Review It Yourself

The concluding part of Sean and Jamie's review of the new Netflix Documentary 'Titan: The OceanGate Submersible Disaster'.Thanks for Listening!This episode is dedicated to those who lost their lives on the Titanic, the Titan and their families and loved ones. Rest In Peace.Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean and Jamie from 'Old Shipping Lines' explore Netflix's new documentary, which chronicles the story of the OceanGate submersible Titan. They discuss the Titan from design to the tragic end.Chapters:0:08 Welcome to Review It Yourself0:55 Diving into the Documentary2:35 Trailer Thoughts and First Impressions5:12 Documentary Structure and Content6:46 The Submersible and Its Crew11:14 Investigative Perspectives14:23 The Design Controversy17:06 The Search and Rescue19:20 Family Perspectives and Emotional Impact21:27 Investigative Hearings22:57 The Role of Experts24:46 The Titan's Final Moments26:43 Media Reaction and Public Interest28:29 The Aftermath and Future Implications29:50 Reflections on Accountability45:34-'Pods Like Us' stingThanks for Listening!This episode is dedicated to those who lost their lives on the Titanic, the Titan and their families and loved ones. Rest In Peace.Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Preview It Yourself continues! Ahead of their upcoming review episode of the full series, Sean and Sarah introduce Luke from 'The Howdy Beans Podcast' to the trailer and show intro for Garth Marenghi's Darkplace (2004).The Preview It Yourself side series is here to help you decide whether a film or TV series is worth watching, from the quality of the trailer alone.Chapters:0:56 Introduction to Garth Marenghi's Darkplace3:00 The Appeal of Dark Place5:09 Exploring Matt Berry's Work6:25 Graham Duff trivia6:39 Closing Thoughts and RecommendationsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean and Sarah throw caution to the wind and flirt with controversy by inviting Ryan Walker, from The Walk The Line Podcast, back onto the podcast.Ryan brings the best film ever: Commando (1985).Warning: Get ready for some one liners, mesh vests and filth! Stick around for the Milky Buttons anecdote.Discussion Points:-Ryan brings Bryan Adams trivia.-Sean and Ryan have a spat.-The three-minutes of world-building.-That suspiciously white dressing gown.-The Did You Even F**king Watch This Film? section returns.Raised Questions:-What was in Ryan's tirade?-How had Sarah never seen this before?-Does Ryan use this film as a 'What if Manual'?-What happened to 1980's 'suit-up' montages?-Why does Sean pretend not to be a geek?-Does this film have the sh*ttest bad guy in the world?Chapters:0:27 Welcome to Review It Yourself0:56 Spiritual Journeys and Cold Tea1:14 Films Sarah Hasn't Seen4:42 Today's Film: Commando6:47 Action and One-Liners Galore15:59 The Simple Story of Vengeance40:59 The Unlikely Heroine42:10 Last-Minute Plot Twists52:45 The Final Showdown55:08 Reflecting on the Chaos1:10:07 The Joy of Podcasting1:13:54 Wrapping Up the EpisodeThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Preview It Yourself side-series takes a historical turn, as Sean from 'Review It Yourself' and Jamie from 'Old Shipping Lines' discuss the trailer for Netflix's upcoming documentary 'Titan: The OceanGate Disaster' (2025). The documentary will be released only on Netflix on 11th June 2025.*Discussion Points:-The direction of the documentary.-Whether the trailer feels less like a documentary and more like a crime-drama.-Similarities between Stockton Rush and J. Bruce Ismay.Raised Questions:-Was the documentary inevitable?-Is the trailer too dramatic?-Do we need to let Titanic rest now?Chapters:0:03 Introduction to Titan Disaster1:56 Trailer Reactions and Expectations3:09 Previous Documentaries and Context4:48 Concerns About the Netflix Approach7:27 The Public's View on Accountability10:38 Are there systemic Issues in the oversight of the submersible industry?12:53 Exploring the Ethics of Titanic Exploration17:59 The Dilemma of Artifact Recovery20:03 Should Civilians Visit Titanic?24:01 The Different Submersibles (Titan, MIR, Alvin) and Safety27:02 Timing of the Documentary Release28:39 Critique of Past Documentaries34:54 Upcoming Documentaries and Books41:50 Closing Thoughts on Media Representation46:37 Conclusion and Future DiscussionsThanks for Listening!This episode is dedicated to those who lost their lives on the Titanic, the Titan and their families and loved ones. Rest In Peace.Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠*This podcast is not sponsored. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Lasse returns to the podcast to discuss Midnight Run (1988), a buddy comedy film with emotional depth, starring Robert DeNiro and Charles Grodin, Joe Pantoliano, and Yaphet Kotto-Kananga from live and Let Die (1973).Discussion Points:-Sean discovers the power of positivity.-Lasse never misses.-The Bond-esque cold open.-Sean breaks out the clichés.Raised Questions:-Has Sean found the world's most enthusiastic German?-Why are there so many actor's from 1987's The Untouchables?-Are Lasse and Sean finally on the same page?-Would your ride DeNiro's coat-tails?Chapters:0:06 Welcome Back Lasse!1:01 De Niro's Bold Move2:45 Diving into Midnight Run10:05 Film School Memories13:47 Casting Connections19:02 Modern Film Critique22:56 Character Dynamics31:51 Exploring Emotional Depths38:25 Helicopter Chase Discussion45:14 Changing Film Landscape51:42 Gushing About Great Films1:04:56 The Future of Cinema1:16:31 Midnight Run's Impact1:21:38 Lasse's Podcasts/ShowsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this initial thoughts review, Sean messages Sarah straight after seeing Gladiator II in cinemas.Has Sean ever sounded this positive?Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Huzzah! Sean continues to recommend some of his favourite films to Sarah. Next Up: Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World. "This ship is our home. This ship is England!".Discussion Points:-The Did You Even F**king Watch This Film? returns.-Sarah's disgraceful lack of nautical knowledge.-Sarah and Sean discuss the rich characters, anchored by the performances of Russell Crowe and Paul Bettany.-Why Sarah isn't "fully sold" on Russell Crowe.-Whether or not we get too many films based in the Twentieth Century.-Sean tries to put the film into historical context.-The idea of having a Jonah onboard.-The importance of the class system if you're English.Raised Questions:-How had Sarah never seen this?-Why didn't we get any sequels?-Was this film badly promoted?-Are some people just not suited to lead?-Did you recognise that actor from 'Shameless'?-Why does Sean say certain words poshly?-Are we too fixated on "Now"?-Do men need to be governed?-Is it true that he would pun would pick a pocket?-Would you trust any of your friends to help you operate on yourself?Chapters1:03 Introduction to Master and Commander2:21 The Royal Navy2:56 Debating Historical Accuracy4:09 Marketing and Reception Issues5:31 Misleading Film Descriptions7:30 Character Depth and Development11:56 The Role of Trailers13:11 The Impact of Historical Context18:43 Exploring the Ship's Dynamics20:43 The Importance of Leadership22:33 The Nature of Naval Warfare25:04 The Complexity of Relationships26:29 The Emotional Weight of Loss29:31 Class Dynamics onboard34:13 The Tension of Decision-Making37:47 The Symbolism of Superstitions42:31 Themes of Friendship and Loyalty43:19 The Balance of Power and Respect47:47 The Philosophical Undertones52:06 The Intersection of Science and Warfare59:52 The Struggles of Life at Sea1:01:23 Tensions on the Ship1:22:12 The Battle Begins1:40:45 Reflections on Victory1:51:28 Did You Even F**king Watch The Film?1:59:26 Looking Ahead to Future EpisodesThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean and Sarah return with the sixth episode of the Preview It Yourself side series. They watch and discuss the trailers for 28 Years Later, Warfare and the live-action remake of Lilo & Stitch.Discussion Points:-Sarah nearly leaves less than two minutes in.-Sean tries to warn Sarah of the truly horrific trailer she is about to watch.-Sarah wonders how the 28 Years Later looks so similar to 28 Days Later (2002).-Adam Driver.-There's a serious "Hunchback of Notre Dame"-based misunderstanding.-Sean was trying to think of Rupert Everett's name.Raised Questions:-Why do Sean and Sarah enjoy apocalyptic films so much?-Have studios lost the art of making trailers?-What film isn't improved by Adam Driver?-Why does Lilo & Stitch look cheap?-Would you watch Nicholas Cage as Frollo?Chapters:0:04 Introduction 3:15 Trailer Reactions Begin-28 Years Later11:43 Discussing A24's "Warfare"21:01 Previewing Lilo & Stitch's Disturbing New Trailer31:34 Disney's Live-Action Remake Discussion39:54 Closing Thoughts and FarewellFilm Recommendation:-13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi (2016), by Michael Bay.Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean introduces Sarah to another hidden gem, that she's never seen: Frequency (2000). "A great film about family, that's not a family-friendly film".Discussion Points:-The difficult-to-explain plot of the film.-The similarities between Frequency and Field of Dreams (1989).-Sean mentions Bill from 'Bill Reads Bad Reviews' and the planned reviews that never were.-Sarah and Sean dive into what the critics thought of this film in “Open up and swallow some dubious reviews" section! With hilarious results!-Sean wonders what happened to American pride in films.Raised Questions:-Did you spot Michael Cera?-How well did Sarah watch this film?-Are they called the Northern Lights because the North is superior?-What happened to father and son films?-What's happened to male role models in cinema?-Why is baseball so special to Americans?-Have Sean and Sarah found the horniest online film review ever?Chapters0:05 Introduction to Frequency39:24 Interconnected Lives41:41 The Impact of Choices46:34 Realistic Consequences50:32 Conclusion: A Well-Woven Tale52:24 Characters in Crisis54:45 The Weight of Choices56:39 Family Connections57:54 The Trap is Set1:00:53 Tension Builds1:03:03 Different Perspectives1:05:25 Critiquing the Critics1:16:49 Reactions to Frequency1:24:07 Final Thoughts on the Film1:27.30 The Horniest Film Review Ever?1:41:24 Conclusion and FarewellThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Find yourself some shade hot legs, and listen to this web-tastic review.Defend It Yourself 25 finds Sean joined by Matthew Dawson, the creator of 'Mortalverse DC' Audio Dramas, who comes to defend his favourite maligned film: Spider-Man 3 (2007).Discussion Points:-Matthew explains why this film has "a special place in his heart".-Sean tries not to moan about modern comic book films.-The common complaints about this film, including villains and tone. -Emo Peter Parker.-Sean thinks this is Kirsten Dunst's best MJ performance.-Matthew and Sean both loved the characters in the film, and how much you connect with them throughout the Raimi Spider-Man trilogy.-Sean has an issue with an omelette and some cookies.Raised Questions:-Is this film iconic or infamous?-Is this film going through a re-appraisal?-Does this film have too many villains?-What are Sean's complaints about the New Green Goblin's costume?-Is Peter's ego the biggest villain in the film?-Did a change in tone from the previous films affect the initial reaction?Chapters:0:07 Introduction to Spider-Man 30:19 Defending the "Meme-tastic" Film1:36 Revisiting Villain Issues3:23 The Rise of Spider-Man 3?5:20 Special Effects and CGI6:11 Plot Lines and Character Arcs9:18 Emo Peter and Tone Shifts10:40 The Complexities of Relationships12:15 The Music of Spider-Man 316:33 The Cancelled Spider-Man 421:43 A Reflection on Nostalgia23:54 The Meaning of Forgiveness27:25 The Impact of Superhero Films32:48 Closing Thoughts on Spider-Man 334:12 Promoting the Mortal Verse56:24 Wrapping Up and Future PlansThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Steve from The Decision Reel returns to finish the Rush Hour series. Has the charm worn off by this third instalment?Check out The Decision Reel here: https://www.thedecisionreel.com/Discussion Points:-The curse of the third film in a trilogy.-Tangents include Jurassic Park 3, The Big Bang Theory, Friends, Stranger Things and The Batman.-Sean puts the boot into the Jurassic World sequel, even though he loved "Battle of Big Rock" (2019).-Steve hasn't seen "No Time To Die" (2021) , so Sean channels his inner Alan Partridge and describes the film's plot.-"It's going to happen fellas": Sean and Steve take time out for a Public Health Announcement.-Sean and Steve clash over Honey Wheat Bread.-Sean is astonished that people eat Garlic Bread with soup. Raised Questions:-Is this film a little tired?-Can Chris Pratt act?-How many names would you want tattooing on your back?-Why were there loads of films set in France around the mid-to-late 2000s?-Is Carry On (2024) the next Die Hard film?-Is it better to watch shows on terrestrial television at a specific time and day of the week?-Is everyone laughing at America and England?-Can you get chicken wings in England?-Are they brothers?Sean Recommends:-The West Wing (1999-2006).Time Stamps2:30 Trilogies and Their Pitfalls4:00 Jurassic Park Comparisons6:00 Lost Potential in Jurassic World10:00 Rush Hour's Unique Appeal11:00 The First and Only Rush Hour18:00 Political Incorrectness in Comedy22:00 The Magic of Buddy Cop Films24:00 Lee and Carter's Dynamic30:00 The Humour in Cultural Differences36:00 The Return of Familiar Characters38:00The Importance of Entertainment42:00 The State of Modern Film46:00 Nostalgia for Scheduled Programming49:00 The Allure of Themed Events52:00 Food Preferences and Cultural Differences56:00 The Humour of Misunderstandings58:00 The Connection to Waterworld1:03.00 The Emotional Climax1:09:00 A Tired Formula1:10:30 The Decision Reel's OfferingsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean is joined by author of 'Understanding J. Bruce Ismay: The True Story of the Man They Called The Coward of Titanic', Clifford Ismay, to look into J. Bruce Ismay.Bruce Ismay was the Chairman of The White Star Line, who became infamous for getting into a lifeboat and surviving the sinking of the Titanic. But are things as one-sided as people think?Listen in to this riveting discussion as Cliff and Sean bring their own insights into the debate.They discuss:-Thomas Henry Ismay and his relationship with his son, Bruce.-Parental expectations.-Bruce Ismay's introverted personality and how it ended up working against the public's perception of him, both before and after the Titanic tragedy.-Myths around Bruce and Captain Smith.-The impact of TV and film depictions of real-life people on public memory.-The cultural impact of Titanic (1997).-The "ram-shackle" evacuation of Titanic.-How surprisingly quickly the attacks on Ismay's character began.-The bravery of Titanic's Engineers and Postmen.Raised Questions:-Who did Cliff really want to write a book about?-Did you know that Bruce's Dad was a world-renowned businessman and self-made man?-Are we all a product of our parents?-Did Bruce's façade alienate people around him?-Has Bruce Ismay been portrayed factually and fairly?-What was the last song played by Titanic's band?-Can we ever corroborate Ismay's version of events?-Do the Public and the Press love a villain when a disaster occurs?-Does the sacrifice of wider Titanic's crew get forgotten?Correction:-It was Lifeboat number 13, which almost had Lifeboat number 15 dropped on it.-Enclosed A Deck Promenade* not "Enclosed Boat Deck" as Sean put it.Further Reading:-Understanding J. Bruce Ismay: The True Story of the Man They Called 'The Coward of Titanic' (The History Press, 2022) by Clifford Ismay.-How To Survive the Titanic; or The Sinking of J. Bruce Ismay (Bloomsbury, 2011) by Frances Wilson.-The Triumvirate: Captain Edward J. Smith, Bruce Ismay, Thomas Andrews and the Sinking of Titanic (The History Press, 2024) by George Behe.Chapters:0:32 Introduction1:17 The Power of Film3:24 J. Bruce Ismay's Perception4:48 Thomas Ismay: A Legacy6:45 Father and Son Dynamics10:33 The Politics of Perception12:49 Portrayals of Bruce Ismay15:48 The Myths of Titanic17:51 The Last Moments21:42 Lifeboat Decisions23:53 The Reality of Survival26:29 The Impact of Inquiry29:02 The Press and Public Perception34:45 The Legacy of Bruce Ismay38:09 Life After Titanic44:35 New Perspectives on History48:17 The Real Heroes of Titanic51:45 Unfinished Stories of Titanic56:59 Future Works and CollaborationsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean and Sarah discuss Doctor Who Series One 'Rose' and whether it holds up twenty years later.Discussion Points:-How Sean and Sarah both found the series.-The casting of Billie Piper.-What Christopher Eccleston's second series could have been like.-The break-neck speed of this episode!-The relationship between Rose and her Mam.-The uneven tone in the first few episodes.-THAT 'oner' shot!-Sean and Sarah discuss escapism.-Sarah is perturbed and a 'tad miffed' by the current state of Doctor Who.Raised Questions:-Was this debut episodes successful for both new and returning viewers?-Did the show become a soap opera?-What happened to this kind of natural and organic story-telling?-Have you fallen out of love with Doctor Who?-Was Rose the last working-class companion?-Are Rose Tyler and Amy Pond too similar?-Did Series One struggle to find the correct tone at times?-Did Eccleston struggle with the more comedic moments?-How many times does Sean mention The Sense Sphere?-Is the state of current Doctor Who a result of sheer incompetence or by design?-Does Doctor Who have an attitude nowadays?Chapters:0:14 Welcome to Review It Yourself1:13 Introducing Doctor Who2:37 The 2005 Revival6:11 Nostalgia and Personal Connections7:00 The New Doctor's Introduction9:01 Character Dynamics Explored12:22 The Role of Rose16:07 The Impact of Eccleston18:30 Humour Amidst Darkness21:38 Family Relationships28:09 Grounded Realism in Characters33:09 Connection to the Audience35:09 The Gritty Atmosphere39:18 Accents and Authenticity41:37 Clive and Conspiracy51:38 Balancing Tone and Humour53:53 Character Dynamics Unveiled1:00:01 The Doctor's Alien Nature1:09:29 Humour and Depth in Dialogue1:17:14 The Complexity of Companionship1:27:10 The Essence of Doctor Who1:34:03 Crafting Quality Television1:37:32 Lessons from the Past1:43:24 Reflections and FarewellsShout-Outs:-The Sense Sphere: The Doctor Who Podcast. Find It Here: www.youtube.com/@TheSenseSphereThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Defend It Yourself returns after over a year away, and it begins with an absolute beaut!Griffin from the Reboot Deboot Podcast joins Sean to defend, Rubber (2010).Find Griffin's Podcast Here: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/show/rebootdebootDiscussion Points:-Griffin thinks people need to check their tone when talking about this film.-Sean was worried what he'd been asked to watch, when he heard the title.-The DVD read-through returns.-This film is truly like nothing you've ever seen!-Sean was disappointed that the deaths weren't more inventive.-Griffin wonders why B-Movies are treated differently.-Sean and Griffin launch into a chat about the art of filmmaking, CGI, and wonder how bad films get made.Raised Questions:-Why don't Americans spell tyre properly?-Where were the body parts? -Is Rubber "unjustly denigrated"?-What did people expect from a movie about a psychopathic, telekinetic tyre?-Is Robert the Tyre just a homicidal version of the cooker from 'A Grand Day Out' (1989)?-Is Robert like Edward Scissorhands?-Were you disappointed that the audience were killed so quickly?-Why is Sean still disappointed with 'Snakes on a Plane' (2006)?Time Stamps:0:43 Welcome Back to Defend It Yourself2:07 Introducing Griffin from Reboot Deboot2:15 Defending the Film: Rubber4:07 A Love for B-Movies5:12 Is Rubber underrated?8:03 The Film's Unique Concept11:13 Comparing Rubber to Other B-Movies18:09 The Art of Filmmaking24:52 Rubber's Length and Timing29:42 Breaking the Fourth Wall32:02 Liam Neeson in the Naked Gun Reboot41:56 The Nature of Bad Movies47:52 The Subjectivity of Film53:08 The Uniqueness of Rubber1:01:20 The Ending of Rubber1:06:55 Final Thoughts on Rubber1:10:18 Where to Find Reboot Deboot1:14:40 Closing Thoughts and AcknowledgmentsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Preview It Yourself returns!Sean and Sarah discuss the new trailer for the upcoming Final Destination Bloodlines.Is it worth your hard earned money? Listen in to find out.Time Stamps:0:11 Trailer Talk0:50 Trailer Reactions3:03 Franchise Expectations5:04 Spoilers and Surprises6:14 Modern Day Elements6:58 New Perspectives9:58 Anticipation Builds10:27 Plot Insights12:35 Cast and Crew13:37 Inheriting Death14:25 Final ThoughtsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sarah is back! She and Sean finally discuss one of their oddly favourite films, Prometheus (2012).Discussion Points:-Sean likes this film, but can see it's faults.-Sarah really appreciates the story's set-up and the unusual landscape.-The film's aesthetics and themes versus the execution and uneven tone.-Sarah loves films where people grapple with their faith.-Sarah's recollections of watching the med-pod scene.-The incredibly awful line reads.-Sarah loved the well-rounded character of Doctor Elizabeth Shaw.-Sean and Sarah discuss Alien: Romulus (2024).Raised Questions:-Is this film trying to insult your intelligence?-Does every tie-in with the Alien franchise weaken the direction that Prometheus was trying to take?-Is the script "too hand-hold-y"?-Does the film feel over-edited to you?-Is the crew of 17 too big?-Why does humanity seek answers?-Is the script "too ham-hocked"?-Is David infatuated with Elizabeth Shaw?-Why doesn't Idris Elba's character do anything until the end?-What happens if Archaeologists find the Engineer's robe?Time Stamps:0:06 Welcome to Review It Yourself1:23 The Long-Awaited Prometheus Review7:21 The Film's Opening and Visuals12:38 Themes of Creation and Faith16:18 Exploring the Characters and Their Dynamics20:59 The Engineers and Their Significance25:59 The Unfolding of the Plot29:33 The Role of David and AI Commentary32:41 Critique of Character Development34:51 Action vs. Atmosphere in Storytelling35:50 The Philosophical Questions Raised37:03 The Flaws and Strengths of Prometheus44:43 Love, Relationships, and Their Portrayal49:01 Conclusion: A Mixed Bag of Ideas1:14:10 Character Introductions1:15:23 David's Understanding of Love1:20:58 Quarantine Procedures1:23:42 The Importance of Emotional Reactions1:29:30 The Horrors of Creation1:30:27 Themes of Control and Gender1:37:48 The Nature of Faith1:47:18 The Engineers' Intentions1:52:39 The Final Confrontation1:58:08 The Complexity of Faith2:09:14 A Mixed Bag of Themes2:18:17 The Implications of Scientific Discovery2:20:14 The Value of Long-Form DiscussionsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean is joined by Jamie from 'Old Shipping Lines' YouTube Channel to review the Norwegian film, Konvoi (2023), known internationally as The Arctic Convoy.The film appears to be based upon the true story of the 1942 PQ17 convoy, one of the first major Anglo-American convoys of the Second World War. Discussion Points:-Sean needs his nautical fix. -Why this film is one of Jamie's favourite films.-The poor promotional poster.-The fantastic script, sound design and special effects.-Sean was surprised to see RAF Coastal Command.-The importance of the Atlantic and the Artic (Russian) Convoys in the Second World War. -Jamie and Sean were impressed by the depth of characters.-The dynamic between the Captain and the First Mate.-The reasons why this film focuses upon the Norwegian Merchant Sailors, who lost 4,000 lives during the war.-Sean and Jamie empathise with different characters.Raised Questions:-Do you love film recommendations from friends?-Why is this film one of Jamie's favourite films?-Are Norwegian films the best out there right now?-Why do the British always get derided in modern war films?-Why don't you eat pickled herring at your desk?-What is the difference between the words 'disperse' and 'scatter'?-Is the Naval side of the Second World War difficult to translate films?The Norwegian War Sailor's Register (Krigsseilerregisteret):https://www.krigsseilerregisteret.no/enRecommendations:-PQ17: An Artic Convoy Disaster (2014), a BBC documentary, hosted by Jeremy Clarkson.Time Stamps:0:24 Welcome and Introductions2:04 Film Overview: The Arctic Convoy3:07 Personal Connection to Norwegian Cinema8:46 Historical Context of Convoys13:36 Character Dynamics and Interactions17:56 The Captain's Leadership Style21:40 Tension Between the First Mate and Captain25:02 The Battle Scenes and Tactics28:45 Thematic Exploration of Fear and Duty32:31 Emotional Moments and Character Development35:55 The Role of the Radio Operator38:19 Confrontations and Power Struggles46:52 The Plan to Escape49:03 The Icy Challenges Ahead55:31 Recommendations for Similar Films59:55 Closing Thoughts and Future PlansThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Stew from 'Stew World Order' joins Sean to try and answer the question:Modern Films, are they flying or dying?Stew believes we're in a golden age, Sean does not...Time Stamps:1:29 Film Debate: Flying or Dying?1:40 Generational Nostalgia6:02 Access to Diverse Films10:48 Voices in Cinema14:41 The Case Against Modern Films17:12 Poor Writing and World Building20:02 Death of Comedy22:38 The Decline of Movie Stars45:24 The Shift in Film Quality1:04:08 Conclusion: Quality vs. Quantity1:08:21 Podcast Wrap-UpThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean is feeling the pressure this week as he and Sarah review his Auntie's favourite film: What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? (1963).Discussion Points:-What the hell happened to acting and film-making.-The tour de force performances from Bette Davis and Joan Crawford.-Sarah and Sean were surprised by the sheer class of the entire production.-The career of Davis and Crawford.-The golden age of Hollywood.-The outstanding performances of the supporting cast.-Sarah loves a sad and cynical film.-The impeccable sound design.-Sean and Sarah can't wait to watch 'The Letter' (1940).-Whether Award-winning films have become more forgettable.-The death of Hollywood star power and 'learning your craft'.-Sean has nothing personally against Zendaya, he was just making a point about the lack of acting prowess in the "go-to actors and actresses" of today.-The promotional tours the actresses went on.Raised Questions:-Have you ever made up your own words?-Why don't we get films like this anymore?-Why do older films see to be so much better than what we get now?-Did the film make you question your own sanity?-How have the Jane sister's become so isolated from the world?-Are they in a cage of their own making?-Who is the one really orchestrating the situation?-Why doesn't Blanche just shout out of the window?-Why are leading ladies pushed so much in modern-day films and series, when we had amazing actresses like Joan Crawford and Bette Davis in the past?-How amazing was Bette Davis?-Have we collectively dropped our expectations for films?Time Stamps:0:11 Introduction3:43 Film Overview: What Ever Happened to Baby Jane8:34 The Performances: A Masterclass in Acting21:33 The Complex Relationship of Jane and Blanche29:00 Cinematic Techniques: Lighting and Sound Design35:42 The Twisted Backstory Unveiled44:00 The Climax: Tension Builds50:21 The Film's Conclusion: Layers of Manipulation and Resentment52:28 Talent and Resentment59:16 Playing the Victim?1:08:20 Hollywood's Shifting Star Power1:20:37 The Art of Acting1:26:55 Behind the Scenes of Baby Jane1:33:19 The Real-Life Drama1:40:58 A Plea for Quality Modern-Day Cinema1:44:07 Listener Engagement and Future TopicsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean gives his initial thoughts to Alex Garland's Civil War (2024).Discussion Points:-Sean was reminded of The Road (2009) and Nightcrawler (2014), with the intent of this film.-Typical American understatement. -Whether this film felt futuristic or not.-The strange sense of normality that people still adhere to, in the midst of a civil war.-Sean goes on tangent about Tesco.-The strange way they marketed the film.-How unexpectedly dark and gritty this film is.-America and foreign intervention.-The film's lack of answers or things to say.Raised Questions:-Did the marketing harm this film?-Where has Kirsten Dunst been?-Did the vague reasons for the war work for you?-Do you like a thought-provoking film?-Did you enjoy the "fantastically-at-odds with the horror" music choices?-Do you think the film fully-commits to the horror?Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean welcomes back massive friend of the show Luke, from The Howdy Beans Podcast! to discuss the first Wallace and Gromit film. What follows is a celebration of English television.With the shops shut on a Bank Holiday, A Grand Day Out (1989) sees an inventor Wallace and his pet dog Gromit travel to the moon in their home-made rocket ship, in order to replenish their cheese supplies. Because you can't have dry crackers can you?Discussion Points:-In the preamble, Sean and Luke still don't see eye to eye on Signs (2002), Bruce Willis's later film roles, and Gladiator II.-The genesis of Wallace and Gromit and the labour of love from Nick Park to get this film made. -"Let's bow to the inevitable"-Sean and Luke try to avoid tangents.-The size of Wallace's "door-stop" cheese slices.-Aardman films over the years.-The cooker on the moon and his dreams of skiing on Earth. -The death of Boomerang, CITV and Cartoon Network.-Luke is still disgusted with Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget (2023).-Luke and Sean discuss subsequent Wallace and Gromit films The Wrong Trousers (1993), A Close Shave (1995), The Curse of the Were-Rabbit (2005), A Matter of Loaf and Death (2008), and Vengeance Most Fowl (2024).Raised Questions:-How many aliases does Luke actually have?-Where's Sarah?-Do you need to describe Wallace and Gromit for the Americans?-Is it ridiculous to call this Wallace and Gromit, the one with the most unrealistic?-How did this film save an entire cheese?-Do you remember surround sound speakers around the room?-Is 'reverse-recency bias' a thing?-Is Moon Cheese just a different variety?Time stamps:0:09 Introduction and Sighs2:09 Signs Discussion5:28 A Grand Day Out Overview10:25 Nick Park and Aardman12:05 Wallace and Gromit Characters16:57 Animation Techniques23:03 Peter Sallis and Voice Acting28:08 Personal Memories of A Grand Day Out30:32 Favorite Wallace and Gromit Films37:49 Nostalgia and British Culture55:14 Ending Reflections1:01:04 Film Length and Experience1:02:53 Aardman's Future and Challenges1:08:15 Podcast Promotion and Closing RemarksNamed TV Shows:-Creature Comforts (1989-Present).-Brum (1991-2002).-Mr Bean (1990-1995).-Open All Hours (1976-1985).-Still Open All Hours (2013-2019)-Come Outside (1993-1997).-Mr Benn (1971-1972).-Pingu (1990-2006).-The Clangers (1969-Present).-Fireman Sam (1987-Present).-Joshua Jones (1992).-William's Wish Wellingtons (1994-1996).-The Queen's Nose (1995-2003).-The Demon Headmaster (1996-1998, 2019).-My Parents Are Aliens (1999-2006).-Jungle Run (1999-2006).-50/50 (1997-2005).-Get Your Own Back (1991-2004).-Cow and Chicken (1995-1999). -The Cramp Twins (2001-2004).-Ed, Edd and Eddy (1999-2006).-Dexter's Lab (1996-1998, 2001-2003).-Recess (1997-2001).-The Powerpuff Girls (1998-2005)-Courage the Cowardly Dog (1999-2002).-Hole in the Wall Game Show (2008-2009).-Shaun the Sheep (2007-Present).Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean is joined once again by Marie from '2 Girls, 1 Reusable Cup Podcast' and 'We Needed Roads' to lay into the poorly-executed Batman: The Killing Joke (2016).Discussion Points:-The DVD read-through returns.-Marie brings her comic book knowledge, whilst Sean brings his views without having read the comic. Neither were impressed.-The baffling creative choices behind this adaptation, particularly the horrific depiction of Barbara Gordon.-Sean questions Barbara Gordon's garment choices.-Marie and Sean discuss studios "subverting expectations".-The failure of the writers to write women properly.-Sean and Marie consider alternative story arcs for this film.-The glimpses of inspiration.-Marie thinks the animation was "lifeless" and misses the vibrant, dynamic look of the comic book. -THAT ending.-The awful post-credits scene.Raised Questions:-Why is Batman a cameo in his own film?-How did they get it so badly wrong?-Should they have bothered adapting this comic book?-We're here to see Batman, so where is he?-Did Luke from 'The Howdy Beans Podcast' appreciate the late night voice-message about this film?-Is Sean a bit of a contrarian?-Are you a fan of the Loony song?-Which line almost made Marie choke?*Sean was trying to think of Julianne Moore in The Fugitive.**Sean was thinking of Steve Kloves, who did all-but-one of the Harry Potter film screenplays.Chapters:0:09 Introduction to The Killing Joke3:19 The Killing Joke Overview44:38 Dissecting the Controversy1:14:12 Closing Thoughts on AdaptationThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean and Sarah review one of their favourite films, M. Night Shyamalan's Signs (2002). They once again examine what the top critics think, before embarking on an in-depth dive into the film. Discussion Points:-The way this film divides people.-The Bad Reviews return!-The laser focus of this film.-Sean isn't happy to be taught how to pronounce a word by Sarah, someone from the South. -Sarah and Sean wonder if people trust mainstream critics anymore.-Whether people consider films art or content.-Studios treating the audience as if they are wrong. -The VERY outside interference in this film. -Sean and Sarah DISAGREE regarding a character. -Sarah thinks the time setting is ambiguous.-Merrill's 'miracle' and Graham's loss of faith.-The way that brothers (Graham and Merrill) interact.-The lack of a female role in the family.-Sean is horrified by the idea of a sequel to this film.Raised Questions:-Have you met anyone who is on the fence about this film?-Are you fed up of 'faffy' words in critic's reviews?-Why are reviews always trying to be funny?-Do people need to stop comparing this to 'The Sixth Sense' (1999)?-Why do people talk to Graham in a strange way?-Did the ending pay off for you?-Would Sarah and Sean's sarcasm be welcome in America?-How good is Cherry Jones?-Why won't the family call a vet?-Is this Mel Gibson's best performance?-Why does Sarah love a dinner party scene?-Do the aliens have a sense of vengeance?-What is the film actually about?Time stamps:0:20 Introduction to Film Reviews1:39 Chasing the Right Tone3:05 Bad Reviews and Polarizing Opinions7:38 Diving into Rotten Tomatoes11:22 Critics' Takes on Signs11:31 The Weight of Expectations16:15 Critiquing Film Criticism27:34 Audience Reactions to Signs47:52 Analysing Character Dynamics52:01 The Emotional Core of the Film59:16 Themes of Grief and Loss1:06:16 Community Responses to Crisis1:18:50 The Timelessness of Signs1:24:15 Eerie Settings and Rural America1:32:02 Notable Characters and Their Impact1:38:29 The Role of Communication2:01:11 Emotional Connections and Relationships2:14:47 The Alien Threat Emerges2:27:41 Regaining Faith and Purpose2:34:32 Critiquing Modern Cinema2:42:06 Reflections on Humanity and Hope2:43:55 Final Thoughts and FarewellsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Marie from '2 Girls 1 Reusable Cup Podcast' and 'We Needed Roads Podcast' finally guests on Review It Yourself and what a film she picked! Batman: Under the Red Hood (2010).Warning, this episode contains spoilers.Discussion Points:-Sean and Marie discuss animated Batman films.-Marie lays out her relationship with Batman animated films and comics.-Sean explains his love of superhero films (no, really!).-The fantastic portrayal of the Joker.-The incredibly dark tone.-The great use of flashbacks.Raised Questions:-Is this one of the best Batman films ever?-Are animated films under less scrutiny and pressure?-Why was Sean so impressed by Fantastic Four: The Rise of the Silver Surfer (2007)?-Have we had "too much of a good thing" with superhero films?-How long has it been since Sean vented about 'The Batman'?-What the hell is Night Wing doing for half the films? -Is the Red Hood trying to kill Batman or not?Sean Recommends: Gladiator II (2024).Timestamps:0:05Welcome to Review It Yourself1:22Introducing Batman: Under the Red Hood4:57Exploring Animated Batman Films11:32The Joker's Brutal Nature33:41The Complexity of Bruce Wayne46:25The Mystery of the Red Hood47:53Characters Matter49:23A Labour of Love49:32The Training of Jason Todd54:06The Joker's Chaos55:56Emotional Turmoil59:09The Al Ghul Connection1:02:35The Final Showdown1:07:31The Impact of Loss1:09:50A New Direction1:18:22The Dangers of CGI1:22:05Future of DCU1:22:49The Penguin's Potential1:25:47Thoughts on Gladiator 21:31:50Where to Find MarieThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean is joined by Josh, Alex, Will and Luke from 'This Isn't Life' Podcast to review one of the best comedies of recent memory: Tropic Thunder (2008). Discussion Points:-Sean gets the This Isn't Life guys to introduce themselves.-The guys and Sean discuss the reason for why this film wouldn't get made now.-How Hollywood lost the ability to laugh at itself.-Sean details how context is key. -A '50 Shades of Grey' Would You Rather? Question.-Whether you could pitch a film like this now.-Josh, Alex, Will and Luke recommend Eyes Wide Shut (1999).-Sean and the guys discuss the Moon Landings and if it's real or not, and barely avoid a discussion about lizard people.Raised Questions:-Is this Robert Downey Jr.'s best film?-What's Loyd Grossman got to do with this film?-What happened between 2008 and now to change people's sensibilities?-How badly does Christian Grey act towards his girlfriend?-Is this film one of the funniest films ever made?-What's your favourite bit of the film?-When did you last see a side-splitting comedy in the cinemas?Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean and Sarah reach the Final Destination (for now) of the franchise, with the oddly-fantastic Final Destination 5 (2011).Discussion Points:-Sean compares this series to the Jaws franchise.-Sarah wonders how The Final Destination (2009) turned out so badly.-Sean moans about modern-day films and the rising cost of visiting the cinema.-The importance of a gut-instinct when picking which film to see.-Sarah and Sean wonder how on Earth this fifth film became, arguably, the best film in the series.-Sean and Sarah clash over whether the evening meal is "your tea" or "your dinner".-Sean debuts his cockney impression.-Which character steals the show.-Sarah questions whether the setting of the film and whether they manage to pull it off and make it believable.-Sarah loved how the film gave the characters time to react to this horrific event and began to question the current trajectory of their lives. -Seeing grief push Peter onto a very dark path.-Sean recorded this episode with a cold, hence the breathiness. Raised Questions:-How did they do this?-Do you remember the 3-D craze?-Does anyone care about the preamble in these films?-Why don't Sean and Sarah review more modern films on the podcast?-Why do studios continue to "subvert audiences expectations" all the time?-"I thought you'd just had your tea?"-Sean questions Sarah's digestive distress.-When are they going to have someone British in this franchise?-Did you see the twist coming?-Was making the survivors group co-workers a genius move?Thank You to Ben from 'Push Pull Health' and Ryan Walker from 'The Walk The Line Podcast'.Time Stamps:0:10Welcome to Review It Yourself3:32A Return to Basics for the Franchise5:57The Cost of Cinema7:36Modern Films and Audience Expectations11:03Meet the Characters16:31Time Travel or Prequel?22:53The Ripple Effect of Tragedy30:36The Bridge Disaster40:58Reactions to Tragedy46:27Humour in Dark Situations52:20Hidden References and Clues54:17Film Quality Contrast57:12Gymnastics Scene Impact1:03:12Turning Safe Spaces Horrific1:06:09Eye Surgery Tensions1:08:25Unconventional Villain Development1:14:31Dark Twists and Confrontations1:30:47Plane Crash Call back1:42:32Nostalgic Technology References1:48:49Listener Engagement and ReflectionsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean does his best to put together a coherent review for the Doctor Who Christmas Special 2024, but it's fair to say, he wasn't impressed. Sean likens the episode to "a sh*t sandwich from a corner shop".Discussion Points:-Sean discusses why he can't be bothered to review Doctor Who anymore.-If you make good TV, people will watch it.-The issues with pacing. -Using a fly to introduce a character's name.-The lack of seriousness in Doctor Who now. -The part of the episode that Sean found distasteful. Raised Questions:-What was all this all about?-Has Ncuti Gatwa been miscast?-Is this episode soulless? -Why is Doctor Who so political now?-Why did this episode feel like a bottle-episode?Shout-outs:-The Nerdstalgic Podcast.-The Sense Sphere.Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Merry Christmas from Sean and Sarah! Join them for an extended look into the 1998 Christmas Classic Jack Frost (1998). Sean and Sarah wonder why this film was decimated by critics but loved by audiences. They unusually look at the criticisms from around the time the film came out and address the ridiculous views of the critics. Is Jack Frost (1998) really 'sloppy', 'repulsive', 'charm-less', 'preachy', 'manipulative' and does it 'prove that Hollywood is in the hands of the minions of Satan'?Discussion Points:-Sean and Sarah spend the first 30 minutes reading bad reviews.-Sean destroys any chance of ever becoming a Rotten Tomatoes critic.-Sarah and Sean compare the rating of Jack Frost (1998) and Captain Marvel (2019).-Why people ignore 'professional critics' nowadays, in favour of Podcasters and YouTubers.-Sean brings Luke from The Nerdstalgic Podcast opinion's into the discussion.-Whether or not a film can be 'over-emotional'.-The loss of a male role model.-Sarah watches the film's trailer for the first time.-Sarah and Sean discuss father and son/mother and son family dynamics.-The quiet strength of Gabby Frost.-Sean and Sarah discuss their traditional Christmas films.Raised Questions:-Which rating did Sarah think was "f*cking criminal"?-Do the reviews about this film disgust you as much as they did to Sarah and Sean?-Have you ever met anyone who is negative about this film?-How many times does Sean take aim at how Americans spell English words?-Do you think this film "ticks all the Christmas boxes"?-How had Sarah never seen this before?-Should Mac have been there at the end?-Did you like that Charlie comes out fighting with a hairdryer?-What do you think of Elf (2003)?-Is the film "a little bit too Disney Channel' at times?Random Film Recommendation:-The Perfect Storm (2000).Random Tangent:-Lindt chocolate:Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean and Sarah continue their nuclear film exposure, with 1979's The China Syndrome; a tale about the power of the media, the dangers of nuclear energy and the effects of corporate indifference and greed. Released just 12 days before the real 'Three-Mile Island' nuclear incident, this film was discussed by everybody in 1979.Sean and Sarah wonder whether this brilliant film has had the cultural impact that it should have had, before delving into what the modern day film industry is failing at (It's pretty much everything). Discussion Points:-The DVD read-through returns.-The almost-perfect timing of the film.-Sarah wonders about the impact of timing, how this film "was everywhere but then nowhere", similar to Avatar (2009).-The impeccable writing and the intelligence of all the characters. -Sarah and Sean struggle to explain just how good this film is.-"We can't go back to living like Hermits", Sean wades into the debate around the future of energy.-Sean and Sarah name their price to give up work for a year and just watch modern films.-The death of "taking-a-risk" films.Raised Questions:-Has this film been forgotten?-Does the title (meaning nuclear meltdown) harm the film?-Do you love films that show the behind-the-scenes "manic-ness" of live broadcasting?-Is there anything more ominous than a shaking cup of tea?-Would a soundtrack have been out of place?-Is Sarah incoherent?-What was the film Sean saw at a mystery screening?*Events:-The San Bernadino Train Crash and 'The Duffy Street Incident' (1989).-The accidents on American Airlines Flight 96 (DC-10) and United Airlines Flight 811 (747), and the crash of Turkish Airline Flight 981 (DC-10) when cargo doors failed.-Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station partial nuclear meltdown on 28th March 1989.-Dresden Nuclear Power Plant 'false high pressure signal' incident on June 5th 1970.-"Counterfeit Plane Parts": The crash of Partnair Flight 394 (CV-580).*The film that Sean thought was "bloody awful" was Joy Ride (2023).Time Stamps:0:08Welcome to Review It Yourself1:22The China Syndrome Overview5:36Exploring the Title's Meaning8:13Behind the Scenes of Broadcasting13:18The Characters and Their Dynamics19:17The Nuclear Incident Unfolds25:14Tension Builds in the Control Room35:07Corporate Greed versus Safety43:23The Cultural Context of Nuclear Power46:44The Climax: Racing Against Time50:27The Final Confrontation and Truth Revealed51:44The Interview Distraction52:52Consequences of Choices54:37The Complexity of Storytelling56:47The Pressure of Public Speaking59:11The Weight of Communication1:01:20The Tragic Break1:04:06The Nuclear Dilemma1:05:10The Value of Depth1:15:05Intentional Filmmaking1:30:08Enjoyable Cinema Experiences1:34:30Disappointment in Modern Films1:36:09The State of Current Filmmaking1:39:16The Quest for Quality Films1:43:37A Call for SupportThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Review It Yourself's first ever guest returns! Ryan Walker from 'The Walk The Line Podcast' joins Sean and Sarah to discuss the fourth (and planned last) film:The Final Destination (2009). Will Ryan and Sarah remain unimpressed by Sean's choice of film?Check Out Ryan's website here: https://www.thewalkthelinepodcast.com/Discussion Points:-Ryan is practising for Loose Women or This Morning, after his BBC Radio Essex Interview.-Sarah was unimpressed by this film.-The way the film jettisons everything that Sarah loved, plot, characters etc.-The lack of importance for the women's names.-Ryan loved the tyre death.-CGI ruins the party, again.-Treat yourself to the deleted scenes.-The really poor script.-The 'Death By Caffeine' Coffee Shop rubbish coffee puns.-This film is so good that Ryan, Sean and Sarah start discussing Commando (1985): "90 minutes of pure adrenaline"-Ryan Walker.-Ryan is annoyed at the CGI dust.-We do not endorse spreading hate, we were laughing at the idiotic guy-just in case you missed the sarcasm, nuance and humour. -Sean is outraged that the main character doesn't get his face spattered with blood.Raised Questions:-What's with Sean's saucy introduction?-Did you know there were 5 Final Destination films?-Did the film go totally go off the rails with this one?-What is with the acting?-Are we supposed to die?-How strong was that fence?-Did death save the best for 3-D?-Why is Sean against the C-word?-Why did they use George's backstory like that?-Why are the visions so rubbish?-Why does no-one emotionally react to any of the deaths in this film?-Why don't they go for a cheeky Greggs?-Would a Final Destination spoof, similar to Scream (1996) work?Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Savon, formerly of Coffee and Comments podcast, returns to review a classic film, The Indian in the Cupboard (1995). Based on the 1980 book by Lynne Reid Banks, the story sees Omri, a young kid who lives in New York City, discover his cupboard brings his toy American Indian to life.Discussion Points:-How the book became a staple of British Primary Schools.-The DVD read-through returns.-Sean is confused by American foods.-Savon and Sean discuss the differences between the book and the film adaptation.-Savon describes how 90's the film feels and was surprised to see an Abacus. -The differences between the book and the film adaptation.-The tumultuous story of the American West.-Savon and Sean discuss the unexpected emotional depth in the film.Raised Questions:-Who chooses the books you read at Primary (Elementary) school?-Why do we read so many American based stories in Britain?-Do Americans get fed up with films based in New York?-Is this film more 'Field of Dreams' (1989) than 'Toy Story' (1995)?-What happened to skating in films?Corrections:-*Frank OZ played Yoda in the Star Wars films, not C3PO.-*Alan Abernathy was the character in Small Soldiers, not Lewis.Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Ben from 'Push Pull Health' returns to the podcast after two years, complete with booing, to help Sarah and Sean review Final Destination 3 (2006).Discussion Points:-Sarah feels this film is a return to form after Final Destination 2 (2003).-The solid opener with the rollercoaster crash.-Ben thinks the characters are "awful" and "stink".-The shocking amount of times Wendy gets her face spattered with blood.-Little Timmy from Final Destination 2. -The return of the memorial service.-Sean thinks there were too many 'splatty' deaths. -Sarah, Sean and Ben wonder how the series managed to stay fresh. Raised Questions:-Has Sean sold out?-Is Ben worth the wait?-Why didn't Ben feel as nostalgic about this film as he thought he would?-Are we meant to care about these characters?-How long is the duration of the premonition?-Would you prefer Sarah to calmly tell you that she's had a premonition?-How many times does the word 'derailed' get used? -Was it a good idea to go with a primarily all-teenage cast again?-Were you rooting for Wendy?-How many baby wipes is Wendy using?-What's with that gym?Time Stamps:0:08- Welcome to Review It Yourself0:49- The Return of Ben2:02- Final Destination 3 Discussion3:53- Tanning Booth Death6:55- The Characters and Their Fates9:56- Deaths and CGI Effects15:51- The Roller Coaster Incident17:55- The Gym Scene22:24- Memorial Service Chaos26:50- The Next Fatalities28:55- The Train Disaster36:09- Exploring the Deaths37:59- The Final Train Scene40:10- Reflections on the Franchise40:30- Anticipating Future Instalments48:28- The Podcast Journey51:17- The Future of Horror Films55:14- Wrapping Up the Discussion1:05:32- Closing Remarks and ThanksThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Thomas Lynskey, actor, writer, and director of The Last Signals joins Sean to discuss the story behind the making of his independent film.The film explores the actions Titanic's wireless operators, Senior Operator John ‘Jack' Phillips and Junior Operator Harold Bride, throughout Titanic's voyage.The story of the making of the film is as amazing as the film itself, as Tom describes how his family and friends worked to bring the film to life! My Guest:The Last Signals is available on Tom's YouTube Channel 'Part Time Explorer': https://www.youtube.com/@PartTimeExplorerDiscussion Points:-The incredible collaborative effort it took to build the sets, assemble the cast, and scout the locations over two years!-The inspiration behind the film, the 'geeks' of 1912, the wireless operators, and why Tom didn't originally plan to star in the film. -The length Tom and the cast went to, to achieve historical accuracy.Raised Questions:-Do limited resources create the need for creative film-making?-Where did the inspiration for the film come from?-How did the cast end up filming from 2am-4am in a Titanic museum?-Will the footage of Tom's Dad as Senator Smith ever be released?-Was there a culture of defending fellow White Star crewmen who died during the disaster?-What can you do to make your parent's pool look like the North Atlantic on screen?Massive Thanks to Marv from 'Pods Like Us' and Ryan Walker from 'The Walk The Line Podcast' for their advice about interview podcast episodes. Go check out their awesome podcasts!Time Stamps:0:05-Welcome to Review It Yourself4:01-The Last Signals Overview9:13-Filming Challenges and Set Design15:10-The Story Behind the Characters23:10-Accents and Performances31:57-Exploring Historical Accuracy40:54-The Impact of the Collision47:14-The Fate of the Wireless Operators51:30-Current Projects and Future Endeavours57:57-Closing Thoughts and ReflectionsThanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sarah continues her first-time viewing of the Final Destination series, with Final Destination 2 (2003).Discussion Points:-The tonal shift from the first film to it's sequel.-The truck with the log that haunts a generation.-Changing the formula of death's design.-Sarah discusses her love of kitchen-based deaths in films. -TANGENT: Sean and Sarah discuss Chinese food.-Sarah is not happy with how Kimberley treats Clear.-The actor who plays Officer Burke is 5 years older than the actress who plays Kimberley.-"Right. NO. I'm going to stop you there!"-Sarah vehemently disagrees with Sean about Eugene's reaction.Raised Questions:-Does the tonal shift guarantee the film series longevity?-What did Sarah think of the film?Where's the memorial service?-How old is Tim supposed to be?-Do you find the character dynamics refreshing?Coming Soon:-Final Destination 3 (2006).-The Final Destination (2009).-Final Destination 5 (2011).Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sarah had never seen a single Final Destination film. Sean cleared the schedule to get these reviews done.Sarah will get her own back soon with 'Sarah decides'. Will Sarah remain unimpressed by Sean's choice of film?Discussion Points:-Sean nearly gets killed by a bookcase.-Sarah was surprised by how good this film was.-The origin of the film's premise.-Sean tries not to spoil any of the upcoming sequels for Sarah.-How well-written the characters are in this film.-Sean apologises for his use of the word 're-writed'. -The brilliant practical effects. -Sarah enjoyed the lingering deaths, as opposed to the 'blink and miss it' deaths seen in Alien Romulus. -The depiction of survivors guilt.-Sarah talks about looking into a bus driver's eyes.Raised Questions:-Where's the Woo-Woo Sarah?-Should you set off Party Poppers during a podcast episode?-Do you enjoy teen-focused horror films?-Does this film feel like an extended, early season episode of Buffy for you?-Does death have a design for us all?-How did this avoid being another sh*tty teen-angst horror film?-Did the Final Destination series ever drop the ball? *-James Wan did the Saw films, not James Wong. Coming Soon:-Final Destination 2 (2003).-Final Destination 3 (2006).-The Final Destination (2009).-Final Destination 5 (2011).Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This is a grim one, but it's a film you need to see!A British kitchen sink drama set in Sheffield in 1983, which follows a young couple expecting their first child before a nuclear war interrupts their plans. Sean and Sarah review one of the most-unflinching and best British TV films of all time.Will they remain unimpressed by their choice of film?Warning: This podcast episodes contains descriptions of some of the shocking events in the film. Discussion Points:-Sarah and Sean forgot how bleak this film is.-How timely this film feels in 2024, even though it was made in 1984.-The impact of this film when it was first released.-How unnerving this film is. -Sean wonders whether they should have chosen this film.-The British Soap Creme-de-le-creme of actors. -Just how much the British underestimated the impact of a nuclear bomb.-Sarah debuts her Northern impression.-Sarah discusses the power of background events bubbling over so "abruptly and quickly", describing it as "masterful" and "amazing".-Sarah describes the power of the small character moments, which make the film so special.-The effects on the post-war generation and the complete lack of social cohesion is highlighted by Sarah. -Sean wonders if humans would become functionally extinct; when a species reaches such a low level of members that it will inevitably become extinct, as it is unable to replenish it's numbers.Raised Questions:-Will this film change the trajectory of your day?-How bad is Sean's Sheffield accent?-Is there anything better than an upper class English voice heralding your doom? -Does watching this film make you extra British?-Why did they show Threads (1984) to school children?-Does this film make you want to stop making jokes?-Was this film the death knell for many high street shops?-Did they need to make it seem survivable?-It's not good when they quietly store away the paintings is it?-Is this the best thing that the BBC has ever made?Thanks for Listening! Get in touch:We would love to hear your thoughts on Threads (1984). Let us know what you thought of the film and our podcast review!Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Randy and Steve return to continue the Rush Hour reviews with Rush Hour 2 (2001).Watch your egg rolls, we're going in!Discussion Points:-Sean's notes are abysmal again.-The lack of seriousness in this film.-Chris Tucker's dancing.-The reason Jackie Chan doesn't like the way he speaks in English in this film.-A brief history of '7 11' shops (Not Sponsored).-Behind the biggest mouth in the West is a damn good cop with Tucker. -Steve thinks this film is better than the original film. Raised Questions:-Does this film start straight after Rush Hour?-The most obvious bomb-planting scene ever?-What is the British version of a '7 11'?-Where did they park the SS Minnow Johnson?-How has Randy never seen The Terminator (1984)?The impressions of Chris Tucker, Jackie Chan, Owen Wilson, Christopher Walken and President Donald Trump (You weren't expecting him were you!) are purely imitations of the performances in the film, or in real life, and not said with any malicious intent and no offence is meant. The impressions of President Donald Trump are not any remark about American Politics, this is a English podcast, we're not interested. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Luke from 'The Nerdstalgic Podcast' returns to join Sean and discuss the Disney-Pixar short film, Float (2019).Float is a short six-minute film which highlights the importance of difference and acceptance, by following a Father coming to terms with his young son, who 'floats'.Chapters:0:00-Welcome and Introduction of this Week's Guest.25:51-The Power of Acceptance.45:07-The Impact of Representation.50:20-Closing Thoughts and Recommendations.Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Jackson from 'History with Jackson' joins Sean to discuss one of his favourite films: Jojo Rabbit (2019). Jackson and Sean use the film as a framework to delve into the world of Nazi Germany, totalitarian regimes and how this film stays funny and effective, whilst dealing with such a grim subject matter. Guest: https://historywithjackson.co.uk/Discussion Points:-The unique and weird tone of the film.-Jackson and Sean discuss some of the criticism aimed at the film.-The power of humour.-Sean compares the films opening to Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (1997).-Sean and Jackson dive into totalitarian regimes, indoctrination and the cult of personalities.-Taika Watiti's portrayal of Adolf Hitler. -The lasting memory of Occupation.-The role of women in Nazi Germany.-The strong performances and dialogue of Jojo Rabbit.-The power of 'doing what we can' and the power of love.Raised Questions:-Do overwhelming positive reviews put you off seeing a film?-How do you tackle such a depressing and serious subject?-Is this film a good place to introduce this subject to new generations?-Does a good cast guarantee a good film?-Which line did Sean really not like?-Why didn't Nazi Germany collapse sooner?-Did you expect an Augustus Gloop impression in this review?-How is this film THIS funny, given the subject matter?-Has the term 'Nazi' been diluted and devalued?Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

As Sarah is feeling under the weather, Sean is joined by Peter Rose to review Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy 2 (2000). The film was originally released as 'Ancient Evil: Scream of the Mummy' in America and Mexico, and has no links to 'Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy' (1998).Welcome to Review It Yourself: The Podcast with the Sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed.Will Sean and Peter be impressed or unimpressed?Discussion Points:-Sometimes you've just got to be brutally honest.-Peter and Sean do their best to find the positives. -The DVD blurb reading returns, and the DVD chapters are discovered. -The sheer lack of preservation protocol in this film.-Peter brings interesting facts about Aztecs.Raised Questions:-How did Sean watch this multiple times on Sky Movies?-Is this a "So-bad-it's-good" film?-How can an 85 minute film feel so slow?-When did 'Animated Menu' stop being classed as a DVD Special Feature?-Is this film a "Pound Shop Version of Halloween H20"?-Why would you kick a door open when you're trying to put something back secretly?-After 100 Mummy film reviews, what is the worst film Peter has watched? Recommendations:-Rough Air: Danger on Flight 534 (2001). Sean has already reviewed this film if you want to check it out.Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Which film trailer/previews make you want to spend your hard earned cash at the cinema?Let Sean and Sarah help with that, by reviewing trailers for upcoming films and a few old favourites.Welcome to Preview it Yourself.This time around, Sean decides to show Sarah the trailer for Gladiator II (2024). He apologises first.Discussion Points:-Lower your expectations. -The long muted Gladiator sequel ideas. -The justification for making the film. -The horrendous soundtrack for the trailer and why Hans Zimmer hasn't returned to score this film.-Whether the cast can elevate this film like Russell Crowe did with the original.-Sean and Sarah also review the Gladiator (2000) trailer.-A mini-review of The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008).-Sarah and Sean try to remain positive.-The downgrade from tiger to rhinoceros.-Sean and Sarah agree to eat humble pie if the film is good. Raised Questions:-Is it mean to make someone watch this trailer?-Have we gone backwards in making films?-Who the hell signed off on the music?-Why does the trailer make the film seem like a pantomime?-Why would you even dare to make a sequel to such a behemoth of cinema?-Would you watch "Aqueduct Shark"?-Did the Romans ever have two Emperors at once?-Is the cast of Gladiator II too big?-Why does Sarah refuse to go camping?Quotes of the episode:-"What the f**k is this film meant to be?".-"If this film is better than Gladiator (2000) then I will shut the podcast down".-"This is so 2024 it hurts...what are you doing!?".-"I'm making a lot of assumptions on [an awful] trailer".-"I don't think people know how to make trailers anymore".Shout-out to Dan from Casting Views for his feedback on this Preview It Yourself side-series. Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean, Sarah and Paul from 'History Rage' reach the final, pitiful end of the Jaws franchise. Discussion Points:-Sean didn't feel this was that bad.-The DVD read-through returns. -Paul finds the DVD cover description hilarious.-The serious lack of deaths in this film.-Sarah sends her thoughts in for Paul and Sean to discuss.-Sean was really with the film... for 12 minutes.-Sean compares the sharks in Jaws and Jaws: The Revenge to pigeons.-Paul and Sean can't abide the Michael Brody character.-Sean doesn't like being pestered.Raised Questions:-Did Sean watch a different film?-Has Sarah binned off the podcast for work or because it's Jaws: The Revenge?-Where are the deaths?-Can Ellen Brody actually cry?-How many flashback does a 90-minute film need?-How much do they love Christmas in Amity?-Why does the coffin look so fake?-Is the shark nose-heavy?-Is your Dad a binfluencer?-Why "Tourist on the Loose"?Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Dr. Dan Ellin, Historian and Archivist from the International Bomber Command Centre, joins Sean to discuss The Dam Busters (1955).Discussion Points:-Dan discusses his love/hate relationship with the film and it's portrayal of Operation Chastise.-The absence of major motion pictures about RAF Bomber Command.-The importance of collective memory regarding the Second World War. -The use of the Dam Busters march at 'Bomber' Harris's funeral.-The enemies in the film: bureaucrats, Whitehall and red tape.-The fantastic casting in the film.-The incredible flying during the making of the film.-Putting RAF Bomber Command into historical context.-The lack of the raid on the Sorpe Dam in the film.-The impact of the Official Secrets Act on the film.-Sean does his best to translate very English aspects of the film for American listeners. -The optics of history and the loss of nuance. -The influence on this film on George Lucas when he was making Star Wars (1977).-The things that Britain leans back on in times of adversity.Raised Questions:-Do people see RAF Bomber Command as either 'Dam Busters or Dresden'?-Are the historical details faithfully intact?-How important are myths to a country?-Was it really difficult for Barnes Wallis to get the idea for the raid accepted?-Why do the British love an underdog story?-Did the Americans have better PR and spin?-Would you love to see Peter Jackson's The Dam Busters?-Does the film tell the story of what happened rather than what was meant to happen?-Why is Guy Gibson portrayed a certain way in the film?-Does the film lack nuance?-Does the film serve as a good starting point for people who may not know the story of the Dam Busters raid?Further Reading Recommendations:-'Guy Gibson' by Richard Morris.-'Dam Buster Barnes Wallis: An Engineers Life' by Richard Morris.-'The Fire' (Original Title: Der Brand) by Jorg Friedrich.-'The Strategic Air Offensive Against Germany' by Noble Frankland and Charles Webster.-The Weirdstone of Brisingamen (1960) and Elidor (1965) by Alan Garner.Film/Documentary Recommendations:-They Shall Not Grow Old (2018).-Dambusters Declassified (2010) with Martin Shaw. -Inspector George Gently (2007-2017).-Judge John Deed (2001-2007).-The Guns of Navarone (1961).-The Heroes of Telemark (1965).-The Carling Black Label adverts.Podcast Recommendations:-History Rage.-Never Mind The Dambusters.Thanks for Listening!Find us here: X: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean, Sarah and Paul from History Rage are here to continue our Jaws series, it's downwards and downwards for Jaws 3-D (1983).Will Sean, Sarah and Paul be impressed or unimpressed with the film?Stick around for 'The Worst Shark Film You've Ever Seen' section, with responses from podcast friends of Review It Yourself. Discussion Points:-Sarah went from Jaws (1975) to Jaws 3-D (1983). -Sean paid £2.49 to rent this film and still didn't get his money's worth.-Paul discusses the Victorian Invention of 3-D and wonders why we haven't mastered it yet. -The dreadful water skiers and the obsession with millions of gallons of water.-The Brody family ageing phenomenon continues. -The idiocy of putting a shark in a petting pen. Raised Questions:-Is this the perfect litmus test for a podcast?-How did this get into cinemas?-Why is the transfer so bad?-How is that floating fish head still alive?-How on Earth did SeaWorld approve being in this film?-Can Leah Thompson cure aquaphobia?-Did Mike and Katherine ever go to Venezuela?-Do you have "Prometheus (2012) levels of disdain" for your audience?Thank You for your contributions:-'The Podcast That Wouldn't Die'. -'Sci-Fi Chronicles YouTube Channel'.-'Stew World Order' podcast.-'Coffee and Comments YouTube Channel'.-'Cinnamon Toast Crunch YouTube Channel'.-'Seismic Cinema' podcast.-'Talking SMAC: Superheroes, Movies, Animations and Comics Podcast'.-'Dissect That Film' podcast.Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

"I'd award [the shark] an assist... I do not watch a Jaws film to have people NOT killed by sharks"-Paul on the inefficient shark in this film."More of the same, just sh*tter"-Sean on the Jaws sequels.Paul from History Rage returns to join Sean, and they begrudgingly continue their journey through the Jaws film franchise.Brace Yourselves, it's Jaws 2 (1978).Will Sean and Paul be impressed or unimpressed with the film?Discussion Points:-Sean thinks he will be the positive one but it doesn't last long.-Paul is disgusted by the lack of character development.-The defence of Mayor Vaughn returns.-The lack of blood in this film.-The shark claiming 'assists'.-The insanity of pointing directions at sea.-The confusing age of the characters, it's only been four years!-The depiction of trauma in the Tina character.-The beach scene. -The strange use of John William's Jaws 2 score.-The deleted scene between Brody and Mayor Vaughn and how impactful that would have been.-PG-13 was brought in, not for ET (1982) but in 1984 after films like Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Gremlins and Poltergeist created the desire for a new rating.Raised Questions:-Where the hell do you start with Jaws 2?-Is Jaws 2 "100% unbridled sh*te"?-How does the Jaws lower the bar at every turn?-How did every film in the Jaws franchise make a profit?-How impressive is the Amity Tourist Board?-How do they miss that lighthouse?-How many Jaws 2 characters can you name?-Why is the shark so poor at hunting?-Did they not have Roy Scheider available for parts of the film?-Why are there 22 minutes of shots of sailing boats sailing?-When a tagline of a film is infinitely more memorable than the actual film, how good is it?Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The Anatomy of Jaws (1975) finds Sean joined by Paul from 'History Rage' to review the first film in the Jaws film series.Enjoy this, as it's all downhill from here as Sean, Sarah and Paul review all four films for September 2024.Discussion Points:-The emotions encapsulated by the characters in the film.-Paul defends Mayor Vaughn.-The reluctance to begin an evacuation.-The lack of a briefing for the beach lifeguards bothers Sean.-Watching Jaws in IMAX.-The politics of a seaside town.Raised Questions:-Is the shark the least interesting thing about this film?-Did you know how blockbusters got their name?-What annoys Sean about this film?-Do dogs eat sharks? -Is this film all about blind bureaucracy?-Is coffee ice cream good for shock?-Does Quint deliberately destroy his own engine?Book Recommendation:-Twelve Days of Terror: A Definitive Investigation of the 1916 New Jersey Shark Attacks [2001, Lyons Press] by Richard G. Fernicola.Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!Find us here:Twitter: @YourselfReviewInstagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Sean and Sarah take on Alien Romulus (2024). Franchise reinvigorator or poorly executed ? Will they remain unimpressed by the newest film in the Alien franchise? Discussion Points: -Sean struggles to sell the podcast. -The anguish of late night cinema showings. -The distubring tonal shift in the film. -The mystery characters in the film. -The dreadful CGI in the film. -Characters making stupid decisions because the plot needs them to. -Whether the film had interesting ideas and fantastic production values, but poor execution. -The quick, unsatisfying deaths. Raised Questions: -Why Sean bothered to go and see Alien Romulus? -Do you know how you feel about the film? -Was the film best before any of the Aliens arrived? -Is there anything left to do with the Xenomorphs? -We've got Alien (1979), so why do we need this? -Does the film pull it's punches? -Why did they mark this as a horror film? -Is Prometheus (2012) better? -Did the film need a good editor? Film Recommendation from Sarah and Sean: -Life (2017). Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

Welcome back to Review It Yourself: The Podcast with the sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed. Clayton from 'Men Who Like Men Who Like Movies' returns to continue The Donna Noble Chronicles. This week Sean and Clayton discuss The Fires of Pompeii (2008). Discussion Points: -Peeking behind the podcast curtain. -The production values of this episode. -"It's Doctor Who, I'm not exactly going to sit here and moan about it"-Sean shows a shocking lack of self-awareness. -Trivia and facts about the Ancient Roman city of Pompeii. -Clayton and Sean's opinions differ greatly regarding the new series of Doctor Who (2024), particulary costumes. -The dynamic between The Doctor and Donna Noble. -Marcus Nonius Balbus was a prominent figure in Herculaneum, nearby Pompeii. -The CGI stone 'Transformers' in this episode. -Treading the line between entertainment and being respectful to a disaster. -The moral dilemma at the heart of this episode. -Sean and Clayton discuss the new series of Doctor Who (2024) and their opposing opinions. -Clayton brings controversial Indiana Jones opinion, whilst Sean shocks with his Jurassic Park opinion. Raised Questions: -How many times does Sean mention that he's been to Pompeii? -What does Veni, Vidi, Vici mean? -Why did size matter to the Romans? -Does the TARDIS perception filter apply to clothes? -Do you agree with Clayton that the Thirteenth Doctor dressed "like a toddler"? -Do you miss when the Doctor had some "bite" to his character? -Does it get chilly in Italy? -Do you ever skip to the loo? -Does the Gladiator II (2024) trailer make the film look like a pound-shop version of Gladiator (2000)? -Could this episode have worked without the Pyrovillian monsters? -Is the Chief Augur just a "Roman Mystic Meg"? -What was the drinking age in Ancient Rome? [Apparently there was no age restriction]. -Is this peak Doctor Who? Sean Recommends: -Pompeii: The Last Day (BBC Docu-Drama 2003). -Pompeii: The New Dig (BBC Series 2024). -Torchwood (2006-2011). -Jurassic Park: The Lost World (1997). Clayton Recommends: -Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008). -Jurassic Park III (2001). Apologies for some audio issues during this recording, we were using a different recording platform than normal. Lesson learned! Thanks for Listening! Thank you to the following for their contributions: -Brendan and Jamie from 'The Sense Sphere' YouTube Channel. -Brandon from 'Cinnammon Toast Crunch' YouTube Channel. -Jon Youlden. -Rachael from 'Chat About It Don't Shout About It' YouTube Channel. -Satsu from 'Chatsunami' podcast. -Luke from 'The Nerdstalgic Podcast'. -Marc from 'Mr & Mrs Who Podcast' (contributions will be used in a future episode). Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

The revamped Review It Yourself continues. The podcast with the sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed. Sean goes it alone without Sarah, already!? I know. Sean is joined by Marv from the 'Pods Like Us', 'When They was Fab' and 'Toppermost of the Poppermost' podcasts to discuss the classic Ealing Studios film The Titfield Thunderbolt (1953). Will Sean and Marv remain unimpressed by the film? Discussion Points: -Marv describes how his Grandad introduced him to hours and hours of train films. -The heart behind the film, the classic British "small force against adversity" story. -The strength in a simple yet effective story. -A libellous, passive aggressive float: what's not to love! -An accidental shotgun shoot-out. -Sean enjoyed the film, so his notes are horrendous. -The subtle social commentary in the film. -Marv and Sean seriously discuss the social impact of closing a railway to a small village, and The Beeching Cuts (1963-1965). The Beeching Cuts were a series of major service changes and line closures, headed by Richard Beeching of the British Railways Board. Raised Questions: -Have they ever bettered Technicolor? -Is this one of the most quintessentially British films ever made? -Does the humour work if you live outside of the UK? -Is this film sweet or quaint? Was the film prophetic? -How had Sean never seen an Ealing film before? -A perfect film for a rainy day with a cup of tea, with cake and sandwiches? -Does the length of the film help with rewatch-ability? Podcast Shout-outs: -Stew from 'Stew World Order'. -Bill from 'Bill Reads Bad Reviews'. Sean and Marv will return to review Passport to Pimlico (1949). Read Marv's Blog Here: https://marvsmidlifemeanderings.blogspot.com/ Thanks for Listening! Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠

The revamped Review It Yourself continues. The podcast with the sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed. Will Sean and Sarah remain unimpressed by this week's film, Dracula (1958)? Film summary: "There's no Whitby, there's no ship, there's no Demeter, there's no bats, there's no wolves, there's only one out of the three brides, and they whittled it down and took out a lot of the supernatural and in a way distilled it to this really, really great film and great simple story through necessity of we don't have the money for it". Discussion Points: -Sarah brings in her extensive knowledge of the depiction of vampires. -Painkillers appear to make Sean even more rambly and scatter-gun in his approach, enjoy! -Sean brings Blu-Ray documentary trivia about the film's production. -The Hammer Horror formula and the introduction of more salacious elements. -The performances of Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing, Melissa Stribling, Carol Marsh, John Van Eyssen and Michael Gough. -The difficulty in adapting Bram Stoker's novel. -Ingenuity from necessity. -The lack of horror clichés. -Sean brings Natasha Kaplinsky trivia (She's the President not the Vice President*). Raised Questions: -Did streamlining the novel make the film better? -Should studios today make only one film at a time? -Are budget constraints sometimes a good thing? -Can you fake screen presence? -Did you spot the redressing of the same set? -Are horror films more frightening when things are more plausible? -Who will be his Bride to-night? -Why are Technicolor films the most beautiful looking films ever made? -Did Gary Oldman's Dracula (1992) accidentally leave his rollers in? -Will anyone be watching Jordan Peele's Nope in 70 years? Thanks for Listening! Podcast sting: Marv from Pods Like Us. Review It Yourself is now on YouTube! Find us here: Twitter: @YourselfReview Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠ This podcast is a member of the PodPack Collective, an indie podcasting group dedicated to spreading positivity within the podcast community. For further information, please follow the link: ⁠https://linktr.ee/podpackcollective