POPULARITY
9 episodes with chris mellon
9 episodes with chris mellon
4 episodes with chris mellon
3 episodes with chris mellon
3 episodes with chris mellon
3 episodes with chris mellon
4 episodes with chris mellon
3 episodes with chris mellon
3 episodes with chris mellon
Patrick discusses Chris Mellon's latest shocking comments in a newly released video.
The UAP Disclosure Fund held an informational briefing about UFOs for Congress. In addition to hearing from Chris Mellon, Avi Loeb, and Tim Gallaudet, we got to hear from Dr. Eric Davis, the alleged author of the Wilson/Davis notes. He spoke about his background in astrophysics and how he started investigating UFOs for Robert Bigelow, eventually becoming one of David Grusch's primary witnesses. He answered questions about exotic material science, UFO flight mechanics, and even talked about the alien races that are alleged to be flying these craft!You can find show notes and references at our website, VeryExcitingTime.com, or support us at patreon.com/VeryExcitingTime.
Patrick discusses Chris Mellon's bombshell comments during a wild Chris Cuomo Interview.
Patrick discusses
Lue Elizondo posted on X that he had began meetings in DC with Chris Mellon and the usual suspects in congress to get the ball rolling on disclosure. Will things actually happen or more of a run around? Kristian HArloff gives his thoughts. #ufo #uap #alien #aliens #uapnews #ufonews #congress
Patrick discusses new video from Japan showing Chris Mellon, Tim Gallaudet, Rep. Eric Burlison and more discussing UFOs with members of the Japanese government.
Patrick discusses bombshell story about David Grusch, Lue Elizondo, Chris Mellon and the Pentagon's office to study UFOs, AARO (All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office). Never in a million years did I think this would happen.
Seriah is joined by Aaron Gulyas and Mike Clelland for the much anticipated year-in-UFO-history episode. Topics include drone viral panic, Luis Elizondo's new book “Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs”, changes in policy on top-secret personnel testifying before Congress, audiobooks, long-term government observation of the UFO phenomenon, Project Blue Book, Hal Puthoff, Roswell, Collins Elite, Nick Redfern, the book “Final Events”, the UFO “truth” vs personal safety and making money, lack of disclosure martyrs, an in-event-of-my-untimely-death video, the 90's book “The Day After Roswell”, Chris Mellon, Lou's involvement with torture at Guantanamo Bay. Abu Ghraib, the ineffectiveness of torture, the TV show “24”, Dick Cheney, further UAP whistleblowers, the “egg video”, Trump's very limited statements on UAPs, Bob Lazar, Stephen Bassett and “buy a bigger TV” for disclosure, Ufology vs pro wrestling, “The Manhattan Alien Abduction” documentary on Netflix, Budd Hopkins, Carol Rainey, real estate deals, Linda Cortile, George Hansen, the 1996 Budd Hopkins book “Witnessed; The True Story of the Brooklyn Bridge UFO Abductions” , the apparent incessant liar “Yancy”, apparent MIB or other fake agents impersonating NYPD cops, Cardinal O'Connor based in NYC, A.P. Strange, Debbie Cobble and Budd Hopkins interpreting her dream as a real event, John Keel and reluctance to edit, the book “The Exiles” contactee memoir, U.S. government agents obsessively “in love” with UFO abductees, unreported kidnappings involving UFOs, the podcast “Bunker Eight”, the drone hysteria, the previous drone activity centered in Colorado, a federal statement in reference to drones over New Jersey, the difficulties of smartphones vs pro-level cameras, photo/film fakery, Seriah's dashcam experiences, Mark Wyatt and owls, Mike's new book on owls, the scientific method vs legal evidence, Dean Radin, psi evidence and it's dismissal by academia, “The Psychic Tapes” podcast, Steven Greer and “Alien Invasion Day”, the “Cosmosis” documentary starring Kelly Chase and Jay King, Daniel Elizondo [no relation], the James Webb telescope and an alien ship, the “the Gobbly Gooker” in the 90's WWF, Blue Avians, and much more! This is every bit as excellent as one would expect!
Seriah is joined by Aaron Gulyas and Mike Clelland for the much anticipated year-in-UFO-history episode. Topics include drone viral panic, Luis Elizondo's new book “Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs”, changes in policy on top-secret personnel testifying before Congress, audiobooks, long-term government observation of the UFO phenomenon, Project Blue Book, Hal Puthoff, Roswell, Collins Elite, Nick Redfern, the book “Final Events”, the UFO “truth” vs personal safety and making money, lack of disclosure martyrs, an in-event-of-my-untimely-death video, the 90's book “The Day After Roswell”, Chris Mellon, Lou's involvement with torture at Guantanamo Bay. Abu Ghraib, the ineffectiveness of torture, the TV show “24”, Dick Cheney, further UAP whistleblowers, the “egg video”, Trump's very limited statements on UAPs, Bob Lazar, Stephen Bassett and “buy a bigger TV” for disclosure, Ufology vs pro wrestling, “The Manhattan Alien Abduction” documentary on Netflix, Budd Hopkins, Carol Rainey, real estate deals, Linda Cortile, George Hansen, the 1996 Budd Hopkins book “Witnessed; The True Story of the Brooklyn Bridge UFO Abductions” , the apparent incessant liar “Yancy”, apparent MIB or other fake agents impersonating NYPD cops, Cardinal O'Connor based in NYC, A.P. Strange, Debbie Cobble and Budd Hopkins interpreting her dream as a real event, John Keel and reluctance to edit, the book “The Exiles” contactee memoir, U.S. government agents obsessively “in love” with UFO abductees, unreported kidnappings involving UFOs, the podcast “Bunker Eight”, the drone hysteria, the previous drone activity centered in Colorado, a federal statement in reference to drones over New Jersey, the difficulties of smartphones vs pro-level cameras, photo/film fakery, Seriah's dashcam experiences, Mark Wyatt and owls, Mike's new book on owls, the scientific method vs legal evidence, Dean Radin, psi evidence and it's dismissal by academia, “The Psychic Tapes” podcast, Steven Greer and “Alien Invasion Day”, the “Cosmosis” documentary starring Kelly Chase and Jay King, Daniel Elizondo [no relation], the James Webb telescope and an alien ship, the “the Gobbly Gooker” in the 90's WWF, Blue Avians, and much more! This is every bit as excellent as one would expect!Recap by Vincent Treewell of The Weird Part PodcastOutro Music is Lee TNB AKA Monkey Mind with Lights Over Phoenix Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In the first half, Mike Bara, a former aerospace engineer turned conspiracy theorist, shared his insights on the intersection of politics, space technology, and the mysteries of UFOs. He delved into the implications of recent congressional hearings on UFOs and thinks there could be a political agenda behind the push for disclosure: a way to get UFOs and aliens into the public discourse. Bara believes the wrong individuals are being called to testify before Congress, as they lack expertise about some of the top UFO cases like Roswell. He was critical of notable witnesses like Chris Mellon and Lue Elizondo, suggesting that their backgrounds in intelligence cast doubt on their trustworthiness. He posited, "What if Kennedy was going to talk about aliens... and that was the reason why they decided to get rid of him?" This theory links JFK's assassination to a broader conspiracy involving alien technology and governmental secrecy.Discussing remarkable advancements in space technology, particularly SpaceX's achievements, he expressed confidence in Elon Musk's ambitions, stating, "When Musk says, I want to go to Mars in four years, who am I to say he's not going to do it?" The conversation shifted to the topic of drones and potential new technologies. A caller theorized about drones laying down reflective powder to enhance holographic images. The guest acknowledged the possibility, stating, "You need a reflective medium... so yeah, it's absolutely possible." He also touched on the Calvine UFO photo taken in Scotland in 1990, which some researchers have called the "best" UFO picture ever. Bara dismissed the diamond-shaped object in the photo as a mountain peak rather than an unidentified object.----------In the latter half, researcher and writer Micah Hanks shared his longtime fascination with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the mysteries of the universe, fueled by advancements in technology, particularly the James Webb Space Telescope. Hanks believes in the likelihood of extraterrestrial life, citing the diversity of organisms on Earth. "I find it almost impossible to think that there isn't life out there," he commented, with liquid methane oceans on moons encircling planets in our solar system, as well as on some of the discovered exoplanets, light years from Earth. He recounted some of the most compelling UFO cases, like the 1964 Lonnie Zamora incident in New Mexico and the 2004 Nimitz incident involving Navy pilots who encountered a Tic-Tac-shaped object. Hanks said he interviewed one of the pilots who described seeing the anomalous object moving erratically on the ocean surface.He acknowledged that while many UFO sightings can be explained, often as misidentified drones or satellites-- he remains captivated by the 2-5% that defy explanation. Discussing historical UFO phenomena, Hanks noted a decline in reported sightings of physical evidence, like landing traces, compared to decades past. He speculated, "Maybe there was a sort of survey... a scientific exploration of a planet... they simply don't need to do that anymore." The discussion moved on to whistleblowers in the UFO community, with Hanks skeptical of some claims while acknowledging the credibility of others. He highlighted the significance of David Grusch's revelations about how the US had reportedly retrieved craft of non-human origin, which was first published on the website he co-founded, The Debrief, in an article by Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal.
In the first half, Mike Bara, a former aerospace engineer turned conspiracy theorist, shared his insights on the intersection of politics, space technology, and the mysteries of UFOs. He delved into the implications of recent congressional hearings on UFOs and thinks there could be a political agenda behind the push for disclosure: a way to get UFOs and aliens into the public discourse. Bara believes the wrong individuals are being called to testify before Congress, as they lack expertise about some of the top UFO cases like Roswell. He was critical of notable witnesses like Chris Mellon and Lue Elizondo, suggesting that their backgrounds in intelligence cast doubt on their trustworthiness. He posited, "What if Kennedy was going to talk about aliens... and that was the reason why they decided to get rid of him?" This theory links JFK's assassination to a broader conspiracy involving alien technology and governmental secrecy.Discussing remarkable advancements in space technology, particularly SpaceX's achievements, he expressed confidence in Elon Musk's ambitions, stating, "When Musk says, I want to go to Mars in four years, who am I to say he's not going to do it?" The conversation shifted to the topic of drones and potential new technologies. A caller theorized about drones laying down reflective powder to enhance holographic images. The guest acknowledged the possibility, stating, "You need a reflective medium... so yeah, it's absolutely possible." He also touched on the Calvine UFO photo taken in Scotland in 1990, which some researchers have called the "best" UFO picture ever. Bara dismissed the diamond-shaped object in the photo as a mountain peak rather than an unidentified object.----------In the latter half, researcher and writer Micah Hanks shared his longtime fascination with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the mysteries of the universe, fueled by advancements in technology, particularly the James Webb Space Telescope. Hanks believes in the likelihood of extraterrestrial life, citing the diversity of organisms on Earth. "I find it almost impossible to think that there isn't life out there," he commented, with liquid methane oceans on moons encircling planets in our solar system, as well as on some of the discovered exoplanets, light years from Earth. He recounted some of the most compelling UFO cases, like the 1964 Lonnie Zamora incident in New Mexico and the 2004 Nimitz incident involving Navy pilots who encountered a Tic-Tac-shaped object. Hanks said he interviewed one of the pilots who described seeing the anomalous object moving erratically on the ocean surface.He acknowledged that while many UFO sightings can be explained, often as misidentified drones or satellites-- he remains captivated by the 2-5% that defy explanation. Discussing historical UFO phenomena, Hanks noted a decline in reported sightings of physical evidence, like landing traces, compared to decades past. He speculated, "Maybe there was a sort of survey... a scientific exploration of a planet... they simply don't need to do that anymore." The discussion moved on to whistleblowers in the UFO community, with Hanks skeptical of some claims while acknowledging the credibility of others. He highlighted the significance of David Grusch's revelations about how the US had reportedly retrieved craft of non-human origin, which was first published on the website he co-founded, The Debrief, in an article by Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal.
In the first half, Mike Bara, a former aerospace engineer turned conspiracy theorist, shared his insights on the intersection of politics, space technology, and the mysteries of UFOs. He delved into the implications of recent congressional hearings on UFOs and thinks there could be a political agenda behind the push for disclosure: a way to get UFOs and aliens into the public discourse. Bara believes the wrong individuals are being called to testify before Congress, as they lack expertise about some of the top UFO cases like Roswell. He was critical of notable witnesses like Chris Mellon and Lue Elizondo, suggesting that their backgrounds in intelligence cast doubt on their trustworthiness. He posited, "What if Kennedy was going to talk about aliens... and that was the reason why they decided to get rid of him?" This theory links JFK's assassination to a broader conspiracy involving alien technology and governmental secrecy.Discussing remarkable advancements in space technology, particularly SpaceX's achievements, he expressed confidence in Elon Musk's ambitions, stating, "When Musk says, I want to go to Mars in four years, who am I to say he's not going to do it?" The conversation shifted to the topic of drones and potential new technologies. A caller theorized about drones laying down reflective powder to enhance holographic images. The guest acknowledged the possibility, stating, "You need a reflective medium... so yeah, it's absolutely possible." He also touched on the Calvine UFO photo taken in Scotland in 1990, which some researchers have called the "best" UFO picture ever. Bara dismissed the diamond-shaped object in the photo as a mountain peak rather than an unidentified object.----------In the latter half, researcher and writer Micah Hanks shared his longtime fascination with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the mysteries of the universe, fueled by advancements in technology, particularly the James Webb Space Telescope. Hanks believes in the likelihood of extraterrestrial life, citing the diversity of organisms on Earth. "I find it almost impossible to think that there isn't life out there," he commented, with liquid methane oceans on moons encircling planets in our solar system, as well as on some of the discovered exoplanets, light years from Earth. He recounted some of the most compelling UFO cases, like the 1964 Lonnie Zamora incident in New Mexico and the 2004 Nimitz incident involving Navy pilots who encountered a Tic-Tac-shaped object. Hanks said he interviewed one of the pilots who described seeing the anomalous object moving erratically on the ocean surface.He acknowledged that while many UFO sightings can be explained, often as misidentified drones or satellites-- he remains captivated by the 2-5% that defy explanation. Discussing historical UFO phenomena, Hanks noted a decline in reported sightings of physical evidence, like landing traces, compared to decades past. He speculated, "Maybe there was a sort of survey... a scientific exploration of a planet... they simply don't need to do that anymore." The discussion moved on to whistleblowers in the UFO community, with Hanks skeptical of some claims while acknowledging the credibility of others. He highlighted the significance of David Grusch's revelations about how the US had reportedly retrieved craft of non-human origin, which was first published on the website he co-founded, The Debrief, in an article by Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal.
In the first half, Mike Bara, a former aerospace engineer turned conspiracy theorist, shared his insights on the intersection of politics, space technology, and the mysteries of UFOs. He delved into the implications of recent congressional hearings on UFOs and thinks there could be a political agenda behind the push for disclosure: a way to get UFOs and aliens into the public discourse. Bara believes the wrong individuals are being called to testify before Congress, as they lack expertise about some of the top UFO cases like Roswell. He was critical of notable witnesses like Chris Mellon and Lue Elizondo, suggesting that their backgrounds in intelligence cast doubt on their trustworthiness. He posited, "What if Kennedy was going to talk about aliens... and that was the reason why they decided to get rid of him?" This theory links JFK's assassination to a broader conspiracy involving alien technology and governmental secrecy.Discussing remarkable advancements in space technology, particularly SpaceX's achievements, he expressed confidence in Elon Musk's ambitions, stating, "When Musk says, I want to go to Mars in four years, who am I to say he's not going to do it?" The conversation shifted to the topic of drones and potential new technologies. A caller theorized about drones laying down reflective powder to enhance holographic images. The guest acknowledged the possibility, stating, "You need a reflective medium... so yeah, it's absolutely possible." He also touched on the Calvine UFO photo taken in Scotland in 1990, which some researchers have called the "best" UFO picture ever. Bara dismissed the diamond-shaped object in the photo as a mountain peak rather than an unidentified object.----------In the latter half, researcher and writer Micah Hanks shared his longtime fascination with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) and the mysteries of the universe, fueled by advancements in technology, particularly the James Webb Space Telescope. Hanks believes in the likelihood of extraterrestrial life, citing the diversity of organisms on Earth. "I find it almost impossible to think that there isn't life out there," he commented, with liquid methane oceans on moons encircling planets in our solar system, as well as on some of the discovered exoplanets, light years from Earth. He recounted some of the most compelling UFO cases, like the 1964 Lonnie Zamora incident in New Mexico and the 2004 Nimitz incident involving Navy pilots who encountered a Tic-Tac-shaped object. Hanks said he interviewed one of the pilots who described seeing the anomalous object moving erratically on the ocean surface.He acknowledged that while many UFO sightings can be explained, often as misidentified drones or satellites-- he remains captivated by the 2-5% that defy explanation. Discussing historical UFO phenomena, Hanks noted a decline in reported sightings of physical evidence, like landing traces, compared to decades past. He speculated, "Maybe there was a sort of survey... a scientific exploration of a planet... they simply don't need to do that anymore." The discussion moved on to whistleblowers in the UFO community, with Hanks skeptical of some claims while acknowledging the credibility of others. He highlighted the significance of David Grusch's revelations about how the US had reportedly retrieved craft of non-human origin, which was first published on the website he co-founded, The Debrief, in an article by Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal.
Seriah is joined by author and researcher Charles Lear and the one and only Red Pill Junkie to discuss the ongoing “Disclosure” movement in Ufology. Topics include Luis Elizondo, his book “Imminent”, Joe Rogan, To The Stars Academy, the Legacy Group, MJ-12, an alleged implant, a strange meta-material, Art Bell, Linda Moulton Howe, Paul Bennewitz, Richard Doty, Adam Gorightly's book “Saucers, Spooks, and Kooks”, Tom DeLonge, Hal Puthoff, Donald Keyhoe, NICAP, James Likowski, AATIP, green orbs, remote viewing, 1st Earth Battalion, Guantanamo Bay detention base, Roswell, Chris Mellon, an alleged international warrant for torture, a 1952 Air Force press conference, Bob Lazar, Robert Bigelow, the disclosure political agenda, Project Stargate, Joe Firmage, the Mormon prophet Joseph Smith, “The Daily Show”, the book “Skinwalkers at the Pentagon”, Tanner F. Boyle, the substack “Getting Spooked”, Chris Bledsoe, Stan Friedman, “Tyler” from the book “American Cosmic” by Diana Walsh Pasulka, the band “Hitchhiker”, the possibilities of a new UFO religion, the Trickster element, Chinese spy balloons, the Nordic and Grey types of alien tropes, element 115, Douglas Dean Johnson, Bob Lazar's strange connections to a biker gang murder, an alleged Russian UFO crash, Area 51 and distraction, George Knapp in Russia, Jack Brewer author of “The Greys Have Been Framed: Exploitation in the UFO Community”, use of allegedly top-secret alien information as a test of trustworthiness, Albatwitch Day content, the podcast “Ley Lines”, Jay Stratton and UAP investigation, the Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Application Program (AAWSAP) vs The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), the National UFO Research Center, David Marler, Mark O'Connell author of “The Close Encounters Man: How One Man Made the World Believe in UFOs”, the 1967 Malmstrom nuclear weapons UFO incident, the spiritual angle on UFO research, Charles McNeal and Anjali and other alleged whistleblowers on a coming alien attack, Sergeant Major Robert O. Dean, Colonel Philip J. Corso, the questionable value of credentials, Tim Binnall's iconic position on alien cover-ups, and much more! This is a fascinating conversation with two excellent guests!
Thanks to the TIN FOIL MULISHA members who support this podcast with their time, talent and treasure! Support UFO...No! with a direct PayPal donation: https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/Y6WRSW9F2JBSC Join the UFO...No! Discord: https://discord.gg/QysDepDu9P Buy UFO...No! Merch: https://ufono-podcast.creator-spring.com Looking for Magic Mushrooms (Psilocybin)? Visit https://www.schedule35.co/us/ Use code U1173687US240607 to get a 20% discount on your first purchase! SHOW NOTES Buy Floyd's Book: https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/14325888.Floyd_Wills 43 monkeys escape South Carolina research facility; police warn residents to secure doors and windows - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/monkeys-escape-south-carolina-research-facility-police-search/ Robert Kennedy Jr says he intends to clear out entire departments of the FDA https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1854243436276383768 The United States will reportedly conduct a test of a hypersonic nuclear missile tonight, just hours after election polls close https://x.com/rawsalerts/status/1853886458613948567 CELEBS ON EPSTEIN LIST BURNING THEIR HOMES DOWN TO ASHES More than 20 homes so far are burning to the ground in Ventura County, California. Epstein list about to be released. https://x.com/HustleBitch_/status/1854374083850543591 People are losing their shit over Trump…again https://x.com/stillgray/status/1854536598873915411 More Poo on Lue…https://x.com/DeJaVu2U2/status/1853519683527549036 Greer Panics after Lue's UFO tanks… https://x.com/gangatoday1/status/1854582792463503360 Chris Mellon says he can't testify to Congress about UFOs because he'll be on trip with his wife https://x.com/MiddleOfMayhem/status/1854545888531894275
Thanks to the TIN FOIL MULISHA members who support this podcast with their time, talent and treasure! Support UFO...No! with a direct PayPal donation: https://www.paypal.com/ncp/payment/Y6WRSW9F2JBSC Join the UFO...No! Discord: https://discord.gg/QysDepDu9P Buy UFO...No! Merch: https://ufono-podcast.creator-spring.com Looking for Magic Mushrooms (Psilocybin)? Visit https://www.schedule35.co/us/ Use code U1173687US240607 to get a 20% discount on your first purchase! SHOW NOTES Buy Floyd's Book: https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/14325888.Floyd_Wills 43 monkeys escape South Carolina research facility; police warn residents to secure doors and windows - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/monkeys-escape-south-carolina-research-facility-police-search/ Robert Kennedy Jr says he intends to clear out entire departments of the FDA https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1854243436276383768 The United States will reportedly conduct a test of a hypersonic nuclear missile tonight, just hours after election polls close https://x.com/rawsalerts/status/1853886458613948567 CELEBS ON EPSTEIN LIST BURNING THEIR HOMES DOWN TO ASHES More than 20 homes so far are burning to the ground in Ventura County, California. Epstein list about to be released. https://x.com/HustleBitch_/status/1854374083850543591 People are losing their shit over Trump…again https://x.com/stillgray/status/1854536598873915411 More Poo on Lue…https://x.com/DeJaVu2U2/status/1853519683527549036 Greer Panics after Lue's UFO tanks… https://x.com/gangatoday1/status/1854582792463503360 Chris Mellon says he can't testify to Congress about UFOs because he'll be on trip with his wife https://x.com/MiddleOfMayhem/status/1854545888531894275
The hearing is almost here. The witnesses have been rumored. Lue Elizondo, Chris Mellon and Tim Gallaudet have been rumored to be some of the witnesses. It seems that they all will indeed testify. The question is, are they the only ones? If so, will this do enough? Kristian Harloff gives his thoughts. #uap #ufo #ufones #uapnews #alien #aliens #space #governemnt MINT MOBILE: http://www.mintmobile.com/DTE
For at least 17 days last December, swarms of ufo's were seen 'moving at rapid speeds' and penetrating the highly restricted airspace above Langley Air Force Base in Virginia. Senior ex-Pentagon security official Chris Mellon said it was 'clear they want to be seen as though taunting us." Also, an unidentified flying object that displays none of the signatures normally associated with propulsion has been officially dubbed " the Jellyfish UAP." LINK TO MY 2/14/24 PODCAST ON JELLYFISH UAP: https://youtu.be/Z0ooxkE6XTQ?si=V_iMgwdP6__Z17nR
Hey everyone! I just wanted to drop this quick bonus episode to let you guys know about another really exciting UFO docuseries coming out this Sunday, October 27th on MGM+ called Beyond: UFOs and the Unknown. This series from JJ Abrams' production company Bad Robot features Whitley Strieber, Jeff Kripal, Garry Nolan, Leslie Kean, Chris Mellon, Jay Christopher King, Tim Gallaudet, Mitch Horowitz, and many more. And hey, guess what? I'm in it, too. It looks like it's shaping up to be a fantastic show, and it is an absolute honor to be involved in this project next to so many people that I admire. In this episode, I sat down with Co-Executive Producer, Kevin Lincoln to hear more about the show and about the process that he and his team went through to bring this to life. I've been very impressed with Kevin and his team and how far they were willing to go to chase this story down all the strange rabbit holes that you find on this path. Kevin is a very intelligent and extremely well-read guy, and this was a fun conversation that made me even more excited to watch the show. —Kelly
Seriah is joined by author and researcher Charles Lear and the one and only Red Pill Junkie to discuss the ongoing “Disclosure” movement in Ufology. Topics include Luis Elizondo, his book “Immanent”, Joe Rogan, To The Stars Academy, the Legacy Group, MJ-12, an alleged implant, a strange meta-material, Art Bell, Linda Moulton Howe, Paul Bennewitz, Richard Doty, Adam Gorightly's book “Saucers, Spooks, and Kooks”, Tom DeLonge, Hal Puthoff, Donald Keyhoe, NICAP, James Likowski, AATIP, green orbs, remote viewing, 1st Earth Battalion, Guantanamo Bay detention base, Roswell, Chris Mellon, an alleged international warrant for torture, a 1952 Air Force press conference, Bob Lazar, Robert Bigelow, the disclosure political agenda, Project Stargate, Joe Firmage, the Mormon prophet Joseph Smith, “The Daily Show”, the book “Skinwalkers at the Pentagon”, Tanner F. Boyle, the substack “Getting Spooked”, Chris Bledsoe, Stan Friedman, “Tyler” from the book “American Cosmic” by Diana Walsh Pasulka, the band “Hitchhiker”, the possibilities of a new UFO religion, the Trickster element, Chinese spy balloons, the Nordic and Grey types of alien tropes, element 115, Douglas Dean Johnson, Bob Lazar's strange connections to a biker gang murder, an alleged Russian UFO crash, Area 51 and distraction, George Knapp in Russia, Jack Brewer author of “The Greys Have Been Framed: Exploitation in the UFO Community”, use of allegedly top-secret alien information as a test of trustworthiness, Albatwitch Day content, the podcast “Ley Lines”, Jay Stratton and UAP investigation, the Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Application Program (AAWSAP) vs The Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), the National UFO Research Center, David Marler, Mark O'Connell author of “The Close Encounters Man: How One Man Made the World Believe in UFOs”, the 1967 Malmstrom nuclear weapons UFO incident, the spiritual angle on UFO research, Charles McNeal and Anjali and other alleged whistleblowers on a coming alien attack, Sergeant Major Robert O. Dean, Colonel Philip J. Corso, the questionable value of credentials, Tim Binnall's iconic position on alien cover-ups, and much more! This is a fascinating conversation with two excellent guests! Recap by Vincent Treewell of The Weird Part PodcastOutro Music is The Deadly Woolly Buggers with Emerger live on The Last Exit for the Lost. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Lue Elizondo's new book: Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs is finally out, and it's jam-packed with fascinating information. Broadly speaking, Lue confirms David Grusch's allegations about an illegally hidden UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program, but he also gets into the back story about how AATIP split from AAWSAP under his direction, how he left the Pentagon for TTSA, and how he and Chris Mellon have worked with Congress to advance disclosure. He also discusses his experience training as a remote viewer for Project Stargate, encountering orbs in his own home, how UFOs work, and even alien implants! You can find show notes and references at our website, VeryExcitingTime.com, or support us at patreon.com/VeryExcitingTime.
From June 01, 2016 The listener can review of what was said then and where we are now. Martin Willis was the first to interview former DoD insider, Chris Mellon. Chris talks about where he ventured with interests in the UFO topic when he was on the inside. What access levels government officials may or may not have, including the US president and why he joined UFOData, as well as the goals they hope to achieve. Chris Mellon's background: Chris graduated from Yale with a Master's Degree in International Relations, he worked for many years for the US Department of Defense as the Deputy Assistant Secretary, Security & Information Operations as well as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Minority Staff Director of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. His responsibilities included review and oversight of intelligence activities, which included Area 51and other sensitive governmental locations. He also spent over a decade on the Senate Intelligence Committee, involved in oversight of NRO, CIA, NSA and other intelligence organizations. He became the first Congressional official to review all of the NSA's compartmented programs. Chris is the recipient of numerous awards, including the National Reconnaissance Office Gold Medal and the Defense Intelligence Agency Director's Medal. Chris has had a lifetime fascination with UFOs, and has recently became a Board Member of UFODATA, UFO Detection & Tracking as he believe the topic needs serious scientific investigation and is putting his efforts forward.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/podcast-ufo--5922140/support.
Thanks for joining us on another episode of UAP Tuesday. Today we discuss the new UAP Disclosure fund that has members such as Chris Mellon, Karl Nell, Garry Nolan, Lue Elizondo and more. Will David Grusch join them? That question was brought up recently. We discuss the Rep Luna comments about the men In Black and the idea of inter dimensional beings. Steven Greer says if anything happens to him, he will release information that will blow the roof off the place. What was that flying around in Georgia? Tim Burchett is doubtful that the Schumer-Rounds bill will get bpassed. This and more on today's UAP Tuesday with Kristian Harloff and Pavel. Enjoy!
Lue Elizondo, Garry Nolan, Chris Mellon : TTSA 2! Cosmic Con Boogaloo!Content created here by Spectral International, LLC.Music videos by Simon Fly. Visit our website here : https://truthseekershow.com Buy some merchandise to support our show : AMAZON STORE : https://www.amazon.com/s?rh=n%3A7141123011%2Cp_4%3ATruthseekershow+Official+Merch&ref=bl_sl_s_ap_web_7141123011Redbubble store (international shipping) :https://www.redbubble.com/people/TSGear/shop?asc=uSubscribe to our youtube channel here :http://www.youtube.com/c/truthseekershowFollow Steven Cambian on twitter : @stevencambian Join our Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/stevencambianDonate by paypal : Send a paypal to TRUTHSEEKERSHOW@GMAIL.COMAny amount you wish. Please include your chatroom user id, and any message you would like me to read on air. We read every paypal message we are sent and thank every person who sends any paypal support. Listen to the audio podcast : https://www.spreaker.com/user/14526799Email us : TRUTHSEEKERSHOW@GMAIL.COM
Patrick discusses the launch of the new UAP NON-PROFIT called "UAP Disclosure Fund" run by Luis Elizondo, Chris Mellon, Garry Nolan and more. Their Mission Statement:"The UAP Disclosure Fund is a nonpartisan political nonprofit 501(c)(4) that advocates for greater government transparency regarding unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP). We work to support new UAP legislation, provide legal representation for whistleblowers, promote scientific research and raise public awareness in an effort to better address the UAP issue." (Source - https://www.uapdisclosurefund.org)
Join our live stream with Franc Milburn, who recently revealed an incident of a UFO crash recovery operation in The Daily Mail in the 1980s. We will dig into other UK UFO sightings.Franc Milburn is a former UK Defence Intelligence officer and alumnus of The Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and the London School of Economics. He has written peer-reviewed papers for numerous globally ranked think tanks and is an affiliated researcher with the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, which published two UAP reports by him on UAP, cited by Dr Hal Puthoff and Chris Mellon, amongst others. He is a member of the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies.Recorded 3/24/2024The Good Trouble Show: Linktree:https://linktr.ee/thegoodtroubleshowPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/TheGoodTroubleShowYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheGoodTroubleShowTwitter / X: https://twitter.com/GoodTroubleShowInstagram: @goodtroubleshowTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@goodtroubleshowFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/The-Good-Trouble-Show-With-Matt-Ford-106009712211646 Threads: @TheGoodTroubleShowBlueSky: @TheGoodTroubleShowBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-good-trouble-show-with-matt-ford--5808897/support.
A bit of a wild ride in this episode, all kicked off by Chris Mellon sharing a Signal conversation with an unnamed senior government official who claimed to be getting access to the crash retrieval program, including a “recovered UAP that landed in Kingman, AZ in the 50s.” The Kingman crash is a legendary and controversial story, so we're getting into it today by discussing three witnesses of varying credibility, including a engineer who was bussed out to the crash site to estimate the crash velocity, a mechanical engineer who claims to have worked on flight simulators for human reproductions of the craft recovered from Kingman, and a microbiologist who claims to have worked with an alien survivor of the crash! Not all of it is believable, but if you accept the premise that a nonhuman craft crashed in Kingman in 1953, it's hard to know where to draw a line in the mess of contradictory claims around the crash. Buckle up, we're getting weird! You can find show notes and references at our website, VeryExcitingTime.com, or support us at patreon.com/VeryExcitingTime.
It's been a busy week! John Oliver dedicated an episode of Last Week Tonight to UFOs and government coverups. Chris Mellon released a scathing review of AARO's historical UAP report. And a FOIA request documented AARO's attempts to get David Grusch to testify, their failures to address his security concerns, and includes Kirkpatrick's private Signal messages, where he badgers Mellon and is surprised by Marco Rubio's claims about whistleblowers. You can find show notes and references at our website, VeryExcitingTime.com, or support us at patreon.com/VeryExcitingTime.
What do we really know about UFOs, following several decades of studying these phenomena? With the many questions that remain about unidentified aerial phenomena, how can science help us to implement new strategies that may allow us to broaden our knowledge about these aerial mysteries? This week on The Micah Hanks Program, former R&D scientist Robert Powell joins us to discuss his nearly two decades of investigation into UFOs, culminating in his new book UFOs: A Scientist Explains What We Know (And Don't Know). Have you had a UFO/UAP sighting? Please consider reporting your sighting to the UAP Sightings Reporting System, a public resource for information about sightings of aerial phenomena. The story doesn't end here... become an X Subscriber and get access to even more weekly content and monthly specials. Want to advertise/sponsor The Micah Hanks Program? We have partnered with the AdvertiseCast to handle our advertising/sponsorship requests. If you would like to advertise with The Micah Hanks Program, all you have to do is click the link below to get started: AdvertiseCast: Advertise with The Micah Hanks Program Show Notes Below are links to stories and other content featured in this episode: FOIA: FOIA Documents Reveal AARO's Authorized and Repeated Attempts to Engage with David Grusch CHRISTOPHER MELLON: Another Signal Exchange... ROBERT POWELL: UFOs: A Scientist Explains What We Know (And Don't Know) SCU: Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies BECOME AN X SUBSCRIBER AND GET EVEN MORE GREAT PODCASTS AND MONTHLY SPECIALS FROM MICAH HANKS. Sign up today and get access to the entire back catalog of The Micah Hanks Program, as well as “classic” episodes of The Gralien Report Podcast, weekly “additional editions” of the subscriber-only X Podcast, the monthly Enigmas specials, and much more. Like us on Facebook Follow @MicahHanks on Twitter Keep up with Micah and his work at micahhanks.com.
Chris Mellon might have blown the lid off this thing AGAIN. He was part of the plan to disclose in 2017 that lead to the New York Times writing the article about UAPS and the piloits who saw them. He now has released an email with a high ranking official that seems to confirm that there is indeed a crash retrieval program and they reference a case from Arizona in the 195-0's. This is big news.
Patrick is joined by John Greenewald Jr. - an author, writer and researcher who runs The Blackvault website. Today we'll cover his most recent article covering documents he received from a FOIA request about David Grusch, Chris Mellon, Sean Kirkpatrick and AARO that seems to based around why David Grusch never gave his testimony to AARO, the Pentagon's office to study UFOs. We'll also look over more recently released documents that detail a rejected prospective Special Access Program to study UFOs and Remote Viewing called KONA BLUE. And MORE!
On March 8, 2024, the Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) released its historical report on UAP, shortly after briefing only a select group of journalists associated with seven mainstream media outlets, none of whom seemingly bothered to fact-check the error-ridden report. "The disappointing lack of critical press coverage of this important report prompted me to begin compiling the insights of UAP scholars and experts who have studied the history of UAP and the US government," wrote former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Christopher Mellon, in a recent lengthy rebuttal in response to the report's release. This week on The Micah Hanks Program, we analyze Mellon's response to the AARO report, along with several intriguing revelations it contains, including the purported existence of a secretive UAP sightings program at Area 51 in the 1980s, how the CIA may have once considered whether UAP were extraterrestrial technologies, and much more. Have you had a UFO/UAP sighting? Please consider reporting your sighting to the UAP Sightings Reporting System, a public resource for information about sightings of aerial phenomena. The story doesn't end here... become an X Subscriber and get access to even more weekly content and monthly specials. Want to advertise/sponsor The Micah Hanks Program? We have partnered with the AdvertiseCast to handle our advertising/sponsorship requests. If you would like to advertise with The Micah Hanks Program, all you have to do is click the link below to get started: AdvertiseCast: Advertise with The Micah Hanks Program Show Notes Below are links to stories and other content featured in this episode: NEWS: Iran and Israel's shadow war is exposed. What's next? World leaders urge Israel not to retaliate for the Iranian drone and missile attack Bishop and worshippers attacked in another mass stabbing in Sydney FBI opens criminal investigation into Baltimore bridge collapse, AP source says AARO: DOD Report Discounts Sightings of Extraterrestrial Technology CHRIS MELLON: The Pentagon's New UAP Report is Seriously Flawed BECOME AN X SUBSCRIBER AND GET EVEN MORE GREAT PODCASTS AND MONTHLY SPECIALS FROM MICAH HANKS. Sign up today and get access to the entire back catalog of The Micah Hanks Program, as well as “classic” episodes of The Gralien Report Podcast, weekly “additional editions” of the subscriber-only X Podcast, the monthly Enigmas specials, and much more. Like us on Facebook Follow @MicahHanks on Twitter Keep up with Micah and his work at micahhanks.com.
Join hosts Matt and Doro every week on "Meditation and Aliens," a podcast that delves into the unfolding mysteries and latest developments within the UAP, UFO, and Alien Disclosure movement. Explore the intriguing insights and disclosures from key figures like David Grusch, Chris Mellon, Lue Elizondo, Diana Pasulka, Bob Lazar, and Steven Greer, along with updates from the US Congress. Engage in thought-provoking discussions about potential government concealment of extraterrestrial crafts and the profound implications of actual alien encounters, including the startling possibility of alien telepathy and its impact on human privacy. Discover how meditation could be a bridge to interacting with extraterrestrial beings, a topic close to the hearts of our experienced meditator hosts. Each episode culminates with a serene, guided meditation led by Doro, ensuring a unique blend of cosmic inquiry and inner tranquility.
The SOL Foundation held their inaugural UAP symposium back in November, and the videos are finally live. The talks are great, and in this episode, we discuss four of them: Garry Nolan tells what he learned from UAP materials he's studied. Chris Mellon discusses the political consequences of disclosure. Kevin Knuth examines the physics of UFOs. And Karl Nell outlines a potential plan for controlled disclosure that avoids the negative consequences of catastrophic disclosure. It's a busy episode, buckle up! You can find show notes and references at our website, VeryExcitingTime.com, or support us at patreon.com/VeryExcitingTime.
Exopolitics Today Week in Review Jan 26 Illuminati Insider revelations, machinations of secret societies Dr Sean Kirkpatrick's oped for Scientific America is fodder for UFO debunkers Expose of Wikipedia's secret cabal of UFO debunkers Belgium becomes 34th signatory to the Artemis Accords, ensuring US leadership in space affairs for decades to come Dr Steven Greer's recent statements corroborate Jean Charles Moyen and Tony Rodrigues claims about children being chosen for SSPs based on psychic abilities 2nd Edition of Majic Eyes Only covers 104 UFO crash retrieval operations from around the world Chris Mellon reveals three insiders with direct knowledge of classified UFO programs that briefed Sean Kirpatrick contradicting his op ed claims. Report by the Dept of Defense Inspector General points to flaws in the current UFO reporting mechanisms by military services Uri Geller tells about Werner Von Braun showing him alien bodies at a NASA facility corroborating claims of a 4th Reich secretly controlling NASA Rare interview of Dr Michael Wolf's whistleblower revelations Trailer released for Feb 3 Webinar, What's Coming in 2024 All that and more in Exopolitics Today the Week in Review Twitter Feed https://twitter.com/michaelsalla --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/exopolitics/support
Patrick discusses Dr. Steven Greer's explanation of counterintelligence /misinformation in the UFO community. Dr. Steven Greer's Claims Made In The Clip Shown: - TTSA, including Lue Elizondo and Chris Mellon, was started to "feed false information to the public". - TTSA lied to President Trump about UFOs - Trump started Space Force because of the UFO information TTSA told him - Greer's pleas fell on deaf ears when he met with President Trump because of the false information given to Trump.
Guardians in the Cosmos – Intergalactic Custodians of Human Evolution Elon Musk on Starship making life interplanetary David Grusch participates in SOL foundation symposium Col Karl Nell's Sol Foundation presentation and Roadmap for Disclosure 60th anniversary of JFK Assassination - Webinar Release Investigative series of the Hollaman AFB landing of 3 Tall Gray Aliens David Grusch on Joe Rogan and importance of UAP Disclosure Act and Lockheed Martin has UFO material that it wants to share but is blocked Chris Mellon article on UAPs and his role in shifting public perceptions Pushback against UAP Disclosure Act for 2023 Exopolitics State of the Planet Webinar later today Twitter feed: https://twitter.com/michaelsalla --- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/exopolitics/support
Would you rather see a ghost or an alien? A military police officer recalls his extraordinary experience of his encounter with a UFO, which was featured on a History Channel show featuring former military intelligence official and Special Agent In-Charge, Luis Elizondo, and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense and Intelligence, Chris Mellon.If you enjoyed this episode, read about Hollywood Actress Susan Peters is Paralyzed — Misdeeds & Intrigue (misdeedsandintrigue.com) or watch Elizabeth Bathory: The Countess Dracula on the Misdeeds & Intrigue Podcast Channel.Follow Misdeeds and Intrigue Podcast on social mediaFacebook: www.facebook.com/misintriguepodInstagram: www.instagram.com/misintriguepod Follow for Curated Collections of ArticlesPinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/MisIntriguepodFlipboard: https://flipboard.com/@misintriguepodWatch Related Videos & ClipsTikTok: @misintriguepod https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMeD9hE5u/YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkBIxvkybymGErnYs-7XL0gIMDB Playlist: http://www.imdb.com/list/ls088470884/This episode in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyrighted holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by general law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship or research. Unscholarly ReferencesHistory ChannelKatt WilliamsEncounters Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
2023-1022 - A fuller understanding of the incarnation - Chris Mellon
2023-1022 - A fuller understanding of the incarnation - Chris Mellon
Andy & Dan look at some of the news from the past few days including;Chris Mellon on the Chris Cuomo Project channelSOL Foundations heavy hitting line-upMonsters of CaliforniaMexican/Peru mummies updateAnd moreMellon/Cuomo; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUUOracxDQY&t=937sSOL; https://thesolfoundation.org/Monsters of Cali ; https://geni.us/MonstersOfCaliforniahttps://www.my-big-toe.com/Please support the show sponsors;Betonline; Claim your welcome bonus - use my special link https://promotions.betonline.ag/ThatUFO-109320 to save 50% on your first deposit up to $1,000. ZenAI; Use my special link https://zen.ai/bqZTjFHe0WbWTvMx7d2G2A to save 12% off your first three months of your ZenAI subscriptionNom Nom; 50% off your first order here - https://trynom.com/thatufoNew Era; 15% off at New Era https://www.neweracap.com/thatufoMotley Fool; Save $110 off the full list price of Stock Advisor for your first year, go to fool.com/thatufo and start your investing journey today!*$110 discount off of $199 per year list price. Membership will renew annually at the then current list price.Wild!: Use my special link https://zen.ai/tOoFwDptszFiILz9SYFHLg to save 40% on your order at wearewild.com for UK listeners and 25% off for global listeners.” BlendJet2; Save 12% off your order, use my special link and the discount will be applied at checkout zen.ai/thatufo12You can also sign up to Zencastr with 40% off for 3 months with promo code: ufopodcast at https://zencastr.com/pricing?coupon=ufopodcast&fpr=7ooh0 . Start recording your own podcast or meetings today!Get in touch with the show;Twitter: @UFOUAPAMFacebook, YouTube & Instagram: "That UFO Podcast"YouTube: YouTube.com/c/ThatUFOPodcastEmail: UFOUAPAM@gmail.comAll podcast links & associated links;Linktr.ee/ufouapamThatUFOPodcast.comLinktr.ee/TheZignalUAPMedia.UKDon't forget to subscribe, like and leave a review of the show,Enjoy folks,Andy
In episode #178 of the IN A CROWDED ROOM PODCAST, Chad Calek shares his thoughts on journalist George Knapp and documentary filmmaker Jeremy Corbell's recent attempts to sell the tall tales of UFO whistleblower David Grusch to the world as “fact” without any proof that Grusch's claims are real. Calek also discusses the recent investigation by journalist Steven Greenstreet that exposed the sketchy origins of AATIP, as well as the questionable history of Skinwalker Ranch, Knapp, Cornell, Lou Elizondo, Chris Mellon and their connection to Grusch, while also exposing the inaccurate reporting within the now-famous UFO story that originally appeared in the New York Times! All of this and much, much more! You do not want to miss this episode!
In this week's exciting episode, we cover the aftermath of last week's explosive UAP hearing, including Chris Mellon's claims that AARO is withholding satellite imagery of UAP from Congress, the fallout and possible legal consequences of Dr. Kirkpatrick's weird LinkedIn post, continued evasion from the Pentagon, and the major aerospace companies going into press lockdown following whistleblower allegations that they're involved in the reverse engineering program. You can support us on Patreon! References Chris Mellon: “AARO has not shared satellite images with Congress” Chris Mellon: “The oversight committees were asking about satellite data back in 2017.” Chris Mellon: “I've seen some VERY compelling evidence.” Liberation Times: Department of Defense Confirms UFO Chief Did Write Scathing Letter Following Public Hearing Rep Luna: “We had a witness testify he was in fear for his life and his former boss posts a letter attempting to discredit him? Seems odd.” Nick Pope: “firing off a personal missive like this was unheard of.” Rogue UAPTF: “Kirkpatrick's statement was unethical and likely illegal.” Tim McMillan: “Never seen a sr civil servant publicly admonish Congress” Jeremy Corbell: “Interfering with Congress and whistleblowers is illegal” Eric Weinstein: “warring factions in the US government.” Sen. Gillibrand: “I asked for Dr Kirkpatrick to meet with Grusch.” Ross Coulthart: “AARO is sending a shocking signal - no phone, no email” Liberation Times: “Dozens of firsthand whistleblowers are frustrated with AARO's handling of their claims.” AOC: “I do think something is going on.” Condorman: “sudden hard industry crackdown on all things UAP” NewsNation: “Lockheed does not deny whistleblower claims.” Ross Coulthart: “Why should DOD answer for Lockheed?” Condorman: “Executives' past bonuses can be ‘clawed back' if they've withheld financial significant information.” Attorney: “C-Suite will sing like canaries to avoid prison”
Since May 2022, Congress has held three hearings looking into Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and the possibility of non-human intelligent life flying aircraft on Earth. In this episode, hear testimony from three Defense Department officials and three credible whistleblowers, whose testimony is often as contradictory as it is shocking. Please Support Congressional Dish – Quick Links Contribute monthly or a lump sum via Support Congressional Dish via (donations per episode) Send Zelle payments to: Donation@congressionaldish.com Send Venmo payments to: @Jennifer-Briney Send Cash App payments to: $CongressionalDish or Donation@congressionaldish.com Use your bank's online bill pay function to mail contributions to: Please make checks payable to Congressional Dish Thank you for supporting truly independent media! Background Sources Whistleblower Protections Clayton E. Wire. 2020. Ogborn Mihm LLP. Security Classifications Security Classification of Information, Volume 2. Principles for Classification of Information. Arvin S. Quist. Oak Ridge National Laboratory: 1993. UAP Background Brian Entin. June 6, 2023. NewsNation. Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal. June 5, 2023. The Debrief. May 16, 2021. 60 Minutes. Ralph Blumenthal. December 18, 2017. The New York Times. Helene Cooper et al. December 16, 2017. The New York Times. Independent Research and Development National Defense Industrial Association. SCIFs Derek Hawkins et al. April 26, 2023. The Washington Post. Kirkpatrick Response Letter D. Dean Johnson (@ddeanjohnson). Twitter. Audio Sources July 26, 2023 House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs Witnesses: , Former Commanding Officer, United States Navy Ryan Graves, Executive Director, Americans for Safe Aerospace David Grusch, Former National Reconnaissance Office Representative, Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, Department of Defense Clips timestamps reflect C-SPAN video 4:30 Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI): The National Defense Authorization Act of 2022 established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office or AARO to conduct or to coordinate efforts across the Department of Defense and other federal agencies to detect, identify and investigate UAPs. However, AARO's budget remains classified, prohibiting meaningful oversight from Congress. 19:50 Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA): We know the Senate is taking up an amendment to their defense authorization bill which will create a commission with broad declassification authority and we should all agree that that is an important step. 27:40 Ryan Graves: Excessive classification practices keep crucial information hidden. Since 2021, all UAP videos are classified as secret or above. This level of secrecy not only impedes our understanding, but fuels speculation and mistrust. 27:55 Ryan Graves: In 2014, I was an F-18 Foxtrot pilot in the Navy fighter attack Squadron 11, the Red Rippers, and I was stationed at NAS Oceana in Virginia Beach. After upgrades were made to our jet's radar systems, we began detecting unknown objects operating in our airspace. At first, we assumed they were radar errors. But soon we began to correlate the radar tracks with multiple onboard sensors, including infrared systems, and eventually through visual ID. During a training mission in Warning Area W-72, 10 miles off the coast of Virginia Beach. Two F/A-18F Super Hornets were split by a UAP. The object, described as a dark gray or a black cube inside of a clear sphere, came within 50 feet of the lead aircraft and was estimated to be five to 15 feet in diameter. The mission commander terminated the flight immediately and returned to base. Our squadron submitted a safety report, but there was no official acknowledgement of the incident and no further mechanism to report the sightings. Soon these encounters became so frequent that aircrew would discuss the risk of UAP as part of their regular pre-flight briefs. 29:00 Ryan Graves: Recognising the need for action and answers, I founded Americans for Safe Aerospace. The organization has since become a haven for UAP witnesses who were previously unspoken due to the absence of a safe intake process. More than 30 witnesses have come forward and almost 5000 Americans have joined us in the fight for transparency at safeaerospace.org 29:20 Ryan Graves: The majority of witnesses are commercial pilots at major airlines. Often, they are veterans with decades of flying experience. Pilots are reporting UAP at altitudes that appear above them at 40,000 feet potentially in low Earth orbit or in the gray zone below the Karman Line, making unexplainable maneuvers like right hand turns and retrograde orbits or J hooks. Sometimes these reports are reoccurring with numerous recent sightings north of y and in the North Atlantic. Other veterans are also coming forward to us regarding UAP encounters in our airspace and oceans. The most compelling involve observations of UAP by multiple witnesses and sensor systems. I believe these accounts are only scratching the surface and more will share their experiences once it is safe to do so. 31:30 David Grusch: I became a whistleblower through a PPD 19 urgent concern filing in May 2022 with the intelligence community Inspector General following concerning reports from multiple esteemed and credentialed current and former military and intelligence community individuals that the US government is operating with secrecy above congressional oversight with regards to UAPs. My testimony is based on information I've been given by individuals with a long standing track record of legitimacy and service to this country, many of whom also have shared compelling evidence in the form of photography, official documentation, and classified oral testimony to myself and my various colleagues. I have taken every step I can to corroborate this evidence over a period of four years while I was with the UAP Task Force and do my due diligence on the individual sharing it. Because of these steps. I believe strongly in the importance of bringing this information before you. 33:30 David Grusch: In 2019, the UAP Task Force director asked me to identify all Special Access Programs and Controlled Access Programs, also known as SAPS and CAPS. We needed to satisfy our congressionally mandated mission and we were direct report at the time to the [Deputy Secretary of Defense]. At the time, due to my extensive executive level intelligence support duties, I was cleared to literally all relevant compartments and in a position of extreme trust both in my military and civilian capacities. I was informed in the course of my official duties of a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program to which I was denied access to those additional read-ons when I requested it. I made the decision based on the data I collected to report this information to my superiors and multiple Inspectors General and, in effect, becoming a whistleblower. 35:20 Cmdr. David Fravor: We were attached to carrier 11, stationed onboard USS Nimitz and began a two month workup cycle off the coast of California. On this day, we were scheduled for a two v two air-to-air training with the USS Princeton as our control. When we launched off Nimitz, my wingman was joining out, we were told that the training was going to be suspended and we're going to proceed with real world tasking. As we proceeded to the West, the air controller was counting down the range to an object that we were going to and we were unaware of what we're going to see when we arrived. There, the controller told us that these objects had been observed for over two weeks coming down from over 80,000 feet, rapidly descending to 20,000 feet, hanging out for hours and then going straight back up. For those who don't realize, above 80,000 feet is space. We arrived at the location at approximately 20,000 feet and the controller called the merge plot, which means that our radar blip was now in the same resolution cell as a contact. As we looked around, we noticed that we saw some whitewater off our right side. It's important to note the weather on this day was as close to perfect as you could ask for off the coast of San Diego: clear skies, light winds, calm seas, no white caps from waves. So the whitewater stood out in a large blue ocean. All four of us, because we were in an F/A-18F F, so we had pilots and WSO in the backseat, looked down and saw a white tic tac object with a longitudinal axis pointing north-south and moving very abruptly over the water, like a ping pong ball. There were no rotors, no rotor wash, or any sign of visible control surfaces like wings. As we started clockwise towards the object, my WSO I decided to go down and take a closer look with the other aircraft staying in high cover to observe both us and the tic tac. We proceeded around the circle about 90 degrees from the start of our descent, and the object suddenly shifted its longitudinal axis, aligned it with my aircraft and began to climb. We continued down another 270 degrees, and we went nose low to where the tic tac would have been. Our altitude at this point is about 15,000 feet and the tic tac was about 12,000. As we pulled nose-on to the object within about a half mile of it, it rapidly accelerated in front of us and disappeared. Our wingmen, roughly 8000 feet above us, lost contact also. We immediately turned back to see where the whitewater was at and it was gone also. So as you started to turn back towards the east the controller came up and said "Sir you're not going to believe this but that thing is that your cat point roughly 60 miles away in less than a minute." You can calculate the speed. We returned to Nimitz. We were taking off our gear, we were talking to one of my crews that was getting ready to launch, we mentioned it to them and they went out and luckily got the video that you see, that 90 second video. What you don't see is the radar tape that was never released, and we don't know where it's at. 37:55 Cmdr. David Fravor: What is shocking to us is that the incident was never investigated. None of my crew ever questioned and tapes were never taken and after a couple days it turned into a great story with friends. It wasn't until 2009 until J. Stratton had contacted me to investigate. Unbeknownst to all, he was part of the AATIP program at the Pentagon led by Lue Elizondo. There was an unofficial official report that came out it's now in the internet. Years later, I was contacted by the other pilot Alex Dietrich and asked if I'd been contacted and I said "No, but I'm willing to talk." I was contacted by Mr. Elizondo, and we talked for a short period of time, he said we'd be in contact. A few weeks after that I was made aware that Lue had left the Pentagon in protest and joined forces with Tom DeLonge and Chris Mellon, Steve Justice, and others to form To the Stars Academy, an organization that pressed the issue with leading industry experts and US government officials. They worked with Leslie Kean, who is present today, Ralph Blumenthal, and Helene Cooper to publish the articles in the New York Times in 2017. It removed the stigma on the topic of UFOs, which is why we're here today. Those articles opened the door for the government and public that cannot be closed. It has led to an interest from our elected officials, who are not focused on Little Green Men, but figuring out where these craft are, where they are from, the technology they possess, how do they operate. It also led to the Whistleblower Protection Act in the NDAA. 39:45 Cmdr. David Fravor: In closing, I would like to say that the tic tac object we engaged in 2004 was far superior to anything that we had on time, have today, or are looking to develop in the next 10 years. If we, in fact, have programs that possess this technology and needs to have oversight from those people, that the citizens of this great country elected in office to represent what is best for the United States and best for the citizens. I thank you for your time. 40:20 Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI): Are your pilots, or pilots that you interact with as part of your organization, do you feel adequately trained and briefed on how to handle encounters with UAPs? Ryan Graves: No. Right now, military witnesses to UAP have limited options for reporting UAP. But more more concerning is that the commercial aviation sector has not adapted to the lessons that the military has implemented. The military and Department of Defense have stated that UAP represent a critical aviation safety risk. We have not seen that same language being used in the commercial markets, they are not acknowledging this. 41:05 Ryan Graves: Right now we need a system where pilots can report without fear of losing their jobs. There's a fear that the stigma associated with this topic is going to lead to professional repercussions either through management or perhaps through their yearly physical check. So having a secure system, reducing the stigma, and making this information available through the public is going to reduce the concerns that aircrew have. 41:30 Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI): Can you just give me a little idea the degree to which reports in the past are not made public right now? Ryan Graves: Well, I don't think there has been a proper reporting system to gather those reports and thus not report them. So to answer your question, I think there is a dearth of data due to the fact that the reporting has been limited up to this time. 41:45 Ryan Graves: There's certainly some national security concerns when we use our advanced sensors and our tactical jets to be able to identify these objects. However, there's no reason that the objects themselves would be classified. I would be curious to see how the security classification guideline actually spells out the different nuances of how this topic is classified from the perspective of UAP, not national security. 43:00 Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI): Mr. Fravor, the tic tac incident that you were engaged [in] occurred in 2004. What kind of reporting took place after that incident? Ryan Graves: None. We had a standard debrief where the back-seaters went down to our carrier intel center and briefed what had happened, and that was it. No one else talked to us. And I was in the top 20 in the battle group, no one came that the Captain was aware, the of Admiral was aware, nothing was done. Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI): Did your commanding officers provide any sort of justification? Ryan Graves: No, because I was the commanding officer of the quadron. So no. Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI): Was this incident the only UAP event that you encountered while you were a pilot? Ryan Graves: Yes, it was. 43:50 Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI): Do you believe UAPs pose a potential threat to our national security? Ryan Graves: Yes, and here's why: the technology that we faced was far superior than anything that we had, and you could put that anywhere. If you had one, you captured one, you reverse engineered it, you got it to work, you're talking something that can go into space, go someplace, dropped down in a matter of seconds, do whatever it wants and leave. And there's nothing we can do about it. Nothing. 44:20 Ryan Graves: I would also like to add from a commercial aviation and military aviation perspective, we deal with uncertainty in our operating space as a matter of our professional actions. Identifying friend from foe is very important to us. And so when we have identified targets and we continue to ignore those due to a stigma or fear of what it could be, that's an opening that our adversaries can take advantage of. 44:55 Ryan Graves: There needs to be a location where this information is centralized for processing and there needs to be a two-way communication loop so the operators on the front end have feedback and can get best practices on how to process information, what to do, and to ensure that their reporting is being listened to. Right now there is not a lot of back and forth. 46:25 Ryan Graves: When we were first experiencing these objects off the eastern seaboard in the 2014 to 2015 time period, anyone that had upgraded their radar systems were seeing these objects. So there was a large number of my colleagues that were detecting these objects off the eastern seaboard. They were further correlating that information with the other onboard sensors. And many of them also had their own eyesightings, as well, of these objects. Now, that was our personal, firsthand experience at the time. Since then, as I've engaged this topic, others have reached out to me to share their experiences both on the military side as well as the commercial aviation side. On the military aviation side, veterans that have recently got out have shared their stories and have expressed how the objects we are seeing in 2014 and 2015 continued all the way to 2019, 2020, and beyond. And so it became a generational issue for naval aviators on the Eastern Seaboard. This was something we were briefing to new students. This is something that was included in the notice to airmen to ensure that there was no accidents. And now with commercial aviators, they are reaching out because they're having somewhat similar experiences as our military brothers and sisters, but they do not have any reporting system that they can send this to. 47:55 Cmdr. David Fravor: It's actually, it's a travesty that we don't have a system to correlate this and actually investigate. You know, so if you took the east coast, there's coastal radars out there that monitor our air defense identification zone. Out to 200 miles, they can track these. So when you see them, they could actually go and pull that data and get maneuvering. And instead of just having the airplanes, there's other data sources out there. And I've talked to other government officials on this. You need a centrally located repository that these reports go to. So if you just stuck it in DOD, you wouldn't get anything out of the Intelligence Committee because they have a tendency not to talk. But if you had a central location where these reports are coming in, not just military, but also commercial aviation, because there's a lot of that going on, especially if you talk to anyone that flies from here to Hawaii, over the Pacific they see odd lights. So I think you need to develop something that allows you a central point to collect the data in order to investigate. 51:20 Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA): Mr. Grusch, finally, do you believe that our government is in possession of UAPs? David Grusch: Absolutely, based on interviewing over 40 witnesses over four years. Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA): And where? David Grusch: I know the exact locations and those locations were provided to the Inspector General, and some of which to the intelligence committees, I actually had the people with the firsthand knowledge provide a protected disclosure to the Inspector General 52:15 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Mr. Graves. Again, I'd like to know, how do you know that these were not our aircraft? Ryan Graves: Some of the behaviors that we saw in a working area. We would see these objects being at 0.0 Mach, that's zero airspeed over certain pieces of the ground. So what that means, just like a river, if you throw a bobber in, it's gonna float downstream. These objects were staying completely stationary in category four hurricane winds. The same objects would then accelerate to supersonic speeds 1.1-1.2 Mach, and they would do so in very erratic and quick behaviors that we don't -- I don't -- have an explanation for. 55:50 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Mr. Fravor, do you believe that you witnessed an additional object under the water in relation to your encounter? Cmdr. David Fravor: I will say we did not see an object. There was something there to cause the whitewater and when we turned around, it was gone. So there was something there that obviously moved. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Okay, it was not the same object, though, that you were looking at, correct? Cmdr. David Fravor: No, we actually joked that the tic tac was communicating with something when we came back, because the whitewater disappeared. 56:15 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): We were, in another instance, told about the capabilities of jamming when there were some people chasing some of these objects. Did you experience any of that jamming, or interrupting your radar or weapon system? Cmdr. David Fravor: My crew that launched, after we landed, experienced significant jamming to the APG 73 radar, which was what we had on board, which is a mechanically scan, very high end system, prior to APG 79. And yes, it did pretty much everything you could do range, velocity, aspect, and then it hit the lock and the targeting pod is passive. That's when we're able to get the video on. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): I'm about to run out of time, but are you aware of any of our enemies that have that capability? Cmdr. David Fravor: No, no. 57:40 Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): You've identified these as taking place on the East Coast. Is it just on the East Coast where these encounters have been reported? Ryan Graves: No. Since the events initially occurred, I've learned that the objects have been detected, essentially where all Navy operations are being conducted across the world. And that's from the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office reporting. 58:50 Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): Are there common characteristics to the UAPs that have been sighted by different pilots? And can you describe what the convergence of descriptions is? Ryan Graves: Certainly. We were primarily seeing dark gray or black cubes inside of a clear sphere. Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): I'm sorry, dark gray or black cubes? Ryan Graves: Yes, inside of a clear sphere where the apex or tips of the cube were touching the inside of that sphere. And that was primarily what was being reported when we were able to gain a visual tally of these objects. That occurred over almost eight years, and as far as I know, is still occurring. 59:45 Ryan Graves: I think we need both transparency and the reporting. We have the reporting, but we need to make sure that information can be propagated to commercial aviation as well as the rest of the populace. 1:05:00 Ryan Graves: In the 2003 timeframe, a large group of Boeing contractors were operating near one of the launch facilities at Vandenberg Air Force Base when they observed a very large, 100-yard-sided red square approach the base from the ocean and hover at low altitude over one of the launch facilities. This object remained for about 45 seconds or so before darting off over the mountains. There was a similar event within 24 hours later in the evening. This was a morning event, I believe, 8:45 in the morning. Later in the evening, post sunset, there were reports of other sightings on base including some aggressive behaviors. These objects were approaching some of the security guards at rapid speeds before darting off, and this is information that was received through one of the witnesses that have approached me at Americans for Safe Aerospace. 1:06:15 Ryan Graves: I have not seen what they've described. This object was estimated to be almost the size of a football field, and I have not seen anything personally that large. 1:07:05 Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL): With the FAA, to your understanding, pilots that are seeing this, commercial airline pilots, are they receiving cease and desist letters from corporations for coming forward with information in regards to safety for potential air airline passengers? Ryan Graves: I have been made privy to conversations with commercial aviators who have received cease and desist orders. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL): So the American public should know that corporations are putting their own reputations ahead of the safety of the American people. Would you agree with that statement? Ryan Graves: It appears so. 1:08:15 Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL): So what about G forces? Let's talk about G forces in those vehicles. Could a human survive those G forces with known technology today? Cmdr. David Fravor: No, not for the acceleration rates that we observed. 1:08:45 Cmdr. David Fravor: So we got within a half mile of the tic tac, which people say that's pretty far, but in airplanes that's actually relatively close. Now it was perfectly white, smooth, no windows, although when we did take the original FLIR video that is out there, when you put it on a big screen it actually had two little objects that came out of the bottom of it. But other than that, no windows, no seams, no nothing. 1:09:05 Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL): Mr. Grusch, as a result of your previous government work have you met with people with direct knowledge or have direct knowledge yourself of non-human origin craft? David Grusch: Yes, I personally interviewed those individuals. 1:09:40 Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL): Do you have knowledge or do you have reason to believe that there are programs in the advanced tech space that are unsanctioned? David Grusch: Yes, I do. Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL): Okay. And when you say that they're above congressional oversight, what do you mean? David Grusch: Complicated question. So there's some, I would call it abuse here. So congressional oversight of conventional Special Special Access Programs, and I'll use Title X, so DOD, as an example. So 10 US Code section 119 discusses congressional oversight of SAPS, discusses the Deputy Secretary of Defense's ability to waive congressional reporting. However, the Gang of Eight is at least supposed to be notified if a waived or waived bigoted unacknowledged SAP is created. That's Public Law. Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL): I don't want to cut you off, but how does a program like that get funded? David Grusch: I will give you generalities. I can get very specific in a closed session, but misappropriation of funds. Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL): Does that mean that there is money in the budget that is set to go to a program but it doesn't and it goes to something else? David Grusch: Yes, have specific knowledge of that. Yep. Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL): Do you think US corporations are overcharging for certain tech they're selling to the US government and that additional money is going to programs? David Grusch: Correct, through something called IRAD. 1:12:45 Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-VA): Mr. Grusch, in your sworn testimony you state that the United States government has retrieved supposedly extraterrestrial spacecraft and other UAP related artifacts. You go so far as to state that the US is in possession of "non human spacecraft" and that some of these artifacts have circulated with defense contractors. Several other former military and intelligence officials have come forward with similar allegations albeit in non-public setting. However, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, the Director of AARO, previously testified before Congress that there has been and I quote, "no credible evidence" thus far of extraterrestrial act activity or "off world technology" brought to the attention of the office. To your knowledge, is that statement correct? David Grusch: It's not accurate. I believe Dr. Kirkpatrick mentioned he had about 30 individuals that have come to AARO thus far. A few of those individuals have also come to AARO that I also interviewed and I know what they provided Dr. Kirkpatrick and their team. I was able to evaluate -- Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-VA): Okay, I need to go on. David Grusch: Sure. 1:21:25 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Has the US government become aware of actual evidence of extraterrestrial or otherwise unexplained forms of intelligence? And if so, when do you think this first occurred? David Grusch: I like to use the term non-human, I don't like to denote origin, it keeps the aperture open scientifically. Certainly, like I've just discussed publicly, previously, the 1930s. 1:21:45 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Okay, can you give me the names and titles of the people with direct, first-hand knowledge and access to some of these crash retrieval programs and maybe which facilities, military bases that the recovered material would be in? And I know a lot of Congress talked about, we're gonna go to area 51. And, you know, there's nothing there anymore anyway, it's just you know, we move like a glacier. And as soon as we announce it, I'm sure the moving vans would pull up, but please. David Grusch: I can't discuss that publicly. But I did provide that information both to the Intel committees and the Inspector General. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): And we could get that in the SCIF, if we were allowed to get in a SCIF with you? Would that be probably what you would think? David Grusch: Sure, if you had the appropriate accesses, yeah. 1:22:30 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): What Special Access Programs cover this information? And how is it possible that they have evaded oversight for so long? David Grusch: I do know the names, once again, I can't discuss that publicly. And how they've evaded oversight in a closed setting I could tell you this specific tradecraft used. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Alright. 1:22:50 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): When did you think those programs began and who authorized them? David Grusch: I do know a lot of that information, but that's something I can't discuss publicly because of sensitivities Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Alright. 1:24:05 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Title 10 and title 50 authorization, they seem to say they're inefficient. So who gets to decide this, in your opinion, in the past? David Grusch: It's a group of career senior executive officials. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Okay. Are they government officials? David Grusch: Both in and out of government and that's about as far I'll go there. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Well, that leads to my next question, which private corporations are directly involved in this program? How much taxpayer money has been invested in these programs? David Grusch: Yeah, I don't know the specific metrics towards the end of your question. The specific corporations I did provide to the committees in specific divisions, and I spent 11 and a half hours with both Intel committees. 1:25:30 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Has there been an active US government disinformation campaign to deny the existence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena? And if so, why? David Grusch: I can't go beyond what I've already exposed publicly about that. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Okay, I've been told to ask you what that is and how to get it in the record. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL): What have you stated publicly in your interviews, for the Congressional Record? David Grusch: If you reference my NewsNation interview, I talk about a multi-decade campaign to disenfranchise public interest basically. 1:28:00 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY): When it comes to notification that you had mentioned about IRAD programs, we have seen defense contractors abuse their contracts before through this committee. I have seen it personally, and I have also seen the notification requirements to Congress abused. I am wondering, one of the loopholes that we see in the law is that there is, at least from my vantage point, depending on what we're seeing, is that there are no actual definitions or requirements for notification, are there? What methods of notification did you observe? When they say they notified Congress, how did they do that? Do you have insight into that? David Grusch: For certain IRAD activities....I can only think of ones conventional in nature. Sometimes they flow through certain out of say SAP programs that have cognisant authority over the Air Force or something. And those are congressionally reported compartments, but IRAD is literally internal to the contractor. So as long as it's money, either profits, private investment, etc, they can do whatever they want. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY): To put a finer point on it, when there is a requirement for any agency or company to notify Congress, do they contact the chairman of a committee, do they get them on the phone specifically, is this through an email to hypothetically a dead email box? David Grusch: A lot of it comes through what they call the PPR, Periodic Program Review process. If it's a SAP or Controlled Access Program equity, and then those go to the specific committees. 1:30:40 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY): For the record, if you were me, where would you look? Titles, programs, departments, regions? If you could just name anything. And I put that as an open question to the three of you. David Grusch: I'd be happy to give you that in a closed environment. I can tell you specifically. 1:35:40 Cmdr. David Fravor: Things are over-classified. I know for a fact the video or the pictures that came out in the 2020 report that had the stuff off the east coast, they were taken with an iPhone, off the east coast. A buddy of mine was one of the senior people there and he said they originally classified a TSS CI, and my question to him was what's TSS CI about these? They're an iPhone, right, literally off the vacates, that's not TSS CI. So they're over classified, and as soon as they do that, they go into the vault, and then you all have to look for them. 1:37:20 Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO): Has any of the activity been aggressive, been hostile in your reports? David Grusch: I know of multiple colleagues of mine that got physically injured. Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO): By UAPs, or by people within the federal government? So there has been activity by alien or non-human technology and or beings that has caused harm to humans? David Grusch: I can't get into the specifics in an open environment, but at least the activity that I personally witnessed, and I have to be very careful here, because they tell you never to acknowledge tradecraft, right. So what I personally witnessed, myself and my wife, was very disturbing. 1:38:20 Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO): You've said that the US has intact spacecraft. You said that the government has alien bodies or alien species. Have you seen the spacecraft? David Grusch: I have to be careful to describe what I've seen firsthand and not in this environment. But I could answer that question behind closed doors. Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO): Have you seen any of the bodies? David Grusch: That's something I've not witnessed myself. 1:40:45 Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO): These aircraft, have they been identified that they are being produced by domestic military contractors? Is there any evidence that that's what's being recovered? David Grusch: Not to my knowledge. Plus the recoveries predate a lot of our advanced programs. 1:48:05 David Grusch: I've actually never seen anything personal, believe it or not. 1:51:00 Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC): If you believe we have crashed craft, stated earlier, do we have the bodies of the pilots who piloted this craft? David Grusch: As I've stated publicly already in my NewsNation interview, biologics came with some of these recoveries. 1:51:15 Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC): Were they human or non human biologics? David Grusch: Non human and that was the assessment of people with direct knowledge on the program I talked to that are currently still on the program. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC): And was this documentary evidence video, photos, eyewitness like how would that be determined? David Grusch: The specific documentation, I would have to talk to you in a SCIF about that. 1:53:10 Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): Commander Fravor, we've all seen the floating tic tac video that you engage with on November 14, 2004. Can you briefly talk about why you were off the coast of San Diego that day? Cmdr. David Fravor: Yeah, we were at a work up with all the battle groups. So we integrate the ships with the carrier, the airway with the carrier and we start working. So we were doing an air-to-air defense to hone not only our skills, but those of the USS Princeton, and when they had been tracking him for two weeks. The problem was, there were never manned aircraft airborne when they were tracking them. And this was the first day and unfortunately, we were the ones airborne and went and saw it. Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): Do you remember the weather that day? It was a cloudy or windy or anything out of the ordinary on the Pacific coast. Cmdr. David Fravor: If you're familiar with San Diego, it was a perfect day. Light winds, no whitecaps, clear skies, not a cloud. For flying, it was the best. Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): Now, is it true that you saw, in your words, a 40 foot flying tic tac shaped object? Cmdr. David Fravor: That's correct. Or for some people that can't know what a Tic Tac is, it's a giant flying propane tank. Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): Did this object come up on radar or interfere with your radar or the USS Princeton? Cmdr. David Fravor: The Princeton tracked it, the Nimitz tracked it, the E2 tracked it. We never saw it on our radars, our fire control radars never picked it up. The other airplane that took the video did get it on a radar as soon as it tried to lock in to jam the radar, spit the lock and he's rapidly switched over to the targeting pod which you can do in the F/A 18 Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): From what you saw that day and what you've seen on video. Did you see any source of propulsion from the flying object including on any potential thermal scans from your aircraft? Cmdr. David Fravor: No, there is none. There is no IR plume coming out. And Chad who took the video went through all the EO, which is black and white TV and the IR modes, and there's no visible signs of reflection. It's just sitting in space at 20,000 feet. Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): In your career. Have you ever seen a propulsion system that creates no thermal exhaust? Cmdr. David Fravor: No. Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): Can you describe how the aircraft maneuvered? Cmdr. David Fravor: Abruptly, very determinant. It knew exactly what it was doing. It was aware of our presence. And it had acceleration rates, I mean, it went from zero to matching our speed and no time at all. Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): Now if the fastest plane on Earth was trained to do these maneuvers that you saw, would it be capable of doing that? Cmdr. David Fravor: No, not even close Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): Just to confirm, this object had no wings, correct? Cmdr. David Fravor: No wings. Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): Now the aircraft that you were flying, was it armed? Cmdr. David Fravor: No, never felt threatened at all. Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY): If the aircraft was armed, do you believe that your aircraft or any aircraft in possession of the United States could have shot the tic tac down? Cmdr. David Fravor: I'd say no. Just on the performance, it would have just left in a split second. 1:58:10 Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN): Is there any indication that these UAPs could be essentially collecting reconnaissance information? Mr. Graves? Ryan Graves: Yes. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN): Mr. Grusch? David Grusch: Fair assessment. Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN): Mr. Fravor? Cmdr. David Fravor: Very possible. 1:59:05 Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN): Mr. Graves and Fravor, in the event that your encounters had become hostile, would you have had the capability to defend yourself, your crew, your aircraft? Ryan Graves: Absolutely not. Cmdr. David Fravor: No. 2:00:55 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): I might have asked this before, but I want to make sure. Do you have any personal knowledge of someone who's possibly been injured working on legacy UAP reverse engineering? David Grusch: Yes. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Okay. How were they injured? Was it something like a radioactive type situation or something we didn't understand? I've heard people talk about Havana syndrome type incidences. What what was your recollection of that? David Grusch: I can't get into specifics, but you could imagine assessing an unknown unknown, there's a lot of potentialities you can't fully prepare for. 2:02:10 Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Are you aware of any individuals that are participating in reverse engineering programs for non terrestrial craft? David Grusch: Personally, yes. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN): Do you know any that would be willing to testify if there were protections for them? David Grusch: Certainly closed door, and assurances that breaking their NDA, they're not going to get administratively punished. 2:03:45 Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL): Referring to your news nation interview, you had referenced specific treaties between governments. Article III of the nuclear arms treaty with Russia identifies UAPs. It specifically mentions them. To your knowledge. Are there safety measures in place with foreign governments or other superpowers to avoid an escalatory situation in the event that a UAP malevolent event occurs? David Grusch: Yeah, you're referring to an actual public treaty in the UN register. It's funny you mentioned that, the agreement on measures to reduce the risk of outbreak of a nuclear war signed in 1971, unclassified treaty publicly available. And if you cite the George Washington University national security archives, you will find the declassified, in 2013, specific provisions in this specific Red Line Flass message traffic with the specific codes pursuant to Article Three and also situation two, which is in the the previously classified NSA archive. What I would recommend and I tried to get access, but I got a wall of silence at the White House, was the specific incidents when those message traffic was used, I think some scholarship on that would open the door to a further investigation using those publicly available information. 2:05:20 David Grusch: I have concerns, based on the interviews I conducted under my official duties, of potential violations of the Federal Acquisition Regulations, the FAR. 2:06:10 Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): What was your general attitude or perspective on the UFO discussion before that happened? Cmdr. David Fravor: I never felt that we were alone with all the planets out there. But I wasn't a UFO person. I wasn't, I wasn't watching History Channel and MUFON and all that. Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): And have you had any experiences or encounters since that happened? Cmdr. David Fravor: No. Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): And so, have you formed any general conclusions about what you think you experienced then? Cmdr. David Fravor: Yes, I think what we experienced was, like I said, well beyond the material science and the capabilities that we had at the time, that we have currently, or that we're going to have in the next 10 to 20 years. 2:06:55 Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): You've been able to answer in great detail on certain questions, and then other things you say you're not able to respond to. Can you just explain where you're drawing the line? What's the basis for that? David Grusch: Yeah, based on my DOPSR security review and what they've determined that is unclassified. Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): I see, so you're answering any questions that just call upon your knowledge of unclassified questions, but anything that relates to classified matters you're not commenting on in this context? David Grusch: In an open session, but happy to participate in a closed session at the right level. 2:08:15 Ryan Graves: Certainly I think the most vivid sighting of that would have been near mid air that we had at the entrance to our working area. One of these objects was completely stationary at the exact entrance to our working areas, not only geographically but also at altitude. So it was right where all the jets are going, essentially, on the Eastern Seaboard. The two aircraft flew within about 50 feet of the object and that was a very close visual sighting. Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): And you were in one of the aircraft. Ryan Graves: I was not. I was there when the pilot landed. He canceled the mission after. I was there. He was in the ready room with all his gear on with his mouth open. And I asked him what the problem was and he said he almost hit one of those darn things. Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): He said he was 50 feet away from it? Ryan Graves: Yes, sir. Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): And his description of the object was consistent with the description you gave us before? Ryan Graves: A dark gray or black cube inside of a clear sphere. Rep. Jaime Raskin (D-MD): Inside of a clear sphere. With no self evident propulsion system. Ryan Graves:: No wings, no IR energy coming off of the vehicle, nothing tethering it to the ground. And that was primarily what we're experiencing out there. April 19, 2023 Senate Committee on Armed Services Witnesses: , Director, All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office Clips 2:00:50 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: The AARO team of more than three dozen experts is organized around four functional areas: operations, scientific research, integrated analysis, and strategic communications. 2:01:25 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: Consistent with legislative direction, AARO is also carefully reviewing and researching the US government's UAP-related historical record. 2:02:05 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: AARO is the culmination of decades of DOD, intelligence community, and congressionally directed efforts to successfully resolve UAP encountered first and foremost by US military personnel, specifically navy and air force pilots. 2:03:15 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: However, it would be naive to believe that the resolution of all UAP can be solely accomplished by the DOD and IC alone. We will need to prioritize collection and leverage authorities for monitoring all domains within the continental United States. AARO's ultimate success will require partnerships with the inner agency, industry partners, academia and the scientific community, as well as the public. 2:04:15 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: I want to underscore today that only a very small percentage of UAP reports display signatures that could reasonably be described as anomalous. The majority of unidentified objects reported to AARO demonstrate mundane characteristics of balloons, unmanned aerial systems, clutter, natural phenomena, or other readily explainable sources. While a large number of cases in our holdings remain technically unresolved, this is primarily due to a lack of data associated with those cases. Without sufficient data, we are unable to reach defendable conclusions that meet the high scientific standards we set for resolution, and I will not close a case that I cannot defend the conclusions of. 2:06:00 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: AARO is a member of the department's support to the administration's Tiger Team effort to deal with stratospheric objects such as the PRC high altitude balloon. When previously unknown objects are successfully identified, it is AARO's role to quickly and efficiently hand off such readily explainable objects to the intelligence, law enforcement, or operational safety communities for further analysis and appropriate action. In other words, AARO's mission is to turn UAP into SEP, Somebody Else's Problem. 2:07:30 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: I should also state clearly for the record that in our research, AARO has found no credible evidence thus far of extraterrestrial activity, offworld technology, or objects that defy the known laws of physics. In the event sufficient scientific data were ever obtained that a UAP encountered can only be explained by extraterrestrial origin, we are committed to working with our interagency partners at NASA to appropriately inform [the] U.S. government's leadership of its findings. For those few cases that have leaked to the public previously and subsequently commented on by the US government, I encourage those who hold alternative theories or views to submit your research to credible peer reviewed scientific journals. AARO is working very hard to do the same. That is how science works, not by blog or social media. 2:13:20 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: How are we going to get more data? We are working with the joint staff to issue guidance to all the services and commands that will then establish what are the reporting requirements, the timeliness, and all of the data that is required to be delivered to us and retained from all of the associated sensors. That historically hasn't been the case and it's been happenstance that data has been collected. 2:17:20 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: As of this week we are tracking over a total of 650 cases. 2:17:45 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: Let me walk everyone through what our analytic process looks like. We have essentially a five step process. We get our cases in with all the data, we create a case for that event. My team does a preliminary scrub of all of those cases as they come in, just to sort out, do we have any information that says this is in one of those likely categories? It's likely a balloon, it's likely a bird, it's likely some other object, or we don't know. Then we prioritize those based off of where they are. Are they attached to a national security area? Does it show some anomalous phenomenology that is of interest? If it's just a spherical thing that's floating around with the wind and it has no payload on it, that's going to be less important than something that has a payload on it, which will be less important than something that's maneuvering. So there's sort of a hierarchy of just binning the priorities, because we can't do all of them at once. Once we do that and we prioritize them, we take that package of data in that case and I have set up two teams, think of this as a Red Team Blue Team, or competitive analysis. I have an intelligence community team made up of intelligence analysts and I have an S&T team made up of scientists and engineers, and the people that actually build a lot of these sensors are physicists, because you know, if you're a physicist, you can do anything. But they're not associated with the intel community, they're not intel officers. So they they look at this through the lens of the sensor, of what the data says. We give that package to both teams. The intelligence community is going to look at it through the lens of the intelligence record, and what they assess, and their intel tradecraft, which they have very specific rules and regulations on how they do that. The scientific community, the technical community is going to look at it through the lens of "What is the data telling me? What is the sensor doing? What would I expect a sensor response to be?" and back that out. Those two groups give us their answers. We then adjudicate. If they agree, then I am more likely to close that case, if they agree on what it is. If they disagree, we will have an adjudication. We'll bring them together, we'll take a look at the differences, we'll adjudicate. Why do you say one thing and you say another? We will then come to a case recommendation that will get written up by my team. That then goes to a Senior Technical Advisory Group, which is outside of all of those people, made up of senior technical folks and intel analysts and operators retired out of the community. And they essentially peer review what that case recommendation is. They write their recommendations, that comes back to me, I review it, we make a determination, and I'll sign off one way or the other, and then that will go out as the case determination. Once we have an approved web portal to hang the unclassified stuff, we will downgrade and declassify things and put it out there. In the meantime, we're putting a lot of these on our classified web portal where we can then collaborate with the rest of the community so they can see what's going on. In a nutshell, that is the process. 2:27:10 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: There are emerging capabilities out there that in many instances, Russia and China, China in particular, are on par or ahead of us in some areas. So previously, I used to be the Defense Department's intelligence officer for science and technical intelligence. That was our job to look for, what does all that look like? And then my last several years of course, in Space Command, doing space. The adversary is not waiting. They are advancing and they're advancing quickly. If I were to put on some of my old hats, I would tell you, they are less risk averse at technical advancement than we are. They are just willing to try things and see if it works. Are there capabilities that could be employed against us in both an ISR and a weapons fashion? Absolutely. Do I have evidence that they're doing it in these cases? No, but I have concerning indicators. 2:43:45 Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick: So the vision is, at one point, at some point in the future, you should not need an AARO. If I'm successful in what I'm doing, we should be able to normalize everything that we're doing into existing processes, functions, agencies and organizations, and make that part of their mission and their role. Right now the niche that we form is really going after the unknowns. I think you articulated it early on, this is a hunt mission for what might somebody be doing in our backyard that we don't know about? That is what we are doing, but at some point, we should be able to normalize that. That's why it's so important the work we're doing with joint staff to normalize that into DoD policy and guidance. We are bringing in all of our interagency partners. So NASA is providing a liaison for us, I have FBI liaison, I have OSI liaison, I have service liaisons, half of my staff come from the [Intelligence Community], half of my staff come from other scientific and technical backgrounds, I have DOE. So what we're trying to do is ensure, again, as I make UAP into SEP they get handed off to the people that that is their mission to go do, so that we aren't duplicating that. I'm not going to go chase the Chinese high altitude balloon, for example. That's not my job. It's not an unknown, and it's not anomalous anymore. Now it goes over to them. May 17, 2022 House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Subcommittee on Counterterrorism, Counterintelligence, and Counterproliferation Witnesses: , Deputy Director, Office of Naval Intelligence , Under Secretary of Defense Intelligence and Security, Department of Defense Clips 10:00 Ronald Moultrie: The NDAA for fiscal year 2022 has helped us to establish a dedicated office to oversee processes and procedures for the timely collection, processing, analysis, and reporting of UAP related data. 10:15 Ronald Moultrie: What are UAP? Put simply, UAP are airborne objects that, when encountered, cannot be immediately identified. 10:25 Ronald Moultrie: It is the department's contention that by combining appropriately structured, collected data with rigorous scientific analysis, any object that we encounter can likely be isolated, characterized, identified and if necessary, mitigated. 10:40 Ronald Moultrie: We know that our service members have encountered unidentified aerial phenomenon. And because UAPs pose potential flight safety and general security risks, we are committed to a focused effort to determine their origins. Our effort will include the thorough examination of adversarial platforms and potential breakthrough technologies, US government or commercial platforms, Allied or partner systems, and other natural phenomena. 11:15 Ronald Moultrie: We also understand that there has been a cultural stigma surrounding UAP. Our goal is to eliminate the stigma by fully incorporating our operators and mission personnel into a standardized data gathering process. We believe that making UAP reporting a mission imperative will be instrumental to the effort's success. 11:45 Ronald Moultrie: To optimize the department's UAP work, we are establishing an office within the Office of the Secretary of Defense. That office's function is clear: to facilitate the identification of previously unknown or unidentified airborne objects in a methodical, logical, and standardized manner. 13:50 Scott Bray: Since the early 2000s, we have seen an increasing number of unauthorized and or unidentified aircraft or objects in military controlled training areas and training ranges and other designated airspace. Reports of sightings are frequent and continuing. We attribute this increase in reporting to a number of factors, including our work to destigmatize reporting, an increase in the number of new systems such as quad copters and unmanned aerial systems that are in our airspace, identification of what we can classify as clutter (mylar balloons and other types of of air trash), and improvements in the capabilities of our various sensors to detect things in our airspace. 14:50 Scott Bray: The basic issues, then and now, are twofold. First, incursions in our training ranges by unidentified objects represent serious hazards to safety of flight. In every aspect of naval aviation, safety of our air crews is paramount. Second, intrusions by unknown aircraft or objects pose potential threats to the security of our operations. Our aviators train as they would fight, so any intrusions that may compromise the security of our operations by revealing our capabilities, our tactics, techniques or procedures are of great concern to the Navy and Department of Defense. 16:40 Scott Bray: The direct result of those efforts has been increased reporting with increased opportunities to focus a number of sensors on any objects. The message is now clear: if you see something, you need to report it. And the message has been received. 18:55 Scott Bray: As detailed in the ODNI report, if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved, they likely fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, US government or US industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, or another bin that allows for a holding bin of difficult cases, and for the possibility of surprise and potential scientific discovery. 22:20 Scott Bray: If UAP do indeed represent a potential threat to our security then the capabilities, systems, processes and sources we use to observe, record, study, or analyze these phenomena need to be classified at appropriate levels. We do not want, we do not want potential adversaries to know exactly what we're able to see or understand or how we come to the conclusions we make. Therefore, public disclosures must be carefully considered on a case by case basis. 23:35 Rep André Carson (D-IN): This is the third version of this task force and, to be frank, one of Congress's concerns is that the executive branch, in administrations of both parties, has been sweeping concerns about UAPs under the rug by focusing on events that can be explained and avoiding events that cannot be explained. What can you say to give the American people confidence that you aren't just focusing our attention on low hanging fruit with easy explanations? Ronald Moultrie: Congressman, I'll start and then Mr. Bray, please feel free to weigh in. So the way that we're approaching it is with a more thorough, standardized methodology than what we have in the past. First and foremost, the Secretary Defense is chartering this effort, this is not someone lower in the Department of Defense, and he is assigned that task to the Office of Secretary of Defense's Under Secretary for Intelligence Security, that's me, because I'm responsible for looking at intelligence matters, I'm responsible for security matters, and this is potentially both. So we're concerning ourselves with the safety of our personnel, the safety of our installations and bases. There's no other higher power than what we have in actually getting after this. And as you have stated, we have been assigned that task to actually stand up an office, the AOIMSG, which I believe the name server will likely change, but we have moved forward in terms of moving to establish that office. We have, as of this week, picked the director for that effort, a very established and accomplished individual. 42:00 Scott Bray: I would say that we're not aware of any adversary that can move an object without discernible means of propulsion. The question then becomes, in many of these cases where we don't have a discernible means of propulsion in the data that we have, in some cases, there are likely sensor artifacts that that may be hiding some of that, there's certainly some degree of something that looks like signature management that we have seen from some of these UAP. But I would caution, I would simply say that there are a number of other events in which we do not have an explanation. There are a small handful in which there are flight characteristics or signature management that we can't explain with the data that we have. 43:40 Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA): With respect to the second two videos showing the small triangles, the hypothesis is that those are commercial drones that because of the use of night vision goggles appear like triangles, is that the operating assessment? Scott Bray: Some type of drone, some type of unmanned aerial system, and it is simply that that light source resolves itself through the night vision goggles onto the SLR camera as a triangle. 47:55 Scott Bray: Allies have seen these, China has established its own version of the UAP task force. So clearly a number of countries have observations of things in the airspace that they can identify. Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH): And do we share data with some, with all? Are they sharing with us? Scott Bray: We share data with some and some share data with us. Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH): But not necessarily all that have publicly reported something? Scott Bray: That's correct. 52:25 Scott Bray: When I say we can't explain, I mean, exactly as you describe there, that there's a lot of information, like the video that we showed, in which there's simply too little data to create a reasonable explanation. There are a small handful of cases in which we have more data that our analysis simply hasn't been able to fully pull together a picture of what happened. Those are the cases where we talked about where we see some indications of flight characteristics or signature management that are not what we had expected. When it comes to material that we have, we have no material. We have detected no emanations within the UAP task force that would suggest it's anything non-terrestrial in origin. 59:35 Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL): There have been no collisions between any US assets and one of these UAPs, correct? Scott Bray: We have not had a collision, we've had at least 11 near misses though. 59:55 Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL): And there's been no attempt, there's no communications, or any kind of communication signals that emanate from those objects that we've detected, correct? Scott Bray: That's correct. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL): And have we attempted to communicate with those objects? Scott Bray: No. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL): So we don't we don't even put out an alert saying, you know, "U.S., identify yourself, you are within our flight path," or something like that? Scott Bray: We haven't said anything like that. We've not put anything out like that, generally speaking. For example, in the video that we showed earlier, it appears to be something that is unmanned, appears to be something that may or may not be in controlled flight, and so we've not attempted any communication with that. 1:00:55 Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL): And I assume we've never discharged any armaments against a UAP, correct? Scott Bray: That's correct. 1:01:05 Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL): How about wreckage? Have we come across any wreckage of any kind of object that has now been examined by you? Scott Bray: The UAP task force doesn't have any wreckage that isn't explainable, that isn't consistent with being of terrestrial origin. 1:01:20 Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL): Do we have any sensors underwater to detect on submerged UAPs, anything that is in the ocean or in the seas? Ronald Moultrie: So I think that would be more properly addressed in a closed session. 1:05:30 Ronald Moultrie: So one of the concerns that we have is that there are a lot of individuals and groups that are putting information out there that that could be considered to be somewhat self serving. We're trying to do what's in the best interests of, one, the Department of Defense, and then two, what's in the best interest of the public, to ensure that we can put factually based information back into the mainstream and back into the bloodstream of the reporting media that we have, so people understand what's there. It's important because we are attempting, as this hearing has drawn out to understand, one, what may just be natural phenomenon, two, what may be sensor phenomenology or things that were happening with sensors, three, what may be legitimate counterintelligence threats to places that we have or bases or installations, or security threats to our platforms. And anything that diverts us off of what we have with the resources that have been allocated to us, sends us off in the spurious chases and hunts that are just not helpful. They also contribute to the undermining of the confidence that the Congress and the American people have that we are trying to get to the root cause of what's happening here, report on that, and then feed that back into our national security apparatus so we are able to protect the American people and our allies. So it is harmful, it is hurtful, but hopefully, if we get more information out there, w
Dimitri and Khalid beam themselves back to the foundational recurring SJ topic of UFO “disclosure”, focusing on serrrious journalist Leslie Kean's most recent exposé in The Debrief (??) about Pentagon UAP whistleblower David Grusch, who claims that the US government possesses crashed alien spacecraft. Topics include: mispronouncing Leslie “Kaaayyn” because you didn't go to the Spence School or Bard, Tucker soyfacing, silk topper UFO maestro Chris Mellon, a possible Yankee-Cowboy war simmering over the framing of Disclosure, comparing the UFO and psychedelic communities, critical support for Ezra Klein erming the shit out of Kean's story, Dr. Garry Nolan's shifting narratives around his ET fixation, his insistence that he's not a eugenicist, Kean downplaying the Pentagon's interest in cryptids and psi phenomena, the trickster element of the Phenomenon, Jacques Vallée's “Messengers of Deception”, and more. Part One of Two. For access to full-length Patreon episodes, upcoming installments of DEMON FORCES, and the SJ Grotto of Truth Discord, subscribe to the Al-Wara' Frequency at patreon.com/subliminaljihad.
Chuck is still on vacation, but the UFO news just keeps coming hot and heavy, so Scott's back with another solo episode to keep you up-to-date. We've got several stories this week, including an alleged secret Canadian UAP reverse engineering program and continued denials from the Pentagon. But the biggest story is that Congress is taking the claims of whistleblower David Grusch very seriously. We've got quotes from multiple Congresspeople as well as new UAP provisions written into the upcoming Intelligence Community Authorization Act that will remove funding from UAP programs that haven't reported to Congress and a ticking clock for defense contractors to turn over any UFO material or information they got from the government, or face penalties! References: The New York Times: Ezra Klein Interviews Leslie Kean (Transcript) Liberation Times: Bombshell Letter Reveals Canadian Politician's Concerns Of Covert UFO Programs Involving Canada And Five Eyes Alliance MP Larry Maguire's letter claiming Canada's DARPA has UAP material Daniel Otis: Canadian defense minister denies allegations of crash recovery Ross Coulthart: Canadian response is not a broad government denial NewsNation: US has ‘downplayed' the number of UFO sightings: Senator Hawley Matt Laslo: Rubio says UAP whistleblower first credibly vetted, referred to Congress Matt Laslo: Intel Chair Warner says gov't has hidden programs from Congress in past Matt Laslo: Gillibrand scheduling hearings with UAP whistleblower David Grusch Liberation Times: Pentagon Unable To Confirm Or Deny Discovery Of Materials Originating From Non-Human Intelligences Or Unknown Origin Within Secretive Programs Douglas Dean Johnson: Senate Intelligence bill gives holders of "non-earth origin or exotic UAP material" six months to make it available to AARO Liberation Times: Senate Intelligence Committee Proposes Amnesty to Defense Contractors for Disclosure of 'Non-Earth Origin or Exotic Materials' in Approved UFO Language The Hill: Congress doubles down on explosive claims of illegal UFO retrieval programs NewsNation: Rubio: Recent UFO whistleblower isn't the only one NY Mag: Marco Rubio Says He's Heard Shocking ‘Firsthand' Accounts of UFOs Matt Laslo: Rep. Burchett hopes to hold public UAP hearing in July Chris Mellon on Senate uncovering truth of off-world tech. Chris Mellon on Congress pursuing evidence of off-world tech. Gillibrand Secures Full Funding For UAP Office In Senate Defense Bill Markup Barnett Parker: Lockheed refers UAP question to AARO Ross Coulthart: Why should AARO have to answer for Lockheed?
In this eye-opening episode, we delve into the unexplored aspects of the UAP phenomenon that were conspicuously absent from the recent Senate hearing. Join us as we uncover crucial evidence like the Ubatuba Magnesium samples, and discuss the compelling comments from experts like Lue Elizondo, Chris Mellon, and Garry Nolan on reverse engineering programs and non-human intelligences. Discover how the UFO community is pushing for a more thorough and transparent investigation that leaves no stone unturned. Don't miss this in-depth analysis that could change the way you think about UAP forever. And please remember, this is my opinion and has been written only hours after the hearing. #UAP #UFO #SenateHearing #UbatubaMagnesium #ReverseEngineering #NonHumanIntelligences #Transparency #UFOCommunity #Investigation #Extraterrestrial If you would like to support my channel you can subscribe for as low as $1.00 or here are my support links Patreon: patreon.com/DimensionsOfReality or through my affiliate link with Audible Plus Audible Premium Plus --- Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dimensionsorpodcast/message Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/dimensionsorpodcast/support
YouTube link: https://youtu.be/j1fN5Gxm9fk Leslie Kean is an investigative journalist and author who is most notable for books about UFOs and the afterlife. Sponsors: - Miracle Made: Go to http://TryMiracle.com/EVERYTHING (code: EVERYTHING) to claim your free 3 piece towel set + additional 40% OFF - *New* TOE Website (early access to episodes): https://theoriesofeverything.org/ - Patreon: https://patreon.com/curtjaimungal - Crypto: https://tinyurl.com/cryptoTOE - PayPal: https://tinyurl.com/paypalTOE - Twitter: https://twitter.com/TOEwithCurt - Discord Invite: https://discord.com/invite/kBcnfNVwqs - iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/better-left-unsaid-with-curt-jaimungal/id1521758802 - Pandora: https://pdora.co/33b9lfP - Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4gL14b92xAErofYQA7bU4e - Subreddit r/TheoriesOfEverything: https://reddit.com/r/theoriesofeverything LINKS MENTIONED: - UFOs: Investigating the Unknown | National Geographic: https://youtu.be/sVhq1YxV_Ec - UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record: https://amzn.to/3ks0PVC - Surviving Death: A Journalist Investigates Evidence for an Afterlife: https://amzn.to/3ZfLOoE - PaCE1 (Physics and Consciousness Explication Winners): https://youtu.be/rGln1sLk5ME #PaCE1 TIMESTAMPS: 00:00:00 “There are entities more advanced than us.” 00:05:09 What are UFOs? 00:15:28 Relationship with Chris Mellon and Lue Elizondo 00:25:21 This is why we need to take UFO sightings seriously 00:27:15 North American UAP "Balloons" 00:29:13 "These objects are clearly extraterrestrial." 00:30:43 [Ross Coulthart] White House vs. Pentagon on UAPs 00:33:44 We don't have a stigma problem, we have a cowardice problem 00:35:29 Evidence indicating extraterrestrials or breakaway civilization 00:41:08 One side is the alien (ET) hypothesis, the other is… 00:45:56 What classifies "The Phenomenon" exactly? 00:48:33 Developing Psi abilities after UAP encounters 00:50:57 Leslie's research into the afterlife 01:00:41 Skinwalker and communicating with the deceased 01:04:57 Peer reviewed studies on the afterlife 01:14:21 Disclosure destabilizes society? I don't buy it! 01:18:20 [Tom Delonge] Gov't secrecy is good for us 01:23:01 The infamous Varginha case 01:26:13 Who knows more? Gov't vs. Private industry (Lockheed Martin) 01:28:08 The Wilson Memo 01:32:01 Stewart Alexander (the physical medium) 01:39:32 Ectoplasm and etheric hands 01:42:01 Apparitions 01:48:08 Pentagon reports studying mediumship / peer-reviewed studies 02:05:02 "UFOs: Investigating the Unknown" 02:08:05 Something big is coming in 2030s 02:12:16 How would the world change if they knew what Leslie knew? 02:13:19 What convinces Leslie that UFOs are intelligent? 02:16:20 Time-traveling human hypothesis Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
**There are a couple of instances of a few seconds of interference on the recording. It doesn't persist throughout and happens within the first 10 mins. Apologies**Andy is joined by Dan for a news run down including;Upcoming UAP Task Force un-classified report & expectationsNASA's UFO Study has begunMoment of Contact- videos to come of beings?Chris Mellon public appearanceAnd much moreSpotify listeners can now access premium content here > https://open.spotify.com/show/7wnXUAQ3vwdsX1BoyaEvjZSign up to support the podcast via Patreon.com/ThatUFOPodcast or Apple Podcast subscriptions (2 week free trial available)Please support our show sponsors;Babbel, learn a new language today - zen.ai/ufobabbelBetterHelp - 10% off first month with http://www.BetterHelp.com/ThatUFOGo to zen.ai/ufosound and use the code “podcast” at checkout to save 10% off any Soundstripesubscription!Zencastr Advertise - Advertise your business on this and other podcasts follow zen.ai/thatufopod1You can also sign up to Zencastr with 40% off for 3 months with promo code: ufopodcast at https://zencastr.com/pricing?coupon=ufopodcast&fpr=7ooh0 . Start recording your own podcast or meetings today!Buy the official podcast map/guide to UK UFO sightings here; https://www.herblester.com/products/the-skies-aboveGet in touch with the show;Twitter: @UFOUAPAMFacebook, YouTube & Instagram: "That UFO Podcast"YouTube: YouTube.com/c/ThatUFOPodcastEmail: UFOUAPAM@gmail.comLinktr.ee/ufouapamLinktr.ee/TheZignalDon't forget to subscribe, like and leave a review of the showEnjoy folks!Andy
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
