Podcast appearances and mentions of anne coulter

My fellow pro-growth/progress/abundance Up Wingers,With the rise of American populist nationalism has come the rise of nativism: a belief in the concept of “heritage Americans” and a deep distrust of immigration. Today on Faster, Please! — The Podcast, I talk with Alex Nowrasteh about the ideology beneath this severe skepticism, as well as what Americans lose economically if we shut our doors to both low- and high-skilled immigrants.Nowrasteh is the vice president for economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute. He is the author of his own Substack with David Bier, as well as the co-author of Wretched Refuse? The Political Economy of Immigration and Institutions.Read more of Nowrasteh's work on immigration, nationalism, and other research.In This Episode* Illegal immigration (1:16)* Rise of xenophobia (3:48)* Psychology of immigration skeptics (9:20)* The future American workforce (14:04)* Population decline and assimilation (17:35)Below is a lightly edited transcript of our conversation. Illegal immigration (1:16)The system that I would favor is one that allows a substantially larger number of people at every skill level to come into this country legally, to work, to live, and to become Americans . . . because this country demands their labor and there's no way for them to come legally.Pethokoukis: Will you, in a very short period of time, give me a sense of the situation at the southern border of the United States of America in terms of immigration, how that has evolved from Trump 1, to Biden, to now? Is it possible to give me a concise summary of that?Nowrasteh: From Obama through Trump 1, the border apprehension numbers were pretty reasonable, you were talking about somewhere between 400,000 and 800,000 per year. Then came Covid, crashed those numbers down to basically nothing by April of 2020.After that, the numbers progressively rose. They were at the highest point in December of 2020 than they had been for any other December going back over 25 years. Then Biden takes office, the numbers shoot through the roof. We're talking about 170,000 to 250,000, sometimes 300,000 a month until January or so of 2024; those numbers start coming down precipitously. December of 2024, they're at 40,000 or so, 45,000. January 2025, Trump comes in, they go down again. First full month of Trump's administration in February, they're about 8,000, the lowest numbers without a pandemic in a very long time.What's the right number?That's a hard question to answer? In an ideal world where costs and benefits didn't matter, I think the ideal number is zero. But the question is how do you get to that ideal number, right? Is it by having an insane amount of enforcement, of existing laws where you basically end up brutalizing people to an incredible extent? Or is it practically zero because we let people come in lawfully to work in this country. The system that I would favor is one that allows a substantially larger number of people at every skill level to come into this country legally, to work, to live, and to become Americans, and that would bring that number down to about what it is now or even lower than what it is now every month, because the reason people come illegally is because this country demands their labor and there's no way for them to come legally.Rise of xenophobia (3:48). . . I just don't think the economic argument is what moves people on this topic.As I've understood it, and maybe understand it wrong, is this issue has developed that — at first it seemed like the concern, and it still is the concern, was with illegal undocumented immigrants. And then it seems to me the argument became, “Well, we don't want those, and then we also really don't want low-skill immigrants either.” And now it seems, and maybe you have a different perspective, that it's, “Well, we don't really want those high-skill immigrants either.”You gave me the current state of illegal immigration at the southern border. What is the current state of the argument among people who want less, perhaps even no immigration in this country?State of the argument is actually what you described. When I started working on this topic about 15 years ago, I never thought I would've heard people come out against the H-1B visa, or against high-skilled immigrants, or against foreign entrepreneurs. But you saw this over Christmas actually, December of 2024. You saw this basically online “H-1 B-gate” where Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk were saying H-1Bs are great. I think Musk had tweeted, “over my dead body we're going to cut the H-1B,” right? And you see this groundswell of conservatives and Republicans — not all of them, by any means — come out and say, “We don't even want these guys. We don't want these skilled immigrants,” using a whole range of arguments. None of them economic, by the way. Almost none of them economics; all culture, all voting habits, all stereotypes, a lot of them pretty nasty in my opinion.So there is this sense where some people just don't want immigrants. The first time I think I encountered this in writing from a person who was prominent was Anne Coulter, Jeff Sessions when he was senator, and these types of people around 2015, in a big way, and it seems to have become much more prominent than I ever thought it would be.Is it that they don't understand the economic argument or they just don't care about that argument?They don't care about it. I have come to the realization — this makes me sad because I'm an economist by training — but I just don't think the economic argument is what moves people on this topic. I don't think it's what they care about. I don't think it animates . . . It animates me as a pro-immigration person, I think it animate you, right?It does, yeah, it sure does.It does not animate the people who are opposed to it. I think it is a cultural argument, it is a crime element, it is a threat element, it is a, “This makes us less American somehow” weird, fuzzy-feeling argument.Would it matter if the immigrants were all coming from Germany, France, and Norway?Maybe for a handful of them, but generally no, I don't think so. I think the idea that America is special, is different, is some kind of unique nation that ethnically, or in other ways cannot be pierced or contaminated by foreigners — I think it's just like an “Ew, foreigners,” type of sentiment that people have. A base xenophobia that a lot of people have combined with a very reasonable fear and dislike of chaos. When people see chaos on the border, they hate it.I hate chaos on the border. My answer is to get rid of the chaos by letting people come in legally, because you legalize a market, you can actually regulate it. You can't regulate an illegal market. But I think other people see chaos, they have this sort of purity conception of America that's just fanciful, in my opinion, and they just don't want foreigners, and the chaos prompts them, makes it even more powerful.To what extent is it fear that all these immigrants will eventually vote for things you don't want? Or in this case, they're all going to become Democrats, so Republicans don't want them.That's definitely part of it. I think that's more of an elite Republican fear, or an elite sort of nativist or conservative fear than it is amongst the people online who are yelling at me all the time or yelling at Elon Musk. I think that resonates a lot more in this city and in online conservative publications, I think that resonates much more. I don't think it's borne out by the facts, and people who say this will also loudly trumpet how Hispanics now basically split their vote in the 2024 election. David Shore, who is the progressive analyst of electoral politics, said he thinks that Trump actually won the naturalized immigrant vote, which is probably the first time a Republican has won the naturalized immigrant vote since the 19th century.The immediate question is, does that kind of thing, will that resonate into a changing opinion among folks on the right if they feel like they feel like they can win these voters?I don't think so because I think it's about deeper issues than that. I think it's a real feelings-, values-based issue.Psychology of immigration skeptics (9:20)When people feel like they don't have control of something in their country or their government doesn't have control of something, they become anti- whatever is the source of that chaos, even the legal versions of it.Has this been there for a long time? Was it exacerbated for some reason? Was it exacerbated by the financial crisis and the slow economy afterward? The only time I remember hearing about people using the idea of “heritage Americans” were elite people whose great great grandparents came over on the Mayflower and they thought they were better than everybody else, they were elites, they were these kind of Boston Brahmans. So I was aware of the concept from that, but I've never heard people — and I hear it now — about people who were not part of the original Mayflower wave, or Pilgrims, think of themselves as “heritage Americans” because their parents came over in the 1850s or the 1880s, but now their “heritage.” That idea to me seems new.I hadn't heard of it until just a few years ago, frankly, at all. I racked my brain about this because I used to have a lot of affinity for the Republican Party, just to be frank. And I'm from California, and I'm in my '40s, so I remember Prop 187 in 1994 when the state had a big campaign about illegal immigrants' enforcement and welfare, and it really changed the state's voting patterns to be much more democratic, eventually.Then I saw the Republican Party under George W. Bush, and John McCain, and all these other guys who were pro-Republican, but always in California the Republicans were very skeptical of immigration across the board, but I didn't really see that spread. Then I saw it go to Arizona in 2010, 2009, 2008, around there. I saw it go to South Carolina, Mississippi, some of these places, and then all of a sudden with Trump, it went everywhere.So I racked my brain thinking, did I miss something? Was there always something there and I was just too myopic to view it, or I wasn't in those circles, or I wanted to convince myself that it wasn't there? And I really think that it was always there to some small extent, but Trump is the most brilliant political entrepreneur of our lifetime and probably of our country's history, and that he took over this party from the outside and he convinced people to be nativists. Because what he was saying, the words — not that different from Scott Walker saying about immigration. It was not that different from what Mike Huckabee was saying about immigration. It wasn't that different from Santorum. But he said it or sold it in a way that just worked, I guess. That maybe absolves me of some responsibility or maybe allows me to say that I didn't miss anything, but I do think that that largely explains it.And how does it explain that, and you may not have an answer. I can sort of understand the visceral concern about chaos at the border or people coming here illegally. But then to take it to the point that we don't even want AI engineers to come to this country from India, or, “I'm really angry that someone from a foreign country is taking my kid's spot at Harvard.” That, to me, seems almost inexplicable.It's not the fact of the chaos, but it's the perception of the chaos, because when Trump came in in 2015, the border crossing numbers were really low. They were in the 300,000s, low 400,000s, but he talked about it like it was millions, and he created this perception of just insane, outrageous chaos.There's a research and political psychology field about the locus of control. When people feel like they don't have control of something in their country or their government doesn't have control of something, they become anti- whatever is the source of that chaos, even the legal versions of it. In some way, it's an understandable human reaction, but in some ways it is so destructive. But, like you said, it spreads to AI engineers from China because it's like all immigration, and it's so bad, and it's so destructive, and that is the best explanation that I've seen out there about that.The future American workforce (14:04)What we notice in the economics of immigration, when we do these types of studies and we take a look at the wage impacts, we've got basically no wage effect on those of native-born Americans.I write a lot about, hopefully, this technological wave that we're going to be experiencing, and then I also write a little about immigration. The question I get is, if we're going to be worried about the jobs of the future being taken over by software or by robots, if we really think that's going to happen, shouldn't we really be thinking very hard about the kinds of people we let enter into this country, even legally, and their ability to function in that kind of economy?I think we need to think about what is the best mechanism to select people to come here that the economy needs. What you described . . . assumes an amount of knowledge, and foresight, and, frankly, the incentive to make a wise decision in the hands of bureaucrats and politicians that they just do not have and that they will never have. and what matters most and who can pick the best in the market,You can say STEM degrees only. I only want people who have STEM degrees from colleges that, on some global ranking, are in the top 500 universities. You could say that. That would be one way of selecting.They could try to centrally plan it like that. . .You're saying “centrally planned” because you know that's going to get a reaction out of me, but go ahead.I do. The thing is, there's all different types of ways to have an immigration system and there's going to be a little bit of planning any immigration system. But I think the one that will work best is the one that allows the market to have the widest possible choice. We don't know how automation is going to turn out.There's this thing called Moravec's paradox in a lot of AI writing, which is the idea that you'll probably be able to automate a lot of high-skill jobs more easily than you will be able to automate, say, somebody who's a maid, or a nanny, or a nurse, or a plumber, just because the real world is harder than . . . You and I type, and talk, and do math. That's probably easier to do. So maybe the optimal thing to do would be to increase immigration for low-skilled people because all the jobs in the future are going to be low-skilled anyway, because we're going to be able to automate all the high-skilled jobs.Though you could say then that that would take away the jobs from the natives.You could say that, of course. What we notice in the economics of immigration, when we do these types of studies and we take a look at the wage impacts, we've got basically no wage effect on those of native-born Americans. If we were to have a situation where let's say massive amounts of jobs disappear in entire sectors of the economy, vanished, automated . . . well, that just means that we're going to have more opportunities and specialization, division of labor, where there's going to be a lot more lower-skilled and mid-skill jobs, just because there's such a much larger and more productive side of the economy.There's going to be so much more profits in these other ones that we're going to have a bigger economy in the same way that when agriculture basically shrank as a massive section of the workforce, those people got other jobs that were more productive, and it was great. I think we could maybe see that again, and I hope we do. I don't want to have to work anymore.Population decline and assimilation (17:35). . . if the whole world is going to have population decline in 20, 30, 50 years, we're going to have to deal with that at some point, but I'd rather deal with that problem with a population of 600 million Americans than a population of 350 million Americans.The scenario — and this was highlighted to me by one of our scholars who looks a lot about demographics and population growth — his theory is that all the population-decline estimates, shrinkage, and slowing down estimates from the United Nations are way too optimistic, that population would begin to level off much faster. Whatever the UN's low or worst-case scenario is, if you want to put a qualifier on it like that, it's probably like that. And a lot of policymakers are underestimating the decline in fertility rates, and eventually everyone's going to figure that out. And there'll be a mad global scandal for population — for people.There's going to be tons of labor shortages and you're going to want people, and there's going to be this scramble, and not every country is going to be as good at it. If people want to immigrate, they're probably more likely, everything else equal, they're going to want to go to the United States as opposed to — not to smear another country — I don't know, Argentina or something. We have this great ability to accept people to come here and for them to succeed and build companies. Maybe that company is a bodega, maybe that company is a technology company. So we're at this moment where we have this great natural advantage, but it seems like we're utterly rejecting it.We are not just rejecting it, we are turning it from a positive into a big negative. You have these students who are being apprehended and having their visas canceled because of a fishing license violation six years ago. People who are skilled science students studying the United States who could go on to be founders of big companies or just high-skilled workers, and we're saying, “Nope, can't do it, sorry.” We're kicking people out for reasons of speech — speech that I often don't like, by the way, but it doesn't matter, because I believe it on principle. It's important.We already see it showing up in tourism numbers plummeting to the United States, and I think we're going to see it in student visa numbers shortly. And student visas are the first step on that long chain of being able to be a high-skilled immigrant one day. So we are really doing long-term damage.On the population stuff, I completely agree, and if the whole world is going to have population decline in 20, 30, 50 years, we're going to have to deal with that at some point, but I'd rather deal with that problem with a population of 600 million Americans than a population of 350 million Americans.What is your general take on the notion of assimilation? Is that a problem? Should we doing more to make sure people are successful here? How do you think about that?I do think assimilation is important. I don't think it's a problem. When I talk about assimilation, I use it in the way that Jacob Vigdor — Jake is a professor, University of Washington economist, and he says, assimilation is when an immigrant or their kids are indistinguishable from long-settled Americans on the measurements of family size, civic participation, income, education, language. Basically it takes three generations. That is, the first generation are the immigrants, second are their kids, third are their grandkids, on average.Some, much faster. Like my Indian neighbors are more than assimilated in the first generation. They do better than native born Americans on most of those measures. Some lower-skilled Hispanic or some East African immigrants, takes three, three and a half, four sometimes, to do that well, but it's going very well.We do not have the cultural issues that some countries in Europe have. To some extent, it's overblown in Europe, those problems, but they do exist and they exist to a greater extent than they do here. Part of that is because we have birthright citizenship. People who are born in this country are citizens, they don't feel like they're an illegal underclass because they're not. They feel totally accepted because they are legally, and we have an ethos in this country, because we don't have an ethnic identification of being American like they do in places like Germany or in Norway. I have family members in Norway who are half Iranian and they're not really considered to be Norwegian, culturally. Here it's the opposite. If I were to go say I'm not an American, people would be offended. There, if you say, “Oh, I'm Norwegian,” they'll correct you and be like, “No, you're not Norwegian, you're something else.”We have this great secret sauce born of our culture, born of our lack of an ethnic Americanness. It doesn't matter what ethnicity or race you are, or religion, anybody can be American. And we have done it so well and we just don't have these issues, and I don't think, as a result, we should do more because I'm worried about the government breaking it.Based on what you just said, at a gut level, how do you feel when someone uses the phrase “heritage Americans,” and they hate the idea of America as an idea, and to be an American you need to have been here for a long time. That whole way of looking at it — do you get it, or do you at some level [think], I am not a psychologist, I do not understand it?A way to make sense of it [is] by swapping out the word “American” in their sentence and we place it with the word “Frenchman,” or “German,” or “Russian,” or “Japanese,” or some other country that's a nation state where the identity is bound up with ethnicity. That's the way that I make sense of it, and I think this is a concept that just does not work in the United States; it cannot work. Maybe it's the most nationalistic I am, but I think that that's just a fundamentally foreign idea that could never work in the United States. It sounds more at home in Europe and other places. That's what strikes meAs I finish up, I know you have all kinds of ideas to improve the American immigration system, which we will try to link to, but instead of me asking you to give me your five-point plan for perfection, I'm going to ask you: How does this turn around? What is the scenario in which we become more accepting again of immigrants, perhaps the way we were 30 years ago?That really is a $64,000 question. The idea that I have floated — which probably won't work, but at least gets people to pause — is the entitlement programs are going insolvent, and I have pitched to my grandmother-in-law, who is a very nice woman, who is a Republican who is skeptical of immigration, but who is worried about Social Security going bankrupt, I say, “Well, there is one way to increase the solvency of this program for 30 or 40 years.” And she said, “What's that?” and I say, “Let in 100 million immigrants between the age of the 20 and 30.” And it gives her pause. I think if that idea can give her pause, then maybe it has a shot. When this country seriously starts to grapple with the insolvency of entitlement programs, that's looming.On sale everywhere The Conservative Futurist: How To Create the Sci-Fi World We Were PromisedMicro ReadsPlease check out the website or Substack app for the latest Up Wing economic, business, and tech news contained in this new edition of the newsletter. Lots of great stuff!Faster, Please! is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit fasterplease.substack.com/subscribe

Perhaps no job in Corporate America could ever fully prepare you for a job with the federal government. Or more particularly, the United States Senate, or the Pentagon, or the white house. Someone who worked in all three of those venues in the early 2000s will tell you, it's not just a different world, it's a different Universe. Matt Latimer started his Washington career working in the US Senate – at one point working alongside Anne Coulter – before taking a job at the Pentagon as a speechwriter for then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Latimer joined the White House in 2007 as a speechwriter for President George W. Bush, a position he held until resigning a year and a half later. disillusioned with how the president and his advisors handled the financial crisis.A year later, Latimer wrote a memoir he called Speech-less. He and I met one day that fall in the cafe at our local Borders bookstore to talk about it.So here now, from 2009, Matt Latimer.Matt Latimer now heads a literary and public relations firm he co-founded in Northern Virginia.

Whip out your tie-dye t-shit and skull-patterned socks, because it's time to talk about the Grateful Dead. Or, rather, their die-hard, multigenerational, technologically proficient fanbase, the Deadheads. Born from the jug bands and acid test shows of 1960s San Francisco, the Grateful Dead took the world by storm with their experimental, long-form jam sessions that, for over five decades, drew legions of young hippies from across the country to experience (with the help of some very strong psychedelics) the pure sonic bliss of a Dead show. But, like laced PCP, nothing can be pure forever. And when your fanbase now comprises of the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Andy Cohen, and Anne Coulter, and your band is now helmed by indie demon John Mayer, you've gotta wonder… what went wrong? In this episode, Hannah and Maia are joined by Hannah's father and former Deadhead, Patrick Raine, to discuss the legacy of the Deadheads, their spirited (or spiritual) online presence, and the dangers of a band outsized by its fanbase. Tangents include: Hannah's terrible texting abilities, a lively discussion about downtown Toronto's “The Well”, and Hannah's dad's love for the hit Bravo reality show, Below Deck.  Get a whole month of great cinema FREE: mubi.com/rehash Support us on Patreon and get juicy bonus content: ⁠https://www.patreon.com/rehashpodcast⁠ Intro and outro song by our talented friend Ian Mills: ⁠https://linktr.ee/ianmillsmusic

Whoopi Goldberg pushes lies on 'The View'; primary Tuesday in Maryland; latest from Trump's NYC trial; Bill Maher and Bill Burr clash over college protests; Vivek Ramaswamy debates Anne Coulter over nationalism; Should DEI programs in education and the work place be removed? #news #theview #whoopigoldberg #vivekramaswamy Watch​⁠ @pop-and-politics every Wednesday at 8pm ET for LIVE shows as the ladies discuss the latest in hot topics, news, and entertainment from a conservative perspective. SUBSCRIBE for more and hit the notification bell so you get it first!

TOPIC: (4/19/24), FRI, Sean/Hake chill with JLP, JLP REACTS NOAH CA: "question about being an athlete", HAKE NEWS Caller: "questions re: silent prayer", RYAN TX: "questions about the silent prayer", DENNY BULGARIA: "homeschooling realities", SUPERCHATS, DRAKE UT: "steps to improve the world?", HAKE NEWS Professors out of control, Protesters out of control Cornell Professor removed from Anne Coulter's Speech, Professor in Albany disrupts pro-life display on campus, Google terminates employees over protests, Columbia protests, anti-Israeli protester arrested for threats, JAMES NY: "I used to give thoughts power?", JOSEPH FL: "comments on anger", BEN VA: "still have fear after forgiving", ROBERT NM: "separated from spouse, advice?", SUPERCHATS

Toby Keith passes away from stomach cancer at 62,Anne Coulter has gone full blown anti-Trump, breakdown of the "border" bill, in hi speech today Biden issued a veiled threat to Trump and MAGA Republicans and The Wheel of Segments.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Toby Keith passes away from stomach cancer at 62,Anne Coulter has gone full blown anti-Trump, breakdown of the "border" bill, in hi speech today Biden issued a veiled threat to Trump and MAGA Republicans and The Wheel of Segments.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Toby Keith passes away from stomach cancer at 62,Anne Coulter has gone full blown anti-Trump, breakdown of the "border" bill, in hi speech today Biden issued a veiled threat to Trump and MAGA Republicans and The Wheel of Segments.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Denise chats with her friend from Australia, Anne Coulter, about her remarkable vitality, energy, and zest for life! Denise and Anne met at a memoir writers retreat and hit it off immediately. Anne says she is a mature spontaneous spirit on a life pilgrimage for the joy of the journey. EPISODE LINKS: Alison Waring, Memoir Writing, Ink. Disrupt Aging by Jo Ann Jenkins   Women Beyond a Certain Age is an award-winning weekly podcast with Denise Vivaldo. She brings her own lively, humorous, and experienced viewpoint to the topics she discusses with her guests. The podcast covers wide-ranging subjects of importance to older women.   SHOW LINKS: Website Join our Facebook group Follow our Facebook page Instagram Episode archive Email us: WomenBeyond@icloud.com Denise Vivaldo is the host of WBACA. Her info lives here More of Denise's info is here Cindie Flannigan is the producer WBACA. Her info is here Denise and Cindie's books

Comic, actor, writer and #Rams fan Taran Killam joins Mase & Sue on the #CulturePopPodcast to talk about his new show NFL PILE ON on Amazon Prime Video. Also, his SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE audition process, his wife Cobie Smulders' performance as Anne Coulter in Ryan Murphy's IMPEACHMENT and playing King George III in HAMILTON on Broadway. 

The night of long knives is lining up for Trump. Loyalists are jumping ship. Is it real or a byproduct of the never ending coup.

* US hospital paid by drug company to prescribe puberty blockers shown to cause brain swelling and blindness. UK clinic gave them to children after just a single consolation* Pedophilia is "OK if its Gay". Salon praises Ru Paul for removing the "gay porn stigma" from drag queens* Fauci's compensation VIOLATES US law which caps compensation for bureaucrats (even the heads of agencies) at the salary level of the Vice President. Who pushed Fauci's pay beyond the legal ceiling and why?* Taxpayers pay $55,000 in charm school tutoring to train CDC's Walensky to be a better liar* Anne Coulter takes on oily sycophant Piers Morgan over Ukraine* On the birthday of "George Jetson", NY Post asked what predictions were right. I ask, what went wrong with society, beginning with the NY Post* Tylenol use in babies and young children is linked to autism after 40 yrs* Gridlock: energy and food are being locked down by governments globally and conservative commentators and politicians offer absurd coincidence theories to explain away the conspiracy* Hole in One! Trump buries Ivanka at his golf course and gets property tax exemption* Harvard study says only 8% of capitol rioters wanted insurrection, that most were driven by loyalty to TrumpFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver

* US hospital paid by drug company to prescribe puberty blockers shown to cause brain swelling and blindness. UK clinic gave them to children after just a single consultation* Pedophilia is "OK if its Gay". Salon praises Ru Paul for removing the "gay porn stigma" from drag queens* Fauci's compensation VIOLATES US law which caps compensation for bureaucrats (even the heads of agencies) at the salary level of the Vice President. Who pushed Fauci's pay beyond the legal ceiling and why?* Taxpayers pay $55,000 in charm school tutoring to train CDC's Walensky to be a better liar* Anne Coulter takes on oily sycophant Piers Morgan over Ukraine* On the birthday of "George Jetson", NY Post asked what predictions were right. I ask, what went wrong with society, beginning with the NY Post* Tylenol use in babies and young children is linked to autism after 40 yrs* Gridlock: energy and food are being locked down by governments globally and conservative commentators and politicians offer absurd coincidence theories to explain away the conspiracy* Hole in One! Trump buries Ivanka at his golf course and gets property tax exemption* Harvard study says only 8% of capitol rioters wanted insurrection, that most were driven by loyalty to TrumpFind out more about the show and where you can watch it at TheDavidKnightShow.comIf you would like to support the show and our family please consider subscribing monthly here: SubscribeStar https://www.subscribestar.com/the-david-knight-show Or you can send a donation throughZelle: @DavidKnightShow@protonmail.comCash App at:  $davidknightshowBTC to:  bc1qkuec29hkuye4xse9unh7nptvu3y9qmv24vanh7Mail: David Knight POB 994 Kodak, TN 37764Money is only what YOU hold: Go to DavidKnight.gold for great deals on physical gold/silver

This episode is also available as a blog post: https://theworldaccordingtocosmos.com/voodoo-this-ann-coulter/

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

Anne Coulter uses the word Fag at CPAC. Godfather. How many sexual partners have you had poll.

-Red Table Talk w Will and Jada -Racist writer for tucker quit -short movie skin and racist shit -Fox News Tucker Carlson -Road dog Aj Styles -Kanye rant -Ron Simmons storyline arc -Anne Coulter establishment face turn -covid deaths spectacles -Trump wants to open schools and student being sent to juvie for not doing homework -Mike Perry bar fight -NBA bubble -torey lanez megan the stallion -Viola Davis -John Lewis Michael Brookes died -Remembering Myspace -Twitter hacks and why I cant get offline -Toronto police Oakville Nazi monument Hamilton gangster -Goya product placement on social media -Tom Chatterton being a new punching bag -Judge family killed tied to epstein -Israel riots bulldozes covid centre -Mary Trump -Tamar Braxton

Are Movie theaters all over. Anne Coulter interview

More on the new guidelines in CA. Anne Coulter takes to Twitter to show her disapproval of McConnell. Mon 7/13: Hour 3 Photo by Morning Brew (https://unsplash.com/@morningbrew?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText) on Unsplash (https://unsplash.com/s/photos/twitter?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText)

An autopsy will be performed on a Vacaville woman that may be linked to vaping, conservative pundit Anne Coulter scheduled to speak at UC Berkeley and a movie ad in several major publications is raising some eyebrows. Local stories. From the KCBS Radio Newsroom, this is "The All Local" for the morning of Thursday, November 14, 2019.

Mitchell Sunderland is a freelance writer (Vice, Adult, Penthouse) known for his nuanced profiles on everyone from Stormy Daniels to Mike Tyson, Anne Coulter, Nick Jonas and more. His stories are insane, from growing up the son of one of the largest dog breeders in Florida and dealing with protestors for most of his childhood, to being banned from a gay safe space in college (he’s gay), to being the first American named to the 50 most hated people at Oxford list. He has profiled eclectic groups of people living at the Sausage Castle in Florida and the Bunny Ranch in Vegas. He and Bridget discuss why marketing something as only “representation matters” in the media can turn people off, why a lot of dog breeders don’t like Trump, how you can’t control what people think about you, and how you choose whether or not you’re a victim. It’s a wild ride. **Warning** This episode is not for the easily offended and more explicit than usual

Mitchell Sunderland is a freelance writer (Vice, Adult, Penthouse) known for his nuanced profiles on everyone from Stormy Daniels to Mike Tyson, Anne Coulter, Nick Jonas and more. His stories are insane, from growing up the son of one of the largest dog breeders in Florida and dealing with protestors for most of his childhood, […]Sponsored by FabFitFun Join the conversation and comment on this podcast episode: https://ricochet.com/podcast/walk-ins-welcome-bridget-phetasy/mitchell-sunderland-believes-in-socializing-with-people-you-disagree-with/.Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing: https://ricochet.com/membership/.Subscribe to Walk-Ins Welcome w/ Bridget Phetasy in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

On today's episode comedian and writer for the Jim Jeffries Show on Comedy Central, Subhah Agarwal, joins Jeff to discuss cultural mispronunciations, arranged marriages, why her mother deserves some loving, the terrifying chubby turtle assault and Anne Coulter's demonic downstairs area. SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC487HjN3m6dpCb1YAa6VpWQ?view_as=subscriber?sub_confirmation=1 SUPPORT: https://www.patreon.com/savagesnowflake SAVAGE MERCH: https://www.bit.ly/2FdmgUU LINKS FOR ALL PLATFORMS: https://www.linktr.ee/jeffleach JEFF'S TWITTER: https://www.twitter.com/jeffleach JEFF'S INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/jeffleach Check our Savage sponsors and get mad savings on their Leach 'tried-and-tested' products: Our buddies over at Manscaped.com want to keep your family jewels looking fresh to death with their precision tools. SkinSafe Technology will get that ballsack smoother than Jeff Goldblum playing jazz piano in a silk nightie. Use code: SAVAGE for 20% off their amazing products. Our friends at bndlstech.com want YOU to be able to vape flower, oils and concentrate using the most innovative technology in existence, ensuring ALL the flavours, no burnt tastes and a multitude of different heats to suit your palate. Give follow them on @bndlstech across social media! Use code: SAVAGE for 10% discount on all their vape tech.

Max starts his week yet again while trying to recover from a busy Monday by having a very nice cup of tea to help calm his nerves after Trumps love fest with Ted Cruz. Max then gets into the fact that many Americans are so jaded by the politicians of both parties that they cannot even be bothered to vote. It gets worse though, they feel if they do vote, no one in DC will listen to them so what's the point as will not make any difference in their lives. Max quotes some voters from Middle America to make his point, which Max finds all very depressing as they all feel let down by the pols in DC. Then Max gets to the list of issues that they do care about, healthcare, jobs, education, infrastructure which is clear that the politicians in DC are not doing anything about. Which brings Max to the point that the woman in America are not only poorly served by politicians, they are also poorly served by the pundits, as Max points out, there is no way Laura Ingram, Anne Coulter, Rachel Maddow and others are doing a good job for women in America. Max jumps to the Trump & Ted show, where Donald Trump showed up a rally in Houston to support his new BFF Ted Cruz and how Trump will pass a fantastic Middle Class tax cut, which really would be a miracle given that Congress is not in session. Max is running out of time, but he still finds time to ask Pat Robertson about the 11th Commandment. Who knew that even existed? Eventually Max gets to his quote of the day, when listening to any politicians ask this question, why is this lying bastard lying to me?

Max starts his week yet again while trying to recover from a busy Monday by having a very nice cup of tea to help calm his nerves after Trumps love fest with Ted Cruz. Max then gets into the fact that many Americans are so jaded by the politicians of both parties that they cannot even be bothered to vote. It gets worse though, they feel if they do vote, no one in DC will listen to them so what’s the point as will not make any difference in their lives. Max quotes some voters from Middle America to make his point, which Max finds all very depressing as they all feel let down by the pols in DC. Then Max gets to the list of issues that they do care about, healthcare, jobs, education, infrastructure which is clear that the politicians in DC are not doing anything about. Which brings Max to the point that the woman in America are not only poorly served by politicians, they are also poorly served by the pundits, as Max points out, there is no way Laura Ingram, Anne Coulter, Rachel Maddow and others are doing a good job for women in America. Max jumps to the Trump & Ted show, where Donald Trump showed up a rally in Houston to support his new BFF Ted Cruz and how Trump will pass a fantastic Middle Class tax cut, which really would be a miracle given that Congress is not in session. Max is running out of time, but he still finds time to ask Pat Robertson about the 11th Commandment. Who knew that even existed? Eventually Max gets to his quote of the day, when listening to any politicians ask this question, why is this lying bastard lying to me?

References and allusions include, but are not limited to:  Valentine's Day, The Ronald McDonald House, McDonald's, Ronald McDonald, "Summer of Roses" by Willie Nelson, David Lynch, Egg McMuffin, Zune, Beijing, "Rock N Roll McDonalds" by Wesley Willis, Scotland, Robert the Bruce, Druids, the warlord Gillebride, Angus Og McDonald, The Knights Templar, Pope Clement V, the King of France, Satan, Pagans, The Illuminati, the New World Order, The Pantheon, The Luxor Temple, Freemasons, Ray Kroc, Mike Douglas, Baphomet, Cliven Bundy, chemtrails, Sarah Palin, AIDS, Space Pens, Willy Wonka, grimoires, magik, Willard Scott, Henry Kissinger, Heinz, Fruit of the Loom, Slinky, ouroboros, the All Seeing Eye, Liberals, Grimace, Hollywood, Shamrock Shakes, Uncle O'Grimacey, Mayor McCheese, Officer Big Mac, The Hamburglar, antisemitism, Goebbels, John F. Kennedy, The Professor, Captain Crook, Fry Guys, Anne Coulter, Dr. Drew, George W. Bush, The Fisher's Island Golf Club, Skull and Bones, harakiri, Big League Chew, Raybans, and a SHOCKING TWIST!

Current Events We aren’t the only ones getting political - Jimmy Kimmel on Graham/Cassidy Monologue #1 Monologue #2 The honeymoon is over - Anne Coulter has tweeted about impeaching Donald Trump Angry Trump supporters are burning MAGA hats RIP Len Wein dies at 69 Bobby “The Brain” Heenan has lost his battle with throat cancer. He was 72. DC Patty Jenkins will direct Wonder Woman 2 Matthew Vaughn’s ‘Man of Steel 2’ would be “a modern version of the Donner” Superman Marvel Stan Lee says Marvel will get X-Men and Fantastic Four back at some point 'Captain Marvel' Adds Oscar-Nominated Production Designer Andy Nicholson (Gravity, The Host, Jurassic World) 'Jessica Jones' Season 2 Wraps Production Marvel’s ‘The Punisher’ Trailer 1 ‘Inhumans’ canceled before it airs? Star Wars Called it - JJ Abrams Returning To Director’s Chair On ‘Star Wars: Episode IX’ Misc Hellboy news! Terminator 6 has a director Linda Hamilton to return to Terminator franchise HBO orders Damon Lindelof ‘Watchmen” adaptation MGM has launched a streaming service dedicated to the Stargate universe ...and I think I just became a fan of ‘The Orville’ Music The boys chime in on 'Concrete and Gold' by Foo Fighters Comics ‘Secret Empire’

In episode 361 of Janey Godley’s podcast with award winning comedian Ashley Storrie, we speak about social awkwardness, Martin Shkrelli and Anne Coulter. Lavender Goombs told us all about her hatred of Jeremy Corbyn and meets the Bold Alec. There is much hilarity about baws oot.  

Today on the show we had our favorite political pundit Angela Rye come by to speak on Hurricane Harvey, Trump and even had some listeners call in to ask her questions. Also Charlamagne gave “Donkey of the Day” to Anne Coulter because she blamed Hurricane Harvey on lesbian mayor before climate change and Angela Yee helped some listeners out during “Ask Yee”.     Learn more about your ad-choices at https://news.iheart.com/podcast-advertisers

Today on the show, another potential healthcare act fallen apart. We discuss why ALL American politicians on the left and the right should be ashamed. Anne Coulter and Delta Airlines go to war on twitter, and Funkhouser figures out how to beat the lines at Disney.

Today on the show, another potential healthcare act fallen apart. We discuss why ALL American politicians on the left and the right should be ashamed. Anne Coulter and Delta Airlines go to war on twitter, and Funkhouser figures out how to beat the lines at Disney.

Matt's back!... At least for a few episodes before he jumps into the next round of his EMT training, and he brought his always delightful sister, Meg, with him.   We decided that a recap of the first presidential debate and the vice president debate would be better than full coverage of either of them because so much time has elapsed since they were originally aired, and we cheated by throwing in SNL's skit recapping the debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trumpsterfire.    Matt has a small "What Matters" segment covering a few things that happened while he was away, Dan recounts an online political argument, Ken Ham is sure to get his followers' houses egged on Halloween, Meg argues that God strips people of free will, Dan blows a gasket while watching a portion of the leaked videos from the LDS Church, Anne Coulter blames atheists for the "Never Trump" movement, and Meg & Ryan confuse everybody while talking about period mist.   Closing song: Mark Morrison - Return Of The Mack   You can find the Godless Rebelution around the Internet at these links: Podbean Stitcher iTunes Facebook Twitter You can also send us hate-mail, show ideas, questions, corrections, whines, and rants at:  GodlessRebelution@gmail.com  ~ OR ~ Send us a text or leave us a voicemail message at: 330-81-REBEL

Nikki talks about the roast and why Anne Coulter sucked and how Rob Lowe is hot. Have you seen Sully? Now you have! Listen to find out what that means. Everyone reviews Brian's Bumble pictures and then they review Dan's photos. Dan talks about his experience with a ghost deer. Nikki tried to save a spider and failed and Brian almost got killed by a bear. Everyone has bear stories. What's the most disturbing thing you've seen on the internet? Dan's probably seen it. Who killed JonBenet? Nikki has the answers.

Back to school; Stef in Rio; Exceptional Speaking; Richard Neville; Anne Coulter; Gigging around; Due Diligence; Think before you film; An interview with Dr Josh Packard; Music from Mick Terry.

7 AM - 1 - Anne Coulter comes on to talk RNC. 2 - Washington Post reporter Sean Sullivan talks RNC stuff with us. 3 - The News with Marshall Phillips. 4 - RNC stuff.

Thank you to you our tremendously awesome, fiercely fantastic listeners, it's time for the horsemen aka the panel to deliver yet another high-larious adventure of laughs, debates and hopefully some "aha" moments along the information super highway. Topics discussed include but certainty ain't limited to - Marijuana laws getting worse down under in 2016, Hand cuffing the youth of Australia with completely redundant lockout laws, How Andy would like to hate fuck Anne Coulter, Donald Trump, his rallies and all his eccentricities aka his fucked up world views & flawed political outlook. People becoming catatonic vegetables, Sad Advertisements like "nivea your worth it", Stop your porn addiction & Masturbation abuse in the hopes of better orgasms. We love animals & their unlikely friendships & bonds... Segments  for this episode include - Choose the News, Why is this the case?, Who's dead 1st? And loads more in this fast paced action packed show that is High Horse Radio..... This features the tornado of truth, the always consistent Andy Establishment, along with the coolest contrarian (a person who opposes or rejects popular opinion), the future of  education that is Fred nations, & also it's  your resident king of procrastination, the fat addict himself J Dot   @highhorseradio on twitter & High Horse Radio @ iTunes + libsyn.com to download and subscribe   (@frednations, @andyestablish, @jdotgater)

Tune into Flesh Wound Radio W/ Todd Loya and Daniel Schein Thursday 7/23 at 9:30 pm eastern. On this fright filled episode we will be covering the the great new American tradition of SYFY channel's Shark Week with the premiere of Sharknado 3:Oh Hell No. Can David Hasselhoff, Anne Coulter, and sub loving pedo save the day? Also Shark Week continues with Danny Trejo and wrestling legend RVD in 3 Headed Shark Attack. Will they deliver a five star frog splash to the fiendish aquatic terror stalking our shore? In more serious reviews we will also break down the paranormal cannibal flick Ghoul, It Follows, and The Town That Dreaded Sundown reboot. Don't miss it Flesh Wound Freaks and be sure to download us on itunes.  

The Round Table is a show featuring Women On The Move coming together to discuss current events, relationships, professional issues, hot topics, gossip, and anything else related to a Woman!  Follow Women On The move on twitter at @womenonthemove1 and check us out online at www.mywomenonthemove.com! Today's topics:1. Hobby Lobby decision: Religious Freedom or War on Women?2. Florida Gubernatorial Race: Florida Democratic Party playing favorites at Leadership Gala.3. Courts around the Country continue to strike down laws against same-sex marriage.4. Police threw a stun grenade into the crib of a child in Georgia5. Georgia's "guns everywhere" law goes into effect.7. Anne Coulter on soccer 

The Round Table is a show featuring Women On The Move coming together to discuss current events, relationships, professional issues, hot topics, gossip, and anything else related to a Woman!  Follow Women On The move on twitter at @womenonthemove1 and check us out online at www.mywomenonthemove.com! Today's topics:1. Hobby Lobby decision: Religious Freedom or War on Women?2. Florida Gubernatorial Race: Florida Democratic Party playing favorites at Leadership Gala.3. Courts around the Country continue to strike down laws against same-sex marriage.4. Police threw a stun grenade into the crib of a child in Georgia5. Georgia's "guns everywhere" law goes into effect.7. Anne Coulter on soccer 

Join Paul Spataro and his kids, Melissa and Matthew as they recap ETERNALCON! A family perspective of the con experience! Hear Paul explain Jim Shooter to his kids and find out why he ended up autographing a book by Anne Coulter!Feedback for this show can be sent to: twotruefreaks@gmail.comTwo True Freaks! is a proud member of BOTH the Comics Podcast Network (http://www.comicspodcasts.com/) and the League of Comic Book Podcasts (http://www.comicbooknoise.com/league/)!! Follow the fun on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/113051642052970/ THANK YOU for listening to Two True Freaks!!

Join Paul Spataro and his kids, Melissa and Matthew as they recap ETERNALCON! A family perspective of the con experience! Hear Paul explain Jim Shooter to his kids and find out why he ended up autographing a book by Anne Coulter!Feedback for this show can be sent to: twotruefreaks@gmail.comTwo True Freaks! is a proud member of BOTH the Comics Podcast Network (http://www.comicspodcasts.com/) and the League of Comic Book Podcasts (http://www.comicbooknoise.com/league/)!! Follow the fun on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/113051642052970/ THANK YOU for listening to Two True Freaks!!

Writing commentaries has turned me into a sort of semi-professional curmudgeon. It's pretty easy too, since the world does indeed appear to be going to hell in a handbasket. Nonetheless, it's getting to be a drag. So, I'm going to try something new today. I'm going to try imagining a better future for America, and, by extension, the world.True, in imagining what could be, I will once more be underscoring how far we are from such lovely dreams. Envisioning a better future can't help but evoke a certain amount of dismay about the present. But I'm going to try anyway, because you cannot get a better future without dreaming of it. The dream, the visualization, is what engenders change. We've seen this over and over again, from Gandhi to Mandela.So:Imagine if the two billion dollars a week America is spending on the war in Afghanistan were being spent to build hospitals here at home. Or schools. Or high speed rail, light rail, bridges, tunnels. Imagine if 10 percent of what America spends on the military was spent on the arts, and another 10 percent on the sciences - what kind of cultural renaissance would we be experiencing right now?Imagine if no one went to sleep hungry in America, or the world. We have enough wealth on this planet right now to give everyone clean food and water.Imagine if there were hundreds of thousands of newly employed workers installing federally subsidized solar panels, wind turbines, insulation, and efficient heating and lighting in your house and mine.Imagine if all American military bases outside the US were shut down; How much fuel we'd be saving; How much money.Imagine if America categorically refused to provide any material aid whatsoever to any brutal regime, regardless of ideology.Imagine if children were taught empathy, comparative religion and literature, critical thinking and non-violent conflict resolution, and real science not creationist claptrap, the world over. No more madrassas of mindless rote memorization, no more ideologically-driven curricula - whether Islamic, Christian, Hindu, or Jewish. No one ever to be taught again that their way of life, their skin color, their tribe, country, ethnic group or religion was superior to any other.Imagine if nothing was ever allowed to become 'too big to fail', again, and every single Wall Street gambler and corporate banking hotshot paid their fair share of their losses.Imagine if corporate CEOs still made on average only 10 times what their workers made in salary. Compared to today's lopsided ratios, that would almost feel egalitarian.Imagine if people thought that paying taxes was patriotic because instead of funding endless wars that bloated the coffers of mega-corporations and politicians, our tax dollars were spent on the best educational and health systems in the world, and on an Apollo-style full-bore attack on the intertwined challenges of energy independence and carbon neutrality.Imagine if carping bullies like Rush Limbaugh, histrionic febrile charlatans like Glenn Beck, sub-intelligent corporate mouthpieces like Sean Hannity and vituperative racist homophobes like Anne Coulter were laughed at whenever they spouted their slanders, absurdities and lies.Imagine if we could all be part of a civil dialogue, one big reality-based conversation among grown ups, with the congenital liars, bullies, and misanthropes all dropped by the wayside, dead ends on our evolutionary tree.Imagine if all racism - black, white, yellow and brown, had withered away and you and I were always judged by the content of our character, not the color of our skin. Imagine if America had some of the lowest teen pregnancy and infant mortality rates in the developed world, and some of the highest literacy rates, instead of the other way around.Imagine if sexuality was seen as a gift from god, instead of something dirty and shameful. Imagine if there were no welfare, because if you were fit to work, society had a job waiting for you, and if you were disabled, your needs were taken care of so you could live comfortably and with dignity.Imagine if America didn't incarcerate almost 25% of all of the prisoners on earth.Imagine that instead of one woman in four on our planet being subjected to sexual or domestic violence, that number was none in 4 billion.Imagine if parents never struck their children, but met their needs and tolerated their inevitable misdeeds with patient, unconditional love.Imagine if it was OK that you believed in one god and I in another, or none at all, that I were straight and you gay.Just Imagine! Powered by Podbean.com All Content Worldwide Copyright - Samuel McKenney Claiborne

Four Imus Fallacies ... Welcome to Episode 30 of Light On Light Through in which we consider four fallacies that have been bandied about the media regarding the firing of Imus from his television and radio shows, which was well-deserved ... the language of rap ... the Duke lacrosse players ... Anne Coulter, Rosie O'Donnell, and other celebrities who traffic in insult ... the First Amendment ... I'll explain why none of those issues or people have relevance to Imus ... Plus flashes ... freed British sailors have every right to sell their stories to the media ... O'Reilly and Rivera knew just what they were doing when they lost their tempers on television ... And a special treat ... a new home demo from England's James Harris ... Walking On Air ... Try GoToMyPC free for 30 days!  For this special offer, visit www.gotomypc.com/podcast  Helpful links: my blog posts about Imus ... No Place for Imus in the Media, Memo to Michelle Malkin re: Don Imus and rap, The Day after Imus: What Doesn't Need to Be Done, Four Imus Fallaciesmy blog posts about British sailors and the media and O'Reilly v. Rivera (includes link to video clip)http://www.myspace.com/jamesharrisacoustic you'll love itThe Silk Code podiobook - my award-winning novel, read by Shaun Farrell, available free -  at http://thesilkcode.blogspot.com or http://podiobooks.com http://artofgraciousliving.com Patsy Terrell's podcast - Patsy does the wonderful Light On Light Through - Blubrry id  The Plot to Save Socrates  published in trade paperback February 20 - this means you can get a new copy, if you like, for $10+ over on Amazon and most places ... (click on the above title to get to Amazon) ... and if you'd like an autographed copy, at no extra charge to you, just send me an e-mail at PaulLevinson@LightonLightthrough.com home page: http://paullevinson.infoblogs: http://paullevinson.net and http://www.myspace.com/twiceuponarhyme and http://paullevinson.blogspot.com                                             videoclips: http://www.youtube.com/user/PLev20062006                                                                                                   The Plot to Save Socrates - my latest novel"challenging fun" - Entertainment Weekly"Da Vinci-esque thriller" - New York Daily News

(Guest: Kevin Grinberg), Fun with Anne Coulter, Russ Learns from a Blind Date, Wrestling with Analogies, Two Indian Tech Supporters Battle for the Heart and Mind of Greg, X3 Spoiled, Veronica Mars vs. Rachel in Africa, the Ministry of Silly Names, and Prince’s Credit Rating. Download Mep Report #33 The post Mep Report #33 appeared first on The Mep Report - High Brow Birds.