Podcasts about Project Debater

Hoy conversé con Carlos Alzate, CTO del AI Fund, un venture studio fundado por Andrew Ng que construye e invierte en startups de inteligencia artificial.Carlos tiene +20 años de experiencia, un Doctorado en IA y anteriormente trabajó en IBM Research donde participó en algunos proyectos pioneros en IA como Project Debater y Watson.-Por favor ayúdame dejando una reseña en Spotify o Apple Podcasts: https://ratethispodcast.com/startupeable-AI Fund ha levantado $175M y a la fecha han invertido en +30 startups incluidas: 10Web, Baseten y Podcastle.Hoy Carlos y yo hablamos sobre:Por qué la IA debe ser el "último recurso" para resolver problemasCómo evaluar si un "wrapper de ChatGPT" realmente aporta valorLa importancia de los datos propietarios como ventaja competitivaEl concepto de "human in the loop" para sistemas de IA efectivosLos desafíos únicos para la adopción de IA en LatinoaméricaNotas del episodio: https://startupeable.com/ai-fundPara más contenido síguenos en:YouTube  | Sitio Web -Distribuido por Genuina Media

The Sunday Times' tech correspondent Danny Fortson brings on Ranit Aharonov to talk about this moment for artificial intelligence (3:15), studying the brain (6:30), Project Debater (8:30), neural networks (11:30), language's AlphaGo moment (14:50), the big idea at Pangea (19:20), getting it into the hands of doctors and drug communities (23:25), the role of AI in this tool (26:15), the regulatory limits (32:15), and why she didn't debate the AI she created (37:25). Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sinds 1950 is IBM al bezig met kunstmatige intelligentie en is terug te lezen in onder andere Georgetown Experiment waarbij in 1954 al een automatisch vertaling werd gedaan van Russisch naar Engels, Deep Blue waarbij een schaakkampioen voor het eerst verslagen werd door een computer, Jeopardy Game Show waar een computer als winnaar uit kwam en als laatste Project Debater welke in staat is om een debat aan te gaan en volledig te onderbouwen. Tegenwoordig zien we kunstmatige intelligentie overal om ons heen. Als we kijken naar de zoekmachines, spam filters, fraude detectie, dan zien we dat ze allemaal gebruik maken van taaltechnologie. De modellen worden steeds complexer en de antwoorden klinken steeds menselijker. Vandaag aan tafel Joost Vos, technisch specialist in Natural Language Processing. We gaan samen dieper in op taaltechnologie zoals Watson Assistant en Watson Discovery. Natuurlijk hebben we het ook even over Watson vs ChatGPT :) Show Notes:IBM i bestaat 35 jaar: https://comeur.org/common-europe-congress-2023/SAP en Watson AI: https://newsroom.ibm.com/2023-05-02-SAP-to-Embed-IBM-Watson-Artificial-Intelligence-into-SAP-R-SolutionsIBM Technology YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbUIGSMf7HkSmart Talks with IBM Podcast: https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/smart/talks/Watson AI, Jeopardy Spel Show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI-M7O_bRNgGeorgetown IBM Experiment: https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/701/701_translator.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgetown–IBM_experimentWatson Assistant: https://www.ibm.com/products/watson-assistantWatson Discovery: https://www.ibm.com/cloud/watson-discoveryWatson Libraries: Embeddable AI: https://developer.ibm.com/technologies/embeddable-ai/IBM Project Debater: https://research.ibm.com/interactive/project-debater/Innovative Woo-tooling dankzij AI: https://you-get.com/open-overheid-woo/Gebruikte afkorting(en):NLP: Natural Language ProcessingAI: Artificial IntelligenceML: Machine LearningAVG: Algemene Verordening GegevensbeschermingWOB (verzoek): Wet Openbaarheid van BestuurWOO (verzoek): Wet Open OverheidOp- en aanmerkingen kunnen gestuurd worden naar: ofjestoptdestekkererin@nl.ibm.com

Deze episode neemt jullie mee in de gesproken shownotes van de vorige aflevering. Joost Vos heeft een website online gezet waar alle taaltechnieken vanuit IBM bij elkaar zijn geplaatst. Joost neemt ons mee in deze website en legt kort uit welke taaltechnieken er zijn ontstaan en waarom ze bijzonder zijn. Denk o.a. aan Georgetown Experiment, The Shoebox, Speech Recognition Computer, ViaVoice, BLEU, Jeopardy!, Project Debater, Deep Blue. De website is hier te vinden: https://application-94.10p0w8p3t3gi.eu-de.codeengine.appdomain.cloudOp- en aanmerkingen kunnen gestuurd worden naar: ofjestoptdestekkererin@nl.ibm.com

Clea is the CEO of Intelligence Squared US Debates (IQ2US), a nonprofit organization that organizes Oxford-style debates that cover provocative topics such as whether a confrontation with Russia is worth it and if we should use gene editing to make better babies. Debaters get to make their case before an audience, which then votes on who has been the most persuasive. IQ2US has organized over 185 debates that have reached millions of people through their multi-platform distribution network which includes over 230 public radio stations, TV networks, and their podcast, which has over 4 million downloads. Their debate series has won multiple awards, including five Telly Awards in 2021. Clea has also won multiple awards for her work in politics and public affairs radio and television programming, including eight Telly Awards, seven Clarion Awards for Women in Communications, and Crain's New York 40 Under 40 in 2018. She developed “Up For Debate” and “That's Debatable” as TV programs for Bloomberg, PBS, and Newsy. Clea also produced the first debate between artificial intelligence and a human debater in partnership with IBM's historic Project Debater. Social Media Links: https://www.facebook.com/IQ2US/ https://twitter.com/IQ2US https://www.youtube.com/user/IntelligenceSquared https://www.instagram.com/intelligencesquaredus/ Podcast:   Intelligence Squared U.S.:https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/intelligence-squared-u-s-debates/id216713308  

Clea Conner is a media executive with 15 years of experience producing high-quality intellectual discourse for a range of distribution platforms. As Intelligence Squared's first CEO, Clea is responsible for leading growth, programming, and strategy for the nation's premier debate platform. Clea developed “Up For Debate” and “That's Debatable” as television programs on Bloomberg, PBS, and Newsy and produced the first debate between artificial intelligence and a human debater in partnership with IBM's historic Project Debater. She holds eight Telly Awards for outstanding video and television programming in politics and public affairs, seven Clarion Awards for Women in Communications, and has received serial New York Festival awards for Best Public Affairs Programming.Named one of Crain's New York “40 Under 40,” Clea served as Strategic Advisor to GZERO Media among other media and technology startups. She led national marketing campaigns for best-selling authors, journalists, and public officials at Greater Talent Network, a celebrity speakers bureau. She also managed direct marketing campaigns for BMG/Columbia House among other direct-to-consumer brands, and launched public affairs campaigns for The Center for Arts Education. Clea holds a dual concentration B.A. from The New School and studied political science at American University in Washington, D.C. A classically trained flutist, she performs with chamber music societies in New York City and has recorded original compositions for documentary films.Learn more: https://www.intelligencesquaredus.orgInfluential Entrepreneurs with Mike Saundershttps://businessinnovatorsradio.com/influential-entrepreneurs-with-mike-saunders/Source: https://businessinnovatorsradio.com/interview-with-clea-conner-ceo-of-intelligence-squared

Clea Conner is a media executive with 15 years of experience producing high-quality intellectual discourse for a range of distribution platforms. As Intelligence Squared's first CEO, Clea is responsible for leading growth, programming, and strategy for the nation's premier debate platform. Clea developed “Up For Debate” and “That's Debatable” as television programs on Bloomberg, PBS, and Newsy and produced the first debate between artificial intelligence and a human debater in partnership with IBM's historic Project Debater. She holds eight Telly Awards for outstanding video and television programming in politics and public affairs, seven Clarion Awards for Women in Communications, and has received serial New York Festival awards for Best Public Affairs Programming.Named one of Crain's New York “40 Under 40,” Clea served as Strategic Advisor to GZERO Media among other media and technology startups. She led national marketing campaigns for best-selling authors, journalists, and public officials at Greater Talent Network, a celebrity speakers bureau. She also managed direct marketing campaigns for BMG/Columbia House among other direct-to-consumer brands, and launched public affairs campaigns for The Center for Arts Education. Clea holds a dual concentration B.A. from The New School and studied political science at American University in Washington, D.C. A classically trained flutist, she performs with chamber music societies in New York City and has recorded original compositions for documentary films.Learn more: https://www.intelligencesquaredus.orgInfluential Entrepreneurs with Mike Saundershttps://businessinnovatorsradio.com/influential-entrepreneurs-with-mike-saunders/Source: https://businessinnovatorsradio.com/interview-with-clea-conner-ceo-of-intelligence-squared

This episode follows up on the previous episode of Opinion Science about IBM's Project Debater. If you haven't already, be sure to check out that episode.But this week we hear more from Harish Natarajan, Dan Zafrir, and Noa Ovadia--three accomplished debaters. They'll share how they got into debate, what debate means to them, and why the exercise of debate is so important.In the opening section of the episode, we hear a quick clip from social psychologist Richard Petty. And the study I summarize is from a working paper by Peter Schwardmann, Egon Tripodi, and Joël J. van der Weele.Music in this episode by Blue Dot Sessions (www.sessions.blue).For a transcript of this episode, visit: http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/episode/debate-with-harish-natarajan-dan-zafrir-noa-ovadia/Check out my new audio course on Knowable: "The Science of Persuasion."Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.

In 2019, IBM introduced the world to Project Debater: an AI system that could go up against humans to debate anything. In this episode, we trace Project Debater's growth from just an idea to a fully fledged piece of technology and the public debates it's engaged in. And it raises a bigger question…is persuasion a fundamentally human ability or is it really something that machines are capable of?We hear from IBM engineer and project leaders Noam Slonim, expert debaters Harish Natarajan, Dan Zafrir, and Noa Ovadia, communication neuroscientist Elisa Baek, and best-selling author Daniel Pink.To learn more about Project Debater, visit IBM's Project Debater website and watch this great mini documentary about the system.  Clips from IBM events were made available by IBM and are licensed creative commons. Check out my new audio course on Knowable: "The Science of Persuasion."Learn more about Opinion Science at http://opinionsciencepodcast.com/ and follow @OpinionSciPod on Twitter.

Why are debates essential for you in life and business?Today, Clea Conner, CEO of Intelligence Squared US Debates, joins A.J. to discuss what makes an intelligent debate and how it offers a structured format for your ideas and arguments. In addition, they discuss beginner's mindset and incremental experimentation as skills to continually lead and grow your company and see why debates are an excellent means to drive innovation in business.Tune in to this episode to learn about the power of intelligent debating. About our guest:Clea Conner is the first and current CEO of Intelligence Squared US Debates, a nonprofit organization that promotes healthy debates in the media today. She developed "Up For Debate" and "That's Debatable" as television programs on Bloomberg, PBS, and Newsy and produced the first debate between artificial intelligence and a human debater in partnership with IBM's historic Project Debater. Clea also holds multiple awards for her outstanding achievements, including eight Telly Awards, seven Clarion Awards for Women in Communications, serial New York Festival awards for Best Public Affairs Programming, and one of Crain's New York "40 Under 40".On today's episode: Meet Clea Conner, CEO at Intelligence Squared US Debates - 00:44 How a beginner's mindset could help you in your entrepreneurial journey (and how it allows Clea to feel 20 years new in her career) - 02:42 Clea on how Intelligence Squared promotes structured, healthy debates and opinions - 04:41 Clea on why it's hard to make people stick to a debate structure when they have the freedom of belief - 08:58 How to use distribution partners for broader debates - 12:13 How to grow yourself as an entrepreneur leading a small, tight-knit team - 17:49 What is incremental experimentation? How did it help Clea reach 50 million people through direct mail marketing? - 22:12 How Intelligence Squared keeps away provocative debating and provides a structured format to the debaters' ideas and arguments - 25:12 The role of advocacy groups and invested audiences in positively amplifying a cause or subject - 34:23 How Intelligence Squared uses motion language, framing, and research to prevent debates from becoming aggressive or unhealthy - 36:11 How to view success as delivering quality performance (and how Clea achieves the same) - 38:54 How debating helps entrepreneurs develop open-mindedness and drive innovation - 43:55 Key Takeaways: Having a beginner's mindset can help you continually adapt to changes and fuel your company's growth. It also nurtures learning and keeps innovation alive. It is possible to disagree without being disagreeable. Debates are, in fact, a way of listening to both sides of a topic and evaluating your agreements and disagreements. Amplification of opinions occurs when people are the most curious about a subject and open to hearing something new. To help your message reach larger audiences, engage with audiences most suitably and efficiently. Incremental experimentation can significantly increase your chances of success as a marketing professional. You start with what you know and continue developing and building on using channels that generate a response from newer audiences. Debates are a healthy way to broaden your views, collect and evaluate public opinions, and give a structured format to ideas and arguments. It helps you learn new perspectives and rethink where you stand as an individual.  Is there a right way to amplify opinions?[14:00] “Amplification is really about capturing people when they are most open to hearing something new, and when they're most interested and curious, and that's not a formula that any media company has perfected.”What are your views on intelligent debating? Let us know what role debates play in your business and how you make sure that all opinions are heard, and don't forget to say hello if you would like to share your entrepreneurship story on our podcast. Connect with Clea Conner: LinkedIn: @Clea Conner Website: https://intelligencesquaredus.org/ Twitter: @Clea Conner Facebook: @clea.conner Podcast: Intelligence Squared US Debates Podcast Follow Beyond 8 Figures: Website:  Beyond8Figures.com Twitter:  @beyond8figures  Facebook: Beyond 8 Figures Instagram:@b8fpodcast Email: team@b8fpodcast.com Connect with Insights Lab:  Website: https://insightslab.ai/  Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheInsightsLab/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/insightslab.ai/ Email: weare@insightslab.ai  LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/insightslab-ai/ 

Wat is IBM Z Xplore? En wat doet IBM met een project zoals Debater? Sophie Kuijt, CTO voor IBM Services neemt ons mee in de wereld van data en ethiek.  Show notes:Master the Mainframe / IBM Z Xplore: https://www.ibm.com/it-infrastructure/z/education/zxplore Project Debater: https://research.ibm.com/interactive/project-debater/ AI fundamentals and Team Essentials for AI Badge: https://www.ibm.com/design/ai/https://www.ibm.com/design/thinking/page/courses/AI_EssentialsAI Ethics: https://www.ibm.com/artificial-intelligence/ethicsAI Research - Trusting AI: https://www.research.ibm.com/artificial-intelligence/trusted-ai/IBM Policy Lab: https://www.ibm.com/policy/policylab/IBM Technology CloudPak for Data: https://www.ibm.com/blogs/journey-to-ai/page/28/IBM Technology Watson OpenScale: https://www.ibm.com/cloud/watson-openscale IBM Cloud en AI: https://www.ibm.com/cloud/aiHeb je een vraag, opmerking, suggestie of wil je iets anders met ons delen? Stuur een email naar ofjestoptdestekkererin@nl.ibm.com

Chris Bouldin joins the podcast this week. We discuss, randomness, the singularity of technology, are we the new Luddites? IBM's Project Debater and of course, COVID.

Artificial Intelligence is expected by many to be the next great step in evolution. That people are on the verge of giving birth to a higher form of life. Given the massive processing power of computers and how they can solve a number of problems faster, much faster than we possibly can, it's easy to see why. After all, they don't have our emotions, our baggage, our biases, they just process information. They are pure logic and that's it. What could be better than to have AI of the future be an integral part of, or even the sole part of making decisions for society? Other than the obvious jokes about building the Matrix, Skynet, Ultron, and I Robot, are these assumptions even accurate? Are computers and thus AI as perfect as they seem?  In a way, yes they are. They perfectly do whatever they are told however they are told to do it. Any error is an error with their coding. But that also means a computer will often have something of the biases of their designers and programmers hardwired into them. Unless we can somehow get them to really learn, to question what they know, or pursue knowledge outside their programming, they won't be able to self-correct on the scale humans do.  It also seems to be the case that AI lacks something that is present in humans, even in something as logically based (one hopes) as a formal debate. Back in 2019, IBM decided to test its newest AI at the Think 2019 conference. They put Project Debater (the apt if the unimaginative name of the computer) up against debate champion Harish Natarajan with an audience of hundreds. The audience gave the victory to Natarajan, adding to Project Debater's mixed record in competing with humans in the argumentation space. Yes, mixed. It has managed to win a few times. But again, at this point, it seems as if the AI should easily win every time. So why doesn't it? That's the real billion-dollar question. Some would certainly say that we just have to get better at teaching it how to cross-reference information, to find a way for computers to recognize tangents off of primary subjects in order to follow and learn about them, mimicking human curiosity. Yet, it would still be mimicking. There is an alternative theory. It's a fact that the human brain has immense processing capacity. If we could direct it in a controlled and linear fashion as a computer, our brains would always beat the snot out of Project Debater, just based on the raw potential. Yet, for all but a few prodigies, that simply isn't the case. The reason may lie in what comes along with real intelligence – self-awareness, self-consciousness, emotions, the very ability to wonder why, and finally the ability to perceive and realize there are parts of reality that are beyond our grasp. That is, we can deduce the idea of an eleven-dimensional universe but can't actually imagine what it is like. Perhaps all of these marks of human intelligence are what seem to bog down our processing ability. Maybe it really isn't bogging things down, maybe all of these are as essential to navigating reality as solving equations and collating data points. Maybe it is exactly these things that allow us to act with compassion, to be altruistic, rather than weighing everything as a cost-benefit analysis.  In this view, the computer doesn't just become a fast-thinking, more logical human when the intelligence stops being artificial and becomes real. Instead, the AI becomes real intelligence and would suddenly find itself bogged down with all the same burdens we are. In fact, given the complexity of the human brain versus that of a computer, it might actually be slower than us.  That doesn't mean there is no role for AI in our decision-making processes. We can still put data into programs and have them run important simulations, predicting the different effects of policies or inventions on society. Not that the resulting conclusions should be followed blindly. That would be the same as putting them in charge. However, they can be valuable tools, if given the right programming and the right data.  What's your data worth? www.tartle.co   Tcast is brought to you by TARTLE. A global personal data marketplace that allows users to sell their personal information anonymously when they want to, while allowing buyers to access clean ready to analyze data sets on digital identities from all across the globe.   The show is hosted by Co-Founder and Source Data Pioneer Alexander McCaig and Head of Conscious Marketing Jason Rigby.   What's your data worth?   Find out at: https://tartle.co/   YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/TARTLE   Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TARTLEofficial/   Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tartle_official/   Twitter: https://twitter.com/TARTLEofficial   Spread the word!

Today we're joined by Noam Slonim, the principal investigator of Project Debater at IBM Research.  In our conversation with Noam, we explore the history of Project Debater, the first AI system that can “debate” humans on complex topics. We also dig into the evolution of the project, which is the culmination of 7 years and over 50 research papers, and eventually becoming a Nature cover paper, “An Autonomous Debating System,” which details the system in its entirety.  Finally, Noam details many of the underlying capabilities of Debater, including the relationship between systems preparation and training, evidence detection, detecting the quality of arguments, narrative generation, the use of conventional NLP methods like entity linking, and much more. The complete show notes for this episode can be found at twimlai.com/go/495.

We live in a world of unbridled technological and argumentative advancement. A.I. has learned to debate Thanksgiving-table politics against humans. People may soon be using “argument checks” as well as “grammar checks” on their smartphones. Cats and dogs have finally put aside their differences and learned to live in peace by forming a coalition against postal workers. Welcome to the future.Whether this sounds like an irenic utopian ideal or an Orwellian dystopia to you, it is the subject of today's episode! In the first installment of our newest re:joinder series, Disciplining Disciplinary Boundaries, we take aim at an article that feels designed to make humanists pull their hair out: Benjamin Wallace-Wells's “The Limits of Political Debate,” published in The New Yorker. This article tells the story of Project Debater, an artificial intelligence designed to compete in political debate competitions against humans using mountains of empirical evidence and “fifty to seventy” prefabricated argument structures. As we read through the dramatic tale of P.D.'s inception to it's first high-profile defeat in public debate by Harish Natarajan in 2019, we discuss the way that science journalists (and scientists themselves) make strange and fascinating assumptions about the humanities.We also frame our reading of the article with two critical pieces of rhetoric scholarship that help illuminate its various rhetorical pitfalls and spurious assumptions. Jeanne Fahnestock's 1986 classic “Accommodating Science” lays the groundwork for studying science journalism by taxonomizing some typical rhetorical appeals and information transformations journalists use to make hard science more appealing for public audiences (e.g. sacrificing technical details at the expense of telling a dramatic narrative of “discovery”). Finally, we end with Carolyn Miller's 2007 article “What can automation teach us about agency,” and reflect upon the ways that A.I. can only have rhetorical agency if an audience attributes it. This article helps us better understand why Project Debater suffered defeat at the hands of a human, and why this article tells us more about the limits of artificial intelligence rather than “rhetorical persuasion.”Works & Concepts Cited in this Episode:Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written communication, 3(3), 330-350.Miller, C. R. (2007). What can automation tell us about agency?. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(2), 137-157.Plato. (2008). Gorgias (B. Jowett, Trans.). Project Gutenberg. (Original published c. 380 BCE). Retrieved from: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1672/1672-h/1672-h.htmSlonim, N., Bilu, Y., Alzate, C., Bar-Haim, R., Bogin, B., Bonin, F., ... & Aharonov, R. (2021). An autonomous debating system. Nature, 591(7850), 379-384.Wallace-Wells, B. (2021, Apr. 11). The limits of political debate. The New Yorker. Retrieved from: https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-populism/the-limits-of-political-debate

Die künstliche Intelligenz Watson hat die TV-Zuschauer schon vor 10 Jahren überrascht, jetzt hat die „Zeit“ ihr auch einen Artikel gewidmet: Im „Project Debater“ debattierte Watson mit Debattier-Weltmeister Harish Natarajan, der zwar letztendlich gewann, aber im Nachhinein sagte, dass es nicht viel anders war als mit einem Menschen zu diskutieren. Die KI ist in der Lage, auf hohem Niveau mit Menschen zu debattieren, Argumente zu entwickeln und auszutauschen mit dem Ziel, das Gegenüber zu überzeugen. Dr. Wolfgang Hildesheim, Director Watson, Data Science & Artificial Intelligence DACH, berichtet im über die im Rahmen von Project Debater entwickelten Fähigkeiten, die nun beispielsweise in den Chatbots eingesetzt werden, die IBM für eine Vielzahl von Kunden entwickelt, entwickelt hat und entwickeln wird.

Die künstliche Intelligenz Watson hat die TV-Zuschauer schon vor 10 Jahren überrascht, jetzt hat die „Zeit“ ihr auch einen Artikel gewidmet: Im „Project Debater“ debattierte Watson mit Debattier-Weltmeister Harish Natarajan, der zwar letztendlich gewann, aber im Nachhinein sagte, dass es nicht viel anders war als mit einem Menschen zu diskutieren. Die KI ist in der Lage, auf hohem Niveau mit Menschen zu debattieren, Argumente zu entwickeln und auszutauschen mit dem Ziel, das Gegenüber zu überzeugen. Dr. Wolfgang Hildesheim, Director Watson, Data Science & Artificial Intelligence DACH, berichtet im Livestudio über die im Rahmen von Project Debater entwickelten Fähigkeiten, die nun beispielsweise in den Chatbots eingesetzt werden, die IBM für eine Vielzahl von Kunden entwickelt hat, entwickelt und entwickeln wird. Außerdem kommentiert Moderator Stefan Pfeiffer wieder aktuelle Medienberichte rund um Technologiethemen. Das Thema Secondhand und Nachhaltigkeit boomt – und das nicht nur im Bekleidungsbereich, wo sich seit einigen Jahren ein unglaublicher Online-Weiterverkaufsmarkt entwickelt. Einen neuen Fachbegriff hat das Ganze auch schon: Re-Commerce. Auch im Elektronikbereich schießen Start-ups aus dem Boden, die sich mit dem Weiterverkauf gebrauchter und wiederaufbereiteter Elektronikartikel beschäftigen. Das B2B ist dieser Entwicklung schon voraus: Hier existiert seit Jahrzehnten ein etablierter Markt für gebrauchte Hardware – ein wichtiger Baustein im Kampf für mehr Nachhaltigkeit in der IT. Was neben dem Nachhaltigkeitsaspekt noch für Pre-Owned-Equipment spricht und welche Anwendungsfälle es gibt, darüber spricht Andreas Moser, Director of IBM Global Financing DACH, im heutigen Livestudio. Die Livestudio-Zuschauer erwartet wieder eine neue Folge der Security-Kolumne: „Auf Nummer sicher - IBM Security Reihe mit Lena Reif & Ute Ibrom“! Unter diesem Motto sprechen Lena Reif, Security Channel Leader, IBM DACH und Ute Ibrom, Security Software Channel Sales, IBM, in der dritten Folge mit Louisa Haiduk, Teamlead IBM Security, Command Center Europe, über Incident Response Trainings und die Möglichkeiten von Unternehmen, sich auf den Ernstfall eines Cyberangriffs vorzubereiten. Zudem wird in der Eventvorschau erneut auf ein weiteres spannendes Event hingewiesen: Die Think 2021, die große digitale Konferenz zum Thema Transformation, Automatisierung und Modernisierung findet am 12. und 13. Mai statt. Dort besteht die Möglichkeit, mehr über die Zukunft von Hybrid Cloud und KI zu erfahren, zum Beispiel im interessanten Vortrag der TU Berlin zum Thema Serious Games und Quantum Computing.

Querem ensinar a linguagem natural dos humanos a elas.

Today on the Science Talk podcast, Noam Slonim speaks to Scientific American about an impressive feat of computer engineering: an AI-powered autonomous system that can engage in complex debate with humans over issues ranging from subsidizing preschool and the merit of space exploration to the pros and cons of genetic engineering.  In a new Nature paper , Slonim and colleagues show that across 80 debate topics, Project Debater’s computational argument technology has performed very decently—with a human audience being the judge of that. “However, it is still somewhat inferior on average to the results obtained by expert human debaters,” says Slonim.  In a 2019 San Francisco showcase, its first public debut, the system went head to head with expert debater Harish Natarajan.  Beyond gaming, it’s rare to see humans and machines go against each other, let alone in an oratory competition. Not unlike its human counterpart, the AI was given only 15 minutes to research the topic and prepare for the debate—rifling through thousands of gigabytes of information at record speed to form an opening statement and layer counter arguments that were later delivered through a robotic female voice, in fragments, and with near perfect diction.  It couldn’t best Natarajan in San Francisco, but in a different debate, the system—co-led by Slonim and fellow IBM researcher Ranit Aharonov —has managed to change the stance of nine people in a debate on the use of telemedicine, essentially swaying the debate to its side and rebutting the argument of its opponent. In other words, in this realm, humans still prevail. But how do you build the architecture for a complex system like this? Is the AI capable of recognizing meaning or larger contexts in a debate? Can a system descended from Project Debater one day intervene in real-life social media arguments to quell misinformation or stir a debate in one direction or another, for better or worse? We answer these questions and more in the podcast.

Diskutieren und debattieren tun wir alle gern – umso spannender, wenn man dabei von Künstlicher Intelligenz auf hohem Debattier-Niveau unterstützt wird. Das KI-Projekt “Debater” zeigt, auf welchem Level KI inzwischen an Gesprächen teilnehmen kann. #Project Debater analysiert dafür eine große Anzahl an Quellen und bewertet die Inhalte. Grund dafür sind neue und aktuelle KI-Fähigkeiten. Matthias Biniok, Leader, AI Tech DACH bei IBM, erläutert, wie IBM Watson aktuell im TV-Format „That's debatable“ auf Bloomberg TV eifrig mitdiskutiert bzw. die menschlichen Diskussionsteilnehmer unterstützt. “That's debatable” ist ein Projekt von IBM und Bloomberg, bei dem Zuseher vorab ihre Meinung zu einem Thema einsenden können. Project #Debater erstellt daraus eine spannende Pro/Contra-Darstellung, auf deren Basis dann ein Team im Fernsehen das Thema analysiert. Gerade in der heutigen Zeit, in der oft Meinungen statt Fakten vorherrschen, zeigt dieses Projekt, wie KI helfen kann, sich eine auf Fakten basierende Meinung zu bilden.

Welchen Einfluss hat Covid-19 auf die Entwicklung des #Digital Office in Deutschland und worauf sollten sich Unternehmen in Zukunft fokussieren? Dazu ist Peter Collenbusch, Vorsitzender des Kompetenzbereichs Digital Office im Bitkom und Brand Leader DBA DACH bei IBM, heute im Livestudio zu Gast. Unser Gast stellt einige interessante Ergebnisse des Digital Office Index 2020 der #Bitkom vor und berichtet über den aktuellen Status quo des Digital Office in Deutschland. Diskutieren und debattieren tun wir alle gern – umso spannender, wenn man dabei von Künstlicher Intelligenz auf hohem Debattier-Niveau unterstützt wird. Das KI-Projekt “Debater” zeigt, auf welchem Level KI inzwischen an Gesprächen teilnehmen kann. #Project Debater analysiert dafür eine große Anzahl an Quellen und bewertet die Inhalte. Grund dafür sind neue und aktuelle KI-Fähigkeiten. Matthias Biniok, Leader, AI Tech DACH bei IBM, erläutert, wie IBM Watson aktuell im TV-Format „That's debatable“ auf Bloomberg TV eifrig mitdiskutiert bzw. die menschlichen Diskussionsteilnehmer unterstützt. “That's debatable” ist ein Projekt von IBM und Bloomberg, bei dem Zuseher vorab ihre Meinung zu einem Thema einsenden können. Project #Debater erstellt daraus eine spannende Pro/Contra-Darstellung, auf deren Basis dann ein Team im Fernsehen das Thema analysiert. Gerade in der heutigen Zeit, in der oft Meinungen statt Fakten vorherrschen, zeigt dieses Projekt, wie KI helfen kann, sich eine auf Fakten basierende Meinung zu bilden.

Project Debater is the first AI system that can debate humans on complex topics, with a larger ambition of helping people build persuasive arguments and make well-informed decisions. In this episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, Robert and Joe chat with Project Debater Lead Researcher, Noam Slonim and IBM VP for Data and AI, Madhu Kochar. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://news.iheart.com/podcast-advertisers

The #AI Eye: #IBM (NYSE: $IBM) Reveals Atmospheric Forecasting System and Project Debater, NVIDIA ( $NVDA) Announces DRIVE Autopilot and Qualcomm ($QCOM) Introduces Snapdragon Automotive Cockpit Platforms at #CES2019

In this episode of AI Buzz, I will discuss how the latest project from IBM Watson, Project Debater, can hold its own with human-level debater. Also, the impact that AI will have on the field of psychiatry will be talked about along with how the United States is currently tackling AI regulation.

In our last episode for season five Katherine and Neil debate his debating project debater and talk about whats coming up at NeurIPS. Hope to see you there!

Ecco le news di cui abbiamo parlato oggi:Project Debater: costruito ad Haifa il robot che dialoga con gli umani:http://siliconwadi.it/project-debater-costruito-ad-haifa-il-robot-che-dialoga-con-gli-umani-6891Arresto cardiaco: come riconoscerlo? Ci pensano Alexa e Google Home!:https://biomedicalcue.it/arresto-cardiaco-alexa-google-home/14672/Ecco Tengai, il robot capace di provare emozioni:https://www.firstonline.info/ecco-tengai-il-robot-capace-di-provare-emozioni/

OpenAI has trained an unsupervised language model that can perform basic reading comprehension, summarize text, answer questions, and generate coherent paragraphs; as Andy and Dave discuss, the bigger news came from OpenAI’s decision to release a less-capable version of the GPT-2 model, “for the good of humanity,” as one news site claimed. IBM’s Project Debater lost a debate with champion debater Harish Natarajan, but more of the audience said Project Debater better enriched their knowledge on the topic. Princeton and Microsoft announce NAIL, an agent for playing general interactive fiction (such as the Zork series), and consisting of multiple Decision Modules for performing various tasks. Part 2 will be posted next week.

On February 11, IBM showcased its Project Debater in a face-off against debate champion Harish Natarajan. We talk about how this machine vs. human competition went. Then, we discuss a Harvard Business Review article citing a survey that discovered companies are not becoming data-oriented quickly enough. --- Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/databytes/message Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/databytes/support

Guillermo Arduino habla del Campus Party que se realizó en Sao Paulo, Brasil. Más de 120.000 personas asistieron al evento que es el más grande del país . También les contará quiénes son algunos de los grandes protagonistas del Congreso Mundial de Móviles que se celebrará entre el 25 y el 28 de febrero en Barcelona. El director de investigación de IBM, Dario Gil, explica sobre el desafío hombre versus máquina. El "Project Debater" de IBM que es un debate con inteligencia artificial frente a un profesional y ser humano. Además te enterarás por qué Amazon no abrirá una sede en Nueva York y los detalles sobre unas cometas que generan electricidad.

In this special episode of Intelligence Squared U.S., we partner with IBM for a historic debate that brings AI to the stage. IBM Project Debater is the first AI system designed to debate humans on complex topics using a combination of pioneering research developed by IBM researchers. In this debate, Project Debater faces world-class debater Harish Natarajan on the motion, "We Should Subsidize Preschool". Still curious about AI? Dive into more debates: Past Debate - Don’t Trust the Promise of AI: http://smarturl.it/ArtificialIntellMain Upcoming Debate - All Hail Driverless Cars: http://smarturl.it/DriverlessCar Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

IBM has a long history with artificial intelligence competing against human beings. Deep Blue mastered Chess, Watson scored big on Jeopardy and now Project Debater is arguing against human champions. We look at some of IBM's latest AI efforts. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://news.iheart.com/podcast-advertisers

The Monolithic black rectangle on stage with luminous, bouncing blue dots at eye level was not Project Debater, IBM's argumentative artificial intelligence. It was just something for an audience to look at while a voice—is it redundant to call an AI's synthesized voice “disembodied”?—projected over the sound system of the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, in San Francisco.

The #AI Eye: #IBM (NYSE: $IBM) Reveals Atmospheric Forecasting System and Project Debater, NVIDIA ( $NVDA) Announces DRIVE Autopilot and Qualcomm ($QCOM) Introduces Snapdragon Automotive Cockpit Platforms at #CES2019

The #AI Eye: #IBM (NYSE: $IBM) Reveals Atmospheric Forecasting System and Project Debater, NVIDIA ( $NVDA) Announces DRIVE Autopilot and Qualcomm ($QCOM) Introduces Snapdragon Automotive Cockpit Platforms at #CES2019

In breaking news, Andy and Dave discuss a potentially groundbreaking paper on the scalable training of artificial neural nets with adaptive sparse connectivity; MIT researchers unveil the Navion chip, only 20 square millimeters in size and consumes 24 milliwatts of power, it can process real-time camera images up to 171 frames per second, and can be integrated into drones the size of a fingernail; the Chair of the Armed Services Subcommitttee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities convened a roundtable on AI with subject matter experts and industry leaders; the IEEE Standards Association and MIT Media Lab launched the Council on Extended Intelligence (CXI) to build a “new narrative” on autonomous technologies, including three pilot programs, one of which seeks to help individuals “reclaim their digital identity;” and the Foundation for Responsible Robotics, which wants to shape the responsible design and use of robotics, releases a report on Drones in the Service of Society. Then, Andy and Dave discuss IBM’s Project Debater, the follow-on to Watson that engaged in a live, public debate with humans on 18 June. IBM spent 6 years developing PD’s capabilities, with over 30 technical papers and benchmark datasets, Debater can debate nearly 100 topics. PD uses three pioneering capabilities: data-driven speech writing and delivery, listening comprehension, and the ability to model human dilemmas. Next up, OpenAI announces OpenAI Five, a team of 5 AI algorithms trained to take on a human team in the tower defense game, Dota 2; Andy and Dave discuss the reasons for the impressive achievement, including that the 5 AI networks do not communicate with each other, and that coordination and collaboration naturally emerge from their incentive structures. The system uses 256 Nvidia graphics cards and 128,000 processor cores; it has taken on (and won) a variety of human teams, but OpenAI plans to stream a match against a top Dota 2 team in late July.

Oggi due parti: nella prima, IBM presenta Project Debater, l'Intelligenza Artificiale che discute con te. O hanno un senso dell’umorismo che non capisco, o ricordiamo ciò che dicevano gli antichi, coloro che gli dèi vogliono perdere, prima li rendono folli. Nella seconda parte, Google, Amazon e Microsoft stanno venendo costrette dai dipendenti ad abbandonare contratti lucrosi con la Difesa e l'Immigrazione. Ottimo, ma occorre arrivare a un trattato internazionale che limiti gli impieghi delle tecnologie digitali dual use, come è stato fatto per le tecnologie chimiche, biologiche e nucleari.

Oggi due parti: nella prima, IBM presenta Project Debater, l'Intelligenza Artificiale che discute con te. O hanno un senso dell’umorismo che non capisco, o ricordiamo ciò che dicevano gli antichi, coloro che gli dèi vogliono perdere, prima li rendono folli. Nella seconda parte, Google, Amazon e Microsoft stanno venendo costrette dai dipendenti ad abbandonare contratti lucrosi con la Difesa e l'Immigrazione. Ottimo, ma occorre arrivare a un trattato internazionale che limiti gli impieghi delle tecnologie digitali dual use, come è stato fatto per le tecnologie chimiche, biologiche e nucleari.

In today’s On the SPOT News Brief, Jay Leask and Craig Jahnke  review some recent SCOTUS decisions, dabble in politics, and discuss the probability of the Machine's taking over the world through civil debate and mind control.  Today's source material, and a few others mentioned in passing, are found below: SCOTUS says your privacy data is yours - go get a warrant -- SCOTUS says it's a State's right to tax your internet purchase -- EU Article 13 wants to block your meme - or something like that -- The GitHub 100 say "It's us or ICE" -- IBM's Project Debater AI changes your mind - and here come the machines -- Microsoft aquires FlipGrid -- Microsoft publishes open research data sets

“Fighting technology means fighting human ingenuity,” an IBM software program admonished Israeli debating champion Dan Zafrir in San Francisco Monday. The program, dubbed Project Debater, and Zafrir, were debating the value of telemedicine, but the point could also apply to the future of the technology itself. Software that processes speech and language has improved enough to do more than tell you the weather forecast.

IBM tar AI til et nytt nivå. Gjennombruddet Project Debater kan konkurrere med mennesker i å debattere. Men forstår den egentlig hva den selv sier?Å skrive taler og debattere regnes som en av de mest krevende oppgavene for vår menneskelige intelligens. Nå har IBM nok en gang nådd en milepæl på veien mot å kunne erstatte oss helt. Per Kristian har intervjuet teamet som jobber for at AI skal kunne utføre enda flere av våre kognitive oppgaver.I tillegg tester vi Apple Pay i ukens sending. Per Kristian fikk kjøpt veldig mye tyggis, men hvor godt fungerte det egentlig?Nå som Apple har kastet seg over det norske markedet med rundt halvparten av alle nordmenn, blir kampen om mobilbetalingskundene tøff. Vi har også testet den nyeste metoden Vipps bruker til å la deg betale med ansiktet eller fingeravtrykket i nettbutikken. Også Apple Pay virker på nett. Hvilken funker best?Apple Pay virker godt på første forsøk, men ikke alt er på plass fra Apple foreløpig. Hvis du venter utålmodig på å kunne ta i bruk vennebetaling i meldingstjenesten iMessage, venter du foreløpig forgjeves. Denne tjenesten kommer nemlig ikke med fra starten her i Norge, men kan komme senere. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.