Podcasts about supreme court chief justice

What do your daily habits reveal about your true priorities? In this thought-provoking episode, Jesse Cope challenges listeners to examine how they allocate their most precious resource—time. While many claim God and family are their top priorities, our actions often tell a different story.The discussion centers on Jesus's greatest commandments: loving God with our whole heart, mind, soul, and strength, and loving our neighbors as ourselves. Jesse shares a convicting perspective on marriage, suggesting that loving your spouse only occasionally is equivalent to a "failing grade" in what should be your most important earthly relationship. He asks listeners to consider whether they're truly making their spouses feel treasured as "one out of seven billion" or merely giving them leftover attention after work, entertainment, and personal pursuits.Through powerful stories of Medal of Honor recipients—including Eugene Ashley Jr., who led five assaults against enemy forces to rescue his trapped comrades—Jesse contrasts true sacrifice with our culture's celebration of celebrities and athletes. These heroes, largely forgotten by society, exemplify commitment to something greater than self-interest or comfort.The episode weaves together biblical parables, American history, and practical spiritual advice, making a compelling case that America's founding principles were deeply rooted in Christian faith. Quoting John Jay, America's first Supreme Court Chief Justice, Jesse argues it's illogical to believe the founders intended to create a nation divorced from the very principles that guided their lives.As cultural and political challenges mount, Jesse encourages listeners not to despair but to strengthen local institutions, support constitutional values, and pray fervently for spiritual revival. "Where the Spirit of God is, that's where liberty is," he reminds us, suggesting that without a return to faith, family, and moral foundations, no political solution alone can restore what's been lost through spiritual neglect. Join this challenging conversation about prioritizing what truly matters before it's too late.Support the showThe American Soul Podcasthttps://www.buzzsprout.com/1791934/subscribe

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in Buffalo for a special fireside chat with Justice Lawrence Vilardo celebrating 125 years of the Western District of New York full 3071 Wed, 07 May 2025 22:15:00 +0000 cOitXksW1ETT6akGVDweeXkHczAnOMlD buffalo,news,wben,u.s. supreme court,john roberts WBEN Extras buffalo,news,wben,u.s. supreme court,john roberts U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in Buffalo for a special fireside chat with Justice Lawrence Vilardo celebrating 125 years of the Western District of New York Archive of various reports and news events 2024 © 2021 Audacy, Inc.

The Supreme Court Chief Justice was sued Monday on behalf of the American people. You'll hear complete details in the show today. I know—shockingly—that it would ever happen! I'll give you a hint of what the suit is about: SCOTUS not reining in the judicial activist district judges who constitutionally do NOT have authority to issue "national" actions. They are only "District" judges.In the second hour of the show, Steve Baker discusses the latest important matters happening at many levels in Washington. Big news about illegal activities perpetrated by Senator Adam Schiff! He may be facing serious consequences for not just Congressional ethics violations, but also federal. and California and Maryland tax fraud!

What if everything you've been taught about America's founding was incomplete? What if our monuments, buildings, and founding documents contain evidence of a deeply Christian heritage that has been systematically erased from public education?This episode takes listeners on a fascinating journey through America's architectural treasures – from the biblical inscriptions inside the Washington Monument to the Ten Commandments engraved above the Supreme Court chamber, from paintings of prayer and Bible reading in the Capitol Rotunda to the towering Forefathers Monument in Plymouth that few Americans even know exists.The evidence is literally carved in stone: America was founded as a Christian nation. Fisher Ames, who worded the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, believed the Bible should be the primary textbook in schools. John Jay, our first Supreme Court Chief Justice, stated that Christians have both the privilege and duty to elect Christian leaders. These weren't religious extremists but the very architects of American liberty.As we explore these forgotten monuments, we also examine how Bible illiteracy has allowed revisionist history to flourish. Without knowledge of Scripture, we miss countless biblical references in our founding documents, presidential addresses, and national symbols. This knowledge gap has enabled the false narrative of America as a secular nation from its inception.The episode weaves together this historical exploration with timeless spiritual wisdom from the book of Philemon about free will, love, and our relationship with Christ. Jesse emphasizes that just as Paul wouldn't force Philemon to free his slave but appealed to his heart, God doesn't force our love either – He offers it freely, waiting for our response.Whether you're a history enthusiast, a person of faith concerned about America's direction, or simply someone who wants to understand the complete story of our national heritage, this episode will challenge assumptions and inspire a deeper appreciation for the biblical principles woven throughout American history. Listen, learn, and consider how reconnecting with these roots might help secure liberty for future generations.Support the showThe American Soul Podcasthttps://www.buzzsprout.com/1791934/subscribe

Inside Olympia, with host Austin Jenkins, sits down with State Supreme Court Chief Justice Debra Stephens.

Comprehensive coverage of the day's news with a focus on war and peace; social, environmental and economic justice. Supreme Court Chief Justice blocks court order to return Maryland man mistakenly deported to notorious Salvadoran prison Israel PM Netanyahu visits White House, Trump hints at new ceasefire while calling for US ownership of Gaza Weekend Hands Off protest in SF targets Musk, DOGE, and Trump policies, with call for solidarity Hands Off protest in Oakland calls for building people power to fight autocratic regime Students blast UC Davis after university dismantles Law Student Association over support for divesting from Israel The post Hands Off protests nationwide blast Musk Trump agenda; Israel PM Netanyahu visits White House as Trump touts relocating Palestinians from Gaza – April 7, 2025 appeared first on KPFA.

This Day in Legal History: Scottsboro Boys ArrestedOn this day in legal history, March 25, 1931, nine Black teenagers were arrested in Paint Rock, Alabama, accused of raping two white women aboard a freight train. The arrests set off one of the most infamous legal sagas of the 20th century, exposing the deep racial injustices of the Jim Crow South. The teens, later known as the Scottsboro Boys, were quickly indicted and tried in Scottsboro, Alabama. Just twelve days after their arrest, an all-white jury sentenced most of them to death in a series of rushed, chaotic trials marked by inadequate legal representation.Public outrage and national attention, particularly from Black communities and civil rights organizations, led to multiple appeals. In Powell v. Alabama (1932), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the defendants' right to counsel had been violated, setting a precedent that effective legal representation is essential in capital cases. Later, in Norris v. Alabama(1935), the Court found that the systematic exclusion of Black jurors violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.Despite these victories, the road to justice was long and uneven. Several of the Scottsboro Boys remained imprisoned for years, and none received a full measure of legal vindication during their lifetimes. Their ordeal became a powerful symbol of the racial bias embedded in the American legal system and spurred greater attention to the rights of defendants in criminal trials. The legacy of the case continues to influence debates over due process, racial discrimination, and criminal justice reform.At a U.S. appeals court hearing on March 24, 2025, Circuit Judge Patricia Millett sharply criticized the Trump administration's deportation of Venezuelan migrants, suggesting they were given fewer rights than Nazis who were removed under the same legal authority during World War II. The administration invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act—a rarely used law last applied to intern Axis nationals during WWII—to justify deporting alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua without immigration court rulings. The court is reviewing whether a temporary ban issued by Judge James Boasberg on such deportations should remain in place. Government attorneys argued that national security and executive authority over foreign affairs justify bypassing normal legal procedures.Family members and lawyers for deportees contest the gang allegations, saying they are based on flimsy evidence like tattoos. One deported man was a professional soccer coach whose tattoo referred to Real Madrid. Judge Millett questioned whether the deported migrants had any opportunity to dispute the gang labels before removal, calling the process rushed and opaque.The deportations, carried out on March 15, sent over 200 people to El Salvador, where they are being held in a high-security prison under a U.S.-funded deal. The ACLU claims the administration defied Boasberg's court order by speeding up removals to preempt judicial intervention. The government has since invoked the state secrets privilege to avoid disclosing further flight details. The case is now a flashpoint over presidential power, immigration enforcement, and judicial oversight, with the Supreme Court Chief Justice issuing a rare rebuke after Trump called for Boasberg's impeachment.Nazis were treated better than Venezuelans deported by Trump, judge says at hearing | ReutersOn March 24, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments over Louisiana's congressional map, which increased the number of Black-majority districts from one to two. The case pits efforts to comply with the Voting Rights Act against claims that the new map violates the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by relying too heavily on race. Louisiana officials defended the map, saying it was drawn to protect Republican incumbents rather than based on racial motives. They argued the redistricting was politically, not racially, driven—particularly to preserve the districts of House Speaker Mike Johnson and Majority Leader Steve Scalise.Civil rights groups and Black voters countered that the map was a necessary remedy after a 2022 ruling found the prior version likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting Black voting strength. A 2024 lower court ruling blocked the updated map, saying race predominated in its design. The Supreme Court justices appeared divided, with liberal Justice Sotomayor skeptical that race had dominated the redistricting process, and conservative Chief Justice Roberts pointing to the odd shape of the second Black-majority district as potential evidence of racial gerrymandering.Justice Gorsuch challenged whether any consideration of race in map-drawing runs afoul of constitutional protections. The Court had previously allowed the new map to be used for the 2024 elections, but a final ruling is expected by June. The outcome could have broad implications for how states navigate the tension between addressing historic racial discrimination in voting and avoiding unconstitutional race-based districting.US Supreme Court wrestles with Louisiana electoral map with more Black-majority districts | ReutersThe Justice Department, under President Trump's direction, has launched an “immediate review” of law firms that have challenged his administration in court, wielding Rule 11 as a tool to pursue sanctions for allegedly frivolous litigation. The memo, issued March 21, empowers Attorney General Pam Bondi to target lawyers not just for recent cases, but for conduct going back eight years—reviving a rarely enforced mechanism that requires legal filings to be non-frivolous and not made for improper purposes. While legal experts note that courts are typically cautious about imposing Rule 11 sanctions, the administration's move is seen as a political shot across the bow of the legal profession.Trump has already threatened prominent firms with revoked security clearances and canceled federal contracts, but one firm, Paul Weiss, avoided penalties by agreeing to a $40 million pro bono commitment to Trump-aligned causes and an audit of its diversity programs. That deal, far from resolving the issue, may have signaled that capitulation invites more pressure. As anyone who's dealt with a bully could have predicted: surrender doesn't end the harassment—it encourages it. The only way to improve your position is to raise the cost of targeting you, yet many law firm leaders (and institutions of higher education, if we're being fair) seem to have missed that lesson the first time they encountered it.Now, those same leaders face the possibility of serious professional consequences for doing exactly what lawyers are supposed to do: advocate for clients and challenge government overreach. Trump's order also singles out individuals like Democratic elections attorney Marc Elias, whom the memo connects to the long-disputed Steele dossier, despite no formal wrongdoing. Critics warn that the DOJ's probe could evolve into a tool to intimidate or sideline legal opposition to Trump, reshaping the legal landscape by discouraging firms from representing those who stand against the administration.Legal scholars have labeled the move a dangerous politicization of Rule 11, pointing out that it essentially makes Bondi the judge and Trump the executioner. In weaponizing a procedural rule with ambiguous standards and rare enforcement, the administration isn't just threatening lawsuits—it's undermining the adversarial system that keeps government power in check.DOJ Launches 'Immediate Review' of Law Firms After Trump MemoCalifornia's new disclosure law on municipal corporate tax-sharing agreements is a welcome move toward transparency, but it's not enough to stop the ongoing drain of public revenue. For years, corporations have exploited the split in California's sales tax—where 1.25% goes to local jurisdictions—by striking deals with cities that offer kickbacks in exchange for routing sales through their borders. This has created a race to the bottom, with municipalities, especially smaller ones, effectively subsidizing some of the world's richest companies in hopes of boosting their own budgets. These deals don't create new economic activity; they just reshuffle where sales are counted and where tax dollars land.While the new law will finally shine a light on these practices starting in April, disclosure without action won't solve the problem. Cities will still have incentives to offer generous tax rebates, and many will rush to lock in long-term deals before limits are imposed. What we need is immediate legislative action to cap how much of their tax base cities can give away. A ceiling tied to a city's budget or economic profile would prevent reckless giveaways while preserving flexibility for true economic development.We should also require that any shared tax revenue be reinvested in local infrastructure or services, not handed over as corporate windfalls. Waiting for more data only gives cover to continue harmful deals that are already draining school, safety, and infrastructure funding. Policymakers don't need years of reports—they need the courage to stop the bleeding now.Transparency Alone Won't Fix California's Corporate Tax Drain This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

In the 5 AM Hour: Larry O’Connor and Julie Gunlock discussed: Chief Justice Roberts shames judicial impeachment talk, rebukes Trump stance Judge blocks implementation of Trump’s transgender military ban Hilaria Baldwin snaps at husband Alec on red carpet: ‘When I’m talking, you’re not talking’ PRESIDENT TRUMP: "Here's my problem with Canada. Canada was MEANT TO BE the 51st state." Where to find more about WMAL's morning show: Follow the Show Podcasts on Apple podcasts, Audible and Spotify. Follow WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" on X: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @Jgunlock, @patricepinkfile, and @heatherhunterdc. Facebook: WMALDC and Larry O'Connor Instagram: WMALDC Show Website: https://www.wmal.com/oconnor-company/ How to listen live weekdays from 5 to 9 AM: https://www.wmal.com/listenlive/ Episode: Wednesday, March 19, 2025 / 5 AM Hour See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Hosts: Erin Rider and Greg Skordas  This legislative session, we've focused on a few bills proposing changes to Utah's judiciary. One of those bills is Senate Bill 296: Judicial Amendments; this would change how the Utah Supreme Court’s Chief Justice is selected. While the bill sponsor wasn’t able to join us, given the legal background of both hosts, Inside Sources spends a segment discussing the proposal. 

Georgia's Supreme Court Chief Justice announces he'll step down; Atlanta's BeltLine celebrates a milestone for affordable housing in 2024; and is it too late to stop Atlanta's public safety training center, AKA "Cop City"? See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

February 20, 2025 ~ Beth LeBlanc from the Detroit News discusses Supreme Court Chief Justice Elizabeth Clement stepping down.

Only one Nebraska Supreme Court Chief Justice has served longer than the current Chief Justice. Mike Heavican retires at the end of October after 18 years on the bench. Nebraska Public Media's Dale Johnson sat down with the 77 year old Schuyler native to talk about his life as a lawyer.

Arizona voters this fall will decide whether or not to change the judicial retention system. A former state Supreme Court chief justice on what adjustments he'd like to see. And, using textile art to highlight conservation. That and more on The Show.

Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Berger, Child Sense, Sibling Rivalry. For details visit http://krobcollection.com

On Daybreak Africa: Egypt delivers military equipment to Somalia amid rising tensions in the Horn of Africa. Plus, the UN says millions of people of African descent face racial discrimination. The entry into Botswana of the Starlink satellite internet service is hailed as a ‘game-changer' amid concern over costs. Cameroon media denounce a surge in attacks as the 2025 presidential elections approach. A Liberian Prosecutor reacts to the nullification of the life sentence of a former Supreme Court Chief Justice. U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris gives her first campaign interview the broadcast media. For these and more, tune in to Daybreak Africa!

In this episode of Submaroach, TMT and Koj are joined by special guest Mr. Ina, the founder of Boho Funk, for a lively and engaging discussion. They dive into a mix of creative ventures, media updates, and legal news, all wrapped in their signature humour. 1. Boho Funk's New Vintage Store: Mr. Ina talks about his innovative new vintage store and creative hub, Boho Funk, which is set to open on the 31st of August and the 1st of September. Get the inside scoop on what makes this space unique and why it's a must-visit. 2. Adesuwa at Arise: The boys celebrate friend of the podcast, news anchor Adesuwa Giwa-Osagie, who's joining Arise TV's international desk and attending the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. Hear their thoughts on her exciting career move and what it means for international news coverage. 3. New Supreme Court Chief Justice Appointment: TMT and Koj discuss the latest shakeup in the legal world with the appointment of a new Supreme Court Chief Justice. Expect insightful commentary and a touch of humor as they break down what this means for the judiciary. 4. And a Myriad of Hilarious Topics: As always, the episode is filled with a wide range of hilarious discussions and spontaneous banter that will keep you entertained from start to finish. Tune in to Submaroach Episode 203 for a blend of creativity, news, and comedy. Don't forget to subscribe, rate, and leave a review to stay updated with all the latest episodes!

Discussion with ND Supreme Court Chief Justice Jon Jensen on the judicial system, Rule of Law, and trust in the judicial branch. Plus Ilonna Pederson and Rick Gion's favorite ND street fair foods.

Send us a Text Message.Chino Y Chicano host Enrique Cerna talks with Washington Supreme Court Chief Justice Steven González about the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision on Presidential immunity, ethical questions involving justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, declining public trust of the court, and President Biden's proposed reforms for the high court. González updates the efforts of the Washington's Supreme Court to address institutional racism. There is also talk of earrings. Yes, earrings. Listen and find out why that became a topic of conversation.  Read:https://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/supreme/bios/?fa=scbios.display_file&fileID=gonzalezRead: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/obituaries/chinatown-international-district-activist-matt-chan-dead-at-71/Hear Rick Shenkman on the BBC Radio Program Sideways:https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001xdg0Read: https://www.thedailybeast.com/i-stuck-with-nixon-heres-why-science-said-i-did-itRead: https://www.washcog.org/in-the-news/your-right-to-knowRead: https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/the-legislatures-sunshine-committee-has-fallen-into-darkness/Read: https://www.cascadiadaily.com/2024/feb/29/weakening-of-state-public-records-act-affects-your-right-to-know-every-day/Read: https://www.futuromediagroup.org/suave-pulitzer-prize/Read: https://pulitzercenter.org/people/maria-hinojosaRead: https://murrow.wsu.edu/symposium/the-edward-r-murrow-achievement-award/Read: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/sinclair-nixes-univision-affiliation-ending-local-spanish-broadcasts/Read: https://www.chronline.com/stories/group-of-washington-state-faith-and-community-leaders-call-for-cease-fire-in-israel-hamas-war,329305Read: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/us/lahaina-fire-families.html#:~:text=The%20F.B.I.,survivors%20wonder%20what%20comes%20next.: Read:https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/apr/15/fentanyl-involved-in-more-...

Tani Cantil-Sakauye, former Chief Justice of California Supreme Court for 11 years, and current President of the Public Policy Institute of California, was interviewed by Joanne Z. Tan, host and producer of "Interviews of Notables and Influencers" of 10 Plus Podcast on June 24, 2024. Around 22 questions and answers are presented in three parts: Part One: Tani's journey, lessons learned, and insights from being the Chief Justice on the highest court in California;  Part 2: California's economy and future; Part 3: Election reform, federalism, and democracy.   –  Please SHARE it! Thank you. To read as a blog (coming soon) To watch as a video (Introduction of the Host of this Podcast:) Before I have the GREAT honor to introduce Tani Cantil-Sakauye, let me briefly introduce myself. I am Joanne Tan, host and producer of the 10 Plus Podcast, “Interviews of Notables and Influencers”.  I am the CEO of 10 Plus Brand, Inc. — a brand-building and brand-marketing agency for companies and leaders. Growing brands - business or personal - is my passion. I also have a law degree and I career-coach attorneys and executives, and manage brands of board members, leadership coaches, and consultants. I have lived and worked in the San Francisco Bay Area for 36 years. It was in San Francisco that I became a US citizen almost 30 years ago. I care deeply about my home state and our country whose ideals and values inspired me to leave everything behind in China 42 years ago. I'd like to give back to my beloved California and America.  (Introducing Tani Cantil-Sakauye:) Tani Cantil-Sakauye was the former Chief Justice of California Supreme Court for 11 years. Currently, she is the president and CEO of the Public Policy Institute of California (“PPIC”) where she holds the Walter and Esther Hewlett Chair in Understanding California's Future. One of the founders of PPIC was Walter Hewlett, also one of the founders of Hewlett Packard.  PPIC provides data-based research to the state legislature to help make better policies for all Californians. California legislators and executive officials do listen to Tani and PPIC. From 2011 to 2022, Tani served as the 28th Chief Justice of California, and led the judiciary as the chair of the Judicial Council—the constitutional policy and rule making body of the judicial branch—the first person of color and the second woman to do so. Before she was elected statewide as the Chief Justice of California, she served more than 20 years on California appellate and trial courts and was appointed or elevated to higher office by three governors. Earlier in her career she served as a deputy District Attorney for the Sacramento DA Office, and on the senior staff of Governor Deukmejian as legal affairs and legislative deputy secretary. https://www.ppic.org/person/tani-cantil-sakauye/ Disclaimer: I take a completely non-partisan approach to economic policy, election reform, and judicial issues. All my questions here are issue-based, not through the lens of politics or political partisanship, even though I regard myself as a centrist Democrat. Part 1 Questions: Tani's personal journey, lessons learned and insights as former Chief Justice of CA Supreme Court (1) Q: How did you choose your path? What were your challenges and satisfactions as a California Supreme Court Chief Justice? What lessons would you like to share with us from serving on the state Supreme Court? (2) Q: As a role model, raised in a non-privileged background, what qualities and mindset are the most important for your achievements and continued growth? What wisdom can you share with people of all backgrounds? (3) Facts or Opinions? - Critical Thinking and Human Intelligence Are Needed to Process Information and Decipher Facts from Media, Social Media, AI (4) Q: As a personal branding expert and a business brand builder, I ask all my honored guests this question: What does your brand stand for?   (5) Q: Are you considering running for any office in the future?    Part 2 Questions: California's Economy and Future (6) Q: About AI and regulations. AI is being widely adopted across many industries globally, and is playing a significant role in reducing costs and increasing productivity. (https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai)  But at the same time, AI is making fake information, disinformation, as well as its distribution a lot easier, faster, and with more impact (based on the Economist Magazine in May 2024 featured two articles: “Fighting disinformation gets harder, just when it matters most”, while “Producing fake information is getting easier” (https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2024/05/01/fighting-disinformation-gets-harder-just-when-it-matters-most?utm_campaign=r.science-newsletter&utm_medium=email.internal-newsletter.np&utm_source=salesforce-marketing-cloud&utm_term=5/1/2024&utm_id=1877854 (https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2024/05/01/producing-fake-information-is-getting-easier?utm_campaign=r.science-newsletter&utm_medium=email.internal-newsletter.np&utm_source=salesforce-marketing-cloud&utm_term=5/1/2024&utm_id=1877854) What is the legislative balance between controlling the harm from AI generated or facilitated false information, and not killing the golden goose of AI technology? (7) Q: California's aging population: What are the anticipated consequences, and how are we going to tackle the issue? Can AI offset the shrinking productive population, since AI increases productivity and decreases labor cost? (8) Q: Related or unrelated to the aging population issue, do border-crossing, undocumented immigrants actually help with the labor shortage? Is it also related to political advantage, i.e. the number of congressional seats are based on the census?  What will California do with the border crossing issue?  (9) Q: Insurance:  Many insurance companies for residential homes have left California. The lack of competition has resulted in much higher premiums for all Californians. What can be done about it? (10) Q: High housing cost for Californians and exodus to other states: Californian families are leaving for other states where housing and living expenses are lower. What are the ramifications for the mid and long term California economy? Does it lead to brain drain?  (11) Q: Homelessness and the implementation of Prop. 1: What improvement have we seen? How can the implementation be improved? Who is accountable?  (12) Q: Increase of minimum wage for California fast food workers and the ripple effects: A Bloomberg article on April 16, 2024 pointed out the impact of California minimum wage hike for fast food workers on prolonging inflation and delaying the Fed's rate cut.  Now, California consumers have to pay more for fast food because the increased wage was passed down to the buyers, and most of the fast food consumers are not well off. Is it a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul? Does this well-intended law result in delayed inflation recovery for everyone? Is legislation interfering with the free market? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-04-16/how-california-s-huge-raises-for-fast-food-workers-will-ripple-across-industries (13) Q: The high cost of doing business in California creates an exodus of businesses to other states. Many are leaving due to pro-labor legislation that burdens employers. What can the state legislature do to keep the cost down for businesses? (14) Q: What does the state government need to do to keep tech giants like Google, Apple, Nvidia and others in Silicon Valley? (15) Q: Budget deficits and tax increases: In the tech industry, there are fewer IPOs now, and less tax from capital gains for the government. (https://www.sfexaminer.com/news/technology/why-california-budget-problems-could-be-blamed-on-ipo-market/article_197ac9d8-0f24-11ef-9f28-5f7fe6820efc.html#:~:text=IPOs%20%E2%80%94%20the%20typical%20way%20startups,are%20taxed%20by%20the%20state.)  Budget deficits exist at both state and local levels.  The California Supreme Court will hear arguments on the legality of a ballot measure that would strip the Legislature and governor of the ability to increase taxes (The Los Angeles Times reports). Tax increases will further the exodus of companies and Californians out of California. Are there any other options for dealing with budget deficits? (16) Q: Bullet trains:  Are they ever going to be completed, after three decades? ( - The Economist's article, May 17, 2024: https://www.economist.com/united-states/2024/05/16/the-worlds-slowest-bullet-train-trundles-ahead-in-california (17) Q: Drought and water shortage due to global warming: Governor Newsom was talking about building reservoirs. What can we do to make it happen, hopefully not in three decades since global warming might turn California into a desert in 30 years without us taking actions NOW? Part 3 Questions: Federal election reform; Term Limits, SCOTUS Ethics Rules, Republic Democracy, Politics (18) Q: Rank Choice Voting:  It has been advocated by some very intelligent Harvard professors and political consultants. Rank Choice Voting is already used in some gubernatorial and mayoral elections, can it be used in primaries for presidential elections? (As advocated in the book The Politics Industry: How Political Innovation Can Break Partisan Gridlock and Save Our Democracy, by Katherine Gehl and Michael Porter, a Harvard Business School professor.) (19) Q: Term Limits for US Supreme Court Justices: Stanford Professors Larry Diamond and other highly respected voices recommend term limits for SCOTUS, which is gaining traction widely in the US.  Some suggested the term limit to be at age 75, or three terms of six years, and the fourth term is up to six years.  Stanford Professor Larry Diamond in his book “Ill Winds” suggests limiting every SCOTUS' term to 18 years. What do you think? (20) Ethic rules for SCOTUSES:  In light of the revelations about accepting lavish gifts for decades by the US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, do you think Congress needs to make ENFORCEABLE ethics rules that will hold SCOTUSES liable, since no one is above the law? If any of the SCOTUSES violate them, who should enforce the rules, and what would be the punishment? (21) Q: Regarding the principles of federalism, state power, and our republic. This may be a loaded question, but I think we all want to hear from your perspective. The United States was founded on the principle of a republic consisting of independent states, where federal laws and state laws are independent and separate. This question is not meant to be political (I know that your political party affiliation is independent, and I respect that) . I'd like to use the current conviction of former President Donald Trump by New York State Court to learn about federal court limitations and potential over-reach.  Federalism, checks and balances: Assume this scenario: IF the US Supreme Court rules that a sitting president has Absolute Immunity, (which sounds like the power of a king), and further rules that the New York conviction must be retried, vacated, or even overruled, on the ground that the falsification of business records under New York Law is related to the FEDERAL election, even though the illegal act related to federal election deprived citizens their right to be informed, which is a FEDERAL crime, will the federal Absolute Immunity override New York state law, under the Supremacy Clause (since Trump wrote the check to reimburse the hush money after inauguration, presumably under Absolute Immunity protection)?  If the US Supreme Court indeed rules as such, what are the ramifications, in your opinion, for our foundational principles of independent state and federal judiciaries? Would that be an overreach by the federal judicial branch? What harm would Absolute Immunity do to the checks and balances of our government? Same scenario, same questions, but with Limited Immunity instead of Absolute Immunity. (22) Q: About civility, the prerequisite for democracy. The vitriol, the hatred, the partisanship, the mutual blaming... All of these are eating America up from inside. What do you think each citizen should do, to restore civility, respect for institutions, public office, healthy debates, and save our democracy?   –  Please SHARE it! Thank you. To read as a blog (coming soon) To watch as a video © Joanne Z. Tan   All rights reserved. ========================================================= - To stay in the loop, subscribe to our Newsletter - Download free Ebook (About 10 Plus Brand: In addition to the “whole 10 yards” of brand building, digital marketing, and content creation for business and personal brands. To contact us: 1-888-288-4533.) - Visit our Websites: https://10plusbrand.com/ https://10plusprofile.com/ Phone: 888-288-4533 - Find us online by clicking or follow these hashtags: #10PlusBrand #10PlusPodcast #JoanneZTan #10PlusInterviews  #BrandDNA #BeYourOwnBrand #StandForSomething #SuperBowlTVCommercials #PoemsbyJoanneTan #GenuineVideo #AIXD #AI Experience Design

There will be long lasting and significant ramifications and consequences for our democracy and the Republic, by this week's US Supreme Court's ruling on Presidential Absolute Immunity or Limited Immunity, said former CA Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, in an interview with Joanne Z. Tan. As we are all waiting for the landmark ruling by the US Supreme Court this week, on the issue of absolute immunity and limited immunity for US presidents, Joanne Z. Tan asked Tani Cantil-Sakauye, former Chief Justice of California Supreme Court for 11 years, and current President of the Public Policy Institute of California, some hypothetical as well as philosophical questions related to the issues. The following is an excerpt from an interview of Tani, conducted by Joanne Z. Tan on June 24, 2024. To read as a blog To watch as a video © Joanne Z. Tan   All rights reserved. ========================================================= - To stay in the loop, subscribe to our Newsletter - Download free Ebook Please don't forget to like it, comment, or better, SHARE IT WITH OTHERS, - they will be grateful! (About 10 Plus Brand: In addition to the “whole 10 yards” of brand building, digital marketing, and content creation for business and personal brands. To contact us: 1-888-288-4533.) - Visit our Websites: https://10plusbrand.com/ https://10plusprofile.com/ Phone: 888-288-4533 - Find us online by clicking or follow these hashtags: #10PlusBrand #10PlusPodcast #JoanneZTan #10PlusInterviews  #BrandDNA #BeYourOwnBrand #StandForSomething #SuperBowlTVCommercials #PoemsbyJoanneTan #GenuineVideo #AIXD #AI Experience Design

Richard Wagner, Supreme Court Chief Justice; Steven Guilbeault, Environment Minister; The Front Bench with: Dan Moulton, Rudy Husny, Kathleen Monk & Laura Stone.

(2:00) It looks like Supreme Court is going to completely trash the First Amendment because it "hamstrings" the government from censoring. No surprise that Biden's pick would be so hostile to natural rights — but what the others said is equally disturbing.  Here's the notable exchanges in a case that a lower court judge ruled "the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history".  That was BEFORE Brown-Jackson got involvedIs coercion of corporations by government to censor, government censorship?Is a massive FBI presence in social media companies, telling them who to censor, censorship? Does having "different and diverse agencies" mean that the federal government doesn't coerce as John Roberts said?Do professionals who were cancelled, defamed, banned, not have standing as one justice implied?How SHOULD government respond to false information?(31:34) The curious timeline and expedited process of the TikTok ban (50:14) Trudeau's new speech law would make "hate speech" THE most serious crime. The government dismisses criticisms as "clickbait" but the former Supreme Court Chief Justice of Canada isn't having it. (59:09) South Carolina Republicans propose Medical Freedom Act — but it is OPPOSED by GOP Governor McMaster who just endorsed Trump and now endorses Trump lockdowns. (1:12:13) Another product of lockdown — RECORD low marriage rate, which has finally returned to 2019 rate (1:14:40) Peter Navarro is going to jail while he appeals his conviction for defying a House subpoena. It's like sending a serial killer to jail for a couple of weeks for jaywalking. Trump NEVER paid for Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin, but you won't believe how much he paid hospitals to kill people with ventilators (1:22:23) New film looks at the epidemic of fraud in the lockdown (1:38:52) "Economic Bloodbath".  The left made it about violence, but Trump's economic point was misdirected.  Chinese tariffs don't address the fundamental problem of the green agenda.  It's NOT about CHINA.  It IS about PARIS. (1:49:46) The New York prosecution of Trump is persecution.  But what about the poor people who've lost a greater percentage of their "wealth" with Civil Asset Forfeiture without ever being charged?  Or Rudy Giuliani who made his career using RICO and is now having that unconstitutional tactic used against him? (1:54:29) It was just a couple of weeks ago that Trump & his attorney, Alina Habba, were bragging that they messed with the wrong guy — Trump HAS the money to pay for the appeal, they said.  Oops! (2:04:15 WATCH Saturday Night Live skit about the power of Trump sneakers and (2:07:32) WATCH Trump's hilarious comedy video about the corrupt GA DA, Fani Willis (2:15:14) "Mad Max" Haiti — will anything be done to stop an invasion of Florida?  Biden administration says NOTHING will be done to protect America (2:28:45) Car theft explodes in Toronto and Chicago.  Police tell people to give up their car keys since criminals have guns (but NOT YOU) (2:35:48) NVIDIA chip for AI has a 30-fold performance increase (3,000%)!  How will it be powered?  How much money will it take to cool it?  Look at the amount of water being used in arid Arizona by Microsoft (2:48:30) Federal Reserve says CBDC is a "Key Duty".  Wait, haven't they been denying they're working on it?  Did Powell JUST deny CBDC? (2:55:07) Music questions and the answer to my question to the audience: "which movie did the music come from for the piece I call Grace & Peace?Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver

(2:00) It looks like Supreme Court is going to completely trash the First Amendment because it "hamstrings" the government from censoring. No surprise that Biden's pick would be so hostile to natural rights — but what the others said is equally disturbing.  Here's the notable exchanges in a case that a lower court judge ruled "the most massive attack against free speech in United States' history".  That was BEFORE Brown-Jackson got involvedIs coercion of corporations by government to censor, government censorship?Is a massive FBI presence in social media companies, telling them who to censor, censorship? Does having "different and diverse agencies" mean that the federal government doesn't coerce as John Roberts said?Do professionals who were cancelled, defamed, banned, not have standing as one justice implied?How SHOULD government respond to false information?(31:34) The curious timeline and expedited process of the TikTok ban (50:14) Trudeau's new speech law would make "hate speech" THE most serious crime. The government dismisses criticisms as "clickbait" but the former Supreme Court Chief Justice of Canada isn't having it. (59:09) South Carolina Republicans propose Medical Freedom Act — but it is OPPOSED by GOP Governor McMaster who just endorsed Trump and now endorses Trump lockdowns. (1:12:13) Another product of lockdown — RECORD low marriage rate, which has finally returned to 2019 rate (1:14:40) Peter Navarro is going to jail while he appeals his conviction for defying a House subpoena. It's like sending a serial killer to jail for a couple of weeks for jaywalking. Trump NEVER paid for Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin, but you won't believe how much he paid hospitals to kill people with ventilators (1:22:23) New film looks at the epidemic of fraud in the lockdown (1:38:52) "Economic Bloodbath".  The left made it about violence, but Trump's economic point was misdirected.  Chinese tariffs don't address the fundamental problem of the green agenda.  It's NOT about CHINA.  It IS about PARIS. (1:49:46) The New York prosecution of Trump is persecution.  But what about the poor people who've lost a greater percentage of their "wealth" with Civil Asset Forfeiture without ever being charged?  Or Rudy Giuliani who made his career using RICO and is now having that unconstitutional tactic used against him? (1:54:29) It was just a couple of weeks ago that Trump & his attorney, Alina Habba, were bragging that they messed with the wrong guy — Trump HAS the money to pay for the appeal, they said.  Oops! (2:04:15 WATCH Saturday Night Live skit about the power of Trump sneakers and (2:07:32) WATCH Trump's hilarious comedy video about the corrupt GA DA, Fani Willis (2:15:14) "Mad Max" Haiti — will anything be done to stop an invasion of Florida?  Biden administration says NOTHING will be done to protect America (2:28:45) Car theft explodes in Toronto and Chicago.  Police tell people to give up their car keys since criminals have guns (but NOT YOU) (2:35:48) NVIDIA chip for AI has a 30-fold performance increase (3,000%)!  How will it be powered?  How much money will it take to cool it?  Look at the amount of water being used in arid Arizona by Microsoft (2:48:30) Federal Reserve says CBDC is a "Key Duty".  Wait, haven't they been denying they're working on it?  Did Powell JUST deny CBDC? (2:55:07) Music questions and the answer to my question to the audience: "which movie did the music come from for the piece I call Grace & Peace?Find out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-showOr you can send a donation throughMail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Zelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at: $davidknightshowBTC to: bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver

AP correspondent Jackie Quinn reports on the U.S. Supreme Court has rejected a final appeal from a former White House adviser who is trying to stay out of prison.

Pierrepont Productions is a successful entertainment company that takes productions of all kinds from pre-financing, through production and post-production to sales and distribution. We use our extensive relationships in the entertainment industry, banking and finance, in-house capital and our roster of additional private equity investors to provide producers with a range of financing options to enable them to create the most appropriate financing plan for their productions. We have excellent, long-term relationships with internationally-acclaimed stars, directors, writers, and producers in the US, Canada, Europe, Australia and Asia, and use our expertise to assist them through the complexities and potential pitfalls of film, television and digital media investment and production to the successful completion and marketing of their projects. From quality, Academy-oriented films to commercial genre productions, Pierrepont Productions produces its own projects and assists other producers and investors to create and market compelling, quality content and leverage it across multiple platforms to promote enhanced audience viewing and higher returns on investment. Julia Jay Pierrepont III is known for Good (2008), Lost in the Pershing Point Hotel (2000) and Ghosts Never Sleep (2005). Ms. Pierrepont's formal education included studying Bio-Chemistry at Kings College, University of London, with a Bachelors of Science degree in Chemistry from New York's Ithaca College. She was the youngest person ever to publish original research in the American Journal of Bio-Chemistry. Ms. Pierrepont also did field study on global socio-economics and indigenous tribal cultures on a three-year solo journey around the world, through the Middle East, Africa, Asia and South America. She is a member of the prominent New York Pierrepont family, related to such interesting historical and contemporary figures as: President Thomas Jefferson; Supreme Court Chief Justice and President of the Continental Congress John Jay (also co-author of “The Federalist Papers”); NY Governor Peter Styvesant, Financier John Pierpont (JP) Morgan; Queen Mary of France and Scotland, King James V of England; King Fairhar of Norway; William Tapley Bennett III, the US Ambassador to NATO and the US Mission to the United Nations; and William Comfort, Chairman of Citicorp Venture Group. She is married to Michael D. Tiberi of Pasadena, the President and founder of Principia Lightworks, a cutting-edge, water purification laser firm, partnered with Academician Basov, winner of the Nobel Prize for inventing the laser www.pierrepontproductions.com Connect with your host Kaia Alexander: https://entertainmentbusinessleague.com/ https://twitter.com/thisiskaia  Produced by Stuart W. Volkow P.G.A. Get career training and a free ebook “How to Pitch Anything in 1Min.” at www.EntertainmentBusinessLeague.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

February 27, 2024 Chief Justice Mary Jane TheisIllinois Supreme Court City Club event description: Chief Justice Mary Jane Theis Mary Jane Theis was born in Chicago. She received her bachelor’s degree from Loyola University Chicago in 1971 and her law degree from the University of San Francisco, School of Law in 1974. From 1974-83, she […]

On today's show, a pair of teachers were chosen to do research in Antarctica- How'd it go? Also, the primary election on March 5 includes the decision for Arkansas' Supreme Court Chief Justice. Plus, the play "Witch" uses the 17th century to comment on the 21st.

Justice Natalie Hudson recently became Chief of the MN Supreme Court. She talks about the Court's responsibilities, and the retirement of another Justice. 

The post More partisan politics and lack of transparency from NC's Supreme Court chief justice appeared first on NC Newsline.

Last updated : 2023.10.06 The latest news from home and abroad, with a close eye on Northeast Asia and the Korean Peninsula in particular

The government introduced a new Bill in the Rajya Sabha in August – the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Bill, 2023. It repeals the Election Commission (Conditions of Service of Election Commissioners and Transaction of Business) Act, 1991. This Bill was initially listed for discussion in the special session of Parliament this month, before being held back. But it has sparked a big debate about the implications of this Bill, especially the provisions that removed the Supreme Court Chief Justice from the selection panel, and altered the status of the Election Commissioner – from being equivalent to a Supreme Court judge, to that of a Cabinet Secretary. 

In a no-holds-barred interview, Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice Annette Ziegler calls the actions of the Court's liberal majority unconstitutional and a "coup" against her lawful authority as Chief Justice.

AP correspondent Jennifer King reports on Wisconsin Court Director Fired-state Supreme Court

Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Sharon Kennedy visited the Ashbrook Center and spoke with students, staff, and faculty about the meaning and importance of the Rule of Law - a fundamental principle in American politics, law, and public life.

Mike Duheme, RCMP Commissioner; Joy Malbon, CTV News; Richard Wagner, Supreme Court Chief Justice; Brian Gallant, former N.B. premier; Lisa Raitt, former Conservative Cabinet minister; Tom Mulcair, CTV News Political Analyst; Robert Benzie, the Toronto Star; and Richard Madan, CTV News.

Washington Supreme Court Chief Justice Steven Gonzalez joins the Chino Y Chicano to share his perspective on the declining trust in the U.S. Supreme Court, the Clarence Thomas controversy, racial bias in the courts, the importance of civics, and how the late artist Alfredo Arreguin left his mark in our state's Temple of Justice. Read:https://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/supreme/bios/?fa=scbios.display_file&fileID=gonzalezRead: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/mental-health/seattle-libraries-transit-branch-into-social-work-to-take-on-mental-health-drug-use/: Read:https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/editorials/buoyed-by-poll-seattle-mayor-harrell-should-go-big-on-public-safety/Read: https://crosscut.com/news/2023/01/two-seattle-asian-american-community-newspapers-go-out-printRead: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/law-justice/leesa-manion-sworn-in-as-king-county-prosecuting-attorney/Read: The Best & Worst Awards for 2022https://i0.wp.com/nwasianweekly.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/04-05-Matt-and-Gei-1.jpgRead Marcus Harrison Green's Seattle's Times column about Black Youth suicide. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/mental-health/more-black-kids-are-dying-by-suicide-the-reasons-unfortunately-arent-surprising/

John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, reflected on his career and work as a judge at the Tenth Circuit Bench-Bar Conference Fireside Chat on September 2, 2022. This podcast features excerpts from that discussion. Incoming Tenth Circuit Chief Judge Jerome A. Holmes and outgoing Chief Judge Timothy M. Tymkovich interviewed Justice Roberts for this program.  Justice Roberts began by responding to news media comments about the Supreme Court's legitimacy after decisions during the 2021-22 Term changing established precedents. Those decisions included the Court's landmark ruling overturning abortion rights established in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. __ (2022).  This podcast also features Justice Roberts' comments about: 1)         his role presiding over the Judicial Conference of the United States and serving as Chancellor of the Smithsonian Institution; 2)         his work in the early 1980's as a law clerk for Justice William Rehnquist, including law clerks' basketball games in that era with Justice Byron White; 3)         his work in private practice and the U.S. Solicitor General's office as an appellate specialist before becoming a judge; 4)         why he enjoys the job as Supreme Court Chief Justice, and his explanation of the behind-the-scenes collegiality which exists among the current justices;  5)         how he seeks to write court decisions that are clear for both lawyers and non-lawyers; and6)         how he deals with welcoming new justices to the Court and its decision making process, and with the stress of deciding complex cases.

Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Elizabeth Clement joins the show to discuss the Michigan Resolve Family System, a free, online platform implemented by the Court, aimed at helping families resolve parenting time and other domestic relations matters. Then, WDET's Eli Newman stops by to discuss Detroit's new Shot-Stoppers initiative, and the latest on anti-crime initiatives in the city.

Tuesday on the NewsHour, Congress moves closer to passing a massive spending bill to keep the government running. Migrant lives hang in the balance after the Supreme Court Chief Justice blocks the repeal of a COVID immigration policy. Plus, questions about the United States military's readiness loom as China's expanding armed forces menace Taiwan's sovereignty. PBS NewsHour is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders

6PM ET 12/19/2022 Newscast Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Elizabeth Clement is the new chief justice of the Michigan Supreme Court. She was chosen this week in a closed-door meeting of the justices. Clement — who was named to the court in 2017 by Republican Governor Rick Snyder — has shown an independent streak. ___ Find more from It's Just Politics. If you like what you hear on the pod, consider supporting our work.Support the show: http://michiganradio.org/donateSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Candace Rennick, CUPE National Secretary-Treasurer; Seamus O'Regan, Labour Minister; Glen McGregor, CTV News; Greg MacEachern, Proof Strategies; Kate Harrison, Summa Strategies; Vsevolod Kniaziev, Ukraine's Supreme Court Chief Justice; Richard Wagner, Canada's Supreme Court Chief Justice; Rachel Aiello, CTV News; Susan Delacourt, Toronto Star; and Greg Weston, Earnscliffe Strategies.

Michigan's highest court will receive a major shakeup at the end of the year as Chief Justice Bridget McCormack announced her plans to retire this week. Rick Pluta, senior state Capitol correspondent for the Michigan Public Radio Network, and Lauren Gibbons of Bridge Michigan, join the show to reflect on Chief Justice McCormack's legacy with the Court, the political ramifications of her decision, and what we can expect moving forward. Then, Detroit Free Press higher education reporter David Jesse joins the show to discuss why Michigan State University president Samuel Stanley, Jr appears to be under pressure to resign from some members of the Board of Trustees, including how we got to this point, as well as how Eastern Michigan University resolved its labor dispute.

Also in the news: Gov. Pritzker says rebate checks are coming; 'Unstable' man walks into Chicago church claiming to have gun; Chicagoans will celebrate Mexican Independence Day on Friday and more.

Welcome to the What's Next! Podcast with Tiffani Bova. Alisa Cohn has been coaching startup founders to grow into world-class CEOs for nearly 20 years, and has even been named the Top Startup Coach in the World at the Thinkers50/Marshall Goldsmith Global Coaches Awards in London. A onetime startup CFO, strategy consultant, and current angel investor and advisor, she was named the number one “Global Guru” of startups in 2021, and has worked with startup companies such as Venmo, Etsy, DraftKings, The Wirecutter, Mack Weldon, and Tory Burch. Additionally, she is the author of From Start-Up to Grown-Up, published by Kogan Page.  Alisa is a guest lecturer at Harvard and Cornell Universities, Henley Business School and the Naval War College. She is the executive coach for Runway–the incubator at Cornell NYC Tech that helps post-docs commercialize their technology and build companies. She serves on the board of the Cornell Advisory Council. She has coached public and political figures including the former Supreme Court Chief Justice of Sri Lanka and the first female minister in the transitional government of Afghanistan. THIS EPISODE IS PERFECT FOR… people who work in start-up culture and leaders/managers that are looking to improve their structures and systems. TODAY'S MAIN MESSAGE… Ultimately, the foundations of a good start-up launch are dependent upon the infrastructure set up in the initial phases. The best way to track progress on your start-up growth is to have definitive goals and setting a game plan for how to get there. The rest is discipline, applied through the feedback and improvement for both workplace leaders and team members. WHAT  I  LOVE  MOST… Alisa fully understands the “sexiness in the strategy” to improve and build upon the personal growth journey for start-ups. But most of all, her eagerness to venture into lyrical rap is impressive!   Running time: 29:26   Subscribe on iTunes   Find Tiffani on social: Facebook Twitter LinkedIn   Find Alisa online: Official Website Twitter LinkedIn   Alisa's Book: From Start-Up to Grown-Up