Podcasts about brugada syndrome

‘People buy people first,' says global speaker Eric Feng, who has built his reputation on this principle, going from being invisible to speaking in 38 countries and shaping the way experts brand themselves. Now writing his fourth book, he shares why public speaking, personal branding, and AI are shaping the future of business and influence.   In this episode of NOTG, Melvin Lim speaks with Eric about the marketing skill too many entrepreneurs ignore, how personal branding safeguards opportunities, and why AI will either propel businesses forward or leave them behind. He also reflects on how his life-changing experience with Brugada Syndrome led him to rethink success. From navigating the experimental years of your 20s to turning passions into professional impact, Eric offers insights that shift perspectives and challenge the status quo.   Tune in for a session that speaks to every stage of the journey. If you're seeking direction in your career, business, and legacy, don't miss this one. It's a powerful conversation that will challenge perspectives and redefine how we approach business, branding, and life.

In this episode, Dr. Valentin Fuster discusses a groundbreaking study on Brugada Syndrome, exploring how non-modifiable risk factors—such as male sex, SCN 5A mutations, and polygenic risk scores—can predict life-threatening arrhythmic events in patients. The research, published in JACC (November 2024), offers new insights into personalized risk assessment for this inherited arrhythmia syndrome, though its clinical implications remain limited for now.

In the September 3, 2024, issue of JACC, Dr. Valentin Fuster introduces a pivotal study on Brugada syndrome in children and adolescents. This research, led by Dr. Marco Berganti and colleagues, demonstrates how continuous monitoring with implanted loop recorders provides critical insights into arrhythmias and syncope in young patients, highlighting the potential for future AI-driven personalized care in this complex condition.

Welcome to the latest episode of Medmastery's Cardiology Digest, where we keep you up-to-date in the ever-evolving world of cardiology. This episode promises to be a riveting exploration of breakthrough studies!   STUDY #1: First, we'll delve into a national registry study on transcatheter mitral valve repair in a population that's different from what the approval was initially based upon. We'll discuss the study's implications, as we eagerly await additional trials comparing this method to traditional surgery. Makkar, RR, Chikwe, J, Chakravarty, T, et al. 2023. Transcatheter mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation. JAMA. 20: 1778–1788. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.7089)   STUDY #2: Next, we turn our attention to a ground-breaking study examining a standardized periprocedural management strategy using direct-acting oral anticoagulants for patients undergoing endoscopy. Given the study's complication rates and length of the anticoagulant interruption period, this novel approach may redefine standards for patients with atrial fibrillation.  Hansen-Barkun, C, Martel, M, Douketis, J, et al. 2023. Periprocedural management of patients with atrial fibrillation receiving a direct oral anticoagulant undergoing a digestive endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 5: 812–819. (https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002076)   STUDY #3: Our third study puts the spotlight on the challenging mission to enhance the success rate for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation treatment. We'll explore whether wider-area ablation proved superior to standard ablation for reducing recurrence, contrast that to previous trials, and touch on what's most important when considering the reasoning behind the choice of wider-area ablation versus standard ablation. Nair, GM, Birnie, DH, Nery, PB, et al. 2023. Standard vs augmented ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation for reduction of atrial fibrillation recurrence: The AWARE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 5: 475–483. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2023.0212)   STUDY #4: Lastly, we dissect a study centered on epicardial ablation for patients with Brugada syndrome who are suffering from ventricular fibrillation. Could this burgeoning therapy eventually replace the current implantable cardioverter–defibrillator approach? Nademanee K et al. Long-term outcomes of Brugada substrate ablation: A report from BRAVO (Brugada Ablation of VF Substrate Ongoing Multicenter Registry). Circulation 2023 Mar 24; [e-pub]. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.063367)   Join us as we unravel the complexities and potential game-changers these studies offer, and embark on a journey to better understand the future landscape of cardiology. Tune in and learn with Medmastery's Cardiology Digest! For show notes, visit us at https://www.medmastery.com/podcasts/cardiology-podcast.  

We review a general approach to syncope in children. Hosts: Brian Gilberti, MD Ellen Duncan, MD https://media.blubrry.com/coreem/content.blubrry.com/coreem/Syncope_in_Children.mp3 Download Leave a Comment Tags: Cardiology, Pediatrics Show Notes Initial Evaluation and Management: Similar initial workup for children and adults: checking glucose levels for hypoglycemia and conducting an EKG. The history and physical exam are crucial. Dextrose Administration in Children: Explanation of the ‘rule of 50s' for determining the appropriate dextrose solution and dosage for children. ECG Analysis: Importance of ECG in diagnosing dysrhythmias like long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, catecholamine polymorphic V tach, ARVD, ALCAPA, and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Younger children's dependency on heart rate for cardiac output and the risk of arrhythmias in kids with congenital heart disease. Condition Characteristic ECG Findings Congenital/Acquired Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) Prolonged QT interval Congenital/Acquired Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome (WPW) Short PR interval, Delta wave Congenital Brugada Syndrome ST elevation in V1-V3, Right bundle branch block Congenital Atrioventricular Block (AV Block) PR interval prolongation (1st degree), Missing QRS complexes (2nd & 3rd degree) Congenital/Acquired

Commentary by Dr. Edward Gerstenfeld

Genetics studies, including genome-wide association studies (GWAS), play an increasingly important role in physiology and pathophysiology studies of cardiovascular disease. Listen as Deputy Editor Dr. Carol Ann Remme interviews authors Prof. Jeanette Erdmann (University of Lübeck, Germany) and Prof. Connie Bezzina (Amsterdam University Medical Center, Netherlands) about their latest Review in Physiological Reviews by Walsh et al. GWAS are aimed at identifying genetic variants for specific traits, and it is essential to study genetic variants in order to understand an individual's susceptibility to develop specific diseases. Understanding the genetic basis of a disease can lead to identification of therapeutic targets for clinical intervention. Listen as these experts discuss how GWAS can be applied to study both rare disorders, for example Brugada Syndrome, as well as common disorders such as myocardial infarction. The possibilities are numerous for GWAS, including the identification of novel pathophysiological insights into cardiovascular disease mechanisms, as well as (future) development of clinically applicable polygenic risk scores. Listen now to learn more.   Roddy Walsh, Sean J. Jurgens, Jeanette Erdmann, and Connie R. Bezzina Genome-wide association studies of cardiovascular disease Physiological Reviews, published April 18, 2023. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00024.2022

With David Duncker (Host), Hannover Heart Rhythm Center - Germany, Rodrigue Garcia (Host), University hospital of Poitiers - France & Pedro Brugada (Guest), University Of Brussels, Brussels - Belgium. In this episode, Prof David Duncker and Dr Rodrigue Garcia speak with Prof Pedro Brugada. They will talk about 30 years of Brugada syndrome - about the beginning, changing approaches and the future.    

A real-life series of deaths of young Hmong men inspired Wes Craven to create Nightmare On Elm Street. We tell this tragic story on this week's Unpleasant Dreams. EM Hilker is our writer and researcher with additional writing by Cassandra Harold. Jim Harold is our Executive Producer. Find the original article by EM Hilker HERE. SOURCES “Brugada Syndrome.” Mayo Clinic, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 5 May 2022. Retrieved 4 August 2022. “Hmong.” International Institute of Minnesota, 17 January 2017. Retrieved 28 July 2022.  Kruse, Colton. “Dying in Your Dreams: Freddy Krueger Syndrome Is Real.” Ripley's Believe It or Not!, 21 July 2017. Retrieved 27 July 2022. Madrigal, Alexis C. “The Dark Side of the Placebo Effect: When Intense Belief Kills.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 14 September 2011. Retrieved 28 July 2022.  McCann, Erin. “Freddy Krueger Is Loosely Based on the Disturbing True Tale of 18 People Inexplicably Dying in Their Sleep.” Ranker, 14 June, 2019. Retrieved 27 July 2022. Morgan, Thaddeus. “How a Terrifying Wave of Unexplained Deaths Led to ‘A Nightmare on Elm Street'.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 30 October 2018. Retrieved 27 July 2022.  Stromberg, Joseph. “What Is the Nocebo Effect?” Smithsonian.com, Smithsonian Institution, 23 July 2012. Retrieved 6 August 2022. Sugg, Richard. The Real Vampires: Death, Terror, and the Supernatural. Amberley Publishing, 2019.  Tofield, Andros. “Pedro Brugada MD: The Spanish Cardiologist Who Together with His Brother Josep Brugada, First Described the Brugada Syndrome.” OUP Academic, Oxford University Press, 7 March 2020. Retrieved 5 August 2022. Vatta, Matteo, et al. “Genetic and Biophysical Basis of Sudden Unexplained Nocturnal Death Syndrome (SUNDS), a Disease Allelic to Brugada Syndrome.” OUP Academic, Oxford Academic, 1 February 2002. Retrieved 27 July 2022.     

In this episode, Sophia Khattak discusses key points from a recent case report published in EHJ – Case Reports.

On this month's EM Quick Hits podcast: Best of University of Toronto EM with Yaron Finkelstein on pediatric cannabis poisoning pitfalls, Brit Long on recognition and management of esophageal perforation, Jesse McLaren on 3 questions to diagnose Brugada Syndrome, Tahara Bhate on QI Corner, Constance Leblanc on maintaining wellness in career transitions from CAEP 2022... The post EM Quick Hits 43 Pediatric Cannabis Poisoning, Esophageal Perforation, Brugada, Career Transitions in EM appeared first on Emergency Medicine Cases.

In this episode, Dr Jonathan Hudson discusses key points from a recent case report published in EHJ – Case Reports.

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

We started a podcast! Check out Episode 1 where we introduce ourselves and talk quarantine, heart health, Brugada Syndrome, new hobbies, homophobic heckling and guys with clipboards.

With Connie Bezzina and Pieter Postema, Amsterdam UMC - Netherlands Link to European Heart Journal paper Link to European Heart Journal editorial

Commentary by Dr. Jonathan Kalman

Listen as Dr. Gary Dhillon discusses Brugada syndrome and pearls for the anesthesiologist and intensivist. Initial publication: February 9, 2021. Please visit: www.openpediatrics.org OPENPediatrics™ is an interactive digital learning platform for healthcare clinicians sponsored by Boston Children's Hospital and in collaboration with the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. It is designed to promote the exchange of knowledge between healthcare providers around the world caring for critically ill children in all resource settings. The content includes internationally recognized experts teaching the full range of topics on the care of critically ill children. All content is peer-reviewed and open access-and thus at no expense to the user. For further information on how to enroll, please email: openpediatrics@childrens.harvard.edu

With Arthur Wilde and Ahmad Amin, Amsterdam Medical Center, NL Link to EHJ paper Link to EHJ editorial

This week we speak with Professor Robert Hamilton of University of Toronto about a recent potentially groundbreaking work on a novel approach to the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome using an immunological test. How accurate is this test for diagnosis of this often elusive syndrome? Is autoimmunity the cause of disease or are the antibodies just a marker of disease. What's the latest on Professor Hamilton's work on testing for ARVC (reviewed previously in episode 43)? Dr. Hamilton provides us with lots of answers this week. For those interested in collaborating in his studies, his email and that of his research coordinator are in the podcast this week. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa383

This week we speak with Professor Robert Hamilton of University of Toronto about a recent potentially groundbreaking work on a novel approach to the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome using an immunological test. How accurate is this test for diagnosis of this often elusive syndrome? Is autoimmunity the cause of disease or are the antibodies just a marker of disease. What's the latest on Professor Hamilton's work on testing for ARVC (reviewed previously in episode 43)? Dr. Hamilton provides us with lots of answers this week. For those interested in collaborating in his studies, his email and that of his research coordinator are in the podcast this week. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa383

Dr Greg Hundley: Welcome listeners. This is Dr Greg Hundley from the VCU Pauley Heart Center in Richmond, who is in the second of his two-week stint without his dear friend, Dr Carolyn Lam who will be returning in a week or two. Our feature article this week is from Dr Mikhail Kosiborod from Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and the Georgia Institute for Global Health, and University of New South Wales. And we'll review the effects of dapagliflozin on quality of life and other metrics in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. But first, let's have a look at the other articles in this issue and just like last week we've got four other original manuscripts. The first two are sort of clinically related and that very first article comes from Dr Ben Levine from University of Texas Southwestern and he serves as the corresponding author and he's examining future predictors of the development of heart failure and preserved ejection fraction or HFpEF. His team tested the hypothesis as to whether patients with LVH and elevated cardiac biomarkers would demonstrate elevated LV myocardial stiffness when compared to healthy controls as a key marker for future HFpEF. The team recruited 46 patients with LVH. The LV septum was greater than 11 millimeters and elevated cardiac biomarkers, so the NTproBNP was greater than 40 or the cardiac troponin T was greater than 0.6. And they were recruited along with 61 age and sex-matched cohort of healthy controls. To define LV pressure volume relationships, right heart catheterization and 3D echocardiography were performed while preload was manipulated using lower body negative pressure and rapid saline infusion. They found that the left ventricle was less distensible in the LVH patients relative to the controls, that is they had a smaller volume for the same filling pressure. When preload was expressed as transmural filling pressure or wedge pressure minus right atrial pressure left ventricular myocardial stiffness was nearly 30% greater in the LVH group compared to the controls. The author's note that although LV myocardial stiffness of LVH patients was greater than that of the healthy controls at this relatively early stage, further studies are required to clarify whether interventions such as exercise training to improve LV compliance may prevent the full manifestation of the HFpEF syndrome in these high-risk individuals. Well, the second paper comes from Professor John McMurry of the British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Center at the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. And the paper is somewhat similar to our feature article because it emanates from the DAPA Heart Failure dataset that we will hear about later. So in this paper, the authors examined the effects of Dapagliflozin according to age, given potential concerns about the efficacy and safety of therapies in the elderly in the prior trial. A clinical trial that as we know, demonstrated that a reduced risk of mortality and heart failure hospitalizations occurred in patients with HFrEF. So in this current study, a total of 4,744 patients that were 22 to 94 years of age were randomized. 636 were less than 55 years of age, 1,242 we're 55 to 64 years of age 1,717 were 65 to 74, and finally 1,149 were greater than 75 years of age. Consistent benefits were observed for the components of the primary outcome of all-cause mortality and symptoms across all the age groups. Although the adverse events and the study drug discontinuation increased with age, neither was significantly more common with Dapagliflozin across any of the age groups. There was no significant imbalance and tolerability or safety events between Dapagliflozin and placebo, even in the very old population group. So we'll have more to discuss later in the feature discussion with a second paper that really looks also at the DAPA-HF study. The next original article comes from our world of Basic Science and it reports that the deficiency of circulating monocytes ameliorates the progression of myxomatous valve degeneration in the Marfan syndrome. And this paper comes from Dr Katherine Yutzey from Cincinnati Children's Medical Center. Well, first is some background, leukocytes comprised primarily of macrophages have recently been detected in myxomatous valves, but the timing of the presence and the contributions of these cells in myxomatous mitral valve degeneration is not known. So the authors found in this study that Marfan syndrome mice recapitulated the histopathologic features of myxomatous valve disease by two months of age, including mitral valve thickening, increased leaflet cellularity and extracellular matrix abnormalities characterized by proteoglycan accumulation and collagen fragmentation. Concurrently, disease mitral valves of the Marfan syndrome mice exhibited a marked increase of infiltrating and resident macrophages along with increased chemokine activity and inflammatory extracellular matrix modification. Likewise, mitral valve specimens obtained from gene-edited Marfan syndrome pigs as well as human subjects exhibited increased monocytes and macrophages detected by immunofluorescence. So remarkably deficiency of monocytes was protected against mitral valve disease progression resulting in a significant reduction of macrophages, had minimal leaflet thickening and preserved mitral valve integrity. So the authors identify for the first time in this interesting study from the world of basic science that monocytes are a viable candidate for targeted therapy in myxomatous valve degeneration. The second basic science original article in this issue is entitled "Genetic IL-6 Signaling Deficiency Attenuates Cardiovascular Risk in Clonal Hematopoiesis" and the corresponding there is Pradeep Natarajan from the Mass. General is background clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential or CHIP is a term that refers to clonal expansion of hematopoietic STEM cells due to acquired leukemic mutations in genes such as DNMT3A or TET2. In humans, CHIP associates with prevalent myocardial infarction. In mice CHIP accelerates atherosclerosis and increases IL-6 and IL-1 beta expression raising the hypothesis that IL-6 pathway antagonism in CHIP carriers would decrease cardiovascular disease risk. So in this study, the authors observed some really exciting results. They analyzed over 34,000 samples from the UK Biobank and identified 1,079 individuals with CHIP, including 432 with large clones an LV fraction greater than 10%. During a 6.9-year median follow-up CHIP presence was associated with increased incidents, cardiovascular disease event risk with greater risk from large CHIP clones. IL6R attenuated cardiovascular event risk among participants with large CHIP clones but not in individuals without CHIP. This really exciting research results suggest that CHIP is associated with increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease. And among carriers of large CHIP clones, genetically reduced IL-6 signaling abdicated this risk. Really exciting results in an emerging area of science. So what else is in the issue? Well, in our in depth review feature, Professor Stephan Rosencrantz from the University of Cologne Heart Center reviews the systemic consequences of pulmonary hypertension with right side heart failure. And then an On My Mind piece, our own associate editor, Dr Vlad Zaha coupled with doctors Walter Myers and Javid Moslehi from Vanderbilt discuss the impact of evolving immunotherapies for cancer and their impact on the cardiovascular system. In our mailbag, Dr Xiayan Shen from the Medical Classification Center of the Singapore Armed Forces discusses in a research letter the prevalence of Brugada Syndrome in a large Singaporean young male population. In letters to the editor, Dr Muddassir Mehmood from University of Tennessee Medical Center in one letter and Dr Goodarz Danaei from Boston in a response letter discuss the importance of diet relative to the development of HFpEF and how heart failure may be coded in by the World Health Organization when assessing global cardiovascular outcomes. Bridget Kuhn in our cardiology news feature reports on preliminary results from the International Childhood Cardiovascular Cohort or i3C Consortium that was presented at the 2019 European Society of cardiology Congress. The i3C Consortium used data on 40,000 patients who participated in seven major longitudinal cohort studies that evaluated childhood cardiovascular risk factors from repeated measures during childhood and adolescence. And finally, our own Molly Klemarczyk at Circulation gathered and combined a very nice serial update that highlights important articles from our circulation family of journals, including electrophysiology, imaging, heart failure, and others. Well, listeners, that's a summary of what's in the journal. But let's now proceed to our feature discussion to learn more about the rapidly emerging field of SGLT2 inhibition. Well listeners, we are very excited for this feature discussion we have today, Dr Mikhail Kosiborod from Saint Luke's Mid America heart Institute and our own associate editor, Dr Justin Ezekowitz from Alberta, Canada. And we're going to be discussing the paper related to the effects of Dapagliflozin on symptoms, function and quality of life in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. They're going to be presenting results from the DAPA Heart Failure trial. Well Mikhail, I was wondering could you orient us a little bit to the DAPA heart failure trial. And then what was the hypothesis that you were trying to address in the current study? Dr Mikhail Kosiborod: DAPA-HF was the first heart failure outcome trial trying to answer two critical questions about the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. We knew from prior trials, outcome trials in patients with diabetes SGLT2 agents can effectively prevent heart failure inpatients, overwhelming majority of which did not have heart failure and baseline. But what we didn't know was whether these agents can also be used as therapies for patients with established heart failure, and specifically heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. And they reduce death or worsening heart failure in the patient population. And the second question was whether that effect, if in fact this medications can significantly improve outcomes in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction. Can they do that even in patients who do not have type 2 diabetes? Because, in a diabetes trial it appears that that heart failure protective effect may be completely independent on the hemoglobin AONC. And so DAPA-HF was specifically designed to test those two hypotheses. It enrolled about 4,800 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction about 45% of which had types 2 diabetes. And there's a majority of us, 55% did not. And the main trial results that were published prior to risk analysis showed that in fact dapagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and worsening heart failure. It was a 26% relative risk reduction and the effects were identical in patients with or without type two diabetes. So both of those hypothesis were proven to be correct. It was effective therapies for established heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, and it was equally effective regardless of diabetes status. Now what we did in this study is really trying to understand the effects not just on cardiovascular deaths and hospitalization for heart failure, but on health status, which is symptoms, physical limitations, and quality of life. He knows that heart failure is a debilitating disease, causes high burden of symptoms, and physical limitations, has adverse impact on quality of lives. We know that two key goals of managing heart failure are to; one, reduce deaths and hospitalizations for heart failure and two to reduce the burden of symptoms and physical limitations and improve the quality of life. So, that was really the focus of this specific analysis that we're talking about today. Dr Greg Hundley: Excellent. So I understand you use the KCCQ-12, maybe help us understand what that test is and then tell us a little bit about your methods and your study population. Did you use the whole study population? Dr Mikhail Kosiborod: KCCQ stands for Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and we actually in the study we use KCCQ-23 which is the full Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, consists of 23 items. And it a disease-specific tools for evaluating health status and heart failure. So it essentially assesses four key domains, which are the symptom burden, physical implementations, quality of life, and social limitations. In this particular study is a primary endpoint as a primary part of the KCCQ as KCCQ total symptom score, which is a domain that focuses on symptoms. And the idea behind KCCQ is that you have a debilitating disease, which is heart failure. That disease has impact on the patient by causing symptoms, the symptoms then translate to physical limitations. And the combination of the symptom burden physical limitations has an impact on quality of life and social limitation. So that's why are this four different domains assessing these four components of the adverse effects of the heart failure compared to health status. And just very briefly, to mention that KCCQ has been proven to be responsive to clinical change. It's highly for data predictive of death and hospitalizations from heart failure. It has been extensively validated both of them hearts failure was reduced enters and the ejection fraction. And so we essentially focused, or the primary focus of the paper was really to evaluate the effect of dapagliflozin versus placebo on a Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire or KCCQ level symptom score. But we also looked at other domains as well. We looked at the clinical summary score, which includes both symptoms and physical limitations and we looked at the overall summary score, which includes all of the four domains that I mentioned before. Dr Greg Hundley: What did you find? Dr Mikhail Kosiborod: The patients treated with dapagliflozin had a greater improvement in health status as assessed by a KCCQ total symptom score or for that matter KCCQ clinical summary overall summary score as compared to patients treated with placebo. So if you look at the mean effect, there is some improvement in the patients taking placebo. That's what we call a placebo effect. And it's very commonly seen in clinical trials. We assessed health status, but there was a greater improvement with dapagliflozin as compared with the placebo, it was statistically significant even in four months. But as the effects were further amplified to eight months and this differences were, I would say favorable when you kind of compare the effect of Dapagliflozin versus other established heart failure therapies when you look at the effects on health status. What I think was even more important than analysis from a clinician standpoint, and then they think it's actually much more meaningful clinically is what we call a responder analysis. And that's where we look as the proportion of patients that have a clinically meaningful improvement with one type of therapy versus other in this case Dapagliflozin versus placebo. So it's been previously established that at five-point difference or a five-point change rising KCCQ is what's considered to be clinically meaningful or minimal clinically meaningful difference. So a 5.2 grade deterioration KCCQ means it's a clinically important deterioration. And a five-point or greater improvement is a clinically important improvement. And then we also looked at the proportion of patients with moderate and large improvements in health status as well defined as STEM point of grade of two, or two point a great improvement. And essentially what we found was that significantly fewer patients treated with dapagliflozin and as compared with placebo had a clinical importance deterioration. And significantly greater proportion of patients treated with dapagliflozin has small, moderate, large improvements in health status. And the numbers needed to treat to see those differences, as the small moderate large improvements was very favorable ranging typically between 12 and 18 and over eight-months-treatment period. Dr Greg Hundley: Outstanding. So both clinically relevant as well as statistically significant findings. Now we're going to bring in Justin, our associate editor. Justin, help us put these results into the just our perspective in looking at SGLT2 inhibitors, particularly for treatment for heart failure. Dr Justin Ezekowitz: This is an exciting class of medications and we're eagerly awaiting these results because we saw the DAPA-HF Overall results. The majority of us treat patients with a pretty symptomatic disease and as such this quality of life is quite an important change. There's ongoing trials we're eagerly awaiting which are also going to be using other medications in the same class, but I think one question that remained was, are these simply improving symptoms by one meaning, so the total symptom score? Or the overall quality of life? And I think you nicely, elegantly portrayed that in the figures and you have. The one other part maybe Mikhail, you could expand upon, which is when you think about DAPA-HF, and the quality of life gains and across all the three different ways of looking at quality of life, where do you see this in terms of its relationship to other things that we know improve quality of life? Where we send patients, for example, CRT or put them on an RNE. Where does this fit on top of those types of changes? Dr Mikhail Kosiborod: Thanks Justin. I think it's a really important question because it says think critical from a clinical standpoint to put it in the context of other therapies that had been previously shown to improve health status, which means again, reduced symptoms, improve physical and patient quality of life. And there are a number of perhaps the types of therapies on heart failure and LVCF that have been evaluated particularly on side this one there also have been studies with exercise training in heart failure or and the ones that you brought up, which is cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block. And as that perhaps, if you kind of think about it. What are some of the most effective treatments to improve the health status? That is ones that we typically would consider as such, which is CRT in patients with half RAF and a left bundle branch block. And in fact, if you look at the mean effects dapagliflozin compares very favorably even with highly effective therapies such as TRT. Relatively few studies have previously reported to this responder in analysis. But if you look at Digoxin comparing those to dapagliflozin, one of the recent ones that I can think of is [inaudible 00:20:23], again dapagliflozin compares very favorably when you look at this types of responder analysis where again you look at proportion of patients, it was a clinically meaningful change. So I think the beautiful thing about putting the study in the context of further studies looking at health status and also in the original main results that were published from a DAPA-HF early this year is that it's really kind of a full house if you will. So as the agent reduced deaths, reduced hospitalizations and made patients feel better and all of that, with very favorable safety profile. So, if you kind of think about risk benefit analysis and you look at numbers need to treat both for clinical outcomes such as CVS and hospitalizations for heart failure for example, where health status, it looks really impactful from a clinical standpoint. Dr Greg Hundley: So relevance to other therapeutic interventions for heart failure is what this whole class of agents seems to be showing? So briefly, what do you see is the next important study in the field? Dr Mikhail Kosiborod: I will waffle on this question a little bit and say there was more than one, but my views are there kind of two key components to this. One is that there are additional trials going on and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with other agents. And so seeing what happens with those other agents in the class in a similar patient population and whether is this a class effect or not? Now the diabetes trials would suggest that these may well be class effects but I think it's nice to have validation of that. I would say that is one real important questions that hopefully we will have additional answers to in the coming year or so. And the second and perhaps I would argue even more important question is whether these agents can also be effective in improving outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. That's a patient population that has also very high debilitating burden of symptoms that has poor prognosis and for which unlike them, half rubs, there are very few, if any medications that have been proven to be disease-modifying and actually have shown outcomes and benefit. So I would say those in my mind, are the two critical developments that we'll be seeing. And the good news is, there are the trials going on with more than one agent in a class and half to half as well. Great. Dr Greg Hundley: And Justin? Dr Justin Ezekowitz: Yeah, I think that there's been an explosion of therapies and Mikhail is bang on with this is the one class where we're excited about. I think the other groups of medications include Omecamtiv Mecarbil we'll know in a year or two. We'll hear more details in the spring and then there's a few other medications that Mikhail mentioned. I think this is a real good message though, that both HFrEF and HFpEF, it's the rise of medications again. Because we were on a device track for a while, but I think the medications have such more potent effect on the underlying structure and function that it's great to see that there's been such a development and explosion of medications that may obviate the need for implanted devices or advanced therapies, so we're very excited about that. Dr Greg Hundley: Outstanding. Well, listeners, we've had the opportunity to hear from Mikhail Kosiborod from Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute and our own associate editor, Dr Justin Ezekowitz from Alberta, Canada, and learn more about SGLT2 inhibition and its importance in improving clinically symptomatology both in those with diabetes and heart failure, but also those with heart failure alone. On behalf of Carolyn and myself, we wish you a great week and we look forward to running and having a coffee chat next week. Take care of. This program is copyright the American Heart Association, 2020  

JACC: Case Reports - Audio Summary by Dr. Julia Grapsa

Dr Paul Wang:                   Welcome to the monthly podcast, On the Beat, for Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. I'm Dr Paul Wang, editor-in-chief, with some of the key highlights from this month's issue.                                                 In our first article, Daniel Alyesh, Konstantinos Siontis and associates described myocardial calcifications in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation in comparison to a control group of patients without ventricular tachycardia. They found that in 56 consecutive post-infarction patients, myocardial calcifications were identified in 39 or 70% of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia patients compared to 6 or 11% of patients without ventricular tachycardia. A calcification volume of 0.538 centimeters cube distinguished patients with calcification-associated ventricular tachycardia from patients without calcification-associated ventricular tachycardias; area under the curve, 0.87; sensitivity, 0.87; specificity, 0.88. A non-confluent calcification pattern was associated with ventricular tachycardia target sites independent of calcification volume, P equals 0.01. Myocardial calcifications corresponding to areas of electrical non-excitability forming a border for re-entry were found in 33% of all ventricular tachycardias for which target sites were identified, and in 62% of patients with myocardial calcifications.                                                 In our next paper, Mia Fangel and associates examined whether glycemic status evaluated by hemoglobin A1c has an effect on the risk of thromboembolism among patients with atrial fibrillation and Type 2 diabetes. They used a cohort study from 5,386 patients with incident non-valvular atrial fibrillation and Type 2 diabetes in Danish registries. Compared with patients with hemoglobin A1c of less than or equal to 48 millimole per mole, they observed a higher risk of thromboembolism among patients with hemoglobin A1c 49 to 58 millimoles per mole with a hazard ratio of 1.49 and a hemoglobin A1c greater than 58 millimole per mole with a hazard ratio of 1.59 after adjusting for confounding factors. Surprisingly, in patients with diabetes duration of 10 years or more, higher hemoglobin A1c levels were not associated with a higher risk of thromboembolism.                                                 In our next paper, Niek Beurskens and associates compared tricuspid valve dysfunction in leadless pacemaker therapy to dual chamber transvenous pacing systems. They studied 53 patients receiving a leadless pacemaker, including 28 with a Nanostim and 25 with a Micra device. Of these 53 patients, 23 or 43% had tricuspid regurgitation that was graded as being more severe at 12 months. Compared with an apical position, a right ventricular septal position of the leadless pacemaker was associated with increased tricuspid valve incompetence, odds ratio, 5.20; P equals 0.03. An increase in mitral valve regurgitation was observed in 38% of patients. Leadless pacemaker implantation resulted in a reduction of right ventricular function. Leadless pacemaker implantation was further associated with a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction and elevated LV TI index. The changes in tricuspid regurgitation in leadless pacing group was similar to the changes in dual-chamber transvenous pacemaker group, 43% versus 38% respectively; P equals 0.39.                                                 In our next paper, Jurgen Duchenne and associates examined whether regional left ventricular glucose metabolism correlates with regional work in an animal model with reversible dyssynchrony due to pacing. In 12 sheep, after 8 weeks of right atrial and right ventricular free wall pacing, there is evidence of left ventricular dilatation and thinning of the septum and thickening of the lateral wall. The authors employed motion compensation and anatomical correction in order to provide reliable regional estimates of myocardial glucose metabolism. They found that in homogenous regional distribution of myocardial workload due to left bundle branch block triggers adaptive remodeling of the left ventricle, leading to a more homogenous load distribution per volume unit myocardium. In reverse, cardiac resynchronization therapy leads acutely to an inhomogeneous distribution of workload, which homogenizes over time due to reverse remodeling. The authors concluded that redistribution of regional loading appears as a mode of action of cardiac resynchronization therapy so that myocardial mechanics should be the main treatment target of cardiac resynchronization therapy.                                                 In our next paper, Jihye Jang and associates examined the association between local conduction velocity and late gadolinium enhancement and myocardial thickness in a swine model of healed left ventricular infarction. They studied six swine with healed myocardial infarction and two controls. The authors found a significantly slower conduction was found in late gadolinium enhancement regions, 0.33 versus 0.54 meters per second, P less than 0.001, and regions of wall thinning, 0.38 versus 0.55 meters per second, P also less than 0.001; areas with greater late gadolinium enhancement heterogeneity and wall thickness gradient exhibited slower conduction velocity.                                                 In our next paper, Xi Zhang and Xiaohui Kuang and associates studied whether restricting contact force to less than 20 grams reduces the risk of esophageal injury in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. In a prospective, single-center, randomized study, 89 consecutive patients, mean age 57.2 years, 57% men, with atrial fibrillation, 68.5% paroxysmal and 31.5% persistent were randomized to restrictive contact force group or non-contact force group. The primary end point was a rate of esophageal injury post ablation. The same power setting, similar ablation time, and average measured catheter tip temperature during posterior wall ablation just opposite to the esophagus were present in both groups, there were no cases of esophageal injury in the restricted contact force group versus 9 or 20% of cases of esophageal injury post ablation in the non-contact force group. There are similar rates of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias at a mean of 31.3 months follow-up, 68.2% versus 64.4%.                                                 In our next paper, J. Martijn Bos and associates examined whether sodium channel blockers like mexiletine may have a potential role in LQT1 and LQT2, two forms of potassium channel mediated long QT syndrome. They retrospectively studied 12 patients, 5 females, median age at diagnosis 14.1 years with genetically established long QT2 in 10 or a combination of LQT1/LQT2 in 1 or LQT2/LQT3 in 1, who all received mexiletine. Prior to diagnosis, six patients were symptomatic and prior to initiation of mexiletine, four patients experienced one breakthrough cardiac event on beta blocker therapy. Median age at first mexiletine dose was 24.3 years. After mexiletine, the median QTc decreased by 65 milliseconds from 547 milliseconds pre-mexiletine to 470 milliseconds post-mexiletine, P equals 0.0005 for all patients. In eight patients or 67%, the QTc decreased by 40 milliseconds with a mean decrease in QTc of 91 milliseconds, P less than 0.008. For the 11 patients maintained on mexiletine therapy, there have been no breakthrough cardiac events during follow-up.                                                 In our final paper, Andrea Mazzanti and associates assessed whether low dose quinidine in Brugada Syndrome patients reduces the occurrence of life-threatening arrhythmic events in this population. They compared the clinical course of 53 Brugada Syndrome patients treated with quinidine to that of 441 untreated controls, matched by sex, age, symptoms, and duration of observation. The 53 Brugada Syndrome patients, 89% males, median age 39.8 years, received quinidine at 439 milligrams per day for 5.0 years. Therapy was stopped in three cases or 6% for side effects. Quinidine reduced by 26% the risk of experiencing life-threatening arrhythmic events in cases versus controls; hazard ratio, 0.74; P equals 0.62. In 27 of 123 Brugada Syndrome patients symptomatic for life-threatening arrhythmic events who were treated for 7.0 years, the annual rate of life-threatening arrhythmic events decreased from 14.7% while off-quinidine to 3.9% while on-quinidine, P equals 0.03. The authors noted that recurrent life-threatening arrhythmic events were recorded in 4 or 15% of cardiac arrest survivors while on-quinidine, underscoring the importance of implantable defibrillator therapy.                                                 That's it for this month. We hope that you will find the Journal to be the go-to place for everyone interested in the field. See you next time. This program is copyright American Heart Association 2019.  

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Dr Paul Wang:                   Welcome to the monthly podcast On The Beat, where Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. I'm Doctor Paul Wang, editor in chief, with some of the key highlights from this month's issue.                                                 In our first paper, Parikshit Sharma and associates reported on the use of permanent his bundle pacing to improve hemodynamics in 39 patients with right bundle branch block. His bundle pacing was successfully performed in 37, or 95 percent of the patients, and resulted in narrowing of the QRS complex from 158 milliseconds to 127 milliseconds. P = 0.0001. An increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from 31 percent to 39 percent. P = 0.004, an improvement in the New York Heart Association functional class from 2.8 to 2.0 P = 0.0001. This work suggests that his bundle pacing maybe helpful in right bundle branch block patients with left ventricular dysfunction.                                                 In our next paper, Philippe Debruyne and associates added to our understanding of using catheter ablation to modulate the autonomic nervous system in patients with neurally mediated syncope, signs of no dysfunction and functional AV block. Prior reports of autonomic modulation using catheter ablation have required extensive ablation in both atria. In this article, the authors report a significant 95% reduction in syncope at six months as a result of targeted ablation in the right atrium alone, focusing on partial ablation of the interior right ganglionated plexus. Ablation is quite limited, taking a mean of seven minutes and creating a mean surface area of 11 millimeters squared. This technique has promise as a possible treatment for avoiding a need of pacemaker implantation in some patients.                                                 In our next paper, Shankar Baskar and associates examined the characteristics and outcomes of pediatric patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators and compared them to their adult counterparts. They examined ICD recipients in the NCDRICD registry from 2010 to 2016. There were 562,209 total ICD implants, including 3461 pediatric patients. Of the pediatric patients, 60 percent of implants were for primary prevention with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy being present in 60 percent of the patients, the most common underlying disease. Over time, there is an increasing trend of both primary and secondary prevention ICD implantations, P less than 0.05. Compared to adults, pediatric patients were likely to have structural heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, ion channelopathy, and to receive a single chamber device. All P less than 0.001. There is no difference in in-hospital complications between the adult and the pediatric cohorts, 2.4 percent versus 2.6 percent. However, among pediatric patients, lower weight, Ebstein's anomaly, worse New York Heart Association class dual chamber and resynchronization defibrillator were associated with greater risk of complications. Although, re-intervention for generator replacement or upgrade was more common in adults, the time to re-intervention was shorter in the pediatric cohort.                                                 In our next paper, Ahmed Hussein and associates examine the effect of using ablation index guiding ablation in 40 patients with persistent HO fibrillation on the rate of pulmonary vein reconnection. Pulmonary vein reconnection was seen as a mandatory repeat electro-physiologic study in 22 percent of patients, effecting seven percent of pulmonary veins. Ablation on the intravenous cryna was required in 44 percent of patients to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation. Atrial tachyarrhythmia occurrence was documented in eight to 20 percent of patients, only one of whom had pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat study. At 12 months, 30 out of 40, or 95 percent of patients, were in sinus rhythm, with four or 10 percent of patients having starting antiarrhythmic drugs. Higher body mass index and excessive alcohol consumption were the only significant factors associated with atrial tachyarrhythmia occurrence.                                                 In our next paper, Atsushi Hirayama and associates examined whether acute exasperation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease increases the risk of repeated atrial fibrillation related health care utilization. They examine 944 patients who are hospitalized for acute exasperation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and had emergency department visit or hospitalization for atrial fibrillation during a 450 day period. Compared to the reference period, the rate of atrial fibrillation related emergency department visits or hospitalizations significantly increased in the first 90 days after acute exasperation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 7.3 versus 14.1 per one hundred person months, resulting in a risk ratio of 1.93.                                                 In our next paper, Namsik Yoon and associates examined the mechanisms underlying the electrocardiographic and arrhythmic manifestation of experimental models of early repolarization syndrome and the ameliorative effects of radio-frequency ablation. The authors recorded axis potentials, bi-polar electrograms, and transmural pseudo electrocardiograms for coronary perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations in 11 animals.                                                 The ITO agonist, NS5806, the calcium channel blocker Verapamil and acetylcholine were used to pharmacologically mimic the effects of genetic defects associated with early repolarization syndrome. The provocative agents induce prominent j waves in the ECG secondary to the accentuation of the action potential notch in the epicardium but not the endocardium. Bipolar recordings displayed low voltage fractionated potential in the epicardium due to temporal and spatial variability and appearance of the action potential dome conceal the phase two reentry develop when the axon potential dome was lost at some epicardial sites but not others. Appearing in the bipolar electrogram, is discrete high frequency spikes. Successful propagation of the concealed phase two reentered beat precipitated ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation of epicardium destroyed the cell displaying abnormal repolarization and thus suppressed the j waves and the development of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in six out of six preparations.                                                 Stavros Stavrakis and associates described ten patients out of 843 patients, or 1.2 percent with AV nodal reentry tachycardia who required ablation of the basal inferolateral left atria, during stable antegrade slow, retrograde fast, AV nodal reentry tachycardia, a single late atrial extra stimulus was delivered at the inferolateral left atria, near the mitral annulus. All patients had failed ablation in the inferior triangle of Koch, and or roof of the coronary sinus. In all ten patients, a late atrial extra stimulus advanced the his bundle potential by at least ten milliseconds and reset the tachycardia. Ablation at that site, eliminates slow pathway conduction and terminated the tachycardia. Ablation was successful at the site of the latest atrial extra stimulus delivered 49 milliseconds after the onset of this his bundle potential. In their series, no recurrent tachycardia was noted at one year follow up.                                                 In our final paper, Justine Bhar-Amato and Malcolm Finlay and associates examine the hypothesis that increased cholinergic tone exerts its pro-rhythmic effects in Brugada Syndrome through increasing dispersion of transmural repolarization in patients with spontaneous and drug induced Brugada Syndrome. Using a recording array in the right ventricular outflow tract and a micro-catheter in the great cardiac vein to record intracardial and epicardial signals, the authors constructed S1S2 restitution curves from the right ventricular apex at baseline and after edrophonium challenge.                                                 The authors studied eight Brugada Syndrome patients and compared them to eight control patients with super ventricular tachycardia. Electrophysiological studies in controls demonstrated shorter endocardial than epicardial right ventricular activation times, mean difference 26 milliseconds. In contrast, Brugada Syndrome patients showed longer endocardial than epicardial activation times, mean difference -15 milliseconds. Brugada Syndrome patients significantly larger transmural gradient in their activation recovery intervals, mean intervals 20.5 versus 3.5 milliseconds, with longer endocardial than epicardial activation recovery intervals. Edrophonium challenge increased the gradients in both controls to a mean of 16 milliseconds. In Brugada Syndrome, to 29.7 milliseconds. However, these changes were attributed to epicardial activation recovery, interval prolongation in control patients. In endocardial activation recovery interval prolongation in Brugada Syndrome patients. Dynamic changes in repolarization gradients were also observed across the right ventricular wall in Brugada Syndrome patients.                                                 That's it for this month. We hope that you'll find the journal to be the go to place for everyone interest in the field. See you next time.  

Dr Carolyn Lam:                Welcome to Circulation on the Run, your weekly podcast summary and backstage pass to the journal and its editors. I'm Dr Carolyn Lam, associate editor from the National Heart Center and Duke National University of Singapore. This week's journal features two papers that deal with genetic testing in young athletes and for sudden arrhythmic death, and with findings that may surprise you. They really show the complexities of this era of genetic testing and cardiovascular medicine, and in fact are discussed as growing pains in cardiovascular genetics. You must listen to our feature discussion, which is coming right up after these summaries.                                                 The first original paper this week suggests that targeting fibronectin polymerization may be a new therapeutic strategy for treating cardiac fibrosis. Fibronectin polymerization is necessary for collagen matrix deposition and is a key contributor to increased abundance of cardiac myofibroblast following cardiac injury. In today's paper, first author Dr Valiente-Alandi, corresponding author Dr Blaxall from University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Heart Institute, and their colleagues hypothesized that interfering with fibronectin polymerization, or its genetic ablation and fibroblasts, would attenuate myocardial fibrosis and improve cardiac function following ischemia reperfusion injury. Using mouse and human cardiac myofibroblasts, authors found that the fibronectin polymerization inhibitor pUR4 attenuated the pathological phenotype exhibited by mouse and human myofibroblasts by decreasing fibronectin polymerization and collagen deposition into the extracellular matrix as well as by myofibroblast proliferation and migration.                                                 Inhibiting fibronectin matrix deposition by pUR4 treatment or by deleting fibronectin gene expression in cardiac fibroblasts confirmed cardioprotection against ischemia reperfusion-induced injury by attenuating at first left ventricular remodeling and cardiac fibrosis, thus preserving cardiac function. In summary, interfering with fibronectin polymerization may be a new therapeutic strategy for treating cardiac fibrosis and heart failure.                                                 The Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke, or IRIS trial, demonstrated that pioglitazone reduced the risk of both cardiovascular events and diabetes in insulin-resistant patients. However, concern remains that pioglitazone may increase the risk of heart failure in susceptible individuals. To address this, Dr Young from Yale Cardiovascular Research Center and the IRIS investigators performed a secondary analysis of the IRIS trial. They found that older age, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, obesity, edema, high CRP, and smoking were risk factors for heart failure.                                                 Pioglitazone did not increase the risk of incident heart failure, and the effect of pioglitazone did not differ across levels of baseline risk. It should however be noted that in the IRIS trial, the study drug dose could be reduced for symptoms of edema or excessive weight gain, which occurred more often in the pioglitazone arm. Overall, pioglitazone reduced the composite outcome of stroke, MI, or hospitalized heart failure in the IRIS trial.                                                 The next study highlights the importance of genetic variation in cardiac fibrosis and suggests that while fibroblast activation is a response that parallels the extent of scar formation, proliferation may not necessarily correlate with levels of fibrosis. In this paper from co-first authors Dr Park and Ranjbarvaziri, corresponding author Dr Ardehali, from David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, the authors utilized a novel multiple-strain approach known as the Hybrid Mouse Diversity Panel to characterize the contributions of cardiac fibroblasts to the formation of isoproterenol-induced cardiac fibrosis in three strains of mice.                                                 They found that isolated cardiac fibroblasts treated with isoproterenol exhibited strain-specific increases in the levels of activation, but showed comparable levels of proliferation. Similar results were found in vivo with fibroblast activation but not proliferation correlating with the differential levels of cardiac fibrosis after isoproterenol treatment. RNA sequencing revealed that cardiac fibroblasts from each strain exhibited unique gene expression changes in response to isoproterenol.                                                 The authors further identified LTBP2 as a commonly upregulated gene after isoproterenol treatment. Expression of LTBP2 was elevated and specifically localized in the fibrotic regions of the myocardium after injury in mice and in human heart failure, suggesting that it may be a potential therapeutic target. That brings us to the end of our summaries. Now for our feature discussion.                                                 We all know that t-wave inversion is common in patients with cardiomyopathy, however up to a quarter of athletes of African descent, and five percent of white athletes also have t-wave inversion on ECG, but with unclear clinical significance despite comprehensive clinical evaluation. Now, what is the role in diagnostic use of genetic testing beyond clinical evaluation when we investigate these athletes with t-wave inversion? Well we're about to get some answers in today's feature paper, and I'm so pleased to have the corresponding author of the paper, Dr Sanjay Sharma from St. George's University of London, as well as our associate editor Dr Mark Link from UT Southwestern.                                                 Sanjay, please let us know what you did and what you found. Dr Sanjay Sharma:            Well as you rightly say, that up to 25% of black athletes have t-wave inversion, as do three to five percent of white athletes. And these t-wave inversions often overlap with the sort of patterns that you see in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. For example, 80% of people with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have t-wave inversion as do 60% of patients with ARVC. Now we know that some ECG patterns, t-wave inversions in V1 to V4 are benign in black patients, but the significance of other ECG patterns is unknown. Cascade screening in family members with cardiomyopathy have shown that t-wave inversion may be the only manifestation of gene inheritance, and there are reports to suggest that some athletes with t-wave inversion do go on to develop overt cardiomyopathy. Now when we investigate the vast majority of our patients with t-wave inversion, these are our athlete patients, we don't actually find anything. But over the past decade, also, these has been major advance in next generation sequencing that allows us to perform genetic testing in a large number of genes that can cause diseases, capable of causing sudden death.                                                 And so, we thought we'd investigate the role of this gene testing in athletes with t-wave inversion. We looked at a hundred, 50 black athletes and 50 white athletes who had t-wave inversion, and we investigated them comprehensively with clinical tests. But we also added in a gene panel looking at 311 genes implicated in six cardiac diseases, notably hypertrophic cardiac myopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, left ventricular non-compaction, long QT syndrome, and the brugada syndrome. We found that 21% of our athletes were then diagnosed with a cardiac disorder capable of causing sudden death, and the vast majority of these people had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. And this diagnosis was based on clinical evaluation. When we looked at gene testing, we found that gene testing only picked up a problem in 10%. So, the diagnostic yield of gene testing was half that of comprehensive clinical investigation.                                                 When we actually looked at athletes who had nothing wrong with them in clinical investigation, and actually had a gene mutation, we found that only 2.5% of athletes who had t-wave inversion but clinically normal tests, actually had something wrong with them. And our conclusions were that gene testing picks up only half the athletes that clinical testing does, and gene testing is only responsible for identifying 2.5% of athletes with t-wave inversion, where clinical tests are negative. That was the summary of our study in short. We did find that black athletes were less likely to have a positive diagnosis of cardiac myopathy than white athletes, and black athletes are also less likely to have a genetic mutation capable of causing a cardiomyopathy than white athletes. Dr Carolyn Lam:                First and foremost, congratulations on such a beautiful paper, and so wonderfully summarized as well. It really seems to fly in the face, doesn't it? Of the way we've been discussing personalized medicine and saying that we're going to start whole genome sequencing everyone and that's going to provide all the answers for future disease risks. I mean, if I'm not wrong, what your paper is trying to tell us is that at this moment we don't have good examples where genetic testing may trump clinical diagnoses, and in fact we should be still focusing on a comprehensive clinical evaluation of patients and in the absence of a genotype we should learn to question what we're doing in genetic testing. Do you agree with that? Dr Sanjay Sharma:            You couldn't have said that more precisely. As I've said, the diagnostic yield of clinical testing was 21% versus only 10% with genetic testing. The diagnostic yield of pure genetic testing in people with otherwise completely normal findings clinically was only 2.5%. And the other thing that I forgot to tell you was that genetic testing, if we included genetic testing in addition to comprehensive assessment, cost us three times as much as clinical investigation on its own, and had we relied solely on genetics, and nothing else, it would have cost us ten times more than clinical testing. So our cost per making a diagnosis using genetics only would have amounted to $30,000 per condition. Dr Carolyn Lam:                Wow, what a great wake up call. Mark, you've thought a lot about this and in fact there was another paper in this week’s journal that has very complimentary messages. In fact you invited an editorial by Dan Roden, and I really loved his title of it, "Growing Pains in Cardiovascular Genetics." Would you maybe add your thoughts in relation to the other paper, as well as overall? Dr Mark Link:                     Sure. Circulation was very interested in these papers. These are really  ... Now, as Dan Roden says, "Growing pains." Twenty years ago when genetics came out it was looked upon as it was going to completely change our clinical medicine and precision medicine is really relying a lot on genetics. And while ultimately that may be the case, we are in a stage now where the honeymoon is over. And the other paper that was in this same issue was a paper by Hosseini  and colleagues, and it was the Clin Gen paper looking at the Brugada Syndrome abnormalities. Now the Clin Gen is an NIH sponsored group that takes individuals from a number of different institutions and actually gene testing, and tries to provide an independent assessment of the abnormality of genes. Previously is was companies that did this. A company would gene test ... They would look for gene abnormalities, try to link it with clinical disease, and they could basically then do just on their patients. But Clin Gen now is trying to tie all those companies together to get a broad consortion and to look at genetic abnormalities and whether they're truly pathologic, where there's areas of unknown significance, or whether they're truly not pathologic.                                                 So as an example, they took Brugada Syndrome, and they took the different gene abnormalities that have been described from basically different companies and different labs and different institutions, and they looked at the evidence behind the fact that they were truly pathologic, 'cause all 21 genes were defined as pathologic. They found in their independent assessment that only one ended up to be truly pathologic, and the others ones were disputed. And sort of another wakeup call that just because a single company calls a gene pathologic or Brugada Syndrome, does not make it pathologic necessarily. So we all thought these were two very important papers that looked at some of the limitations of genetic testing. We asked Dan Roden, who is really a very accomplished scholar in this field, to provide perspective on this. And I agree, I loved his title, "Growing Pains in Cardiovascular Genetics." And what he did is reviewed the history of genetic testing, and he actually starts before genetic testing and starts with Mendelian genetics, and [inaudible] genetics. And then 23 years ago they started linking that Mendelian genetics to gene abnormalities, especially in diseases such as long QT syndrome and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.                                                 We've come a tremendous way in diagnosing gene abnormalities and associating them with these underlying cardiac myopathies and hind channel abnormalities. So no one doubts we've come a tremendous way, but there's a long way to go in terms of getting better diagnostic accuracy and really defining where these genetic testing are ultimately going to play out in clinical medicine. So everyone's excited about it, but I think these two papers are two cautionary tales that we do have to remember that genetic testing in 2018 is not the end all and be all. Dr Carolyn Lam:                I love that, cautionary tales. So important. But where do we go from here? What's the take home message for clinicians listening to this today in 2018? I mean is it that perhaps when we do these things we now need to include medical geneticists and genetic counselors as vital partners as we look at this all? Perhaps we need to not forget the primacy of clinical evaluation. What do you think, Sanjay? Dr Sanjay Shar:                  Well, there are guidelines from the American Medical Genetics side as to what one defines as a disease-causing mutation. But I agree that we need to be using certified laboratories that can actually interpret the genetic mutations. For example, in our study of athletes, 63% actually had variance of undetermined significance. So they had spinning mistakes in their genes which probably didn't account to anything at all, but had these mutations, or these so called variance of undetermined mutations been interpreted by someone who didn't really know much about this, these could have resulted in false positive results which could cause absolute chaos for an athletes career. So I do think this type of testing has to be governed very, very carefully and needs to be performed in very specialized and certified laboratories. Dr Carolyn Lam:                Indeed. Not just to the athlete, but to their families too, isn't it? Mark, what do you think is the take home message [inaudible 00:16:18]? Dr Mark Link:                     I think one of the big take home messages that I took away from these papers is that clinical medicine is not dead. In fact, clinical medicine in this day and age is still the prime way of taking care of patients. Genetic testing is still in its infancy. It doesn't help clinically in too many situations yet. It will in the future. It helps in the diagnosis, it's not as useful in the treatment. So we have a long ways to go with genetics. I like your comment that going forward we're going to need more genetic counselors to make sense of these results. Clinicians are going to have a hard time making sense of these results. I do think that there is plenty of role once a disease causing mutation has been defined, and in that situation it's invaluable in cascade screening in identifying other family members who may be affected, but outside that I do believe and I agree completely with both of you, that clinical medicine is not dead. And clinical evaluation should be number one and should enjoy it's prime time because that's where we still are at. And genetics is still in its infancy and so is cardiology. Dr Carolyn Lam:                Perhaps in selective settings ... We're not talking here about, for example, hypercholesteremia variance, we're not talking about cancer gene variance for which screening may be a little bit more advanced, and we may understand the gene phenotype associations that are perhaps- Dr Mark Link:                     I think that understanding gene phenotype associations are going to be critically important in the future. I think, as Sanjay said, the real use of genetic screening now is cascade screening for the family, and there it's invaluable. That you can tell if you've got a co-band with the disease, and with a defined pathological mutation. You can test siblings, sons and daughters, parents to see if any of them have the gene. I think that's where it should be used for sure in 2018. Dr Carolyn Lam:                Thank you so much Mark and Sanjay. So some precautions, some hope. Very, very balanced discussion. So much more we could discuss, so I really want to highly encourage our audience. Pick up this issue. You have to read these amazing papers and the editorials. Dr Carolyn Lam:                So, here's a podcast with all your colleagues, and don't forget to tune in next week.  

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Dr. Paul Wang:           Welcome to the monthly podcast On the Beat for Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. I'm Dr Paul Wang, editor-in-chief, with some of the key highlights for this month's issue. We'll also hear from Dr. Suraj Kapa reporting on new research from the latest journal articles in the field.                                                 In our first article, Barry Maron associates report on the long term clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients following ICD therapy for ventricular arrhythmias. They studied a cohort of 486 high-risk hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with ICDs from eight international centers. Of these 486 patients over 6.4 years, 94 patients or 19% experienced appropriate ICD interventions, terminating VT or VF. Of the 94 patients receiving appropriate ICD therapy, 87 were asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic at the time of appropriate ICD interventions. Of these 87 patients, 74 or 85% remained in classes one or two without significant change in clinical status of the subsequent 5.9 years up to 22 years. Among the 94 patients, there was one sudden death in three patients who died from non arrhythmic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy related processes. Post ICD intervention, freedom from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, mortality was 100% at one year, 97% at five years, and 92% at 10 years, distinctly lower than the risk of ischemic or non ischemic cardiomyopathy in ICD trials.                                                 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with ICDs interventions reported the heightened anxiety and expectation of future shocks. However, they did not affect general psychological well-being or quality of life. The authors concluded that in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, unlike ischemic heart disease, prevention of sudden death with ICD therapies unassociated with a significant increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, nor transformation into heart failure deterioration, ICD therapy does not substantially impair overall psychological and physical well-being. In our next article, Abdulla Damluji and associates examined the cost of hospitalizations for cardiac arrest using the US nationwide inpatient sample from 2003 to 2012. Using the log transformation of inflation adjusted costs the authors examined 1,387,396 patients who were hospitalized after cardiac arrest. They had a mean age of 66 years. Inpatient procedures included coronary angiography in 15%, PCI in 7%, intra-aortic balloon pump in 4.4%, therapeutic hypothermia in 1.1%, and mechanical circulatory support in 0.1% of patients.                                                 Notably the rates of therapeutic hypothermia increased from 0 in 2003 to 2.7 in 2012, p less than 0.001. Both hospital charges inflation adjusted costs linear increased over time. In a multi-variant analysis predictors of inflation adjusted costs included large hospitals size, urban teaching hospital, and length of stay. Among co-morbidities, atrial fibrillation or fluid and electrolytes imbalance were the most common associated with cost. The authors found that during the period between 2003 and 2012 post cardiac arrest, hospitalizations had a steady rise and associated healthcare costs likely related to increase length of stay, medical procedures and systems of care.                                                 In our next paper, Peter Huntjens and associates examined intrinsic interventricular dyssynchrony as a predictor of human dynamic response to cardiac resynchronization. The authors use a cardiovascular computational model CircAdapt to characterize the isolated effect of intrinsic interventricular or intraventricular activation on resynchronization therapy response that is the change in LV dP/dt max. The simulated change in LV dP to dt max had a range of 1.3 to 26.5% increased considerably with increasing inter ventricular dyssynchrony. In contrast, the isolated effect of intra ventricular dyssynchrony was limited with the change in the LV dP/dt max range and the left ventricle from 12.3 to 18.3% in the right ventricle from 14 to 15.7%.                                                 Secondly, electrocardiographic imaging derived activation characteristics of 51 CRT candidates were used to create individual models of ventricular activation in CircAdapt. The model predicted change in LV dP/dt max was close to the actual value in left bundle branch block patients with 2.7% difference between measured and simulated when only intrinsic interventricular dyssynchrony was personalized. Among non left bundle branch block patients a change in LV dP/dt max was systematically over predicted by CircAdapt with a 9.2% difference between measured and simulated. Adding intra ventricular activation to the model did not improve the accuracy of response prediction. The authors found that computer revealed intrinsic interventricular dyssynchrony is the dominant component of the electrical substrate driving the response to CRT.                                                 In the next paper Kenji Kuroki and associates examined the use of voltage limit adjustment of substrate mapping and fast Fourier transform analysis of local ventricular bipolar electrograms during sinus rhythm to predict VT isthmuses. They performed these studies and nine post infarction patients who underwent catheter ablation for total of 13 monomorphic ventricular tachycardias. Relatively higher voltage areas on electroanatomical map or defined as high voltage channels, which were further classified as full or partial if the entire or more than 30% of the high voltage channel was detectable. 12 full high voltage channels were identified in seven of nine patients. Relatively higher fast Fourier transform areas were defined as high frequency channels, which were located on seven of 12 full high voltage channels. Five VT isthmuses or 71% were included in the seven full high voltage channels positive in high frequency channel positive sites.                                                 While no VT isthmuses were found in five full high voltage channel positive but high frequency channel negative sites, high frequency channels were identical to 9 out of 16 partial high voltage channels. Eight VT isthmuses or 89% were included in nine partial high voltage channel positive in high frequency channel positive sites, whereas no VTs isthmuses were found in the seven partial high voltage channel positive and high frequency channel negative sites.                                                 All high voltage channel positive in high-frequency channel positive sites predicted VT isthmus with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 80%. The authors concluded that based on this small series that combined use of voltage, limited adjustment and fast Fourier transform analysis may be useful method to detect VT isthmuses.                                                 In the next study, John Whitaker and associates examined the use of lesion index, LSI index, a proprietary algorithm combining contact force, radio-frequency application duration, and RF current. Cardiac CT was used to assess atrial tissue thickness. Ablation lines two to three per animal were created in the right atrium in seven mini pigs with point lesions using 25 watts of energy. Two weeks after the ablation, serial sections of targeted atrial tissue or examine histologically to identify gaps and transmural ablation. LSI guidelines had a lower incidence of histological gaps. Four gaps in the 69 catheter moved or 5.8% compared to ablation using LSI plus two millimeter lines in which there is seven gaps in 33 catheter moves or 21.2% and using LSI plus four millimeter lines in which there are 15 gaps in 23 moves or 65.2% p less than 0.0. The change in LSI was calculated retrospectively is a distance between two adjacent lesions above the mean LSI of the two lesions. Changing LSI values of 1.5 or less were associated with no gaps in transmural ablation.                                                 The authors concluded that in this mod of chronic atrial ablation delivery of uninterrupted transmural linear lesions may be facilitated using LSI to guide catheter movement. When change in LSI between adjacent legions is 1.5 millimeters or lower, no gaps in atrial linear lesions should be expected.                                                 In our next paper, Matthew Bennett and associate examined whether their response to antitachycardia pacing in patients with ICD could further discriminate ventricular from super ventricular arrhythmias in patients receiving ATP in the RAFT trial. The RAFT trial randomized 1,798 patients with New York Heart Association class two or three heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 30%, in QRS duration 120 millisecond or greater, to an ICD plus or a minus cardiac resynchronization. Beginning with 10,916 ATP attempts for 8,150 tachycardia episodes in 924 patients, the author's excluded tachycardias where ATP terminated the episode or were the specific etiology tachycardia was uncertain. In this study, they analyzed 3,676 ATP attempts delivered to 2,046 tachycardia episodes in 541 patients. The authors found that a shorter difference between the post pacing interval is PPI minus TCL, was more likely to be associated with VT than SVT, mean of 138.1 milliseconds for VT and 277.4 milliseconds for SVT p, less than 0.001. A PPI minus TCL value of less than or equal to 300 milliseconds had a sensitivity in 97.4% and a specificity of 28.3% for VT.                                                 The authors concluded that specifically the PPI minus TCL following antitachycardia pacing may help distinguish ventricular from supraventricular arrhythmias.                                                 In the next study, Shailee Shah and Amr Barakat and associates examined the outcomes after repeat AF ablation. The authors examined 137 patients out of a total of 10,378 patients undergoing Afib ablation who had had initial long-term success defined from recurrent arrhythmias for greater than 36 months off anti-arrhythmic drugs in subsequent underwent repeat ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation. The median arrhythmia free period that define long-term success was 52 months. In redo-ablations reconnection of at least one of the pulmonary veins was found in 111 or 81% of patients. Additional non PV ablations were performed in 127 or 92.7% of patients. After a mean follow-up of 17 months, 103 patients or 75% were arrhythmia-free, 79 off anti-arrhythmics, and 24 on arrhythmics. The authors found that repeat ablations with re-isolation to the point of veins and modifying the atrial substrate had a good success rate.                                                 In the next article Qiongling Wang and associates hypothesized that genetic inhibition of CaMKII oxidation in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy can alleviate abnormal calcium homeostasis thus preventing ventricular arrhythmias. The authors tested whether the selective loss of oxidation of the CaMKII effects ventricular arrhythmias in the mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Genetic inhibition of ox-CaM kinase II by knocking replacement of the regulatory domain methionines with valines, which we'll call MMVV, prevented ventricular tachycardia in the mdx mice. Confocal calcium imaging of ventricular myocytes, isolated from the mdx MMVV mice revealed normalization of intra-calcium release events compared to myocytes from the mdx mice. Abnormal action potentials as assessed by optical mapping mdx were also alleviated by genetic inhibition of ox-CaMK II. Knockout of the NADPH oxidase regulatory sub-unit P 47 Fox normalized elevated ox-CaMK II, repaired intracellular calcium hemostasis and rescued inducible ventricular arrhythmias in the mdx mice. The authors concluded that inhibition of ROS or ox-CaMK II protects against pro-arrhythmic intracellular calcium handling, preventing ventricular arrhythmias in a mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.                                                 In the next article, Kyohei Marume and Teruo Noguchi and associates examined whether the combination of QRS duration of 120 milliseconds or greater in late gadolinium enhancement is a precise prognostic indicator for the primary endpoint of all cause death and a composite of sudden cardiac death or aborted sudden cardiac death in 531 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. They also analyzed the association between the combination of late gadolinium enhancement and increased QRS duration in these end points among patients with a class one indication for implantable defibrillator. The author's divided study patients in three groups according to late gadolinium enhancement in QRS duration. Two negative indices that is late gadolinium enhancement negative and narrow QRS, one positive index with either late gadolinium enhancement positive or wide QRS or two positive indices late gadolinium positive and wide QRS and followed them for 3.8 years. Multiple variable Cox regression analysis identified to positive indices as significant predictors of all cause death. A hazard ratio of 4.29 p equals 0.026. Among the 317 patients with a class one indication for ICD, the five year event rate of sudden cardiac death or aborted sudden cardiac death was lowest in the two negative indices groups, 1.4%. With propensity score matching cohorts the two negative indices group had a significant lower event rate of sudden cardiac death or aborted sudden cardiac death than to two other groups hazard ratio 0.2, p equals 0.046.                                                 The authors concluded that the combination of late gadolinium enhancement in wide QRS provides additional prognostic stratification compared to late gadolinium enhancement status alone.                                                 In the next study, Matthew Sulkin and associates examined whether a novel local impedance measurement on an ablation catheter identifies catheter tissue coupling and is predictive of lesion formation. The author's first studied explanted hearts, 10 swine, and then in vivo 10 swine, using an investigational electro anatomical mapping system that measures impedance from an ablation catheter with mini electrodes incorporated into the distal electrode. Rhythmia and Intellanav, Boston Scientific.                                                 Explanted tissue was placed in a warmed 37 degree celsius saline bath mounted on a scale, and the local impedance was measured 15 millimeters away from the tissue to five millimeters of catheter tissue compression at multiple catheter angles. Lesions were created for 31 and 50 watts from 5 to 45 seconds for an N of 70. During in vivo valuation of the local impedance measurements of the myocardium 90 and blood pool 30 were guided by intracardiac ultrasound while operators were blinded to the local impedance data. Lesions were created with 31 and 50 watts for 45 seconds in the ventricle with an n of 72. The local impedance of myocardium, which was 119.7 ohms, was significantly greater than in blood pool 67.6 ohms the p of less than 0.01. Models that incorporate local impedance drop to predict lesion size had better performance that models incorporate force time integral r squared of 0.75 versus r squared of 0.54 and generator impedance drop r squared of 0.2 versus r squared of 0.58. Steam pops displayed a significantly higher starting local impedance and a larger change in local impedance compared to successful RF applications, p less than 0.01.                                                 The authors concluded that local impedance recorded for miniature electrodes provides a valuable measure of catheter tissue coupling and the change in local impedance is predictive of lesion formation during RF ablation.                                                 In the next paper, Boaz Avitall and associates found that the rising impedance recorded from a ring electrode placed two millimeters from the cryoballoon signifies ice formation covering the balloon surface and indicates ice expansion. The authors studied 12 canines in a total of 57 pulmonary veins, which were targeted for isolation. Two cryoapplications were delivered per vein with a minimum of 90 and a maximum 180 second duration. Cryoapplications was terminated upon reaching a 500 ohm change from baseline. Animals recovered 38 plus or minus six days post procedure, and the veins were assessed electrically for isolation. Heart tissue was histological examined. Extra cardiac structures were examined for damage. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% of veins if the impedance reached 500 ohms in 90 to 180 seconds. When the final impedance was between 200 and 500 ohms within 180 seconds of freeze time, pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 86.8%. For impedance of less than 200 ohms pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 14%. No extra cardiac damage was recorded. The authors found that impedance rise of 500 ohms at less than 90 seconds with a freeze time of 90 seconds resulted in 100% pulmonary vein isolation.                                                 In our final papers Sally-Ann Clur and associates examined left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time as the potential diagnostic marker for fetal Long QT Syndrome. Left ventricular isovolumetric contraction time, ejection time, left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time, cycle length, and fetal heart rate were measured using pulse doppler wave forms in fetuses. Time intervals were expressed as percentage of cycle length, and the left ventricular myocardium performance index was calculated. Single measurements were stratified and compared between Long QT Syndrome fetuses and controls. Receiver operator curves were reformed for fetal heart rate in normalized left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time. A linear mixed effect model including multiple measurements was used to analyze fetal heart rate, the left ventricular iso volume metric relaxation time, and the left ventricular myocardial performance index. There were 33 Long QT fetuses in 469 controls. In Long QT fetuses the left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time was prolonged in all groups, p less than 0.001, as was the left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time.                                                 The best cutoff to diagnose Long QT syndrome was the normalized left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time greater than equal to 11.3 at less than or equal to 20 weeks, giving a sensitivity in 92% and a specificity of 70%. Simultaneous analysis of the normalized left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time and fetal heart rate improved the sensitivity and specificity of Long QT Syndrome, AUC of 0.96. The normalized left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time, the left ventricular myocardial performance index, and fetal heart rate trends differed significantly between Long QT Syndrome fetuses and controls throughout gestation.                                                 The authors concluded that left ventricular volumetric relaxation time is Prolonged QT fetuses. Findings of a prolonged normalize left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time, and sinus bradycardia can improve the prenatal detection of fetal Long QT Syndrome.                                                 That's it for this month, but keep listening. Suraj Kapa will be surveying all journals for the latest topics of interest in our field. Remember to download the podcasts On the Beat. Take it away Suraj. Suraj Kapa:                          Thank you, Paul and welcome back to On the Beat were we will be summarizing hard-hitting articles across the entire electrophysiologic literature. Today we'll be starting within the realm of atrial fibrillation where we're review an article within the realm of anticoagulation and stroke prevention. Quon et al. published in last month's issue of JACC cardiac electrophysiology on anticoagulant use and risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding in patients with secondary atrial fibrillation. It is well known that use of anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation can reduce overall thromboembolic outcomes. However, its role in secondary atrial fibrillation is unclear. Thus, the authors sought to evaluate the effects anticoagulant use on stroke and bleeding risk. Amongst those where atrial fibrillation occurred in the setting of acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary disease, or sepsis. Amongst around 2300 patients evaluated retrospectively there was no evidence of a lower incidence of ischemic stroke among those treated with anticoagulants compared to those who are not.                                                 However, anticoagulation was associated with a higher risk of bleeding in those with new onset AF associated with acute pulmonary disease. The authors suggest as a result that there is unclear overall benefit for long-term anticoagulation in patients with presumed secondary atrial fibrillation. The difficulty in assessing this is how to define secondary atrial fibrillation. However, in many studies patients who developed in the setting of acute illness still had a high risk of developing quote unquote clinically significant AF in long-term follow-up. However, this was not necessarily absolute as many patients not necessarily develop AF that could be considered clinically significant. Thus, the clinical question that arises is: how long should we treat a patient with anticoagulation when they have presumed secondary atrial fibrillation. These data seem to suggest that there may be no net overall benefits. In other words, all-comers with secondary atrial fibrillation should not necessarily be forever treated with anti-coagulation. However, this slightly requires clinical trials to evaluate further.                                                 Next we delve into the realm of cardiac mapping and ablation where we view an article by Gaita et al. entitled 'Very long-term outcome following transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Are results maintained after 10 years of follow-up?', published in Europace last month. While pulmonary vein isolation is a widely accepted approach for treatment of atrial fibrillation, most reported studies review outcomes in terms of freedom of AF over a relatively short time period, generally two to five years. However longer term follow up is inconsistently reported. Gaita et al. sought to review 10 year outcomes amongst 255 patients undergoing ablation in a single center. They noted 52% remainder arrhythmia-free amongst a mixed cohort of both paroxysmal and persistent patients while 10% progressed to permanent atrial fiBrillation. They found that absence of increases in blood pressure, BMI, and fasting glucose was protective against an arrhythmia recurrence.                                                 These findings suggest that in a relatively small cohort of patients limited to a single center that even long-term outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation are generally quite good, exceeding 50%. However, future freedom from atrial fibrillation is heavily tied to control of other risk factors. In other words, if a patient is going to have poor control of diabetes, blood pressure, or gain weight, the benefit of their pulmonary vein isolation over long-term follow-up is likely less. These data thus highlight both the potential long-term benefit of PVI, but also the importance of counseling patients regarding the need for continued management and control of future and existing risk factors.                                                 Staying within the realm of atrial fibrillation we next review an article by Weng et al. entitled 'Genetic Predisposition, Clinical Risk Factor Burden, and Lifetime Risk of Atrial Fibrillation' published in last month's issue of circulation. The probability of detecting atrial fibrillation in patients based on clinical factors and genetic risk is unknown. Weng et al. sought to clarify whether a combination of clinical and polygenic risk scores could be used to predict risk of developing atrial fibrillation over long-term followup in the Framingham Heart Study. Amongst 4,600 individuals, 580 developed incident atrial fibrillation and had an overall lifetime risk of developing atrial fibrillation of 37%. Those are the lowest risk tertile based on clinical risk factor burden and genetic predisposition had a lifetime risk of 22% versus 48% in the highest. Furthermore, a lower clinical risk factor burden was associated with delayed atrial fibrillation onset. In order to identify patients with atrial fibrillation, before negative sequelae such as stroke occur, patient and physician understanding of risk and monitoring needs is necessary. The fact is that it will be great to identify every single patient who has atrial fibrillation before they have a negative sequela of that atrial fibrillation such as ischemic stroke.                                                 However, performing continuous monitoring of all patients with potential negative sequelae of atrial fibrillation is extraordinarily difficult. The reason is it's excessively costly. We cannot monitor the entire population irrespective of whatever the risk factors are. However, if we're able to identify the highest risk cohorts early on before the atrial fibrillation onsets, this may offer opportunities for use of newer cheaper monitors. The work by Weng et al. suggests one such possible approach combines clinical and polygenic risk scores. Actionability of these data, however, remains to be seen and further validation other cohorts is necessary to clarify generalized ability.                                                 The next article we review is published in last month's issue of the Journal of American College of Cardiology by Lopes at al. entitled 'Digoxin and Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Lopes et al. sought to evaluate the impact of the Digoxin on mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation and the association with the Digoxin serum concentration and heart failure status. They value this association in over 17,000 patients. At baseline 32% were receiving Digoxin. Baseline Digoxin use did not associate with risk of death, but even in these patients a serum concentration of greater than 1.2 nanograms per milliliter was associated with a 56% increase in mortality risk. For each .5 nanogram per milliliter increase in oxygen concentration the hazard ratio increased by 19% for overall mortality. This was irrespective of heart failure status. Furthermore, in patients who are newly started in Digoxin over the follow-up period, the risk and death and sudden death was higher. These data suggests a significant risk associated with Digoxin use for management of atrial fibrillation irrespective of heart failure status. Furthermore, serum valleys above 1.2 require close consideration of dose de-escalation. Whether there is any optimal dose, however, from the study is unclear. These data amongst a host of prior data strongly suggest again strategic use of Digoxin  principally for the management of atrial fibrillation.                                                 Moving on within the realm of atrial fibrillation, we review an article published in last month's issue of Circulation Research by Yan et al. entitled Stress Signaling JNK2 Crosstalk with CaMKII Underlies Enhanced Atrial Arrhythmogenesis. In this more acellular based study the mechanism underlying atrial arrhythmogenesis associated with aging was evaluated. Yan et al. sought to figure out whether the stress response JNK in calcium mediated arrhythmias might contribute to atrial arrhythmogenesis in aged transgenic mouse models. They demonstrated significant increased activity of JNK2 and aging atria, those furthermore associated with rhythmic remodeling. This association was mediated through CaMKII and ryanodine receptor channel function, with activation of the former leading to increased calcium leak mediated by the ladder. This in turn related to increase atrial fibrillation likelihood. Identifying novel targets for atrial fibrillation therapy is critical. Given atrial fibrillation is a complex disease process related to a multitude of risk factors it can be assumed that the contribution of any single factor may be mediated through distinct mechanisms.                                                 Aging in particular as well regarded, but considered to be non-modifiable risk factor for atrial fibrillation. Identifying genes or pathways, the immediate aging associated fibrillation, may take the risk of aging as no longer a non-modifiable thing. The finding of the significance of JNK2 and associate downstream effects with AF risks and aging hearts may hold potential in offering unique therapeutic targets.                                                 Finally, within the realm of atrial fibrillation, we're viewing article by Chen et al. in last month's issue of the Journal of the American Heart Association entitled Association of Atrial Fibrillation With Cognitive Decline and Dementia Over 20 Years: The ARIC-NCS Study. Multiple studies have suggested a significant association between atrial fibrillation risk of dementia. However, these studies have limited time follow-up and were often done and predominantly white patients. Thus, the authors sought to use the data from ARIC, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study, to assess the risk of cognitive decline associated with atrial fibrillation. Amongst over 12,000 participants, a quarter of whom are black and half of whom are white, they noted 2100 patients developed atrial fibrillation and 1,150 develop dementia over a 20 year follow up period.                                                 There was a significantly greater risk of cognitive decline amongst those who developed atrial fibrillation. In turn incident atrial fibrillation for the follow-up period was associated with a higher risk of dementia even after adjusting for other clinical and cardiovascular risk factors such as incidents that ischemic stroke. These data further strengthened prior evidence of a direct link between atrial fibrillation and risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Understanding this long-term risk raises the need to additionally identify approaches to prevent this occurrence, which in turn is dependent on understanding the underlying mechanisms. The finding that the risk of cognitive decline dementias independent of ischemic stroke events raises concern that either subclinical micro-embolic events or other factors may be playing a role in this risk and in turn raises question as to how best to prevent them. Until better understood, however, the question of whether the association is causal remains to be seen.                                                 Changing gears yet again, we now delve into the realm of ICDs, pacemakers and CRT. Published in last month, issue of Heart Rhythm Tarakji et al. published a paper entitled 'Unrecognized venous injuries after cardiac implantable electronic device transvenous lead extraction.' Overall risk of transvenous lead extraction includes that of potentially fatal venous laceration. The authors sought to evaluate the incidence of venous injury that may be unrecognized based on microscopic study of extracted leads. Amongst 861 leads obtained from 461 patients they noted 80 leads or almost 9%. Amongst 15% of patients showed segments vein on the lead body, most of which were transmural including the tissue layer. However, in terms of clinical significance, only 1% had need for emergent surgical intervention for clinically significant venous laceration. Risk factors for having the entire vein on the lead included age of lead, ICD leads, and the use of the laser sheath.                                                 These findings suggest that there may be a high incidence of subclinical venous injury after lead extraction though rarely resulting clinically apparent sequelae. As would be expected, venous injury, including transmural removal of portions of the vein traversed by the lead, was more common amongst older leads, which generally more often require laser sheets and ICD leads. The question is however, whether this carries any direct clinical implications. One they may be considered is the potential additive risk of an advancing new lead through the same venous channel, particularly in the setting of potential transmural venous injury that already exists.                                                 Next in last month's issue of Heart Rhythm we review an article by Sharma at al. entitled 'Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience.' The use of resynchronization therapy for treatment of patients with heart failure and wide QRS has been shown to offer morbidity and mortality benefits. However, many patients maybe non-responders, and recent studies on His bundle pacing of suggested potential clinical benefits. His bundle pacing essentially only requires one pacing catheter attached within the region of the His bundle Sharma et al. sought to evaluate the safety and success rates of His bundle pacing for patients who have either failed standard resynchronization therapy or in whom most tried as a primary intervention. They noted His bundle pacing was successful in 90% of patients with reasonable myocardial and His bundle capture thresholds. Patients in both groups exhibits significant narrowing of QRS morphology and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction from a mean of 30 to 43%. However, a total of seven patients had lead related complications.                                                 These database on a retrospective analysis of two types of patients, those failing standard biventricular therapy, and those on whom his bundle pacing was attempted as a primary modality suggest overall safety and efficacy in a handful of experienced centers. The promise of His bundle pacing is that a may allow for more effective resynchronization than standard approaches. The high rate of success suggests that His bundle pacing maybe both safe and reasonable to pursue. However randomized trials across more centers are needed to fully prove its benefit, particularly as a primary modality of treatments.                                                 Next we review ICDs and chronic kidney disease. In last month's issue of JAMA cardiology by Bansal at al. entitled 'Long-term Outcomes Associated With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease.' While the benefit of ICDs in patients with low EF is widely recognized, modifying factors that may increase risk of death are not as well defined. These include things like advanced age and chronic kidney disease. Bansal et al. sought to evaluate long-term outcomes and ICD therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease. In retrospective study of almost 5,900 ambulatory patients amongst whom 1550 had an ICD, they found no difference in all cause mortality. However, ICD placement was associated with an increased risk of subsequent hospitalization due to heart failure or any cause hospitalization.                                                 In light of recent studies such as DANISH the robust sense of ICD benefit is being questioned. One of the thoughts for the absence of similar benefit to prior studies lies in the improving care of ambulatory heart failure patients. In patients with chronic kidney disease several questions rises to the risk with ICD, including infectious risk in dialysis patients and the concomitant mortality risk with renal dysfunction. The author suggested in retrospective study, no incremental benefit of ICDs in patients with chronic kidney disease and perhaps some element of added risk is related to hospitalization. However, this study has several limitations. It is retrospective and many patients received ICDs may have been perceived to be sicker in some way. Thus care must be taken in interpretation, but consideration of randomized studies to adjudicate benefit are likely necessary.                                                 Finally, within the realm of devices, we reviewed an article by Tayal et al. entitled "Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Narrow QRS Complexes.' publishing the Journal of American College of Cardiology last month. Several parameters have been stressed to identify benefit of resynchronization therapy in patients with wide QRS include cross correlation analysis with tissue doppler imaging. However, many patients may have evidence in mechanical dyssynchrony even in the absence of an apparent wide QRS thus Tayal et al. sought to evaluate the benefit of resynchronization therapy amongst 807 patients with heart failure and a narrow QRS mean criteria in a randomized study. Of the 807 46% had delayed mechanical activation. Those without delay mechanical activation had underwent we standardization therapy and were associated with worse overall outcomes likely due to new delayed mechanical activation potentially related to CRT pacing. These data support the absence of a role for resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS. This is expected as resynchronization therapy likely offers the most benefit in patients with mechanical dyssynchrony that results from electrical dyssynchrony.                                                 Since by its very nature resynchronization therapy relies on non physiologic cardiac pacing thus compared to normal cardiac activation the nature of resynchronization pacing is desynchronization. These data support the absence of a role for resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and narrow QRS complexes.                                                 Moving on to cellular electrophysiology we review an article by Kozasa et al. published in last month's issue of Journal of Physiology entitled 'HCN4 pacemaker channels attenuate the parasympathetic response and stabilize the spontaneous firing of the sinoatrial node.' Heart rate is controlled by an interplay between sympathetic and parasympathetic components. In turn HCN4 abnormalities have been implicated in congenital sick sinus syndrome. The authors sought to clarify the contribution of HCN4 to sinus node autonomic regulation. They created a novel gain-of-function mouse where the HCN4 activity could be modulating from zero to three times normal. They then evaluated ambulatory heart-rate variability and responsive heart rate to vagus nerve stimulation. They found HCN4 over-expression did not increase heart rate, but attenuated heart-rate variability. It also attenuated bradycardic response to vagus nerve stimulation. Knockdown of HCN4 in turn lead to sinus arrhythmia and enhanced parasympathetic response. These data suggest HCN4 attenuates sinus node response to vagal stimuli thus stabilizing spontaneous firing of the node. The clinical application of this remain to be seen but are maybe important in that they highlight a mechanism for a heretofore poorly understood mechanism for how exactly HCN4 abnormalities may lead to sick sinus syndrome.                                                 Within the realm of ventricular arrhythmias we highlighted a number of articles published this past month. The first article we review was published in last month's issue of JACC clinical electrophysiology, entitled characterization of the electrode atomic substrate and cardiac sarcoidosis: correlation with imaging findings of scarring inflammation published by [inaudible 00:41:40] et al. In patients with cardiac sarcoidosis one of the questions is how to define the electronic atomic substrate, particularly before we entered the electrophysiology laboratory. Both active inflammation and replacement fibrosis maybe be seen in patients. The authors evaluated in 42 patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, the association between an abnormal electrograms and cardiac imaging findings including PET and Computed Tomography, as well as Cardiac MRI. They noted that amongst these 40 patients, a total of 21,000 electrograms were obtained, and a total of 19% of these were classified as abnormal. Most of the abnormalities occurred in the basal paravalvular segments and intraventricular septum. They further noted that many of these abnormalities in terms of electrograms were located outside the low voltage areas, particularly as it relates to fractionation. In about 90% of patients they notice late gadolinium enhancements and they noted abnormal FDG uptakes suggesting active inflammation in about 48%.                                                 However, it should be noted that only 29 of the 42 patients underwent cardiac imaging. Segments with abnormal electrograms tended to have more late gadolinium enhancement evidence scar transmurality, and also they noted that the association of abnormal PET scan did not necessarily occur with abnormal electrograms. Thus, they concluded that in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and ventricular tachycardia pre-procedural imaging with cardiac MRI could be useful in detecting electroanatomic map abnormalities that may in turn be potential targets for substrate ablation. However, they were more likely associated with more scar transmurality and lower degrees of inflammation on PET scanning. These data are important in that they highlight potential non-invasive means by which to understand where substrate might occur in patients with the cardiac sarcoidosis. It is well recognized that cardiac sarcoidosis is associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias. These risks have increased ventricular arrhythmias, might be targetable with ablation. Newer therapies might even offer non invasive means by which to perform ablation in patients best. Thus if we could identify non based on mechanisms of identifying the substrate, this will be even more critical.                                                 The critical findings of this particular paper lie in noting that most of the abnormalities still is in intra ventricular sePtum in basal segments, and also that it is MRI in late gadolinium enhancement and associates more with the abnormal electrograms. Interestingly, the absence of inflammation correlating with the presence of more abnormal electrograms suggests that it is not so much the act of inflammation as being reflected in the endocardial map, but the existence of scar.                                                 Next, again within JACC clinical electrophysiology we review an article by Porta-Sánchez et al. entitled 'Multicenter Study of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation With Decrement Evoked Potential Mapping With Extra Stimulus.' The authors sought to conduct a multicenter study of decrement evoked potential base functional tech ventricular tachycardia substrate modification to see if such mechanistic and physiologic strategies could result in reduction in VT burden. It is noted that really only a fraction of the myocardium in what we presume to be substrate based on the presence of low voltage areas are actually involved in the initiation and perpetuation of VT. Thus if we can identify the critical areas within the presumed substrate for ablation, this would be even a better way of potentially honing in on our targets. They included 20 consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. During substrate mapping fractionated late potentials were targeted and an extra stimulus was provided to determine which display decrements. All patients underwent DEEP focus ablation with elimination being correlated with VT non-inducibility after radio-frequency ablation. Patients were predominantly male, and they noted that the specificity of these decrement evoked potentials to detect the cardiac isthmus for VT was better than that of using late potentials alone. They noted 15 of 20 patients were free of any VT after ablation of these targets over six months of follow-up, and there was a strong reduction in VT burden compared to six months pre ablation.                                                 They concluded that detriment evoked potential based strategies towards ablation for ventricular tachycardia might identify the functional substrate and those areas most critical to ablation. They in turn regarded that by its physiologic nature it offers greater access to folks to ablation therapies.                                                 This publication is important in that it highlights another means by which we can better hone in on the most critical regions for substrate evaluation in patients with ventricular tachycardia. The fact is more extensive ablation is not necessarily better and might result in increased risk of harm if we think about the potential effects of longer ablations or more ablation lesions. Thus if we could identify ways of only targeting those areas that are most critical to the VT circuits, we could perhaps short and ablation procedural time, allow for novel ways of approaching targeted ablation with limited amounts of ablation performed, or perhaps even improve overall VT outcomes by knowing the areas that are most critical to ensure adequate ablation therapy provided. However, we need to understand that this is still a limited number of patients evaluated in a non randomized manner. Thus whether or not more extensive ablation performed might have been better is as of yet unclear                                                 Staying within the realm of ventricular tachycardia we review an article published in last month's issue of Heart Rhythm by Winterfield et al. entitled the 'Impact of ventricular tachycardia ablation on healthcare utilization.' Catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia has been well accepted to reduce recurrent shocks in patients with ICDs. However, this is a potentially costly procedure, and thus effect on overall long-term health care utilization remains to be seen. The authors sought to evaluate in a large scale real world retrospective study the effect of VT ablation on overall medical expenditures in healthcare utilization. A total 523 patients met study inclusion criteria from the market scan database. After VT ablation median annual cardiac rhythm related medical expenditures actually decreased by over $5,000. Moreover the percentage of patients with at least one cardiac rhythm related hospitalization an ER visit decreased from 53 and 41% before ablation respectively, to 28 and 26% after ablation. Similar changes we're seeing in number of all cause hospitalizations and ER visits. During the year before VT ablation interestingly there was an increasing rate of healthcare resource utilization, but a drastic slowing after ablation.                                                 These data suggests that catheter ablation may lead to reduced hospitalization in overall healthcare utilization. The importance of these findings lies in understanding why we do the things we do. We can provide a number of therapies to patients, but we seek two different effects. One is the individual effect of improving their particular health. The second thing is trying to avoid increasing healthcare expenditures on a population level and making sure resources are utilized. If we can reduce recurrent hospitalizations and overall healthcare expenditure in patients by providing a therapy in addition to provide individual benefit, this is the optimal situation. These data suggests that VT ablation might provide such a benefits, that in fact it reduces overall healthcare utilization while improving overall outcomes.                                                 Next and finally within the realm of ventricular arrhythmias, we review more on the basic side the role of Titin cardiomyopathy leads to altered mitochondrial energetics, increased fibrosis and long-term life-threatening arrhythmias, published by Verdonschot et al. in last month's issue of European Heart Journal. It is known now that truncating Titin variants might be the most prevalent genetic cause of dilated cardiomyopathy. Thus, the authors sought to study clinical parameters and long term outcomes related to Titin abnormalities in dilated cardiomyopathy. They reviewed 303 consecutive and extensively phenotype dilated cardiomyopathy patients who underwent cardiac imaging, Holter monitoring, and endomyocardial biopsy and in turn also underwent DNA sequencing of 47 cardiomyopathy associated genes. 13% of these patients had Titin abnormalities. Over long-term followup they noted that these patients had increased ventricular arrhythmias compared to other types of dilated cardiomyopathy, but interestingly, they had similar survival rates. Arrhythmias in those Titin abnormal patients were most prominent in those who were subjected to an additional environmental trigger, including viral infection, cardiac inflammation, other systemic disease or toxic exposure. They also noted the cardiac mass was relatively reduced in titan admirable patients.                                                 They felt that all components of the mitochondrial electron transport chain we're simply up-regulated in Titin abnormal patients during RNA sequencing and interstitial fibrosis was also augmented. As a result, they concluded that Titin variant associated dilated cardiomyopathy was associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias, and also with more interstitial fibrosis. For a long time we have reviewed all non ischemic cardiomyopathy as essentially equal. However, more recent data has suggested that we can actually hone in on the cause. In turn, if we hone in on the cause, we might be able to understand the effects of specific therapies for ventricular arrhythmias based on that underlying cause. Patchy fibrosis might not be as amenable, for example, to ablation as discreet substrate that we might see in infarct related VT. Understanding the relative benefit in very specific types of myopathies might hold benefit in understanding how to, one, risk stratify these patients, and two, understand what type of therapy, whether pharmacologic or ablative, might result in greatest benefit to the patients.                                                 Changing gears entirely now to the role of genetics, we review multiple articles in various genetic syndromes published this past month. First, we reviewed an article by Providência et al. published in the last month's issue of heart entitled 'Impact of QTc formulae in the prevalence of short corrected QT interval and impact on probability and diagnosis of short QT syndrome.' The authors sought to assess the overall prevalence of short corrected QT intervals and the impact on diagnosis of short QT syndrome using different methods for correcting the QT interval. In this observational study they reviewed the sudden cardiac death screening of risk factors cohorts. They then applied multiple different correction formulae to the ECGs. They noted that the prevalence of individuals with the QTc less than 330 and 320 was extremely low, namely less than .07 and .02% respectively. They were also more frequently identified using the Framingham correction. The different QTc correction formulae could lead to a shift of anywhere from 5 to 10% of individuals in the cohort overall.                                                 They further noted, that based on consensus criteria, instead of 12 individuals diagnosed with short gut syndrome using the Bazett equation, a different number of individuals would have met diagnostic criteria with other formulae, 11 using Fridericia, 9 with Hodges, and 16 using the Framingham equation. Thus, they noted that overall the prevalence of short QT syndrome exceedingly low and an apparently healthy adult population. However, reclassification as meeting criteria might be heavily dependent on which QT correction formula is used. The importance of these findings is that not all QTs are created equal.                                                 Depending on how you compute the QT interval in which formula to use may affect how you actually risk characterize a patient. Unfortunately, these data do not necessarily tell us which is the right formula, but this highlights that it might be relevant to in the future evaluate the role of different formulae and identifying which is the most necessary to classify a patient.                                                 Moving on to an article published in last month's issue of the journal of clinical investigation by Chai et al. we review an article entitled 'Physiological genomics identifies genetic modifiers of Long QT Syndrome type 2 severity.' Congenital Long QT Syndrome is a very well recognized, inherited channelopathy associated life-threatening arrhythmias. LQTS type 2 is specifically caused by mutations in casein to encoding the potassium channel hERG. However, even with the mutation not all patients exhibit the same phenotype. Namely some patients are more at risk of life threatening arrhythmias in spite of having the same mutation as others who do not exhibit the same severity phenotype. The authors sought to evaluate whether specific modifiable factors within the remaining genetic code might be modifying the existing mutation. Thus, they sought to identify contributors to variable expressivity in an LQT 2 family by using induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes and whole exome sequencing in a synergistic manner.                                                 They found that patients with severely effected LQT 2 displayed prolonged action potentials compare to sales from mildly effected first-degree relatives. Furthermore, stem cells derived from patients were different in terms of how much L-type calcium current they exhibited. They noted that whole exome sequencing identified variants of KCNK17 and the GTP-binding protein REM2 in those patients with more severe phenotypes in whom greater L-type calcium current was seen. This suggests that abnormalities or even polymorphisms in other genes might be modifying the risk attributed to by mutations in the primary gene. This showcases the power of combining complimentary physiological and genomic analysis to identify genetic modifiers and potential therapeutic targets of a monogenic disorder. This is extraordinarily critical as we understand on one level that when we sequence a monogenic disorder that there might exist variants of uncertain significance, namely they have not been classified as disease causing, but could be. In turn, we also recognize that mutations in a family might effect different relatives differently. However, why this is has been relatively unclear.                                                 If we can understand and identify those patients who are most at risk of dangerous abnormal rhythms, this will be useful in how much to follow them, and what type of therapy to use in them. The fact that other genes might modify the risk even in the absence of specific mutations, suggests that novel approaches to characterizing the risk might help for the risk modified patients classification in general. Clinical use, however, remains to be seen.                                                 Moving on from long QT, we evaluate 'The Diagnostic Yield of Brugada Syndrome After Sudden Death With Normal Autopsy' noted in last month's issue of the Journal of American College of Cardiology and published by Papadakis et al. It is well known, the negative autopsies are not uncommon in patients, however, families might be wondering how at risk they are. Thus, the authors sought to assess the impact of systematic ajmaline provocation testing using high right precordial leads on the diagnostic yield Brugada syndrome in a large cohort of Sudden Arrhythmic Death syndrome families. Amongst 303 families affected by Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome evaluation was done to determine whether or not there was a genetic inherited channelopathy cause. An inherited cardiac disease was diagnosed in 42% of the families and 22% of relatives Brugada syndrome was the most prevalent diagnosis overall amongst 28% of families. Ajmaline testing was required, however, to unmask the Brugada Syndrome in 97% of diagnosed individuals. Furthermore, they use of high right precordial leads showed a 16% incremental diagnostic yield of ajmaline testing for diagnosing Brugada syndrome.                                                 They further noted that a spontaneous type 1 regard or pattern or a clinically significant rhythmic event developed in 17% of these concealed regardless syndrome patients. The authors concluded the systematic use of ajmaline testing with high right precordial leads increases the yield of Brugada Syndrome testing in Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome families. Furthermore, they noted that assessments should be performed in expert centers or patients could also be counseled appropriately. These findings are important and one of the big questions always becomes how aggressively to test family members of patients or of deceased individuals who experienced sudden arrhythmic death. Many of these patients have negative autopsies, and genetic autopsy might not be possible due to lack of tissue or blood products that can be adequately tested.                                                 The data here suggest that amongst a group of 303 sudden arrhythmic death, families that Brugada Syndrome is by far the most frequent diagnosis. If an inherited cardiac disease was identified. In turn, it is not ECG alone or echo alone that helps identify them, but requires drug provocation testing in addition to different electrode placements. Whether or not this will consistently offer benefit in patients in general or my result in overcalling remains to be seen next within the realm of genetic predisposition.                                                 We view an area where we don't know if there's a genetic predisposition in article published by Tester et al. entitled Cardiac Genetic Predisposition in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome in last month's issue of the journal of american college of cardiology. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome is the leading cause of post-neonatal mortality and genetic heart diseases might underlie some cases of SIDS. Thus the authors sought to determine the spectrum and prevalence of genetic heart disease associated mutations as a potential monogenic basis for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. They study the largest cohort to date of unrelated SIDS cases, including a total of 419 individuals who underwent whole exome sequencing and targeted analysis for 90 genetic heart disease susceptibility genes. Overall, 12.6% of these cases had at least one potentially informative genetic heart disease associated variants. The yield was higher in those mixed European ancestry than those of European ancestry.                                                 Infants older than four months were more likely to host a potentially informative gene. Furthermore, they noted that only 18 of the 419 SIDS cases hold a [inaudible 01:01:26] or likely pathogenic variant. So in other words, only 4% of cases really had a variant that they could say was distinctly pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Thus, overall, the minority of SIDS cases have potentially informative variant in genetic heart disease susceptibility gene, and these individuals were mostly in the 4 to 12 month age group. Also, only 4% of cases had immediately clinically actionable variance, namely a variant, which is well recognized as pathogenic and where we could actually say that a specific therapy might have had some effect. These findings can have major implications for how best to investigate SIDS cases in families. It might suggest that SIDS cases where the individual was older, nearly 4 to 12 months of age might have a greater yield in terms of identifying variance.                                                 While this might not affect the deceased in fit, it might affect, families are planning on having another child in whom a variant can be identified.                                                 Finally, within the realm of genetics, we review an article published in last month's issue of Science Advances by Huang. et al. entitled 'Mechanisms of KCNQ1 Channel Dysfunction in Long QT Syndrome Involving Voltage Sensor Domain Mutations'. Mutations that induce loss of function of human KCNQ1 underlie the Long QT Syndrome type 1. While hundreds of mutations have been identified the molecular mechanism by which they result in impaired function are not as well understood. The authors sought to investigate impact of 51 specific variants located within the voltage sensor domain and emphasized effect on cell surface expression, protein folding, and structure. For each variant efficiency of trafficking of the plasma membrane, impact of proteasome inhibition, and protein stability were evaluated. They noted that more than half of the loss of function mutations were seen to destabilized structure of the voltage sensor domain, generally accompanied by mistrafficking and degradation by the proteasome.                                                 They also noted that five of the folding defective Long QT Syndrome mutant sites were located in the S0 helix, where they tend to interact with a number of other loss of function mutation sites in other segments of the voltage sensor domain. They suggested these observations reveal a critical role for the S0 helix as a central scaffold to help organize and stabilized KCNQ1 overall. They also note the importance of these findings is that mutation-induced destabilization of membrane proteins may be a more common cause of disease functioning in humans. The importance of these findings lies in better understanding why specific mutations lead to appa

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Please listen to this powerful interview with Jeff & Audra Reidmiller.  Jeff was 35 years young when a significant medical event occurred in the Reidmiller's life.  Jeff lives with Brugada Syndrome.  Brugada Syndrome is a rare genetic heart condition that is not simply diagnosed.  You will hear this amazing couples story and learn about Audra and her Beach Body Coaching.  This family has learned to live a vibrant & vigorous life after adversity struck!  BAM!   

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Jane Ferguson:                Hi, everyone. Welcome to Episode Four of Getting Personal: -Omics of the Heart." I'm Jane Ferguson, an assistant professor at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. This month, we have a special feature from early career member, Andrew Landstrom, who went to the Heart Rhythm Scientific Sessions in Chicago earlier this month and talked to some of the scientists who presented their research. So listen on for interviews Andrews conducted with Anneline te Riele, discussing the challenges and opportunities related to incidental findings in genetic testing, with Ernesto Fernandez, describing his research into whole exome sequencing and Long QT syndrome, and with David Tester, discussing novel variance and pathway analysis in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Andrew :                           My name is Andrew Landstrom and I am from the Baylor College of Medicine Department of Pediatrics' section on Cardiovascular Disease. I'm here at the 2017 Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Sessions. Anneline, will you tell us a little bit more about yourself, and what brought you to HRS? Anneline:                          Sure. So my name is Anneline Te Riele, I am a physician from The Netherlands. I finished my medical training in 2012 basically, in The Netherlands, and I started doing a PhD on ARVC in a combined project of our Netherlands patient as well as a group at Hopkins. So what brought me to HRS? I think of course the science. There's a lot of very good science. Actually, I think it's the best meeting for my purposes. Andrew :                           Absolutely. So will you just start by telling us a little bit about the spectrum of genetic testing in the clinic and about both the opportunities and the challenges that it brings? Anneline:                          Sure. So what we do in clinic, and I think this is really the challenge that we're facing currently, is we have moved from just testing on gene or one small panel of genes to bigger panels and then to whole exome or even whole genome sequencing. And I think the good part of that is that in certain cases, certain well-selected cases, you'll get a higher change of actually finding that gene that is responsible for disease.                                            On the contrary, it also leads to a lot of incidental findings. So findings that you were not expecting based on the phenotype of the patient and then you need to deal with those abnormalities that you've found and that brings on a lot of challenges as well for the family but also for us as physicians. Do we then need to screen those families, what do we do with this patient, do we treat them with medical therapies or drugs or do we give them ICDs? That kinds of question. So that I think is a virtually important part of what we're currently dealing with in clinical practice. Andrew :                           It does seem to be a very widespread problem. And here in the US of course we have the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines about reporting a variance. How do you think that that plays into the increased genetic uncertainty here in the US at least? Anneline:                          So that's a great questions. In 2013, the ACMG produced a guideline on which genes to report if you find these incidental findings. So 24 of these genes, and that's actually a big number, 24 of these genes are cardiovascular genes and that's mainly because changes in cardiovascular genes may detrimental effects down the line and really cause death or certain morbidities that are really important for the patient so we do need to deal with that.                                            And the problem with the ACMG guidelines and especially the pathogenicity guidelines is that they require two aspects. They basically require first that the variant was seen before in other cardiomyopathies or in this case other patients with disease. And that's really difficult for cardiomyopathy genes because these are large genes, they have a lot of novel or private mutations in there, so it's really hard to fulfill that requirement of having been seen before.                                            And the second thing is that the ACMG guidelines require functional studies as another proof of evidence of pathogenicity and of course, I think we would all like to do that in all of our patients, but it's just not feasible for financial purposes and all that. So that's a problem that we're facing. There are options and solutions but I think we'll talk about that later, but yeah, I think that's a problem that we're facing. Andrew :                           So on the one hand you have the ability to make a diagnostic decision based on a clear finding, but oftentimes the threshold to calling it a clearly pathologic variant is very high and oftentimes it never rises to that so it becomes more genetic uncertainty. Anneline:                          Yeah. I think that's basically right. And of course in an ideal world, we'll have certainty and say this is likely or this is definitely pathogenic, and this is likely or definitely benign, but in the real world, really, I think maybe even 80, 90% of the cases were in that gray zone in between and we need to deal with that. Andrew :                           Yeah, yeah. And you had some great resources that both scientists and clinicians alike can apply to these unknown, uncertain variants that might clarify things at least a little bit, and what are these tools? Anneline:                          So of course, from a traditional perspective, we have always looked at in silico predictive programs, we'll look at segregation data, and I think they're all very important, but they all have limitations, so for example, in silico predictive programs, they likely overcall mutations deleterious and segregation data is nothing more than evidence of pathogenicity of a locus to a disorder, not necessarily that variant, so the new things that are on the horizon, and a thing that could be the future of [inaudible 00:06:04] interpretation is collaborative project so really we should be collaborating, we should not be having our own little islands. The collaboration is the key here.                                            And collaborative efforts in the US have been for example, ClinVar and NHLBI funded effort, as well as ClinGen and ClinGen, or Clinical Genome, is perhaps the, at least it claims to be, the authoritative central resource to go back to that curates variants as being pathogenic yes or no. And I think these databases, ClinVar finally has a database entry, so the variants will be in ClinVar, but ClinGen provides an expert panel of individuals who will curate these variants as being pathogenic yes or no. I think that is a central resource that we should all be aware of. I know these are not the only ones, there are other collaborative efforts out there.                                            I mean, there are ways to connect clinicians, so for example, Match Maker Exchange is a website that you could use to enter your variant and the phenotype of the patient and you submit your own information and then you'll get matches in other databases, but not only your own match shows up. So if, say, two years later, another physician comes up and looks for the same variant, you'll get a pop up, which will actually be very nice for these clinicians to get in touch. So that's, I think, the feature ... future of variant interpretation is collaboration. That's basically my, I think my main important message here. Andrew :                           I think that's absolutely right. I think this has become sort of a big data question that requires many perspectives, and a lot of resources to be able to curate accurately. What are some of the limitations of these tools that you've seen that kind of, you have to keep in mind in terms of trying to determine whether a variant is truly pathologic or not with a patient that you have sitting in front of you? Anneline:                          So that is, I mean, of course, there's many limitations in the things that we currently do because there's so much that we don't know. But for example, to give you an example, ClinVar I think, is one central resource that we should all be aware of and if you go to ClinVar, there is actually data from two years ago, and I'm sure the numbers are high if we would look now, but if we look in ClinVar two years ago, we already saw that of the, say 120,000 variants that were in the database, 21% of these variants were called VUSes but if you look at these variants, 17% of the cases, the labs or the individual submitters of ClinVar didn't agree on the actual classification of that variant.                                            So the limitations that we all should be aware of is that there is not one single solution and you should look for evidence and really research your variants. So look at Popmap, look at what is out there, look the patient of course, look at the clinical phenotype, does it match what you think the gene should be doing or not, or is it completely unrelated? And then of course search these databases but be aware of the fact that there may be errors there.                                            Another thing I want to highlight too is that we typically go to population databases, so Exome Variant Server, ExAC, I think these are very popular databases that we use to look at the frequency of variants in a selected population. But really these databases may have sub-clinical disease patients, so I know ExAC has three NYBPC-3 mutations that are known to cause HCM, so this is something to keep in mind. There's not a gold standard truth if you open these databases, but you should have multiple pieces of information when interpreting your variant. Andrew :                           And that's a good point. I think with a lot of these cardiomyopathies and channelopathies, particularly some of the more frequent ones, when you have a database of 60,000 people, at least a couple of them are going to have disease. Anneline:                          Yeah. I think that is part of the problem. I mean HCM is pretty prevalent, I mean one in 500 individuals likely, I mean these are recent numbers, has the disease. So I think the cutoff of a minor allele frequency of five percent, which is in the ACMG guidelines, I think is way too high for this disease. So this is what the cardiovascular expert panel of ClinGen has done, so they ... This is, ClinGen, as you might know, Clinical Genome, is a one-on-one team of curators that know the framework of ClinGen and then there is disease experts that are very well accustomed with the disease and the genes associated with it. So they provide teams and these teams work together, and the cardiovascular expert group has recently published a modified, or customized, ACMG guidelines on how to deal with the intricacies of the cardiomyopathies and for example, NYH-7 which is the first genotype deposed in ClinGen or in ClinVar finally.                                            So they modify that cutoff, the minor allele frequency of five percent, which is the BA-1 ACMG guideline cutoff, they changed that to 0.1% and I think that's exactly what you were saying, that is important to keep in mind, some of the cardiomyopathies are way more prevalent so you should not consider that if you see it in a population database that you think that it's, then it's normal, it's not necessarily the case because this is a prevalent disease. Andrew :                           Yeah, and particularly when commercial genetic testing companies all can't agree that a variant is bad, and we all can't agree that a healthy variant may or may not be good, there is definitely a lot of genetic uncertainty there. Anneline:                          Exactly, exactly. Andrew :                           Now, whole-exome sequencing certainly has its role clinically, even with that genetic uncertainty that we spoke about, but it has a clear role in genetic discovery as well. Anneline:                          Sure. Andrew :                           And you were part of a very recent paper, and you led a very long list of authors, speaking more about your collaborative approach to genetics research that evaluated a novel substrate for ARVC, is that correct? Anneline:                          Yes. So this is something I'm actually pretty proud of. As you said, it's a collaborative effort, so it literally take a village to do these kind of studies and we're lucky enough to collaborate with a lot of people who are interested in the same topic. So what we did ... and I metnioned to you in the beginning, I come from the ARVC field ... So what we did is we had one ARVC patient that was discovered by whole-exome sequencing to carry an SCN5A variant and we, in and of itself, found that that was very interesting, because SCN5A, as you know, has been associated with Brugada syndrome predominantly but many other cardiomyopathies as well, so DCM, even ACM. There's been a lot of controversy about SCN5A in that matter.                                            So the computational data, the population data, it all pointed to the fact that this variant may be pathogenic, but we weren't really able to connect those dots just yet. So we then collaborated with the group in NYU with Mario Delmar, who did, first of all, functional studies on the sodium channel, but what was nice is that he was able to use his novel method of super-resolution microscopy which is a way in which we can look at the nano-scale structure of the cardiomyocytes, or really the small, small levels of molecules that you see in these cells. And what we did is we found that not only NAV1.5 which is the gene product of SCN5A but also [inaudible 00:13:53] which is an adherence structure molecule, which links the cells together was actually less present in our ARVC patient compared to the control. And this was in the IPS so cardiomyocyte molecule, which we corrected using CRISPR-Cas9 technology so I think at least in current practice, on of the best pieces of evidence that we can get.                                            So I think this shows that our SCN5A variant, I mean, in this case, probably really was pathogenic, but also in a pathophysiological standpoint, explains to us how SCN5A mutations, which are typically thought to be only affecting the sodium channel, can also lead to cardiomyopathy phenotype which has implications beyond the ARVC world, but also in DCM I think this is a nice finding of collaboration that I think ... I hope more people will look into this. Andrew :                           Absolutely I think the trouble with SCN5A is exactly like you were saying, it's been implicated in Long QT, Brugada Syndrome, SIDS, [inaudible 00:14:57], now ARVC, and even nodal disease, like sinus syndrome and things like that. So the ability to show sort of mechanistically, that while you have a change in your sodium channel gating that you also have a change in the way that the cells can connect with each other and form contractile force is, I guess, key to your study. Anneline:                          Yeah, yeah. I think this really, I mean, I'm hoping at least, it was also finally published in a journal that looks more into functional studies, so not necessarily only genetics, and I think we need to work closely not only on the genetic side, but look closely at the pathophysiological standpoint for gene discovery purposes because this will really explain to us why one gene is implicated in one disease, and also it points to possible directions to perhaps stop the disease process and treat these patients, which I think is vital in our clinical practice. Andrew :                           So are SCN5A mutations in ARVC a common finding or are they rare? Anneline:                          So they are pretty rare. I mean, we do find them every now and then and maybe they're modifiers. So what we did to follow up on that one individual, we check 281 ARVD patients who were screened just by regular screening, not by whole-exome but we did a targeted screening of SCN5A and we found five variants in these 281 patients, so that's two percent. I mean, it's still rare, but it is as rare as any other minor gene causing ARVC, but it is a rare feature, so I mean, I think it could be a player. And interestingly, the phenotype didn't change much. It wasn't really different from the ARVC patients without an SCN5A mutation which is reassuring.                                            What we also saw is that the prevalence of mutations in those with desmosomal mutations. So ARVC is, as you know, typically associated with diseases or mutations in the desmosome. It was more often seen in those without a desmosomal mutation. That was almost double as frequent as in those with a desmosomal mutation. So it does give us some direction to the fact that this may be a player out there. I mean of course it's not Plakophilin-2 which is the major player, I think, in ARVC, but I think it may cause a, at least a certain form of cardiomyopathy of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy that we need to be aware of. Andrew :                           And how do you think your new discovery of SCN5A being associated with ARVC, how do you think that plays into the bigger discussion we were having about expansive genetic testing and what that may mean for a patient as far as diagnostic utility but also limitations of variant interpretation? Anneline:                          That's a great question. So I think we should be cautious of saying this gene causes only this disease, and I think this is a common feature not only in ARVC but in a lot of cardiomyopathies and even in channelopathies. I think the concept of one gene causes one disease is outdated. We know that multiple genes have multiple effects and this SCN5A, of course the gene product is NAV1.5 which is the major alpha subunit of the sodium channels so it is really not the canonical function of SCN5A or NAV1.5 that causes cardiomyopathy here but it's a non-canonical function so I think we should be aware of the fact that gene products have different functions and that there can be overlap of the cardiomyopathies. So of course I think we should be screwing SCN5A in our ARVC patients and I'm hoping a lot of labs and a lot of physicians are already doing that, but it's really not the only thing that is associated with ARVC. So that's important to keep in mind. Andrew :                           What do you think the next steps are for sort of broadening the implication of your finding? Anneline:                          So what we are doing currently, and is a little bit of a sneak peek, because this data is not really out there yet, but we have, in this cohort, we found these five variants in 281 individuals, and we're currently working on one of these individuals to get another IPSO cardiomyocyte cell line and look into the functional components to that. And interestingly, this variant, that exact variant in that ARVC patient was also found in a Brugada Syndrome patient. So wouldn't it be nice to actually set them side by side and see what the differences are?                                            Of course this is a little bit of a future music, if you know what I'm saying, like this is something that we don't have just yet, but I think what we need to figure out is how epigenetic or environmental factors play into this field and to explain how one gene or one variant, even, can cause opposite functional effects in different phenotypes. Andrew :                           What do you think is needed to help clarify some of the genetic uncertainty you see clinically? Anneline:                          I think a lot of collaboration, a lot of money, quite frankly. I think we need to ... I mean, the functional data is really helping us not only for understanding that single variant, but also for gene discovery, and as I said, for treatment down the line, that is necessary, and I think the variant of uncertain significance, I mean, if we all live on our little islands and only do our little practices, then we're not going to go a lot further. So we need to work together to understand what your patient has in this variant, my patient had in that variant, and this is our phenotype, so we need to connect those dots to be able to make certain conclusions. Andrew :                           Well, I'm all for collaboration, as well as additional money, that's good. Anneline:                          Good. Andrew :                           Well, thank you so much for spending time with us. Anneline:                          Sure. Andrew :                           And again, congratulations on a wonderful presentation. Anneline:                          Thank you very much. Andrew :                           I'm joined by Dr. Ernesto Fernandez from the Baylor College of Medicine to talk about his research project. Ernesto, I'm wondering if we can just start by introducing yourself and what your project is. Ernesto:                            I am a second-year pediatric resident, I'm applying to a cardiology fellowship right now and I'm interested in, obviously, all aspects of pediatric cardiology. We're trying to figure out whether testing for Long QT genes or Long QT syndrome is actually warranted in otherwise healthy individuals. We're trying to see what the yield is on these testings, specifically whole-exome sequencing. Andrew :                           And I think this project really hits on an important point, whereby, because we've been able to interrogate the genome more comprehensively with clinical testing, that we've run into more incidentally identified variants. And these variants can pop up in genes, like the genes responsible for Long QT syndrome. Talk a little bit more about these variants, what the implication is of finding these variants incidentally, and what your project hoped to target as far as the diagnostic value of these variants. Ernesto:                            Yeah. So I guess the answer to your first question is that we are coming up with these marvelous new techniques of analyzing the genome and now we're using whole-exome sequence testing to look up is someone has any exome that's abnormal and this has caused a huge problem whereby we're now finding all these variants that we don't really know what they mean. We call them variants of undetermined significance.                                            Our study is basically premised by the fact that if you have no underlying suspicion for any arrhythmic disease, there's really no need or no indication to be referred for whole-exome sequencing testing, given that the most likely result is a variant that we don't really know what it means. And it's probably going to be benign. Andrew :                           So on the one hand, you have a well-established gene panel that's being used for diagnostic purposes with you index of suspicion being high for Long QT syndrome versus something like a whole-exome gene screen where somebody may not be thinking about Long QT syndrome as a diagnosis and have low pre-test suspicion but then comes back with a variant found in these genes sort of incidentally. Is that sort of the dichotomy you're drawing? Ernesto:                            Yeah. I think the best way of explaining it is through Bay's Theorem whereby if you have someone with a high index of suspicion when you start off to have sudden cardiac death, a family history of an arrhythmic disease, and you get a test for it, such as a gene panel for Long QT syndrome, and they come up with a positive test result, then you're going to say, "Oh. I should probably evaluate this further," whereas if you have someone who has some dysmorphism, they have delay, they might have seizures, but there's no family history of sudden cardiac death, no personal history of syncope, then there's really no need to send off this big gun, the whole-exome sequence, because you're likely to either get a normal variant or you're likely to get a variant that we don't know what to make of. Andrew :                           So I think, Ernesto, that nicely summarizes the clinical question that you had in mind. What was your hypothesis going into the study, and how did you seek to approach that hypothesis, sort of experimentally? Ernesto:                            So we came up with the hypothesis that if you have an incidentally identified variant within the whole-exome sequencing tests without any other clinical suspicion, it's likely to represent a benign finding. We went about by analyzing the data from the Baylor Miraca labs on the whole-exome sequencing data that they achieved, and we looked specifically at individuals who had gotten these tests and found to have a variant of undetermined significance, or had a pathologic variant for either one or all 17 of the genes for Long QT syndrome. We compared them to individuals who had known Long QT syndrome that had undergone genotype testing, and we [inaudible 00:25:21] these individuals from the literature. And we wanted to compare the whole-exome sequencing cohort to individuals who were otherwise healthy and had obtained a whole-exome sequence. So these are patients or individuals from the well-established ExAC database that are believed to be ostensibly healthy individuals. Andrew :                           So if I understand you correctly, you're comparing this unknown cohort, that being the rare variants found in whole-exome sequencing, against a positive control cohort of pathologic cases versus a negative control cohort of healthy individuals derived from the ExAC database to look for whether those west variants are more similar to the cases or the controls. With regards to the west cohort, what was the prevalence of individuals with these incidentally identified variants, how many did you find? Ernesto:                            So we actually found just about 49% of individuals had some variant in Long QT syndrome gene, and noted that about 12% of them had a mutation in the major causes of Long QT syndrome, and just over a third, or 36% had a mutation in the more rare causes of long QT syndrome. Andrew :                           That's a pretty surprising finding. So you're saying that one in two individuals who get whole-exome sequencing sent for whatever reason, have a variant in a Long QT-associated gene? Ernesto:                            That's what the data suggests. Andrew :                           And where did you go from here? Ernesto:                            So from there, we went onto compare the variant frequency between the case's cohort, those individuals with known Long QT syndrome, those individuals in our west cohort from the Baylor Miraca labs, and those individuals from the ExAC database who are otherwise healthy. So we noted that in our west cohort, there was about 13% of individuals who had a positive variant in the Long QT syndrome one through three genes, the major causes of Long QT syndrome. When we compare that to the ostensibly healthy individuals from the ExAC database, it was 12% in that study that had some variant in Long QT syndrome genes that are major causes of Long QT syndrome itself.                                            This was statistically similar, it was indistinguishable. And then when we compared it to the pathologic cases, it was actually about 50% of those cases who had a positive variant in a Long QT syndrome gene one through three. Andrew :                           So there was a relatively low frequency of individuals who had variants in one of the big three Long QT genes in both controls and the west cohort, and was obviously much higher among individuals with a diagnosis of Long QT syndrome. Ernesto:                            Yep. That's exactly what we found. Andrew :                           And where did you go from here? Ernesto:                            And then from there, we had a good idea that there was probably a big difference between cases and west, but we wanted to make sure, gene by gene, that there was no difference between our west cases and the ExAC database, the control cases. So we mapped each variant frequency by gene for the major causes of Long QT syndrome. There was no statistically significant difference between the west and the controls. Andrew :                           So the gene frequencies between the controls and the west were indistinguishable and very much different, both of them, it would seem, to the pathologic cases. Ernesto:                            Correct. Andrew :                           And you then looked at the position of these variants, the actual amino acid residues, correct? Ernesto:                            Yeah. So we looked at, for KCNQ1, KCNH2, and SCM5A, the three major causes of Long QT syndrome, one, two, three respectively, and we mapped out the amino acid positions where there was actually a mutation for each individuals. So the cases, controls, and pathologic cohorts. We determined the percent overlap between the west cohort and the controls and the percent overlap between the west cohort and the cases and noticed that for all three, there is a huge preference for west and control versus west and cases. Andrew :                           So if you're a west variant you're more likely to reside in the residue also occupied by a healthy individual variant as opposed to a pathologic variant? Ernesto:                            Yeah. Exactly. Andrew :                           And so what did you do next? You retrospectively looked at some of the charts of the patients who were seen at Texas Children's Hospital, correct? Ernesto:                            Mm-hmm (affirmative). So then we had 223 total individuals that had an incidentally identified variant within one of the major three genes, the Long QT syndrome genes. We looked at the reasons for their referrals and noticed that the vast majority of individuals were referred for some developmental delay, for some dysmorphism, for a non-cardiac cause, and then it was only about 23% of these individuals that actually had a reason for referral that was cardiac in nature. And less than on percent of individuals were referred for a solely cardiovascular reason. And we concluded that it's unlikely that these individuals were referred for a cardiac reason, as the data suggests, and that as a result, the index of suspicion for an arrhythmia is likely lower in these individuals. Andrew :                           And what did you find when you looked at the charts of those individuals? Ernesto:                            We had EKG data for a good number of them, and we excluded individuals who obviously had no EKG data, and we excluded individuals who had some congenital abnormality and then anyone with any other arrhythmia that would make the QTC interpretation more difficult, such as interventricular conduction defects.                                            We ended up with 62 individuals and 61 of them had a normal QTC, so there was no evidence of QT prolongation at all. There was one individual who was left who had borderline elevated QTC of 460, which was our cutoff for borderline elevation and this individual had actually been seen by pediatric cardiology at Texas Children's Hospital and found to have ... a history of syncope and it was found to be non-cardiogenic in nature. Andrew :                           So matching the variant data which suggested that you had likely found background variation in the west, you found no evidence of Long QT syndrome in these individuals who had variants in Long QT genes. Ernesto:                            That's correct. So, the overall percent was very similar between the healthy individuals and the west individuals. The variant frequencies were almost indistinguishable, and then the variant co-mapping for all, for both the west and the controls, was preferential to the western cases. So that kind of matched what we found in our study, that there was no clinical suspicion or clinical diagnosis of Long QT syndrome in these individuals who had been found incidentally. Andrew :                           Well that sounds to me to be a pretty big finding. Ernesto:                            Yeah. I think it's pretty important to get this information out there. Andrew :                           So what do you think the take home message for your study is? Ernesto:                            I think the take home message is if you don't have a suspicion of Long QT syndrome or of an arrhythmia, there's low likelihood that such a big gun test as the whole-exome sequence is likely going to change your mind. Andrew :                           So Ernesto, what would you advise a cardiologist who maybe gets a patient in clinic with a chief complaint of a VUS in a Long QT associated gene picked up on west, what would you advise based on your study findings? Ernesto:                            They're going to have to determine their own pre-test suspicion. They're going to have to get a good history and physical, probably get a baseline EKG to determine what the QTC intervals are, and if there's really no other clinical suspicion for Long QT syndrome, they're likely to be able to provide reassurance at that point in time. Andrew :                           Ernesto, what do you think the next steps are for this project, and what do you think still needs to be done in the field to reinforce your conclusions? Ernesto:                            I think my study is one of the early studies of this field, so getting more studies like this and other channelopathies, getting not just looking at Long QT one through three but looking at all of them, and in patients who've been evaluated at Texas Children's or any other institution would be helpful. And then moving forward to give more credence to the idea that if you have history that's reassuring and physical exam that's reassuring, then you probably don't need to have further testing. Andrew :                           What do you recommend if your index of suspicion is high for Long QT syndrome, so maybe a QTC in the low 480s, maybe a family history of syncope or seizures, do you think whole-exome sequencing is the way to go? Ernesto:                            Right now, that's probably not the best test, given all these incidental findings that we don't really know what to do with. There's other tests that are more high-tailored for those specific diseases, like Long QT syndrome panel among others, that are probably more likely to give you a positive post-test probability. Andrew :                           So testing for the disease you're suspicious for as opposed to testing indiscriminately? Ernesto:                            Yeah. Andrew :                           So Ernesto, thank you so much for taking the time our of your day to speak with us. Ernesto:                            Thank you, Andrew. Andrew :                           I'm here with David Tester, senior research technologist working with Mike Ackerman at Mayo Clinic, and he just gave a wonderful talk on whole-exome sequencing and next-generation sequencing as an unbiased look to determine underlying causes of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, or SIDS. So David, I'm wondering if you can introduce yourself and talk a little bit about your project. Dave:                                 Sure. I'm Dave Tester and I'm at the Mayo Clinic, again with Mike Ackerman. Dr. Ackerman and I have been together for about 18 years now, with a real focus on genetics of sudden cardiac death disorders. So this latest study was looking at whole-exome sequencing in a population of SIDS cases in collaboration with Dr. Elijah Behr at St. George's University in London.                                            And really the approach, what we were aiming for is really kind of two-fold. First we were looking to determine what is the yield of ultra-rare variance within genes that have been implicated in cardiovascular disorders? These would be the cardiac channelopathies and some of the cardiomyopathies such as ACM or ARVC, for example.                                            And the second thing that we were wanting to look at was can we use this to search for sort of novel candidate genes for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome susceptibility? And so we took that aim and really the main result was to show that about 14% of our SIDS cases had what we term potentially informative variants. And those are going to be variants that were within sort of the major channelopathy genes that are implicated in Long QT syndrome or CPVT as well as loss of function variants within the 90 ICC genes that we had examined.                                            Using the ACMG guidelines for determining the pathogenicity of variants, about 4.3% of our SIDS cases hosted an ACMG guideline predicated likely pathogenic to pathogenic variant. And most of those variants represent either a frame shift or splice site error variance really in minor cardiomyopathy genes and channelopathy genes. So there's still a lot of work that needs to be done in terms of looking at specifically missense variance within channel genes and that sort of thing, and really kind of functionally characterizing those to determine whether or not they truly are pathogenic or if they should remain variants of uncertain significance. Andrew :                           And so you took a very complex disease like SIDS with probably a number of differens ideologies and found a pretty good percentage have suspicious variants, that 14% or so, and then 4% had variants that were so suspicious they would meet American College of Medical Genetics guidelines for being a possible or likely pathologic variant. Where do you think this study lies in sort of the continuum of identifying the genetic ideology of SIDS, and what do you think these findings sort of add to that overall picture? Dave:                                 Well I think these findings in general really just kind of show the complexity of SIDS. Whether or not SIDS is really truly genetic or not, or perhaps it just, if it's not monogenic, perhaps it's polygenic, and so those are some things that we should be considering and looking at. Now some of those questions might be able to be answer through our whole-exome sequencing data set that we have, and I think those are really going to be kind of the next phases.                                            We can also take and do some pathway analyses of the exome sequencing data, for example, and see our variance kind of lining up on certain pathways that may contribute to certain pathologies that could contribute to SIDS. Andrew :                           And in your study, you had a few genes where the number of variants that were found in SIDS cases were higher than in your controls. Can you speak some more about what those genes may tell you in the context of pathway analysis for SIDS? Dave:                                 Yes. So there was ... There were not genes that came out with sort of a genome-wide significance level. But there were at least 400 genes that had a p-value of 0.05 over representation in SIDS versus our ethnic match controls and 17 of those genes have a p-value of 0.005 and we're really kind of focused on some of those that have a little bit higher p-value for us to assess. A few of those genes may represent biologically plausible candidate genes for SIDS and we were kind of actually going through and considering which ones we'd like to follow up on in terms of function. Some of these genes do play a role in, say, cardiorespiratory system and function of the heart as well as in the brain. Andrew :                           So then given all these findings, and the fact that you may have some candidate genes and candidate pathways that might be interesting to look at further, what are the next steps that you think would help this project move forward, and what do you think the field of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Sudden Unexplained Death Syndrome needs to kind of move forward? Dave:                                 Well I think from a genetic standpoint, the study that we just complete was really on a large set of unrelated infants that had died suddenly. We did not have access to parental DNA and so moving forward in terms of the genetics, I think incorporating sort of a trio analysis I think would get at the question of sort of [inaudible 00:42:01] variance for example. The other things, in terms of genetic standpoint is perhaps looking at different genetic mechanisms. Whether these are copy number variance that may be missed by exome sequencing, perhaps some of the SIDS could be due to epigenetic abnormalities or even small chromosomal abnormalities that perhaps may not be detected on certain arrays on there being used. So I think going forward, kind of taking those approaches to look for sort of unique genetic variation. Andrew :                           Well Dave, thank you so much for taking the time to speak with me and congratulations on a great project. Dave:                                 All right, great, thank you. Jane Ferguson:  Thanks to Andrew for highlighting the interesting precision medicine research presented at HRS and thanks to you all for listening. We'll be back with more next month.

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster

SynTalk thinks about the tantalizing cocktail of poisons, toxins & venoms, and wonders if ‘what does not kill us makes us stronger’. We also constantly explore the striking similarity (in many ways) between medicine and poison (a la the vagueness of the word pharmakon). The concepts are derived off / from Sant Eknath, Parikshit, Derrida, & RG Macfarlane, among others. We peek into the world of snakes, scorpions, bacteria, rats, SNARE proteins, Botox, & bioterror. Why are there poisons in nature at all, and is there a link to the natural tendency towards ecological diversity? Is nothing poison in the world? How ‘the dose is the poison’. We (illustratively) explore the origins, structure, molecular & cellular actions, transmission, and dynamics of the Botulinum Neurotoxin (BoNT). How the Botulinum bacteria can survive for many months inside us (unlike any other bacteria). Do we have to have crime to have a stable society, and do poisonous plants & animals serve a parallel purpose in nature? How scorpion poison can be used to (potentially) treat Brugada Syndrome, and its links with cardiac sodium channel. How it is very difficult to use vaccines to permanently protect against venoms given the speed with which toxins act. We also borrow concepts such as padarth and dravya from vaiseshika philosophy to understand the (beautiful) metaphysical link of poison with the concept of ‘space’. How ‘substance’ is something that has different quality and action. Is venom a highly prestigious molecule for the snake itself for finding prey? How, then, do the non venomous snakes make a living? Why a child is (often) not afraid of a cobra? Is it possible to look at (molecular) structure and predict its (poisonous) action? Is it possible to identify the exact molecule (& not the cocktail) responsible for blocking the pre synaptic receptors? Is a more advanced society more vulnerable to poisons? What does poison look like? Should our nature ‘be’ to understand poisons? The SynTalkrs are: Dr. H.S. Bawaskar (medicine, Bawaskar Hospital & Research Centre, Mahad), & Prof. Bal Ram Singh (biophysical chemistry, indic studies, UMass, Dartmouth).

Commentary by Dr. Valentin Fuster