Podcasts about review it yourself

Love, grief, desire, and rebirth collide in Deb Twiss's Crave journeyIn this emotionally honest and deeply engaging episode of Review It Yourself, Sean sits down with filmmaker, writer, actor, and creative force Deb Twiss to discuss her powerful new independent film Crave (2025). Exploring themes of love after loss, emotional vulnerability, self-discovery, relationships, intimacy, and personal liberation, Crave is a bold indie drama that refuses to shy away from the complexities of real human connection.Deb Twiss opens up about the deeply personal inspirations behind Crave, including grief, healing, and navigating life after devastating loss. Together, Sean and Deb unpack how the film balances sensuality, emotional honesty, hope, and realism while also diving into the realities of independent filmmaking, guerrilla shooting techniques, music, cinematography, and character-driven storytelling.If you love independent cinema, emotionally intelligent drama, behind-the-scenes filmmaking discussions, or films exploring mature relationships and emotional growth, this is an essential listen.In This EpisodeDeb Twiss discusses the inspiration behind Crave (2025)The emotional themes of grief, healing, desire, and personal rebirthCreating authentic adult relationships on screenHow music shapes the emotional identity of the filmIndependent filmmaking and guerrilla production techniquesShooting scenes using innovative low-budget filmmaking methodsAbout Crave (2025)Crave follows Abigail, a woman struggling to rebuild her life after the death of her husband. As she forms a passionate and emotionally complex connection with her friend Max, the film explores themes of grief, emotional dependency, intimacy, healing, liberation, and rediscovering identity.Set against the backdrop of New York City, Crave combines raw emotional honesty with stylish indie filmmaking to create a mature, thought-provoking drama about what it means to truly reconnect with yourself and others.Why You Should ListenThis episode goes far beyond a standard film review. Sean and Deb Twiss explore:The emotional realities behind storytellingHow personal experiences shape creative workThe changing landscape of independent cinemaThe importance of authentic representation in relationshipsMental health, emotional growth, and vulnerabilityHow filmmakers can create visually stunning work on limited budgetsWhether you are a filmmaker, film fan, writer, actor, or simply someone interested in meaningful conversations about life, art, and emotional resilience, this episode offers genuine insight and inspiration.Guest Details – Deb TwissDeb Twiss is a filmmaker, writer, actor, and creative artist behind the 2025 indie drama Crave.Follow and support Deb Twiss:Instagram: deborahtwiss Threads: @deborahtwissCrave on IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt38068899/Follow Review It YourselfStay connected with Review It Yourself for more film reviews, filmmaker interviews, TV discussions, pop culture conversations, and independent cinema coverage.Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comSupport the PodcastIf you enjoyed this episode of Review It Yourself, please:Follow the podcast on your favourite podcast platformLeave a 5-star review on Apple Podcasts and SpotifyShare the episode on social mediaRecommend the podcast to fellow film fansEngage with the show online and send in your film review requestsEvery review, share, comment, and recommendation genuinely helps independent podcasts grow and reach new listeners Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

A ridiculous climb, impossible odds, and a surprisingly fun debateIn this episode of Review It Yourself, we take on the 2000 survival thriller Vertical Limit—a film that's equal parts intense, absurd, and weirdly unforgettable. Hosts Sean and Sarah go head-to-head as nostalgia clashes with scepticism in a lively, funny, and surprisingly thoughtful deep dive into one of the most over-the-top mountaineering films ever made. Sean comes in with a soft spot for the film, while Sarah questions whether it deserves any praise at all. What follows is a sharp, entertaining breakdown of explosive action scenes, questionable realism, and the emotional stakes behind the story. From the infamous opening tragedy to the film's relentless escalation, the discussion highlights just how much Vertical Limit asks its audience to suspend disbelief.But this episode goes beyond just picking apart unrealistic climbing sequences. Sean and Sarah dig into the deeper themes—exploring ambition, ego, and the ethics of risking lives for glory. The film's portrayal of mountaineering culture, corporate greed, and extreme decision-making becomes a springboard for wider conversation about human nature under pressure.Along the way, there's plenty of humour as the hosts debate whether this is the “dumbest” film they've covered—or simply one of the most entertaining. They also touch on standout performances, character motivations, and the film's place in early 2000s action cinema. The result is an episode that balances critique with genuine enjoyment, making it perfect for film fans who love both analysis and banter.If you enjoy film reviews that don't take themselves too seriously—but still offer real insight—this episode delivers exactly that.

High-altitude chaos, nitro explosions, and questionable climbing decisions collideIn this second part of Review It Yourself's deep dive into Vertical Limit, Sean and Sarah push further up the mountain—and deeper into the madness. From explosive set pieces to surprisingly brutal injuries, this episode breaks down everything that makes this cult climbing thriller unforgettable… for better and worse.Picking up where Part One left off, the conversation explores the film's most intense sequences, including the deadly realities of high-altitude climbing, where your body is already failing long before the danger even begins . The hosts dive into the film's logic (or lack of it), debating whether the action holds up or collapses under its own ambition—often hilariously.Expect plenty of sharp observations and laughs as they unpack the film's wild choices, from characters making questionable survival decisions to the sheer physical toll of climbing up… and especially down. There's also discussion of memorable moments that stuck with them since childhood, including some genuinely grim scenes involving injury and survival .By the end, Sean and Sarah reflect on whether Vertical Limit deserves its place as a cult favourite, or if it's simply an over-the-top relic of early 2000s action cinema. Either way, it's a film that sparks strong reactions—and makes for a highly entertaining review.If you enjoy film reviews with honest opinions, humour, and zero pretension, this episode delivers exactly that.

A haunting maritime tragedy retold through gripping drama and expert insight.In this episode of Review It Yourself, we dive deep into the powerful Polish mini-series Heweliusz—a dramatisation of one of the most devastating maritime disasters in European history. Joined by special guest Jamie from Old Shipping Lines, this episode blends historical analysis, storytelling critique, and real-world maritime expertise for a truly compelling listen.A gripping true story beneath the wavesThe series explores the tragic sinking of the Jan Heweliusz ferry, which capsized on 14th January 1993—still considered the worst maritime disaster in Polish history, with only a handful of survivors .From the very first episode, the show establishes a sombre and haunting tone, capturing not just the disaster itself, but the human cost—families grieving, survivors haunted, and investigators searching for answers. The narrative cleverly shifts through timelines, gradually revealing the truth behind what happened .What we discuss in this episodeJamie brings his deep maritime knowledge to the conversation, helping unpack the realism behind the show and the real-life events that inspired it.Expect discussion on:The accuracy of the ship's portrayal and conditions onboardThe political and institutional pressures surrounding the disasterThemes of accountability, secrecy, and systemic failureThe emotional impact on victims, families, and investigatorsHow the series builds tension across its five-episode structureThe conversation also explores how the show handles complex topics like blame and cover-ups, with particular attention to how institutions may shift responsibility rather than confront systemic issues .Why this series stands outHeweliusz isn't just another disaster drama—it's a slow-burn investigation into truth, responsibility, and memory. The series balances technical realism with emotional storytelling, making it both informative and deeply affecting.Jamie highlights how the show captures the reality of maritime disasters, from ship conditions to decision-making under pressure, while also pointing listeners to further resources for a deeper understanding of the tragedy.About our guest: Jamie – Old Shipping LinesJamie runs the Old Shipping Lines YouTube channel, where he explores maritime history, ship disasters, and detailed breakdowns of real-world incidents. His content includes in-depth analysis and even visual reconstructions of how disasters unfolded.

When the sea turns deadly, every decision becomes a fight.Dive into this week's episode of Review It Yourself, where Sean and Sarah tackle the gripping disaster drama The Perfect Storm—a film that blends real-life tragedy, intense character drama, and jaw-dropping ocean spectacle.Based on a semi-biographical account inspired by real events and the book by Sebastian Junger, this episode explores whether the film still holds up—and what it gets right (and wrong) about survival at sea .

Volcanoes, chaos, and 90s thrills—does Dante's Peak still erupt today? In this explosive first part of our deep dive into Dante's Peak, Review It Yourself hosts Sean and Sarah unpack one of the most iconic disaster movies of the 90s. From molten lava to political tension, this episode blends nostalgia, film critique, and surprisingly relevant real-world themes. Tangents aside, we eventually begin reviewing the film 52 minutes in.The discussion kicks off with a look at the film's gripping opening and its commitment to practical effects, crowds, and realism—something modern blockbusters don't always deliver. Sean and Sarah highlight how the film balances spectacle with grounded storytelling, praising the tension-building and strong character focus that made it stand out in the disaster genre .As the episode unfolds, the conversation turns toward deeper themes—science versus politics, risk management, and how communities respond to looming catastrophe. The hosts explore the character of Harry Dalton and the film's portrayal of experts struggling to be heard, a theme that feels just as relevant today .There's also plenty of fun debate around classic disaster movie tropes: evacuation logistics, clogged roads, and the sheer impossibility of saving everyone when nature strikes . The group questions how realistic the film's crisis response really is—and whether any town could truly survive such an eruption.Whether you're a fan of 90s cinema, disaster films, or just love a passionate breakdown of movies, this episode delivers insight, humour, and a fresh perspective on a cult favourite.

Volcano chaos, science ignored, and peak 90s disaster movie madness!If you love explosive disaster films, this episode dives deep into Dante's Peak and why it still erupts with tension, questionable decisions, and surprisingly sharp commentary on human behaviour under pressure.In Part Two, the hosts of Review It Yourself (Sean and Sarah) go beyond surface-level reactions and explore what really makes this film tick—from the science to the way panic spreads faster than lava. Expect a mix of humour, critique, and genuine appreciation for what works.

A conspiracy, a courtroom, and one film that changed political cinema forever.What happens when one of the most controversial political films ever made is given the full Director's Cut treatment? In this episode of Review It Yourself, Sean and Sarah are joined by returning guest Fraser McCallum to explore the sprawling, provocative and endlessly debated film JFK (1991) – Director's Cut.Part One finds Fraser returning to the podcast to discuss what he considers one of his favourite films of all time, and the conversation quickly moves beyond a simple review. Together Sean, Sarah and Fraser l dive deep into the filmmaking craft, historical context and cultural impact of Oliver Stone's controversial political epic.The discussion explores how the film blends historical fact, speculation and cinematic storytelling to present the investigation led by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. While some critics argue the film plays fast and loose with history, Fraser argues its true power lies in its ability to spark curiosity, debate and deeper research.Along the way the team unpack the film's extraordinary ensemble cast, the remarkable editing and sound design, and the narrative structure that turns the story into something between a detective mystery and a courtroom drama. The conversation also reflects on how the film influenced public discourse around government transparency and historical truth in the years after its release.Expect a lively conversation covering:Why JFK: Director's Cut remains one of the most debated films in political cinemaKevin Costner's performance as Jim Garrison and the film's incredible castThe detective-story structure that evolves into a powerful courtroom climaxThe blurred lines between history, conspiracy and storytellingHow the film helped fuel renewed public interest in the Kennedy assassinationWhether artistic storytelling can still reveal deeper truths about historyWhether you love political thrillers, historical films or big cinematic swings, this episode explores why JFK remains a landmark film more than three decades later.About Our Guest – Fraser McCallumFraser McCallum is a returning guest on Review It Yourself, works for the Imperial War Museum and is the author of 'Cold War Britain: Fifty years in the Shadow of the Bomb'. His deep knowledge of the Kennedy assassination and the cultural impact of Oliver Stone's film brings a unique perspective to this discussion.Instagram: fraser_mcca11umThreads: @fraser_mcca11umFind His Book at IWM Bookshop: https://shop.iwm.org.uk/products/cold-war-britain-fifty-years-in-the-shadow-of-the-bomb?_pos=2&_sid=4d048dfe1&_ss=rListen to More from Review It YourselfIf you enjoyed this episode, make sure you subscribe to Review It Yourself, the podcast where we dive deep into films, TV, books and pop culture — sometimes with guests, always with strong opinions.Follow the podcast here:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comSupport the PodcastIf you enjoy Review It Yourself, please consider supporting the show:Subscribe on your favourite podcast platformLeave a review on Apple Podcasts – it really helps new listeners discover the showShare the episode with friends who love film discussions and deep divesFollow us on social media and join the conversationYour support helps the podcast continue bringing thoughtful, entertaining and sometimes controversial discussions about the films and stories that shape culture. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Conspiracies, cinema, and political paranoia collide in Oliver Stone's controversial JFK epic.In this second part of our deep dive into Oliver Stone's landmark political thriller JFK (1991) – Director's Cut, hosts Sean and Sarah continue their conversation with returning guest Fraser McCallum. The discussion moves beyond the basics of the film and into the deeper cultural and cinematic impact of one of the most debated movies ever made.Fraser returns to the show to talk about a film he considers one of his favourite movies of all time, exploring why JFK continues to provoke debate decades after its release.Together, the panel examine how Stone's film blends investigative drama, political commentary, and conspiracy thriller storytelling to recreate Jim Garrison's controversial investigation into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The conversation looks at how the film presents competing perspectives and contradictory narratives, reflecting the complexity surrounding the historical event itself.Part Two of the discussion expands into wider themes about political corruption on-screen, the evolution of Hollywood filmmaking, and the changing landscape of serious adult drama. The hosts and Fraser explore how films like JFK once occupied a major place in mainstream cinema and why similar ambitious political films are rarer today.The episode also explores how the film's legacy extends beyond entertainment, shaping how audiences think about political conspiracies, historical truth, and the power of cinema to influence public debate.In this episode we discuss:Why JFK: Director's Cut remains one of the most controversial political films ever madeOliver Stone's filmmaking style and narrative structureKevin Costner's portrayal of Jim Garrison and the film's star-studded castThe influence of JFK on conspiracy culture and political storytellingHow the film blends fact, speculation and cinematic storytellingThe decline of large-scale political dramas in modern HollywoodWhy films like JFK still shape how audiences understand historyIf you're fascinated by political thrillers, film history, or the enduring mystery surrounding the Kennedy assassination, this episode is an essential listen.About Our Guest – Fraser McCallumFraser McCallum is a returning guest on Review It Yourself, works for the Imperial War Museum and is the author of 'Cold War Britain: Fifty years in the Shadow of the Bomb'. His deep knowledge of the Kennedy assassination and the cultural impact of Oliver Stone's film brings a unique perspective to this discussion.Instagram: fraser_mcca11umThreads: @fraser_mcca11umFind His Book at IWM Bookshop: https://shop.iwm.org.uk/products/cold-war-britain-fifty-years-in-the-shadow-of-the-bomb?_pos=2&_sid=4d048dfe1&_ss=rFollow & Contact Review It YourselfStay connected with Review It Yourself and join the conversation about films, TV and pop culture.Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter:https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky:https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads:https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email:reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comSupport the PodcastIf you enjoy Review It Yourself, here are a few ways you can help support the show:⭐ Subscribe on your favourite podcast platform⭐ Leave a review on Apple Podcasts to help more listeners discover the show⭐ Share this episode with friends who love film discussions and deep dives⭐ Follow us on social media and join the conversationYour support helps the podcast keep producing thoughtful and entertaining film discussions.

Why Raiders of the Lost Ark Still Defines the Perfect Adventure MovieIn this episode of Review It Yourself, we dig into one of the most iconic adventure films ever made: Raiders of the Lost Ark. Joining the show is Ryan Walker, host of The Walk The Line Podcast, for a lively and often hilarious discussion about the film that launched the legendary archaeologist Indiana Jones into pop-culture history.Together we explore why this classic directed by Steven Spielberg and starring Harrison Ford continues to influence modern cinema decades after its release. From unforgettable set pieces and practical effects to the film's pacing, villains, and iconic moments, this episode breaks down what makes Raiders such an enduring favourite.But it wouldn't be Review It Yourself without a few disagreements. While many fans consider Raiders the pinnacle of the original Indiana Jones trilogy, the conversation dives into whether it truly stands above entries like Temple of Doom or The Last Crusade.Along the way, we also talk about nostalgia, blockbuster storytelling, and the changing nature of heroes in modern movies.Expect passionate opinions, film geek deep dives, and plenty of laughs as we revisit one of the greatest adventure films ever made.What We Discuss In This EpisodeWhy Raiders of the Lost Ark is considered a masterpiece of adventure filmmakingThe legacy of Indiana Jones and why the character still resonates todayMemorable scenes, villains, and practical effects that defined the filmHow blockbuster storytelling has evolved since the early 1980sWhether the original Indiana Jones trilogy still holds up todayWhy practical effects often feel more impactful than modern CGIGuest: Ryan Walker – Walk The Line PodcastThis episode features Ryan Walker, host of the Walk The Line Podcast, where he explores stories, culture, and engaging conversations with a unique perspective.Follow and listen to Ryan here:Podcast: The Walk The Line PodcastSearch The Walk The Line Podcast on your favourite podcast platform.About Review It YourselfReview It Yourself is the podcast where we break down films, TV, and pop culture with honest opinions, humour, and a fresh perspective. If you enjoy deep dives into classic movies, debates about beloved franchises, and thoughtful discussion about storytelling, this is the show for you.Follow Review It YourselfStay connected and join the conversation:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021

Ventriloquism, noir shadows, and murder mystery collide spectacularly.In this episode of Review It Yourself – film reviews without the faff, we step into the strange, stylish world of The Dummy Detective, a bold independent film blending classic film noir with the art of ventriloquism.Joining us are:Jonathan Geffner – Writer, producer and star, plays Detective Van Trillo, and his wooden-partner Suede.Ed Altman – Portraying enigmatic radio presenter Elliot BlackDeb Twiss – Bringing Femme Fatale Chloe Lake to lifeThis is a deep-dive conversation into independent filmmaking, character psychology, creative persistence, and the fine line between illusion and reality.Inside The Dummy Detective (2025)The Dummy Detective is no ordinary murder mystery. Fusing noir atmosphere with ventriloquism, the film introduces audiences to the unforgettable Van Trillo and Suede characters — creations that Jonathan Geffner developed decades ago before finally bringing them to the screen.Jonathan discusses:The 30-year journey of developing the charactersWriting and producing an independent featureThe challenges of self-financing and independent promotionBalancing humour and darkness in a noir-inspired storyEd Altman shares the unique acting challenge of portraying a ventriloquist entangled in a murder mystery — exploring themes of loneliness, dual identity, and perception.Deb Twiss reflects on playing a modern femme fatale, the strength of the script, and how layered writing allowed her to fully inhabit Chloe Lake.Together, we explore:The collaborative atmosphere on setShooting on a tight scheduleBlending classic noir influences with contemporary indie filmmakingAudience reactions and the film's receptionWhy ambiguity is central to the story's powerIf you're searching for discussions on independent film, noir cinema, ventriloquism in film, murder mystery movies, indie filmmaking challenges, or actor interviews, this episode delivers.Where to WatchThe Dummy Detective (2025) is available on major streaming platforms including Amazon Prime and Tubi.Support independent cinema and experience this unique noir experiment for yourself.Connect with the GuestsJonathan GeffnerWriter, Producer & Actor – Detective Van TrilloFollow his work and updates related to The Dummy Detective via official film channels and streaming platforms.Ed AltmanActor – Elliot BlackFor professional updates and appearances, search Ed Altman via official film listings and casting platforms.Deb TwissActress – Chloe LakeFor career updates, film appearances and future projects, follow Deb Twiss through official industry listings and social media.Follow & Contact Review It YourselfWe're a proudly independent podcast spotlighting film and television — from blockbusters to hidden indie gems.

What happens when space exploration meets human emotion? Discover the Deep Impact effect in Part Two of our review.Deep Impact Review — A Thoughtful Dive into Humanity and the Cosmos:In this episode of Review It Yourself, we unpack the 1998 sci-fi drama Deep Impact, exploring how this disaster movie combines thrilling spectacle with emotional storytelling. More than just comets and chaos, Deep Impact asks profound questions about leadership, sacrifice, and the meaning of survival.Listeners will gain exclusive insights into what makes Deep Impact stand out from other end-of-the-world films — from its grounded realism to its compassionate portrayal of humanity under pressure. Whether you're a film buff, a sci-fi fan, or love character-driven stories, this one's for you.Key TakeawaysHow Deep Impact redefined the 90s disaster movie genreThe emotional core and moral dilemmas faced by its charactersBehind-the-scenes details that add depth to the film's impactWhy its ending still resonates decades laterGuest DetailsJust the classic combo of Sean and Sarah.Follow & Contact Review It YourselfStay connected with Review It Yourself for more intelligent reviews, interviews, and deep dives into books and films:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comFor guest enquiries, collaborations, or listener feedback, email directly — the show welcomes thoughtful discussion and future topic suggestions.Why You Should ListenThis isn't just another movie review — it's a smart, heartfelt exploration of how cinema mirrors our fears, hopes, and humanity. Tune in and rediscover why Deep Impact remains one of the most underrated sci-fi dramas of its time. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

What happens when space exploration meets human emotion? Discover the Deep Impact effect.Deep Impact Review — A Thoughtful Dive into Humanity and the Cosmos:In this episode of Review It Yourself, we unpack the 1998 sci-fi drama Deep Impact, exploring how this disaster movie combines thrilling spectacle with emotional storytelling. More than just comets and chaos, Deep Impact asks profound questions about leadership, sacrifice, and the meaning of survival.Listeners will gain exclusive insights into what makes Deep Impact stand out from other end-of-the-world films — from its grounded realism to its compassionate portrayal of humanity under pressure. Whether you're a film buff, a sci-fi fan, or love character-driven stories, this one's for you.Key TakeawaysHow Deep Impact redefined the 90s disaster movie genreThe emotional core and moral dilemmas faced by its charactersBehind-the-scenes details that add depth to the film's impactWhy its ending still resonates decades laterGuest DetailsJust the classic combo of Sean and Sarah.Follow & Contact Review It YourselfStay connected with Review It Yourself for more intelligent reviews, interviews, and deep dives into books and films:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comFor guest enquiries, collaborations, or listener feedback, email directly — the show welcomes thoughtful discussion and future topic suggestions.Why You Should ListenThis isn't just another movie review — it's a smart, heartfelt exploration of how cinema mirrors our fears, hopes, and humanity. Tune in and rediscover why Deep Impact remains one of the most underrated sci-fi dramas of its time. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Inside the mind of a Nazi—and the psychiatrist who studied him.In this powerful episode of Review It Yourself, Sean sits down with acclaimed author and journalist Jack El-Hai to discuss his gripping and deeply researched book, The Nazi and the Psychiatrist.This is not just another Second World War/World War II book review. It's a psychological investigation into evil, power, ego, and moral reckoning at the aftermath of history's darkest chapter.A Psychological Duel at NurembergIn The Nazi and the Psychiatrist, Jack El-Hai explores the extraordinary relationship between Hermann Goering, the highest-ranking Nazi captured alive, and Douglas M. Kelley, the U.S. Army psychiatrist tasked with evaluating him during the Nuremberg Trials.During our conversation, we unpack:How Kelley psychologically assessed leading Nazi defendantsWhy Goering fascinated and manipulated those around himThe concept of the “banality of evil” in practiceThe absence of a single psychiatric diagnosis to explain atrocityThe moral and professional toll the Nuremberg experience took on KelleyWhy these questions still resonate todayJack reveals how Kelley's pioneering psychological work challenged simplistic narratives about madness and evil — and how America struggled to process the uncomfortable conclusions.Why The Nazi and the Psychiatrist Matters NowWith the upcoming 2025 film Nuremberg renewing interest in this story, El-Hai's book has never been more relevant.In a world still grappling with extremism, ideology, and the psychology of power, this episode asks:Are monsters born—or made?Can ordinary individuals commit extraordinary evil?What responsibility does psychology bear in interpreting history?About Our Guest: Jack El-HaiJack El-Hai is an award-winning author and journalist specialising in narrative non-fiction, medical history, crime, and ethics.

Corruption, crime, and Connery—diving deep into De Palma's classic.In this episode of Review It Yourself, we break down the first half of The Untouchables—the iconic Prohibition-era crime thriller directed by Brian De Palma. Joined by co-host Sarah, we explore the film's powerful opening act, its larger-than-life characters, and why this stylish gangster epic still commands attention nearly four decades later.From the tense cat-and-mouse battle between federal agent Eliot Ness and Chicago crime boss Al Capone, to the unforgettable performances by Kevin Costner, Sean Connery, and Robert De Niro, we unpack what makes this film such a standout in the gangster genre. Is it the script? The score? The mythologising of law enforcement? Or Connery's scene-stealing gravitas?Expect thoughtful film analysis, sharp opinions, historical context around Prohibition-era Chicago, and a discussion about how Hollywood reshapes real-life events into cinematic legend. Whether you're a long-time fan of classic crime dramas or discovering this film for the first time, this episode offers insight, debate, and plenty of appreciation for one of the 1980s' most celebrated gangster movies.We discuss:The film's themes of justice, morality, and myth-makingThe dynamic between Ness and MaloneDe Palma's directorial style and use of tensionPerformances that elevate the materialHow The Untouchables compares to other mob classicsIf you love deep-dive movie reviews, classic cinema breakdowns, and honest film discussion, this episode is for you.Please Note: There are direct quotes used in this review, which include the use of contextual slurs/stereotypes. These are used purely as quotes from the film and to aid discussion, as the film's dialogue reflects the bigoted, harsh atmosphere of 1930's Prohibition-Era Chicago. There is no intention to cause offence or distress.Follow & Contact Review It Yourself:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comSupport the Podcast:If you enjoy Review It Yourself, please:Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favourite podcast platformLeave a 5-star rating and written review on Apple Podcasts to help boost visibilityShare this episode with fellow film fansFollow us on social media for updates and future episodesYour support helps the podcast grow, reach new listeners, and continue producing in-depth film reviews.Part Two of our The Untouchables discussion available now—where we continue analysing the film's most iconic sequences and its lasting legacy in crime cinema.Listen now and decide for yourself… is The Untouchables truly untouchable? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Violence escalates, loyalties fracture, justice turns brutally personal.In Part Two of their deep dive into The Untouchables, Sean and co-host Sarah break down the explosive second half of Brian De Palma's Prohibition-era crime classic. If Part One explored myth-making and morality, this episode tackles consequence, sacrifice, and the film's unforgettable climax.From the emotional weight of Sean Connery's Oscar-winning performance to the operatic violence that defines De Palma's directing style, we analyse how the story of Eliot Ness versus Al Capone reaches its dramatic peak.We explore the tension between justice and revenge, the cost of incorruptibility, and whether the film earns its legendary status among gangster cinema greats.Starring Kevin Costner, Sean Connery, and Robert De Niro, this 1987 crime epic blends Hollywood spectacle with historical myth.But does the courtroom finale deliver? Does the violence feel operatic or excessive? And does The Untouchables still hold up for modern audiences?In this episode, we discuss:The emotional impact of Malone's arcThe morality of Ness's final choicesThe famous Union Station sequence and De Palma's visual storytellingThe balance between historical fact and cinematic legendWhether The Untouchables deserves its classic statusIf you're searching for:The Untouchables 1987 reviewThe Untouchables podcast discussionBrian De Palma film analysisSean Connery Oscar performance breakdownGangster movie deep dive podcast…this episode delivers sharp film criticism, humour, debate, and honest takes.Sarah returns as co-host for this two-part breakdown. (No external projects to plug this week—just pure film conversation and classic cinema appreciation.)Why Listen?Whether you're a long-time fan of The Untouchables or revisiting it decades later, this episode will make you rethink its themes, performances, and cultural legacy. Expect passionate disagreement, strong opinions, and thoughtful analysis of one of the most iconic crime films of the 1980s.If you enjoy deep-dive movie reviews, classic film discussion, and spirited debate — this is the podcast for you.Please Note: There are direct quotes used in this review, which include the use of contextual slurs/stereotypes. These are used purely as quotes from the film and to aid discussion, as the film's dialogue reflects the bigoted, harsh atmosphere of 1930's Prohibition-Era Chicago. There is no intention to cause offence or distress.Follow & Contact Review It YourselfStay connected and join the conversation:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comWe love hearing your thoughts, episode suggestions, and hot takes.Support the PodcastIf you enjoy Review It Yourself and want to help us grow:Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favourite platformLeave a 5-star rating and written review on Apple Podcasts (this massively boosts discoverability)Share this episode on social mediaRecommend the podcast to fellow film fansYour support helps the show reach new listeners and continue producing in-depth film reviews every week.Listen now and decide for yourself: is this crime epic truly untouchable? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Travel millions of years into the future with this classic sci-fi reviewIn this episode of Review It Yourself, we jump into one of the most influential science-fiction films ever made: The Time Machine (1960). Inspired by the legendary novel by H.G. Wells, this classic movie helped shape the way audiences imagine time travel on screen.Sarah returns to the podcast after her holiday (and a memorable rant about the state of air travel), joining the discussion as we explore the timeless ideas behind this iconic film. From the eerie future world of the Eloi and the Morlocks to the ground-breaking practical effects that brought time travel to life, this episode dives deep into why The Time Machine (1960) still matters today.We also talk about the themes beneath the surface:The film's commentary on class division and humanity's futureThe fascinating design of the Morlocks and Eloi societiesThe enduring appeal of practical effects and classic sci-fi filmmakingWhether the story still resonates with modern audiencesComparisons with the later Time Machine adaptations, including the 2002 version starring Guy PearceIf you love classic science fiction, time travel stories, or thoughtful film discussions, this episode is packed with insights, laughs, and a fresh perspective on a genre-defining movie.In This EpisodeWhy The Time Machine (1960) became a sci-fi classicThe influence of H.G. Wells' original novelThe disturbing future vision of the Eloi and MorlocksHow the film's special effects were ahead of their timeA discussion of the story's deeper social commentaryWhy time travel stories continue to fascinate audiencesRecommended ReadingIf you enjoyed this episode, check out the original novel:The Time Machine by H.G. Wells – the ground-breaking sci-fi story that inspired the film and shaped the time-travel genre.Follow & Contact Review It Yourself:Stay connected with the podcast and join the conversation:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comSupport the PodcastIf you enjoy Review It Yourself, please consider supporting the show:Follow or subscribe on your favourite podcast platformLeave a rating or review on Apple Podcasts or SpotifyShare the episode with friends who love film and TV discussionsTag the podcast on social media and join the debateYour support helps more listeners discover the show and keeps new episodes coming. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Evil never dies: deep dive into Halloween's legacy and lore! In this electrifying episode of Review It Yourself, we explore the terrifying brilliance and enduring cultural impact of the Halloween franchise — from Halloween (1978) to Halloween Ends (2022), and every film in-between!— with journalist and author Andrew Graves, author of 'Horror in Haddonfield: The Untold Stories of Halloween'.If you're a horror fan, a lover of film history, or fascinated by long-running movie franchises, this episode is essential listening.A passionate deep dive into the Halloween franchiseAndrew Graves, author of Horror in Haddonfield, joins Sean for an unfiltered, in-depth conversation about one of the most iconic horror series, Halloween.We explore:The psychology and legacy of Michael MyersWhy Dr. Loomis (played by Donald Pleasence) is just as essential as The Shape himselfThe evolution of Laurie Strode, immortalised by Jamie Lee CurtisThe highs, the controversies, and the reinventions across the entire Halloween timelineHonest thoughts on Halloween (2018), Halloween Kills (2021), and Halloween Ends (2022).The Nights He Never Came Home: Unrealised Halloween filmsThis isn't just a review — it's a celebration and critical examination of horror cinema, franchise storytelling, and what keeps audiences returning to Haddonfield decade after decade.About the Guest: Andrew GravesAndrew Graves is a journalist and horror author whose book Horror in Haddonfield serves as a comprehensive love letter to the Halloween series. The book dives into untold stories, behind-the-scenes insights, and deep franchise analysis — essential reading for fans of slasher cinema and horror history.

Who you gonna call? Ghostbusters!In this electrifying episode of Review It Yourself, we bust ghosts and break down the timeless supernatural comedy classic Ghostbusters — joined by special guest Rob from 'How Haunted? Podcast'.If you love 80s movies, paranormal investigations, horror-comedy crossovers, or in-depth film analysis, this is the Ghostbusters podcast episode you've been waiting for.Rob brings real paranormal podcasting experience to the discussion, giving a unique perspective on hauntings, scepticism, and how Ghostbusters blends supernatural lore with sharp comedy. Together, we explore whether the film still stands as the gold standard for horror-comedy — and why it continues to influence pop culture decades later.Why Ghostbusters Still Works Today:From iconic performances and endlessly quotable dialogue to ground-breaking practical effects, Ghostbusters isn't just nostalgia — it's cinematic lightning in a bottle.In this episode, we discuss:The genius of the character dynamics and comedic timingHow the film balances horror, sci-fi, and comedyThe portrayal of paranormal investigation vs “real” hauntingsThe cultural impact of Ghostbusters on film and fandomWhether modern audiences still connect with itIf you're searching for:A Ghostbusters 1984 review podcastA horror comedy film analysisA paranormal perspective on Ghostbusters80s movie breakdownsYou've found your people.About Our Guest – Rob from How Haunted?Rob Kirkup is the host of How Haunted?, a podcast exploring real-life paranormal encounters, strange phenomena, and unexplained experiences. With a balanced and open-minded approach, Rob examines ghost stories and supernatural reports with curiosity and grounded analysis.

Deep-sea Exploration, Titanic dives and life on the ocean floor.In this extraordinary episode of Review It Yourself, we dive into the real-world adventures of legendary deep-sea explorer and diver Dik Barton — a man who has descended to historic wrecks including RMS Titanic and worked on the raising of the Mary Rose.From extreme underwater conditions to the emotional reality of visiting one of the world's most famous shipwrecks, this episode explores what it's truly like to work where history rests: on the ocean floor.If you're searching for Titanic diving stories, deep-sea exploration insights, or first-hand accounts from historic wreck dives, this conversation delivers authenticity, expertise, and unforgettable moments.What It's Really Like Diving to Titanic!Most people know Titanic through films and documentaries. Few have been on the seabed beside her.Dik Barton shares:The physical and psychological demands of deep-sea divingWhat it feels like approaching Titanic in darknessThe technology used in extreme underwater explorationThe dangers professional divers faceHis experiences working on the Mary Rose recovery projectLife lessons learned from decades beneath the surfaceThis episode blends maritime history, technical diving expertise, and personal storytelling into a gripping and human exploration of underwater discovery.History Beneath the Surface.Having worked on projects connected to both RMS Titanic and the raising of the Mary Rose, Dik offers rare insight into how underwater archaeology intersects with adventure, preservation, and respect for the past.This isn't theory — it's lived experience from someone who has operated in some of the most extreme environments on Earth.About Dik Barton:Dik Barton is a professional deep-sea diver, explorer, speaker and world adventurer. With decades of experience in commercial diving and historic wreck exploration, he brings unmatched credibility to discussions of maritime history and underwater operations.Connect with Dik Barton:Please see:Dik Barton's Website: https://dikbarton.com/This includes information about the Titanic Expert Club.White Star Heritage: https://whitestarheritage.com/Why You Should Listen.This episode is essential for anyone interested in:Titanic explorationDeep-sea diving careersUnderwater archaeologyMary Rose recovery historyReal-life extreme adventure storiesMaritime history interviewsIt's a powerful, grounded discussion that moves beyond myths and into the lived reality of exploration.Follow & Contact Review It YourselfStay connected with Review It Yourself for more in-depth interviews and thoughtful discussions:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comFor guest enquiries, collaborations, or listener feedback, email directly — the show welcomes your thoughts and topic suggestions.Every review and share helps grow the podcast and secure more fascinating expert guests.Descend into history. Experience the reality of deep-sea exploration.Thank You to Clifford Ismay.Correction: Sean was trying to recall Bill Sauder's description of the smell of artefacts "the smell that comes off it is perfectly alien, perfectly fetid, you know it's a kind of death you have never experienced", from a National Geographic documentary. Bill Maynard was an actor on Heartbeat who played Greengrass. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Did Abnormal Refraction Doom The Titanic?In this powerful and thought-provoking episode of Review It Yourself, Sean sits down with renowned historian, author and TV presenter Tim Maltin to explore one of the most compelling alternative explanations behind the sinking of RMS Titanic — the Abnormal Refraction Theory.Drawing from his ground-breaking research in Titanic: A Very Deceiving Night, Tim explains how rare atmospheric conditions on 14 April 1912 may have distorted visibility in the North Atlantic. Could a natural optical illusion have delayed iceberg warnings, confused distress signals, and changed history forever?If you're searching for Titanic history, Titanic iceberg theories, or scientific explanations behind the Titanic disaster — this episode delivers evidence, clarity, and serious debate.A Deceptive Night in the North AtlanticMost Titanic discussions focus on speed, lifeboat numbers, or Captain Smith's decisions. But Tim Maltin's research introduces a fascinating scientific dimension:What is abnormal atmospheric refraction?How can mirage effects alter visibility at sea?Did false horizons hide the iceberg?Were distress rockets misinterpreted due to optical distortion?Could this explain the mysterious “nearby ship” debate?Blending maritime history, meteorology and survivor testimony, this episode re-examines one of history's most analysed disasters with fresh, data-driven insight.Whether you're a Titanic enthusiast, maritime historian, or fan of investigative book discussions, this is essential listening.About Tim MaltinTim Maltin is a leading British historian specialising in maritime history and the RMS Titanic. His research has been featured in international documentaries and media investigations examining the science behind the sinking.Connect with Tim:Website: https://www.timmaltin.comX (Twitter): @TimMaltinBook: Titanic: A Very Deceiving Night (available worldwide via major retailers)If you want the full scientific and historical breakdown of this theory, his book is a must-read.Tim's Book Recommendations (which Sean has ordered):-'The Ship That Stood Still' by Leslie Reade.-'A Titanic Myth: The Californian Incident' by Leslie Harrison.Why This Episode MattersThis episode is perfect for listeners interested in:Titanic disaster analysisAlternative Titanic sinking theoriesMaritime optical illusions and miragesHistorical myth-bustingIn-depth book discussionsIt's a compelling blend of science and storytelling that challenges what we think we know about Titanic's final hours.Follow & Contact Review It YourselfStay connected with Review It Yourself for more intelligent reviews, interviews, and deep dives into books and films:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comFor guest enquiries, collaborations, or listener feedback, email directly — the show welcomes thoughtful discussion and future topic suggestions.Subscribe, Rate & Support the PodcastIf you enjoy independent, in-depth conversations like this:Subscribe on Apple PodcastsFollow on SpotifyLeave a 5-star rating and written reviewShare the episode with Titanic history fansRecommend Review It Yourself on social mediaEvery rating, review and share helps grow the podcast and bring more expert guests to the show.If this episode changed how you see the Titanic disaster, don't keep it to yourself.Follow, subscribe, and join us next time on Review It Yourself — where we examine the stories you think you already know. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The forgotten liner that outshone Titanic in real life.What if the most dramatic story of the Olympic-class liners isn't the one you've seen on film?In this fascinating episode of Review It Yourself, we uncover the extraordinary true story of RMS Olympic — the ship often overshadowed by her ill-fated sister, Titanic — but whose career was packed with mutiny, collisions, U-boats, innovation, and wartime heroics.Sean and maritime historian guest Mark Chirnside dive deep into the remarkable history behind his definitive book, RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister. First published in 2004 and expanded in its 2015 second edition, this meticulously researched volume restores Olympic to her rightful place in maritime history.Far from being the “boring older sister,” Olympic earned the nickname “Old Reliable” for good reason. She survived a major collision with HMS Hawke, served with distinction during the First World War, transported thousands of troops, and even rammed and sank a German U-boat. While Titanic's story has dominated popular culture, Olympic's 24-year career tells a powerful story of resilience, adaptation, and maritime safety reform in the early 20th century.In this episode, we explore:Why Olympic has been historically overlookedThe myths and misconceptions surrounding the Olympic-class linersThe ship's vital wartime service and technical innovationsHow historical narratives are shaped — and sometimes distortedThe research process behind writing a definitive maritime historyMark shares insights into archival research, the challenges of correcting the historical record, and why Olympic deserves far greater recognition among historians and enthusiasts alike.About the GuestMark Chirnside is a respected maritime historian specialising in White Star Line and Cunard liners of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. His work is known for its depth, accuracy, and myth-busting clarity.Find Mark's Website 'Mark Chirnside's Reception Room' (including blog) Here: https://markchirnside.co.uk/Listen & SubscribeIf you enjoy deep dives into film, history, and cultural storytelling without the faff, make sure you're subscribed to Review It Yourself on Apple Podcasts and Google Podcasts.New episodes explore films, historical subjects, and fascinating guests — always with sharp insight and honest analysis.Support the PodcastLove the show? Here's how you can help:Follow and subscribe on your podcast platformLeave a 5-star rating and written reviewShare the episode with fellow Titanic and maritime history enthusiastsFollow Review It Yourself on social media for updates and bonus contentYour support helps the podcast grow, attract expert guests, and continue producing in-depth conversations like this one.If you thought you knew the full story of the Olympic-class liners, this episode might just change your perspective.Follow & Contact Review It YourselfStay connected with Review It Yourself for more intelligent reviews, interviews, and deep dives into books and films:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/reviewityourselfpodcast2021X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/YourselfReviewBlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/reviewityourself.bsky.socialThreads: https://www.threads.net/@reviewityourselfpodcast2021Email: reviewityourselfpodcast@gmail.comFor guest enquiries, collaborations, or listener feedback, email directly — the show welcomes thoughtful discussion and future topic suggestions. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean is joined by Carla and James from 'The Traumarific Podcast'. Although newcomers to Review It Yourself, Sean, Carla and James bond over a shared bewilderment over how E.T. is considered a classic.Chapters:0:08 Welcome Everyone0:58 The Trauma of E.T.2:28 An Unbearably Long Slog of a film?8:00 Modern Film Frustrations9:32 The Art of Storytelling11:28 Nostalgia and Influence19:31 E.T. and Star Wars Connections25:51 The 2002 Remastered Version of E.T.31:30 The Value of a simple premise37:07 Comparing E.T. to Other Films43:18 Humour in E.T.47:50 E.T. Merchandise Madness53:13 Bizarre E.T. Collectibles (the finger)58:55 Reflecting on Family DynamicsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean from Review It Yourself is back to look at the forgotten sequel to 30 Days Of Night–it’s 30 Days Of Night: Dark Days! For more from Review It Yourself, click HERE!

Marie from '2 Girls 1 Reusable Cup Podcast' and 'We Needed Roads Podcast' finally guests on Review It Yourself and what a film she picked! Batman: Under the Red Hood (2010).Warning, this episode contains spoilers.Discussion Points:-Sean and Marie discuss animated Batman films.-Marie lays out her relationship with Batman animated films and comics.-Sean explains his love of superhero films (no, really!).-The fantastic portrayal of the Joker.-The incredibly dark tone.-The great use of flashbacks.Raised Questions:-Is this one of the best Batman films ever?-Are animated films under less scrutiny and pressure?-Why was Sean so impressed by Fantastic Four: The Rise of the Silver Surfer (2007)?-Have we had "too much of a good thing" with superhero films?-How long has it been since Sean vented about 'The Batman'?-What the hell is Night Wing doing for half the films? -Is the Red Hood trying to kill Batman or not?Sean Recommends: Gladiator II (2024).Timestamps:0:05Welcome to Review It Yourself1:22Introducing Batman: Under the Red Hood4:57Exploring Animated Batman Films11:32The Joker's Brutal Nature33:41The Complexity of Bruce Wayne46:25The Mystery of the Red Hood47:53Characters Matter49:23A Labour of Love49:32The Training of Jason Todd54:06The Joker's Chaos55:56Emotional Turmoil59:09The Al Ghul Connection1:02:35The Final Showdown1:07:31The Impact of Loss1:09:50A New Direction1:18:22The Dangers of CGI1:22:05Future of DCU1:22:49The Penguin's Potential1:25:47Thoughts on Gladiator 21:31:50Where to Find MarieThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Cyborgs, circuits, and controller-smashing chaos converge in this week's electrifying Play Comics episode! Grab your pixel blasters and prepare for a digital demolition as we dive deep into the most metal crossover of the 90s: Robocop vs Terminator! Our special guest Ryan Placchetti from the Don't Wreck Yourself podcast joins us to dissect this multi-platform mayhem that blasted its way across the Super Nintendo, Genesis, Master System, Game Boy, and Game Gear. We'll explore the Dark Horse comic mini-series that spawned this epic robotic rumble, breaking down the circuits and carnage that made gamers and comic fans lose their mechanical minds! Learn such things as: Are Robocop or Terminator ever going to stop being relevant? Is this a bigger take on the capitalist nature of society or the true nature of police policy? Is it a feature or a bug when you have essentially different games with the same name coming out like this? And so much more! You can find Ryan and the Don't Wreck Yourself podcast on BlueSky @wreckyourpod and of course over at Don't Wreck Yourself. If you want to be a guest on the show please check out the Be a A Guest on the Show page and let me know what you're interested in. If you want to help support the show check out the Play Comics Patreon page or head over to the Support page if you want to go another route. You can also check out the Play Comics Merch Store. Play Comics is part of the Gonna Geek Network, which is a wonderful collection of geeky podcasts. Be sure to check out the other shows on Gonna Geek if you need more of a nerd fix. You can find Play Comics @playcomics.bsky.social on Bluesky, @playcomicscaston Twitter and in the Play Comics Podcast Fan Groupon Facebook. A big thanks to The Last Comic Shop and Review It Yourself for the promos today. Intro/Outro Music by Backing Track, who has not proven to me that they're not a robot yet. Support Play Comics by contributing to their tip jar: https://tips.pinecast.com/jar/playcomicsRead transcript

Review It Yourself's first ever guest returns! Ryan Walker from 'The Walk The Line Podcast' joins Sean and Sarah to discuss the fourth (and planned last) film:The Final Destination (2009). Will Ryan and Sarah remain unimpressed by Sean's choice of film?Check Out Ryan's website here: https://www.thewalkthelinepodcast.com/Discussion Points:-Ryan is practising for Loose Women or This Morning, after his BBC Radio Essex Interview.-Sarah was unimpressed by this film.-The way the film jettisons everything that Sarah loved, plot, characters etc.-The lack of importance for the women's names.-Ryan loved the tyre death.-CGI ruins the party, again.-Treat yourself to the deleted scenes.-The really poor script.-The 'Death By Caffeine' Coffee Shop rubbish coffee puns.-This film is so good that Ryan, Sean and Sarah start discussing Commando (1985): "90 minutes of pure adrenaline"-Ryan Walker.-Ryan is annoyed at the CGI dust.-We do not endorse spreading hate, we were laughing at the idiotic guy-just in case you missed the sarcasm, nuance and humour. -Sean is outraged that the main character doesn't get his face spattered with blood.Raised Questions:-What's with Sean's saucy introduction?-Did you know there were 5 Final Destination films?-Did the film go totally go off the rails with this one?-What is with the acting?-Are we supposed to die?-How strong was that fence?-Did death save the best for 3-D?-Why is Sean against the C-word?-Why did they use George's backstory like that?-Why are the visions so rubbish?-Why does no-one emotionally react to any of the deaths in this film?-Why don't they go for a cheeky Greggs?-Would a Final Destination spoof, similar to Scream (1996) work?Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean from Review It Yourself is back, and he’s here to review Dark Phoenix, the last X-Men movie we have gotten so far. How good is it? Sean had one question before we recorded: “Am I allowed to swear?” For more from Review It Yourself, click HERE!

We're singing Mike Flanagan's praises this episode, because we're talking Doctor Sleep! He had to walk the tightrope between adapting Stephen King's source novel, and a sequel to the film version of The Shining, and he nailed it! We're not alone though, we've got Sean from Review It Yourself to help us break it down! We gush over Rebecca Ferguson's Rose the Hat, contemplate the True Knot as a version of the vampire mythos, and take a look at the toll alcoholism can take. Get your most epic hat on, and dive in with us! Check out our Patreon for *exclusive* episodes every week that you won't find over here! There are minisodes, film commentaries, and film reviews of things that are only in the theater! Take a look at patreon.com/triplemmmpod Follow us on the socials @triplemmmpod Clayton - @justhappy2cu Shawn - @murphthesmurph Sean - @reviewityourselfpodcast2021 Email: menwholikemenwholikemoviespod@gmail.com If you're enjoying the pod, give us a rate/review - it helps us out SO much! Don't forget to be kind out there! --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/triplemmmpod/support

Randy and Steve return to continue the Rush Hour reviews with Rush Hour 2 (2001).Watch your egg rolls, we're going in!Discussion Points:-Sean's notes are abysmal again.-The lack of seriousness in this film.-Chris Tucker's dancing.-The reason Jackie Chan doesn't like the way he speaks in English in this film.-A brief history of '7 11' shops (Not Sponsored).-Behind the biggest mouth in the West is a damn good cop with Tucker. -Steve thinks this film is better than the original film. Raised Questions:-Does this film start straight after Rush Hour?-The most obvious bomb-planting scene ever?-What is the British version of a '7 11'?-Where did they park the SS Minnow Johnson?-How has Randy never seen The Terminator (1984)?The impressions of Chris Tucker, Jackie Chan, Owen Wilson, Christopher Walken and President Donald Trump (You weren't expecting him were you!) are purely imitations of the performances in the film, or in real life, and not said with any malicious intent and no offence is meant. The impressions of President Donald Trump are not any remark about American Politics, this is a English podcast, we're not interested. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

"YOU KNOW THE PART IN SCARY MOVIES WHEN SOMEBODY DOES SOMETHING REALLY STUPID AND EVERYBODY HATES THEM FOR IT? THIS IS IT." On this "Horrorthon" episode of the podcast, Ed's joined by Sean, from his podcast "Review It Yourself", to sit down and give Jeepers Creepers the Film Effect Treatment for it's 23rd anniversary!! In Jeepers Creepers, a brother and sister driving home through isolated countryside for spring break encounter a flesh-eating creature which is in the midst of its ritualistic eating spree.. Episode Directory: *Intro  00:00 *Current Events  05:56 *Last Time On The Podcast...  18:46 *Pre-Dive Top Five  20:13 ----------The Film Effect Breakdown----------  *First Time Viewings  29:55 *Cast & Crew Run-Through  30:50 *How It All Started...  31:57 *Plot/General Film Discussion  41:11 *What Works  01:27:24 *What Doesn't Work  01:35:30 *Finger-Lickin' Good Moment  01:43:47 *Trivial Pursuit  01:46:05 *Box Office Receipts  01:52:29 *Critic's Corner  01:54:52 *Movie MVPs  01:56:54 *Final Effect Rating  01:59:44 *RIYL  02:01:51 ------------------------------------------------ *Coming Soon  02:04:57 *Shoutouts & Sponsorship  02:05:22 *Outro  02:06:10 Website: https://www.thefilmeffectpodcast.com Merch Store: https://www.thefilmeffectpodcast.com/store Email: filmeffectpod@gmail.com Find us on social media! Facebook: https://facebook.com/thefilmeffectpodcast IG: https://instagram.com/thefilmeffectpodcast Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/filmeffectpod TikTok: https://tiktok.com/@filmeffectpodcast Check Out Review It Yourself! Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/review-it-yourself/id1590846415 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7LSPMDvUWUAPZloi194ZXc Twitter/X: twitter.com/YourselfReview --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/thefilmeffectpodcast/support

As Sarah is feeling under the weather, Sean is joined by Peter Rose to review Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy 2 (2000). The film was originally released as 'Ancient Evil: Scream of the Mummy' in America and Mexico, and has no links to 'Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy' (1998).Welcome to Review It Yourself: The Podcast with the Sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed.Will Sean and Peter be impressed or unimpressed?Discussion Points:-Sometimes you've just got to be brutally honest.-Peter and Sean do their best to find the positives. -The DVD blurb reading returns, and the DVD chapters are discovered. -The sheer lack of preservation protocol in this film.-Peter brings interesting facts about Aztecs.Raised Questions:-How did Sean watch this multiple times on Sky Movies?-Is this a "So-bad-it's-good" film?-How can an 85 minute film feel so slow?-When did 'Animated Menu' stop being classed as a DVD Special Feature?-Is this film a "Pound Shop Version of Halloween H20"?-Why would you kick a door open when you're trying to put something back secretly?-After 100 Mummy film reviews, what is the worst film Peter has watched? Recommendations:-Rough Air: Danger on Flight 534 (2001). Sean has already reviewed this film if you want to check it out.Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Which film trailer/previews make you want to spend your hard earned cash at the cinema?Let Sean and Sarah help with that, by reviewing trailers for upcoming films and a few old favourites.Welcome to Preview it Yourself.This time around, Sean decides to show Sarah the trailer for Gladiator II (2024). He apologises first.Discussion Points:-Lower your expectations. -The long muted Gladiator sequel ideas. -The justification for making the film. -The horrendous soundtrack for the trailer and why Hans Zimmer hasn't returned to score this film.-Whether the cast can elevate this film like Russell Crowe did with the original.-Sean and Sarah also review the Gladiator (2000) trailer.-A mini-review of The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008).-Sarah and Sean try to remain positive.-The downgrade from tiger to rhinoceros.-Sean and Sarah agree to eat humble pie if the film is good. Raised Questions:-Is it mean to make someone watch this trailer?-Have we gone backwards in making films?-Who the hell signed off on the music?-Why does the trailer make the film seem like a pantomime?-Why would you even dare to make a sequel to such a behemoth of cinema?-Would you watch "Aqueduct Shark"?-Did the Romans ever have two Emperors at once?-Is the cast of Gladiator II too big?-Why does Sarah refuse to go camping?Quotes of the episode:-"What the f**k is this film meant to be?".-"If this film is better than Gladiator (2000) then I will shut the podcast down".-"This is so 2024 it hurts...what are you doing!?".-"I'm making a lot of assumptions on [an awful] trailer".-"I don't think people know how to make trailers anymore".Shout-out to Dan from Casting Views for his feedback on this Preview It Yourself side-series. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean, Sarah and Paul from 'History Rage' reach the final, pitiful end of the Jaws franchise. Discussion Points:-Sean didn't feel this was that bad.-The DVD read-through returns. -Paul finds the DVD cover description hilarious.-The serious lack of deaths in this film.-Sarah sends her thoughts in for Paul and Sean to discuss.-Sean was really with the film... for 12 minutes.-Sean compares the sharks in Jaws and Jaws: The Revenge to pigeons.-Paul and Sean can't abide the Michael Brody character.-Sean doesn't like being pestered.Raised Questions:-Did Sean watch a different film?-Has Sarah binned off the podcast for work or because it's Jaws: The Revenge?-Where are the deaths?-Can Ellen Brody actually cry?-How many flashback does a 90-minute film need?-How much do they love Christmas in Amity?-Why does the coffin look so fake?-Is the shark nose-heavy?-Is your Dad a binfluencer?-Why "Tourist on the Loose"?Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean, Sarah and Paul from History Rage are here to continue our Jaws series, it's downwards and downwards for Jaws 3-D (1983).Will Sean, Sarah and Paul be impressed or unimpressed with the film?Stick around for 'The Worst Shark Film You've Ever Seen' section, with responses from podcast friends of Review It Yourself. Discussion Points:-Sarah went from Jaws (1975) to Jaws 3-D (1983). -Sean paid £2.49 to rent this film and still didn't get his money's worth.-Paul discusses the Victorian Invention of 3-D and wonders why we haven't mastered it yet. -The dreadful water skiers and the obsession with millions of gallons of water.-The Brody family ageing phenomenon continues. -The idiocy of putting a shark in a petting pen. Raised Questions:-Is this the perfect litmus test for a podcast?-How did this get into cinemas?-Why is the transfer so bad?-How is that floating fish head still alive?-How on Earth did SeaWorld approve being in this film?-Can Leah Thompson cure aquaphobia?-Did Mike and Katherine ever go to Venezuela?-Do you have "Prometheus (2012) levels of disdain" for your audience?Thank You for your contributions:-'The Podcast That Wouldn't Die'. -'Sci-Fi Chronicles YouTube Channel'.-'Stew World Order' podcast.-'Coffee and Comments YouTube Channel'.-'Cinnamon Toast Crunch YouTube Channel'.-'Seismic Cinema' podcast.-'Talking SMAC: Superheroes, Movies, Animations and Comics Podcast'.-'Dissect That Film' podcast.Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

"I'd award [the shark] an assist... I do not watch a Jaws film to have people NOT killed by sharks"-Paul on the inefficient shark in this film."More of the same, just sh*tter"-Sean on the Jaws sequels.Paul from History Rage returns to join Sean, and they begrudgingly continue their journey through the Jaws film franchise.Brace Yourselves, it's Jaws 2 (1978).Will Sean and Paul be impressed or unimpressed with the film?Discussion Points:-Sean thinks he will be the positive one but it doesn't last long.-Paul is disgusted by the lack of character development.-The defence of Mayor Vaughn returns.-The lack of blood in this film.-The shark claiming 'assists'.-The insanity of pointing directions at sea.-The confusing age of the characters, it's only been four years!-The depiction of trauma in the Tina character.-The beach scene. -The strange use of John William's Jaws 2 score.-The deleted scene between Brody and Mayor Vaughn and how impactful that would have been.-PG-13 was brought in, not for ET (1982) but in 1984 after films like Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Gremlins and Poltergeist created the desire for a new rating.Raised Questions:-Where the hell do you start with Jaws 2?-Is Jaws 2 "100% unbridled sh*te"?-How does the Jaws lower the bar at every turn?-How did every film in the Jaws franchise make a profit?-How impressive is the Amity Tourist Board?-How do they miss that lighthouse?-How many Jaws 2 characters can you name?-Why is the shark so poor at hunting?-Did they not have Roy Scheider available for parts of the film?-Why are there 22 minutes of shots of sailing boats sailing?-When a tagline of a film is infinitely more memorable than the actual film, how good is it?Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Anatomy of Jaws (1975) finds Sean joined by Paul from 'History Rage' to review the first film in the Jaws film series.Enjoy this, as it's all downhill from here as Sean, Sarah and Paul review all four films for September 2024.Discussion Points:-The emotions encapsulated by the characters in the film.-Paul defends Mayor Vaughn.-The reluctance to begin an evacuation.-The lack of a briefing for the beach lifeguards bothers Sean.-Watching Jaws in IMAX.-The politics of a seaside town.Raised Questions:-Is the shark the least interesting thing about this film?-Did you know how blockbusters got their name?-What annoys Sean about this film?-Do dogs eat sharks? -Is this film all about blind bureaucracy?-Is coffee ice cream good for shock?-Does Quint deliberately destroy his own engine?Book Recommendation:-Twelve Days of Terror: A Definitive Investigation of the 1916 New Jersey Shark Attacks [2001, Lyons Press] by Richard G. Fernicola.Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean and Sarah take on Alien Romulus (2024). Franchise reinvigorator or poorly executed ? Will they remain unimpressed by the newest film in the Alien franchise? Discussion Points: -Sean struggles to sell the podcast. -The anguish of late night cinema showings. -The distubring tonal shift in the film. -The mystery characters in the film. -The dreadful CGI in the film. -Characters making stupid decisions because the plot needs them to. -Whether the film had interesting ideas and fantastic production values, but poor execution. -The quick, unsatisfying deaths. Raised Questions: -Why Sean bothered to go and see Alien Romulus? -Do you know how you feel about the film? -Was the film best before any of the Aliens arrived? -Is there anything left to do with the Xenomorphs? -We've got Alien (1979), so why do we need this? -Does the film pull it's punches? -Why did they mark this as a horror film? -Is Prometheus (2012) better? -Did the film need a good editor? Film Recommendation from Sarah and Sean: -Life (2017). Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Welcome back to Review It Yourself: The Podcast with the sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed. Clayton from 'Men Who Like Men Who Like Movies' returns to continue The Donna Noble Chronicles. This week Sean and Clayton discuss The Fires of Pompeii (2008). Discussion Points: -Peeking behind the podcast curtain. -The production values of this episode. -"It's Doctor Who, I'm not exactly going to sit here and moan about it"-Sean shows a shocking lack of self-awareness. -Trivia and facts about the Ancient Roman city of Pompeii. -Clayton and Sean's opinions differ greatly regarding the new series of Doctor Who (2024), particulary costumes. -The dynamic between The Doctor and Donna Noble. -Marcus Nonius Balbus was a prominent figure in Herculaneum, nearby Pompeii. -The CGI stone 'Transformers' in this episode. -Treading the line between entertainment and being respectful to a disaster. -The moral dilemma at the heart of this episode. -Sean and Clayton discuss the new series of Doctor Who (2024) and their opposing opinions. -Clayton brings controversial Indiana Jones opinion, whilst Sean shocks with his Jurassic Park opinion. Raised Questions: -How many times does Sean mention that he's been to Pompeii? -What does Veni, Vidi, Vici mean? -Why did size matter to the Romans? -Does the TARDIS perception filter apply to clothes? -Do you agree with Clayton that the Thirteenth Doctor dressed "like a toddler"? -Do you miss when the Doctor had some "bite" to his character? -Does it get chilly in Italy? -Do you ever skip to the loo? -Does the Gladiator II (2024) trailer make the film look like a pound-shop version of Gladiator (2000)? -Could this episode have worked without the Pyrovillian monsters? -Is the Chief Augur just a "Roman Mystic Meg"? -What was the drinking age in Ancient Rome? [Apparently there was no age restriction]. -Is this peak Doctor Who? Sean Recommends: -Pompeii: The Last Day (BBC Docu-Drama 2003). -Pompeii: The New Dig (BBC Series 2024). -Torchwood (2006-2011). -Jurassic Park: The Lost World (1997). Clayton Recommends: -Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008). -Jurassic Park III (2001). Apologies for some audio issues during this recording, we were using a different recording platform than normal. Lesson learned! Thanks for Listening! Thank you to the following for their contributions: -Brendan and Jamie from 'The Sense Sphere' YouTube Channel. -Brandon from 'Cinnammon Toast Crunch' YouTube Channel. -Jon Youlden. -Rachael from 'Chat About It Don't Shout About It' YouTube Channel. -Satsu from 'Chatsunami' podcast. -Luke from 'The Nerdstalgic Podcast'. -Marc from 'Mr & Mrs Who Podcast' (contributions will be used in a future episode). Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

The revamped Review It Yourself continues. The podcast with the sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed. Sean goes it alone without Sarah, already!? I know. Sean is joined by Marv from the 'Pods Like Us', 'When They was Fab' and 'Toppermost of the Poppermost' podcasts to discuss the classic Ealing Studios film The Titfield Thunderbolt (1953). Will Sean and Marv remain unimpressed by the film? Discussion Points: -Marv describes how his Grandad introduced him to hours and hours of train films. -The heart behind the film, the classic British "small force against adversity" story. -The strength in a simple yet effective story. -A libellous, passive aggressive float: what's not to love! -An accidental shotgun shoot-out. -Sean enjoyed the film, so his notes are horrendous. -The subtle social commentary in the film. -Marv and Sean seriously discuss the social impact of closing a railway to a small village, and The Beeching Cuts (1963-1965). The Beeching Cuts were a series of major service changes and line closures, headed by Richard Beeching of the British Railways Board. Raised Questions: -Have they ever bettered Technicolor? -Is this one of the most quintessentially British films ever made? -Does the humour work if you live outside of the UK? -Is this film sweet or quaint? Was the film prophetic? -How had Sean never seen an Ealing film before? -A perfect film for a rainy day with a cup of tea, with cake and sandwiches? -Does the length of the film help with rewatch-ability? Podcast Shout-outs: -Stew from 'Stew World Order'. -Bill from 'Bill Reads Bad Reviews'. Sean and Marv will return to review Passport to Pimlico (1949). Read Marv's Blog Here: https://marvsmidlifemeanderings.blogspot.com/ Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

The revamped Review It Yourself continues. The podcast with the sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed. Will Sean and Sarah remain unimpressed by this week's film, Dracula (1958)? Film summary: "There's no Whitby, there's no ship, there's no Demeter, there's no bats, there's no wolves, there's only one out of the three brides, and they whittled it down and took out a lot of the supernatural and in a way distilled it to this really, really great film and great simple story through necessity of we don't have the money for it". Discussion Points: -Sarah brings in her extensive knowledge of the depiction of vampires. -Painkillers appear to make Sean even more rambly and scatter-gun in his approach, enjoy! -Sean brings Blu-Ray documentary trivia about the film's production. -The Hammer Horror formula and the introduction of more salacious elements. -The performances of Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing, Melissa Stribling, Carol Marsh, John Van Eyssen and Michael Gough. -The difficulty in adapting Bram Stoker's novel. -Ingenuity from necessity. -The lack of horror clichés. -Sean brings Natasha Kaplinsky trivia (She's the President not the Vice President*). Raised Questions: -Did streamlining the novel make the film better? -Should studios today make only one film at a time? -Are budget constraints sometimes a good thing? -Can you fake screen presence? -Did you spot the redressing of the same set? -Are horror films more frightening when things are more plausible? -Who will be his Bride to-night? -Why are Technicolor films the most beautiful looking films ever made? -Did Gary Oldman's Dracula (1992) accidentally leave his rollers in? -Will anyone be watching Jordan Peele's Nope in 70 years? Thanks for Listening! Podcast sting: Marv from Pods Like Us. Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ This podcast is a member of the PodPack Collective, an indie podcasting group dedicated to spreading positivity within the podcast community. For further information, please follow the link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/podpackcollective

Jon Youlden from 'Sci-Fi Chronicles Podcast' joins Sean to discuss Season One of Star Trek Enterprise (2001-2005). Welcome to Reach Any Star: The Best of Star Trek Enterprise, a Star Trek side-series. Discussion Points: -The Premiere Episodes: Broken Bow Parts One and Two. -New Dynamics in this series. -Stand-out Episodes and Honourable Mentions. -The Theme Song "Where my Heart will take me". -The Decontamination Chamber. -Enterprise NX-01. -The Season One that could have been. -The impact of the September 11th attacks on the series. -The series increasingly darker tone. -The issue with modern science-fiction shows: the quality of the writing. Raised Questions: -Is Science-Fiction at it's best when it creates conversations, instead of stifling them? -Would the original "Earth-Bound" plan for Season One have worked? -Should they have matured or adapted the theme song as the -Did Enterprise fail to do enough differently than previous Star Trek series? -Has humanity become more cynical? -Do Star Trek shows reflect the times when they were made? -Has 'Star Trek' since 2005, lost it's way and left behind the optimism? -Was the series ahead of it's time? -What happened to Star Trek after 2005? -Does humanity need a Jonathan Archer? Recommendations: -The Orville (2017-Present). Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Welcome to the revamped Review It Yourself. Sean introduces his new co-host Sarah to her first ever viewing of M. Night Shyamalan's Unbreakable (2000). Discussion Points: -Sean and Sarah keep up to date with a 24 year old film. -Sickness monitoring. -Lone survivor stories. -David Dunn and his lack of emotional response. -"David is clearly very depressed": Sarah's stunning analysis continues. -Mass Death Events. -The unspoken moments in the film, particularly after the gun scene. -Sarah argues that every scene in a film "should earn it's weight" and right to be there. -In the last 10 minutes Sean and Sarah discuss the plans for the future of their respective podcasts and the reasons behind the new co-hosting format. Raised Questions: -Is it foolish to review a film twice on a podcast? -Does this film have an amazing opening scene? -Does this film begged to be watched again and again? -Is it normal to tip a full glass of water in the bin? -The moodiest babysitter in the history of films? -Do you find saying the word tarpaulin exciting? -Do you want to be like M. Night Shyamalan? Podcast Sting: Marv from 'Pods Like Us'. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

The revamped Review It Yourself continues. Sean introduces his new co-host Sarah to her first ever viewing of Field of Dreams (1989). Calamitous opening aside, they discuss this magical and cornfield-filled film. Discussion Points: -Sarah's love of dinner table scenes and corn-filled field films. -The ethereal and dream-like quality of this film. -If they ever remake this film, Sean will stop watching new films. -Sean kicks off about theatre snacks, farmer's markets and London prices. -The worst-American accent in the history of podcasting returns. -Sean desperately tries to not embarrass himself whilst trying to discuss baseball. -Sarah and Sean enact the English version of Field of Dreams, "there's a drunk out there". -The film makes Sean incredibly reflective. Raised Questions: -How did they mess up the intro that badly? -Is Everyone like "Oooh"? -If you build a podcast, will they come? -Do films always need explanations? -Do good films transcend barriers? -Does Sean pick films purely to do impressions? -Did people want more baseball? Podcast Sting: Marv from 'Pods Like Us'. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Which film trailer/previews make you want to spend your hard earned cash at the cinema? Let Sean and his new co-host Sarah help with that, by reviewing trailers for upcoming 2024 films and a few old favourites. Welcome to Preview it Yourself. This time around Sean bravely broaches the the cream/jam scone debate with Sarah from Cornwall before examining the trailer for M. Night Shyamalan's new film: Trap (2024). With just a week until it releases, is it worth your time and money? Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Nick and Keith from 'Happiness in Darkness: The Superhero Movie Podcast' join Sean to explore the characters and themes in X-Men: First Class, including Conformity, Exclusion, Pride, Revenge, and Family. Sean, Nick and Keith discuss the surprising depth and quality in this film, the journeys of Charles and Eric, and wasting a great character. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Sean finally reviews an animated film after nearly three years of podcasting: Ice Age (2002). To discuss this near-perfect film he is joined by Luke from The Nerdstalgic Podcast. They side-track into a tangent about animated films for the first half an hour. Discussion Points: -The unnecessary sequels. -The rise and fall of Blue Sky Studios. -The similarities between Ice Age (2002) and The Fugitive (1993). Raised Questions: -Have we lost the 'heart' in modern animated films? -Why don't animated films take risks anymore? -What happened to the magic of Disney and Pixar films? Intermission Sting: -Marv from 'Pods Like Us'. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ This podcast is a member of the PodPack Collective, an indie podcasting group dedicated to spreading positivity within the podcast community. For further information, please follow the link: https://linktr.ee/podpackcollective

Ed from The Film Effect Podcast returns to discuss the concluding chapter of David Gordon Green's Halloween Trilogy, Halloween Ends (2022). Discussion Points: -Sean trials a new introduction, but buggers up his guest's name. -The reception of Halloween (2018) and Halloween Kills (2021). -The surprising direction of this film. -The divisive direction of this concluding chapter. -The character of Corey and whether he was always meant to be in the film. -Sean and Ed clash over their views of the wider Halloween series, particularly Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers. Raised Questions: -Does this film make you feel like ripping your shirt off? -Could they have gone "bigger and better" after Halloween Kills? -Did it help to introduce an all-new character as the main character? -Why is Jeremy such a git? -Is this film The Dark Knight Rises of the 2018 Halloween trilogy? -A marching band or extras from Grease (1978)? -Why does Corey dance like that? -Is Halloween Ends a "breath of fresh air"? Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ This podcast is a member of the PodPack Collective, an indie podcasting group dedicated to spreading positivity within the podcast community. For further information, please follow the link: https://linktr.ee/podpackcollective

Neil from We Needed Roads Podcast joins Sean to review Gremlins, a quintessentially Christmas film in the middle of the year. "You'll be unwrapping more than you can imagine this Christmas". Discussion Points: -The DVD back cover readthrough returns. It sounds incredibly serial-killery. -Neil reads his 4K DVD description. -How badly this film has aged. -The uninspiring open scene. -TANGENT: Watching Star Wars and Lord of the Rings films without all of the expectations. -Neil brings unbelievable trivia for one of his favourite films, whilst Sean brings British Board of Film Classification Board trivia. -TANGENT: Films which frightened you when you were younger. -Touch a Mam's cookies and she'll turn into Michael Myers. Sean has a theory about characters that disappear. Raised Questions: -Why did Gremlins (1984) put Sean to sleep? -Did you expect a comparison between Gremlins (1984) and Silence of the Lambs (1991)? -Is the first 45 minutes boring? -Would you have got films like Small Soldiers (1998) without Gremlins? -Does working on a cruise ship destroy your love of the film Titanic (1997)? -Would you watch Jaws (1975) in a marina? -Do time-zones affect Gremlins? -Can Gremlins drink alcohol on the rocks? -Who eats Skittles with a sandwich? Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ This podcast is a member of the PodPack Collective, an indie podcasting group dedicated to spreading positivity within the podcast community. For further information, please follow the link: https://linktr.ee/podpackcollective

Clayton from 'Men Who Like Men Who Like Movies' joins Sean for a brand new side-series. The Donna Noble Chronicles will explore every episode from 2006-2010 which starred Catherine Tate as Donna, from 'The Runaway Bride' to 'The End of Time'. This second episode explores the Series Four opener: Partners in Crime. Discussion Points: -The characterisation of Donna Noble in this episode. -The quality of this episode. -Clayton thinks Tennant and Tate are the ultimate duo, ever. Sean thinks he is being silly. -The power of a Health and Safety badge. -The performance of Sarah Lancashire. -The noise of the Adipose. -*Lance not Lawrence. -Sean introduces Clayton to the word 'ginnel'. -The fantastic moment where the Doctor looks up and realises that he is alone in the TARDIS. -Clayton isn't a fan of The Voyage of the Damned. -The iconic reunion scene and the brilliant ending scene with Wilf. Raised Questions: -Did they soften Donna in this re-introductory episode? -Are all New-Who companions in love with the Doctor? -Is this episode better than you remember? -How many floors does that building have? -Has this episode become more topical? -Did you pick up on the 'Super-Nanny' look of Miss Foster? -Does anyone want a podcast concerned with Data Protection? -Do you miss the moments when the Doctor goes into the darker side of his character? -Is it plausible to hide in a toilet cubicle for 6 hours? -Which scene did they leave out of the press screening? Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ This podcast is a member of the PodPack Collective, an indie podcasting group dedicated to spreading positivity within the podcast community. For further information, please follow the link: https://linktr.ee/podpackcollective