Oz Culture

Send us a textFresh out of the theater, we're diving straight into Marvel's latest attempt to bring the Fantastic Four to life in "First Steps." This film represents yet another chapter in the troubled cinematic history of Marvel's first family, and we're breaking down exactly why it stumbles despite its impressive cast and visuals.The movie teases greatness with an exhilarating opening sequence showcasing the team's powers, but quickly devolves into a frustrating waiting game. Pedro Pascal and Vanessa Kirby deliver committed performances as Reed Richards and Sue Storm, with Kirby particularly shining in emotional moments. However, the film fundamentally misunderstands what makes the Fantastic Four special – their dynamic family chemistry and distinctive personalities.We explore how the retrofuturistic aesthetic creates a unique visual identity but lacks narrative purpose, and why Galactus' mere four minutes of screen time in a two-hour movie represents a massive missed opportunity. Through a direct comparison with James Gunn's Superman, we highlight where both films succeed and fail in their superhero storytelling approaches. For longtime Fantastic Four fans, this will feel like another disappointment in a long line of adaptations that can't seem to capture the magic of Marvel's original superhero team. If you're looking for the definitive Fantastic Four experience, you might be better off watching The Incredibles instead! Subscribe now for more brutally honest superhero movie reviews delivered straight from the theater to your ears. Support the show

Send us a textSuperman flies onto screens with a divisive splash as James Gunn attempts to resurrect DC's cinematic universe. Our hosts Michael, Addy, and a special guest dive into whether this fresh take soars or crashes under the weight of universe-building ambitions.What makes Superman so challenging to adapt? The team explores why this iconic character has struggled in modern cinema, comparing Gunn's approach to previous incarnations from Zack Snyder's gritty Man of Steel to Brandon Rauth's Superman Returns. They question whether any filmmaker can recapture the magic of Christopher Reeve's classic portrayal and if Gunn was the right choice to helm DC's rebirth.The conversation heats up around the film's juggling act of introducing too many characters while trying to tell Superman's story. "Instead of giving us 10 million different characters, why don't you just flesh out the rivalry between Lex Luthor and Superman?" one host demands. They debate the political messaging that becomes more apparent on second viewing, the on-the-nose dialogue about morality, and whether the stellar cast performances can save a script lacking nuance. With ratings ranging from a dismal 1/5 to a respectable 7.5/10, this spirited debate captures the polarizing nature of modern superhero cinema and what it means for DC's future.Subscribe, share your thoughts in the comments, and join our passionate community of movie lovers who aren't afraid to speak their minds about the films that shape our cultural landscape. Support the show

Send us a textWe review "Ballerina" from the John Wick universe, analyzing whether this Ana de Armas-led action film delivers as a worthy addition to the franchise or if it falls short of expectations.• An entertaining but not particularly deep addition to the John Wick franchise• Gabriel Byrne delivers a compelling performance as the villain• Ana de Armas brings emotional range to her character Eve• Inconsistency in Eve's fighting abilities when sharing scenes with John Wick• Film sets up unique fighting styles for Eve but doesn't follow through• Unrealistic action sequences push beyond even John Wick's established boundaries• Excellent CGI throughout with only minor noticeable flaws• Rated 2.5-3 out of 5 stars by our reviewers• Recommended for John Wick fans but probably best viewed on streaming servicesComment below to let us know what you thought of Ballerina. Did you think it was a worthy addition to the John Wick franchise, or should John Wick stay retired forever? If you enjoyed this video, please like, share and subscribe for more videos like this. Support the show

Send us a textDeath has never been so logical. Final Destination Bloodlines delivers what might be the most perfectly plotted horror film in years, surprising us with its airtight storyline and fully justified character actions. Who would have thought that the sixth installment in a horror franchise would be the one to eliminate plot holes entirely?The film brilliantly connects to the broader Final Destination universe while standing confidently on its own. Set after previous entries yet functioning as a prequel that explains the entire franchise's mythology, Bloodlines introduces a 1950s premonition that establishes the "bloodlines" concept – suggesting all victims throughout the series share a connection. This elegant world-building enhances rather than complicates, giving viewers just enough information without overwhelming them with convoluted explanations.Tony Todd's final performance deserves special recognition, as the filmmakers crafted a perfect send-off that acknowledges both the character and the actor. His recurring presence throughout the franchise finally receives meaningful context. Meanwhile, Richard Hammond shines as "a perfect likable dick," landing every joke and emotional beat with precision that elevates the entire film. Unlike typical horror movies where audiences root for annoying characters to die, Bloodlines presents people you genuinely care about, making their potential deaths more impactful.The family-centric narrative creates a refreshing dynamic where characters quickly accept their predicament and work together intelligently. Gone are the frustrating moments of previous films where skeptical characters ignore warnings until it's too late. Our only minor complaint involves the occasionally obvious CGI that lacks the visceral impact of the practical effects in earlier entries. Nevertheless, both hosts rate this as potentially the best film of the year and a triumphant revitalization of the franchise. What are your favorite kills from the Final Destination series? Share in the comments and join the conversation! Support the show

Send us a textWe review Ryan Coogler's vampire film "Sinners" starring Michael B. Jordan as twins, discussing how it attempts to blend social commentary with horror but struggles with pacing and storytelling issues.• Michael B. Jordan plays twin brothers whose differences aren't distinct enough, creating confusion• The film spends 75% of its runtime on character development before introducing vampires• Beautiful cinematography and music are standout elements despite narrative problems• Vampire rules like needing invitation to enter homes create some genuinely funny moments• The film attempts to draw parallels between vampire stories and historical discrimination• Final act delivers action but feels disconnected from the character-focused first two acts• Mixed ratings from the hosts, ranging from 2 to 3.5 out of 5 starsIf you enjoyed this video, please like, share and subscribe, and comment below with your thoughts on "Sinners." Support the show

Send us a textStepping into the pixelated world of Minecraft proves to be a blocky disaster as we break down everything wrong with Hollywood's latest video game adaptation. Jack Black brings his signature energy as Steve, but rather than feeling authentic, his performance comes across as a greatest hits compilation played in the wrong venue – a Jack Black impersonator rather than the real deal. Meanwhile, Jason Momoa provides some genuine comedic moments as a saving grace in an otherwise disjointed experience.The fundamental flaw of this film lies in its jarring visual approach – real actors placed against CGI backdrops create a constant disconnect that prevents full immersion. While the Minecraft world itself looks beautiful with its colorful blocks contrasting nicely against the deliberately sterile real world, the human characters never feel like they belong. This creative choice stands in stark contrast to fully animated successes like The Super Mario Bros. Movie and Wreck-It Ralph, which committed to consistent visual worlds with relatable characters.What's most frustrating is how the film fails to understand its own audience. The moments that generated the most excitement – faithful recreations of game elements like zombies, skeletons, and other creatures – take a backseat to conventional Hollywood storytelling tropes and bizarre romantic subplots. Critics have largely panned the film with ratings around 4.8/10, while audiences (particularly young fans) have embraced it with scores of 88% on Rotten Tomatoes. This disparity reveals the film's identity crisis – trying to please everyone while fully satisfying no one. Whether you're a Minecraft enthusiast or simply curious about video game adaptations, we'd love to hear your thoughts! What video game movies do you think succeeded where this one failed? Support the show

Send us a textJack Quaid stars as Nathan Cain (Novocaine), a man impervious to physical pain who transforms from a reluctant banker into an action hero when his girlfriend is kidnapped. The film balances comedy and gore effectively while exploring the journey of a man who initially sees his condition as an embarrassment before embracing it as a superpower.• Clean, simple premise: a man who can't feel physical pain placed in emotionally painful situations• Strong character development establishes a convincing relationship in the first 30 minutes• Jack Quaid perfectly balances comedy and emotional depth• Realistic, imperfect fight scenes make the action more engaging than polished superhero films• Extremely graphic gore had reviewers wincing and covering their eyes• Plot twist in the third act undermines character motivations• Generic villains (bank robbers) leave room for improvement• Both reviewers give it 3.5/5 stars - entertaining but not groundbreaking• Perfect "bloke movie" for watching with friendsIf you enjoyed this review, please like, share and subscribe for more reviews like this. Support the show

Send us a textWe review "Black Bag," a dialogue-heavy spy thriller starring Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender that explores loyalty in both professional and personal relationships. Our panel has wildly different opinions, creating a dynamic discussion about what works and what doesn't in this unconventional film.• Chemistry between the lead characters stands out as a highlight even for those who disliked the film• The dialogue-heavy approach divides viewers - some find it immersive while others consider it boring• Star-studded cast includes Pierce Brosnan, Regé-Jean Page, Naomi Harris, and Gustav Skarsgård• Film focuses more on interpersonal relationships than typical spy thriller action sequences• The central question explores whether spies are loyal to country, job, or spouse• Classical cinematography and screen composition receive praise despite other criticisms• Final ratings range dramatically from 1/5 to 4.5/5, reflecting our divided opinionsIf you enjoyed this review, please like, share, and subscribe. Comment below what you thought of Black Bag - whether you loved it, felt neutral, or absolutely hated every second of it. Support the show

Send us a textEver watched a movie you expected to hate but ended up enjoying? That's exactly what happened with Disney's latest live-action remake "Snow White." Going in with rock-bottom expectations after months of PR disasters, we found ourselves genuinely surprised by a film that delivers far more entertainment value than its pre-release controversy suggested.The unexpected highlight? Gal Gadot absolutely shines as the Evil Queen. After seeing her typecast as heroic Wonder Woman for years, watching her embrace villainy with such delicious enthusiasm is refreshing. Her musical performance impresses (even with probable auto-tuning), and her physical embodiment of the character through facial expressions and movement demonstrates genuine talent. Andrew Burnap as the prince similarly delivers a charismatic performance that leaves you wanting more of his character – ironically contradicting lead actress Rachel Zegler's now-infamous comment that "he could be cut out."What makes this film fascinating is the disconnect between its actual quality (we both gave it 3.5/5 stars) and its public perception. The visuals are stunning, the supporting cast delivers, and even the controversial dwarf characters quickly become endearing through their whimsical presence. Yet the film's reception has been overshadowed by off-screen drama that threatens to sink what could have been a successful Disney remake. It's a reminder that sometimes the most interesting Hollywood stories happen behind the camera – and a genuinely good film can be torpedoed before audiences ever get a chance to form their own opinions.Have you seen Snow White yet? We'd love to know if you were also surprised by its quality or if the controversy kept you away. Share your thoughts and subscribe for more honest reviews where we're not afraid to admit when we're wrong! Support the show

Send us a textThe Gorge defies expectations at every turn. What starts as a seemingly formulaic assassin romance between Miles Teller and Anya Taylor-Joy evolves into something far more intriguing when they literally fall into another world. Their chemistry anchors this genre-bending adventure that seamlessly transitions from romantic thriller to monster-filled horror without missing a beat.Miles Teller's transformation is nothing short of remarkable. Gone is the young actor from Whiplash, replaced by a commanding leading man whose emotional range perfectly complements Anya Taylor-Joy's enigmatic presence. Though her Lithuanian accent occasionally wavers, their connection feels authentic and earned. When joined by the legendary Sigourney Weaver in a perfect supporting role, the cast elevates what could have been a standard streaming release into something truly cinematic.The film's visual design deserves special mention—particularly the creature concepts that blend organic and plant elements reminiscent of The Last of Us. While some CGI moments betray budget limitations, the overall production design creates a world you can believe in. The pacing masterfully drip-feeds information, building tension before dramatic reveals that keep you invested throughout. Even as hardcore film critics, we found ourselves genuinely startled by jump scares in what isn't technically a horror film.Where The Gorge stumbles is its final act. After brilliantly navigating multiple genres and building to a thrilling climax, it settles for a predictable conclusion that lacks tension. The music telegraphs developments too obviously, undermining otherwise strong storytelling. Yet these flaws don't erase what works—a streaming release that proves direct-to-digital films can deliver genuinely engaging cinematic experiences. Whether you're drawn to romantic thrillers, creature features, or simply appreciate watching talented actors elevate material, The Gorge offers something unexpected and worth your time. Support the show

Send us a textHave you ever witnessed something simultaneously brilliant and terrible? That's the puzzling contradiction at the heart of Joker: Folie à Deux, a film that delivers breathtaking visual artistry while completely missing what made its predecessor special.The cinematography deserves nothing but praise – the lighting, color grading, and camera work create moments of pure visual poetry. One striking example: during Arthur Fleck's interview, the lighting falls just above his eyebrows, casting half his eyes in shadow. These thoughtful visual touches appear throughout, telling a more compelling story than the actual narrative. Joaquin Phoenix's physical performance remains astonishing, his body contorting as though "some monster is trying to get out of his skin," while Lady Gaga brings depth to Harley Quinn despite the script's limitations.But these strengths can't overcome the film's fundamental flaws. The decision to transform Joker into a musical feels like a cynical cash grab following industry trends rather than an organic storytelling choice. Even more frustrating is how the sequel systematically dismantles what made the original Joker impactful. Where the first film ended with a clear transformation from Arthur Fleck into Joker, the sequel inexplicably reverts him to a state of identity confusion. It explains away mysteries that were deliberately ambiguous, stripping the character of psychological depth. As we discuss in the podcast, "This film was like an assassination of the first movie."The result is a beautiful-looking film that leaves viewers feeling empty and confused – a 10/5 for cinematography paired with a 1/5 for storytelling. It's a fascinating case study in how technical excellence can't salvage fundamental creative missteps. Have you seen Joker: Folie à Deux? We'd love to hear if you experienced the same conflicted reaction or if you found something in the film that we missed. Share your thoughts in the comments! Support the show

Send us a textStep into the blood-soaked underworld where vampires rule the night and only one man walks between worlds. Wesley Snipes' portrayal of Blade isn't just a performance—it's a declaration of superhero cinema's untapped potential that continues to resonate decades later.What made the 1998 Blade so revolutionary was its complete disinterest in franchise-building. Before shared universes dominated the landscape, this film stood confidently alone, establishing its own unique visual identity and R-rated sensibilities. The result? A marvel property that doesn't feel like a "Marvel movie" at all.Snipes brings an undeniable magnetism that elevates every scene. His physical prowess shines through extended fight sequences captured in long takes—no quick cuts hiding stunt doubles here. Even when delivering the corniest lines imaginable, there's something mesmerizing about his presence that makes it all work. As one viewer notes, "If you can take something that's not cool at all and create a character that makes that cool, you get a guaranteed hit."The film's practical effects and minimal CGI give it a gritty authenticity that many modern superhero films lack. While some visual effects might look dated ("like PlayStation 1" as one fan puts it), they're used sparingly enough to maintain the film's impact. Stephen Dorff's Frost provides an interesting villain, though his character development sometimes feels rushed or incomplete compared to the fully realized Daywalker.With Blade's recent cameo in Deadpool & Wolverine sparking renewed interest, the question remains: would you prefer a complete reboot or a proper Blade 4 with Wesley Snipes getting the send-off this iconic character deserves? Share your thoughts and favorite Blade moments in the comments below! Support the show

Send us a textRyan Reynolds has performed a miracle with Deadpool & Wolverine, crafting what feels like an extended apology letter to fans who've suffered through the MCU's recent disappointments. This isn't just another superhero movie – it's a statement that someone at Marvel finally understands what audiences have been craving all along.The film thrives on the undeniable chemistry between Reynolds' Deadpool and Hugh Jackman's Wolverine, creating a dynamic that's both hilariously antagonistic and surprisingly emotional. What makes this pairing work so brilliantly is how the film doesn't shy away from acknowledging the questionable decision to resurrect Wolverine after his perfect send-off in Logan. Instead, it leans into the absurdity through its multiverse framework, while simultaneously mocking the very concept that has become Marvel's narrative crutch.Where Deadpool & Wolverine truly shines is in its willingness to be unabashedly entertaining without the burden of social commentary that has weighed down recent Marvel entries. The film is packed with cameos and references that reward longtime fans, from Wesley Snipes reclaiming his role as Blade to Channing Tatum finally getting his chance to play Gambit. These moments feel like genuine celebrations of Marvel's cinematic history rather than cheap nostalgia bait. While some references might be too niche for casual viewers, they demonstrate a deep respect for the source material and the fans who've remained loyal despite the studio's recent missteps. If this marks Marvel's return to prioritizing entertainment over messaging, it couldn't have come at a better time. Subscribe to our podcast for more honest takes on the latest blockbusters and let us know if you think this signals Marvel's comeback! Support the show

Send us a textRemember when action movies had substance? RoboCop wasn't just an explosive sci-fi flick about a cyborg cop—it was a prescient vision of our future.Watching Paul Verhoeven's 1987 masterpiece today feels eerily prophetic. Long before our current concerns about facial recognition technology, corporate control of public services, and media desensitization to violence, RoboCop was laying it all out with remarkable accuracy. What makes this film truly special is how it balances biting social satire with genuinely thrilling action sequences that still hold up decades later.The practical effects deserve special mention—from the horrific toxic waste scene to Clarence Boddicker's spectacularly bloody demise, these moments remain seared into viewers' memories. Speaking of Boddicker, Kurtwood Smith's performance stands out as remarkably ahead of its time, feeling contemporary even by today's standards. Nancy Allen's portrayal of Officer Lewis also deserves recognition for avoiding the typical female action character tropes of the era—no forced romance, no unnecessary sexualization, just a competent cop who happens to be a woman.What truly elevates RoboCop is Verhoeven's outsider perspective as a Dutch director examining American culture. The film's commercial breaks and news segments might seem like quirky additions, but they build a rich dystopian world while delivering sharp commentary on media, consumerism, and violence. This film isn't just worth seeing—it's essential viewing that rewards multiple watches with new details and insights each time. Whether you're revisiting this classic or experiencing it for the first time, you'll understand why we both rated it 4.5/5 stars without hesitation. What's your favorite scene from this groundbreaking film? Support the show

Send us a textEver watched a movie so bad it makes you question how it was even made? That's exactly what happened when we subjected ourselves to Sony's latest Spider-Man Universe disaster, Madam Web. From the moment Dakota Johnson's paramedic character coldly dismisses a child thanking her for saving their mother, we knew we were in for a special kind of cinematic catastrophe.The problems with this film run deeper than a spider's web. Every performance feels like it was delivered under duress, with talented actors like Sydney Sweeney appearing completely stripped of their natural abilities. Dakota Johnson delivers each line as if she's reading it for the first time, with comedic timing so poor it sabotages even the rare moments when the script manages a decent joke. Meanwhile, the villain suffers from dialogue that appears completely disconnected from his on-screen actions, suggesting extensive post-production fixes that failed spectacularly.What makes Madam Web particularly disappointing isn't just that it's bad - it's that it lacks even the ambition to be memorably terrible. Unlike cult classics that fail with passion, this film feels created on autopilot, devoid of creative risks or distinctive vision. The plot holes are numerous and baffling: a clairvoyant villain who can't see an oncoming car, a protagonist who abandons the very people she's meant to protect, and timeline inconsistencies that make no logical sense. Add in the most heavy-handed Pepsi product placement we've seen in years, and you have a film that earns a solid zero out of five stars. Did you subject yourself to Madam Web? We'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments below, and don't forget to subscribe for more brutally honest movie reviews! Support the show

Send us a Text Message.Ever find yourself stuck in a cinematic time warp? That's where Addy and I landed when "Sexy Beast" leaped out from our movie vault. We kick things off with a bewildering opening straight out of a Looney Tunes sketch, before diving into the meat of this unconventional heist film where the loot is less glittering jewels and more the intense, heart-thumping interactions between characters. Listen as we unravel the threads of a narrative spun with the central theme of escaping one's past, and how the formidable Don, played by Ben Kingsley, casts a shadow long enough to chill your spine.What happens when a self-proclaimed 'sexy beast' is stripped of his bravado by a ghost from his old life? We dissect the transformation of our protagonist, whose veil of arrogance is torn away by Don's relentless pursuit, leading to a captivating exploration of power dynamics and masculinity. The film's dream sequences and the significant influence of the protagonist's wife drive our conversation further into the depths of the story's complex psychological landscape. You won't want to miss how we unfold the narrative's symbolism and dissect character arcs that mirror the struggle to sever ties with a life of crime.Wrapping up, we shine a spotlight on Ben Kingsley's tour-de-force performance, which set expectations sky-high for his later roles, like the Mandarin in "Iron Man 3." Plus, we give a nod to the stellar contributions from Ian McShane and Ray Winstone. As we break down the film's artistry, from impactful scene transitions to the authentically flavored British dialogue, our final verdict lands at a generous three and a half stars. This episode peels back the layers of an oddball movie that dares to twist heist film conventions, all woven with humor and everyday banter that breathes life into the script. Support the Show.

Send us a Text Message.Explore the unseen battlefields of the heart through the lens of "Civil War," a film that pulls back the curtain on the human cost of conflict, devoid of the usual heroics. Joined by the incisive Adi Aisha, we dissect this raw and unflinching narrative that refuses to choose sides, forcing you, our listeners, to confront the uncomfortable reality of war's true victims. Our spirited discussion scrutinizes the filmmakers' decision to leave the war's origins obscured, raising questions about the impact such omissions have on our understanding of the story and how it reflects the complexities of real-world warfare.Witness the transformation of war journalists from idealistic truth-seekers to desensitized observers in a world that feeds on the chaos of conflict. Adi Aisha and I delve into the role of media in war, using Kaylee Spaney's character as a vessel to explore the ethical dilemmas faced by those who report from the frontlines. The film's controversial ending serves as a crux for our debate, as we navigate the moral quandaries and the consequences of actions taken in the pursuit of the perfect story. We reflect on how the film's portrayal of these character arcs mirrors a broader societal desensitization, especially in the age of social media.Concluding with a critique that balances appreciation of the film's artistic merits against the frustrations of missed narrative potential, our dialogue is an invite to listeners to consider their own stance. The episode is not just a review; it's a contemplation of what "Civil War" achieves in its depiction of the human condition amidst the backdrop of an unending civil strife. We share our varied takeaways, rate the film, and extend the conversation to you, urging you to join in and share how the movie resonates with your perceptions of war, journalism, and the blurred lines between art and reality. Support the Show.

Send us a Text Message.Ever wonder how a modern remake stands up to a cult classic? Strap in as Addy Asher and I break down the latest "Roadhouse" remake—where the promise of high-octane thrills meets the harsh reality of missed potential. Without the nostalgia goggles (I'm yet to watch the original), I expected a wild ride but found myself grappling with the film's attempt at humor and a less-than-stellar debut by Conor McGregor. We'll dissect the marketing missteps that might have buried this film's chances at success and debate whether the streaming giant Prime could've given it a better shot at the spotlight.This episode takes the pulse of both versions of "Roadhouse," zeroing in on the heart of the film—the protagonist, Dalton. The original Dalton was a man with depth, his past trauma and strategic thinking adding layers to his tough exterior. Contrast that with the remake's Dalton, who seems to have traded vulnerability for invincibility, and you've got us questioning the impact on our connection to the story. Addy and I tackle the character evolution head-on, musing over the lost anticipation and engagement—a casualty of the remake's action-heavy approach.As the curtains close, we don't hold back on our candid critique of the film's direction and missed opportunities to spotlight Jake Gyllenhaal's prowess. The action scenes, fight choreography, and the rest of the cast under our microscope reveal a film that could have soared but instead plummeted in our esteem. We even revisit those expectations—like the Family Guy-famous roundhouse kick—you won't find in this remake, laying bare how such omissions can leave fans feeling shortchanged. Join us for an unflinching look at a remake that could've been a contender but ended up down for the count. Support the Show.

Step into the eerie glow of the '70s showbiz limelight as my guest, Adi Asher, and I dissect "Late Night with the Devil," where ambition dances devilishly with fate. Imagine, if you can, a world where the pursuit of fame could cost you everything, even your soul. We dive headfirst into the heart of Jack Delroy's character, a late-night host caught in the tangled web of his own ambitions. His moral compass spins wildly as he vies to eclipse none other than Johnny Carson. Through the film's single-location setting, we peel back the layers of a mysterious elite club, hinting at the sinister and secretive, much like the cryptic corridors of "Eyes Wide Shut." Adi and I then shift gears to the darker side of fame. We discuss the shocking extremes some go to for notoriety, contrasting a teenager's assault for TikTok fame with the film's narrative of a Faustian deal that's as costly as life itself. We ponder the eerie similarities between this and the plot of "The Devil's Advocate," where success's shadow looms long and heavy over one's moral fiber. The film's chilling subtext prompts us to question the moral dilemmas we face in our own quests for recognition and the haunting possibility of losing ourselves along the way.But it's not all doom and gloom; we also share a laugh about our own late-night hosting dreams, tossing around the notion of an OnlyFans account as a quirky stepping stone to stardom. We even dare to dream big, issuing a playful challenge for none other than Quentin Tarantino to grace our podcast with his presence. Whether it's through laughter or critical analysis, Adi and I bring our unique perspectives to the fore, critiquing the film's impact and its reflection of our societal obsessions with the limelight. Join us for a compelling journey into the heart of cinematic suspense and the soul of ambition. Support the Show.

Prepare to be enthralled and possibly a bit disturbed as we, Michael Pishonery and Addy A'Shula, along with our guest AJ, offer an unflinching critique of wealth and its follies through our discussion of the dark comedy "Saltburn." This episode promises to unravel the psychological twists of a film that's as darkly humorous as it is thought-provoking. We're not just talking about the plot here; we're dissecting the film's take on class dynamics, the impact of an outsider's seductive creepiness on a wealthy family, and Barry Keoghan's spellbinding performance. Carrie Mulligan and Rosamund Pike's smaller but no less significant roles also come under our spotlight, as does the movie's ability to shock and intrigue with scenes that push the envelope.Venture into the realm of the privileged elite with us as we dissect the necessity of shock value in film. Is it just a ploy to hook viewers, or is there a deeper meaning behind the hedonistic depictions of the rich? Listen as we debate whether the portrayal of wealth in "Saltburn" eclipses its artistic quality or enhances its narrative. The discussion takes a turn towards a transformative moment within the film, contemplating metaphorical interpretations of power shifts and personal metamorphosis. We'll also delve into how the casting choices contribute to the movie's thematic layers, creating a relatable yet surreal experience for the audience.Wrapping up our in-depth conversation, we speculate on the ambiguous outcomes for the characters, particularly the elusive Elspeth and the machinations of the mysterious Oliver. As we share our personal standout moments, we analyze the broader social commentary "Saltburn" offers on class and privilege, and how it contrasts the lives of the untouchable wealthy against the striving middle class. Don't miss our insights on the film's intricate details, which shape the narrative and leave a lasting impression. Discover which scenes left us awestruck, and join us in the examination of a film that boldly challenges viewers with its narrative choices and stunning conclusions. Support the show

Step into the narrative ring with us and special guest Adi Aishua as we explore the emotional landscape of "The Iron Claw," a film that brings the tumultuous tale of the Von Erich wrestling dynasty to life. Zac Efron's portrayal of family and fame dives deep into the Von Erich clan's journey, marked by patriarch Fritz's heavy hand and the brothers' search for validation amidst the chaos of the ring. Listen closely as we dissect the actors' stunning physical metamorphoses and the poignant depiction of brotherhood that resonates far beyond the wrestling arena, a testament to the film's powerful storytelling.The conversation takes an unexpected turn when we geek out over a He-Man cameo, playfully considering digital wig makeovers and the alchemy behind the iconic transformation. We waltz through the film's soundtrack, lose ourselves in the era's beats, and unpack how music underscores the emotional pulls of the narrative. With Adi Aishua's fresh perspectives and our shared enthusiasm, we peel back the layers of the on-screen relationships that amplify the drama and tug at the heartstrings.Wrapping up the episode, we venture into the broader realm of cinematic storytelling, drawing parallels with Brendan Fraser's return to the spotlight in "The Whale" and the artful direction of movies that leave a lasting impact. Our musings wander into the daring territory of "Epstein the Musical" before grounding back to the reflections on the Von Erich saga, offering listeners a hearty mix of history, tragedy, and the riveting complexities of family legacy. Tune in for a discussion that's as gripping as the wrestling moves it depicts, and stay for the unexpected detours that make this episode truly one-of-a-kind. Support the show

Ever wonder how a movie can make you laugh, grip your seat, and still leave you wanting more? Join us as we navigate the cinematic odyssey of 2023, where we dissect the year's silver screen spectacles, including the gravity-defying stunts of "Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part 1." Our discussion veers through the Italian locations that left us awestruck, blending a rich tapestry of critique and nostalgia that only true film enthusiasts can appreciate. From the personal anecdotes tied to the locations to the challenge of distinguishing this year's gems from last, we promise an episode filled with insightful banter and a relentless quest for the movies that truly shine.Imagine Tom Cruise scaling another skyscraper in his fifties. We chew over the "Mission Impossible" saga's future and its daredevil lead's career longevity, debating whether the franchise should stick to its spy thriller roots or continue upping the ante. We also can't help but muse on the parallels with other action giants, like the "Fast and Furious" series. But we don't stop there; animated wonders and the web-slinging excellence of "Across the Spider-Verse" are on the agenda too. We pick apart the narrative depth, moral dilemmas, and whether cameo appearances enhance or distract from the storytelling.Let's not forget the punchlines and face-palms that movies can sometimes bring. We take a no-holds-barred approach to the cringe-inducing dialogues from the "Madame Webb" trailer, sparing no criticism for what looks to be 2024's potential popcorn fodder. From admiration for unexpected comebacks like Brendan Fraser's gripping performance in "The Whale," to the whimsical hopes for a bolder "Mario Brothers" sequel, we cover the highs, the lows, and the laugh-out-loud moments that make going to the movies—or just talking about them—a blast. So, settle in for a ride through the best, the worst, and everything in-between from the world of film in 2023. Support the show

Has the superhero genre finally met its kryptonite? This episode pulls no punches as we take aim at the cinematic disappointments that marked 2023, with a particular side-eye at the superhero fatigue that "Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania" so clearly embodies. We throw down the gauntlet on Marvel's relentless release schedule, debating its toll on even the most die-hard fans. But it's not all doom and gloom; we shine a light on "Across the Spider-Verse" for its breath of fresh air in a stifling year for the industry.You thought "Barbie" was just child's play? Think again. We strip down the layers of misguided marketing that left us with more than we bargained for, peeling back the political veneer that the trailers carefully concealed. In an era where even the heavyweights like David Fincher stumble, we dissect the disconnect that left "The Killer" in the shadows of his past glory. And as for the legacy sequels like "Indiana Jones 5," we grapple with the question: Are they redefining classics or just riding on nostalgia's coattails?We wrap things up with a reflective glance at the year's challenges and a hopeful gaze towards the horizon. Despite the stumble of DC films and the waning allure of the big screen, we spot a flicker of hope in the surprising dynamism of "Godzilla Minus One." And as we bid adieu to the year with a mixture of humor and weariness, our anticipation for "Deadpool 3" proves that our love for cinema burns eternal. So join us as we raise a toast to the past and set our sights on the cinematic adventures awaiting us in the new year. Support the show

"Is 'The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes' more than just a fancy title? we dive headfirst – or maybe just toe-dip – into the Hunger Games prequel. Will it soar like a songbird or hiss away like a snake? Let's find out!We're going to investigate young Snow. Does he chill us to the bone, or is he more of a snowflake? We'll dig into Rachel Ziegler's performance too. Spoiler alert: There's singing involved – because what's a Ballad without a few tunes?Get ready for a rollercoaster of ‘why did they do that?' as we compare this prequel to the beloved original trilogy. It's like déjà vu, but with less... well, everything. From casting choices that had us scratch our heads to plot twists that left us spinning in circles – we're covering it all!Join us for laughs, rants, and maybe even a few revelations as we navigate the maze that is 'The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes.'  Support the show

"Get ready for a riveting cinematic journey on today's episode! We kick off with the intriguingly divisive film “The Killer.” Did its meticulous storytelling captivate or fall flat? We're divided, and you'll want to hear why.Next up, “John Wick” - a film that starts slow but explodes into action. You won't believe our comparison to a certain Avenger's tactic! Plus, we dive into the world of CGI, budgets, and how they shape movies like “The Killer.”Our final act? A sneak peek into “The Killer Does His Taxes.” Yes, you read that right. It's a unique blend of mundane and mayhem that ties into our wider discussion: what makes a film truly gripping?Join us for this episode as we explore these cinematic puzzles. Bring your popcorn and your opinions – we want to hear them all! Tune in now for an episode full of surprises." Support the show

Prepare for an enlightening foray into the cinematic universe of Gareth Edwards' 'The Creator.' We've dissected this low-budget gem to reveal the secret ingredients that helped it beat the odds and emerge as a sleeper hit. You'll also discover how it carefully straddles futuristic and post-apocalyptic themes, carving out a unique niche in a crowded genre. From drawing parallels with iconic movies like Blade Runner and Terminator, to appreciating the nuanced performances of child actress Madeline Yuma and John David Washington, we've got it all covered. In a world of stereotypical villains, 'The Creator' paints its human antagonists with shades of grey, offering justified reasoning for their prejudice against AI. Our discussion throws light on this unique portrayal and the power dynamics between humans and AI in the movie. We also dissect the pivotal events that act as a catalyst for the inevitable conflict, drawing comparisons with movies like Avatar. Despite the serious themes, the movie doesn't get preachy, focusing more on the action and the heart of its story. Gareth Edwards' background in VFX proved to be an ace up his sleeve in overcoming budget constraints and delivering a visually stunning masterpiece. We delve into how this expertise, coupled with creative techniques like practical lighting and minimal crew, tricked the audience into believing they were watching a big-budget spectacle. Wrapping up the episode, we explore the cultural impact of 'The Creator' and its contrast with its "twin movie". The final segment takes a step back from the movie itself and sparks a conversation about the broader theme of film and ambition. So buckle up for a roller coaster ride through the making and impact of 'The Creator. Support the show

Prepare for an intense journey as we tackle the controversial film, The Sound of Freedom. This stirring cinematic piece, starring Jim Cavieziel, bravely dives into the chilling underworld of child trafficking. We unpack its harrowing narrative and applaud the remarkable performances that breathe life into these grim realities. But how does a film address such shocking truths without losing respect for the victims? Tune in to find out.Through the lens of Jim Caviziel's character, Tim Ballard, we navigate the terrifyingly real world of child exploitation, and the emotional journey he embarks on for redemption. Despite its modestly low budget, Sound of Freedom pulls no punches in its technical and narrative execution. With impressive tension-building, it sucks you into the stark reality of its dark themes.Lastly, we examine the ripple effect of this movie on its viewers and the controversy it has sparked since its release. The Sound of Freedom, despite its limited marketing support and lower budget, has struck a nerve, inspiring many with its powerful message and outstanding performances. We share our candid insights and reflections on this provocative film. Be prepared for a discussion that's as compelling as the film itself. Support the show

Buckle up for an exhilarating rush of adrenaline as we steer you through the cinematic universe of Gran Turismo! This is one riveting ride you won't want to miss, as we discuss the thrilling world of high-speed racing.we're going full throttle into an extensive analysis of the film's subplots and cinematography. From the character development of the antagonist to the romance subplot and the lack of female representation, we're laying it all out on the track. The film's innovative use of GoPro and FPV drone shots has added an intriguing dimension to its cinematography;Last but not least, we're going to pull back into the pit stop and share our thoughts on Gran Turismo's overall enjoyability. How does the sound design amplify the racing scenes? How do the visuals contribute to the movie's scope?  So, gear up and join us as we navigate through the fast lanes of Gran Turismo Support the show

What if we told you that a seemingly innocent children's movie could harbor harmful, sexist undertones? That's exactly what we tackle today as we analyze the controversial movie Barbie. We tear apart the movie's 'girls rule, boys suck' narrative, unearthing how this message might negatively impact its youthful demographic. From its lack of substantial story to the awkward dialogue, we expose the damaging messages the movie sends, regardless of the story's last 15-minute attempts to salvage it.Moving on, we put the character portrayals under the microscope, focusing on how Ken's character contrasts sharply with Barbie's superficial journey. We ask tough questions about the film's objectification of men, especially the shocking portrayal of Ryan Gosling's Ken. The film's PG rating adds another layer to this discussion, raising questions about its target audience and the detrimental messages it could be passing on to impressionable minds.Finally, we don't shy away from the bigger picture, linking our critique of the Barbie movie to the societal necessity of critical thinking and acceptance. The film seems to suggest that any criticism is equivalent to being anti-feminist, a notion we contest. We also champion the importance of recognizing diverse opinions and values as integral to societal development and empowerment for both men and women. So, buckle up as we embark on this eye-opening journey, scrutinizing what lies beneath the surface of seemingly harmless entertainment. Support the show

Why do so many video game adaptations fall short of the mark? Today, we're joined by Denise Chan and Martin Yeung as we tackle this pressing question and dissect the complex world of video game movies. From the debacle of Alone in the Dark to the more recent success of The Last of Us show, we dive into the key factors that contribute to the success or failure of these adaptations.Together, we explore the significant differences between the storytelling of a movie and a video game, as well as the role of studio executives who may not be in tune with the games they're adapting. We also discuss the importance of staying true to the source material, as seen in iconic adaptations like Mortal Kombat. By examining our favorite video game adaptations, such as the animated series Arcane and the classic Wreck-It Ralph, we draw conclusions on the elements that make for a good adaptation, and how these stories can stand on their own while still honoring the games that inspired them.Don't miss out on this fascinating conversation about the intricate process of adapting video games to other mediums. Join us as we uncover the secrets behind successful adaptations and discuss the challenges creators face in bringing beloved video game characters and stories to life. Share your favorite adaptations and let us know why they worked (or didn't) in your opinion! Support the show

 Today, we're diving headfirst into the world of Super Mario with the highly-anticipated movie adaptation. Is it a must-see for all video game enthusiasts, or should you give it a miss? As lifelong fans of the game franchise, we were excited to see this on the big screen. And we have to say, it did not disappoint! In our conversation, we discuss how the movie stays true to certain aspects of the game, while also introducing new elements that keep things fresh and exciting. We also examine the movie's production quality, including its special effects, cinematography, and music, and the simple foundational narrative. From the visually stunning moments to what voice acting worked and what did not, we'll give you our take on what makes this movie stand out. We also weigh in on the performances of the actors, the nostalgia of it all, whether non-gamers will enjoy the movie, the feel-good moments of the film, and more! Join us as we delve into one of the best video game adaptations ever made, The Super Mario Bros. Movie!   Support the show

Spoiler alert! The Scream franchise has just released its sixth film and we are so excited to share our thoughts, theories, and criticism about the newest movie. Joining us for this episode is Luke Agius, an incredible photographer and film director with 15 years of experience. Tuning in, you'll hear all about what we thought of the film, why we think the killers should be sent to prison instead of dying, Easter eggs from the other movies, the interesting number of killers in Scream 6, and so much more! Next, we delve into our favorite and least favorite parts of the film before discussing plot holes, the absence of fan-favourites and what plot twists didn't work. Sometimes, in slasher franchises that span over years like the Scream movies do, original characters need to be killed off to move the plot forward , we discuss our opinions about how the franchise handles murders as well as our theories for future sequels. Can Luke win a game of SCream Trivia for a secret prize? To hear all this and get some insight into why you should watch Scream 6, tune in now!  Support the show

 Today we are looking into the Scream franchise with the release of Scream VI. Though it hasn't been long since the reboot of the Scream movies with the fifth movie in the franchise ‘Scream', Ghost Face is back with Scream VI.  In this no-spoiler review, we discuss how the franchise has produced consistently good films, and how rare this is compared to other long-running movie franchises. We discuss what the film did well, such as subverting expectations, nods to previous Scream films, and suspense-filled horror sequences. why is Sidney  absent in this sequel, why this film lacks its own unique identity. Tune in to find out more about what we might expect from Scream VII before finding out where Scream VI ranks in the Scream franchise, what rating it gets, and whether or not it is a movie worth seeing.  Support the show

Hollywood is continuing with its mission of live-action remakes, and adding another to the list of nostalgic reboots is Pinocchio, a classic childhood favourite by Disney about a marionette's journey to becoming a real boy. Despite being supported by a star-studded cast, the movie has not been received well, with many saying it is the worst movie of all time, but is it that bad? In this episode, we put the debate to rest and explain why the critics are right about Pinocchio as we unpack the movie from beginning to end, from the boring dialogue and childish jokes to the underwhelming cinematography. We discuss why the live-action version does not work, why it feels like no effort was put into making the movie, and why Michael had to use subtitles to understand Tom Hank's voice acting. We unpack the characters' cringy Italian accents, the terrible CGI moments of the movie, how it relied on the nostalgia of other franchises, why the remake does not live up to expectations, whether the animation quality saves it, and more. Tune in to find out why this movie is a perfect cure for insomnia with Martin and Michael!  Support the show

 Another year of movies is done, but what can we expect from 2023? This year looks like it is going to be an amazing year for movies, but with so many, what stands out from the rest? To help us unpack the ultimate upcoming movies of 2023 is film director  Matt Vella .Matt is the perfect guest to help us with this list. In our conversation, we discuss and dissect the big, exciting, and most anticipated movie projects of 2023. We talk about a possible  Mummy reboot, expected trends in movie franchises, what we want less of in 2023, our anxiety around Super Mario, why the Fast and the Furious is a dying movie franchise, and the movies that you should avoid. Hear about upcoming immersive sci-fi movies, exciting animated franchises, horror movies that will make you jump out of your seat, insider information, and our ultimate wishlist for 2023. Tune in to find out about this year's potential blockbuster hits with Denise, Martin, Michael, and Matt Vella!  Support the show

 In line to become the top-selling movie released in 2022, after it led the box office for a third weekend in a row, James Cameron's latest offering has made more than $1.3 billion worldwide since its release on 16 December. Set more than a decade after the events of the first film, Avatar: The Way of Water continues the story of the Sully family and chronicles the lengths they will go to keep each other safe, and the battles they fight to stay alive.But is it worth the 3h 12m runtime? Join Michael Pisciuneri and special guests Luke Agius and Martin Yeung as we dissect this long-awaited sequel, which treads a fine line between spectacle, storytelling, and tried-and-true tropes. While The Way of Water repurposes themes and ideas from the first Avatar film, it also continues James Cameron's overt commentary on our own society (and it certainly doesn't hurt that it's breathtakingly beautiful to watch). Tune in to hear our insights and hot takes when it comes to the epic visual effects in Avatar: The Way of Water!  Support the show

 We are living in the decade of superhero films, with this comes many tropes that refuse to die.  It is fair to say viewers are suffering from superhero fatigue.But The Rock promises to restore DC superhero movies back to glory . Did he do it? Can we smell what the rock is cooking? In this episode, we review Black Adam and debate whether it was different and if it is worth your time; spoiler alerts The film has received mixed reviews from movie critics and fans alike, and today we lay the debate to rest. We discuss the many missed opportunities, what it got right and what it got wrong, and which one of us considered walking out of the cinema. We talk about the characters, why they are dull and uninteresting, and how the movie could have benefited from a plot twist. There was some amazing CGI and action scenes, plus the incredible performances of Pierce Brosnan and Aldis Hodge. Tune in, and join us for another unforgiving and brutally honest review with Denise, Martin, and Michael!  Support the show

Support the show

 Filmmaker Matt Vella joins us on the show today to talk about his new short film, She's Not Your Type, and then to do an in-depth review of the new Jamie Foxx and Dave Franco film, Day Shift, that was just released on Netflix. To kick things off, Matt shares a little about his work, and what motivated him to make a short rom-com at this stage in his career. He talks about how performing standup influenced his process, and why he is sticking to projects that he believes in and are close to his heart. We also spend a little time recounting the wild and hilarious quotables from Matt's film! From there, the conversation turns to Day ShiftWe go through the picture's many problems, from casting issues, a confused script, and undercooked ideas and execution. With such a promising cast, it seems a shame that the final product is such a letdown. We find some time at the end of the episode to see how it measures up to other bad movies we have seen this year. So to hear the full breakdown, and a lot more in between, be sure to listen in with us in this fun conversation!  Support the show

 Today we are joined by Anthony and Denise to discuss the latest horror sensation, Nope. Nope was directed by Jordan Peele, and follows two siblings who discover something wonderful, sinister, and otherworldly. Critics hail Nope as an undeniable success, but the story is riddled with holes and pitfalls, and the unsatisfying ending summates the general feel of the film. It makes one wonder whether critics would think differently if it was directed by someone other than Jordan Peele; it seems he can do no wrong. We talk about the characters and their confusing intentions throughout the movie, how many concepts are great but not fully developed, how the subplot is disconnected from the main plot, and some ideas on how the movie could've been improved. You'll then get a list of other movies of a similar nature that we think are much better than Nope. Join us for another brutally honest movie review with Denise, Anthony, and Michael Pisciuneri!  Support the show

 Today we are doing a review on the film Nope. Nope was directed by Jordan Peele and follows two siblings who discover something wonderful, sinister, and otherworldly. We discuss why Jordan Peele can ‘do no wrong,'. We give you a brief summary of the film (with a few spoilers!) and discuss the issues with the lead actor and an abandoned subplot, before looking into a few positives  We discuss what would improve the movie, and list similar movies that are better!   Support the show

 We all know who The Hulk is, but what about She Hulk? In this episode of Movies Worth Seeing, we review a new addition to the Hulk movie and series franchise. She Hulk is a modern take on an iconic character from Marvel Comics. Unfortunately, it might not be the entertaining watch you expected. In this episode, we cover all the reasons not to watch She Hulk and discuss the many pitfalls the series suffers. We break down the problems with the main character, Jennifer Walters, and why her character arc makes no sense. We also cover the many flaws with the male characters, and reasons why the screen version of She Hulk does not fit the original comic books. Various cringe-worthy scenes are discussed, as well as the many missed opportunities to create a worthy addition to the franchise. Find out why She Hulk is not worth your time with the unconventional and brutally honest review  Support the show

The trailers for Bullet Train built up anticipation for a thrilling action-packed cinematic experience. The question is, is this the next John Wick, or is this a train you do not want to board? Bullet Train is directed by David Leitch, and stars Brad Pitt. What could possibly go wrong? Well, in this episode, you're sure to find out. Comparing Bullet Train to John Wick, we look at the film's shortfalls, from its plot holes, outdated humor and bizarre dialogue, to its misleading genre and obvious use of CGI. Fortunately, it wasn't all bad! Tune in to hear our take on the film and about the redemptive performances (particularly that of Joey King) that almost made it a movie worth seeing. The Jordan Harbinger ShowApple Best of 2018-Learn the stories, secrets & skills of the world's most fascinating pplListen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Support the show

Support the show

This episode Netflix's attempt at a 200 million dollar extravaganza with 'The Gray Man' This spy action thriller has everyone talking, with Chris Evans and Ryan Gosling facing off in an epic battle to see who can pull off the most hilarious one-liners in an action movie.  Let's check whether Netflix has a new Jason Bourne franchise on its hands, or if this gray man can be left out in the cold . Should you see this movie in theaters or just stream it on Netflix from home? Support the show

 Today, we are joined by a special guest, Lisa Bonnici, to review Elvis. From Austin Butler's faithful performance, bringing the King back to life, to Tom Hank's eerily apt portrayal of the ‘villain', Colonel Tom Parker, the film boasts incredible acting and tasteful directorial choices. In this episode, we discuss the plot line, the effectiveness of Baz Luhrman's ‘show, don't tell' editing style, as well as the iconic director's ability to allow the emotional scenes to breathe.  Support the show

 Is Thor: Love and Thunder a typical, predictable Marvel film? Let's find out Although there is no doubt that Chris Hemsworth gave this his best shot, the lack of focus on the storyline and the abundance of focus on Chris' muscular body makes the seeming emptiness of the plot all too clear. It was not without its positives, but the longing for a scene without jokes makes you question the efficacy of their attempt at comedy. Tune in to hear more details about the film and why it's got everybody in a frenzy about the current state of Marvel's phase four The PsychexperienceDr. Nardi is a psychiatrist and psychologist. He obtained his psychology degree in the...Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Support the show

 Jurassic World is the tragic result of commercialization. Today, I'm joined by my friend Giuseppe to discuss the abomination that is the Jurassic World trilogy. Giuseppe and I studied together at film school, and I knew he'd jump at the opportunity to bag out Jurassic Park. Spielberg set the stage with such a strong start, and the great success of Jurassic Park lead to the utterly humiliating exploitation of the franchise. In this episode, we share our feelings about the shortfalls of Jurassic World, particularly the latest addition, Dominion. From the poor dialogue and scientific falsehoods to the absurd subplots, lack of through-vision, and ridiculous plot armor, this film has left us seething. We look at what makes Jurassic Park work, where it started to go wrong, and why the Jurassic World trilogy simply misses the mark. Tune in to hear our thoughts on the matter, and to find out how we feel Jurassic World might be redeemed in a follow-up sequel! The PsychexperienceDr. Nardi is a psychiatrist and psychologist. He obtained his psychology degree in the...Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Check out All Things WritingLove writers and writing? How about finding your new favorite author? Check us out today!Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Formidable OpponentsFunny and intense arguments about what is "the best" in the world of movies, music,...Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Support the show

 “You are the only you there ever was.” There are no shortage of cringe-worthy lines like these in Jurassic World Dominion, despite the fact that it is a blockbuster franchise with a $200 million budget.  Despite the abundance of awful dialogue, this movie is still doing well at the Box Office. Let's dive deep into what Jurassic World Dominion does right and what it does wrong and answer the question Should Jurassic Park sequels become extinct? The Angry DesignerA No-Bull Design Podcast that helps frustrated designers survive & thriveListen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Oh F*ck Yeah with Ruan WillowListen as author Ruan Willow reads her erotica stories & talks about sex with experts.Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Support the show

What happens when you suck the fun out of one of the funniest characters in Pixar's universe?Well, you get Lightyear! Tune in today to hear why, despite the success of the Toy Storyfranchise, Lightyear falls short. We hear about the themes and messages of the film, whythey're obvious from the opening scenes, and why they are ‘done to death' in comparison torecent films like Turning Red. Hear about Michael's main gripes with the film, what he wouldhave appreciated instead, and why, as a result, the emotional moments in the film totally fell flat for him. You'll get to know what he thinks of Chris Evans's performance, and why he thinks Tim Allen would have been a better fit. Find out about the best and worst characters in the film, and why, before Michael expands on why the film lacks the charm of the original Toy Story films. The Angry DesignerA No-Bull Design Podcast that helps frustrated designers survive & thriveListen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Support the show

This episode is the first of a new series of the Movies Worth Seeing Podcasts where I'm going to compare original movies to their sequels. This week's comparison is between the original and the sequel of Beavis and Butthead! For me, Beavis and Butthead Do the Universe (the sequel) doesn't even begin to compare to Beavis and Butthead Do America (the original), and that's not just for nostalgic reasons! However, from the reviews I've seen online, it seems my sentiments may be in the minority. During this episode, we'll explore 7 categories, from animation to celebrity appearances to the soundtrack, and we'll let the score tally at the end speak for itself! The Angry DesignerA No-Bull Design Podcast that helps frustrated designers survive & thriveListen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Oh F*ck Yeah with Ruan WillowListen as author Ruan Willow reads her erotica stories & talks about sex with experts.Listen on: Apple Podcasts Spotify Support the show