a legal order to stop doing something
POPULARITY
... but not anymore. Ali Velshi breaks down the monumental ruling to undermine "nationwide injunctions" and explains why we now need to look elsewhere for checks and balances on presidents.
Guests: Melissa Murray, George Conway, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, AG Dana Nessel, AG Andrea Joy Campbell, Betsey Stevenson, Justin Wolfers After a stark warning from the Supreme Court's liberal justices, how the Supreme Court's actions threaten American democracy. Plus, two state Attorneys General on what happens next in the fight against Trumpism. And as American confidence in Trump's economic plan continues to tumble, he responds by kicking off another trade dispute with Canada? Want more of Chris? Download and subscribe to his podcast, “Why Is This Happening? The Chris Hayes podcast” wherever you get your podcasts.
It started with President Trump's bold and triumphant strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. It ended with massive wins at the Supreme Court on several issues, including an end to lower court injunctions on his executive orders and a green light to end birthright citizenship in the United States.Jake Kubie, Director of Communications for the Denver Zoo explains the venue's decision to shut down on early Saturday with reports of violent teenage mobs descending on City Park.
The Supreme Court today ruled to limit the ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions blocking President Trump's executive orders. The decision will have major implications for how businesses push back against federal policy in the United States. We'll get into it. And, American consumers aren't feeling too hot about the economy. How much do those feelings matter? Plus, we'll play a round of Half Full/Half Empty!Here's everything we talked about today:"Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on nationwide injunctions in birthright citizenship case" from SCOTUSblog"America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried" from Bloomberg"Opinion | How the N.B.A. and M.L.B. Shattered America's Sports Culture" from The New York Times"Bumble stumbles as dating apps struggle" from Marketplace"Latest time use survey shows Americans are spending more time at home" from Marketplace"The colleges using ultimate frisbee to boost enrollment" from Marketplace"After a tough decade, American malls are reinventing themselves" from MarketplaceGot a question for the hosts? Email makemesmart@marketplace.org or leave us a voicemail at 508-U-B-SMART.
Divided Argument hosts Daniel Epps and William Baude join Sarah Isgur to unpack the Supreme Court's decision (ahem, non-decision) on birthright citizenship. Plus: a little showdown between two justices. The Agenda:—What the Supreme Court did NOT decide—What the Court DID decide—Similarities to Marbury v. Madison,Loper Bright, and Chevron—Justice Amy Coney Barrett v. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson—Judicial supremacy?—Sir, this is not a Denny's—Injunction influx—The future of forum shopping—A big July for Advisory Opinion Show Notes:—SCOTUSblog on the 6-3 decision itself This episode is brought to you by Burford Capital, the leading global finance firm focused on law. Burford helps companies and law firms unlock the value of their legal assets. With a $7.2 billion portfolio and listings on the NYSE and LSE, Burford provides capital to finance high-value commercial litigation and arbitration—without adding cost, risk, or giving up control. Clients include Fortune 500 companies and Am Law 100 firms, who turn to Burford to pursue strong claims, manage legal costs, and accelerate recoveries. Learn more at burfordcapital.com/ao. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Supreme Court today ruled to limit the ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions blocking President Trump's executive orders. The decision will have major implications for how businesses push back against federal policy in the United States. We'll get into it. And, American consumers aren't feeling too hot about the economy. How much do those feelings matter? Plus, we'll play a round of Half Full/Half Empty!Here's everything we talked about today:"Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on nationwide injunctions in birthright citizenship case" from SCOTUSblog"America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried" from Bloomberg"Opinion | How the N.B.A. and M.L.B. Shattered America's Sports Culture" from The New York Times"Bumble stumbles as dating apps struggle" from Marketplace"Latest time use survey shows Americans are spending more time at home" from Marketplace"The colleges using ultimate frisbee to boost enrollment" from Marketplace"After a tough decade, American malls are reinventing themselves" from MarketplaceGot a question for the hosts? Email makemesmart@marketplace.org or leave us a voicemail at 508-U-B-SMART.
Supreme Court rules that individual judges do not have the power to block a president's policies across the country, known as nationwide injunctions. The underlying case, whose merits have not been decided yet, involves President Donald Trump's Executive Order restricting birthright citizenship; Supreme Court also handed down other closely-watched decisions today, including in favor of Maryland parents who want to have their children opt-out of a curriculum with LGBTQ books and upholding a Texas law requiring age-verification for adult websites; Senate Republicans look to have their first vote on the tax cut & spending cut budget reconciliation bill on Saturday; House members get a classified briefing on the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear site; Foreign Ministers of Rwanda & the Democratic Republic of Congo meet in Washington to sign a peace agreement brokered by the White House; Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R-VA) talks about this year's Virginia governor election between Winsome Earle-Sears (R) and Abigail Spanberger (D). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Trump HUGE WIN on nationwide injunctions will also benefit Dem Presidents; Local teacher fired from Catholic School for being - you guessed it - gay; Someone DO SOMETHING about the punishment light at Canal & N Rampart! The friendly skies aren't so friendly anymore - what happened?
Justin Crowe of Williams College joins Chad to talk about what the Supreme Court decision on the birthright citizenship case means for lower courts and the power of the executive branch.
Tyler and Will legal analyst Jake Thompson explains the future of Zakai Zeigler and his denied injunction for a fifth year, and much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Tyler and Will legal analyst Jake Thompson explains the future of Zakai Zeigler and his denied injunction for a fifth year, and much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Tyler and Will legal analyst Jake Thompson explains the future of Zakai Zeigler and his denied injunction for a fifth year, and much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Tyler and Will legal analyst Jake Thompson explains the future of Zakai Zeigler and his denied injunction for a fifth year, and much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
VLOG June 6 US v Sean Combs, Jane Doe 2d day of direct https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extraanalysis-to-in-sean-combs-trial Week 4 book later today; Week 3 https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=seJhEQAAQBAJDocs https://patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-and-130774877. Chung wins injunction against ICE; UN Volker Turk conflicts https://www.innercitypress.com/ungate9volkerturkicp060525.html
Guest: John Boscariol, Partner, Leader of the International Trade and Investment Law Group at McCarthy Tétrault LLP.
Supreme Court has dismissed an injunction application filed by the Centre for Citizenship, Constitutional, and Electoral Systems (CenCES), which sought to halt the impeachment proceedings against Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo
The Supreme Court hears oral arguments challenging the rights of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy calls Vladimir Putin's bluff by arriving for peace talks in Turkey. And in a worldwide first, scientists save a baby boy's life by deploying gene therapy for a rare disease. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Professor John Eastman discusses the oral arguments made on May 15 in the birthright citizenship cases before the Supreme Court and the problem of nationwide injunctions. A classic film review relevant to arrogant judges is provided of the 1940 movie, “The Westerner.”
Professor John Eastman discusses the oral arguments made on May 15 in the birthright citizenship cases before the Supreme Court and the problem of nationwide injunctions.A classic film review relevant to arrogant judges is provided of the 1940 movie, “The Westerner.”
VLOG May 15 Sean Combs, Cassie on the cross today; extras https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-sean-combs-trial-cassie-4e5…Who can she speak to? Doc https://patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-in-128903614…Book https://amazon.com/dp/B0DHP7YF19FDNY Saccavino 3 years, SDNY Alien Enemies Act injunctionUN irrelevant on Ukraine & Gaza as bans Press
Brian kicks things off by welcoming David Hunt of Boies Schiller Flexner to unpack the ever-spicier topic of anti-suit injunctions, using the UK Supreme Court's decision in UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC as a springboard [TIME 13:18]. They explore how the case intersects with the proposed revisions to the Arbitration Act 1996, revisit Enka v Chubb, and debate whether the English courts' approach is evolving. If anti-suit injunctions and jurisdictional gateways are your thing, this one's for you.For Happy Fun Time, Sadia is joined once again by arbitration-lawyer-turned-productivity-guru, coach Jon Passaro [TIME 39:52]. Jon breaks down how a business plan can keep a career on track, sharing a examples listeners can use for their own practice.
Controversial mining projects are moving ahead and stalling in the legal arena; the state Attorney General is joining others opposing a Trump Administration plan for energy production on federal land; an update on the University of Arizona financial situation; student athletes can now be paid differently; and more...
Questions? Comments? We love feedback! Email us at info@baishavaad.org
A US judge ordered Apple (AAPL) to immediately decrease its App Store fees and asked for criminal prosecutors to review the company's alleged "cover-up," jeopardizing billions in revenue for the tech giant.~This episode is sponsored by iTrust Capital~iTrustCapital | Get $100 Funding Reward + No Monthly Fees when you sign up using our custom link! ➜ https://bit.ly/iTrustPaul00:00 intro00:14 Sponosor: iTrust Capital00:50 Nobody Talking About This?01:35 Apple Defies Court Order02:34 Link-Out Buttons03:05 Judge Pissed Off03:40 Criminal Charges05:04 It's Over05:50 Stripe Reacts06:08 Devs Already Building07:00 Apple Thought No One Would Care07:33 Tim Sweeney on Apple Monopoly08:50 Fortnite returns09:27 Gaming will be fun again10:44 NFTs Incoming11:29 Microsoft Flips Apple12:02 No Bull-Case for Apple13:13 Better A.I. Assistants15:20 Virtuals Incoming16:06 Judge Destroys Apple17:04 outro#Crypto #apple #nft~Judge Eviscerates Apple Monopoly!
Listen to a recap of the top stories of the day from 9to5Mac. 9to5Mac Daily is available on iTunes and Apple's Podcasts app, Stitcher, TuneIn, Google Play, or through our dedicated RSS feed for Overcast and other podcast players. Sponsored by CardPointers: The best way to maximize your credit card rewards. 9to5Mac Daily listeners can exclusively save 30% and get a $100 Savings Card. New episodes of 9to5Mac Daily are recorded every weekday. Subscribe to our podcast in Apple Podcast or your favorite podcast player to guarantee new episodes are delivered as soon as they're available. Stories discussed in this episode: New Apple Vision ‘Air' product could launch this year, per report Google CEO ‘hopeful' Gemini will be part of Apple Intelligence this year iOS 19 might be adding several new third-party AI models Fortnite will return to the App Store for iPhone and iPad in every country — on one condition Apple addresses App Store ruling as Fortnite eyes return Epic Games claims victory as Apple sanctioned for defying court order over App Store rules Epic win: Apple forced to give developers (almost) free reign to link out and avoid paying Apple's 30% cut Listen & Subscribe: Apple Podcasts Overcast RSS Spotify TuneIn Google Podcasts Subscribe to support Chance directly with 9to5Mac Daily Plus and unlock: Ad-free versions of every episode Bonus content Catch up on 9to5Mac Daily episodes! Don't miss out on our other daily podcasts: Quick Charge 9to5Toys Daily Share your thoughts! Drop us a line at happyhour@9to5mac.com. You can also rate us in Apple Podcasts or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.
On this episode of Conduct Detrimental: THE Sports Law Podcast, Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) is joined by Tarun Sharma (@tksharmalaw), Mike Kravchenko (Watch on YouTube) and special guest, Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich) to jump into a discussion covering a wild last week or so in the sports law universe - and our episode is jam-packed.Was it just a dumb joke or a reputational and career-ender? We break down the implications of Falcons DC Jeff Ulbrich for his son's impersonating of a team exec and prank-calling Shadeur Sanders, along with other players, during one of the most important moments of their lives.Judge Claudia Wilken pushes back on settlement approval, citing walk-on harm and a lack of clarity on grandfathering athletes. Sam explains how Holly McLean's story at Oklahoma exemplifies the chaos for cut athletes and why this delay could haunt the NCAA for years. Sam also unpacks the anti-competitive logic used in Pavia and Elad's recent wins, and why lawsuits are replacing waivers.With the Edge Collective attempting a $200K clawback from Madden Iamaleava, we ask: Is a 50% clawback clause enforceable or a penalty in disguise? Sam, Mike, and Tarun dive into liquidated damages law, incentives, and the risk of opening this can of worms nationwide.Champions Blue LLC might be the most important structural shift in college sports. Will this move invite private capital? Change employee classification? Or blur the line between collectives and athletic departments entirely?New lawyer, media silence, and ESPN likely out. The crew analyzes why Shannon's legal team's strategy may have cost him his job, and how even a winning legal case may lose in the court of public opinion.Professor Sam Ehrlich's College Sports Litigation Tracker: https://www.collegesportslitigationtracker.com/ ***Have a topic you want to write about? ANYONE and EVERYONE can publish for ConductDetrimental.com. Let us know if you want to join the team.As always, this episode is sponsored by Themis Bar Review: https://www.themisbarsocial.com/conductdetrimental Host: Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) Featuring: Tarun Sharma (@tksharmalaw) , Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich)Feat. and Produced by: Mike Kravchenko (Watch on YouTube)Twitter | Instagram | TikTok | YouTube | Website | Email
On this episode of Conduct Detrimental: THE Sports Law Podcast, Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) is joined by Tarun Sharma (@tksharmalaw), Mike Kravchenko (Watch on YouTube) and special guest, Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich) to jump into a discussion covering a wild last week or so in the sports law universe - and our episode is jam-packed.Was it just a dumb joke or a reputational and career-ender? We break down the implications of Falcons DC Jeff Ulbrich for his son's impersonating of a team exec and prank-calling Shadeur Sanders, along with other players, during one of the most important moments of their lives.Judge Claudia Wilken pushes back on settlement approval, citing walk-on harm and a lack of clarity on grandfathering athletes. Sam explains how Holly McLean's story at Oklahoma exemplifies the chaos for cut athletes and why this delay could haunt the NCAA for years. Sam also unpacks the anti-competitive logic used in Pavia and Elad's recent wins, and why lawsuits are replacing waivers.With the Edge Collective attempting a $200K clawback from Madden Iamaleava, we ask: Is a 50% clawback clause enforceable or a penalty in disguise? Sam, Mike, and Tarun dive into liquidated damages law, incentives, and the risk of opening this can of worms nationwide.Champions Blue LLC might be the most important structural shift in college sports. Will this move invite private capital? Change employee classification? Or blur the line between collectives and athletic departments entirely?New lawyer, media silence, and ESPN likely out. The crew analyzes why Shannon's legal team's strategy may have cost him his job, and how even a winning legal case may lose in the court of public opinion.Professor Sam Ehrlich's College Sports Litigation Tracker: https://www.collegesportslitigationtracker.com/ ***Have a topic you want to write about? ANYONE and EVERYONE can publish for ConductDetrimental.com. Let us know if you want to join the team.As always, this episode is sponsored by Themis Bar Review: https://www.themisbarsocial.com/conductdetrimental Host: Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) Featuring: Tarun Sharma (@tksharmalaw) , Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich)Feat. and Produced by: Mike Kravchenko (Watch on YouTube)Twitter | Instagram | TikTok | YouTube | Website | Email
Super Lawyer Bill Kelhoffer secretly records a phone call with Gil—without consent—potentially violating Federal Law and the Creed of Professionalism.During the call, Litigation Super Lawyer Bill Kelhoffer reiterates his demands that Gil and Jezuz refrain from mentioning Mike Rafi, Paige Rafi, and Jessica Sanich on the podcast.Gil responds by telling Top 40 Under 40 Lawyer Bill Kelhoffer that he will continue defending himself on the podcast as long as Rafi's lawsuit continues.Following the call, 8-year veteran and managing attorney Bill Kelhoffer contacted the police, filed a report, and pursued an Injunction for Harassment against both Gil and Jezuz.
In this episode, I break down three key reasons why Judge Wilkens declined to confirm the House v NCAA settlement during the April 7 hearing: 1) Future Athlete Impact- Judge Wilkens expressed concern that the settlement could unfairly affect future student-athletes who weren't part of the case and had no opportunity to object, potentially settling a troubling legal precedent. She asked the attorney to provide legal precedent to justify the 10 year Injunction which will impact future student athletes. 2) Roster Limits - She challenged the immediate implementation of roster size limits, suggesting that current student-athletes should be "grandfathered in" to protect their roster spots or that limits should be phased in over time. 3) $600 Dollar Review on Third party NIL Deals - Judge Wilkens questioned the logic behind questioning deals over $600. She pressed the attorneys to explain how the $600 limit would benefit student-athletes. Go to my home page to jillmcbridebaxter.com to set up a meeting. https://linktr.ee/jillmcbridebaxter Get on my email list or sign up for one of my free classes.
Harvard's faculty has turned up the heat with a new Injunction lawsuit filed in Massachusetts Federal Court against the Trump Administration and its efforts to cut off $9 billion in federal funding to violate Harvard's academic freedom and First Amendment rights, as Harvard hires the Trump Organization's own “ethics counsel”'s firm to defend against the Trump Administration's attacks. Michael Popok ties it all together including the curious case of the Quinn Emmanuel firm and its flipping sides to go on the attack against Trump in several high-profile cases. Try VIIA Hemp! https://viia.co/legalaf and use code LEGALAF! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Our special podcast show today deals primarily with a 112-page opinion and 3-page order issued on March 28 by Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in a lawsuit brought, among others, by two labor unions representing CFPB employees against Acting Director Russell Vought. The complaint alleged that Acting Director Vought and others were in the process of dismantling the CFPB through various actions taken since Rohit Chopra was fired and replaced by Acting Director Scott Bessent and then Acting Director Russell Vought. This process included, among other things, the termination of probationary and term employees and possibly another 1,300 or so employees through a reduction-in-force , the issuance of a stop work order, the closure of the CFPB's main office in DC and branch offices throughout the country, the termination of most third-party contracts, the decision not to request any additional funding from the Federal Reserve Board for the balance of the fiscal year and the voluntary dismissal of several enforcement lawsuits. Alan Kaplinsky, Senior Counsel and former chair of Ballard Spahr's Consumer Financial Services Group, and Joseph Schuster, a Partner in the Consumer Financial Services Group, discuss each part of the preliminary injunction issued by Judge Jackson which, among other things, required the CFPB to re-hire all probationary and term employees who had been terminated, prohibited the CFPB from terminating any CFPB employee except for just cause (which apparently does not include lack of work because of the change in focus and direction of the CFPB), required the CFPB not to enforce a previous “stop work” order or reduction-in-force. We observed that Judge Jackson's order has required the CFPB to maintain for now a work force that is not needed for the “new” CFPB. We also discuss that the preliminary injunction order does not require the CFPB to maintain any of the regulations promulgated or proposed by Rohit Chopra or to continue to prosecute any of the enforcement lawsuits brought by Director Chopra. DOJ filed a notice of appeal on March 29 and on March 31 filed a motion in the DC Court of Appeals to stay Judge Jackson's order. (After the recording of this podcast, the DOJ filed in the Court of Appeals a motion seeking a stay of Judge Jackson's order. Pending a hearing on April 9th, the Court issued an administrative stay of Judge Jackson's order. The 3-Judge panel is composed of two Trump appointees and one Obama appointee.) A copy of the blog co-authored by Alan and Joseph is linked here. We also discuss another lawsuit initiated by the City of Baltimore and one other plaintiff against Acting Director Vought in Federal District Court for the District of Maryland seeking to enjoin him from returning to the Federal Reserve Board or the Treasury funds held by the CFPB. The Court denied the motion for preliminary injunction on the basis that it was not ripe for adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act because the CFPB never actually returned any funds. Finally, Alan expresses surprise that the Acting Director has not relied on the argument that all funds received by the CFPB after September, 2022 were unlawfully obtained because the Dodd-Frank Act stipulates that the CFPB can be funded only out of “combined earnings of the Federal Reserve Banks” and the fact that there have only been huge combined losses of the Federal Reserve Banks since Sept 2022 which continue through today and are likely to continue through the foreseeable future.
www.commsolutionsmn.com- President Trump is finally releasing the JFK files to the world, but we still know nothing about Thomas Matthew Crooks. There was a recent article that hints that FBI is reporting that he may have had an accomplice. The article asserts that there could have been a man on the inside to help Crooks, purposefully reducing President Trump's security, or that the whole thing was a government op. Our election would have been thrown into chaos, had things worked out differently. Lawfare against President Trump isn't anything new, but the left is doubling down on this tactic to stop the Trump agenda. There are currently over 130 cases that have been filed, and some injunctions from district federal judges (as if they had jurisdiction). Temporary Protective Status (TPS) was granted to Haitians and Venezuelans to stay in our country for a specific time. The Trump administration is trying to revoke the TPS of these groups, after the former head of the NSA, Alexander Mayorkas, extending the policy. The courts are trying to say that the Kristi Noem and the new administration does not have the right to govern the way they wish. The AFL/CIO sued the Trump administration to stop the voluntary buyouts of federal employees. Judge George O'Toole sided with the Trump administration, but only because they were not union employees, so they had no standing. This will allow for other lawsuits to be filed. There were cases to allow a biological female, who identified as a man, to go to a male prison and to keep transgender soldiers in the military. The Dems are trying to keep criminals that are here illegally from going to Guantanamo Bay or to the new maximum-security prison in El Salvador. There is also a challenge to birthright citizenship, due to the meaning of the 14th amendment. President Trump also signed an Executive Order that aims to clean up federal elections, including a provision that requires Voter ID and the left is beside itself, filing court cases faster than a rabbit in fox country. How will all of this work out? Who will emerge victorious? Will congress ever come and make President Trump's changes permanent in law? Where are they already? Let us know how you feel about all this lawfare!
Trump Invokes STATE SECRETS and REJECTS Judge! (YOU LOSE JUDGE!)WINNING: Court of Appeals PAUSES Corrupt Judicial Order (YOU ARE STAYED!!)Trump CRUSHES Dem Lawyers with Executive Order Onslaught (THIS IS EPIC!!)
Danielle Smith's government in Alberta brought in legislation that restricts healthcare access for trans and gender diverse young people. Bill 26 prohibits medically-necessary care from being provided to gender diverse people under 16 years old in the province. Egale Canada, Skipping Stone, and five individual gender diverse youth, supported by their parents, have gone to court seeking an injunction against the legislation. We speak with Bennett Jensen, Director of Legal for Egale Canada.
A Dublin secondary school has been embroiled in controversy after it was claimed online that one of its teachers is the notorious GAA catfish. County Armagh woman Niamh Farrell denies being the catfish who deceived at least 40 people, including multiple Ulster GAA players. The Portadown woman has now secured a court injunction stopping Coláiste Éanna from continuing with a disciplinary process – which could have resulted in her losing her job. She insists she is not the infamous catfish but an investigation at the school found that she confided in its principal that she was. Ms. Farrell disputes that. Host; Ciaran Dunbar, Guest; Ellen CoyneSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Join Washington Examiner Senior Writer David Harsanyi and Federalist Editor-In-Chief Mollie Hemingway as they break down and debate the showdown between the Trump administration and the judiciary over deportation flights and discuss former President Joe Biden's alleged autopen pardons. Mollie and David also share their culture picks for the week including "Adolescence."If you care about combatting the corrupt media that continue to inflict devastating damage, please give a gift to help The Federalist do the real journalism America needs.
Democrats lost every swing state in November, but they have a backup plan to keep Donald Trump from keeping any of his promises: Nationwide judicial injunctions. How can America escape the tyranny of almost 700 would-be dictators with gavels? And when are things bad enough that the Trump Admin should consider ignoring a judge entirely? Charlie weighs in, and Ben Weingarten offers his own ideas for how to navigate this crisis for the American republic. Watch ad-free on members.charliekirk.com! Get new merch on charliekirkstore.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Join Washington Examiner Senior Writer David Harsanyi and Federalist Editor-In-Chief Mollie Hemingway as they break down and debate the showdown between the Trump administration and the judiciary over deportation flights and discuss former President Joe Biden's alleged autopen pardons. Mollie and David also share their culture picks for the week, including "Adolescence."If you care about combatting the corrupt media that continue to inflict devastating damage, please give a gift to help The Federalist do the real journalism America needs.
Democrats lost every swing state in November, but they have a backup plan to keep Donald Trump from keeping any of his promises: Nationwide judicial injunctions. How can America escape the tyranny of almost 700 would-be dictators with gavels? And when are things bad enough that the Trump Admin should consider ignoring a judge entirely? Charlie weighs in, and Ben Weingarten offers his own ideas for how to navigate this crisis for the American republic. Watch ad-free on members.charliekirk.com! Get new merch on charliekirkstore.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
This is the full show for March 14, 2025. We ask the American Mamas what the difference between the Democrat Party and a cult is. We Dig Deep into baseless injunctions that the Demcrats are using to try and keep President Trump from doing anything. Plus, it's Fake News Friday! And we finish off with calmer dogs that will make you say, “Whoa!”
In this podcast, shareholders Nonnie Shivers and Scott Kelly delve into the enforcement activities after a preliminary injunction blocked key provisions (including the certification requirement) of two executive orders (EOs) issued to eliminate “illegal” diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and initiatives. Scott (who co-chairs the firm's Government Contracting and Reporting Practice Group) and Nonnie (who co-chairs the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Compliance Practice Group) discuss the implications of the national injunction recently issued by a federal judge, the ongoing enforcement activities not halted by the injunction, and the broader impact on federal contractors and DEI programs across all employers. Nonnie and Scott also highlight the importance of staying informed and assessing risk tolerance in light of the evolving legal landscapes, which employers can do with Ogletree's New Administration Resource Hub.
Hampton Dellinger is reinstated, temporarily, to his position as Special Counsel in the Office of Special Counsel.There is a mysterious $3 Million in Mayor Eric Adams' reelection account.Disappointing news about Kenneth Chesebro in Fulton County.Plus, we have an update on Rudy. Allison Gillhttps://muellershewrote.substack.com/@muellershewrote.bsky.social on BlueskyHarry DunnHarry Dunn | Substack@libradunn1.bsky.social on BlueskyWant to support this podcast and get it ad-free and early?Go to: https://www.patreon.com/aisle45podTell us about yourself and what you like about the show - http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=short
The legal battle over the SAVE plan just took another turn. With the injunction now made permanent, what happens next? Learn how this latest court decision affects your repayment plan, the impact on student loan forgiveness, and what it means for current and future borrowers. We'll also cover the legal and legislative angles, what to watch for in the coming months, and how to adjust your student loan strategy. If you're wondering whether student loan forgiveness is still in play or how this affects your next steps, tune in to this episode. Key moments: (02:48) The ICR statute doesn't explicitly promise forgiveness after 25 years (04:44) What the SAVE injunction means in plain terms (07:31) How this ruling could throw a wrench into House Republicans' tax cut plans (12:09) What to consider if you're in the SAVE forbearance or going for PSLF Like the show? There are several ways you can help! Follow on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or Amazon Music Leave an honest review on Apple Podcasts Subscribe to the newsletter Feeling helpless when it comes to your student loans? Try our free student loan calculator Check out our refinancing bonuses we negotiated Book your custom student loan plan Get profession-specific financial planning Do you have a question about student loans? Leave us a voicemail here or email us at help@studentloanplanner.com and we might feature it in an upcoming show!
Welcome to the award-winning FCPA Compliance Report, the longest running podcast in compliance. In this episode, Tom welcomes back Corporate Transparency Act expert and maven Jonathan Wilson for a look at judicial insights and recent developments in the Corporate Transparent Act (CTA) litigation. Tom and Jonathan discuss the recent developments, including a preliminary injunction by Judge Kernodle in the Smith v. Treasury case, and its implications on CTA enforcement. Important differences between this injunction and previous ones, such as the Texas Top Cop Shop case, are highlighted. Wilson offers insights into the constitutional debates, particularly regarding the Commerce Clause, and reviews key decisions from federal district courts, including the persuasive Boyle decision from the District of Maine. They also touch on upcoming appeals and the potential impacts on the CTA's nationwide enforcement. Key Highlights · Current Status of the Corporate Transparency Act · Judge Kernodle's Injunction and Legal Arguments · Supreme Court's Involvement and Implications · Analysis of the Boyle Decision · Procedural Updates and Future Outlook Resources Jonathan Wilson on LinkedIn FinCEN Report Tom Fox Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitter LinkedIn For more information on the Ethico Toolkit for Middle Managers, available at no charge by clicking here. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Tuesday, February 18th, 2025Today, Elon Musk is seeking access to personal taxpayer data raising alarms at the Internal Revenue Service; The Washington Post has blocked a two page ad calling for the removal of Elon Musk; January 6th rioters are arguing in court that their pardons apply to unrelated charges; Trump has fired hundreds of FAA employees despite four deadly crashes in four weeks; the Washington state judge who imposed a temporary restraining order last week on Trump's executive order blocking gender affirming care for minors has now imposed an injunction on him; and Allison and Dana deliver your Good News.Stories:Here's the ad the Washington Post wouldn't run - Common CauseDOGE-affiliated employee expected to seek access to IRS system with sensitive taxpayer information - Garrett Haake and Megan Lebowitz | NBC NewsTrump administration firing hundreds of FAA employees despite four deadly crashes in four weeks - Edward Helmore | The GuardianJan. 6 Rioters Argue Pardons Apply to Charges Including Murder Plot, Child Porn - Scott CalvertFollow , Tawnell D. HobbsFollow, C. Ryan BarberFollow | WSJJudge Hits Donald Trump With Legal Setback: 'Unconstitutional' - Sean O'Driscoll | Newsweek Good Trouble:The FCC is accepting comments from the public regarding their case against 60 minutes on CBS. Let them know how you feel.COMPLAINT INVOLVING CBS BROADCASTING INC., LICENSEE OF WCBS, NEW YORK, NY - PDFComments - FCC.govFCC Seeks Comment on WCBS News Distortion Complaint | Federal Communications CommissionFCC case against CBS for ‘news distortion' may go far beyond precedent, scholars say | ReutersFederal workers - feel free to email me at fedoath@pm.me and let me know what you're going to do, or just vent. I'm always here to listen. Check out muellershewrote.com for my interview with a systems security expert about the massive breach at opm.gov caused by Elon Musk From The Good NewsFlow (2024 film) | WikipediaComfortHouseNV.orgBureau of Consular Affairs Check out other MSW Media podcastshttps://mswmedia.com/shows/Subscribe for free to MuellerSheWrote on Substackhttps://muellershewrote.substack.comFollow AG and Dana on Social MediaDr. Allison Gill Substack|Muellershewrote, Twitter|@MuellerSheWrote, Threads|@muellershewrote, TikTok|@muellershewrote, IG|muellershewrote, BlueSky|@muellershewroteDana GoldbergTwitter|@DGComedy, IG|dgcomedy, facebook|dgcomedy, IG|dgcomedy, danagoldberg.com, BlueSky|@dgcomedyHave some good news; a confession; or a correction to share?Good News & Confessions - The Daily Beanshttps://www.dailybeanspod.com/confessional/ Listener Survey:http://survey.podtrac.com/start-survey.aspx?pubid=BffJOlI7qQcF&ver=shortFollow the Podcast on Apple:The Daily Beans on Apple PodcastsWant to support the show and get it ad-free and early?Supercasthttps://dailybeans.supercast.com/Patreon https://patreon.com/thedailybeansOr subscribe on Apple Podcasts with our affiliate linkThe Daily Beans on Apple Podcasts
John Daniel Davidson from The Federalist joins the show to explain why the Supreme Court will need to settle the issue of radical district judges issuing national injunctions blocking President Trump's agenda. Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.
En este Trumpwatch: múltiples órdenes de tribunales paralizan acciones de Trump, Musk y DOGE pero... ¿las acatarán?; primer encuesta de CBS News con buenos números para Trump; y los demócratas comienzan a dar (algo) señales de vida. - Si fueras partes de nuestro patreon, hubieras escuchado este episodio ayer. ¡Únete a la mejor comunidad del internet boricua en patreon.com/puestospalproblema! Aprovecha la oferta de 50% de descuento en el primer mes. - Presentado por el mejor internet de Puerto Rico - AeronetPR.com. Cambiate ahora llamando al 787 273 4143. - Nuestros Patroncitos PYMES de hoy: ¿Quieres agradar a alguien, elevar cualquier ocasión o simplemente añadir un toque de frescura a tu entorno? Comunícate con Ruscus. Comprar flores no tiene por qué ser complicado, en Ruscus te llevarán de la mano para diseñar un arreglo personalizado. Para estar al tanto de sus últimos trabajos y promociones, síguelos en sus redes sociales como Ruscuspr o visita su página ruscuspr.com. Además, puedes visitarlos en su acogedor flower shop ubicado en el casco urbano de Canóvanas. Ruscus cuenta con servicio de entrega en toda el área metro y este de Puerto Rico. Recuerda mencionar que vienes de parte de PPP para recibir 10% de descuento en tu orden. Para más información, llámanos o escríbeles al 939-408-7809. Piensa en flores, piensa en Ruscus Los expertos en sexualidad dicen que si tu quieres mantener viva la pasión con tu pareja a través de los años, tienes que meterle a la creatividad e integrar al menos 12 novedades al año. Si tú estás teniendo sexo aburrido es porque ustedes lo hacen aburrido, pero para esa ayudita está capela.love. Uno, dos, tres nuevos juguetitos sexuales al año no hacen daño, pero sacan muy buenos orgasmos. Además que te dan una ayudita cuando lo necesitan, te ayudan a bajarle al estrés y Este San Valentín, regálense amor y fuete. Capela.love, empaques discretos siempre. I.E.S Elevator Services es una compañía con más de diecisiete años ofreciendo servicios en Puerto Rico e Islas Vírgenes en todo lo relacionado a instalar, modernizar y mantener los equipos relacionados al transporte vertical.Integramos el arreglo y el mantenimiento de elevadores, reparaciones menores y de emergencia, así como la venta de piezas. Además, nuestros servicios están disponibles las 24 horas, los 365 días del año en todo Puerto Rico incluyendo Vieques, Culebra e Islas Vírgenes. Realizamos la actualización de todos los equipos existentes en el mercado para que cumplan con los más recientes códigos y con todas las regulaciones vigentes. En adición para personas mayores y/o impedidos contamos con alternativas de movilización como silla elevador al igual que todo lo relacionado a elevadores residenciales, para sillas de rueda y carga en general. Antes que otros te fallen llama a los expertos de I.E.S Elevators al 787-908-3462 con Eduardo Castillo para coordinar cualquier consulta y/o cotización. Chequea su website en elevadorespr.com. Al decir que los escucharon en Puestos Pal Problema tienen un 10% en los planes de mantenimiento preventivo. Suscríbete a nuestro Patreon y recibe contenido exclusivo, artículos: https://patreon.com/puestospalproblemaSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
This week on the podcast I am joined by Gary (Middleton Tech), check out the driver tools offered at: https://garysapps.com