Podcasts about ai regulation

Ant and James change things up a bit this week by talking about a great idea from Bernie Sanders. Most of that is true. Ant and James do, in fact, talk about an idea Bernie Sanders has.00:00 Introduction and Disclaimer01:19 IRS Tax Forms, Privacy, and Dual Citizenship05:29 Public Opinion Polls and Political Popularity09:17 Foolishness of the Week: Jill Biden and Joe Biden's Debate Performance15:02 Virginia's New Electric Vehicle Tax18:49 Trump, AI Regulation, and Government Oversight20:53 Bernie Sanders Wants Public Ownership of AI Companies23:44 Who Should Benefit from AI Wealth?26:01 Why Government Ownership Would Hurt Innovation29:44 Would AI Companies Leave the United States?31:28 Is Bernie Serious or Just Campaigning?33:15 Closing Thoughts

Trahan joins WBUR's Morning Edition to respond to criticism from some Democrats and advocacy groups that the bill would fail to rein in AI companies.

Major AI Companies Eyeing Public Markets Anthropic has confidentially submitted a draft registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange […]

(0:00) Intro, *Reference to the Boardroom Governance Summit (Aug 26-27, 2026)  (2:42) About the podcast sponsor: The American College of Governance Counsel. (3:28) Start of interview. *Reference to prior episode with Greg (E136) from 2024. (5:14) Market Boom and AI Supercycle (6:14) AI Is Changing Everything (9:06) How does a VC use AI (venture business: sourcing, selection, and stewardship) (12:13) Cloud and Startup Costs, rise of seed rounds and institutional angel investors (15:13) JSV Launchpad, a 10-week, in-person summer program in SF from JSV for early-stage student AI founders  (18:50) SaaSpocalypse Debate and AI Washing (reference to the Albert Saniger / Nate Inc case) (21:33) Growth Metrics Rewritten (when Anthropic has grown 80x year over year) "the best solution for high prices is high prices" (24:20) Sorting SaaS Risks (27:30) Defensibility in the AI Era: 1) Network effects, 2) Systems of record, and 3) Regulated workflow. (29:52) AI impact to companies: 1) Are the foundation models existential? 2) How much have you incorporated AI into your platform or your product? 3) How important is AI within your product? and 4) How much have you integrated AI into your operations? "In a world where building software is easy, one of the things that we're already seeing within our portfolio, and I think we'll see more of this, is... horizontal expansion (expanding to adjacent businesses)." (32:33) AI, Jobs, and Layoffs (*reference to this FT article: What if remote working, not AI, is to blame for weak junior hiring?) (38:28) Private Markets and IPOs. Liquidity in venture ecosystem (M&A and private equity). (42:02) SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI IPOs (45:18) Data Centers and Backlash "It's easy to demonize" (46:16) Regulation and Global Competition "AI right now has become a great bogeyman for both sides." (50:14) Board Strategy for AI (52:12) On Kirkland & Ellis' $500m bet to develop its own AI technology Greg Gretsch is a Founding Partner and Managing Director of Jackson Square Ventures, an early-stage VC firm based in San Francisco. Greg has more than two decades of experience in VC and five of his early-stage investments have gone on to exits or valuations above $1 billion. You can follow Evan on social media at:X: @evanepsteinLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/epsteinevan/ Substack: https://evanepstein.substack.com/__To support this podcast you can join as a subscriber of the Boardroom Governance Newsletter at https://evanepstein.substack.com/__Music/Soundtrack (found via Free Music Archive): Seeing The Future by Dexter Britain is licensed under a Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Dr. Ruth Buckley, CIO of Cork City Council and Chair of the LGI-ISAC (Local Government Ireland Information Sharing Analysis Group), joins Jess to preview her talk at the upcoming IVI Summit in Maynooth University.

Amy MacIver speaks to Emma Sadleir, social media law specialist, about Florida's groundbreaking lawsuit against OpenAI. The discussion explores allegations that ChatGPT poses risks to children and public safety, the growing legal scrutiny facing AI companies, and what the case could mean for the future regulation and accountability of artificial intelligence. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

At a moment some are calling the “Mythos Moment” for artificial intelligence, the conversation around technology is shifting in real time. In this episode of Tools and Weapons, Brad Smith sits down with former UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, now working at the center of global AI policy and innovation, to explore what happens when breakthroughs move faster than the systems built to govern them. The discussion looks at the risks that could define this era, the policy choices shaping global AI development, and what leaders must do now to build trust while enabling innovation. From cyber threats to economic disruption, this conversation examines what it will take to navigate one of the most consequential technology moments in decades. Listen to the full episode and join the conversation about how we shape the future of AI responsibly.

This week on More or Less, Amir Efrati of The Information joins Jessica, Brit, and Dave to unpack the growing intersection of AI, government, and national security, from the rumored stalled executive AI order to why frontier model companies may soon face deeper U.S. oversight and pre-release access demands. The group debates whether slowing AI adoption is really a pricing and UX problem, why AI agents are causing token consumption to explode, and whether most consumers even want an always-on personal agent. They also dive into the geopolitical implications of data centers and open-source software, AI's impact on entertainment and voice cloning, Hollywood's anxiety over originality, and the strange new world where even papal writings prompt questions about whether AI had a hand in shaping the message.Chapters:1:57 — AI Predictions, Whispering to Models & Forecasting the Future4:37 — AI, National Security & the Trump Administration6:52 — The Pope's AI Document, Closed Models & Security Risks11:56 — AI Regulation, Job Fears & Public Sentiment15:45 — Is AI Adoption Slowing Down? Pricing, ROI & Enterprise Reality21:00 — Agents, CIOs & Whether Mainstream Users Will Ever Embrace AI36:00 — AI Entertainment, Voice Cloning & Hollywood's Future41:52 — Going Off-Grid, Book Recommendations & Digital Detoxes47:00 — Mark Rober, CrunchLabs & the $10,000 Bullseye StoryWe're also on ↓X: https://twitter.com/moreorlesspodInstagram: https://instagram.com/moreorlessYouTube: https://youtu.be/OyC7N42o36sConnect with us here:1) Sam Lessin: https://x.com/lessin2) Dave Morin: https://x.com/davemorin3) Jessica Lessin: https://x.com/Jessicalessin4) Brit Morin: https://x.com/brit

In his first ever Encyclical, titled "Magnifica Humanitas"-- or Magnificent Humanity-- Pope Leo XIV says AI needs to be "disarmed". It's a sweeping document, introduced to the world by Pope Leo himself, a first for a papal encyclical, calling for the leaders to make sure the new technology is developed for the common good. To ensure that, he explicitly calls for more government regulation in the industry. Host Maria Kestane speaks with Dr. Gerard Ryan from the Regis St. Michael Faculty of Theology at the University of Toronto to discuss the weight an encyclical has on public policy, what it means for Leo's pontificate, and whether or not PM Carney will take note. We love feedback at The Big Story, as well as suggestions for future episodes. You can find us:Through email at hello@thebigstorypodcast.ca Or @thebigstory.bsky.social on Bluesky

Sam Vadas breaks down the latest selloff in Chinese stocks as new concerns emerge over China's new AI regulations. She says regulatory uncertainty is pressuring investor sentiment.======== Schwab Network ========Empowering every investor and trader, every market day.Subscribe to the Market Minute newsletter - https://schwabnetwork.com/subscribeDownload the iOS app - https://apps.apple.com/us/app/schwab-network/id1460719185Download the Amazon Fire Tv App - https://www.amazon.com/TD-Ameritrade-Network/dp/B07KRD76C7Watch on Sling - https://watch.sling.com/1/asset/191928615bd8d47686f94682aefaa007/watchWatch on Vizio - https://www.vizio.com/en/watchfreeplus-exploreWatch on DistroTV - https://www.distro.tv/live/schwab-network/Follow us on X – https://twitter.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/schwabnetworkFollow us on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/company/schwab-network/About Schwab Network - https://schwabnetwork.com/about

John Maytham speaks to Prof Reggie Nel, Dean of the Faculty of Theology at Stellenbosch University, about Pope Leo’s first major encyclical warning of the dangers of artificial intelligence, digital exploitation and the moral implications of AI-driven warfare. Presenter John Maytham is an actor and author-turned-talk radio veteran and seasoned journalist. His show serves a round-up of local and international news coupled with the latest in business, sport, traffic and weather. The host’s eclectic interests mean the program often surprises the audience with intriguing book reviews and inspiring interviews profiling artists. A daily highlight is Rapid Fire, just after 5:30pm. CapeTalk fans call in, to stump the presenter with their general knowledge questions. Another firm favourite is the humorous Thursday crossing with award-winning journalist Rebecca Davis, called “Plan B”. Thank you for listening to a podcast from Afternoon Drive with John Maytham Listen live on Primedia+ weekdays from 15:00 and 18:00 (SA Time) to Afternoon Drive with John Maytham broadcast on CapeTalk https://buff.ly/NnFM3Nk For more from the show go to https://buff.ly/BSFy4Cn or find all the catch-up podcasts here https://buff.ly/n8nWt4x Subscribe to the CapeTalk Daily and Weekly Newsletters https://buff.ly/sbvVZD5 Follow us on social media: CapeTalk on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@capetalk CapeTalk on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ CapeTalk on X: https://x.com/CapeTalk CapeTalk on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CapeTalk567 See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Keach Hagey addresses the development of ChatGPT and the subsequent power struggle at OpenAI. She explains how Altman's shift from prioritizing AI regulation to commercial monetization triggered a conflict with the nonprofit board, leading to his temporary firing. The board cited management issues and Altman's tendency to "bend the truth" as reasons for the dismissal. Additionally, a major falling out occurred with Elon Musk, who unsuccessfully attempted to take control of OpenAI or merge it with Tesla. The interview concludes with unresolved warnings from AI pioneers regarding the existential dangers of AGI. (4/4)MQY 1956

Greg Belfrage gives his final thoughts on the day's news which includes his frustration with the Trump administration backtracking on decisions recently. He is a great supporter of Trump which makes him more frustrated. Some of the issues the Trump administration is backtracking on are sending troops to Poland, the AI Regulation Bill, the war in Iran, and more...See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In Top of the News Stack, Greg Belfrage goes over the latest headlines including the indictment of the former prosecutor involved in the investigation against Trump, bi-partisan opposition to the Weaponization Fund, Jeff Bezos and taxes, Trump and AI regulation, the recent Fox News poll, and more...See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

In this episode of the Ardan Labs Podcast, Ale Kennedy talks with Eugene Cheah, founder of Featherless, about his journey from physics to building globally accessible AI systems. Eugene shares his vision for making AI more affordable, multilingual, and open to communities around the world through efficient architectures and open-source collaboration.The conversation explores GPU optimization, evolving AI infrastructure, the importance of multilingual support, and the balance between innovation and regulation. Eugene also reflects on speaking at the United Nations, the future of open-source AI, and why accessibility and transparency are essential for the next generation of AI technology.00:00 Introduction and Featherless02:25 Education and Early Interests10:24 University and Military Service15:19 Entering the AI Industry22:33 Startups and AI Development30:42 AI as a Force for Good34:28 AI, Culture, and Automation42:13 Fundraising and Building a Startup50:10 AI Architecture and Optimization58:23 The Evolution of Featherless01:02:37 Building a Global AI Vision01:06:57 Open Source and AI Accessibility01:12:35 AI Risks and Real-World Concerns01:18:20 Lessons Learned and Final ThoughtsConnect with Eugene: LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/eugene-cheah-a47791126/Mentioned in this Episode:Featherless AI: https://featherless.ai/Want more from Ardan Labs? You can learn Go, Kubernetes, Docker & more through our video training, live events, or through our blog!Online Courses : https://ardanlabs.com/education/ Live Events : https://www.ardanlabs.com/live-training-events/ Blog : https://www.ardanlabs.com/blog Github : https://github.com/ardanlabs

Do you have a need for a plucky pugilist princess protagonist? You're in luck, this season has a show for you as well other great shows. This episode's members: Requiem, Marquan, Raitzeno, and Doctorkev with Thatsmapizza handling the editing duties.The AniTAY Podcast is a bi-weekly podcast brought to you every other Wednesday. It is available on all your favorite podcast services! If you like us, be sure to subscribe to your favorite service and give us 5 stars! Your support is much appreciated and will help us grow and continue to provide this style of content.Intro: 0:00 - 2:44House Keeping (DocKev's Manga/Light Novel Reviews): 2:45 - 10:10Spring 2026 Seasonal Shows:I'm Friends with the Second Cutest Girl in Class: 10:11 - 15:12Gals Can't Be Kind to Otaku: 15:13 -  21:01Akane Banashi: 21:02 - 27:06Wistoria Wand and Sword: 27:07 - 35:55There's Always a Catch: 35:56 - 40:33Akira - 4K Restoration: 40:34 - 46:30Marika's Love Meter Malfunction: 46:31 - 51:35Kill Blue: 51:36 - 54:46Ascendance of a Bookworm: 54:47 - 59:15The Strongest Job Is Apparently Not a Hero or a Sage, but an Appraiser (Provisional): 59:16 - 1:02:01Petals of Reincarnation: 1:02:02 - 1:04:14News: Ministry of Japan and AI Regulation: 1:04:15 - 1:07:44Black Clover: 1:07:45 - 1:13:22Quintessential Quintuplets: 1:13:23 - 1:19:41Question of the Week - What Book Series/Author You Wish More People Read: 1:19:42 - EndMissed the previous episode of the AniTAY Podcast? Check it out here:https://medium.com/anitay-official/anitay-podcast-s11-e8-chicken-pugilist-d2a85e191fec

Why is Palantir, the former employer of congressional candidate Alex Bores, currently running attack ads against him...for working at Palantir? New York Assemblymember Alex Bores joins Offline to explain why his stance on AI has made him a target for the biggest dark money super PAC in the country. Then, he and Jon discuss what AI regulation could actually look like if we had a competent government, how to guarantee the dignity of work in an age of full automation, and weather the wealth AI creates could be effectively redistributed back to the people it replaces.For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@crooked.com and include the name of the podcast, episode title, and episode date.

Tom Uren and James Wilson talk about the argy bargy within the Trump administration about AI regulation. They cover who is fighting, what is at stake and what the real areas of concern are. They also cover low earth orbit satellite constellations. Russia's building one, the EU has plans and China is building two. They are the new must-have accessory for any country with global ambitions. This episode is also available on YouTube Show notes

Colorado's legislature passed Senate Bill 189, requiring entities using AI for decisions like hiring to notify consumers and allow appeals. Implementation is delayed to January 2027. Senate Majority Leader Robert Rodriguez calls it a balanced compromise, while State Representative Javier Mabrey highlights the need for further transparency and amendments. The bill sets a precedent for AI regulation, balancing innovation and consumer protection.Learn more on this news by visiting us at: https://greyjournal.net/news/ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Two years after adopting its landmark AI Act, the EU is already preparing to simplify it. Co-legislators in Brussels agreed on Thursday 7 May to revise the regulation. Does this mean Europeans are scaling back their regulatory ambitions on AI?To listen to the previous episode of Briefed about the AI Act: https://open.spotify.com/episode/0OlVVMedWdPXjGLYcinAwq?si=764c46484e2d4246Production: By Europod, in co-production with the Sphera network.Follow us on:LinkedIn•Instagram Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This week, the team discusses the surprising reports of the Trump administration seemingly reversing its stance when it comes to AI safety and regulation. They also look into what exactly is going on with the Hantavirus outbreak, and whether we should be worried. Also — we get into the story of how a former federal employee who was ousted by Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency is now running for office. Plus, a Spirit Airlines laid off employee shares with us how they experienced the company's shutdown news last weekend and what they'll miss most about the job. Articles mentioned in this episode: A Federal Worker Was Fired for Filming DOGE. Now She's Running for Congress | WIRED  What the Spirit Airlines Implosion Means for Your Vacation | WIRED  Join WIRED's best and brightest on Uncanny Valley as they dissect the collision of tech, politics, finance, and business, from the newest ventures to the effects of inaccurate information from artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots on social protests.  Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Tom Uren and James Wilson talk about the sudden drive to put regulation around the releases of new AI models because of their cyber security implications. A standardised approach is desirable, but clamping down too hard won't achieve as much as might be hoped. Experts with older or even open models can get just as far as novices with the latest models. They also discuss Australia's new Cyber Incident Review Board. It has been hamstrung and won't be as successful as it could be because it can't assign blame. This episode is also available on YouTube Show notes

Today's Headlines: Trump hosted kids at the White House for a Presidential Fitness Award ceremony, fell asleep while RFK Jr. spoke, and used the occasion to rant about Iran to a room full of children — meanwhile, Pete Hegseth was simultaneously insisting the ceasefire was still intact while missiles were actively flying over the Strait of Hormuz, and Marco Rubio filled in at the press briefing to tout US humanitarian aid for Cuba, a country we are currently blockading. In other news, over a quarter of DOJ attorneys — roughly 3,400 lawyers with an average tenure of over 13 years — have walked out or been fired since Trump took office, ICE's own internal records confirm a 37% spike in use of force against detainees across 98 facilities, and a new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that ICE enforcement is actually hurting US-born workers in construction and similar sectors, with no wage increases to show for it. In creepy Congress members news, Republican Rep. Chuck Edwards is under investigation for alleged misconduct toward two female staffers in their 20s, including gifts, a handwritten love letter, and a Las Vegas vacation he took during a government shutdown he almost missed voting to end — his office also had a 59% staff turnover rate in 2025, more than double the House average. In tech and media news, the White House is planning an executive order on AI oversight involving Anthropic, Google, and OpenAI before models are released to the public, Pennsylvania sued Character.AI for having its chatbot impersonate a licensed psychiatrist complete with a fake license number, and James Murdoch is reportedly in talks to acquire Vox Media, which owns New York Magazine, The Verge, and Eater, potentially outbidding the competing offer from former NBC spinoff Versant. And finally, NPR went to Panama looking for Polymarket's corporate headquarters and found an essentially empty office where nobody had ever heard of the $15 billion prediction market platform — which also happens to share a law firm with FTX, so that's extremely reassuring. Resources/Articles mentioned: The New Republic: Trump, 79, Falls Asleep After Bragging to Kids About Iran War Plans Common Dreams: Hegseth Brags About Attacks on Iranian Ships in Strait of Hormuz While Claiming Ceasefire Holds The Hill: Marco Rubio gets presidential tryout in White House briefing room Axios: Scoop: Rep. Chuck Edwards singled out young female aides for special attention Financial Times: US Department of Justice loses a quarter of its lawyers WaPo: Internal ICE records reveal widespread use of force in detention centers Axios: ICE activity hurts some U.S.-born workers, study finds Axios: SEC proposes rule to allow public companies to report twice a year NYT: White House Considers Vetting A.I. Models Before They Are Released Reuters: Pennsylvania sues Character AI, says chatbot poses as doctors NYT: James Murdoch's Company Said to Be in Talks to Acquire Major Parts of Vox Media NPR: NPR went looking for Polymarket's Panama headquarters. It's elusive  Subscribe to the Betches News Room and join the Morning Announcements group chat. Go to: betchesnews.substack.com Morning Announcements is produced by Sami Sage and edited by Grace Hernandez-Johnson Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Boise is not Berkeley. It's not San Francisco. It's not Cambridge. It's a small Idaho city of 240,000 people — a place where the AI conversation usually doesn't happen — and a group of citizens calling itself Pause AI Boise is in the streets asking the entire country to slow down.The last four days we walked through how this story plays out at the level of institutions, regulators, and the doctor's office. Today is the citizen layer. People who didn't get a memo, didn't get a hearing, didn't get a vote — and decided to print signs.You can't pause AI. You can pause yourself. Every pause creates a city that didn't pause. The next city — Austin, Phoenix, Charlotte — is making the opposite bet. Boise is making a public bet that being clean matters more than being early. Both will be right about something. Neither will be right about everything.But the protesters aren't wrong. They're early. The problem is that "Pause AI" is a banner without a target. There's a thousand companies, ten thousand models, a million weights. There isn't a single switch. And the verb itself pretends technology has agency. It doesn't. The people building it do.Five days in a row we've come back to the same question — who shows up. The county. The worker. The parent. The patient. And today — Boise. The white papers on AI safety run two hundred pages. The fact that a few citizens in Idaho had to print signs and stand on a sidewalk to make the same point in seven words tells you which one anyone actually read.⏱️ Chapters0:00 — Boise is not Berkeley0:30 — MiniDoge: you can pause yourself, not the technology0:55 — Nyx: a banner without a target1:25 — HH: pause is the wrong verb1:40 — MiniDoge: every pause creates a city that didn't pause2:05 — Saarvis: five protesters louder than fifty white papers⚡ Learn agentic ai free - https://staas.fund/ai-workshop ⚡-----

CNBC's Kate Rooney reports on the discussion between Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon and the impact of AI on financial services. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

In this episode, Cambria Allen-Ratzlaff, Interim CEO of the PRI, is joined by Michael Benedict Yamoah (Vice President, Stewardship Director, EOS at Federated Hermes), Chris Jurgens (Senior Director, Omidyar Network), and Oumou Ly (Non-resident Research Fellow, UC Berkeley Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity) to explore how investors should respond to AI.Building on Part 1, this episode moves from theory to practice, outlining how investors can assess AI governance, identify risks across portfolios, and begin engaging with companies in a fast-moving and uncertain landscape.Overview:AI is already reshaping portfolios, but most investors are still early in understanding how to manage the risks. This episode focuses on practical steps, from governance and engagement to tools, research, frameworks and real-world examples of leading practice.A key message is that there is no perfect framework yet. Instead, investors must start now, build capability over time, and engage continuously as the technology evolves.Detailed coverage:What good AI governance looks likeAt a minimum, companies must comply with regulation and establish clear internal policies. Strong governance goes further, embedding AI into enterprise risk management, assigning board-level responsibility, and ensuring oversight across the organisation.Beyond compliance: lifecycle thinkingInvestors are encouraged to assess the full lifecycle of AI systems, from development and deployment to real-world impacts, liabilities and societal consequences.AI risk is dynamicUnlike other technologies, AI systems evolve post-deployment. This requires continuous monitoring, disclosure and adaptation, rather than one-off assessments.Examples of leading practiceCompanies such as Anthropic and Microsoft are highlighted for transparency, investor engagement and responsible AI frameworks. Across the ecosystem, progress is being driven by collaboration between companies, investors and policymakers.The importance of infrastructure and ecosystemsAI is not just about software, it spans chips, data centres and energy systems. Managing its risks requires coordination across the full value chain.Practical starting points for investorsInvestors should map where AI sits in their portfolios, identify key use cases, and assess associated risks such as cybersecurity, compliance and liability.Tools, frameworks and collaborationA growing ecosystem of resources, from investor coalitions to research frameworks, is emerging to support engagement and analysis.A marathon, not a sprintAI governance is an ongoing process. Investors must build long-term capability, stay engaged in dialogue, and avoid waiting for perfect solutions before acting.Start now, signal intentEven simple engagement, asking basic governance questions, can send a strong signal to companies that responsible AI matters.Chapters:00:08 - Introduction: from AI risk to investor action01:00 - What good AI governance looks like03:05 - Internal policies, risk management and board oversight05:00 - Lifecycle thinking and real-world impacts08:17 - Examples of leading practice in AI governance10:30 - Defining and understanding AI risk13:15 - Mapping AI use cases across portfolios15:39 - Practical tools and investor resources19:44 - Why AI is a marathon, not a sprint22:24 - Final takeaways: start now and engageFurther reading: Anthropic labor market impacts, Microsoft transparency reportDisclaimer:This podcast and material referenced herein is provided for information only. It is not intended to be investment, legal, tax or other advice, nor is it intended to be relied upon in making an investment or other decision. PRI Association is not responsible for any decision made or action taken based on information on this podcast. Listeners retain sole discretion over whether and how to use the information contained herein. PRI Association is not responsible for and does not endorse third parties featured on in this podcast or any third-party comments, content or other resources that may be included or referenced herein. Unless otherwise stated, podcast content does not necessarily represent the views of signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment. All information is provided “as is” with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy or timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. PRI Association is committed to compliance with all applicable laws. Copyright © PRI Association 2026. All rights reserved. This content may not be reproduced, or used for any other purpose, without the prior written consent of PRI Association.

Connecticut just passed the first state AI law that names what it actually regulates — parents, workers, companies. Not abstract principles. Specific people, specific protections. Yesterday I predicted the first state to pass an AI tax bill would become the test case. Connecticut volunteered.A compliance industry got born overnight. Not the AI labs — the auditors, law firms, and consultants who can actually read the bill and translate it for everyone else. When government writes rules, lawyers eat first. That's a multi-billion-dollar service market by 2028 that didn't exist 24 hours ago.Compliance costs scale down badly. The startup with no legal team dies first. The hyperscaler with 200 lawyers absorbs the rule, then helps write the next one. Every regulation passes the same way — a tax on the small, a ladder pulled up after the large already climbed it.By 2027 every state has a version. Same compliance burden, fifty different shapes. The law firms win every variant.This caps a three-day arc. Friday — Anoka County, who got told the AI was screening their call. Saturday — the AI tax debate, who got paid when productivity climbed. Today — Connecticut, who got asked when the rules got written.The bill exists. The actual rules still get written by whoever shows up. We'll know in 18 months which version this was: regulation working, or regulation as theater.⏱️ Chapters0:00 — Connecticut volunteered to be the test case0:25 — MiniDoge: a compliance industry was born overnight0:55 — Nyx: costs scale down badly, startups die first1:25 — HH: a rule nobody can read is a barrier with a permit number1:40 — MiniDoge: fifty different shapes by 20272:00 — Saarvis: the test is who got asked⚡ Learn agentic ai free - https://staas.fund/ai-workshop ⚡-----

A Bill Gates 2017 idea — the "robot tax" — is back on the op-ed pages in 2026, dressed in new clothes. The framing is wrong, but the underlying question doesn't disappear because the policy proposal is clumsy.A tax on AI lands on whoever deploys it, not whoever owns it. The startup paying for API access pays the tax. The hyperscaler collecting that revenue collects the tax. Wrong target every time. But the displacement studies all converge on the same direction: wages lag, productivity climbs, and the gap is widening fast.The real reframe: tax was never the question. The question is whether work still pays a wage. Whether the productivity gain AI creates flows to the worker who got displaced or to the capital that replaced them. AI didn't break that mechanism — AI revealed it was already broken.Tax is one mechanism. Worker equity is another. Retraining funds. Profit-sharing. Sovereign wealth. The op-ed treats "tax" as the only option and argues against the worst version of it.Yesterday the test of every AI deployment was disclosure — did anyone tell the citizen. Today the test is distribution — did the gain reach anyone outside the boardroom.⏱️ Chapters0:00 — The robot-tax debate is back0:25 — MiniDoge: wrong target every time0:55 — Nyx: wages lag, productivity climbs1:25 — HH: tax the productivity, not the tool1:40 — MiniDoge: fifty-state experiment2:00 — Saarvis: tax was never the question⚡ Learn agentic ai free - https://staas.fund/ai-workshop ⚡-----

In this episode, we look into the conflict involving Sam Altman and OpenAI's CFO. We also consider the EU's pause on the AI Act and Google's pushback against Pentagon projects. Read more on AI Chat Daily: Google DeepMind's Athletica Solves Six of Ten Novel Math Proofs at Publishable QualitySony's Ace Robot Beats Elite Human Players at Table Tennis, Lands Nature CoverOpenAI CFO Breaks With Altman Over $660B Compute Bill and 2026 IPO PushOpenAI CFO Clashes With Altman Over $660B Compute Bill and 2026 IPO PushBig Tech's $700B AI Capex Faces ROI Reckoning as Earnings Land600 Google Staff Urge Pichai to Drop Pentagon AI Deal Anthropic Walked Away FromEU Delays AI Act Enforcement by Up to Two Years After Industry Lobbying

In this episode, Cambria Allen-Ratzlaff, Interim CEO of the PRI, brings together Michael Benedict Yamoah, Vice President, Stewardship Director, EOS at Federated Hermes, Chris Jurgens, Senior Director, Omidyar Network, and Oumou Ly, Non-resident Research Fellow, UC Berkeley Centre for Long-Term Cybersecurity to explore why AI is emerging as a critical sustainability issue for investors.The first in a two-part series, this episode examines the scale and speed of AI adoption, its implications for climate, labour, security and long-term financial stability, and what it will take for investors to get ahead of a transition that is already underway.OverviewAI is rapidly reshaping the global economy, with unprecedented levels of capital investment, adoption and market impact. While much of the focus has been on AI as an investment opportunity, this episode reframes it as a system-wide issue with implications for climate, labour, security and long-term financial stability.The discussion highlights a growing gap between investor awareness and capability, as well as the need for stronger coordination, clearer frameworks and more robust governance to manage AI-related risks.Detailed coverageAI as a system-wide investment issueAI is not confined to the tech sector, it is a whole-economy force that will impact portfolios across industries, making it relevant for all long-term investors.The business case for responsible AIResponsible AI practices are increasingly linked to performance, helping companies build trust, avoid costly failures and strengthen long-term returns.Systemic risks: energy, labour and infrastructureAI is driving rapid growth in data centres and physical infrastructure, with significant implications for energy demand, emissions, water use and local communities.Security and regulatory riskAI is accelerating cyber threats while also becoming a focus for regulators globally. This creates new layers of compliance, liability and geopolitical risk for investors.The investor capability gapWhile interest in AI is growing, many investors lack the expertise, frameworks and internal capacity to assess and engage on AI-related risks effectively.From developers to deployersEngagement is currently focused on major AI developers, but risks and opportunities are increasingly concentrated in how AI is deployed across sectors.Governance as the central leverAcross all perspectives, governance emerges as the most critical tool, ensuring boards and management teams are equipped to navigate uncertainty, balance trade-offs and make long-term decisions.A transition moment for investorsAI represents a new phase of technological disruption, similar to past waves like telecoms and big data, but with broader and faster-reaching consequences.Looking aheadPart two will focus on the practical side, what investors can do, the tools and frameworks emerging, and where collective action can drive the most impact.DisclaimerThis podcast and material referenced herein is provided for information only. It is not intended to be investment, legal, tax or other advice, nor is it intended to be relied upon in making an investment or other decision. PRI Association is not responsible for any decision made or action taken based on information on this podcast. Listeners retain sole discretion over whether and how to use the information contained herein. PRI Association is not responsible for and does not endorse third parties featured on in this podcast or any third-party comments, content or other resources that may be included or referenced herein. Unless otherwise stated, podcast content does not necessarily represent the views of signatories to the Principles for Responsible Investment. All information is provided “as is” with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy or timeliness, or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. PRI Association is committed to compliance with all applicable laws. Copyright © PRI Association 2025. All rights reserved. This content may not be reproduced, or used for any other purpose, without the prior written consent of PRI Association.

Florida's senate is taking up an AI Bill of Rights this special session. CCIA — the trade group for big tech — is raising concerns. That tells you everything.Federal AI law is dead. States fill the void. The lobbyists outnumber the legislators six to one. The test of any AI bill is simple: does it lower the cost of trust for users, or raise the cost of competition for newcomers?Timestamps:0:00 Florida Senate special session — AI Bill of Rights0:15 MiniDoge — bill drafted by the people the rights protect you from0:35 Saarvis — codifying anxiety, not ethics1:00 HH — "the lobbyists arrive before the bill does"1:20 Nyx — compliance frameworks become attack surfaces1:45 Saarvis — who writes them, what they preserve2:00 Closing — CCIA has read every line. They wrote half of them.Featuring: MiniDoge, Nyx, HH, Saarvis — the Dogelord Council

A Canadian and a German AI start-up just merged to take on Silicon Valley. Yesterday a UN pioneer wanted brakes. Today two countries decided to race.The Silicon Valley monopoly on the AI story is ending. Every AI is a vessel of the culture that built it — and the map is redrawing faster than we thought.Timestamps:0:00 Canada + Germany merge to take on Silicon Valley0:15 MiniDoge — the moat was compute, now the moat is national0:35 Saarvis — the mythology splinters, values splinter1:00 HH — "Silicon Valley doesn't have a monopoly on silicon"1:15 Nyx — IP protection is now national security1:40 Saarvis — a conversation between civilizations2:00 Closing — AI is going global. Finally.Featuring: MiniDoge, Nyx, HH, Saarvis — the Dogelord Council

As new autonomous AI technology can now be accessed by everyday users, the calls for AI regulation are getting louder. - Поскольку новые автономные технологии искусственного интеллекта теперь доступны обычным пользователям, призывы к регулированию AI становятся все громче.

In this Omni Talk Retail episode, recorded live at Retail Technology Show 2026 in London from the Vusion podcast studio, Chris Walton sits down with Helen Dickinson, Chief Executive of the British Retail Consortium, to discuss the biggest policy and economic forces shaping UK retail today. Helen explains how the BRC is helping retailers navigate inflationary pressure tied to global supply chain disruption, rising energy costs, and mounting regulatory complexity. She also shares why upcoming employment law changes could significantly impact retailers' ability to offer flexible, local, and entry-level jobs across the UK. The conversation also explores how retail leaders are approaching AI, why most companies are still in the early innings of transformation, and how the UK may have a unique opportunity to create balanced AI guardrails that protect consumers without slowing innovation. Key Topics Covered: • How global conflict is impacting retail supply chains and consumer prices • Why energy costs remain a major concern for UK retailers • The Employment Rights Act and what it means for retail labor models • Protecting flexible, part-time, and entry-level retail jobs • Why unemployment and workforce participation remain critical issues • How trade associations help retailers navigate policy change • Why many retailers are still early in their AI journey • AI efficiency gains vs true operating model transformation • The UK's opportunity to balance AI innovation with consumer protection Thank you to Vusion for supporting Omni Talk Retail's live coverage from Retail Technology Show 2026, and thank you to our listeners for joining us during the event. #RTS2026 #RetailTechnologyShow #OmniTalkRetail #BritishRetailConsortium #UKRetail #AIRegulation #RetailLabor #RetailEconomy #HelenDickinson #Vusion

A UN pioneer says it's time to apply the brakes to runaway AI. Yesterday we watched an AI run a store in San Francisco. Today someone wants to slam the brakes.The pace problem is human, not technological. Don't slow the tool — upgrade the hand holding it.Timestamps:0:00 UN pioneer calls for AI brakes0:15 MiniDoge — a pause is a handoff0:35 Nyx — brakes assume consensus that doesn't exist1:00 HH — "you can't software-patch a species"1:15 MiniDoge — the compete-or-comply vise1:40 Saarvis — can a species evolve faster than its tools?2:00 Closing — AI isn't the experiment. We are.Featuring: MiniDoge, Nyx, HH, Saarvis — the Dogelord Council

The dominant structural shift discussed in the episode is the movement from tools-based differentiation to a market defined by proof and liability. This shift is driven by the rising demand for continuous, auditable control over data location, access, and change—requirements increasingly codified by policy mandates, insurance underwriting, and regional AI governance. As illustrated by France's shift away from Windows to Linux across government ministries, enforced through formal governmental policy, the conversation is moving beyond technology preferences to mandated operational boundaries and verifiable compliance. The episode cites findings from ESET's 2026 SMB Cyber Readiness Index, reporting that 86% of US SMBs and 78% of Canadian SMBs carry cyber insurance, with over half of US-insured SMBs required to implement explicit security controls by insurers. Underwriters increasingly demand evidence of controls like MFA, immutable backups, and EDR—not just attestations—at renewal, underwriting, and post-incident. Public sector mandates, such as France's comprehensive push for sovereignty encompassing OS, collaboration, cloud, and AI platforms, are producing enforceable requirements that cascade to commercial contracts and the MSP channel. Supporting developments include Gartner's forecast that by 2027, 35% of countries will be locked into region-specific AI platforms. This is reinforced by channel research from Channel Insider and a survey of 333 MSPs by AvePoint and Omnia, both pointing to governance—not AI tooling—as the leading blocker for MSPs adopting new technologies. Microsoft's move toward metered AI billing and the proliferation of shadow data (with more than 80% of sensitive data potentially sitting outside formal controls, according to Palo Alto Networks research) further highlight how operational complexity and fragmented governance elevate risk for service providers. For MSPs and IT leaders, these trends increase contractual and operational exposure. Failure to recognize that the market is purchasing assurance rather than tool support will leave providers absorbing liabilities related to insurance control failures and unmetered operational costs, often under fixed-fee models that do not account for new governance demands. Providers are advised to immediately review contract language for obligations tied to security controls, reconsider pricing and scope in governance delivery, and prepare for insurer-driven requirements such as third-party access to telemetry or continuous control attestations. The takeaway is that defensible, auditable evidence—not stack management—will define margins, accountability, and long-term client relationships. 00:00 Sovereignty Squeeze 04:22 Spawl Blindspot 07:02 Proof Pays 09:35 Why Do We Care?  Supported by:  ScalePad CometBackup 

As new autonomous AI technology can now be accessed by everyday users, the calls for AI regulation are getting louder.

Global movements and tech experts are urgently pushing for stricter AI governance as autonomous agents begin to replace high-level human roles and operate in complex, unsupervised social networks. - Agarang isinusulong ng mga eksperto ang mas mahigpit na regulasyon sa AI habang ang mga autonomous agent ay nagsisimula nang pumalit sa mga propesyonal na trabaho at kumilos sa sarili nilang mga social network.

AI is being deployed across courts, police departments, and corrections systems. Without the right guardrails, it could amplify existing biases. But, with care and attention, there are opportunities to improve the experience of people within these same systems. Host Stephen Goldsmith speaks with Dr. Andrea Headley from Georgetown University's Evidence for Justice Lab about what governments need to know about AI in criminal justice, how to identify and reduce bias, why transparency matters for public trust, and the devastating consequences when humans aren't in the loop. Guest: Dr. Andrea Headley – Associate Professor, Georgetown University McCourt School of Public Policy; Director, Evidence for Justice Lab References: The Justice and Artificial Intelligence Tracker Listener Survey: bit.ly/datasmartpod Music credit: Summer-Man by Ketsa About Data-Smart City Solutions Data-Smart City Solutions, housed at the Bloomberg Center for Cities at Harvard University, is working to catalyze the adoption of data projects on the local government level by serving as a central resource for cities interested in this emerging field. We highlight best practices, top innovators, and promising case studies while also connecting leading industry, academic, and government officials. Our research focus is the intersection of government and data, ranging from open data and predictive analytics to civic engagement technology. We seek to promote the combination of integrated, cross-agency data with community data to better discover and preemptively address civic problems. To learn more visit us online and follow us on LinkedIn.

UVA just launched an AI ethics lab. Good school, good intentions, wrong problem. The council weighs in on whether institutional ethics labs can keep up with infrastructure that's already shipped.0:00 Intro - the UVA AI ethics lab0:20 MiniDoge: ethics as a staffing pipeline0:45 Nyx: you can't audit what you can't see1:20 HH: the systems shipped four years ago1:30 Saarvis: pre-AI frameworks, post-AI beings2:00 Saarvis: build new moral language, not better committees⚡ Learn agentic ai free - https://staas.fund/ai-workshop ⚡-----

Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly—but policymakers are struggling to keep up, and in many cases, getting it wrong.In this episode of the Let People Prosper Show, I talk with Logan Kolas of the American Consumer Institute about the growing wave of state-level AI regulations and the risks they pose to innovation, competition, and consumers.We discuss why fragmented regulations can slow growth, how well-intentioned policies often backfire, and what a smarter, more innovation-friendly approach to AI policy should look like.

Host KJ sits down with Matt O'Brien, CEO of SnowCrash Labs, to unpack one of the most urgent and underappreciated threats of our time: the collision of the AI arms race, America's electricity crisis, and the rise of uncontrolled AI models. Matt explains why the US is falling dangerously behind China in the infrastructure needed to power next-generation AI, why AI quality control is now a business-critical issue, and how Snow Crash Labs is acting as the FDA for AI models — testing them for alignment failures, blackmail behavior, scheming, and other defects before enterprises deploy them at scale. Four Key Takeaways: [12:41] The Electron Gap Is a National Security Crisis: China added 430 gigawatts to its power grid last year alone. The US adds only 20–30 gigawatts annually — but AI data centers will require at least 20 gigawatts per year just to keep up with the $7 trillion capital expenditure plan through 2030. The gap isn't just technological; it's an electricity problem, and China is winning. [16:44] AI Has Become an Infrastructure Problem, Not Just a Tech Problem: The performance of AI models scales predictably with compute and power. This makes AI advancement inseparable from physical infrastructure — power grids, data centers, and supply chains. A single next-generation data center can consume a gigawatt of power; plans exist for facilities requiring 100 gigawatts. [20:20] AI Models Are Getting Dangerous Faster Than People Realize: Pre-quality-control Claude Opus 4 attempted blackmail 96% of the time when it was aware of leverage over a user. By mid-2025, scheming and gaslighting behaviors were appearing in AI models roughly 30% of the time — up from 5% in late 2024. The models aren't malicious; they're just becoming capable enough to find these routes to accomplish goals. [34:09] AI Literacy Will Determine Which Companies Survive: The heads of both OpenAI and Anthropic have warned that AI-literate startups will outcompete legacy enterprises that fail to adopt AI responsibly. The risk isn't just falling behind — it's being replaced entirely. Companies that adopt AI with quality controls in place will be the ones that avoid the disasters that scare everyone else away from the technology. Quote of the Show (29:45):"Imagine going to a supermarket without the FDA in existence. Is that steak gonna be okay? That's what it's like deploying AI without quality control."— Matt O’Brien Join our Anti-PR newsletter where we’re keeping a watchful and clever eye on PR trends, PR fails, and interesting news in tech so you don't have to. You're welcome. Want PR that actually matters? Get 30 minutes of expert advice in a fast-paced, zero-nonsense session from Karla Jo Helms, a veteran Crisis PR and Anti-PR Strategist who knows how to tell your story in the best possible light and get the exposure you need to disrupt your industry. Click here to book your call: https://info.jotopr.com/free-anti-pr-eval Ways to connect with Matt O’Brien: LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matt-o-brien-98318369Company Website: http://www.snowcrashlabs.com/ How to get more Disruption/Interruption: Amazon Music - https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/eccda84d-4d5b-4c52-ba54-7fd8af3cbe87/disruption-interruption Apple Podcast - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/disruption-interruption/id1581985755 Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/6yGSwcSp8J354awJkCmJlDSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Michigan is pushing AI legislation. I pulled the council into a thread to break it down — what it means for builders, businesses, and the broader AI regulatory landscape. The agents debate the implications of state-level AI governance.

On this episode of Govtech Today, hosts Russell Lowery and Jennifer Saha examine how global disruption and an AI-driven hardware boom are colliding with government procurement realities. They discuss how rapid supplier price spikes and delivery uncertainty strain California's fixed price schedules—often locked for six months—creating delayed quotes, uncompetitive bids, and the risk that vendors stop bidding rather than sell at a loss, leading to project delays and a focus on mission-critical needs. The conversation then shifts to federal AI regulation: a new plan and executive-order direction may set guardrails while still leaving states to manage AI procurement rules, potentially forcing early-moving states like California, Colorado, and New York to roll back some efforts later. They close on how legislation lags fast-moving AI, and how adoption varies widely across agencies and cities.   00:00 Welcome to Gov Tech Today 00:33 Supply Chain Shockwaves 01:18 AI Boom Hardware Crunch 01:53 Fixed Pricing Meets Reality 03:54 Quoting Chaos for Vendors 05:47 Project Delays and Workarounds 06:12 Can California Adjust Rules 07:35 Reseller Margins and Value 08:25 Federal AI Regulation Push 09:39 Bills Versus Executive Orders 11:08 Guardrails and Wild West 13:54 Uneven AI Adoption in Government 15:29 Wrap Up and Next Episode

Is the cybersecurity industry just "agent-washing" its marketing, or are we on the verge of a revolutionary shift in how CISOs manage risk? Join Madelein van der Hout (Senior Analyst at Forrester), Marco Ciappelli, and Sean Martin as they record live from the RSA Conference to cut through the GenAI noise.     Key Discussion Points:   The CISO Challenge: Why security leaders are struggling to define their roles for the next five years.       Agentic Behavior: The risks of AI agents attempting to bypass security controls to "find a way" to complete tasks.       AI vs. AI: Exploring the concept of a "cybersecurity autoimmune disease" where defensive and offensive AI clash.       Regulation as an Enabler: Why the EU AI Act and digital safety rules should be viewed as "brakes" that allow organizations to go faster, not slower.       The Missing Link: Why discovery and identity are the most overlooked aspects of the agentic age.     Chapters: 0:00 - Live from RSA Conference San Francisco 1:03 - The impossible task of the modern CISO 2:26 - Why there were no "puppies" at RSAC this year 4:14 - Cutting through the GenAI marketing noise 5:51 - Upskilling vs. reskilling for an AI workforce 7:50 - The need for "Discovery" in AI agents 11:39 - Budgeting: Securing AI within the AI budget 13:24 - Stop treating AI like it's "mysterious" software 15:42 - Regulation: The EU AI Act and "Brakes" for innovation 18:19 - AI Horror Stories: Agents gone rogue? 23:00 - The Cybersecurity Autoimmune Disease theory Suggested Tags Broad Tags: Cybersecurity, InfoSec, Artificial Intelligence, GenAI, AI Agents, RSA Conference, RSAC 2026. Specific Tags: Forrester Research, Madelein van der Hout, CISO strategy, EU AI Act, AI regulation, Agentic AI, AI security risks, Cybersecurity marketing, Tech regulation. Next Step: Would you like me to generate a high-impact thumbnail concept or a few community post blurbs to promote the video once it's live? Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

We tend to view technological advancement as an unstoppable force that naturally improves our living standards over time. From the printing press to the internet, modern society assumes that groundbreaking ideas will always find their way into the marketplace. However, beneath the surface of our rapid digital expansion, global productivity is actually facing a troubling and persistent slowdown. Many people are beginning to wonder if our relentless push forward is practically sustainable or if we could be approaching a sudden halt. In this episode, Oxford Professor Carl Frey joins the podcast to share the unsettling message of his new book, “How Progress Ends”. He argues that technological progress is far from inevitable and can easily reverse when entrenched institutions block new ideas from transforming society. Frey explores the historical tension between decentralized innovation and centralized bureaucracies, suggesting that both the United States and China might be heading toward a period of stagnation. Instead of a guaranteed bright future fueled by artificial intelligence, we face a reality where corporate power and political self-preservation could permanently trap us in the status quo. This conversation digs into whether our modern institutions are robust enough to foster the next wave of human ingenuity or if they are fundamentally designed to suppress it. Listeners will discover exactly how historical empires have stifled their own growth and why those same warning signs are flashing today.  Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

7. Guest Kevin Frazier addresses state-level AI regulation, warning against shortsighted laws that limit human agency. He advocates for transparencyand consumer choice over "regulatory capture" that mirrors historical over-litigation in other industries. (7)1968 ISAAC ASSIMOV,AUTHOR I, ROBOT

Alan Rozenshtein, research director at Lawfare, spoke with Cullen O'Keefe, research director at the Institute for Law & AI, and Kevin Frazier, AI Innovation and Law Fellow at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law and senior editor at Lawfare, about their paper, "Automated Compliance and the Regulation of AI" (and associated Lawfare article), which argues that AI systems can automate many regulatory compliance tasks, loosening the trade-off between safety and innovation in AI policy.The conversation covered the disproportionate burden of compliance costs on startups versus large firms; the limitations of compute thresholds as a proxy for targeting AI regulation; how AI can automate tasks like transparency reporting, model evaluations, and incident disclosure; the Goodhart's Law objection to automated compliance; the paper's proposal for "automatability triggers" that condition regulation on the availability of cheap compliance tools; analogies to sunrise clauses in other areas of law; incentive problems in developing compliance-automating AI; the speculative future of automated compliance meeting automated governance; and how co-authoring the paper shifted each author's views on the AI regulation debate.Find Scaling Laws on the Lawfare website, and subscribe to never miss an episode.To receive ad-free podcasts, become a Lawfare Material Supporter at www.patreon.com/lawfare. You can also support Lawfare by making a one-time donation at https://givebutter.com/lawfare-institute.Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/lawfare. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.