Podcasts about mail in voting

Joyce has ALL the info you need to know for vote by mail for this years election. VOTEPALMBEACH.GOVSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Minnesota Secretary of Stave Steve Simon joins Adam and Jordana to talk about threats to mail in voting.

Carolyn Shapiro, a constitutional law professor at Chicago-Kent College of Law, joins Karen Conti to talk about this week’s Supreme Court rulings on birthright citizenship and mail-in voting. Carolyn explains birthright citizenship, the arguments made by President Trump’s administration in support of the executive order to end it, and what would need to happen to get […]

The American Democracy Minute Radio News Report & Podcast for July 7, 2026With the SAVE America Act Stalling in Congress, Look for Renewed Efforts to Pass Similar Restrictions in State LegislaturesWith the SAVE America Act now stalled in Congress and unlikely to pass, more GOP-dominated state legislatures may take up SAVE Act-like restrictive proof of citizenship and narrower voter ID options.  Some have already passed similar provisions.Some podcasting platforms strip out our links.  To read our resources and see the whole script of today's report, please go to our website at https://AmericanDemocracyMinute.orgToday's LinksArticles & Resources:Voting Rights Lab - 2026 Legislative Session in ReviewCenter for American Progress - The SAVE Act May Be Stalled in Congress, But State Versions Are Being Advanced All Across the CountryBrennan Center for Justice - States Already Enacting Harmful SAVE Act Policies, Requiring Proof of Citizenship to Vote Related ADM Reports:American Democracy Minute - Florida Legislature Passes State Version of the SAVE America Act. Its Proof of Citizenship & Voter ID Rules May Disenfranchise Thousands.American Democracy Minute - (2025) Restrictive Voting Laws Passed in 20 States in 2025. Proof of Citizenship, Limits on Mail-In Voting and Narrower Voter ID Rules Dominated.Groups Taking Action:League of Women Voters FL, ACLU UT, Legal Defense FundRegister or Check Your Voter Registration:U.S. Election Assistance Commission – Register And Vote in Your StatePlease follow us on Facebook, Instagram, and Bluesky Social, and SHARE! Find all of our reports at AmericanDemocracyMinute.orgSubscribe for FREE at Apple Podcasts, Spotify and most podcasting platforms.#Democracy  #DemocracyNews #VoterID #ProofofCitizenship #VoterSuppression  #Disenfranchised #SAVEAmericaAct

This Day in Legal History: Civil Rights Act of 1964On July 2, 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 into law. It was one of the most important pieces of legislation in American history, and it fundamentally transformed the legal landscape by banning discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in public accommodations, employment, education, and programs receiving federal funding.The Civil Rights Act was the product of the Civil Rights Movement—years of courageous activism by Black Americans and their allies who marched, protested, and demanded that the law recognize their equal humanity and their constitutional rights. The movement included iconic figures like Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, John Lewis, and countless others whose names we'll never know but whose courage changed America.The Act made it illegal for hotels, restaurants, theaters, and other public places to refuse service based on race. It made employment discrimination illegal. It empowered the federal government to withhold funding from schools and institutions that discriminated. It created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to investigate and remedy workplace discrimination.Before the Civil Rights Act, the law itself endorsed discrimination. Southern states had explicit “Jim Crow” laws that required racial segregation. “Whites only” signs hung on businesses, schools, water fountains, and bathrooms. The law said Black Americans couldn't use the same facilities as white Americans. The Civil Rights Act said that's unconstitutional and illegal. It didn't end racism—racism persisted and persists today—but it transformed the law from a tool of discrimination into a tool of protection. The Act represented a moral and legal turning point. It affirmed that the Constitution's promise of equal protection applies to everyone, regardless of race. It showed that the law can change when people demand justice. It demonstrated that the Civil Rights Movement's sacrifice—the beatings, the arrests, the deaths, the long struggle—could actually transform American law and create a more just society.The Civil Rights Act remains one of the most important achievements in American legal history. Every civil rights protection we have today—protection against employment discrimination, housing discrimination, educational discrimination—traces back to that law signed on July 2, 1964. It's a reminder that legal change comes from struggle, from people willing to demand their rights, and from a government finally willing to recognize the dignity and equality of all its citizens.The Supreme Court's use of its “shadow docket”—an informal process for issuing emergency decisions with minimal explanation—has expanded dramatically, and the justices are sharply divided over whether this is appropriate.The Supreme Court has a formal process for cases: parties file briefs, the Court hears oral arguments, justices deliberate, and then the Court issues a written opinion explaining its reasoning. This is the public docket. But the Supreme Court also has an emergency process called the “shadow docket” for last-minute requests for emergency relief. For example, if someone is about to be executed and files an emergency request for a stay, the Court needs to decide quickly. Traditionally, the shadow docket was used only for these genuine emergencies. But in recent years, particularly under the current Supreme Court, the shadow docket has been used for major constitutional decisions. The Court will issue orders on the shadow docket with little or no explanation, effectively deciding important cases without full briefing, oral arguments, or written opinions.Imagine if a school made major policy changes through emergency procedures meant only for fire drills, without explaining the policy or letting people comment on it. That's what's happening with the Supreme Court's shadow docket. Conservative justices defend the practice, saying the Court needs flexibility to respond to emerging issues. Liberal justices are furious, arguing that major constitutional decisions require full briefing and transparent reasoning. They point out that decisions on the shadow docket often don't explain the Court's reasoning, making it impossible for lower courts to apply the law or for Americans to understand their constitutional rights. The shadow docket has been used for decisions affecting voting rights, abortion, immigration, and religious freedom—major constitutional questions that deserve full public deliberation.The shadow docket allows the Supreme Court to reshape constitutional law without public explanation or accountability. It enables the conservative majority to implement a constitutional agenda without transparent reasoning. It divides even the justices—a sign that this practice is controversial even at the highest level. The shadow docket represents a concerning shift toward less transparent, less democratic judicial decision-making on matters of profound constitutional importance.US Supreme Court supercharges its ‘shadow docket,' dividing the justices | ReutersThe Minnesota Attorney General has shut down its unit dedicated to reviewing and overturning wrongful convictions, citing budget constraints. The decision has shocked criminal justice advocates who view wrongful conviction review as a core function of government. Here's the context: Innocent people sometimes go to prison. Witnesses misidentify them. Evidence is planted or fabricated. Police coerce false confessions. Lawyers provide inadequate representation. DNA evidence may later prove innocence. Many states have created units—often within the Attorney General's office—dedicated to reviewing cases where there's evidence of wrongful conviction and seeking to overturn convictions when appropriate. These units have freed hundreds of innocent people from prison. In Minnesota, this unit reviewed cases, worked with innocence organizations, and petitioned courts to overturn convictions when evidence showed innocence. Now that unit is being shut down.If you discovered you had been wrongly convicted and imprisoned for a crime you didn't commit, you would want the government to help free you. You would want the justice system to correct its own mistakes. Wrongful conviction units exist to do exactly that—to correct serious errors in the criminal justice system. When the government shuts down its wrongful conviction unit, it's saying it will no longer systematically look for innocent people who have been wrongly imprisoned. Think of the human cost. People serving decades in prison for crimes they didn't commit may never have their convictions reviewed. Their appeals for help will go unanswered. The government agency that should be most interested in justice—the Attorney General—has decided it can't afford to help innocent prisoners.This decision signals a deprioritization of wrongful convictions and prisoner justice. It means innocent people will remain in prison because the state won't investigate their claims. It undermines public faith in the criminal justice system. It suggests that budget concerns are more important than freeing innocent people. Criminal justice advocates worry this is part of a broader pattern: reduced funding for public defenders, reduced funding for innocence organizations, and now elimination of the state's own wrongful conviction review unit. The decision raises a fundamental question: Do we actually care about justice, or do we only care about convictions?Minnesota attorney general shuts unit reviewing wrongful convictions, cites Trump funding cut | ReutersA federal judge has blocked the U.S. Postal Service from implementing restrictions that would have made mail-in voting more difficult. The ruling is a significant victory for voting rights advocates.The Postal Service proposed new restrictions on how mail-in ballots could be delivered. These restrictions would have required mail-in voters to meet stricter deadlines, reduced ballot processing times, and imposed other requirements that voting rights groups argued would disenfranchise voters, particularly voters in rural areas and voters with disabilities who rely on mail-in voting. Voting rights advocates sued, arguing that the restrictions would violate the right to vote. The federal judge agreed and blocked the restrictions.The right to vote is fundamental to democracy. Mail-in voting is a way many Americans exercise that right—people who are elderly, disabled, working on election day, or living in areas far from polling places depend on mail-in voting. When the government imposes restrictions that make mail-in voting harder, it's making it harder for people to vote. The Postal Service argued it needed to implement restrictions for operational reasons. The judge said operational concerns can't be used to interfere with voting rights. If the Postal Service needs to adjust its operations, it has to do so in ways that don't undermine the right to vote.This decision protects mail-in voting access at a time when voting rights are under increasing attack. It affirms that the right to vote can't be sacrificed for bureaucratic convenience. It signals that courts will step in if government agencies try to restrict voting access. As more Americans rely on mail-in voting, protecting mail-in voting access is essential to protecting voting rights. The decision reflects a judicial recognition that voting is a fundamental right and that restrictions on voting deserve strict scrutiny, not deference to government agencies.Judge blocks US Postal Service's proposed restrictions on mail-in voting | Reuters This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.minimumcomp.com/subscribe

July 2, 2026 ~ Jocelyn Benson, Secretary of State, Democrat Gubernatorial candidate launches "Cost Down, Wages Up" tour and reacts to the Supreme Court mail in voting decision. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Who was mail-in voting actually meant for? Joe Pags breaks it down and explains why the system has drifted far beyond its original purpose. Then, Mike Davis of the Article III Project joins fired up over what he calls one of the most lawless judicial decisions he's ever seen. Davis names the judges, explains why he believes they're abusing their power, and lets loose on what this means for the courts, elections, and the country. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Let's talk about Trump's mail-in voting loss at SCOTUS....

Can ballots arriving after Election Day still be counted? In this episode, Todd breaks down the Supreme Court's decision in Watson v. RNC and explains why he believes the ruling undermines election integrity and public confidence. Todd examines the Court's majority and dissenting opinions, discusses the implications for mail-in voting, highlights President Trump's response and renewed support for the SAVE Act, and closes with a look at Paris officials blaming Americans for Europe's deadly heat wave. If election security, constitutional interpretation, and government accountability matter to you, this is a conversation you won't want to miss.

Can ballots arriving after Election Day still be counted? In this episode, Todd breaks down the Supreme Court's decision in Watson v. RNC and explains why he believes the ruling undermines election integrity and public confidence. Todd examines the Court's majority and dissenting opinions, discusses the implications for mail-in voting, highlights President Trump's response and renewed support for the SAVE Act, and closes with a look at Paris officials blaming Americans for Europe's deadly heat wave. If election security, constitutional interpretation, and government accountability matter to you, this is a conversation you won't want to miss.

A new Supreme Court ruling won't affect voting by mail in Minnesota. An explanation from Blois Olson on The WCCO Morning News.

A new Supreme Court ruling won't affect voting by mail in Minnesota. An explanation from Blois Olson on The WCCO Morning News.

Oregon's mail in voting late day ballot acceptance law is allowed to stand by SCOTUS: This issue is not over: https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/30/here-are-the-key-takeaways-from-scotus-monday-decisions/Key takeaways from SCOTUS mail in voting decision: https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/key-takeaways-from-supreme-court-ruling-on-late-arriving-ballots-6055146?ea_src=frontpage&ea_med=section-1 Trump's EO on restricting who can vote by mail is still in play: https://www.koin.com/news/politics/supreme-court-rules-states-can-accept-mail-ballots-after-election-day/  Most OR citizen initiative petitions failing except 2: https://oregoncatalyst.com/97692-petitions-failing-2.htmlIP-28 fallout: no more Tillamook Ice Cream: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2026/06/30/oregon-is-telling-voters-not-to-worry-about-this-insane-ballot-initiative-thats-not-the-point-n2678468  

Episode 5478: SCOTUS Drops Bombshell Rulings On Mail In Voting

SCOTUS ruled on a flurry of issues today, including the ruling on mail-in ballots, where they decided that votes can be counted after Election Day. Then, Grace discusses the Great State Fair and how it has spurred more TDS.  Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.

Gov. Mike DeWine this week vetoed a bill that would mandate photo ID for mail-in ballots starting in 2027. On the heels of DeWine calling on Ohio lawmakers to abolish the death penalty, we learned this week that for the first time in his tenure, he granted clemency to a death row inmate. The U.S. Supreme Court signed off on the Trump administration's plan to strip temporary protected status from Haitian immigrants. The move could leave more than 10,000 Haitians living in Springfield at risk for deportation. Republican U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno has an unexpected ally in the effort to shore up social security: Democrat Sen. Elizabeth Warren. And Cleveland has been raking in cash since it implemented changes to its parking pricing structure earlier this year. We will discuss these topics and other news of the week on the “Sound of Ideas Reporters Roundtable.” Guests:- Kabir Bhatia, Senior Reporter/Producer, Ideastream Public Media- Gabriel Kramer, Reporter/Producer & "NewsDepth" Host, Ideastream Public Media- Sarah Donaldson, Reporter/Producer, Ideastream Statehouse News Bureau

It is officially the beginning of primaries where early voters can make their voices heard and we talked to Esme Murphy, political analyst with WCCO Television on that, Steve Simon assuring Minnesota voting integrity, and more!

It is officially the beginning of primaries where early voters can make their voices heard and we talked to Esme Murphy, political analyst with WCCO Television on that, Steve Simon assuring Minnesota voting integrity, and more!

Thursday, June 25, 2026 Today, Mamdani's endorsed candidates sweep the primaries in New York; mail-in voting is under attack as Democrats sound the alarm on Trump's Postal Service; the first appeals court has rejected Trump's bid to force states to hand over voter rolls; a federal judge has blocked Trump's bid to require proof of citizenship to vote; Donald cancels the signing of a bipartisan housing bill until the Senate passes the SAVE Act; Amazon retaliated against workers who supported regulating data centers; Stephen Miller is said to be behind a memo eroding disability rights; a US boat strike in the Eastern Pacific kills two and leaves six survivors as the Senate threatens to freeze Hegseth's travel; plus Allison and Dana deliver your Good News. Thank You, AG1DRINKAG1.com/DAILYBEANS to get a free Morning Person Hat and free AG1 Flavor Sampler in your Welcome Kit with your first AG1 subscription (an $82 value!). Join The Daily Beans and give a gift today to ensure The Trevor Project can continue its crucial work in the face of continued challenges. Donate to The Trevor Project - Daily Beans Podcast Guest:  The Latest Breakdown:The Breakdown | Trump And Trillionaires' Secret Plan To Destroy America StoriesMamdani emerges as kingmaker, and other takeaways from Tuesday's primaries | Washington Post US appeals court rejects Trump bid to force Michigan to hand over voter rolls | Reuters Senate Democrats sound alarm over Trump's Postal Service plans for mail-in ballots | MS NOW Trump leaves major housing bill in limbo, demanding Congress pass the SAVE Act | NBC News U.S. strike on an alleged drug boat kills 2, leaves 6 survivors in the eastern Pacific Ocean | NBC News Amazon Retaliated Against Workers Who Supported Regulating Data Centers, Complaint Says | The New York Times Stephen Miller Said to Drive DOJ Memo Eroding Disability Rights | Bloomberg Law   Good TroubleChicago, don't sell your parking meter company to the same private-equity firm that owns Omni Air International  | Gillian Brockell | Bluesky →Oppose House Amendment to Defund the Peace Corps! →Comment on FR-6518-P-01 Equal Access  in HUD Programs Revisions  →Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance -  Open For Comments →FieldTeam6.org →Standwithminnesota.com →Tell Congress Ice out Now | Indivisible, Defund ICE | 5Calls →ICE List  →iceout.org Good News gillianbrockell.com https://www.daviscountyutah.gov/animalcare/adoption-information/adopt#cats Tour — DANA GOLDBERGTickets for Dana Goldberg: Outrageous - Sep 23 - Den Theater - Chicago  →Share your Good News & Good Trouble - The Daily Beans →Beans Talk audio -beans-talk.simplecast.com →Email Dana LGBTQ Owned eating establishments in your area - hello@mswmedia.com Subject: “Dana's Project” Subscribe to the MSW YouTube Channel - MSW Media - YouTube Our Donation Links The Trevor Project - trevorproject.org/beans Blue Wave California - bluewavecalifornia.org/concert Donate to Public Citizen - https://citizen.org/beans/ The Daily Beans is donating $10,000 and invites you to give what you can to support their life-affirming work - Donate to It Gets Better / The Daily Beans Fundraiser   Pathways to Citizenship link to MATCH Allison's Donationhttps://crm.bloomerang.co/HostedDonation?ApiKey=pub_86ff5236-dd26-11ec-b5ee-066e3d38bc77&WidgetId=6388736 Join Dana and The Daily Beans in support of Human Rights Campaign http://onecau.se/_ekes71 More Donation LinksNational Security Counselors - Donate, ActBlue.com/donate/msw-bwc, WhistleblowerAid.org/beans Dr. Allison Gill - The Breakdown | Allison Gill, Mueller, She Wrote @muellershewrote.com - Bluesky, MSW & The Daily Beans Podcast @muellershewrote - Instagram, MSW Media - YouTube →Federal workers - email AG at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen.  Dana Goldberg - Dana is on Patreon! At Dana's Dugout, @dgcomedy - Bluesky, @dgcomedy - IG, Dana Goldberg - Facebook,  DanaGoldberg.com More from MSW Media - Shows - MSW Media, Cleanup On Aisle 45 pod, The Breakdown | Allison Gill Reminder - you can see the pod pics if you become a Patron. The good news pics are at the bottom of the show notes of each Patreon episode! That's just one of the perks of subscribing! patreon.com/muellershewrote Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:https://apple.co/3XNx7ckWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?https://patreon.com/thedailybeanshttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/https://apple.co/3UKzKt0 Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

URSULA'S TOP STORIES: BREAKING — Federal judge slaps down Trump EO seeking to take control of mail in ballots // Low income folks getting a toll discount // CID businesses are struggling for customers with the World Cup // Ursula takes in the World Cup action for the first time // WOULD YOU RATHER?

June 12, 2026, 5pm: Nicolle Wallace on mail in voting being safe and secure enough for Donald Trump -- just not anyone else -- especially not anyone who wants to vote against him. For more, follow us on Instagram @deadlinewh   For more from Nicolle, follow and download her podcast, “The Best People with Nicolle Wallace,” wherever you get your podcasts.To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Have you seen the mess they're dealing with in California? Yes, Minnesota's mail-in voting law is more strict than California, but is making voting more convenient really worth the problems? Jason talks with listeners.

Vancouver resident Jonathan Hines makes the case that universal mail-in voting has exposed serious logistical and security failures — from nearly 400 abandoned ballots found near a Renton dumpster to California acknowledging weeks-long primary count delays. He proposes a three-pillar hybrid model built around verified drop boxes, expanded in-person voting windows, and a request-based absentee system. https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/opinion/letter-the-logistics-crisis-of-universal-mail-in-voting/ #MailInVoting #ElectionSecurity #WashingtonState #VotingReform #ClarkCounty #ElectionIntegrity #Opinion #Politics

This is The Briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from a Christian worldview.On today's edition of The Briefing, Dr. Mohler discusses California's elections, the controversy over 60 Minutes, Barry Diller's play to get into gambling industry, the corruption of gambling and “prediction markets,” and the major shark problem of South Africa's new Club Med.Part I (00:14 – 10:45)Mail-In Voting, Progressivism's Chokehold, a History of a Male-Only Governors, and More: Christians Should Take Notice of California's ElectionsWhy Hasn't California Elected a Woman Governor? by The New York Times (Heather Knight, Soumya Karlamangla, and Jill Cowan)Part II (10:45 – 17:40)The Controversy Over 60 Minutes: Scott Pelley Fired as CBS News is Setting Iconic 60 Minutes Program on a New TrajectoryPart III (17:40 – 20:25)Barry Diller Sees the Future? Media Billionaire Makes Play to Get Into Gambling IndustryPart IV (20:25 – 21:31)Insider Information: Multiple Headlines Reveal the Corruption That Comes With Gambling and “Prediction Markets”Part V (21:31 – 26:46)Bull Sharks, Great Whites, and Tiger Sharks, Oh My: South Africa's New Club Med Has a Major Shark ProblemNobody Can Agree How to Keep the Sharks Out of South Africa's New Club Med by The Wall Street Journal (Alexandra Wexler)Sign up to receive The Briefing in your inbox every weekday morning.Follow Dr. Mohler:X | Instagram | Facebook | YouTubeFor more information on The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to sbts.edu.For more information on Boyce College, just go to BoyceCollege.com.To write Dr. Mohler or submit a question for The Mailbox, go here.

A proposed rule from the U.S. Postal Service could have major implications for who gets to vote by mail, including in Wisconsin. A former government building has been sold in the hopes of bringing Amtrak to Madison. And, we'll hear about new rules in effect for ATV and UTV riders in the state.

On the DSR Daily for Thursday, we cover a judge paving the way for Trump's mail-in voting executive order, a Justice Department probe targeting E. Jean Carroll, Jill Biden's insane admission, and more.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

War Room U.S. and Iran Negotiators Reach “Tentative” Agreement to Extend Ceasefire and Open Nuke Talks… PLUS, Judge Declines to Block Trump's Order on Mail-In Voting

On the DSR Daily for Thursday, we cover a judge paving the way for Trump's mail-in voting executive order, a Justice Department probe targeting E. Jean Carroll, Jill Biden's insane admission, and more.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On the DSR Daily for Thursday, we cover a judge paving the way for Trump's mail-in voting executive order, a Justice Department probe targeting E. Jean Carroll, Jill Biden's insane admission, and more.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Send us Fan MailMail-in voting feels like a modern convenience, but the rules behind it are older and more rigorous than most people realize, and one small mistake can create big headaches. We sit down with Dr. Gilberto “Dr. Z” Zelaya from the Montgomery County Board of Elections to make vote by mail in Montgomery County, Maryland feel straightforward, practical, and stress-free.We talk about how voter outreach has evolved from excuse-required absentee voting to today's no-excuse mail-in ballots, plus why programs like Future Vote help build lifelong civic engagement by bringing students into the election process early. Then we get into the stuff you actually need: how to request a mail-in ballot (including texting “VBM” to 77788), how to check voter registration (text “VOTE” to 77788), and where to get help if you prefer a phone call or an in-person visit. Transcript

Hour 4 continues with author and former Army captain Seth Keshel discussing his new book The American War on Election Corruption, which argues that widespread distrust in U.S. elections is driven by structural vulnerabilities rather than isolated incidents. Keshel lays out his case that expanded mail-in voting, automatic voter registration, and ballot harvesting systems create fundamentally different election outcomes across states, pointing to statistical disparities between states with stricter versus looser rules. He highlights concerns about voter roll maintenance, claiming that incomplete or outdated rolls combined with mail voting increase the risk of unreliable outcomes, and argues that transparency in voter databases is essential to restoring trust. The conversation broadens to international comparisons, noting that many European countries restrict or ban mail-in voting entirely, which he uses to question why U.S. states continue expanding it. The segment closes with his assertion that election reform must begin with agreeing on core structural problems before any fixes can be effective. Guests: Seth Keshel Hashtags: #ElectionIntegrity #VotingReform #MailInVoting #VoterID #ElectionSecurity #USPolitics #ElectionLaw #SethKeshel #BallotSecurity #MorningShow

There were small numbers of ballots that didn't get counted after the spring election in Wisconsin. Several voters even sued. What's the message for clerks and voters alike?

Community News and Interviews for the Catskills & Northeast Pennsylvania

Your Nebraska Update headlines for today, April 16, include: mail-in voting remains vital in rural Nebraska as county clerks work to counter misinformation and reassure voters about ballot security, former law enforcement leader Tom Casady joins new PAC criticizing federal actions, state auditor warns of steep decline in employee health fund, Capitol security focus grows as threats increase, Gov. Jim Pillen suggests change to filibuster rules, state launches cancer trends dashboard, food prices expected to rise amid global pressures.

Ryan Wiggins and the host break down the Supreme Court case involving whether ballots can legally be counted after Election Day, with Wiggins arguing the Constitution clearly implies a single election day rather than an extended voting window. They discuss how the Court appears inclined to restrict post–Election Day ballot arrivals while still allowing early voting, and how critics frame the potential ruling as “catastrophic,” particularly pointing to its impact on a small number of rural Alaska voters. The conversation pushes back on that framing, arguing that voters in remote areas are capable of meeting deadlines and that expanded voting timelines create unnecessary confusion and inconsistency. Hashtags: #SupremeCourt #ElectionLaw #VotingRights #ElectionDay #MailInVoting #AlaskaPolitics #RyanWiggins #Politics

The evening All Local update for Friday, April 3, 2026.

Barrett Marson of Marson Media and Democratic strategist Tony Cani joined The Show to talk about President Donald Trump's executive order to end mail-in voting, the repeal of Cesar Chavez Day in Arizona and more.

President Trump signed an executive order that seeks to create federal lists of eligible voters and directs the U.S. Postal Service not to send mail-in ballots to anyone not on those lists. We discuss why experts say this order is illegal. This episode: voting correspondents Ashley Lopez, Hansi Lo Wang and Miles Parks. This podcast was produced by Casey Morell and Bria Suggs, and edited by Rachel Baye.Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.To manage podcast ad preferences, review the links below:See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

Harry mines Marc Elias's unrivaled expertise in election law to dig into the alarming contents of the SAVE Act, the Supreme Court's possible lurch to ban mail-in voting, and the progress of the DOJ's efforts to seize personal information about as many voters as possible. Mentioned in this episode: Democracy Docket: democracydocket.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Rep. Jamie Raskin joins Marc Elias to discuss Donald Trump violating the Constitution, the president's efforts to seize control of elections, and the Department of Justice acting as the Department of Donald Trump's Vendettas.Support Democracy Docket's mission:https://newsletters.democracydocket.com/anchor-youtube-thursday00:00 Today's Guest: Jamie Raskin01:09 Congressional Power vs Donald Trump Executive Overreach02:18 Is Congress Failing to Check the Presidency?05:49 Epstein Files, War Powers & Rule of Law Concerns08:22 Would the Founders Recognize Today's Government?12:12 Clash with Pam Bondi & DOJ Transparency Battle16:35 Supreme Court Case on Mail-In Voting & Election Rules20:12 Election Fears, Voter Access & Final Constitutional Warning

President Trump signed an executive order Tuesday that instructs the U.S. Postal Service to only send mail-in ballots to people who have been deemed eligible by the administration. Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read has vowed to challenge the order in court, along with other secretaries of state.    Meanwhile, the Supreme Court appears poised to overturn a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots that arrive late to be counted as long as they’re postmarked on or before Election Day. Oregon has had a similar law in place since 2022.     Read joins us to talk about what these changes could mean for Oregon’s vote-by-mail system.  

Ryan and Dana are joined by Senior Editor at The Dispatch, Sarah Isgur, for a breakdown of President Trump's new Executive Order targeting mail-in voting and what changes it could bring nationwide. They also examine Governor Ron DeSantis signing Florida's version of the SAVE Act into law.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Legal expert Bill Graham joins Bo and Beth to breakdowns yesterday's SCOTUS hearing on birthright citizenship, Pam Bondi's standing in the the Trump administration and President Trump's EO regarding mail-in voting.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Ryan and Dana are joined by Senior Editor at The Dispatch, Sarah Isgur, for a breakdown of President Trump's new Executive Order targeting mail-in voting and what changes it could bring nationwide. They also examine Governor Ron DeSantis signing Florida's version of the SAVE Act into law.

Last Monday, March 23, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Watson v. Republican National Committee, a challenge to a Mississippi law that allows mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted after Election Day. Several conservative justices appeared sympathetic to the challengers, who argued that the state law violates federal statutes defining the date of elections. If the Court rules in favor of the challengers, more than a dozen states with similar laws could be affected.Ad-free podcasts are here!To listen to this podcast ad-free, and to enjoy our subscriber only premium content, go to ReadTangle.com to sign up!A scientific survey of Tangle readers.Every day, we share an informal survey on our daily topic to get a sense of reader sentiment and show Tangle subscribers what their fellow readers may be thinking. This survey is not at all scientific. However, a team of researchers wants to take a more rigorous look at you, our readership.Today, we are sharing an opportunity to participate in an independent study led by researchers at the University of Minnesota examining how Tangle readers engage with other people about politics. It would be incredibly helpful for us if you participated. The survey is anonymous, takes five minutes, and gives you the option to enter a lottery for a $200 Amazon gift card.Take the survey here!You can read today's podcast⁠ ⁠⁠here⁠⁠⁠, our "Under the radar." ⁠here⁠. story and today's “Have a nice day” story ⁠here⁠.You can subscribe to Tangle by clicking here or drop something in our tip jar by clicking here. Take the survey: How do you think the Supreme Court should rule in this case? Let us know.Our Executive Editor and Founder is Isaac Saul. Our Executive Producer is Jon Lall.This podcast was written by: Isaac Saul and audio edited and mixed by Dewey Thomas. Music for the podcast was produced by Diet 75.Our newsletter is edited by Managing Editor Ari Weitzman, Senior Editor Will Kaback, Lindsey Knuth, Bailey Saul, and Audrey Moorehead. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Trump signs order targeting mail-in voting To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

WMAL GUEST: REAGAN REESE (White House Correspondent, The Daily Caller) on President Trump’s new executive order targeting mail-in voting and the success of the DC Task Force in clearing 142 homeless encampments across the city. WEBSITE: DailyCaller.com SOCIAL MEDIA: X.com/ReaganReese_ Where to find more about WMAL's morning show: Follow Podcasts on Apple Podcasts, Audible, and Spotify Follow WMAL's "O'Connor and Company" on X: @WMALDC, @LarryOConnor, @JGunlock, @PatricePinkfile, and @HeatherHunterDC Facebook: WMALDC and Larry O'Connor Instagram: WMALDC Website: WMAL.com/OConnor-Company Episode: Wednesday, April 1, 2026 / 8 AM HourSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Bruce & Ian Schwartz talk to election experts about President Trump's Executive Order that directs the creation of a national eligible voter list, a move expected to face swift legal challenges.

Amid an unrelenting news cycle, one story really hit hard for both Mary and Andrew this week: the passing of former FBI Director Robert Mueller. Both hosts worked with him: Mary in the DC US Attorney's Office; Andrew as FBI Special Counsel, General Counsel, and ultimately, as a top prosecutor in Mueller's 2016 Special Counsel investigation into Russian election interference. They reflect on Mueller's life and legacy being one dedicated topublic service, which, in Andrew's accounting, “wasn't just a calling, it was a privilege.” Next, they move to a win for journalism and freedom of the press: Judge Paul Friedman's decision in the case brought by the New York Times against the Pentagon regarding press access. And lastly, Mary and Andrew reviewMonday's Supreme Court oral arguments in a case centered on whether mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day should be counted. The co-hosts read the tea leaves on the merits the justices seem to be eyeing and what it could mean for midterm voting this fall. And, a big thank you to listeners as Main Justice celebrates it's 3-year anniversary. Starting today, you can also find us on YouTube at ms.now/mainjustice. Sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts to listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads. You'll also get exclusive bonus content from this and other shows. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

3-24 Adam and Jordana 9a hour