a legal order to stop doing something
POPULARITY
Your favorite Buzzkill duo are back at it with hot takes, hot guests, and plenty of RAGE! What went down this week in Abobolandia? Well… let's just start with a win—Ken Paxton: 0 Texas abortion provider, Dr. Margaret Carpenter: 1. HUZZAH! Also, what happens in West Virginia certainly won't stay in West Virginia—we're laying out the latest terrible, horrible, no good, very bad decision curbing access to medication abortion from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in West Virginia *barf*. AND we're making some sense of the clear-as-swamp water Kentucky case that makes us wonder—what do frozen eggs have to do with the right to sue? GUEST ROLL CALL!Joining the Buzzkills this week is Chase Strangio, Co-Director of the ACLU's LGBTQ & HIV Project, to break down the intersections of abortion care and trans care, and how the media (NOT SCIENCE) has literally done all of the work in forming anti-trans bias. PLUS!!! Showing up to FBK with the palate cleanser we all need is the FABU and ICONIC actress and recording artist Peppermint! She's showing us what trans resilience and JOY truly look like, and how she finds the strength to keep fighting. Scared? Got questions about the continued assault on your reproductive rights? THE FBK LINES ARE OPEN! Just call or text (201) 574-7402, leave your questions or concerns, and Lizz and Moji will pick a few to address on the pod! Times are heavy, but knowledge is power, y'all. We gotchu. OPERATION SAVE ABORTION: Sign up for virtual 2025 OSA workshop on August 9th! You can still join the 10,000+ womb warriors fighting the patriarchy by listening to our past Operation Save Abortion pod series and Mifepristone Panel by clicking HERE for episodes, your toolkit, marching orders, and more. HOSTS:Lizz Winstead IG: @LizzWinstead Bluesky: @LizzWinstead.bsky.socialMoji Alawode-El IG: @Mojilocks Bluesky: @Mojilocks.bsky.social SPECIAL GUESTS:Chase Strangio IG: @Chasestrangio Bluesky: @Chasestrangio.bsky.socialPeppermint IG: @Peppermint247 TikTok: @Therealpeppermint247 GUEST LINKS:WATCH: “Heightened Scrutiny” DocumentaryACLU Website IG: @ACLU_nationwide Bluesky: @ACLU.orgDONATE: The ACLU LGBTQ & HIV ProjectREAD: Andrea Gibson's PoetryWATCH: Enigma on HBOPeppermint's Documentary “A Deeper Love”Peppermint's WebsitePeppermint's LinktreePep & Hugh's Queer History 101 Book ClubREAD: Transgender History by Susan StrykerREAD: Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents by Isabel WilkersonREAD: So Many Stars by Caro De RobertisREAD: Another Word for Love by Carvell Wallace NEWS DUMP:Respectful Treatment of Unborn Remains Act of 2025Republicans Propose National Ban on Flushing AbortionsNY County Official Refuses to Enforce Texas Sanction Against Doctor in Abortion CaseNew VA Law Prompts Walmart's Online Data Collection Pop-UpsJewish Woman's Challenge of Kentucky's Abortion Ban Gets Green Light From Appeals CourtWV Can Restrict Abortion Pill Access, Appeals Court Says EPISODE LINKS:ADOPT-A-CLINIC: Palmetto State Abortion Fund's WishlistBUY AAF MERCH!SIGN UP 8/9: Operation Save AbortionEMAIL your abobo questions to The Feminist BuzzkillsAAF's Abortion-Themed Rage Playlist SHOULD I BE SCARED? Text or call us with the abortion news that is scaring you: (201) 574-7402 FOLLOW US:Listen to us ~ FBK Podcast Instagram ~ @AbortionFrontBluesky ~ @AbortionFrontTikTok ~ @AbortionFrontFacebook ~ @AbortionFrontYouTube ~ @AbortionAccessFront TALK TO THE CHARLEY BOT FOR ABOBO OPTIONS & RESOURCES HERE!PATREON HERE! Support our work, get exclusive merch and more! DONATE TO AAF HERE!ACTIVIST CALENDAR HERE!VOLUNTEER WITH US HERE!ADOPT-A-CLINIC HERE!EXPOSE FAKE CLINICS HERE!GET ABOBO PILLS FROM PLAN C PILLS HERE!When BS is poppin', we pop off!
This week we examine one of the most troubling intersections of Government secrecy, national security, and parliamentary accountability in recent memory. Thousands of Afghans who had worked with British forces were placed at risk of Taliban revenge attacks after a catastrophic Government data leak in 2022 exposed their details. In response, ministers secured a “super-injunction” – so secret that even its existence could not be reported – effectively silencing public debate and preventing parliamentary scrutiny for almost two years. The breach, only revealed this week, has already cost taxpayers millions of pounds as part of a covert resettlement scheme. Legal expert Joshua Rozenberg joins us to unpack the legal and constitutional ramifications.___Please help us improve Parliament Matters by completing our Listener Survey. ___Joshua Rozenberg explains the legal context to the granting of the super-injunction and how it persisted under both Conservative and Labour governments. We discuss how parliamentary privilege meant those MPs aware of the breach could have raised the issues in the House of Commons Chamber because they were protected by parliamentary privilege, but any MP who knew about the issue would have had to weigh national security concerns and respect for the courts against their right to free speech.This case raises profound questions about ministerial accountability to Parliament. In light of the constitutional implications, we discuss whether the chairs of key select committees should in future be confidentially briefed when national security results in court action that blocks normal parliamentary scrutiny processes in order to provide some degree of democratic oversight. We also explore the political and constitutional fallout: How many current and former MPs were subject to the super-injunction? Was the National Audit Office subject to the super-injunction and was it made aware of the costs of the secret Afghan relocation programme? Should there be a new Joint Committee of both Houses or a sub-committee of the overarching Liaison Committee to look at the issues and draw the constitutional threads together? The case was not raised at Prime Ministers Questions so is there a risk that MPs will simply shrug off such a significant breach of accountability? And has this set a precedent for future governments to shield embarrassing or costly errors behind injunctions?Sticking to the theme of parliamentary privilege we also discuss the sensitive issue of whether unpublished evidence given to the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee in 2009 should be released to the Omagh bombing inquiry. Joshua Rozenberg explains how parliamentary privilege protects witnesses who give evidence to MPs, allowing them to speak freely, often in confidence. We then turn to other parliamentary controversies, including Labour's decision to withdraw the whip from welfare rebels. Will this help Keir Starmer to restore his authority or deepen internal rifts within his party? And we discuss the Government's plan to lower the voting age to 16, a move some hail as democratic renewal while others question whether it will truly engage younger voters.❓ Send us your questions about Parliament Presenters: Mark D'Arcy & Ruth FoxProducer: Richard Townsend Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The Smart 7 is an award winning daily podcast, in association with METRO, that gives you everything you need to know in 7 minutes, at 7am, 7 days a week…With over 18 million downloads and consistently charting, including as No. 1 News Podcast on Spotify, we're a trusted source for people every day and we've won Gold at the Signal International Podcast awardsIf you're enjoying it, please follow, share, or even post a review, it all helps... Today's episode includes the following: https://x.com/i/status/1945223377884524943https://x.com/i/status/1945025543360876985https://x.com/i/status/1945091645839409497 https://x.com/i/status/1945093673609200106 https://x.com/i/status/1945076204089885096 https://x.com/i/status/1945086085459034532 https://x.com/i/status/1945069205964935608 https://x.com/i/status/1944976204634677534 https://youtu.be/sIQrWAkpIII Contact us over @TheSmart7pod or visit www.thesmart7.com or find out more at www.metro.co.uk Voiced by Jamie East, using AI, written by Liam Thompson, researched by Lucie Lewis and produced by Daft Doris. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Handel on the Law. Marginal Legal Advice.
Coming up on today's Local: Could a federal judge melt ICE raids in LA County? ... there were fresh raids today at a cannabis farm in Ventura County ... an agriculture union calls BS on the idea that Medicare recipients can replace immigrant laborers on farms ... and today's stupid controversy centers around the idea of Superman as an immigrant.
Mere days after SCOTUS enjoins universal injunctions, judges find other way to afford “complete relief.” A big one: The Administrative Procedure Act allows courts to enjoin agency actions.Also:What if a defendant does not want a co-defendant dismissed and relieved of liability? The California Supreme Court says co-defendants can oppose each other's MSJs in R&D Contractors v. Superior Court.The Climategate saga continues: when 12-years of anti-SLAPP litigation does not end Dr. Michael Mann's lawsuit defending his “hockey stick” temperature graph, the D.C. court reverses on punitive damages: with a mere $1 nominal damages award, $1M in punitives is too high. Dr. Mann's total result after a dozen years of litigation: $6,002 (and a bill for $9,000 in discovery sanctions).You snooze, you pay: Employer gets sanctioned $183k for late arbitration fee payment in Guffey v. Bokeet.Family law FC 2030 fee denial reversed for considering improper, extra-statutory equitable factors in Marriage of Sadie v. Cativar.Georgia appellate court sanctions lawyer for ChatGPT-cited fake cases, citing study showing AI makes mistakes 75% of the time.Can you hand up exhibits during appellate argument? Maybe in Texas.The Third District new program delays record deadlines pending mediation.Tune in for insights on trial prep, appeals strategy, and the increasingly blurred lines between branches of government.Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal's weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.Other items discussed in the episode:Climate Change Trial Update: Jury awards $1 plus $1M punitives for hockey-stick criticismAlex Anteau 'Don't Be Dumb': Ga. Court of Appeals Sanction Gives Insight...Law360 The Funniest Moments of The Supreme Court's Term - Law360
Steve Grzanich has the business news of the day with the Wintrust Business Minute. There’s a new development in the fight over gates at O’Hare Airport. American Airlines is asking a court for an injunction to block the awarding of more gates to United Airlines. The City of Chicago is reallocating gates and United is […]
Hi. Katy, Cody, and Jonathan are here to discuss the Supreme Court's rulings against nationwide injunctions and how every non-white baby, starting next month, is going to need to lawyer up to establish that they're a U.S. citizen. They also go through some of the worst parts of the GOP mega-bill, which is set to strip about 12 million people of their Medicaid coverage.PATREON: https://patreon.com/somemorenewsMERCH: https://shop.somemorenews.comYOUTUBE MEMBERSHIP: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvlj0IzjSnNoduQF0l3VGng/joinSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
This week, the NatCon Squad discusses: 00:00 - Intro 00:59 - SCOTUS Rules on Universal Injunction 14:28 - Big Beautiful Bill 24:57 - NYC Dems Pick Zohran Mamdani 39:33 - Aligator Alcatraz 45:44 - Final Thoughts With Will Chamberlain, Ben Weingarten, Amber Duke, and Inez Stepman. Produced by the Edmund Burke Foundation. For the latest updates, follow us on X: @natcontalk www.nationalconservatism.org
This is an excerpt from my podcast This Week in Geopolitics. I record new episodes every Monday so give me a follow if you would like to see more!
... but not anymore. Ali Velshi breaks down the monumental ruling to undermine "nationwide injunctions" and explains why we now need to look elsewhere for checks and balances on presidents.
Guests: Melissa Murray, George Conway, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, AG Dana Nessel, AG Andrea Joy Campbell, Betsey Stevenson, Justin Wolfers After a stark warning from the Supreme Court's liberal justices, how the Supreme Court's actions threaten American democracy. Plus, two state Attorneys General on what happens next in the fight against Trumpism. And as American confidence in Trump's economic plan continues to tumble, he responds by kicking off another trade dispute with Canada? Want more of Chris? Download and subscribe to his podcast, “Why Is This Happening? The Chris Hayes podcast” wherever you get your podcasts.
It started with President Trump's bold and triumphant strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. It ended with massive wins at the Supreme Court on several issues, including an end to lower court injunctions on his executive orders and a green light to end birthright citizenship in the United States.Jake Kubie, Director of Communications for the Denver Zoo explains the venue's decision to shut down on early Saturday with reports of violent teenage mobs descending on City Park.
The Supreme Court today ruled to limit the ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions blocking President Trump's executive orders. The decision will have major implications for how businesses push back against federal policy in the United States. We'll get into it. And, American consumers aren't feeling too hot about the economy. How much do those feelings matter? Plus, we'll play a round of Half Full/Half Empty!Here's everything we talked about today:"Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on nationwide injunctions in birthright citizenship case" from SCOTUSblog"America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried" from Bloomberg"Opinion | How the N.B.A. and M.L.B. Shattered America's Sports Culture" from The New York Times"Bumble stumbles as dating apps struggle" from Marketplace"Latest time use survey shows Americans are spending more time at home" from Marketplace"The colleges using ultimate frisbee to boost enrollment" from Marketplace"After a tough decade, American malls are reinventing themselves" from MarketplaceGot a question for the hosts? Email makemesmart@marketplace.org or leave us a voicemail at 508-U-B-SMART.
Divided Argument hosts Daniel Epps and William Baude join Sarah Isgur to unpack the Supreme Court's decision (ahem, non-decision) on birthright citizenship. Plus: a little showdown between two justices. The Agenda:—What the Supreme Court did NOT decide—What the Court DID decide—Similarities to Marbury v. Madison,Loper Bright, and Chevron—Justice Amy Coney Barrett v. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson—Judicial supremacy?—Sir, this is not a Denny's—Injunction influx—The future of forum shopping—A big July for Advisory Opinion Show Notes:—SCOTUSblog on the 6-3 decision itself This episode is brought to you by Burford Capital, the leading global finance firm focused on law. Burford helps companies and law firms unlock the value of their legal assets. With a $7.2 billion portfolio and listings on the NYSE and LSE, Burford provides capital to finance high-value commercial litigation and arbitration—without adding cost, risk, or giving up control. Clients include Fortune 500 companies and Am Law 100 firms, who turn to Burford to pursue strong claims, manage legal costs, and accelerate recoveries. Learn more at burfordcapital.com/ao. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Supreme Court today ruled to limit the ability of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions blocking President Trump's executive orders. The decision will have major implications for how businesses push back against federal policy in the United States. We'll get into it. And, American consumers aren't feeling too hot about the economy. How much do those feelings matter? Plus, we'll play a round of Half Full/Half Empty!Here's everything we talked about today:"Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on nationwide injunctions in birthright citizenship case" from SCOTUSblog"America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried" from Bloomberg"Opinion | How the N.B.A. and M.L.B. Shattered America's Sports Culture" from The New York Times"Bumble stumbles as dating apps struggle" from Marketplace"Latest time use survey shows Americans are spending more time at home" from Marketplace"The colleges using ultimate frisbee to boost enrollment" from Marketplace"After a tough decade, American malls are reinventing themselves" from MarketplaceGot a question for the hosts? Email makemesmart@marketplace.org or leave us a voicemail at 508-U-B-SMART.
Supreme Court rules that individual judges do not have the power to block a president's policies across the country, known as nationwide injunctions. The underlying case, whose merits have not been decided yet, involves President Donald Trump's Executive Order restricting birthright citizenship; Supreme Court also handed down other closely-watched decisions today, including in favor of Maryland parents who want to have their children opt-out of a curriculum with LGBTQ books and upholding a Texas law requiring age-verification for adult websites; Senate Republicans look to have their first vote on the tax cut & spending cut budget reconciliation bill on Saturday; House members get a classified briefing on the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear site; Foreign Ministers of Rwanda & the Democratic Republic of Congo meet in Washington to sign a peace agreement brokered by the White House; Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R-VA) talks about this year's Virginia governor election between Winsome Earle-Sears (R) and Abigail Spanberger (D). Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Trump HUGE WIN on nationwide injunctions will also benefit Dem Presidents; Local teacher fired from Catholic School for being - you guessed it - gay; Someone DO SOMETHING about the punishment light at Canal & N Rampart! The friendly skies aren't so friendly anymore - what happened?
Today on What's Right:HUGELY important SCOTUS ruling in Trump v CasaWhy DEI Supreme Court justices are so insulting to capable minoritiesTrump strategy for new Supreme Court appointmentsDemocrats ignore any law they don't likeSocialism and bad immigrationLove for America and good immigrationThanks for tuning into today's episode of What's Right! If you enjoyed this episode, subscribe to the show on Spotify or Apple Podcasts, and make sure you leave us a 5-star review.Have personal injury questions? Visit Sam & Ash Injury Law to get free answers 24/7.Connect with us on our socials:TWITTERSam @WhatsRightSamWhat's Right Show @WhatsRightShowFACEBOOKWhat's Right Show https://www.facebook.com/WhatsRightShow/INSTAGRAMWhat's Right Show @WhatsRightShowEMAILSam sam@whatsrightshow.comProducer Robbie robbie@whatsrightshow.comTo request a transcript of this episode, email marketing@samandashlaw.com
Justin Crowe of Williams College joins Chad to talk about what the Supreme Court decision on the birthright citizenship case means for lower courts and the power of the executive branch.
Tyler and Will legal analyst Jake Thompson explains the future of Zakai Zeigler and his denied injunction for a fifth year, and much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Tyler and Will legal analyst Jake Thompson explains the future of Zakai Zeigler and his denied injunction for a fifth year, and much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Tyler and Will legal analyst Jake Thompson explains the future of Zakai Zeigler and his denied injunction for a fifth year, and much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Tyler and Will legal analyst Jake Thompson explains the future of Zakai Zeigler and his denied injunction for a fifth year, and much more!See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
VLOG June 6 US v Sean Combs, Jane Doe 2d day of direct https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extraanalysis-to-in-sean-combs-trial Week 4 book later today; Week 3 https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=seJhEQAAQBAJDocs https://patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-and-130774877. Chung wins injunction against ICE; UN Volker Turk conflicts https://www.innercitypress.com/ungate9volkerturkicp060525.html
Supreme Court has dismissed an injunction application filed by the Centre for Citizenship, Constitutional, and Electoral Systems (CenCES), which sought to halt the impeachment proceedings against Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo
The Supreme Court hears oral arguments challenging the rights of federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy calls Vladimir Putin's bluff by arriving for peace talks in Turkey. And in a worldwide first, scientists save a baby boy's life by deploying gene therapy for a rare disease. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Professor John Eastman discusses the oral arguments made on May 15 in the birthright citizenship cases before the Supreme Court and the problem of nationwide injunctions. A classic film review relevant to arrogant judges is provided of the 1940 movie, “The Westerner.”
Professor John Eastman discusses the oral arguments made on May 15 in the birthright citizenship cases before the Supreme Court and the problem of nationwide injunctions.A classic film review relevant to arrogant judges is provided of the 1940 movie, “The Westerner.”
VLOG May 15 Sean Combs, Cassie on the cross today; extras https://matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-sean-combs-trial-cassie-4e5…Who can she speak to? Doc https://patreon.com/posts/diddy-docket-in-128903614…Book https://amazon.com/dp/B0DHP7YF19FDNY Saccavino 3 years, SDNY Alien Enemies Act injunctionUN irrelevant on Ukraine & Gaza as bans Press
Brian kicks things off by welcoming David Hunt of Boies Schiller Flexner to unpack the ever-spicier topic of anti-suit injunctions, using the UK Supreme Court's decision in UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC as a springboard [TIME 13:18]. They explore how the case intersects with the proposed revisions to the Arbitration Act 1996, revisit Enka v Chubb, and debate whether the English courts' approach is evolving. If anti-suit injunctions and jurisdictional gateways are your thing, this one's for you.For Happy Fun Time, Sadia is joined once again by arbitration-lawyer-turned-productivity-guru, coach Jon Passaro [TIME 39:52]. Jon breaks down how a business plan can keep a career on track, sharing a examples listeners can use for their own practice.
Controversial mining projects are moving ahead and stalling in the legal arena; the state Attorney General is joining others opposing a Trump Administration plan for energy production on federal land; an update on the University of Arizona financial situation; student athletes can now be paid differently; and more...
A US judge ordered Apple (AAPL) to immediately decrease its App Store fees and asked for criminal prosecutors to review the company's alleged "cover-up," jeopardizing billions in revenue for the tech giant.~This episode is sponsored by iTrust Capital~iTrustCapital | Get $100 Funding Reward + No Monthly Fees when you sign up using our custom link! ➜ https://bit.ly/iTrustPaul00:00 intro00:14 Sponosor: iTrust Capital00:50 Nobody Talking About This?01:35 Apple Defies Court Order02:34 Link-Out Buttons03:05 Judge Pissed Off03:40 Criminal Charges05:04 It's Over05:50 Stripe Reacts06:08 Devs Already Building07:00 Apple Thought No One Would Care07:33 Tim Sweeney on Apple Monopoly08:50 Fortnite returns09:27 Gaming will be fun again10:44 NFTs Incoming11:29 Microsoft Flips Apple12:02 No Bull-Case for Apple13:13 Better A.I. Assistants15:20 Virtuals Incoming16:06 Judge Destroys Apple17:04 outro#Crypto #apple #nft~Judge Eviscerates Apple Monopoly!
Listen to a recap of the top stories of the day from 9to5Mac. 9to5Mac Daily is available on iTunes and Apple's Podcasts app, Stitcher, TuneIn, Google Play, or through our dedicated RSS feed for Overcast and other podcast players. Sponsored by CardPointers: The best way to maximize your credit card rewards. 9to5Mac Daily listeners can exclusively save 30% and get a $100 Savings Card. New episodes of 9to5Mac Daily are recorded every weekday. Subscribe to our podcast in Apple Podcast or your favorite podcast player to guarantee new episodes are delivered as soon as they're available. Stories discussed in this episode: New Apple Vision ‘Air' product could launch this year, per report Google CEO ‘hopeful' Gemini will be part of Apple Intelligence this year iOS 19 might be adding several new third-party AI models Fortnite will return to the App Store for iPhone and iPad in every country — on one condition Apple addresses App Store ruling as Fortnite eyes return Epic Games claims victory as Apple sanctioned for defying court order over App Store rules Epic win: Apple forced to give developers (almost) free reign to link out and avoid paying Apple's 30% cut Listen & Subscribe: Apple Podcasts Overcast RSS Spotify TuneIn Google Podcasts Subscribe to support Chance directly with 9to5Mac Daily Plus and unlock: Ad-free versions of every episode Bonus content Catch up on 9to5Mac Daily episodes! Don't miss out on our other daily podcasts: Quick Charge 9to5Toys Daily Share your thoughts! Drop us a line at happyhour@9to5mac.com. You can also rate us in Apple Podcasts or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.
On this episode of Conduct Detrimental: THE Sports Law Podcast, Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) is joined by Tarun Sharma (@tksharmalaw), Mike Kravchenko (Watch on YouTube) and special guest, Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich) to jump into a discussion covering a wild last week or so in the sports law universe - and our episode is jam-packed.Was it just a dumb joke or a reputational and career-ender? We break down the implications of Falcons DC Jeff Ulbrich for his son's impersonating of a team exec and prank-calling Shadeur Sanders, along with other players, during one of the most important moments of their lives.Judge Claudia Wilken pushes back on settlement approval, citing walk-on harm and a lack of clarity on grandfathering athletes. Sam explains how Holly McLean's story at Oklahoma exemplifies the chaos for cut athletes and why this delay could haunt the NCAA for years. Sam also unpacks the anti-competitive logic used in Pavia and Elad's recent wins, and why lawsuits are replacing waivers.With the Edge Collective attempting a $200K clawback from Madden Iamaleava, we ask: Is a 50% clawback clause enforceable or a penalty in disguise? Sam, Mike, and Tarun dive into liquidated damages law, incentives, and the risk of opening this can of worms nationwide.Champions Blue LLC might be the most important structural shift in college sports. Will this move invite private capital? Change employee classification? Or blur the line between collectives and athletic departments entirely?New lawyer, media silence, and ESPN likely out. The crew analyzes why Shannon's legal team's strategy may have cost him his job, and how even a winning legal case may lose in the court of public opinion.Professor Sam Ehrlich's College Sports Litigation Tracker: https://www.collegesportslitigationtracker.com/ ***Have a topic you want to write about? ANYONE and EVERYONE can publish for ConductDetrimental.com. Let us know if you want to join the team.As always, this episode is sponsored by Themis Bar Review: https://www.themisbarsocial.com/conductdetrimental Host: Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) Featuring: Tarun Sharma (@tksharmalaw) , Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich)Feat. and Produced by: Mike Kravchenko (Watch on YouTube)Twitter | Instagram | TikTok | YouTube | Website | Email
On this episode of Conduct Detrimental: THE Sports Law Podcast, Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) is joined by Tarun Sharma (@tksharmalaw), Mike Kravchenko (Watch on YouTube) and special guest, Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich) to jump into a discussion covering a wild last week or so in the sports law universe - and our episode is jam-packed.Was it just a dumb joke or a reputational and career-ender? We break down the implications of Falcons DC Jeff Ulbrich for his son's impersonating of a team exec and prank-calling Shadeur Sanders, along with other players, during one of the most important moments of their lives.Judge Claudia Wilken pushes back on settlement approval, citing walk-on harm and a lack of clarity on grandfathering athletes. Sam explains how Holly McLean's story at Oklahoma exemplifies the chaos for cut athletes and why this delay could haunt the NCAA for years. Sam also unpacks the anti-competitive logic used in Pavia and Elad's recent wins, and why lawsuits are replacing waivers.With the Edge Collective attempting a $200K clawback from Madden Iamaleava, we ask: Is a 50% clawback clause enforceable or a penalty in disguise? Sam, Mike, and Tarun dive into liquidated damages law, incentives, and the risk of opening this can of worms nationwide.Champions Blue LLC might be the most important structural shift in college sports. Will this move invite private capital? Change employee classification? Or blur the line between collectives and athletic departments entirely?New lawyer, media silence, and ESPN likely out. The crew analyzes why Shannon's legal team's strategy may have cost him his job, and how even a winning legal case may lose in the court of public opinion.Professor Sam Ehrlich's College Sports Litigation Tracker: https://www.collegesportslitigationtracker.com/ ***Have a topic you want to write about? ANYONE and EVERYONE can publish for ConductDetrimental.com. Let us know if you want to join the team.As always, this episode is sponsored by Themis Bar Review: https://www.themisbarsocial.com/conductdetrimental Host: Dan Lust (@SportsLawLust) Featuring: Tarun Sharma (@tksharmalaw) , Sam Ehrlich (@samcehrlich)Feat. and Produced by: Mike Kravchenko (Watch on YouTube)Twitter | Instagram | TikTok | YouTube | Website | Email
In this episode, I break down three key reasons why Judge Wilkens declined to confirm the House v NCAA settlement during the April 7 hearing: 1) Future Athlete Impact- Judge Wilkens expressed concern that the settlement could unfairly affect future student-athletes who weren't part of the case and had no opportunity to object, potentially settling a troubling legal precedent. She asked the attorney to provide legal precedent to justify the 10 year Injunction which will impact future student athletes. 2) Roster Limits - She challenged the immediate implementation of roster size limits, suggesting that current student-athletes should be "grandfathered in" to protect their roster spots or that limits should be phased in over time. 3) $600 Dollar Review on Third party NIL Deals - Judge Wilkens questioned the logic behind questioning deals over $600. She pressed the attorneys to explain how the $600 limit would benefit student-athletes. Go to my home page to jillmcbridebaxter.com to set up a meeting. https://linktr.ee/jillmcbridebaxter Get on my email list or sign up for one of my free classes.
Harvard's faculty has turned up the heat with a new Injunction lawsuit filed in Massachusetts Federal Court against the Trump Administration and its efforts to cut off $9 billion in federal funding to violate Harvard's academic freedom and First Amendment rights, as Harvard hires the Trump Organization's own “ethics counsel”'s firm to defend against the Trump Administration's attacks. Michael Popok ties it all together including the curious case of the Quinn Emmanuel firm and its flipping sides to go on the attack against Trump in several high-profile cases. Try VIIA Hemp! https://viia.co/legalaf and use code LEGALAF! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Coalition of the Sane: https://meidasnews.com/tag/coalition-of-the-sane Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Democrats lost every swing state in November, but they have a backup plan to keep Donald Trump from keeping any of his promises: Nationwide judicial injunctions. How can America escape the tyranny of almost 700 would-be dictators with gavels? And when are things bad enough that the Trump Admin should consider ignoring a judge entirely? Charlie weighs in, and Ben Weingarten offers his own ideas for how to navigate this crisis for the American republic. Watch ad-free on members.charliekirk.com! Get new merch on charliekirkstore.com!Support the show: http://www.charliekirk.com/supportSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Join Washington Examiner Senior Writer David Harsanyi and Federalist Editor-In-Chief Mollie Hemingway as they break down and debate the showdown between the Trump administration and the judiciary over deportation flights and discuss former President Joe Biden's alleged autopen pardons. Mollie and David also share their culture picks for the week, including "Adolescence."If you care about combatting the corrupt media that continue to inflict devastating damage, please give a gift to help The Federalist do the real journalism America needs.