POPULARITY
18 episodes with Ruth Marcus
37 episodes with Ruth Marcus
18 episodes with Ruth Marcus
12 episodes with Ruth Marcus
12 episodes with Ruth Marcus
10 episodes with Ruth Marcus
15 episodes with Ruth Marcus
7 episodes with Ruth Marcus
4 episodes with Ruth Marcus
The New Yorker contributing writer Ruth Marcus joins the guest host and staff writer Clare Malone to discuss Marcus's recent profile of U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. They talk about Bondi's political origins and her unprecedented reshaping of the Justice Department, and how she delivers on President Trump's desire to use the legal system for revenge and retribution. They also touch on Bondi's mishandling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, which has drawn the ire of both Democratic politicians and core parts of the President's base. This week's reading: “Pam Bondi's Power Play,” by Ruth Marcus “Texas Democrats' Weapons of the Weak,” by Rachel Monroe “Do State Referendums on Abortion Work?,” by Peter Slevin “Why Don't We Take Nuclear Weapons Seriously?,” by Rivka Galchen “How Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.,'s Anti-Vax Agenda Is Infecting America,” by Isaac Chotiner Tune in to The Political Scene wherever you get your podcasts. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
Veteran journalist Ruth Marcus takes Harry on a tour of Attorney General Pam Bondi's Justice Department. Drawing on months of reporting including candid interviews with top officials, Marcus reveals the department's frightening new view of itself and the costs of Bondi's revolutionary tactics. The pair end with a look at another American institution undergoing seismic change: the Washington Post, which Marcus left this year after a four decade tenure.Mentioned in this episode:Marcus' story about Bondi and the department: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/08/25/pam-bondi-profileMarcus' piece about leaving the Washington Post: https://www.newyorker.com/news/essay/why-ruth-marcus-left-the-washington-postMarcus' piece about her dog: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/my-dog-tank-was-a-precious-creature-that-saw-no-dividing-lines/2020/08/31/4880738e-eb99-11ea-b4bc-3a2098fc73d4_story.html Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The New Yorker's Ruth Marcus says Bondi has presided over the DOJ's most convulsive transition of power since Watergate, aggressively reversing policies, investigating Trump's foes and firing staff.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
The New Yorker's Ruth Marcus says Bondi has presided over the DOJ's most convulsive transition of power since Watergate, aggressively reversing policies, investigating Trump's foes and firing staff.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
From the attempt to end birthright citizenship to the gutting of congressionally authorized agencies, the Trump Administration has created an enormous number of legal controversies. The Radio Hour asked for listeners' questions about President Trump and the courts. To answer them, David Remnick speaks with two regular contributors: Ruth Marcus, who writes about legal issues and the Supreme Court, and Jeannie Suk Gersen, who teaches constitutional law at Harvard Law School. While the writers disagree on some significant questions—such as the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. CASA, which struck down the use of nationwide injunctions—both acknowledge the unprecedented nature of some of the questions from listeners. “They never taught you these things in law school, because he's pushing on areas of the law that are not normally pushed on,” Marcus tells Remnick.New episodes of The New Yorker Radio Hour drop every Tuesday and Friday. Follow the show wherever you get your podcasts. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
From the attempt to end birthright citizenship to the gutting of congressionally authorized agencies, the Trump Administration has created an enormous number of legal controversies. The Radio Hour asked for listeners' questions about President Trump and the courts. To answer them, David Remnick speaks with two regular contributors: Ruth Marcus, who writes about legal issues and the Supreme Court, and Jeannie Suk Gersen, who teaches constitutional law at Harvard Law School. While the writers disagree on some significant questions—such as the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Trump v. CASA, which struck down the use of nationwide injunctions—both acknowledge the unprecedented nature of some of the questions from listeners. “They never taught you these things in law school, because he's pushing on areas of the law that are not normally pushed on,” Marcus tells Remnick.
Ruth Marcus, a contributor to The New Yorker and a former columnist for The Washington Post and the author of Supreme Ambition: Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover (Simon & Schuster, 2019), talks about Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and takes stock of what the Supreme Court's latest decisions mean for the identity of the court and the ability of judges to check executive power.
This week, Emily Bazelon and guest hosts Ruth Marcus and James Forman discuss Trump's bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities with guest Steven Cook from the Council on Foreign Relations, Zohran Mamdani's stunning victory in the NYC Democratic mayoral primary, and an astonishing whistleblower report that sheds incriminating light on Trump's judicial nominee Emil Bove and defiance of court orders in deportation flight cases. For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, Emily Bazelon and guest hosts Ruth Marcus and James Forman discuss how Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's approach differs from the other liberal Justices and her ferocious critiques of the Roberts Court's processes and opinions. In the latest Gabfest Reads, David talks with author Alison Bechdel about her new book, Spent. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Research by Emily Ditto Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This week, Emily Bazelon and guest hosts Ruth Marcus and James Forman discuss Trump's bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities with guest Steven Cook from the Council on Foreign Relations, Zohran Mamdani's stunning victory in the NYC Democratic mayoral primary, and an astonishing whistleblower report that sheds incriminating light on Trump's judicial nominee Emil Bove and defiance of court orders in deportation flight cases. For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, Emily Bazelon and guest hosts Ruth Marcus and James Forman discuss how Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's approach differs from the other liberal Justices and her ferocious critiques of the Roberts Court's processes and opinions. In the latest Gabfest Reads, David talks with author Alison Bechdel about her new book, Spent. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Research by Emily Ditto Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This week, Emily Bazelon and guest hosts Ruth Marcus and James Forman discuss Trump's bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities with guest Steven Cook from the Council on Foreign Relations, Zohran Mamdani's stunning victory in the NYC Democratic mayoral primary, and an astonishing whistleblower report that sheds incriminating light on Trump's judicial nominee Emil Bove and defiance of court orders in deportation flight cases. For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, Emily Bazelon and guest hosts Ruth Marcus and James Forman discuss how Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's approach differs from the other liberal Justices and her ferocious critiques of the Roberts Court's processes and opinions. In the latest Gabfest Reads, David talks with author Alison Bechdel about her new book, Spent. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Research by Emily Ditto Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Ruth Marcus resigned from the Washington Post after its C.E.O. killed an editorial she wrote that was critical of the paper's owner, Jeff Bezos. She ended up publishing the column in The New Yorker, and soon after she published another piece for the magazine asking "Has Trump's Legal Strategy Backfired?" "Trump's legal strategy has been backfiring, I think, demonstrably in the lower courts," she tells David Remnick, on issues such as undoing birthright citizenship and deporting people without due process. Federal judges have rebuked the Administration's lawyers, and ordered deportees returned to the United States. But "we have this thing called the Supreme Court, which is, in fact, supreme," Marcus says. "I thought the Supreme Court was going to send a message to the Trump Administration: 'Back off, guys.' . . . That's not what's happened." In recent days, that Court has issued a number of rulings that, while narrow, suggest a more deferential approach toward Presidential power. Marcus and Remnick spoke last week about where the Supreme Court—with its six-Justice conservative majority—may yield to Trump's extraordinary exertions of power, and where it may attempt to check his authority. "When you have a six-Justice conservative majority," she notes, there is"a justice to spare." Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
Ruth Marcus resigned from the Washington Post after its C.E.O. killed an editorial she wrote that was critical of the paper's owner, Jeff Bezos. She ended up publishing the column in The New Yorker, and soon after she published another piece for the magazine asking “Has Trump's Legal Strategy Backfired?” “Trump's legal strategy has been backfiring, I think, demonstrably in the lower courts,” she tells David Remnick, on issues such as undoing birthright citizenship and deporting people without due process. Federal judges have rebuked the Administration's lawyers, and ordered deportees returned to the United States. But “we have this thing called the Supreme Court, which is, in fact, supreme,” Marcus says. “I thought the Supreme Court was going to send a message to the Trump Administration: ‘Back off, guys.' . . . That's not what's happened.” In recent days, that Court has issued a number of rulings that, while narrow, suggest a more deferential approach toward Presidential power. Marcus and Remnick spoke last week about where the Supreme Court—with its six-Justice conservative majority—may yield to Trump's extraordinary exertions of power, and where it may attempt to check his authority. “When you have a six-Justice conservative majority,” she notes, there is“a justice to spare.”
President Donald Trump has always bashed the press. But his attacks are no longer just rhetorical — he's using lawsuits to intimidate the news media, and he's inspired a conservative legal movement to overturn the New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. The landmark Supreme Court decision protects freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and unfortunately, Trump's attempt to destroy it are part of a larger pattern of tearing away at our right to freedom of expression. To break it all down, Kara speaks to three exceptional journalists: David Enrich, a deputy investigations editor for The New York Times and the author of four books, including the newly released, Murder the Truth: Fear, the First Amendment, and a Secret Campaign to Protect the Powerful; Ruth Marcus, a former associate editor and columnist for The Washington Post and the author of Supreme Ambition: Brett Kavanaugh and the Conservative Takeover; and Ben Mullin, a media reporter for The New York Times covers the major players in the news and entertainment business. Questions? Comments? Email us at on@voxmedia.com or find us on Instagram, TikTok, and Bluesky @onwithkaraswisher. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
New York Times columnist David Brooks and columnist Ruth Marcus join Geoff Bennett to discuss the week in politics, including Trump officials sharing sensitive information on a commercial app, the reaction to the revelation, the state of U.S. foreign relations and President Trump’s bid for Greenland. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
New York Times columnist David Brooks and columnist Ruth Marcus join Geoff Bennett to discuss the week in politics, including Trump officials sharing sensitive information on a commercial app, the reaction to the revelation, the state of U.S. foreign relations and President Trump’s bid for Greenland. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
What is a journalist to do when senior White House officials accidentally send them imminent war plans? That's just one of the surreal current events Ruth Marcus unpacks in this week's episode. The former Washington Post columnist and editor recently stepped down after nearly four decades at the paper, making headlines with her high-profile resignation. She joins Preet to discuss the chaos unfolding inside the Trump administration—from the mood inside DOJ to the president's escalating assault on the judiciary. Marcus also shares her insights on knowing when it's time to walk away from a job you've loved. For show notes and a transcript of the episode head to: https://cafe.com/stay-tuned/oops-we-texted-a-war-plan-to-the-press-with-ruth-marcus/ You can now watch this episode! Head to CAFE's Youtube channel and subscribe. Have a question for Preet? Ask @PreetBharara on Threads, or Twitter with the hashtag #AskPreet. Email us at staytuned@cafe.com, or call 833-997-7338 to leave a voicemail. Stay Tuned with Preet is brought to you by CAFE and the Vox Media Podcast Network. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
This week, John Dickerson and David Plotz are joined by Ruth Marcus to discuss the showdown over mass deportation and the government's defiant response to court orders; a deep data dive by Ezra Klein and David Shor about why Trump won the 2024 election; and this week's so-called “negotiation” call between Trump and Putin. Listener chatter from Kevin in Portland, Oregon: Orb (Netflix) For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, John and David are joined by Ruth Marcus to discuss the arrest and prosecution of a Houston midwife this week under Texas's near-total abortion ban. In the latest Gabfest Reads, David talks with author Adam Higginbotham about his new book, Challenger: A True Story of Heroism and Disaster on the Edge of Space. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Kevin Bendis And Cheyna Roth Research by Emily Ditto Want more Political Gabfest? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Political Gabfest show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or visit slate.com/gabfestplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This week, John Dickerson and David Plotz are joined by Ruth Marcus to discuss the showdown over mass deportation and the government's defiant response to court orders; a deep data dive by Ezra Klein and David Shor about why Trump won the 2024 election; and this week's so-called “negotiation” call between Trump and Putin. Listener chatter from Kevin in Portland, Oregon: Orb (Netflix) For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, John and David are joined by Ruth Marcus to discuss the arrest and prosecution of a Houston midwife this week under Texas's near-total abortion ban. In the latest Gabfest Reads, David talks with author Adam Higginbotham about his new book, Challenger: A True Story of Heroism and Disaster on the Edge of Space. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Kevin Bendis And Cheyna Roth Research by Emily Ditto Want more Political Gabfest? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Political Gabfest show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or visit slate.com/gabfestplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The veteran courts reporter Ruth Marcus joins the host Tyler Foggatt to discuss the Trump Administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, why flights of Venezuelan deportees were sent to El Salvador, and how the defiance of federal court orders has set off a constitutional crisis. This week's reading: “The Trump Administration Nears Open Defiance of the Courts,” by Ruth Marcus “The Case of Mahmoud Khalil,” by Benjamin Wallace-Wells “The Long Nap of the Lazy Bureaucrat,” by Charlie Tyson “Hundreds of Thousands Will Die,” by David Remnick “The Felling of the U.S. Forest Service,” by Peter Slevin To discover more podcasts from The New Yorker, visit newyorker.com/podcasts. To send feedback on this episode, write to themail@newyorker.com. Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
This week, John Dickerson and David Plotz are joined by Ruth Marcus to discuss the showdown over mass deportation and the government's defiant response to court orders; a deep data dive by Ezra Klein and David Shor about why Trump won the 2024 election; and this week's so-called “negotiation” call between Trump and Putin. Listener chatter from Kevin in Portland, Oregon: Orb (Netflix) For this week's Slate Plus bonus episode, John and David are joined by Ruth Marcus to discuss the arrest and prosecution of a Houston midwife this week under Texas's near-total abortion ban. In the latest Gabfest Reads, David talks with author Adam Higginbotham about his new book, Challenger: A True Story of Heroism and Disaster on the Edge of Space. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Kevin Bendis And Cheyna Roth Research by Emily Ditto Want more Political Gabfest? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes. Plus, you'll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Political Gabfest show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or visit slate.com/gabfestplus to get access wherever you listen. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Join Washington Examiner Senior Writer David Harsanyi and Federalist Editor-In-Chief Mollie Hemingway as they discuss the Trump administration's deportation order for Mahmoud Khalil over his role in pro-Hamas demonstrations at Columbia University, analyze Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett's rulings track record, and examine writer Ruth Marcus' departure from The Washington Post. Mollie and David also continue their review of Gene Hackman movies.If you care about combatting the corrupt media that continue to inflict devastating damage, please give a gift to help The Federalist do the real journalism America needs.
More on the Covid lockdowns, including a past article from Ruth Marcus, who recently resigned from the Washington Post, arguing for mandating the vaccine. Plus, Lee Zeldin of the EPA announces the end of massive environmental regulations that have been costing Americans trillions. Visit the Howie Carr Radio Network website to access columns, podcasts, and other exclusive content.
Join Washington Examiner Senior Writer David Harsanyi and Federalist Editor-In-Chief Mollie Hemingway as they discuss the Trump administration’s deportation order for Mahmoud Khalil over his role in pro-Hamas demonstrations at Columbia University, analyze Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s rulings track record, and examine writer Ruth Marcus’ departure from The Washington Post. Mollie and David […]
Brace yourself for a jaw-dropping recap of the *MG Show* as Jeffrey Pedersen and Shannon Townsend rip into "President Trump Buys a Tesla; Trump vs Massie Feud"—a patriot-fueled expose that turns the tables on the swamp and its insiders! The episode explodes with Trump's bold Tesla purchase, a defiant move amid the relentless assault on Tesla's American innovation. But the bombshell? Gen Flynn's claim of an assassination contract on Alex Jones takes a dark twist—whispers are growing that Flynn himself might be part of the problem, suspected of running psyops to infiltrate and undermine the Patriot, America-First, MAGA movement. The hosts dig deep, questioning if the deep state's got a mole in their ranks. The Trump-Massie feud heats up as the Massie crew gets sassy with Trump, but Jeffrey and Shannon call out Massie's betrayal of the MAGA mission with fierce clarity. More Oval Office clips drop, with POTUS noticing JD's socks, sparking a kekked-out laugh-fest! Trump welcomed Ireland's PM to the Oval, with live questions during the visit, spotlighting the global sovereignty fight. The drops hammer home “these people are sick” 40 times, while Doug Collins unleashes questions on the fake news. And the clincher? USAID staffers shredded evidence, proving the swamp's desperation. Catch the replay on Rumble — this is the MG Show exposing infiltrators and rallying patriots to stand guard! Join the Conversation with The MG Show! Experience a dynamic live session packed with insights and engaging discussions. Tune in for stories that truly matter. GO SEE DR KIRK! https://mgshow.link/kepm
Join Washington Examiner Senior Writer David Harsanyi and Federalist Editor-In-Chief Mollie Hemingway as they discuss the Trump administration's deportation order for Mahmoud Khalil over his role in pro-Hamas demonstrations at Columbia University, analyze Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett's rulings track record, and examine writer Ruth Marcus' departure from The Washington Post. Mollie and David also continue their review of Gene Hackman movies.If you care about combatting the corrupt media that continue to inflict devastating damage, please give a gift to help The Federalist do the real journalism America needs.
Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to the Daily Compliance News—all from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional. Top stories include: Ignore FCPA at your peril. (WSJ) Tennis Ump suspended for betting on tennis games. (ESPN) Bags no longer fly free on Southwest Airlines. (USA Today) Ruth Marcus resigns from WaPo after they cut her editorial. (NYT) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
BOA data stolen… Cargo ship crash update… X cyberattacked… On the Border Mexican Grill & Cantina bankrupt… Email from Listener on restaurant personalization… Ruth Marcus quits Washington Post… Email: ChewingTheFat@theblaze.com James Taylor extends tour… Amazon movies to the theater / Airing MLB… Ex Meta insider whistleblower?... Michelle Obama podcast… Who Died Today: Jamie White from INFO Wars 36 / Craig Wolfley 66 / Prince Frederick 22... Widow sues Las Vegas Hotel over husbands death… New accusations surround Diddy / Odell Beckham Jr, & Comedian, Druski Joke of The Day… Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Democrats in Olympia are pushing yet another crazy bill that would go easy on violent criminals. Are we heading towards a government shutdown? Shawn Kemp’s pot shop in Seattle was once again burglarized. // Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus quit the paper after it wouldn’t run her story trashing owner Jeff Bezos. CNN’s Van Jones says that Democrats are ‘screwed.’ The Trump Administration has converted the CBP One App into a self-deportation app. // The Seahawks made a flurry of big moves over the last few days.
Howie Kurtz on veteran columnist at the Washington Post resigns after piece was scrapped, a judge ordering a release of DOGE records and Elon Musk calling former Navy combat pilot Sen. Mark Kelly a 'traitor'. Follow Howie on Twitter: @HowardKurtz For more #MediaBuzz click here Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Thanks for listening to The Morning Five! Thanks for listening, rating/subscribing The Morning Five on your favorite podcast platform. Learn more about the work of CCPL at www.ccpubliclife.org. Michael's new book, The Spirit of Our Politics: Spiritual Formation and the Renovation of Public Life, is now available! You can order on Amazon, Bookshop.org, Barnes & Noble, or at your favorite local bookstore. Join the conversation and follow us at: Instagram: @michaelwear, @ccpubliclifeTwitter: @MichaelRWear, @ccpubliclifeAnd check out @tsfnetwork Music by: King Sis #politics #faith #prayer #POTUS #Trump #journalism #WashingtonPost #JeffBezos #immigration #lawenforcement #Syria #humanrights Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
0:00 Marco Rubio, Elon Musk team up to dismantle USAID—They need to listen to Rand Paul! Robby Soave 11:17 Why Elon Musk needs to leave Social Security alone; It's not a "Ponzi" scheme: Marianne Williamson 21:37 Ukraine drone-strikes Moscow; Rubio conducting peace talks in Saudi Arabia: Interview 34:04 JD Vance memes flood social media; VP responds; The Atlantic warns Republicans?! 38:42 Trump assassination attempt: Behind the scenes of what went down in Butler, PA: Alex Isenstadt intv 50:25 X cyberattack: Musk points to Ukraine IP addresses; Pro-Palestinian hackers take blame 1:02:35 Jeff Bezos transforming Washington Post; Ruth Marcus latest to resign as shakeup continues 1:12:13 Dylan Mulvaney joins 'The View,' responds to Newsom breaking with Dems on trans sports issue Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
President Trump is trying to make good on his campaign promises to end wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, and he has brought his shock-and-awe strategy to the world stage. Ruth Marcus talks to David Ignatius about the chaotic past week in Europe, whether Trump will sell out the Ukrainians in a deal with Russia, and how Trump is refusing (for now) to join Israel in bombing a weakened Iran. Additional reading by David Ignatius:At Munich, Trump's chaotic approach has allies rattledTrump wants to play peacemaker. Israel may have other plans.The art of the just Ukraine peace deal
Hour 1 Segment 1 Tony starts the show talking about Maxine Waters getting extremely frustrated with Elon Musk. Tony also talks about 19-year-old, Edward Coristine, also known as “Big Balls” and has a concerning hacker background who works for DOGE. Hour 1 Segment 2 Tony talks about Ted Cruz saying that the key safety system was turned off on the Blackhawk helicopter that was involved in the Potomac River plane crash. Hour 1 Segment 3 Tony talks more about USAID paying Politico and other media outlets. Hour 1 Segment 4 Tony wraps up the first hour of the show talking about a Ruth Marcus opinion piece saying Trump 2.0 is the most damaging first two weeks in presidential history. Hour 2 Segment 1 Tony starts the second hour of the show talking more about President Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu’s meeting and where Ireland stands on this situation. Hour 2 Segment 2 Tony talks about President Trump saying he will sign an executive order saying he will go back to plastic straws. Hour 2 Segment 3 Tony talks about the Never Trump crowd. Tony also talks about Bill Kristol. Hour 2 Segment 4 Tony wraps up the second hour of the show talking about another federal judge dealing another blow for birthright citizenship. Hour 3 Segment 1 Tony starts the final hour of the show talking to Dr. Matt Will, economist from the University of Indianapolis, to talk about the latest in the job market and the tariffs. Hour 3 Segment 2 Tony talks about Carl’s Jr. bringing back the hot women campaign commercials. Tony also talks about the Bud Light commercial for the Super Bowl with Post Malone, Shane Gillis, and Peyton Manning. Hour 3 Segment 3 Tony talks about Kamala Harris checking out the wildfire damage in southern California. Hour 3 Segment 4 Tony wraps up another edition of the show talking about how he doesn’t care who wins the Super Bowl. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Hour 1 Segment 1 Tony starts the show talking about Maxine Waters getting extremely frustrated with Elon Musk. Tony also talks about 19-year-old, Edward Coristine, also known as “Big Balls” and has a concerning hacker background who works for DOGE. Hour 1 Segment 2 Tony talks about Ted Cruz saying that the key safety system was turned off on the Blackhawk helicopter that was involved in the Potomac River plane crash. Hour 1 Segment 3 Tony talks more about USAID paying Politico and other media outlets. Hour 1 Segment 4 Tony wraps up the first hour of the show talking about a Ruth Marcus opinion piece saying Trump 2.0 is the most damaging first two weeks in presidential history. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus join Amna Nawaz to discuss the week in politics, including FBI Director Christopher Wray's announcement that he will be stepping down, what to expect from the FBI under Kash Patel and what Trump voters are expecting from his second term. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus join Amna Nawaz to discuss the week in politics, including FBI Director Christopher Wray's announcement that he will be stepping down, what to expect from the FBI under Kash Patel and what Trump voters are expecting from his second term. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
New York Times columnist David Brooks and Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus join Amna Nawaz to discuss the week in politics, including FBI Director Christopher Wray's announcement that he will be stepping down, what to expect from the FBI under Kash Patel and what Trump voters are expecting from his second term. PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
L'émotion causée par le carnage de Wharf Jérémie n'était pas encore passée que les images d'un autre massacre ont surgi, survenu cette fois dans la commune de Petite-Rivière, dans le département de l'Artibonite. Au moins dix personnes ont été tuées à Petite-Rivière, rapporte notre correspondant Peterson Luxama, une nouvelle tuerie qui porte l'empreinte du gang « Gran Grif ». Selon les habitants, les malfrats lourdement armés ont fait irruption dans le village, s'attaquant sans distinction à la population. Parmi les victimes, on compte notamment des enfants et des adolescents, pris au piège de cette violence insensée. Pour échapper à de nouveaux assauts des gangs, certains habitants ont dû fuir leurs maisons. Cette nouvelle tuerie collective survient alors que la Police nationale haïtienne (PNH), accompagnée des policiers kenyans, a fait son retour à Petite-Rivière de l'Artibonite, le samedi 7 décembre 2024, après une longue absence des forces de l'ordre. Mais cette présence policière semble sans effet sur les gangs armés qui multiplient leurs exactions. Dans son éditorial et sur notre antenne comme chaque jeudi, le rédacteur en chef du quotidien Le Nouvelliste, Frantz Duval, dresse ce constat implacable : « Haïti rappelle Sarajevo avec ses snipers du début des années 90 lors du siège mis en place par les Serbes, sauf qu'ici il n'y a ni guerre ethnique, ni guerre de religion, ni bataille autour des nationalités ou des régions. Comme on administre un lent goutte-à-goutte, on tue en Haïti. Chaque jour. Sans répit. Grands et petits massacres se rejoignent dans les statistiques de la désolation. La violence s'infiltre, s'installe, se perpétue. Pendant ce temps, le gouvernement et les meilleurs amis d'Haïti se contentent de changer les dates et les lieux dans d'anciens communiqués absolument affligeants qui sont, en fait, l'expression d'une impuissance insupportable.D'un gouvernement à un autre en Haïti, d'une ambassade à une autre, d'un porte-parole à un autre, tout le monde condamne, réclame justice ou promet une réponse appropriée. Dans les faits, rien ne se passe. Les massacres se suivent et se ressemblent comme les réponses des autorités de tout poil, de tout plumage et de tout temps ». Quel avenir pour le FBI ?Les men in black, les agents les plus célèbres du monde, n'auront bientôt plus de patron. Le bruit courait depuis des semaines, il est devenu réalité hier : Christopher Wray, l'actuel chef du FBI, va quitter son poste en janvier. Il jette l'éponge, rappelle Politico, après avoir été la cible d'un « torrent d'attaques » de la part de Donald Trump, y compris au sujet de la perquisition judiciaire menée en 2022 en Floride au domicile du futur président. Ou bien pour avoir traqué et arrêté les militants MAGA (Make America Great Again) qui avaient envahi le Capitole, le 6 janvier 2021. Trop c'est trop, et pour ne pas se lancer dans un duel à distance avec la Maison Blanche, Wray va démissionner après les fêtes de Noël et avant l'investiture de Donald Trump.Cette décision est une erreur, martèle Ruth Marcus dans le Washington Post. « Il aurait dû rester, écrit-elle, et tordre la main du futur président, parce que l'histoire se répète. Trump avait déjà provoqué un cataclysme en 2017 en virant le prédécesseur de Christopher Wray, or, c'est en train de devenir la norme. Et si chaque nouveau venu à la Maison Blanche place ses pions à la tête du FBI, ce poste en principe apolitique et doté d'un mandat de dix ans, va se transformer en une énième caisse de résonance partisane ». Le FBI, rappelle Ruth Marcus, détient d'énormes pouvoirs d'enquête, et avec eux, le danger que les autorités en abusent. « Personne n'a besoin d'une perspective aussi dangereuse que celle de l'arrivée de Kash Patel pour s'en rendre compte.»Désigné par Trump comme le futur n°1 du FBI, avocat, complotiste, Kash Patel est aussi, aussi surprenant que cela puisse paraître, auteur de livres pour enfants. Bien illustrés, nous dit le Washington Post, bien écrits et « loin d'être les pires que l'on trouve sur le marché ». La curiosité, ce sont les personnages, car Kash Patel s'y met en scène dans la peau d'un magicien au service d'un certain roi Donald, victime d'une machination orchestrée par la méchante Hillary Queenton (sic) avec l'aide de porte-voix appelés CNN et New York Times. À ne pas manquer avant les fêtes de Noël.À lire aussiÉtats-Unis: le directeur du FBI va démissionner avant l'investiture de TrumpAffaire Luigi Mangione : panique sécuritaire chez les grands patrons américainsL'assassin présumé de l'un des géants de l'assurance-santé aux États-Unis a commis un meurtre atroce, mais il a touché un point sensible. Son acte ravive l'animosité envers les grandes sociétés d'assurance aux États-Unis qui font un maximum de profit, parfois au détriment des citoyens. Si bien, relate CNN, que la panique gagne les conseils d'administration américains. Les dirigeants des entreprises du secteur de la santé se précipitent pour gonfler leurs mesures de sécurité au moins que l'un des spécialistes de la protection rapprochée interrogés par CNN a reçu plus de 70 sollicitations dans les heures qui ont suivi l'assassinat de Brian Thompson. « C'est fou qu'on se réveille seulement maintenant », concède un banquier terrorisé. Les pros de la sécurité privée recommandent à ces grands patrons de nettoyer leurs traces sur internet, de faire à tout prix disparaître des réseaux leur adresse ou celle de l'école de leurs enfants. Et l'on sait déjà que les réunions publiques qui vont se tenir dans les mois qui viennent seront scrutées de très près. Car, que l'on veuille ou non, conclut l'un des sources de la chaîne américaine, en tuant un assureur de premier plan, Luigi Mangione est devenu populaire. « Et beaucoup de gens pourraient vouloir suivre son exemple. »À lire aussiÉtats-Unis: vague de soutien pour Luigi Mangione accusé d'avoir tué le patron d'une entreprise d'assurance Au Chili, les étudiants face au mur de la detteLe dossier Amériques de Naïla Derroisné revient sur l'une des promesses de campagne du président chilien, Gabriel Boric. Les députés du Chili examinent en ce moment une proposition de loi relative au financement de l'enseignement supérieur, censée corriger le coût exorbitant des études dans les universités locales : au moins 3 000 euros par an, et jusqu'à 8 000 pour une année de médecine, dans un pays où le salaire minimum tourne autour de 500 euros par mois. Ces frais d'inscription écartent du système éducatif un certain nombre de jeunes Chiliens et entraînent les autres dans une spirale d'endettement et surendettement. Reportage à écouter dans son intégralité dans l'édition du jour. L'actualité des Outre-mer avec nos confrères de la 1èreLe nouveau directeur territorial de la police nationale officiellement installé en Guyane.
America has lost faith in experts, and it's certainly showing in some of Donald Trump's Cabinet picks. Beyond a lack of qualifications, there are concerns over character problems with several nominees too. But do either really matter in American politics anymore? Deputy Opinions Editor David Von Drehle talks with columnists Ruth Marcus and Dana Milbank about what, if anything, can sink a nominee in today's political culture.
On Washington Post Live's “First Look,” associate editor Jonathan Capehart speaks with The Post's Hannah Knowles, Jim Geraghty and Ruth Marcus about the bumpy process Trump could face in assembling his Cabinet and President Biden's decision to pardon his son Hunter. Conversation recorded on Friday, December 6, 2024.
Ruth Marcus, opinion columnist for The Washington Post, talks about the latest national political news of the day, including the status of President-elect Trump's nominees, plus offers her opinions on how she sees Trump's plans to expand presidential power and undermine democracy.
Tuesday night's election has left us with total Republican control of all three branches of government. What does this mean for the immediate future of the Republic? Shadi Hamid and Damir Marusic get together to discuss. We are releasing this episode early and completely free for all subscribers.Will Donald Trump become a dictator? What is he capable of? What might be the worst aspects of his second term? Damir discusses mass deportations as the biggest risk. Shadi worries about Trump's foreign policy in the Middle East. More than that, Shadi worries about a Donald Trump who all of the sudden has everything he's ever wanted — a revenge victory — and finds it still unsatisfying. “What now?”Damir and Shadi are not very fond of the Harris-Walz campaign. Shadi laments that Harris never seemed comfortable on the campaign trail, and could never quite communicate authenticity. Damir says that Walz is an irrelevant politician, a “weirdo” with no discernible contribution to the Democratic cause. Two minds trying to figure out where things stand in the wake of what seems to be like a momentous election. The first of many attempts at Wisdom of Crowds where we will try to read the signs of the times.Required Reading:* Tim Alberta on the dysfunction in the Trump campaign (The Atlantic).* Politico piece why Kamala lost (Politico).* Shadi: “The Democrats can't blame anyone but themselves this time” (Washington Post). * Turkish migrant interview (YouTube).* “What Do Men Want?” podcast with Shadi and Richard Reeves (Washington Post). * Megan McArdle, Jim Geraghty and Ramesh Ponnuru podcast: “Are Republicans Kamala-curious? Not so much.” (Washington Post). * Ruth Marcus, Dana Milbank and James Hohmann podcast: “Ruth Marcus, Dana Milbank and James Hohmann” (Washington Post). * Andrew Sullivan's Election Night Notes on Substack.* Donald Trump's interview with the Wall Street Journal editorial board.* Barack Obama roasts Donald Trump at the White House Correspondent's Dinner (YouTube). Wisdom of Crowds is a platform challenging premises and understanding first principles on politics and culture. Join us! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit wisdomofcrowds.live/subscribe
None of us can know the outcome of the election, but our columnists talk through the campaign's final spasms. Ruth Marcus, Dana Milbank and James Hohmann discuss the shifting mood in Pennsylvania, whether abortion will be as motivating this time around and if Donald Trump can get “crypto bros and the guy who vapes” to actually vote.Subscribe to The Washington Post here.
It's 200 episodes for Amarica's Constitution, and we mark the occasion by bringing you a key expert for an in-depth exploration of a breaking development. Ruth Marcus, long-time Washington Post columnist, editor, Pulitzer Prize nominee, and insider, joins us to explore the inexplicable: the last-minute decision by the Post and its owner, billionaire Jeff Bezos, to withhold what would have been an endorsement for Vice President Harris for election to the Presidency. What goes on in an editorial board? What is the role of the owner? What are the alternatives for editors, columnists, and reporters? Was Bezos intimidated by Trump? What does all this mean for the nation? We have the perfect means to explore this shocker: a frank and unhurried inquiry with our friend, Ruth Marcus. What a way to mark our bicentennial. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com.
[This blog will always be free to read, but it's also how I pay my bills. If you have suggestions or feedback on how I can earn your paid subscription, shoot me an email: cmclymer@gmail.com.]Yesterday, just before noon, The Washington Post, through CEO William Lewis, announced it would not endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential election, the first time the nation's third-largest daily newspaper by circulation hasn't done so in nearly four decades.The announcement was shocking for two immediate reasons.The most grave—and, frankly, terrifying—reason is that the United States is obviously at threat of sliding into a horrific dictatorship from which it's difficult to see how we'd ever recover. Donald Trump and J.D. Vance have made it abundantly clear that they aspire to devolve our nation into the world's most powerful authoritarian regime. One need look no further than the chilling plans outlined in Project 2025.But there are many other warning signs, too. A small sampling:There's Trump openly praising Hitler's generals, according to his former chief-of-staff John Kelly (himself a retired four-star Marine Corps general), just the latest marker of fascist narcissism in Trump's very long and documented history of being obsessed with dictators.There's Trump repeatedly pledging to carry out the largest deportation of undocumented migrants in American history, a sweat-lipped plan made in blustering tones that somehow manages to exceed its inherent cruelty with an inexplicable failure to understand basic economics.(Not only is it logistically impossible to deport our nation's 11 million undocumented migrants, not only would it cost taxpayers an estimated quarter trillion to do so, but the American economy would completely collapse from the loss in labor force.)There's Trump's flagrant disregard for the Constitution and the rule of law: an indictment that resulted in a guilty verdict on 34 felony counts (his sentencing for that is on Nov. 26th), three other pending indictments on 52 more felony counts, two impeachments, being found liable for defamation of a woman he raped, etc.Oh, and, of course, there's Trump's frequent statements to serve past the constitutional limit of two terms as president (I'm sure he's just kidding), and the extremist conservative majority of the Supreme Court ruling last year that Trump is essentially a king beyond accountability for official acts in office.That's all an abbreviated version of why Donald Trump is obviously unfit.The second reason is The Washington Post's abdication of journalistic integrity under the ownership of Jeff Bezos, a development that is especially chilling for a publication that has long prided itself on being the vanguard for American democracy and free speech.The storied newspaper has won 76 Pulitzer Prizes over its history—second only to The New York Times—one of which was for the investigative reporting by Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein that eventually led to the resignation of Richard Nixon. Another was for the reporting on the Jan. 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol.The Washington Post has long been synonymous with the essential role of the free press in a healthy, functioning democracy in the same manner we associate Babe Ruth with baseball or July Fourth with fireworks or Dolly Parton with a clean soul.And so, it was with great confusion and incredulity that I read Mr. Lewis' painfully shameless attempt to justify the decision. He sure did try to put on a powdered wig and insist that the bowl of s**t he wanted to feed to the American public was actually chicken soup for the American soul.Most curiously, in writing about The Washington Post's history of largely declining to endorse presidential candidates prior to 1976, he stated that year's endorsement for then-Gov. Jimmy Carter was made “for understandable reasons at the time…”Did you catch that? He's obliquely referencing Watergate, the scandal that brought down Nixon with reporting by the paper — Nixon, who, by any measurable standard, comes across like Lincoln when compared to Trump.Mr. Lewis, for some odd reason, thought it persuasive to essentially say: “Look, we don't regret endorsing Carter because Nixon was terrible, but also: Trump is not nearly terrible enough to justify continuing this dangerous practice of presidential endorsements.”Furthermore, aside from the dollar store cheap imitation of logic, he failed to mention in his desperate, sorry excuse for rationalizing that The Washington Post, for the past several weeks, had been drafting an approved endorsement for Vice President Harris.He failed to mention that the endorsement was still on track a week ago, and there was no indication that it would be halted for any reason, let alone on the rather cringe-inducing reasoning he put forward in his announcement.He failed to mention that Trump met today with corporate leaders of aerospace company Blue Origin—also owned by Bezos—which is, at best, godawful timing or a pretty clear signal of Bezos' reasoning in killing the endorsement. Maybe both.Probably both.If none of this makes sense, you're far from alone. It completely failed to persuade the staff and alums of The Washington Post. Conservative columnist and editor-at-large Robert Kagan immediately resigned in protest. Sixteen other Washington Post columnists—Perry Bacon Jr., Matt Bai, Max Boot, E.J. Dionne Jr., Lee Hockstader, David Ignatius, Heather Long, Ruth Marcus, Dana Milbank, Alexandra Petri, Catherine Rampell, Eugene Robinson, Jennifer Rubin, Karen Tumulty, and Erik Wemple—published this statement on the paper's website:The Washington Post's decision not to make an endorsement in the presidential campaign is a terrible mistake. It represents an abandonment of the fundamental editorial convictions of the newspaper that we love. This is a moment for the institution to be making clear its commitment to democratic values, the rule of law and international alliances, and the threat that Donald Trump poses to them — the precise points The Post made in endorsing Trump's opponents in 2016 and 2020. There is no contradiction between The Post's important role as an independent newspaper and its practice of making political endorsements, both as a matter of guidance to readers and as a statement of core beliefs. That has never been more true than in the current campaign. An independent newspaper might someday choose to back away from making presidential endorsements. But this isn't the right moment, when one candidate is advocating positions that directly threaten freedom of the press and the values of the Constitution.Mr. Woodward and Mr. Bernstein issued this statement:We respect the traditional independence of the editorial page, but this decision 12 days out from the 2024 presidential election ignores the Washington Post's own overwhelming reportorial evidence on the threat Donald Trump poses to democracy. Under Jeff Bezos's ownership, the Washington Post's news operation has used its abundant resources to rigorously investigate the danger and damage a second Trump presidency could cause to the future of American democracy and that makes this decision even more surprising and disappointing, especially this late in the electoral process.Retired WaPo executive editor Martin Baron, who led the paper from 2012 thru 2021, including the tumultuous years of Trump's presidency, responded with a scathing statement: “This is cowardice, with democracy as its casualty. Donald Trump will see this as invitation to further intimidate owner Jeff Bezos (and others). Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”The Washington Post Guild—the paper's employee union—had this to say:We are deeply concerned that The Washington Post—an American news institution in the nation's capital—would make the decision to no longer endorse presidential candidates, especially a mere 11 days ahead of an immensely consequential election. The role of an Editorial Board is to do just this: to share opinion on the news impacting our society and culture and endorse candidates to help guide readers.The message from our chief executive, Will Lewis—not from the Editorial Board itself—makes us concerned that management interfered with the work of our members in Editorial. According to our own reporters and Guild members, an endorsement for Harris was already drafted, and the decision to not publish was made by The Post's owner, Jeff Bezos. We are already seeing cancellations from once loyal readers. This decision undercuts the work of our members at a time when we should be building our readers' trust, not losing it.Washington Post editorial cartoonist Ann Telnaes published this jarring work on the paper's website, titling it “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” referencing WaPo's official slogan that was introduced in 2017, just a month after Trump took office.As of 7:30pm yesterday, Semafor's Max Tani reported that at least 2,000 subscriptions to the paper had been canceled in the previous 24 hours, the overwhelming bulk of those likely being in the seven-and-a-half hours following the announcement from Mr. Lewis. Numerous public figures—including Stephen King, Mark Hamill, Jon Cryer, and former Congresswoman Marie Newman—publicly announced they were cancelling their own subscriptions.Last night, I made the same decision. I had heard rumblings early in the morning from friends in media that WaPo was about to announce a non-endorsement, credible enough that I mentioned it during a 10am meeting with colleagues and they were understandably shocked.I spent most of yesterday morning and afternoon, in the midst of a very busy schedule, privately agonizing over what I would do as a subscriber.Over the years, I've published a number of op-eds in The Washington Post, pieces of which I'm quite proud in a paper I've put on a pedestal since I was a kid, and I've worked with numerous editors and reporters at the outlet whom I admire for their professionalism and public service.It is not lost on me that cancelling a newspaper subscription will not hurt Jeff Bezos but will hurt those employed at the paper.And yet, as much as my heart breaks for the staff of The Washington Post, who haven't done anything to deserve this, I am still left with the simple truth that if Bezos is willing to kill an endorsement 11 days out, whether out of fear or ambition, what else is he willing to do with the paper?There are numerous journalists at the outlet doing critical work, but how we do know anymore when Jeff Bezos is putting his thumb on the scale, backed up by a complicit CEO who blatantly lies about the paper's direction?There have to be consequences for an action this brazen and irresponsible and dangerous for our democracy. Something's gotta give. I respect the decisions of other subscribers, but I simply cannot stomach giving another dime in reward to a publication with such great influence that can be used to do such great harm moving forward.It is my hope that there will be a time, after Vice President Harris is elected, after Trump is held accountable, after the craven capitalists of media have learned there's not much to be made in the long run from these corrupt and shameless tactics, that The Washington Post will be restored to its former glory.In the meantime, I will pay for my news elsewhere.Charlotte's Web Thoughts is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Charlotte's Web Thoughts at charlotteclymer.substack.com/subscribe
In the vice-presidential showdown JD Vance tried to remake himself by being nice, while Tim Walz directed his attacks at Donald Trump. Columnists Karen Tumulty, Dana Milbank and Ruth Marcus discuss the Jan. 6 moment and what Vance's soft talk on abortion says about Republicans' fear of how the issue will hurt them at the ballot box.Subscribe to The Washington Post here.
RFK Jr. has withdrawn from the race and endorsed Trump. This meeting of an estranged Kennedy and an indicted Trump, is laced not only with strangeness but also constitutional themes, as we explore. Meanwhile, backlash after the Trump immunity opinion continues, and Senate Majority Leader Schumer has introduced legislation in response. The great Washington Post columnist, Ruth Marcus, returns to our podcast to comment on this legislation and the many serious implications it would have if adopted, as well as the issues it raises for consideration even if it fails, as it seems likely to do. CLE credit is available from podcast.njsba.com
This week, hosts Emily Bazelon and John Dickerson are joined by Washington Post associate editor and columnist Ruth Marcus. They President Joe Biden's big step down, how the race is evolving with Kamala Harris stepping in as the presumptive nominee, and the fallout of the Secret Service. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Ethan Oberman and Cheyna Roth Research by Ethan Oberman Public.com+Public Investing: All investing involves risk. Brokerage services for US listed securities, options and bonds in a self-directed brokerage account are offered by Public Investing, member FINRA & SIPC. Not investment advice. Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank.Cryptocurrency trading services are offered by Bakkt Crypto Solutions, LLC (NMLS ID 1828849), which is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the NYSDFS. Cryptocurrency is highly speculative, involves a high degree of risk, and has the potential for loss of the entire amount of an investment. Cryptocurrency holdings are not protected by the FDIC or SIPC. . See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
This week, hosts Emily Bazelon and John Dickerson are joined by Washington Post associate editor and columnist Ruth Marcus. They President Joe Biden's big step down, how the race is evolving with Kamala Harris stepping in as the presumptive nominee, and the fallout of the Secret Service. Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.) Podcast production by Ethan Oberman and Cheyna Roth Research by Ethan Oberman Public.com+Public Investing: All investing involves risk. Brokerage services for US listed securities, options and bonds in a self-directed brokerage account are offered by Public Investing, member FINRA & SIPC. Not investment advice. Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank.Cryptocurrency trading services are offered by Bakkt Crypto Solutions, LLC (NMLS ID 1828849), which is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the NYSDFS. Cryptocurrency is highly speculative, involves a high degree of risk, and has the potential for loss of the entire amount of an investment. Cryptocurrency holdings are not protected by the FDIC or SIPC. . See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
On the first episode of their new podcast "Impromptu," our colleagues at Washington Post Opinions discuss what's at stake the Supreme Court hears a case on access to mifepristone. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade back in 2022, it indicated that abortion was an issue to be relegated to the states. Instead, it has blown up American politics, firing up voters and leading to conflicting lower court rulings. Post columnists Ruth Marcus, Alexandra Petri and Amanda Ripley discuss how it feels to be a woman in the post-Dobbs world.Ruth Marcus: Even after abortion pill ruling, reproductive rights remain in the balanceAlexandra Petri: I don't know how to write about all that hasn't happened since the fall of RoeSubscribe to The Washington Post here.
© 2020-2025 Ivy Podcast Discovery LLC
