.B. Tauris, 2009.Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books, 1995.Gill, Rosalind. Gender and the Media. Polity Press, 2007.Herzig, Rebecca. Plucked: A History of Hair Removal. NYU Press, 2015.Ovid. Ars Amatoria (The Art of Love). Translated by James Michie, Modern Library, 2002.Peiss, Kathy. Hope in a Jar: The Making of America's Beauty Culture. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Strings, Sabrina. Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia. NYU Press, 2019.Tyldesley, Joyce. Nefertiti's Face: The Creation of an Icon. Harvard University Press, 2018.Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. Harper Perennial, 2002.Additional historical and cultural analysis referenced throughout the episode includes studies on Ancient Egyptian beauty and grooming rituals, Islamic hygienic traditions and body hair practices, feminist media theory surrounding bodily surveillance, pornography and beauty culture, beauty labor and gendered self-surveillance, racialized beauty standards, Eurocentric femininity, and contemporary discussions surrounding Brazilian wax culture, “clean girl” aesthetics, and social media beauty trends.****************Leave Us a 5* Rating, it helps the show!Apple Podcast:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/beauty-unlocked-the-podcast/id1522636282Spotify Podcast:https://open.spotify.com/show/37MLxC8eRob1D0ZcgcCorA****************Follow Us on TikTok & Subscribe to our YouTube Channel!YouTube:@beautyunlockedspodcasthourTikTok:tiktok.com/@beautyunlockedthepod****************Intro/Outro Music:“Fame Inc” by Savvier — https://icons8.com/music

Dans l'émission du 27 mai 2026, Marc-Antoine Le Bret a imité Jean-Pierre Foucault, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Cyril Lignac et Chantal Ladesou . Retrouvez tous les jours le meilleur des Grosses Têtes en podcast sur RTL.fr et l'application RTL.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Dans l'émission du 27 mai 2026, Marc-Antoine Le Bret a imité Jean-Pierre Foucault, Jean-Claude Van Damme, Cyril Lignac et Chantal Ladesou . Retrouvez tous les jours le meilleur des Grosses Têtes en podcast sur RTL.fr et l'application RTL.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Ho-fung Hung on the Political Economy of China. Shownotes Ho-fung Hung Prof. Ho-fung Hung at the Johns Hopkins University: https://soc.jhu.edu/directory/ho-fung-hung/ The Conference ‘China and Us: Perspectives on Peace, Human Rights and Socio-Ecological Transformation': https://www.attac.de/china-konferenz/startseite Ho-fung, H. (2015). The China Boom. Why China Will Not Rule the World. Columbia University Press.     https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-china-boom/9780231540223/ on Citic Press:  https://www.group.citic/en/Diversified_Portfolio/New_Consumption/Citic_Publish/ on the 1989 protests in China:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre on the fiscal reform in China in 1994:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax-Sharing_Reform_of_China_in_1994 on Carl Schmitt: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Schmitt https://www.bpb.de/shop/zeitschriften/apuz/archiv/537943/ortung-und-ordnung-carl-schmitt-im-nationalsozialismus/ on Benito Mussolini:  https://www.dhm.de/lemo/biografie/benito-mussolini https://nationalgeographic.de/geschichte-und-kultur/2023/09/benito-mussolini-aufstieg-und-fall-eines-faschistischen-diktators/ the Constitution of the People's Republic of China:  https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/lawsregulations/201911/20/content_WS5ed8856ec6d0b3f0e9499913.html on Foucault's ‘Regime of Truth':  Lorenzini, D. (2015). What is a ‘Regime of Truth'?. Le foucaldien 1(1).  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317961938_What_is_a_Regime_of_Truth the mentioned article by Ho-fung Hung in the Jacobin:  Ho-fung, H. (2023). Mussolini in Beijing. Jacobin.  https://jacobin.com/2023/02/mussolini-in-beijing on China's falling CO2 emissions:  https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-chinas-co2-emissions-have-now-been-flat-or-falling-for-21-months/ on renewable energy in China:  https://www.carbonbrief.org/china-briefing-5-february-2026-clean-energys-share-of-economy-record-renewables-thawing-relations-with-uk/ Ho-fung, H. (2026). The China Question. Eight Centuries of Fantasy and Fear. Cambridge University Press.  https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/china-question/C15B207366F98DC034ED279435A8CCCA on the case of Solyndra: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solyndra on the economic policy of Mao Zedong and China's relationship to the Soviet Union, Felix Wemheuer's youtube channel ‘Studying Maoist China' is recommended:  https://www.youtube.com/@felixwemheuerstudyingmaois1051 on Chile during the Cold War:  Lockhart, J. (2016). Reimagining Chile's Cold War Experience: From the Conflict's Origins to Salvador Allende's Inauguration. University of Arizona.  https://repository.arizona.edu/handle/10150/620841 on Salvador Allende:  www.britannica.com/biography/Salvador-Allende on the Paris Commune: Badiou, A. (2021). The Paris Commune: Marx, Mao, Tomorrow. Monthly Review 73(1).  https://monthlyreview.org/articles/the-paris-commune-marx-mao-tomorrow/ Weber, I. M. (2021). How China Escaped Shock Therapy. The Market Reform Debate. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/How-China-Escaped-Shock-Therapy-The-Market-Reform-Debate/Weber/p/book/9781032008493 the mentioned publication on i.a. guerilla policymaking:  Heilmann, S. & Perry, E. J. (2011). Mao's Invisible Hand. The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China. Harvard University Press.  https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674060630 the quote ‘it's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism' is commonly attributed to Frederic Jameson:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fredric_Jameson on Wolfgang Streeck:  https://www.mpifg.de/457994/Streeck on the 2026 Hungarian parliamentary election:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Hungarian_parliamentary_election Relevant Episodes of Future Histories  S04E02 | Merle Groneweg zu Staatskapitalismus, Ökologie und Klimapolitik in China https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s04/e02-merle-groneweg-zu-staatskapitalismus-oekologie-und-klimapolitik-in-china/ S03E60 | Felix Wemheuer zu unserer Zukunft mit China https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s03/e60-felix-wemheuer-zu-unserer-zukunft-mit-china/ S02E09 | Isabella M. Weber zu Chinas drittem Weg  https://www.futurehistories.today/episoden-blog/s02/e09-isabella-m-weber-zu-chinas-drittem-weg/ Future Histories Contact & Support If you like Future Histories, please consider supporting us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/join/FutureHistories Contact: office@futurehistories.today Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/futurehpodcast/ Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@FutureHistories English webpage: https://futurehistories-international.com   Episode Keywords #Ho-fungHung, #JanGroos, #Interview, #JohnHopkinsUniversity, #FutureHistories, #China, #PoliticalEconomy, #Capitalism, #MarketSocialism, #Socialism, #Mao, #Governmentality, #Democracy, #Imagination, #Society, #Communism, #ClimateChange

What's a recession indicator you've noticed?Lately, one answer keeps resurfacing online: "You can see celebrities' ribs again." And as unserious as that sounds at first, history suggests it may not be entirely wrong.In this episode, I dive into Ozempic, recession aesthetics, quiet luxury, heroin chic, and the return of thinness as a cultural ideal. From celebrity weight loss trends to the politics of appetite, I explore how beauty standards shift during periods of economic anxiety, social instability, and cultural fear- and why women's bodies so often become the place where those anxieties are projected.Are. You. Ready?****************Sources & References: Bordo, Susan. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. University of California Press, 1993.Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice, Harvard University Press, 1984.Debord, Guy. The Society of the Spectacle. Zone Books, 1994.Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books, 1995.Foxcroft, Louise. Calories & Corsets: A History of Dieting Over 2,000 Years. Profile Books, 2011.Rose, Nikolas. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. Free Association Books, 1999.Stearns, Peter N. Fat History: Bodies and Beauty in the Modern West. New York University Press, 2002.Strings, Sabrina. Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia. NYU Press, 2019.Tolentino, Jia. Trick Mirror: Reflections on Self-Delusion. Random House, 2019.Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Oxford University Press, 2007.Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. Harper Perennial, 2002.Additional reporting and cultural analysis referenced throughout the episode includes coverage of Ozempic and Wegovy, celebrity weight loss culture, recession aesthetics, heroin chic and 1990s fashion culture, wellness culture, self-optimization, and digital body surveillance from contemporary journalism, academic commentary, and media analysis.****************Leave Us a 5* Rating, it helps the show!Apple Podcast:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/beauty-unlocked-the-podcast/id1522636282Spotify Podcast:https://open.spotify.com/show/37MLxC8eRob1D0ZcgcCorA****************Follow Us on TikTok & Subscribe to our YouTube Channel!YouTube:@beautyunlockedspodcasthourTikTok:tiktok.com/@beautyunlockedthepod****************Intro/Outro Music:“Fame Inc” by Savvier — https://icons8.com/music

O corpo das mulheres indígenas, quilombolas e negras da Amazônia é o primeiro território de resistência, e a última linha de defesa de um mundo que o capitalismo tenta destruir. No segundo episódio da série Utopias Amazônicas: Conversas com os Autores, recebemos a professora Flávia Marinho Lisbôa, doutora em Letras e Estudos Linguísticos pela UFPA, professora adjunta da Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará, na Faculdade de Educação do Campo, e no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras da UFPA. Autora do livro Racismo Linguístico e os Indígenas Gavião na Universidade: língua como linha de força do dispositivo colonial(EDUFBA, 2022). No livro Utopias Amazônicas, a professora assina o artigo Corpo-Utópico: Território e Dimensões de Gênero na Amazônia, um ensaio que parte de Foucault, atravessa a Amazônia Oriental e chega até os corpos concretos de mulheres que estão, hoje, segurando o céu com as próprias mãos. Conversamos sobre corpo-território, heterotopia, racismo linguístico, o protagonismo político das mulheres amazônidas, e a violência colonial que atinge primeiro os corpos que mais resistem. Utopia não é o lugar que não existe. É o lugar que sempre esteve ao alcance, e onde os povos originários sempre estiveram.

La psychiatrie se présente comme un espace de soin. Mais pour de nombreuses personnes qui en sont revenues, ce qu'elles ont vécu ressemble davantage à une privation de liberté qu'à une thérapie. Chambres d'isolement, hospitalisations sous contrainte, traitements imposés sans consentement — ces pratiques sont légales en France. Et elles continuent.Dans cet épisode, je plonge dans le mouvement pour l'abolition psychiatrique — pas pour dire que la souffrance psychique intense n'existe pas, mais pour poser la question que ce mouvement pose depuis des décennies : est-ce que la coercition peut être du soin ? Je reviens sur les travaux de Tina Minkowitz et sur ce que la Convention des Nations Unies relative aux droits des personnes handicapées dit sur les traitements forcés. J'explore pourquoi la réforme de l'institution — des chambres plus humaines, des durées plus courtes — ne touche pas à ce qui pose problème au fondement. Et surtout, je présente ce qui existe déjà comme alternatives : le modèle Soteria, l'Open Dialogue finlandais, le mouvement Entendre des Voix, les maisons de répit communautaires.Un épisode dense, situé politiquement, qui ne simplifie pas les tensions réelles — parce qu'elles existent — mais qui refuse aussi que ces tensions servent à maintenir le statu quo.Références citées :Minkowitz, T. (2006-2014). Travaux au sein du Comité de la CDPH / Convention relative aux droits des personnes handicapées, Nations Unies. Articles 12 et 14.Foucault, M. (1961). Histoire de la folie à l'âge classique. Gallimard.Mosher, L. R., & Menn, A. Z. (1978). Community residential treatment for schizophrenia: Two-year follow-up data. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 29(11), 715–723.Seikkula, J., & Arnkil, T. E. (2006). Dialogical Meetings in Social Networks. Karnac Books.Romme, M., & Escher, S. (1993). Accepting Voices. Mind Publications.Contrôleur général des lieux de privation de liberté (CGLPL). Rapports annuels sur les établissements psychiatriques. Disponibles sur cglpl.fr.Basaglia, F. (1968). L'institution en négation. Éditions du Seuil.Ben-Moshe, L. (2020). Decarcerating Disability: Deinstitutionalization and Prison Abolition. University of Minnesota Press.Venez continuer la conversation sur @equilibre.therapie.paris — vos expériences, vos réactions, vos questions. Et si cet épisode a résonné, partagez-le à quelqu'un qui en a besoin.abolition psychiatrique, soins communautaires santé mentale, hospitalisation sous contrainte France, alternatives psychiatrie coercitive, Tina Minkowitz CDPH, Open Dialogue Finlande, Soteria maison, chambres isolement psychiatrique, droits patients psychiatriques, Mad Pride France, survivants psychiatrie, désinstitutionnalisation psychiatrie

La question, c'est : est-ce qu'il marche ? Est-ce qu'il flâne ? Est-ce qu'il se promène ou est-ce qu'il vagabonde ? Oui, je viens de refermer le livre d'Edgardo Scott et je m'interroge à son sujet. Né à Buenos Aires en Argentine, il semblerait qu'il soit issu d'une lignée de grands marcheurs, que vous appelez migrants parfois. Il semblerait aussi que lui-même ait été pris de flânerie pour Paris. Avec Edgardo Scott, c'est aussi l'histoire d'un psychanalyste qui fait marcher sa « cabeza », Freud, Lacan, Foucault jamais très loin de sa plume. L'occasion faisant le larron, lorsque vous lirez Du flâneur au vagabond – un essai littéraire sur la marche qu'il publie aux éditions Riveneuve –, vous cheminerez aux côtés d'Edgar Allan Poe, Baudelaire, Walter Benjamin, Cortázar, Borges.  Programmation musicale de l'invité : Edmundo Rivero – « Cuando Me Entres a Fallar »  Aparte – « Summerflight » The Divine Comedy – « To The Rescue »

Ce mercredi 13 mai, Laurent Gerra a imité Phillipe de Villiers, Jean Lassalle, Jean-Pierre Foucault, Patrick Sabatier, Stéphane Collaro et Yves Mourousi. Tous les jours, retrouvez le meilleur de Laurent Gerra en podcast sur RTL.fr, l'application et toutes vos plateformes. Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

On Jürgen Habermas' The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (1985), featuring guest John Ganz.  Habermas defines modernity as Enlightenment ideals, discusses what's wrong with them (subjectivity), how Hegel argues constructively that a social element needs to be added this this, and how many other critics (e.g. Adorno, Nietzsche, and Foucault) instead argue more destructively against Enlightenment values like Truth, liberty, and justice. Get more at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Visit partiallyexaminedlife.com/support to get ad-free episodes and tons of bonus discussion. Sponsors: Check out the Scribe Optimize Workflow AI platform at Scribe.how/PEL. Get a $1/month e-commerce trial at shopify.com/pel.

Hace mucho que no le echamos cuento, así que esta semana nos resarcimos con el Premio de Narrativa Breve Ribera de Duero, que en su novena edición ha distinguido a Sofía Balbuena. La escritora argentina nos presenta Personaje secundario (Ed. Páginas de Espuma), un puñado de historias que bucean en el mundo interior, convulso y secreto de sus protagonistas femeninas.  Luego, Javier Lostalé abre su ventanita a Taller de relojería (Ed. Averso), el nuevo poemario del asturiano Alejandro Céspedes, una de las voces más hondas y singulares de la generación de los ochenta. En su sección, Ignacio Elguero nos recomienda otras lecturas: el segundo volumen de la Narrativa esencial de Ramon J. Sender (Ed. Biblioteca Castro), que recoge tres obras muy reveladoras de la variedad de temas y estilos que manejaba el escritor oscense y Curso de filosofía. De Sócrates a Foucault (Ed. Anagrama), un libro del filósofo, ensayista y crítico literario Dardo Scavino, quien lo concibió inicialmente como una serie documental. Además, Sergio C. Fanjul pone sobre la mesa Un metro cuadrado (Ed. Libros del Asteroide), crónica en primera persona en la que la periodista y escritora mallorquina Llucia Ramis repasa su relación con los pisos que ha habitado a la vez que explora cómo la transformación de la vivienda en producto financiero ha impactado de forma decisiva en nuestra relación con la ciudad. Terminamos Desmontando el poema junto a Mariano Peyrou, que hoy nos habla de Las ilusiones. Poesía 2005-2017 (Ed. Pre-Textos), volumen que recoge los tres primeros poemarios del extremeño Abraham Gragera, un autor de imaginación personalísima y gran hondura emocional que destaca por el rigor con el que trabaja los temas trascendentes.Escuchar audio

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit andrewsullivan.substack.comAdrian is a journalist and an old friend. We arrived in America on the same plane in 1984 and spent the first few days together in the same hotel room. After more than 20 years writing for The Economist, he became the global business columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. He's the author of several books, including The Aristocracy of Talent, and the co-author of many more with John Micklethwait, including The Right Nation. Adrian's new book is The Revolutionary Center: The Lost Genius of Liberalism. It's a terrific tonic for a philosophy as vital as it is in eclipse.For two clips of the episode — on how Enlightenment ideas got corrupted, and Big Tech's threat to liberalism — head to our YouTube page.Other topics: raised in rural Shropshire; his parents both teachers; his dissertation on the 11-plus (an exam that changed my life); when IQ tests were a liberal cause; Luther and the Reformation; the religious civil wars leading to the Enlightenment; Hobbes as a proto-liberal; the humanism of Erasmus; Montesquieu and the spirit of liberalism; John Stuart Mill and utilitarianism; Isaiah Berlin and pluralism; Graham Wallas and the Great Society; Lippmann; Leo Strauss; Thatcherism; consumerism vs. self-improvement; meritocracy threatened by the left; Foucault's folly; the EU and managerial liberalism; Brooks' bobos; affirmative action and DEI; why liberal democracy in Iraq didn't work; Oakeshott; Schmitt and friend-enemy; Trump's stark illiberalism and neo-royalism; King Charles; Putin ushering in a strongman era; Biden's open borders; the migration crisis and Brexit; the buffoonish Boris; the struggling Starmer; high culture and other upsides to elitism; Abundance; Deneen and post-liberalism; and Europe stepping up for Ukraine.Browse the Dishcast archive for an episode you might enjoy. We have some real stars coming up: Ben Rhodes on Iran and speech-writing, Harvey Mansfield on modernity, HW Brands on the life of George Washington, John Gray on Trump's new world, Bob Wright on the evolutionary force of AI, Tiffany Jenkins on privacy in a liberal democracy, Jerusalem Demsas on the state of the left, Daniel McCarthy on conservatism, Stephen Grosz on the struggles of love, and Robby George on pretty much everything. Please send any guest recs, dissents, and other comments to dish@andrewsullivan.com.

Tous les jours, retrouvez le meilleur des archives de Laurent Gerra en podcast sur RTL.fr, l'application et toutes vos plateformes.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

A partir da História da Loucura de Michel Foucault, conversamos sobre o círculo antopolígico, isto é, sobre o pensamento moderno como uma armadilha que, ao tentar compreender o mundo, acaba sempre encontrando um reflexo de homem. Como seria um pensamento que não busca o homem como medida de todas as coisas? É possível escapar dessa dobra onde o sujeito e o objeto se confundem em uma busca incessante por uma "essência" que talvez não passe de uma invenção histórica? Partimos da análise arqueológica para entender que o "fim do homem" não é um apocalipse, mas a condição de possibilidade para que novas formas de vida e novos saberes possam, finalmente, respirar fora do círculo.ParticipantesRafael LauroRafael TrindadeLinksTexto lidoOutros LinksFicha TécnicaCapa: Felipe FrancoEdição: Pedro JanczurAss. Produção: Bru AlmeidaTexto: Rafael LauroGosta do nosso programa?Contribua para que ele continue existindo, seja um assinante!Support the show

Dans l'émission du 29 avril 2026, Marc-Antoine Le Bret a imité Patrick Sébastien, Jean-Pierre Foucault, Kylian Mbappé et Jean-Alphonse Richard ! Retrouvez tous les jours le meilleur des Grosses Têtes en podcast sur RTL.fr et l'application RTL.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Dans l'émission du 29 avril 2026, Marc-Antoine Le Bret a imité Patrick Sébastien, Jean-Pierre Foucault, Kylian Mbappé et Jean-Alphonse Richard ! Retrouvez tous les jours le meilleur des Grosses Têtes en podcast sur RTL.fr et l'application RTL.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Dans l'émission du 27 avril 2026, Marc-Antoine Le Bret a imité Laurent Ruquier, Jean-Pierre Foucault, Arielle Dombasle, Nagui, Julien Doré, Renaud et Matthieu Chedid ! Retrouvez tous les jours le meilleur des Grosses Têtes en podcast sur RTL.fr et l'application RTL.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Dans l'émission du 27 avril 2026, Marc-Antoine Le Bret a imité Laurent Ruquier, Jean-Pierre Foucault, Arielle Dombasle, Nagui, Julien Doré, Renaud et Matthieu Chedid ! Retrouvez tous les jours le meilleur des Grosses Têtes en podcast sur RTL.fr et l'application RTL.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Imagine revelar seu segredo mais sombrio na véspera do casamento. Agora imagine que todos na sala também têm segredos terríveis, mas só você será julgado como monstro. Bem-vindo a O Drama, o filme da A24 que está fazendo plateias saírem do cinema em silêncio constrangedor.Zendaya e Robert Pattinson interpretam um casal aparentemente perfeito cuja vida implode em uma dinâmica de grupo que vira armadilha moral. Mas aqui está a pegadinha de O Drama: por que uma personagem é condenada por um pensamento não executado enquanto outros saem ilesos por ações cruéis reais que machucaram pessoas de verdade? E o que o racismo estrutural tem a ver com isso?Rafael Arinelli, Thiago Muniz e Carissa Vieira destrinçam as camadas deste thriller psicológico de 28 milhões de dólares (que já faturou 81 milhões globalmente). Eles debatem Hannah Arendt e a banalidade do mal, Foucault e o panóptico das redes sociais, e por que um diretor norueguês conseguiu olhar para a "patologia americana" dos tiroteios em massa com uma lucidez brutal.O Drama testa você, não a protagonista. Você vai passar?• 05m44: Pauta Principal• 1h18m25: Plano Detalhe• 1h32m36: EncerramentoOuça nosso Podcast também no:• Spotify: https://cinemacao.short.gy/spotify• Apple Podcast: https://cinemacao.short.gy/apple• Android: https://cinemacao.short.gy/android• Deezer: https://cinemacao.short.gy/deezer• Amazon Music: https://cinemacao.short.gy/amazonAgradecimentos aos padrinhos: • André Marinho Moreira• Bruna Mercer• Charles Calisto Souza• Daniel Barbosa da Silva Feijó• Diego Alves Lima• Eloi Xavier• Guilherme S. Arinelli• Thiago Custodio Coquelet• Wilmar Arinelli Jr• William SaitoFale Conosco:• Email: contato@cinemacao.com• X: https://cinemacao.short.gy/x-cinemacao• BlueSky: https://cinemacao.short.gy/bsky-cinemacao• Facebook: https://cinemacao.short.gy/face-cinemacao• Instagram: https://cinemacao.short.gy/insta-cinemacao• Tiktok: https://cinemacao.short.gy/tiktok-cinemacao• Youtube: https://cinemacao.short.gy/yt-cinemacaoApoie o Cinem(ação)!Apoie o Cinem(ação) e faça parte de um seleto clube de ouvintes privilegiados, desfrutando de inúmeros benefícios! Com uma assinatura a partir de R$30,00, você terá acesso a conteúdo exclusivo e muito mais! Não perca mais tempo, torne-se um apoiador especial do nosso canal! Junte-se a nós para uma experiência cinematográfica única!Plano Detalhe:• (Carissa): Filme: Veneno para as Fadas• (Carissa): Filme: Suspíria• (Carissa): Filme: Exploda Minha Cidade• (Thiago): Filme: Michael• (Rafael): Canal do youtube: SanagoEdição: ISSOaí

The obsession with thinness didn't just appear out of nowhere-and it's not just about beauty, body image, or "health."In this episode, I'm unpacking the deeper history of diet culture, female body standards, and the social conditioning that taught women to shrink themselves-physically, emotionally, and culturally. From historical ideals of discipline and restraint to the racial roots of the modern thin ideal, we're digging into how thinness became tied to morality, self-control, and worth.This is a conversation about appetite, power, control, and the quiet rules women have been taught to follow without ever questioning them.So the real question is... when did thinness stop being about beauty-and start being about obedience?Are. You. Ready?****************Sources & References:Core Books & Foundational TextsWolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth (1991)Bordo, Susan. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body (1993)Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish (1975)Strings, Sabrina. Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia (2019)Historical Context: Appetite, Religion & Discipline“Gluttony.” Encyclopaedia Britannica“How the Seven Deadly Sins Began as ‘Eight Evil Thoughts.'” History.comForcen, Fernando E. “The Practice of Holy Fasting in the Late Middle Ages.” Journal of Religion and Health (2015)Bynum, Caroline Walker. “The Religious Significance of Food to Medieval Women.”Victorian Femininity & Bodily ControlMurray, E. Food and Femininity in Victorian Literature (2022)Coar, L. “Sugar and Spice and All Things Nice: The Victorian Woman's All-Consuming Predicament.”Krondl, M. Fashioning Gendered Appetite in the Victorian Age (2022)“Did Corsets Harm Women's Health?” New York Academy of MedicineRacism, Fatphobia & the Thin IdealStrings, Sabrina. Fearing the Black Body (NYU Press)“How Racism Created the Thin Ideal.” UC Irvine School of Social SciencesReview of Fearing the Black Body. UCLA Center for the Study of WomenWeight Stigma & Social Bias“The Burden of Weight Stigma.” American Psychological Association (2022)“Weight Stigma.” National Eating Disorders AssociationGiel et al. “Weight Bias in Work Settings – A Qualitative Review.”National Academies / NCBI — Weight stigma and labor market outcomesSocial Media, Wellness Culture & Modern ThinnessMunro et al. “Diet Culture on TikTok” (2024)Davis et al. “#WhatIEatInADay on TikTok” (2023)Weber. “TikToxic Effects of ‘That Girl' Content” (2025)Germic. Digital Wellness Culture & Womanhood (2025)“Why ‘Skinny' Culture Is Back.” University of Colorado Anschutz (2026)****************Leave Us a 5* Rating, it helps the show!Apple Podcast:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/beauty-unlocked-the-podcast/id1522636282Spotify Podcast:https://open.spotify.com/show/37MLxC8eRob1D0ZcgcCorA****************Follow Us on TikTok & Subscribe to our YouTube Channel!YouTube:@beautyunlockedspodcasthourTikTok:tiktok.com/@beautyunlockedthepod****************Intro/Outro Music:“Fame Inc” by Savvier — https://icons8.com/music

When the exiled Ayatollah Khomeini received Western media in a small French village in 1978, he sat cross-legged in his robes and black turban under an apple tree in the garden. They described him as “on another planet,” with “eyes of steel,” and compared him to an Eastern sage or ascetic guru. French philosopher Michel Foucault, most famous for his penetrating analysis of power, knowledge (and punitive coercion) was there as well. He called the holy man “an old saint in exile” who had no personal political ambitions. Visiting Iran during the revolution, the philosopher was captivated by what he called a new form of “spiritual politics” that he saw as “advancing toward a luminous and distant point.” Foucault dismissed Iranian feminists who warned of the true dangers of an Islamic state being established once the autocratic king—the Shah—had been overthrown. Today, as the reckless and destructive American and Israeli war against the Iranian regime continues, Julian revisits the political history of Iran and the complex regional power struggles between nationalists, monarchists, communists, and Islamists that played out on the Cold War stage. He examines the connections between the controversial 1953 CIA coup d'etat and the hugely popular 1979 Islamic Revolution, which led to the one-party totalitarian theocracy that dominates the Iranian people to this day. How did so many within Iran and in the West, including the most influential radical philosopher of his time, misperceive Khomeini and his ruthless intentions? Show Notes Foucault: What Are The Iranian's Dreaming About Did Foucault Disregard Iranian Feminists? Dr. Taimur Rahman's Red Star Lectures The CIA Coup That Never Was Iran's Decade of Assassinations Bayandor: Iran and The CIA Foucault's Iranian Folly Foucault and the Question of Orientalism The Shah, by Abbas Milani Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

durée : 01:22:28 - Les Nuits de France Culture - par : Philippe Garbit - EN 1962, le philosophe Michel Foucault proposait une lecture de l'œuvre de Raymond Roussel. Il revenait sur ses techniques d'écriture, analysait les thèmes de ses récits et la place singulière que l'auteur "Locus Solus" et de "La Doublure" occupe dans la littérature française. - réalisation : Virginie Mourthé

In this episode, I explore Richard Rorty's essay “Moral Identity and Private Autonomy” from Essays on Heidegger and Others and think through one of the tensions that has been staying with me lately: how to honor private self-creation without letting it collapse into a form of individualism that forgets public responsibility. I reflect on Rorty's reading of Foucault, his idea of the “knight of autonomy,” and why I find myself deeply resonating with that figure through my own sense of being an otrovert — someone drawn to autonomy, inward authority, and the refusal of borrowed foundations.At the same time, I wrestle with my fear that the private/public distinction can leave democratic life too thin, even as I remain deeply doubtful that a return to shared religious, philosophical, or universal foundations would actually produce the solidarity people imagine. From there, I explore Rorty's provocative suggestion that people can be humane without being universalists, and I consider how art and culture — including the imperfect but moving example of Apple TV's Shrinking — may help create a shared public vocabulary through empathy, grief, failure, and recognition rather than through doctrine or theory.This is an episode about autonomy, democracy, suffering, self-creation, and the difficult task of trying to remain faithful to one's own vocabulary while still taking part in the shared work of making the world more decent for others.

Ce mercredi 8 avril, Laurent Gerra a imité Bernard-Henri Lévy, Jean-Pierre Foucault, Pascal Praud, Gilbert Montagné et Céline Dion. Tous les jours, retrouvez le meilleur de Laurent Gerra en podcast sur RTL.fr, l'application et toutes vos plateformes. Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Jim talks with Jeff Giesea, entrepreneur, writer, and founder of the Boyd Institute, about his essay "Dionysian Futurism" and the broader question of what's missing from our visions of the future. They discuss Nietzsche's Apollo/Dionysus framework from The Birth of Tragedy, the critique that techno-optimist futures are lifeless and sterile, Jim's extension of that critique to Game B and adjacent social change spaces, the distinction between positive Dionysian energy and mere degeneracy, Jim's concept of decadence as wire-heading on dopamine traps and gambling apps, generational decline in conviviality, Gen Z statistics on less sex and fewer dates, the structural economic pressures of student debt and housing unaffordability, the shift in college freshman values away from meaningful philosophy of life toward financial success, the dinner party versus restaurant ratio and what's been lost, the vanished culture of Georgetown dinner salons and political hostesses like Pamela Harriman, the trade-off between women entering the workforce and the loss of socially maintained conviviality infrastructure, the call to bring back the host or hostess curating eight to twelve people around a topic, Jeff's "The Humanities Revolution Has Already Begun" essay and the Kairos Project's decentralized open-source great-books discussion groups, Hannah Arendt's The Human Condition and its relevance to AI and what it means to be human, the tent-revival quality of the new bottom-up humanities movement, Homer and the bards as evidence that great books were never meant only for scholars, Substack as Renaissance Florence, self-gatekeeping around the humanities and the call to read great books at any phase of life, Jim's return to the Iliad and Odyssey and current reading of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, audiobooks and the opportunity to produce better audio versions of copyright-free great works, Foucault as a poisoner of two generations of scholars, the woke turn in university humanities departments and Jacob Savage's essay "The Lost Generation," three drivers of the humanities revolution in pushback against woke academia, digital technology, and AI, AI as a tool for reading difficult books versus the risk of delegating critical thinking, Pirsig's concept of quality as a North Star for deciding when to use AI, taste as the Silicon Valley word for quality, Jeff's "goddamn Boomers" trilogy on the Boomer reckoning and the long Boomer farewell, the Boomer paradox of holding society together while holding it back, the gerontocracy problem of spending six dollars on old people for every one dollar on young people, entitlement spending flowing to the wealthiest demographic, Social Security couples at the top receiving over a hundred thousand dollars a year, California's real estate tax caps and their effect on schools, the political power of older voters and the absence of an AARP for young people, Gen X's failure to produce a presidential contender, Don Draper in Mad Men as a hinge figure between Greatest Generation and Boomer values, Boomer narcissism versus Gen X grandiosity, Jim's reframe of the core Boomer failing as hyper-individualism rather than narcissism, and much more. Episode Transcript "Dionysian Futurism," by Jeff Giesea The Boyd Institute Jeff Giesea (Twitter) "The Lost Generation," by Jacob Savage "The Boomer Reckoning No One's Ready For," by Jeff Giesea "Boomer Caregiving Will Wreck Our Politics," by Jeff Giesea "The Long Boomer Farewell," by Jeff Giesea "The Broligarchy Will Either Save the World or Destroy It," by Jeff Giesea Jeff Giesea is an entrepreneur, investor, and writer. A Stanford graduate, he has built several successful businesses and recently founded the Boyd Institute, a policy lab for America's future. You can read his essays on his Substack.

Tous les jours, retrouvez le meilleur des archives de Laurent Gerra en podcast sur RTL.fr, l'application et toutes vos plateformes.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

Enroll in classes now: https://www.acidhorizonpodcast.com/ahrc-coursesSubcribe to LEPHT HAND: https://www.patreon.com/LEPHTHANDWhat if the psychedelic revolution in end-of-life care is less a liberation from the medicalization of death than its most seductive intensification? In this crossover episode of LEPHT HAND and Acid Horizon, SEREPTIE and Emma are joined by anthropologist Sujit Thomas, whose research on psychedelic thanatology cuts through therapeutic optimism to ask harder questions about pastoral power, metaphysical belief shift, and the commodification of mystical experience. Drawing on Foucault, Deleuze, and Nietzsche, the conversation moves from authentic dying to the death transcendence scale and Huxley's heroic final dose — asking whether the good death being marketed to us is really a pacification of the excess and irrationality that makes life worth affirming.Letheby paper: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12152-024-09564-3Sujit Thomas:https://as.nyu.edu/departments/anthropology/graduate/alumni/doctoral-alumni/thomas-sujit.html?challenge=d06e90d7-4d8f-4b88-9d8c-10b73beb60f1Support the showSupport the podcast:AHRCCurrent classes at Acid Horizon Research Commons (AHRC): acidhorizonresearchcommons.comAHRC Course Archive: https://www.acidhorizonpodcast.com/ahrc-course-archivesSubmit your course proposal: acidhorizonresearchcommons@gmail.comMore LinksWebsite: https://www.acidhorizonpodcast.com/Linktree: https://linktr.ee/acidhorizonAcid Horizon on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/acidhorizonpodcastBoycott Watkins Media: https://xenogothic.com/2025/03/17/boycott-watkins-statement/Subscribe to us on your favorite podcast: https://pod.link/1512615438Merch: http://www.crit-drip.comSubscribe to us on your favorite podcast platform: https://pod.link/1512615438LEPHT HAND: https://www.patreon.com/LEPHTHANDHappy Hour at Hippel's (Adam's blog): https://happyhourathippels.wordpress.com​Split Infinities (Craig's Substack): https://splitinfinities.substack.com/​Music: https://sereptie.bandcamp.com/ and https://thecominginsurrection.bandcamp.com/

Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by Mark Pennington This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from within the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault's ideas and those of a neglected 'post-modern' stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic 'scientism' and 'expert rule'; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of 'self-creation' in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.Part two combines the tools of Foucault's critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping 'bio-political' or 'pastoral' dispositifs in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic 'creative destruction' that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral dispositifs that seek to 'monitor and correct' multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King's College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King's he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science. Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/new-books-network

Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by Mark Pennington This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from within the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault's ideas and those of a neglected 'post-modern' stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic 'scientism' and 'expert rule'; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of 'self-creation' in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.Part two combines the tools of Foucault's critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping 'bio-political' or 'pastoral' dispositifs in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic 'creative destruction' that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral dispositifs that seek to 'monitor and correct' multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King's College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King's he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science. Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/political-science

Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by Mark Pennington This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from within the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault's ideas and those of a neglected 'post-modern' stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic 'scientism' and 'expert rule'; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of 'self-creation' in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.Part two combines the tools of Foucault's critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping 'bio-political' or 'pastoral' dispositifs in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic 'creative destruction' that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral dispositifs that seek to 'monitor and correct' multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King's College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King's he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science. Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/critical-theory

Foucault and Liberal Political Economy: Power, Knowledge, and Freedom by Mark Pennington This highly original and innovative book is the first to comprehensively engage the ideas of the French social theorist and philosopher Michel Foucault from within the tradition of liberal political economy. Divided into two parts the book commences by demonstrating important commonalities between Foucault's ideas and those of a neglected 'post-modern' stream in liberal political and economic thought. These ideas draw on a social theory emphasising a culturally situated individualism; a philosophy of science highly critical of socio-economic 'scientism' and 'expert rule'; and an understanding of freedom as an open-ended process of 'self-creation' in the face of cultural power relations—a freedom threatened by alignments between state power and more decentred manifestations of power.Part two combines the tools of Foucault's critical social theory with those of a post-modern liberalism to problematise four separate though overlapping 'bio-political' or 'pastoral' dispositifs in contemporary liberal societies focused on social justice, public health, ecological sustainability, and law and order. Where the Foucauldian and the post-modern liberal approaches suggest that freedom requires a cultural and economic 'creative destruction' that destabilises existing modes of thought and ways of being, the pastoral dispositifs that seek to 'monitor and correct' multiple pattern anomalies are shown to stifle the space for that creative freedom.Though the book does not engage the question of whether Foucault himself moved towards endorsing liberal political economy, it throws considerable light on how key Foucauldian concerns may be addressed within the liberal tradition, and why Foucauldians may have reason to embrace a reconstituted or post-modern liberalism Mark Pennington has been Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy in the Department of Political Economy, King's College, University of London, since 2012, and is currently Director of the Centre for the Study of Governance and Society. Prior to King's he taught for twelve years in the Department of Politics and International Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. He has a PhD from the London School of Economics and Political Science. Morteza Hajizadeh is a Ph.D. graduate in English from the University of Auckland in New Zealand. His research interests are Cultural Studies; Critical Theory; Environmental History; Medieval (Intellectual) History; Gothic Studies; 18th and 19th Century British Literature. YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/a48266/videos Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/intellectual-history

Thank you to BRITA for supporting the podcast, helping us keep our deep dives going, and, of course, keeping us hydrated!Check out BRITA here: ⁠https://www.brita.com.au/This episode explores if accountability can actually be enforced online. From Couch Guy to the Coldplay CEO scandal to various celebrity scandals, we break down how accountability culture has evolved into a tool for public shaming, who bears the heaviest burden of that shame, and why the people causing the most harm are often the least likely to face consequences. Join our Patreon here!!! https://www.patreon.com/c/CentennialWorld/Please consider buying us a coffee or subscribing to a membership to help keep Centennial World's weekly podcasts going! Every single dollar goes back into this business

Show Notes This week on MSB we cover G Gundam Episode 5 and a shocking revelation about how Rain got her position on Team Neo Japan, the cunningly-disguised real inspiration for Argo's prison, Foucault's Gundam Fight, a reasonable critique of Domon's problem solving methods, and much more. Ready? Go! Mobile Suit Breakdown is written, recorded, and produced within Lenapehoking, the ancestral and unceded homeland of the Lenape, or Delaware, people. Before European settlers forced them to move west, the Lenape lived in New York City, New Jersey, and portions of New York State, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Connecticut. Lenapehoking is still the homeland of the Lenape diaspora, which includes communities living in Oklahoma, Wisconsin, and Ontario. You can learn more about Lenapehoking, the Lenape people, and ongoing efforts to honor the relationship between the land and indigenous peoples by visiting the websites of the Delaware Tribe and the Manhattan-based Lenape Center. Listeners in the Americas and Oceania can learn more about the indigenous people of your area at https://native-land.ca/. We would like to thank The Lenape Center for guiding us in creating this living land acknowledgment. You can subscribe to Mobile Suit Breakdown for free! on fine Podcast services everywhere and on YouTube, visit our website GundamPodcast.com, follow us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook, or email your questions, comments, and complaints to gundampodcast@gmail.com. Mobile Suit Breakdown wouldn't exist without the support of our fans and Patrons! You can join our Patreon to support the podcast and enjoy bonus episodes, extra out-takes, behind-the-scenes photos and video, MSB gear, and much more! The intro music is WASP by Misha Dioxin, the recap music Window by 1000 Handz, and the outro is Long Way Home by Spinning Ratio, all licensed under Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 licenses. All music used in the podcast has been edited to fit the text. Mobile Suit Breakdown provides critical commentary and is protected by the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright law. Gundam content is copyright and/or trademark of Sunrise Inc., Bandai, Sotsu Agency, or its original creator. Mobile Suit Breakdown is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Sunrise, Bandai, Sotsu, or any of their subsidiaries, employees, or associates and makes no claim to own Gundam or any of the copyrights or trademarks related to it. Copyrighted content used in Mobile Suit Breakdown is used in accordance with the Fair Use clause of the United States Copyright law. Any queries should be directed to gundampodcast@gmail.comRead transcript

Tous les jours, retrouvez le meilleur des archives de Laurent Gerra en podcast sur RTL.fr, l'application et toutes vos plateformes.Hébergé par Audiomeans. Visitez audiomeans.fr/politique-de-confidentialite pour plus d'informations.

  In the final installment of Binchtopia's two-part reality TV series, Allegra returns to dissect the inner workings behind the spectacle. The girlies unpack the psychological profiling of contestants, examine why so few stars ever escape the system that made them, and consider what happens when your mental breakdown becomes public entertainment. Digressions include a medical emergency induced by Tinsley Mortimer, Mary Cosby's Mother God arc, and seeking justice for Disney adults. Check out Allegra's radio show here: https://kpiss.fm/show/reverse-library/ This episode was produced by Julia Hava and Kylie Finnigan and edited by Livi Burdette. To support the podcast on Patreon and access 50+ bonus episodes, mediasodes, and more, visit patreon.com/binchtopia and become a patron today. SOURCES  Cue the Sun! By Emily Nussbaum Everything old is new again: reality television celebrity, the Hollywood studio system, and the battle for control of one's image 'For the first time in ________ history…': microcelebrity and/as historicity in reality TV competitions How Love Island Became a TV Reality of Sex, Fame, and Sometimes Tragedy Meet the psychologist who helped cast your favorite reality TV villains and heroes  Modern Voyeurism: How the Reality TV Boom Is Affecting Our Mental Health   Reality Check: A Qualitative Study of Mental Well-Being Among Participants  Reality Television as a Model for Online Behavior: Blogging, Photo, and Video Sharing  Reality TV : audiences and popular factual television  Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age The Dark Side of "Reality TV": Professional Ethics and the Treatment of "Reality"-Show Participants  The Evolution of Foucault's Utopic Panopticon The harsh reality of Reality TV and mental health  The Presentation Of Self In Everyday Life by Erving Goffman The Psychological Impact of Reality TV: Exploring Viewer Responses through Cognitive Appraisal Theory The Reality-TV Confessional Shaped Our Digital Lives Uncomfortable Television by Hunter Hargraves Why Aren't We Outraged by Psych Evaluations for Reality TV?.